20191614 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191124

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20191614
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
CENTREGREEN VI & VII
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Bob Zarzecki
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
11 /24/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Crabtree Creek (Lake Crabtree)
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
B NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.825728
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wake
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-78.801637
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
* Nationwide Permit (NWP)
* Regional General Permit (RGP)
7 Standard (IP)
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Stephanie Goss:eads\szgoss
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
V

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)iress
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Centregreen VI & VII - DMS Acceptance Letter.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twe nty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
O Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Highwoods Realty LP
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book 016238 Page 00147
2c. Responsible party:
Randy Roberson, Senior VP Development (c/o Jeff Emerson, Director of Pre -development)
2d.Address
Street Address
3100 Smoketree Court
Address Line 2
Suite 600
City
Raleigh
Rostal / Zip Code
27604-1050
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
State / RWnce / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
81.09KB
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
U

Bob Zarzecki
4b. Business Name:
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
4c.Address
Street Address
8412 Falls of Neuse Road
Address Lim 2
Suite 104
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
27615
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Centregreen VI & VII - S&EC Agent Authorization. pdf
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
1.09MB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History u'
1. Project Information
111b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
10. Nearest municipality/ town:
Town of Cary
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0755859496
2c. Project Address
Street Address
2000 Centregreen Way
Address Lim 2
City
Cary
Postal / Zip Code
27513
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Crabtree Creek (Lake Crabtree)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
B NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Nauss
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202010801
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
14.14
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The existing conditions on the property containing the jurisdictional tributary (WoTUS) consists of vacant, wooded land (mesic mixed hardwood stand with mostly open understory). The
proposed project will be surrounded by similar uses. The existing Centregreen Park commercial office complex is located to the east. A portion of this project Will extend to into the
existing parking lots located on that property. The existing Lantower Weston Corners residential apartment complex is located to the west. The existing Biologics, Inc. Corporate
Headquarters commercial office complex exist to the north across Weston Parkway. The existing John Deere Cary marketing center commercial office complex existing to the south
across the Town of Cary greenway, perennial stream and Neuse and Urban Transition Buffers stream buffers.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
F Yes r No F Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Centregreen VI & VII - USGS.pdf 874.93KB

4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Centregreen VI & VII - Soil Survey.pdf 76.24KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
619
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To construct a commercial office park.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
See attached "Justification Statement". The proposed project includes the construction of two office buildings, two parking decks, surface parking and driveways. Each office building is
approximately 160,000 gross square feet. The approximate rentable area is 152,000 square feet. Heavy equipment (e.g. excavators, bulldozers, dump trucks, cranes, etc.) typically
used for civil works will be used.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Centregreen VI & VII - IMPACT MAPS.pdf 779.43KB
Centregreen VI & VII - 2019-09-04_Justification Letter.pdf 30.06KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No O Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW# not yet assigned to my knowledge.
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Tasha Alexander & James Lastinger / Steven Ball & Bob Zarzecki
Agency/Consultant Company: USACE / S&EC
Other: Sara Knies / NCDWR-RRO
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
June 2, 2016; NCDWR NBRRO#16-167 (attached), Sara Knies; determined stream to be "ephemeral" & not subject to Neuse Buffers.
March 27, 2018; USACE field verification of PJD request, Tasha Alexander (USACE) w/ Steven Ball (S&EC).
November 6, 2018; USACE stream evaluation for potential 300' waiver & mitigation, James Lastinger (USACE) w/ Bob Zarzecki (S&EC).
May 2018 & August 2019; NCSAM forms (most current attached) completed by Bob Zarzecki (S&EC)
Sd1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Centregreen VI & VII - PJD Request.pdf 2.95MB
Centregreen VI & VII - NCSAM - LOWER SECTION —Weston Centregreen 6-7 (August 2019).pdf 213.54KB
Centregreen VI & VII - NCSAM - UPPER SECTION —Weston Centregreen 6-7 (August 2019).pdf 213.4KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
No.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name * ��3e.
Stream Type*
3f. Type of
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
❑
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*

S1
Parkin Deck & Grad
Parking 9
Permanent
Fill
S01 "UPPER SECTION"
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
336
(lin�rfeet)
S2
Road Crossing & Gradin
9 g
Permanent
Fill
S01 "LOWER SECTION"
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
138
(lir�rfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
474
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
474
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
3j. Comments:
For section "3e. Stream Type" there is no option for "ephemeral" (as DWR classified the stream to be), so I used "intermittent". However, the USACE
has identified it simply as a "jurisdictional tributary" and did not specific whether it is "ephemeral" or "intermittent".
We are requesting the District Engineer waives the 300 LF limit as we believe this discharge will result in no more than minimal adverse environmental
effects per the attached "Justification Letter", NCSAM forms and proposed stormwater management, streams buffers and mitigation.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
* See attached "Justification Letter". The site contraints require impacts to 474 LF of the approximately 619 LF of the "jurisdictional tributary" stream
located within the project site, thereby avoiding approbmately 145 LF aong the far southwestern property corner. The project was able to avoid any
impacts to the larger, perennial stream and 100' wide stream buffers to the south, through the use of retaining walls.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
* See attached "Justification Letter". The project will obtain an erosion and sediment control permit from the Town of Cary to protect the avoided larger
perennial stream of the south. This plan will require a minimum 100' urban transition buffer and 50' Neuse River Buffer along the stream. A post
construction NPDES stormwater management plan approval will be obtained from the Town of Cary for the project to include the proposed stormwater
wet pond designed to both Town and DWR standards.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
f DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
138
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(squarefeet)
0
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0
4h. Comments
Per negotiations and guidance from the USACE, the fact that the DWR determined the entire tributary to be "ephemeral" and the attached completed
NCSAM forms, the applicant is proposing stream mitigation at a 1:1 ratio for the 138 LF of "LOWER" section of the "jurisdictional tributary".
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) h
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:

A diffuse flow plan is not provided as the project proposes to install a stormwater management wet pond that removes nitrogen prior to discharging to the jurisdictional "ephemeral"
stream outside of the stream buffers.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15ANCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government F State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
W Phase II W NSW r USMP r Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Town of Cary
Comments:
* See attached "Justification Letter" and impact maps. The project will obtain a stormwater management plan from the Town of Cary. The project proposes a stormwater wet pond
designed to Town and DWR standards to treat stormwater runoff from the project and help protect downstream water quality.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project involves the expansion of an existing commercial office complex that is surrounded by existing development. Projects such as this are not
anticipated to result in additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality. Any potential additional development will be held
to the same requirements of this project to include stormwater management, stream buffers and sections 404/401 of the Clean Water Act and
therefore shoudl not result in impacts to water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r WA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Wastewater from the project will discharge to the Town of Cary sanitary sewer system and treated by the Town's "North Cary Water Reclamation
Facility" located on Old Reedy Creek Road just downstream of Lake Crabtree. The Town and DEQ will ensure that adequate capacity is available. The
current use at plant is 7.5 mgd of the 12 mgd permitted capacity (based on the 2018-2019 annual report).
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No

5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?`
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
NHP & FWS websites. Per the NHP data explorer website there are no known elemental occurrences of federally protected species or habitat on the
project site. There are no known occurrences within 1 mile of the project site. However, the project is located in Wake County and therefore "may
affect, but not likely to adversely effect" NLEB. The project does not have details on the type of percussive activity. But due to the significant grading
proposed on the site, while blasting in not anticipated, other percussive activity may occur (such as mechanized pile drivers, etc.) during construction.
This is no different than similar projects that were recently built nearby, such as the Lantower apartment complex or the MetLife campus, as such we
believe this project will not likely effect NLEB. There's no habit on the property for federally protected aquatic species such as the Atlantic Pigtoe. Bald
Eagles are known to exist at Lake Crabtree, but the project is +/- 0.3 miles (>660') south of the lake with existing buildings and infrastructure in
between. As such the project will not effect nesting eagles.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA-EFH Mapper. The project is located within the piedmont of NC far from any EFH areas.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
SHPO HPO website.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
Centregreen VI & VII - SHPO.pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC FLOOD, FEMAvebsites & DFIRM.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Centregreen VI & VII - FEMA.pdf
Signature
F7 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
317.25KB
395.83KB
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Bob Zarzecki
J
Signature

Sign
Date
11/24/2019

ROY COOPER
Governor
MIC14AEL S. REGAN
seaw-Y
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Dire"
Jeff Emerson
Highwoods Realty Ltd., Partnership
3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 1100
Raleigh, NC 27604
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 7, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 4/7/2020
Project: Centregreen VI & VII County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Neuse
03020201
Warm Stream
138
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 0213.0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Bob Zarzecki, agent
QE Q
Sincerely,
tStanfill
nagement Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Fmironmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
717 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Mane: (919) W-59M • Fax; (919) 84_9467
sandec.com
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: CentreGreen VI & VII S&EC Project # i/03
Date: 3/16/2018
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: P-'+ield Office: t� C P c:
�t'i ti I/ �' i`�1 �/1 r� C
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the
property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This
document also authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions
necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and
all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any previous
correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call
S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): _ 0-7 5
Site Address:
City, County, State:J
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Name: Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership
Mailing Address: 3100 Smnketre . C'nnrt, Suite 1 100 _
Telephone Number: 919_875_661 1
(please print)
Owner Signature
3/16/2018
Date
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

0)
'gal/
L
Lake
Crabtre
ice.««� ��
z
i
J
0

SHEET NUMBER 46
74 w
r 90.
DprA
La
J ' _
.I •. 1 4 a
- + __ - 1�
— �Alc.r " 1- �t
%
�- r f
.ate+ f � - --
' CL
Centregreen VI&VI
'�• _ '�Ii f � � 1 �J Y
� - _ . =
Ww
i I . '#� - ■
z %
1, �
LC
I�
h� r
r � •
1 r
1 1'
1

WESTON PARKWAY ' '
(120' PUBLIC R/W) now MON
AREA OF JURISDICTIONAL ucRwrvez
B.M. 1969, PG. 1481 -1484 � i / / Rwrv/ a� w� sicry
V
TRIBUTARY STREAM CHANNEL - - - // //'/ j
IMPACT - 1,512 SF/0.0347-- /'/' %;��" \\ \\ LA
ACRES 474 LF / / / c �— / /'//'�'�� �\ �� \ /\> �\\ T sT��2
RwM / /
�6 Z-6 4
/7,,/
/ I
A-77
\
II III I I I \ \ \ \ 11
E -39211 \
� 385
�
8� I�( —
III
a -- I Il�j
CRP/WF WESRIN CORNERS, LLC. `P� /' ' - \\\� �' ' -1 I /•/ �OSEO PPR11N // // '/ / / i — _ _// / / / / // // / / / I I I
D.a 16238, PG. 159 \ — _ — �, PROP Na • / ' �j/ / / / / / / / / /j // / / / �' _ ' _ I
aM. 2015, PG. 2008-2009 A — • / // / / i / / / / I / — _ _ III
am. 2o18, PG. 415-416 /v
PIN 0755.02-85-1663 PROPOSED
RETAINING / J
WALLS —� — / j / / // / / / / / // PR gU1L01N� NCI / / 3a5
ELEV - 325
R 3L
'A/L 80
-
- — L PONT
EXISTING
CENTLOOTREEN
WIN
ZFER ` �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\�� PpSEO PARING OEC = '_ /// /// \�� — —
I \ \ \ D.B.
a
PROPOSED \ \ `� _ _ _ %> 7- DASHED LINE DENOTES
STORMWATER LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE o
WET POND \ \\\\� —� 350 --
50' RIPARAN BUFFER \ \ L \ 340�� \ \ \
(MEASURED FROM EACH SIDE
TOP OF BANK) ^ _ \ 1 \ �n\ -\�-'4 - - - _ —� —� I� NORTH
Eo N00 DDfCOMMERICAL5FEER COMS PANNY \ �� _ -' 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 300
D.B. 6666, PG. 1944
D.a 8637, PG. 2107 100' TOWN OF CARY BUFFER �� \ ' — '
aM. 2001 PG. 951 (MEASURED FROM EACH SIDE \ \ /
am2000 PC 1632 TOP OF BANK) _
P'W 07�64 84-8591 71 LANDSCA FFE-PG. 1222' SCALE: 1 " —10 0
B.M. 2000, PC. 1632
Piedmont Land Design, LLP
8522-204 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Tel [phone] Fax [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Z
p06
z
ao
Lu
WN
YU
I.I.
F-
w
OO
F-
�-z
z
W�
W
3:
U
oU
PROJECT:
HNNO
DATE:
4 5EPT 201q
SCALE:
HORIZ.: I" = 100'
DWG. # I M.1

(51
Sol
I _ _DD1/
-AREA OF JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY STREAM CHANNEL-
-IMPACT - 1,512 SF/0.0347
ACRES 474 LF
SEA PARK\N
_ _ ! %' / / /' NCSAM REVIEW UPPER
PROPOSED / /
RETAINING SECTION - 1,034 SF/ / '' �/' ' OSE� 1\
WALLS/' PR gU\Lp\NG /
0.0237 ACRES/336 LF
BEGIN "LOWER" SECTION
NCSAM REVIEW "LOWER"
SECTION - 478 SF/0.01 10
ACRES/138 LF
—
\ NORTH
0 50 100 150
SCALE: 1 "=50'
Piedmont Land Design, LLP
8522-204 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Tel [phone] Fax [phone]
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
06
Z
CO
z
ao
Lu
W
YV
F_
w
OO
F
z
z
w�
W
>
U
oU
PROJECT:
HNNO
DATE:
4 5EPT 20Iq
SCALE:
HORIZ.: I" = 50'
DWG. # IM.2

PLDPiedmont Land Design, LLP
8522-204 Six Forks Road * Raleigh, NC 27615 * [phone] * Fax: [phone]
September 4, 2019
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
Centregreen VI and VII
Weston Parkway
Cary, North Carolina
The proposed project includes the construction of two office buildings, two parking decks, surface
parking and driveways. Each office building is approximately 160,000 gross square feet. The
approximate rentable area is 152,000 square feet. The project is located on a 14.14 acre site on
Weston Parkway in Cary, North Carolina. Parking decks are being provided to minimize
impervious areas on the site. The perennial stream located along the southern property line is not
being impacted. The Town of Cary requires a 100' stream buffer on this stream.
This project is located on a lot separate from the five existing Centregreen buildings. The parking
for these buildings must be evaluated separately and must be close enough to serve the new
buildings.
In order to construct this development, approximately 474 linear feet of jurisdictional tributary
stream channel are impacted. The justifications for these impacts are as follows:
Parking Requirements — Sufficient parking must be provided to meet the tenant requirements.
The minimum parking to meet tenant requirements is based on the rentable area. We are
proposing to provide approximately 1,520 spaces which is equivalent to 5.2 spaces/1,000
square feet of rentable area and 5.0 spaces/1,000 square feet of gross area. This is in keeping
with current market leasing standards. The tenant requirements for the five existing buildings
on the existing Centregreen lot is provided below. These requirements vary from 3.97 spaces to
7.63 spaces/1,000 square feet of rentable area.
Tenant Lease Requirement
Provided
Building No.
Rentable SF
Spaces
Spaces/1,000 sf
Spaces
Spaces/1,000 sf
CG 1
99,409
430
4.33
423
4.26
CG 2
99,948
397
3.97
475
4.75
CG 3
147,148
599
4.07
569
3.87
CG 4
98,307
750
7.63
784
7.98
CG 5
1 98,017
1 427
1 4.36
1 341
1 3.48
542,829
1 2,603
1 4.80 average
1 2,592
1 4.77 average
Information provided by Highwoods Properties, Inc.
The Town of Cary Land Development Ordinance requires 3.33 spaces/1,000 gross square feet
of office, therefore 1,067 spaces are required to meet Town requirements. The parking required
by the Town is not sufficient to meet the requirements of prospective tenants.
Civil Engineers * Landscape Architects * band Planners

Page 2
2. Parking Location — The parking to serve each building must be in close proximity to the
building entrances. In addition, the parking needs to be located on the same lot as the building
it serves. Parking decks must be located on the same lot. This applies to the proposed
development lot and the adjacent developed Centregreen lot with five buildings. We are
planning to remove 316 spaces on the existing Centregreen lot to make the required traffic
improvements to provide access to both lots and constructing 294 surfaces spaces to serve the
existing Centregreen lot. The stormwater runoff from approximately 2 acres of the parking area
on the existing Centregreen lot is being treated by the proposed stormwater wet pond. This area
is currently not being treated by a stormwater pond.
3. Topography — The topography on the site is very steep. There is 72' of fall from the high point
to the low point. The jurisdictional tributary is approximately 32' lower than Weston Parkway
and only 155' from the property line at its closet point. The jurisdictional tributary is
approximately 32' lower than the proposed building finished floor elevation. The building
finished floor elevation is designed to connect to Centregreen Way to the north. The
jurisdictional tributary is approximately 20' lower than the proposed parking deck elevation.
Two levels of the deck are designed to be subterranean to take advantage of the existing site
slopes. This allows the deck to be depressed to make up for some of the grade change and
reduces the above grade deck height.
4. Jurisdictional Tributary Location — The jurisdictional tributary is too close to Weston Parkway
to allow development of a parking deck or office building on this portion of the property. The
distance from the Weston Parkway right of way varies from 155' to 368' and the topography is
steep.
5. Street Network — The adjacent development has provided a driveway (Encore Place) into the
property that will cross the jurisdictional tributary when extended.
6. We have evaluated several parking options to minimize the impacts to the jurisdictional
tributary as follows:
A. Parking Deck No. I Size and Height — The current deck is designed to provide an efficient
layout and to maximize the floor plate. It is not feasible to reduce the length or width of the
large deck to avoid the jurisdictional tributary due to the following:
I. Reducing the length will result in a deck that is too short to allow a single ramp at a
reasonable slope (5-5.5%) between levels.
2. Reducing the width of the deck by one bay results in an inefficient deck and does not
avoid the jurisdictional tributary due to the required slopes down to the jurisdictional
tributary.
3. A much taller deck is required to provide the required parking.
4. The taller deck will be unattractive and blocks view corridors from the office building
and the visibility of the building from Weston Parkway.
5. Taller Decks are also more expensive to construct.
6. A driveway cannot be provided from the north side of the deck without crossing the
jurisdictional tributary.
PLD

Page 3
B. Provide deck on each side of jurisdictional tributary - This is not feasible due to the
following:
1. There is not sufficient room to construct a deck on each side of the jurisdictional
tributary. There is approximately 120' left for the deck on the north side and 180' left
for the deck on the south side. This is not enough room to construct a deck.
2. There is no room for a driveway around the deck. This driveway is needed for tenant
access and access to the loading dock.
3. It will be much more expensive to provide two decks instead of one larger one.
4. Two smaller decks are not feasible for the many of the reasons identified in Item 6.A.
C. Increasing the size of Proposed Deck No. 2 to serve Building VI and VII — This is not
feasible due to the following:
1. The parking is too far away from the Building VI. The parking must be within a
reasonable distance for the building to be leasable.
2. The deck cannot be increased in length due to the existing Neuse Buffer and parking for
the existing Centregreen lot.
3. A much taller deck is required to provide the required parking which is more expensive
to construct and blocks view corridors.
D. Parking Deck on the existing Centregreen lot — This is not feasible due to the following:
1. The parking deck serving Building VI and VII must be located on the same lot.
2. The lots must stand alone for future sales. A parking deck would require a
condominium agreement which is not acceptable.
3. The parking is too far from Building VI.
HWWC RPH/rph
PLD

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
user rvianuai version d.,i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): WESTON PARKWAY (14-acres) 2
3. Applicant/owner name: Highwoods Properties LP 4
5. County: Wake E
7. River basin: Neuse 03020201
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
Date of evaluation: August 19, 2019
Assessor name/organization: B. Zarcecki / S&EC, PA
Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Crabtree Creek (Lake Crabtree
35.825728 /-78.801637
S012LOWER
9. Site number (show on attached map): SECTION" 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): +/- 138'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 2 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ®NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water— assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
®B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ®No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses W ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F CD ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o Y ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y rC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R)
= present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R
C A P
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
®
❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ® Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
®
❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes
®No
Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
®F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ❑A ®A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ®B ❑B ®B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ®B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ®No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
- storm water pipe discharge from parking lot above origin reuslting in downcutting of channel; determined "ephemeral" by DWR; right bank
towards lower end cleared of vegetation;

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
WESTON PARKWAY (14-
Stream Site Name Date of Assessment
acres)
August 19, 2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization
B. Zarcecki / S&EC, PA
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
MEDIUM
MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
user rvianuai version d.,i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic
quadrangle, and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property,
identify and number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for
detailed descriptions and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were
performed. See the NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): WESTON PARKWAY (14-acres) 2
3. Applicant/owner name: Highwoods Properties LP 4
5. County: Wake E
7. River basin: Neuse 03020201
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach):
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
Date of evaluation: August 19, 2019
Assessor name/organization: B. Zarcecki / S&EC, PA
Nearest named water body
on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Crabtree Creek (Lake Crabtree
35.825253 /-78.802318
S012UPPER
9. Site number (show on attached map): SECTION" 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): +/- 336'
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 2 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ®NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water— assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
®B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming,
over widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of
these disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area,
leaky or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision,
disruption of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples:
impoundments, intensive mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a
man-made feature on an interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a
drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ®No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses W ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) F CD ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o Y ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y rC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged.
Check at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) _
absent,
Rare (R)
= present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative
percentages should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R
C A P
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
®
❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
❑
❑ ❑ ® Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
®
❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
®
❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes
®No
Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ❑Yes ®No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ®No Water ❑Other:
12b. ❑Yes ®No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland
runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil
compaction, livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
®F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but
is within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ®No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
- storm water pipe discharge from parking lot above origin reuslting in downcutting of channel; determined "ephemeral" by DWR;

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
WESTON PARKWAY (14-
Stream Site Name Date of Assessment
acres)
August 19, 2019
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization
B. Zarcecki / S&EC, PA
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

•
o*
II
�nter��
46.
Centregreen Vi&VII
Lake Grabir@e
courilly NldA
0
UVA E
t-
Centregreen VAVII
Pkwy
Mor --■
t
1.
a
October 16, 2019
NR Points NRHD Center Point F1 Boundary of Destroyed/Removed NR Listing
# NR Individual Listing NR Boundaries SL Points
0 NR Listing, Gone ` National Register Boundary SL Individual Entry
VV UM 1%?* r
5Wi4 733 John IGcGhee
Farm{Gan`ej
J1Qo�+�xbelta L3r
•
16 1
1:31,147
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
SL and DOE entry
0 0.33 0.65 1.3 km
Town of Cary, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin,
S&EC

Northing: = 757,358, Easting = 2,057,354
Northing: = 757,358, Easting = 2,060,822
Northing: = 753,889, Easting = 2,057,354 Page 1 of 2 Northing: = 753,889, Easting = 2,060,822
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. This map incorporates changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest
product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store atwww.msc.fema.gov.
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
With BFE or Depth
Regulatory Floodway
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance
Flood Hazard
Areas Determined to be Outside the
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Jurisdiction Boundary
FIRM Panel Boundary
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
l inch =500 feet 16000
19
0 125 250 500
Feet
0 25 50 100
OMeters
E NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
CC0 FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
'QA
O Panel(s):0755,0765
a CONTAINS:
U COMMUNITY CID
TOWN OF CARY 370238
C6
i Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown
below should be used when placing map
N orders; the Community Number(s) shown
above should be used on insurance
applications for the subject community.
6 SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
3720075500J 5/2/2006
3720076500J 5/2/2006
O
a=+
C6
Z
C-5-

FEMA: National Flood Insurance Program ° z
$ Page 2 of 2 Atq�
Panel(s):0755,0765
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID
TOWN OF CARY 370238
Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown below should be
used when placing map orders; the Community Number(s)
shown above should be used on insurance applications for
the subject community.
SELECTED PANELS:
MAP NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE
3720075500J 5/2/2006
3720076500J 5/2/2006
NOTES TO USERS
This is an official FIRMette of a portion of the effective panels
listed in the Title Block shown on Page 1. The information
represented on this FIRMette was extracted from the effective
digital flood hazard data available at http://fris.nc.gov/fris.
Base flood elevation data, floodway, nonencroachment widths,
information on certain areas no in the Special Flood Hazard
Areas protected by flood control structures, and other pertinent
data are available in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) available at
http://fris.nc.gov/fris. Users should be aware that flood elevations
shown on this FIRMette represent elevations rounded to one
tenth of a foot (0.1') and should be utilized in conjunction with
data available in the FIS.
NOTES TO USERS
Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRMette were obtained
from various organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and
federal agencies, and/or other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery
acquired by the State in 2010. Information and geospatial data supplied by the local
community(ies) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered the preferred
source for development of the base map.
See geospatial metadata for the associated digital FIRMette for additional information
about base map preparation. Base map features shown on this FIRMette, such as
corporate limits, are based on the most up-to-date data available at the time of publication.
Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map
users should consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current
conditions of jurisdictional boundaries and base map features. This map may contain
roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new
hydraulic model was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM.
Flood elevations on this map are referenced to either or both the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) or National Geodetic Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29), and are
labeled accordingly. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground
elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. To obtain current elevation, description,
and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, or for information
regarding conversion between NGVD 29 and NAVD 88, please contact the Information
Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at [phone], or visit its website at
hftp://www.ngs.noaa.gov/.
MORE INFORMATION
Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA)
1-877-336-2627
hftp://msc.fema.gov/
Letters of Map Revision (LOMR)
919-715-5711
www.ncfloodmaps.com
Flood Insurance Availability
North Carolina Division of Emergency
Management (NCDEM)
919-715-5711
http://www.nccrimecontrol.org/nfip
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
1-877-638-6620
hftp://www.fema.gov/business/nfip
Questions about this FIRMette
1-877-336-2627
hftp://fema.gov
LEGEND
LEGEND
MAP REVISIONS
This FIRMette includes revisions for the following LOMR
LOMR DATE
LOMR-Crabtree Creek Tributary 4/11/2008
No. 6 (Basin 18, Stream 20)
WAKE 07-04-2347P