20191576 Ver 1_401 Application_20191113

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 -
Prepare file folder
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Birkdale Site
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
2. Work Type: Private a Institutional ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 63e]:
Mixed commercial/retail use
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1�po*
Government ❑ Commefci
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Birkdale Real Estate Partners, LLC, POC: Trent Gustafson
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: CWS; POC: Mr. Dan Zurlo
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 65b]: 2019-00407
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 61b]:
Birkdale Golf Club southeast of the Birkdale Commons Parkway
and Sam Furr Road intersection. 35.441062°,-80.879784'
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 00914136 and 00914117
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg ECOVED1©E pv1�R
R
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Huntersville NOV i 3 2oIg
ier Resources
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: McDowell Creek rr0tit 9 $eGti►'_\0
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba (HUC 03050101)
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑✓
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit # 14
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 & 404
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
1 Revised 20150602

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
To: Mr. David Shaeffer
USACE Wilmington District -Charlotte Regional Satellite Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NC Dept of. Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Date: November 8, 2019
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 14
Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Huntersville, North Carolina
SAW-2019-00407
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Mr. Johnson,
The Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use site (Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel Nos. 00914136 and 00914117) is
approximately 46 acres in extent and is located at 16500 Birkdale Commons Pkwy, Huntersville, NC (Figures
1 and 2, Attachment A). Birkdale Real Estate Investors, LLC has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
(CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project.
On behalf Birkdale Real Estate Investors, LLC, Carolina Wetland Services is submitting a Pre -Construction
Notification pursuant to NCDEQ WGC 4135 and Nationwide Permit No. 14 to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and NCDEQ for proposed impacts to one jurisdictional wetland. These impacts include filling the
wetland in preparation for grading and installation of a public road that will support a mixed use development.
An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment B). CWS is submitting a check for $240.00
to cover the cost of the application fee for the NCDEQ — DWR PCN submittal.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination was issued by the USACE on April 12, 2019 (SAW-2019-00407).
Please do not hesitate to contact Dan Zurlo at 717-460-3466 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Dan Zurlo
Project Scientist
Christine Geist, PWS, CE
Principal Scientist

DESCRIPTION
Attachment A
- Agent Authorization Form
Attachment B
- PCN
Attachment C
- Figures 1-7
Attachment D - Additional Supplemental Information
Attachment E
- PJD Authorization, SAW-2019-00407
Attachment F -
Construction Plans and Proposed Impact (W1)
Attachment G
- Previous NWP Authorization 9.8.95, CESAW-199505518
Attachment H
- Rejected Alternative Plans
Attachment I -
NCWAM and NCDMS ILF Acceptance
Attachment J -
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
Attachment K-
NCSHPO Response
Attachment L-
Photo a e
Page 2of3

Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
ATTACHMENT A:
Agent Authorization
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives) of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
and the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination
associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 4041401 of the
Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
I, , representing,
hereby certify that I have authorized Dan Zurlo of CarolInJ Wetland Services, Inc. to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this
request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all standard and special conditions
attached.
I hereby certify that the above information submitted In this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.
Applicant's —signature
Date T
Agent's signature
2/22/19
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign
all future application correspondence.

Birkdals Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
Attachment B:
PCN Pursuant to NWP 14
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113

� W AL4c
>b6l
olqiii�-c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes N No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
ROMSPEN Birkdale LLC C/O PGP LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
29110-637
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
peter Oelbaum
3d. Street address:
1115 E Morehead St Ste. 200
3e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28204
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Birkdale Real Estate Investors, LLC
4b. Name:
Trent Gustafson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Birkdale Real Estate Investors, LLC
4d. Street address:
PO Box 12170
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28220
4f. Telephone no.:
704-953-3104
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Dan Zurlo
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services
5c. Street address:
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
717-460-3466
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
100914136 and 00914117
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.441062 Longitude: -80.879784
1 c. Property size:
46 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
McDowell Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Catawba 03050101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
CWS reviewed the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map (Figure 2, Attachment C) and determined on -site elevations range from
680-750 feet above mean sea level. The project area consists of maintained golf course, forested areas, and parking lots. Land cover within the
project area consists of deciduous forest and mixed forest, low density development, and maintained herbaceous areas (Figure 3, Attachment C).
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.087
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,769
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a mixed use commercial development and associated publics roads and utilities.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See additional sheets (Attachment D)
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall for phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
® Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Dan zurto
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina wetland Services
Other:
4d. If yes, fist the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A preliminary JD was issued by the USACE on April 12, 2019, SAW-2019-00407 (Attachment E).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
©Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
See additional sheets (Attachment D)
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.087
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.087
2h. Comments:
Proposed activities in waters of the U.S. include impacts to 0.087 acres of wetland (W1) resulting from grading and fill associated with the construction
of the public road that will serve as the primary means of ingress/egress for the site (Attachment F, Construction Plans/Impacts).
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary m
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
Sg -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
10

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indiv" ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
O3 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
Bi -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
11

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See additional sheets (Attachment D).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See additional sheets (Attachment D).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
© Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
© Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.087 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: This wetland was given a functional rating of medium using the NCWAM (Attachment 1). We propose a mitigation ratio 1.5:1.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
12

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation Is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
13

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
24 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A stormwater management plan is being developed for the site and will be submitted to the City of Huntersville for approval.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Huntersville
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Huntersville
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
® Phase II
❑ NSW
❑
USMPX Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑X No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
ORW
HSessionLaw 2006-246
❑Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
14

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
© No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑X Yes
❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
See
narrative in Section 135b (Attachment D, Additional Supplemental information)
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
treatment facility.
Wastewater
will be piped to the nearest Charlotte-Mecidenburg sewage
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009
15

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A field assessment of the on -site habitat was conducted, on February 26, 2019 by CWS scientists. No habitat for federally protected species was
found. See attached protected species report (Attachment J).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes © No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NMFS EFH Mapper
https://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. WIII this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑x Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO response is attached (Attachment K). They have no comment on the project.
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A FEMA floodplain development permit wiN be obtained.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Panel 3710464200K
Dan Zurlo�'=
-
11-08-2019
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10
16

Birkdals Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
ATTACHMENT C:
Figures 1-7
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
17

-- ,t
State Location Extent
z
t� {>rifrit�r�r
Kentucky Virginia
Davidson
Tennessee
North Carolina
c9
South Carolina
Georgia
R,0,
a
im
w
NAh
6 RAY 5
Huntersville
C347 k'.d wi li if
„ _*"f�Rq Legend
Project Limits (46 ac)
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, 2019. ;,,. 1^t5,000 2,500 0 5,000 Feet
,y�rtb�.ej�ri t
�gy
SCALE. DATE. FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 5,000 feet 2/21/2019 Vicinity Map
CM PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY:
2019-0113 JKMBirkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use Site
COORDINATES. CHECKED BY. CAR ❑ L l N A Mecklenburg County
35.441853,-80.88015 CAG WETLAND SERVICES Huntersville, North Carolina
G:\Team Dnves\Consulting Team Dnve\2019\2019 Consulting Projects`,201MI13 Birkdale\JD\ArcGIS\Figurel_Veinity (2).mxd

• r
4
;5; Cir t'4
xkG�
.. F
r
g ,
r
y
, t .
w. Rtea..
„ w
, _ t
SAM ELF
R RD { .,.� Soh'
m
`Pµ .
�+prt
Mrilrxi _•-�:
2141
Legend
Q Project Limits (46 ac)
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE(S): LAKE NORMAN SOUTH, NC (2017) 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
AND CORNELIUS, NC (2017).
\
(SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 2,000 feet 2/21/2019 USGS Topographic Map
CM PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2019-0113 JKM �ry Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use Site
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: C A R O L I N A Mecklenburg County 2
35.441853,-80.88015 CAG WETLAND SERVICES Huntersville, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\ConsJting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consuhing Projects\201M113 Birkdale\JD\ArcGIS\Figure2_USGS (2).mxd

GATeam Drives\Consrting Team Drive12019\2019 Consulting Projeds\2019-0113 &rkdaleUDlArcGIS\Figure3_Aerial (2).mxd

MENG•
CeB2
IApD
CeB2
CeB2
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam. 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
EnB
Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
EnD
Enon sandy loam. 8 to 15 percent slopes
No
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Yes
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
REFERENCE. USDA -MRCS SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY N=2011
J
MO
EnD
MeB
CeB2
-o
07
23.9IIIIWLegend
14.7
19.3 Project Limits (46 ac)
3,0
8.2 Roads
i30.7.-e
•7 J O
400 200 0 400 Feet
SCALE: 1 inch = 400 feet DATE 3/4/2019 USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey FIGURE NO.
CM PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY. of Mecklenburg County
2019-0113 JKM L Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use Site
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY. C A R D L I N A Mecklenburg County 4
35.441853,-80.88015 CAG WETLAND SERVICES Huntersville, North Carolina
G \Team Dnves\Consulting Team Dnve\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0113 Birkdale\JD\ArcGIS\Figure4_Current Shcs(2).mxd

:�. __ I _j � fit• � - ��
I i
`#A
�`•a � �� � `Ya 'fin ' '. ��, ` .-4� I ". ''r' .�, � 4
�. r ^'�• '!_. 1 Z � r-� tea•-`
! C1
_ U
3
CeD 2
I'
.r
CeB2,
'
N
kD
m EnD
Q
00
;* f
J
I
! d
1! r* !
_V
4 aY 4U
@�
Lt� �
g Wyk
�� � „ J
I
CeD
p e '
Soil Unit Name and Daacriptlon
Hydric
Coverage (%)
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
17
Legend
CeD2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes. moderately eroded
No
/.
En8
Enon sandy loam. 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
21
EnD
Enon sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
No
HeB
Helena sandy loam. 2 to 8 percent slopes
Yes
7
Project Limits (46 ac)
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
37
'• "'.
y
Total Coverage:
100!4
1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS HISTORIC SOIL SURVEY OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
NC, SHEETS 1 AND 2, DATED 1976.
S"3
SCALE: 1 inch = 1,000 feet
2/21 /2019 DATE:
USDA-NRCS Published Soil
FIGURE NO.
Surveyof Mecklenburg County
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
2019-0113
JKM
Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use Site
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
CAR ❑ L I N A
Mecklenburg County
35.441853,-80.88015
CAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Huntersville, North Carolina
G:\Team Dtives\Consulling Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0113 BirkdaleUDWrcGIS\Figure5_Histodc Soils(2).mxd

y
PAP P�e� �GZp C� i 2p 0t Z �
Cr z 0. Q
O NLL OA O C2
F GRO O
G
EVANSTON N Gp CE a Z
DUNMORE VIEW PP�K�O �•X,n
01
-/lv��t��
Gt
\�rYTj w g'I C��p W-TOP)SAILUUVE-
7 `c o
``Q
OC r. m TOIV FORM C� �i v c j
��� m1 � jEV� AG 0��� 2 � Z.
O JQ CO T" �i Z 002 p
\ 4
UXBRIDGE
KNOX
REFERENCE NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA PROIVDED BY UNITED STATES FISH AND
WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR NORTH CAROLINA, ACCESSED 2018.
BACKGROUND LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2018.
Ry
s"
Legend
0 Project Limits (46 ac)
Roads
National Wetlands Inventory
® Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Pond
J RI TD
800 400 0 800 Feet
77
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 800 feet 2/21/2019 National Wetlands Inventory
CM PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2019-0113 JKM Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use Site
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: C A R O L I N A Mecklenburg County 6
35.441853,-80.88015 CAG WETLAND SERVICES Huntersville, North Carolina
G:1Team Dnves\Consulting Team Dnve\201 9Q01 9 ConsuMing Projects\2019-0113 BirkdaleXJDUVcGIS\Figure6_NWI(2).mxd

A <p
i� Q0 ��� GT1�� 00�� 0
a�Ao N
Wetland AA
0.087 ac.
Z
Stream
tr If
D (Caldwell Station Creek)
655
0
730
SAM FLIRR
O2 _
Stream E . �N
197 If J ��� DIP
p� DP240
_ Y
ca
�Stream C � C'o 27 If
-
s�
0
r��4
�
120-zol—
w
Jim
Legend
Pond A
Stream
35 If
B
120
Project Limits (46 ac)
0.06 ac.
Perennial Streams
- - - Intermittent Streams
Stream A (McDowell Creek)
1,855 If
Ponds
Wetlands
Roads
Tax Parcels
*DP Data Point
M
•SCP Stream Classification Point
JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES WERE VERIFIED BY THE USACE ON
APRIL 12, 2019 (SAW-2019-ON07).
Photo Location and Direction
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG
�J
< Indicates Flow
COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2018.
NQM: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED
(FLAGGED IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND MAPPED USING A
400 200 0 400 Feet
SUB -FOOT GPS UNIT BY CWS, INC., ON JUNE 13, 2017.
KNOX HILL
SCALE:
1 inch = 400 feet
DATE:
3/1/2019
Jurisdictional Boundaries
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
2019-0113
JKM
Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use Site
7
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
C A R O L I N A
Mecklenburg County
35.441853,-80.88015
CAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Huntersville, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consdting Team Ddve\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0113 BlrlcdaleUDWrcGIS\Figure7_JD(2).mxd

Birkdals Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
ATTACHMENT D:
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
Additional Supplemental Information
25

Additional Supplemental Information
Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use Site
Pre -Construction Notification For Activities Affecting Waters of the United States or the
State of North Carolina
B3e. Describe the overall project in detail, Including the type of equipment to be used.
Preparation of the Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use site project involves the grading and
construction of a mixed use, commercial site, along with associated access roads and utilities.
Proposed activities in waters of the U.S. include impacts to 0.087 acres of wetland (W1)
resulting from grading and fill associated with the construction of the public road that will serve
as the primary means of ingress/egress for the site (Attachment F, Construction Plans).
Because the only impacts to waters will result from the construction of this road, impacts will be
permitted under Nationwide Permit 14.
Typical heavy equipment will be used in the grading operations (bulldozers, excavators, dump
trucks, graders, etc.).
BSb. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" Instructions.
This site was originally permitted under several nationwide permits in 1995 to develop the site
as a golf course (CESAW-199505518; Attachment H). The currently proposed Birkdale Golf
Course Mixed -Use site project was discussed in a July 8, 2019 pre -application meeting with the
USACE Project Manager, David Shaeffer, at the USACE Charlotte Regulatory Field Office. The
Corps' initial stance was that this project, as a result of an analysis of cumulative impacts, would
require an individual permit review. Proposed permanent impacts for the Birkdale Golf Course
Mixed -Use site project were 197 If of stream channel and 0.087 ac. of wetland. The previously
permitted impacts totaled 2.11 ac. (CESAW-199505518; Attachment H), and added impacts
from the Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use site project would have exceeded the Nationwide
Permit threshold. However, 1.58 acres of the previously permitted 2.11 ac. was stream or open
water impact. Just 0.38 ac. of wetland was impacted according to the permit. It was agreed
upon that if the currently proposed stream impact of 197-If of stream impact could be eliminated
from the Birkdale Golf Course Mixed -Use site project, then the project could move forward
under a Nationwide Permit. The 0.087 ac. of wetland impact, when added to the previously
permitted 0.38 ac. of wetland impact, does not exceed the Nationwide Permit threshold of 0.5
ac. The 197-If of stream impacts were eliminated, and therefore, the Birkdale Golf Course
Mixed -Use site project will be permitted under a Nationwide Permit.
D1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in
designing project.
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S., the project limits were delineated for
streams and wetlands prior to site design, and impacts to on -site jurisdictional waters have been
minimized to the maximum extent practicable while meeting the project goals.
26

A "No Build" alternative was considered. Since the purpose of the project is to construct a
mixed use, commercial site, a "No Build" option would not meet any of the project goals.
Rejected Alternative
This alternative proposed permanent impacts to approximately 197 If of jurisdictional stream
channel and 0.087 ac jurisdictional wetland (Table D1a; Attachment H, Rejected Alternative).
The stream impacts would have resulted from fill due to the construction of a parking lot and
support facilities for the undeveloped portions of the golf course. While these impacts alone
were below current Nationwide Permit thresholds, a cumulative analysis of previously permitted
stream channel impacts resulting from the construction of the Birkdale golf course in 1995
(CESAW-199505518) currently located on the site would have caused the currently proposed
project to exceed those thresholds and trigger an Individual Permit review (see narrative in
section 135b). Due to the cost and timeline constraints of an Individual Permit, and excessive
impacts to waters of the U.S., this alternative was eliminated from consideration and the
proposed project was redesigned.
Preferred Alternative
This alternative eliminates the proposed stream impacts and limits permanent impacts to 0.087
acres of wetland (W1) resulting from grading and fill associated with the construction of the
public road that will serve as the primary means of ingress/egress for the site (Attachment F,
Construction Plans/impacts). These impacts were unavoidable as a public road providing
ingress/egress to the site is required. The placement of the road was dictated the NCDOT
requirement to tie to the road into existing intersections and align with Lindholm Road in the
northern portion of the project area. Impacts to waters of the US were unavoidable as they
abutt McDowell Creek in the northern portion of the project area, near the proposed public road
tie in to the Lindholm road intersection .
Table D1a. Impacts Summary of Rejected and Preferred Alternatives.
Preferred Alternative
Rejected Alternative
Wetland Impacts
(ac.)
Stream Impacts (If.)
Wetland Impacts
(ac.)
Stream Impacts (if.)
0.087
0
0.087
197
131b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts
through construction techniques.
27

Erosion and sedimentation control measures will be properly installed and inspected in
accordance with the latest NPDES permit. Erosion and sedimentation BMPs will be installed
prior to construction. Water will be diverted around the work area to prevent sedimentation of
downstream aquatic resources and all work will be conducted in the dry. Impacts will be
minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of surface
waters, restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US. This
project will follow all conditions of NWP 14 and WGC 4135. Equipment to be used includes a
track hoe, dump truck, pumps, various hand tools, possibly a crane to move construction
material such as reinforced bars of steel, and concrete buckets to place concrete.
28

Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
ATTACHMENT E:
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
PJ D Authorization, SAW-2019-00407
29

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-00407 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Lake Norman South
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Gustafson Partners
Trent Gustafson
Address: 1115 East Morehead Street. Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28204
Telephone Number: 704-632-1013
E-mail: =stafson<atgpartnerscre.com
Size (acres) 46 Nearest Town Huntersville
Nearest Waterway McDowell Creek River Basin Santee
USGS HUC 03050101 Coordinates Latitude: 35.4418
Longitude:-80.8801
Location description: The review area is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Birkdale Commons Parkway and
Sam Furr Road. PINS: 00914136 and 00914117.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 3/18/2019. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
30

SAW-2019-00407
LJ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David L. Shaeffer at 704-510-1437 or
david.l.shaefferQ..usace.armv.m il.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary jurisdictional determination
form dated 4/12/2019.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
///�)) Digitally signed by
' SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.1260750573
Corps Regulatory Official: Date:2019.04.1215:37:18-04'00'
Date of JD: 4/12/2019 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
31

SAW-2019-00407
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.anny.mil/cm_apex/Vp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
Daniel Roberts
Address: 550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 704-527-1177 eat. 707
E-mail: danieViDcws-inc.net
32

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Gustafson Partners Trent Gustafson File Number: SAW-2019-00407 Date: 4/12/2019
.Attached is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at orhttp://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section I1 of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
33

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered pen -nit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: David L. Shaeffer
CESAD-PDO
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room I OM 15
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David L. Shaeffer, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this firm to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
34

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 4/12/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Gustafson Partners, Trent Gustafson, 1 115 East
Morehead Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28204
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Birkdale Site, SAW-2019-00407
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The review area is located on the southeast
corner of the intersection of Birkdale Commons Parkway and Sam Furr Road. PINS: 00914136 and 00914117.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Huntersville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.4418 Longitude:-80.8801
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: McDowell Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 4/12/2019 by Corps
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES tNREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
„
Site Number
review area (acreage
may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
and linear feet, if
wetland vs. non -
Section 404 or Section
applicable
wetland waters)
10/404)
Wetland
35.4425
-80.8785
0.087 acre
Wetland
404
AA
Pond A
35.4406
-80.8825
0.06 acre
Non -wetland
404
Stream A
(McDowell
35.4408
-80.8792
1,885If
Non -wetland
404
Creek)
Stream B
35.4412
-80.8785
35 If
Non -wetland
404
Stream C
35.4413
-80.8783
27 If
Non -wetland
404
Stream D
(Caldwell
35.4424
-80.8774
655If
Non -wetland
404
Station
Creek)
Stream E
35.4408
-80.8830
197 If
Non -wetland
404
35

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
36

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Figuures 1-6 dated 2/21/2019
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO Web Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ®Other (Name & Date):Photos 1-7 dated March 1. 2019
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Digitally signed by
SHAEFFER.DAVID.LEIGH.126
�i- 0750573
�,1� ,•i Date: 2019.04.1215:38:01
-04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
4/12/2019
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.
37

SAM
Stream E^N
197 li
a�
Wetland AA
0.087 ac.
DPI
DP26`
Stream D (Caldwell Station Creek)
6551f
�I
N
Stream C
27 If
Legend
Pond A Stream B
35 If
Project Limits (30 ac)
0.06 ac.
Perennial Streams
- - - - Intermittent Streams
Stream A (McDowell Creek) o`O
1,8551f
= Ponds
Wetlands
Roads
Tax Parcels
ODP Data Point
• SCP Stream Classification Point
�o
�o
N Photo Location and Direction
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY MECKLENBURG AJ
< Indicates Flow
COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2018.
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED
(FLAGGED IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND MAPPED USING A 400
200 0 400 I
SUB -FOOT GPS UNIT BY CWS, INC., ON JUNE 13, 2017. JURISDICTIONAL
FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE KNOX HILL
SCALE:
1 inch = 400 feet
DATE:
3/18/2019
C A R O L I N A
Jurisdictional Boundaries
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
2019-0113
DRAWN BY:
JKM
Birkdale Site
Mecklenburg County
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
35.441853,-80.88015
GAG
WETLAND SERVICES
Huntersville, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Drive\2019\2019 Consulting Projeds\201"113 Birkdale\JDWroGIS\Figure7_JD(2).mxd

Birkdale Golf Club Mlxed Use Site
Attachments
ATTACHMENT F:
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
Construction Plans/Impact Sheets (W1)
39

DEMOL ANON NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION AND SEQUENCING OF
DEMOLITION AS DESCRIBED BY THESE DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONTRACTOR
IS TO OBTAIN ALL PERMITS
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXISTENCE, LOCATION. AND DEPTH OF ALL
BURIED UDUMES (ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, WATER, SEWER, TELECOMMUNICATION, GAS
ETC.) WTHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. URUMES ARE
LL IUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE OMISSION OF, OR INCIJISON OF.
UTUTY LOCATIONS DN THE PLANS IS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED AS THE NON-EXISTENCE
OR DEFINITE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES, PRIOR M
CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WTH ALL UTNJTY OWNERS
WHOSE FACIUMES WLL BE AFFECTED TO DETERMINE UTIUTY LOCATIONS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UPUTIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS
OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UNDERGROUND
UTIUTIES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE
3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ANY REWIRED UTILITY
DEMOLITION OR RELOCATION WTH THE APPLICABLE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR
STALL COORDINATE THIS WOW WTH THE RESPECTIVE UDUTY OWNERS SO AS NOT TO
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PROJECT SCHEDULE
t. ALL MATERIAL GENERATED BY THE DEMOLITION WILL BE HAULED FROM THE STE AND
DISPOSED OF PER LOCAL ORDINANCES.
S INSTALL 6' CHAIN UNK FENCE MOUND PERIMETER OF PROPERTY DURING DEMOLITION
MD CONSTRUCTION.
6. ALL EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAW -CUT AT THE UMIT OF DEMOLITION
WERE CONSTRUCTION PLANS SHOW TIE-INS SAW -CUT JOINT SHALL BE ONE FOOT
FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT, MINIMUM.
7. ALL EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK AND/OR CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE
REMOVED TO THE NEAREST EXISTING CONTROL JOINT BEYOND THE UMIT OF DEMOLITION
SHOWN ON THE PLAN. WHERE NO EXISTING CONTROL JOINTS ARE PRESENT WTHIN
FIVE FEET OF THE UMIT OF DEMOLITION, CONCRETE PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAW -CUT.
6 BIRKDALE COMMONS PARKWAY SHALL REMAIN OPEN MO UNOBSTRUCTED TO TRAFFIC
AT ALL TIMES,
9. CONTRACTCR Is RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL WRING CONSTRUCTION PER
WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK STANDARDS (W.A.T.C.H.)
M ALL DEMOLITION OR INSTALLATION WORK ALONG SAM FURR ROAD SHALL BE
COORDINATED WTH NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
11. DEMWTION OF STORM DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM(S) BY CONTRACTOR
SHALL ALLOW FOR CONTINUOUS USE OF THE SYSTEM(S).
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY ADJACENT CONCRETE CURBING AND/OR
SIDEWALK DAMAGED AS PART OF DEMOLITION PROCESS.
13, FOR THE RENOVATION OR DEMWTION OF BUILDINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES. FEDERAL
MD/OR LOCAL REGULATIONS REWIRE THAT A THOROUGH INSPECTION BE CONDUCTED
FOR ASBESTOS -CONTAINING MATERIALS PRIOR TO CONWCTNG A RENOVATION OR
DEMOLITION ACTINTY. THE ASBESTOS INSPECTION MUST BE CONDUCTED BY A NORTH
CAROLINA ACCREDITED ASBESTOS INSPECTOR. ALL REGULATED AND/OR FRIABLE
ASBESTOS -CONTAINING MATERIALS IDENTIFIED DURING THE SURVEY, WHICH WLL BE
DISTURBED. MUST BE PROPERLY REMOVED BY ACCREDITED INDIVIDUALS BEFORE
BEGINNING THE RENOVATION OR DEMOLITION ACIINTY.
14. EASDNG WELLS. IF ANY, SHALL BE ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCE WTH NORTH
CARWNA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 15A NCAC 02C.0I13.
SAM FURR Roan
SLWVEY DISCLA\@1
SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 2017, PROVIDED BY R.B.
PHARR k ASSOCIATES. P.A. 420 HAWTNORNE LANE.
CHARLOTTE, NC 262G4. [phone]
I FC&M
CIINIIIL
® CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED
ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED
CURB TO BE REMOVED
BUILDING TO BE REMOVED
I� TREE To eE REMOVED
LIGHT FIXTURE TD BE REMOVED
SILT FENCE
HIGH HAZARD SLT FENCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCING
� DENUDED LIMITS
SEWER LINE TO BE REMOVED
STORM LINE TO BE REMOVED
I9
i f* 4
smE �
1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PARDES AND ASSURING THAT EXSTING UTIUnES ARE
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
RAG MEN, ETC, AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO ME PUBLIC.
3. ALL PAVEMENT CUM CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UTIUDES SPECIFICATIONS
4. SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 1025 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
V'A
co Pnnmt
& Stone
Shagn9 the Enrirenmmt
Realitina to Pessidlitia
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONS PARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE.NC 28078
DEMOLITION
PLAN
Project No.
4464
Issued
10/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TOH COMMENTS
N
SCALE 1"=100'
0 "1 1DO, 70'
C-100
The LJPM,n TP, Ne Feytt mPnwlinC �e de:i�n shown tlreron
re NPtrumenb af(G<knsl8 jP�n, P.A. The rcProEuction
nao 1151.ual8merHs wiNout consentM
�Neknal B Aon, all —
PA. Is PrWb—,
W.k_t A Ron. I.A. nn

I E)aSnNG POLES AND NETTING r •. ['� ` 1 r l- ',,• ///
I
/ \ f ��/ / � � • it TO BERELaVFTT. TYP. 1 / ✓" ,�, ,� ! I/! / �G ��• �!
Qom" i _ /' • F'\
Ok
"STING 10' U DUTY
EASEMENT TO ENE
ABANDONED
Das'nNG V6- CURB AND I j I • / \ •' , EXISTING POLES AHU Itf7/1G \ '
CUTTER ro BE REMOVED M I I / / \ TO BE BELOVED. TYP.
ColeJenest
& Stone
sn.p°Rm En
waRw<M<Ne<a.<
xt-SwM lreenS M I�ro
o-Aota Iwta oaa<
/ ! • l .' '\.� . • / / � �. \ i i
EXISTING CONCRETE SIDE WAU( /I / '. • /i /� A3 .�' 1 �• /'!/1I j /U&Y DOCl/J<Bi
TO BE REMOVED, TYP. / , / / •• \. •• • �Q I / / / 20' ALTERNATIVE BUFFER r0 . \ .r�tN
BE ABANDONED - / / / / f SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 2017, PROVIDED BY R.B.PI,IBIR KDALE
E)OSTNG STORM DRAIN N1ET I j /•/ . \•' •.•'. • ` , T� I J `_ - /t \1 /' // f J l CHARARLLOTTE, NBC 282G4. (iWl 75-2186
1
To BE REMOVED. TYP.
REAL ESTATE
"STING STOW GRAIN UNE � I / �f' / // ✓ / - J \ --- I / / /
l /\' kh� \\'i jr/ //
ro BE eEMGNEO. TYP. � / \ / ' ' . t uaIT INNi W)IR�/ �// % / � .- � —�---'"•f/ • / / J '
SIDEWALK ACCESS TO BE MAINTAINED ! ' '- -! ! ! • ' ..,' < M. -c /; 't/ --- _. /- INVESTOR LLC
DURING CONSTRUCTION. REFER ro ;� / E / . \• . ' • b f / , •-/ / , , / / //J'\ IN LEGEND S,
// ( ! • •�.' r \ //// //i / // J I — — / 4600 PARK ROAD. SUITE 370
EROSION CONTROL PLANS (SHEETS 7 / , ! / . • i \ \ _-'. /, /- / i(/ / -�,\ ( /
G-2K0 TO C-Dos) FOR FURTHER/ ! I ! ! •. / // \ y _i /, //\ �\ / _ — \ CHARLOTTE. NC 28284
Casa m IV = AND CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED -/-
i/ r . 1 .' I ll�i /;•;} GUTTER TO BE TWA. \\\ :\\\\ r \ ", \\`,\ ; , -I !'J' ® BIRKDALE GOLF
EXISTING 2'a' CURB AND / •) t` •.' , /,,( \� / EXISTING STOW DRAM LINE TO BE REZONED. M: / / ! CLUB MIXED -USE
I`
TYP
GUTTER s G REMOVED. AND I \.. I I I `!! ' 1 / /
r / I ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED -/..
t �5� MAIN INLET GBEt \\ \\ , I L-_ ,/, % PRELIMINARY PLAN -
TO B RETANNG WALL ® 1 I'"/ i \ \\ 1 I _ ) ,
To BE REwoNEO. Trv. / ! � . ' .` � I L / / // c \ \ V � !! ousTa+c �liov�mmT» 1 /l \\
I / 1 \`\ \,\\\ JJ-COSTNG WOOD WALL m ) !l f lt� {/ I ! _ _ ___- / \�
EXISTING CONCRETE OR
hP 1 1(I /may' f 1 L \ ,\//N /J BE REMOVED. TVP. � I / 1r t 1 � (✓/ ! ! ! !�� CURB TO BE REMOVED -/-
INFRASTRUCTURE
MSMNc CONCRETE SIDEWALK / J /• / 1 j • �': if / I / // J�/.�- ./ !! /l ~' . ONLY
TO BE REMOVED. TYP. ' / / 1 J REMOVED 1 1 ,i - \ ----JJj/ J/ /-'� \�
\_/ / / /�-- / 16500BIRKDALE
\\ f -.�� j���_j BUILDING TO BE REMOVED -/- COMMONS PARKWAY
PORTION of EXISTING STORM J �• •.• \ ,[\ \ try/�- \p�mc SLaaL DRaN N1F-r um — /// / '� !� °�\ \ f J i!!� / HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
ON
UNE ro TIE REMOVED. M / ® EXISTNG FLAGPOLES ro.� \ \ \ (L /
RENOVID. V \ \ \ \ f CONNECTED PIPING TO SE \
r:7 / / ® ,,. • • /-✓/ \\\\\ \\ \\ //F v ` BELOVED. TYP. TREE To BE REMOVED -/-
1 / COSTING STRUCTURE TO E DEMOLITION
�j ,- \\- EMSTIMO TEES Am CONCRETE \\\;� \\ EI1,\1�,\ 1, \\ \ ` ,, / / !! ,!;! J C_ \\ PLAN
a A /•;' i / , / 1 .' PAO ro BE REMOVED. \\ 1, \ 1\ 1 \ I 7 1 f ! 1 ° LIGHT FIXTURE m BE REMOVED -,-
! SILT FENCE a/c-801
A ' // / t \ •- ! I /' woaoEN FENCE ro BE �\ \\`\ \\ \\/' — \ r•\`// I
�� I\ � ♦Y , �- \, I \ 1@110VED. T1P. . \\ \\` \_-- ' ' ,��•! /. i
R Ili MOVE CONCRETE srNRs ro \ \�\ \ \\\\\\ -'� // !� •/ / 1 \ \ \ \ N14TI HA2ARD SILT FENCE 1/c-SC5 Project No.
( / /-- -..••! /u' I \ L / ! '.�*!/! \ l \ \ EX"C STORM GRAN INLET AND \ \ \ \ \ ! ! ` ' ! / t ` \ \ 4464
J lyl I \ _ 1\ [ - CONNECTED PIPING To BE \ \ 1\ \ / ! //' , - I I j I f ( \�' \ /
REMOVED. TYP. \ , I �\\ ! !�/ f.1 {' t \t Issued
>' � \ \ EnsnrvG ucHT Pale ro ff t \\ // /T /
RELovY.D. TWA. �� ® i, 7EEE PROTECTION FENCING Ie/c-8c3
/ // \ ♦ \1� �� - EXSTING TEES AND CONCRETE , I \/
PAD TO TIE REMOVED.
,/ / EXISTING SAWTMY
// / / // \ ` �� � \ �... / \\ / ! \'� 1 , I \\ I ( 1 1 BE ABANDONED. /TITO \�" - \ / // \/ ����� \�'� \ •\ \. - \ EXISTING CONCRETE STAIRS TOEASEMENT TO �` •��� DENUDED UNITS
/ /Jy/ / / / /(/'� • �/ .-- �:....m\ \\ , -\ BE RELONm. -/-
/ WOODENFENC TO BE
1 ( 1 t I 11 I I 1/ , /// \ \ ♦\ ♦ \ -- \ / / / / / — i f 1 / / ! ( 1 \ \ / \ `a. SEWER LINE To BE REMOVED -/-
�}\\\ — 1 `k ♦ \I //' Ewsnrvc PAVEMENT
To \\ ,� \ / ♦ !! `��! ! \ \ (--
�II 1 I REMAIN. TWA. Q,\ \\\ � \ � � , J/r / / \ ! ! / r [ \ \ Revised
l �( \ J \ \ \\ 10/19/2019 -TENSED PER i0H COMMENTS
�t III 'W Il` j\ tll 1 ' /!/ EwsnNG MEauacAL. •.\\ \ \\\ \ \ ♦ \ \ J / J .../ / I I ! / ` ® )
1 \\ 1111 EQUIPMENT ro REMAIN. \ \ _ - / p �\
\ \ - �\ / / 1 .�.',,. ice' �' 1 1// J //,`\ l r. STORM LINE TO BE REMOVED -/-
// EXlsnrvc z-sronr w \ \ \ / \f 1 ! 1
�. \\�\\\ \\ t
T / ! BLmDINc ro ETasT1Nc CDNCIEE awe
ENST
TY'. SEE I
DOUBLE POW OF MOI NA2ARD SILTFENit \ \ \ \ \ ♦ / �/ /// TO BE REMOVED, TYP. / /®' ' /i JJ ` l /
FENCE DETAL /trIOI. r ,1 \\\ \ \ \ / //// NG SNOW DRAIN „/ SEE SHEET C-1� FOR DEMOLfTION
i /// PIP
J - / STING CONCRETE WALKWAY / \,// // INLET AND CONNECTED
! / ; �// • /�� \\ NOTES.
I / / ! / / \ Y TO BE REMOVED, TYP. / /PIPINGTOBE REMOVED
E` 1\\\\ \ / / TWA.
1,
1 1 \\ \ ♦ /�/ —w/ y� I ( 1� 7T� r r \ 1 \ \, \ f //� !!! %! J i / i✓' f/ -
v
/ 1 TREE PROTECTION FENCING TYP._ \ \ ( EXISTNG ONE STORY •ULD•10- 1\\ \\ \\ RDOo/UI/I / `, ' // / ?per SSNO [ y': OpSH O:✓(e. .\
54.E DETAIL 1f1/C aO.T t \\� \ / ! ( TO RE REMOVED. TYP. 1 \\ 1 -'.•� - iy'J/ r2 s T r •'VY�S\
UNIT OF DENUDED AREA TYP. \ \ \ / / t `\ , /
,\ \ \ \ \ / / 1 \ I 1 , 1 FOIE hOWWAY I
1--GA,�\ !,p / ` ♦ I , ___ .� / ic}, Pq, a �.: q�,�
1 — `\\ ` 1�.JJ'\/i � 1 J � x/ !!/ —' \ \� r , \ /�/ \\ \\) 1 1 1 ® ® ';. It / / � �� �.c�' ,,, i J-' �.. J ',,,Y/ R 4��4,�,••� .�'*y�..�
I '•' ,/ !� \ \! / __ //ice)\II �r� ® 1 ! / _ r_J /' // / ON
�� /JJ/Ji\ l�I t\//' \ ill ,lf\\\ °i ® ® t f / //' ®.'%/' '.! J •/ / SCALE: V=00' E)OSTING STORM DRAIN INLET AND CONNECTED
PIPInc To BE REMOVED. 0 2D' 40' so,�
roams 7/' Ie[ /ANTARY
J TRACTOR IS F ES G-NTA AND BRINCONTACT..
UTIUnEs ARE -1 0 1
`_� G7�T< M I. CON
♦ \ �/ LOCATED PRIOR To CONSTRUCTION.
\ • / Alyp�. TT►I Y V\ \ "' % / tr /1 % . l l l / \\ /'�� l t ♦ \ �.lf/' L CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
/ FLAG MEN, ETC AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUSUC
amod DilOtl[CIII�N70 \ -�� / 3/ / l �l 1 / /,/t TN J
E IBgII� RP. / / / .. / / (/ / / t/NTARI/' 1 // / }, ALL PAVEMENT CUTS. CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE re.nrt d[cI ]enest85ton< PA. The rcprodnnon
_- J/ \\ • 1 fl .\ V / // / /•`' // /! / // / //. / REPLACED ACCORONC ro STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROUNA .uiuuM.ori<d vu dNe deam<n:s wiMan rnnsen[d
• { f ! / / / /// ! \ / / J/ DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND ir4hrrestA<ton. P.Ahprd�iblMd.
I \\ • ( I \\ // \ r / // /J//\ \/ I /' ' ( CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UYUTIES SPECIFICATIONS. r;{ehMstBStam. P.A±oT°©
\ -
♦. SHORING WILL RE ACCOR04NG TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
1 J • ~,/'// �7 '- • /!>'/ ` PART TB28 9JBPART P, OR AS AMENDED.
n

SAM FURR RO
' AD on
— ! ' Dww uaT POLE Tu MANIM. _'� — (780' PUBLIC
�_��_ '�'"•— CONTRACTOR
DURIINNG CONNSTRu�cTlai. N TMAIN AWED R 21
1 am
DOSTING SANITARY SEWER L04E TO
REM". CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT OBIM roffam a
M PLACE AS NECESSARY
DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
UCRI N.
�/Y CURB AND GUTTER TO BE REMOVED,—_— —~.
SEE INSET A FOR LIMITS OF REMOVAL
_ 7.5• DEPTH MILL
• _' OVtRLAT=mAs•HALr..
`yam /.J ."•. __� _
aft aft
an am
oft
/ fS 7LL`/f / / / _
_eWI H7! OBILIO® Aliti M_ I i ` ( :1 "MOVED. T19. COST" TIME iD B[,"
INSETS
�-------�_ � —'►
' ® ® ® — ` t\ \\ i , �� �• ® \ ®. ® f • • \ / \ • SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 2! ASSOCIATE017. PRONGED BY R.B.
_ / f r ® ® I \ \ \ \ t ® \\ • , / / • • \ PHMR S P.A. 420 HAWTNORNE LANE.
✓/ / / ® L ^ \ _ \ \ ® - / • CHARLOTTE, NC 28204, (7014) 376-2186
® — EASTiNc TREE TO BE y\\\ ; '29 ®® ® ., 1 \ • •/ • • /,/� :v,/• LEGEND
REMOVED, TYP. /g/Y •. //� / /\ \ ®
11qq FEMA AND COMMUNITY
FLooDPLMN ® f J( / // ` / CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED -j- '•,4 / /.• \ }lo /+ ® '// I 4 ! ® i /• / • Ji f/ \ j
® / l / COMMUNITY FLOODWAY { I { I ® / /; •
FEMA FLOODWAY { I r
LIMIT OF UPLAND ZONE (LOCATED I I
AT FL.000PLNN LIMITWHERE +,f r I 1 I i
FLOODRAIN IS C✓EATER THEM 25'
FROM MANAGED USE UNIT)
"SlIN TO BE
J EASTING POLES AND NETTING
TO BE REMOVED. TYP.
_ I { •� ` t
® ,
EIOSTNG TREE TO BE ®
FASTING LIGHTING TO REMOVED TYP.
\ \ , BE REMOVED, TYP.
EXISTING WOODEN WALL
\\ t\ r / / / _.._. __ TO BE REMOVED. TYP. I\ \ I /(/(f \ ® rf� �r ,F\
— — _ _ — — \ DOUBLE ROW OF Nlal NA7AM iT J/ / 1 I I a I l i
FENCE, TYP. SEE DETAIL
EX
TO BE PROTEWOMM, NWQ t� i It— ,Y� •
SEE DETAIL 191
o
PIPING TO t REMOVED.
� -is�+�aE�r311! =9r, n&AIVr_"YF
EASTING TREE TO R\
/ J /� /i• _"—/ \' REMOVED. M.
,/j !� 'O O \\ INIETNTO BE REMOVED. TYP.
EMSLNG SANITARY
SEWER. TYR. _ /r
\ \ "Sr'� _J, ,6Ji \
p95TYHG SANITARY SEWER
) \ LAMENT TO BE ABANDONED.
,. / • • /,//J/ /tJ../' ,' /� V t ' ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED -/-
30' UNIT.
510E .
{\
ZONE LIMIT. /,• , r/.F/ ' ////��
/ • • / CURB TO BE REMOVED
Z45'ONE
MANAGED USE _/..
�-���0.1
CURB\\� V TONE LIMIT. 7 �• • • , / /
f — i•/ / • — / j I J X. /% // BUILDING TO BE REMOVED -/-
• • �j f/ ,/'„ • // `�i J`t TREE TO BE REMOVED -,-
�, / �• \ ,
FWLIGHT FIXTURE TO BE REMOVED /-
9L7 FENCE 3/C-8D1.
• / / /, // y/i / r , HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE 1/C-9v5
TREE PROTECTION FENCING 19/C-BCJ
DENUDED LRAITs -/-
/ It SEWER LINE TO BE REMOVED -/-
STORM LINE TO BE REMOVED -/-
SEE SHEET C-100 FOR DEMOLMON
NOTES.
` � ^" ✓ .y '.01•WAY ORf10 AlMIIT _
— — MW/ t �1=
mow s' — W. 19FF1FHC rmr ro WININ —
INSET A
1'=50'
L q
I q
CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT EASTING UTILITIES ARE
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
L CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
FLAG MEN, ETC AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBUC
S. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPUCED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROUNA
DEPARTMENT OF TRARSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVRIE AND
CHARLOTTE-MEC1(LENBURG UTIUTIE9 SPECIFICATIONS
I. SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 1926 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
ColeJenest
& Stone
5,.ON the b,;m ent
Reatinrg the Pasvd M1hes
ine PMnrvnq
landrtape AnMrtmin
(5re Fngi 'nq
U2w Deign
iro Sownl
Pe 3
w ole n
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD. SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONS PARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE.NC 28078
DEMOLITION
PLAN
Project No.
4464
Issued
10/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TCH COMMENTS
N
SCALE. V=40'
0 20. 40' 80,
C-102
Tne d.. -I.o P xtn.n�.lanatn. ae:ign;hown m.,P�
re Hnstry dloNhnes[BSM,rc.PA IM repoaurtion
nquNP.Ka vx Nrb dcP�menss.vhaut conxert of
iNehrresH 8 Storv, P.A h prAiblrtC.
:PlehrcstBStcne. P.A:otg
Q

STAKING AND MATERIALS NOTES
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB. FACE OF BUILDING, OR CENTERLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE AT 90 DEGREES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
1 ALL BACK OF CURS RADII AT PARKING LOT ISLANDS ARE 4.5-FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. PARKING STALL OMENSONS ARE 1&0' (TO FACE OF CURB) X 9.0' WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. ALL BACK OF CURB RADII AT ROADWAY INTERSECTCNS SHALL BE 20-FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
6. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING DIMENSIONS
7. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE
CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF ENE OWES AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.
8. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL OWNERS OF UTUTIES, EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY, PUBLIC
AND PRIVATE, PRIOR TO WORKING IN THESE AREAS
9. ALL ASPHALT PAVING SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE NCDOT STANDARD
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES LATEST EDITION.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS
11. ALL SIGNS PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE
LATEST EDITION OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD).
12. ALL PARKING STALL STRIPING SHALL BE 4-INCH WHITE UNES. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
13. STOP SIGNS SHALL BE Rl-1, 30'a30'.
14. EIGHT TRIANGLES SHOW ARE THE MINIMUM REWIRED.
15. NO DEMOLITION LANDFILLS ALLOWED ON SITE.
18. CURB AND GUTTER VARIES AT CATCH BASIN LOCATION.
TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS PER TIA
THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS BASED ON THE
APPROVED TIA ARE INCLUDED BELOW.
PER NCOOT:
INMRSECTCN: NC-73 h LINDHOLM DRIVE (PUBLIC STREET'A)
OTOWIN IMPROVEMENTS NOTED : SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON
FINAL DETERMINATION FROM NCDOTO
RE -STRIPE WITH THRU/RIGHT TURN LANE ALONG NC-73
EAST BOUND. ...r_
RE -STRIPE MTN UFT/THRU/RIGHT TURN LANE AT
UNDHOLM DRIVE INTERSECnON ACROSS THE SITE. j
- EXTEND LEFT TURN STORAGE ALONG WEST BOUND NC-73
FROM 215' TO 350%
PROVIDE A LEFT/STRAIGHT/RIGHT-IN TURNING ACCESS
PRIOR TO THE NCOOT TIP PROJECT AT PROPOSED PUBLIC j
STREET 'A INTERSECTION. 1
PRIOR TO THE NCDOT TIP PROJECT, PROVIDE EITHER: }
-- A SINGLE RIGHT -GET TURN LANE AT THE PROPOSED
PUBLIC STREET 'A' WITH A PROTECTED STEM LENGTH OF
- Z7DUAL RIGHT -OUT TURN LANES AT THE AT PROPOSED
PUBUC STREET 'A' WITH A PROTECTED STEM LENGTH OF 1EA
Sa. Q Z
-- ACCESS TO THE STE FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF
THE HCOOT TIP PROJECT WILL BE LIMITED TO s
a
RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ONLY. THE RIGHT -OUT WILL INCLUDE E� v
DUAL LANES WITH A PROTECTED STEM LENGTH OF 200' Z J
UJ
INTENSE PROVIDEMA UFT/THRU/RIGHT TURN LANE
ANE TI THE
'A'
EQ N [•
PROPOSED INTERSECTION ALONG BIRKDALE COMMONS PARKWAY, O J i PER TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE- I
INTERSECTION: GUM RD. Y SEATIES FORD RD. U D
PROVIDE A LEFT TURN LANE AND 175' OF STORAGE AT W S
GILEAD RD. AND BEA TIES FORD RD. Q �, O
'ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED AT GEAD RD AND BAIY 3 r
FORD RD. ARE TO BE AnED PAYMENT
T
NT IN LIEU TO TEEE
2
DIr
TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND WORK
TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN
OF HUNTERSVILLE IN CONJUNCTION WI1H TOWN IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT AT SIRE LOCATION. m / 1
f/
APPROVED REZONING NOTES
mr/nE ra ¢W�aI.pT mATow, (¢WpA[xT mwpxlRe) AvcaAhD WM M < of �S ¢ •Lw, M fw«Orrt 0.� .T� mOrER. wfM.gFD R,r,Iag1 yql axUgp[T ,pIT w M Et1wW(D
rox :M >Egorrr )� m EemNL Iw.W mArz [[+OtW ( Ertwn011[7 llvr o[ r 9¢Tw RAx a Mmaf* ASietmE C Uuxn M+T p>wAx M avPEtT. NL fLv - .tx T4 wDbD a1 E fluLAlm d M NtOe[IrtY tl
+pexaL M M fNC uwvwlt 91ot EUA04Rf ICE GLt[Mrz0 ATM 7M « M aetuL A1•tIOKI pC 9HAt1 E aloes TI¢ M� N MT
mI. ArO E]uirtt[p w uwA�Oa. aOle (M En MN Eo'ISEL. x¢rvfalldK nl M OE I`-
« M M[xd « M elll CMf[� 6 . tMNnropglY. tlt u A EaIITnM fvN
vLw) M rMCcnw >tM vut a iN v.11[¢ MM[A 00[-t.t�-t Ht « w[-tkt-]C (m[ P�fFtti T [K an r+961Wi0NµM AW IN Enna E r M s OrMYIEtoI « t M
Cdlegx0•rld w LOq «S AE N IwFPeAt rlxt Sim-uuNm wlf rnRSoE9W MACTI¢2 EwtCD fa[ N.41CrasvtT' u4 t�EF
Elm!)N.tlL.SMIaGML1 = Nauo> r•>I sAH, IKOrVTOus AOCUIdn AAO rATd wAutt ¢artr rM M [weaHArl¢-
¢K
v[nn� >A1L 5_AAX5L M _II pmgQ umFp (M M EZo.q � ar - M iCq�CAn01Ia �',rg�gglNa pu gczT g-tot « M EllsCa NML M Eivaxp NN ME wti[mFn rI M rJipawml « EOSCD MFE s+K sa mE
MITax M Mrz AvvAovK m marl soAN Nt ra Is (W) aawNG vsTlln roVvw ¢HtaAon « M
v[cvdn ,3 SiAtw w M aIIDIwM 11A tl •+mn.mlTO¢rfaVv{ R rn4 vRcgAu uAauZv « OWLO[rz-a!0¢IKxIIAc 5*mx w"
M r�r vLN1 III[ runty[ ArW rO�i�M[41gnAr m�ienoK Maio o6�ilww. s[FT a-m. wCr- vPI uwM NF ¢nnrrm ro E N Ao]]mw¢ .n M auxAv¢. +s Ew[an
nd> A6WT[CTUE, 9Er, rAmt 41Kt Pa61WaU vAleaaq 9IAAt>Q) wA� E xOOFFD a•rK
OG�M «RIdE •E•oHYxn 9C•aN 4 M E2MIn9 vt,VL WAAIt No-IHwn Nw ¢1Drara9 CT _4 mR ALL Lew- rtIM> urwT Ax0 9HULrR aaexc nCM ttWSTRUCI� MAE uW sw.lME mwn[n AllvMT OFf/nATIPUCMC xCWroOInM ¢V wt[IS Iwv2Cn
aw[nn nl�. [M.II smlAriE �vo �,ovwrr is _MN nf�.�om�, wEwt ,V urY rTrwmlricwwn IIµmTOT� u z ^^•�
e) xa.N T u mlrlwcnar ro w.aEn o pn Iml mIr wua ora.ma a rosaTrm wK 1) [.a .IM I n caK�«Ann 15 nmrtl:
rQT ALL awaux¢ TCZ elMTneCTaw +Io arlaxc 9ut1 E 6¢nvld m lAw MawuAl vnI_4 A [Aw is o[wwmouWAl « TaANEWxeNTd « « EruK mDxllio w Ms E.zu�Ic n.w ro blxT NBC a
¢��" IrftfmCAT[ar 11mrr M aoXArny [raitiraG sn rq[ u[tED R u ¢� Slxtr w M E2¢ra R.w xIx
'®...MIII�c� tsEIDxuC �N�9t[-F[PC O[T6wa?rt N+ .w0 .PRNrrt HEAP (isnNRl Hn[D Rwt3 ix M EZ¢C•G R.W t1 vAaluAi tDT CM[cmttt. WJ[WLW wO I0[snulx MalL1Kr6 wD SN[Is ro aPPrM A«ONO K 91OrM M M WVI:
PON � M O[T4OSD U66 : a AC¢SSOwT UE�vv!>NMITEO M M rK ZaMR weTWCT. I � wU T M pA-AlK]I « M Aan® ]O wRd ALdO M «-m wY-Mr MriG
rH0 vWl W16.Cm M 9110H us> M falp'-Ir
OnT ERM£, r]IiN. aAAEi, IEwANGaL EP SOON IVAfL cNr EPW¢/fdaO-w.Z eTea[Y J)r¢N tDW'TIk APMD'.m TO E Ip ILxmI Tlux kl.Hm flET N terpTlL
9qI 1NaY mAnax> ArC FlAwami Ax6
nE•n[O Axe PCO[vw«EIRY d M EZMM vVW rAY sn Ipf lYr « 1) AN .:fit µDI RµnxO udG MC sA¢T A u M¢ «" 9ACDr wu N xt2T PMwc So�wGB EGK¢vpT IM
MIT M M AOadcer «
wH-tv AM w.w[�P AUTWAtFO tQiq IL+pr,F3 AE iFE6ICNLY edWTrzD ww LaM M MY Ia¢T M OfaOI Ew[OEN R
M aOwAx¢- f)sC YARD vMAM AEA TO E IMOIFO r1ATd ro M wLT atlYttlli Nr.WnK i
Nn°va°�i wli� -1 EurzEloln •naexRUM..�ATi Icv a .mown .pia wln�rn:[cmY'ax.T � i : nI .APED alwiT xor�Ewa : a [[ava Ii a Ar1iw �rtocM ma[E.L nErel®.IxMwtx m mlaurTM nay I.wa
M3orNo « M Plimu[r. wT auM oTxarE wPLT rM Irruw[ mKTur FoeeT EaMlmwtlT> naa Ix rA,� Pt`nALN Tr TT naax;MILao am An nAToaEc M muwxe .Ewt[cnn'�¢aw et voumq sew. isw` 1
wB�IL ra iw«pr1Yy OIw p[YRIPIENT Arp u4YE .� YaTR Il ro Td (tOUOn rMwT A ro Auor sPAMrz Owllpn t) A4 w1➢•WS tOOTwCTFpra Arz 9✓1L E AltwrzCllwALLY mrAtWtt w AFAAwNN¢ [MOuw M « a.. u As vEt1 A fMIfaCKLIxI'
[MOH WEpWr01 If M rM AVPl11:.rL uw ataepn9J1 nag •OIC�fA 1 MIA wIDNC WrzWAL; cOLP6 ¢Sty. Au wr6f16 Yea E OOI.YTpHr wM M wIDUL nCJE « THE rOIHrDNIL aurllg 91i•TTFD M
m-oraeaL.Tge. « EGR w M MIrWw « vIAII3 xAT Oaiw M A¢9oNA2 'earl M E¢NOT . « M aldux¢- E W Aimolif Hui AE M E[bMe AVPUGMaA nOI[vd wa+WAl w41eI5 rLL E OWII aL Na>R]rATIaI ro 6TAMlH MFI O= au ZTpr.
r[T EY M iRO{LT A A rWLL Wq1 A 091 mu£ THE LH ND ewwJnAae E9+SaElT> Ia® NOT E rET m w«.WAL vNICFl9.
a M. s nmw « LL awnNm 9 u c Ksam ro �M ¢ o aA.� T Fro :. x c. ows o rn
> R� ,nQ HMa uII: Aa,�.�T � �x III
[ n.9 M mE9 9 W. N¢. tyro as awes N¢ D.WMEA�9 n, d a, DaY En -n ..x9, ,nw2 .am[[ aMa�D Naa M
»� Nw AN. fRALL alrg. M mAw.,D"ILJft «¢,w TO OFArz I_
�IA�ITA�uTTIaA,.TPL �
> eME ro M [.tear rurN a M EnWNMa MINA AEAf MnrH ra (GULF caI.WE mdun MA
M M C.Al4M1K1r « Ovd fA[L E9uawn TIKf >AK TUr M pwC«tC[.'T�(aAYM[wsTMalA[MiIEl3 MAT H)M[ «OM-1 M �Wls « WLn+uIT u>H4 s Edi vuRK TELT "' fluff TO.iL AT tlAST aa[ STIw[T W1Mx¢ m
H]!) Aup EOM M WS9 W[6NAur - w M rSWrN vuK, rEiFll fW1 E Ea1FO wrMM M[ AY ACYFss ro Mt wT [AOrr M fA¢i. r9w KVA«Taa.TC K ¢1EACED EY M xuMA[lY pEHtaYY1[ «ano
FMMn ALaKR ra a (m) wu-A6Y. T U - aLNL E OCYA�iFDw rat nevAn Nnw Has SECT A Aa0 M aml[Wr. w A9dnaA wow auON9 NLOwf It9rN M ruwc sTAm,
E E aE 1MLT OR PMMUY NET I- ra eWNWY 9u11 E eKnOOwATfA
MQV616 M M -1 AKY Td1 « M F11pPdtt 6 faHK'rm TO A TwW vI:ItIY, RnTr:aQ wY EnAST Ax AIaMRra0 T TO M setae ME
M amid ngmaT « AxT O1Np OrQ « ut «ANT vanes « M aw«OTM1 QUID ww AICTUM OOrOntnTlS A - N J) wmC YWO D -Mw0.t ..0 Dew TOaW M Ms 3 AND M wlP+f3 Ax[O « O Olm AAa1TECMH Ax0 VwOYAv[ O[IOTT>ILVG iHaaKaT M Ma9wc � ocay ARTIOMTO f"AogOEf « OTIG 4t¢ICIgiLn
SAMB PURR ROAD a)rWA ra tNox.AM9 >WM E - m f«,nI M ed¢Txax AIo awAa r'.=` MEAi ,Ie mN"-`.w M"IgoATt E M
NCO PUBLIC R/Yy) ATIAOEn x� - Tu c 6GwoHm .M t.dRWnI TIIDa MAT AE A IWI-M t
- - °T MA�AINED . S.R. 2145 T. TT oesnw M wwsorM «�� Nr¢ mwow E vAmaw « tralAla4TUTT m+PKIIT mnwc M
ro IwtArsMII C +GUM. +.
_
• • � /
�re'�-u1
y
I
' �• / LINDHOLM DRIVE
�(`I{ ID PUBLIC RMIU
HUNTERSVILLE MA-INED)
v I PNRD
I MA00
v
L e PCCE PCCE PCCE- 17
PCCE PCCE- PCCE-(\/
\ T. 7� 1
EE[A A
w Aos
e /
• A� i
SfTE PLAN DATA TABLE
(1 /
PROJECT NAME: BIRKDALE MIXED USE
C�N PARCEL NUMBER A PORnOH OF 009-1h11 T, 009-14-136
p SITE ACREAGE: 15.67 ACRES 4
APPROVED REZONING ACREAGE: MIMI ACRES 3
COMMERCIAL (RETAIL RESTAURANT
PRINCIPAL USES: MULE -FAMILY MOTEL, OfFICE, MIXED -USE)-
/ / I
BLOCK LENGTH TABLE
f/ • � / / Ybs ICI^
• � MM'n'S .Wr[y�
J
VICINITY MAP !LT$ �l I
SLIWEY DOCIA AER
auw SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, IM7. PROVIDED BY R.B.
eunaH9.
'MR ! ASSOCIATES. P.A. 420 HAWTHORNE LANE,
CHARLOTTE, NC 26204. [phone]
LEGEND
9M9f7L
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
OEIAIL
9/C-S00
PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE RAMP
11/C-Soo
PROPOSED STOP SIGN
-/-
SLR PROPOSED SPEED UMIT
-/-
-
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
19/C-800
SHEAVY DUTY B UM NOUS CONCRE E
20/C-B00
-
LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS CONCRETE
23/C-800
PROPOSED 1'-5' CURB h GUTTER
1/C-SDD
PROPOSED 2'-6' CURB k GUTTER
I/C-SOD
/ •/ /
/
PROPOSED UGH NO
W (REFER TO STE ELECTRICAL PUN 4,9/C-605
FOR SPECIFICATION)
__
SEE SHEET C-606 FOR TYPICAL
STREET SECTIONS AND PAVEMENT
SPECIFICATIONS.
p
SEE SHEETS C-617 TO C-620 FOR
INFORMATION ON ROADWAY
STRIPING AND SIGNAGE.
'TO BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER
ZONING OSTRICT: HC-CO
WATERSHED: MCDOWELL
DENSITY: HIGH DENSITY
ROAD
ROADFROM FROM
ROADTO
LENGTH
F
DRIVE
UNDHCLM DRIVE
PARKIND ENTRY
Pt RUC STREETA
34T.19FT
UNDHOLM DRIVE
PUBLICSTREETA
PARKING ENTRY
329.6E FT
UNOHGLM DRIVE
AR JNG ENTRY S
PARKING ENTRY C
M3 FT
LII`YCLM OPNE
PAPWNG ENTRY
PARKING ENTRY D I ROUIMBOUT
wITR
UNph^LM DRIVE
PARKING ENTRY DI ROUNDABOUT
91RKOALE COMMON6 PKYVY
253.65 FT
PUBLIC STREET
LINGHOLM DRIVE
PUBLIC STREETA
116.Tl FT
1
GM0799pu
1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PAR TES AND ASSURING THAT EXISTING UTUTIES ARE
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
FLAG MEN, ETC AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBUC,
3. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS. CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CARCUNA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UTIUTIES SPECIFICATIONS.
4. SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 1926 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
& Stone
Shapry the Environment
Rcalitinq lne Possidlitid
rtl Punnnq 4
lane-­nure
f
Ertl Fna:reednq
UeM Rvgn
282 200 so:.m Tryw snnr. L400
or.rom, Nnu ow;.: zezo2
704 376 1555 µ 704 376 7MI
urFF nnn mleenesr.ten. can
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, E 370
CHARLOTTE, NC 2 264
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONSPARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
DIMENSION
CONTROL PLAN
Project No.
4464
Issued
10/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TCH COMMENTS
N
SCALE: 1" 100'
0 50100, 200'
C-200
Ths drorl , the pro}eot m .Ol and the deign W,o U,a
«W hetTVmen[e of COIeJeneet h St_ P.A.. The rep[oducli
nw N«IZW uw of NE document[ rithwl Otmeent of
CdeJ t i Stm P.A. Ie proh Wlted.
CdeJeneft R Stone. PAD 2019

PROPOSED GREENWAY
(TYP)
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
EASEMENT
PROPOSED 2•-G CURB AND
GUTTER SEE DETAIL qc-B00.
PROPOSED DIECTI AL
ACCESSIBLE RAMP, TYP.
SEE DETAIL tI/C-BOO.
STAMPED ASPHALT CROS9MAK,
TYP. SEE DETAIL 17/C-aOO.
PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL
ACCESSIBLE RAMP, T .
SEE DETAIL 11/C-BOO
PROPOSED 10' WM 4' THI
CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO TIE IN
TO EXISTING SEE DETAIL
9/c-aoo.
35'X35' SIGHT TRIANGLE
I L/
1
i
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
(
(
1
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPOSED 10' CONCRETE
90EWALX. SEE DETAIL 9/C-aoo.
A
Tf
/
/ R / STTP SON,
1px (
S58' 40' 39.90
Ob ` IM7r
ay8/
SPEED U.. sGN
ROUNDABOUT SIONAGE.
REFER TO SHEET C-61e.
PROPOSED DIRECTION AL
ACCESSIBLE RAMP. TYP.
00
SEE DETAIL 11/C-5WALKFLUSH WALK a PAVEMENT -
AT REFUGE ISLAND, TYP.
YIELD SIGN. TYP. -
Y)
OD
EXISTING STORMWATER P
(REMEDIATION PLAN TO PE
SUBMITTED UNDER SEPERATE
00"
■
PRE
SIDE
SOE
SIDE I ME
J q
J
5-30' et✓ID-TO RANGE
PROPOSED 15• STORM
I 'MIAGE EASEMENT
ALONG BIWmAI£ COWIONS
PARKWAY
1R� R PARCEL
`b.
uw_ UM4. TYP.
/
PROPOSED 6' WIDE' I
PN4RCEL B
/
PARCEL C
4' THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK.
SEE DETAIL 9/C-BOG
1
2.22 ACRES
/
1.92 ACRES
PROPOSED SIDEWALK EASEMENT
/
PRWOSED DRECTIONAL 1
ACCESSIBLE RAMP TYP
\ PURVEY DOCLA .61
SURVEY ISSIIE DATE AUGUST 1, 2017. PROVIDED BY R.B.
PHARR a ASSOCIATES. P.A. 420 HAWTHORNE LANE
CHARLOTTE NC 28204. (7D4) 376_2186
SEE DETAIL 11/C-am (
- 20' WIDE SAM. SOUR. D6MVEW YTWE IN / LEGEND
EASEMENT BURR -TO LINE TYP. PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY / / �"
- 15' WIDE STORM EASEMENT BITUMINDUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT. /
CONCRETE SIDEWALI 1. SEE DETAIL 20/C-aoG / • \\\ �e� ��
SEE DETAIL 9/C-B00
LINDHOLM DRIVE I S• MONOLITHIC CON. 19aIN / / • \ \� \ 19*� PROPOSER SIDEWALK B/C-800
PUBLIC Puc a/w) PLANTING STRIP.rw. I Ncoor s1D. es2m � ---
(TOWN IX HUNTERSMLE MAINTAINED)
SEE DETAIL 20" ON FOR TYPICAL SECTION
TYP.
t LTT ,
� • JJJ ^ � a
I \ _ _
RNti l
PROPOSED a+mL wALL z
WITH STAIRS AND HANDRAIL
1'-6' MOUNTABLE CURB AT 1129' w
ISLANDS. TYP. !_ y
q
1x.e•
R A
4
16e.6
& m R
2e.00' • \ i \ \ 1 I PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE RAMP 11/c-BOO
PROPOSED STOP 4d -/.-
its
1?21/
PROPOSED SPEED UNIT -/-
• \\\. \\\\\ \ • �� NAMED PED6n6N1
• • • -" � J CROSSWAIK/$PEED TABLE
SEE DETAIL 12/C-e04. , HEAW DUTY CONCRETE 19/C-800
STAMPED ASPHALT, TYP.
(- r PLANnNC STRIP, TIP. IDRIYE WYTIPE INPROP
SEE DETAIL 4/C-602. /�. I' HEAW DUTY BITUMINOUS CONCRETE 20/C-800
QY / CURB AND 2'-6' P L E
CURB AND CUTTER FIRECHARLOTTE
LOTTE WA ER REFER TO
R34,Sy SEE DETAIL 1/C-aaa CHARLOTTE WATER PLANS FOR R61.SO• /� plc
dS PROPOSED OWECTIONAL FURTHER INFORMATION. C O O RES /
ACCESSIBLE RAMP, TYP. UGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS CONCRETE 23/C-800
/
SEE DETAIL II/C-800. PROPOSED 13' WIRE, (� U / C 4' TWIX CONCRETE SIDEWALK.
PROPOSED SEE DETAIL 9/C-80G
RI(NT-OF-WAY, TYP. PCCE
� J PROPOSED 1•-6• cuRa a curTER 1/c-eoo
MAXIMUM EXTENT OF GEOGIO CALLED
FOR ON RETAINING WALL PLANS BY
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE TRUCK TERAACON. REFER TO THEIR PLAN SET
APRON FOR FURTHER IIFORYAnON. h n\ PROPOSED 2•-6* CURB a GUTTER I/C-800
PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL ACCESSIBLE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 125' / r
( RAMP, TYP. SEE DETAIL I1/C-BOO. PAR/�GI D (REFER TO DESIGN PLANS \
/CQippRVGLp� BY TERRACON) ll/
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 2.AJV ACRES / ST LOCATION ORNWA BNP , C�• PROPOSED UCHRNC 4,9/C-805
(TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS)
SEE SHEET C-200 FOR STAKING
AND MATERIAL NOTES, AND
I PR-- WALL PAVEMENT REPAIR NOTES.
WITH STAIRS MILD HANDRAIL
M I I SEE DETAIL 4/C-802
L' I ATQI FLOOOUPLAND
LNN uNITGNNHEREA� 37.0• / T
ROOOPLAIN IS GREATER THEN 25•
FROM MANAGED USE LIMIT) .• JI, �J/�//
/— PCCE A►/// / /
1II_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
Ai.'( PCCE PCCE— PCCE— PCCE— PCCE— PCCE— PCCE— PCCt—\/
PCCE PCCE PCCE— PCCE— PCCE-- PCCE PCCE PCCf�'r� •1,�.• // // / I `/ //
\ T- TCF TICE PROPOSED 20' SAN.
RLICETEMPORARY
,/-
OEASEMENT
dI TENPARY ,: \ SOUR. EASEMENT / k' Y/MAt USE
CONSTRUCTIONEASEMEHr (rcE) / � � , / ZfAt Limit
PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH BMP \ / J // // ' / : ' �• E �'
MAINTENANCE AND STORY A,Ow COURSE IGMONIlNT 1G PE
DRAINAGE EASEMENT (PCCE) `!' OINNIMED IRDFIt UPARAIE /
OGRIVI• ROUGH GRADING ONLY MR ,/ 1. CONTRACTOR IS RALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
ICE +-- TCE / IM AREA 9DM1 WIll<I lHn APCATED P PARTIES AND ASSI/PoNG THAT EXISTING UTIUnAR ES E
PROPERTY LINE TYP. PLAN SET. / / LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
ZOK LYT. PRE / 2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
/ RAG MEN, ETG AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBLIC.
fl "/�j,,.`•'/ g- —� J / 3. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS. CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
iE' / REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CARDUNA
DEPARTMENT
OF UCRupETSPFInpTERSNLLE AND
CARLOTTEiMEC(LENBURUTILITIES
/ ) / i/•�W / / !. SHORPART G WILL BE 1926 SUBPART P,DIOR AS "ENDED.OSHA STANDARDS
ColeJenest
& Stone
Shaping Me Enmmlmenl
ReYixim the Pa bi0ha
O200wbm- 1 ow 2B202
W 704 37e 1555 H• ]OQ 3M 72151
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE. NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONSPARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
DIMENSION
CONTROL PLAN
Project No.
4464
Issued
,0/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TOFU COMMENTS
N
SCALE: V=40'
0 20' 4080'
C-201
1drawlnpa, the project m 4 and U,,tl it anon U,,
het— . of CelaJ t a Starve, P.A. The eepr•d V
Rau NarlxN N- of the dot —w vthaut eon-nt of
col• -t a Starve. P.A. h prehATted.
Cde3n-t a Starve, P,® 2019
M

PROPOSED 8' WIDE. '�"" _� •�
!' THICK conCRETE sDEwAuc.
SEE DETAIL 9/C-800. -
�— EASTYIG SANITMY EASEMENT
—0 EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY 6
i-4t f
�
LC_'
L —si
'3s p / 1o'xTa saEr rRIANaE
%'66 • l / 35'X35' SIGHT TRIANGLE �—
'e! ,) dole • I /
773 - • ' II • f
141-33 "
+,. PROPFRIY LSE. TW. -/ PAVEMENTSED TAILMARKINGS. TW.
LIMIT OF UPLAND ZONE (LOCATED � SEE DETAIL 17/C-BOIL
/ I AT FLOODPLAIN LIMIT WHERE SPEED LIMIT SIGN
FOOOPLNN IS GREATER THEN 25
/ I / FROM MANAGED USE LIMIT)
• • • • •� / A AND COMMUNTY
• // / 0 •••�/• •/ FLOOOPLNN
"A
COMMUNITY 100DWA1
/ _` I / FEMA FLOODWAY
/ ` \ J 24' WIDE TYPE III DRIVEWAY /
\\ • / /� \ \ PARCEL A ti
2.81 ACRES
\ STOP PIN. TESL
r / PROPOSED 2'-8- CURB AND /+ /
GUTTER. $ DETAIL 1/C-600. '
INTERIOR PM.
UNE, TYP. \ PCONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE ROP 0 UGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS
\ 23/C-8G0. ./
/ 5' MONOLITHIC CONCRETE ISLAND, TYR.
NODDY STD. 6520E
PROPOSED
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
FIRE HYDRANT, TIP. REFER TO ///
t 26' WADE TYPE III DRIVEWAY CHARLOTTE WATER PLANS FOR
MRTHER INFORMATION,
STAMPED ASPHALT. TYP. / •
RASED PEpESTRIAN _
CAOSS.AL SPEED TABLE
SEE DETAIL 12/C-804. _
L
PROPOSED 13.5' WIDE i� / Y
4' THICK CONCRETE SIDEWALK . 'Ar
\ $ DETAIL 9/C-600.
!' Mp10U11NC CONCRETE
LAND
ISLAND / R2
Y /
DO 1
/
`/
----
SAM FURRgp�
--•---- (180' PUBLIC ..
NCDQT MAINTAIN_ S- �"-'•• , �_.
STAMPED ASPHALT Ot06SlWJL� 4—+ r f'�Y--+mot++4 +. +
'r SEE DETAIL 20/C ++`+ T + __+
PROPOSED a' WIDE. 4' 7HICK
- CONCRETE SIDEWALK $ DETAIL ,
9/C-aw.
MONOLITHIC CONCRETE "._.
'\ + 3 i �v.\� 8 •-i' �_ MEDIAN TO MATCH
MSS' ... ry i o • EXISTING MEDIAN.
1.5 MILL AND OVERLAY
OF FASTING PAVEMENT
.. 4 • � / ._lam \ .0 ! _ \ j I/ NSET A
2a GREEHWAY TRAIL EASEMENT TO PROVIDE PUBLIC ACCESS SURVEY DISCLMHi
,f �� PURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 2017. PROVIDED BY R.B.
FROM N1RE tl6ENWAr CONNECTION RELATED TO NCDOT PHARR 3 ASSOCIATES, P.A. 420 HAWTHORNE LANE,
TREENWAY TRAILAIION AUGNMU"OVEMENT DESIGN
TO BE C FlNAL to CHARLOTTE, NC 2B204, [phone]
Y P / / • • WITH
TARO E DESIGN
AND DES1Q1 TO T COORDINATED
/ // $ / ` / I • / WITH NCDOT S THE LOCATION.
. AI -SENT AND 111E PROPOSED _
• � • GILVERT CROSSING LOGTIdl. EASEMENT TO BE INCLUDED L..
WITH FINAL PUT •
/ LEGEND
PROPOSED 15' PUBLIC STORM•
p ��' ;'/ / // // • DRAINAGE EASEMENT / /�
5 • MBSd DL
b' / `tti�• PROPOSED
zD' SANITARY•
SEWER EASEMENT • / PROPOSED SIDEWALK
• / I o
4R / / /� / • / : / l� PROPOSED ACCE-- RAMP 11 /C-800
O Z6,Lt/0M .. •
ZONE LIMIT. •
�rys / / ZONE MANAGED USE / •/ •• • • PROPOSED STOP SIGN/ -/-
/ 8 r r- • �`` . / / / PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT
17 • / 1
/ // /,[ • / • Dogma Pam.
/ '47 /j •• • / - • •
// /• • • HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 19/C-800
PROPOSED ASPHALT 90EWAlX. • // • O HEAVY DULY BITUMINOUS CONCRETE 20/C-800
$ DETAIL 17/C-1100 /
12- CONCRETE SiRP / •
/ BE1WA:E11 PLANTER AND /
GARB, TYP
• / 1 • e• / LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS CONCRETE 23/C-BIN
Y PLANING S118P,
SEE DETAIL 4/C-602.
// --
1 • / /j / 1.5' MILL AND OVERLAY
PROPOSED /.
'RIGHT -OF -WAS LINE
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
MAINTENANCEUN EASEMENT / / / -_
E • � / / NCDOi PAVEMENT WIDENING
BVILD-TO UN
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL • '/ / / //' '
I (REFER TO DESIGN PLANS /
1 BY TERRACON) / ' PROPOSED V-6' CURB h GUTTER 1/C-600
MAXIMUM EXTENT OF GEOCRO CALLED
FOR ON RETAINING WALL PLANS BY
TERREFER ACON. RTO THEIR PLAN =T
1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION./
PROPOSED 2'-6' CURB d[ CUTLER 1/C-600
/
\�.. �,... �a�,\�\\ • _s"� / l•��I I • A4�'/ �'�i i \ \\ / PPROPOSEDucRnNeo c 4.9/c-s
�
— LNG
SEE SHEET C 200 FOR STAKING
AND MATERIAL NOTES, AND
PAVEMENT REPAIR NOTES.
COURSE REALIGNMENT TO WE
SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE /'�
.R?i5 COVER. ROUGH tAADING MLY FOR /--
Y
0 , / PLANTING ' / \ THIS AREA SHOWN WITHIN THIS
/ STRIP, TYP. \y \ ELAN
/ A
PROPOSED 2'-6' CURB AND E✓
GUT � 5E� I/C-000. M, I PROPOSED I, STC. I. f
DRAINAGE EASEMENT J /
CROSSWALK/SPEED
PEDESTRIAN
SEE
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
P SEEDETAIL 12/C ao4 COMSTRUCTIOM EASEMENT (TCE)
PA L E
o o PIES
PGCE
—_ J--�
PCCE' P,COL,/
��
STORMWATER BMP
LOCATION /��,
REFER TO SHEETS C-817 TO C-620 REFER TO SHEET C-806 FOR
FOR INFORMATION CH ROADWAY TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS AND
SWIPING AND SIG NAOE' PAVEMENT SPECIFICATIONS
1A' Mal AND OVERLAY
MONUTHIC CONCRETE
o MEDIAN TO MATCH WITH
® WHITE SOP UHE� — — EXISTING MEDIAN. PAVEMENT wDENINC. REFER TO
_- SOW WHITE — — �� PAVEMENT SPECIFICATION ON
w•TE MINI -SKIP — — SHEET C 606
UME —
MEDIAN CURB AT
2+ —_--- -`_`J -- RANTED MEDIAN. $
�� .�•-._ DETAIL 4/C800.
a +
5,00
.a.
INSFT A
1 "s50e
ColeJenest
& Stone
Sharyng the E,,hm e
Rnaftlrg the Pons Oil t a
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONS PARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28078
DIMENSION
CONTROL
PLAN
Project No.
4464
Issued
10/14/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TOH COMMENTS
N
SCALE. 1"=40'
0 20' 40' 80'
CONTRACTOR IS RILLS RESPONSIBLE FCONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT EXISTING UTILITIES ME
C.LOL
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
FLAG MEN, ETC, AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBLIC.
Th<drawing5, [M Ccpc[ manual antl v'+e ae.�9n ;hnn. ine.un
ALL PAVEMENT CUTS CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS M THE NORTH CAROLINA
PA.. The uCOAIOLon
nauthohmd uae dtM daoim4nh w9hart ronHntd
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSNUE AND
ieM3eneseBS[oiR, P.AhprMibtted.
CHARLOTTE-MECKLINBURG UTILITIES SPEORCATIONS.
Cdahnst i P.A. xpXy
SHORING WILL SE ACCORDING TO OMEN TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 1926 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
4

EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. ON-SM BURIAL RTS REWIRE AN ON-STE DEMWTON LANDFILL PERMIT FROM ME
Z DINING ADMINISTRATOR.
2 ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED UNITS SHOW ON ME PLAN IS A MOUTON OF THE
CITY/COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE AND IS SUBECT TO A FINE.
1 GRADING MORE MAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS A
MOUTON OF THE CITY/COUNTY EEOSON CONTROL ORDNANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A
FINE.
4. SOIL STAMUZATION SHALL BE REWIRED ON ANY AREA OF A SITE WHERE
LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ACCORDING TO
THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:
4 PERIMETER N TCHE PERIMETER SLOPE AND ALL SLOPES
.1. ALL PEF HAN 3 OR ONTAI_ DI 5, 5,
STEEPER THAN 3 HORIZONTAL WITH
1 VERTICAL COVER
SMALL IN PROVIDED TEMPORARY
IN2 PERMANENT MIN Z CALENDAR
GRW ND COVER AS SOON M PRACTICABLE BUT
L ANY EVENT, WITHIN ]CALENDAR DAYS FRDI THE DALE IN TIE UST
LAND -DISTURBI
NG ACTIVITY.
A PROVIDED TEMPORARY IT PERMANENT
4.2 ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS SHALL SE
STABILIZATION M AS SOON AS E LASGABLE, BUT U ANY EVENT, WITHIN 14 CALENDAR
DAYS FROM TIE DATE CE THE UST LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY.
5. ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT MAY BE REWIRED BY A
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COUNTY.
6. SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED NO STEEPER THAN 2:1. niLL SLOPES GREATER MAN id
REWIRE ADEQUATE TERRACING (REFERENCE MCLDS STD. 30.16). ME SOILS ENGINEER
SHALL VERIFY ME STABILITY OF SLOPES GREATER MAN 21.
7. A GRADING PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ANY LOT GRADING EXCEEDING ONE ACRE MAT
WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.
8. DRIVEWAY PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES IN NCDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE
PRESENTED AT PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING.
9. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
WEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF -SITE GRADING PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED
FROM THE AFFECTED PROPERTY OWERS.
10. THE DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN EACH STREAM. CREEK OR BACKWASH CHANNEL IN AN
UNOBSTRUCTED STATE AND SHALL REMOVE FROM THE CHANNEL AND BANKS OF ME
STREAM ALL DEBRIS. LOGS. TIMBER, JUNK AND OTHER ACCUMULATIONS
11. MY CONSTRUCTION OR USE WITHIN THE AREAS DEUNEATED AS COMMUNITY (0.1')
FLOOD AY ENCROACHMENT AREA IS SUBJECT M ME RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE
FLOODWAY REGULATIONS OF ME NORTHERN TOWNS AND MECKLENBURG COUNTY.
12. ME TOTAL STE ACREAGE IS 15.643 ACRES ME TOTAL DENUDED AREA IS III ACRES.
13. BEFORE ARY LOT$ ARE DENUDED OUTSIDE OF ME PERNITTED AREA SHOWN ON THIS
APPROVED SET OF PLANS, A REVISED PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY LUESA LAND DEVELOPMENT STAFF. ARY LOT DEVELOPMENT
WITHOUT A REVISION TO ME APPROVED PUN COULD RESULT IN IMMEDIATE CIVIL
PENALTIES BEING ISSUED TO BOTH ME DEVELOPER AND HOME BUILDER.
14. FOR NC CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT (NCWI) NOTES SEE DETAIL 19.20/C-804.
/i
/i
/
Y 1-'1l8ijaii
CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE
1. OBTAIN GRADING/EROSION CONTROL PLAN APPROVAL FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND
USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AGENCY (LUESA).
2. SET UP A ON -SITE PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENTS
LUESA EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR, LAND DEVELOPMENT INSPECTOR, AND ZONING
INSPECTOR. FAILURE TO SCHEDULE SUCH CONFERENCE 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY LAND
DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS AN ORDINANCE VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO FINE
STAGE 1
1 INSTALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE, INLET PROTECTION, SEDIMENT BASINS 1, 2 AND 3,
DIVERSION DITCHES, TREE PROTECTION, AND OTHER MEASURES AS SHOWN ON PLANS,
CLEARING DAILY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THESE DEVICES.
4 F PR IN THE
CALL OR PERMIT
A INSPECTION BY INSPECTOR WHEN APPROVED, INSPECTOR ISSUES
GRADING PERMIT AND SITE WORK MAY BEGIN.
S. INSTALL PERMANENT STORY UNE FROM MH-CI TO MH-C4, REMOVE EXISTING STORY UNE
THROUGH PARKING LOT.
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT NOTES
1. ME SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL ROW HAZARD AREA AS
DETERMINED FROM FEMA FLOW INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 37104632DOJ, REVISED
THRWGH 3/2/2009.
2. ME COMMUNITY ENCROACHMENT LINE MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING
AND ME MARKED LINE MUST BE MAINTAINED ON -SITE UNM FNAL GRADING IS
COMPLETED.
TREE / BUFFER PROTECTION - HUNTERSVILLE
1. INSTALL TREE / VEGETATION PROTECTION MEASURES ALONG BUFFER AREA(S) AND ANY
TREE SAVE AREAS DELINEATED ON THE PLAN.
I.I. THE BUFFER UNE (MEASURED FROM ME CREEK BANK OR PROPERTY LINE, OR
WHATEVER IS WPUCABLE) SHALL BE STAKED.
1.2. PROTECTION MEASURES SMALL BE INSTALLED AS DICTATED BY ME DRIP-UNE OF
VEGETATION MAT IS WITHIN THE BUFFER. WHERE DRIP UNE(S) DO NOT EXTEND
BEYOND THE BUFFER UNE, ME BUFFER UNE SHALL BE RESPECTED.
1.1 TREE / VEGETATION PROTECTION MEASURES MUST RE USED WERE ANY CLEARING OR
GRADING ACTVITIE WILL. R WITHIN 1 MEASURES
S LL OCW NTI UO A BVFFTFLAGGING
PROTECTION
STALL BE ORANGE TREE FENCING,OR CONTINUOUS M(Y BE ON VEGETATION ONLYOR
STAKES WIGS SHOULD BE MAX. 20' ON CENTER, NNICH MAY BE USED ONLY THERE
THICK UNDERBRUSH EXISTS,
2 REQUEST TREE INSPECTION FROM TONAL CE HUNTERSVILLE, PLANNING STAFF
(704-875-7000).
1 SETUP PRE-CONSTRUCTON CONFERENCE RAM MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
It TOWN OF HUNMFISNLLE PLANNING TNT 704-87 PIANN S 5-70DO .
4. CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE PER MECKLENBURG COUNTY, AS REWIRED.
5. WERE STANDARDS AND RESPONSBIUTY FOR INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING
BUT NOT UMITED TO STREETS, SOEWALKS, AND LANDSCAPING ARE SPECIFIED IN ME
ZONING AND/OR SUBOVISON ORDINANCES OF ME TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE, TOWN
STANDARDS SHALL CONTROL IN ME ABSENCE OF A SPECIFIED TOWN STANDARD.
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ME THEN MOST RECENT VERSION OF ME
MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (MCLDS).
SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES
1. SURFACE WATER CONTROL MEASURES TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO PLAN.
2. AREAS TO RE SEEDED SHALL BE RIPPED AND SPREAD WITH AVAILABLE TOPSOIL 3' DEEP.
TOTAL SEEDBED PREPARED DEPTH SHALL BE 4' TO 6' DEEP.
3. LOOSE ROCKS. ROOTS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ME SURFACE
SO MAT THEY WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH ESTABLISHMENT AND MANTENANCE OF
VEGETATION. SURFACE FOR FINAL SEEDBED PREPARATION AT FINISHED GRADES SHOWN
SHALL BE REASONABLY SMOOTH AND UNIFORM.
4. R NO SOIL TEST IS TAKEN, PROVIDE FERTILIZER AND UME ACCORDING TO SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS N ADDITION. PROVIDE 15 LBS/IOW SF. SUPERPHOSPHATE.
5. R SOL TEST IS TAKEN, PROVIDE UME AND FERTIUZER ACCORDING TO SCIL TEST REPORT.
6. LINE AND FERTILIZER SHALL BE APPUED UNIFORMLY AND MIXED WITH ME SOIL DURING
SEEDBED PREPARATION,
T ADDITXMAL EROSION CONTROL. MEASURES MAY BE REWIRED DEPENDING ON REM
CONDITIONS.
S. MOOCH TO BE TACKED OR MECHANICALLY TIED DOWN 'WMIN TWO DAYS AFTER MULCH IS
SPREAD.
9. ALL SLOPES STEEPER MAN Yi AT MORE MAN 5 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE
STABXJHD WITH AN EROSION CONMOL BLANKET CONSISTING OF A DOUBLE
POLYPROPYLENE NET WITH A STRAW -COCONUT FIBER MATRIX HAVING A MINIMUM
LONGEVITY OF 24 MONTHS
SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
1 a OPFc DR FLATTER
1. ARPLY AGRICULTURAL LIME AT ME RATE OF 100 LBS/1000 SF.
2. APPLY 10-10-10 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OR 20 LBS/1000 IF.
1 SEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE AND APPLICATION RATES:
DATE: TYPE: PLANTNG RATE
AUG 15 - NOV. 1 TALL FESCUE 300 M/AC OR 7 LBS/10DO S.F.
NOV. 1 - MAR. 1• TALL FESCUE AND 300 LBS/AC OR 7 LBS/IOW S.F.
ABRUZZI RYE 25 LBS/AC OR 1/2 LB/IOW S.F.
MAR. 1 - A. 15 TALL FESCUE 3W LBS/AC OR 7 LBW S/10S.F.
APR. 15 -PR
JUL 10 MULLED COMMON
BLNImA GRASS 30 LHS/AC OR 3/4 LB/TODO S.F.
All. 15 - AUG 15 TALL TOP ANO 3W LEIS/AC OR 7 L95/IOW S.F.
M SO TOP MILLET 35 LBS/AC OR 3/4 LB/1000 IF.
OR RIDS UM SWAN
HYBRIDS 30 Les/AC OR 3/4 LB/1000 IF.
4. MULCH WITH 6' STRAW MPED AT ME RATE OF 75 M11000 S.F. AND ANCHOR
WITH ASPHALT EMULSION TACK COAT MPED AT THE RATE OF 14-28 GAL/1000 S.F.
OR 800-1200 GAL/AC, CRIMPING OR BY INSTAWNG BIODEGRADABLE NETTING
• HEAVILY MUCHED WRING JNUARY - MARCH PERIOD.
$LOPES (iLEATER MAR 11
1. APPLY AGRICULTURAL UME AT A RATE CIF 100 LBS/IOW V.
2. APPLY 10-10-10 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER AT ME RATE OF 20 LBS/1DW S.F.
3. SEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE AND APPLICATION RATES:
DATE: TYPE: PLANTING RATE
MAR. 1 - JUN. 1 S]RICEA LESPEDEZA 50 LBS/AC OR 1 1/4 LBS/1000 IF.
(SCARIFIED) 6Ba
MAR. 1 -APR. 1 AW TALL FESCUE 150 LBS/AC OR 3 1/2 LBS/1000 S.F.
OR
MAR. 1 - JUN. 1 ADD WEEPING LOVEGRASS 5 LABS/AC OR 1/8 M/1000 S.F.
JEAN. 1 - SEPT. 1•••TALL FESCUE AND 60 LBS/AC OR 1 1/2 LBS/1000 S.F.
BROWN TOP WLLET M LBS/AC OR 3/4 LB/MOOD S.F.
OR SORGHUM SUDAN
HYBRIDS 30 LBS/AC OR 3/4 LB/1000 SF.
SEPTA 1 - MAR. 1 SERICEA LESPEDEZA 70 LBS/AC OR 1 3/4 LEI SF.
(UNHULLEO - UNSCARTREB)
&a ADD TALL FESCUE 150 LEI OR 3 1/2 LBS/10DO SF.
MILLET OR SUDAN 20 LBS/AC OR 1/2 LB/1000 IF.
4. MULCH WITH 6' STRAW APPLIED AT ME RATE OF 75 LBS/1000 S.F. AND ANCHOR
WIM ASPHALT EMULSION TACK COAT APPUED AT THE RATE OF 11-28 GAL/1000 S.F.
OR 8W-1200 GAL/AC, OR BY INSTALLING BIODEGRADABLE NETTING
••• TEMPORARY RESEED SEPT. 1 AT RECOMMENDED RATES,
OLFIVEY DISCLAIMM
SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 2017, PROVIDED BY R.B.
PHARR t ASSOXAMS, P.A. 420 HAWTHORNE UNE,
CHARLOTTE, NC 26204. (7D4) 375-2186
LEGEND
�V SEDIMENT BASIN 20/C-B.�I.
V6�L� OUTLET STRUCTURE WITH SKIMMER 19/C-BDt
ENHANCED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES:
1. THESE MEASURES ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED IN ME AREAS IDENTIFIED IN
ATTACHMENT 1 (MCDOWELL CREEK WATERSHED, CRITICAL t PROTECTED
WATERSHED DISTRICTS AND LAND WTHIN 500' OF CLARKE CREEK. SURFACE WATER
DRAW DOWN DEVICES (RISERS OR SKIMMERS) SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL
SEDIMENT BASINS. ROCK COFFER FMEBAYS SHALL BEUSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH
ALL SEDIMENT BASINS. SHALL BASIN SHALL ALSO HAVE A VOLUME TWENTY-FIVE
- -
(25) PERCENT GREATER MAN ME 11500 CUBIC FEET PER DRAINAGE ACRE, WEN
-
-----..�`
POSSIBLE PMYACRYLAMIDES (PAM) SHALL BE USED TO REWCE TURBIDITY AND
--
= GUSPENOED SOUDS WHENEVER A SEDIMENT TRAP, BASIN, PIT, HOLE, DR BUILDING
FOUNDATION BEING PUMPED TO REMOVE SEGMENT PAM IS
-
OUT LADEN WATER.
NOT REWIRED WHEN ANY OF ME ABOVE IS BONG PUMPED TO AN APPROVED
_
MUST INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY
SEDIMENT BASIN ON SITE. THIS NCO
ME MECKLENBURG COUNTY EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR.
IN
•
2. POLYACRVLAMIDES WAY BE REWIRED ON SITE. AS DETERMINED BY ME EROSION
CONTROL INSPECTOR.
D
DOUBLE ROW CE HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE WITH WIRE BACKING AND STONE SHALLR�
AN
BE USED ALONG WETLANDS. STREAMS, LAKES OR OMER SURFACE WATER BODIES
/ A
S WELL AS ADJACENT TO ALL S.W.I.Y. OR OMER WATER QUALITY BUFFERS.
4.SINSINGLEGROW CE SILT FENCE WITH WIRE BACKING AND WASHED STONE MAY BE
REQUIRED RE IRED ON ALL OTHER AREAS, AS DETERMINED NECESSARY BY ME TOWN
ENGINEER OR FIELD INSPECTOR.
I�1
5. ME AMOUNT OF UNCOVERED AREA AT ANY ONE TIME SHALL BE UNITED TO NO
MORE MAN 20 ACRES, UNLESS APPROVED BY ME TOWN.
6. A 10-FOOT UNDISTURBED BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE OUTSIDE
O O O O
O 0
EDGE OF DRAINAGE FEATURES SUCH AS INTERMITTENT AND PERENNIAL STREAMS
PONDS, AND WETLANDS INODENTAL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS OR REPAIRS WILL
BE PERMITTED WITHIN ME BUFFER AS APPROVES BY TOWN STAFF. THESE WOULD
INCLUDE ALLOWANCES STATED IN ME SWIM BUFFER AND/OR PCCO
IIIO�� j
DINAANY
ORDINANCES IF APPLICABLE
' 7. A GROUND COVEN SUFFICIENT TO RESTRNN ACCELERATED EROSION MUST BE
PROVIDED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF ME DATE OF UST LAND-DISTURBING
L�J
/
ACTIVITY ON ANY PORTION OF ME PROJECT.
��i N1 04VERUM DTCNES AND INTERIOR BASIN SLOPES MUST BE MATTED.
♦ SUFTICIENT ACCESS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE MUST RE PROVIDED AT
THE TOE OF ALL RETAINING WALLS THAT ARE 4' OR HIGHER. THE MINIMUM ACCESS
WIDTH SHOULD BE NO LESS THAN SIX FEET.
-�
/ I
10. ALL BASIN SPILLWAYS SHALL BE SIZED TO PASS ME 25-YR STORM EVENT.
IT. FILL SLOPE STEEPNESS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 2:1. SLOPES STEEPER MAN 3:1
/
MUST BE TERRACED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDE AN APPROVED ENGINEERED SOLUTION.
AWES 11 MUST BE DESIGNED N
SET ND IN ME NC Shc
FLATTERPLANNING
IN THE6.02A.
N
EROSION t SEDIMENT PUNNING t DESIGN MANUAL, STANDARD
E T
12. ALL PLANS WILL CARRY A 'PERFORMANCE RESERVATION'.
13. ALL SELF -INSPECTION IN BOOK ENTRIES WILL BE ELECTRONICALLY SENT OR ME
AREA INSPECTOR, WITHIN 2 BARKING OAS$ IL A WLECTRON RAIN EVENT TO
WEEKLY IS SHORTER).FOR EROSION CONTROL BASNS WITH A
_
(WHICHEVER
ORMNAGE AREA GREATER THA 10 S
TTMEASUREMENTSURBIDITY
REWIRED AT ME DISCRETION OF THE To. O MEASURE CLARITY OF BASIN
/
EFFLUENT AND ANY POTENTIAL IMPACT TO RECEIVING WATERS AT ME TIME OF
RAINFALL TRIGGERED INSPECTIONS. READINGS MUST BE COLLECTED AT ME BASIN
CLARITY OF BASIN EFFLUENT). DUVALL (TO MEASURE CLUPSTREAM OF ME
DISCHARGE POINT (TO MEASURE BASELINE CONDITIONS) AND DOWNSTREAM OF ME
DISCHARGE POINT (TO MEASURE STREAM IMPACTS OF ME BASIN EFFLUENT) -
POSSIBLE. ME RESULTS MUST BE LOGGED IN ME INSPECTION REPORTS.
SILT FENCE
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE
TREE PROTECTION FENCING
STONE INLET
SEDIMENT TRAP
CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
STAB6IZED CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
GRAVEL, RIP RAP APRON
DENUDED UNITS
DWERSON DITCH
ROCK CHECK DAM
DRAINAGE AREA
SPILLWAY
3/C-801
1/C-605
19/C-603
18/C-801
4/C-B01
9/C-803
12.17/C-802
3/C-801
2/C-801
17/C-801
RIDGE UNE -/-
i
1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSUR IG MAT EXISTING UTUTES ARE
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2 CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR ACING BARRICADES USING
FLAG MEN, ETC AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO ME PUBUC.
1 ALL PAVEMENT CUTS. CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF ME NORTH CAROUNA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TONAL OF HUNTERSVILLF AND
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENWRG UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS
4. SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 1T126 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
ColeJenest
& Stone
ShIpl.9 the Eav lllmt
RtMinrg tM Passidlitia
ePNnn�nq
,__�vpe APiutenun
i
ivq Enynminq
UMn Devgn
2W Sovtn Taw. Snot Sd1e1400
KW.Nm, Nwu oml�-282M
u704 370 ISM N 704 3M 711151
dF ...akA+•+
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SURE 370
CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONS PARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE.NC 28078
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN -
STAG E 1
Project No.
4464
Issued
10/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TOH COMMENTS
N
SCALE. 1"=100'
0 50100, 2Dd
C-300
The d io qe, the project moaud and the dnIW M IR the
an hetrN to of Col e t t Stwk P.A. The reproduntl
authorised u of the docamaate Nthoul caa Beat of
CdeJeneet t Staa. P.A. b Prohibited.
Cdw ml, t Stm PAD 2019

Comm Umm/ Y
ILI ACM
P'RD/E11i1' 12IE. 7l•. / \ 1 � � / l • �� --.. / _! 1 ^ + !`- � _'� -.� /� �✓ % l \\
SAM
�IJ �P \I /' / `1 ! rTT✓/1 i �� �� \\ % _ / /� �, IRKOAL/
v _
VO�A��
40 4 2 Tau MH-u
IEMONNG EASTND S'TM•111L
J
PAI•ISIa
�� o'!i!;!\1 `! +\\L\ \' /�/ !!`�l/!I//°/Ji (liii!/� !/^t 1�\\/'/� i i �� / VICINITY MAP NTa®
A. I / ! } ! ! ! 5'eID' WP RAP APRON. TYP. I 1 / Imo'^./ !! , ! !/ ! / �. +
} ! ! \ SEE DETAIL 3/C-603 i 1\ \ ,! �/ / /`.�/ ' , !! // ! / I L _ ��\ \ / ! I I
2. srIm ER WITH 1.30 wcHI ORIFICE I�3 i I ( �! )! \\ , 1 //i/ //' //� //!// � 1 I 1 �. 1 , /! 1 I J / SMI DOCLAI
CONNECTED To TEMPORARY RISER J ! TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN Nt / �'% } , / /) f + t T 1 / \ _1 / ! / / ) SURVEY ISSUE DATE AIR 1 1, 2O17, PROVIDED BY R.B.
STRUCTURE WITH V OF 6' HOPE PIPE / I /! / ! \ BOTTOM: 706.00 / j/ �', 6 / 1 I / / !! ! 1 ! 1 t 1- _ ' / \ \" l /! ! ) ! I ! PHARR t ASSOCIATES. PA !2a HAWTHORNE LANE.
WMMER TO BE PLACED AT ELEVATION •! REGAINING OF STORAGE: 70].00 a / \ l i l / ! ! ! L CHARLOTTE, NC 2a2O4. (7D4) 376-2186
707. SEE DETAIL 19/C-6OI. I / I / / !\ \ SPLLWAY CREST. 709.00 •//// / �/ /I/� If / !� ! ` 1 1 / \ // ! /,I`�' ,
/r / / / \ \ ; TOP OF BERM: nto0 . /,! !/ / ! t //// //
30 iFLARY CUP RISER (RIM
DRAINAGE AREA 1.7 ACRES
POR
( ! , REQUIREDSTORAGE: 3.oeA a
SET AT 70D.00') w1N AN la' J ! / / ! 1 !' PROVIDED STORAGE 6.950 OF
BARREL. BARREL INVERT-706.00 ' / / (Cr' LEQEND
P O ED SURF
A�1 3.sx g /ram/ - / /
117 LP OF TEMPORARY la' GAP I / 1 / _ / ( . SEE DETAIL 20/C-a01 /// / r// / I__�. �. ` / /'/
won FRI / l ! 1 Y-_ // / / / _"_` �.\ \ ! �- �!� DETAIL
CATCH BASH INET PROTECTIOIA SEDIMENT BASIN2o/c-801
TYP. SEE DETAIL 4/C-a01
STAauan CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SEE DETAIL 12.17/C-602 / I (. / I : • t \ lJ / .', j�// j1, / / \ \ \ } 1\\- \ \ J I 1 ) / 1 ' '
\\�\` OUTLET STRUCTURE WITH SKIMMER 19/c-801
I / fNW7N.•1 'f / J � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / ! ! \ \ ) I 1 I ! ! ! � SILT FENCE 3/C-901
_'�! ! t / ! ! 1 / i 1 �\).�) ► \ \ \\ \\\\ I I \\ \ TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINIM�T
BOTTOM: 695.00\--
SPILLWAY
NG OF STORAGE: 597.00
50 - (� HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE 1/C-905
DOJBLE ROW a HIGH HAZARD / , 'd- / ! O J / - 7 - ! \ (\ \ \ - TOP OFF CREST. 69z5o
! G' 1 , ( \ TOP OF BERM'. 699.00 /
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, TYP //% / O i !-. / ! I \ \ \ \ DRAINAGE AIiEti 11.0 ACRES
$ DETAIL 1/C-605 y/ / / / OOdO. T 1 I / / l r� 1' \\\\\ \ / DISTURBED AREA: 11.0 ACRES \
TREE PROJECTION FENCING, .0 //! / Y Q bA 1 f ` //"� ! / RIDGE SEPARATING TTGMPORNRY \\ \\ \ \ { REWIRLU STORAGE 19,791 a
TIP. SEE OETNL 19/C-603/ /% / /!\`" 4 I / SEDIMENT BASIN 11 AND /2 \ \ \ \ \ I PRONGED STORAGE SA,196 Ci '\ \ \ TREE PROTECTION FENCING 1S/C-803
/ \�` \ L / DRAINAGE AREAS \
\\ \ \\ I REWIRED SURFACE AREA \ .95PRONGED SURFACE AREA 2929,756 3
t \ SEE OE7FL 20/C-601 \ / ( J
90 m TRAP BAFFLE TIM \ ® STONE INLETTEMPORM1e/c-Bc:
MANAGE AREA
(1.7T BARN / j) / \ \ S ' !
\ \ \ SEE DETAIL 12/C-a01 \ SEDIMENT TRAP
DRAINA/E AREA (1Jt ACRES) 1 J 1 \ \ \\ ~ \ \ - •- " ♦ ///��`
\4e'SNNMER W H 3' OPoFJCE TO BE RELEASED
1mN A 6- HOPE PPE. WINNER TO HAVE A V
4" THE
WTIPE ON THE END O PLACID t / CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION
/ / \ _ V' � \\E TOP
P AT ELEVATION 695.00. CONNECT � '
-- I \� \ \ EP TO OCS-P2 SEE DETAIL 19/C-601. !!!!/ • HW
INSTALL PERMENANT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE II��
.PPE,! !� PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE 9/C-803
\ 1 / _ + / / �• � \ 1 • \ \ \ \ \ ` \ (�sT cT M NT BASIN
DU AL FOR THE T • !
i / Y �/. / /'f j \ } L ! / ) ! �( , \ ♦ l \ \ \ - 3s(Daf.Nr BASH WRNC ALL BIASES.
\.1 f !
/ r ��� � a !///)I \ \ \ f (/ � , / + I \ ♦ \. \ \ \ I I J I � \ ! 5FILLWAY SET AT 697, 50
1 (51' LENGTH) O 0 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
i V /�/� t �/ \\\ \�\ / \ A rI/ 1 ♦ \\ \ \ / / I 1 �� /. a �. OpOp ENTRANCE 12,n/c-eoz
��\ / ♦ 1 BASIN RIP RAP BERM
\.:+IaEED[TK20/0-ool. l \\
� i// !!� !!/!/ / �•- .,� l� ` �\\�,� \ � -J., \\\ \ \ \ ! / Y i /!I IN /N /• , \ �, 1 I GRAVEL RIP RAP APRON 3/c-e03
X
oEnuoEo uwlTs -/-
i{III/L+N\ �J/�\ \l�i /J'�✓/!I! \ �\\\\�\\\\\\ \..\� \„ + \ \\ j!/�///!/! \\��t��// � � / /! t \
r'/
DOUBLE ROW OF HI94 HAZARD \ \ \ \ \ / / ! ,/ \ ,!
DIVERSIONO CH z/c-801
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE. TIP. 1 \ \ \\ \ \ \`+ \I 1 !
SEE DETAIL I/c-605
TEMPORARY SE7i 1wEHT
\ i 1 ! fl, + \ \ \ \y �\ \ DRAINAGE AREA W15\\.,ter//
v� s IN I ! ! / / \ \\ \ \ \ L + (IID4 ACRES) \ \ / Mir// / WT Ni l/{AI� aMi 7� / / , \ ./ `�� \ ® ROCK CHEM DAN 17/C-801
\\ \ \ ��, / j \\\•/r, // N11ADaq.Iw1YE / / // - \
M r
RaNA Mr anLlw aFteF 1a
eME 9® USE
DRAINAGE AREA -/-
\ TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN R \ ! ! / / '' ' ! � �•�
! '�I I lt II r 1 / !\ // MANAGE AREA (11, ACRES)
,y''tl SALT FENCE OUTLETSPIuwAY
, TYP. (. \J ! ! / ! V
SEE DETAIL 11/C-601 / -/-
/ , TREE PROTECTN/I\\\"-��"••y\�/!7! j I I ! i i,!!I/ '� ' l„���\, r��^--�,
1 1 TIP. SEE DETAIL 19/P603 -.\ / ) 1 L \\ \ / ! ! / / J 1 /' r i / -_
1 ! PROTECTION TTP. MET PROTECTION
STONE RIDGE LINE -/-
II SEE DETAIL 19/PNw,
SEE SHEET C-300 FOR EROSION CONiROL
NOTES, TREE R/PROTECTION NOTES,
1 ) SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES. AND
1 - - 'r!! / / �,/ / ��� / .� N III N N F•'� „` -y )1 t I / i i 1 ` \t CONSTRUCTION SEOIEJCE.
MANAGED USE ZMEE WT.
1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
LOCATED (PRIOR PARTIES
CONSTRUCTIIOOIPoNc n1Ar E%IsnMc UTILITIES ARE
I /!If -•,\ `• y !! !/^ \\ )m J 1111/I JIj �I l� \. � 11 }+\\ ! / 2. CON MEN EIS RESPONSIBLE TC AS NECESSARY OR PLACING
SAFE' CING BARRICADES T USINGFLAPUBLIC.
30' STREAM SIDE H, { `
/ \\ • \\ ( \ //- ' ! / / / ! i (//) `! ZONE LIMIT. &ALL PAVEMENT CUM CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS 0 THE NORTH CARO3NA
// �./ / III !/ EK / DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND
\\ •• 11 Il \\\ - [!!/ % / 7/ -MCDOWEI'I- CRE i / /( / CHARLOTTE-MECKLEINBUFG UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS-
-I-
\ / �. SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
\ /,! / � .(li/ a 1 , ! PART 1926 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
I
ColeJenest
& Stone
Shap'ng the Emlmmneri
RealzI the I`MbI Des
zoo •.>. • -.� sneer 2820200
ae 704 375 1555 M 70A 376 7851
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD. SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE. NC28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONS PARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE.NC 28078
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN -
STAG E 1
Project No.
4464
Issued
C/04/.9
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TOM COMMENTS
N
SCALE: 1"=40'
0 20' 40' 80'
C-301
TT. M hgA, the p,,*t maraud and the Ewen Novo Me
a Ine WIN is of CaleJenesl a store, P.A. The 'eTNOBucll
nau MN 1,e uw of Me Eoe Ate efthwt canwnt of
Cd eet h stone, P.A. 1• prohWited
CdeJ eet a St— PIB 2019
a

•
ire-,
\cvs / rr
cased Birkdo% ' f
PG. 77J
If
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. I
SEE DETAIL 12.17/C-502 DENUDED EMITS , TYR. oft 7:7immm
19.1 ACRES '� N SAM F URR RO /EwsnNc RIaNr-tK-wnr O / `��f —l� ��LINE �,m ^A' BLIC S-y_ _ / + 1111110
= _
OO 0 �\ //'" /-��A�� _ _ _ AiD_S.R.21�5 ' ' aft -raft aft, ion ININ aft NNN 7
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN CHARLOTTE NC zez 76-z,e6 E� -
l PH 3 ASSOCUTES, P.A. 420 HAWTHORN
--.--- CH TTE. 04. (704) 3
/y i<.. ♦ - - - _ \ ' BOTTOM: 69a0f1 \ \ \ • G
`� / -- , // • •`..i \ SBEGINNING OF STORAGE'
tEPLLW UE
696.00 \ \ \ -° 5 / ' n • /
NILWAY CREST 097.00 \ % ' �• / I �
• /% 9 I ) t, TOP OF BF7•L 69a50� \ \\ `\ \ } • , • TREE PROTECTION FENCNG. / 1
DRAINAGE AREA. 3.1 ACRES i T1P. SEE DETAIL ,9/C-60.T /// -
\ ;. / ) ♦ ( pSNRBED AREA: 3.1 ACRES �\ \\ \ \ \ `\ \ r / ="--, I�VG`4D
/ REQUIRE STORAGE: __ a61! C£ \ \ \ \ \ t R ?�•
PROVIDED STORAGE iT.016 CF :' \ \ \ \ \ { \ ,( • SPRLWAY SET AT 117,1 -\
/ _
REQUIRED SURFACE AREA 4.225 3 ) \ / / (15' MINIMUM LENGTH) ,{/ /"-' ` / 9A109L DETAIL
y f • / \ l ♦\ / ! r PROHOEn wRFACE Ate` tT.Tu s i\\\\ \\t \ / / 7 )� • \
p /--� J / \ i ♦ l / -SEE DETAL 20/C-em / \ \ /` 3• SKIMMER WITH 1.80. FITO BE •\/ \
I \ \ _ ORICE !, / �\ SEDIMENT BASIN 20/C-801
• RELEASE mmmD MRE A 6' HOPE PIPE
Yrr /• l / \ 1 ! `� 1 - I 1 (I I I \ \ \ \ \ "/' / f • • 90MNER TO BE RNFASED AT E LVVATiON
UNIT OF UPLAND ZONE (LOCATFO I t I / \ / ' / 696.1)0. SEE DETAL E9/C-DOt.
AT FLOODR-AN LIMIT WHERE I I
FN IGREATER THEN 25' ••, 1 • : / / /
/ -- -- \ FROM
/ MANAGED USE LIMIT) � I I / / / �/- / I i • / i /' , � WiR iIET SUCNRE WITH SKIMMER 19IC-801
30. sTanMT yoE A
/
---
/.
/ ,i' --�� / '/ // j ,/ \\ /---'/' .. \ i \�• -} FTNA AND COMI ! / (,/ I ZONE I11rT.
MYUNIIY • / // �-
1 ,, f't ! ! J \✓ / ONC�USEUo" ti • �1 //' !/ f 1 l SILT FENCE 3/c-501
COMMUNITY FLOOOWAY 1
FEw t �\ t� Mr T BASINBASINFE110DWAr #3
L $ /•�_ ORA•IAQE AREA (llt ACRES) �\.\- ) 1
\ \ Hlol HAZARD s11-r FENCE 1/c-e05
TREE PROTECTION FENCING 19/C-603
'� ....� / `_- 1 t\♦ \ \ \\ \\L���`.� \\� f l/� ' t �---- i \/ \\�. \ STONE INLET 19/c-801
_ LE_
SEDIMENT TRAP
RIDGE SEPARATING TEMPORARY .`\\...\\\\ I 4 / I i • 1 / - JJ / �' /�1j /• \�` � J ® �j
SEDIMENT BASIN (2 AND I3 \ '� _ \ ,`'T`\9 \ \ \ / 1 / • / , J` J
\�\t/— DRAINAGE AREAS ',\ I�l—z\�\,`-\\ \\cam\\� 1�. R / / , ! / \\�
[\ l J J V j IE/ / / 1 '1• CATCH BASIN INLET PROTEcnw a/c-e01
/(( f II 111)� II I 1 f �� I //r //// •,� \) /� r
�� \\ \ ! (1 \1q\ �/ I I111 I' I } I IL� / �/ •• t J /// i //// ' ` /
\ 1 1 -- - - - - \ / ) \ \ // 1 I 1 1 •I f 1 I / / / I / / LN + / . PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE 9/c-003
!III / ../�-__. ♦ -.. �'� � `(i/!//// �
/ -' J' \ // o 0
/ - b" / \ r1 ) /� 1 /'./ O O suBluzEo coNSTRucna+ Iz,n/c-eoz
I / f 1 1 // 1 I • +`� / / / 1 I / Q 0 ENTRANCE
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN #2 /' \ \ �/ � 1 � 1 t f \ �/ J/ /r / t ' I I ;' \\ \\ \ /�� � // � t � \
Bona: 694.00 t- J Ji - l / /
BEGINNING OF STORAGE 69aoo - ( `\ C/_ \ \ \-�//,� l \\ \� \• •t --i ///'/ ZO
SPI LWAY CREST: 697.50 t / / NE ? 1 f�4X[i'o
TOP W BERM: 699.00 j \\ - / /' ) \\� \ -- /J ,Y/V / / , I 1�
\ `S� 1 \ / / I / / / GRAVEL RIP RAP APRON 3/C-603
DRAINAGE AREA ILO ACRES / /-- \ \\ / / \ ^ l• / / t // / -.�//\ I / /
J DISTURBED AREA: U.0 ACRES---
/' REWIRED STORAGE 19.791 CF / / ] RppL CHEO< DAM. TIN.
PROVIDED STORAGE 54,, 96 CF / / _.. - \ = DETAIL 17/C-60Y - ( \ \ / / \/ '� / - - / / - / !
REQUIRED SURFACE AREA: 14,950 sF R - , j�'� I
PROVIDED SURFACE AREA: 29,756 SF 1 1 l I , R `- DENUDED OMITS -I-
\ _lK DETAIL 20/C-601 t t \ 1BiOlART oRBTSION DITCH. TYP, r `-
DETAL 2/0-e111
-\\\\ I / l i ��l / // / /r "\ j /-����_� //� /�I\`` _�//J'/ -- __ 8tR1'AL�/?-wE \\ \ \ \'t �'� f 3'y� \� / I ,� / -► y DIOERSON DITCH 2/C-801
ROC( CHECK DAM 17/C-801
DRAINAGE AREA -/-
SPILLWAY -I-
\... I TEMPLE ROW LT FEN /JF \
1' SEE DEAL SILT FFJVCF. / / / \ y / / RIDGE LINE -/-
t SEE DETAIL t BDB // „/� 1 \/ // D.
- - / t ® / `\ �\ /' SEE S1-EET C-300 FOR EROSION CONTROL
NOTES. TREE BUFFER/PROTECTION NOTES,
SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES, AND
CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE.
Fl ON
mm ma WIN
'-- /
• 4 SKIMMER WTH 3' ORIFICE TO BE RELEASED WITH A 6' HOPE PIPE. SIMMER
TO HAVE A V UPTURNED PIPE OI 7FIE / 111 // / I/
END TO BE PLACED NTH THE TOP AT AEJ L / // / \
�t ELEVATION 593.00. SEE DETAIL 19/C-M. // ! / / `�� // // '
ATTACH 90RIER TO BOTTOM DRAIN AT , / / / / 1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
/ / / ARPROPI6ATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT E%ISTNG UTILITIES ARE
��-- // LOCATE 'OR To cDNsrnucnaN.
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
FLAG MEN, ETC 4NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBLIC.
ALL ACED ACC CUTS. CONCRETE STANDARDS A OF THE
ARE TO BE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. TOM OR HUNTERSVILLE AND
,I SEE DETAIL 12/C-601. �f ._ / 7 // if N� // // / C
HA
R
TTE-MECKLENBURG UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS.
/
II 11, �l ,. / /' �J / I \ ../ t. PPARTI 1926 SUBPART�PR,DIOR AS AMNDEDENCHING STANDARDS
ColeJenest
& Stone
Sh.pi, , the Env ...mt
RtAit lg the Pon bil ties
zNw so : z�14ao
c,,.m a��odm. zez9z
of 704 376 1555 µ 704 376 7651
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SURE 370
CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
165M BIRKDALE
COMMONSPARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28078
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN -
STAGE 1
Project No.
4464
Issued
IO/04/,9
Revised
10/15/2019 - REVISED PER TO/ COMMENTS
N
SCALE. V=40'
0 20' 40' $0,
C-302
The C,.whg., the propct --II -d the —ir shown the
are Me—ente of Cole—e.t k St.., P.A.. The reprodu.tl
.Mo,[R.d use of the document. without .-sent .1
CdeJeneet k Sl-e, P.A. Is Prohibited
ColeUeneet k St-e, P.® 2019

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
STAGE 2
1. COORDINATE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCING PHASE 2 OF
EROSION CONTROL MEASURE&
2, GRADE AND INSTALL ROADWAY AND ASSOCIATED STORM DRAINAGE LEAVE SEDIMENT BASIN
/1 AND /3 IN PLACE FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE PRIOR TO GRADING IN AREA SEDIMENT
BASIN /2 SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT PHASE 2.
3. PLACE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL INLETS WITHIN THE ROADWAY AS THEY ARE INSTALLED.
4. MASS GRADE SITE AND INSTALL REMAINDER OF STORM STRUCTURES PLACE STONE INLET
PROTECTION AROUND ALL STRUCTURES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PAVED AREA.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES AND STRUCTURES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN
CLOSE CONTACT WITH THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR SO THAT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS
CAN BE PERFORMED AT APPROPRIATE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION.
6. THE LAND DEVELOPMENT INSPECTOR SHOULD BE CALLED TO CONDUCT INSPECTIONS OF
STOW DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENTS, AND ALL ASPECTS OF ROAD
CONSTRUCTION.
7. STABIUM SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT TO FINISHED GRADE.
& COORDINATE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY
ERO90N CONTROL MEASURE.
9. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE 'NTH THE N.C.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL, U.S. DEFT. OF
AGRICULTURE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE, AND THE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
10. CALL THE WATER QUALITY INSPECTOR TO SET UP A BMP PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING
PRIOR TO THE CONVERSION OF TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN /2 TO THE SAND FILTER BMP.
THIS MEETING SHOULD TAKE PLACE AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO STARTING
CONSTRUCTION ON THE SAND FILTER CONVERSION. THE INSPECTOR WALL VERIFY THAT THE
CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS COMPLETELY STAERUZED AND STORM DRAINAGE PIPES
ARE CLEAN BEFORE THE CONVERSION.
14. FOR NC CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT (NOGOi) NOTES SEE DETAIL 19,20/C-804.
STAGE 2A
1. STAGE 2A CONSISTS OF THE ROUGH GRADING FOR THE GOLF COURSE HOLE /9
REAUCNMENT. FOR THIS PHASE, THE SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROLS ARE TREATED
INDEPENDENTLY FROM THE MAIN INFRASTRUCTURE WORK, THIS HAS BEEN DONE TO ALLOW
THE GOLF COURSE TO REMOVE THE SAE CONTROLS AND RESUME FUNCTION ONCE THE
GROUND HAS BEEN STABILIZED PRIOR M THE COMPLETION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE
INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGE
3. INSTALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND TREE PROTECTION AS SHOWN ON PLANS, CLEARING
ONLY AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL THESE DEVICES.
4. CALL FOR ON -SITE INSPECTION BY INSPECTOR. WHEN APPROVED, INSPECTOR ISSUES THE
GRADING PERMIT AND SITE WORK MAY BEGIN,
5. ROUGN GRADE THE PROPOSED HOLE jB CONFIGURATION. FOR SLOPES 3H:IV OR STEEPER
AND GREATER THAN 5- VERTICAL HEIGHT, MAR THE SLOPE WAIN NORTH AMERICAN GREEN
SC250 OR APPROVED EOUIVAENT.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DIUCENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
DEVICES AND STRUCTURES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN
CLOSE CONTACT WITH THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR SO THAT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS
CAN BE PERFORMED AT APPROPRIATE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION.
& STABILIZE SITE AS AREAS ARE BROUGHT TO FINISHED GRADE. NOTE THAT THIS MAY BE
DONE BY SEPARATE GOLF COURSE CONTRACTOR WHO WILL BE CONDUCTING THE FINE
GRADING AND SEEDING OF THE GREENS.
9. COORDINATE WITH THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY
EROSION CONTROL MEASURE
10. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N.C.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL, U.& DEPT. OF
AGRICULTURE. MECKLENBURG COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE, AND THE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
NCDOT 11.6g,N bL C RAF✓) -... en r l = ":..`,F " : - e= ems;, .-+....F _yam � ,— i'•
ED 214.5
302
BAAr
lW
a)
<0
o J Lu
` L
I
I
(
BIIFrVEY DOCI AIMM
SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 1017, PROVIDED BY R.B.
PHARR at ASSOCIATES, P.A. 420 HAWTHORNS LANE,
CHARLOTTE, NC 25204.[phone]
LEGEND
SYMBOL DETAIL
SEDIMENT BASIN 20/C-801
OUTLET STRUCTURE WITH SKIMMER 19/C-001
SILT FENCE 3/C-801
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE 1/C-805
TREE PROTECTION FENCING t9/C-803
STONE INLET 18/C-80t
SEDIMENT TRAP
® CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION 4/C-80T
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE 9/C-803
Q Q Q Q STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION 12,17/C-802
Q Q ENTRANCE
GRAVEL RIP RAP APRON 1/C-803
DENUDED UNITS
y e� DIVER90N DITCH 2/C-801
® ROCK CHECK DAM 17/C-801
DRAINAGE AREA -/-
SPILLWAY -/-
RIDGE LINE -/-
EROSION CONTROL MATTING 9/C-802
SEE SHEET C-300 FOR EROSION CONTROL
NOTES, TREE BUFFER/PROTECTION NOTES,
AND SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES.
, A
1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT EXISTING UTILITIES ARE
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
FLAG MEN, ETC AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBLIC.
3. ALL PAVEMENT CUM CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING M STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND
CHARLOTTE-MECKLEN8URG UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS.
4. SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 1926 SUBPART P, OR AS AMENDED.
CoWenest
& Stone
Sh.piN the E,, i,W menl
R<Mieing the Pmsdli[ies
lend PNnnin9
.a E p Arw9 rtn�<
uM irnn steN, su�rt laoD
Cr,adott, NortA GMin 28eai
e 15ss f. roc Tm IA I
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE, NC28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONSPARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN -
STAG E 2
Project No.
4464
Issued
10/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TOH COMMENTS
N
SCALE: VON'
0 50, 100' 200'
C-303
me dn.in9.s, Ne F'ajett mnnualand the design shorn IMron
re inrtrumerh dCde]enat85tom, PA. The reproduction
na�meriad �,e dd,e d�,mens,Hna,seement M
:cM]enzsl8 Bane, P.A. h DrMibXed.
Cdehnest i Stone, P.A. 1.19
0

/ I ' IEYPORMY WALKWAY. WALKWAY TO BE
\ \� / • / MAINTAINED UNTIL THE PERMANENT PARKING 15
DENUDED UNITS (TYP.) COMPLETE AND CLEM OF CONSTRUCTION
IB.B ACRES/ ) \ / J "; HAZARDS TO PEDESTPoMS AND IS TURNED
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
SIDEWALK ACCESS ALONG BRKDAE COMMONS PARKWAY TO BE
MAINTAINED nAiGUGH T CONSTRUCTION. ACCESS TO ONLY BE a -D9
WTERRUPTTD DURING INSTALLATION OF STORM DRAINAGE FROM a! _ t ��'`.- y
MH-CJ TO THE EASING MANHOLE, DURING WHICH ME PORTION O / � MN-.2 '���._� ' �•..I / \. , ) � I --
OF SIDEWALK IS TO BE CLOSED. PEDESTRIANS TO BE PROTECTED
AS NECESSMY DURING VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION
BY PEDESTRIAN- / ` / /j
WALKWAY NTH OVERHEAD PROTECTION.
/ � CT /; / � ... \ -��� a� iF 1 `ems l ��\•\`
IR
P<4
AV
ColeJenest
& Stone
shaping Me Env'mmnmt
Realltlrg [ne Possib'bbes
a PYmm�q
.anda.pe A:wha,�
Ora Fngimennq
ma le- a
CMAntte. ,NM Gml n. tato2
e lg,' /'' ; 3J ISSUE DAM All T 1. 30 ]. FRONDED BY R.B. BIRKDALE
f\ \ J // /'.� q l r / 2iY' J J I J I ` ;i i 1 /T SURVEY' PN% t ASSOCIATES, P.A. 42021717 LANE.
1 / •iA' / l j 1 I J / L J CHARLOTTE. NO 2112D4. (7D4) 375-z,BM
TEYFCOURKNSEOLY-NTFOR EF REAL ESTATE
/ 1 ;—'�^
�v _ A TO BE MAINTANIED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION INVESTORS LLC
-------------------- 1 /
AO J / J \ TopoRMY sETAM-T SAS_ LT f �l \ -/ ��_ PERMANENT PAR HAZARDS
IS COMPLETE AND CIEM OF LHEND
DRAINAGE AREA (12]3 ACES) .y/� / //� q1� / / i- r a CWSIINCIIAI HA2'ARDS TO {'FDE5115M5 AND IS T
': / i I T15Wm OVER TO im GOUN�
/ / 4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CATCH BASIN _LET PROTEa
CTION,
SE501 �, ti
TYP. E DETAIL 4/C-/ + / / ,. _ , , �� I . , �-D141 ` "�\ -,- SEDIMENT BASIN 2o/C-B01 CHARLOTTE. NC 28284
I1 /
STMIU2ID CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 1
SEE DETAIL
SILT FENCE OUTLET. TYP. , .< '
SEE DETAIL II/C-501 / /
C
A � /
/ � I
I l J STONE INLET PROTECTION TO BE INSTALLPERMANENT STORM
REMOVED AND REPLACED NTN - /f / / / j / , STRUCTURES AND PIPING, TYP. >., \ • BIRKDALE GOLF
\
CA Ta 5AMN _LET PROTECTION ! -
ONCE SW 15 PAVED. �i 1 � /' \ 1 � _ _ _ - a -On
/ \ _ OJIET STRUCTURE NTH SKIMMER 19/C-BO1 /-------_ /�' CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
SILT \ \ ,-% i FENCE J/C-6C'.
/ + r a- - %;/ - --,' , \, , � a-05 0INFRASTRUCTURE
} G l �10 y \ ONLY
J
- NNII I I q, ' d-0,2 � / / j HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE ,/C-8o5 16500 BIRKDALE
_ a -AST \ / ' / J / / COMMONS PARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
TREE PROTECTION FENCING 19/C-w3 EROSION
I S C-All \ 1J (_�--- it ' ✓,/
® STONE INLET ,B/C-w,NTH CONTROL PLAN
REL
r \ \ \ ORIRCE TO Ci (`') ♦ SEDIMENT TRAP
EASED a S' a- HOPE RPE J
\ . `,j sKINMER TO eRELEASED RETEASEO AT EtEVA/C-B01. STAGE 2
ELEVATION
- ' r
I "I SEE OETAL 19J / / / // / )
G-A] _ {/ / // I ® CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION {/C-801
INSTALL PAND 4NIT OUTILET CONTRA 5R5/AMENT
(OCs- C AND TO RCP ION AS PIPE PaIAN THE
SRe UCNIE TO IT BAST D I lid FOR
H THE
\�\ �l \\ ¢�p1T BASIN DURING A41 PHASES.
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE 9/C-803
Project No.
10e,
CONNECTSKIMMERTO 4464
PERMANENT"
OUTLET
CONTROLSTRUCTURRUOTURf
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
\ i t \ \ INV-69J.00 } 1 1 y AT 0000 ENTRANCE 1x.17/c-eo2 I55UBd
TEMPORARY ARY SEDIMENT BASIN rig
BOTTOM: 9J.00
BEGINNING OF STORAGE, 5895.00 : I\ GRAAl RIP RM APRON 3/C-803
SPILLWAY CREST: 697.50 P
TOP OF BERl1' 899.00 /
AREA 110 AGES
'4(9 j/ f/ /i'//j�,`� `_ - \ \ \ DISTURBED AREA 24. ACRES
/
\` Yk \\\\ ` ��� DENUDED UNITS -/-
REWIRED STORAGE- 24.7J9 CFfJ ,
1 _ \ �`.•. \ \ \ PRO,
STORAGE 54,,85 ff {. \ \ I /
REQUIRED SURFACE
PRONGED
1SURFACE AREA: 29.755 Sf \ \ 'LF
SEE DETAIL zo/c-em / \
/ \ j - - Revised
SKIMMER TR
DIVER9oN aral x/c-9o1 / /2019 - REVISEDPER ION COMMENTS
SEE DETAIL 12/C-801
JR:,V OR STEEPER AND GREATER
/
s' wencAL Howr sHAl1 eE
YATMTim NTI/ NORTH NIETSCAN CiE}71J / `
ROCK CHECK OM IJ/C-BO,
SC230 OR APPROVED EOUVAENT. TYP.. f f
SEE DETAL SX-1110i J \\
M BERM / DRAINAGE AREA -J �jS & ST
! SNw LI�M�9E B-B2 MN-B5/ /
LIMIT OF UPLkT
w4D zac 0.ocArED / / / % \ /. • / /� // // / sPIuwAY
,� \ FtaaDPLAraFU NITER WH
ERE
nil
FROM MANAGED USE UNIT) ` \ /
I I / � �\ \\ T\,• � \/ �\ \\\ \ - � // / j � �� SCR' � � a-BJ I ' � / � / /_. ` j /� RIDGE LINE
If
I I JJ'/1/\\\\�ao`•\\a y a -BST ) 1 j / / /J/ J/ t ` t, ' / EROSION CONTROL MATING 9/C-802
SEE SI ET C-3DO FOR EROSION CONTROL ro ,E, ;
NOTES, TRIES BUFFERIPROTECTION NOTES, io/,5/,9
SEEDBED PRF3ARATiON NOTES, AND SFLET IN
( ' /
c a i \ / / ♦ 0-303 FOR CONSTRUCTION SC-Ot1ENCE
/ ) NOTES
I I / , � ✓ � � SCALE: 1"-40'
(D
SLOPLI 3HI OR S,EEPFJI AIO BEATER / J /� f"{S•tNAZONEDUUg _ 1 1 E 0 20' 40' 80'
/ \ THIN W VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE ,
MATTED NTH NORTH AMERICAN GREEN /
r - SC250 DR APPROVED EOIAVAIENT, TYP. \ / / 1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESFONSIBIE fdN CONTACTING Ci�3O4
APPROPRIATE PMrES AND ASSURING THAT ENSING LILIES ME
SEE DETAIL VI LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
J
"�'"� ./..�bN \ V' - J j S ♦ i /' 2 CONTRACTOR IS ASRESPONSIBLENECESSARY
FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
I / RAG MEN, ETC AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY ro THE PUBLIC.
� / REFER 70 SHEET FJOB FOR ERO9011
�''�l i / T<d•aw ngs me F'II ma1111d, 11
11 •non�Geeon
- •'-'-- /� CONTROLS FOR (RAGING NTH_ COL/ �_ �3 _ '" / S / i 30' STREAM 90E $ ARE TO BE a
NOTE THAT THE GRADING NMIN THE aai / // / ZONE UNIT. �..� /J ± ALL REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA o unauNm4e4-aFNe daamet n:s.,iMautcenzent dmon
,. COURSE MAY CONCLUDE PRIOR TO TIR EIO .- / //'
1 OF STAGE TWO THE MAIN WFRASIRI1CRRi -. -./ ' N13 y 1 /" R�,EK /, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND CNeJgna, L Se. , P.A. W p,Mibl,ed.
WORK \` / --"MG�OwEI.�C • 1'- ! CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UTIL11E5 SPECIFlCATONS. [aMJemFTAS1P,rc.PA aot9©
I / /Y V. 4 PART N9xs SUBPARTCP. atDIN�G AS
"ENDED.
CHING STANDARDS

DENuom umim (TYR. SA j -•d_. --_` ``.:...
J
1e.e Aa{ES - M FU R i MIN
i
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN (T80'PUB4C ROAD i i i ,.-_ i `"""_1•/ r __"""•`•-- —�
\ �..4 • ti � ` "� `c \ / F�_�,� ._—i _ _ DRAINAGE AREA (1vt ACRES) NCOOTMAI' R(w)
a _ -\ \ ^..'� ♦ �..� �� "' STABILIZED CONSiFK1CTCN ENTRANCE._ l ;.� i _
SEE DETAIL 12,17/C-E02 1.1 _ i 1
o fift
\ am aft 0 _
r
71e VcitttAres
PC
vise BiNYtdo% • ` ,�/� ! !f ��'\ \\,\\` \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ `\\\\ a-033 �A"_--
ce/ . 3 a_ ( \ \ \ \ \ a-034
PG77• ! �/ - ( O OC rr �
1-141-33 �
r 1
ColeJenest
& Stone
Sh,piN me brrixommem
ReaKzi 9 the Poss:Nbnc
„"SIP` nq
.Na+aPe AreNNm�re
OVN Fngineednq
UMn Detign
ioO Scum —1 «t I.00
O+dctrt ,mom :
I t SLT FENCE OUTLET (TYP.). SUR-1 ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 2017. PROVIDED BY R.B.
\ _ :. T" • SEE DETAIL 11 /C-801 / • A�QAIATTEES, P.A. 420 HAWMORNE LANE,
/ TREE PROTECTION FENGNG BIRKDALE
/ /1 • • =���4 / _--- �\\ '�`\ \ \ \ .� ,. �(TW.). SEE DETAIL 1a/C-BOS • CHAFtL0T1E. NC 28204. (704) J76-z188
o '• .;• \ - \ \\ , �+ f • OGBF ROW OF HIa HAZARD' REAL ESTATE
�`� a-0]0 / Cl 032_'S ; •/ f TEMPORARr pLT FENCE . fND INVESTORS, LLC
I7FE DETAIL 1/C-M15 ' o-om �, , • / �/ �� Skb9o1 DETAIL 4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
/� ""mil / / I \ „--" /� �� ,'1 if j • // '�/ '�-`� SEDIMENT BASIN 20/C-a01 CHARLOTTE. NC 28284
�y • / ' ! r// TGTP. STCHE BASIN TE AL 4/INLETPROO CHOW. i 1 / / i ' •Y%�/ \
I - 1� •1 ` / /�/'� ' BIRKDALE GOLF
9s (1 \ \,' \ 1T f 1 !! \^ ^' ~�" ,. • •/ % • • • ` / //�/ j/lr ��
• OUTLET STRUCTURE WTH SKIMMER 19/C-Bo1 / G
CLUB MIXED-USEDPLAND`,'' r • r i�`/ PRELIMINARY PLAN-
.. -
/ �' \i"' / ,� •-- '�" ZONE 1k.11T j�
INSTALL PERMANENT STORM / t / �' 1
STRUCTURES AND PIPING• TYP. { \ , t [. / SILT FENCE 3/C-601
ISTONE INLET PROTECTION TO E4 .� ,� ; • INFRASTRUCTURE
r INFRAS
rr� _ REMOY£D AND RFRACED Wm _ / ONLY
CATCH BASIN &LET PROTECTIOK N �/ mmN Ili r am/ •� • • // ' !
/ , `i �! \ ! , ' `��/, "` ONCE pTE IS PAVED. / P • l / NIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE t/C-805
)j \ a Ds /J j ! • • /• / % 16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONSPARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
.-� -'"/ '! ! f!/ ! .. ` \ "\.�. � / � /• 4 / • /)" �� ` � TREE PROTECTION FENCING 14/c-B03
WNW WL r PROTEcn (TYR.). \ 1 ��.. j if"- • • i f// /✓ /." / "\ t
'�j/ / EROSION
SEE DETAIL 9/CrWI. \ »;... / , / Jl / ` PLAN
, e • / / r T \ STONE INLET
t _-, ti -1 r, �. , l \` r .> , / r, • /f // - \\ SEDIMENT TRAP le/c-eo1
` r /
a-022 CI-026 f - \ CONTRO
1 . / / =-„ ', •,'' STAGE 2
I 1 ` L - .,,{t I ",�( r• //J/// / T • �•�"� r q'gp�'V LA— BASIN INLET PROTECTION 4/C-BO1
ll`; '� 1 � / � `s'J' r r /,�� / ^Y• \� � I "
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE 9/C-803
—1 1 S-•r �! '�/ • I r% !f' t / �/• ),/ Project No.
Dm • !f/' // , \ Il 1� 4454
O O SueIUZEO CONSTRUCTION
OOOO ENTRANCE 21]/C-802 Issued
iy _�� ` �i � Lr r � l I I l f�( / / � .i _r � ! / ✓ ,-/ j) ! / 1D/C4/t9
f. �''� i�'''G-bl/~� /I \\\\! • r/ '�/i� \I \\J''/ / j ' j' J/ f7/ , / GRAVEL RIP RAP APRON 3/C-803
//. � Ai' !f� I r �,,,i �'''' - -� /J// /l� � �• .,. /ice t J /i/ `� r//`� ! I /
/�/ //.... . ^"' . , \ ' w / I \ ! \ j !/� ' .-Y •� /,, / /P P / DENUDED UNITS -/-
HW-FI
/ ! /
Revised
� ! t -►' / _„ � II �� / /' J((`(\ \(\ -'l //� i/ � � �L+'K\ , ///' t I � / / -� �► OIVER90N DITCH 2/C-801 10/18/2014 -REVISED PER TOH COMMENTS
/ _ __- .�.^__ �! Y ; ' /`"�'' V' ✓ �\ \ \\ \ \ \\ / ® ROCK CHECK DAM 1?/C-801
_ REFER TO SHEET C-Sob FOt EROpNX/
CONmOlS FOR gIMNC WITHIN GOLF COUR9El r // \ DRAINAGE AREA -/-
NOTE THAT THE ORAD&G WITHIN THE S GOLF ^ ^ / ♦ \ \ ! / ,' S &
COURSE MAr CON0.VOE PraaR To THE EPPo \ I / / / F,ST
i
SPILLWAY
RIDGE LINE -/- p��N ,CA o�<y,,'
/ \ %\ O.B. ,=o ssLti9 v
Y// p/ CON4
\ / EROSION CONTROL MATTING a/c-802
/ e ti
SEE SHEET C-300 FOR EROSION CONTROL " /4 E `P
NOTES, TREE /PROTECTION NOTES, °o/1e/1a N
f , GREATER
3H:1V OR VERnCAt IND
f /� GREATER THAN s• NERTICAL HEIGHT./ /' / // i SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES, AND SHEET
' ASIi�c�v Mc� scATH NORTH TH 1 /' � / C-3(k! FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE "a"Nx
APPROVED EQUIVALENT, TYP. SEE ! / // / / NOTES, SCALE: 1 =40
DETAIL 9/C-802. \, J / / / / / / I . (i)
IEH±fib/ 0 20' 40' 80,
i. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY AND ASSURING
FOR T EXISTING C-/' O E"
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT EXISTING UTLIDES ARE 33 5
LOCATED PRIOR RE CONSTRUCTION.
/ 2 CONTRACTOR IS AS NECESSARY
FOR PUGNG SAFETY TO USING
FUG MEN, ETG AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBUC.
'ha dra+mgs, the Frejen nanualand me design xhoem(heron
3.
/ PAVEMENT O BE
REPLACED CORD G 70 STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA are inmunrenn ofCdeJemst85tone,PA. The rcprMumon
unauaiorued ue oFahe daamen4+ltl,md<onsent of
DEEP OTEEENT
CH-MOF TRANSPOROURG TATION.
TOVIN OF AUNTTERSVILLE AND ieMJenest651—P.A. Ix P,Mib.e
I . .,'/ / // 4. SHORINO WILSUBE ACCOPR,DIING TO AS OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS ('lihnesttStone.PA to19©
RTL
PART
AMEN
I 51

INSET B
1,-40t
1
NNT
INSET A
1=_ A/11
4 \
I I^
l '
!
!
TREE PROTECTION FENCING
(TYP ). SEE DETAIL 19/C-803
/
DOUBLE ROW OF HIGH HAZARD .
TEMPORMY SILT FENCE.
SEE DETAIL 11/C-806
/
/
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE FOR .'— �` / \/.: •
GOLF COURSE WORK ONLY
' HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS /
THE AREA COVERED BY THIS,'
J
STAGE 2A PUN
..
+�
LIMIT OF OISTURBANCE FOR MAN
INFRASTRUCTURE WOW
It I
r
//ram
y
\_~�� \ 1 \,"M,. A } \\\ \ t i r / • r�,� 45' YMAGED USE
ZONE UMIT.
gSDll®MCE FOR YAW
INFRA51RUC11Mi
TtE TCEIt
—� //// I P // v, — rcE t , 1 t i i \ t / / ♦ , t r i ,'��/ .r //`,/
t r
U — •-- •.nM Af#Lt �. 1 /' J \ \\ ` • / //f t f / s s i % ,- �-s,.- r-rj t
JO' STREAM SIDE g DOUBLE ROW OF HIQI HAZARDTEMPORARY
/J \\ • 1 \\� / /// //.(•. ZONE UMIT. SE DETAIL 11S/C-806 f f +9
!,
\ • • t t \ r - r i / CREEK
\ i \\ / / \ — / , ,s Gpp+NEti- m- TREE PROTECTION FTINCi/G
�, \ • '� \ ( tt �! -••_• / / , : / P, /�. ' (IYP.). SEE DETAIL 19/C-603
SILT FENCE OUTLET, TY9.
JSEE DETAIL tt/C-801
HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS
THE AREA COVERED BY n65� ;
sin STAGE 2A
PLAN
slG av AND
NTH NOR
GREATER THAN 3' VERTICl1 HEIGHTSHALL BE
\
/ T OF OB1IW�AMQ m J / / / AMERICAN M
ATIED
LIST GREEN SC250 OTH
—/ low COURK wm LYLY — / DETAIL D
APPROVED D'l�;/ T. TYR. SEE
e
i
SURVEY DIBCLAMA
SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 2017. FRONDED BY R.B.
PHARR h ASSOCIATES. P.A. 420 HAWTHORNE LANE,
CHARLOTTE. NC 2a204, [phone]
LEGEND
SYMBOL OIIdIL
SILT FENCE 3/C-801
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE 1/C-BOS
TREE PROTECTION FENCING 19/C-803
STONE INLET 18/C-801
SEDIMENT TRAP
® CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION 4/C-801
PROPOSED ST. DRAINAGE 9/C-803
DENUDED LIMITS -/-
DRAINAGE AREA -/-
RIDGE LINE -/-
EROSION CONTROL MATTING 9/C-802
SEE SHEET C-300 FOR EROSION CONTROL
NOTES, TREE BUFFER/PROTECTION NOTES,
SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES, AND SHEET
C-303 FOR CONSTRUCTION SEOUENCE
NOTES.
ColeJenest
& Stone
Shaping th E n1
RMz,.-Psblties
d P4n " q
O:I Fnq P
UNan R q
�m t
aad� ml 01
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONSPARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN -
STAG E 2A
Project No.
4464
Issued
10/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TOH COMMENTS
SCALE: i"=40'
N
t 4
0 2D' 40'
80'
1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
/►
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT ENSTING UTILITIES ME
33 8'VVM�
C-/' O
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
MG MEN, ETC. AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBLIC.
Thadrawmgs Me Polect marual and Nedesgn zhowethe,oe
3. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
are instrumenn dCOMhrest6gmre,
P.A.Tha uDrodurnon
REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
oz unauNwied use dBa!dao,manb
wXhoutconsentd
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOM OF HUNTERSVILLE AND
iMehnest6hoM.PA hDrch,bDed.
CHARLOTTE-MECNLENBURG UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS.
Cdehnert 45tone. P A xot9
BE
4. SHORING MULL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 19H P. OR AS AMENDED.

GRADING AND EARTHWORK NOTES
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT INSPECTOR 48 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.
2. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE REQUIREMENTS
3. ON-STE BURIAL PITS REQUIRE A PERMIT.
4. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
IS A VIOLATION OF EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCES AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
S. GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS A
V10LATION OF EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCES AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE
S. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF -SITE GRADING, PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED
FROM ME AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER(S).
7. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND
BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR
INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.
B CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO
BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.
S. LIMITS OF CLEARING SHOW ON GRADING PLAN ARE BASED UPON ME APPROXIMATE CUT
AND FILL SLOPE LIMITS, OR OTHER GRADING REQUIREMENTS
10. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO ME STE BENCHMARK. CONTRACTOR SHALL
VERIFY ME BENCHMARK PRIOR TO GROUND BREAKING
11. ME PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN WITHIN ROADWAYS, PARKING
LOTS, AND SIDEWALK AREAS REFLECT FINISHED ELEVATIONS INCLUDING PAVEMENT. REFER
TO PAVEMENT CROSS SECTION DATA TO ESTABLISH CORRECT SUBBASE OR AGGREGATE
BASE COURSE ELEVATIONS TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.
12. GRADES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH SURFACE, FREE FROM IRREGULAR
SURFACE CHANGES GRADING SHALL COMPLY YAM COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS AND GRADE
CROSS SECTIONS LINES, AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED. WERE NO SPOT GRADES ARE
INDICATED, THE GRADE SMALL BE ESTABUSHED BASED ON INTERPOLATION OF ME
ELEVATIONS BETWEEN ADJACENT SPOT GRADES WILE MAINTAINING APPROPRIATE
TRANSTON AT STRUCTURES AND PAVING, AND UNINTERRUPTED DRAINAGE FLOW INTO
INLETS
13. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE SUCH THAT RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY
GRAVITY FLOW ACROSS NEW GRADED AREAS TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE INLETS, OR
SHEET OVERLAND.
14. ALL SIDEWALKS, STOOPS, TERRACES AND OTHER PAVED AREAS SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM
BUILDING(S) AT 20S MAXIMUM.
15. COLEJENEST AND STONE. P.A. HAS NOT PERFORMED ANY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATIONS OF OR OTHER ADJACENT IMPROVEMENTS
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND HAS NOT MADE ANY DETERMINATIONS AS TO ME SUITABIUTY
OF STE SOILS FOR USE AS FILL BENEATH PROPOSED BUILDINGS, DRIVEWAYS, PARKING 22 OWNER SHALL ENGAGE A QUALIFIED INDEPENDENT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TESTING
AREAS, OR FOR OTHER USES. ALL EARTHWORK STALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE AGENCY TO PER FIELD QUALITY CONTROL TESTING TESTING AGENCY SHALL TEST
WITH ME RECOMMENDATIONS OF A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER WHO SHALL BE N OF SO COMPACTION IN PLACE ACCORDING TO ASTM D2922 AND ASTM D2937, AS
RETAINED BY THE OWNER. ARPILCARI_ TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED AT EACH COMPACTED BACKFlLL LAYER AT A
RATE OF NOT LESS THAN ONE TEST FOR EACH 2500 SF OF FILL AREA OR ONE TEST PER
ALL FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAXIMUM 8-INCH UFTS AND COMPACTED. ALL FILL WITHIN EACH 100 LF OF WALL OR TRENCH LENGTH.
8.
LIMITS OF BUILDING AND PAVEMENT AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO HODS OF MAXIMUM
AR STANDD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHIN ME TOP 12 INCHES PT A MINIMUM IN L OF
N
AREASS ALLBESTANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BELOW 1OF INCH DEPTH. FILL WITHIN LANDSCAPED
AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO MINIMUM AL OF MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR pENSTY.
ASTMMAXIMUM
STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITIES NGNE BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
ASTM D 898. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL EARTHWORK
SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS.
17. FOR SLOPE CONSTRUCTION 3:1 AND STEEPER AND EXCEEDING 5 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT,
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ON THE SUITABILITY
OF SOILS PLANNED FOR THESE SLOPES AND FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORM BY
THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR SLOPE CONSTRUCTION. ALL SUCH SLOPES SHALL BE
TRACKED TOP TO BOTTOM AND STABILZED WITH A ROLLED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
CONSISTING OF POLYPROPYLENE NETTING AND A STRAW/COCONUT FIBER MATRIX, STAKED
TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS TOP SOIL PLACEMENT ON SLOPES SHALL BE
INSTALLED IN A BENCHED PATTERN.
1B. ALL PROJECT SUBGRADE SHALL BE INSPECTED BY ME GEOTECHNICAL ENDNEER. IF ME
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINFER DETERMINES MAT UNSATISFACTORY SOIL IS PRESENT, ME
UNSATISFACTORY MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH COMPACTED
BACKFlLL SUCH ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZED EXCAVATION SHALL BE PAID FOR ACCORDING TO
ME CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR UNIT PRICES
19. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL FILL AND BACKFlLL MATERIAL
WITHIN 3 PERCENT OF THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D 698.
SOIL MATERIAL MAT EXCEEDS THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT BY 3 PERCENT OR MORE,
AND IS TOO WET TO COMPACT TO THE SPECIFIED DRY UNIT WEIGHT, SHALL BE SCARIFIED
AND AIR DRIED, LIME STABILIZED. OR REMOVED AND REPLACED.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL DEWATERNG MEASURES NECESSARY, INCLUDING WELL
POINTS, SUMP PUMPS, TEMPORARY SHORING ETC, TO ENSURE COMPLETION OF STABLE
EXCAVATION AND BACKFlLL OPERATIONS GROUNDWATER SHALL BE MAINTAINED A MINIMUM
OF 2 FT. BELOW THE BOTTOM OF ALL EXCAVATIONS
21. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER AND PROVIDE ANY AND
ALL SHORING DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXISTING BUILDING FOUNDATIONS
23. ALL GRADED OR DISTURBED AREAS BEYOND THE UNITS OF PAYING SIDEWALKS, BUILDINGS,
ETC., MAT ARE NOT OTHERWISE LANDSCAPED PER THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. SHALL BE
STABILIZED WITH A NEW LAWN SEEDED N ACCORDANCE WITH ME SEEDING SPECIFICATION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SEEDED AREAS UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS
ESTABLISHED.
24. ME PURPOSE OF ME STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT (SDE) IS TO PROVIDE STORM WATER
CONVEYANCE. BUILDINGS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN ME EASEMENT AREA AND OMER
OBJECTS WHICH IMPEDE STORM WATER ROW OR SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ARE ALSO
PROHIBITED.
SWIM BUFFER NOTES
1. GRADING AND OMER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ARE ALLOYED ONLY INT HE UPLAND
ZONE OF S.W.I.M AND POST -CONSTRUCTION BUFFERS HOWEVER THESE ACTIVITIES MUST
BE PERFORMED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO PREVENT DAMANGE TO ME ROOTS OF ME
REMAINING TREES GRASS AND/OR OMER SUITABLE GROUND COVER CAN BE PLANTED IN
THE UPLAND ZONE
2. DRAINAGE OUMALLS MUST BE DESIGNED TO ALLOW WATER TO SHEET ROW ACROSS THE
BUFFER TO FILTER OUT POLLUTANTS
3. ME CUTS DE BUFFER BOUNDARY MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED BY ORANGE FABRIC FENCING
PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AT THE SITE AND THIS FENCING MUST BE
CALLED OUT ON ME PLANS N SITUATIONS WHERE THE DISTURBED LIMITS OF A
DEVELOPMENT OCCUR PRIOR TO ME WATER QUALITY BUFFER, ME ORANGE FABRIC
FENCING MAY BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF THE DISTURBED AREA AND PRIOR TO ME
OUTSIDE EDGE OF ME BUFFER.
STORM DRAINAGE NOTES
1. ALL PIPE TO BE INSTALLED AND BEDDED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPEOFTCATONS
SEE DETAIL 9/C-BG3.
2. NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SHALL BE ALLOWED ACROSS PIPES UNTIL A MINIMUM OF 2' OF
COMPACTED COVER HAS BEEN INSTALLED.
3. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO MEET OR EXCEED NMOT AND LOCAL STANDARDS.
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT NOTES
1. ME SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA AS
DETERMINED FROM FENA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 3710463200K, DATED
SEPTEMBER 2 2015 AND REVISED THROUGH 10/14/2016, AND MAP NUMBER 37104642001(,
DATED SEPTEMBER 2 2015.
7. THE COMMUNITY ENCROACHMENT LINE MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING
AND THE MARKED LINE MUST BE MAINTAINED ON -SITE UNTIL FINAL GRADING IS
COMPLETED.
RETAINING WALL NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RETAINING ME SERVICES OF A QUALIFIED
ENGINEER TO COMPLETE ME DESGN AND PERMITTING O ALL PROPOSED SEGMENTAL
CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALLS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. THE DESIGN OF ALL
RETAINING WALLS IS TO BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ME NORTH CAROUNA STATE
BUILDING CODE, SECTION 1807. DETAILED RETANING WALL DESIGN DRAWINGS, SEALED BY
A NORTH CAROLINA LICENSED ENGINEER, SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ME LOCAL PLAN
REVIEW AUTHORITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. A NORTH CAROLINA LICENSED ENGINEER
MUST PERFORM CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION, VERIFYING IN A SEALED LETTER TO ME
LOCAL INSPECTION AUTHORITY MAT ME RETAINING WAILS WERE CONSTRUCTED IN
a✓�IVEfA�(
ACCORDANCE VIM THE APPROVED ENGINEERED DRAWINGS. IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIOIN
1704 OF ME NORM CAROUNA STATE BUILDING COOS
SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 207. FRONDED BY R.B.
2. BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS (BW) REFERENCE ME BOTTOM OF WALL AT FINISHED GRADE,
PNARR 3 ASSOCIATES, P.A. -0 HAWTHORNE LANE,
CHARLOTTE, NC 2B2G4, [phone]
TYPICAL IN ALL AREAS REFER TO WALL STRUCTURAL PLANS BY OTHERS FOR TOP AND
BOTTOM OFFOOTING ELEVATIONS.
3 ALL RETAININp WALLS GREATER MAN 4 FT (RESDENTAL) OR 5 FT (COMMERCIAL) IN
a,
LEGEND
SYMBDL
PROPOSED CONTOUR
IqU PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR
1m� PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE
I� PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
l pG PROPOSED CURB INLET
PROPOSED DROP INLET
PROPOSED MANHOLE
PROPOSED JUNCTION BOX
PROPOSED GRAVEL
AND RIPRAR IRON
PROPOSED HEAD WALL
FES
PROPOSED FLARED
END SECTION
DETAIL
9/C-803
NCDOT STD.
840.02
NCDOT STD.
840.14
NCDOT SM.
640.52
NCDOT STD.
840.31
3/C-803
I/C-803
4/C-803
SEE SHEET C-403 FOR STORM
DRAINAGE SCHEDULE AND STORM
DRAIN SCHEDULE NOTES.
i
1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING MAT EXISTING UTUTIES ARE
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
RAG MEN, ETC. AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO ME PUBLIC.
3. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF ME NORTH CAROUNA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOM OF HUNTERSVILLE AND
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS.
4, SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 1926 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
ColeJenest
& Stone
ShapiNthe Envi -
RealizingthePes bilitin
lantl PNnn�ng
untl¢peAWteeene
Ertl Enpneerinp
UMn Design
m,, so-ezc r>rlu u
u�.donc nm:W oml- znzoz
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE. NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONSPARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE, INC 28078
OVERALL
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
Project No.
4464
Issued ,
10/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TCH COMMENTS
N
SCALE:
0 50, 100, 200,
C-400
The drawinTs, We props[ manualand Me design shown Nerun
are fnmumenn of[oMknat 8 Stone. P.A.. The reprgduRian
-erAorted aoo,manswxhe�ez�n,enta
inMknes[ 6 Stom' -, P.k P.A I, 6 DrMibRd.
[Meknes[ 8 Stone, P.A. I.,q
A

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED 6' SANITARY SEWER
LANE. REFER TO CHARLOTTE WATER
PLANS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.
2
g� QJ5
0 ��
V�
IQ 0
�04
'
�2
1
I
/
% r
PROPOSED WATER MAN. REFER TO
CHARLOTTE WATER PUNS FOR /
FURTHER INFORMATIOI. / f
i
I
ColeJenest
& Stone
Sh,piN Me EnvrronmcnH
PeaHiir9 [ne Pwsidl t a
ImdPbnninq
und=weArw,Keme
prJ Fngimadnq
umm� Ragn
1—T, s 1mre
m.mnc Nmm ad;n<:sm:°0
anvEroea,veR
`\ \_ , , ,, i I I /�sF'; r'! !it t ��! i + o �o �Y PH R A AAVEY SSMATESE DATE UP.A.T4202HAWTHORNE017. �FANE R.B. BIRKDALE
I f • / \ ! f \ \ 7 # / ! / t CHARLOTTE. NO 25204, [phone]
REAL ESTATE
---:FUTURE BUILDING PAD INVESTORS LLC
I t ! \ ! e f l R' ! r ! : • / I I " ELEVsI12.50 - LEGEND
/ _ - 4600 PARK ROAD, SURE 370
A)TURE BUILDING PADS\ 1�1j/%\Y-`!%" !r '� 1 PwDwDSEo 4• Poc Pit ti J 1fi �L CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
ELEV=71.3.3 \\ l /j }}� �� !! �...///i ,' / 1 AND SLOMP ALONG aT7tw• j \
\ J f!1/!J�}! 1 % , TNroRou� m riai \ PROPOSED CONTOUR
SE DETAIL 11/C-OW-/-
E
� BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR -/-
y — - — — PRELIMINARY PLAN-
.
n �% /'' _ T,:,>: 11 if/, ; INFRASTRUCTURE
} ! � } + _ .. T � J ,IWrM. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVAnoN
/ \ T
/t//� LINDHOLM DRIVE ' � /
�� t. ONLY
/ ♦ W uF . \ - - i H- 1 1oN6500 BIRKDALE
PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE -/-
/ r ! ' ♦ \ cTowrvoFHueTEITs ! COMMONS PARKWAY
FOREBAY /IB '
, ! / � � � ,,. - ,� ♦ \� � HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28076
zo
PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE 9/C-603 GRADING AND
NCDOT SM DRAINAGE
PROPOSED CURB INLET 640.02
SAND CHAMBER n6 ,. ! PLAN
\ \ \\ \\ \ \\;\\� \� ' .. UNDERDRAN. TW. •'� �• \\�� PROPOSED DROP INLET 640. 4
-� NCDOT STD.
/ -
., SAND CHAMBER /IA • )^y
/ \f1�� it it _- � `� / _ � /� I '^\� _ r j,F''F' •^•�'.}
J
e
A.A.E tEAYNar � j / r t ,/ c /�� �l\-`sf
SDE
! 7•y i
i (T l
/ / SIDE
SIDE �7
SIDE
F1
7 jY /" \ 1 ! \ �. \ \ \ \ \ / ]'•, MH NCDOT STD.
~, / / / /'t.J! I } \ FX 24• CPP \•. \ \ \ \ I % i' P PROPOSED MANHOLE 64032 446 Project No. ,
N0 Nw7oa4D• (vIF) \ \ ,�.,, 4464
EXIS 24 -CPP � "z EX. FFE: - � \ \ \ \ t \ i [ / /
lsjr)lt�j7y v\.v, !{�_ 716.68 vv \v k I t l vv� �! /T I T Ncoor sro
! 1 �! ����� a . Issued
PROPOSED JUNCTION BOX 6/0.31 10/04l19
/ ..rx
FUTURE BUILDING PAD
♦„ �/' f / / A ,� /"� "�� \\1\ \\ \ ' MAXIMUM EXTE7NT OF GEOGPoD PER C PROPOSED GRAVEL
ELEV LVL 1 = 713.00 % / ! a
, , DESIGN.
REFER
RTO THAT
WALL t
ELEV LyL ((TT 702.00 DESGN. REFER TO THAT PLAN j / { AND RIPRM APRON
3!c-6a3
! // /�/ ; fl l�! l �,/ h \\\ \� \ •\�` w y}t �. \\ \ C / / ! SET FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,
\I \\j�,\ �R� \ r / \ PROPOSED SAND FI Pam#; ! FOREBAY nA ! / / 1 !_ / PROPOSED HEAD WALL 1/C-BOS
\\\\ ! / , J ` ( ! Revised
SEE DETAIL I/C-606 /
\ \ \ 10/18/2019 -REFUSED PER TOH COMMENTS
\\\ \ \
\\\ A l t t �/P \\\\\ PROPFLARED
OSED P ANSRITNINING WALL. REFER I `(��yJ, / FES
\\ TO PLMIFSURMER I�KFORMATION i I / ° /' �(! t PROPOSED
ND SECTIONN
, 1 �,' 4/c-803
\ I } \ / , ! , \ ! ! rTewEAL en �o
SSANITARY/ S Ur AT 1111111117.11111 w' /• ,'
A�\ \ \ \\ \ ( `, \ \ -, !, . - EASEMENT! !\ \ SEE SHEET C-400 FOR GRADING
PROPOSED VARIABLE WITH •r AND EARTHWORK NOTES, STORM
\ / , ! / - t l ! ! } / ! / �•' J i \ MAINTENANCE AND sraw , ! r ! / ! ! �/ ' "' '"- r
DRAINAGE NOTES, FLOODPLAIN s &
\ \ \ 6✓, ! /,. 1t � t t � i t} / � � DRAINAGE EAS]IIF74T (PGDq / !! r ! ! ! r! / � MH- { ' 25 Sro
/J41 t111tttf l P I ,r- !� ! / ! !/ ! / .! ! , �{`/ ��� NL pPOR4
1! ((\\ 4 - DEVELOPMENT NOTES AND SEA
I ` \ \ - - t! c !� 1 RETAINING WALL NOTES. of Iva
t \ i ;�•\ , \` POSE- PC GE PCCE— PCCE�1 p'P SEE SHEET C-403 FOR STORM
\te
+ } \= ;\ `DOA U11 CATCH BATO SI
N N ! ' �17 . ' / ! a DRAINAGE SCHEDULE AND STORM 2oe� ss, tidy
PCCE— P PCCE­ GCE— p —'— PCCE�- P ^ / / T 9 .
\}7 / DRAIN SCHEDULE NOTES. _ 9
suerr SEWER. ti -) ! /�' \ \ CD o / D/Iar,9
TO CTIARLOTTE WATER + , �y , ,�
PLANS FOR FURTHER ! i - U / ':•. N
NFORMATI ON
SCALE 1"=41'
+ t PROPOSED TEMPORARY ! \\ \ 1 I \ / ``•� _J 1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESONSBLE Fdt CONTACTING
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TOO , \ ` I. t t I APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT EXISTING UTILITIES ARE /�
t\ i ? f } r 1 / ! ,, ! LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
L CONTRACTOR
IS RESPONSIBLE
RPLACING
NECESSARYTO
BARRICADES USING FLAG AS INSURESAFETY TO THEUSauc.
r� V f ✓
macanrn3:m<crex_i m3n�<I <neme a<,;qn:ho«n u,<..e
3. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS CONCRETE OR ASPHALT. ARE TO BE re+nrtrumenv d(daaennta Stone.PA The r<producti0n
i ,' \ • i I \ \ / - / / ♦ ,-/ I ,/ �'�_ / ! I REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROUNA ruruuNarved dnumen's wt mnumcF
- \ •• ! lr \ / p ._�/ / Nr• - /.� . % 7 ! ''' , `'' /I` / ""` !` DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND CdaJenest6 Stonsedae ne1. PA , PrMmiMd."
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS.
Stona.PA. 2019®
\ t ((
SHORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
I \ r } � N+ `� ./ ! .t / � /�. .r / � �114 TI!„ ; -.*- .,m,u•..« -� / � PART 1926 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
U

I
— -- __.. -- ---_ - SAM FURR RO
_.. NC (BO PUBLIC RAN
• : �_. f ""' ,. ." _...�..�-_'-,.---._ _ _.._..,.....,� DDT J PROPOSED WATER ARAM. R6EA To /
�- IYIAINT NED _ _ CHARLOTTE WATER PLANS FOR / L /--"---"'-
-_ _ • • �, '-_ )i` {�� CLEANOUT TO BE O FINK. RAISED
AADE -�-�S.R. 2145 \ - FURTHER IN ORMAnON. PROPOSED B- SANITARY SEWER ��-
�� 0
LANE REFR U OiARLOTTE WATER .-„-
- -- PLANS FCR FURTIiER INFOPo/At
/ f y RE
PROPOSED 15' STORM
-.- -_ DRAINAGE EASEMEEASEMENTMENTYENT - -
t
Ott/Nlf(?.C % 1
166
'ce/ FUTURE'BUILDING PAD
PG. 7 -•"• I•I IkEV�707.50 It
(j 7:77—
n
CoWenest
& Stone
ShePiN the Env'mnment
Revlrshg the Pa b'I ties
2oo`MN.l 5Suh1400
20 -1
!( / V \ `\ \ // / i y • �_ SURVEY DIBCL UM .•k,.7o4 37e 7rf
SURVEY& ASSOCIATES. �� R.B BIRKDALE
-' / l / / \ \ / /► 6 / / • r CHARLOTTE, NC 28204. [phone]
PRO/ / •
. •. _ Q ' _ ,. / .. UNE. PTE 6' SANITARY TE WA I REAL ESTATE
�- • LANE REFER TO CHARLOTTE WATER ��
/ / PLANS FOR FURTHER INFORMAnM
/ INVESTORS LLC
,r / PROPOSED 13• SANITARY
/ LEGEND 7
l / _ — `o / I`� SEWER EASEMENT r�'S s • 4600 PARK ROAD. SUITE 370
// ` `\` / / _0�4 /. �%•)/ • r s�asx-"-'I- CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
rr`'/ • r ' I / / / ` v , / i / �' . �rQ , MTENpiAUCOf1EREN NIMC SEOIRID PER �J ` PROPOSED CONTOUR -/-
�t •/ ; • . WALL
DESIGN. REFER BIRKDALE GOLF
PROPOSED INDEX CONTOUR /• / / `\ J `� I ' t / / ��/ ' _/_ CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN-
.
_/ /' • ' ' ` �// PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION INFRASTRUCTURE
• • f • / ' / /tV� J ELEVATION-/-
�/' / . • . /' / IfONLY
/�G /�' \� 01Pa�ry� �, / I `�p Lj • /• • • ••� • / ` 16500BIRKDALE
PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE -/- COMMONS PARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE, NC 28078
PROPOSED WATER MAIN. REFER TO ^�C - / / !' • L f '� PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE 9/C-803 G RA D I N G A N D
CHARLOTTE WATER PLANS FOR / / • • •� • /
FURTHER INFORMATION.
-��� �' /' f' •' • s a NCDOTBD. DRAINAGE
/ / / • ` \ • �, PROPOSED CURB INLET 640.02
PROPOSED DROP INLET W. PLAN
�`< , / / "'• ` / NOW. STD.
{ '�' ��\ / '; 1 \ � IL' ( / • � \ / �� of 7{
1
V V
U U
PAD t1
t
/ / i / /
1 • I .- �f 1" i \ // / Project No.
���i�� �` , / I Ir I • /- /, )/ /� / PROPOSED MANHOLE Np40.5ro
MH 4464
FUTURE BUILDING PAD
ELEV=710.50 Issued
PROPOSED JUNCTION BOX NCDOT STD.
f .Ad' ) , r • � � � / N�. � � // 7 � � / / 640.31 tD/Ga/,s
!��`S' .i• f't tj 1• '� ,// /'/ �^. O I� If / ® ANDPROPORWRAP APRON GRAVEL 3/C-803
• .i•' r I 1 // ^� /' / / W PROPOSED HEAD WALL 1/C-803
t
Revised
If
�/(
I �t /y ��� ���Xv / 10/1e/2019 - REVISED PER TRH COMMENTS
- s
-� / s'g R' •� r I t✓� �� /� i % \\� I FES PROPOSED FLARED
..PROPOSED 4' PYC !R y' YgVE ALONG PROPOSED TEMPORARY ���. i� \ END SECTION4/C-803
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TC1D
GUTTER TO PROVIDE h� �.�� / AIFDRAINAGE THROUGH��
SP
1 / ,-// \\��`\ t / SEE SHEET C-400 FOR GRADING
1 ' �AND EARTHWORK NOTES, STORM - '
/ /// J/ DRAINAGE NOTES, FLOODPLAIN ESj !` Sr2
f , a \ / DEVELOPMENT NOTES AND
I•I
4m. N1EAlr 7 fi r \ \ \ / RETAINING WALL NOTESo-lss
N SET AT xua / u _ Jl / ' \ \ '\ \ / . o
4e tit
�\ \\.\\ SEE SHEET C-403 FOR STORM o N'CA/o�
\ , _ \Y �// O.a DRAINAGE SCHEDULE AND STORM =o� Ss,D�9 y ?
ar. DRAIN SCHEDULE NOTES. a 9
SAND CHAMBER n / j / p(f / �%� �✓ ./.. / `r/ �;,�Q+ �1' 1 �/•
UNDFRORAIN.
PROPOSED BMP #1
(SAND FILTER) / f / �, / / / \ / •Nunes.
sSEEDDETAIL08 t/C-8/� /_.r. �.. , %/ N
PC / - / ' ,' , / / SCALE: 1"=4d
400,
/ / /' ^� vv� • ' , // / / �..y 1. coPR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING 4� /\
APPROPPoATPRIAT E PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT FASTING UTILITIES ARE L
LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
/ = r
2. CONTITACTDR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING BARRICADES USING
I/ ` jmrn �' S✓ / / // // , RAG MEN, ETC. AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUSUC.
/' e• / The drowhg% the project monual and NA dv lgn Mown U,,
/ CONSTRUCi1D BBE Y GOLF CLUB ` / / // / �. 3. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE uhemu t, of CdvUvnevt h Stm4 P.A.. The reproductl
SAND CHAMBER (IA h / y / TO MATCH EX157RNG CR055NC / / / REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROLJNA nautNorized usw of Ne tlocumente wthoul convent of
r / \ •\ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND C I Jm,,t i Stm4 P.A. 1, pmhlbitetl
`Q PROPOSED VARIABIi IMDTH elm / f AT NCoo CREEK. / / // , / I CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UMUTIES SPECIFICATIONS
P. St C
MAMNTENANIZ AND STORM / / daJeneei db ms, ® 2019
/ / DRAINAGE EASEMENT (PCCE) . /'/ .// I / //// // / / %• 4. SHIN1926 SUBPART P. ACCORDING
OR AS AMENDEDENCHING STANDARDS

STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE
STORM NETWORK'A'
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM SIZE (IN.) MATERIAL LENGTH (FT.) SLOPE (WIT) UPSTREAM INVERT DOWNSTREAM INVERT UPSTREAM RIM
STRUCTURE STRUCTURE ELEVATION (Fr) ELEVATION (FT) ELEVATION
CI AQ
MH-Al
18
RCP
86
0.010
701.50
700.60
708.45
O-A3
CI-A2
18
RCP
32
0.011
702.05
701.70
708.80
O-A4
CI-A3
15
RCP
25
0.057
704.40
703.00
708.85
MH-A5
O-A3
IS
R.
RCP
54
0.010
702.80
702.25
709.45
CI-A6
MH-A5
15
RCP
72
0.025
705.55
703.75
710.00
CI-A7
MH-AS
15
RCP
96
0.011
704.OD
709.00
709.90
CI-A8
CI-A7
15
RCP
80
0.010
705.DD
7D4.20
710.50
O-A9
CI-A8
RCP
67
0.Ml
705.90
705.20
711.
9
15
RCP
C
48
0.010
N&GD
706.10C-A0CI-AA
711.05
CI-A
65
0.0.
707.20
706.55
712.65
STORM NETWORK'B'
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM SIZE (IN.) MATERIAL LENGTH(FT.) SLOPE (FT/FT( UPSTREAMINVERT DOWNSTREAM INVERT UPSTREAMRIM
STRUCTURE STRUCTURE ELEVATION (FT) ELEVATION (FT) ELEVATION (FT)
JB-B2
FES-01
36VRCP31
0.007
693.15
693.170
699.50
DI-B3
IVIH-B2
240.008
693.95
693.25
698.50
CI-B4
DI-83
240.0D7
693.15
693.00
699.50
CI-B5
O-B4
24
0.007
695.55
694.6D
700.20
18-B2
MH-96
240.OD7
693.15
693.00
699.50
MH-B6
FES-87
18O.1142
688.30
.1.
693.61
STORM NETWORK'C
UPSTREAM
STRUCTURE
DOWNSTREAM
SIZE (IN.) MATERIAL LENGTH (FT.) SLOPE (FT/FT)
STRUCTURE
UPSTREAM INVERT DOWNSTREAM INVERT UPSTREAM RIM
EIEVO.N ELATION
T30
4
0
703.95
714.75
MH-CI
-C2
24
C
06
704.906
704.40
rELEVATION
I 709.54
EX-MH-C4
i MH-C3
24
1 RCP
275 1
0.005
706.25
70.5.00
71104
STORM NETWORK'D'
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM UPSTREAM INVERT DOWNSTREAM INVERT UPSTREAMRIM
STRUCTURE STRUCTURE 512E ON.) MATERIAL LENGTH (FT.) SLOPE (FT/FT) CATION ELEVATION ELEVATION [FT)
JB-D2
FES-D1
36
RCP
21
0.019
69140
693.00
701.50
JB-DZ
FES-D3
36
RCP
21
0.019
693.40
693.OD
701.50
CFD4
JB-D2
36
RCP
38
0,005
693.70
693.50
708.90
CI-DS
CI-04
24
RCP
83
0.056
699.60
695.00
709.99
CI-D6
CI-DS
15
RCP
59
DOW
700.60
700.00
709.75
CI-D7
CI-D5
15
RCP
95
0.030
7OL75
700.80
709.45
CI-D8
CI-07
15
RCP
62
0.030
704.60
702.75
710.70
DI-D9
CI-D8
15
RCP
145
DOLL
707.00
704.80
71150
MH-010
O-05
24
RCP
147
0.010
7OL30
699.80
713.32
CI-Dil
MH-D10
15
RCP
59
0.065
706.80
703.00
711.25
CI-012
MH-DSO
24
RCP
57
0.011
702.10
701.50
721.75
CI-D13
CI-D12
24
RCP
123
0.010
703.50
702.30
712.40
CFD34
CI-D73
24
RCP
125
0.020
704.95
703.70
711.82
CI-D15
CI-014
15
RCP
29
0.014
707.15
706.75
711.96
MH-016
CI-1)14
18
RCP
46
0.011
705.60
705.10
712.33
CFD17
MH-D16
1B
RCP
148
0.011
707.40
705.80
712.67
CI-D18
CI-D4
30
RCP
78
0.005
6W.20
693.80
70IL15
CI-D19
Cl-Dig
15
RCP
60
U131
703.80
696.00
70&25
MH-D20
CI-DS8
30
RCP
76
0.005
694.70
694.30
707.95
CI-D21
MINI
15
RCP
95
0.038
698.W
694.90
708.33
CI-D22
CI-D21
15
RCP
61
0.021
699.25
698,00
709.12
CI-D23
CI-D22
15
RCP
99
0.020
701.45
699.45
709.65
CI-024
TV1H-D20
30
RCP
68
0.005
695.15
694.80
706,99
CI-D25
CI-D24
30
RCP
74
0.005
695.65
695.25
706.63
CI-D26
CI-D25
30
RCP
89
0.005
F9820
695.75
705.99
CI-D27
CI -DM
24
PCP
24
M006
69645
696,30
705.92
CI-D28
CI-D27
24
RCP
44
0.011
697.70
697.20
705.99
CI-D29
CI-D27
697.10
696,55
7OC40
CI-D30
CI-D29
699.30
697.30
704.SS
CI-D31
CI-D30
700.65
699.50
705.10
CI-D32
CI-D29
=RCPICY7
NO.G70
697.60
697.20
704.35
CVD33
CI-D32
698410
697.70
702.65
CI-D36
CI-D33
69855
1 69820
703.27
STORM NETWORK'E'
MH-E2 FESEl 15 RCP 70 0.006 696.40 696,00 702.17
DI-E3 MH-E2 15 RCP 150 0.005 697.35 696.60 70LBD
STORM NETWORK'F
OCS42 FES-Fl 42 RCP 23 1 0.005 1 689.08 688.97 694.62
STORM DRAIN SCHEDULE NOTES
1. 'a' STRUCTURES TO BE CATCH BASINS (NCDOT STD. 840.02).
2 'DI' STRUCTURES TO BE DROP INLETS (NCOOT STD. 540.14).
1 "FES' STRUCTURES TO BE F ENO SECTION (4/C-W3).
A 'Jr STRUCTURES TO BE JUNCTION SOWS (NCDOT STD. 840.31 WITH MANHOLE).
S 'MH' STRUCTURES TO BE MANHOLES (NCDOT STD. 540.52).
& 'RCP' TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (ASTM C 76). CLASS 111 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
7. US GRATE ELEVATION FOR CB IS AT EDGE OF PAVEMENT.
S US CRATE ELEVATION FOR DI IS AT CENTER OF GRATE.
9. US GRATE ELEVATION FOR MH OR JB IS AT TOP OF UD.
10. " DENOTES MANHOLE AND/OR JUNCTION BOX RIM SET 1 FOOT ABOVE RNISHED GRADE.
r14 E
1. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PARnES AND ASSUMING THAT EASTING UTUTIES ARE
LOCATED MDR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE OR PLACING BARRICADES USING
FLAG MEN, ETC AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBLIC.
S. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING M STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAFOUNA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENSURG UTIUTIES SPECBTCATIONS.
4. SHORNG WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
PART 1926 SUBPART P, OR AS AMENDED.
& Stone
SM1Rpng IM1q Envimnwent
R,Wixirg th, Pa Nlitia
Jntl PWnn�nq
wdYepe HW—
LTVY Eneneennq
J_ IN—
200 SeamI-"m . '400
CTerlotN, Ne 1am—28202
» 7W 374 ISM 4 704 376 7
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE. NC28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONS PARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
STORM
DRAINAGE
SCHEDULE
Project No.
4464
Issued
1a/C4/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TCH COMMENTS
C-403
THe dro.Inpe. tho Project m nu wed Ul dalgn a o.n "I
w hemto of C010J al bt Stone, P.A.. The raproductl
au INw1ie0 u of Ns documents .IlM1out consent of
CdeUsnest de BI- P.A le proHlblled.
Col J -t k St-, P.® 2019

•
tl
.1/e
I Lc J vt
M ' PG 166 • r iP
4Gkdo% /
re/ 3 _
PC. 773
! / DENUDED Lwas (rep.)
art ta.e ACRES ( — `S FU R R r an aman NM
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN --_ (MA PUBLIC OAD _ I� i ! / --M"�•---..,.. `'
5... DRAINAGE AREA (tz.7t Aa¢s) ""'-_ NCppT '-
_
SEEM 2145 am
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION
TRUCTISEE DETAIL ,22 — - t77:
r
LEft
am
a-034 0 a-D33
s
0.087 nc of permanent �\ , o°ado
impact due to fill ;, �� °yO ' 'i FFEET/GE OUTLET (rip.). ` �s— V.Wffl10'
p J • , ( / SURVEY ISSUE DATE AUGUST 1, 2017. PRONDED BY R.B.
° WE
DETAIL 11/C-e01 PH ARR • ASSOCIATESr P A. 420 HAWTHORNE LANE,
j/fir- �• f i 1t/z/ \\ \ \ / _ • TREE PROTECTION FENCING• CHARLOTTE. NC 2ez04. (704) 376-27ee
_. 4 /! • • " /1 f J / y'—(TVP.). SEE DETAIL,u/C-e03 a
j♦ "!i // % / O • —{•\• 7 '�`, \ ���`` / /• / �� / `� 10WORRow OF H1a1 HAZARD'
�r / •1 \ \ \\,\ \\ . i �� / a-•ai• /! 1 s ` ! Y f / LEGEND
a=D31 . • / •� /'— ./' i i13lBLL DETAIL
// 1 ..'" / / / t • ` ` SEDIMENT BASIN 20/C-801
wTaN BASIN wLEra4 cn
! • / TrP. SEE DETAILa
�!' 1 ` \ \'" �%n/ i l -�` ; \.... I I / i / • �` / • %� %� /��i !!-/"�! OUTLET STRUCTURE M1 SIMMER 19/C-801
ZONE LNT.' / ` / r f % •'♦� �!
INSTALL PERMANENT STORM
/ // // ---"' ! •'-•-� STRUCTURES AND PIRNG. TYI.
i SILT FENCE 3/C-801
STONE INIFT PROTECTION TO BE'
RENOYFD AND REPLACED VAIN
CATCH INLET PROTECTION!J{ ar YAL&A
ONCE STE IS PAYEDLINE S� UK W-
CAT( // •e • L V/ l/ ! 1
. / / • • •
`, • S /?' �� HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE i/C-Ws
a 02e
i / rJt // \� / - \ \ �, C._ i • /1 ' f'� \ TREE PROTECnON FENCING 19/c-803
STONE INLET PROTEC71 (TYP.} \ `` f / ,l j % r // • •
s1x DETAIL 9/o-e01.STONE
�._.... / // / • r !. /1 / /7!/ \
1 , , — -- fs \ ;/.. ,. /' • / --- i \ SEDMENTL TRAP
� w / "` / / i/ I � "i • // // .� � ( ( \\ \ TRAP 18/C-801
-....�
3 a -DTI -_ A. � a-Dsa
` i , 1t ` ,- i/ ` ' '� °'� `� .:. ;. ,�,, !/! ,�- ! f// • ��`' \ I CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION 4/C-801
• /
1 1, \' / � \ -� / / nt � i I l� �\ � �- -� � t j//! // • /e \) /// !! � PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE 9/C-803
\,�y a-os �� � \` �� a-Dz, \ �°-°s ,1 i' ; �/ I �• •� /% 1 J% �/ -,� /// ! �11y� f J.
O O STABIUZFD CONSTRUCTION
1z.n/c-eoz
ENTRANCE
GRAVEL MP RAP APRON 3/C-803
DENUDED UMITs -/-
(� t \111, - 11 \4
SEE SHEET G-304 FOR
INFORMATION OFHESON PHASAS
E
2 S' THE SEDIMENT
BASIN. 1
1� HW-D1�
_' /!/ - _.- •' "/- _� � J ; � � \ \\\ —,� �� ��\ \ � l // 1 I � -+ -► DIVERSION DITCH 2/c-601
a-o1e
�.7-' / / „ems ' ✓ '>B \ \\ \` \ \ \ / / ® ROCK CHECK DAM 17/C-B01
r
.,! ! REFER 70 9lEr C-305 FOR EROSION / ! I i // \\ �\t DRAINAGE AREA -/-
CONTRAS FOR GRADINGWTHN car t1rj
I/ -� - /
.-! / !
ARE
/
--- NOTE THAT THE GRADING WHIMTHE GOF
COURSE MAY CONCLUDE PRIOR TO THE Do
OF THE MAN INFRASTRUCTURE
.,,
y.y``
..,� •Drat. ---
7K_i( 1
"
\
SPILLWAY -/-
RIDGE LINE -/-
EROSION CONTROL MATTING 9/C-IO2
SEA SHEET C-300 FOR EROSION CONTROL
/
SLOPES 3H ry ORSTEEPERAND
GREATER
EATER THAN 5' VERTICAL Heart./
\
////AL
NOTES, TREE BUFFER/PROTECTION NOTES,
SEEDBED PREPARATION NOTES, AND SHEET
NORTH
GRREEEN
/ \ / /j
//
` "
FOR CON TRUCTION SCOUENCE
/
AAMERICAANN
SC2550
APPROVED EQUIVALENT, TYP. SEE
1 /
//
DETAIL S/CrIDL
// //'I
NOTES.
,. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING
APPROPRIATE PMTES AND ASSURING THAT EXSTING UTILITIES
LOCATED PWOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACING SAFETY TO
USING
/ FUG MEN, ETC AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBIJC.
3. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS, CONCRETE OR ASPHALT, ARE TO BE
REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPAR ENT OF TRANSPORTATION. TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UnUTIES SPECIFICATIONS
t !"
a. SHORPPARRTTI 1926 SUBPART ONPR,DIOR AS AMENDEDENCHING STANDNG TO OSHA ARDS
►vi
BSbww
P a9 eni
R,Wizi,q tM P s birVu
Iintl PMn ' q
landKpe AmFi
Ori EnA ^55nnF
uro.n oSNyn
xa mmn T_
Clvdottr, NortM1 (S'aA t&aoa
W 3)6 i555 N]ot 3]6]95i
ud• nnaavkRnS*vem
BIRKDALE
REAL ESTATE
INVESTORS, LLC
4600 PARK ROAD, SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE, NC 28284
BIRKDALE GOLF
CLUB MIXED -USE
PRELIMINARY PLAN -
INFRASTRUCTURE
ONLY
16500 BIRKDALE
COMMONSPARKWAY
HUNTERSVILLE. NC 28078
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN -
STAG E 2
Project No.
4464
Issued
1D/04/19
Revised
10/18/2019 - REVISED PER TON COMMENTS
N
SCALE: 1"=40'
0 20' 40' 80'
C-305
The d-1 N1F ?op manual end the d09n 1-1 UAron
a]e 11an dcaJ' n t&stm PA. ThnrSproducttan
N.ffi md—dNe dowmennnitNautc.n d
CNeJe L5ton5 PA B".Ibftd.
C.1,M t&Start.PA, 2019
A

Birkdale Goff Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
ATTACHMENT G:
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
September 8, 1995 NWP Authorization
(CESAW-199505518)
58

01/08/97 15:03 MP704 562 9944 THE HARRIS GROUP -+1-► LND DES ENG '10003/oo5 -
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILM [NGTON DISTRICT
Action m. 19gussia County
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWME)'VERVICATION
Property OwnedApmt Harris Group/Mr. Ron rieban
Address Rotunda Suite 175, 4102 Congress Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28209
Telephone No. [phone]
Size and Location of project (waterbody, mad namdrrurnbeG town, etc.) The proposed "Sirkdals * mixed-
use development including an 16-hole golf course on 645 acres adjacent to McDowell
Creek and unnamed tributaries off San Purr Road and NC Hwp 73 in Runteraville, NC
Description of Av ivity
Construct a seweiline crossing of McDowell Creek; fill 0.30 ae of waters and wetlands
to construct a road crossing of McDowell Crk; fill 0.10 ae of wetiartd'adjacent to McDowell
—x_Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only. Crk for golf course development; and impact 1.E
ae of beadwater channels and wetlands for
Section 10 (diver and Harbor Act of 18") only. general development
,_„_,,,Section 404 outd Section 10.
y,1 d . i A _ � 6Re gfonal General Pemdt or Nationwide Permit Number.
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Peanit referenced above may subject the
peradnee to a stop work order; a restoration order. and/or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional GeneraWationwide Permit verification does not ralieve the undersigned
permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, Stam or local approvalsipermits. The permit["
may need to conmet appropriate State and local agencies before beginning work.
By signature below, the permuttee certifies an understanding and and of c6rAtions of this
pelt, Permittee will impie*ent in full the wetland a� ail terms minimization and mitigation measures
included in their application of 7/27PI and li t dLA& Attachment 1.
Property Owner/A.ut 4dzed Agent Signature
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
Date Q9-08-9S Expimtioa Date O1-27-97
SURVEY PLATS, FMM SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED TO
THE YELLOW C.MZ) COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUUM OR AVAILABLE -
Coss* roan "I
o« 1"S
59

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources 4 MIA
OM
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Q E H N F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 1, 1995
Mecklenburg County
DEM Project # 95794
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Ron Flehan
Harris Group
Rotunda Suite 175
4102 Congress Street
Charlotte, N.C. 28209
Dear Mr. Flehan:
You have our approval to place fill material in 2.21 acres of wetlands or waters for the purpose of
developing a golf course community at.Birkdale development, as you described in your application dated 27 July
1995. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality
Certification Numbers 2664, 2732, 2733 and 2671. These certifications allow you to use Nationwide Permit
Numbers 12, 14, 18 and 26 when they are issued by the Corps of Engineers.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. For this approval to be
valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification. Additional wrium approval is required
from DEM for the stormwater and mitigation plan. Any lots with jurisdictional wetlands shall have deed
restrictions to prevent future wetland fill. Runoff from the golf course shall be directly so as not to flow directly
into nearby streams and tributaries. Fill of site number 16 (Wetland Permitting and Mitigation Plan) shall be
further minimized or conclusively demonstrated to DEM that such minimization is not feasible. In addition, you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition
which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding
unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Environmental Mana ent der Section 401 of the
Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone John Dorneey t 919-7 1786.
Jr. P.E.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Asheville Field Office
Mooresville DEM Regional Office
Mr. John Domey
Central Ales
Len Rindner 95794.1tr
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535B0 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opporiunity Affirmative Action Employer W%recycled/ 10%post-cocaxner paper '

Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
ATTACHMENT H:
Rejected Alternative Plans
61

°,
• /• \ \, � _
..
� Mil,
P
/ 4 • \ _. __
/
4PF
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Fib T10.00•
[1{I
QD
D. J1PC 166 i
I
•
"IJ - ,1 `
Laf JB Bir4YR4
Ke. iz Pl- m
�p.,/`%��/��/
& MOM
Sh.Om the EM.i 1
Rtalz(N tnt Pxsib fib s
land PWnnn!
landrtaPe ArtAite!1-e
aI Engmenny
Nbdn Oetign
eoo So lryoni '
UNetIe, II•rtb UN' iatai
ZJo•ro.>mss r:anest
,� . • - / • , ..\ % , � : � ,, T SURVEY AS DALE S* GUST ,, 207. PRONDm BY R.B. G U STA F S O N
CHARLOTTE. A5 HMR ASSOCP.A. 420 HAWTHORNE LANE.
:.:, :�N• r ,B'p! / _ ., ,;\ , I I'„ 1 I4TF, NC 28204. 376 PARTNERS
• ' LEGEND
4600 PARK ROAD
SUITE 370
CHARLOTTE. NC 28284
r•
00
• / / /P r�jj E%1STNC CONTOUR
/
BIRKDALE GOLF
PROPOSED CONTOUR
/ ,� /, (,r O� ,1; ..::� CLUB MIXED -USE
- '- - - ' REZONING PLAN
�,1 \I %1- � t � // /' � / ll -' � I. � � ," / ,-�..�-- • / PROPOSED SAND FILTER AND DRY DETENnoN
16500BIRKDALE
-- ---- ��
6A1P DRAINAGE AREA COMMONS PARKWAY
/ HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
gq'r/ .•-r'" E \I Tipp - I I ( y (
/- (, i \1\ + _ f / •r ' �I �J +� a SPEFMOUS AF£A CALCU�4TIOte
1 / ,� / /� I � ,� t, 11 r PRELIMINARY
� f
• r ' `V J '• • f
. \ / _ \ I , ` ) I •,i // ; mil` `� /� ... PERVIOUPRE-DEVELS OPMENT: POST-O IOPMFNT.
• + / i / \ / ' I ( \ t % \ �\ / + Y % , \ 12097 AC. PERVIOUS 2.9IL6 AG
IXIS 206
+ ✓l l \ \ , !r7 } ' / / /' / Y/I I4PERN3 AC IMPERVIOUS; 11.J{ AG N
\ / /./: , , - © , d, , _ _ / , '• TOTAL_ ,1.18 AC TOTAL,- 14.18 AC. GRADING PLAN
I / , r - \ ` ` ` \� _,P, { }' \ // i /' / / � / ` I I / / THIS PLAN IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE AND
/ �� TOTAL BLIP DRAINAGE ACREAGE WITHIN PARCELS !L{.18 ACRES LOCATIONS OF ROADS LOTS AND OTHER
197 If Of / • �'� . \ / / • � - /' � I (/ AREAS AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE wBECT To
,�1r O J' ® \ / /,,�Y / -� -?� I / TOTAL STE EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 32.083 ACRES OR 1/.S91 FINAL DETER NATION ON PRELMINMY AND
permanent / • _ / ( '� \ a. / /// ' --/ - /r/ / FINAL PLAN.
/ / / // \ R- 1, J I r / "- ' �,/ _ .> ASSUMED TOTAL STE PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS *11.34 ACRES
stream \ i , J //^ - /JL ! -` OR 80% FINAL STE IMPERVIOUS AND DRAINAGE ARE TO BE Project No.
/ ® / --- 1 // ( / , I / ' !iJ _ _"-' S - / DETERMINED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE.
impact j�//` j, , / - �' / ( ) / ' ,/ ( REFER TO ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS FIRt SIZING OF BMP. 4464
eliminated � // / - �" `' / / / / / CALCULATIONS RE FSREFERENCE OWL
LINEN D SUBJECT TO
/` AIMM Issued
LorJ>1a�'i m.
!' % ,% / \ I - \ '"�: �i !`1/� • e� - /' ; 3TOPMWATSi MANAGELBdi NOTES
APPROXIMATE DUVALL LOCATON• 1, ON TE ITORMWATER MANAGEMENT WILL BE DESGNED TO
FMAL LOCATION AND ELEVATION TO / MEET THE RE UREMENTS AS SET FORTH IN THE POST
j aROPOSEO BIW / BE OETF I- DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTROLS ORDINANCE AND TOWN OF
(, / / [\-\ __ :' i / • AREA t25A79 SF / CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
• j \ HUNRERSNUi WATER QUALITY DESIGN MANUAL
I
EASEMENT WOULD BE REWIRED FOR
ALL aTiMiS WILL�• 1 / �� P OU�� MS / / 2 THE LOCATION
STORK ROUTING URE BE BASED UPON THE FINAL
� LocAnaN OF ON -SITE rT[ATUREs. Revised
AS
1 I ERT LOW TO
SMLLAR TECHNIQUE.
FILTERS MAY USED TO
PF•' nt7p - ' �/ W UEV OF SWALE AS SHOWN BY ro INVERT FLOW MS AND. TIERS
(23-At STORM EVENTS AND, BYPASS URGER STORMS ,1/11/2018 PER COUNTY/TOWN COMMENTS
ALL MEANS ALLOWABLE PER THE
NECESSARY
AND ABOVE) OR OTHER METHODS AS DEEMED
� ' ` gDI11ANCE 01 /11 /2019 PER COUNTY/TOWN COMMENTS
,, . /� / •� /. ' I o FM TMDC1 _ - - I- .� ` / r / \ I • .:. NECESSARY INDIVIDUAL THE ENGINEER THAN
eABE1'®R r( !! ,', it �� ` •'••'•= •f /,.: / / ' THEAAMU4 of 10 SAN FILTER
O�DRAIINNAGE AREA,
S AMPS WERE SHED TO CONTAIN THE WATER WEEN VOLUME
\ j \� / ^+ i , 1 '••f.' •l �, / �/ `/� ' AMID DETAIN THE 10 D PO STORM LOPME BETWEEN THE
PREIGNED PWENT SS POST DEVELOPMENT. THE BASH IS
- DESf2ER TO BYPASS THE LARGER STORM EVENTS NA
\ 4 I /. ` •,� q ;. tt.\\) r+ I / / '/ \ t / FEMA ROOD FRINGE UNE, ,/ // SPUTTER BOX
-ust F9• xx \\ / / f . , COMMUNITY FLOOD FRINGE UNE , /
\ I/ / R•. ' F \\\\ ! '�.(,[ i ) ;`•:'=•:�•;• \Y ANDPOGO LIMITS
MIMICS FEMA _ /
0. THE PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL RO SHALL INCLUDE THE
�. I q �/ • ' y t�1S TREATMENT OF ALL INTERNAL ROADWAYS TO THE SITE AS cU1 $ S`
✓ \ yL / t / j-+91OWN ON THE CONCEPT PLAN.
yy } �. • \\ \♦ i j j iiiiii �(( �!( ( / / / /' \\\ • �-J �� / 0.
NO EXIc NG SANITARY SEWER EASDIEEA To ABANDONED. / '�''�PS AL l0
�.i' \ � '\ � • \ 7 �, tt 1 / Y �. NO E%ISTNG SANITARY SEWER MTIIR/ EASEMENT 7. APPROVAL OF THIS CONCEPT PUN GOES NOT IMPLY OR yyXN SEAL A
WARANTEE APPROVAL OF T# FINA1 CONSIRULTON PLAN. J �1an
SYAY BUFFER. TIP.- / FINAL UALL PLANWNMILL SE RENEWED FOR O T1 Ft91 P
/ CPLANCE INI PER TO. COUNTY AND STATE J C
COMMUNITY ENOtOACIRIETIT LINE �,/ / W
, REGULATIONS IN EFFECT AT THE OF SUBMITTAL ,t tt mtu
/�/.- -- "tom / "s, gOA90 1 / / F�•y" / / /2 �' -� FEMA ENCROACHMENT UNE. TTP. �/ / E%ISTINGSELLSOU 20• 0. TH AB DEVELOPER RETAINS THE RICH? A NG AS THEEITHERIN
�� " G / / / / ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND 8MP8 SO ALONG AS 77E INTENT
/ ' / /� / / �� /� / EASEMENT
� � % _ 6 THE ORDINANCES AS STATED IN NOTE 1 ARE MET.
/,�'Yy •• AL
lU �1 VAAV\A A/L � f / / f I , / / ,.-v, •... /t/r/ / / .9 "VCI N'o'" 4. ,:
ir
lllpppll 11111
1AL1E ALLLTAMq
WALL
tMLOfAiKHML .
SCALE: 1"�0'
FIETAINM WALL NOTES '
1\ 1 JY(
t RESP
APPROPRIATE ATTE IPAR¶ES MD �RMa TORiIACONTACTING
ou5 Nc UTILITIES ARE /S�
-•. l / / yl/ /j[ rrj/ / / / , _,`... 1. RETAINING WALLS GREATER THAN a• (RESDENTAL) OR s LOCATED PRIOR To CONSTRUCTION. S P- V U U
I 1 I \-•`� � -- r \ _tI ! / �� 1 ` ii 1/`/r'r l/l 1 / / / /,/ ENFORRCEMENNT PRIOR IN TO CONS ITRREiXCTIONN. FROM CODE
2. CONTRACTOR is RESPONSIBLE FOR PULING BARRICADES USING 2 CONSTRUCTON OF WALL CANNOT BEGIN UNTIL ALL FLAG KEN. Err- AS NECESSARY TO INSURE SAFETY TO THE PUBLIC, o Yr dtd xnht8aom v.A They pred"mno NECESSARY PERMITS ARE ACQUIRED. 3. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS. CONCRETE OR ASPHALT. ARE TO BE A C i•ct mn•w g
]trUPLANB ZOK j
LfT (! r / 1 / 3. THE 4EIXL1?IBURG COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS REPLACED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA n Nortrtd drte doam•ntswMMcon,e�rtd
\ ! _• - / ' / , ) ! / , �e /� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, TOWN OF HUNTERSVILLE AND CNekMst 6.rone PA h PMb.,L
\\ \ - �'.. \\ ` / \ 1•f I I J' /' / I f r I� t/Y 1 I: •/ \ �RREAWM �•C / \ I I (( �\ , /�///��t/// NOT REVIEWED
CTURA_ STABILITY OF MY ME OIAROTIF-MECKLEBURG UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS.
NGWLON THE STE AND DOES NOTRESPONSIBILITY CdeknesfaSteM,PA zme
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEM. {. STORING WILL BE ACCORDING TO OSHA TRENCHING STANDARDS
I ,' \\ • + \\ / _ i/ /'�!' // J I/ // L 1 P� I I , I// ? + PART i926 SUBPART P. OR AS AMENDED.
82

Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
ATTACHMENT I:
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
NCWAM and NC DMS ILF Acceptance
63

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Applicant/Owner Name Birkdale Real Estate Partners
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont
River Basin Catawba
County Mecklenburg
fl Yes R No Precioitation within 48 hrs?
Date of Evaluation June 13, 2017
Wetland Site Name Wetland AA
Assessor Name/Organization Dan Zurlo/Carolina Wetland
Services
Nearest Named Water Body McDowell Creek
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03050101
NCDWR Region Mooresville
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• HabitatIplant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area Intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes []No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
® Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, If any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal Island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the
normal rainfall
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box In each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch 5 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, sod compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment arealwetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box In each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (W ).
AA WT
3a. ❑A ❑A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
®C ®C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ❑A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
64

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon t 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
®A ®A ®A > 10% impervious surfaces
❑B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C ❑C ❑C z 20% coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D Z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
❑E ❑E ❑E Z 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F ❑F OF 2 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed Qr hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer — assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No if Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric B.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note N a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A a 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
®E < 5 feet 4r buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
05 154"t wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ®No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑Exposed — adjacent open water with width 2 2500 feet (Lr regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (Wr) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for Wr and WC boundaries.
Wf WC
❑A ❑A z 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
OF OF From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ®H < 5 feet
65

9. Inundation Duration —assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
®A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
❑C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition —assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
®B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland typefwatland complex condition metric
Check
a box In
each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of
the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual).
Seethe User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A a 500 acres
❑B
❑B
❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
❑E From 10 to < 25 acres
OF
OF
OF From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
❑G
❑G From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
❑H From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I
❑I
❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
®J
®J
®J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
❑K < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (t 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four4ane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
t 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
®E
❑E
< 10 acres
❑F
OF
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas t 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear-cut&. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 160 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
❑B 1 to 4
®C 5to8
16. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
®A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
❑B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species Q at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover ofarotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
171b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
❑A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
o®A ®A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
0 ❑C ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
❑B
❑B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C
®C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense shrub layer
t ®B
®B
Moderate density shrub layer
U) ❑C
❑C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
❑A
❑A
Dense herb layer
_ ❑B
❑B
Moderate density herb layer
®C
®C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
®C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
67

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland AA Date of Assessment June 13, 2017
Dan Zurlo/Carolina
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization Wetland Services
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function
Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition HIGH
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Condition MEDIUM
Habitat
Overall Wetland Rating
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence (Y/N) NO
Condition LOW
68

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretory
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Trent Gustafson
Birkdale Real Estate Investors, LLC
PO Box 12170
Charlotte, NC 28220
Project: Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
November 5, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 5/5/2020
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Lou o� Impact Type Impact Quantity
(8-digit HUC)`
Catawba 03050101 Riparian Wetland
0.087
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010,
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Dan Zurlo, agent
Sincerely,
Jamesj Stanfill
Asse,Wanagement Supervisor
- -
D_EQ�
North Carolina Department of Environmen%guality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mall Service Center I Ulelgt4 North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
Attachment J
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
70

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
March 14, 2019
Mr. Trent Gustafson, CCIM
Gustafson Partners
4600 Park Road, Suite 370
Charlotte, NC 28209
Subject: Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
Birkdale Site (46 ac.)
Huntersville, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
Dear Mr. Gustafson,
Gustafson Partners has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide a
protected species habitat assessment for the Birkdale Site. The project area includes
Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel Nos. 00914136 and 00914117, totalling approximately 46 acres
in extent. The project area is located at the Birkdale Golf Club southeast of the Birkdale
Commons Parkway and Sam Furr Road intersection in Huntersville, North Carolina (Figure 1).
In -office Desktop Review
To determine which protected species are listed as occurring or potentially occurring within the
project vicinity and prior to conducting the on -site field investigation, CWS consulted the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) Endangered and Threatened Species and Species
of Concern by County for North Carolina online database for Mecklenburg County'. In addition,
CWS performed a data review using the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
Data Explorer on February 22, 2019 to determine if any record occurrences of federally -listed,
candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat are located within the project
limits.
Typical habitat requirements for listed species were discerned from multiple USFWS3 and
NCNHP° online resources including, but not limited to, specific USFWS species profiles,
recovery plans, NCNHP's Guide to Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species of
North Carolina, and List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. United States Department
of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh Field Office. Accessed February 22, 2019. Endangered and Threatened
Species and Species of Concern by County for North Carolina. https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/mecklenburg.html
z North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2018. Biotics Database. Division of Land and Water Stewardship. Department of
Natural and Cultural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina..
3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species. http://www.fws.gov/nces/es/plant_survey.html. Accessed February 22, 2019.
Buchanan, M.F. and J.T. Finnegan. 2010. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. NC Natura
Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC. Accessed from https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/nc_counties.html
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Pago71 of 8

Birkdale Site
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
March 14, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
Mecklenburg County' and aerial imagery were also reviewed for potential habitat communities
of listed species within the project vicinity (Figures 2 and 3).
Field Survey
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) scientist Dan Zurlo, Staff Scientist II, and Julia McGuire,
Staff Scientist I, conducted a pedestrian habitat assessment of the project area on February 26,
2019. Potential habitat for potentially occurring federally -protected species that was identified
during the desktop review was assessed in the field for the quality of physical and/or biological
features that would support the applicable species. Additionally, during the pedestrian habitat
assessment, areas were reviewed for applicable federally protected species; however, formal
surveys were not conducted. Identification references for natural communities include Schafale
and Weakley's Third Approximation for Natural Communities of North Carolina (1990)1 and
Weakley (2015)' for plant species.
Results
Based on the NCNHP data explorer review, there are no current records of federally -protected
species within the project limits or within a mile of the project limits (Attachment A). The
USFWS lists seven federally protected species for Mecklenburg County (Table 1). An official
species list has not been obtained from the USFWS Asheville Field Office.
Table 1. Unofficial List of Federally -Protected Species Potentially Occurring within the
Birkdale Site, Mecklenburg County, NC.
Major Group
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status*
Record Status
Plant
Helianthus
Schweinitz's
E
Current
schweinitzii
sunflower
Plant
Echinacea
smooth coneflower
E
Current
laevigata
Plant
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Historic
Animal
Bombus affinis
rusty -patched
E
Historic
bumblebee
Animal
Lasmigona
Carolina heelsplitter
E
Current
decorata
Animal
Myotis
northern long-eared
T
Current
septentrionalis
bat
Animal
Haliaeetus
bald eagle
BGPA
Current
leucocephalus
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
The site is an active golf course. Within the golf course. four terrestrial community types were
identified during the field survey. These community types consist of maintained roadside areas,
maintained grassy areas, forested areas, and an unmaintained right-of-way (Figure 3). Of the
identified on -site terrestrial community types, the roadside areas and border between
United States Department of Agriculture, 2017. Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. February 22, 2019.
Source: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
Schafale, M.P., and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation.
https//ww.namethatplant.net/PDFs/class.pdf.
Weakley, A.S. 2015. Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States. http:Hwww.herbarium.unc.edu/flora.htm.
Page 2 of 8
72

Birkdale Site March 14, 2019
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0113
maintained grassy areas and the poweriine right-of-way are considered potential habitat for
federally threatened or endangered species that could potentially occur within the project limits.
Aquatic habitat is present onsite in the form of two perennial streams, Streams A and B, which
is a potential habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter. A brief description of each species habitat
requirements and determination of effect findings are listed below by species.
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzil1
Habitat Description:
Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb with yellow rays and yellow centers. They
can reach heights of five feet. Populations are limited to the Piedmont of North and
South Carolina. It has been listed as an Endangered species under the ESA since
1991.8 The typical habitat for this plant includes roadsides, old pastures, transmission
line right-of-ways, open areas, either natural or human -maintained habitats, or edges of
upland woods. Major characteristics of soils associated with suitable Schweinitz's
sunflower habitat include thin soils, soils on upland interstream flats or gentle slopes,
soils that are clay -like in both composition and texture (and often with substantial rock
fragments), soils that have a high shrinkage swell capacity, and those which vary over
the course of the year from very wet to very dry.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no records of Schweinitz's
sunflower within a one -mile radius of the project area (Attachment A). The field survey
assessment and desktop review examined the site for suitable habitat and appropriate
soils. Forest composition varies over the site, yet all forested areas have a similar dense
canopy that does not offer supporting habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower (Photograph 1).
The maintained roadside areas and the maintained grassy areas lie within the Cecil and
Enon soil series, which are supportive of Schweinitz's sunflower; however, these areas
receive frequent maintenance through regular mowing and spraying typical of golf
course maintenance, and consequently, these areas are not suitable habitat
(Photographs 2 and 3). The powedine right-of-way lies within the Monacan soil series
and contains a dense understory of woody vegetation, which would outcompete
Schweinitz's sunflower and, therefore, is unsuitable habitat (Photograph 4). During the
field assessment on February 26, 2019, no individuals or identifiable plant parts of
Schweinitz's sunflower, or other Helianthus species, were observed in any portion of the
project site. Due to the lack of supportive habitat and no observed Helianthus
species, CWS concludes that this project will not affect the Schweinitz's sunflower.
Smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata)
Habitat Description:
Smooth coneflower is a tall, perennial herbaceous plant found in areas with abundant
sunlight where competition in the herbaceous layer is minimal. It has been federally
listed as Endangered under the ESA since 1992.9 Typical habitat for this plant includes
meadows, open woodlands, the ecotonal regions between meadows and woodlands,
° United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1991. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Helianthus schweinitzii
(Schweinitz's sunflower) DetemNned to be Endangered. http://erns.tws.gov/docslfedeml_registorKrl852.pdf.
9 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1992. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Echinacea laevigata (Smooth
Coneflower) Determined to be Endangered. http://ecos.tws.gov/doestfederal_mgfster/f2l40.pdf.
Page 3 of 8
73

Birkdals Site
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
March 14, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
cedar barrens, dry limestone bluffs, clear cuts, and roadside and utility rights -of -way. In
North Carolina, the species normally grows in magnesium- and calcium -rich soils
associated with gabbro and diabase parent material, and typically occurs in Iredell,
Misenheimer, and Picture soil series. Smooth coneflower grows best where there is
abundant sunlight, little competition in the herbaceous layer, and periodic disturbances
(e.g., regular fire regime, well-timed mowing, careful clearing) that prevents
encroachment of shade -producing woody shrubs and trees. On sites where woody
succession is held in check, it is characterized by a number of species with prairie
affinities.
Biological Analysis:
According to the NCNHP data record, there are no records of smooth coneflower within
a one -mile radius of the project area (Attachment A). Both the field survey assessment
and desktop review examined the site for suitable habitat and appropriate soils. On -site
soils consist of the Cecil, Enon, Helena, and Monacan soil series. Helena, Enon, and
Cecil soils series have the preferred parent material. However, no area on -site has
appropriate land cover. Each forested area has a similar dense canopy, which would
prevent the growth of the smooth coneflower (Photograph 1). The maintained roadside
areas and the maintained grassy area receives frequent maintenance through regular
mowing and spraying, consequently, it is not suitable habitat (Photographs 2 and 3). The
powerline right-of-way is unsuitable habitat for the smooth coneflower due to its dense
understory of woody vegetation (Photograph 4). During the field assessment on
February 26, 2019, no individuals or plant parts of the Echinacea species were observed
in any portion of the project site. Due to the lack of supportive habitat and no
observed Echinacea species, CWS concludes that this project will not affect the
smooth coneflower.
Michaux's sumac (Rhus michau_xAh
Habitat Description:
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous shrub. It is densely hairy with compound leaves
exhibiting evenly -serrated leaflets. Flowers are small, greenish to white, in terminal
clusters. Fruits are red drupes produced from August to October. Michaux's sumac has
been listed as an Endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) since
1989.10 It is found on the coastal plains of Virginia to Florida, with most populations
occurring in North Carolina. Michaux's sumac prefers sandy or rocky open woods with
basic soils, as well as highway right-of-ways, roadsides, or edges of
artificially -maintained clearings.
Biological Analysis:
A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are no current occurrences of
Michaux's sumac within the project limits, or within a one -mile radius of the project
(Attachment A). Both the field survey assessment and desktop review analyzed the
project area for suitable habitat. The onsite forested areas are unsuitable due to the
inability of sunlight to infiltrate the canopy (Photograph 1). The maintained roadside
area and maintained grassy areas are unsuitable because of frequent maintenance, and
t0 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. 1969. Endangered and Threatened wildlife and Plants ;Determination of Endangered
Status for Rhus mkhouxii (Michaux's sumac). http://ecos.tws.gov/docstfedeml_register/fri601.pdf.
Page 4 of 8
74

Birkdale Site March 14, 2019
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0113
the powerline right-of-way because of a competitive understory (Photographs 2-4).
Additionally the Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office states in its Michaux's sumac
profile page that the species is considered historic in Mecklenburg County". Due to the
lack of habitat and historic listing status; CWS concludes that this project will not
affect Michaux's sumac.
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata)
Habitat Description:
The Carolina heelsplitter was historically known from several locations within the
Catawba and Pee Dee River systems in North Carolina and the Pee Dee and Savannah
River systems, and possibly the Saluda River system in South Carolina. In North
Carolina, the species is now known only from a handful of streams in the Pee Dee and
Catawba River systems. The species exists in very low abundances, usually within 6
feet of shorelines, throughout its known range. The general habitat requirements for the
Carolina heelsplitter are shaded areas in large rivers to small streams, often burrowed
into clay banks between the root systems of trees, or in runs along steep banks with
moderate current. Recently, the Carolina heelsplitter has been found is in sections of
streams containing bedrock with perpendicular crevices filled with sand and gravel, and
with wide riparian buffers.12
Biological Analysis:
A pedestrian review of potential on -site habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter was
conducted on the two on -site perennial streams (Streams A and D) during the site visit
on February 15, 2019 (Figure 1). Streams A and D have unstable, incised banks and
buffer areas consisting of maintained lawn areas or disturbed vegetation dominated by
invasive species (Photograph 5). A NCNHP data record review revealed that there are
no occurrences of the Carolina heelsplitter within the project limits, or within a one -mile
radius of the project (Attachment A). Based on the lack of supportive onsite habitat and
the absence of any Carolina heelsplitter populations within the watershed, CWS
concludes that the proposed project will not affect the Carolina heelsplitter.
The rusty -patched bumble bee was listed as Endangered under the ESA in January 2017.13
Rusty -patched bumble bees once occupied grasslands and tallgrass prairies of the Upper
Midwest and Northeast, but most grasslands and prairies have been lost, degraded, or
fragmented by conversion to other uses. According to USFWS guidance, "the rusty -patched
bumble bee is likely to be present in scattered locations that cover only about 0.1 % of the
species' historical range. It is within these limited areas USFWS recommend that federal
agencies and others consider the need to consult with the Service on the potential effects of
their actions or the potential need for an incidental take permit under section 10(a)(1)(B). For
the remaining 99.9% of the historical range, USFWS advise agencies and others that this
Suitor, Dale. Fish and Wildlife Biologist. Raleigh Ecological Services Field, USFWS. Michaux's Sumac Species Profile page. Last
updated August 24, 2017. Accessed February 22, 2019 https:/twww.fiNs.gov/raleigh/species/es—michauxs—sumac.html
sumac.html
72 NCDOT TE Animal Habitat Descriptions. 2015.
https://connec,t.nodoot.gov/rosoumes/Envimnmental/Compliance%2OGuides%20and%20ProcedurosrrE%2OAnimal%2OHabitat%
20Descriptlons%20Mar 6_2015.pdf
13 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. https:/twww.fws.gov/midwestlendangersdAnsects/rpbb/index.html
Page 5 of 8
75

Birkdale Site
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
March 14, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
bumble bee is not likely to be present and that consultations or incidental take coverage is not
necessary.*14 According to the USFWS "Rusty Patched Bumble Bee Interactive Map",
Mecklenburg County is not within the 0.1 % historical range as no high potential zones or low
potential zones are present within Mecklenburg County. Based on these findings, CWS
concludes the proposed project will not affect the rusty -patched bumble bee.
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis sententriona/is)
The northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is one of the species of bats most impacted by the
white -nose syndrome disease. Summer habitat (roosting habitat) of the NLEB includes forests
and woodlots containing live trees and/or dead snags greater than three inches diameter at
breast height with cavities or crevices. Winter habitat (hibemacula) of the NLEB includes caves,
mines, rocky areas, or structures that mimic similar conditions such as culverts greater than
48-inch in diameter.15 The NLEB was listed as Threatened (T) on April 2, 2015.
The forested areas within the property are potential habitats for the NLEB. A Standard Local
Operating Procedure for Endangered Species Act Compliance (SLOPES) was established for
NLEB between the USFWS Asheville and Raleigh Ecological Offices and the United States
Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), Wilmington District, on January 31, 2017.16 This SLOPES
defines how the USACE will make determinations of effect to the NLEB on projects in which the
USACE is the lead federal agency. Alternative Local Procedure 1 (ALP 1) applies for the
Birkdale Site as the action area is within range of the NLEB," the action area is located outside
of a red 12-digit HUC as defined by the Asheville Ecological Services Field Office,18 and
consultation by the USACE is required on other listed species or critical habitat.
The final 4(d) rule exempts incidental take of NLEB associated with activities that occur greater
than 0.25 miles from a known hibemaculum site and greater than 150 feet from a known,
occupied maternity roost from June 1-July 31. In accordance with ALP 1 and the final 4(d) rule
(effective as of February 16, 2016), any incidental take that may result from associated activities
is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Therefore, this project Is exempt under the 4(d) rule.
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act,19 enacted in 1940, prohibits anyone, without a
permit issued, from "taking" bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. Habitat for the
bald eagle includes cliffs and forested areas near estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers,
seacoast, and as they become more abundant, stands of undisturbed forest. While Lake
Norman is approximately 1.2-miles of the site, on -site nesting habitat is poor as the forest areas
are fragmented and areas surrounding are heavily developed which would cause significant
disturbances for nesting bald eagle. Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area,
a survey of the project study area and the area within the project limits was not conducted. A
review of the NCNHP database on February 15, 2019 revealed no known occurrences of this
74 United States Fish and Wildlife Services. https:/twww.fws.gov/mktwestlendangeredrinsects/rpbbrindex.htmi
15 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. 4(d) Rule for the Northern Long -Eared Bat; Final rule.
httpsJ/www.gpo.gov/fdays/pkg/FR-2016-01-14/pdf/2016-M l 7. pdf
t° USACE httpJ/saw-rog.usace.army.miVNLEB/1-30-17-signed_NLEB-SLOPESBapps.pdf
" The U.S. Fish and wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. https:/twt;;cMs.gov/midwesVendangered/mammals/nlebtpdfMMSZone.pdf
1° The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2016. Northern Long -Eared Bat.
1° https://www.tws.gov/mkiwestIMidwastBird/8aglepermks/bagape.html
Page 6 of 8
76

Birkdale Site March 14, 2019
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report CWS Project No. 2019-0113
species within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to lack of habitat and known occurrences,
CWS concludes that this project will not affect the bald eagle.
Determinations
Based on the literature search and the desktop review, the site contained potential habitat for
Schweinitz's sunflower and smooth coneflower along maintained roadways and rights -of -way,
and potential habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter within the two perennial streams. However, the
onsite assessment revealed that none of these potential habitat areas were suitable for the
examined species. Additionally, based on the project area location, no tree removal activities
will occur within a 150-foot radius of a known, occupied NLEB maternity roost from June 1-July
31, and no trees will be removed within 0.25 miles of a known hibernaculum at any time of year.
Therefore, any incidental take on NLEB that may result from associated activities is exempt
under the 4(d) rule and notifications will follow the SLOPES agreement20. Biological
determinations requirements for federally protected species are summarized in Table 2 (below).
Table 2. Biological Determination Requirements Summary Table for Federally Protected Species
Federal
Effect on Listed
Biological
Scientific Name
Common Name
Status*
Species
Determination
Required
Helianthus schweinitzii
Schweinitz's sunflower
E
Will Not Affect
No
Echinacea laevigata
Smooth coneflower
E
Will Not Affect
No
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
E
Will Not Affect
No
Lasmigona decorata
Carolina heelsplitter
T
Will Not Affect
No
Bombus affinis
Rusty -patched bumblebee
E
Will Not Affect
No
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern -long-eared bat
E
Exempt/Excepted
Yes**
Haliaeetus
Bald eagle
E
Will Not Affect
No
leucocephalus
* E - Endangered, T - Threatened, BGEPA - Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
*` - Required in accordance with SLOPES, ALP 1 agreement.
20 http://www.fws,gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.htmi
Page 7 of 8
77

Birkdale Site
Protected Species Habitat Assessment Report
March 14, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
A biological assessment was not conducted for this project. All biological determinations of
effect represent the best professional opinion of CWS and are not official determinations of
effect. It is the responsibility of the lead federal agency to render an official determination of
effect. Should the lead federal agency agree with CWS initial findings of no effect, then no
USFWS consultation is required to comply with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
Should the lead federal agency's determination of effect differ from the findings of CWS, formal
or informal consultation with USFWS may be required.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this project. Please do not hesitate
to contact Daniel Roberts at 704-527-1177 ext. 707 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Daniel Roberts, PWS
Project Scientist
Christine Geist, PWS, CE
Consulting Group Manager
Attachments: Figure 1: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2: Current USDA-NRCS Soil Map of Mecklenburg County
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Attachment A: NCNHP Data Review Report
Attachment B: Representative Photographs (1-5)
Page 8 of 8
78

Ht'�AOk •. «�� 1 Y iMulfOrn
WA t K DR t...` 5 :Elam Sch t_ _
K _ l
K i
3� wtcrMORt'-•
i
J j
1
r' N
ai Grace
o
�� �Sp � r',�,:y L 3,. µCRiNERG.fS. C�� { _ • �vp
C----------------
RD
r
L
SA1N
"
Aaca�daerJul-
UM.'FU--�_" HN R" fl'— ;._.. rt
SAMIFUD y _..
f e _ . ... •. Brrkr.}nle�•--" Kf �, f'..-.... ham, F �
LL
i
f �[
j
i' �'li'R1
y
F
A
9
a en
-- !� Project Limits (46 ac)
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE(S): LAKE NORMAN SOUTH, NC (2017) 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
AND CORNELIUS, NC (2017).
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 2,000 feet 2/21/2019 USGS Topographic Map
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2019-0113 JKM Birkdale Site
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: C A R O L I N A Mecklenburg County
35.441853,-80.88015 CAG WETLAND SERVICES Huntersville, North Carolina
G:\Team Drives\Consulting Team Ddve\2019\2019 Consulting Projects\2019-0113 Birkda1e\JD\ArcGIS1Figure2_USGS (2).mxd

GATeam Drives\Consulting Team Drtve\2019\2019 Consuting Projects\2019-0113 Birkdale\JD\ArcGIS\Figure4_Current Soils(2).mxd

GATeam Nves\Consulting Team Nve\2019\201g Consufting Projects\201M113 6irkdale\PETS\ArcGIS\Figure3_Aerial.mxd

Attachment A: NCNHP Correspondence
82

NOW Roy Cooper. Governor
NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton Secretary
■�N■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
a MEN Walter Clark, Director. Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-8324
February 22, 2019
Julia McGuire
Carolina Wetland Services
550 e Westinghouse Blcd
Charlotte, NC 29707
RE: Birkdale Site; 2019-0113
Dear Julia McGuire:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
ill Yi C'//\A/\A/\A/ f\A/c nn\//nffircc /rlirc�tnrv/I ictrlffirr�c rfm?ctatcrnrla-�7
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerCa ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
(D 121 w !ONES STREET PALDGa1, NC 17��03 • 16S1 MAIL �;[PVICE CEWER, :A{.DGI4, NG 1'176Y)
(!:� OPC OXI707912083 FAX 11970%"�12\

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Birkdale Site
Project No. 2019-0113
February 22, 2019
NCNHDE-8324
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Vascular Plant 205 Silphium perfoliatum Northern Cup -plant 1970-07-22 H 3-Medium --- Threatened G5 S1
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos //ncnhde natureserve.ora/content/help. Data query generated on February 22, 2019: source: NCNHP, Ql Jan 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of �4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Birkdale Site
Project No. 2019-0113
February 22, 2019
NCN H D E-8324
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Vascular Plant 205 Silphium perfoliatum Northern Cup -plant 1970-07-22 H 3-Medium --- Threatened G5 Sl
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Mecklenburg County Open Space Mecklenburg County Local Government
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DECK, Division of Mitigation Services State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos //ncnhde.natureserve.ora/content/help. Data query generated on February 22. 2019; source: NCNHP, Q1 Jan 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 45

NCNHDE-8324: Birkdale Site
•fir ��M1a E...... rMe. b.. f(�- I,
Cy [nwry Cm.m:. r H.l
rk
-rr-
4 ewe.+w -
'M1.,g4'
i• 1 ,,
k ~f
N
S
February 22, 2019
Project Boundary Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 46
123,540
0 02 04 0.8mi
10 , ice' . r I
0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Sources Esn, HERE. Gann, IM*mwp, ,nGt ra P Corp., GESCO. USGS,
FAO, NIPS, NRCAN, GecBase. 1GN. Kadsslat W Ordnance Swey, Em Japan,
MET" Esn ., .,Hong "), su satepe, O OpenSUeeWap coMnbulors, and
eye GIs User Co. —my

Attachment B: Photopage (Photos 1-5)
87

Birkdale Site March 14, 2019
Attachment B: Photopage CWS Project No. 2019-0113
Photograph 1. View of forested habitat, unsuitable for all examined terrestrial species.
WA
x�
��.y� '�^ x �� .i:� M�1JvA�.� Y^�M ."�.Y�LYCr.'l•�' ��.-.'�' •1, ,^ :_,� _ d
yap
Photograph 2. View of maintained grassy area, unsuitable for all examined terrestrial species
Photop ge 1 of 3

Birkdale Site
Attachment B: Photopage
March 14, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
Photograph 5. View of the on -site perennial stream, unsuitable habitat for the Carolina
heelsplitter.
Photopage 3 of 3
9b

Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
Attachment K
NC SHPO Response
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
91

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, :Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
April 4, 2019
Trent Gustafson
Gustafson Partners
4600 Park Road, Suite 370
Charlotte, NC 28209
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kcvin Cherry
Re: Develop Mixed Use Site, Birkdale Site, Birkdale Commons Parkway & Sam Furr Road, Huntersville,
Mecklenburg County, ER 19-0999
Dear Mr. Gustafson:
Thank you for your letter of March 12, 2019, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review(@ncdcrgov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
69*'Ramona M. Bartos
Location: RN Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mai4ngAddress: 4617 Mail Service Center, l6leigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599
92

Birkdale Golf Club Mixed Use Site
Attachments
Attachment L
Photopage
November 8, 2019
CWS Project No. 2019-0113
93

fy 47 P+fr`F� a r F k: f► y
1

Birkdale Site
Attachment C: Photopage
June 21, 2017
CWS Project No. 2017-0337
Photograph 3. View of RPW Stream B facing downstream.
Photograph 4. View of Seasonal RPW C facing downstream.
Photop
ge 2 of 4

Aw
ram'• '� Y;V 1 + `��( l%..,;<lowe
a�
a�
rr
77
+a
- r �� `r• -
- lolvu
e'er •}•^ � .��� � � 3 + � .jiy,—.. ' r�I
M
f :W51�. f t

Birkdale Site June 21, 2017
Atta chment C: Photopage CWS Project No. 2017-0337
Photograph 7. View of Pond A facing southwest.
Photo page 4 of
97