The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About19981233 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19990129 (2)State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director 1 ? • NC ENR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMEN'T' OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES January 26, 1999 Mecklenburg County DWQ Project # 981233 APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Mr. Jerry Moore Yager Construction 600 Towne Center Blvd. Suite 100 Pineville, NC 28134 Dear Mr. Moore: You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 0.18 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of constructing road crossings for Sandy Porter Road Apartments, as you described in your application dated December 21, 1999. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Numbers 3103 and 3108. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit Numbers 14 and 26 when the Corps of Engineers issues them. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Water shed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below. 1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to notify the state in order to assure compliance for future wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later). If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611- 7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing. This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786. How Pn ard, Jr. P.E. Attachment cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office Mooresville DWQ Regional Office John Dorney Central Files Todd St. John Len Rindner 981233.1tr Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone 919-733-1786 FAX # 733-9959 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper -% lvo Sandy Porter Road Apartments Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Joint Application Form and Supporting Documentation for NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE :YOTIFICATION TO CORPS OF ENGINEERS NATIONWIDE PERVITS THAT REQUIRE SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION CONCURRENCE Prepared For: Yager Construction 600 Towne Center Boulevard Suite 110 Pineville, NC 28134 1-704-889-2500 Prepared By: Leonard S. Rindner, PWS Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane Matthews, NC 28105 (704) 846-046I *Subject to verification by the USACE Date : 12198 De._'i ID: CORPS ACTION ID-* Da--:0WTIDE PERM_T REQUESTED (PRCVIDE NATICN'rT=DE PERMIT #) : JK PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION -R NATIONW=DL PERMITS T::AT REQUIRE.: 1) NCT _ CATION TO =-- CORPS OF r ?GT:Tc.-°..'Z.S 2) A231IC?T_:CN FOR S'C'ZTCN 401 CzR__F=C_xT2CN 3) C:.CR.^..T.NAT_,CN il: - NC 0-7=3 OF CZ-AZZAL S T'-.:r OR CGI'i1. P,D77i (1) C::'-n'- OF TtiTS C.;?-.T=? ?CR.': TO TLS A_2==G= _?T= _ OF:'=Cm Ce G: ?`7GIN'% <S (S= AGc VC° Al; z' - SV SENT Tv T *XT N.C. P_ _/_?_CN Cc _-ONP"_ _=ytz:j^ _ r. SSE DC-?j^ ?__-• ?r?cv?lt.c. =_=-_. fit- -- - Cei Ae? 245134 MAr 4. -- ::7.-N7 'S :_{= Cc 5?C?TS=? CCrc_C?? -_ _ ^?-Sc 00, tloo re , Samx 0-66 e, ?C JL.1_7 i) NE.-a-TST TOWN OR Kra ?O 10 1 S?ECZcZC LGC?=_CN (ZNCZ.IIDE RCAD NUY_3??S, LALND1u _.{S, ETC . ) : ,_r.. r -_?f: KV..--- rJr___ .? ':.Y ,'i , \n,,'v_S^: ?_?: ?_5 ?....._ .V^--TZS r - __ =-?R 8.=. _./? .V_ ._.__.L ?++L ??? _. ?J ?R?P?R="?_ [ `10 :•Y?Z- _-- _=ROVZ.= =OBI =.?. `-'==_-R 0? J:?_ _vuS PZL?__ ?i'?i ? ___w?i: _yJ _{ ___ LJ (_\.'l.____ _?CT? ..__ ?0_ _' 1Z. YES _ ?lOlj/? __ :'Z`, DESC1__? ._ :EC-= =--- ;dOR:. 9?. CS:?LL:_°D _C.?? N ??Z3 C_ AC ES ZV =.C= 06' -?;?. !IJ / 'fir! C, -5177M T^n _C-1- •;u:^EER 0_ • - ,S d > ??;DS LCC= --D- OL ;RCj S?,_. t2.o'? yAtr-" I?_?v,?c!P c. a&e e.?S? z 10a. NUMBER 0. QACRES OF W' :?MDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROSC: B'_': r ?.-VG : • V #4rcwr4ef EXCAVATION: MCCD--NG : D-NAGZ : OTHER: TOTAL A= TO BE L" wr'-ACTED I? .C: _E7. F??. I=y.;=5C f CR= -::D n: _ C? _ r- -=C G /NLwP 'Z4• __ C'vLVS^, `._ N O. :L:l? PRO_CS_r, v = _S _: _ I-Z. 6d=---Rc ID DP.:.--:7: •iG TO T .Z _CVD? T _ 3X77-z_TJ PCD7: C= PRC_CS_r ;vG3a _VC?rvD=VG D.S.CuSS=C` :c T'_' C= u-...??V _•r: Jl • _..rS ?l'' r-_ .B.- vv_r (..-_ ?Ca. ?j aCi ? ?/_.S _aDLti=1 _?•i?:i Syr 13. . -R20SL C_ Pa020SE0 WC.1: 4ci a HV4A4A 3 3Lr1IOMAY- WATERS OF THE U. S. Surface Waters Int. & Perennial Streams (± 3,330 If) ±0.43 acres Wetlands Scrub / Shrub and emergent wetlands +1.64 acres Approximate Total - Waters of the U.S. ±2.07 ac. PROPOSED IMPACTS Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters on this site have been avoided and/or minimized to the extent feasible. Impacts to wetlands are limited to the following: NWP #14 (1 Crossing) Int/Perenmal tributaries (± 80 If) ±0.01 ac. - Total - NWP #14 ± 0.01 ac. NWP #26 Unimportant Intermittent tributaries (215 If by road crossing and general grading to establish detention) ± 0.03 ac. Wetlands ±0.15 ac. Total - NWP #26 ± 0.18 ac. I?. STATE R=:?vNS Wr.`: I.' -,S BELIEVED J. T::-,S AC= 'T:.TY MVS"' 3E C?-CRIED CG.' iii W+iETL:--1\ii,S. (INCLUDE AUTZ MEASURES Z;LK=- 7 TO M?`iM?=ZE ?vETLc1iD !D :CTS) . 4 c U.S. ANC n_-?:.__- S__'?_-_ _ v..:/ .i?li.+?C-. :;:.__..N.. :'?--._?1:, F:St':.?_-_ __t°J_L.-„ (''.'?__? (5=.... 1[=:I`•? a..?.._.r-S S:'.___, :t?..:__i_?... -..- DRL_`"..-NC. v. Div _-'?'_??•-'r L7 ?z _.+U K_ _._,?.._R-,•.-. TO ....?.?iC CC TZ- SC. __.-DERV: __.._. .._ -` (S:__ __-„__ ._.^. c-.ZZz S-Z: S t--..__) :trtiA_.__NG _ :_ -_NC- C_ :_.. _.._._... RC 17 _-- YEr (. NC L;o Or?= NC, GO 'r 3. __ J.:, .VrJ T.. :R".v-.. ?Ki71'_A_-_ii Oi EZ?I EN'v_<CN -N^_A:r T'-= R=-r-7RZA--N'MS C-- --:-Z NORTH AC-- Y -J : • ' .rv . --= -•C:4t'NT 0 CL----•:%rG"OUSI. __ ?VSIvER To 17r =S `!ES, THEN SU3:1IT A.?RC?R=A=T DCCUMENTATION :RCM S=___C C Z R=NG=C:;S= TO DOF E.`IV=RCN-,!ENTa r CCu?-=iNCT WITH T:-_ NCRT= C:_ROL=i1:_ ENV-; RC?f-NT AL PCL=__ ACT T. ?G=SC=CNS R:.G:.33=NG THE' ST_._r CLE- RI-NG::CUSE REJ_-;J PRCCTSS SFOU--J BE D.RE.._CJ TO CIS. Cw-',','S BAGG=_C, DIRECTOR SC TE CLZAR_NC:OUSE, NOR_ CAROL=NA DE?A3T}LN OF ADu=N=STRACION, 11E Fj s ^ JCNE_ SCREE: . ? NCR 'H CAROLINA _7603-2003, _Ty ?::ONE 733-0363. 4 18. THE FOLLCWING IT=-.%,S SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATICN I? PRCPCSED ACT:i._`! INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EYCAVAT ED OR FILL I???ERr?L , TT0 WETLANDS : a. WET? =_iD DEL=NMATICN MG.? SHCWING ALL WETL;.LNl)S, STMAIMS, LA-=- S tiMi PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (?OR NAT=ONWIDE PERMIT NM-B7-AS 14, 18, 21.26 29, AND 38) . I= STR A.MS J.- .6 AND PEI?M'1EZiT) ON T _ PRC?=.tTY IQ'! BE SHOW?T C!'T THE :_f=?. MAP SCALES SHCULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS So OR .QUA S _GG ?'i.T Cn T=__? EQUtJA : `T ?. IS ._? =_?ABLE, RE;3CSE:1_:._=`.IE PAC-CGcZ.?D< Oc' ?riS::,ASiDS TC 3= _'I_ ^_.D BY JZ-_VrS:_vV WIC ?1'?<TLCR:?:O B*r : CBOT TSU_T `i-, _-,T Tr- P A.?_.'SE T O _CN AT T_ I C.?717 OF ._-Vr Cc_`!EV _ r V =• nr"-- -- -= vC :SE C= S'uRRCU' TL -IT= =t0 2 V' V r,M y#7 wzTT.AVLS OR WATERS CF" THE U. S . MPLY NOT BE IMPkCTME) = R= :R TO: ?) ISSU +.v CE OF A SE:.TiCN 404 C :` S OF ENG"N ERS PERM_:, 2) EIT:?R THE ISSUtitiC- OR WAIV_R OF A 40 DIVISION CF tiv=RClv'. - u`NAGZ..SN(WATER QUA:.= '`_') CERTIF=C??TION, E?.?L. 3) (:V = TR.v= T= CCiJT C0172VT= ONLY) , A LETTER FRCM Miz_ C.aROL_NA D IVI S =CN C- CCA- i?.r. ua? yGLi T S7 ?TING T::E PRCPCSID aCT?vITY IS CCNSIS ll - .,;_.._ THE NCR":. CAROLINA COASTAL M?'+AGE` 'NT U ? ? ^A n C6vti'E R' S /AG E_ _ ' S S . G'7?? _ RE (?_GENT' S S:GNATURr. V =.=D CNlY _ AUTHOR l Z =.ON LATTER FROM T-HE OWNER IS =ROV DED (_g ) ) )ff?j (? 43 Dk 1 5 LEONARD S. RINDNEIL PWS Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane Landscape Architecture Matthews, NC 28105 Land Planning Tele: (704) 846-0461 Fax (704) 847-0185 December 7, 1998 Mr. Steve Chapin US Army Corps of Engineers - Reg. Field Office 151 Patton Avenue-Room 143 Asheville, NC 28801 - 5006 Mr. John R. Dornev Division of Water Quality - NCDENR Environmental Science Laboratories 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607 Mr. Mike Parker NCDENR - Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Re: Sandy Porter Road Apartment Proiect - ± 25 Acres, Cha rlotte Mecklenburg- County, North Carolina - Nationwide Permit 426. Nationwide Permit #14 Dear Sirs: On behalf of my client, Yager Construction, Inc.,. I am requesting confirmation of eligibility to fill ± 0.15 acres of wetlands; and cross 215 If of streams utilizing NWP #26; and cross = 80 If of streams utilizing NWP #14. Crossings of individual channels do not exceed 150 If. There are approximately 1.65 acres of wetlands and 3,300 If of intermittent to perennial streams. As depicted on the plan and in this report the developer has taken great care in minimizing impacts to streams and wetlands on the project site. Over 90% of the streams and wetlands have been avoided and has been incorporated into the overall development plan. The preserved wetlands and streams will be protected by restrictive covenants and the hydrology will be maintained and enhanced by utilizing the storm drainage system which will increase their water storage, pollution removal, bank stabilization, and aquatic life value. BACKGROUND The proposed residential development is on approximately 25 acres in southwest Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. This area of vfecklenburg County is experiencing rapid economic and population growth especially in conjunction with the Charlotte Outer Belt, the adjacent Whitehall development, and other commercial, industrial, and offices complexes near the Charlotte-Douglas Airport. Current land use in the vicinity consist of developing single family subdivisions, industrial and commercial areas, former agricultural areas, and wooded areas in early to secondary succession. SUMMARY OF WATERS OF THE U.& Method loov Preliminary identification and delineation of the Jurisdictional Waters on the site were determined according to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, 1987, with Appendices. Preliminary data gathering included review and interpretation of topographic maps; USDA Soil Conservation Survey; aerial photographs, and preliminary site visits to selected areas. Then the Routine On-Site Determination Method was utilized to determine the upper boundary of the wetlands. In order to . Mr. Steve Chapin - USACE, Mr. John R Dorney, Mr. Mike Parker - NCDWQ Page 2, December 7, 1998 make a positive wetland determination indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland hydrology were be identified as described in the manual. General Wetland Classification and Description The wetlands on this site can be describe as Palustrine Scrub/Shrub and/or Emergent Temporarily Flooded and Seasonally Flooded. The site is within a drainage area of an unnamed tributary of Sugar Creek in the Catawba Basin. Vegetation The wetland areas are dominated by Obligate and Facultative Wet species. Trees include green ash, alder, and black willow. Understory and herbaceous strata includes silky dogwood, buttonbush, spicebush, smilax, microstegium, sedges, soft rush, poison ivy, and jewelweed. Where the soils are more saturated Obligate species such as smartweed and duck potato are present. Hydric Soils The site includes Monacan (%Io) soils. These soils are map units which may have inclusions (Wehadkee) of hydric soils according to the Soil Conservation Service (now Natural Resource Conservation Service), Technical Guide-Section 11-A-2, June 1991. ffi,droloZE The wetland areas on this site are the result of a surface runoff, and a high seasonal water table over a clayey subsoil. Water Classification - C - aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. Surface Waters Int. & Perennial Streams (± 3,330 If) =-0.43 acres Wetlands Scrub / Shrub and emergent wetlands ±1.64 acres Approximate Total - Waters of the U.S. x.07 acres PROPOSED IMPACTS Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters on this site have been avoided and/or minimized to the extent feasible. Impacts to wetlands are limited to the following: NWP 914 (1 Crmsine Int/Perennial tributaries (± 80 If ±0.01 ac. Total - NWP #14 +-0.01 ac. N"#26 Unimportant Intermittent tributaries (215 If by road crossing and general grading to establish detention) + 0.03 ac. Wetlands ± 0.15 ac- Total - NWP #26 ± 0.18 ac. Mr. Steve Chapin - USACE, Mr. John R Dorney, Mr. Mike Parker - NCDWQ Page 3, December 7, 1998 WETLANDS PERMITTIZVG AND MITIGATION The layout minimizes impacts to the perennial, intermittent tributaries, and wetlands. Except for temporary construction and development impacts, we believe that the proposed project wr`Il not cause significant impacts to the ecological functions or values of Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. Avoidance, Minimization. and Mitigation The following avoidance and minimization efforts and measures will also be taken: Best Management Practices will also be employed to minimize impacts to Jurisdictional Waters. These will include: a) Siltation Barriers; Sediment Traps and Diversion Ditches b) Barricades to define construction limits to sensitive sites and to protect trees c) Preconstruction meetings d) Vehicular access will be restricted to specific areas to avoid disturbance to adjacent wetlands and natural areas to be preserved. e) Methods to prevent short term impacts will be inspected regularly and maintained during construction of the project. f) Wetlands to be preserved will be clearly marked prior to construction to prevent accidental damage to wetlands. The contractors will be held responsible for unauthorized wetland damage not permitted according to plans and specifications. Preconstruction meetings shall be held if necessary with representatives of the USACE and the NCDWQ. g) Short term construction impacts, primarily stream sedimentation will affect aquatic habitat, however this will be. minimized to the extent practicable to promote rapid recovery. h) Project construction will strictly adhere to an approved Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan. Best Management Practices will include utilizing siltation trapping ponds and other erosion control structures where appropriate. Impacts from hazardous materials and other toxins to fish and aquatic life such as fuels will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near surface waters. i) As required by the 401 Water Quality Certification conditions, measures will be taken to prevent "live" or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters until the concrete has hardened. Mid A mitigation plan is proposed for a "no net loss" of wetland and stream habitat, value, and function to the extent feasible on this site. The g2al_ of this plan is to preserve, protect and the extents of the existing wetlands and streams to be saved through enhancement by the use of protective riparian buffers and utilization of the undeveloped floodplain and wetlands to treat and dissipate storm drainage. Establishing and maintaining a natural, forested, low maintenance ecosystem in reducing the volume of runoff; will reduce erosion and pollutants (such as nutrients) coming from an area of more intensive land use to a water body. The reduction of erosion and pollutants occurs through natural mechanisms such as deposition, infiltration, adsorption, absorption, filtration, and decomposition. PROTECTTON FROM FUTURE DEVELOPMENT The preserved wetlands and streams will be protected from future impacts by the applicant or by a group designated by the applicant for this purpose. Development of these areas will be deed restricted in accordance with restrictive covenants which will be developed for approval by the USACE and/or NCDWQ. Mr. Steve Chapin USACE, Mr. John R. Dorney, Mr. Mike Parker - NCDWQ Page 4, December 7, 1998 Restrictive Covenants will include the following information: The area shall remain in its natural condition in perpetuity Prohibition of the placement of utilities, filling, dredging, construction, or other activities, unless approved. 7HRE47ENEED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Federally listed plant and animal species with endangered or threatened status are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The US Fish and Wildlife Service has identified Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) and the Carolina heelsplitter (Mecklenburg County). Schweinitz's sunflower thrives in full sun characteristic of succession fields, margins, and forested openings. Based on a site reconnaissance, the site is wooded and overgrown along margins, wetlands, and clearings caused by Hurricane Hugo. The site does not appear to be conducive to the habitat or presence of Schweinitz's sunflower. The Carolina heelsplitter is a freshwater mussel which prefers shaded areas either in a porded portion of a small stream or in runs along steep banks with moderate current. Primary habitat are waters less than three feet deep with a soft mud, muddy sand, or shady gravelly substrate. It is normally restricted to protected silted areas or under banks especially associated with obstructions such as stumps or fallen trees. Its current distribution according to the US Fish and Wildlife Service is limited to portions of two streams - Goose Creek and Waxhaw Creek -- and a small river originating from rural areas in Union County. Therefore it is does not occur on this site. rotectea aneci The Carolina Darter (Etheostoma collis) is a fish that inhabits small streams such as those found in the project area. This species has a federal status of Proposed Special Concern and a state status of Special Concern. The species prefers small clear streams of less than 15' width with moderate to swim current and a sand/gravel benthic composition. It apparently tolerates a wide range of water quality conditions and vegetation types adjacent to the streams and appears resistant to pollution. (E. Menhinick). Therefore, strict adherence to an approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be maintained during the construction period in order to control degradation of water quality. CULTURAL RESOURCES The project site is disturbed from agricultural activities and is in early to secondary forested areas. No standing structures were encountered on the project site. AQUATIC HABITAT The aquatic systems in the project area consist of wetlands and intermittent tributaries of Sugar Creek. A variety of wildlife is supported by these systems including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, insects, mollusks, and crustaceans. Therefore strict adherence to an approved erosion and sedimentation control plan will be maintained during the construction period in order to control degradation of water quality downstream and protect the areas to be preserved. Short term construction impacts, primarily stream sedimentation will affect aquatic habitat, however this will be minimized to the extent practicable to promote rapid recovery. Project construction will strictly adhere to an approved sedimentation and erosion control plan. Best Management Practices will include utilizing siltation trapping ponds and other erosion control structures where appropriate. Mr. Steve Chapin - USACE, Mr. John K Dorney, Mr. Nfike Parker - NCDWQ Page 5, December 7, 1998 Impacts from hazardous materials and other toxins to fish and aquatic life such as fuels will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near surface waters. Also, as required by the 401 Water Quality Certification conditions, treasures will be taken to prevent "live" or fi-esh concrete from coming into contact with waters urrtil the concrete has hardened. Aquatic resources are expected to be enhanced through the restoration of wetland areas that flood and pond for longer durations. CONCLUSION The approximate 25 acre development is a sensitively designed mixed use development that will provide important economic benefits to the region. Based on the value of the jurisdictional waters and wetlands on this site, the developer through sensitive site planning has chosen to balance the site's economic viability with its environmental value and permitability. The goal of the Site Plan and Mitigation Plan is to help balance the environmental consequences of this development by preserving and enhancing beneficial wetland or riparian habitat. The undisturbed wetland areas and the mitigation sites will be preserved by the applicant or by a group designated by the owner for this purpose. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank you for your consideration. 166n7ard S. Rindner, PWS Environmental Planning Consultant NC Landscape Architect 9-578 cc: Jim Gunton • x • •A ?J_ Q -;; 11 11 1 ? ??? - 650 / 0 ? . • •? / 0 ^ ?. 481 • O 0 i • 0 Oo 600 o ?o t ti • ?? - , 63 c Central c .8 .? Ch r rilr a k • '? O ?? / . O USGS MAP-CHARLOTTE WEST • /•' . • • . V l? OQ 3 Ml. To N. C. 16b? f ORT MILL) 1506 4854 1 /l SW NWP#26 / .i err,- •'': ?' - _ _ / fl ' ' NWP#14 P ? - e _ ?i r 1 NWP#26 f' fit C . a B/= o. ?so aws a OVERALL SITE PLAN __ - 'JS--- +0.u __. _..> 17ACT A - w ^.x, ?cr e - a ary ? ??%fl `• ------------ z - ---------------- --------- --_ ------------------ --------- ---- WETLAND DELINEATION ��. ♦ �y: A s • _ _ �. is ��.r uvp VON- Amin r iA •ra �+-:� ygy,�4, �� ' v 6 .} k'j � '�,'; j `` ` '. z•^ F 't •"�0 �.F"^�' = s �` �. :his•_ � '4 .. - rf` ✓rL � �"�`t a. 4 ! w. �r� �3 it low is o ter- r ♦ � H ;u•'4 'sr- �= .�?• � f s a� - ¢' milY j 4- --,q f. r!�` 'i • 1�# Y 'V}F F' mac:,.• w \ � �a`n5� - 4!!�y ''?� ,CA �- Kw �.". � � '1<`>, �y��, t r ;��rC Q . y, ) •.. �_ y,-•311:.�� y •w �� i . _,4. �,'Y./ 3 '"' E � ^'4. J' .✓ G .Q'M f ax- s � ,�''",'T,i+... s � r ,w. NCO .t y6 CAI s z-+ WX NRCS SOIL SURVEY B •� Y '%� w.. _ I^. tiJ S(.•p, �"Y.i�maw ?O W U3 n <Q -rs-' w *k LL. N.. 55.33$ ga LIJ \ \ \: Z U V.0 J y? \ n tl t ;N F? \ ? h D 45 ?, a? ?? ` X8.9 3 W GRATE-6 ss49 C Z/ X I PF NWP#26 L APRON i i X23 20t ? ROAD CROSSING ±80 LF I RP 15i 5 GRA 2287 j . •i GRA GRATE-6 ,\ .F?j?l..c _\,` ,cam ?`;, ; `•,, ?? % ?. GRA 2,? , I RP `Cl./,// \\ \ a ' ?? APRON `.`GRATE =625 r i RAP IO1 > _ ROAD CROSSING ±80 LF % bry .? zok% 008 9627.50 32'-18• RCP CB #36 GRAZE--'%' ---- ? ,\ + •? ? ,, ?,.? . ?? ? . roR 35'-t8' a 3887 GFPA 626 i \ : f r, i., CB, 3929 'e" W+,r / T • 10 ? E ? ? ?./ ?a??\l?. b`0.}YE .r • ,r - ' Q? L t ? .? ; T ' ` 1? "Z04gD? tf . ,? ? ? •l? 1 ? ? B Oro • ?_'7 7 \ ??': N? /`" / J ; --- rte' ?-_--? _ _ = oo,o 'All 0 (IN cli 4 • ,. t ' `goo Ur% I to rv nwt ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: _H WY - ??z f ??-? ??.G??{ Date: -7 Applicant/Owner: _\-t/i?A(-z(L County: {?1G. Investigator: L.< tztf-t t7>tL-- State: L Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ? No Community 10: Is the site significantty disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes Transect ID: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes o Plot 10: L ? (If needed, explain on reverse.) VEC- ATION Dominant Plant Soeeies Stratum Indicator Cominant Plant Scecies Strar rr Indicator Z.< i s. ;.max i?Y'\ Y1<_/ I\/ ? t4. 7. LI x GT?? ra _ -- ?-? L 1 s $• ts. Percent of Dominart Soecies that are CSL. FAUN or FAC ( l di F ?Q exc u ng AC-i. i i Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarksk Wetland Hydrology Indicators: !! _ Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _ Aerisi Photographs Inundated _ other atturated in Upper 12 Inches _ No Recorded Cata Available _ Water Merits pift Lines P Sediment Deposits 1 ' Said observations: rainage Patterns in Wettards 2 0 Secondary Indicators (2 or more required;: Depth of Surface Water- _ Gn.) _LrVw-dized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: fin.) _ Local Sail Survey Data FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: 11:?' (in.) _ other (E-piain in Remarks) Remarks: VM'I95 -196- SOILS Map Unit Narns (Series and phasel: Crainage Class: t ?(yn r r Feld Cbservations Taxonomy (=?_,:oupl: Confirm Mapped T yp el Yes Na Profile Oesc-?n- Depth Matrix Color Matde Colors Mottle (Finches) He=Z.n Texture, Cone:ations. ?_ (Munseil maistt (Munsell Moisv Abundance/Canrrast Structure. ete "1 2 SYrz ?t?? _ 5u, rc!?., ? c?,?.•_ Hydric Soil rc.catcrs: _ =is;csol E-ipedon _ S:::odic Odor _ Ac_ic -Moisture Regime _ R.C.-ng Conditions ieyed or Low-C:iroma Colors Remarks: WETLAND DE-MMINATION Hydrophytic Vevrwion Present? Wedand Hydrciggy Present? Hydric Soils P-ssant? Remarks: _ Concretions _ High organic Conant in Surface Layer :n Sandy Soils _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils _ listed on Local Hyd:ic Soils list Listed on National Hydric Soils List - Cther (Explain in Remarks) (Circle) (Circle) Is this Sampling Paint Within a Wedane Yes o -197- WTI, 1996 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: _H k,./-{ Date: I/2ZJ"? Applicant/Owner: `,!?TZ- Cl?;'3'ryC?Tlc7?4 County Investigator: L, Izl1?l tai-F>? State: /--ECM Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transect 10: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot 10:_ (if needed, explain on reverse.) VEGETATION Dominant Plant Soecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies Strarim Indicator z. (>^ JS ctrl. ?G-?>.. 5 10. . ?iIY?G-v< i..t?Svc f?Gi ^? T 4.?rq. ?-1????-r? /vim ,?r' 'CG t2. rr ,t.,>??srvlralnrctr"?trT `` 5. ?r?k- ?? ?r''Y`C•..J !?/ . ? +Grl 13. ?v??r%u < I a?! b : ? ?l;r,-? &TVy+ ?t- c rli:r ?i + ?^ I! S?/.-lam 14. Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-t. Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetiand Hydrology Indicators: _ Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: Aerial Photographs Inu ad _ _ Other aturated in Upper 12 Inches _ No Recorded Data Avmlable Wat Marks nes ant Deposits Feld Observations: _ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Seconds icators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water: (in.) _ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit: On.) _ Local Soil Survey Data FAC-Nautral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: fin.) - Other (Explain in Remarks) Remarks: co?M p WTI, 1995 -196- SOILS Profile Descricxicn- Oepth Matrix C--)or Mottle Colors Mottle (Inches) N^r?z:n (Munseif Mcistt (Munseil Moistl Ahundartca/Canrr;st ?.s Y,L z S?t rL c? (o L? No Texture, Carc: scions, Structure, arc. ' Hydric Sail Ircicaccrs: _ ?ist?sa) _ Hiss: _cicedon _ SuiEdic Cdor AGtic Moisture Regime _ Reducing. Conditions or Low-CSrma Cziors Remark/s;: l u V1 U m WE"LAND DEiERRMINAT70N Hydraphytic Vegstwdon Present? Wetland Hydrelogy Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: Map Unit Nara (Series and Phase): _N!?^L?? E C t 1?C? t n (?! l./OS101?'\ rat"90 Class: Taxonomy (Sul: ou I Feid Observations Canfirm Mapped _ Cancraticns _ High Crganie Canter.: in Surface Layer in S mdy Soils _ Crganic Strasking in Sandy Soils _ Listed on Locai Hydra Soils List _ Lasted on National Hyd:ic Soils List _ Cther (Explain in Rerrarics) (Circle) (Circle) Is this Sampling Print Within a Wetland? I,- Y'11 No -197- WTI, 1995 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1927 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site: ?-, W`{ 4+1 Ani I-}r_•kr_. ( i . { Date: Applicant/Owner: `-?o?t ctc? ?0? 4 %'YJC.?"t? I County: 1 'ttic.??-. I nvestigator• L, ) ?.. e - State: /,4(- Do Normal Circurnsrnnces exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No Transact 10: Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Plot ID: (If needed, ex;lain on reverse.) Nor\ _Vq-47tt e ra ee-a w VEsETATION Cominant Plant See=:es Stratt:m Indicator Dominant Plant Soecies 5;ratuz^.. Indicator ' C i i ?! Tim- r 3r?rn ?I eta-. ,? 7, l % 11. ?rYl f /.tnC 4a- rAt- 4. I_iitl<"`(ri/Y ?-..A 14. Percent of Dominant SCecies that are CEL. FACW or FAC ( l di ?? exc u ng FAC-), Remarks: HYDROLOGY _ Recorded Data (Ceseriba In Remarks): Watiand Hydrology Indicators: _ Stream. Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: _ Aerial P! otcgraphs _ Inundated _ Other, -Saturated in Upper 12 Inches -No Recorded Data Available _ Water Marks Drift Lines S invent Deposits solid observations: _/Drainage Params in Wedands Secondary Indicators (2 or more required): Depth of Surface Water- (in.) _ oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches _ Water-Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Fir. fin.) _ Local Soil Survey Data _ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.) _ Other (Ex;fain in Remarks) Remarks: i' WTI, 1996 -196- SOILS Map Unit Naas ?•- (Series and P=ase): ?Q l ( Orainage Class: ?.?/ I lOa+Gl 1 . Taxonomy (SQ:;Cg.cup): Feld Observations Confirm Mapped Type1 Cues No Profit e Oesc--^cn: Oapth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Morde inches) F+--z- Texture, Coreratians, L--_? ?n _ (Mansell Mcist) (Murtsefi Moist) Aburtdanes/Canrrasr Structure. arc. 1,.,, rq ) Hydric Soil Irc:catcrs: ?sic cpipedan Sc:Seie Cdor _ q -;;c Moisture Reg;md Rec_cing Conditions Gleved or Low-Ctiroma Colors Remarks: WETLAND OE-1=RMINATICN Hydrophytie Vegstation Present? <Soj7No (C.:rcle) Wedand Hydreicgy Present? Yes No Hydrie Sails Pressrt? Yes Remarks: _ Cancradcns _ Hign Crganie Cantsnt in Surfacs Layer in _ardy Sails _ Crganic Streaking in Sandy Sails _ Lsted on Local Hyd is Soils List _ Usted an National Hydric Soils List Cther (Explain in Remarks) (Circla) Is ;his Sampling Print Within a WedaM7 Yes No proved -197 - WTI, 1995 !r.e4c{ MEMORANDUM TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Samar Bou-ghazale Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: Rex Gleason Date: ct/aa SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Facility Name Yager Construction Sandy Porter Road Apartments Project` Number 98 1233 Recvd From APP Received Date 12/21/98 Recvd By Region Project Type residential County Mecklenburg County2 Region Mooresville Certificates Stream Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. supp. Basin Req. Req. 26 BLH W770 N F_- 11-137 F_c-F__ 030834 0.18 215.00 14 F-O,yQN F_F_F__F_F__Ir- 80.00 Mitigation Wetland MitigationType Type Acres Feet Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y (0 N Did you request more info? Q Y (0 N Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N Is Mitigation required? Q Y 0 N Recommendation: pQ Issue O Issue/fond O Deny Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 351110 Longitude (ddmmss) 804645 Comments: Field investigation revealed that no mitigation is required for the above project_ The road crossing - tar ' ga'laco nn . fo different streams, Also, it is this office's opinion that avoidance and minimization were addressed during design procedures, cc: Regional Office Central Office Page Number 1 001110 -eilueo Z iagwnN abed ad? 11.0 II O160H M . :(L eBed woaj panui}uo3) sluawwoo 66/6 U l :018(3 aewes :iaeIuoo leuoifiaa ?IanquapjaaK Alunoo UZI 86 aagmnN 10010.1d sjuatupu V peon nlaod SpueS uotjanalsuoD aatvA OwBN AIM3e=1 MEMORANDUM TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Samar Bou- hg azale Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: Rex Gleason Date: 1/1 ca.49a SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Facility Name Yager Construction Sandy Porter Road Apartments Project Number 98 1233 Recvd From APP Received Date 12/21/98 Recvd By Region Project Type residential County Mecklenburg County2 Region Mooresville Certificates Stream Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Feet Req. 26 BLH O Y O N 11-137 C 30,834. 0.18 215.00 F14 O Y O ?' r F_ F-F_ so.w O Y _0N F_I rI -F-F_Ir- F- Mitigation Wetland MitigationType Type Acres Feet Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 351110 Longitude (ddmmss) 804645 Comments: Field investigation revealed that no mitigation ms required for the above eject. The road crossing is tacking place on two different streams- Also, it is this office's opinion that avoidance and minimisation were addressed addressed duringsign procedures. cc: Regional Office Central Office Page Number 1 Facility Name Yager Construction Sandy Porter Road Apartments County Mecklenburg Project Number 98 1233 Regional Contact: Samar Date: 1/19/99 Comments (continued from page 1): cc: Regional Office Central Office Page Number 2