The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20181597 Ver 1_Design/Maps/Site Plans_20191120Carpenter, Kristi From: Steenhuis, Joanne Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 7:48 AM To: Herndon, T. Mason; Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); Westphal, Anneliese Subject: RE: [External] FW: B-4438_Permit_Drawings_20190930.pdf All, I am with Brad on this. It is your decision as what would work the best for DOT and hopefully not have a lot of issues in the future. So let me know which one you decide on. From: Herndon, T. Mason <tmherndon@ncdot.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 5:12 PM To: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Brad.E.Shaver@usace.army.mil>; Westphal, Anneliese <awestphal@ncdot.gov>; Steenhuis, Joanne <joanne.steenhuis@ncdenr.gov> Subject: RE: [External] FW: B-4438_Permit_Drawings_20190930.pdf Your concern is why I prefer Option 1 because we can grade the tributary to a 0.1% slope within the 40 ft reach and tie into the new ditch at grade. I believe this the best option for stability and drainage plus not interfere/overwhelm our roadway drainage through the 30 culvert @ -Y1-. Mason Herndon Environmental Program Supervisor Division 3 NCDOT- Division of Highways 910-341-2036 office 910-604-0050 mobile tmherndon(@ncdot.eov 5501 Barbados Blvd Castle Hayne, NC 28429 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties From: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Brad.E.Shaver@usace.army.mil> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 11:16 AM To: Westphal, Anneliese <awestphal@ncdot.gov>; Steenhuis, Joanne <loanne.steenhuis@ncdenr.gov> Cc: Herndon, T. Mason <tmherndon@ncdot.gov> Subject: RE: [External] FW: B-4438_Permit_Drawings_20190930.pdf Wan xternal email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to AW, I really don't have any comments or questions being that the impacts are related to a JS non mit. Whichever strategy the Division chooses would be fine with me. I am curious how they are going to make up the foot elevation difference between the JS non mit and the receiving ditch which sits one foot higher in elevation. Brad From: Westphal, Anneliese [mailto:awestphal@ncdot.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 9:01 AM To: Shaver, Brad E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Brad.E.Shaver@usace.army.mil>; Steenhuis, Joanne <joanne.steenhuis@ncdenr.�ov> Cc: Herndon, T. Mason <tmherndon@ncdot.gov> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: [External] FW: B-4438_Permit_Drawings_20190930.pdf Joanne and Brad, Chris Rivenbark has coordinated with Moffat and Nichol regarding the drainage along Little Loop Rd at Brunswick Bridge 47 (B-4438). Please see the 4 options that are presented below. Presently, I think Mason is leaning toward one that doesn't have a junction box or pipes so that the drainage would be open. Specifically he thinks that the one with 40 "feet" of additional impacts could be the best option. Do either of you have any comments or concerns regarding these options? We also plan to discuss these options with NCDOT maintenance. Thanks, Anneliese Anneliese Westphal Environmental Senior Specialist Division 3 NCDOT- Division of Highways 910 341 2000 office 910 604 1330 mobile 910 675 0143 fax awestphal(cancdot.gov 5501 Barbados Blvd Castle Hayne, NC 28429-5647 From: Rivenbark, Chris <crivenbark@ncdot.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 6:27 AM To: Westphal, Anneliese <aestphal@ncdot.gov>; Herndon, T. Mason <tmherndon@ncdot.gov> Cc: Riffey, Deanna <driffev@ncdot.gov> Subject: FW: [External] FW: B-4438_Permit_Drawings_20190930.pdf The design firm has come up with three possible options. Can you let us know which you would prefer? Chris Rivenbark NCDOT- Environmental Analysis Unit (919) 707-6152 From: Huffman, Trent <THuffman@moffattnichol.com> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 5:02 PM To: Rivenbark, Chris <crivenbark@ncdot.gov>; Bowles, Jacquelyn K <jkbowles@ncdot.gov> Cc: Riffey, Deanna <driffev@ncdot.gov>; Stutts, David S <dstutts@ncdot.gov>; Peterson, Tierre R <trpeterson@ncdot.gov>; Davenport, Justin <javenport@moffattnichol.com>; Dorney, John <idorney@moffattnichol.com>; Efird, Adam <aefird@moffattnichol.com>; Long, Cameron <clong@moffattnichol.com> Subject: RE: [External] FW: B-4438_Permit_Drawings_20190930.pdf External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspi report.spam@nc.gov� Chris / Jacquelyn, Please see below the options we have come up with to solve this JS non-mit ditch issue. Please let us know if you have any questions or need additional information. Regards - Trent To provide positive drainage (0.1% grade) from the JS non-mit to the proposed base ditch we would have to wrap the ditch around the end of the proposed cross pipe and extend the grading of the JS non-mit back to around station 10+65 Y1 which would be around 40' of additional stream impacts along Little Loop Road. This is according to the survey we were provided to design the project. Another option would be to not increase impacts but to grade the JS non-mit in the radius of the intersection as it transitions from cut to fill and tie into our proposed base ditch. This would result in a low spot in the JS non- mit. However we would not expect this to cause any flooding issues. #vav !! 1 iTa1 J-I 4 V . k lost ?-3CWUT � 0 Another option would be to add in a Junction Box with pipe stubs. The pipe going to the JS non-mit would have an adverse slope and would potentially create a low point. 5 Still another option would be to add the JB with pipe but extend the pipe back far enough to achieve a positive grade in the pipe (0.1%). Again this would add additional impacts to the JS non-mit. ~- - - -- - - - �- TB 21 Trent E. Huffman, PE Moffatt & Nichol From: Rivenbark, Chris [mailto:crivenbark@ncdot.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 12:56 PM To: Huffman, Trent <THuffman@moffattnichol.com>; Jacquelyn Bowles <jkbowles@ncdot.gov> Cc: Riffey, Deanna <driffey@ncdot.gov>; Stutts, David S <dstutts@ncdot.gov>; Peterson, Tierre R <trpeterson@ncdot.gov>; Davenport, Justin <*davenport@moffattnichol.com>; Dorney, John <idorney@moffattnichol.com>; Efird, Adam <aefird@moffattnichol.com> Subject: RE: [External] FW: B-4438_Permit_Drawings_20190930.pdf Trent, The agencies made a compliance inspection on Tuesday and have additional questions. The note below is from the Div. Env. Specialist. Regarding the note on permit drawing 6: the agencies reviewed this site in the field yesterday. Both the Corps and DWR are interested in how the existing drainage along the east side of Little Loop Rd. (a JS non mit) will tie to the created special lateral base ditch. The base ditch has already been graded by the contractor. The attached photo shows the base ditch -the water in the foreground is the JS non mit. The photo was taken from Little Loop Rd facing the base ditch. The contractor indicated that grade shots show that the base ditch is about 1' higher than the bottom of the JS non mit. Therefore, we are looking for some guidance on how to connect these drainages — either by grading or with a box and pipe stubs. Also to explain a change from your previous version, I removed the existing channel impacts temp (linear amounts) from sites 1,2, & 7 from the impact summary sheet. The JS non-mit impacts only need to be provided in ac. If SMU approves, please take a look at this and make any necessary revisions. Chris Rivenbark NCDOT- Environmental Analysis Unit (919) 707-6152 Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.