NCG140081_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20120928

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/V U&IqL-20�1
DOC TYPE
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ -MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ @O)a OAb
YYYYMMDD

Fi , 4 � 7 �4 k�• � � dfk1 t-
THomAs E. CHANDLER, JR.
PRESIDENT
September 28, 2012
Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor —Water Quality
NC DENR
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, NC 27107-2241
Dear Mr. Bassinger,
REcE vEo
f 'C' GeOt. Of t fHR
CT 0 q 2
1"'-StonSa)err,
Re9inn2i orn",
VIA CERTIFIED MARL
By means of this letter I certify that Kenneth E. Waegerle, Environmental, Health & Safety Manager,
as the duly authorized representative for Chandler Concrete Company, Inc., and for Chandler
Concrete/Piedmont, Inc. He is responsible for the overall environmental operations and has the
authority to sign documents and to shut down the operations should an emergency occur for any of
our plants in North Carolina. The plants in the Winston Salem.Region include, but not limited to the
following locations:
Plant
Counly
Num.
Greensboro Mill St,
Guilford
101
Greensboro Swing Rd
Guilford
102
Greensboro Chimney Rock Rd.
Guilford
103
Reidsville
Rockingham
104
Eden
Rockingham
105
Madison
Rockingham
106
Asheboro
Randleman
108
Randleman
Randleman
110
Boone
Watauga
501
Blowing Rock
Watauga
502
West Jefferson
Ashe
503
Jefferson
Ashe
504
Sparta
Alleghany
505
Burlington 601
Alamance
601
Burlington 605
Alamance
605
Haw River
Alamance
609
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
T. E. Chandler, Jr.
President
POST OFFICE Box 131 • BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27216-0131
TELEPHONE:_ 336.226.1181 / FAx: [phone]

';ice Sy�1�
�i a x _ k i34Arr �
Energy Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
April 5, 2016
Ken Waegerle, CSP
1006 S. Church Street
PO Box li l
Burlington, NC 27216-0131
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Permit No. NCG 140081
Chandler Concrete --- Reidsville Plant # 104
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Waegerle:
PAT MCCRORY
Govemor
DOATALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
TRACY DAMS
On March 24, 2016 Glen White of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality;
Department of Minerals and Land Resources met with you and Philip Motsinger at the Highway
87 plant in Reidsville, NC to conduct a compliance inspection per the Industrial Stormwater
Permit requirements. Inspection consist of review of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,
training and monitoring records and observation of the general condition of the site and outfall.
Your assistance with the inspection was greatly appreciated.
Permit:
The concrete plant holds General Stormwater Permit NCG140081 to discharge stormwater from
industrial activity associated with Ready Mixed Concrete [SIC 3273] and like activities under
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The permit became effective
July 1, 2011 and expires on June 30, 2016. A copy of the current permit is required to be
maintained with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) documents. The current
permit was included in the file. Training is conducted annually.
Records/Reports:
This facility was'required to develop and maintain a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SPPP) in accordance with Part 11, Section A of the permit. The documents have been
maintained and past documents were available for review at the time of inspection.
Facility Site Review:
This facility is a ready mixed concrete plant and supplies concrete hatches for various
commercial and residential applications. Mixes are prepared to the customers specifications
using industry standards. Site was busy and in full operation at the time of inspection. No
deficiencies noted.
State of North Carolina { Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
450 Hanes Mill Road — Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
[phone]

Self -Monitoring Program:
The plant has two outfalls. One is located and the northern and the other at the southern end of
the property along Hwy 87. All flow is overland. Monitoring records so back several years and
show compliance with monitoring requirements as well as results being below required
parameters. No deficiencies noted.
If you have questions or need additional information, please contact Glen White at (336) 776-
9660.
Enclosures:
Inspection Report
Sincerely,
Matthew E. Gantt, P.E.
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
cc: WSRO File Copy
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (WSRO)
1

A
Permit: NCG140081
SOC:
County: Rockingham
Region: Winston-Salem
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 07/01/11 Expiration: 06/30/16 Owner : Chandler Concrete/Piedmont Inc
.Effective: Expiration: Facility: Chandler Concrete Co -Reidsville Pit #104
7699 N NC 87
Contact Person: Kenneth E Waegerle Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/24/2016 Entry Time: 09:00AM
Primary Inspector: Glen White
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reidsville NC 27320
Phone: [phone]
Certification: Phone:
Exit Time: 10:15AM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine - Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Ready Mix Concrete StormwaterNVastewater Discharge COC
Facility Status: EM Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG140081 Owner -Facility: Chandler Concrete/PiedmontInc
Inspection pate: 03/2412016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
(See Compliance Inspection Report)
{
Page: 2

. • .
17 Permit: NCG140081 owner - Facility: Chandler Concrete/Piedmont Inc
Inspection Date: 03/2412016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
IN ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include'a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
No ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: SPPP updated annually, records for annual training and spills records are current.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Monitoring per permit requirements.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment: Monitoring per permit requirements. Results below parameters in all samplings reviewed.
Documentation goes back for several years with records complete.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 1W ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwaier) discharges? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Two outfalls observed during inspection. One is at the road and the other is at the other end of
the site. All flow is overland.
Page: 3

Environmental
Quality
September 16, 2016
KENNETH WAEGERLE — CORPORATE EHS MANAGER
CHANDLER CONCRETE PIEDMONT, INC. i
REIDSVILLE PLANT 104
PO BOX 131
BURLINGTON, NC 27216
Dear Permittee:
PAT McCROU
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
Chandler Concrete Piedmont, Inc.
Reidsville Plant 104
Rockingham County
Department of Environmental Quality staff from the Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of Chandler, Concrete Piedmont, Inc. Reidsville Plant 104 on
September 1, 2016 for permits and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Management
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmentalcompliance at
your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and
regulations at the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact Ryan Swaim at
[phone] or [e-mail]. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
cc: DAQ WSRO Files
DEMLR WSRO Files
DWR WSRO Files
DWM WSRO files
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 West Hanes Milt Road, Suite 300 1 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105-7407
336 776 9800 T t 336 776 9797 F

NORTH CAROLINADIVISION OF
AIR QUALITY,
41§Pection ReDdrt'
Dakie-:*, 0.9/14/2016
Facility pita
Ciian¢leir C&ciete/Pi . ed. . ni.bnt,-.1fic. -;Rb . id . sville"P] arit 1.04
7699 'Hig&:Way 80''N'ofth
Reidsville;� NC 27320
Long: 79d 43.7592tfi,
Si& 3273 j R&dy.Mixcd Cofiefete
NAICS- 32732 /'Read Ready --Mix Coif&et6Mihufacturidg
contact Data
-Facilky.Contact
Aulfiorized:ConfacV
Dewey Pruitt
Kenneth Waiegerk.
P I aln"t M -a n ager
Corporate -EHS Manager,
'(336).6351:0975
(336)2264 181
icennicai contact
Kenneth Waegerle
torporat4 EHS Ma'nager
Wihst0-Saleffi Regional Office.
Chdfidi6f.Conce6t0j?iedftibht,. hi" . -: R�i&vil fe Phint.
NC Fdifity-[D. 7900 118:',
Codfity/F1 P&WddkihOdW15.7'
Permit Data
Permit NIA
fs§ued NIA
-
Eiojees,N/A
Chissifkation,N/A
Kifflit Stitus'N/A
Cufieht P*fmit Aoplkatioh(s) . Nofie
SIP,
Compliance Data
Comments: Data
inspectio'n 6W 09/01/2016
inspector's Nome Ryan -Swaim
Inspector's Signature, Operating Staius -Operating
...... Compliance'. Code :Compliance..-:;inspectionI
/. Action Code.: �IFCE
o DecSignature: On;Site,linspecii6n Result -Compliance
Total'Actual ernksioils ifiTONNIVVAW
TSP
SO2:
:Ndx-
voc"
CO
Pmtd
*-.HAP
`2013
0.2870
0.1370
2009,
0: 3 000
0.1400
0972
Date
Date
6 Histdri - :Vori6
Letter- Type
Rule Violated.
None
test.mefho"
*1J,W-t LTA:DX,
Violation Resolution Date
Source6f Tesied-

Emission Sources:
mia n.
Enission=ource _
Con I
CoSys« _
dS.ouree{iD
Descri ; iii . - _
s eEnrID
iiecri tt.4tt
ES-2
cement silo
CD-3
central bag filter (1,107 square
feet surface area) (CD-3
ES-3
fly ash silo
CD-3
central bag filter (1,107 square
feet surface area) (CD-3
ES-4
weigh hopper
CD-3
central bag filter (1,107 square
feet surface area) (CD-3
ES-5
truck load -out
CD-3
central bag filter (1,107 square
feet surface area) (CD-3
IES-1
300-gallon chemical storage tank
Mortarman truck Wash)
NIA
NIA
IES-2
500-gallon chemical storage tank
aravair 1000 air entrainment mixture
IES-3
500-gallon chemical storage tank
(cement hydration stabilizer)
IES-4
1000-gallon chemical storage tank
(WRDA 35 water reducer)
IES-5
1000-gallon chemical storage tank
ADVA 140 water reducer)
NIA
NIA
IES-6
1000-gallon chemical storage tank
non -calcium accelerator)
IES-7
1500-gallon chemical storage tank
calcium chloride accelerator
IB-1
Natural gas -fired hot water heater
(0.67 million Btu/hr.
Discussion:
On September 1, 2016, Multi Media Inspector Mr. Ryan Swaim, Environmental Specialist of the WSRO-DEMLR, contacted Mr. Ken
Waegerle, Plant -Manager, of Chandler Concrete/Piedmont Inc. - Reidsville Plant 4 104 to conduct a Multimedia Inspection of the
facility. The facility was last inspected by DAQ personnel on April 20, 2015 by WSRO-DAQ personnel and the facility appeared to
be operating in compliance with Air Quality standards and regulations at that time. The facility is currently operating 8-10 hours a
day, five days a week, and 50 weeks per year. The facility does however experience occasional reduced operating hours due to .
seasonal and market demand. This is a concrete batching, truck -mix facility and was operating at time of inspection. Please note that
this facility's permit has been rescinded (September 8, 2016) since the inspection of this facility. However, this facility is still subject
to all applicable air quality rules and regulations.
Safety:
Inspectors are required to wear safety shoes, safety glasses, and hardhat. Hearing protection and reflective safety vest are
recommended. Inspectors should be aware of truck traffic while on the premises.
Applicable Regulations:
Applicable regulations are 213.0503, 2D .0515, 2D .0516, 2D .0521, 213.0535, 213.0540, and 2D .1806. This facility is not subject to
RMP requirements of the 112(r) program since it does not use or store any of the regulated chemicals in quantities above the threshold
levels in the rule. It should be noted that the facility is subject to the General Duty clause of the Section 1 t2(r) program.

Process:
The facility produces batch concrete in a truck -mixing process. This plant currently produces mainly a 3,000-4,500 psi strength
concrete used in road construction and for residential purposes. The aggregate materials are weighed and then dispensed in measured
amounts from the bottom of each hopper onto a conveyor that takes them to the weigh hopper. Measured amounts of cement and
flyash (as applicable) are dispensed from the silo into the weigh hopper. Water or heated water (during winter months) and designated
amounts of a water reducer and/or other additives are then added to the mix before the concrete mix is dropped into the truck.
Inspection:
The facility operates a cement storage silo, ES-2, a flyash storage silo, ) S-3, a weigh hopper, ES-4, and a truck loadout, ES-5.
Particulate matter from ES-2, ES-3, ES-4, and ES-5 are all controlled only from the central bagfilter (CD-3). The "skirt" associated
for the truck loadout process (ES-5) was identified as needing maintenance in the previous inspection. This skirt has since been
replaced immediately after the previous inspection. The plant normally operates up to 60 cubic yards/hour, with a maximum capacity
of 70 cubic yards/hour according to Mr. Wacgerle. The plant does have a magnebelic gauge mounted near the bagfilter, and was
operating at 3 inches of W.C. at time of inspection. Mr. Wacgerle provided the inspector with the bagfilter logbook upon request
showing the most recent internal inspection of the bagfilter occurring on August 29, 2016. 36 of the 72 bags were replaced on that
date and the other 36 were scheduled to be replaced in the upcoming weeks.
The facility operates a total of ten 275-2,000-gallon aboveground storage tanks used mainly for additives in the concrete mix, except
IES-l. There is currently a chemical supplier transition between Grace and BASF chemical supply companies. Consequently, the ten
tanks observed on site at time of inspection will be reduced to five after the transition is fully implemented. IESI-5 additives are
currently being replaced with similar products or removed all together. There was also a I0,000-gallon diesel fuel tank that was
observed and not included in the InsignificanVEExertipt Activities listing. This tar! was reported by Mr. Waegerle and onsite staff to
have been at the facility for many years. All of these tanks except for the 10,000 gal diesel fuel tank are located outside near the
aggregate storage bins.
The facility operates a natural gas -fired water heater (IB-1) used to heat process water mainly in the winter. It is exempt from
permitting in accordance with 2Q .0102(c)(2)(B)(ii), which exempts natural gas -fired combustion sources with maximum hourly heat
inputs less than 65 million Btu. This heater is located in a building near the truck loadout area. The facility submitted an initial
notification for NESHAP JJJJJJ indicating that the facility is not subject to the regulation. The notification was received in DAQ on
September 13, 2011 in the NCDAQ Planning Section and the WSRO on October 18, 2011.
The facility currently does not operate an emergency generator or have any diesel water pumps.
Applicable Regulations:
15A NCAC 2D .0503 particulate control requirements. The exempt Natural Gas -fired Boiler (113-1) is subject to this regulation,
which limits sulfur dioxide -emissions to 2.3 1bs:/MMBtu. The actual SO2 emission rate is less than the allowable emission rate and
(1134) is considered an exempt source therefore, compliance is demonstrated.
15A NCAC 2D .0515 requirements associated with particulates from miscellaneous industrial processes. The allowable PM emission
rate for silos ES-2 and ES-3 are each 35.4 lbs. PM/hr. The allowable PM emission rate for the weigh hopper (ES-4) and truck loadout
(ES-5) are 34.3 lbs. PM/hr. and 57.0 lbs. PM/hr., respectively. With the bagfilter having a control efficiency of 99+%, calculated
emissions from ES-2 is 0.025 lbs. PM/hr., ES-3 is 0.22 lbs. PM/hr., ES-4 is 0.0001 lbs. PNVbr., and ES-5 is 0.668 lbs. PM/hr. It
should be noted that all sources can comply without controls, except ES-3. This source requires at least a control efficiency of 54.9%
to meet the emissions limit. The facility appeared to be in compliance with this applicable regulation.
15A NCAC 2D .0516 sulfur dioxide control requirement. This condition sets the maximum allowable sulfur dioxide emissions rate to
be no more than 2.3 pounds per million Btu heat input. The September 8, 2016 rescission review states that the actual SO2 emission
rate was zero. Compliance with this requirement is indicated.

15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions requirement. Visible emissions from the emission sources, manufactured after July 1, 1971,
shall not be more than 20 percent opacity when averaged over a six -minute period, except that six -minute periods averaging not more
than 87 percent opacity may occur not more than once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24-hour period. However, sources
which must comply with 15A NCAC 2D .0524 "New Source Performance Standards" or .1 110 "National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants" must comply with applicable visible emissions requirements contained therein. At time of inspection no
truck loading operations were being conducted. There were some aggregate loading operations occurring on the facilities conveyor
systems. However, no visible emissions were detected from the facility at time of inspection. The facility appeared to be in
compliance with this applicable regulation.
15A NCAC 2D. 0535 which requires the facility to notify the DAQ of any malfunctions associated with a source causing an excess of
emissions lasting more than four hours. Condition A.5 pertains to regulation 2D .0535 "Notification Requirement." The facility is to
notify the DAQ director of any source with excess emissions that last for more than four hours and that result from a malfunction, a
breakdown of process, or any other abnormal conditions. Mr. Waegerle stated that no such malfunction had occurred at the facility.
The facility appeared to be in compliance with this applicable regulation.
15A NCAC 2D .0540 fugitive dust control requirement. According to Mr. Waegerle the facility is regularly watered with watering
trucks from the adjacent Martin Marietta quarry as needed. However, a complaint was received on April 20, 2016, regarding dust
from this facility. The complaint was investigated on April 21, 2016 by Mr. Blair Palmer of DAQ-WSRO. Mr. Palmer notified Mr.
Ken Waegerle of the issue and who in turn ensured the facility dust control devices were working adequately and that the facilities
vehicle yard area was watered at a frequency to suppress dusty conditions. No new complaints were observed in the file and no
qualifying emissions were observed at time of inspection. The facility appeared to be in compliance with this applicable regulation.
15A NCAC 2D .1806 concerns the control of odorous emissions. No objectionable odors were detected during the inspection nor
have any complaints been received regarding the same. The facility appeared to be in compliance with this applicable regulation.
MACT/GACT:
The facility does not operate an emergency generator or any diesel stationary combustion engines. The facility does not appear to be
subject to any MACT/GACT regulations. The facility does have a small natural-gas fired boiler, which is used primarily during the
winter months. The facility did submit an initial notification regarding NESHAP 6J to DAQ on October 18, 2011, indicating they are
not subject to the rule because there is no boiler being used. The facility does use a small natural-gas fired water heater, which is
listed as 1B-1.
Permit Issues:
No apparent permit issues found at time of inspection.
Facility_- Wide Emissions: -
34,897 cubic yards of concrete were produced between August 2015 and July 2016.
The emission estimates below were pulled from the 12-30-2014 Inventory Certification Form
�., �' x
Compliance History (last five years):
No NOVs. or NODS have been issued.
Conclusion:
Based on observations made during the September 1, 2016 inspection and records review, this facility appears to be operating in
compliance with all applicable Air Quality regulations and standards.
4
Compliance History (last five years):
No NOVs. or NODS have been issued.
Conclusion:
Based on observations made during the September 1, 2016 inspection and records review, this facility appears to be operating in
compliance with all applicable Air Quality regulations and standards.
4

Permit: NCG140081
SOC:
county: Rockingham
Region: Winston-Salem
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 07/01/16 Expiration: 06/30/17 Owner: Chandler Concrete/Piedmont Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Chandler Concrete Co -Reidsville Plt #104
7699 N NC 87
Contact Person: Kenneth E Waegerle Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/01/2016 Entry Time: 09:20AM
Primary Inspector: Ryan Swaim
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Reidsville NC 27320
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Exit Time: 12:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Ready Mix Concrete Stormwater/Wastewater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
N. Storm Water_
(See attachment summary)
Page.

Permit: NCG140081 Owner - Facility: Chandler Concrete/Piedmont Inc
Inspection Date: 09/01/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCG140081 Owner - Facility: Chandler ConcretelPiedmoni Inc
Inspection Date: 09/01/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
AnalYtical_ Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: Ensure all outfalls are sampled per NCG permitigggirements.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
Qualitative Monitorinq
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Yes No NA NE
®❑❑❑
❑❑®❑
Yes No NA NE
N ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: A Qualitative sample has been taken on 2-3-16 and 6-17-16 for outfalls 1 an2 but not 3. Please
be aware that all facility outfalls must be sampled.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a 'Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
M ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
®❑❑❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

f ;
Permit: NGG140061 Owner- Facility: Chandler Conctete/Piedmoni Inc
Inspection Date: 09/01/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Comment: The SPPP was in place and well organized overall with a few items that had to be located that
were external to the plan. A new wash pit system is currently being designed and will have
influence on outfalls 2 and 3. Please update the SPPP as necessary as the changes are
implemented. In addition, the site had been recently_ graded and product_placed on it. This area
byeasses outfall #3. Please direct all facility stormwater to an, identified outfall per the facilities
NCG 140081 permit.
Page: 4

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG140081 Effective: 08/01/17 Expiration: 06/30/22 owner: Chandler Concrete/Piedmont Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Chandler Concrete Co -Reidsville Plt #104
County: Rockingham 7699 N NC 87
Region: Winston-Salem
Reidsville NC 27320
Contact Person: Kenneth E Waegerie Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Relaied Pernits:
Inspection Date: 08/10/2017
Primary Inspector: Glen White
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
EntryTime: 10:o0AM Exit Time: 11:30AM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Ready Mix Concrete StormwaterNVastewater Discharge COC
Facility Status: e Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG140081 Owner - Facility: Chandler Concrete/Piedmont Inc
Inspection Date: 08/1012017 Inspection Typo, Compliance Evaluation . Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Annual SPPP review was conducted on July 22, 2017. The new permit came out on August 1, 2017. Mr. Waegerle is in the
process of updating the SPPP's for all Chandler facilities to show match requirements of the new permit.
Page: 2

J
Permit; NOG140081 Owner - Facility: Chandler Concrete/Piedmont Inc
Inspection Date: 08110/2017 .. Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible altematives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
■❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑
0❑❑❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑
M ❑ Cl ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ Cl ❑
Comment: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) updated annually. Last annual review 7/22/17. No
deficiencies noted.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: Facilitv had one discharge from the pond over night when facility was not open. Industrial
Yes No NA NE
❑❑■❑
❑❑■❑
Stormwater Permits only require monitoring during normal business hours. No qualifying
discharge during normal business hours. If a qualifying discharge occurs during normal hours of
operation, an analytical sample will be required.
Permit and Outfails Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall- status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non sormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3