U-92

4 pit
Hope Mills Bypass
From SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
• TIP Project No. U-0620
j ` s MAR 1 2000
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Submitted Pursuant to
Date William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
Date r,, ,Nich L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator, FHWA
Hope Mills Bypass
From SR 1 141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1 132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Document Prepared in the Planning and Environmental Branch By:
Beverly G, binson
Project Development Engineer

SE AL ,t c
1978

S. Eric Midkiff, P.E. F cG `
Project Development Unit Head Rj

t
Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. TYPE OF ACTION ....................................................................................... i
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION .................................................. I
III. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS .......................... 2
IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENT .......................................................... 4
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment ................................... 4
B. Comments Received on Environmental Assessment ......................... 4
C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearing....... 6
D. Post Environmental Assessment Coordination .................................. 7
V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ...................... 8
VI. ONLY PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE WETLAND FINDING .............. 10
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ............................ 11
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Proposed Improvements
APPENDIX
Hope Mills Bypass
from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
1. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will not have any significant impact on
the human environment. This Finding of No Significant Impact is based on the August
31, 1998 Environmental Assessment (EA) which has been independently evaluated by the
FHWA and determined to adequately and accurately discuss the need, environmental
issues and impacts of the proposed project. The EA provides sufficient evidence and
analysis for determining that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required.
The FHWA takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content of the
Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways,
proposes to construct a new facility, the Hope Mills Bypass, south of Fayetteville.
The proposed project will widen the existing George Owen Road (SR 1133) to a
multi-lane facility from Bingham Drive (SR 1141) to Columbine Road (SR 3065) and
extend on new location to intersect Legion Road (SR 1132) directly across from Elk Road
(SR 1363). A four-lane divided facility with a 5.4m (18-foot) raised median is proposed
for the new location section.
The proposed project is included in the 2000-2006 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) with right of way acquisition scheduled for Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 and
construction for FY 2003.
The total estimated cost for the proposed project is $29,515,460 including
approximately $7,200,000 for right of way acquisition, $21,650,000 for construction and
$312,960 and $352,500 for wetland and stream mitigation, respectively. Both five lane
and four lane (with median) alternatives were considered for the section along George
Owen Road.
III. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
Standard Operating Procedure
Precautions will be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the
study area. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface
Waters will be strictly enforced during the construction stage of the project.
Hydraulics Unit and Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
(PD&EA)
The NCDOT Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and local authorities during final design to process
the floodway revisions and ensure compliance with applicable floodplain
ordinances. Floodway revisions are anticipated to be needed for crossing of
Beaver Creek, Beaver Creek Tributary B, and Buckhead Creek.
Standard Operating Procedures
NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage will
apply to all stream crossings within the project area.
Standard Operating Procedure
It is anticipated an Individual Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers will be required due to the project wetland impacts. A North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Section 401 Water Quality General
Certification is required prior to the issuance of the Section 404 Permit.
Roadway Design
Efforts will be made during design to further reduce impacts to a wetland
area near the CSX Railroad on Alternate 1. These minimization efforts will be
coordinated with resource agencies early in the preliminary design process.
PD&EA Branch
The NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation recommend mitigation
consisting of protecting a nearby tract of wet pine flatwoods. No wet pine
flatwoods have been identified in the project area however, this will be evaluated
in more detail during the design phase.
PD&EA Branch
NCDOT is committed to providing mitigation for unavoidable wetland
impacts. This mitigation will be developed in coordination with resource agencies
during the preliminary design process.
PD&EA, Roadway Design and Hydraulics Unit
WRC recommends installing a level spreader into wetland areas to aid in
filtering stormwater runoff. Project Development along with Roadway Design
will work with the Hydraulics Unit to develop stormwater drainage plans. A
series of alternates for handling runoff will be developed for the proposed project.
Drainage Plans will be forwarded to resources agencies once they are completed.
Geotechnical Unit
The Hope Mills Bypass will impact four facilities with underground
storage tanks (UST's). These facilities could not be avoided, therefore,
"Preliminary Site Assessments" will be performed prior to right of way
acquisition to determine the existence and/or extent of any contamination.
Roadway Design ;Branch
AASHTO guideline 14-foot wide outside lanes will be constructed on
George Owen Road and 4-foot paved shoulders will be provided on the new
location portion of the project for bicycle accommodations.
Area Traffic Engineer
The Area traffic engineer will determine if intermediate installation of a
left turn lane and turn signal is warranted at the Cumberland Road/George Owen
Road intersection.
IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENT
A. Circulation of Environmental Assessment
The Environmental Assessment was approved on August 31, 1998. The approved
Environmental Assessment was circulated to the following federal and state, and local
agencies for review and comments. Copies of the correspondence received are included
in the Appendix of this document. (Note an asterisk indicates those agencies that
responded to this letter):
*U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
*U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Geological Survey
Region M Council of Governments
Mayor of Hope Mills
Mayor of Fayetteville
Cumberland County Manager
Cumberland County Commissioners
*N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
*N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Department of Administration
Department of Public Instruction
B. Comments Received on Environmental Analysis
Department of the Army Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Comment: Waters and Wetlands: POC - Mr. Dave Timpy, Wilmington
Field Office Regulatory Division at (910) 25 f -4634
A commitment in the EA (page 30) states that efforts will be made during the
design to further reduce impacts to a wetland near the CSX Railroad on Alternative 1. By
letter dated December 7, 1998, NCDOT provided an adjusted alignment to Alternative 1
that will reduce wetland impacts in this area. Based on our review of this alignment, we
feel that the EA commitment may be satisfied pending the revised estimate of wetland
impacts.
On page 33, paragraph 2, it is stated that a known population of rough leaved
loosestrife (Lysimachia asperlaefolia) was observed on June 8, 1998. We believe the EA
is in error and that the observation of rough leaved loosestrife was made in 1997.
On page 39, paragraph 3, states that direct discharge of roadway stormwater
runoff into live streams will be avoided to the extent practicable. It also indicates that the
NCDOT Hydraulics Unit, in conjunction with the Planning and Environmental Branch,
will coordinate efforts with the resource agencies in the final hydraulic design to ensure
all environmental concerns are addressed and to facilitate the permit process, if necessary.
We feel coordination of these efforts is necessary.
The EA does not discuss a compensatory mitigation plan. We realize that
mitigation plans are not normally addressed in an EA. However, we encourage NCDOT
to prepare and submit a compensatory wetland mitigation plan for our approval as early
as possible.
Response: Wetland impacts for Alternate 1 was reduced by 0.64 ha (1.58 acres) after
shifting the alignment near the CSX railroad.
Rough leaved loosestrife was discovered by NCDOT Biologists in 1997 on an
early alignment. A plant by plant survey was conducted in 1998 after two additional
alignments were developed.
Coordination with resource agencies will occur during final design to ensure all
environmental concerns are addressed and to facilitate the permit process.
NCDOT is actively searching for wetland and stream mitigation sites for river
basins throughout North Carolina.
2. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Comment: Based on information provided in meetings, correspondence, and the EA,
the Service concurs with the selection of Alternate 1 as the preferred alternative.
However, the Service retains the right to recommend other alternatives if data not
contained in this EA become available and to provide comments on the final alignment of
the highway within the corridor selected.
As required by the 404(b)(1) guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency,
the NCDOT should first endeavor to avoid, then minimize, and finally compensate for
wetland losses that would be incurred if this project is implemented. As noted in Table 1
(pg. 9) there will be wetland loss and streamside impacts associated with construction of
the preferred alternative. The EA (pgs. 29-30) presents measures that the NCDOT has
committed to for avoidance and minimization of wetland losses. These include selection
of an alternative that minimizes encroachment into wetlands in the project corridor, grass
shoulders, rather than curb and gutter, on the new location to reduce and filter roadway
runoff, design efforts to further minimize impacts to a wetland area near the CSX
Railroad, and the use of Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters.
While NCDOT has committed to a wetland mitigation plan during the design
stage there is no plan for mitigating stream impacts. NCDOT should also prepare an
acceptable stream mitigation plan suitable to replace the functions and values of the
existing streams.
The Service notes that the EA provides a detailed discussion (pgs. 31-34) of the
potential project related impacts on federally-listed threatened and endangered, and
candidate, species. NCDOT has reviewed the Services' map of known occurrences of
federally protected species in Cumberland County, and of 8 species, none were shown to
be potentially impacted by the proposed project. NCDOT has concluded that the project
will have no effect on these species. The Service concurs with this determination.
However, this decision would be reconsidered if additional information on listed species
that could be impacted by this project comes to light, or if there is a significant change in
project plans.
Response: NCDOT is actively searching for wetland and stream mitigation sites for
river basins throughout North Carolina.
C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearing
Following the circulation of the Environmental Assessment a combined Open
House/Formal Public Hearing was held at the Southview High School Auditorium
located on Elk Road in Fayetteville on April 20, 1999. Interested citizens were given the
opportunity to review preliminary designs of the project, talk to NCDOT engineers and
right of way agents, and make comments concerning the proposed improvements.
Approximately 133+ persons attended the public hearing.
NCDOT addressed the concerns of all of those who commented on the proposed
improvements, either in person or by written letter following the public hearing. The
following is a list of comments received during and following the public hearing along
with NCDOT's responses.
Comment: We strongly urge DOT to construct the five-lane option along George
Owen Road. This option will allow sufficient ingress and egress to the Cumberland
United Methodist Church.
Response: George Owen Road is proposed as a four-lane median divided facility, per
request from the Fayetteville Transportation Advisory Council (TAC). The four-lane
facility will provide greater consistency for the overall system of roadways in the project
area. The four-lane section will provide safe traffic operations and levels of service on
the proposed facility.
Comment: Can an interim signal and left turn lane on Cumberland Road be
constructed at the Cumberland Road/George Owen Road intersection?
Response: The Area Traffic Engineer will investigate intermediate installation of a
left turn lane and traffic signal. This will be determined prior to the completion of the
final design plans.
Comment: Has an alternate route been proposed for the Hope Mills Bypass?
Response: Six alternates were studied early in the planning process. These alternates
were not feasible due to environmental impacts and a large number of relocatees. No
additional alternatives are being considered at this time.
Comment: Will access be provided to the into Dixie Yarns Mill at Cumberland and
George Owen Road?
Response: A right in/right out driveway access will be provided for the Dixie Yarn
Mill to access the small parking lot near the intersection of George Owen Road and
Cumberland Road.
Comment: Can the cul-de-sac and dead end Pinewood Lakes Drive be left as it is?
Response: Pinewood Drive will tie into the Hope Mills Bypass which will help the
road network. Leaving this road as a cul-de-sac or dead end will negatively effect the
traffic operations and level of service for the proposed facility.
Comment: Can the project be extended to US 301?
Response: There is currently a project, U-3849 in the TIP (Transportation
Improvement Program), to improve Elk Road from Legion Road to US 301, but it is not
currently funded. The Division Office will investigate the possibility of a Division
Design Construct Project to improve Elk Road prior to construction of the Hope Mills
Bypass.
D. Post Environmental Assessment Coordination
NCDOT officials met with representatives of the Division of Water Quality,
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, US Army Corps of Engineers and the
Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (FAMPO) on September 29, 1999
to update the resource agencies on the proposed project. Early in the project study, a
four-lane median divided facility was proposed for the new location portion of the
project. During the post hearing meeting the representative from the FAMPO requested
sidewalks for the entire length of the project, which will require curb and gutter on both
sides of the proposed facility for the entire length of the project. This was discussed with
the resource agencies to receive comments.
This project did not follow the NEPA 404 Merger Process. NCDOT however is
coordinating with resource agencies prior to the permit application stage of the project to
assure smooth transition into right of way acquisition.
At the September 29, meeting, resource agencies agreed with the purpose and
need, selected alternative and minimization measures for the proposed project. No
additional minimization measures are needed.
NCDOT will continue to coordinate with resource agencies concerning sidewalks
along the new location portion of the project. Additional comment will be requested
from the resource agencies once drainage plans are completed for the new location
portion of the project.
V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
SUMMARY
Description of the Proposed Action
The total cost for the proposed project is $29,515,460 including approximately
$7,200,000 for right of way acquisition, $21,650,000 for construction, $ 312,960 for
wetland mitigation, and $352,500 for stream mitigation. The EA did not give the cost for
wetland and stream mitigation.
The four-lane median divided typical section is recommended for the section
along George Owen Road. In the EA, both the five-lane curb and gutter and the four-lane
(with median) alternatives were being considered for the section along George Owen
Road.
Summary of Environmental Impacts
The recommended alternative, Alternate 1, is estimated to impact 2.14 ha
(5.3 acres) of wetlands and 481 m (1577 feet) of surface waters. The wetland impacts
include 1.26 ha (3.12 acres) on new location, 0.1 ha (0.25 acres) along George Owen
Road and 0.78 ha (1.93 acres) at the George Owen Road/Bingham Drive intersection.
The EA listed an estimated impact of 2.78 ha (6.87 acres) for wetlands along Alternate 1.
The wetland impacts included 1.9 ha (4.7 acres) on the new location portion of the
project, 0.1 ha (0.02 acres) along George Owen Road and 0.78 ha (2.00 acres) at the
George Owen Road/Bingham Drive intersection. Conversions from ha to acres were
corrected for impacts along George Owen Road and the George Owen Road/Bingham
Drive intersection.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION, page 1
The total cost for the proposed project is approximately $7,200,000 for right of way
acquisition, $21,650,000 for construction, $ 312,960 for wetland mitigation, and
$352,500 for stream mitigation. The EA did not give the cost for wetland and stream
mitigation.
The four-lane median divided typical section is recommended for the section
along George Owen Road. In the EA, both the five-lane curb and gutter and the four-lane
(with median) alternatives were being considered for the section along George Owen
Road.
PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS
Proposed Typical Section, page 5
The recommended cross section consists of 3.6 in (12-foot) inside and 4.2 in (14-foot)
outside lanes in each direction divided by a 5.4 in (18-foot) raised median along George
Owen Road. Curb and gutter will be constructed with this typical section. The EA listed
the four-lane cross section as the proposed cross section with a five-lane cross section as a
studied option.
The new location portion will consist of two 3.6 in (12-foot) lanes in each direction
divided by a 5.4 m (18-foot) raised median utilizing curb and gutter. The Fayetteville
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization has requested that the new location section of
the project contain curb and gutter in order to incorporate sidewalks. NCDOT is
evaluating this request. The EA described this section as two 3.6 m (12-foot) lanes in
each direction divided by a 5.4 m (18-foot) raised median utilizing a 10-foot shoulder
section with 4-foot paved.
Sidewalks, page 6
The inclusion of sidewalks is under consideration for one side for the entire length of
the project. Once stormwater drainage plans are reviewed by resource agencies, a
decision for sidewalks along the new location portion of project will be made. The EA
did not propose sidewalks for the proposed project.
Bicycle Accommodations, page 6
Bicycle accommodations will include 14-foot wide outside lanes on George Owen
Road. If the new location section is to accommodate a curb and gutter section, it will also
include 14-foot wide outside lanes for bicycle accommodations. The EA stated 4-foot
paved shoulders would be on the new location portion of the project, which was proposed
to have grass shoulders.
Cost Estimates, page 6
The proposed improvements are estimated to cost a total of $29,515,460. This cost
includes $21,650,000 for construction, $7,200,000 for right of way acquisition, $312,960
for wetland mitigation, and $352,500 for stream mitigation. The EA did not give cost
estimates for wetland and stream mitigation.
10
ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
Table 1 Alternate Comparison, page 9
Wetland impacts for the proposed project are approximately 2.14 ha (5.3 acres). The
EA listed wetland impacts as 2.7 ha (6.8 acres). The changes are a result of adjustments
to the alignment near the CSX railroad.
ADAJCENT PROJECTS
Projects Contributing to South/West Looping Corridor, page 11
U-3311 Right of way acquisition is scheduled for FY 2005 and construction for
FY 2006. The EA listed right of way acquisition for FY 2001 and construction for
FY 2003.
U-3424 Right of way acquisition is scheduled for FY 2006 and construction for
Post Year. The EA listed right of way acquisition for FY 2003 and construction for FY
2004.
Projects Intersecting the Hope Mills Bypass, nave 11
U-2308 Construction is scheduled for FY 2001. EA listed construction for
FY 2000.
U-2809 Construction is scheduled for FY 2001. EA listed construction for
FY 2002.
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Page 29 Table 8 Wetland Impacts [ha(ac)]
W2 has been decreased to 0.7 ha (1.72 acres). The EA listed W2 as 1.3 ha
(3.3 acres). Total wetland impacts for Alternate 1 is 2.14 ha (5.3 acres). The EA listed
total wetland impacts for Alternate 1 as 2.7 ha (6.8 acres).
VI. ONLY PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE WETLAND FINDING
Executive Order 11990 established as a national policy to avoid, to the extent
possible, adverse impacts on wetlands and to avoid direct or indirect support of the new
construction in wetlands wherever there is a practicable alternative.
The majority of impacts to "Waters of the United States" will be in the form of
wetland impacts (5.3 acres) and surface water impacts (1577 ft.). With the exception of
not building the project, there are no feasible means of avoiding this wetland taking.
NCDOT will minimize impacts on wetlands through the use of Best Management
Practices.
It has been determined there is no practicable alternative to the proposed
construction in wetlands and that the proposed action includes all practicable measures to
minimize harm to wetlands which may result from such use.
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the impacts of the proposed project as documented in the
Environmental Assessment and comments received from federal, state, and local
agencies, it is the finding of the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the
Federal Highway Administration that this project will not have a significant impact upon
the quality of the human or natural environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact
Statement will not be required.
The following persons may be contacted for additional information regarding this
proposal:
Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1442
[phone]
William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]
Hope Mills Bypass
From SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
FIGURES
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1(?L. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
1 mile 0.5 mile 0 1 mile
I I I I
HOPE MILLS BYPASS
FROM SR 1141 (BINGHAM DRIVE)
TO SR 1363 (ELK ROAD)
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-620
FIG. 1
Hope Mills Bypass
From SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
APPENDIX
oPPt?f NT Or
T F?Z? United States Department of the Interior
H =-= s FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
a Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
1'aPCH 3 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
t' .
December 23, 1998 V ?99Fq
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Gilmore:

This responds to your letter of November 6, 1998, requesting comments from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) on the Environmental Assessment (EA), dated September 1998, for the
Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1 141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1 132 (Legion Road), Hope Mills,
Cumberland County, North Carolina (TIP No. U-0620). This report is provided in accordance
with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543).
According to the EA, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct a new facility, the Hope Mills Bypass, south of Fayetteville. The proposed project will
widen the existing George Owen Road (SR 1133)) to a multi-lane facility from Bingham Drive to
Columbine Road (SR 3065) and extend on new location to intersect Legion Road directly across
from Elk Road (SR 1363). A four-lane 5.4 meter (18-foot) raised median is proposed for the new
location section. The total project length is 5.47 kilometers (3.4 miles)
Purpose and Need
The EA points out that the proposed project will provide a circumferential route to facilitate
travel around the southwest side of Fayetteville and will also provide a facility linking radial
facilities on the southwest side of Fayetteville. Existing George Owen Road currently operates at
a low level of service (i.e. there is a greater traffic volume than the road can adequately handle)
and this problem will only become more severe in the foreseeable future. In addition, the present
accident rate for George Owen Road is nearly six times the statewide average expressed as
accidents per one hundred million vehicle miles (acc./100 MVM). This project will alleviate
congestion and improve safety along George Owen Road, thus improving the level of service.
The Service concurs that the primary purpose and needs for this project have been adequately
stated and supported by written discussion and4abular data.
A-1
Alternatives Analysis
In addition to the Do Nothing alternative, three alternatives for the new location portion of the
project were carried forward for further consideration: (1) the Throughfare Plan Alignment was
eliminated early in the process due to the impacts to high quality wetlands, (2) Alternate 1 (the
preferred alternative) was developed to reduce wetland impacts and would locate the bypass on
the north side of a major wetland located between Camden Road and Legion Road. The new
location section is approximately 1.9 miles in length and would begin at Columbine Road and
continue on new location crossing Camden Road south of Midland Court, and ending at Legion
Road directly across from Elk Road. Wetland impacts associated with this alternative are 6.8
acres and surface water impacts are 1230 linear feet of stream divided among 7 perennial stream
crossings, and (3) Alternate 2 would begin at Columbine Road and continue on new location,
crossing Camden Road north of Midland Court and ending at Legion Road directly across from
Elk Road. Wetland impacts associated with this alternative are 3.51 acres and surface water
impacts are 1208 linear feet divided among 7 perennial stream crossings.
Based on information provided in meetings, correspondence, and the EA, the Service concurs
with the selection of Alternative I as the preferred alternative. However, the Service retains the
right to recommend other alternatives if data not contained in this EA become available and to
provide comments on the final alignment of the highway within the corridor selected.
Wetlands
As required by the 404(b)(1) guidelines of the Environmental Protection agency, the NCDOT
should first endeavor to avoid, then minimize, and finally compensate for wetland losses that
would be incurred if this project is implemented. As noted in Table I (pg. 9) there will be wetland
loss and strearnside impacts associated with construction of the preferred alternative. The EA
(pgs. 29-30) presents measures that the NCDOT has committed to for avoidance and
minimization of wetland losses. These include selection of an alternative that minimizes
encroachment into wetlands in the project corridor, grass shoulders, rather than curb and gutter,
on the new location to reduce and filter roadway runoff, design efforts to further minimize
impacts to a wetland area near the CSX Railroad, and the use of Best Management Practices for
Protection of Surface Waters.
While NCDOT has committed to a wetland mitigation plan during the design stage there is no
plan for mitigating stream impacts. NCDOT should also prepare an acceptable stream mitigation
plan suitable to replace the functions and values of the existing streams.
Endangered Species
The Service notes that the EA provides a detailed discussion (pgs. 31-34) of the potential project
related impacts on federally-listed threatened and endangered, and candidate, species. NCDOT
has reviewed the Services' map of known occurrences of federally-protected species in
A-2
Cumberland County, and of 8 species, none were shown to be potentially impacted by the
proposed project NCDOT has concluded that the project will have no effect on these species.
The Service concurs with this determination. However, this decision would be reconsidered if
additional information on listed species that could be impacted by this project comes to light, or if
there is a significant change in project plans.
Section 4(f)
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 specifies that the Secretary of
Transportation may not approve the use of land from any publicly owned park, recreational area,
wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or other designated area, purchased all, or in part, with Federal
funds unless a determination has been made that: (1) there is no feasible and prudent alternative to
the use of the land from the property and (2), the action includes all possible planning to minimize
harm to the property from such use. NCDOT has not provided a 4(t) declaration for this project.
However, based upon review of the project plans, information provided in the EA, and
information in our files, the Service does not believe that this project will impact any 4(f) lands.
Summary
The Service considers that this EA adequately addresses the existing fish and wildlife resources
and the potential impacts of this proposed project on these resources. Based on the information
provided, the Service concludes that this project, implemented as described, will not have
significant impact on resources under our jurisdiction, and would not oppose Department of the
Army (DOA) authorization of this project, provided that both wetland and stream mitigation plans
are incorporated as conditions of any permit.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on the project. Please advise us of any
changes in project plans and provide us with your response to any issues we have raised in this
letter. If you have any questions regarding these comments, contact Tom McCartney at (919)
856-4520, ext. 32.
Sincerely,
John M. H ner
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc:
COE, Wilmington, NC (McLendon)
DWQ, Raleigh, NC (Bell)
WRC, Creedmoor, NC (Cox)
FHWA, Raleigh, NC (Graf)
EPA, Atlanta, GA (Bisterfield)
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:12/22/98:919/856-4520 extension 32:\U-0620.tip
A-3
USACE WILMINGTON
/ DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
I WILMINGTON DISTRICT; CORPS OF ENGINEERS
• l P.O. 80 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
IN REPL MUM TO January 11, 1999
Planning Services Section
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
This is in response to your letter of November 6, 1998, requesting our comments
on the "Federal Environmental Assessment for Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road), Hope Mills, Cumberland County, Federal-
Aid Project No. STP-0622(2), State Project No. 8.1442601, TIP Project No. U-0620"
(Regulatory Division Action I.D. No. 199704287). i
Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources that
include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. The proposed
roadway Improvements would not cross any Corps-constructed flood control or
navigation project. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
C. Alex Morrison, Jr.,
Chief, Technical Services (vision
Enclosure
A-4
USACE WILMINGTON
January 11, 1998
Page 1 of 2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT, COMMENTS ON:
"Federal Environmental Assessment for Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to
SR 1132 (Legion Road), Hope Mills, Cumberland County, Federal-Aid Project No. STIR-0822(2),
State Project No. 8.1442601, TIP Project No. U-0620° (Regulatory Division Action I.D.
No. 199704287)
1. FLOOD PLAINS: POC Mr. Bobby L Willis, Planning Services Section. at
[phone]
Our comments on flood plains were furnished to your once previously by letter dated
May 5, 1997, a copy of which is contained in Appendix A of the Environmental Assessment
(EA). We commend your agency for the thorough discussion of flood plains as contained on
pages 38 and 39 of the EA, the included illustration (Figure 12) of affected detailed study
streams, and for your proposed coordination efforts. The only additional comment we have to
offer is that the floodway limits are not shown on older versions of Flood Insurance Rate Maps
but rather are included separately on Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps.
2. "CATERS AND WETLAN $• POC Mr. Dave Timpv. Wilmington Field Office.
gggulatorv Division, at [phone]
The following are comments on the Environmental Assessment for the subject project
submitted by your office in the letter of November 6, 1998. Additignally, in accordance with the
EA, by letter dated December 7. 1998, your agency provided an adjusted alignment of
Alternative 1 that reduces wetland impacts in the vicinity of the CSX railroad.
According to the EA, the proposed project will involve the widening of SR 1133 (George
Owen Drive) to a multilane facility from Bingham Drive (SR 1141) to Columbine Road
(SR 3065) and extend on new location to Legion Road (SR 1132) directly across from Elk Road
(SR 1363).
Two typical section alternatives are being considered for the portion of the project along
George Owen Road. 't'hese include a five-lane curb and gutter and a four-lane (18 foot)
median divided facility.
A four-lane facility with an 18-foot median and outside grassed shoulders is proposed for
the new location portion of the project. The EA considers three aftematives for this portion of
the project: the Thoroughfare Plan; Alternative 1; and Altemative 2. Due to the large Impacts
on high quality wetlands, the Thoroughfare plan was eliminated from consideration. Based on
the EA, Alternative 1 would result in substantially less relocations than Alternative 2 (28 versus
41). However, the wetland and perennial stream impacts of Alternative 1 (6.8 acres and 1230
feet) are greater than the impacts associated with Altemative 2 (3.5 acres and 1208 feet). As
stated in the EA, the preferred alternative selected by NCDOT is Alternative 1 based on the
lower number of relocations and similar wetland and stream impacts.
A-5
USACE WILMINGTON
January 11, 1998
Page 2 of 2
Our comments on the EA are as follows:
a. We concur with NCDOT's preferred Alternative 1.
b. Additionally, we commend NCDOT's decision to include outside grassed shoulders
along the new location portion of the project, as requested by the NC Division of Water Quality.
This measure will minimize adverse impacts associated with stormwater runoff.
c. A commitment in the EA (page 30) states that efforts will be made during the design to
further reduce impacts to a wetland near the CSX railroad on Altemative 1. By letter dated
December 7, 1998, NCDOT provided an adjusted alignment to Altemative 1 that will reduce
wetland impacts in this area. Based on our review of this alignment, we feel that the Fro
commitment may be satisfied pending the revised estimate of wetland impacts.
d. On page 33, paragraph 2, it is stated that a known population of rough leaved
loosestrife (Lysimachla aspen,laefolia) was observed on June 8, 1998. We believe the EA is in
error and that the observation of rough leaved loosestrife was made in 1997.
e. On page 39, paragraph 3, states that direct discharge of roadway stormwater runoff into
live streams will be avoided to the extent practicable. It also indicates that the NCDOT
Hydraulics Unit, in conjunction with the Planning and Environmental Branch, will coordinate
efforts with the resource agencies in the final hydraulic design to ensure all environmental
concerns are addressed and to facilitate the permit process, if necessary. We feel coordination
of these efforts is necessary.
f. The EA does not discuss a compensatory mitigation plan. We realize that mitigation
plans are not normally addressed in an EA. However, we encourage NCDOT to prepare and
submit a compensatory wetland mitigation plan for our approval as early as possible.
A Department of the Army (DA) permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material in
waters of the United States or any adjacent wetlands in conjunction with this project, including
disposal of construction debris. Under our mitigation policy, impacts to wetlands should first be
avoided or minimized. We will then consider compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts.
When final plans are completed, including the extent and location of any work in wetlands, our
Regulatory Division would appreciate the opportunity to review these plans for project-specific
determinations of DA permit requirements.
A-6
TOTAL P.04
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
D E N R
December 11, 1998
MEMORANDUM
To: Me'1b5`M606e
Through: John Dorney
From: Cyndi Bell c W
Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
to SR 1132 (Legion Road); Cumberland County
State Project No. 8.1442601, T.I.P. No. U-620, DENR # 99E-0310, DWQ #12294
The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities which
impact waters of the state including wetlands. The project will involve up to 6.8 acres of fill in wetlands.
Seven perennial stream crossings will be required. DWQ offers the following comments based upon
review of the document:
Based upon the information provided in scoping meetings and in the EA, we concur with DOT's
preferred Alternate 1. We encourage DOT to minimize stream and wetland impacts to the maximum
extent practical during design. DOT is reminded that new stream crossings and/or channel changes
involving losses in excess of 150 feet linear distance of any single perennial stream will require
mitigation in accordance with DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)). DOT has not
addressed stream mitigation in the document. DOT should be aware that a stream mitigation plan
suitable to replace the functions and values of the existing streams will also be required with the permit
application. Therefore, we advise DOT to pursue development of a stream mitigation plan during. the
design process, as DOT has already committed to preparing a wetland mitigation plan during design.
DOT is also reminded that in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h)(3), the Wetland Restoration
Program will be available to use for stream mitigation.
Based upon the project description provided in the EA, an Individual 401 Water Quality
Certification will be required for this project. Final permit authorization will require formal application
by NCDOT and written concurrence from DWQ. Please be aware that this approval will be contingent
upon evidence of avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and
provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary.
DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the EA. DOT is reminded that
issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure
that water quality standards are met and-no wetland or stream uses are lost. Questions regarding the 401
Certification Program should be directed to Cyndi Bell at [phone] in DWQ's Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch.
Cc: Dave Timpy, COE, Wilmington Tom McCartney, FWS, Raleigh
David Cox, WRC Ken Averitte, FRO, DWQ
U620EA
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
A-7
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission P2
312 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coo
Habitat Conservation Program DZ'4e
DATE: December 21, 1998
SUBJECT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Environmental Assessment
(F.A) for the 14ope Mills Bypass, from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion
Road) in Ilope Mills, Cumberland County, North Carolina. TIP No. U-0620, SCH
Project No. 99-E-0310.
Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject EA and
are familiar with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to assess project
impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions
of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2xe)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
NCDOT proposes to widen existing Gorge Owen Road (SR 1133) to multi-lanes from Bingham
Drive to Columbine Road (SR 3065) and extend on new location to intersect Legion Road across from
Elk Road (SR 1363). Impacts to the natural environment from the preferred alternative includes impacts
to approximately 6.8 acres of jurisdictional wetlands as well as 1,577 feet of surface water impacts.
We have the information included in the EA. Due to the environmental commitments included in
the document do not object to the project as proposed. At this time, we concur with the RA for this
project, NCDOT should continue efforts to reduce wetland and stream impacts. NCDOT beat
management practices should be employed to minimize impacts to off-site resources.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EA. If we can be of any further assistance please
call me at (919) 528-9R86-
cc: U.S. Dish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
A-8
State of North Carolina _
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Reviewing Otfiicc: L4 -Y CL?,
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number: '?7/g 0.3 / D Due Date:
After review, of this project it has been determined that the ENR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project to
comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the reverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office.
Normal Process Time
i
(statutory t
me limit)
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
O Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of construction 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions & sewer systems contracts. On-site inspection. Post-application technical conference usual.
not discharging into state surface waters. (90 days)
O NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. Pre-application 90-120 days
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to corurruct wastewater
discharging into state surface waters. treatment facility-granted after NPDES. Reply time, 30 days after receipt of (N/A)
plans or issue of NPDES pemtit-whichever is later.
O Water Use Permit Pre-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days
(N/A)
O Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the 7 days
installation ofa well. (13 days)
1 Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner. 33 days
On-site inspection Pre-application conference usual. Filling may require
Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of Administration and Federal Dredge (90 days)
and Fill Permit.
O Permit to construct & operate Air Pollution Abatement N/A
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 15 A NCAC 60 days
(2Q.0100, 2Q.0300, 2H.0600)
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC 2D. 1900
Demolition or renovations of structures containing 60 days
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15 A
NCAC 2D.1110 (a) (1) which requires notification and
removal prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control N/A
Group 919-733-0820. (90 days)
O Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC
2D.0800
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion &
sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed Plan filed with proper Regional Office (land Quality 20 days
Sect.) At least 30 days before beginning activity. A fee of S30 for the first acre and $2000 for each additional acre or part must (30 days)
accompany the plan.
O The Sedimentation Pollution control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referenced Local Ordinance. (30 days)
O Ml runts Peanut On-site inspection usual. Surety band filed with ENR. Bond amount varies
with type mine and number of acres of affected land Any are mined greater 30 days
than one acre must be permitted The appropriate bond must be received (60 days)
before the permit can be issued.
O North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if peanut exceeds 4 days I day
(N/A)
O Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22 On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources required "if more than I day
counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils five acres of ground cleaning activities are involved Inspections should be (N/A)
requested at least ten days before actual bum is planned"
O Oil Refuting Facilities N/A 90-120 days
(N/A)
O Dam Safety Permit If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction Applicant
must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans, inspect constructioty
certify construction is according to ENR approved plans. May also require 30 days
permit under mosquito control program. And a 404 permit from Corps of
Engineers. An inspection of site is necessary to verify Hazard Classification A (60 days)
minimum fee of 5200.00 must accompany the application. An additional
processing fee based on a percentage or the total project cost will be required
upon completion.
A-9
Continued on reverse
Normal Process "I'ime
e limit)
ti
t
ory
m
(statu
PERI`1ITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
O Pcmut to drill exploratory oil or gas well File surety bond of S5,000 with ENR running to State of NC conditional that 10 days
any well opened by drill operator shall, upon abandonment, be plugged (NIA)
according to ENR rules and regulations.
O Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with ENR at least 10 days prior to issue of pcrrrrit 10 days
Application by letter. No standard application Corm i (N/A)
O State Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged Must include descriptions & 15-20 days
drawings of structure & proof of ownership of riparian property. (N/A)
O 401 Water Quality Certification N/A 60 days
(130 days)
O CAMA Permit for MAJOR development 5250.00 fee must accompany application 55 days
(150 days)
O CAMA Perntit for MINOR development 550.00 fee must accompany application 22 days
(25 days)
O Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project .area. If any monuments need to be moved or desvn;ird, plea-: n^til;,:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611
O Abandonment of any wells, if required must be in accordance with Title 1511 Subchapter 2C.0100.
O Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (LISTS) are discovered during any excavation operation.
O Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000 (Coastal Stormwater Rules) is required. 45 days
(NIA)
• Other comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite continent authority)
REGICNAL OFrICES
Questions regarding these perndts should be addressed to the Regional OMce marked below.
O Asheville Regional Office
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
'D Fayetteville Regional Office
Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
O Mooresville Regional Office
919 North Main Street, P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
O Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Niall
Washington, NC 27889
919) 946-6481
O Raleigh Regional ice
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101
Ralcigh, NC 27609
[phone]
O Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
O Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown St.
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(910) 7714600
A-10

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Division
January 12, 2000
.i

Subject: Action ID No. 199704287 and TIP Project U-620, State Project No. 8.1442601
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Reference your letter dated October 20, 1999, regarding the proposal by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) to construct a multilane facility from Bingham Drive
(SR 1141) to Legion Road (SR 1132), TIP Project No. U-620, Hope Mills, Cumberland County,
North Carolina. The purpose of this project is to provide a circumferential route and to facilitate
travel around the southwest quadrant of Fayetteville in Cumberland County.
This letter is to verify the project team concurrence with "Alternative One" as the selected
alternative for the proposed project. This concurrence was provided at the project team meeting
held on September 29, 1999. The selected alternative proposes to construct a multilane facility
from Bingham Drive (SR 1141) to Columbine Road (SR 3065) and extend on new location to
Legion Road (SR 1132) directly across from Elk Road (SR 1363) (Figure 1 attached). Both the
widening and new location segments of the proposed project include an 18-foot wide raised
median. Sidewalks and curb wu?d gutter are proposed for the entire project. The estimated
wetland impacts of this alternative are 5.22 acres.
During the meeting held on September 29, 1999, the project team also concurred with the
proposed minimization measures except for the final stormwater management plan. The
proposed minimization measures have decreased the wetland impacts by 1.58 acres. This
concurrence is conditional upon agency review of the stormwater drainage plan associated with
the proposed curb and gutter design. NCDOT will distribute the revised stormwater drainage
plan to the review agencies at a later date.
A-11
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Dave Timpy, Wilmington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, at telephone [phone].
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (with enclosure):
Mr. David Cox
North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188
Sincerely,

E. David Franklin
Assistant Chief, Regulatory Division
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR-DWQ
Wetlands Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Mr. John Hefner, Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mrs. Kathy Matthews
Wetlands Section, Region IV
Water Management Division
United States Environmental Protection
Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
A-12
Hope Mills Bypass
From SR 1 141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1 132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
JJ
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
U. S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
and
N. C. Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
Submitted Pursuant to
Date William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
Date F rNich L. Graf, P.E.
"'Division Administrator, FHWA
Hope Mills Bypass
From SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1 132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Document Prepared in the Planning and Environmental Branch By:
Beverly G. binson
Project Development Engineer .•` ?;'

:
v-DO 1gl?1 4
P.E. LTU
Eric Midkiff
S
F 1 ???^
,
.
Project Development Unit Head
;RIC o\\)
%
hutn
t
Lubin V. Prevatt, P.E., Assistant Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

1. TYPE OF ACTION .......................................................................................
11. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION .................................................. I
III. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS .......................... 2
IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENT .......................................................... 4
A. Circulation of the Environmental Assessment ................................... 4
B. Comments Received on Environmental Assessment ......................... 4
C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearing....... 6
D. Post Environmental Assessment Coordination .................................. 7
V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ...................... 8
VI. ONLY PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE WETLAND FINDING .............. 10
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ............................ I I
FIGURES
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Proposed Improvements
APPENDIX
Hope Mills Bypass
from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
1. TYPE OF ACTION
This is a Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) administrative action, Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
The FHWA has determined this project will not have any significant impact on
the human environment. This Finding of No Significant Impact is based on the August
31, 1998 Environmental Assessment (EA) which has been independently evaluated by the
FHWA and determined to adequately and accurately discuss the need, environmental
issues and impacts of the proposed project. The EA provides sufficient evidence and
analysis for determining that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required.
The FHWA takes full responsibility for the accuracy, scope, and content of the
Environmental Assessment.
II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION
The North Carolina Department of Transportation, Division of Highways,
proposes to construct a new facility, the Hope Mills Bypass, south of Fayetteville.
The proposed project will widen the existing George Owen Road (SR 1133) to a
multi-lane facility from Bingham Drive (SR 1141) to Columbine Road (SR 3065) and
extend on new location to intersect Legion Road (SR 1132) directly across from Elk Road
(SR 1363). A four-lane divided facility with a 5.4m (18-foot) raised median is proposed
for the new location section.
The proposed project is included in the 2000-2006 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) with right of way acquisition scheduled for Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 and
construction for FY 2003.
The total estimated cost for the proposed project is $29,515,460 including
approximately $7,200,000 for right of way acquisition, $21,650,000 for construction and
$312,960 and $352,500 for wetland and stream mitigation, respectively. Both five lane
and four lane (with median) alternatives were considered for the section along George
Owen Road.
III. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
Standard Operating Procedure
Precautions will be taken to minimize impacts to water resources in the
study area. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface
Waters will be strictly enforced during the construction stage of the project.
Hydraulics Unit and Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
(PD&EA)
The NCDOT Hydraulics Unit will coordinate with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and local authorities during final design to process
the Foodway revisions and ensure compliance with applicable floodplain
ordinances. Floodway revisions are anticipated to be needed for crossing of
Beaver Creek, Beaver Creek Tributary B, and Buckhead Creek.
Standard Operating Procedures
NCDOT's Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage will
apply to all stream crossings within the project area.
Standard Operating Procedure
It is anticipated an Individual Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers will be required due to the project wetland impacts. A North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Section 401 Water Quality General
Certification is required prior to the issuance of the Section 404 Permit.
Roadway Design
Efforts will be made during design to further reduce impacts to a wetland
area near the CSX Railroad on Alternate 1. These minimization efforts will be
coordinated with resource agencies early in the preliminary design process.
PD&EA Branch
The NCDENR, Division of Parks and Recreation recommend mitigation
consisting of protecting a nearby tract of wet pine flatwoods. No wet pine
flatwoods have been identified in the project area however, this will be evaluated
in more detail during the design phase.
PD&EA Branch
NCDOT is committed to providing mitigation for unavoidable wetland
impacts. This mitigation will be developed in coordination with resource agencies
during the preliminary design process.
PD&EA, Roadway Design and Hydraulics Unit
WRC recommends installing a level spreader into wetland areas to aid in
filtering stormwater runoff. Project Development along with Roadway Design
will work with the Hydraulics Unit to develop stormwater drainage plans. A
series of alternates for handling runoff will be developed for the proposed project.
Drainage Plans will be forwarded to resources agencies once they are completed.
Geotechnical Unit
The Hope Mills Bypass will impact four facilities with underground
storage tanks (UST's). These facilities could not be avoided, therefore,
"Preliminary Site Assessments" will be performed prior to right of way
acquisition to determine the existence and/or extent of any contamination.
Roadway Design Branch
AASHTO guideline 14-foot wide outside lanes will be constructed on
George Owen Road and 4-foot paved shoulders will be provided on the new
location portion of the project for bicycle accommodations.
Area Traffic Engineer
The Area traffic engineer will determine if intermediate installation of a
left turn lane and turn signal is warranted at the Cumberland Road/George Owen
Road intersection.
IV. COORDINATION AND COMMENT
A. Circulation of Environmental Assessment
The Environmental Assessment was approved on August 31, 1998. The approved
Environmental Assessment was circulated to the following federal and state, and local
agencies for review and comments. Copies of the correspondence received are included
in the Appendix of this document. (Note an asterisk indicates those agencies that
responded to this letter):
*U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
*U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Geological Survey
Region M Council of Governments
Mayor of Hope Mills
Mayor of Fayetteville
Cumberland County Manager
Cumberland County Commissioners
*N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
*N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Department of Administration
Department of Public Instruction
B. Comments Received on Environmental Analysis
Department of the Army Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Comment: Waters and Wetlands: POC - Mr. Dave TYmpy, Wilmington
Field Office Regulatory Division, at [phone]
A commitment in the EA (page 30) states that efforts will be made during the
design to further reduce impacts to a wetland near the CSX Railroad on Alternative 1. By
letter dated December 7, 1998, NCDOT provided an adjusted alignment to Alternative 1
that will reduce wetland impacts in this area. Based on our review of this alignment, we
feel that the EA commitment may be satisfied pending the revised estimate of wetland
impacts.
On page 33, paragraph 2, it is stated that a known population of rough leaved
loosestrife (Lysimachia asperlaefolia) was observed on June 8, 1998. We believe the EA
is in error and that the observation of rough leaved loosestrife was made in 1997.
On page 39, paragraph 3, states that direct discharge of roadway stormwater
runoff into live streams will be avoided to the extent practicable. It also indicates that the
NCDOT Hydraulics Unit, in conjunction with the Planning and Environmental Branch,
will coordinate efforts with the resource agencies in the final hydraulic design to ensure
all environmental concerns are addressed and to facilitate the permit process, if necessary.
We feel coordination of these efforts is necessary.
The EA does not discuss a compensatory mitigation plan. We realize that
mitigation plans are not normally addressed in an EA. However, we encourage NCDOT
to prepare and submit a compensatory wetland mitigation plan for our approval as early
as possible.
Response: Wetland impacts for Alternate 1 was reduced by 0.64 ha (1.58 acres) after
shifting the alignment near the CSX railroad.
Rough leaved loosestrife was discovered by NCDOT Biologists in 1997 on an
early alignment. A plant by plant survey was conducted in 1998 after two additional
alignments were developed.
Coordination with resource agencies will occur during final design to ensure all
environmental concerns are addressed and to facilitate the permit process.
NCDOT is actively searching for wetland and stream mitigation sites for river
basins throughout North Carolina.
2. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Comment: Based on information provided in meetings, correspondence, and the EA,
the Service concurs with the selection of Alternate 1 as the preferred alternative.
However, the Service retains the right to recommend other alternatives if data not
contained in this EA become available and to provide comments on the final alignment of
the highway within the corridor selected.
As required by the 404(b)(1) guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency,
the NCDOT should first endeavor to avoid, then minimize, and finally compensate for
wetland losses that would be incurred if this project is implemented. As noted in Table 1
(pg. 9) there will be wetland loss and streamside impacts associated with construction of
the preferred alternative. The EA (pgs. 29-30) presents measures that the NCDOT has
committed to for avoidance and minimization of wetland losses. These include selection
of an alternative that minimizes encroachment into wetlands in the project corridor, grass
shoulders, rather than curb and gutter, on the new location to reduce and filter roadway
runoff, design efforts to further minimize impacts to a wetland area near the CSX
Railroad, and the use of Best Management Practices for Protection of Surface Waters.
While NCDOT has committed to a wetland mitigation plan during the design
stage there is no plan for mitigating stream impacts. NCDOT should also prepare an
acceptable stream mitigation plan suitable to replace the functions and values of the
existing streams.
The Service notes that the EA provides a detailed discussion (pgs. 31-34) of the
potential project related impacts on federally-listed threatened and endangered, and
candidate, species. NCDOT has reviewed the Services' map of known occurrences of
federally protected species in Cumberland County, and of 8 species, none were shown to
be potentially impacted by the proposed project. NCDOT has concluded that the project
will have no effect on these species. The Service concurs with this determination.
However, this decision would be reconsidered if additional information on listed species
that could be impacted by this project comes to light, or if there is a significant change in
project plans.
Response: NCDOT is actively searching for wetland and stream mitigation sites for
river basins throughout North Carolina.
C. Comments Received During and Following the Public Hearin
Following the circulation of the Environmental Assessment a combined Open
House/Formal Public Hearing was held at the Southview High School Auditorium
located on Elk Road in Fayetteville on April 20, 1999. Interested citizens were given the
opportunity to review preliminary designs of the project, talk to NCDOT engineers and
right of way agents, and make comments concerning the proposed improvements.
Approximately 133+ persons attended the public hearing.
NCDOT addressed the concerns of all of those who commented on the proposed
improvements, either in person or by written letter following the public hearing. The
following is a list of comments received during and following the public hearing along
with NCDOT's responses.
Comment: We strongly urge DOT to construct the five-lane option along George
Owen Road. This option will allow sufficient ingress and egress to the Cumberland
United Methodist Church.
Response: George Owen Road is proposed as a four-lane median divided facility, per
request from the Fayetteville Transportation Advisory Council (TAC). The four-lane
facility will provide greater consistency for the overall system of roadways in the project
area. The four-lane section will provide safe traffic operations and levels of service on
the proposed facility.
Comment: Can an interim signal and left turn lane on Cumberland Road be
constructed at the Cumberland Road/George Owen Road intersection?
Response: The Area Traffic Engineer will investigate intermediate installation of a
left turn lane and traffic signal. This will be determined prior to the completion of the
final design plans.
Comment: Has an alternate route been proposed for the Hope Mills Bypass?
Response: Six alternates were studied early in the planning process. These alternates
were not feasible due to environmental impacts and a large number of relocatees. No
additional alternatives are being considered at this time.
Comment: Will access be provided to the into Dixie Yarns Mill at Cumberland and
George Owen Road?
Response: A right in/right out driveway access will be provided for the Dixie Yarn
Mill to access the small parking lot near the intersection of George Owen Road and
Cumberland Road.
Comment: Can the cul-de-sac and dead end Pinewood Lakes Drive be left as it is?
Response: Pinewood Drive will tie into the Hope Mills Bypass which will help the
road network. Leaving this road as a cul-de-sac or dead end will negatively effect the
traffic operations and level of service for the proposed facility.
Comment: Can the project be extended to US 301?
Response: There is currently a project, U-3849 in the TIP (Transportation
Improvement Program), to improve Elk Road from Legion Road to US 301, but it is not
currently funded. The Division Office will investigate the possibility of a Division
Design Construct Project to improve Elk Road prior to construction of the Hope Mills
Bypass.
D. Post Environmental Assessment Coordination
NCDOT officials met with representatives of the Division of Water Quality,
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, US Army Corps of Engineers and the
Fayetteville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (FAMPO) on September 29, 1999
to update the resource agencies on the proposed project. Early in the project study, a
four-lane median divided facility was proposed for the new location portion of the
project. During the post hearing meeting the representative from the FAMPO requested
sidewalks for the entire length of the project, which will require curb and gutter on both
sides of the proposed facility for the entire length of the project. This was discussed with
the resource agencies to receive comments.
This project did not follow the NEPA 404 Merger Process. NCDOT however is
coordinating with resource agencies prior to the permit application stage of the project to
assure smooth transition into right of way acquisition.
At the September 29, meeting, resource agencies agreed with the purpose and
need, selected alternative and minimization measures for the proposed project. No
additional minimization measures are needed.
NCDOT will continue to coordinate with resource agencies concerning sidewalks
along the new location portion of the project. Additional comment will be requested
from the resource agencies once drainage plans are completed for the new location
portion of the project.
V. REVISIONS TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
SUMMARY
Description of the Proposed Action
The total cost for the proposed project is $29,515,460 including approximately
$7,200,000 for right of way acquisition, $21,650,000 for construction, $ 312,960 for
wetland mitigation, and $352,500 for stream mitigation. The EA did not give the cost for
wetland and stream mitigation.
The four-lane median divided typical section is recommended for the section
along George Owen Road. In the EA, both the five-lane curb and gutter and the four-lane
(with median) alternatives were being considered for the section along George Owen
Road.
Summary of Environmental Impacts
The recommended alternative, Alternate 1, is estimated to impact 2.14 ha
(5.3 acres) of wetlands and 481 m (1577 feet) of surface waters. The wetland impacts
include 1.26 ha (3.12 acres) on new location, 0.1 ha (0.25 acres) along George Owen
Road and 0.78 ha (1.93 acres) at the George Owen Road/Bingham Drive intersection.
The EA listed an estimated impact of 2.78 ha (6.87 acres) for wetlands along Alternate 1.
The wetland impacts included 1.9 ha (4.7 acres) on the new location portion of the
project, 0.1 ha (0.02 acres) along George Owen Road and 0.78 ha (2.00 acres) at the
George Owen Road/Bingham Drive intersection. Conversions from ha to acres were
corrected for impacts along George Owen Road and the George Owen Road/Bingham
Drive intersection.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION, pace 1
The total cost for the proposed project is approximately $7,200,000 for right of way
acquisition, $21,650,000 for construction, $ 312,960 for wetland mitigation, and
$352,500 for stream mitigation. The EA did not give the cost for wetland and stream
mitigation.
The four-lane median divided typical section is recommended for the section
along George Owen Road. In the EA, both the five-lane curb and gutter and the four-lane
(with median) alternatives were being considered for the section along George Owen
Road.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Proposed Typical Section, page 5
The recommended cross section consists of 3.6 m (12-foot) inside and 4.2 m (14-foot)
outside lanes in each direction divided by a 5.4 m (18-foot) raised median along George
Owen Road. Curb and gutter will be constructed with this typical section. The EA listed
the four-lane cross section as the proposed cross section with a five-lane cross section as a
studied option.
The new location portion will consist of two 3.6 m (12-foot) lanes in each direction
divided by a 5.4 m (18-foot) raised median utilizing curb and gutter. The Fayetteville
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization has requested that the new location section of
the project contain curb and gutter in order to incorporate sidewalks. NCDOT is
evaluating this request. The EA described this section as two 3.6 m (12-foot) lanes in
each direction divided by a 5.4-m (18-foot) raised median utilizing a 10-foot shoulder
section with 4-foot paved.
Sidewalks, page 6
The inclusion of sidewalks is under consideration for one side for the entire length of
the project. Once stormwater drainage plans are reviewed by resource agencies, a
decision for sidewalks along the new location portion of project will be made. The EA
did not propose sidewalks for the proposed project.
Bicycle Accommodations, page 6
Bicycle accommodations will include 14-foot wide outside lanes on George Owen
Road. If the new location section is to accommodate a curb and gutter section, it will also
include 14-foot wide outside lanes for bicycle accommodations. The EA stated 4-foot
paved shoulders would be on the new location portion of the project, which was proposed
to have grass shoulders.
Cost Estimates, page 6
The proposed improvements are estimated to cost a total of $29,515,460. This cost
includes $21,650,000 for construction, $7,200,000 for right of way acquisition, $312,960
for wetland mitigation, and $352,500 for stream mitigation. The EA did not give cost
estimates for wetland and stream mitigation.
10
ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION
Table 1 Alternate Comparison, page 9
Wetland impacts for the proposed project are approximately 2.14 ha (5.3 acres). The
EA listed wetland impacts as 2.7 ha (6.8 acres). The changes are a result of adjustments
to the alignment near the CSX railroad.
ADAJCENT PROJECTS
Projects Contributing to South/West Looping Corridor, page 11
U-3311 Right of way acquisition is scheduled for FY 2005 and construction for
FY 2006. The EA listed right of way acquisition for FY 2001 and construction for
FY 2003.
U-3424 Right of way acquisition is scheduled for FY 2006 and construction for
Post Year. The EA listed right of way acquisition for FY 2003 and construction for FY
2004.
Projects Intersecting the Hope Mills Bypass, page 11
U-2308 Construction is scheduled for FY 2001. EA listed construction for
FY 2000.
U-2809 Construction is scheduled for FY 2001. EA listed construction for
FY 2002.
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Summary of Anticipated Impacts
Page 29 Table 8 Wetland Impacts [ha(ac)]
W2 has been decreased to 0.7 ha (1.72 acres). The EA listed W2 as 1.3 ha
(3.3 acres). Total wetland impacts for Alternate 1 is 2.14 ha (5.3 acres). The EA listed
total wetland impacts for Alternate 1 as 2.7 ha (6.8 acres).
VI. ONLY PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVE WETLAND FINDING
Executive Order 11990 established as a national policy to avoid, to the extent
possible, adverse impacts on wetlands and to avoid direct or indirect support of the new
construction in wetlands wherever there is a practicable alternative.
The majority of impacts to "Waters of the United States" will be in the form of
wetland impacts (5.3 acres) and surface water impacts (1577 ft.). With the exception of
not building the project, there are no feasible means of avoiding this wetland taking.
NCDOT will minimize impacts on wetlands through the use of Best Management
Practices.
It has been determined there is no practicable alternative to the proposed
construction in wetlands and that the proposed action includes all practicable measures to
minimize harm to wetlands which may result from such use.
VII. BASIS FOR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
Based upon a study of the impacts of the proposed project as documented in the
Environmental Assessment and comments received from federal, state, and local
agencies, it is the finding of the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the
Federal Highway Administration that this project will not have a significant impact upon
the quality of the human or natural environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact
Statement will not be required.
The following persons may be contacted for additional information regarding this
proposal:
Mr. Nicholas L. Graf, P.E.
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
Department of Transportation
310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1442
[phone]
William D. Gilmore, P.E. Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
[phone]
Hope Mills Bypass
From SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
FIGURES
I
1 mile 0.5 mile 0 1 mile
? I I I
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
HOPE MILLS BYPASS
FROM SR 1141 (BINGHAM DRIVE)
TO SR 1363 (ELK ROAD)
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-620
FIG. 1
Hope Mills Bypass
From SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road)
Hope Mills, Cumberland County
Federal Aid Project No. STP-0622(2)
State Project No. 8.1442601
TIP Project No. U-0620
APPENDIX
QPP?'."ENT OFUnited States Department of the Interior , W
= o FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
?A?CH 3 Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
December 23, 1998 199Fq

Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
N.C. Division of Highways
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
This responds to your letter of November 6, 1998, requesting comments from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) on the Environmental Assessment (EA), dated September 1998, for the
Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1 141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1 132 (Legion Road), Hope Mills,
Cumberland County, North Carolina (TIP No. U-0620). This report is provided in accordance
with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543 ).
According to the EA, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct a new facility, the Hope Mills Bypass, south of Fayetteville. The proposed project will
widen the existing George Owen Road (SR 1133) to a multi-lane facility from Bingham Drive to
Columbine Road (SR 3065) and extend on new location to intersect Legion Road directly across
from Elk Road (SR 1363). A four-lane 5.4 meter (18-foot) raised median is proposed for the new
location section. The total project length is 5.47 kilometers (3.4 miles)
Purpose and Need
M
-The EA points out that the proposed project will provide a circumferential route to facilitate
travel around the southwest side of Fayetteville and will also provide a facility linking radial
facilities on the southwest side of Fayetteville. Existing* George Owen Road currently operates at
a low level of service (i.e. there is a greater traffic volume than the road can adequately handle)
and this problem will only become more severe in the foreseeable future. In addition, the present
accident rate for George Owen Road is nearly six times the statewide average expressed as
accidents per one hundred million vehicle miles (acc./100 MVM). This project will alleviate
congestion and improve safety along George Owen Road, thus improving the level of service.
The Service concurs that the primary purpose and needs for this project have been adequately
stated and supported by written discussion and4abular data.
A-1
Alternatives Analysis
In addition to the Do Nothing, alternative, three alternatives for the new location portion of the
project were carried forward for further consideration: ( I ) the Throughtare Plan Alignment was
eliminated early in the process due to the impacts to high quality wetlands, (2) Alternate 1 (the
preferred alternative) was developed to reduce wetland impacts and would locate the bypass on
the north side of a major wetland located between Camden Road and Legion Road. The new
location section is approximately 1.9 miles in length and would Begin at Columbine Road and
continue on new location crossing Camden Road south of Midland Court, and ending at Legion
Road directly across from Elk Road. Wetland impacts associated with this alternative are 6.8
acres and surface water impacts are 1230 linear feet of stream divided among 7 perennial stream
crossings, and (3) Alternate 2 would begin at Columbine Road and continue on new location,
crossing Camden Road north of Midland Court and ending at Legion Road directly across from
Elk Road. Wetland impacts associated with this alternative are 3.51 acres and surface water
impacts are 1208 linear feet divided anion, 7 perennial stream crossings.
Based on information provided in meetings, correspondence, and the EA, the Service concurs
with the selection of Alternative I as the preferred alternative. However, the Service retains the
right to recommend other alternatives if data not contained in this EA become available and to
provide comments on the final alignment of the highway within the corridor selected.
Wetlands
As required by the 404(b)(1) guidelines of the Environmental Protection agency, the NCDOT
should first endeavor to avoid, then minimize, and finally compensate for wetland losses that
would be incurred if this project is implemented. As noted in Table I (pg. 9) there will be wetland
loss and streamside impacts associated with construction of the preferred alternative. The EA
(pgs. 29-30) presents measures that the NCDOT has committed to for avoidance and
minimization of wetland losses. These include selection of an alternative that minimizes
encroachment into wetlands in the project corridor, grass shoulders, rather than curb and gutter,
on the new location to reduce and filter roadway runoff, design efforts to further minimize
impacts to a wetland area near the CSX Railroad, and the use of Best Management Practices for
Protection of Surface Waters.
While NCDOT has committed to a wetland mitigation plan during the design stage there is no
plan for mitigating stream impacts. NCDOT should also prepare an acceptable stream mitigation
plan suitable to replace the functions and values of the existing streams.
Endangered Species
The Service notes that the EA provides a detailed discussion (pgs. 31-34) of the potential project
related impacts on federally-listed threatened and endangered, and candidate, species. NCDOT
has reviewed the Services' map of known occurrences of federally-protected species in
A-2
Cumberland County, and of 8 species, none were shown to be potentially impacted by the
proposed pro . iect. NCDOT has concluded that the project will have no effect on these species.
The Service concurs with this determination. However, this decision would be reconsidered if
additional information on listed species that could be impacted by this project comes to light, or if
there is a significant change in project plans.
Section 4(f)
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 specifies that the Secretary of
Transportation may not approve the use of land from any publicly owned park, recreational area,
wildlife and waterfowl refuge, or other designated area, purchased all, or in part, with Federal
funds unless a determination has been made that: ( I ) there is no feasible and prudent alternative to
the use of the land from the property and (2), the action includes all possible planning to minimize
harm to the property from such use. NCDOT has not provided a 4(f) declaration for this project.
However, based upon review of the project plans, information provided in the EA, and
information in our tiles, the Service does not believe that this project will impact any 4(f) lands.
Summary
The Service considers that this EA adequately addresses the existing fish and wildlife resources
and the potential impacts of this proposed project on these resources. Based on the information
provided, the Service concludes that this project, implemented as described, will not have
significant impact on resources under our jurisdiction, and would not oppose Department of the
Army (DOA) authorization of this project, provided that both wetland and stream mitigation plans
are incorporated as conditions of any permit.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on the project. Please advise us of any
changes in project plans and provide us with your response to any issues we have raised in this
letter. If you have any questions regarding these comments, contact Tom McCartney at (919)
856-4520, ext. 32.
Sincerely,
John M. H ner
Ecological Services Supervisor
cc:
COE, Wilmington, NC (McLendon)
DWQ, Raleigh, NC (Bell)
WRC, Creedmoor, NC (Cox)
FHWA, Raleigh, NC (Graf)
EPA, Atlanta, GA (Bisterfield)
FWS/R4:TMcCartney:TM:12/22/98:919/856-4520 extension 32:\U-0620.tip
A-3
USACE WILMINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, GORPS OF ENGINEERS
• P.O. SOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402.1890
INRMYREFMTO January 11, 1999
Planning Services Section
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
This is in response to your letter of November 6, 1998, requesting our comments
on the "Federal Environmental Assessment for Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion Road), Hope Mills, Cumberland County, Federal-
Aid Project No. STP-0622(2), State Project No. 8.1442601, TIP Project No. U-0620"
(Regulatory Division Action 1. D. No. 199704287).
Our comments involve impacts to flood plains and jurisdictional resources that
include waters, wetlands, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects. The proposed
roadway improvements would not cross any Corps-constructed flood control or
navigation project. Enclosed are our comments on the other issues.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
C. Alex Morrison, Jr.,
Chief, Technical Services vision
Enclosure
A-4
USACE WILMINGTON
January 11, 1998
Page 1 of 2
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT, COMMENTS ON:
"Federal Environmental Assessment for Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to
SR 1132 (Legion Road), Hope Mills, Cumberland County, Federal-Aid Project No. STP-0622(2),
State Project No. 8.1442601, TIP Project No. U-0620" (Regulatory Division Action I.D.
No. 199704287)
1. FL-0012 PLAINS: POC Mr. Bobby L Willis. Planning Services Section. at
[phone]
our comments on flood plains were fumished to your office previously by letter dated
May 5, 1997, a copy of which is contained in Appendix A of the Environmental Assessment
(1=A). We commend your agency for the thorough discussion of flood plains as contained on
pages 38 and 39 of the F-.A, the included illustration (Figure 12) of affected detailed study
streams, and for your proposed coordination efforts. The only additional comment we have to
offer is that the Foodway limits are not shown on older versions of Flood Insurance Rate Maps
but rather are included separately on Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps.
2. WATERS AND WETLANDS POC - Mr. Dave Timav. Wilmington Field Office-
Regulatory Division, at (910) 2514634
The following are comments on the Environmental Assessment for the subject project
submitted by your office in the letter of November 6, 1998. Additignally, in accordance with the
EA, by letter dated December 7. 1998, your agency provided an adjusted alignment of
Alternative 1 that reduces wetland impacts in the vicinity of the CSX railroad.
According to the EA, the proposed project will involve the widening of SR 1133 (George
-Owen Drive) to a multilane facility from Bingham Drive (SR 1141) to Columbine Road
(SR 3065) and extend on new location to Legion Road (SR 1132) directly across from Elk Road
(SR 1363).
Two typical section aftematives are being considered for the portion of the project along
George Owen Road. These include a five-lane curb and gutter and a four4ane (18 foot)
median divided facility.
A four-lane facility with an 18-foot median and outside grassed shoulders is proposed for
the new location portion of the project. The EA considers three alternatives for this portion of
the project: the Thoroughfare Plan; Alternative 1; and Alternative 2. Due to the large impacts
on high quality wetlands, the Thoroughfare plan was eliminated from consideration. Based on
the EA, Alternative 1 would result in substantially lass relocations then Alternative 2 (28 versus
41). However, the wetland and perennial stream impacts of Alternative 1 (6.8 acres and 1230
feet) are greater than the impacts associated with Alternative 2 (3.5 acres and 1208 feet). As
stated in the EA, the preferred alternative selected by NCDOT Is Alternative 1 based on the
lower number of relocations and similar wetland and stream impacts.
A-5
USACE WILMINGTON
January 11, 1998
Page 2 of 2
Our comments on the EA are as follows:
a. We concur with NCDOT's preferred Alternative 1.
b. Additionally, we commend NCDOT's decision to include outside grassed shoulders
along the new location portion of the project, as requested by the NC Division of Water Quality.
This measure will minimize adverse impacts associated with stormwater runoff.
c. A commitment in the EA (page 30) states that efforts will be made during the design to
further reduce impacts to a wetland near the CSX railroad on Alternative 1. By letter dated
December 7, 1998, NCDOT provided an adjusted alignment to Alternative 1 that will reduce
wetland impacts in this area. Based on our review of this alignment, we feel that the EA
commitment may be satisfied pending the revised estimate of wetland impacts.
d. On page 33, paragraph 2, it is stated that a known population of rough leaved
loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia) was observed on June 8, 1998. We believe the EA is in
error and that the observation of rough leaved loosestrife was made in 1997.
a. On page 39, paragraph 3, states that direct discharge of roadway stormwater runoff into
live streams will be avoided to the extent practicable. It also indicates that the NCDOT
Hydraulics Unit, in conjunction with the Planning and Environmental Branch, will coordinate
efforts with the resource agencies in the final hydraulic design to ensure all environmental
concerns are addressed and to facilitate the permit process, If necessary. We feel coordination
of these efforts is necessary.
f. The EA does not discuss a compensatory mitigation plan. We realize that mitigation
plans are not normally addressed in an EA. However, we encourage NCDOT to prepare and
submit a compensatory wetland mitigation plan for our approval as early as possible.
A Department of the Army (DA) permit authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act of 1977, as amended, will be required for the discharge of excavated or fill material in
waters of the United States or any adjacent wetlands in conjunction with this project, including
disposal of construction debris. Under our mitigation policy, impacts to wetlands should first be
avoided or minimized. We will then consider compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts.
When final plans are completed, including the extent and location of any work in wetlands, our
Regulatory Division would appreciate the opportunity to review these plans for project-specific
determiriations of DA permit requirements.
A-6
TOTAL P.04
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Q??
D E N R
December 11, 1998
MEMORANDUM
To: Mt lby'M6Gee
Through: John DorneTFrom: Cyndi Bell ciL6
Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive)
to SR 1132 (Legion Road); Cumberland County
State Project No. 8.1442601, T.I.P. No. U-620, DENR # 99E-0310, DWQ #12294
The referenced document has been reviewed by this office. The Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) is responsible for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities which
impact waters of the state including wetlands. The project will involve up to 6.8 acres of fill in wetlands.
Seven perennial stream crossings will be required. DWQ offers the following comments based upon
review of the document:
Based upon the information provided in scoping meetings and in the EA, we concur with DOT's
preferred Alternate 1. We encourage DOT to minimize stream and wetland impacts to the maximum
extent practical during design. DOT is reminded that new stream crossings and/or channel changes
involving losses in excess of 150 feet linear distance of any single perennial stream will require
mitigation in accordance with DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)). DOT has not
addressed stream mitigation in the document. DOT should be aware that a stream mitigation plan
suitable to replace the functions and values of the existing streams will also be required with the permit
application. Therefore, we advise DOT to pursue development of a stream mitigation plan during. the
design process, as DOT has already committed to preparing a wetland mitigation plan during design.
DOT is also reminded that in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h)(3), the Wetland Restoration
Program will be available to use for stream mitigation.
Based upon the project description provided in the EA, an Individual 401 Water Quality
Certification will be required for this project. Final permit authorization will require formal application
by NCDOT and written concurrence from DWQ. Please be aware that this approval will be contingent
upon evidence of avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the extent practical, and
provision of wetland and stream mitigation where necessary.
DWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the EA. DOT is reminded that
issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfaction of water quality concerns, to ensure
that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Questions regarding the 401
Certification Program should be directed to Cyndi Bell at [phone] in DWQ's Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch.
Cc: Dave Timpy, COE, Wilmington Tom McCartney, FWS, Raleigh
David Cox, WRC Ken Averitte, FRO, DWQ
U620EA
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
A-7
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
312 N. Salisbury Streec, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Melba McGee
Office of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, DENR
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coo
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: December 21, 1998
SUBJFCT: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Environmental Assessment
(P.A) for the l4ope Mills Bypass, from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (Legion
Road) in )Elope Mills, Cumberland County, North Carolina. TIP No. U-0620, SCH
Project No. 99-F,-0310.
Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject EA and
are familiar with habitat values in the project area. The purpose of this review was to assess project
impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with certain provisions
of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(e)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
NCDOT proposes to widen existing Gorge Owen Road (SR 1133) to multi-lanes from Bingham
Drive to Columbine Road (Sit 3065) and extend on new location to intersect Legion Road across from
Elk Road (SR 1363). Impacts to the natural environment from the preferred alternative includes impacts
to approximately 6.8 acres of jurisdictional wetlands as well as 1,577 feet of surface water impacts.
We have the information included in the EA. Due to the environmental commitments included in
the document do not object to the project as proposed. At this time, we concur with tie FA for this
project. NCDOT should continue efforts to reduce wetland and stream impacts. NCDOT best
management practices should be employed to minimize impacts to off-site resources.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this EA. If we can be of any further assistance please
call me at (919) 528-9RR6.
cc: U.S. Dish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
A-8
State of North Carolina _
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Reviewing Office:
INTERGOVERNAIENTAL REVIEW - PROJECT COMMENTS Project Number: ?// /?-: •3 / U Due Date:
After review of this project it has been determined that the ENR permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this project to
comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the rcverse of the form.
All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office.
Normal Process Time

(statutory time linilt)
PERMITS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
O Permit to construct & operate wastewater treatment Application 90 days before begin construction or award of construction 30 days
facilities, sewer system extensions & sewer system contracts. On-site inspection. Pori-application technical conference usual.
not discharging into state surface waters. (90 days)
O NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water and/or Application 180 days before begin activity. On-site inspection. Pre-application 90-120 days
permit to operate and construct wastewater facilities conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct wastewater
discharging into state surface waters. treatment facility-granted after NPDES. Reply time, 30 days after receipt of (N/A)
plans or issue of NPDES prnnit-whichever is later.
O Water Use Permit Pro-application technical conference usually necessary 30 days
(N/A)
O Well Construction Permit Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the 7 days
installation of a well. (15 da) s)
Dredge and Fill Permit Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property owner. 33 days
On-site inspection Pre-application conference usual. Filling may require
Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of Administration and Federal Dredge (90 days)
and Fill Permit.
O Permit to construct & operate .air Pollution Abatement N/A
facilities and/or Emission Sources as per 13 A NCAC 60 days
(2Q.0100, 2Q.0300, 2H.0600)
Any open burning associated with subject proposal
must be in compliance with 13 A NCAC 2D. 1900
Demolition or renovations of structures containing 60 days
asbestos material must be in compliance with 15 A
NCAC 2D.1110 (a) (1) which requires notification and
removal prior to demolition. Contact Asbestos Control N/A
Group 919.733-0820. (90 days)
O Complex Source Permit required under 15 A NCAC
2D.0800

/ The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion &
sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres to be disturbed. Plan filed with proper Regional Office (land Quality 20 days
Sect) At least 30 days before beginning activity. A fee of $30 for the first acre and S2000 for each additional acre or pan must (30 days)
accompany the plan.
O The Sedimentation Pollution control Act of 1973 must be addressed with respect to the referenced Local Ordinance. (30 days)
D humng Permit On-site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with ENR. Bond amount varies
with type mine and number of acres of affected land. Any are mined greater 30 days
than one acre myst be permitted. The appropriate bond must be received (60 days)
before the permit can be issued.
O North Carolina Burning permit On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources if permit exceeds 4 days I day
(N/A)
O Special Ground Clearance Burning Permit - 22 On-site inspection by N.C. Division Forest Resources required "if mom than 1 day
counties in coastal N.C. with organic soils five acres of ground clearing activities are involved. Impections should be (N/A)
requested at least ten days before actual bum is plamed"
O Oil Refining Facilities N/A 90-120 days
(N/A)
O Dam Safety Permit If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction. Applicant
must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plant, inspect construction,
certify construction is according to ENR approved plans. May also require 30 days
permit under mosquito control program. And a 404 permit from Corps of
Engineers. An inspection of site is necessary to verify Hazard Classification A (60 days)
minimum fee of $200.00 must accompany the application. An additional
processing fee based on it percentage or the total project cost will be required
upon completion.
A-9
Continued on reverse
Normal Process Timc
li
i
i
m
t)
me
(statutory t
PERMriS SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQLfIRENIENTS
O Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well File surety bond of 55,000 with ENR running to State of NC conditional that 10 daps
any well opened by drill operator shall, upon abandonment, be plugged (N/A)
according to ENR rules and regulations.
O Geophysical Exploration Permit Application filed with ENR at least 10 days prior to issue of pc=L 10 days
Application by letter. No standard application form (N/A)
O State Lakes Construction Permit Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include descriptions & 15-20 days
drawings of structure & proof of ownership of riparian property. (N/A)
O 401 Water Quality Certification N/A 60 days
(130 days)
O CAMA Permit for MAJOR development S250.00 fee must accompany application 55 days
(150 days)
O CAMA Permit for MINOR development S50.00 fee must accompany application 22 days
(25 days)
O Several geodetic monuments are located in or near the project ,vea. If any monuments need to be moved or dff-L n„,:d, plea- a n^tif?y:
N.C. Geodetic Survey, Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611
O Abandonment of any wells, if required must be in accordance with Title 15.1 Subchapter 2C.0100.
O Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (USTS) are discovered during any excavation operation.
O Compliance with I5A NCAC 2H 1000 (Coastal Stormwaler Rules) is required. 45 days
(N/A)
• Other comments (anach additional pages as necessary, being certain to cite comment authority)
REC301NAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
O Asheville Regional Office
59 Wooditn Place
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
'0 Fayetteville Regional Office
Suite 714 Wachovia Building
Fayetteville, NC 28301
[phone]
O Mooresville Regional Office
919 Noah Main Street, P.O. Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
O Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Niall
Washington, NC 27889
919) 946-6481
O Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Burett Drive, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27609
(919) 5714700
O Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
O Winston-Salem Regional ice
585 Waughtown St.
Winton-Salem, NC 27107
(910) 7714600
A-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890 ^nnn
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
. ly
IN REPLY REFER TO January 12, 2000 -
Regulatory Division µ-,,-
Subject: Action ID No. 199704287 and TIP Project U-620, State Project No. 8.1442601
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Division of Highways
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Reference your letter dated October 20, 1999, regarding the proposal by the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT) to construct a multilane facility from Bingham Drive
(SR 1141) to Legion Road (SR 1132), TIP Project No. U-620, Hope Mills, Cumberland County,
North Carolina. The purpose of this project is to provide a circumferential route and to facilitate
travel around the southwest quadrant of Fayetteville in Cumberland County.
This letter is to verify the project team concurrence with "Alternative One" as the selected
alternative for the proposed project. This concurrence was provided at the project team meeting
held on September 29, 1999. The selected alternative proposes to construct a multilane facility
from Bingham Drive (SR 1141) to Columbine Road (SR 3065) and extend on new location to
Legion Road (SR 1132) directly across from Elk Road (SR 1363) (Figure 1 attached). Both the
widening and new location segments of the proposed project include an 18-foot wide raised
median,. Sidcwall:s and curb and gutter are proposed for the entire project. The estimated
wetland impacts of this alternative are 5.22 acres.
During the meeting held on September 29, 1999, the project team also concurred with the
proposed minimization measures except for the final stormwater management plan. The
proposed minimization measures have decreased the wetland impacts by 1.58 acres. This
concurrence is conditional upon agency review of the stormwater drainage plan associated with
the proposed curb and gutter design. NCDOT will distribute the revised stormwater drainage
plan to the review agencies at a later date.
A-11
Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Dave Timpy, Wilmington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, at telephone [phone].
Enclosure
Copies Furnished (with enclosure):
Mr. David Cox
North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188
Sincerely,

E. David Franklin
Assistant Chief, Regulatory Division
Mr. Larry Hardy
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR-DWQ
Wetlands Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Mr. John Hefner, Field Supervisor
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mrs. Kathy Matthews
Wetlands Section, Region IV
Water Management Division
United States Environmental Protection
Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
A-12
. J.
N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TRANSMITTAL SLIP DAT16 [?
T O O M, SL D4.
• ?y v
FROM I

t
666 R R. NO. R , SLOB.
1 h
-I ACTION
? NOTE AND FIL ? PER OUR CONVERSATLON
? NOTE AND RETURN TO ML ? PER YOUR RLSUCST
? RETURN WITH MORE DETAILS [? IOR YOUR APPROVAL
? NOTE AND SEE ME ABOUT TNIS ( fJ __OR YOUR INPORMATION
V
? PLEASE ANSWER ? POR YOUR COMMENTS -
? PREPARE REPLY FOR MY SISNATURE ? SIGNATURE
? TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION ? INVESTIGATE AND REPORT
COMMENTS:
r
! t
ttir ,
Oft

e.. srA71o?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
October 20, 1999
Mr. David Timpy
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
P. O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Dear Mr. Timpy:

DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
d?
. ,fir.,...
SUBJECT: Hope Mills Bypass, from SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) to SR 1132
(Legion Road), Hope Mills, Cumberland County, Federal Aid Project
No. STP-0622(2), State Project No. 8.1442601, TIP Project No. U-0620
As discussed at our September 29, 1999 meeting, this letter documents wetland
avoidance and minimization efforts conducted for this project. Our Department requests
your concurrence that wetland avoidance and minimization has been satisfactorily
addressed.
General Description and Purpose
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to construct a new
facility, the Hope Mills Bypass, south of Fayetteville. The project will widen George
Owen Road to a four lane facility divided by a 18 foot raised median beginning at
SR 1141 (Bingham Drive) and extend on new location to intersect SR 1132 (Legion
Road) across from Elk Road. A four lane 18-foot median section is also proposed for the
new location portion of the project.
The proposed project will provide a circumferential route to facilitate travel
around the southwest side of Fayetteville. Between All-American Freeway and the
Proposed Outer Loop, no other roadways serve this purpose.
This project will also provide a facility linking the following radial facilities on
the southwest side of Fayetteville: Cumberland Road, Camden Road, Legion Road and
I-95 Business.
The proposed project is one element of a system wide thoroughfare plan that
provides circumferential travel between suburban growth areas, and is consistent with the
local land use plans . By connecting with Bunce Road, Bingham Drive, Elk Road, and a
0
new intersection with I-95 Business/US 301, this project will provide a southwestern
looping facility that allows developing areas access to 1-95 Business/US 301. By
connecting the existing radial facilities (Cumberland Road, Camden Road, Legion Road,
and I-95 Business), this project reduces the need for circuitous travel in southwestern
Cumberland County.
September 29, 1999 Meeting Minutes
NCDOT officials met with representatives of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, Division of Water Quality, and the Fayetteville
Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (FAMPO) on September 29, 1999 to update the
resource agencies on the project. Early in the project study, a four-lane median divided
section with grass shoulders was proposed for the new location portion of the project.
During the post-hearing meeting, the FAMPO requested sidewalks for the entire length of
the project, which will require curb and gutter on both sides of proposed facility for the
entire length of the project. This was discussed with the resource agencies to receive
comments.
This project did not follow the NEPA 404 Merger Process. Therefore, this
meeting was also intended to verify concurrence on the selected alternative and
minimization efforts. The following is a list of persons in attendance and a summary of
the information presented at the meeting and the comments.
Attendees
Dave Timpy US Army Corps of Engineers
David Cox NC Wildlife Resources Commission
John Hennessy Division of Water Quality
Rick Heicksen Cumberland County Joint Planning Board
Mike Little Roadway Design
Bruce Ellis Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Rob Hanson Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Beverly Robinson Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Proiect History
Transportation plans have included this project since 1973. In the spanned time,
six alternatives have been considered (See Figure 5). These alternatives either did not
meet the need for the area or could not be justified environmentally or socially. Some of
the problems associated with the past alternatives included crossing Beaver Creek,
crossing Hope Mills Lake, crossing the park area near Hope Mills Lake, crossing new
subdivisions, and significant wetland impacts.
At the beginning of the current planning studies the thoroughfare plan alignment
(Alternate 6 on Figure 5) was the only alignment being studied. A preliminary survey for
wetlands (including fieldwork) was conducted early in the project development. This
revealed major wetlands impacts associated with the new location section of the
3
thoroughfare plan alignment. Alternates 1 and 2 were then developed. Both Alternate 1
and 2 avoid major wetland impact associated with the thoroughfare plan alignment. See
Figure 1 for the location of Alternates 1 and 2.
Alternates 1 and 2 were presented at a Citizens Infonnational Workshop in
October, 1997. Approximately 70 persons attended this meeting. Most of the questions
concerned impacts to individual properties and alternate preferences. Citizens'
comments overwhelmingly recommended Alternate 1 as shown below.
Citizens recommending Alternate 1 2 comment sheets, 2 letters, 2 petitions
(90 & 60 signatures)
Citizens recommending Alternate 2 0
Proposed Improvements in Environmental Assessment (EA)
In the EA, proposed improvements included widening George Owen Road to a
four lane facility divided with an 18-foot median or a five lane facility both utilizing curb
and gutter. The new location portion of the project, beginning at Columbine Road and
ending at Legion Road, was proposed as a four-lane facility divided by an 18-foot median
with grass shoulders. The NC Division of Water Quality had previously requested a
grass shoulder typical section to help in filtering runoff.
Alternate Comparison
Alternates Relocatees Wetland Impacts Surface Water Impacts Total Cost
Alternate 1 28 6.8 acres* 1230 feet $28,850,000
Alternate 2 41 3.5 acres 1208 feet $27,375,000
* (later reduced to 5.22 acres)
Sidewalks
Sidewalks were not proposed in the EA. During the post hearing meeting Rick
Heicksen, Cumberland County Joint Planning Board, requested sidewalks be added as a
part of this project. Sidewalks will be added along the north side of the entire project.
Constructing sidewalks would require curb and gutter along the entire length of both
sides of the proposed project. Constructing sidewalks on both sides of the proposed
project will require runoff to be channelized. NCDOT had concerns about problems that
this would cause during the permit application stage of the project process.
Based on the comments at the September 29 meeting, the curb and gutter proposal
may be acceptable to the resource agencies pending their review of a stormwater drainage
plan. Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) recommends runoff not drain directly into
streams, but can be piped into ditches or wetland sites. WRC recommended installing a
level spreader into wetland areas. Project Development along with Roadway Design will
work with the Hydraulics Unit to develop stormwater drainage plans. A series of
alternates for handling runoff will be developed for the proposed project. Plan sheets are
4
not available for the proposed project at this time. Roadway Design will begin working
on plan sheets in January 2000. The Hydraulic Unit will begin working on drainage
plans in July 2000. Drainage plans will be forwarded to Resource Agencies once they are
completed.
Agency review of the drainage plans will be included in the Project Commitment
green sheet.
Concurrence Points
This project did not follow the 404 Merger Process. NCDOT however is
coordinating with resource agencies prior to the permit application stage of the project to
assure a smooth transition into right of way acquisition. This project was presented at the
monthly NCDOT/resource agency meeting in May of 1998. The agencies concurred with
the purpose and need and Alternate 1 as the recommended alternate. The agencies
requested a shift in the alignment to reduce impacts to a wetland pocket near the CSX
Railroad. The alignment was adjusted and a copy of the adjusted alignment was
forwarded to the agencies during the comment period for the EA. The adjusted
alignment decreased the wetland impacts by 1.58 acres. The current estimated wetland
impacts for Alternate 1 is approximately 5.22 acres. Attached is a hearing map showing
the recommended alternate and delineated wetland sites.
At the September 29, 1999 meeting, resource agencies agreed with the purpose
and need, selected alternative and minimization measures. The agencies did not see the
need for additional minimization measures.
A mitigation proposal in not ready at this time. NCDOT is currently exploring
possible mitigation sites.
Please document your concurrence with the proposed project's avoidance and
minimization measures. I would appreciate your response within 30 days of the receipt
of this letter. Thank you for your assistance and participation during the meeting. For
additional questions or comments, please give me a call at [phone] extension 231.
Sincerely,
&WAI
A A
Beverly G. Robinson
Project Development Engineer
BGR/bgr Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
cc: Meeting Attendees
Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Assistant Branch Manager, PD&EA
John Alford, P.E., State Roadway Design Engineer
Roy Shelton, Federal Highway Administration
1 mile 0.5 mile 0 1 mile
I I I I
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL
BRANCH
HOPE MILLS BYPASS
FROM SR 1141 (BINGHAM DRIVE)
TO SR 1363 (ELK ROAD)
CUMBERLAND COUNTY
TIP PROJECT U-620
FIG. 1
h•
z
V
rd
O
g
wl
V9
C?
G
E- N 01, I' 4,-r
a
ao

rrjn ,e?. S i

h ? 3
o m
z ;
? U z
g ? w
^rf
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources F • FVA
Division of Water Quality
IT
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director
March 30, 2000
MEMORANDUM
To: Melba McGee
Through: John Dorn
From: John Hennessy
Subject:
i
Comments the FONSI for the construction of the Hope Mills Bypass from SR 1141
(Bingham Drive) to SR 1132 (legion Road) in Cumberland County, Federal Aid No. STP-
0622(2), State Project No. 8.1442601, TIP Project No. U-0620, DENR Project Number
OOE-0421.
This office has reviewed the referenced document. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is responsible
for the issuance of the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for activities that impact Waters of the U.S.,
including wetlands. It is our understanding that the preferred alternative, as presented in the FONSI, will
I'estllt in a maximum impact to 5.3 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 1577 linear feet of streams. The
DWQ offers the following comments based on review of the aforementioned document:
A) At this time, the DWQ concurs with the Finding of No Significant Impact. The proposed impacts
are not of a magnitude and nature to preclude the construction of the project.
B) The DWQ would prefer that a conceptual stormwater management plan be submitted with the EA.
However, we understand that in many circumstances this is not always plausible. However, in a
previous meeting dealing with this project the DWQ raised the question about the proposed
stormwater plan. To date, a finalized plan has not been proposed. Instead, DOT has proposed that
final stormwater planning will occur during the design phase. It should be noted that 401 issuance
will be contingent on an approved stormwater plan from the DWQ be obtained.
C) Prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification, the NCDOT is respectfully reminded
that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and minimization of impacts to wetlands (and
stream,) to the maximum extent practical. Should the impacts to jurisdictional wetlands exceed
1.0 acres, mitigation may be required in accordance with NCDWQ Wetland Rules ( 15A NCAC
2H.0506 (h)(2) ). Based on the impacts described in the document, wetland mitigation will be
requircd for this project.
D) In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules f I5A NCAC 2H.0506(b)(6)), mitigation will be
requircd for impacts of greater than 150 linear feet to any single perennial stream. In the event that
mitigation is required, the mitigation plan should he designed to replace appropriate lost functions
and values. In accordance with the NCDWQ Wetlands Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h)(3)), the
Wetland Restoration Program may be available for use as stream mitigation.
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, lhdorth Carolina 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
A -I ;fir. n Affirm - ?c.I .
- .._.._ _ :; E-,- V rc? cr .; a;cr
Mr. William D. Gilmore memo
4 04/04/00
Page 2
E) Where streams must be crossed, the DWQ prefers bridges be used in lieu of culverts. However,
we realize that economic considerations often require the use of culverts. Please be advised that
culverts should be countersunk to allow unimpeded passage by fish and other aquatic organisms.
Moreover, in areas where high quality wetlands or streams are impacted, a bridge may prove
preferable. When applicable, DOT should not install the bridge bents in the creek, to the
maximum extent practicable.
F) Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands.
G) Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practicable. Impacts to
wetlands in borrow/waste areas could precipitate compensatory mitigation.
H) The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed
methods for stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater should not be permitted to
discharge directly into the creek. Instead, stormwater should be designed to drain to a properly
designed stormwater detention facility/apparatus.
I) There should be a discussion on mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts. If mitigation is
required, it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the
environmental documentation. While the NCDWQ realizes that this may not always be practical,
it should be noted that for projects requiring mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be
I required in conjunction with the issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification.
J) Future documentation should include an itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream
impacts with corresponding mapping.
K) Based on the information presented in the document, the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and
streams will require an Individual Permit application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding
401 Water Quality Certification. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires
satisfactory protection of water quality to ensure that water quality standards are met and no
wetland or stream uses are lost. Final permit authorization will require the submittal of a formal
application by the NCDOT and written concurrence from the NCDWQ. Please be aware that any
approval will be contingent on appropriate avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream
impacts to the maximum extent practical, the development of an acceptable stormwater
management plan, and the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where appropriate.
The NCDWQ appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on your project. Should you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact John Hennessy at [phone].
cc: Dave Timpy, Corps of Engineers
Tom McCartney, USFWS
David Cox, NCWRC
Ken Averitte, NCDWQ Regional Office
C:\ncdot\TIP U-0620\comments\ U-0620 FONSI comments.dec
fd d STN[ OF NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 2761 1-5201 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR
February 18, 2000
Commander (OAN)
Fifth Coast Guard District
Federal Building
431 Crawford Street
Portsmouth, VA 23704
Attn: Ms. Ann Deaton, Bridge Permits
Dear Ms. Deaton:
SECRETARY
r'r9M
yo a IV
r'CJI
SUBJECT: New Hanover County, construction of bridge on U.S. 117 (Smith Creek
Parkway) on new location over Smith Creek, Federal Project No.
MANHS-0332(8), State Project No. 8.2250110, TIP No. U-0092A.
Application is hereby made by the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) for approval by the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, of the location and plans
of the bridge to be constructed across Smith Creek in Wilmington, North Carolina. The
bridge is located roughly 1.2 miles above the mouth of Smith Creek, which flows into the
Northeast Cape Fear River, as shown on the attached plans. We propose to construct this
bridge approximately 700 feet upstream of the existing U.S. 117 bridge, as part of
Section A of the Smith Creek Parkway. When completed, the Smith Creek Parkway will
serve as a bypass around downtown Wilmington, allowing traffic to move more easily
from east to west and reducing congestion on Market Street.
We have provided a main channel span with a minimum vertical clearance greater
than the 25 feet called for in the FSEIS and a minimum horizontal clearance of 90 feet,
that you concurred with in a letter dated January 28, 1998 (copy of letter enclosed).
This bridge, as proposed, does not have a fender guide system or navigational
lighting.
Legal authority for the bridge is found in the General Bridge Act of 1946. Federal
funds will be utilized for this project. However, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must
approve this project under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act. The NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) must approve this
project under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The NCDOT is preparing and will
submit a Joint Permit Application for both State and Federal Permits. The NCDOT is
also preparing an application for a Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) Major
Permit, for approval by the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (DCM).
The NCDOT analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the project in a
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) that was signed by the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) on March 30, 1998. The FHWA has
determined that FSEIS has satisfactorily addressed the environment impacts (Record of
Decision [ROD] signed August 13, 1998). The environmental impacts of the project are
discussed on pages IV-40 through IV-58 of the FSEIS. This section of the Smith Creek
Parkway is designated as U-0092A. The names and addresses of the adjacent property
owners are enclosed. Also, please find enclosed one original and three copies of the
USCG drawinjs, for the project.
Please initiate review of the proposed project for authorization under a U.S. Coast
Guard Permit. It is requested that any correspondence from your office regarding this
project include the NCDOT TIP Number (U-0092A). Should you have any questions
regarding this information, please contact Ms. Sue Brady at [phone].
Sincerely,
't'/ G. XJ,
William T. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
0 Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Encls: 1) Original and three copies of a vicinity map and plans of the bridge.
2) Two copies of the FSEIS and ROD.
3) Addresses of the adjacent property owners.
4) One copy of the Jan. 28, 1998 letter from the U.S. Coast Guard regarding
the proposed vertical clearance of the bridge.
Cc: Mr. David Timpy, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, USNMFS
Mr. N.L. Graf, FHWA; Attn: Mr. Roy Shelton
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development Branch
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., State Highway Engineer - Design
Mr. A.L. Hankins, P.E., Hydraulics Unit
Mr. Timothy V. Roundtree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. John Alford, P.E., State Roadway Design Engineer
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
LTyO ? STA7[ ??
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALrIGI I, N.C. 2761 I-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 4, 1999
Ms. Cyndi Bell FE
N
.C. Department of Environment
And Natural Resources 131999
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road WETLANDS GROUT'
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 ,WATER QUALITY SECTI,:
Dear Ms. Bell:
Subject: 1998 Annual Monitoring Report for the Smith Creek Parkway (U-
92D)Mitigation Site, New Hanover County.
Please find enclosed the 1998 annual monitoring report for the Smith Creek Parkway (U-
92D) Mitigation Site.
In January 1999, a representative of the Planning and Environmental Branch will contact
the recipients of each report in order to facilitate a discussion of the annual monitoring
reports.
If you have any questions prior to these discussions, please contact Phil Harris, Natural
Systems Unit, at [phone]. Thank you for your continued support and cooperation.
Sincerely,
I/ ajw jw)?
V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D.,
Assistant Branch Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
cc: Phil Harris, PE, Natural Systems Unit Head
David Franklin, USACOE
i
1
1
ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1998
U-92D Mitigation Site
New Hanover County
Project # 8.2250101
TIP # U-92 D WIM

Prepared By:
Natural Systems Unit
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
December 1996

L

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................ ............................1
1.1 Project Description ............................................... ..........................1
1.2 Purpose ................................................................ ..........................1
1.3 Project History ............................................. .......................1
2.0 HYD ROLOGY ................................................................ ...........................3
2.1 Success Criteria .................................................. ............................3
2.2 Hydrologic Description ......................................... ...........................3
2.3 Results of Hydrologic Monitoring ......................... ...........................3
2.3.1 Site Data ........................................... .......................3
2.3.2 Climatic Data ...................................... ......................4
2.4 Conclusions ................................................ .......................4
3.0 VEGETATION ................................................................. ..........................6
3.1 Success Criteria ................................................... ...........................6
3.2 Description of Species ......................................... ...........................6
3.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring ........................ ...........................6
3.4 Conclusions ................................................ .......................6
4.0 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS/ RECOMMENDATIONS ................................8

t

TABLES
TABLE 1 - 1997 HYDROLOGIC MONITORING RESULTS ..................................3
TABLE 2 - 1998 HYDROLOGIC MONITORING RESULTS ............................4
TABLE 3 - VEGETATIVE MONITORING RESULTS ............................................6
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAP ......................................................................2
FIGURE 2 - 30-70 PERCENTILE GRAPH ..................................................5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER CHARTS .....................................9
APPENDIX B - SITE PHOTOS ...........................................................................13
APPENDIX C - MONITORING PARTNERING MEETING MINUTES .............15

r
1

I

F

1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
The U-92D Mitigation Site, located in New Hanover County, is directly south of
the new alignment of the Smith Creek Parkway east of NC 132 (Figure 1). The
site encompasses approximately 4.5 acres and serves as mitigation for the
Wilmington Bypass.
1.2 Purpose
Monitoring of the U-92D site is required to demonstrate successful mitigation.
The site is monitored for both wetland hydrology and vegetation. The following
report details the results of both the hydrologic and vegetation monitoring for the
U-92D Mitigation Site. Also included is a consecutive day analysis of the 1997
hydrologic data. This analysis is provided as an addendum to the 1997 annual
report, in which cumulative days were incorrectly tallied in order to determine
hydrologic success.
1.3 Project History
January 1996
October 1996
May 1997
September 1997
August 1998
Site planted
Vegetation Monitoring (1 yr.)
Monitoring Wells Installed
Vegetation Monitoring (2 yr.)
Vegetation Monitoring (3 yr.)

I

0

7
I

14
a
ZO
N ..
m

2l
L d
r
N kERR Z
O BAVARIAN LN
N KERR _. ..:- .. ....
q? FP
eq??c 4p
yRo p,...
CRICKET
NEIL
FIVE ACRE RD
,.¢_MURRY
' ????? FERND?
6 sx $»tiiths Cres
F `.

Murraysviile
aa r
?.m
0,4
0
?i
co
I

? t r/
321. r;
g/G GU
.TUPELO Rp

?,. NAW
y; ?w q
?RFS
w.
/ 4 -
. .._
U-92D Wetland ('pRO041 `4u
O
Q
m
'
(132J ?' ,` ?

' GRAN6, QP.' O

,
O
C
g
TUS
KAREN LN
GORDO. 6
NRD BR/fiRC,,.NORTHBROO/C
cg
AqR? c ANTARES.: ALDER 21
?O.
?a LEXRD
0 EU
LIOT,
New Hanover International a; `g°`.° eek,,.'
Cr
S? iths..._.: ?o
kIN,
m NOLAND ?G . P?KENNINGSTON
....
J???Q y?0 ` ??? ry0 SQL GREG l?RD ELKINS D Q _ O9?` (O F((/pl
?Pe? ?Tq?L G?? K/NHS r C?.` c BY/?ON` . JAMES Z
rsPP ?w/((AMFC /A ... BRA ON.RD OQ iC', n a. KipjS FFR?
M[x ' 'S' SHfI 0 ?O PIff . ?T
A 0 TERRY LN LfY L)
_ . A /S DEAN v DRICFLjgRDSON 2 G9 ;? O IJP
LOR NO
a1???
SP?NC'. EW Z NCR SnVOp SAN !???0
D S?-
ACANDALE ? Z RIPLEE ? ?. ASHFpRD _ ....0 OQS`O e?pQ_
i ? r-- a f STONEHEAD m 22? y P?B?C? yyP
C3 G 1 1: LO
M BERKLEr
d? p & m C? l p
co z o c1 m ?
2
moo
rv ?Pg?i w HUNT f ' 1321 v ?? SS n .
9,1,P? US: Z ? RST .
t z R(
?b j g
JOHNSON
ON:
Z
O ?
?
C1
to p , o
ofd'
t7 ?mN
OZ
'IN CE 17 O

z rn N3N? G? Om2
ol
f
p G m

y?
EMERS?NA 9
-k
m
a Ur
60 paT
0
y
e
PATRICK C(F of
t 1997 DeLorme. Street Atlas USA °N
G 17 D ?? ?AT
m? 'pa
?
OAKLAND
Marketplace I
U4,
a
oR104 Q. -- :Q
y
GFORC? ? : 5P0?. y?
iii rRq O p?CS mP .
64
p
Q-
o
'
.
6ersity Centre'' FIGURE 1
I
SITE LOCATION MAP
?
,rr/voR4 ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2.0 HYDROLOGY
2.1 Success Criteria
In accordance with federal guidelines for wetland mitigation, the success criteria
for hydrology states that the area must be inundated or saturated (within 12" of
the surface) by surface or ground water for at least a consecutive 12.5% of the
growing season. Areas inundated less than 5% of the growing season are
always classified as non-wetlands. Areas inundated between 5% - 12.5% of the
growing season can be classified as wetlands depending upon factors such as
the presence of hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils.
' The growing season in New Hanover County begins February 27 and ends
November 26. The growing season dates correspond to a 50% probability that
air temperatures will drop to 28°F or lower after February 27 and before
November 26.' The growing season is 271 days; optimum wetland hydrology
thus requires a consecutive 34 days. Also, local climate must represent average
conditions for the area.
' 2.2 Hydrologic Description

Two monitoring wells, one rain gauge, and one surface water gauge were
installed in May 1997. The automatic monitoring wells and rain gauges record
daily readings of both depth to groundwater and rainfall, respectively. It is
expected that hydrologic monitoring will occur for three years.
Appendix A contains a plot of the water depth for each monitoring well and
surface gauge. Precipitation events are included on each graph as bars.
2.3 Results of Hydrologic Monitoring
2.3.1 Site Data
The largest number of consecutive days that the groundwater was within twelve
inches of the surface was determined for each well. This number was converted
into a percentage of the 271 day growing season. Table 1 shows the monitoring
results for 1997; Table 2 has the results for 1998.
Table 1
1997 HYDROLGIC MONITORING RESULTS
Monitoring
Well- < 5% 5% -8% 8% -12.5% > 12.5% Actual %
SC-1 ? 69.4
SC-2 ? 69.4
' Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of New Hanover County, North Carolina, p.39.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Table 2
1998 HYDROLOGIC MONITORING RESULTS
Monitoring
well < 5% 8% - 12.5% > 12.6% Actual %
SC-1 ? 100.0
SC-2 ? 100.0
Monitoring well SC-2 has been in standing water the entire growing season.
The surface water gauge has indicated surface water on the site throughout the
1998 growing season.
2.3.2 Climatic Data
' Figure 2 is a comparison of 1997 and 1998 monthly rainfall to historical
precipitation for the area. The two lines represent the 30th and 70th percentiles of
monthly precipitation for the Wilmington area. The bars are the monthly rainfall
' totals for 1997 and 1998. The data was gathered by the National Climatic Data
Center; because of data availability, the 1998 rainfall encompasses precipitation
through October. The 1999 annual monitoring report will include a 30-70
percentile graph with the monthly rainfall from the winter of 1998.
Though 1997 was generally a dryer year than normal, the winter of 1997-1998
produced higher rainfall totals. Wilmington also experienced higher rainfall totals
in May and August 1998.
2.4 Conclusions
' For two years, the monitoring wells have indicated wetland hydrology for well
over 12.5% of the growing season.

7

s
a
'L^
V
d
c V
z
i
d c
a o
c_
M •?
Y
d
2
U
E
N

EV .1 k E, ?, AW a' ON, vi I
.It N O co (D sl N O
•-- r r
(-ui) uoi;elidioaJd
m
0
0
z
t
U
0
? I
? O
a
3 ? w°-
-? I c
0
00
c ?
w
m c
? i
?i
v
a?
LL
c
FIGURE 2
30-70 PERCENTILE GRAPH

fl

r

3.0 VEGETATION
3.1 Success Criteria
Success Criteria states that there must be a minimum mean density of 320 trees
per acre of approved target species surviving for at least three consecutive
years.
3.2 Description of Species
The following tree species were planted in the Wetland Restoration Area:
Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Green Ash
Nyssa sylvatica, Black Gum
Betula nigra, River Birch
Quercus michauxii, Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus lyrata, Overcup Oak
Quercus nigra, Water Oak
3.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring (3 year)
Table 3
VEGETA TION MONIT ORIN G RESULTS
a
O ?

Ul
d O v ?
O a ?
U V
= 4. ? ?/
3
c v
v E
u
N
?
Cr rw?
V ^"
? >
?. c?
? >
Q >
V7 O
1"
? O
f" O
E" C
A

1 8 3 4 4 1 20 34 400
2 4 3 6 1 14 34 280
3 18 8 1 1 2 30 34 600
4 9 1 2 9 2 23 34 460
AVERAGE DENSITY 135
Site contains some volunteer species such as Wax Myrtle, Cotton Wood, Tulip
Poplar, and Pines. Site also contains juncus, cattails and centipede grass.
3.4 Conclusions
There was approximately 4.5 acres involved with this project. The site was
planted with a variety of bottomland hardwood species. There were four plots
6

I I

n

' established throughout the planting areas, encompassing all plant communities.
The third year vegetation monitoring revealed an average density of 435 trees
' per acre, which is above the minimum of 320 trees per acre required by the
success criteria.

L

1?

I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

4.0 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS/ RECOMMENDATIONS

L

The site has achieved wetland hydrology for two years. NCDOT intends to
conduct hydrologic monitoring on the site for a third year.
After the third year of vegetation monitoring, the site has met vegetation criteria
specified for the site. NCDOT recommends discontinuing all vegetation
monitoring on the site.

?I