20191209 Ver 2_PCN Form Submission_20191122

November 22, 2019
Washington Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Attention: Mr. Billy Standridge
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Application for Nationwide Permit No. 12/WQC No. 4133
PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, North Carolina
S&ME Project 7435-19-023
Dear Mr. Standridge and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) hereby submits this application
for impacts to Waters of the U.S. in accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12 and the
corresponding North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 4133. The proposed project will
involve installation of approximately 10.5 miles of 12-inch diameter natural gas transmission pipeline.
The application and accompanying support information is being submitted through the NCDWR E-PCN
website (httl2s://edocs.deq.nc.gov/Forms/Pre-Construction Notification FormU. The supporting
information submitted online consists of the following:
Figures: Site Vicinity Exhibit (Figure 1), N.C. USGS Topographic Map Exhibits (Figures 2- 3) and USDA
Soil Survey Exhibits (Figures 4-5).
Agent Authorization Form
Site Photographs
Impact Tables
Impact Drawings (Figures 6 through 33)
Typical Stream and Wetland Involvement Details
NCNHP Report and Agency Scoping Information
Mitigation Credit Availability Letter
Restoration Plan
Inadvertent Return Contingency Plan
S&ME, Inc. 19751 Southern Pine Boulevard I Charlotte, NC 28273 1 p 704.523.4726 1 f 704.525.3953 1 www.smeinc.com

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133
PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC
S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
Written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) is also required for
the proposed buffer impacts, and because the proposed project will not cross all stream channels at a
near perpendicular angle.
General Project Information
PNG is planning to relocate a segment of 12-inch dimeter steel natural gas transmission pipeline in
Beaufort and Martin Counties. The new pipeline will be installed within a new 50-foot wide cross-country
easement, and will originate at a tie-in on the north side of VOA Road in Beaufort County. The new
pipeline will then roughly parallel the west side of US Highway 17 at varying distances for approximately
10.5 miles. The new pipeline will end at a tie-in to the existing line near thejunction of US Highway 17 and
Mill Inn Road in Martin County
The purpose of the project is to accommodate the US Highway 17 widening project. The existing pipe is
currently located within the NCDOT right-of-way, and is in conflict with the widening project.
The general project location is depicted on the Site Vicinity Exhibit (Figure 1). The project vicinity consists
primarily of a mixture of agricultural and silvicultural areas with scattered residential development. The
project will cross multiple parcels. Of these, PNG has either acquired easement agreements or initiated
negotiation proceedings.
Approximately 62 percent of the project is located in the Chowan-Roanoke River watershed (HUC
03010107), while the remaining 38 percent is located in the Tar -Pamlico watershed (HUC 03020103).
Typical conditions within the project area include actively farmed corn, tobacco, cotton and soybean
fields, tracts used for rotational timber operations, mature hardwood and pine forest, and existing road
rights -of -way or maintained lawns. Several areas have been recently logged, or consist of habitat types in
varying successional stages.
Description of the Proposed Work
The relocated segment of pipe will be installed within a new 50-foot wide permanent easement. In
general, temporary workspace sufficient to provide a combined 75- to 100-foot wide construction
corridor will be utilized in high ground areas. The width of the combined temporary and permanent
easements will be reduced to 50 feet at wetland and stream crossings.
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries,
and other associated workspaces, etc. At the wetland crossing, efforts will be made to remove surface
vegetation in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the substrate and prevents exposure of soil. If
necessary, temporary equipment crossings will be installed along one side of the easement to facilitate
equipment passage, cross over streams, and prevent excessive rutting and ground disturbance in the
wetlands. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control (E&SC) measures will be installed as clearing
proceeds to prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features.
No grubbing or below -ground vegetation removal will occur within wetland areas or along stream banks,
except within the trench line or as needed for safety purposes, where stump removal or light grading may
be necessary to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably -level work surface. Within
the wetland area where extensive rutting or soil disturbance may occur, timber or composite mats will be
placed to provide work and travel space for equipment.

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary E&SC measures, the trench will be
excavated along the "non -working" side of the easement. The work will be performed from the timber
mats placed along the working side of the easement. In certain areas, including the wetland, efforts will be
made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil. If necessary, trench breakers (temporary barriers generally
constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be installed within the trench to slow the flow
of subsurface water.
Lengths of the new pipe will be trucked to the site from temporary storage yards, strung along the
easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). The pipe segments will be heat -welded together,
inspected, and then lowered into the trench. Permanent trench breakers will then be installed where
necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil and topsoil is required, the
topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by rough -grading and temporary
seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the
easement as closely as possible to pre -disturbance contours and conditions. All work within the wetland
and at stream crossings will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permit conditions. Best
Management Practices (BMPs) will be employed at all stream and wetland crossings to help prevent
siltation or inadvertent discharges to a Waters of the U.S.
At several locations, permanent vehicular access crossings will be installed in order to allow for future
access along the pipeline easement for maintenance. Two of these crossings will involve fill placement
within jurisdictional areas along the new permanent access roads. Culverts will be installed at these
crossings to allow for appropriate passage of high flows and will be buried in a manner to allow for
passage of aquatic organisms. At 12 additional locations along the proposed pipeline easement, 20-foot
long permanent culvert crossings will be installed adjacent to the pipeline within jurisdictional ditches or
streams in order allow access along the pipeline corridor.
Jurisdictional Areas
S&ME visited the project area on multiple occasions ranging from July to September 2019 to delineate
jurisdictional features located therein. S&ME followed the procedures set forth in the 1987 USACE
Wetlands Delineation Manual and the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regional Supplemental Guidance.
Field conditions were documented using USACE Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms, as
appropriate. The field review also included identification of tributaries (streams or jurisdictional ditches)
within the project area. Drainage features identified during the field review were assessed to determine
the jurisdictional status of the tributary. Drainage features were classified as either non jurisdictional or
jurisdictional. S&ME used the NCDWR Stream Classification Form to document characteristics of identified
drainage features on the day of the assessment. During the site visit, the boundaries of regulated surface
waters were demarcated using sequentially -numbered flagging. Typical photographs of some of the
subject features were included with the information submitted online.
Multiple jurisdictional features were identified within the proposed project area during the site visit.
Wetlands within the project corridor included pine/hardwood flats, headwater forests and bottomland
hardwood swamps. Streams consisted of a variety of natural and channelized features, a majority of which
exhibited perennial flow. For purposes of this application, non -stream tributaries are defined as drainage
ditches that were historically excavated in hydric soil, exhibited a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation
and evidence of active hydrology, but were not considered streams. Impacts to non -stream tributaries
were calculated on the basis of area (sf) rather than linear feet, and proposed mitigation for their losses
will be achieved via wetland credits.
3

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
Project -wide stream and wetland impacts are summarized in Table 1
Table 1: Summary of Proiect-wide Impacts to Iurisdictional Features
Temporary Wetland Impacts (Ac) I Forested Wetland Conversion (Ac) I Permanent Fill Placement (Ac)
0.106 1 4.591 1 0.185
Temporary (LF) Permanent (LF)
177 52
Stream and Wetland Impact Tables are also included with the information submitted online. A majority of
the proposed impacts will result from conversion. Minor permanent stream/wetland impacts associated
with the project will result from fill placement for construction of permanent access roads.
A mixture of horizontal directional drill (HDD) and conventional isolation/excavation pipe installation
methodologies are proposed for this project. In areas of conventional installation, the temporary stream
impacts will result from installation of a new pipeline and/or construction of a temporary equipment
crossing. Impacts to wetlands will result from conventional pipe installation.
Drawings depicting the location of each crossing (Figures 6-25), and typical wetland and stream
involvement details (Figures 1131-1138) are included with the information submitted online with the E-PCN.
Following construction, the temporarily affected jurisdictional areas will be returned to their pre -
construction grade and contour, seeded, and stabilized.
Protected Species
To assist you with determining the project's compliance with applicable sections of the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543), S&ME first reviewed the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP) database and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Raleigh Ecological Field Office
lists to identify occurrences of federally protected species that may be documented in Beaufort or Martin
Counties. The complete list of federally -protected species for these is summarized in Table 2 below.
Table 2: Federally Protected Species for Beaufort and Martin Counties
Scientific Name
Ha(ioeetus (eucocepha(us
Common Name
Bald Eagle
Federal
Status
BGPA
County Status
Beaufort Martin
Current/Current
Rana capito capito
Carolina Gopher Frog
ARS
Historic/None
Noturus furiosus
Carolina Madtom
ARS
None/Current
Orconectes virginiensis
Chowanoke Crayfish
ARS
No/Current
Che(onia mydas
Green Sea Turtle
T
Current/None
Lepidoche(ys kempii
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle
E
Current/None
Necturus (ewisi
Neuse River Waterdog
ARS
Current/Current
Myotis septentriona(is
Northern Long -Eared Bat
T
Current/Current
4

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
Scientific Name
Calidris canutus rufa
Common Name
Red Knot
Federal
Status
T
County Status
Beaufort Martin
Current/None
Canis rufus
Red Wolf
EXP
Current/Current
Picoides borealis
Red -cockaded
Woodpecker
E
Current/None
Trichechus manatus
West Indian Manatee
E
Current/None
Fusconaia masoni
Atlantic pigtoe
ARS
Current/Current
Alasmidonta heterodon
Dwarf Wedgemussel
E
Current/Current
Parvaspina steinstansona
Tar River Spinymussel
E
Current/Current
Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Rough -leaf Loosestrife
E
Current/None
Aeschynomene virginica
Sensitive Joint -vetch
T
Current/None
Dionaea muscipula
Venus Flytrap
ARS
Current/None
E = endangered; T = threatened; BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act; ARS = At Risk Species; EXP = experimental
population.
S&ME also conducted a review of the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) data explorer for records of
rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within one
mile of the project boundary. The NCNHP database report identified one occurrence of red wolf within
one mile of the project route. No other records relating to federally -protected species were identified by
the NCNHP report.
On June 10, 2019, S&ME provided project information to the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and the NC
Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) requesting that they review records that may have relating to rare,
endangered, or threatened species, protected/managed lands, conservation easements or high quality
natural communities within the vicinity of the project corridor, and provide recommendations and
comments.
The FWS responded with a June 27, 2019 letter stating that they believed the project is not likely to
adversely affect any federally listed threatened or endangered species, their formerly -designated critical
habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act, and that the requirements under section 7
of the Act are fulfilled. A copy of the June 27, 2019 FWS letter was included with the information
submitted online with the E-PCN. The WRC did not provide a response to S&ME's request for comment.
Based on pedestrian assessments conducted by S&ME, it was determined that the project corridor does
not contain suitable habitat for the following species: bald eagle, green sea turtle, Kemp's Ridley's sea
turtle, red cockaded woodpecker, West Indian manatee, rough -leaf loosestrife, sensitivejoint vetch and
Venus flytrap. None of the remaining terrestrial species were observed during S&ME's assessment.
Further, impacts to waterbodies of sufficient size to support the remaining aquatic species will be avoided
by use of HDD for pipe installation. Accordingly, results of our assessment support the FWS conclusion
that the project is not likely to affect any of the species identified in Table 2.
Descriptions of the federally -protected species obtained from USFWS species descriptions, or as noted
otherwise, are provided below.

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
Bald Eagle
Biological Determination: No Effect
Bald eagles were removed from the endangered species list in August 2007 because their populations
recovered sufficiently. However, bald and golden eagles are still protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty
Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Act (Eagle Act). The bald eagle is a large raptor with a
wingspan of approximately seven feet. Adult individuals of this species have a mainly dark brown plumage
with a solid white head and tail. Bald eagles develop adult plumage in the fifth or sixth year. Juveniles of
the species exhibit a chocolate brown to blackish plumage with occasional occurrences of white mottling
on the tail, belly, and under -wings. Bald eagle's primary diet consists of fish. However, it will feed on birds,
mammals, and turtles when fish are not available.
The bald eagle is associated with coasts, rivers, and lakes, usually nesting near large bodies of water where
it feeds. Nesting habitat in the Carolinas usually occurs in large pine trees along the edge of large bodies
of water. The bald eagle is listed as a current record for Beaufort County. The project corridor is not
located next to a large body of water, and accordingly, does not contain suitable habitat for bald eagle.
Green Sea Turtle
Biological Determination: No Effect
The green sea turtle is found offshore from Massachusetts south to Florida, but is also known from areas
outside the United States for both nesting and migration. Within the United States, nesting areas are
limited to Florida's east coast, where approximately 300 to 1,000 nests occur annually. In North Carolina,
the green sea turtle is limited to offshore areas. Feeding habitat in North Carolina may include shallow
inlet waters with an adequate food source of marine grass and algae.
The green sea turtle grows up to four feet in length and has a heart -shaped shell and flippers with one
claw. The plastron is white while the carapace is smooth and brownish with mottling.
The green sea turtle is not known to nest in North Carolina, and the project area does not contain suitable
habitat for this species.
Kemps Ridley Sea Turtle
Biological Determination: No Effect
Kemp's ridley sea turtle, considered the smallest marine turtle in the world, weigh on average around 100
pounds with a carapace measuring between 24-28 inches in length. The almost circular carapace has a
grayish -green color while the plastron (bottom shell) is pale yellowish to cream in color. The carapace is
often as wide as it is long and contains five pairs of costal "scutes". Each of the front flippers has one claw
while the back flippers may have one or two.
Female Kemp's ridleys nest from May to July, laying two to three clutches of approximately 100 eggs,
which incubate for 50-60 days. Adult Kemp's ridely sea turtles primarily occupy waters containing muddy
or sandy bottoms where prey can be found. Their diet consists mainly of swimming crabs, but may also
include fish, jellyfish, and an array of mollusks. Depending on their breeding strategy, male turtles appear
to occupy many different areas within the Gulf of Mexico. Some males migrate annually between feeding
and breeding grounds, yet others may not migrate at all, mating with females opportunistically
encountered. Female Kemp's have been tracked migrating to and from nesting beaches in Mexico.
Females leave breeding and nesting areas and continue on to foraging zones ranging from the Yucatan
Peninsula to southern Florida.
I.

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
The project area does not contain suitable habitat for this species.
Northern Long Eared Bat
Biological Determination: May Affect Not Likely to Adversely Affect
The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is a medium-sized bat about 3 to 3.7 inches in length but with a
wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. As its name suggests, this bat is distinguished by its long ears, particularly as
compared to other bats in its genus, Myotis, which are actually bats noted for their small ears (Myotis
means mouse -eared).
During summer, the bats roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live
and dead trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and
mines. This bat seems opportunistic in selecting roosts, using tree species based on suitability to retain
bark or provide cavities or crevices. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and
sheds. NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula. They typically use large
caves or mines with large passages and entrances; constant temperatures; and high humidity with no air
currents. Specific areas where they hibernate have very high humidity, so much so that droplets of water
are often seen on their fur. Within hibernacula, surveyors find them in small crevices or cracks, often with
only the nose and ears visible.
The project area is located within NLEB range, but not within .25 mile or a "red HUC." The project will
involve tree clearing, and may involve percussive activities. However, based on informal agency
coordination, we concur with the June 27, 2019 letter from FWS which stated that the project is not likely
to adversely affect any federally listed threatened or endangered species.
Red Knot
Biological Determination: No Effect
The red knot is a medium-sized shorebird with a small head and eyes, a short neck and a slightly tapering
bill that is no longer than its head. It has short dark legs and a medium thin dark bill. The winter, or basic,
plumage becomes uniformly pale grey, and is similar between the sexes. The alternate, or breeding,
plumage is mottled grey on top with a cinnamon face, throat and breast and light-colored rear belly. The
alternate plumage of females is similar to that of the male except it is slightly lighter and the eye -line is
less distinct.
It makes one of the longest yearly migrations of any bird, traveling 15,000 km (9,300 mi) from its Arctic
breeding grounds to Tierra del Fuego in southern South America. Red know breeds in drier tundra areas,
such as sparsely vegetated hillsides. Outside of breeding season, it is found primarily in intertidal, marine
habitats, especially near coastal inlets, estuaries, and bays. Because the project area does not consist of an
estuary or bay, the proposed project should not affect this species.
Source: Baker, Allan; Gonzalez, Patricia; Morrison, R.I.G.; Harrington, Brian A. (2013). Poole, A., ed. "Red
Knot (Colidris conutus)". The Birds of North America Online. Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Biological Determination: No Effect
Red -cockaded woodpecker measures approximately seven inches long and have black and white
horizontal stripes on its back. The cheeks and underparts are white and the sides are streaked in black.
The cap and stripe on the throat and neck of the bird are black. Male individuals of the species have a

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
small red spot on each side of the black cap and display a red crown patch after the first post -fledgling
molt. The woodpecker's diet consists primarily of insects.
Red -cockaded woodpecker's range is closely linked to the distribution of mature stands of southern pines.
Longleaf and loblolly pines that are 60 years old or greater are most commonly selected for nesting and
roosting trees. The woodpecker excavates nest and roost cavities in trees that are stressed, and often are
infected with red -heart rot fungus. Preferred nesting sites generally include relatively open, park -like,
mature pine stands with a suppressed mid -story layer. Suppression of the mid -story by fire or mechanical
means in mature pine stands promotes colonization by the red -cockaded woodpecker. Foraging habitat is
frequently limited to pine or pine -hardwood stands that are 30 years old or greater with a preference for
pine trees with a diameter of 10 inches or larger. Dense hardwood mid -story hampers foraging by red -
cockaded woodpecker and increases the occurrence of cavity competitors. The USFWS indicates that the
maximum foraging radius from a colony site for red -cockaded woodpecker's is typically one-half mile or
less.
The project area was visually assessed for the presence of potential red -cockaded woodpecker foraging
and nesting habitat during July -August 2019. No suitable nesting habitat was observed within or adjacent
to the project area. Forested portions of the project area that contained pines exhibited a dense
understory. Given the lack of suitable habitat within the project area, the red -cockaded woodpecker
should not be affected as a result of this project.
West Indian Manatee
Biological Determination: No Effect
The West Indian manatee is a large marine mammal reaching approximately 10 feet in length. The front
limbs are flipper -like, there are no rear limbs, and the tail is rounded, flat, and paddle -like. Manatees are
gray or brown in color with a rounded head and whiskers around the mouth.
Manatees are generally seen in North Carolina passing through only during the summer months for
feeding. They are most common on the Florida Gulf Coast, where year-round warm water temperatures
provide more suitable habitat.
The pipeline will be installed beneath all named waterbodies by HDD methods to avoid impacts.
Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to affect this species.
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Biological Determination: No Effect
The dwarf wedgemussel is a small bivalve mussel which rarely exceeds 1.75 inches in length. Young shells
are greenish -brown with green rays. As the mussel ages, the shell color becomes obscured by algae or
mineral deposits and appears brown or black. The anterior end is rounded while the posterior end is
angular and forms a point. The nacre is bluish -white. The most distinctive shell character is the
arrangement of the lateral teeth. There are two lateral teeth in the right valve and one in the left valve.
Their foot and other organs are white. This species is a generalist in terms of habitat. It has been identified
in small streams less than 15 feet to large rivers and can be found in a variety of substrates including
gravel, clay, sand, and pebble. It usually inhabits hydrologically stable areas such as the shallow water
along streambanks and under root mats. Threats to this species include riparian disturbance, pollution,
sedimentation, impoundments, artificial flow regimes, and stream fragmentation. Toxic effects from
industrial, domestic, and agricultural pollution are the primary threats to this species.
R

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
Although the project area contains potentially suitable habitat for this species, impacts to all such
waterbodies will be avoided by use of HDD.
Tar River Spinymussel
Biological Determination: No Effect
The Tar River spinymussel is a freshwater mussel approximately 2.4 inches long. The shell is rhomboid -
shaped with zero to six spines on each valve. Juveniles can have up to 12 spines, although adults tend to
lose their spines as they mature. The shell is smooth and shiny with concentric rings and ends in a blunt
point. Young individuals have an orange -brown shell with green rays while adults are older with less
distinct rays. One to three small ridges run on the interior surface of the shell extending from the beak
cavity to the lower ventral area of the shell. The anterior half of the shell's inner surface is salmon -colored
and the posterior half is iridescent blue. The Tar River spinymussel prefers relatively silt -free, non -
compacted gravel and/ or coarse sand in fast -flowing, well oxygenated streams. The primary threats to
this species appear to be stream impacts associated with the loss of forested lands and forested riparian
buffers, and poorly controlled stormwater runoff of silt and other pollutants from forestry and agricultural
activities, development activities, and road construction, operation, and maintenance.
Streams within the project corridor do not exhibit characteristics consistent with habitat for Tar River
spineymussel, and impacts to all named waterbodies will be avoided by use of HDD.
Sensitive Joint Vetch
Biological Determination: No Effect
Sensitive joint -vetch is an annual plant in the pea family (Fabaceae) that is native to the eastern United
States. Plants typically attain heights of 3.3 — 6.6 feet in a single growing season, although they can grow
as tall as 7.8 feet. The stems are single, sometimes branching near the top, and with stiff or bristly hairs.
The leaves are even -pinnate, 0.8 — 4.7 inches long, with entire, gland -dotted leaflets. Each leaf consists of
30 to 56 leaflets that fold slightly when touched. The yellow, irregular flowers are 0.4 — 0.6 inches across,
streaked with red, and grow in racemes. The fruit is a loment with 4 to 10 one -seeded segments, turning
dark brown when ripe. The plant flowers from July through September and occasionally into October.
Sensitive joint -vetch typically grows in the intertidal zone of coastal marshes where plants are flooded
twice daily. The species seems to prefer the marsh edge at an elevation near the upper limit of tidal
fluctuation. In North Carolina, Sensitive joint -vetch is most often found in roadside ditches, often with
some connection to nearby brackish marshes.
The project corridor does not contain suitable habitat for sensitivejoint vetch.
Historic and Archaeological Resources
To assist in your determination of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) of 1966, S&ME submitted a scoping letter to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) on June 4, 2019. The SHPO responded with a July 16, 2019 letter recommending that
comprehensive archaeological and architectural surveys of the route be performed. Accordingly, S&ME
completed both surveys and presented results to SHPO in separate 2019 reports.

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
Fieldwork was conducted in August and September, 2019. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for direct
effects to aboveground resources for the proposed project consists of the proposed pipeline corridor and
access roads, and properties adjacent to the proposed corridor and access roads.
As a result of the archaeological investigations, eight sites (31 BF442 through 31 BF444 and 31 MT212
through 31 MT216) and one cemetery (31 MT217, Mason/Rogers Family Cemetery) were identified. The
eight archaeological sites are recommended not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP). The cemetery is associated with NRHP-eligible resource MT0653 (Woolard -Perry House);
although the cemetery itself is not eligible for inclusion in the NRHP, it is a contributing element to the
significance of MT0653 and will be avoided by ground disturbing activities.
As a result of the Historic Structure survey, eight previously recorded aboveground resources were
revisited, and eight previously unrecorded structures were identified. Three of the previously recorded
structures (BF1609, MT0298, and MT0653) are eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. The Thad Hodges House
(BF1609) is adjacent to the proposed pipeline corridor, but the corridor does not cross its NRHP boundary;
therefore, the proposed pipeline will have no effect on the Thad Hodges House. Griffin's Hatchery
(MT0298) is located adjacent to a proposed access road; however, since the proposed access road is an
existing dirt road, use of the road for construction traffic will not adversely affect Griffin's Hatchery. The
Woolard -Perry House (MT0653) has an NRHP boundary that encompasses the 43-acre tax parcel on which
the house sits. Although the proposed pipeline corridor passes through the NRHP boundary for the
Woolard -Perry House, it will be located approximately 810 feet from the house structure, and will not
adversely affect the Woolard -Perry House, as the pipeline will be buried and the site returned to original
contours.
Based on the results of the surveys, the proposed project will have no adverse effect on National Register
listed or eligible resources along its current proposed route, and S&ME recommended that no additional
cultural resources work is necessary. SHPO responded to the report with a November 4, 2019 letter
concurring with our findings. The November 4, 2019 SHPO correspondence is included with the
information submitted online with the E-PCN.
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed easement was routed to avoid wetlands and streams and utilizing areas that have been
previously developed (agricultural land) where practicable. Impacts to significant streams and adjacent
wetland areas will be avoided by use of HDD.
PNG will reduce the width of the work area to 50 feet at wetland/stream crossings. Given the size of the
proposed pipe, this represents the minimum amount of workspace necessary to adequately and safely
accommodate the following elements, all of which are necessary within that space: Installation of silt fence
or other erosion control devices, along with appropriate offsets within the boundaries of the easement;
placement of timber mats or equipment bridges for the travel lane in such a manner that allows sufficient
boom and dipper arm swing radius of excavation and pipe -lowering equipment; trench excavation and
sloping to a width and depth necessary to accommodate placement of the new pipe and avoid cave-ins
or undermine adjacent equipment work space in wet or saturated soils, and; space for temporary
placement and separate stockpiling of topsoil and subsoil. To further minimize impacts, PNG will limit the
width of the permanently maintained corridor to 30 feet through wetland areas that are crossed by HDD.
10

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
At the proposed stream crossings, dam and pumps or flume systems will be used to divert clean water
flow around the work area until the crossing is completed. Once work affecting streams or wetlands is
initiated, it will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance.
Typical details for a dam and pump and flume methodology for isolation of the trench excavation were
included in the information submitted online with the E-PCN.
Project BMPs used in connection with conventional isolation methodology include the following:
Crossings will be executed in as minimal amount of time necessary.
Sufficient equipment to execute the crossing in an expeditious, environmentally responsible manner
will be available on site prior to initiation of the crossing.
Efforts will be made to perform crossings will be conducted during anticipated low flow conditions.
Local weather conditions will be monitored such that, to the extent possible, stormwater events will
be avoided during and immediately following installation of the pipe.
The crossings will be monitored during installation by personnel experienced in stream and wetland
crossing procedures, familiar with site conditions, and knowledgeable of North Carolina
environmental regulations. The monitor shall have the authority to stop work should conditions
change and additional or different measures be needed. This professional will be on -site from the
initiation (preparatory stages) through to the completion (e.g. implementation of the restoration
plan).
Sufficient qualified staffing will be maintained for the project duration such that compliance
monitoring activities associated with pipeline installation in other locations do not take precedence
over crossings.
The upstream and downstream crossing points will be sealed to isolate the crossing for pipeline
installation "in the dry." Clean steel plates, sand bags, or similar measures will be inserted to
temporarily dam the flow. Steel plates will be cleaned prior to use on streams using biodegradable
products or heat. On both sides of the installed plates (both upstream and downstream) sandbags will
additionally be placed to secure the plates, reinforce the damming of water, and provide a secondary
barrier to seepage. The excavated trench will be monitored for groundwater intrusion and, if noted,
excess water will be pumped to a discharge site located 50'-100' from the top of bank of the receiving
stream. Discharged water from the trench will be filtered through an appropriate E&SC measure.
Where possible, the top 6-12 inches of streambed substrate will be stockpiled separately from the
subgrade material and kept saturated during the installation.
Pumps will be obtained and staged prior to executing the crossing. Back-up pumps shall be kept on -
site should the primary pump(s) malfunction, or to control high flows. All pumps will have screened
intakes and will be placed in secondary -containment for the duration of the installation. In the event
an unforeseen weather event occurs during installation, pumps near the crossing will be monitored
24-hours a day until normal flow conditions are present.
Pump flow rates will be monitored to ensure adequate flow is achieved such that water neither
accumulates behind the upstream dam nor is discharged too rapidly on the downstream side. At the
downstream discharge location, flow discharge rates shall be controlled such that scouring of the
stream bed and/or banks does not occur. Efforts will be made to aerate the water prior to its
downstream discharge into the receiving stream.
Removal of in -stream control devices will be conducted in such a manner as to allow a gradual re-
introduction of flowing water into the channel.
Banks will be restored in a careful manner, achieving pre -construction contours to the extent practical.
11

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133
PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
A cover crop and specialized riparian seed mix will be applied for the length of banks disturbed by the
crossing. Coir matting with appropriate shear strength will additionally be installed to anchor the
seeding and the banks.
Stream crossings will be monitored for stability following construction and for the duration of the
pipeline construction. Restoration will be considered complete when herbaceous vegetation reaches
80-percent coverage.
All disturbed areas within wetlands or on stream banks will be seeded with a customized seed mix
that will extend 10-feet landward of the jurisdictional boundary. Stream banks temporarily affected by
trenching or placement of equipment bridges will be stabilized with a native seed mix specifically
designed for riparian areas, and with biodegradable coir matting. Affected wetland areas will be
seeded with a native wetland seed mix; however, no heavy mulching will occur within wetlands.
Construction equipment operating near streams and the wetland areas will be limited to that
necessary for excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities. Vegetation near the streams will
be cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to promote re -growth.
Appropriate E&SC practices outlined in the most recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and
Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" and approved by the local governing authority shall be in
compliance with specifications governing the proper design, installation, operation, and maintenance of
such BMPs to comply with the appropriate turbidity water quality standard.
The project will comply with applicable conditions of NWP No. 12 and WQC No. 4133, except as noted.
Following the work, the affected areas will be restored to their original grade and contour. As proposed,
the project will not result in permanent changes to the ground surface elevation(s) in the proposed
easement or permanently affect the dimension, pattern, or profile of the subject streams. Temporarily
affected areas are proposed to be restored in accordance with the attached Restoration Plan (submitted
online with the E-PCN) following completion of the work.
Mitigation
Wetlands
Project -wide, a majority of the impacts to jurisdictional areas will not result in a loss of waters of the US.
The project will convert forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands (see Wetland Impact Table). Based on
prior USACE coordination, the required mitigation for wetland conversion can be satisfied at a 1:1 ratio.
Impacts associated with the permanent access road crossing is required at a 2:1 ratio. Private mitigation
banks in the appropriate watersheds have not been established or do not have the necessary credit
available at the time this PCN was prepared. Therefore, PNG plans to purchase the required amount of
credit from NC Division of Mitigation Services (NC DMS) in the appropriate basin, as indicated below.
Table 3. Required Wetland Miti
Chowan-Roanoke
03010107
Conversion
2.503
1x1
2.503
Fill Placement
0.168
2x1
0.336
Tar -Pamlico
03020103
Conversion
2.088
1x1
2.088
Fill Placement
0.016
2X1
0.032
Total Required Credit:
4.959
12

Application for NWP No. 12/WQC No. 4133 PNG Line 204 Relocation
Beaufort and Martin Counties, NC S&ME Project No. 7335-19-023
Streams
Less than 150 linear feet of the proposed project stream impacts are permanent (see Stream Impact
Table). Further, it is our understanding that stream impacts authorized under NWP 12 are considered
temporary if the affected streams are restored to original pre -construction contours once construction is
completed, and do not involve the permanent placement of hard armor. A general stream and wetland
restoration plan was provided with the information submitted online with the E-PCN. Accordingly, we do
not anticipate that purchase of stream mitigation credit will be required.
Riparian Buffers
The project will require mitigation for impacts to Zone 1 of the buffer (see Riparian Buffer Impact Table).
However, because areas within Zone 2 that are impacted will be restored and maintained with grass and
herbaceous vegetation, mitigation is not required. The amount of "mitigatable" buffer was determined
using the Table of Uses included in the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Rules, and subtracting the amount of wetland
area from the affected buffer, per NCDWR regulations.
DENC plans to purchase the required amount of mitigation credit from NC DMS as indicated below.
Table 4. Reauired Rivarian Buffer Miti
Tar -Pamlico 03020103
30,525
An acceptance letter from DMS is included with the information submitted online with the E-PCN.
Closing
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written concurrence with this
NWP No. 12 / WQC No. 4133 permit application. If you have questions or need additional information,
please feel free to contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME
Joey awler, PWS
Natural Resources Project Manager
[e-mail]
Senior Review by Jason S. Reeves, PE, Principal Engineer
Cc Alicia DePalma - Duke Energy
Keith Gualtieri, PE, — ELI
Suzanne Herring, PE, CPESC - ELI
13

DWR
mrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20191209
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Washington Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
PING Line 204 Relocation
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Joey Lawler
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
11 /22/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Dog Branch, Ready Branch, Gum Swamp and multiple unnamed tributaries
Basin
Roanoke; Tar -Pamlico
Water Classification
Gum Swamp is C;Sw,NSW ; all others are C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.731039-77.077810
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Beaufort
Martin
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Version#*
2
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Robert Tankard:eads\rbtankard
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
L.1

W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
12 - Utility Lines
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F- 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
P Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
PNG Line 204 Relocation Acceptance Letter.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r- No
1i. Is the project located within a INC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
11. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
CS Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
F Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
See Property Owner List
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Responsible party:
Piedmont Natural Gas
2d.Address
Street Address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Address Line 2
city
Charlotte
Fbstal / Zip Code
28054
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Rmince / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
88.8KB
r- Yes r No
r Yes r No

3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Kelsey Pace
3b. Business Name:
Piedmont Natural Gas
3c.Address
Street Address
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Address Une 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28054
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
.bey Lawler, PWS
4b. Business Name:
S&ME, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
9751 Southern Pine Blvd
Address Une 2
city
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Ode
28273
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Aggent Authorization Letter*
Signed Agent Form.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Williamston
2. Project Identification
State / Rmince / I3gion
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Rmince / Rion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
See Property Owner List
—90
2c. Project Address
Street Address
West of US Highway 17
Address Une 2
City
State / Rmince / Rion
Williamston
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
27892
Beaufort and Martin
128.72KB
3. Surface Waters

3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Dog Branch, Ready Branch, Gum Swamp and multiple unnamed tributaries
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
Gum Swamp is C;Sw,NSW ; all others are C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Roanoke
Tar -Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
03010107 and 03020103
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project vicinity consists primarily of a mixture of agricultural and silvicultural areas with scattered residential development. The project will cross multiple parcels. Of these, PING has
either acquired easement agreements or initiated negotiation proceedings.
Typical conditions within the project area include actively farmed corn, tobacco, cotton and soybean fields, tracts used for rotational timber operations, mature hardwood and pine
forest, and existing road rights -of -way or maintained lawns. Several areas have been recently logged, or consist of habitat types in varying successional stages.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
02-03_TOPO_NW IREV.pdf
2.63MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
04-05_soils.pdf 1.15MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
5.0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
353
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
PING is planning to relocate a 12-inch diameter segment of steel natural gas transmission pipeline in Beaufort and Martin Counties in order to accomodate the US Highway 17 widening
project. PNG's existing pipe is currently located within the NCDOT right-of-way. The new pipeline will be installed within a new 50-foot wide cross-country easement, and will originate at
a tie-in on the north side of VOA Road in Beaufort County. The new pipeline will then roughly parallel the west side of US Highway 17 at varying distances for approximately 10.5 miles.
The new pipeline will end at a tie-in to the existing line near the junction of US Highway 17 and Mill Inn Road in Martin County, where it will no longer be in conflict with the NCDOT
project.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The relocated segment of 12-inch diameter pipe will be installed by industry -standard earth moving equipment within a new50-foot wide permanent easement. In general, temporary
workspace sufficient to provide a combined 75- to 100-foot wide construction corridor will be utilized in high ground areas. The width of the combined temporary and permanent
easements will be reduced to 50 feet at wetland and stream crossings.
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries, and other associated workspaces, etc. At the wetland crossing, efforts will be
made to remove surface vegetation in a manner that minimizes disturbance of the substrate and prevents exposure of soil. If necessary, temporary equipment crossings will be installed
along one side of the easement to facilitate equipment passage, cross over streams, and prevent excessive rutting and ground disturbance in the wetlands. Appropriate erosion and
sedimentation control (E&SC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features.
No grubbing or below -ground vegetation removal will occur within wetland areas or along stream banks, except within the trench line or as needed for safety purposes, where stump
removal or light grading may be necessary to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably -level work surface. Within the wetland area where extensive rutting or soil
disturbance may occur, timber or composite mats will be placed to provide work and travel space for equipment.
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary E&SC measures, the trench will be excavated along the "non -working" side of the easement. The work will be
performed from the timber mats placed along the working side of the easement. In certain areas, including the wetland, efforts will be made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil. If
necessary, trench breakers (temporary barriers generally constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be installed within the trench to slowthe flowof subsurface water.
Lengths of the new pipe will be trucked to the site from temporary storage yards, strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). The pipe segments will be heat -
welded together, inspected, and then lowered into the trench. Permanent trench breakers will then be installed where necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of
the subsoil and topsoil is required, the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by rough -grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final
grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the easement as closely as possible to pre -disturbance contours and conditions. All work within the wetland and at stream
crossings will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permit conditions. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be employed at all stream and wetland crossings to help
prevent siltation or inadvertent discharges to a Waters of the U.S.
At several locations, permanent vehicular access crossings will be installed in order to allowfor future access along the pipeline easement for maintenance. Two of these crossings will
involve fill placement within jurisdictional areas along the new permanent access roads. Culverts will be installed at these crossings to allowfor appropriate passage of high flows and will
be buried in a manner to allow for passage of aquatic organisms. At 12 additional locations along the proposed pipeline easement, 20-foot long permanent culvert crossings will be
installed adjacent to the pipeline within jurisdictional ditches or streams in order allow access along the pipeline corridor.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Typical-Details.pdf 1.97MB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
r No
O Unknown
Comments:

A Request for Pre -JD was provided on 09.16.2019. The USACE has reviewed the delineation in the
field but has not provided a Pre -JD Letter.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown f N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Joey Lawler, PWS and Walter Cole, LSS
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME, Inc.
Other:
Mt. Jurisdictional determination upload
Pre -JD Request.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
243.88KB
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
N/A
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries m Buffers
r Open Waters F Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
f��
2a1 Reason M 2b. Impact type * (') 2c. Type of W.2d. W. name 2e.Forested* 2f.Typeof 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
WA-JD28
Utility Line
P
h1CWAM TYPES
See Table
Yes
Both
4.776
(acres)
WA-JD28
Utility Line
T
NCWAM TYPES
See Table
Yes
Both
0.185
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.185 4.776
2g. Total Wetland Impact
4.961
2h. Comments:
Please see Wetland Impact Table for breakdown of permanent/temporary impacts by feature.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* �3�name* ��3e. Stream Type* 3f. Type of F��
3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*
81
Utility Line
Permanent
Culvert
See Table
Perennial
Both
6Average (feet)
5Qi earfee )
$2
Utility Line
Temporary
Other
See Table
Perennial
Both
Average (feet)
177
(linearfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
52 177
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
229
3j. Comments:

Please see Stream Impact Table for breakdown of permanent/temporary impacts by feature.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
r Neuse
r Catawba
r Goose Creek
r Other
I7 Tar -Pamlico
r Randleman
r Jordan Lake
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact
Allowable and Allowable w/Mitigation
P
B1-B6
Yes
19,578
17,180
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Zone 1 Zone 2
Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total Permanent impacts: 19,578.00
17,180.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 19,578.00
17,180.00
61. Comments:
Please see Buffer Impact Table for breakdown by site and for required mitigation calculations. After subtracting wetland area from the buffers and
applying the appropriate multiplier (x3), 30,525 sf of riparian buffer mitigation is required.
Supporting Documentation
Buffer Call Approval Letter.pdf 923.34KB
26-27_buffercrossings.pdf 3.45MB
28-33_bufferlMPACTS.pdf 2.2MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed easement was routed to avoid wetlands and streams and utilizing areas that have been previously developed (agricultural land) where
practicable. Impacts to significant streams and adjacent wetland areas will be avoided by use of HDD.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
PNG will reduce the width of the work area to 50 feet at wetland/stream crossings. Given the size of the proposed pipe, this represents the minimum
amount of workspace necessary to adequately and safely accommodate the following elements, all of Mich are necessary within that space:
Installation of silt fence or other erosion control devices, along with appropriate offsets Within the boundaries of the easement; placement of timber
mats or equipment bridges for the travel lane in such a manner that allows sufficient boom and dipper arm swing radius of excavation and pipe -
lowering equipment; trench excavation and sloping to a width and depth necessary to accommodate placement of the new pipe and avoid cave-ins or
undermine adjacent equipment work space in wet or saturated soils, and; space for temporary placement and separate stockpiling of topsoil and
subsoil. To further minimize impacts, PNG Will limit the width of the permanently maintained corridor to 30 feet through wetland areas that are crossed
by HDD.
At the proposed stream crossings, dam and pumps or flume systems will be used to divert clean water flowaround the work area until the crossing is
completed. Once work affecting streams or wetlands is initiated, it will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of
disturbance. Additional measures are described in the attached cover letter.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
W DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
r Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.

r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
0
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
30,525
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0
4h. Comments
See Acceptance Letter
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4.95
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more
information.
r Yes r- No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact.
r7Reason for impact
6d. Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e. Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
See Buffer Impact Table
0
Zone 2 See Buffer Impact Table
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
30,525
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
r Yes r No
6h. Attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
PING Line 204 Relocation Acceptance Letter.pdf 88.8KB
6j. Comments:
See Buffer Impact Table for calculations regarding required mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
0
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SMNT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
9 Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r- Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information

1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15ANCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project is intended to relocate a segment of exiting pipe.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
FWS and NC Natural Heritage Data - see cover letter for additional information.
Consultation Documentation Upload
FWS Response - Line 204.pdf 181.2KB
NCNHP_Report.pdf 789.16KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NMFS Mapper online utility
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No

7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC SHPO - see cover letter for additional information.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
ER 19-1880 -- archaeology.pdf 124.94KB
ER 19-1880 -- architecture.pdf 122.35KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r. No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Project will comply with applicable floodplain encroachment requirements.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
NC Flood Mapper online utility
Miscellaneous
Comments
Please see cover letter and attached supporting information
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
01_vicinityREV.pdf
949.4KB
06_25_impacts.pdf
37.65MB
HDD Drilling Fluid Contingency Plan_071218.pdf
90.94KB
Restoration Plan.doc.pdf
121.39KB
Site_Photos.pdf
507.08KB
Buffer Impact Table.pdf
110.71 KB
Stream Impact Table.pdf
132.53KB
Wetland Impact Table.pdf
111.4KB
Property_Owner_List.pdf
75.49KB
CoverLetter.pdf
265.39KB
Signature
*
fJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Joey Lawler
Signature
,7-vOYLAWLAf -
Date
11/22/2019

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Date -
"en Information
S&ME Project Name: PNG Line 204 Relocation
Type of Project: Natura Gas Transmission Line Relocation
Locati n: Beau tort a-ld Martin Counties, NC
-rupeity urrtirirrero rtaV i i i iu r i rsauun
Owner Name: Piedmont Natural Gas
Mail inig Address: 4720 Piedmont Rcy.v Drive
City. State. Zip Code: Charlotte, NC 2 054
i el ephflne No. 744.73l A 705
Contact: Kelsey Pace ([e-mail])
I4gent Inrormatron
Business Name:
Street Add ress
City, Stakes Zip
Telephone Na
Contact:
S&M E, Inc.
97S1 5outhem Rine Blvd
Charlotte. NC 28273
7104-523.4726
Joey Latimer, PWS ? Walter Cole, L5S
Autharixatiarr: I, e!� Fe� , herebyauthrorize S&ME. Inc. to
submit information to and coordinate vAth the US Army C*rps *f Engineers
(USACE) andfcr the NC Division of Environmental Quality (NCDE-Q) and other
relevant Federal/State/Local agencies pursuant to obtaining nrecessary
environmental permits for the project referenced above. If applicable, this also
authorizes the USACE/ICDECt to access the proposed easEment for the
purposes of conducting site a ssessment{corrfirming the accuracy of delineated
boundaries.
Kelsey Pace I�r iOlx sigr1e-d be Kelsryp Pao`
Signature: LWL-.2DI9.MLD7 11:1MI -NOD'
S& MI E INC I97S1 Scud herr. pine Blvd ) p 704.5214726 f 744.52S.39&3 � wwKsmeim.Dwn

COUNTY
PARCEL_ID
MAP -BLOCK-
OWNER -NAME
ADDITIONAL
MAILING
CITY
STATE
ZIP -CODE
Martin
400045
5763-97-7658
EDWARDS, JULIE
ANNE ETALS
POWELL, REBECCA
LYNN
107 CAMELIA WAY
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Martin
400046
5773-26-4931
EDWARDS, JULIE
ANNE ETALS
POWELL, REBECCA
LYNN
107 CAMELIA WAY
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Martin
400047
5772-06-5069
HARRISON, JEFFREY W
HARRISON,
CHRISTIE C
3115 SWEET HOME
RD
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8534
Martin
400075
5772-09-1602
BEACHAM, CARL LEE
JR ETALS
PRETTYMAN, MILLIE
B
4634 JOE MOBLEY
RD
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8514
Martin
400095
5773-08-2803
COLTRAIN, DORIS
HARDISON ESTATE
110 S HAUGHTON
ST
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-2312
Martin
400192
5762-95-8194
BEACHAM, CARL L JR
BEACHAM, DALICE
4634 JOE MOBLEY
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8514
Martin
400232
5772-03-3950
GRIFFIN, JOSEPH S
9584 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8522
Martin
400275
5771-15-0456
BEACHAM, BETTY G
533 CRESTLINE
GREENVILLE
NC
27834
Martin
400299
5773-12-8369
HARRISON, JOSEPH W
HEIRS
1090 FOREST DR
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Martin
400394
5763-86-9406
KEEL, EDNA H
7156 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-7954
Martin
400501
5763-85-7184
LILLEY, MARY P
300 CEDAR LN
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-2907
Martin
400543
5773-01-2320
REVELS, MARIE BAKER
400 OAK RIDGE DR
EDENTON
NC
27932-9253
Martin
400677
5771-09-4178
HARRISON, JACKIE
ANDERS
HARRISON, LINDA
JEAN W
10550 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Martin
400678
5762-97-1368
WEYERHAEUSER
COMPANY
C/O
WEYERHAEUSER
DALE WILKINS
BRUNSWICK
GA
31525
Martin
400766
5772-08-2112
ROGERSON, BUD
ONEAL
8325 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Martin
400842
5774-11-3223
HARRISON, MINNIE
ANGE
1090 FOREST DR
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Martin
400849
5774-22-0972
GRIFFIN, JOSEPH S
9584 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8522
Martin
400880
5773-03-3493
MACEDONIA
1 CHRISTIAN CHURCH
7640 US HIGHWAY
17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-7956
Martin
400941
5774-33-0461
SETH & RACHEL PERRY
1 FARMS LLC
10750 NC 171
JAMESVILLE
NC
27846

COUNTY
PARCEL_ID
MAP -BLOCK-
OWNER -NAME
ADDITIONAL
MAILING
CITY
STATE
ZIP -CODE
Martin
400974
5772-02-5506
HARRISON, JACKIE
ANDERS
HARRISON, LINDA
JEAN W
10550 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Martin
400975
5772-01-5864
WARD, JAMES D
WARD, ELIZABETH
9831 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8523
Martin
401100
5774-01-7737
SETH & RACHEL PERRY
FARMS LLC
10750 NC 171
JAMESVILLE
NC
27846
Martin
401117
5773-24-6024
LILLEY, MARY P
300 CEDAR LN
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-2907
Martin
401137
5772-13-2193
GRIFFIN, JOSEPH S
9584 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8522
Martin
401141
5762-83-7885
GRIFFIN, JOSEPH S
9584 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8522
Martin
401144
5761-96-5705
WARD, KADER
10744 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Martin
401163
5773-10-5428
PEELE COTTAGE LLC
C/O WILLIAM PEELE
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-7958
Martin
401209
5774-44-1864
SETH & RACHEL PERRY
FARMS LLC
10750 NC 171
JAMESVILLE
NC
27846
Martin
401338
5772-20-5488
HODGES, JOHN DAVID
JR
JOHNSON,
CAROLYN H
116 CHARLESTON
DRIVE
GRANDY
NC
27939-9634
Martin
401530
5762-98-4979
ROGERSON, LOUISE
ROBERSON
3006 DAN PEELE RD
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-7928
Martin
401592
5774-10-5006
BARBARA W PERRY
IRREVOCABLE TRUST
6655 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-7951
Martin
401815
5771-08-5457
CONNER, KEITH H
CONNER, LYNN W
1200 CECIL
WHITEHURST RD
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Martin
401816
5761-97-8701
SHELTON, BENJAMIN F
III
SHELTON, SUSAN S
1340 TALL TIMBERS
LN E
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Martin
401931
5772-02-7378
WARD, LAUREN
HARRISON
WARD, BENJAMIN
LANE
9660 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Martin
502466
5774-37-0576
BARBARA W PERRY
IRREVOCABLE TRUST
6655 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-7951
Martin
502612
5774-09-9510
ELIZABETH T
BRANDON LLC
31142 BROOKS ST
LAGUNA BEACH
CA
92651
Martin
505622
5774-48-6322
CRATT, WARREN DAVE
4636 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892-8220
Beaufort
5761-94-3287
BEACHAM BETTY G
533 CRESTLINE
BLVD
GREENVILLE
NC
27834

COUNTY
PARCEL ID
MAP BLOCK
OWNER NAME
ADDITIONAL
MAILING
CITY
STATE
ZIP -CODE
Beaufort
5770-12-4582
BIG SWAMP LLC
1694 AVENUE RD
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5679-28-6392
WARD EDWARD G
HRS
7442 US HWY 17 N
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5760-97-2558
LEGGETT PHILLIP RAY
LEGGETT SUSAN
148 WOOLARD
ROAD
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5760-97-2979
WARD JAMES RODNEY
WARD WILEY R
148 WOOLARD
ROAD
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5761-90-0806
ROBERSON JAMES W
JR
ROBERSON DEBRA
W
9996 US HWY 17
NORTH
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5760-97-4046
WARD STEVEN
CHERRY
155 WOOLARD
ROAD
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5760-99-4407
ALLIGOOD TOBY RAY
ALLIGOOD
PATRICIA ANN
879 DAN TAYLOR
RD
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5770-03-9205
GORHAM STEVE R
GORHAM SANDRA
C
8235 US 17 N
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5760-96-2015
WYNNE SANDRA W
8317 US HWY 17 N
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5760-79-2766
LILLEY STEPHEN C JR
LILLEY VIRGINIA W
4607 US HWY 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Beaufort
5761-82-5133
ROBERSON JAMES W
JR
ROBERSON DEBRA
W
9996 US HWY 17
NORTH
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5771-03-4606
LEE RALPH A JR
10437 US 17
WILLIAMSTON
NC
27892
Beaufort
5760-82-8846
BIG SWAMP LLC
1694 AVENUE RD
WASHINGTON
NC
27889
Beaufort
5770-00-7539
BIG BUCK
PLANTATION LLC
8150 MARKET
STREET EXT
WASHINGTON
NC
27889

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
see,ewy
TIM BALIMGARTNER.
Me"
Kelsey Pace
Piedmont Natural Gas
PO Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233
NORTH CAROLINA
EnvtronmmW QuaW
November 15, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 5/15/2020
Project: PNG Line 204 Relocation County: Beaufort
This is a conditional acceptance letter.
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin I Impact Location I Impact Type I Impact Quantity
I 8-it NUG —
Roanoke 03010107 'Riparian Wetland 2.84
Tar -Pamlico 03020103 Riparian Wetland 2.9
Tar -Pamlico 03020103* Riparian Buffer 30,525
*DMS can accept payment for this impact provided the DWR approves of credits being provided out of HUC. Upon
receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If
you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Joey Lawler, agent
Sincerely,
James. B Stanfill
set Management Supervisor
e, - �# aEQWFUH >
North Carolina D "off rnt of Enviromnental (biaiity I Division of Mitigation Services
217 w. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service CerAvr I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.7073976

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
see,ewy
TIM BALIMGARTNER.
Me"
Kelsey Pace
Piedmont Natural Gas
PO Box 33068
Charlotte, NC 28233
NORTH CAROLINA
EnvtronmmW QuaW
November 15, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 5/15/2020
Project: PNG Line 204 Relocation County: Beaufort
This is a conditional acceptance letter.
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin I Impact Location I Impact Type I Impact Quantity
I 8-it NUG —
Roanoke 03010107 'Riparian Wetland 2.84
Tar -Pamlico 03020103 Riparian Wetland 2.9
Tar -Pamlico 03020103* Riparian Buffer 30,525
*DMS can accept payment for this impact provided the DWR approves of credits being provided out of HUC. Upon
receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If
you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Joey Lawler, agent
Sincerely,
James. B Stanfill
set Management Supervisor
e, - �# aEQWFUH >
North Carolina D "off rnt of Enviromnental (biaiity I Division of Mitigation Services
217 w. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service CerAvr I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.7073976