20180181 Ver 1_Final PJD Package_20191122

WATER & LAND SOLUTIONS
7721 $IX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 1$0, RALEI0H, NC 27615
(919( 614 - 5111 I waterlandsolutions.com
March 29, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Samantha Dailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Subject: Scarborough Mitigation Project, Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Request, Wayne County, NC
Dear Ms. Dailey,
Please find attached the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for the Scarborough
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project. The project is located in Wayne County, North Carolina,
approximately four miles south of the Town of Goldsboro. Attached you will find the following:
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Form
• Landowner Authorization Form
• Four Maps: USGS Topographic Map (with project vicinity), Aerial (with soils borings), Soils
Map, and Preliminary Jurisdictional Waters Map
• Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Determination Forms
• NC DWR Stream Identification Forms
If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact me directly.
Sincerely,
Adam V McIntyre
7721 Six Forks Rd, Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615
Office Phone: [phone]
Mobile Phone: [phone]
Email: adam0waterlandsolution.com

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/29/19
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Adam McIntyre, 7721 Six Forks Rd, Ste. 130 Raleigh, NC 27615
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Raleigh
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wayne City: Goldsboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.32110000 Long.:-77.98972220
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See
Attached
List

Revised November 15, 2019
Site #
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated amount
of resource in
review area
(acreage and linear
ft, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e. Section
404 or Section 10/401)
W1
35.3159
-77.9894
3.86 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W2
35.3177
-77.9915
1.12 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W3A
35.3195
-77.9955
1.40 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W313
35.321
-77.9955
0.43 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
WK
35.3214
-77.9957
1.13 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W4A
35.321
-77.9899
7.40 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W413
35.3242
-77.9893
0.61 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W5
35.3214
-77.9941
1.66 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W6
35.3202
-77.9932
0.23 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W7
35.3232
-77.9964
1.02 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W8
35.3233
-77.9959
0.41 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W9
35.3259
-77.9927
0.46 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W10
35.3249
-77.9931
0.15 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
W-1-118
35.3247
-77.9961
0.64 acres
Wetland
Section 404/401
UT1-RI
35.3198
-77.9930
2,571.91 If
Non -wetland
Section 404/401
UT1-112
35.3203
-77.9876
1,450.07 If
Non -wetland
Section 404/401
UT1-113
35.3217
-77.9832
1,176.38 If
Non -wetland
Section 404/401
UT1A
35.3186
-77.9923
236.85 If
Non -wetland
Section 404/401
UT1B
35.3216
-77.9934
1,261.28 If
Non -wetland
Section 404/401
UT2
35.3179
-77.9891
2,252.99 If
Non -wetland
Section 404/401
UT3
35.3214
-77.9902
997.13 If
Non -wetland
Section 404/401
D1
35.3166
-77.9902
176.56 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D2
35.3170
-77.9901
222.67 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D3
35.3155
-77.9890
605.87 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D4
35.3180
-77.9921
352.61 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D5
35.3211
-77.9958
788.13 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D6
35.3244
-77.9966
445.15 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D7
35.3244
-77.9968
76.39 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D8
35.3225
-77.9960
101.11 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D9
35.3231
-77.9958
92.63 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D10
35.3166
-77.9880
1065.63 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D11
35.3207
-77.9862
154.65 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D12
35.3218
-77.9867
1027.62 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D13
35.3219
-77.9879
1320.17 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D14
35.3223
-77.9888
1293.03 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D15
35.3228
-77.9910
2171.54 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D16
35.3239
-77.9907
914.74 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D17
35.3211
-77.9909
508.63 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D18
35.3219
-77.9916
604.52 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D19
35.3246
-77.9931
1267.29 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D20
35.3247
-77.9938
564.81 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401

Revised November 15, 2019
Site #
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated amount
of resource in
review area
(acreage and linear
ft, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e.
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e. Section
404 or Section 10/401)
D21
35.3243
-77.9948
1364.66 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D22
35.3259
-77.9940
678.73 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D23
35.3237
-77.9956
917.15 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D24
35.3192
-77.9898
522.45 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D25
35.3192
-77.9892
336.66 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D26
35.3215
-77.9928
332.25 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401
D27
35.3194
-77.9833
1900.97 If
Non -wetland Ditch
Section 404/401

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: USGS, Soils, Soil Borings, Jurisdictional Waters
❑E Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
C] USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS S and 12 digit HUC maps.
)•❑ U.S. Geological Surrey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1 :24,000 Southeast Goldsboro
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Surrey. Citation: 1974 Wayne County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ Stateflocal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later 'urisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
v 3/29/19
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action

Mn� -�
.�. Legend
'dk' +` _
OConservation Easement
+ Existing Stream
--Qp- Flowlines
1918
•
•
5 �
o �
h 917 \S�1R3
r C C
w
pt�
UT1-R2
if
iN,
N �� •
• 'M Home
0 330 660 1 *320 Feet Pic
1 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubeld
FIGURE
WATER & LAN DM Scarborough USGS Topographic
SOLUTIONS Mitigation Project Map
NAD 1983 2011 State Plane
North Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US

+ -r
I
f
r*
q a
►+
nn �4 '
(92
�a
91
! r • � 1
C
y Tt: S
1
1
�r.. .
ap contributors
Scale: 1 inch = 400 ft.
LEGEND Horizontal Datum: WGS84 SCALE 1:4800
Proposed Easement Bo "
0 Wetlands w o too zoo 300 400 500 soo
Stream Feet
Drainage Feature Figure 2 Aerial - Wetlands Overview W E 0.0 0.1
Data Point Scarborough Mitigation Site - Miles
s

0
226200
35° 20' 10" N
N
93
W
N_
93
N_
93
Soil Map —Wayne County, North Carolina
=00 2272M 227700 2282M 228700 229200 229700 230200
35° 18' 24" N
226200 226700 227200 227700 228200 228700
in
a Map Scale: 1:23,000 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters N
0 300 600 1200 18D0
Feet
0 1000 2000 4000 6000
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 18N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
® ` • Y 0
C
229200 229700 230200
230700
IjEw U 35° 20' 10" N
N
93
N
93
N
N_
93
N_
93
93
I ' 35° 18' 24" N
230700
in
3/28/2019
Pagel of 4

Soil Map —Wayne County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Stony Spot
;�. Y
1 :20,000.
Soils
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Very Stony Spot
measurements.
Soil Map Unit Lines
Wet Spot
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other
Web Soil Survey URL:
Soil Map Unit Points
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Special Line Features
Special
Point Features
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Blowout
water Features
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Streams and Canals
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Borrow Pit
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Clay Spot
Transportation
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Rails
0
Closed Depression
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
. 0 Interstate Highways
of the version date(s) listed below.
Gravel Pit
US Routes
Soil Survey Area: Wayne County, North Carolina
f,
Gravelly Spot
Major Roads
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Sep 10, 2018
Landfill
Local Roads
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
�
Lava Flow
1:50,000 or larger.
.
Marsh or swamp
Background
Aerial Photography
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 7, 2015—Oct 26,
2017
Mine or Quarry
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
Miscellaneous Water
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
Perennial Water
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
g
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
oa
Sodic Spot
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4

Soil Map -Wayne County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Bb
Bibb sandy loam
26.4
1.0%
Bp
Borrow pit
75.4
2.9%
Ch
Chewacla loam
109.6
4.2%
CrC2
Craven sandy loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes, eroded
(Gritney)
12.9
0.5%
Dr
Dragston loamy sand
118.0
4.5%
Jo
Johns sandy loam
68.5
2.6%
KaA
Kalmia loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
17.1
0.7%
KaB
Kalmia loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
24.7
1.0%
KaE
Kalmia loamy sand, 15 to 25
percent slopes (Winton)
50.5
1.9%
Kn
Kinston loam
144.8
5.6%
La
Lakeland sand
416.3
16.0%
Le
Leaf loam
126.2
4.9%
Lu
Lucy loamy sand
28.4
1.1 %
Lv
Lumbee sandy loam
356.3
13.7%
Ly
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2
percent slopes
0.2
0.0%
M-W
Miscellaneous water
45.6
1.8%
Na
Nahunta very fine sandy loam
156.9
6.0%
NoC
Norfolk loamy sand, 6 to 10
percent slopes
70.3
2.7%
NrB2
Norfolk sandy loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes, eroded
11.4
0.4%
Po
Pantego loam
0.8
0.0%
Rm
Rimini sand
2.7
0.1 %
RyB2
Ruston sandy loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes, eroded
(Orangeburg)
51.3
2.0%
To
Torhunta loam
40.8
1.6%
Tr
Troup sand
29.2
1.1 %
W
Water
76.2
2.9%
WaB
Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
123.9
4.8%
WaC
Wagram loamy sand, 6 to 10
percent slopes
83.8
3.2%
WaD
Wagram loamy sand, 10 to 15
percent slopes
81.9
3.2%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4

Soil Map —Wayne County, North Carolina
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
We
Weston loamy sand
(Woodington)
14.5
0.6%
WhB
Wickham loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
42.4
1.6%
WkB2
Wickham sandy loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes, eroded
190.1
7.3%
Totals for Area of Interest
2,697.3
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/28/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4

�,•A 'Y .T ITS ( (. r �A. Yr` J`Legend
-�r D Conservation
StreamsExisting
Unverified Wetlands
t �
IMP
Moo -
A `
r�
F
Ct
�a-
M
�} Y 0• II III �
(moo MM11% Msaso A@WMD, gem, Md ,Q�i.�- (rD OMnl�ur UR
A

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 2157 Pecan Road
City, State:
Goldsboro. NC
County: Wayne
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 3507132313, 3507322710
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam McIntyre
Mailing Address: 7721 Six Forks Rd., Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: 919-632-5910
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
ZI am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: see attached table
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Owner of Record
Landowner
PIN
County
Deed Book &
Page Number
Parcel
Acreage
Water & Land
3507132313
Wayne
3427/65
218 acres
Solutions, LLC
(previously
(previously
(previously
Scarborough
3507039221)
3133/486)
Heirs)
Sleepy Creek
3507322710
Wayne
3020/381
38 acres
Farms

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATIONS a
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Adam McIntyre
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner
3/29/`19
Date
✓❑Authorized Agent'
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
EJI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construc develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and, or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
8✓ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
0 I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please pro% ide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet,
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 259 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.3211000
Longitude:-77.9897222'
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
F4 USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
DEED PG, 658 DEED BOOK 31S6 PARCEL M: 3507039221
STREET ADDRESS: 2157 Pecan Road, Goldsboro, NC
Property Owner: Scarborough Heirs Farms of Wayne County LLC
J
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
11030 Raven Ridge Rd
Suite 119
Raleigh, NC 27614
waterlandsolufions.com
919-614-5111
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby
authorize Adam McIntyre, CEO r of. Water & Land Solutions. LLC
to review nay property and to act on my behalf to take all actions necessary for the
processing, issuance and acceptance of necessary permits and/or certifications and any and
all standard and special conditions attached. This authorization allows the individual to
represent on my behalf to the necessary Government agency personnel for the proposed
property.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: [phone] _^
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate
to the best of our knowledge.
0
Authorizedd Signature Authorized Signature
Date: �/Z a gf2 Z -7 Date:

4
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
7721 Six Forks Rd
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM Suite 130
Raleigh, NC 27615
waterlandsolutions.com
919-614-5111
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
DEED BOOK: 3 0 z Q PAGE: 3 8/ PARCEL ID: �O 3 Z 71 O
STREET ADDRESS: 4., O /" C- —7W cill
S u, Zo g7- / `79 ; A,�,��iy�-moo/✓
Please Print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby
authorize
Adam V. McIntyre of Water and Land Solutions. LLC
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to review my property and to act on my behalf to take all actions necessary for the
processing, issuance and acceptance of necessary permits and/or certifications and any and
all standard and special conditions attached. This authorization allows the individual to
represent on my behalf to the necessary Government agency personnel for the proposed
property.
Propellty Ow'sAddress (idiff�rethaG r p� ty a� G
.� rF,B ✓� .j 61 age /✓. C' - �.. � .fire.....
Telephone: 9 ' 1 2— 2 i.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate
to the best of our knowledge.
prized Sign
Authorized Signature
Date: �_ l� Date:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Feb 02 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 159 W1 wet
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.316125 Long:-77.989884 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Lumbee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland data pt for Wetland W1
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -4
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 159 W1 wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 35 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
10 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Acer rubrum
3 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2 Salix nigra
2 Yes OBL
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
✓ 2 -Dominance Test is >50%
8.
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
5 = Total Cover
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Boehmeria cylindrica
10 Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Polygonum pensylvanicum
10 Yes FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Scirpus cyperinus
5 Yes OBL
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13
20% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
1 N/A FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
1 = Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Point within clear-cut area. Woody vegetation limited
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 159 W1 wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 N2.5/- 100 CL
5-19 5GY2.5/- 100
19-27 2.5Y 3/2 98 10YR 3/4 2
SC
C PL SC massive, very firm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �--I Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161) unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: clay content and structure
Depth (inches): 19
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Feb 01 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 160 W1 up
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex - convex Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.316141 Long:-77.990089 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Lumbee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Non-hydric data pt for Wetland W1
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches): -29
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches): -15
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 160 W1 up
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Eupatorium capillifolium
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Pueraria montana
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
holoaical adaptations
Point is in clear-cut
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
_
FAC species x 3 =
10 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
13 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
10 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
20% of total cover:
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
15 Yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
35 Yes FACU
Hydrophytic
35 = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 160 W1 up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3 10 YR 2/2 100
LS
3-7 7.5 YR 3/3 100
S
7-12 10 YR 4/4 100
S
12-31 10 YR 5/2 93 10 YR 4/4 7 C PL
S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑---III
LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�--I
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Feb 02 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 181 W3w
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.321364 Long:-77.995858 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Lumbee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland data pt for Wetland W3
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
✓❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -2
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -2
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 181 W3w
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Taxodium distichum
15 yes OBL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
10 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Acer rubrum
5 yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
5 yes FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
✓ 2 -Dominance Test is >50%
8.
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
10 = Total Cover
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Eupatorium capillifolium
20 yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Juncus effusus
15 yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Scirpus cyperinus
5 no OBL
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Lonicera japonica
2 N/A FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Point within clear-cut area. Woody vegetation limited. Limited ditching is present. Species
compositions indicates dry periods enough to support upland species.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 181 W3w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 2.5/1 100
Sic
6-17 7.5YR 2.5/1 100
CL
17-22 513 2.5/1 100
C massive, restrictive
22-30 7.5YR 2.5/1 100
SC
30-38 7.5YR 2.5/3 100
SC
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑---III
LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�--I
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Q✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: clay content and lack of structure
Depth (inches): 17
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Mar 07 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 180 W3u
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex - convex Slope (%): _4%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.321358 Long:-77.996201 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Kalmia loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent slopes (Winton) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Non-hydric data pt for Wetland W3. On toe of slope
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No water table observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 180 W3u
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Ligustrum sinense
30 yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Eupatorium capillifolium
75 FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Dichanthelium clandestinum
5 FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Cardamine hirsuta
5 FACU
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Point is in within cultivated field.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 180 W3u
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type
Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3
10 YR 2/1
100
SL
3-11
10 YR 4/4
90
10 YR 5/4 10 C
M
LS
11-17
10 YR 5/4
85
10 YR 5/3 10 D
PL
LS
--
--
--
10 YR 5/1 5 D
PL
17-22
10 YR 6/1
100
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �--I Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161) unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Mar 13 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 190 W4w
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave -concave Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.319853 Long:-77.990017 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Lumbee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland data pt for Wetland W4 in cultivated field. Point -25 feet from channel. Inundation has
eliminated vegetation from crops.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
✓❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -34
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -34
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Water table rising.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 190 W4w
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
= Total Cover
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
In cultivated field -vegetation absent due to inundation
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 190 W4w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 2.5/1 100
SCL
6-19 N 2.5/- 85 7.5YR 2.5/1 15 C M
C restrictive
19-36 N 4/- 90 7.5YR 4/4 10 C M
C massive, restrictive
36-41 10YR 4/1 100
SC
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑---III
LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 160A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ (MLRA 163B)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�--I
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 160A)
Q✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 160A, 160B)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 163C9 163D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: clay content and lack of structure
Depth (inches): 10
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
At 30 -41 old roots are present, likely from old stump. Auger refusal at 41 due to woody
material.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Jun 4 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 64 W4 nhy
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear - convex Slope (%): <2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.321668 Long:-77.988485 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dragston loamy sand NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Non-hydric data pt for Wetland W4
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -9
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -9
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 64 W4 nhy
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Glycine max
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
holoaical adaptations
Point in cultivated field.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
_
FAC species x 3 =
30 yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
El3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
20% of total cover:
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
25 yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
25 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
75 yes UPL
Hydrophytic
75 = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 64 W4 nhy
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-5 10 YR 3/3 100
SL
5-18 2.5 YR 2.5/1 85 7.5YR 3/4 15 C M
SC restrictive
18-25 10 YR 5/1 93 7.5YR 4/6 25 C PL
SC massive, restrictive
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑---III
LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�--I
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Jun 12 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 102 W4 nhy
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear - convex Slope (%): <2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.323556 Long:-77.991683 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Nahunta very fine sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Non-hydric data pt for Wetland W4
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -20
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -20
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 102 W4 nhy
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Glycine max
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
holoaical adaptations
Point in cultivated field.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
_
FAC species x 3 =
30 yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
El3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
20% of total cover:
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
25 yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
25 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
75 yes UPL
Hydrophytic
75 = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 102 W4 nhy
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type
Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6
10 YR 3/1
100
fSL
6-13
10 YR 4/1
75
7.5YR 4/6 25 C
M
SC massive, restrictive
13-23
10 YR 4/1
93
10 YR 3/3 7 C
PL
SL
23-27
10 YR 6/2
85
10 YR 5/4 15 C
PL
S
27-40
10 YR 5/2
100
LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �--I Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161) unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Mar 5 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 176A W5w
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.321466 Long:-77.994457 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Nahunta very fine sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Depressional area.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
✓❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -3
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -3
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Prior to start of growing season.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 176A W5w
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
90 yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Taxodium distichum
5 no OBL
Total Number of Dominant
3 Ulmus rubra
4 no FAC
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
99 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover: 20
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
II 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
= Total Cover
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
10 YES FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 = Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Point within clear-cut area. Woody vegetation limited
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 176A W5w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-5 N 2.5/- 100
fSL
5-14 N 2.5/- 100
C massive, very firm
14-19 N 4/- 70 N 2.5/- 30 C PL
C
19-26 N 2.5/- 100
SL many fine and med roots
26-34 2.5Y 3/3 100
SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑---III
LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�--I
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Mar 05 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 177 W5u
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear - convex Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.321660 Long:-77.994705 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Lumbee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Non-hydric data pt for Wetland W5
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 177 W5u
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Glycine max
NA
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Point is in within cultivated field.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 177 W5u
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-9 2.5 Y 3/1 100
SL
9-17 10 YR 3/4 60 2.5 Y 3/1 40 C M
SC v firm
17-24 7.5 YR 4/6 90 7.5 YR 3/1 10 D PL
SC
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑---III
LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�--I
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Feb 02 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 183 W7w
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.323324 Long:-77.996564 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Kalmia loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent slopes (Winton) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland data pt for Wetland W3
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑✓
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_❑✓
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
✓❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 183 W7w
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Ulmus rubra
90 yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Acer rubrum
10 no FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3 Quercus phellos
5 no FAC
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
105 = Total Cover
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
50% of total cover: 53
20% of total cover: 21
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
FAC species 105 x 3 = 315
1 Ligustrum sinense
10 Yes FACU
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
2
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 130 (A) 385 (B)
3
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.96
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.01
10 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Hibiscus moscheutos
5 Yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Juncus effusus
5 Yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Scirpus cyperinus
5 Yes OBL
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8
20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Smilax sp.
2 N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 183 W7w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 2/1 100 SL
9-15 10YR 2/1 100
15-19 N2.5/- 100 7.5YR 4/6 10
SC
C PL C massive, very firm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �--I Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Q✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161) unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: clay content and lack of structure
Depth (inches): 17
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Mar 07 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 182 W7w
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex - convex Slope (%): _5%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.323238 Long:-77.996747 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Kalmia loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent slopes (Winton) NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No x
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No x Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Non-hydric data pt for Wetland W7. On toe of slope above wetland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -9
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -9
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Shallow water table observed outside of growing season following wetter than normal period. Point
is in on toe of slope above wet floodplain. Slope and soil textures indicate that hydrology would not
be present during extended
periods during the growing season.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 182 W7w
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Rubus argutus
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Pueraria montana
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
holoaical adaptations
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
_
FAC species x 3 =
30 yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
El3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
30 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
20% of total cover:
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
25 yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
25 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
75 yes UPL
Hydrophytic
75 = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 182 W7w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 10 YR 3/2 100
SL
6-13 10 YR 5/4 95 10 YR 4/6 5 C PL
LS
13-20 10 YR 3/1 100
LS
20-27 10 YR 4/2 100
S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
TTT❑---III
LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
�--I
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Mar 07 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 184 W8w
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.323597 Long:-77.996077 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Lumbee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland data pt for Wetland W8
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑✓
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
✓❑
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 184 W8w
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Ulmus rubra
100 yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
10 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Diospyros virginiana
5 yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
✓ 2 -Dominance Test is >50%
8.
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
5 = Total Cover
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Scirpus cyperinus
55 yes OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Juncus effusus
5 no OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5 yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 = Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 184 W8w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 N 2.5/- 100 CL
2-10 N 2.5/- 100
10-22 N 2.5/- 98 2.5Y 3/1 2
Sic
C PL C massive, restrictive
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
0Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
(MLRA 153B)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) El
El
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Q✓ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161) unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: clay content and lack of structure
Depth (inches): 10
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Scarborough Mitigation Site City/County: Wayne Sampling Date: Mar 05 2019
Applicant/Owner: Water & Land Solutions State: NC Sampling Point: 185 W8u
Investigator(s): G Lankford Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear - linear Slope (%): 1-2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P and MLRA 133A Lat: 35.323620 Long:-77.996234 Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Lumbee sandy loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Non-hydric data pt for Wetland W8
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑
Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I --I Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
QSediment
Deposits (B2)❑-r
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El
Drift Deposits (B3)
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): -18
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 185 W8u
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
FAC species x 3 =
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
70 yes FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2 Rosa multiflora
10 no FACU
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
✓ 2 -Dominance Test is >50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.01
80 = Total Cover
Q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 40
20% of total cover: 16
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Dichanthelium clandestinum
5 yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Juncus effusus
2 yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
7 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4
20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20' radius )
1 Lonicera japonica
10 yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 = Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 185 W8u
ocument the indicator or confirm
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-12 7.5 YR 2/2 100 SL
12-20 7.5 YR 4/4 80 7.5 YR 3/1 20 D
PL SC v firm
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
.❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
TTT❑---III
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
.❑
.❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
H Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
.❑Stratified
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ (MLRA 15313)
Q
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �--I Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8) LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
.❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
.❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
.❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
.❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
.❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161) unless disturbed or problematic.
.❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
.❑ Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
.❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
.❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 or, &Pav�_)
Date: iZ 1?
ProjectlSite: �C�
Latitude: '�9/Iylsl/
Evaluator: =
County: €'
Longitude:-
Total Points:
Stream pet (circle one)
Other SE
Stream is at Least intermittent 0
Ephemera termitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name.
rf a 19 or erenniat if? 30'
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 0 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
r1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual �--
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = l5 sc" S )
0
12, Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
C10
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C No = D
Yes = 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = '.
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
D
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
, 0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =
0.75: OBL = 1.5 ther =
"perennial streams may also be identified using other meth ds. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: "U010/ o
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 iTT/ C"'")
Date: y
ProjectfSitw
Latitude: '/ /13 7)
Evaluator: �/
County: W4 NC
Longitude��C]'S r 5_
Total Points:
Stream is least intermittent
Stream Determination (c' )
Other
at
if z 19 or perennial it>_ 30* S
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = �L S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure. ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
A
1 1.5
10. Natural valley
0
775
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 2+ Q 1
12. Presence of Baseftow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
r?
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
CD
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C Rinlnnv (Suhtntal = / _ d 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthcs (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
C0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26, Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Pther =
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 4177A
Date:
ProjectlSite: a
� �/ Il
Latitude: /d
Evaluator:
County,
Longitude:-"
Total Points:
Stream Deterininatlp (circle one)
.n
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 7 L s
Ephemera termitt Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30" v� ,
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
SUOQ
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2j
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
ri
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
1 cl-7-1)2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1
10. Natural valley
o
5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R_ Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 6-4)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or plies
0
.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
i No = 0
Ye -
r_ Rinln!CF ihtntal = Z . cii 1
to
1B. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
D
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
rf
1
1.5
26, Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL -
1.5 Other =
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 ('41Tz)
Date: Z f
Project/Site: SGGrr�JodO
Latitude: $ S�
Evaluator: 7" [AV/ �L�
County:
Longitude:r27057-! 9
Total Points:
Stream Determination (ci
Other SEA
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or perennial if a 30' 0' 0
Ephemeral tntermitten erenni
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15. 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Str g
10 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thaiweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict fioodplain
0
1
C2D
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
01D,
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R_ Hydrology (Subtotal = Id ,15 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
(' Rinlnnv fSiihtntnl = H, .S 1
NV
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
clop
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.
Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 (�rr3
Date: ! l� ��
Project/Site: CdO
Latitude: 15�' Z03
Evaluator: K ����
County: mv&gLongitude:"
iS i sziti
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Se [, l
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if a 30'
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
w
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7, a )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
amhcial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = 9.0 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
_ 3
14, Leaf litter
1.5
CID
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = D
es :1,?
C. Biology Subtotal = ;-�'
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
4
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.
_
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: