NCG020766_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20120502

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/VC&OaDqIy
DOC TYPE
9/HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ �O
YYYYMMDD

Rijn
tt CDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mrs. Janet G. Whitehead
3421 Highway 210 West
Hampstead, NC 28443
Mrs. Whitehead,
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
May 2, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Shaw Highway Pit
NPDES General Permit NCG020766
Pender County
On March 3, 2012, Jean Conway and Joanne Steenhuis from the Division of
Water Quality Wilmington Regional Office conducted an inspection of the Shaw
Highway Pit located in Pender County. This inspection was conducted in response to a
DLR mining renewal request and to determine if the facility is operating in compliance
with the conditions specified in NPDES General Permit Number NCG020766. On March
27, 2012 DWQ staff conducted a follow up visit along with Crystal Amschler of the US
Army Corps of Engineers.
During the inspection, it was found that the wetland areas were not marked and
that the buffers were inadequate to protect the wetlands and stream. USACOE
representative, Ms. Amschler requested that a wetland delineation be performed in
order to identify the wetland areas and any possible impacts that may have occurred.
I have enclosed information regarding coverage and requirements of the permit
along with a copy of the NCG20000 General Permit to discharge stormwater, mine
dewatering and process wastewater.
• Please provide a wetland delineation to ensure wetlands do not exist within the
mine boundary. Be sure the boundaries are properly marked to ensure the
employees working at the site can maintain the adequate buffers to any adjacent
wetlands and/or streams (etc.).
• Develop and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) that
includes a site map sufficient to clearly depict: the site property boundary
indicating the position of all wetlands, ditches, borrow areas, stormwater controls
and the mine footprint. In addition, the following industrial activity areas must
127 Cardinal ©rive Extension. Wilntinmon. North Carolina 2840i-384i
Plione: 910-790-72 1511:ax:910-3J0-20041Customer Scrvice: [-877-023-0748
Inientet: www.nctva[er nalit .or
An Equal Opportunity 1 Alfnnative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Aw rally

Shaw Highway Pit
ns County
pa, Page 2 of 2
also be identified on the site map- fueling, engine maintenance and repair,
vessel maintenance and repair, washing, painting, sanding, blasting, welding,
and metal fabrication.
The General Stormwater & Wastewater Permit for Mining (NCG020000) requires a
Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Plan that includes: a thorough
inspection and maintenance plan; preventative maintenance and good
housekeeping measures, including spill control and cleanup measures; stormwater
management requirements; and the requirement that erosion and sedimentation
control (E&SC) measures in the mining permit or E&SC plan approved by the
Division of Land Resources be implemented. In addition, the NCG02 permit
requires qualitative and analytical monitoring of discharges.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me or
Joanne Steenhuis at 910-796-7215.
Sincerely,
1: �� cv�
Jean Conway
Surface Water Protection
Wilmington Regional Office
Enclosures: Inspection Reports (2)
Technical Bulletin
General Permit Text
CC' DWQ/ Raleigh Central files
WiRO NPDES General Permit Files (Pender County NCG020766)
WiRO DLR

Permit: NCG020766
SOC:
County: Pender
Region: Wilmington
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 04/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Janet Whitehead
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Shaw Highway Pit - Rocky Point
4324 Shaw Hwy
Contact Person: Janet Whitehead
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title:
Inspection Date: 03/05/2012 Entry Time: 10:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Jean Conway
Secondary Inspector(s):
Rocky Point NC 28457
Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Exit Time: 11:00 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ® Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page- 1

Permit: NCC3020766 Owner -Facility: Janet Whitehead
Inspection Date: 03/0512012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The buffer consists of woody vegetation mixed in with dirt pushed into a berm which appears to be encroaching into
wetland areas. A previous breach from this area has been documented and repaired but there is a high potential for
impacts to the wetlands from future mining activity in this area.
A follow up site visit is planned by DWQ and a USACOE representative.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
❑❑I]■
■nnn
0 0 M 0
D 00 0
Page: 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020766 Effective: 04/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Janet Whitehead
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Shaw Highway Pit - Rocky Point
County: Fender
4324 Shaw Hwy
Region: Wilmington
Rocky Point NC 28457
Contact Person: Janet Whitehead Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/2712012 EntryTime: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Jean Conway U Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Joanne H Steenhuis Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COG
Facility Status: n Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020766 Owner - Facility: Janet Whitehead
Inspection Date: 03/27/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
The wetland areas are not marked it appears there is not adequate buffer to protect the wetlands. USACOE
representative, Crystal Amschler requested a delineation of the wetlands be performed in order to identify wetlands and
any possible impacts.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG020766 Owner -Facility: Janet Whitehead
Inspection Date: 03/27/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
n
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
n
n
n
■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
n
n
n
■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
n
n
■
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
❑
n
■
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
n
n
n
■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
n
n
n
■
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
n
n
n
■
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
n
n
n
■
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
n
n
n
■
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
n
!�
n
■
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
n
n
n
■
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? n ❑ ❑ ■
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ n n n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? fl n ■ n
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? n n n ■
Comment:
Page:3

L '
jA7A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
C.Land Quality Section.
James D. Simons, PG, PE
Director and State Geologist
CERTIFIED MAIL.
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7008 1300 0000 1125 6613
Ms. Janet Whitehead
3421 Highway 210 West
Hampstead, North Carolina 28443
RE: Renewal Request for Shaw Pit
Permit No. 71-20
Pender County
Cape Fear River Basin
Dear Ms. Whitehead-
C_'� G"":-O
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
November 18, 2011 Dee Freeman, Secretary
L�0V •, 3 l�.l11
This is in response to your submittal of the renewal request dated November 8, 2011 for
the above referenced mine site. The renewal request was received in this office on November
9, 2011.
Pursuant to G.S. 74-52 (b), an uncorrected violation of the type listed in G.S. 74--51 (d)
provides the basis for the denial of the renewal of a mining permit. One of the -violations listed
in G.S. 74-51 (d) is (d)(7)(b) which states that the forfeiture of part or all of a bond or other
security is cause for denial of a permit renewal. On October 5, 2011, the Department collected
your $13,600.00 reclamation bond for the Whitehead Fish Farm Mine (expired mining permit
no. 71-17) through bond forfeiture proceedings. Due to this previous bond forfeiture (and the
fact that the Fish Farm Mine site has not been reclaimed), your request for renewal of mining
permit no. 71-20 is hereby denied.
Pursuant to G.S. 74-51 (g), the Department is required to notify you of any modifications
in the application that would make the application acceptable. In order to be able to renew any
mining permit you hold at this time, the bond forfeiture violation must be resolved. This would
entail the complete reclamation of the site for which the bond was forfeited (expired mining
permit no. 71-17). Please note, however, that you must initiate renewal of a mine permit
application before its expiration date. Thus, your bond forfeiture violation for the Whitehead
Fish Farm Mine would have to be resolved and your renewal application for the Shaw Pit
received (with the required processing fee) prior to February 13, 2012.
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1612 • Telephone [phone] FAX: [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27604 - Internet:http://www.dlr.enr.state.nc"us/pages/landqualitysection.html
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

CERTIFIED MAIL
Ms, Whitehead
Page Two
You may appeal this denial by filing an appeal as provided in G.S. 74-61. This petition
must conform to the requirements of G.S. 150 B-23 and be filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. A
copy of the petition must be served on the Department as follows:
Mary Penny Thompson
Registered Agent
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
In addition, please also be reminded that your $19,000.00 mine reclamation bond
(Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. 100063, previously Carolina First Bank's Irrevocable
Standby Letter of Credit No. 02-452) for the Shaw Pit is currently under a bond cancellation
notice. (Please refer to the letter you received from Ms. Ashley Rodgers of this office dated
October 14, 2011.) If the referenced bond is not reinstated or replaced by January 7, 2012,
mining permit no. 71-20 will be automatically revoked (G.S. 74-50(c)). Thus, all mining
activities must cease and the entire mine site must be completely reclaimed. Should any
further mining activities occur at the site after this date, such activities will be considered
mining without a permit and subject to further enforcement action, such as civil penalties and
injunctive relief.
Please contact Ms. Janet Boyer, State Mining Specialist, Land Quality Section, as soon
as possible regarding your intentions in this matter. She may be reached at [phone].
Sincerely,
. ff
f= James D. Simons, PG, PE
l>' Director
Division of Land Resources
JDSIar
Enclosure: Renewal application materials for mining permit no. 71-20 received by the Land
Quality Section on November 9, 2011
CC' Mr. Dan Sams, PE
Ms. Janet Boyer, PE

w�
C®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
May 2, 2012
Mrs. Janet G. Whitehead
3421 Highway 210 West
Hampstead, NC 28443
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Shaw Highway Pit
NPDES General Permit NCG020766
Pender County
Mrs. Whitehead,
On March 3, 2012, Jean Conway and Joanne Steenhuis from the Division of
Water Quality Wilmington Regional Office conducted an inspection of the Shaw
Highway Pit located in Pender County. This inspection was conducted in response to a
DLR mining renewal request and to determine if the facility is operating in compliance
with the conditions specified in NPDES General Permit Number NCG020766. On March
27, 2012 DWQ staff conducted a follow up visit along with Crystal Amschler of the US
Army Corps of Engineers.
During the inspection, it was found that the wetland areas were not marked and
that the buffers were inadequate to protect the wetlands and stream. USACOE
representative, Ms. Amschler requested that a wetland delineation be performed in
order to identify the wetland areas and any possible impacts that may have occurred.
I have enclosed information regarding coverage and requirements of the permit
along with a copy of the NCG20000 General Permit to discharge stormwater, mine
dewatering and process wastewater.
• Please provide a wetland delineation to ensure wetlands do not exist within the
mine boundary. Be sure the boundaries are properly marked to ensure the
employees working at the site can maintain the adequate buffers to any adjacent
wetlands and/or streams (etc.).
• Develop and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) that
includes a site map sufficient to clearly depict: the site property boundary
indicating the position of all wetlands, ditches, borrow areas, stormwater controls
and the mine footprint. In addition, the following industrial activity areas must
127 Cardinal Drive Extension. Wilmington. North Carolina 28403-3815
Phone: [phone] i1 Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-023-67.18
I Ittemet: 54`14'R'.nC1VatC i�i LI31 ]tV.OiT
An Equal Opportimity 1 Affinnative Action Employer
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Shaw Highway Fit
�K-6ns4ow-County
Page 2 of 2
also be identified on the site map: fueling, engine maintenance and repair,
vessel maintenance and repair, washing, painting, sanding, blasting, welding,
and metal fabrication.
The General Stormwater & Wastewater Permit for Mining (NCG020000) requires a
Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Plan that includes: a thorough
inspection and maintenance plan; preventative maintenance and good
housekeeping measures, including spill control and cleanup measures; stormwater
management requirements; and the requirement that erosion and sedimentation
control (E&SC) measures in the mining permit or E&SC plan approved by the
Division of Land Resources be implemented. In addition, the NCG02 permit
requires qualitative and analytical monitoring of discharges.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me or
Joanne Steenhuis at 910-796-7215.
Sincerely,
C �� '�;�
Jean Conway
Surface Water Protection
Wilmington Regional Office
Enclosures: Inspection Reports (2)
Technical Bulletin
General Permit Text
cc: DWQI Raleigh Central files
WiRO NPDES General Permit Files (Pender County NCG020766)
WiRO DLR

Permit: NCG020766
SOC:
County: Pender
Region: Wilmington
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 04/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Janet Whitehead
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Shaw Highway Pit - Rocky Point
4324 Shaw Hwy
Contact Person: Janet Whitehead
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title:
Inspection Date: 03105/2012 Entry Time: 10700 PM
Primary Inspector: Jean Conway
Secondary Inspector(s):
Rocky Point NC 28457
Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Exit Time: 11:00 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG020766 Owner -Facility: Janet Whitehead
Inspection Date: 03/05/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The buffer consists of woody vegetation mixed in with dirt pushed into a berm which appears to be encroaching into
wetland areas. A previous breach from this area has been documented and repaired but there is a nigh potential for
impacts to the wetlands from future mining activity in this area,
A follow up site visit is planned by DWQ and a LISACQE representative.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
n
❑
n ■
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
n
n n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
n
n
■ n
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
in
n
n ■
Comment:
Page: 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020766 Effective: 04/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Janet Whitehead
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Shaw Highway Pit - Rocky Point v
County: Pender 4324 Shaw Hwy
Region: Wilmington
Rocky Point NC 28457
Contact Person: Janet Whitehead Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/27/2012 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Jean Conway Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Joanne H Steenhuis Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COG
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 'I

Permit: NCG020766 Owner -Facility: Janet Whitehead
Inspection Date: 0312712012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
The wetland areas are not marked it appears there is not adequate buffer to protect the wetlands. USACOE
representative, Crystal Amschler requested a delineation of the wetlands be performed in order to identify wetlands and
any possible impacts.
Page: 2

0
Permit: NCG020766 Owner -Facility. Janet Whitehead
Inspection Date: 03/2712012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit:
Follow-up
Stormwater P011ution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
n
n
n
■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
n
n
n
■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
n
n
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good housekeeping Plan?
n
n
n
■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
n
n
n
■
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
n
n
n
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
n
❑
❑
■
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
f l
n
0
■
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ it ❑ ■
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
n
n
n
■
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
0
❑
Q
■
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
n
n
n
■
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
n
n
n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
fl
❑
■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
n
n
n
■
Comment:
Page: 3

Print this form to PDF Return PDF of this form to DLR CO by email. cc DLR FRO and DWQ SPU
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
for the
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
UN TU BE FILLED UU 1 by ULK:
Project Name: Shaw Pit DLR Permit#: 71-20 County: Pender Address:_ Mailing address:
3421 Hwy 210 W Hampstead, NC 28443
YES NO Date Commencinq
Is this mine a new mine? F_ r Permit issued 2/13/02
Have land disturbing activities
started? Date? rv- f 2/13/02
Latitude:34.5078 Longitude:-77,8083
Please return comments to (at DLR CO): Ashley Rodgers
Comments due by: 3/9112
SECTION BELOW TO BE FILLED OUT BY DWQ:
Is the RO concerned that the operation, as proposed, would violate standards of water quality? 'e !;
Comments: a\,QCk. S .'i:;i `{: 40 r�'d �e rJ i fi r, 0 '•.r�_ c fir )rc Gc;'J :fJr i?„J
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification:
DWQ Compliance Status of Mine: 11 F. 11Z'=' ' I "J firil�4
C ;
YES NO
NPDES permit required?
Fv ,
r
NPDES existing?
permit
p g .
/ o l
(Permit # /iA ��
r
If an NPDES permit is not required, .is DWQ
still concerned about wetland degradation
F-
by dewatering?
Should permittee contact DWQ RO
!r
immediately? (e.g. to schedule a site visit if
r I RO Contact Name:
/
mine has already begun digging or is
Contact Reason:
dewatering without DWQ permit)
401 Wetland Cert. required?
I-
401 Wetland Cert. existing?
F Permit #`�
Does .DWQ RO. currently have enough
/
information to determine if a 401
r/ f�
certification is 're uired?A
,
Rev September 2010

Print this form to PDF
Return PDF of this form to DLR CO by email. cc DLR RO and DWQ SPU
YES, NO
Are wetlands disturbed at this site?
I-
Does DWQ RO suspect or know of nearby
wetlands to the site? -
Is a wetland delineation required prior to
r By: r JD or r -Consultant :
`
F/
DWQ issuing the permit?
Onsite? . Or F_ Offsite .?
i ?1 k�t�
, q "S
Stream Determination Needed?
r
r
Stream Determination Completed?
r
r
Does DWQ RO need a statement that no
wetlands/streams are disturbed
r
I' '
for this project from applicant?
Buffer Determination Needed?
Fv
Buffer Determination Completed?
f /,
Recycle system permit existing?*
r - Permit #
��
New Recycle System permit required?*
r
V
Enough information to determine?
Non -discharge permit existing?*
r Permit #
,r
Will wastewaters discharge to HQW waters
F-
,7010
Unknown (permittee determine): r
with a 7Q10=0? **
Flow:
r Has Violation
Requirements
Does DWQO&M
require DLR to hold the permit
F ' HQW/7Q10 Concerns
r
(e.g, so DWQ can review it further or
r ' Other. Reason:
t,
because DWQ requires more information)?
RO contact:
r Hold Until:
Mine must wait to dewater until an O&M
r L) .� �� ., .:�
f
:, 4rr l „b
plan is approved?
!!
raj=C!' ..17.! i s F ilJ? 64d1 "11Grr ':C
:�
''n-Ff' TC .D inn V%�-rji
*The NPDES SW and WW permit NCG020000 covers closed -low recycle systems, designed to exclude, all stormwater run-off from
the system and overate at or below two -feet of freeboard. These systems may be permitted by a Non -discharge Recycle System
Permit from the Aquifer Protection Section (APS). OR may instead be permitted under NCG020000 to eliminate an additional permit
Recycle systems that do not meet those criteria are considered dischargina systems, and are subiect to the NCG020000 discharae
permit.
**To obtain 7Q10 flows, permittees must contact the DWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit, If DWQ does not have a flow estimate fora
specific stream, permittees will be asked to obtain one. Permittees should contact J. Curtis Weaver at the USGS: 919-571-4043, for
more information on obtaining a 7Q10 flow. USGS will not determine a 7Q10 flow for tidally influenced water bodies.
Reviewed by:
i
DWQ RO Surface Water: '\f Regional Office: / Date-
RO Aquifer Protection Section: Regional Office: Date:
SPU DWQ Central Office Reviewer (if applicable):
r
Rev September 2010

� r i4r "' 'rJ6d''a'4 -'0T . -'--r.M y-6!�,,r � .r f�%a].�j "� ^ � y � �k 'I
.'0. �' - LS+ti.�."4� E'L �. ii c6
,°'�rl3r,�wA'
... l ! .! f .awn a}+� ' �, •- ♦ L F' hh4J - t J- ^( i . , i `:, ' tJ .
dF
L'�^-}•� ._i .r - . w 4 �I� r' } �`�`.�'`' w � uw � � �:., � tj�+�. •'-', r �i �.� ��..� ter" �i� r'., �. � � •r �' ,.'�� , .'C-�-' . S r • I ,
z,l �.^I; Avon
� V
Ivy r j �.►.sr• te— ] .�,+ , A
`Y
� • Dr �! JI �� A �� v �.�• 1 ae a � 1 r !r'`� ep �,r�' - tiG :� t P� i'F E..,
f •z••' � 4�� '• "' a„o�'rT. r .f �ir f { y}y � } t } t +x. • _ "� � �a $Siy� r .rt '� r°'
� �� �� •�i h r � f +�� w� �'�' `kGS� � ` ^� ' �*" y �`' .}�•t" �-'�{, ?'�"`�'�.� ,*7 �� Y•i •'t�' a'fi �' ���, r iq.i
fA �� •
r r
b7 �hr r �+ „ bra s •1��t"St y • % � � • `. y �� - � .i. .. u r • it : `.} � ��'"y��' r.
v.P's• r•'4�]. '. q. . • Jr•En... tip-l• •' 'f• . 7 i'l�.s r` :"�+,.r !�✓
;;l �i-�.::itiX1- � a /��,+y►w. Q�t{✓ �"�'n;r � +,Y ^'Y.� ,�t_ 5�4k 'h•♦ ;1, e» t �-swf1� ' L a^'C�, � rva- �Mrk���• g' fi
yw � L4":;a eY`�* �•wC �. �.�_ r. y r `J teas a•.. `E �t �! stir ',tea >,. i�
i�4P�l
ph'Al
�'�' '.�y) 't��tf ��� • :.a y�+�m rk 1r _ � s1��a� ,. �� ��'....
7.'ti1``1 ::�1 ��, �, -,�^' -A:•'�y it `+ � y- f ��- `N� �� .Zf {lj Yr�}�'_m,rk' 5 f:
y r•�-�;' t> M #,
- sr il_
S,'hawF '��� r� a. '�Jf .-'� -�� r,� • I .."��r�~•, hi rf4,4k� �.
Al
COCEc.11� A
r 7.a4 �' . �I� 1 t r wY..+•wr r .w�-iw r,. i. i. y� .f y . aT lr� K� E t7 y 3�71
- *sT�. S. - � 1 �r i w _^ � C. r ��_i
-f-.. r ,�,j:-�rL` -_ ...:} ' �� _ -may, '✓ ,�� � ysi a; y �f � t • v •rf 1+•f• � a.. �•.� �
A.
��•� � � �' � - '�� ' +r - .R.t• - s f�f, ID`2012�Googte;" ,� l_ ��'i'' �j'- 4�. r4 �' ��:�F •,•.� ��Iaa • � (� .
Imagery Date�;,Or22{201Oi ;': , lat "34?507696' lon-77.8086fi4•: eleyL .l S, It Zs�44 ;ti * x :1 - Eye�alt, 3805 t'T }

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME Shaw Pit 2. MINING PERMIT # 71-20
3. OPERATOR Janet Whitehead
4. COUNTY Pender S. ADDRESS 3421 Hwy 210 West, Hampstead, NC 28443_
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 02.13.2012 7. RIVER BASIN _ Cape fear
8. Person(s) contacted at site Operator
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes ® No
It. Date last inspected: 10.20.1 1 12. Any mining since last inspection? ® Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ® No
If no, explain: Operating Condition (O.C. KC. —All mining activates shall be condaccted as indicated
on the mine map submitted to the Department on December 7, 2001. — The excavations for the mortar sand are
outside the permit boundaries. O.C. S. — All affected area boundaries shall be visibly and permanently marked
at the site on 100 foot intervals unless the line of sight allows for larger spacing The excavations have
been marked incorrectly and will need to correctly mark on site when the mine map is renewed.
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage: Unknown — it is unclear if excavations outside the permitted
area have affected wetlands due to lack of delineation in those areas.
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: During the renewal process, a mine map that
accurately reflects the site conditions for current and future excavations needs to be submitted and then
accurately marked on site. Additional information may be needed for renewal on the mining permit and will be
addressed in a letter sent from the RaleiLyh Central Office
17. Other recommendations and comments:
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ❑ Yes ® No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed
See above.
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ® Yes ❑ No Proposed date upon permit approval _
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 21. Copy of Report sent to operator 3.9.12
INSPECTED BY: Trentt James DATE 2.28.12
Telephone No: 910.796.7227
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

Shaw Highway Comments
Field Issues
A. A wetland delineation would be beneficial, particularly in the areas where they have excavated
outside the original permit boundaries. It appears very wet just beyond the permitted
boundaries in the areas where the buffer is supposed to be and adjacent to where the
excavation is outside the permit boundaries.
B. Proposed buffer distances appear fine but in the field, it appears wet immediately adjacent to
the permit boundaries where the buffer is supposed to be. Buffers will need to be shown in
areas excavated outside the permit boundaries. These also need to be accurately marked in the
field to ensure an adequate buffer to Lillington Creek and the associated wetlands.
F. There is a berm around the excavation outside the permit boundaries that will need to be
reflected on the plans and they have started building a berm around the permit boundaries. There
needs to be a detail of the berm.
G. There is no reclamation map. This needs to be included for both pit areas.
Other comments
1. The land entry agreement needs to filled out and signed. Do they have to renotify there
neighbors?
2. A larger scale maybe beneficial since the mineable are will change.

f�_,._�,-, ttomV; rr
Eile Iasks Quen
Permit. NCG010758 Version: status:.+ctiv
Event Type: ,0&aAlPumpinq Plan approved Event Date: 64fl 7nOl l)
a
Responsible Person: 11ndamillis Due Date:
Comment:
C:
R
3
H
rhis One site was Constructed without a wetland dehneuton. Impacts Pom mining are evident, but
are now aid impacts that could not be quanbfied since the wetland soils are mined out The discha{ge
'ram the pit wlh go directly Into a wetland Wit» stp,v, WGl`�G'• 1�" be4..�iw1QS
bey loud+ on 44-ic Si a e o-F to p+} ady� +
W &k—JA- a4 atrt&rs Av lr avG 64.,n placed 1v, 44C
w�� �ar•�t T>wG is allowing a d�sa�rwcty 444L# -
�if �v *4,A- v�G�i S Vrr- ri-
F:K l lose:.
!`Page:1,of3.t. Wcr�
7) Y Kw .4arc. G �. _ .`.` pNg 9,43 AM

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division -of Land -Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME Sha�W_Pit 2. MINING PERMIT # r-71-j-_
3. OPERATOR Janet Mitehead
4. COUNTY Pender 5. ADDRESS 3421 Hwy 210 West, Hampstead, NC 28443_
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 02.13.2012 7. RIVER BASIN Cape fear
S. Person(s) contacted at site Operator _
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures? ® Yes ❑ No
11. Date last inspected: 1.19.11 12. Any mining since last inspection? ® Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken:
17. Other recommendations and comments: A bond cancellation notice has been received by this
office and the bond needs to be reinstated or the site completely reclaimed by January 7, 2012. In order to
reclaim the site all slopes need to be praded at angle that can support vegetative cover and vegetative cover
established on areas disturbed by the mining activity. Also all stockpiles need to be leveled and smoothed.
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) E Not Reviewed
An Annual Reclamation Report has not been received by this office.
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes E No Proposed date 1.7.12
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 21. Copy of Report sent to operator
10.21.2011
INSPECTED BY: Trentt James DATE 10.20.2011
Telephone No: 910.796.7227
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

PLAN FOR SHAW HWY. PIT 471-17
CERT. OF COVERAGE NC6020766f
WHITEHEAD SAND
WE WILL PUMP INTO EXISTING POND ADJACENT TO WHERE WE ARE
DIGGING. THIS POND WILL HAVE BERMS AROUND IT. ALL WATER
PUMPED INTO THIS POND IS CLEAR. THERE ARE NO POLLUTANTS OF ANY
KIND, NO OIL OR ANYTHING STORED IN THE AREA.
THE WATER WILL STAY IN THIS POND UNTIL IT REACHES THE ELEVATION
TO RUN INTO SMALLER POND. MOST ALL SETTLEMENT WILL REMAIN IN
THE FIRST POND. A SPILLWAY WILL LEAD INTO THE SMALLER POND.
IF AND WHEN THE SMALLER POND FILLS UP IT WILL NATURALLY FLOW
THE CONTOURS OF THE GROUND MAKING IT'S WAY TO LILLINGTON
CREEK, FLOWING THRU OLD EXISTING DITCH OF 50 YEARS OR MORE.
I DON'T SEE WHERE ANY EROSION WOULD OCCUR, BUT IF IT HAPPENS
CORRECTIONS WILL BE DONE.
WILL ONLY PUMP WHEN WE NEED TO GET IN BOTTOM OF PIT. DEPENDING
ON WORK LOAD, WHICH HAS BEEN VERY SLOW FOR PAST YEAR.
HOPE THIS IS UNDERSTANDABLE. THANKS FOR ALL THE HELP,
T KING YO
NET WHITEHEAD
JUNE 1, 2010
RECEIVEDil
JUN 07 2010
BY:

tmtiD � -
wauaa
a1someerr� nw r.e
litf..M „Or1C,. ►..�/IC.�,.I�rl1lI�R41
4WAGi 105, 1 ,
wn.Ie Mao Y , I
riOpMm.11iM'�iD /
ramI
wr
ShA= IYi w
�, �f mko
• ir,,r aenl*+rou IIoe ►o ac w wo rnuloa F
,n �arios+aae 5640me � 1p PG. so +�rar�sr/a��IgCiSW L WMAt11t w.c�s wn4eea r
V; 0oam—dc12001,i M ��le Il aw�m
ILV wrWM IIIIRw tvRw
CxIfQ�fA liQ ftiVAA4m 0.cr
ICIl.l�YC11 M& za� Vr ln�w• . �.rJy Z
PROJCT MAP Or 1"WPOSM MIMING f TM" ��• �D�
um
�.
I Mao a I ao we GaD
,�*.... JAN ET .. H ITE H EAD o
Z%

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Mrs. Janet G. Whitehead
3421 Hwy, 210 W.
Hampstead, NC 28443
Dear Mrs. Whitehead:
DirectorLAPR
cEID Secretary
April 1, 2010 12 2010
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Shaw Hwy, Pit
COC NCCO20766
Pender County
,Na�
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on March 11, 2010, ►n m. un w�_W 0340��
we are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject�,,>�
state — NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North n_CV0
Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolinas
and the US Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently
amended). PL
)AL�e 4,C)
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to 1111�
the Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage. Q�
Please be aware that mine dewatering at your site has the potential to impact adjacent 4V\J
wetlands. The specific requirements for mine dewatering at facilities near wetlands can be found pl�.2e�tE
in Section C, Part 1 of your permit (Part III Page 5 of 9). You must have an approved
Operation and Monitoring flan before mine dewatering discharges occur at your facility.
Discharging mine dewatering wastewater without Plan approval will be subject to enforcement
action. An Operation and Monitoring Plan for your facility must be submitted to the Wilmington
Regional Office within 60 days of your receipt of this permit. Contact Linda Willis at the
Wilmington Regional Office at [phone] for more information about the approval
process.
Please note that mine dewatering wastewater includes wet pit overflows CLlused solely
b , direct rainfall and yroLindwater seepage for this type of mining operation. Any discharge of
this water (and any stormwater commingled with it) is subject to the effluent limitations in this
permit.
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.navaterquality,org
An Equal Opportunity 1 A.Nirmadve Action Employer
One
NorthCarolina
Natul�atlJ

Mrs. Janet G. Whitehead
Shaw Hwy. Pit—NCG020766
April 1, 2010
y
This general permit allows the discharge of stormwater and certain types of wastewater
from your facility. In your application, you specified that only thine dewatering water would be
discharged from this facility. If separate point -source discharges of stormwater occur (i.e.,
stormwatertn(Tcombined .with mine dewatcring water), you will be required to adhere to the
conditions in this.permit for stormwater discharges.
j
` This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be
required .by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local governmental permit that
may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Robert Patterson at
telephone number [phone].
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
KEN PICKLE
for Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Wilmington Regional Office, Linda Willis
Central Files
" Stortnwater Permitting Unit Files
1
\ 1

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020766
STORMWATER AND MINE DEWATERING DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Janet G. Whitehead
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and mine dewatering wastewater from a facility
located at
Shaw Hwy. Pit
4324 Shaw Huy.
Rocky Point
Pender County
to receiving waters designated as Lillington Creek, a class C; Sw water in the Cape Fear River
Basin, in -accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions
set forth in Parts I, II, Ill, IV, V, and V1 of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage. shall become effective April 1, 2010.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this I" day of April. 2010.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
KEN PICKLE
for Coleen H. Sullins., Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

NCG020766
Map Scale 1: 30, 000
Janet G. Whitehead
Shaw Hwy. Pit
Latitude: 340 30' 27" N
Longitude: 770 48' 35" W
County: Pender
Receiving Stream: Lillington Creek
Stream Class: C; Sw
Sub -basin: 03-06-23 (Cape Fear River Basin)
Facility Location

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division -of -Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME Shaw Pill 2. MINING PERMIT #
7 l� 0
3. OPERATOR Janet Whitehead
4. COUNTY Pender 5. ADDRESS 3421 Hwy 210 West Hampstead, NC 28443
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 02.13.2012 7. RIVER BASIN
Cape fear
8. Person(s) contacted at site _ Billy Whitehead
_
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No 10. Pictures?
❑ Yes ® No
11. Date last inspected: 2.9.109 12. Any mining since last inspection?
® Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit?
❑ Yes ® No
If no, explain: #11 An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a
form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved. An Annual
Reclamation Report has not been received for the years 2007, 2008, & 2009.
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage:
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: 1. Submit an Annual Reclamation Report for 2009 and
any years that have not been received by the Department.
17. Other recommendations and comments: Operator stated they did -not -receive the ARR, until
recently and will or have submitted the 209 ARR. The breach in the dike wall ahs been repaired.
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +1- map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) ® Not Reviewed
An Annual Reclamation Report has not been received by this office.
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes ® No Proposed date
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 21. Copy of Report sent to operator 3.29.10
INSPECTED BY: Trentt James DATE 3.26.10
Telephone No: 910.796.7227
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist

f 11
TO:3502004 P.1
'i
�i
II
1,
I:
�E�!• I II , fi ij '! i
}'.'
E 1 j
I
� ` � ''' � 1• �. � VI JSi� ji1[ � 1 l I ' I i e I' � !`tl` j} :1'
I ,l� �I,�k�. !• i i i � � � � � i I
I I

• �� �- j�'��-'r,1 t�,�acf���°i"i�'}� �° '4- ..<r rn �j a.�-.<.---- r .- r '. �s a � •- ,i s. i .
:u � 6>t� ���� �i �� �"r•� nip.. � k-�.r a'r^� i - •, _ .. , i,, .: .,
_TABLE OF. CONTENTS.
31
n.i 0 PROTECT NARRATIVE
` 1 1 Deiieloprh6nt History and Use.
3 . , .: i .....
J 12 Water Classifications, Zoning,•and Adjacent Uses..... .
.... ........
...
13 Proposed Development .....:.......:.:... ...............................
2.0 Conclusions .......:.:..:...::. , ' .
.4
1... - ...........4
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Vicinity Map
Figure 3 - 2006 Aerial Photograph
Figure 3A - Subdivision Layout and Previously Authorized Marina
i Figure 4 - AIWW Setback
Figure 5 - Spoil Location t.
Figure 6 - On -Site spoil location _
APPENDIX
-.t.�: t'l �si•
s�
Site Photographs ±°�; - • I
Sheet 1 of 3-Topview of Existing and Proposed -Layout �I its: SF
Sheet 2 of 3-Cross Sections ,?!�
Sheet 3 of 3-Breakwater V I IS O t4 OF
Form MP-1 CAMA Major Development Permit Application COA'S4;L ��� f�iAG ttn rat
Form MP-2 Excavation and Fill
Form MP-4 Structures +
Certified Mail Return Receipts From Adjacent Riparian Property Owners Notification'
Previous Permits "
Agent Authorization Form '
Deed
Particle Size Distribution Report ,
K
� Z a.�s��";'~t � � yi�....,E � YnS!' c?. ty !€.u..•� T, _ :,; -r -.`
i'�»� t•:_,» 7�_f..t3,' •;rs.�::...'`,�`e$ .: -� �. _t?, i. .��, -:: a^! t�"'.�-f�gr,. ^�..[ ii��t� u .k.�r""ca_ +t3 .s�';r5x_" ._.: �.:�...� _`4.r� mo?!ti. - .�R� . r ,�._ . .: . ...sr,.. - ._ . � _ _

'tart I ,ii I p'I'lIg i Ij� i I I tII lE i I Ir P.2
F_ EB-5- 10 201,E 01 45 ;FROM: 1 `f` I T0:'350z004
s j.�glF. ,I i + I• i 1 ,j,l�p �„ f a II��' i ' ,?! � , sf
' Ali �, 9►�L�d '! ' � rl ;� �� �� i'
I 1
r:
t ) /1! �4j •
(VIZ:AD Y f
'" C+�
�F
'
i •)
Q
4 W41} uQPQW PLO QMMM
wou 10 > AMM w4mm v.wl
ma m HO m
d E`i
11
I
f
N
;i.1
I
i
I i
N1iF11111'i tIIII
i€. t 11
/
Q I —atl� 'QM 1
I?loul V i IM!
1' iI ��I I� I: Ilk j
N 7 I
it It �PDJ'd!Z I' �lsl6
I N :
7.
,���
�1,4I�.1,11
II
;;I:li,i��il.l�'1 ,It1sl
'III illl' ;I.' I
'' �
i � b'✓�i$ .I.
I � �''�
�i'
`
'il'+„ti� � 1 4s11,.
'I' 1111 , ,
'I � I , ���� •I, I
�I
1
�0J,
aDoD JIZ am
1 i �•9 � � 1 iWBN �++�Q
u
u sdgWauAAo;o &quo 14
,I.
f
��
f, •sI
:
{ I
441 r
l
f
'I "�II'
I.li� 1' •
'li„r
1.
J
=�I 4 •1 i I
1
r
Mina nod 51PO
l owru
� + St Il „}11
li 11
�
WgRi
s �'i i F
C� '+. li [li
t • � '
�
�W ��n�ww�W P� �q''�,Ow
�
'
W�teui�%P�����t� W�1
�"�
rI
Owl
okpoomm
I
I
I I Il
1
q
l
; ,� • ; ,
I', , � %
ow a o.�ei
� ow ple
I ,
±� V �SM4"CWPOW PGOORlib m(7d)MWAffyW, JGW*wPUd' •NM!�.#W I
'i'O`N �4�mON
a013Z05£ 916 l XHAjjl-� ,
. o I e6� j 065 Sii Now OIRd�dw
'

32 SUP DOCKING FACUTY --
(BOATS C4 ELEVATED CRADLES)
A
\` x
\\
� -:.• -tea.., .r.� �_\\\\�\�\\\�`\\\� \ }
_ - _ -
_ ,
w
•� •s•' y \ �\ ��
-
• •�
.L- C_—__
PROJE
C
4Po
QEv
L
SCALE: As Shown. FIGURE 3A-SUBDIVISION LA
Source: Estuarine Resources
CAMA Major Development Permit
Application
Saponas Pointe Waterfront Facilities, Inc.
New Hanover County,
North Carolina

A
ii
A
MAR-08-2010 MON 08:59 AM NCDENRi
It
NCO02=0 ".0-11.
W. 910. 50 -.w
boas
5) rft WEIM Pwrnft Appliodgen MVIL" to will of the fallowing:
(D Now or Proposed Fa illy Dale operation IS to min
New Permit not awicw;ile — ATC request only. Il Permit Number
6)
Pfevlee the 4 digit SwWwa Industrial Classification Code (SIC Code) Mid c1fill ft Mill Industrial
Gi bWl Y at this fad] ItY 41
SIC 44
r7qt
7) MvtdoonaffatIl
Igggiriplion of the types of minerals tnlmW at th% fol
Al
is this mine an,irall mlTwzft6? 11
K
El Yes if yes. do youlp=es an I&wftg fj"w& fmm.DLR Md noiiilad than
have you cEl to Ow'DWO that the site hai been staiiiiev,1 i�ii
T
of _And
9) Cill this soutty. airewy have a valid Mining penWt Imm the Obdalon4 -our (t IL 7
Cl No If No. ll Irl Ow status ai the Mining Nrmft aprill
2"fas it y9s, pical provide" Mining Pall numbar. a I — JZJ (220 Owl 81s; 1pll!04; a
0g,
copy of your DLR Mining Permit vll M15 OWO ap�" 0
-Now. UWO g:ppQt bovo a Coo for Vw U66020+000 GwIll pwmk ungil a WnkV Permit is ftsued or
Imff eii. 1
P. U
4. 1
W
10) iNm this taclft have ally alhet NPDES pervildis?
I�u;No
11 Yes if yes. (a ei� permit numbers for 0 ou rrent H PDES pill for this fall
l4 i NOeowrrdt9 (e,rpermits)?
.11) go" this twciIityHave spyft"l 4, No It
current Non-Dischargo Owl fay this al
- 0 yes if yes, flat VVI PVMR ftumbm for d curre
i Ilk 111, read mix and aq2W AMU?
12) Udd� "I am Of thils 11111111 Ift IrWmd* V,
impal C3. No.) E) yes
4y' DW` 0 6torm"illil Poll all"i C, 11 Yes If Ves, do 0 the
. I
(prov-40 Poopit nutrtt>•r .....- -? I si ll' I '' I I !{. �' 4 :i '��
ivy the sij�e comil who is the If not owned,'owner?
is) W1111 this rrining apeMkill pnKeft developmtrit 011AN11183 at thIS Its?
I :,: iII
I No
0 Yes
14) Is tMa mine Wall within 011 Of the 20 C065W Counties and w1V it add MOM #an 1000
surface?
No
Page 3 of 0 Lost fi!�11111601113
SWU-N
Ag"
:W08j 9b:10 0T02-s-eaj

(PLAN i)
PEDESTRIAt!
WALKWAY
(PLAN 2)
n= ACCEss PIER ' �. '
l •' �_ •- ' • -
••
32 SUP DOCMNO FAcjUTY /r •�''
.� - -- - - -
(BOATS ON PI EVA'iEE3 mAaES)
BREAKWATER
\ DREDCED \ _
1
\
\ � i
CIPL
Ili; ,.: -.: :�-`�•-•� - \ \\
-
\\�\\�!.
;::'�;' '• `'''-'� "•' -_.---_---------------------
CUT CAV-M)
•-�- ` c.• �Y+x.l-Nr•-,S' _���� ` ------------------•.----------
PROJE
r _ 1
4CO
L
u.tV
SCALE: As Shown. FIGURE 3A-SUBDIVISION LA
Source: Estuarine Resources
CAMA Major Development Permit
Application
Saponas Pointe Waterfront Facilities, Inc.
New Hanover County,
North Carolina

. I
FEB-5-2010 01:46 FROM:
m
1' '� ''I
i '
;tj
L
Im OMWA01."m
TO:3502004 PA
coax="=
I
Mwwvmo am m(s 041A Awwv; &*ujfinjR1"p Wo pq OuW**owp f%*A!.
jo SX14A) is= 11
(000 10 VA*W) sww'uAm to,
&W MX,# *W A~ &ftp$W4MP JR131 MN OF M AnCiq
Cy
Tl
aw uJan Acmum M W�WUWW *mW'WlJW) 00 OMPAP P AWN
Alill II]�
j4�W, irk, low
�1111&RA if 914 Ail A a I
4A
7-
-am= 02AGnME H vu% aq MU
I lit" :1 1 41! 1,
vim Jim AID"" q SIP '"OJQU%q"4JF. �91 �. *1 sma;m 1,
Aq pM*Aft
-41 14 PW-V8 30 A -MA R-ft W PMFRP wOm ftU4ww 96 A"NOPOR memd ja 4
Um= 4u MUM 4 umsts Jew"
imp* a at sm Awmww ads
amm" OVIAPOWA to L
81V44
18111 'AN@ Famw aqv up mnplq am-waam wmp izp w" "A 0 sell 0
ION
114 L
46POV"4" 14ddfla A"
so m %qsm A" "M902 20 t9pumdm. %*W4 "w sm 4 W
1 1 MOMMAUUP QPP. PWORFWU IM no Aldo C4 pwlftw eq u rvqc wX a =A
Ll
1711111- 1114K 111M 71k RA "w4afew uv MIN Nnu nin _?wU

NOTE
DISTANCE ALONG HICHWATER UNIE BETWELN
PAINT A AND PO(NT B IS 720?,
FIXED ACCESS PIER
32 SUP DOMNG FACIUTY—
(130ATS CH ELEVATED CRADLES)
BREAKWATE7? --�
DREDGED I L)
>
PROInTy cr:
N
C-HAL CPLILC
aLA&L PLQ
.0-
%
-b N
L — k
to
fW A
L N
-A
-- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - --- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
410
OW
Orc
10
PROJE(
4CO 2(
-K
"am-
DXYA'X
SCALE: As Shown. FIGURE 3A-SUBDIVISION LAl
Source: Estuarine Resources ar
CAMA Major Development Permit
Application
Saponas Pointe Waterfront Facilities, Inc.
New Hanover County,
North Carolina

101. 46 i FROM.-
I I TQ : 3502004 P . 5
I � �FROM
I;
r11 0
jq Ir it
1 ! BOA Q �i11
e.,,
Z� d to OARAWF;% 6411 ==Q
1 I �
BM 4=Wftum iM Am A90ma AMM 44m
�1f i; • . I I � ; ; : ! !I 'ua�Ws�s ua�dde W � �c A ' � �A Ci �
6It J
ram 9% Aa u� R upw o t a punbei �a ncA � 4Z
!?i! I;Iliir 1 I I It I: li1lt, ; I ,, 1
1
111,`tHIF '� 1;�i
j° ilil� 4 ji s.
E: altrt�ssa�oolp +p�V "pWJ*4AMWWMp1V JO uOJn1 vjWdffM �I x
!
l I f D1 JO I
&WvWO 40 WWui sN WQ!"*sm mkqWfP mW" 'DIIIIA 11 SOLI
i ON ❑
vd ourka W Am uyl apas"pm @*@wu AD wpueom amp Imo wrio to nQA a Gaz
iw G:w o Jm![mo lusty mp 10 PUB a
I oaS 1-Gosaw W m Dumlmw Wmadm 0w Aft0*f,4 FNJ 1waLm u1mum In vivo
f (8) VA 4ORM sump w +tlR mwsu awift B *AMd Amm pus 9Mfsnid m pw
j I' ► l;'+�a aul i as sai sa a?u a�� JaVIIAWOWD i 1:� �wtf ms s1 VN' 1 Imp u>ld eal
,.mroywdv�ao+wd•qPry
II ��� �•j li ������R�.;.Il�w�a��e��u��u'
�' I l Ir I. �;�� � �! #�iI lEl I 'I� � r�:l l i ���� I ,' 115II, � 1 i ;! • I ,! l' I' � J ' { r
t{ I` � � t�i•�;��:� , ugeq s� >� sWd (1>i•01 � l� �l[�!:Id � 1�81dW
in
F ' I �'p„inn ��°ia!„►�P.L�Il�1 m wmrN► �� ��1 as � ul'�P w fuiwe� � � � �I!
f t 111 4024 04 OIsymmm`mm qp Na Lw GaLy3t"a
I` � i �; l I' I '' �� i•. 1 � !!. I ;� i ii 11 I
lO'�ui14iS'{1AMif Itiw:fiedriH � svuWiO+��� Ot[1t1tiYl� �oRp�dd �1 i��
Pn 'A. ' ' ! bnn? n4x mR '1111 Y94
1
.}o m.v wd nn : ►n Ww n t n?-Rn XUU

MOTE.
DISTANCE ALONG HiGHWATER LINE 9ETHELN
PCIHT A AND PUNT H IS 720'.
FIXED ACM--S PIER
32 SUP DOCKING FACIIRY—
(@OATS ON ElEvATM cRADLEi)
BREAKWATER
\ /
P Mrr on
TC
p' 4S LD
W 4K xr
'ten" "a• .t'"`' = \ k`
•� -•
•
-
��\\\\\�\a\� ���
- -
- , - •
tit
� •.ter . •y'• ti • rr '. \ .�
} . .
�
,�ti a �•�`•: �;'- v+c , \\ --_ ---------------------------
::+.`
fM
•}•
;�• '�• ,'► .t,;�r•-..----•.-------..--_._-------_—
CClf�y11�
Wool
,•f' -ti ox
"�
-
PROJE(
~_`
4^o 2(
r
i
It-IM,
ELLYAN
��}• C?-.
SCALE: As Shown. FIGURE 3A--SUBDIVISION LA1
Source: Estuarine Resources ar
CAMA Major Development Permit
Application 'ILEfilt
Saponas Pointe Waterfront Facilities, Inc.
New Hanover County,
North Carolina �1; E 1-9! C 51
s .. s ...-..M1. _ . x,... _s•.� ... .� 3.. ..Z '��. �ik.� sty'+, ,.�✓. . sx,.±i '^�..;Y' .. �.. ,.;..2. Z:Yc:. __i1

F TO :I 3502004 ' P . 6 i FF�-5-2010 k 101: 45 ,i! FROM I f,
� I � �k I i ;f
'a r 6 ilia A gad .
to (AWL i
(v
%1
' l wow3zq
W {4Wow��4 area yo emw..ra �1 D00t) m�tAW� �'1 � �Il� �14� $1 (a
I t �oe4
I
Ate p tm No). um mm) AMOUS6 lgmmv) o u+s a A!@m sm 14 {q
rem •!:
I'>I-@1Z '` Fla OVON V9& Rd VM1 MoOk & 04: W04 YOWWW,,aPM lw*ftR mavewl-;
' � W plp><uegd %q�s o��u D a'tDRAg4 s34 � � ii9'Z�
[wPOO-WON A ffin A4 WMW WJJ 9M PWPW In NO 0 Al A* o as vmtd mom
f 4?41 ro olDt pep d' Um to kauumb as ow jwMm ww'a=u KP GM 0000 Is" u
°e��i7 o `© fa�P�0 O0Pu0� In iwW &*fW0 t 2i sip -Q
il.�.'IIIiEEi Ilii11
I' ,. I i IiB�IIaaWsa�uedes
I{ MAUM! w ua+ivagdsh'' lap kftm Em ate, 8* ma arom in (Nowwo
s a » !' I` .t I #+�►�. eq0� a� ado 10 it `603riP �I P Y4 WM419
!`e� ':1e1... If•-�0• .+ III II y+f Its
13 -(-Jp %sane "ou* UWM *� O l� �I�Y
11�OyFi :' � ?� assvoid aql dgL1G� �blRust 1>E'84 02 RY4i� ssa d 30 "A �IA �Q�'►0�1 �00� 'e
k'� I'hl6 sal I E ` �:t } t, � i �� I •' I ;. I� :
' � �� III �' `'' �� ! iyt Ilt��t '�� 15 �I'' ,; I � '� 9 '� {I{ :'I+•A101we�TA, IAA �► ,fsr10! ,�, 6 e� "� �f
t !' ! i l 1 I ! 5o11' Q i
hl,���"�!�I��i���-
f { A�7W tin lf�i
If Moj irtOlvRNlii 1>d Ii1Q� gMOp�Mo 10 �J INlrl,,
kip ,
, It@" Amm; loud qwn imlli► ilaWu iiw► Mp ?GW
T I ;. an •� a.. i z} ngF,!n':R nH .x�.a . �rraa-NrM f W nn;Rn Olnz-Rn-HVw
if
i..!'II•
i'I*€t'I.

hp COIOY LaSerJet 5550 printers
j©b storage stat�us page 1
Error: Unable to store job at printer
Reason: Insufficient disk space for this job
Solution: Delete some files from the disk before resending this job.

1�1aw to mabariad stored:
where % Mnww Swat
How ffam ftp" 81IdPMwM per yM­-
NwM of MUMMd I &MMM va-Aw. --.;.
FAX Rol 91A501220
. ' � ] � ��it � �' tt�l'��I,I
ji
vandw
30) Are VW XVWIV tar 9 Mbdill PWM In the asp WM*M as d ViF Pwft4ftd fodne
31) OM low am Mvi piisdhra, lsndM Within tM wrad permit ftKM,dwi
UNSS if it 0 LClo 0 ot,III I�No I i. ' `p�� � �i �' �w
33) kywr
bag"
Ilia men tai it MwMwMn&
wpm fW11111M
� � IIl.� � � � jl , _ i � �'r . _I;.f �.I l1.�Ljl_�i ..�r..:i�.
yes
.ftili mmdrad bdi nndoA flea bow
j=wMHLLv"
spw
I -A
I
Caffoldo appDandon v4oDrft W&Ifftffft
Of 00 MMII� PYAMS to
and ND
✓ 00" of the vad qwMwd Mlfft PERM IMP) f1w Use WHY ar kdcO= of up apokaftri suta
,,--i am gsww W=dwn My end sh"s ft Mo** elm WO rMUCIM.
✓ ___ M of eammy MP or -
CM d USUS UPOOMPIIii MW &aft the MwfM SU find surip snag, or, ~M*
-2hD" Ob 11COMA11M in wagnAds. &rA cow OWL
2, wpm of largei tN Onas VAM an OuNik awobte,willwo and "duld*
early dew '
�ykcw at Yom DLA ffdnbV pwM cod
Ii mbw Sit* is in 6m iiIii fto 20 C*iM CAurdM
Sfony*MWL Perri R@jWnsi UP= Cw=t
I" Mwid a deli ON at "riban siafsoe areas and Qesaanita0e�.
4W dmWija WM. 1,
orl+"to doin**4
it b diiIiw� sad Roo. a 0 fii�v
Inch," ga haii;wri tM MWO"111AM a
slid
lot mud In*MEM* ZU M" 02 MUMS OMM A
fill,
2 topm Cd do FW We PWw
vat"Is "Wraft"M 1111111110111 NOV tum
pass), MW driii snm W"mnld so= MMMMMU of $ODOM W?WfwM*),q
buffers, and WON AIIi bw M111111118).
weo bile, ion (dm%f% dOOM Msiftw*
­."Wo
LWm MW 11WWO
l
TI
�. I N
t;,0020sr- 01
wodd qt? : To 0 w-s-e3j
I I

MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT LISTING
FIRE INSURANCE COVERAGE
DIVISION/PROGRAM: DATE:
COMPANY:
ACCOUNT:
CENTER:
MANUFACTURERIF EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
MODEL NO. & DESCRIPTION AS NO. LOCATION VALUE
Please Complete Form in Red Ink
PAGE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL

0- .—may -rs•r. --.. _. _ - - .... - �- -
m
CD

PAGE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL

I
3
L`
1; jT40h
tow-uu-2ulu MIN Lrj.*Ul An KUM M NU. VTU W ZUU4' to
N=2WW N-0-1-
H I to abide by me WpAeMw w WW ob" mW mmgnl= VO Vie puvktbm gmtobs co mMoi ad w
I CWLVMW I am fimiWWRh the lrftrmdun cufMthA Inft oppftdcn and twbthy. W6 otmYlm"I'm Eo
1"p,bized Nam of pmop 8%
;K 1, 1 A 11 J JAI 11111 1 llfl
TF .
fill',
li Ti
No*= of Mr�t/nmwot be by a C&DL* Ormumv wdw to
SM"rA;2W and GOMM ftrmitr Unit
omal" of wader duality
i IM 7 Mall gervics Center
Raleigh, North Clarclirtu 27690.1617
T" sUbnOOM Of Oft gULMMU ON M 9MFWftm the b*UWM- Of an WOES
p"I'laL
f A
M�m
h
Dwo
(IMO) 433-MM
g!
waby ,qw Off ici—cm
wftbVtm omim.- (MO) 78&7215
Wb*w,Saiem .......
CIMW Orr= .........
I
1700205E oi
I
11
L jil l It
A
4j
;,:Iwcldj 0T02's-''114
11 1k, Nh

`!i,"II "i '� I I I�{ ' III • II IIq }' j
.1;`I;,II}I FEB-5-201011' 01: 47 ! FROM: f
1
�v
I
I ' 1
mummw1wof"
w
�'
lit
II ''�I�;� 1,f t+.., . �.-j. � �'i� ��+'':i !I' � €� � `; fll • � � I
- I
f 1
I�g I � , { '�011RIiA/TgFfB I `� �k '} ;I •.t.�� i� � � I i � f
IA'TMM �11
I-
1
gar • I! I �' ! " , � � �
. �r � J�Y✓T�5 Ailfal "yi
i
I r C9
Ih
'R,
VI
V
I
1

FEB-5-2010 01:48 FROM:
. 11 p
TO:3502004 I P.11
W1
� ,14,E f4
� ���
�;
,1,1a �..
Y,
Iri,
It
jj,'WW1l WO OWAMIN Ill loci "-U, dO All TU Oki l QW0111,11Y
T1 I
AT v3d �Wsllmm amW 'uZil
hi
WITH .111, WMI01101", mud Lmwm mi L�lp
vgmommmmp -M -,OWN
A=77
.AW um
1419dbd 04 WOW = MR U=WWMSI ALW so 10 IV 9191L
AM 7
awbo 40 Emmmostmilu
ul 0,4 a =Woo wu wo )om SupAft aj*M'Nffvm PON 40il Va UP* A*Pt
.04190 poupws 1112wo ftmmft ow Wman $MCI IUBWWA=m a& mind
033 gig* ol povKtvm aq low 011 1110 Oppm mulp"Jo sm"m AW0301SYM
to Im on Am'jo vWj21W*j9 WIN" PURPIPWif *Mpm Wim Dow I ps in no" Avv
10 WW1 sift Im "m of powd ---
0.40 Will vvvvHlllllll"
M 41 We Amw 00 so upoid Wivil Ill sow P"Umo a WIM of
iT x al -1 1; , - � I i'' I
1111J -� I I I �. li�, �
_11mill W ."V;o
uana
W %qqWW ppom PON
7 70 7
m No Iwo 'Aammomm P= ..4
oug Ol
4" VION ONCM01 J6 KW
a" a* mouWnd ON
Poe
AM"
6"am *P! OW
Ix"m Nue"B"m
033NIGN210 Gl ARW Vn.
14
'II`

PAGE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL

! I.
y il, FEB-5-2010i;i61'.4 FROM:_ TO:3502004 P.12
II ,j
III
et
II !r14
, ! I Iif i1
{ MI L1 1
t 1p w
j'yl�it�i :,�;�� a' II I '�It� F 19IIr{.1 II III ;all,i E Ill I' �•IG' .I ' � � '�' � - III
C , I! •_I , ; E ,t ,4 , i :IV I I ' to
°
II l
1�loop
II
s� ir
1; ii, J j !
r� L.Ix ;_', III. "1, ,'^ I.r I i�!�- i,�,�J' •),� fiylF
p, •,� III � I
Is
�E, I�l� ` � !• I I�IJ � r �E II tl , ; 113'�„ ' � t ' �! � ,
If'I }_�,,�! I ' I• i • i }Il.. �,1. ' 'it � 7 i I I � #I� I '��E
l
� 1, I

PAGE TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL

i FEB-5-2010 01249 FROM
'Elf
if
t
,r4
ki
t.
I . 1 11, 1 ,
TO: 3502004 P.13

04' WETLANDS LINE
SURVEiED BY:
4LAN BELL SURVEYING, P,A_
604E CEDAR POINT BLVD. c
SWANSBOR0, N.C.
(2S2)-333-6101
� 1
P
--------------
I,
404 WETLANDS
L-
Tk � Faicsr
T
1�Y/--)
[kG NBA. Cl �

t A
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND mAtupAL Rk30 ukdEs
fi
DIVI$I0N OF LAND RESOURCE
LAND auALrry sECTION
9lpi
4
PERMIT
for +'4 operation of a mining ooWlly
In nee with the pridolons of G.S. 7440 Mmugh 08, -Me pAninning Of 1971.0 mlnlq
taemalr Rule A WAc 5, pow a 11clAft laws and moul
pp
ftrklulm is hereby granted to -
and
iij
j Janet G. Whftt*od,; ,� � � �� it ,; �a�� t i (I:I
q
Shaw Pit, 19
Pendw Cou* - Permit No. 71-20 f ;' i� II !;' + .';t' ',, !
for the operation of a
Sand Mine
Wfl"'Shall PMWS ffW Vjj UWjUjnM. PMUeNty and $MIC VI Of all lands Brad waters
affe—d Y minlnp Ccparogora;Mrl reoeivo the grestasi prrtctical degree tat protedlon artid
II TII
. I i i I 1f ! I I i t� . F , i ji! I'
+
MI 1 1 1 i �, , I I I {i �i � E Ili. � � 3i%;'��i ,' , i ���:, r�
EXPIRATION
flit ij
00020SE: 01 :W08A 80: TO, OT02-S-83

L404 WETLANDS LINE
SYRVEYED BY.
co
ALAN BELL SURVEYING, P.A.
604E CEDAR PUNT ELVES. -- o
SWANS60RO, N.C. \
(2;12)-393-61 Oi c y
0
` I U
e 71
T c
�II
mp
O
� I ¢
c
a
I i
404 WETLANDS ,
)b�
AB
y - x
HG Nam- Y ``� r%m lml
1

Al
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Land Resources
James D. Simons, PG, PE 1_and Quality Section'
Director and State Geologist
" -
March 8, 2010 (Resent)
February 12, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL 7008 1140 0000 4156 5532
_RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Janet G Whitehead
3421 Hwy 210 West
Hampstead, NC 28443
Dear Ibis. Whitehead:
Resources
Re: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
C Sliaw Pith
Permit No. 71-20
Pender County
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
On February 9, 2010, an inspection of the subject nine was performed by personnel of this office (copy of
inspection report enclosed.) As you will note, deficiencies were observed that require your prompt attention.
The deficiencies discovered and the necessary corrective actions are as follows:
Operatinp, Conditions:
Operating Condition #10.A. - No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of
the mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit area unless authorization to
conduct said disposal has been obtained from both the Division of Waste Management and Land Quality.
Off -site disposal is being stored on site.
Operating Condition #11 - An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a form supplied by the
Department by February 1 of each year until reclamation is completed and approved.
An Annual Reclamation Report has not been received for the years 2007, 2008, & 2009.
Operating Condition #4.A - Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversion, earthen dikes,
silt check dams, silt retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in the initial stages of any land
disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake,
wetland or natural water course in proximity to the affected land.
A breach has been made in the north boundary of the earthen dike that is allowing water from the pit to
flow into the adjacent wetland.
127 North Cardinal Drive, Wilmington, N.C. 28405-3845 A Telephone [phone] a Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Ms. Janet Whitehead ,
February 12, 2010
Page 2
In order to bring this site into compliance, the following corrective actions must be taken:
1. Obtain authorization from Waste Management for an LCID or appropriate permit and submit
modification to Land Quality.
2. Submit an Annual Reclamation Report for 2009 and any years that have not been received by the
Department.
3. Repair the breach in the earthen dike to prevent water from being discharged to adjacent wetland area.
If the previously described deficiencies are not corrected within 30 days following your receipt of this Notice, this matter
will be referred to the Director of the Division of Land Resources in an effort to secure compliance at the site.
Please do not hesitate to contact Trentt James or me at [phone] regarding any questions you may have about this
matter.
Sincerely,
Dan Sams, P. ., M.E.
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
DES/KRR/asb
cc: Judy Wehner; Assistant State Mining Specialist
Enclosure: Mine Inspection Report

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
I. MINE NAME Shaw Pit 2. MINING PERMIT # 71-20
3. OPERATOR Janet Whitehead
4. COUNTY Pender 5. ADDRESS 3421 Hwy 210 West Hampstead, NC 28443
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 02.13,2012 7. RIVER BASIN Cape fear
8. Person(s) contacted at site None
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ❑ Yes ® No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Date last inspected: 7.7.09 12. Any mining since last inspection? ® Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ®No
If no, explain: _ #10 — A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of
the mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the minim pennit area unless authorization
to conduct said disposal has been obtained from both the Division of Waste Management and Land Quality.
Off -site disposal is being stored on site. #11 An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted on a_form
supplied by the Department by February I of each , year until reclamation is completed and approved. An
Annual_ Reclamation Report has not been received for the years 2007, 2008, & 2009. #4.A -- Adequate
mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversion, earthen dikes, silt check dams, silt retarding
structures rip rap its or ditches shall be rovided in the intia] sta es ofan land disturbance and maintained
to prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into anv lake, wetland or natural water
course in proximity to the affected land. A breach has been made in the north boundary of the earthen
dike that is allowing water from the pit to flow into the adjacent wetland.
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage: Water leaving the site at the time of the inspection did not apnear to be
turbid, however, there was not active mining at the. time of the inspection. if digging was to continue the
breach would allow turbid water to leave the site into the adjacent wetland.
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: 1. Obtain authorization from Waste Management for an
LCIDor appropriate permit and submit modification to Land Quality. 2. Submit an Annual Reclamation
Report for 2009 and any years that have not been received by the Department. 3. Repair the breach__ in the
earthen dike to prevent water from being discharged to adjacent wetland area.
17. Other recommendations and comments:
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ❑ Yes El No (Explain) : ® Not Reviewed.
__ . An Annual_ Reclamation Report has not been received by this office.
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes ® No Proposed_ date 3.13.10 -
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 21. Copy of Report sent to operator 2.12.10-
INSPECTED BY: Trentt James DATE 2.9.10
Telephone No: 910.796.7227
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist
4e

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division -of -Land Resources, Land Quality Section
MINE INSPECTION REPORT
(PERMITTED MINE)
1. MINE NAME rShaw_Pit• 2. MINING PERMIT # 71-20
3. OPERATOR `"Janet Whitehead L -_ '
4. COUNTY gender 5. ADDRESS 3421 Hwy 210 West Hampstead, NC 28443
6. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE 02.13.2012 7. RIVER BASIN Cape fear
8. Person(s) contacted at site None
9. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ❑ Yes ® No 10. Pictures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Date last inspected: 7.7.09 12. Any mining since last inspection? ® Yes ❑ No
13. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ® No
If no, explain: # 10 — A. No on -site disposal of refuse or other solid waste that is generated outside of
the mining permit area shall be allowed within the boundaries of the mining permit area unless authorization
to conduct said disposal has been obtained from both the Division of Waste Management and Land Quality_
Off -site disposal is being stored on site. #11 An Annual Reclamation Report shall be submitted o_na form
supplied by the Department by February I of each year until reclamation is completed and approved. An
Annual Reclamation Report has not been received for the years 2007 2008 & 2009. #4.A — Adequate
mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversion, earthen dikes. silt check dams, silt retarding
structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall be provided in the intial stages of any land disturbance and maintained
to prevent sediment from discharging onto adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland or natural water
course in proximity to the affected land. A breach has been made in the north boundary of the earthen
dike that is allowing water from the pit to flow into the adjacent wetland.
14. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, explain:
15. Did any of the above deficiencies result in offsite damage? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the
type and severity of the damage: Water leaving the site at the time of the inspection did not appear to be
turbid: however, there was not active mining at the time of the inspection. If digging was to continue the
breach would allow turbid water to leave the site into the adjacent wetland.
16. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: _ _1. Obtain authorization from Waste Management for an
LCID or appropriate permit and submit modification to Land Quality. 2. Submit an Annual Reclamation
Report for 2009 and any years that have not been received by the Department. 3. Repair the breach in the
earthen dike to prevent water from being discharged to adjacent wetland area.
17. Other recommendations and comments:
18. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ❑ Yes ❑ No (Explain) ® Not Reviewed
An Annual Reclamation Report has not been received by this office.
19. Follow-up inspection needed? ❑ Yes ® No Proposed date 3.13.10
20. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report' 21. Copy of Report sent to operator 2.12.10
INSPECTED BY: Trentt James DATE 2.9. t 0
Telephone No: 910.796.7227
Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist