20191567 Ver 1_401 Application_20191113

a 0 / 5ezl /_
November 13, 2019
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Ms. Karen Higgins
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Camel Street Townhomes
Request for Riparian Buffer Authorization
Sage Project #2019.93
140
RE0rAVMDE1NMDWR
NOV 13 201 i
=*!�lW►tN RssMe* A,
4t>leQ 9:GtiW
On behalf of Glenwood Homes, LLC. (applicant), please find attached a complete application and supplemental
information requesting written authorization from the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) that
the activities associated with the buffer and stream impacts for the proposed residential subdivision project may
proceed. No impacts to wetlands are proposed. Proposed impacts do not require written authorization from the
USACE.
Project Summary, Location, and Purpose
The purpose of the Project is to construct a townhome subdivision with associated roads and utilities which will
connect to existing adjacent infrastructure in the area. The Project site is currently undeveloped and consists of +/-
9.12-acres of wooded land located south of Camel Drive and east of Mail Street in Clayton, NC. Land -use in
immediately adjacent properties consist of residential, institutional, commercial, and undeveloped wooded land.
The project site drains to the Neuse River within the Neuse River Basin. Please see attached supplemental file for
corresponding Johnston County parcel PIN. The coordinates of 35.65386'N, 78.45256*W generally correspond to the
center of the Site.
Project History
The Site was evaluated and delineated by Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. A site meeting to verify the limits of
the Waters of the US delineation was held on February 27, 2018 with Mr. Ross Sullivan of the USACE (see attached
email). Streams on the site are present in the field as approximately shown on the USGS and Soil Survey maps
therefore a buffer verification site meeting was not requested.
Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed roads and lots were positioned and aligned so as to avoid impacts to streams and buffers to the extent
practicable (no stream or wetland impacts are proposed). In addition, open space was provided around drainages
containing streams and buffers. Construction fencing will be used to define the construction corridor and prevent
any accidental impacts. Silt fencing will be installed to provide additional protection from runoff.
Page 1 of 2

Project Impacts
Permanent buffer impacts proposed for the project include 2,490 Square Feet (ftz) in Zone 1 and 2,100 ftz in Zone 2
resulting from the installation of the proposed sewer line. Overall riparian buffer impacts total 4,590 ftz. No other
riparian buffer impactssa�e proposed.
Mitigation $ .
The riparian buffer impacts associated with this project are considered "allowable" and "exempt" within the table
of uses. Therefore, no riparian buffer mitigation is proposed at this time.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Attachments:
PCN Form
Agent Authorization Form
Johnston County Tax Parcel Information
USACE Post -Field Verification Confirmation E-mail
USGS Topographic Quad Site Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map
NCNHP Report
Impact Maps (2 sheets)
Page 2 of 2

of W A 7F4
E10Ja�
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. SAW-2016-
01126
DWQ project no.
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
® Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project.
Camel Street Townhomes
2b.
County:
Johnston County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Clayton
2d.
Subdivision name:
Camel Street Townhomes
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Glenwood Homes, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
DB: 05387, DP: 0013
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Mitch Murphy
3d.
Street address:
PO Box 90427
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27675
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-730-0784
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Mr. Sean Clark
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
5c. Street address:
3707 Swift Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27606
5e. Telephone no.:
919-559-1537
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
sclark(&-sa4eecological.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
166914-23-5178
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.65386°N Longitude: 78.45256°W
1 c. Property size:
9.12 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to Neuse River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV;NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application. The Site is currently wooded and undeveloped. Two streams enter the property from the west and flow east
where they converge near the center of the southern property line. The stream exits the Site near the southeastern
property comer. The surrounding land use is urban residential and includes schools and businesses as well as some
undeveloped forested land
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 (stream only)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: +/- 1,752 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct residential townhomes to meet the demand for housing in this part of Johnston
County.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of a single-family residential townhome subdivision with approximately 62 units. Two
entrance roads enter from the north of the Site via Camel Street. No impacts are proposed for the construction of the
townhomes or roads. Utilities for the proposed project will connect to existing utility lines on the southern portion of the
site. Impacts will result from installation of proposed utilities. Heavy equipment typically used for utility installation
projects (e.g. back hoes, bull -dozers, etc.) will be utilized.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments: A field determination made by Mr. Ross
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Sullivan (see attached email confirmation).
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
® preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
Name (if known): Mr. Wyatt Brown
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE Site meeting on February 27, 2018, with Ross Sullivan (USACE) SAW-2018-00251 — email from Josh A. Deal,
09/27/2019
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams —tributaries ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Corps (404, 10) or
Area of
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
impact
Temporary (T)
(acres)
Choose one
Choose One
Choose one
Yes/No
-
0
Choose one
Choose One
Choose one
Yes/No
-
0
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments: No wetland impacts are proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average stream
Impact
number
(PER) or
width
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
(feet)
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
feet)
Utility
UT to Neuse
Impact 1 - (T)
(Excavation)
River
PER
Corps
4
24
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
24
3i. Comments: Temporary stream impacts total 24 LF. No permanent impacts are proposed.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of
impact number —
waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
(acres)
Temporary T
01 Choose one
Choose One
Choose
0
0. Total open water impacts
0
4g. Comments: No impacts to open waters are proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 4 of 10

5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or
(acres)
number
purpose of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Tota 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5g. Comments: This project does not propose Pond or Lake construction
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason for
Buffer mitigation required?
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
Stream
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
name
UT to
No, per Table of Uses
Impact 1 (T)
Utility line
Neuse
1,830
1,160
Impact 2 (T)
Utility line
UT to
Neuse
No, per Table of Uses
0
475
UT to
No, per Table of Uses
Impact 3 (T)
Utility line
Neuse
660
465
6h. Total buffer impacts
2,490
2,100
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts are Allowable or Exempt per the Table of Uses.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Impacts resulting
from fill or permanent crossings were avoided for the proposed for the project. The proposed sewer crossing was
positioned so as to result in only one stream crossing and minimized by using a perpendicular crossing. Because the
sewer line is a gravity line a crossing could not be achieved further upstream (to the west). The stream crossing could not
be located further downstream (to the east) from the proposed location because the property to the south of the stream is
under separate ownership.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
General techniques include the use of construction fencing to define the construction corridor and prevent any accidental
additional impacts. Silt fencing and temporary basins will also be used to prevent sediment runoff into the stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
Type: Choose one
Quantity N/A
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments: N/A
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
0
Zone 2
1.5
0
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
0
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: Proposed impacts are considered "allowable" or "exempt".
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The diffuse flow plan is part of the Stormwater Management Plan being
❑ Yes ® No
reviewed by the County.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
Greater than 24%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The project requires a Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) which will be reviewed by
Johnston County.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Johnston County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Johnston County
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
® Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
® Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will tie into existing utilities and infrastructure in the area. The development of this property will not increase or
decrease the potential for future development in the surrounding area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) i
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will tie into existing municipal sewer lines located in the southern portion of the site.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Database (2019) was queried and a report (dated November 12, 2019) was received from
NCNHP which identified no recorded federally listed species on the project site or within a 1-mile radius.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
FEI Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The proposed project takes place in Johnston County which is not near any coastal or tidal habitat that would support
EFH (i.e. salt marshes, oyster reefs, etc.).
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/ Based on a review of the website, no historic structures occur on the Property. The Property is
adjacent to but not within the Clayton Historic District.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood Map #3720166900K; Dated 06/20/2018.
Sean Clark
11/13/2019
�� C04�7
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Sig ture
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
SERVICES
FST. 2016
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks to Be Filled in By the Current Landowner or Legal Representative
Name: 6 Woo C) u o, ec, it G
Address: eo 6p Ll0427
�-&Lely�A A c- zIyls
Phone: -t �`j �j0 0-1 84
Email: del (TC .� : I�tCLb21a41c, ctp- q wi t`,L , Cr�
Project Name/Description: Camel Street Townhomes
Sage Project # 2019.93
Date: to - (4--[I9
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn:
Field Office:
Re: Wetlands and Streams Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the undersigned, the owner or a duly authorized representative of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters
of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. I also hereby designate and authorize Sage Ecological Services to act on my behalf as my
agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of
applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
Notice: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government
officials to enter the property when accompanied by Sage staff. Please contact Sage to arrange a meeting
prior to visiting the site.
BY: k rrc44 T ; lb tlJgr4 BY:
Pri t Name of Landowner or Si nature of Land ne r
Legal Representative Legal Representative

* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
i
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
z
0
`— ---
Parcel Report
'-
X Coordinate:
2162615.3175628
Y Coordinate:
693341.98611967
-
id:
05E99012C
Tag:
05E99012C
NCPin:
166914-23-5178
/
Mapsheet No:
166914
Owner Name 1:
GLENWOOD HOMES, LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mall Address 1:
Mail Address 2:
PO BOX 90427
;r
Mail Address 3:
Site Address 1:
RALEIGH, NC 27675-0427
312 CAMEL ST
Site Address 2:
CLAYTON, NC 27520-
�� ..
Book:
05387
Page:
0013
Market Value:
223440
G
Assessed Acreage:
9.12
Calc. Acreage:
9.12
Sales Price:
Sale Date:
850000
2019-07-18
\
Township:
Clayton
Water District:
N/A
---�
ETJ:
Clayton
City Limits:
Clayton
Town Zoning:
R-8
County Zoning:
N/A
Overlay Zoning:
N/A
Scale: 1:6000 - 1 in. = 500 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 112 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
October 14, 2019

Sean Clark
From: Jacob Levan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 2:34 PM
To: Sean Clark
Subject: Fwd: SAW-2018-00251 (Camel Street Townhomes): Preliminary JD Concurrence
Attachments: MT Murphy - Camel Street Signed -Sealed Bndry 23Aprill8.pdf
---------- Forwarded message From: Wyatt Brown <E _ - - ---_ :>
Date: September 27, 2019 at 2:43:31 PM EDT
To: Penny Engineering Design <F... _. ; ...,_: >, ...
Subject: Fwd: SAW-2018-00251 (Camel Street Townhomes): Preliminary 1D Concurrence
Please see below COE concurrence email for Camel Street, thanks for letting me work with you. They are sending these
emails instead of official paperwork, consider this email as official COE response.
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Pres., Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
[phone]
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Deal, Joshua A CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)" <Joshua.A.De , ,s_ _._�,r >
Date: September 27, 2019 at 1:25:53 PM EDT
To: Wyatt Brown <:.,....,- __.. ..,;'..11.1...':...1111>
Cc: "Gibby, Jean B CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)" < n.R_r,ii; 1::_ eL..:: :r,.:r:i?>, "Sullivan, Roscoe L III
CIV (US)" < :::.::.. _:............ ...... .:.... 1>
Subject: SAW-2018-00251 (Camel Street Townhomes): Preliminary JD Concurrence
Hey Wyatt,
Ross Sullivan conducted a site visit with you at the above referenced property on February 27, 2018 to
verify the limits of any potentially jurisdictional waters of the United States (WoUS) within the project
area. I have determined that the delineation map that you provided to me on September 25, 2019
entitled "Terramisu, LLC" accurately depicts the limits of any potentially jurisdictional WoUS within the
project area.
I will issue the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for this project in the order that it was received,
but please note that I have a substantial backlog of permits and JDs to work through at this time and it
may take several months. However, please note that delineation concurrence is more than sufficient for
any required permitting under section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Best,
Josh
Joshua A. Deal

Regulatory Specialist
Raleigh Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone], Ext. 35
Fax: [phone]
Email: 3usiiud.a.easwuSaCe.ai iiiy.tiiii

USGS Topo Map rigure -i
Camel Street Townhomes
Sage Project # 2019.93 N
Clayton, NC Quadrangle
USGS Topography, December 2013
October 14, 2019
0 500 1,000 Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Feet Cell: 919-559-1537

NRCS Soils Map riyure c
Camel Street Townhomes
Sage Project # 2019.93 N
SAGE
ECOLOGICAL
Johnston County Soil Survey, 1994 , SERVICES
Soil Sheet 1
October 14, 2019
0 750 1,500 Sage Ecological Services, Inc.
Office: 919-335-6757
Feet Cell: 919-559-1537

L1� = NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES Susi Hamilton. Secretary
■y� Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-10690
November 12, 2019
Sean Clark
Sage Ecological Services
3707 Swift Drive
Raleigh, NC 27606-2543
RE: Camel Street Townhomes; 2019.93
Dear Sean Clark:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at < or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Camel Street Townhomes
Project No. 2019.93
November 12, 2019
NCNHDE-10690
Element Occurrences
Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal
State Global State
Group
Observation Occurrence Status
Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Dragonfly or
33753 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H? 5-Very ---
Significantly G3G4 S2?
Damselfly
georgiana Low
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name ;.. b owner N r� �
.Fvk x . . _.._z� Owner Type
WK
Johnston County Open Space Johnston County: multiple local Local Government
government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at h` r)s•//n nhd .na r s r ora/content/heir). Data query generated on November 12, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q4 O
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-10690: Camel Street Townhomes
ram._
7
aJ�
J r an
v,2
ai
A.
twos:
ec E` n
z�R ClaytafSi
ems µ[q'rMY Pxrh t 9i9,y WV Cf'e
' s
w E >5-
S
J,
November 12, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
E3 Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:21,511
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Esn, HERE, Garmn, Intennap, increment P Corp., GESCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN. Ce Sase, IGN, Ksdaster NL. Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong). (c) OWStreetWp contributors, and the GIS
User Community

LPH DRIVE
REST
50 55a�=� 50100
PLANS

L.
15e
SS SS —
MH #6 9
,5 S ,S MHS STREAM IMPACT PACT TABLE
9z2 NY210 - — _ 16 zQ p=
ez Z -- El? 2_ J IMPACT 1
S 1 9830 SF IN ZONE 1 17 Zw
11 2-
---_ 1 )160 SF IN ZONE 2 D
� s 12 24 LINEAR FEET 18 �o �o Y
N M" 13 IMPACT 2 19
S F I N ZONE 2f`AR��
475 -��_-
ss 0 LINEAR FEET 20 = S1EA
1921
BZ —e12\ ` IMPACT 3 . 21 I
`
9Y2-BZz—ezZ 660 SF IN ZONE 1 � z
z \ \
\ IMPACT 1 e�� 465 SF IN ZONE 2 22
\ IMPACT 2
\ \ R0 LINEAR FEET
w z
23C
\ s G O
� s
of m
N s
IMPACT 3
ss =
9r
z7/ MH #3 Ste' _ SS j oz
�, =t �� _ MH #8 ss o
a MH #2� 5 24 o
5 � .� 5s ._ 25 z
SS ss \ \ ss W o
Bz z ez z �_ SLU LA
2 LU S
\ al o
\ , ✓ z s
s V)
a
\
'` \ o
s _/
\ N s �
1 m ss
SCALE: DRAWN:
1 "=40' 18L
I DATE: CH, ,D.
Lezz--ers-ezz 11/8/19 PLS
REVO
BZ 2
\ l \
SHEET
\ ,\ OF
PPOJ. i
\ . P 1724