HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG020523_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20150615STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
� /V C&oa
i
i
DOC TYPE
��HISTORICAL FILE
7 MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ � ��I SUIT
YYYYMMDD
MCENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
June 15, 2015
Mr. J.M. Glover
P.O. Box 40
Pleasant Hill, NC 27866
Subject: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Venters Pit -Catherine Lake
NPDES General Permit No. NCG020523
Dear Mr. Glover:
On June 11, 2015 1 conducted a site inspection for the tract/project known as Venters Pit
located on Highway 111, Onslow, North Carolina. The site visit and file review revealed that the
subject project is covered by NPDES Stormwater General Permit — NCG020523.
Accordingly, the following observations were noted during the inspection (please see the
attached addendum for information about your permit):
1. A Draft SWPPP was submitted for this project. Part III A.
2. The Draft SWPPP does not include a location map. Part III A. 1. a.
3. The Draft SWPPP does not include a site plan with the location of the outfalls and wetlands.
Part III A. 1. e.
4. The Draft SWPPP refers to three (3) outfalls. There appears to be nine (9) outfalls on the
site. Part III A. 1. e.
5. The Draft SWPPP does not include the drainage areas for the outfalls. Part III A. 1. c.
6. The Draft SWPPP does not include the phone numbers for the primary or secondary. contact.
Part III A. 7.
7. The SWPPP needs to show the location of any proposed fuel storage and what measures will
be installed to prevent and contain any leaks or state that the SWPPP will be updated with
this information before mining resumes on the site. Part III A. 1. c.
8. The Erosion and sediment control measures required on the mine permit inspection letter
have not been completed. Part III A.2.
9. Qualitative Monitoring has not been conducted. Part .II1 D.
10. Analytical Monitoring has not been conducted. Part III B.
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Energy Section • Geological Survey Section - Land Quality Section
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405.910-796-7215 / PAX: 910-350-2004
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 • Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/webAr/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during this inspection. Please be advised that
violations of the NPDES Stormwater General Permit may be subject to a civil penalty
assessment of up to $25,OOOA0 per day for each violation. If you have any questions,
comments, or need assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please do not
hesitate to contact me at (910) 796-7372.
Sincerely,
Karl Hammers
Environmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
Addendum
cc: WiRO — Land Quality
Hammers, Karl
From:
Lovett, Richard <Richard_Lovett@golder.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, June 09, 2015 8:45 AM
To:
Hammers, Karl
Cc:
Armon Pfeifer
Subject:
RE: Figure 2 - Venters
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Completed
Karl,
Since I will be traveling from Greensboro, I can meet you at the site around 10:30-11am. I will be leaving around
7:00am. I have copied Armon Pfeifer (,Glover Construction) on this e-mail so he is aware of the timing of the site visit and
so he can make sure the gate is open for our access to the site. Should you arrive early or get delayed my cell phone is
(336)707-7865. 1 look forward to meeting you on Thursday.
Rich Lovett
From: Hammers, Karl[maiIto: karl.ham mersCa)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 12:50 PM
To: Lovett, Richard
Subject: RE: Figure 2 - Venters
Can we arrange to meet on Thursday? Can you bring the map of the site that shows the location of the outfalls? I just
want to verify that this plan is complete and matches the condition of the site. Thanks.
Karl Hammers
Environmental Specialist
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
910-796-7372-direct
910-350-2004-fax
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.
From: Lovett, Richard [mailto:Richard Lovett@golder.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:12 AM
To: Hammers, Karl
Subject: RE: Figure 2 - Venters
Mr. Hammers,
Attached please find the draft SWPPP that we prepared for the Venters Site. There are a few highlighted topics (mainly
contact information) that were pending when the draft was submitted to the client for review. We have since obtained
that information and can provide it to you is it is germane to your review. The info will be included in the final SWPPP.
have not finalized the SWPPP because we want to incorporate any of your comments and recommendations where
appropriate. I am available Wed and Thursday of next week to meet at the site if you still require it.
Thank you,
Richard P. Lovett
From: Lovett, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:28 AM
To: 'karl.hammers@ncdenr.gov'
Subject: Figure 2 - Venters
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Permit: NCG020523 Owner - Facility: Venters Pit
Inspection bate: 06111/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a Generai Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ® ❑ ❑
❑ go El ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ®❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
IN ❑ ❑ ❑
F2 ❑ ❑ ❑
® ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ®❑ ❑
ON ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: A Draft SWPPP was submitted for this project.
The Draft SWPPP does not include a location map.
The Draft SWPPP does not include a site plan with the location of the outfalls.
The Draft SWPPP refers to three (3) outfalls. There appears to be nine (9) outfalls on the site.
The Draft SWPPP does not include the drainage areas for the outfalls.
The Draft SWPPP does not include the phone numbers for the primary or secondary contact.
The SWPPP needs to show the location of any „proposed fuel storage and what measures will
be installed to prevent and contain any leaks or state that the SWPPP will be updated with this
information _before mining resumes on the site.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: Qualitative Monitoring has not been conducted.
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: Analytical Monitoring has not been conducted.
Permit and outfalls
# is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ® ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ® ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ® ❑
Page: 3
Permit: NCG020523 Owner -Facility: Venters Pit
inspection Date: 06111/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
Ii 0
Page: 4
i
i ••
1
�4
i
qk
�ageq Date 12l3112011 1993
WE
.is
lat 34 813006 - ion-77.537907" elev 60 ft
Ste -earth
Eye alt 5277 ft 0
I
Aia
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Chuck Wakild, P.E.
Governor Director
April 30, 2012
Mr. J.M. Glover
P.O. Box 40
Pleasant Hill, NC 27866
Subject: NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Venters Pit —Catherine Lake
NPDES General Permit No. NCG020523
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Glover
Dee Freeman
Secretary
I conducted an inspection of the Venters Mine Pit — Catherine Lake Facility on April 12, 2012. 1 met with your
representative, Mr. Reuben Williams. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in
compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in NPDES General Permit No. NCG020523. The findings
and comments noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of Compliance Inspection Report.
Please provide a written response specifying the date upon which you intend to have a written stormwater
pollution prevention plan completed. The requirement for the stormwater pollution prevention plan was
implemented in the last permit renewal for the general mining permit NCG020000 in January 2010. Also, please
ensure that the qualitative and quantitative monitoring is implemented in accordance with permit
requirements.
If you have any questions concerning this report, you may contact me at the letterhead contact information or
via email at linda.willis@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
Cc: Wilmington Regional Office File — Permit Type by County
Central Files, Surface Water Protection Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: 910-796-7215 / FAX: 910-350-2004
Internet: www.ncwater ualit .or
Linda Willis
Environmental Engineer I
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
Nor thCarolina
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
0
P4,J-z - 9fS t rS
51 --,s -5
1
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020523 Effective: 01/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Venters Pit
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Venters Pit - Catherine Lake
County: Onslow Hwy 301 N
Region: Wilmington Off Sr 1227
Pleasant Hill NC 27866
Contact Person: Ed Martin Title: Phone: 252-536-2660
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 04112/2012 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis (`�y��p (, iJ�h�. 2-1�p�Z Phone: 910-796-7396
Secondary Inspector(s): v
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1
Permit: NCG020523 Owner • Facility. Venters Pit
Inspection Date: 04/1212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
This mine pit, from a stormwater and wastewater discharge standpoint, is the best designed pit for the management of
discharge quality that I have seen in this region. A lot of thought went into managing stormwater and wastewater.
Wastewater and much of the stormwater from this pit is directed to either large stormwater sediment traps that provide
vegetated filtration and significant storage prior to rising to any level that would discharge from the riser barrel ultimately to
a large surface area of rip rap that helps to dissipate the discharge energy and velocity. All but one stormwater trap
discharges to a broad wetland area for the use of infiltration, which could feasibly eliminate the need for stormwater
sampling. The only discharge point that is conveyed to a ditch is at the north edge of the mine pit along the access road.
It is not certain at this time that a discharge from this point actually makes it to surface waters. The discharge may just
recharge an adjacent and very dry wetland. The mine pit has a natural grade toward the north north-east corner of the pit
where pit dewatering from the active areas are being channelized by an internal ditch that receives water from small ditch
rows internal to the pit. The conveyance ditch is located along the perimeter of the pit, outside the 50' undisturbed buffer
and meanders adjacent to the wetlands. The mine pit is fairly shallow to avoid the layer of gumbo clay beneath the
coarse sand. No pumping is used at this pit. All flow is accomplished via gravity flow with velocities slow enough to avoid
scouring. The conveyance ditch discharges to a network of large ponds providing more than adequate settling capacity.
An excellent design from a water quality management standpoint. The 50' undisturbed buffer is marked by a silt fence all
around the mine pit. The pit is actively discharging wastewater. The wastewater must be monitored quarterly. This is the
only deficiency that could be addressed by compliance actions, however, given the efforts taken to provide such an
outstanding design and implementation of well maintained BMPs, the inspector would like to allow the permittee time to
comply without the need for issuing a Notice of Deficiency.
Page: 2
Permit: NCG020523 Owner -Facility: Venters Pit
Inspection Bate: 04/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? -
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a t3MP summary?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
■
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
■
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
■
❑
❑
Comment. A requirement to develop a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWP3)
was implemented in the last permit renewal for NCG020000 in January 2010. The
SWP3 was due for all permittees operating under the NCG020000 permit on January 1,
2011. Please provide a written SWP3 for this site. The requirements of the SWP3 are
described in the NCG020000 permit text.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Comment. Begin semi annual qualitative monitoring for all stormwater outfalls from
this facility. Qualitative monitoring is required for every stormwater outfall regardless of
representative outfall status.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 3
Permit: NGG020523 Owner - Facility: Venters Pit
Inspection Date: 04/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: Begin semi annual analytical monitoring for the stormwater outfalls from
the pit. Also begin quarterly monitoring for the discharge as the result of dewatering
activities in the pit. One outfall for wastewater was identified and is located at the outlet
to the last settling pond at the north northeast corner of the mine site. The inspector
suggested the use of representative outfalls to reduce the number of samples that will
need to be collected. The mine site operator will evaluate whether discharges are
occuring from the stormwater settling basin at the north side of the pit. It was
recommended that this outfall be utilized as the representative outfall for sampling
purposes. If it does not discharge, please contact this office to discuss a better location
for representative outfall status.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑
Cl
❑ ■
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
Q
❑ Q
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
Q
■
❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
0
❑
n ■
Comment: There is no office at the mine site for the retention of paperwork. Please
ensure a copy of the Certificate of Coverage is accessible. The mine pit does not have
representative outfall status, however, the Wilmington Regional Office recommends the
use of representative outfall status should the permittee wish to request such. Since
there was not a SWP3 prepared, the permittee would not have known that an evaluation
of illicit non stormwater discharges is a requirement of the permit.
Page: 4
April 17, 2012
Ms. Ashley Rodgers
Assistant State Mining Specialist
Land Quality Section
Division of Land Resources
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
Re: Venters Pit
Permit No. 67-57
Onslow County
White Oak River Basin
Dear Ms. Rodgers,
RECEIVED
APR 18 2012
LAND QUALITY SECTION
Please find enclosed the additional information requested to process our modification and
renewal application for the above permitted mine. The responses will correspond with the items
in your letter:
1. We have enclosed a check for the $250 requested.
2. The initial 25 foot buffer along the property line contained existing logging paths which
had ruts that were allowing surface water to leave the site. To prevent this runoff from
leaving the site our operators graded the haul roads to drain into the existing mined areas.
In doing this they disturbed the buffer zone but prevented soiled water from draining unto
the adjacent property. Therefore, we request a modification to operating conditions #9
and 3C.
3. We have not mined the pit in phases as shown on the original mine application. We
discovered upon investigation of the pit that soil types varied on the property. Depending
on the type of material required for a project is where the mining operation took place.
For example, Area D on the original map, Area E on the original map, and the new Area
E on the revised maps all contained clay material that could be used in landfill
construction, while Areas A, B, and C contain just general fill material. So it depends on
the material needs of a project as to which area of the pit will be utilized. As for
dewatering, the original plan was to pump water while mining an area into a basin and let
it flow into the wetland. Upon investigation we found that the site would drain naturally
if a ditch was dug as shown on the map. We have not had to operate any pumps. Map
will be revised to show the different stages of mining activity. As you can see Areas B
and C still have large sections that have not been mined at this time.
4. All the details have been combined on to one sheet. See the enclosed Detail sheet.
5. Ms. Willis made a site visit on April 12, 2012. She had no comments concerning the
operation and maintenance of the pit except that we need to set up a program to sample
the discharge water leaving the site. Once we get her information we will begin those
requirements.
6. Mr. Floyd Williams performed the calculations and sized all the erosion control measures
that we installed. lie did not provide clear dimensions as to size. We will attempt to
show these items, however because of the scale they may not show up very clearly.
7. The permitted acreage on the original mining permit was just wrong. We do not own 273
acres in Onslow County. The original permit requested 90 acres out of the 175 acres
listed on the deed to be mined. The reason we only requested that amount was because
the wetlands had not been clearly delineated and everyone thought 90 acres would be a
safe number. Since then the maps have gotten more accurate and that is why the acreage
has changed. The 3 acres for the access road from Highway 111 to the pit has been
included and thus the 178 permitted acres.
8. We have not been able to accurately import the delineated wetland map into our
computer system and print out a map that shows the wetland limits compared to our
existing maps. We have enclosed the latest Google map which the ACOE accepted
showing the wetlands. This picture clearly shows some locations where the buffer would
be greater than 25 feet as depicted on our mine map. To date we have not been able to
import this information into our plans.
9. The part of the pit which will be left as a lake will depend on how much material can be
used on any one particular project. Once all the suitable material is mined out of an area
and we can maintain a minimum 4 feet of water, that area will be left as a pond. If that is
not possible than we will grade the area to drain and reclaim that area. To date the only
area completely mined is area E which is graded to drain and a portion of area B which
has a small pond section and an area which has been graded to drain. The other areas
have not been depleted of material and thus we cannot say which will be left as a pond or
which will be graded to drain and reseeded. Please see sheet 2 of 3 for our proposed
reclamation plan.
If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to call. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Estimator
MINING PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW FORM
for the
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GlGve�- "C-'-kV1C0S;.1.nC_
Project/ Number:ye:y-"kYS�'+-iv County: On5k-)-W
Please return comments back to: 1116
Comments due by: 4�17YZO
Will the operation, as proposed, violate standards of water quality?
Comments:
Watershed/Stream Name & Classification: `}:\ t L \= tc, � 'mac=.� cx,,
YES NO
NPDES permit required
NPDES permit existing V (Permit
Nondischarge permit required
Nondischarge permit existing (Permit # )
Wetlands disturbed
401 Wetland Cert. required
401 Wetland Cert. existing (Permit # }
Reviewed by: 1 % s f!:«? f.,�' Date:
Print Name:
09/2005 Central Office Reviewer:
007 131Z r 1938 case '
i r r
Fmnc trn 1 .5
i307
{Irrdl�fown , 1003
\ 8rod6 y6 102?;J-
ra $311 : .r .,
_ .a ^ f311 Mo;n
Lit 14` t s y lass B 1as I Y r �L..
!Z y �0�3 .y* t 2009 ^ 130 13 t4
^ CD t j
POP.1,2$9 r 'n S
t301 , -� - 1
131e 2214 204 ry
,F •� r tt 1513t t1344� -I 2715, 3013
1301 x 2zie
iae /, Ervinlrnm �'F A205x
MOyY318 - 2213 Y
1 0 a
!� 7022
731318 ,• ,l
�I �4 Sz
3 • 2 r304 1]ls 1z36 ^ `!. r�.�.. �•�• ' 1317� -73
Q• t 7229 ,cR
723
5293 723s f237 4' � 1225 tit � r t221~ .t � / -? � ^<W� r A • 2157• ~' / r `5_I ,
zza Izza / ' ``
14 R 2t" 21S 1 21 r 1224! $223 ,1 .J --2159 r Tar f,nndin4 ~' �r
24 2341? 160 !r�! C,� �►
tire9� o a3• 1�25 2t67 � 2155'
Y232 / 3 1219 Croy d. r f227 2--$� 4
e? ' 122g tr p 21s7 = / ias
e Cote ne /D
1225 a r22
WS 161 �15x ,/ ! 1243
1230 1225 I / F
/ • ,b 1225.-
122E yZ /
-^� 126E J .. n Swrtltw
^ \ • Vack Snomp,\-
1230 t fp r 251 1255 1213
230
1220 1134 a ^
` uls � 251a r
,.o
` 1I111 r Wl;ra! ` 4 ar
\ 121
r
r 1209�
'• 1 VirrY 4
127 5270 �y 1210
VI 1247 1 ' r'"✓ 1/ 1203 � 1507
7206 /1t 1204 ^ .l ' , `l .�
f203 9 cyrvs
�245"
12.1
Airml
1 Manor
1205 /J '
�126
7209 f r Nll ''�� f
e t�
/ 1520 � !/! } �1�1 p Cwtganvr � .-•- ®� ,i � �
/ 120se
M99
1gsc r Apl;da
Aq\
1V'
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG020523
SOC:
County: Onslow
Region: Wilmington
Contact Person: Ed Martin
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Effective: 01/01/10 Expiration: 12/31/14 Owner: Venters Pit
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Venters Pit - Catherine Lake
Hwy 301 N
Off Sr 1227
Pleasant Hill NC 27866
Inspection Date: 06/11/2015
Primary Inspector: Karl J Hammers
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Certification:
Entry Time: 09:45AM Exit Time: 12:30PM
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
19 Storm water
(See attachment summary)
Phone: 252-536-2660
Phone:
Phone:
Compliance Evaluation
Page: 1
Permit: NCG020523 owner - Facility: Venters Pit
Inspection Date: 05/11/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
A compliance evaluation was conducted to determine if the site is in compliance with the NPDES Permit. The following
items were found to be not compliant with the General Permit NCG020000.
1. A Draft SWPPP was submitted for this project. PartIII A.
2. The Draft SWPPP does not include a location map. Part III A. 1. a.
3. The Draft SWPPP does not include a site plan with the location of the outfalls and wetlands. Part III A. 1. e.
4. The Draft SWPPP refers to three (3) outfalls. There appears to be nine (9) outfalls on the site. Part III A. 1. e.
5. The Draft SWPPP does not include the drainage areas for the outfalls. Part III A. 1. c.
6. The Draft SWPPP does not include the phone numbers for the primary or secondary contact. Part III A. 7.
7. The SWPPP does not show the location of any proposed fuel storage and what measures will be installed to prevent and
contain any leaks. Part Ill A. 1. c.
8.. The Erosion and sediment control measures required on the mine permit inspection letter have not been completed.
Part Ill A.2.
9. Qualitative Monitoring has not been conducted. Part III D.
10. Analytical Monitoring has not been conducted. Part III B.
To bring this site into compliance the following corrective measures need to be completed:
1. Submit a final SWPPP that includes:
a. A location map.
b. A site plan with the location of all 9 outfalls and wetlands.
c. The drainage areas for the outfalls.
d. The phone numbers for the primary or secondary contact.
2. Remove the sediment from the sediment traps and basins as required in the mine permit inspection report.
3. Show the location of any proposed fuel storage and what measures will be installed to prevent and contain any
leaks or state that the SWPPP will be updated with this information before mining resumes on the site
4. Conduct the Qualitative Monitoring.
5. Conduct the Analytical Monitoring.
Page: 2
r�
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources =BY:
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governo
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
MAY 26, 2000
VENTERS PIT
ATTN: MATT GLOVER
P.O. BOX 40
PLEASANT HILL, NC 27866
ilkfz.'�W'A
0
NCDENR
NORTH
ENVIRONME
Subject: General Permit No. NCG020000
Venters Pit
COC NCG020523
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Glover:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on February 25, 2000 we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES
general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute
143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental
Protection agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual
permit application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the
Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and
reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required
by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact ANTONIO EVANS at
telephone number 919/733-5083 ext. 584.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
WILLIAM C. MILLS
For Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-9919
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020523
STORMWATER, MINE DEWATERING, AND/OR OVERFLOW FROM
PROCESS WATER RECYCLE SYSTEMS DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, .
Glover Materials, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge mine dewatering and stormwater from a facility located at
Venters Pit
Off SR 1227
Pleasant Hill, NC
Onslow County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to New River, class C-NSW waters, in the White Oak River
Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,1I, II1,
IV, V, VI and VII of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective May 26, 2000.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day May 26, 2000.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
WILLIAM C. MILLS
for Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
UFUQTi
Roger _
21
' •y ' �` :'_ .! Jr I .r t � x'� F - � � r ily. / 1 ,` ,9s � O� �.
{.-_ .1 •i ' J -I. IrlrR:. : /! a •*.a�^al�'•'f ( rr_� / �( S
IL
j' o 't• ' t— -'. 7. :» I u .x ! f jI _�', r1 \ Bothtl '+' 4 ,..�"k
o` '� _ �. _i`` ,� r _—_S1 � , f� �.� _ �{j1 f ,h ` '�,�ri � % 1 'r" ��, •Chi : _.� �;; � �I
,lamom
"/SR. ':i I• f,• :� .s..
� �r: '�•"��h`� -"I
CMn —•i • a BM 15.
• j!•Cathen�eNCG02052 entM' Plt
12i3 I• i�Tral 1 �, `.IODII +;
r r �.�` �• r. a
f � ��•' 'ems' ��'• o + v � ,•.t . � �-..:r w j���� ;- ���." �'��t���i
V 1 Ay 1 i#,; >f.
Tower a l_ 1 t I 't r' Va
30 f { ,t i I f v�Q � `�fj � � - ��y• 1 -- .,
j
Trgle! �. j: _ r _ t-
". Park
! - I 11T
--------------------
.tz S �•",i'•x ��°�' �. '•---�•-. -- � f --- ,�. -,dam.
T.
_ram _-..� •'-a_.. �'� � ---�— 1 \ 4 I , -��� ` 4r k — . _ i �._..._ � �
COPYn9hl (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.
�'j
DRAFT STORMWATER
POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLAN
JM Glovers Venters Pit
1857 Catherine Lake Road
Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina 28540
Submitted To: Glover Construction Company, Inc.
P.O. Box 40
Pleasant Hill, North Carolina 27866
Submitted By: Golder Associates NC, Inc.
5B Oak Branch Drive
Greensboro, NC 27407 USA
May 2015 1530786
9#�Golderssoc,ates
Golder, GoYder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation
May 2015 DRAFT ES-1 1530786
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (Plan) has been prepared for Glover Construction
Company, Inc.'s — JM Glover's Venters Pit, hereafter referred to as "facility" in accordance with the
requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No,
NCG020000. The purpose of the Plan is to assist facility management in identifying potential sources of
storm water pollution and to develop and implement best management practices that minimize the
amount of potential stormwater pollutants discharged from the facility.
The Plan provides guidance related to key actions that facility management/personnel must perform to
comply with the requirements of General Permit No. NCG020000. These actions include but are not
limited to:
■ Provide a description of the physical facility and the potential pollutant sources which
could be expected to contribute to contamination of storm water discharge.
■ Provide a narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities,
outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating control processes, and waste
disposal practices, as applicable.
■ List of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility during the
three previous years and any corrective action taken to mitigate spill impact.
■ Provide certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of
non-stormwater discharges. The certification will be signed per the requirements found in
Part IV. B. 5 of the NPDES General Permit (NCG 020000), The certification that the
outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges must be re-
certified annually.
■ Implement an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan that are included in the mining permit
or erosion and sedimentation control permit issued by the Division of Land Management
(DLM). Compliance with the DLM is considered a requirement of the General Permit
(NCG 020000).
■ Implement a Stormwater Management Plan that describes. management practices
employed which control or minimize the exposure of significant materials to stormwater.
These management practices include:
• Management of Stormwater Runoff and Runon.
• Best Management Practices (BMPs) - Inspection of all stormwater management
controls.
• Secondary Containment Requirements and Records.
■ Develop a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP) and designate facility personnel
(or team) responsible for implementing the SPRP and maintain responsible persons on
site at all times during facility operations when a potential to contaminate stormwater
runoff associated with facility operations.
■ Implement a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program.
■ Train employees at least annually on proper spill response and cleanup procedures.
■ Identify the specific position(s) responsible for the overall coordination, development,
implementation and revision to the SWPPP,
gAprojects%4cvertventers p WreFt venters swppp(rpl).docx
-r._ lisociates
Golder
May 2015 DRAFT ES-1 1530786
® Amend this Plan whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, or
maintenance which has a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants
to surface waters.
■ Review and update this Plan annually - Implementation of this Plan shall include
documentation of all monitoring, measurements, inspections, maintenance, activities, and
training provided to employees, and actions taken to implement BMPs. Such
documentation shall be kept on -site for a period of five years and made available for
inspection immediately upon request.
giprojectslglovertventers pitW7eft venters swppp(rplfAOU
Golder
Associates
May 2015 DRAFT i
1530786
Table
of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................
ES-1
1.0
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................
2.0
GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION ............... ..........................................................
...- ................ 1
3.0
SITE PLAN............................................................................................................
3.1
Location Map......................................................................................................
3.2
Site Map.......................................................................................................................................2
3.3
Watershed Identification Map.. ................ ..................... ..........
...... ............... 2
3ASignificant
Materials............................................................................................
.................
3.4.1 Outdoor Process Areas............................................................................................................
3
3.42 Vehicle Maintenance Fueling Process Areas..........................................................................
3
3.5
Significant Spills / Leaks..............................................................................................................
3
3.6
Stormwater Outfall Certification...................................................................................................
3
4.0
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL..........................................................................................
3
5.0
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN...........................................................................:..I...........4
5.1
Feasibility Study.................................................................
5.2
Secondary Containment...............................................................................................................
5
5.3
Best Management Practices (BMPs)...........................................................................................
5
6.0
SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN (SPRP).................................................................
5
6.1
Potential Pollution Sources..........................................................................................................
6
6.2
Material Handling and Storage Practices and Spill Control Equipment .......................................
6
7.0
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING................................................6
8.0
EMPLOYEE TRAINING...................................................................................................................
7
9.0
RESPONSIBLE PARTY...................................................................................................................7
10-0
PLAN AMENDMENTS.....................................................................................................................
8
11.0
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MONITORING.....................................................................
8
11.1
Analytical (Quantitative) Monitoring.............................................................................................
8
11.2
Qualitative Monitoring Requirements...........................................................................................9
12.0
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS....................................................................................................10
12.1
Spill Reporting ................... .......................................................... -..-.......................
.............. 11
13.0
INSPECTION AND ENTRY...........................................................................................................
11
14.0
CLOSING.......................................................................................................................................12
List of Tables
Table 1
Analytical Monitoring Requirement
Table 2
Monitoring Schedule
Table 3
Benchmark Values
Table 4
Analytical Monitoring Requirements for Vehicle Maintenance Area
0orciaosigoverlventers pttWraR venters swppp(rpl).docx
GGolder
Associates
May 2015 DRAFT ii 1530786
Table 5 Qualitative Monitoring Requirements
List of Figures
Figure 1 General Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map (with topographic map)
List of Appendices
Appendix A
Stormwater Pollution Plan Certification
Appendix B
Annual Certification of Stormwater Discharge Outfalls
Appendix C
Drainage of Secondary Containment Visual Inspection Log
Appendix D
Semi-annual Stormwater Management System Inspection Form
Appendix E
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Semi-annual Discharge Monitoring Report
Appendix F
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Annual Summary Data Monitoring Report
Appendix G
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) Qualitative Monitoring Report
glprajectslgloverlventers pitldrafl venters swppp{rpl}.doax
Golder
Associates
May 2015 Draft 1 1530786
1.0 INTRODUCTION
It is the intent of Glover Construction Company Inc. (Glover)'s — JM Glovers Venters Pit— hereafter
referred to as "facility" — to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, permits, and orders. The facility is
currently registered with the North Carolina (NC) Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR) Division of Energy Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR), has filed a Notice of Intent (NOI) and
has paid the applicable fees for coverage under General Permit No. NCG 020000. Coverage under
General Permit No. NCG 020000 is applicable to all owners or operators of stormwater point source
discharges associated with facilities that are engaged in the mine dewatering wastewater generation,
processing wastewater discharges to surface waters of the state and the discharge of stormwater from an
active and inactive mining sites with these activities operating under a Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) 1442.
As a requirement of General Permit No. NCG 020000, the permittee shall develop and implement a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, hereafter referred to as the "Plan." The purpose of the Plan is to
identify potential sources of stormwater pollution and to develop and implement management practices
that minimize pollution in stormwater discharged from the facility. A copy of this plan is kept on file at
Glover's corporate office, at the facility (when mining activities are being performed or when
representatives of Glover are onsite), or at Glover's nearest field office for review during normal business
hours (8:00 AM to 5:00 PM).
2.0 GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION
The facility is composed of one individual parcel of approximately 130.3 acres located at 1857 Catherine
Lake Road, in Jacksonville, North Carolina. The location and overview of the parcel is shown on General
Location Map in Figure 1. The facility is designated as a borrow pit. This facility is currently inactive. The
last excavation event occurred in 2009 and the most recent delivery of soil (stockpiled at the site) in 2010.
The facility is utilized as needed for nearby ongoing projects.
The facility has three distinct activity related areas: historical pit mining/soil stockpiling areas, delineated
wetlands and unmined/undisturbed areas, and vehicle access areas. Stormwater flow across the facility
is controlled by natural and modified surface topography. Stormwater that flows across the mine site is
generally directed inward from the perimeter of the site which is generally surrounded with a 1-foot berm.
Stormwater that does not infiltrate into the ground is ultimately directed eastward toward the one of three
discharge points. The stormwater from each of the three discharge points flows into a northern or
southern branch of an unnamed tributary of the New River. The three distinct activity related areas and
the approximate drainage pathways are shown on the Site Map included as Figures 2.
'�h Golder
g:lpnojectstgoverlventers plSdraR venters 8wppp(r0).docx Associates
May 2015 Draft 2 1530786
3.0 SITE PLAN
The following site plan provides a description of the physical and the potential pollutant sources which
may be expected to contribute to the contamination of stormwater discharges. The site plan contains the
following items as described below.
3.1 Location Map
A United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle map was used in the creation of the
Site Location Map included as Figure 1. The map extends beyond the facility property boundary and
displays general topographic features including the facility's location in relation to transportation routes
and adjacent surface water bodies. The USGS topographic map does not illustrate the borrow pit
activities and the historical excavation and delivery of soil (stockpiles) at the facility.
3.2 Site Map
There are three representative stormwater discharge outfalls (SDOs) located on the facility property: 01,
02, and 03. The approximate location of each SDO is identified on the Figure 2 and shown below. The
site map is drawn to scale with a distance legend and depicts the site property boundary, site activity
areas, drainage areas for each outfall, and direction of flow in each drainage area. There are no
impervious surfaces identified at the facility.
Stormwater Discharge Outfall
Latitude
Longitude
01
34°, 48', 53.23753" N
77°, 32', 09.60735" W
02
340, 48', 48.82773" N
770, 32', 03.47259" W
03
34', 48', 39-54723" N
77, 32', 02.81080" W
3.3 Watershed Identification Map
The USGS topographic map does not identify any wetlands surrounding the subject site. Figure 2
identifies areas of the site that have been classified or reported as wetlands by the Williamsburg
Environmental Group and the ACFE for the original permit (April 2000). The map identifies the immediate
receiving water(s) to which the stormwater outfalls discharge. The receiving water(s) are identified as
unnamed tributaries of the New River. The New River basin was not identified by NC DENR as total
maximum daily loads (TMDLs) watershed, and as such any associated additional monitoring is not
required under the existing permit.
3.4 Significant Materials
A significant material, for the purposes of this document, is defined by the NC DENR DEMLR as including
but not being limited to: raw materials, fuels, materials such as solvents, detergents and plastic pellets,
finished materials such as metallic products, raw materials used in food processing or production;
hazardous substances designated under section 101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental
gAprojectslgloverlvenlers pllWratt venters swppp(rp1) docx
V� Golder
Associates
May 2015 Draft 3 1530786
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA); any chemical the facility is required to report
pursuant to section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA); and
fertilizers, pesticides and waste products such as ashes, slag and sludge that have the potential. to be
released with Stormwater discharges. Any additional materials and/or chemicals introduced to the site
must be reviewed to determine appropriate reporting requirements under Federal and State law. The
facility does not store any significant materials.
3.4. T Outdoor Process Areas
As stated in Section 2.0, the facility is currently inactive; the last excavation occurred in 2009. The facility
is comprised of three distinct activity ' related areas: pit mining/soil stockpiling areas,
wetlands/unmined/undisturbed areas, and vehicle access areas.
3.4.2 Vehicle Maintenance Fueling Process Areas
The facility does not conduct or have onsite maintenance or fueling capabilities. A historical secondary
containment structure was identified along the northwestern side of the property. This structure was
reported to have contained an above -ground storage tank (AST) used for historical refueling activities
(diesel). At the time of the site visit, the AST was not present and the secondary containment structure
was abandoned. Stormwater flow in this area is primarily to the east toward SDO01 and SDO02.
3.5 Significant Spills / Leaks
There have been no significant spills or leaks of pollutants at this facility identified by facility management,
as of the date of this Plan. Spills of any volume are to be handled per spill response procedures in
Section 5.0.
3.6 Stormwater Outfall Certification
Appendix A of the Plan contains the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Certification and Appendix B
contains the Annual Non-Stormwater Discharge Certification. The certification statements are to be
signed by a responsible corporate officer or by a duly authorized representative in accordance with the
requirements of Part IV, Section B, Paragraph 5 of the general permit.
4.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
The facility manages and maintains their erosion and sediment controls through the NC DENR —
Department of Natural Resources Division mining permit (Permit No. 67-57). The permit is in effect until
July 27, 2022, and requires the facility to implement various engineering and institutional controls to
maintain and manage sediment accumulation and reduce/eliminate erosion. The applicable components
of the mining permit that have potential to impact the implementation of this SWPPP include:
e Sufficient buffer (minimum 25-foot undisturbed) shall be maintained between and affected
land and any adjoining waterway or wetland ti prevent sedimentation of that waterway or
9jedMgloverlventers pitltlrah venters swppp{rplj.dacx
G
� Gvider
Associates
' May 2015 Draft 4 1530786
wetland from erosion of the affected land and preserve the integrity of the natural water
course.
■ Adequate mechanical barriers including but not limited to diversions, earthen dikes,
sediment check dams, sediment retarding structures, rip rap pits, or ditches shall provide
in the initial stages of any land disturbance and maintained to prevent sediment from
discharging into adjacent surface areas or into any lake, wetland, or natural watercourse
in proximity to the affected lands.
i All drainage from the affected areas around the mine excavation shall be diverted internal
to said excavations or into existing sediment basins.
■ The angle of graded slopes and fills shall be no greater than the angle which can be
retained by vegetative cover or other adequate erosion control measure, structure, or
device. In any event, exposure slopes of any excavated channels, the erosion of which
may cause off -site damage because of sedimentation, shall be planted or otherwise
provide ground cover, devices or structures sufficient to restrain such erosion.
® The affected land shall be graded so as to prevent collection of ponds of water that are
likely to become noxious or foul. Necessary structures such as drainage ditches or
conduits shall be constructed or installed when required to prevent such conditions.
■ The final slopes in all excavations in soil sand gravel and other unconsolidated materials
shall be at such an angle to minimize the possibility of slides and me consistent with the
future use of the land.
■ A revegetation plan shall conform to acceptable and recommended agronomic and
reforestation practices as established by the NC Agriculture Experiment Station and the
NC Forest Service.
® Side slopes to the lake excavation shall be graded to a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter
to the water and 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter below the water line.
■ All other final perimeter side slopes shall be graded to a 3 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter
slope.
® Compacted surfaces shall be disced, subsoiled, or otherwise prepared before
revegetation
■ Any revegetation plan activities shall comply with the seeding, planting and amendments
specifications outlined in the mining permit.
5.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
The stormwater management plan contains a description of the materials management practices that the
facility employs to control or minimize the exposure of significant materials to stormwater, including
structural and non-structural controls.
5.1 Feasibility Study
Whenever practical, the facility shall prevent exposure of storage areas, material handling operations,
manufacturing, and fueling or vehicle maintenance operations to stormwater. The facility's operations
status is inactive (last operated in 2010) therefore a feasibility study is unnecessary at this time. Should
the facility return to and active operational status, the facility shall assess the stormwater exposure to
storage areas, material handling operations, manufacturing, and fueling or vehicle maintenance
operations prior to the reinitiating of facility operations. In such an event, practical and economically
-# ` Golder
rdettsl overlventers iWraft venters s .docx Associates
9 W 1 � P h'PPPirWI
May 2015 Draft 5 1530786
feasible efforts will be made to limit run-on and run-off by diverting stormwater away from areas where
significant materials may be exposed to stormwater.
5.2 Secondary Containment
The general permit states that secondary containment is required for the bulk storage of liquid materials;
storage in any amount of Section 313 of Title III of the SARA water priority chemicals; and storage in any
amount of hazardous substances, in order to prevent leaks and spills from contaminating stormwater
runoff. At the time of the site visit there were no bulk storage of liquid materials, SARA (Section 313 of
Title III) water priority chemicals, or hazardous substances used or stored on the subject property.
Should these types of chemicals be used or stored on site in the future, the appropriate secondary
containment will be needed at the time of use.
5.3 Best Management Practices (BMPs)
BMPs are defined in General Permit No. NCG020000 as measures or practices used to reduce the
amount of pollution entering surface waters; BMPs may take the form of a process, activity, or physical
structure. The installation and implementation of BMPs at the facility is based on the assessed potential
for sources to contribute significant amounts of pollutants to stormwater discharges; as well as, historical
data collected from stormwater discharge monitoring.
The most basic BMPs at the facility include proper conveyance of stormwater from the pit mining/soil and
stockpiling areas, which is achieved by the use of swales and a stormwater drainage system. Should
excavation or stockpiling of soil resume at the facility, the on -site activities should be performed in a
manner to minimize exposure to precipitation.
6.0 SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN (SPRP)
The purpose of the SPRP is to prevent the discharge of petroleum and/or hazardous materials into the
waters of North Carolina per 40 CFR 112. The plan is aimed at preventing spills from occurring, as well
as, describing clean-up and recovery measures.
As part of the spill response plan, the facility has a Pollution Prevention Team that will be responsible for
assessing the need to implement spill response measures. Additionally, a trained person shall be on -site
at all times during facility operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff through
spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations. Spills or releases, excluding minor
spills within containment areas, will be reported to a member of the Pollution Prevention Team and
cleaned up as soon as possible. Section 11.1 of this Plan outlines additional reporting requirements that
may be necessary. The following personnel are the designated Pollution Prevention Team:
g)projecMgloverWenters pitWraft venters swppp(rpl).docx
GlGolder
ssociates
Primary Contact:
Armon Pfeifer
May 2015 Draft 6 1530786
Co., Inc.
, North Carolina 27866
Secondary Contact:
GTove onstmdion Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 0
Pleasant l4lill, North Carolina 27866
Off e
Cell
Potential Pollution Sources
The areas of potential pollution sources are listed in Section 3 and Section 4 of this Plan. The facility's
operations status is inactive (last operated in 2010) therefore a feasibility study is unnecessary at this
time. Should the facility return to and active operational status, the facility shall assess the stormwater
exposure to storage areas, material handling operations, manufacturing, and fueling or vehicle
maintenance operations prior to the reinitiating of facility operations.
6.2 Material Handling and Storage Practices and Spill Control Equipment
The facility historically conducted soil excavation and stockpiling operations on -site. The historic activities
likely involved the storage and used materials at include diesel fuel (on and off -road), used oil, motor oil,
hydraulic fluid, gear oils, greases, gasoline, and degreasing solvents on -site for the completion of daily
operations. However, since the facility's operations status is inactive (last operated in 2010) and no
chemicals of chemical storage structures were observed for the site visit, the requirement for both
structural and non-structural BMPs to reduce the possibility of spills and releases of significant materials
to the environment and the need for on -site spill control equipment is not necessary. Should the facility
return to an active operational status, the facility shall assess the material handling and storage practices
and identify the necessary spill control equipment necessary to adequately respond to spill event prior to
the reinitiating of facility operations.����
7.0 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE AND GOOD HOUSEKEEPING
As part of the preventative maintenance and good housekeeping program, members of the facility
Pollution Prevention Team, or other designated qualified employees, will perform inspections of the facility
g: projectslgloveAventers polerart venters swppp(rpl).docx
Golder
Associates
I - _Wi
-- May 2015 Draft 7 1530786
and stormwater systems (see the "Semi-annual Stormwater Management System Inspection Form" in
Appendix D). These inspections will take place on a semi-annual basis. The first inspection will occur
within the second half of the year (July - December) and the second inspection will take place in the first
half of the new year (January - June 2016). A minimum of 60-days must separate each inspection.
This form is also used to determine required for updating the Plan to include any changes to the facility's
operation. The completed inspection forms are filed in the General Manager's office to document the
findings and/or corrective measures undertaken. Inspection reports shall be kept with the Plan at the
facility for at least five (5) years.
The facility also employs good housekeeping practices to minimize contact of materials with stormwater.
Specific good housekeeping practices are as follows.-
i Each worker is responsible for good housekeeping practices in their work area. Any
improperly working equipment or leaks will be reported to a member of the pollution
prevention team for further assessment and corrective action.
■ Any spills outside of containment structures will be cleaned as soon as possible. No spills
will be washed into the stormwater conveyances on site.
® Employees will ensure that soils delivered to the site are place in the proper staging area.
Material handling equipment, such as excavators, will only be operated by qualified
personnel,
e Facility personnel will oversee the onsite refueling activities and observe any filling and
removal of liquids from containers to minimize spills and overfills.
® Equipment maintenance or repairs shall be performed off -site if feasible. Waste fluids
generated from the maintenance of equipment shall be properly collected and disposed.
8.0 EMPLOYEE TRAINING
All facility personnel shall be trained in accordance to the procedures, goals, and components of the Plan.
New employees will not be allowed to work unsupervised until they have been properly trained in the
areas of the Plan related to their daily duties. Training will be provided to facility personnel on an annual
basis. Additional training will be provided as necessary for operational modifications, equipment
malfunctions resulting in spills or releases, or for other stormwater related issues. The training program
will be conducted by the General Manager or other duly appointed qualified person. Documentation of
each training session will be recorded on a training log and maintained with this Plan for a period of 5-
years.
9.0 RESPONSIBLE PARTY
As a requirement of NCG020000 a specific position must be identified that is responsible for the overall
coordination, development, implementation, and revision to the Plan. The facility has established a
Pollution Prevention Team, listed in Section 5 of this Plan, which will be responsible for the coordination,
gipr0jectS5g1overlventers pi[Wraft venters swppp(rpl).docx
Golder
Associates
May 2015 Draft 8 1530786
implementation, and revision to the Plan. The primary contact listed in the Pollution Prevention Team will
also meet the signatory requirements outlined in Part IV. Section 13.5 of the general permit.
10.0 PLAN AMENDMENTS
The facility will update and amend this Plan whenever there is a change in design, construction,
operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to
surface waters. All aspects of the Plan shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis. The annual
update will include:
■ An updated list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants for the previous three years, or
the notation that no spills have occurred.
0 A written re -certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the
presence of non-stormwater discharges.
■ A documented re-evaluation of the effectiveness of the BMPs listed in the Plan.
11.0 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE MONITORING
Monitoring of the three facility outfalls (SDO 01, 02, and 03) will be performed on a semi-annual basis in
accordance with Part III. Sections S-D of the General Permit; and reporting will be performed in
accordance with Part IV Section E. The following sections will outline the analytical and visual inspection
programs and associated reporting for compliance with the General Permit.
11.1 Analytical (Quantitative) Monitoring
The requirements for analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges are outlined in Part III, Section B of
the General Permit. The General Permit requires samples to be collected on a semi-annual basis, during
a representative storm event, at each SDO unless representative status is granted.,The sample will be
taken on a day and time that is characteristic of the discharge and before the discharge joins or is diluted
by any other waste stream, body of water, or substance. A representative storm event is defined as a
storm event that measures greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall and that occurs at least 72 hours form the
previously measurable (greater than 0.1 inches) storm event. Grab samples should be collected within the
first thirty minutes of discharge from the SDO. During each representative storm event in which samples
are collected, the total precipitation must be recorded from an on -site or local rain -gauge. The following
(Tablel) lists the required analytical parameters:
gAprojects%Jover%venters pitl&afl venters swppp(rpl).docx
99 Golder
Associates
May 2015 Draft 9 1530786
TABLE 9: Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Parameter
Units
Frequency
Sample Type
Location
Settleable Solids
ml/L
Semi-annual
Grab
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Total Suspended
mg/L
Semi-annual
Grab
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Turbidity
N.T.U.
Semi-annual
Grab
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Total Precipitation
Inches
Semi-annual
--
--
Total Flow
MG
Semi-annual
Estimate
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Event Duration
Minutes
Semi-annual
Estimate
The facility must complete the monitoring in accordance to the following sampling schedule (Table 2) and
a minimum of 60-days must separate each monitoring event.
Table 2: Monitoring Schedule:
Monitoring Event
Start
End
1
July 1, 2015
December 31, 2015
2
January 1, 2016
June 30, 2016
3
July 1, 2017
December 31, 2017
4
January 1, 2018
June 30, 2018
5
July 1, 2019
December 31, 2019
Upon completion of the semi-annual sampling events the facility shall report the analytical results within
the monitoring period. The results of the sampling event shall be compared to the benchmark values
listed in Table 3.
Table 3: Benchmark Values
Parameters
Benchmark Values (in milligrams per liter)
Settleable Solids
0.1 ml/L
Total Suspended Solids
100 mg/L
Turbidity
50 N.T.U.
Exceedances of Benchmark Values require the facility to increase monitoring, increase management
actions, increase record keeping, and/or install stormwater BMPs in a tiered program. The requirements
for Tier One, Tier Two, and Tier Three are listed in Part III. Section B of NCG020000.
11.2 Qualitative Monitoring Requirements
Qualitative monitoring (visual inspection) of each stormwater outfall shall be performed during the semi-
annual analytical monitoring events, regardless of representative status. Qualitative monitoring is
completed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Plan and assessing new sources of stormwater pollution.
Although no analytical tests are required, qualitative monitoring must be performed during a
g.4prajectsYglovenventers pAdratt venters swppp(rpl).docx
�._ Golder
Associates
May 2015 Draft 10 1530786
representative storm event. The following (Table 5) lists the requirements of the qualitative monitoring
program:
Table 5: Qualitative Monitoring Requirements
Parameters
Frequency
Monitoring Locations
Color
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Odor
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Clarity
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Floating Solids
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Suspended Solids
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Foam
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Oil Sheen
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Deposition at or immediately
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Erosion at or immediately below
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
Other obvious indicators of
Semi-annual
SDO: 1, 2, & 3
'Note — 60-days must separate mon►toting events
The results of the qualitative monitoring events and any response actions should be kept in a log in the
facility files or with the Plan. If the facility fails to respond effectively to correct problems identified by
qualitative monitoring, or if the discharge causes or contributes to a water quality standard violation the
DEMLR may, but is not limited to one or more of the following:
■ Require the facility to revise, increase, or decrease the monitoring frequency for the
remainder of the permit
■ Rescind coverage under the General Permit, and require the facility to apply for an
individual permit
■ Require the facility to install structural stormwater controls
■ Require the facility to implement other stormwater control measures
■ Require the facility to implement site modifications to qualify for the No Exposure
Exclusion.
12.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Samples analyzed in accordance with NCG020000 shall be submitted to the DEMLR on the Discharge
Monitoring Report (DMR) forms provided by the Director. The DMR form is included in this Plan as
Appendix E. Submittals shall be delivered to the DEMLR no later than March 1 of each year. Two signed
copies of the Discharge Monitoring Report shall be submitted to:
Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
g'tpro)ectMooverwenters plt4dratt venters swppp(rpq.docx
Golder
Associates
— — --- ---- May 2015 Draft 11 1530786
When no discharge has occurred from the facility during the report period, the permittee must record "No
Flow" or "No Discharge" within 30 days of the end of the six-month sampling period in the SPPP. "No
Flow" or "No Discharge" shall be reported on the annual summary Discharge Monitoring Reports.
The facility shall also submit an Annual Summary Discharge Monitoring Report to the appropriate DEMLR
Regional Office not later than March 1 of each year. The submittal shall be on the forms supplied by the
DEMLR. A copy of the Annual Summary Discharge monitoring Report is included in this Plan as Appendix
F.
The facility shall record the required qualitative monitoring observations on the SDO Qualitative
Monitoring Report form provided by the DEMLR, and shall retain the completed form on site. A copy of
the SDO Qualitative Monitoring Report is included in this Plan as Appendix G. Visual monitoring results
should not be submitted to the DEMLR, except upon request.
12.1 Spill Reporting
The facility shall report to the local DEMLR Regional Office, within 24-hours, all significant spills as
defined in Part IV of the General Permit (NCG020000). This includes but is not limited to releases of oil or
hazardous substances in excess of reportable *quantities under Section 311 of the Clean Water Act or
Section 102 of CERCLA. Additionally, the facility shall report spills including:
■ Any oil spills of 25-gallons or more
i Any spill, regardless of amount, that causes a sheen on surface water
® Any oil spill, regardless of amount, occurring within 100 feet of surface waters
m Any oil spill less than 25-gallons that cannot be cleaned up within 24-hours
13.0 INSPECTION AND ENTRY
The facility shall allow the Director of DEMLR, or an authorized representative, upon presentation of
credentials and other documents that may be required by law, to:
■ Enter the premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where
records must be kept under the conditions of this General Permit.
■ Have access and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of this permit.
■ Inspect at reasonable times any facility, equipment, practices, or operations regulated or
required under this General Permit.
■ Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring General Permit
compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or
parameters at any location.
g'.lprojectslgloveAventers pMdraft venters swppp(rpl).docx
(Golder
Associates
May 2015 Draft 12 1530786
14.0 CLOSING
This Plan has been developed for the JM Glovers Venters Pit in accordance with the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. NCG200000. A copy of this plan is kept on
file at the corporate office, at the facility (when mining activities are being performed or when
representatives of Glover are onsite) or at Glover's nearest office for review during normal business hours
(8:00 AM to 5:00 PM). The facility will amend the Plan whenever there is a change in design,
construction, operation, or maintenance that has an effect on the potential for discharge of pollutants to
waters of the United States.
gApmjectslgloverrienters pll\dratt venters swppp(rpl).doez
Vt
Golder
Associates
STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN CERTIFICATION
Venters Pit Mining Site
1857 Catherine Lake Road
Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina 28540
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified
personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the
person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering
the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Signature
Title
Date
CERTIFICATION OF THE EVALUATION OF OUTFALLS FOR
NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES
Venters Pit Mining Site
1 857 Catherine Lake Road
Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina 28540
certify that I have evaluated the stormwater discharge of the facility and determined
there is no presence of non-stormwater discharges. The method used for evaluating the
discharge was a visual inspection of discharge patterns and inspection of drainage maps and
schematics. The stormwater discharge review was conducted on . The on -site
drainage points observed during the evaluation included: stormwater Outfalls 01, 02 and 03.
Signature
Title
Date
Visual Inspection Log
Drainage of Secondary Containment Structures
Inspector Name:
Date:
Accumulated stormwater in the following secondary containment structure(s) was visually
inspected for Color, Foam, Outfall Staining, Visible Sheen, and Dry Weather Flow prior to being
discharged. If accumulated stormwater was found to be contaminated it was not discharged and
facility management was notified.
Structure ID Color Foam Screen Outfall Staining
/ Dry Weather
Flow
71
Note:
1. Checkmark indicates no observable contamination and stormwater may be discharged.
Comments:
Semi -Annual Stormwater Management System Inspection Form
Facility: Venters Pit Mining Site
1857 Catherine Lake Road
Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina 28540
Date of Inspection:
Time of Inspection:
Inspector Name & Title:
Weather Conditions:
COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THE FOLLOWING DEVICES AS APPROPRIATE AND APPLICABLE. NOTE ANY
LEAKS, POOLED CONTAMINANTS, CRACKS, STAINS, CORROSION, OR OTHER STRUCTURAL DAMAGE.
PARKING AREAN: (Stains, Sheen on Standing Water, Standing Water, etc.)
STORMWATER OUTFALL(S). (Stains, Erosion Issues, etc.)
CONTAINER STORAGE: (Lids, Plugs, General Condition, etc.)
BERMS : (Structural Damage, Erosion Issues, Standing Water, etc.)
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT DEVICE(S)7 (Leaks, Corrosion, Standing Water, etc.)
LOADING/ UNLOADING AREA(S): (Stains, Potential Hazards, etc.)
Loading/Unloading Area(s) Continued:
FUELING AREA(S): (Stains, Potential Hazards, Presence of Spill Kits & Fire Ext., etc.)
PIPING & HOSE(S): (Corrosion, Leaks, Hose Condition, etc.)
PUMPS OVERFILL PROTECTIONS, LEVEL GAUGE(S). (Proper Operation, etc.)
TANK WALL(S): (Corrosion, Structural Damage, etc.)
TANK SUPPORT(S): (Corrosion, Structural Damage, Potential to Fall, etc.)
USE THE TABLE ON THE NEXT PAGE TO EVALUATE EACH SIGNIFICANT MATERIAL BULK STORAGE LOCATION.
SEE APPENDIX F OF THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR THE LOCATION OF EACH BULK
STORAGE CONTAINER AT YOUR FACILITY, AS APPROPRIATE.
INSPECTION OF MATERIAL STORAGE STRUCTURES
161NSIDE"
As!
oF!QRTAIiLE `
CONTAINER
MATERIAL.${1]REi1
MGAV.
RLAI,CONTAINMENT
CONTAINMENT
METHOD
LEAKS
CORRQSION
CRACKS
E�ISCOLORATION
CO MEENTS
1
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
2
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
3
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
4
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
5
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
6
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
7
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
8
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
9
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
10
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
11
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
12
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
13
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
14
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
15
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
16
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
17
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
18
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
19
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
Y N
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS REQUIRED;
NOTE: THE RECORD OF THIS INSPECTION SHALL BE KEPT ON -SITE IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
PLAN FOR A PERIOD OF NO LESS THAN (5) YEARS.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
1
,t `•
d.�.
�'t. ,j �ly N ! !l.• C.{. 1 -, -_ -F i i _
} 4 � .. 4
� - t ' i3'` y-�, .�
At' Golder Associates uie'sirive to"be the most respected global group of _
Africa., }
+ 2711'2S19t300
'compa6les_specializing rn g ound'engfneering and en�iron'Mental services .�: {
.:Rsfa" .' :'�
:- +852`25o2�fi56
Empii)yBe orvried-since our formation in 1960, we have,created a unique
? 5traiasia
+bl`38862-35.Q0 ;
c>,Iture;wFtt� ride ir�•ownershrp`, resultin in lisri -tern anizatranal;stabiltt
p e 9 9 rg Y
it rope `
R + 355 2142,30 20
�. LT L •.. k
Golder;pro(essionals`take the ".time to build�an understanding of Client needs,
North Ait�errca'
"I
' + 1804'275y3281
South AmedU U.
+:55 2t 3095 9500 ,
-and of the'specific environments in +nihich they operate; -We continue to expand-
: x
our Eechnrcat`capabilities and Have experienced steady 00%%.4h yMb employees;
'
_
ynovl o erating'.trvi oM es.ti:7c ted throughout Afnc_a,rAsia-Austraiasia
;Soluuons@goldercorn
�wwwgDlderc�xr+
r , r
Europe North`Amer"scaland 'Soutf America.`
*'
Q
n1.
>>i .(f
1.
'r3
.Yy f a
- 4
..h`
4
•-
.. 1i• ! J
F' r . I
•
•
lr
`�]Lo„'.P t�rr,�� w r-i� /iZ n-.-Ny �kcf •�.. ���� C ( S�e =+� � aS L�.,! f 1,.�,1G-fw. y �r/i-„--
�) luMl udl oudlII
4.
�•.r, -
k
� '�; it ����^ .-. � ' ,'S' N �� •
•
F
i r-
.i
r
A
l
.�. 144 F
d tij
50
,l' p:
rilei,
, tip I
.•,1► ri
gle-earth
. T y
in.-
,ery Date 12l31?2011 m 1993 lat 34 813006- Ion-77.53790T elev 60 ft Eye alt 5277 ft
z
O
W
w
W10
cl-
CUcx
LU
a
cr_
z
z
5
d
10,
03
Its
z,
c7
fj
U
�A
y
qz
2
N
LA
kA
O
713
•
Z
7v
U
r
91
U
tow '-n'
10
zr
1
N
m
C]
C]