20001045

•
110
dd $CAiFp
F
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
July 15, 2002
N. C. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
151-B Highway 24
Hestron Plaza II
Morehead City, NC 28557
Attention: Mr. Bill Arrington
DCM Transportation Field Representative
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
?I y
Subject: Request for Refinement of the Existing CAMA Major Development
Permit for the Expansion of Smith Creek Parkway from the Northeast
Cape Fear River to 0.53 mile East of 23rd Street; State Project No.
8.2250101; Federal Aid Projects No. MAM-M-5851(2) and MANHS-
0332(8); TIP Nos. U-92B and U-92A, respectively; New Hanover County
The Department of Transportation (DOT) proposes to modify its activities in
jurisdictional areas in portions of U-92A and U-92B. The "A" project is under
construction; the "B" project was let on May 21, 2002. The contractor's date of
availability for the "B" project is likely to occur near the end of July. With this letter and
attachments, a request is hereby made for a CAMA Letter of Refinement. A similar
request (for modifications) has been made by separate letter to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the Division of Water Quality.
U-92A
The DOT requests permission to install additional temporary work bridges at site 3
(centered at Station -L- 29+00). This action would occur at Smith Creek. The bridges
have become necessary due to scheduling delays and resulting tie-up of an adjacent
trestle, which was the intended construction access over Smith Creek. Tidewater Skanska
Construction Corporation proposes to fabricate and install additional trestles to allow a
continuous work-bridge across Smith Creek. The proposed design allows for a center
span, which could be removed with 24 hours notice to allow a clear span of 33 feet if
necessary. Placement of the trestle above Bents 19 and 20 footing locations would allow
sufficient overhead clearance. for passage of small watercraft. In order to comply with the
instream moratorium from February 1 through June 15, the additional work bridge will be
installed in September 2002 and removed in September 2003. The resulting temporary
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
Page 3
July 15, 2002
Mr. Arrington
discharge of fill into surface waters. This results in a total net decrease in permanent
impacts to wetlands and surface waters of 0.081 acre.
Although approval of the temporary bridge on the "A" project is not needed before mid-
August, the "B" project has a more critical schedule. A letter of Refinement is needed
before the end of July on this project. If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth
L. Lusk at [phone], extension 335 for Section A; and Randy Turner at extension
270 for Section B.
Sincerely
V. Charles Bruton, Ph.D., Manager
Office of the Natural Environment
Cc with cover letter only:
Mr. David Timpy, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. David Franklin, USACE, Wilmington
John Domey, NCDWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, USEPA
Mr. Howard Hall, USFWS
Mr. Fritz Rhode, NCDMF
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Ms. Cathy Brittingham, NCDCM
Mr. N.L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
Mr. Mason Herndon, Division 3 Environmental Officer
File: U-0092
\I- C?,
n
SITE
a
e
MAP
N.C. DEPT. OF TRA%SPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
.SHEET Z OF Z 4 DATE

I
V 3NI IHJi V VN
r?
? Q
I r, o
I
a
co
a l ? ? ?It a
? I
u I ? '
? I
I I
I I '
I I i ? I
I '
>
co
z
z I
FU 31Y7
a I '
? I I
I I' I
I I
z ? t.
O 0 -4
??., F' ca `' J 4

p o+
?N?
H
o a
a N
F ?,
p j
p o ??
?x
? ;? o

a
Q ? w
zu
Q w
z 0 x
?? w
U a

gym= I I
ON I ?, ??* I
I I I ?
t
i o
3
D
I ? I
o I I Q
r I - I o
I I
K N y
w° I i cW
?- m I u
w 31TO 3170 --
cr
~ r
N I
z I i
~ I
Li I i
I:
o
v I I I
W
I
11? 6 1101!
I I <W
W
O
t mm

w
b
c?
z
t=j
W
U
rz ri)
O
N
O

l
N

WN
0
m
a o
\ UZ
IZX'
7 ..,
0?

\
? W 3 $ ?0 0 w

N
I ?" D O a ?H
to 0
?8 O a0 ?
a
a 0 x V .
E- ?
Il w U '-'
I c
r
i C4 0 xw u C4
v z
V)
\ ' Wm

I
1 \ J
` Q
VI
W F

I W
Z
Z 3
W
Z
O
fiy kiyX3 ? _
/ jf. SIC ?/
N /
MATCHLINE B
/
N
F-
• Q
W
?
/• [T1
F? NLD
Z
' /% b o a
•

Q
W •? f

V `
V WV
Q t •

?J
W

IPVO3 ""06
__ \ %
. U
rn
__` ?
NIb13? "i N
> '
Q
Z 1
W ?
\
G W
?V
O
W
L, Q O

D ` ?_

4

I
7 V. t,
O O
a \ 0 a 0 p< 0
x
&W ? ' ? ? U U ? ? ? ca Q
?m w j. •' - x p ?'
S mw W c W ?+
:2:2 wo ` O ,O c C. Ems' N
o
aQ <= O 1 L z CO
:2J JCD /v^J VCO i4
y" L, w
LJOD L) 1:4 L)
?\ \ ?? a ?`, C 0 c] ?" Z U U
od z d V)
\ W co
\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \\\ \ /
Ld. \
°Quui
w
NW
wm _
co
/' ?? /? \ bf L+? W
Z 2E
'Y ! a
/ a? CO
SW / ww
/ W=
coo
Q k' / 1 4i = Fa O
NQ ?/ W
F-
LJ< / Z
• ? ? ? fr 1
QQ
J ???111
75w
' WC3
/c
OD \
\ O
W /o \ N
z ?. m •??
H ?' •L
/ \ ??•
b
\ 1`
z
Q -?
0-4
E" G' a
S? VF"
z ?
00
I
E. O O N r E- z c:
:G O
i
W I r z Q: I?? L•'
I 0 0= E,cN:/? J ,,,a T
<W
UN
J I
??~r I I
I ' ;I I
? i
• •I I
?I
= I?
N
•l o I
Z
I• ?I.I i o
W Q
a I• :I ? ?? ?a z?
_ az =w
2 -
41 I, ?I? I W4- w z
v
WZ WZ
Q, I• .I ?} I 40
I' • i I ?-- Z-i Z W
CL I•? •I I Oti OU
I• I ???
W
I• .I I o
o I?
•I z
ac 1 ` • I I
i
v
I ?
I ? ..a
U
cn
I O
N
I ?
I ?
3 3NIIHXVW
O
O
1
`?

l I I
?_ I ''

I I
of
---I-

\
W
O C
J
W
2
7
N ^

I

/

2]
m
m
N

i

,

?

'Y

W

'? P

r
9 3NIIHOiVN x o ?,
1 + z C???wz A
-N , ci- > H
F 00r ?x ?-
z 06 N
0
I _
+ 0 0? u C U O
-fit F- c"n 14 U 3 ?
?a0 z? ..?
u cz?'?? w
1
?I I
1 N
1
Xt
1
1
O
I
I ?I +
t Q? .
t
1
z °
V 10 ?
?t
711 +
t
t
0
W t
06 Z t
o
vu HQ t
W a? 1
1 ? U .a
1 ?
1 N
t 7-+ Q
O V
N
1 m x ?
r +
?r N N
r
r
0
?o
„dr, 3NI-lHDiVN +
0 0
N N o rt
1
0
+
0
0
0
l
0
co
V ?D
N
-r
n
Q o
a-

:> z o
o ?.
o Q
o
C
Q O
U

F 0 C
o ,4, T
?.
a z
O
U
?,
U
F,
O

p V O z U

co
?

o
o k

'o La
o
?
+

T

Lao %

O
+
1

?
?
to ca
'
O's U
z
O U_
co
x
o
N E
0
10
„0„ 3NI IHOiVVI +
0 0
N z `D
N E E
n anIT'1WI iHw

z s?
\\? 0 ??'p
g a ? ?. ? ? 3
z ?Fw
o
\ app Ci wV) Q
?g z x uCUU
I I \ ,I 1 ti v N
I \ I 1 0 ca-a x z U U
\ I v°z a H5 v
,I ? I I II {
{ I ? I i
0 Z
W Q
N J
I ` lt? ? ? 1 \ (r? Q f-
JN
?z ?Z
F4
LL LL ' 1i WI u L F W Z
Z3 oa
LL Ll. I WW J
OZ
0u
Ua L:j
I ?\ I u,
I I- l N I ?1
III I I
I 1 N I I W
ICI I 1 \ I
? ? 1 1 w C:l
V) u
11 1 ?? 0= N
11 W 1 H? I ? I
Ilr 1 Z? I I I
?? 11 ? ( Ua ? 11 I
111 i0 1 1 1 p
I 1? I 3 J I 1?
C) I
1 1
1

I
c
o:?
..
: p
0 0 .
E
0 3
x U 3 ;

LU9' 0
0 d x w° QU?
G

w E., o o

z 01 F" x
V)
w N

N
w c?

o

z 00

??;

x
w
?W.
?.

o
Z ?N G o ?
ti ?t.U

N
° Q > w° xzU
u U z C.
z ?b x

1 J
i _.
-? Q
w E I
?--

> N

N
h
1
1
W

Z
? I
I
Q
1
Q
Q
J E 1
1 Q
N
ri
1
z
W

?,
'
O ,
^
?,
E
1
W
>
N
fn 1 N
Q (?
?+-
a.
E I
I rn

N
h 1

I
U.
z

Q 1
1
ll
0-
N
O
LLJ
0:4 <ZZ
00 OCR W
ry w
co 0 Do
?- a
L-a
Q c)
z 0
z
Q U

E
0 w

0
co O
w
o E
z Ln

a

N ca CD
O
10
to

Gi
? ?
-
N
CL LL
Z
O
O
0
Z

c > -

E
to ? O¢ of o
O

CL LU
?
ZO O

o
= Qo
?LL =o
W 0
N
>
w C4
O
O Z
ao
N
w
?
00

r U
Z
of S
}
CL V)

; 0

C O

O
Z

W
W
S

U.
J
Co d to
O

Z
we w

cr-

W M
O Fw
-
_
W

00 wZ
0
~

1

1

1

1 W
N W
LU
0
W ?
co
w
J ¢
J
_

MCI)
O
Of
D
(D Dg
Z
go

wZ
?w
LL
Y
OZ
CD) t6 m
O
m
W

W

Z

v ?
N
V =
c N

U
w
•o

o m?
?r
? U

_ c
v v

ff? v

f?7
a wv E

a

w a v? oo O
Q co
N ? ? O

w

7 V
LL

c
?
o

a
N C •p t7 N r- co co

}
R N ?
L
o
O
O

eN- O r

ch
C
N V ? O O o
Q ? v

?
a H
o
c

X
?

W LL ? O

3
?
v '-
?m
es o c
F
-
C
y
C C
V ODD
N
t{9
O
O
0
_ ;? c ? cD ? O co
LL j O O O ? N
U
U N W V ? 0:

m M m fh
?
O O O
c

LL N C) O O
C D O N 1 N
N ? ? ?
N N

r
N
<'r1
Q J
O
Z
O
0
0

W
U
U ¢
H
SITE, MAP
N 56820.6270 E 709921JW
MCD
ZZ
\ I \ / //
LL.
LL- \ \
isa I I ? / /
• /' / J2-b
I 1
x
v `
m

'
I
/
/ J
Nm
/ iJ?
CJ
/
W
wig

/ ???? y
\
• 14
4ty

V7
s0 ? ?
S
\
\

m
t
Na
s
h

0 oF?
1-4

F
..
a
47

0 e
3 z
? o
°
two

Z
C7 O
U
.. y
?zN
d x ? ° ?
u0 N
Ems'' C O W?F+ 0
c z < °•°
H
H
? °
?
a U
ti a
U°w? s
F
p rr
Q
z O
a DE
F R W
U o
?0o
z a

d
1

0-4
? N
o?
W Z
N Q
Z J
Q ~

-i = W
3
L)
JN z
? WZ
2-
9A
LLI-j
Z
W
it
W J
W
O ? D U
m
M
!
W
Z
z
•
J •
? !

Lzl
U
N
0

Gm
-7 Crm
ZZ

/

s /

1-4 ?p \ tJ.13
/ J \
/ WN \
\ \
/ iK
in
I \ 1-1
Z
0
OFE- r-
rn F Q6Ca

,- a v it z ?

/ Z

d

x

a 64
w Z M
O

N
F w G
il
> P
° U ?.
C6 O
O O
Z e .?
o

aa O Z
O
x
E" W?cn
WD?
,
ti
a+ -- U a W
U
a13 p a

W O
ry) F
,'
U G
Z a
G O
g
t O W
S'
A a
o
9

V 3NI-IHOidW
J ~
J
r
0
rc
i
i
W
2

rw?
w
N
wZ
N a
2 J
aww
=3
Z Z
UEu -j fa V) H?
0 LLJ
?
W
w z w
w ? W J
O DU
•
•
•
W
Uww
N
O
0
z X
NHo
O
O
W ri
..4 11
4 ?' F' ? w O a
w
o$ e o
c d
O a v 3z c
+ z x 0 a 0 64
? W o ?U ?N
F o z
/
0
-J + o x ??d 00
a w vow
- a
a ? W o
ca z FOB x
X O OR v'
i Z cn a
O ?
W
N %
OLLJ
aO 1
oa t +
CLO ?t
?a C LO
t ?
1
10
Al
t
... ?I
L W > / +
t FM
o
N
C.7
ZLU
O
In Q / ?? ?1
W O
Al IlD N N ® (?
?..?
J C; C;' V ra
0 V
/ Q ~ 0
W Q +
a N
t =? a E-
o O
+ x
N ?1-
0
O O
4
0
rri
N
O
N
O
rl?
N
0
M
o$
0
ri
0
i
I
I
i
0
,l-;
0 o z
O E0, F

? ?
b

. rr
d .. O
F d z g ?, ?? ?
a x aza d
z c?
x
a
° W Z
ao Q
0 0 ° d
a 0 0 - 0 N
E
"' ac DE ?,
Q O d
x F+ ,OW
W O
x
w 0 a W ?
UC
A ?
z O

a
ypD4
F
U ad
w
0
0
Z M

O

0
i 0
O ?0q
J +

z

O
_
b

O
N
O
M
0
IT
O

o ?

J ?
_J Q
L? Z
V1 Q
W J
Fo ~
Z W
3
W
[tl
,.a

u
d

d
F .a
z d
O U

a a
o c?
x ?
E E
O O

O O
E E

V 3NIlHD 1bW O O P W
as w 7
o "U
' " duo o a ° ;
? w a

• 0:Z
?•• ?
/ ° guw 94
N

;i
o

1

-
•

o Ch rA
r
t
1
•
/1
?
-
0.
?
V
V A w
-

co 001
.
/
s?•- - --

?1 - -

y •?

o

A W

a

xo

w
U z 4 Q m
Z /• // ?• 1 ,? •J Z ?a
= / 1 1 -

•/ 1 1 1 1 1 ,?---

om 1 1 ''

-
-
k
2
1 1 1 _ 1 1.

1 1 ;

i 1 { 1 1 ?

' -? P
-4
% > i 1
- - 1 1
G , ' _ {1 J
u ? ? 1 1
.0 t t

s
...1 1 1
1 1 ?

N

F N
_ and

?
<

O
1. nm
N
¢
I /. \ N S\ u O
O
ti JC /
E- 1.04
p ? i J
?Wy t .? N 1 // O
Q U w
Z a!
Z to
? 0154
' N ~
V '
94
,I I a W o ?o N
?, I F p C a a ^? 0
c, F O
Q6 z
TA rn
14 U 12
W
u CE E- c z a x am
10
Wa
i' >a.
• ? O< I r
,01
:at
m I q 1 ? ?$? E lr Vl/
r r W°z
I 1 S NQ
? Q N J
B I ?`` \ O p a l j
0- Q J U3
ak I ? I \ ? FW LJ-i.Z w z
1 1 \ PPP??? N 3 N J N Z
1 I \ i tat z W F- W
I f - F-W r0:
1 I W \ \ ZJ Z3: ZW
p? pU
I
I I I \ «
I \ \'a
?I\ I \ \ s4 IIF???--44 ?
I \ \ ? \ 1 II a ? ?1 •
1..
\\1 1 1 III cci ?1
?, ? ? ? 1 ?+II a z
• "" ` Sfc c
-r-rr \I?.y
1 1 ? ? _ 1 t.. r LV/J
u 7 1 1 K? \?? ? N
"' r P It?PI • • ; 1
E? 3
pP 0 P 1 •
3NI-IH.)1dW O
E
O

.000
oo*

0 cc
?- ?"Z via d
W
a
LU e
>? W
Q b
v>
OZ
LLJ _ Q Z
?~ HIx
Z3 2W
u
z
o-j
0-
* r3
17 • •
/ im urc as •
/ - W
o ? ? ?? J U
z U
F-
3
N
/ \ / / O

O
J 3
O
I O
N)
?
3
C M
C17 O

-- N
(? O
? z

N N P O - ?
+ MATCHLINE A
N
0
A
O
+
0

?d +
® o
A
W
t
N
O
C
+
O
t
O?
O

N z +
O
? ?
m ? ?
v
CO)
O EAUlm "•? Z oo.

?? O 14 C OLT ?
??nY c m x Y
Wz? aoc r
c

O
- O
N IN la IS

V

R
N O
3 3 N N a o ?
O o
c I?- MATCHLINE B
I
C17 C ° I?
I
Y Z I
r y I
Col-
IIE-
1
y Z
r' ® o iK- c,
m
? I
I? n r
-
N
O
i
i
I'K
O I ?N
IK
I
e7 ?
•v
m Nb?
y m O zv?. .'
o
m9
o EA rA m No
y P'C z t l m a
O ? MATCHLINE C
V V,zt' x z + `???
dCzj7? O O °
pq H g z
O
m 10
1 y O z N N a o a

N O

O O
N

3
C ?

N
n o
z
r •?

Po.

a
0
N
a P IS
0
P
0
It
+
0
10
10
C1I?

0

0
P
O
m z
n
mox z ° v
M o C
m VC) O ii tpn17 Cm ? Z
v O
'=7 ?., pC ?o 17
z
v zzm ° z Q z
°m? o o
gz>
o `4 CA >
o m?0 to
o ? p zz
N
MATCHLINE C
N lo. IS

rl

r
3 ? N N
0 o b C
o
O O
o ? 1

.p I I
1 1
3 I ?
a?
O I Cy
? ; I

I I a
C. y I I T
n r s + ?

r
n

C7 1 1
+
, I

? ? 1 fY
I ;? I T
1 MCA ?
I vq I
p 1 1
I
-
\
1
p
S /
/- - - - - - -
/
C>W / i '
/ - - - - - - - - - - - J I

S 1
?
r- - - -----------
1
owe
o>
3

•
$ / I
, co
u
3
\ 1 ,

? j I I
1
\
N
w
z

N _

\ A
\
wog
m
O z
t? v
C \
\
,.. 1
\
O
tin
0
04 C (A
'
0
zw c
? ?o
dz?
o?c z ? ? ?o
? g ?
? .? ? ? c ?o ?o ?o to
n
"
n
O o
3 ?; i
[It
n
I / MI
9 I
-IJ
•\m f / //? / / /1) •? /
??I 1 s ? 1
y
?s
I ~ Z Cp?_
i m
s
? f
i 1
Om ZO Cm ' •\•.1
mz z ;vz 'f
so rrno -no •?,
;D - -+ n --+
zm rm nm
cn >LA rnN
Z
N? err- ?}Q I / 1 1 :?'I ..
m m
r? NZ ?'' 1 l
N )
zrn
N
1 ?
\ _>
00
y o, z \
00 0
\ o
0
0 z
N pG"d c C ?I •? _
n ?
y v [ O
.
f

o \ \ I Po \ \F\ r
N?1 I \
Nj
\ I rs \ T \ s /
I \ K
\ r
I I \
n \ ? \ I D r
N I"
m \
t?4 I m r
\\ \ I rr
rr
o r
LL183M.0 Z - g \
1
:E 31
Mm m?
N? m
I 'N 11
I 1\
Sol
?b I I I ,
I I I
o? ?n z I I I
m ?o'? ?rn°v I r I I ?
'U I I M
N >C? ?,?-,3yz? ?q 1 I I
o y j6 z ?, \ I
o? C y \\ I I I
W _ C I I o
Z FA
o 0 ) I I I I a
p C ? ' ? ? I I o
o '? '?' y I? 1 I I
'g yn o z '?' ? ?
3N'H3V2[H HTTIASIHOIZIM
968 XOH O d
SOY89 ON'NO.LONIW'IIM
1332I19 Q2I29 H.L2ION 909I
90f89 ON `NOJLDNIW llt*
NOT XOH O d
2099£ 'Id `H'I'IIANOSXDVf
99f0I• XOH O d
90M ON `NO.LONIWIIIM
69II XOH O d
loM ON `NOXONIKIIIM
XHHH.LS .LabUS,3H3 092£
III `Wflf)bzvw 1w wV111'IIM
'ONI `*GNI 'IdOI.LA'IdNv QHI'Iddv
,LHNIIO.L.LV LLIO 0/3
NOXONINIIIM d0 JUIO
(IVO'd'IIvu XSO
'OO NINS NvORIawv
UO.LVII.LSININ(IV Xv L 0/3
AINfI03 UHAONVH MHN
SHSSHIRRIV
Hwvm s.7HHNMO
SHSSHiIaQw QNd SHKVN
SUHNAA,® XJLHHdO'Hell

D Ln A W N -? p N

r
4 4 N N
1s N O c0 V O O W -+
O N to Al O+D CO V OD w
T1 (n
-
O O cn W O O cn O C) O
r- r
. -1
O r
W r -4
O
M -?
0
7
0

-r a
O '
cn
N C
N a
C
N
a C
<
A O O O j ?1
;
N V
C C j
N

O O O
A ?
A W ?
'
m
C _
v,

m z

.
x
d A CA
a c D C
m ? A 7
a

ID
?

?' ° vo_

.
a
o O
= CO (D
CL

Z c
0 o O o ? o'
W O Cl) O n C
VA W - v N Cl)
v
?
^ _ C
n : 7 m
..,a
::E A
m

m ?
3
c°i Cm -o
.. m
M
< T
3

x A
y?
W
+
/ N 7
Q CD
(Q
T
^ N
\J

V
W
ID
CL
n m
:r :3

0
v
m (D
ys-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMETN OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDo TIPPETC
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 1, 2001
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality,
Wetlands Unit
160 Mail Scrvice Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
ATTENTION: John Hennessy, NCDOT Coordinator
SUBJECT: Application./or Modification to Section 401 Water Quality Certificate No.
3304.for the Construction oj'a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd
Street to Third Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project
No. 8.2250102; Federal Aid Project No. MAM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
REFERENCE: NCDOT's March 27, 2001 Application for Permit Modification.
Enclosed you will find seven (7) copies of the referenced application for a modification to
the Section 404 Permit/Section 401 Water Quality Certificate for the subject project.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $200.00 to cover the cost of the minor
modification.
Please process this application at your earliest convenience. As you are aware, the
project has already been let to construction. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] ext. 270 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Enclosures: (7 copies of application, check for $200.00)
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone]
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone]
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBS/TE: WWW.DOH.DOT,STATE.NC.US
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
? ?'
rn IZZ r-11
4
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David L. Timpy, Regulatory Project Manager
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to DOA Permit No. 199603836 for the
Construction of a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd Street to Third
Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project No. 8.2250102;
Federal Aid Project No. MAM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
The Department recently discovered that a small section of sanitary sewer line will have
to be relocated left of station 22+60 (see figures). The proposed work will impact 0.07
acre of bottomland hardwood forested wetland within wetland site 2. The scope of work
will include clearing and grubbing, excavation and filling in a rectangular area measuring
approximately 8 x 38 meters.
Please modify the existing permit to allow this work to go forward. Insofar as
compensatory mitigation is concerned, the Department offers to provide up to 0.14 acre
of in-kind credit at the Haw's Run Mitigation Site. Alternatively, in an attempt to
provide mitigation within the local watershed, you are asked to consider applying the
0.14 acre against the overall compensatory wetland mitigation package for the Smith
Creek Parkway (U-92 A/B). This plan provides over 87 acres of total compensation
including 9.8 acres of restoration credits for impacts totaling only 6.5 acres.
W'--4
March 27, 2001
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
A separate letter is being sent to the Division of Coastal Management requesting that the
impacts resulting from the relocated sewer line be authorized by a Letter of Refinement to
the CAMA Major Development Permit. A check in the amount of $200.00 is being
forwarded under separate cover to the Division of Water Quality to cover the cost of the
Section 401 modification.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSI TE. WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
a ,
Page 2
March 27, 2001
David L. Timpy, USACE
Since this project has already been let to construction it is urgent that the appropriate
authorizations, including the modified Section 404 permit, be obtained at the earliest
opportunity. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this approval. Should you have
any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] x270.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
cc: David Franklin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Tom McCartney, Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Quality, Wilmington
David Cox, NCWildlife Resources Commission,
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
Ed Brooks, Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington
Ron Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort
Fritz Rohde, Division of Marine Fisheries, Wilmington
Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design, Raleigh
H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
Joe Blair, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
K. T. Cross, P.E., Division 3 , Burgaw

s i'll'i E I I A P
Y

Q
SITE 1
END STATE PROJECT 8.1250110
END F. A. PRO CT VfANHS-0332 8
-L- STA. 36+20.000
N 57202.1487
E 708038.6293

7

k SITE 3
/11 5?J

\ `
J SITE 2

` A

SITE i

T
? / MU

?J I G
is ,..m
ter.-
?E
BEGIN STATE PRO CT 8.1250110
0332 8
O CT MA
NHS
\ .
-
BEGIN F.A. PR
-L- STA. 12+67112
11 \ N 55631.2792 E 706563.6093

Q N. C. DEPT.OF .TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
-. .

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DA'T'E
.Or %*, 6

O

\
1N) E?QA A
/

m ?N
-n rn
()
r

>r
It /
;D

i CUM

;Dm
T
cn At « « NW z
\ I m
L •
q N
« ? E

no Zo I? m

a0 m0 \
\ \ '
n
?t
m m
r^
r^ \
\ T *'
r
Z
GALA
0 _
Z
o N? \
\ \
\
\

ZZ M \ m ' A, /

\
\ R/
\

n

z z

0
I
LI
x ® O 1-3

Gl CA
c ? ®x ®
?,
00 Lb6S 9£>
lam/ ? o 0-3 h?
W il
?

0
m i1
A
SD
C

a

` F
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDo TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 1, 2001
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality,
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
ATTENTION: John Hennessy, NCDOT Coordinator
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to Section 401 Water Quality Certificate No.
3304.16r the Construction oj'a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23ru
Street to Third Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project
No. 8.2250102; Federal Aid Project No. AMM--M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
REFERENCE: NCDOT's March 27, 2001 Application for Permit Modification.
Enclosed you will find seven (7) copies of the referenced application for a modification to
the Section 404 Permit/Section 401 Water Quality Certificate for the subject project.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $200.00 to cover the cost of the minor
modification.
Please process this application at your earliest convenience. As you are aware, the
project has already been let to construction. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] ext. 270 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
n ?
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch 4
Enclosures: (7 copies of application, check for $200.00)
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION- FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTAND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBS/TE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
W 4%
?'0 SWtq
?V 7
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 27, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David L. Timpy, Regulatory Project Manager
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application ./or Modification to DOA Permit No. 199603836 J61- the
Construction of a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd Street to Third
Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project No. & 2250102:
Federal Aid Project No. MAM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
The Department recently discovered that a small section of sanitary sewer line will have
to be relocated left of station 22+60 (see figures). The proposed work will impact 0.07
acre of bottomland hardwood forested wetland within wetland site 2. The scope of work
will include clearing and grubbing, excavation and filling in a rectangular area measuring
approximately 8 x 38 meters.
Please modify the existing permit to allow this work to go forward. Insofar as
compensatory mitigation is concerned, the Department offers to provide up to 0.14 acre
of in-kind credit at the Haw's Run Mitigation Site. Alternatively, in an attempt to
provide mitigation within the local watershed, you are asked to consider applying the
0.14 acre against the overall compensatory wetland mitigation package for the Smith
Creek Parkway (U-92 A/B). This plan provides over 87 acres of total compensation
including 9.8 acres of restoration credits for impacts totaling only 6.5 acres.
A separate letter is being sent to the Division of Coastal Management requesting that the
impacts resulting from the relocated sewer line be authorized by a Letter of Refinement to
the CAMA Major Development Permit. A check in the amount of $200.00 is being
forwarded under separate cover to the Division of Water Quality to cover the cost of the
Section 401 modification.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX. [phone]
WEBSITE: W14W DOH. DOT STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
Page 2
March 27, 2001
David L. Timpy, USACE
Since this project has already been let to construction it is urgent that the appropriate
authorizations, including the modified Section 404 permit, be obtained at the earliest
opportunity. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this approval. Should you have
any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] x270.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
cc: David Franklin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Tom McCartney, Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Quality, Wilmington
David Cox, NCWildlife Resources Commission,
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
Ed Brooks, Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington
Ron Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort
Fritz Rohde, Division of Marine Fisheries, Wilmington
Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design, Raleigh
H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
Joe Blair, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
K. T. Cross, P.E., Division 3 , Burgaw
SIS 17-l" E A P
F
SITE /
?B K a EPM STATE PROJECT 8.1250110
END F. A. PRO CT MANHS-0332 8
-Ir STA.36+20.000
N 57202.1487
t E 708038.6293
d
?\ o ? 1
3 ?
4
nr ,.r
l
SITE 3
n ?
. ? -? r 1 F
\ SITE 2
SITE 1
lusA?'u ?'? ?. r
is ,..w ..a,,.. BEGIN STATE PROTECT 8.2250110
\ BEGIN PA PRO CT MANHS-0332 8
-Ir STA. 12+67112
11 N 55631.2792 E 706563.6093
Q N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
J

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIO\T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE

O
?
/I 1
O a` f \ 1

?\ \M
O
3 /'111 \\\ \\\\ l

m ' ,

rn C O
l
"
? ?
H
\ AFT 1 fn
n N
/
?,
T
ExR?\ \ 1

m-n T
>r /
-4

r4
•

T

?v
m
vi rr?? ?

.
. e p0 ?m
Z 1
8 1
I ?m . m ? N

•
r ?

m m
\
\
\ o I
2K o?
? cn \
\
\ \ -n
r \
r- Z
P-J

\

?`
'
z m
v°
N I?
? \
\
£x \ :
s m ??
l 1
?? ' /
\M r
R?

/
R. A \

?GA z \

® i"

81,

? ?
Ci ? x
?
?
®® O ®
/
- - -
"- ?ess?s?

i e
® /
m z
i
0 cyoi?r
d1 $TNfa ,,'moo
r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL f. EASLEY LYNDo TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 1, 2001
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality,
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
ATTENTION: John Hennessy, NCDOT Coordinator
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to Section 401 Water Quality Certificate No.
3304.16r the Construction of a . four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd
Street to Third Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project
No. 8.2250102; Federal Aid Project No. MAM--M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
REFERENCE: NCDOT's March 27, 2001 Application. for Permit Modification.
Enclosed you will find seven (7) copies of the referenced application for a modification to
the Section 404 Permit/Section 401 Water Quality Certificate for the subject project.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $200.00 to cover the cost of the minor
modification.
Please process this application at your earliest convenience. As you are aware, the
project has already been let to construction. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] ext. 270 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager o
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Enclosures: (7 copies of application, check for $200.00)
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX. [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
N
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David L. Timpy, Regulatory Project Manager
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to DOA Permit No. 199603836 for the
Construction of a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd Street to Third
Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project N6.8.2250102,
Federal Aid Project No. MAM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
The Department recently discovered that a small section of sanitary sewer line will have
to be relocated left of station 22+60 (see figures). The proposed work will impact 0.07
acre of bottomland hardwood forested wetland within wetland site 2. The scope of work
will include clearing and grubbing, excavation and filling in a rectangular area measuring
approximately 8 x 38 meters.
Please modify the existing permit to allow this work to go forward. Insofar as
compensatory mitigation is concerned, the Department offers to provide up to 0.14 acre
of in-kind credit at the Haw's Run Mitigation Site. Alternatively, in an attempt to
provide mitigation within the local watershed, you are asked to consider applying the
0.14 acre against the overall compensatory wetland mitigation package for the Smith
Creek Parkway (U-92 A/B). This plan provides over 87 acres of total compensation
including 9.8 acres of restoration credits for impacts totaling only 6.5 acres.
M
`awn
March 27, 2001
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
A separate letter is being sent to the Division of Coastal Management requesting that the
impacts resulting from the relocated sewer line be authorized by a Letter of Refinement to
the CAMA Major Development Permit. A check in the amount of $200.00 is being
forwarded under separate cover to the Division of Water Quality to cover the cost of the
Section 401 modification.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBS/ TE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
Page 2
March 27, 2001
David L. Timpy, USACE
Since this project has already been let to construction it is urgent that the appropriate
authorizations, including the modified Section 404 permit, be obtained at the earliest
opportunity. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this approval. Should you have
any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] x270.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
cc: David Franklin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Tom McCartney, Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Quality, Wilmington
David Cox, NCWildlife Resources Commission,
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
Ed Brooks, Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington
Ron Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort
Fritz Rohde, Division of Marine Fisheries, Wilmington
Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design, Raleigh
H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
Joe Blair, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
K. T. Cross, P.E., Division 3, Burgaw
[ I T F'l
-AAi

r
F
J
Q
SITE 1
END STATE PROJECT 8.2250110
END F. A. PROJECT ?WANHS43-32 8
-L- STA. 36+20.000
% N 57202.1487
E 708038.6293
?
y
h? r t^ ru
J
a

SITE 3
i 'S- SJ

f'

I \ SITE 2

.` k
?_ ' ?
• SITE 1
,?
`dY
1 1
S
BEGIN STATE PROJECT 8.2250110
BEGIN FA. PRO CT MAKHS-0332 8
-L- STA. 12 + 67112
11 \ N 55631.2792 E 706563.6093

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
- Y _
C-)
/ \ 1
N f#ltA R ` l
rn
'" Coco
z?
11
I ' m`" !
am o? 8
» \ ' I • v'm rn 1
» / • ? Ijli`
a • tl
• *
\ ?1 *(
D O m o \ \
N V'
ZK v'! \? \ \ c u *I ?1
m N r \ \ I
m Z \ ?l * h` '*t
h?
z m f? \ \ A` : I /
V) TI f
A-
RI
V) z
\ \ R
\
\ 9
ILI Me
®
>
®® z ` 1 / - - iecsecr - -
r ry 1
m z
f,
C
?J
0
(A?
W
*TN?s
Dc)/041s'
10 6D
1© STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
May 1, 2001
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality,
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
ATTENTION: John Hennessy, NCDOT Coordinator
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to Section 401 Water Quality Certificate No.
330; for the Construction of a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd
Street to Third Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project
No. 8.2250102; Federal Aid Project No. MAM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
REFERENCE: NCDOT's March 27, 2001 Application for Permit Modification.
Enclosed you will find seven (7) copies of the referenced application for a modification to
the Section 404 Permit/Section 401 Water Quality Certificate for the subject project.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $200.00 to cover the cost of the minor
modification.
Please process this application at your earliest convenience. As you are aware, the
project has already been let to construction. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] ext. 270 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
J-0. ?4
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Enclosures: (7 copies of application, check for $200.00)
n
c r?
"-t
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBS/TE: WWW..DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
e Ilk
s.. SWJr s?
r ,T
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 27, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David L. Timpy, Regulatory Project Manager
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to DOA Permit No. 199603836 for the
Construction of a, four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd Street to Third
Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project No.8.2250102;
Federal Aid Project No. AA-M-585](2); TIP No. U-92AIB
The Department recently discovered that a small section of sanitary sewer line will have
to be relocated left of station 22+60 (see figures). The proposed work will impact 0.07
acre of bottomland hardwood forested wetland within wetland site 2. The scope of work
will include clearing and grubbing, excavation and filling in a rectangular area measuring
approximately 8 x 38 meters.
Please modify the existing permit to allow this work to go forward. Insofar as
compensatory mitigation is concerned, the Department offers to provide up to 0.14 acre
of in-kind credit at the Haw's Run Mitigation Site. Alternatively, in an attempt to
provide mitigation within the local watershed, you are asked to consider applying the
0.14 acre against the overall compensatory wetland mitigation package for the Smith
Creek Parkway (U-92 A/B). This plan provides over 87 acres of total compensation
including 9.8 acres of restoration credits for impacts totaling only 6.5 acres.
A separate letter is being sent to the Division of Coastal Management requesting that the
impacts resulting from the relocated sewer line be authorized by a Letter of Refinement to
the CAMA Major Development Permit. A check in the amount of $200.00 is being
forwarded under separate cover to the Division of Water Quality to cover the cost of the
Section 401 modification.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS -
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW. DOH. DOT. STATE. NC. US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
VA.
Page 2
March 27, 2001
David L. Timpy, USACE
Since this project has already been let to construction it is urgent that the appropriate
authorizations, including the modified Section 404 permit, be obtained at the earliest
opportunity. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this approval. Should you have
any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] x270.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
cc: David Franklin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Tom McCartney. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Quality, Wilmington
David Cox, NCWildlife Resources Commission,
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigk
Ed Brooks, Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington
Ron Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort
Fritz Rohde, Division of Marine Fisheries, Wilmington
Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design, Raleigh
H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
Joe. Blair, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
K. T. Cross, P.E., Division 3 , Burgaw
r..
)Y1,AP
i
SITE 1
f?
q Elm STATE PROJECT 8.2250110
END F. A. PRO CT .?NHS-0332(s)
y -lr STA. 36+20.000
N 57202.1487
E 708038.6293
lu
a
nr , ?+
l
SITE Z
s?
J SITE 2
.\ ? l r
?W ' ?,? • SITE I
1l ?
. '1 `JI iG 0'
rs -w -a- BEGIN STATE PROJECT 8.2250110
BEGIN F.A. PRO CT MANHS-0332 8
\ L- STA. 12+67.112
11 \ N 55631.2792 E 706563.6093
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
^ r ?

O

v
C" m
Z l '
CO Z STN
T
'_O
D Ffi
-n
A
T
rn
r /
>
>
?.y
--q

i • TI
2
mm

N / T
vi he I • CW

-' E52
$
\ m m
r •
• N
r TI
•
(?O ZO
m
r m
a
o mo
m * G
Zm rr -m \ *I ?`

A
m D

o m ?
v "Ir
is? 4

\ ne

FGS \
Tim Ri"
\
\ \
\ \ \
?
\ R

C) Z

a
/

v ?
? ® x
?
?
®® F. Y®y V ? - Lb65'9£Y

?.`) p? ?`I 1 7
?v655Sq.H? 1
l /

® Q o

2
z
1
1
.9

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
May 1, 2001
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality,
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
ATTENTION: John Hennessy, NCDOT Coordinator
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to Section 401 Water Quality Certificate No.
3304 for the Construction of a . four-lane divided highway on New Location , from 23rd
Street to Third Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project
No. 8.2250102; Federal Aid Project No. M4M--M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
REFERENCE: NCDOT's March 27, 2001 Application for Permit Modification.
Enclosed you will find seven (7) copies of the referenced application for a modification to
the Section 404 Permit/Section 401 Water Quality Certificate for the subject project.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $200.00 to cover the cost of the minor
modification.
Please process this application at your earliest convenience. As you are aware, the
project has already been let to construction. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] ext. 270 if you have any questions.

Sincerely, L

William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch 0

Enclosures: (7 copies of application, check for $200.00)
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENTAND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS - 1 SOUTH WI LMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWWDOH. DOT. STATE.NC. US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
000-5
yyyes STAlto I 6M/
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPART ENT OF TRANSPORTATION
r
,. sTwrLn?
y ?-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTN ENT OF TRANSPORTATION

MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 27, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David L. Timpy, Regulatory Project Manager
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to DOA Permit No. 199603836 for the
Construction of a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd Street to Third
Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project No.8.2250102;
Federal Aid Project No. IMM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
The Department recently discovered that a small section of sanitary sewer line will have
to be relocated left of station 22+60 (see figures). The proposed work will impact 0.07
acre of bottomland hardwood forested wetland within wetland site 2. The scope of work
will include clearing and grubbing, excavation and filling in a rectangular area measuring
approximately 8 x 38 meters.
Please modify the existing permit to allow this work to go forward. Insofar as
compensatory mitigation is concerned, the Department offers to provide up to 0.14 acre
of in-kind credit at the Haw's Run Mitigation Site. Alternatively, in an attempt to
provide mitigation within the local watershed, you are asked to consider applying the
0.14 acre against the overall compensatory wetland mitigation package for the Smith
Creek Parkway (U-92 A/B). This plan provides over 87 acres of total compensation
including 9.8 acres of restoration credits for impacts totaling only 6.5 acres.
A separate letter is being sent to the Division of Coastal Management requesting that the
impacts resulting from the relocated sewer line be authorized by a Letter of Refinement to
the CAMA Major Development Permit. A check in the amount of $200.00 is being
forwarded under separate cover to the Division of Water Quality to cover the cost of the
Section 401 modification.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
l'
Page 2
March 27, 2001
David L. Timpy, USACE
Since this project has already been let to construction it is urgent that the appropriate
authorizations, including the modified Section 404 permit, be obtained at the earliest
opportunity. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this approval. Should you have
any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] x270.
Sincerely,
Q4
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
cc: David Franklin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Tom McCartney, Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Quality, Wilmington.
David Cox, NCWildlife Resources Commission,
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
Ed Brooks, Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington
Ron Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort
Fritz Rohde, Division of Marine Fisheries, Wilmington
Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design, Raleigh
H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
Joe Blair, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
K. T. Cross, P.E., Division 3, Burgaw.
t ?%o
71E I A ?- p

T
Y
r
K
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIULN
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
.# w:

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE H AYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
? , M

0
3 ?
/ 1
o '? \ 1

\
EXSr
l

m
C O
T Cl*
\ '?REEj m
j--4
/
t 1
FX?, R ?\ \ 1
-n
M
r /
? r

Zn
WIC m

N
i

uc: m

mZ

g
l
i Nm t
W
• \ A-
m t
!
i

• 4?
"o Zrn
rm m
IN r r
ct
i
'?
;o o--I rn
zm ?m \ \ n ? I
h?
C) N n to t

mD */ k
r- Z
0
a,
V1 EX
S? f
\
\ we

FwST6N' RiM \ \ \ \

\

CA ® ? ? \ \

? C',
? a

? ? ? n C? 1,
i 1 b
00 A ;6S V

Li V6S?SV /
r
® L
l Y

?
~
14
® i
t
CD

C)6) to ?
/,j6D.
dw SW[u?
I
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETr
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
May 1, 2001
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality,
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
ATTENTION: John Hennessy, NCDOT Coordinator
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to Section 401 Water Quality Certificate No.
3304. for the Construction of a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd
Street to Third Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project
No. 8.2250102; Federal Aid Project No. MAM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
REFERENCE: NCDOT's March 27, 2001 Application for Permit Modification.
Enclosed you will find seven (7) copies of the referenced application for a modification to
the Section 404 Permit/Section 401 Water Quality Certificate for the subject project.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $200.00 to cover the cost of the minor
modification.
Please process this application at your earliest convenience. As you are aware, the
project has already been let to construction. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] ext. 270 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Enclosures: (7 copies of application, check for $200.00)
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone]
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone]
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
r-r7
?
n ?
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
s STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
March 27, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David L. Timpy, Regulatory Project Manager
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to DOA Permit No. 199603836 jor the
Construction of a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd Street to Third
Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project No.8.2250102;
Federal Aid Project No. MAM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
The Department recently discovered that a small section of sanitary sewer line will have
to be relocated left of station 22+60 (see figures). The proposed work will impact 0.07
acre of bottomland hardwood forested wetland within wetland site 2. The scope of work
will include clearing and grubbing, excavation and filling in a rectangular area measuring
approximately 8 x 38 meters.
Please modify the existing permit to allow this work to go forward. Insofar as
compensatory mitigation is concerned, the Department offers to provide up to 0.14 acre
of in-kind credit at the Haw's Run Mitigation Site. Alternatively, in an attempt to
provide mitigation within the local watershed, you are asked to consider applying the
0.14 acre against the overall compensatory wetland mitigation package for the Smith
Creek Parkway (U-92 A/B). This plan provides over 87 acres of total compensation
including 9.8 acres of restoration credits for impacts totaling only 6.5 acres.
A separate letter is being sent to the Division of Coastal Management requesting that the
impacts resulting from the relocated sewer line be authorized by a Letter of Refinement to
the CAMA Major Development Permit. A check in the amount of $200.00 is being
forwarded under separate cover to the Division of Water Quality to cover the cost of the
Section 401 modification.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC
Page 2
March 27, 2001
David L. Timpy, USACE
Since this project has already been let to construction it is urgent that the appropriate
authorizations, including the modified Section 404 permit, be obtained at the earliest
opportunity. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this approval. Should you have
any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] x270-
Sincerely,
,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
cc: David Franklin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Tom McCartney, Fish and Wildlife Service. Raleigh
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Quality, Wilmington
David Cox, NCWildlife Resources Commission,
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
Ed Brooks, Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington
Ron Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort
Fritz Rohde, Division of Marine Fisheries, Wilmington
Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design, Raleigh
H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
Joe Blair, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
K. T. Cross, P.E., Division 3 , Burgaw
+ 19 r..
L?,IIAP
f
Fy
J

SITE 1
A° END STATE PROJECT 8.2250110
END F. A. PRO CT .VL4NMS-0332 8
-L- STA.36+20.000
N 57202.1487
E 708038.6293
t
.7+ ro
a
?\ O

7

m ?r

SITE 3

Sl

/

SITE 2

SITE 1

-' 4

1 4

BEGIN STATE PRO]?CT 8.2150110
a ...m -0.? BEGIN FAPRO C7' M4NHS-0332 8
` -L- STA. 12 + 67112
11 \ N 55631.2792 E 706563.6093

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 11
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE

0
3 /i 1
o ?\ 1
T1
v
zm /
H
C O / \ STgE.ET 1 m
.-n r / TI EX/\S) \ 1
DN / McgM\ \
m-n 1 \
A
?r I
-? Zn WW' 11
N Fe po mm i
• VC: Om °z 8 1
\ m m N W
22-4
• q rn •
•
• ?'1 C
w?
?Y -1 G
rm Zmm I? w' m
ao mo \, , \ Oft,
c T
Zm rm \ \ «' h
N
? m r \\ \ \ w' T
?! l \
v O
N eke) ? (??
\ \ RI
fA A \ /
\ \ R
\
cn cn / \ \
z® / /-N
rx
® ® /
/a
SIX -A, 't
r ® v ? i Lv65 . m
m z
J
i
C)0?61T-
xK1a0
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
May 1, 2001
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality,
Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
ATTENTION: John Hennessy, NCDOT Coordinator
LYNDo TIPPETT
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Application .16r Modification to Section 401 Water Quality Certificate No.
330 for the Construction of a four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd
Street to Third Street, Wilmington. New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project
No. 8.2250102; Federal Aid Project No. MAM--M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
REFERENCE: NCDOT's March 27, 2001 Application for Permit Modification.
Enclosed you will find seven (7) copies of the referenced application for a modification to
the Section 404 Permit/Section 401 Water Quality Certificate for the subject project.
Also enclosed is a check in the amount of $200.00 to cover the cost of the minor
modification.
Please process this application at your earliest convenience. As you are aware, the
project has already been let to construction. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] ext. 270 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
(r?
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Enclosures: (7 copies of application, check for $200.00)
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone]
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone]
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WESSITE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
C__)
rn ?
m ?
a --r
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTNMNT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David L. Timpy, Regulatory Project Manager
SUBJECT: Application for Modification to DOA Permit No. 199603836 for the
Construction of a.four-lane divided highway on New Location from 23rd Street to Third
Street, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North Carolina; State Project No.8.2250102;
Federal Aid Project No. MAM-M-5851(2); TIP No. U-92AIB
The Department recently discovered that a small section of sanitary sewer line will have
to be relocated left of station 22+60 (see figures). The proposed work will impact 0.07
acre of bottomland hardwood forested wetland within wetland site 2. The scope of work
will include clearing and grubbing, excavation and filling in a rectangular area measuring
approximately 8 x 38 meters.
Please modify the existing permit to allow this work to go forward. Insofar as
compensatory mitigation is concerned, the Department offers to provide up to 0.14 acre
of in-kind credit at the Haw's Run Mitigation Site. Alternatively, in an attempt to
provide mitigation within the local watershed, you are asked to consider applying the
0.14 acre against the overall compensatory wetland mitigation package for the Smith
Creek Parkway (U-92 A/B). This plan provides over 87 acres of total compensation
including 9.8 acres of restoration credits for impacts totaling only 6.5 acres.
March 27, 2001
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
A separate letter is being sent to the Division of Coastal Management requesting that the
impacts resulting from the relocated sewer line be authorized by a Letter of Refinement to
the CAMA Major Development Permit. A check in the amount of $200.00 is being
forwarded under separate cover to the Division of Water Quality to cover the cost of the
Section 401 modification.
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: WWW.DOH.DOTSTATE.NC.US
LOCATION:
TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC

Page 2
March 27, 2001
David L. Timpy, USACE
Since this project has already been let to construction it is urgent that the appropriate
authorizations, including the modified Section 404 permit, be obtained at the earliest
opportunity. Thank you for your assistance in expediting this approval. Should you have
any questions or comments please call M. Randall Turner at [phone] x270.
Sincerely,
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
Attachment
cc: David Franklin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Tom McCartney, Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh
Joanne Steenhuis, Division of Water Quality, Wilmington
David Cox, NCWildlife Resources Commission,
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management, Raleigh
Ed Brooks, Division of Coastal Management, Wilmington
Ron Sechler, National Marine Fisheries Service, Beaufort
Fritz Rohde, Division of Marine Fisheries, Wilmington
Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design, Raleigh
H. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
Joe Blair, P.E., Division 3, Wilmington
K. T. Cross, P.E., Division), Burgaw
S5 it 11E )L, /I A, P

Y
3
c
SITE 4
f ? END STATE PROJECT 8.2250110
ENID F. A. PROTECT MANHS-0332fV
s -Ir STA.36+20.000
N 57202.1487
E 708038.6293
,t
,v

?\ O
3 ?
i

?
pp
SITE 3
!1 ? W

l?
r

SITE 2

.\ k

SITE L
E ?
-r
s'
J ? wu cc`

BEGIN STATE PROJECT 8.2250110
2 8
BEGIN FA. PROJECT MANHS-033
-L- STA. 12 + 67112
11 \ N 55631.2792 E 706563.6093

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 82250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
r i

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKW.kY FROtii
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF Dzi?.TE
I y
y

O
3
O
N
O
C/I
n
r?
C'
A v
rm
ao
zm
N N
Z rn
m
?m
m=
r z
z m
v
v
N
zv
m
N z
C ?
D N
mm
r
yc r
n
m
N
Z O
m
Z
m°
?.
rm
D N
Z
o F
r
z
o ? c h
.?.,zze
moo
x
o ? ? f
z
.
0
rz
0
v
a
w
m
It
4?

07 ?
,,Zx
z?
r
r
V
ti.!
W
s
r

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA .
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1501 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1501 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 30, 2001
Mr. David Timpy
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Dear Sir:
Subject: New Hanover County, Smith Creek Parkway (Sections A and B)
TIP No. U-92A/B, State Project No. 8.2250102
COE Action ID No. 199603836
On July 10, 2000, the North Carolina Department of Transportation submitted a
permit application for the subject project. On September 29, 2000 the NC Division of
Water Quality issued a Section 401 permit, and on December 12, 2000 the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers issued a Section 404 permit for this project.
Since the permits were received, a small discrepancy in the permit drawings was
found in the area around the existing Third Street Bridge (Site 1 of U-92A). In order to
avoid working directly in the CAMA jurisdictional wetlands, the temporary work bridges
will be extended. This change will not affect the amount of permanent wetland impact
for the project, and will slightly reduce the amount of temporary wetland impact. This
change is reflected in the attached drawings, which replace the corresponding pages in
the previously submitted permit drawings.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Sue
Brady at [phone] ext. 270.
Sincerely,
William . Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Mike Street, DMF
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. D. R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3 Engineer

1

r
V 3NI?HD1dW
r
V I?
/ I Q
O
Z
co
m
Q f
u I ?

' m
l
m
l ct I
I I t )j

I
"
t
J I ,

v I

I
300
I
I
I I
I I i
I I , I, I /
X?WW1111 I -
Wp y I
Coln I `I 'I
. . / I
~W
Z
a W -? I I I
7J?
? I I I z
vi
I I o
°
3
? I I a
3 I _ x W
r O I 0
? I 3c
oly r I
W0 I K H
rm I ao I
W _ -?
(n !-
W 3tvp 31v?
d'
H
N V,
o I i
Z I I
? to
i
w
m e
o I'
U I i
z
W
11 I Cf. KO??
39 I aW
l w
04
J ZUO f/ / ZV
1 W¢ I
1 mm

44

U

O

Al

0

AP
z

o x a?
?W

mm

®
F
It
g
m= ?'
Z x w aC F w
*-+ w z
m cr
° w

a w
a
<E

?

wl

o?,?@
44
/ w z
. Z d H w?a

I? w r3
? ti
F Z v E.
w
? W
I 1 ° Z ?
UN
I
z x
q
_ _ o \ I Wm
tr
WWO \
2
2 \
,
7J

_
' ? )C EX?rMr a
W ?
Z?
oz
N? 19X3 _ _
W
mN
M= I / /
MATCHLINE B - 0? al / /
b
Yle
k y/
?? N J
QF
/k
LLI Z

/k « 7 wz
'
k ?.//,?
k/
- b oa
wJ
/ O U

LLI e
z
J k ` •
•
U
P
-4

ru'006\ \
ZZ \ a°?tip \

P4' CA
Nldl x/ Q
I N

?
co W \ \
\
W

Q
Y
Q
Ue I

/ /+ \ m O

/ D
/} \ \ O

I
E
a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1501 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1501 DAVID MCCOY
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 30, 2001
Mr. David Timpy
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Dear Sir:
Subject: New Hanover County, Smith Creek Parkway (Sections A and B)
TIP No. U-92A/B, State Project No. 8.2250102
COE Action ID No. 199603836
On July 10, 2000, the North Carolina Department of Transportation submitted a
permit application for the subject project. On September 29, 2000 the NC Division of
Water Quality issued a Section 401 permit, and on December 12, 2000 the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers issued a Section 404 permit for this project.
Since the permits were received, a small discrepancy in the permit drawings was
found in the area around the existing Third Street Bridge (Site 1 of U-92A). In order to
avoid working directly in the CAMA jurisdictional wetlands, the temporary work bridges
will be extended. This change will not affect the amount of permanent wetland impact
for the project, and will slightly reduce the amount of temporary wetland impact. This
change is reflected in the attached drawings, which replace the corresponding pages in
the previously submitted permit drawings.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Sue
Brady at [phone] ext. 270.
Sincerely,
William . Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
7
:Y
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Mike Street, DMF
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. D. R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
4
V 3NI-IHDidW
m
w
z
v
a
a-
b
31v? ? 6 31v?
f ?. I
I I
I? I
I?
I" I
QI ?
ll
f I I ?
WC
1 mm
0r
W
z MO?j
aw
=LL
?W
ZQ

?i

U

0
N
O .

O

/ I
1? I

I
I

I o

3
M

U
2
Q

w
I
I
I
L
.

®^ o
1 z
O °o ?q 0 w
\ W ® F
?w \ W°a 3
w? m m ' Z
g mW \ x a ,-? 0.'w Z
>
v A
/ O ev w? x
Z " w
. O Q° E-4 W ?d a
E-F ?-4 U tx U F
/ z ?FzU
¢ W
U 0, x
09
ilo
Wm
wWoO
z
z \
7Jt-
If"
1 ' l+_ O
Z
Vf Q
\l?EX?iiN wJ
H
Z3
LLI p z
?? `X'X1LX) ?
V>
w /
mN / / ,b??vlsTy
MATCHLINE B oZ S//
/
w Z
? • y/ NJ
ter, QH
w
/*Y UJ Z .
-VI /? • Nz
LLJ W '
U \w ?? ? a
a /
Q ? ? aw
m'oafi? ? o \ U
e`
N'V13
O 4 \ \
Z ti \
0' W \
m
a \ W
f 2U
a va
V mwat
m O
t
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO February 1, 2001
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 199603836 and TIP Project U-92AB, Smith Creek Parkway, New Hanover
County, North Carolina.
Mr. William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Division of Highways
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
Reference the Department of the Army permit issued on December 12, 2000 for the subject
project and your letter dated January 30, 2001 requesting a permit modification to the permit
drawing for Wetland Site 1 of U-92A that shows a temporary workbridge near STA 12+00.
The permit drawing for Wetland Site 1 of U-92A shows a temporary workbridge that will
be used for construction access across jurisdictional wetlands, associated with the Northeast
Cape Fear River, near STA 12+00. Based on recent information from the NCDOT, the
authorized temporary workbridge does not extend to the CAMA boundary. You have requested
a permit modification to authorize extension of the temporary workbridge at Wetland Site 1 of
U-92A to the CAMA boundary. This revision does not change the amount of permanent wetland
impacts associated with this project.
Your DA permit is hereby modified to allow the temporary Work Bridge at Wetland Site 1
to be extended to the CAMA Boundary along the Northeast Cape Fear River near STA 12+00.
The permit drawing for Wetland Site 1 of U-92A, attached to your letter dated January 30, 2001,
which reflects this extension, replaces the permit drawing for Wetland Site 1 of U-92A of the
permit issued on December 12, 2000.
effect.
All other conditions of your Department of the Army permit shall remain in full force and
L7

Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Dave Timpy, Wilmington Field Office,
Regulatory Division, at telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
James W. DeLony
Colonel, U.S. Army
District Engineer
Copies Furnished:
Mr. David Cox
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188
Mr. John Dorney /
NCDENR-DWQ /
Wetlands Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Mr. Garland Pardue
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Fish and Wildlife Enhancement
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
Mrs. Kathy Matthews
Wetlands Section, Region IV
Water Management Division
US Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Mr. Ron Sechler
National Marine Fisheries Service
Pivers Island
Beaufort, North Carolina 28516

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1kf
? WA A
4 •
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 31, 2001
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning & Environmental Branch
N.C. Department of Transportation
PO Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
Dear Mr. Gilmore
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Modification to the construction of Smith Creek Parkway (sections A & B), TIP U-092A/B, State
Project No. 8 .2250102, WQC Project No. 001045 (DWQ No. for original application 001045).
New Hanover County
Attached hereto is a modification to Certification No. 3304 issued to the North Carolina Department of
Transportation on September 29, 2000. The attached modification authorizes no additional impacts to
wetlands or streams. Rather, the certification authorizes the design changes to Site 1 as described in
the correspondence dated January 31, 200. It should be noted the modification is applicable only to
the proposed changes presented in the January 31, 2001 correspondence. All the authorized activities
and conditions of certification associated with the original Water Quality Certification dated
September 29, 2000 and all other corresponding modifications still apply except where superceded by
this certification.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
tevens
Attachments:
Modification to WQC No. 3304
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Wilmington Field Office
DWQ Wilmington Regional Office
Cathy Brittingham, Division of Coastal Management
Ron Ferrell, NC Wetlands Restoration Program
Central Files
File Copy
Division of Water Quality • 401 Wetlands Unit
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401 Public Laws 92-
500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500. The attached modification. authorizes no additional impacts to
wetlands or streams. Rather, the certification authorizes the design changes to Site 1 as described in the
correspondence dated January 31, 200. It should be noted the modification is applicable only to the
proposed changes presented in the January 31, 2001 correspondence. All the authorized activities and
conditions of certification associated with the original Water Quality Certification dated September 29,
2000 and all other corresponding modifications still apply except where superceded by this certification.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the proposed wetlands in
conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a violation of applicable Water Quality
Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will
not violate the applicable portions of Sections 301, 302, 303; 306, 307,of'PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if
conducted in accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your application, as described in
the Public Notice. Should your project change, you are required to notify the DWQ and submit a new
application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy. of this Certification and approval
letter, and is thereby responsible for complying with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project
(now or in the future exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC
2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you are required to comply with all the
conditions listed below. In addition, you should obtain all other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project including (but nol limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal
Stormwater, Non-discharge and Water Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those outlined in the
most recent version of two manuals. Either the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina Surface Mining Manual" (available from the
Division of Land Resources in the DEHNR Regional or Central Offices). The control practices
shall be utilized to prevent exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50
NTUs in all fresh water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes
and reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters);
2. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be removed and
the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
3. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
4. There shall be no excavation from or waste disposal into jurisdictional wetlands or waters
associated with this permit without appropriate modification of this permit. Should waste or
borrow sites be located in wetlands or stream, compensatory mitigation will be required since it is
a direct impact from road construction activities;
5. No additional compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with this modification.
6. All other conditions written into previous Water Quality Certifications for this project still apply.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void unless the above conditions
are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area Management Act Permit. This Certification
shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA permit.
.%
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request
within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must be in the form of a written
petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 276 1 1-7447. If modifications are made to an
original Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written
request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this
Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 31" day of January 31, 2001
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Stevens
Modification to WQC No. 3304
cAncdot\U-092\wqc\U-092 modification.doc
-- State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources • •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor D E N R
Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch & Wetlands/401 Unit
Location: 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Mailing Address: 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699
FAX: [phone]
/o : Zy ?c
I FAX TO: -D07 I FAX NUMBER: 733- 97yy I
FROM: jo-AV #1;nP7ESSy 1AltWjAvps dAjil
PHONE: 733 -369
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET: -YvVes
If you receive this fax by mistake call: ESB [phone] or Wetlands [phone].

dI.-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY 1501 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1501
GOVERNOR
January 30, 2001
Mr. David Timpy
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Dear Sir:
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
Subject: New Hanover County, Smith Creek Parkway.(Sections A and B)
TIP No. U-92A/B, State Project No. 8.2250102
COE Action ID No. 199603836
On July 10, 2000, the North Carolina Department of Transportation submitted a
permit application for the subject project. On September 29, 2000 the NC Division of
Water Quality issued a Section 401 permit, and on December 12, 2000 the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers issued a Section 404 permit for this project.
Since the permits were received, a small discrepancy in the permit drawings was
found in the area around the existing Third Street Bridge (Site 1 of U-92A). In order to
avoid working directly in the CAMA jurisdictional wetlands, the temporary work bridges
will be extended. This change will not affect the amount of permanent wetland impact
for the project, and will slightly reduce the amount of temporary wetland impact. This
change is reflected in the attached drawings, which replace the corresponding pages in
the previously submitted permit drawings.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Sue
Brady at [phone] ext. 270.
Sincerely,
William . Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ
Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Mike Street, DMF
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. D. R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Allen Pope, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
t
V INI?HO1dW
r ? / ( a
W
I ? I
1 I ? ?°m
?1 I J
co
z ?1 I I t
41j-
v I
31v9 I ? ?
? I 1 I
I ?
I: I ? I
1
Noy y I I 1 • -
COW 1 .
I / I
3J%' I
I I z
( i I
I
3
D
1 1 _
I
o I Q
3 1 - >< w
? o I O
a? I ? I
rm I °a0
I
3
W
N F-
L.11 31tl0 ? ? 31tl7
Q'
F
r V
I 1
Z
I? 1
L 1' 1
w
co
o i"
s
W
7 '
111 rr NOIj
1 QW
WLL
W / aLL
O /
WC 1-_
1 mm

F=-i

a
U

O

N
O

0
I
0

E4 Z

N

\
v
z O ° $ H

°
mm
a
x V
x 3
a w-
z c? " r ca
m=
` x x ,-? x w Z
a (-)Z > oa??

w
o z w w
E-

? m
w U v
° o ??z"
w z ?. x x
--_ ? a
?g ? ? z ?p
_ ZZ
O \
_ W

O
W
2 Wm

\
7
?? J

'?XC z

1 y,
E%rw Q
W ?
H
I Z 3
O Z
M/b ?1uX3 - J
N
W l
/ /
t,
RQ T' ! ~? I
/ / /b3?1STj
iy ?_
MATCHLINE B - QZ ?/ / Y /
U /
/ N
wz
YYII ?? Q
aw
/*Y z
`)
b w_
' •? oa
Zw
o L)
w '
_ ? ? e3 ? ?d r
>w :
~ lxa
lxw
Neal 3
m
a
2 4
m \
W
<1
2V
E
Q V?
u ? /+ \ m O
/ 3
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27611
Q*?
NCDENR
August 24, 2000
Re: Permit Application for the construction of the Smith Creek Parkway in New Hanover County
DWQ No. 001045; T.I.P. No. U-092.
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your submittal for a 401 Water Quality Certification for the
aforementioned project. Review of your application revealed it lacking necessary information required for
making an informed permit decision. The permit application was deficient in the following areas:
The discussion presented in the permit application that describes the construction methods for the
proposed bridge piles is incomplete. The NCDOT will need to submit a detailed proposal describing
the proposed construction techniques for the placement of bridge piles. The application states, "Due to
on-site soil conditions, it may be necessary to use jetting to set the piles for the proposed bridge...".
The NCDOT needs to explain in detail the "on-site soil conditions" that require jetting in jurisdictional
areas. It should be noted that the NCDWQ is not necessarily opposed to the use of jetting to place
bridge piles. If there are legitimate engineering constraints that require the use of jetting to construct
the bridge, then the NCDWQ is willing to approve the method, provided a plan is developed to address
the containment and cleanup of sediment displaced from the operation. Therefore, a complete
application will require: 1) a detailed discussion explaining the need to use jetting for the placement of
bridge piles, 2) a plan explaining the proposed methods for containing sediment during the jetting
operation, and 3) a plan for the cleanup of sediments upon completion of the pile placement. In the
absence of an appropriate technical rationale for the use of jetting, the NCDWQ would prefer the
NCDOT use more environmentally sensitive construction techniques, such as drilled shaft construction
with accompanying sediment curtains or pile driving.
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h.0507(a)(4), we will have to place the permit application on hold
until we are supplied the necessary information. Furthermore, until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of Engineers place
the permit application on hold.
Wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Empiover 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Donna D. Moffitt, Director
?r)
CDE R
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

August 21, 2000
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Mr. John R. Dorney, NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
??.
114
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: NCDOT-DOH/Smith Creek Parkway - TIP#U-92A/B
Project Location: Highway corridor bet. 3rd & 23rd Sts., City of Wilmington, New Hanover Co.
Proposed Project: To construct a new multi-lane road to provide a bypass around the downtown area
of the City of Wilmington. The current application addresses that portion of the
Smith Creek Parkway, between 3rd & 23rd Streets, including a realignment of the
NE Cape Fear River Bridge and two bridge crossings of Smith Creek
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form
by September 14, 2000. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
E.F. Brooks at extension 247. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED DATE
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: NC DOT-DOH/ Smith Creek Parkway TIP No. U-92AB
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: New Hanover County - Highway corridor between 23rd
St. and 3rd St., in the City of Wilmington.
Photo Index-Northeast Cape Fear Bridge Only 199514-153:T-X 5-9 1M:179-40:T-X 9-14
State Plane Coordinates - X:2321259 Y:185375
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA - D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 8/15/00 8/19/00
Was Applicant Present - no
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received - 7/19/00
Office - Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Wilmington-New Hanover County
Land Classification From LUP - Varies throughout highway corridor
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW; FS; PT; CW
(C) Water Dependent: Bridges - Yes
(D) Intended Use: State/Federal Highway corridor`
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - N/A
Planned - N/A r r
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - N/A
Planned- Four-lane divided highway and bridge
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source - N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
l,xV_liLyr r? ,Lrll S LTFER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands
Permanent Impacts appx. 6.9 ac.
(B) Non-Vegetated Wetlands
(C)
L- - Other- Stream Channel Impacts
- Hi h ound disturbance
875 LF
a rx. 87 ac.
(D) Total Area Disturbed: approx. 93.9 acres
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No Water Classification: CSw Open: N/A
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicants propose to construct a new multi-lane road to provide
a bypass around the downtown area of the City of Wilmington. The current application
addresses that portion of the Smith Creek Parkway, between 3rd St. and 23rd St., including a
realignment of the Northeast Cape Fear River bridge and two bridge crossings of Smith Creek.
Smith Creek Parkway/NC DOT-DOH
Page 2
9. PROTECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Smith Creek Parkway project will connect Eastwood Road (US 17) with Third Street
(NC 133) at the Northeast Cape Fear River Bridge. The project was designed as a by-pass of the City
of Wilmington downtown area to alleviate traffic congestion on Market Street (US 17). The sections
of the Smith Creek Parkway between Eastwood Road and 23rd Street have already been completed.
This project is the final 3.6 mile section, between 23rd Street and 3rd Street, including a realignment
of the Northeast Cape Fear River bridge and two bridge crossings of Smith Creek. The project has
been in the coordinated interagency review and planning process since the early 1980s. This 12 step
procedure integrates the requirements of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) into the development and design of the final proposed project. Environmental
documents that were completed during this planning and review process include; Final Environmental
Impact Statement (1991), Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (1998), and Smith
Creek Parkway (Sections A & B) Compensatory Mitigation Plan (Revised 6/29/00). Your Agency's
copies of these documents should be used for reference and specific detailed information during the
review of this project.
The proposed highway alignment is primarily north of Smith Creek, except for the two crossings. The
proposed alignment would impact jurisdictional wetlands and perennial streams in eleven (11)
different areas. The majority of the project's wetland impacts (5.5 acres) affect areas of Coastal Plain
Bottomland Forest systems. These areas are dominated by both hardwood and softwood species
including: Sweet Gum (Liquidambar sMc'flua), Black Gum (N? sylvatica), Red Maple (Acer
rubrum), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tuLipi&m), and Loblolly Pine. (>'. s taeda). At the Smith
Creek crossing sites, wetland impacts (1.4 acres) affect Tidal Cypress/Gum Wooded Swamp.
Hydrophytic vegetation includes Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum), Black Gum v a ylv" atica),
and Red Maple (Acer rubrum).Adjacent areas of tidal marsh and shrub wetland vegetation include
various shrubs; Black Willow Silverling (Baccharis h almifolia), and Wax Myrtle
(Myrica r_akm), with borders of Giant Cordgrass (SpaAim cynocoroides), Saw Grass (Cladium
spp.), Narrow-leaf Cat-tail ( an 'fo i) and Bulrush (SSL m spp.).
The waters of Smith Creek are classified as C Sw by the NC Division of Water Quality. The waters
of Smith Creek are classified as Inland waters. The adjacent Northeast Cape Fear River is a
designated Primary Nursery Area (PNA) by the NC Division of Marine Fisheries, and although Smith
Creek functions similarly as a nursery area, the PNA designation cannot be extrapolated to the Inland
Waters classification.
The NCDOT proposes to construct this portion of the Smith Creek Parkway (TIP No. U-92A/13)
totaling 3.6 miles, on a new undeveloped right-of-way in New Hanover County. The project would
consist of a four-lane divided highway with two (2) four-lane bridges over Smith Creek. The highway
would include a new interchange at North Third Street which would require the reconfiguration of
the east end of the existing Northeast Cape Fear River bridge to allow for a new approach from the
proposed Smith Creek Parkway. The project would also include the replacement of the existing 23rd
Street bridge over Smith Creek. Efforts have been made to reduce the project's wetland impacts by
extending the length of the proposed bridges. The western bridge crossing of Smith Creek, near
Castle Hayne Road, would be 3,100 feet in length, 82 feet wide, and provide a navigational vertical
Smith Creek Parkway/ NC DOT-DOH
Page 3
clearance of 26 feet. The eastern bridge crossing of Smith Creek, near 23rd Street , would be 2,106
feet in length, directional separates each 49 feet wide (total width outside to outside 120 feet), and
provide a navigational vertical clearance of 26 feet. The replacement bridge at 23rd Street would be
262 feet in length, 63 feet wide, and provide a navigational vertical clearance of 12.8 feet. This is an
increase in vertical clearance of 1.3 feet from the existing bridge. The new approach to the Northeast
Cape Fear River Bridge would be 567 feet in length, 66 feet wide, and provide a height of 39 feet
above the wetlands. This proposed section of bridge is not located over navigable waters. To facilitate
construction of the permanent bridges, temporary work bridges would be constructed adjacent on one
or both sides of the permanent bridge alignment. Bridge construction over open water area would be
facilitated from floating work barges. In addition to the bridge work, an existing box culvert would be
extended for 95 linear feet to allow for a wider road width. The extension would match existing
culvert dimensions (7 ft. X 6 ft.).
10. ANTICIPATED D IPA .TS
This portion of the proposed Smith Creek Parkway project (TIP U-92A/B) would impact a total of 6.9
acres of jurisdictional wetlands. Of that amount, approximately 1.4 acres of tidal wetlands containing
coastal wetland species would be consumed by the project , as well as, additional temporary impacts
associated with the construction of the temporary work bridges. In addition, there would be 875
linear feet of jurisdictional stream impacts and approximately 87 acres of highground disturbance.
NCDOT proposes to mitigate for the Smith Creek Parkway's wetlands and stream impacts at six (6)
sites within or near the proposed project. They have provided a compensatory mitigation plan for the
project that describes the mitigation sites in detail. A summary of the mitigation totals is listed below.
1. Restoration(11.7 acres) and preservation (16 acres) of Tidal Swamp Forest
2. Restoration (1.1 acres) and Enhancement (11.7 acres) of Tidal Freshwater Marsh
3. Creation (1.3 acres) of Bottomland Hardwood Forest
4. Creation (2.7 acres) of Tidal Swamp Forest
6. Preservation (47.3 acres) of Tidal Cypress-Gum Swamp
Total Wetland Mitigation - 92.8 acres.
NCDOT proposes to mitigate for the Smith Creek Parkway's stream impacts through the North
Carolina Wetland Restoration Program for 875 linear feet of stream channel restoration.
Submitted by: E. F. Brooks Date: August 21, 2000 Office: Wilmington
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. 1501 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1501
GOVERNOR
July 10, 2000
Mr. Bob Stroud
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
WEAWDS 6" 'JP
Dear Mr. Stroud; 1t
,?f ' C
Subject: New Hanover County, Construction of Smith Creek Parkway from Twenty-
third Street to Third Street, Wilmington, TIP No. U-92 A and B, State Project
No. 8.2250102.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct
Sections A and B of Smith Creek Parkway, a controlled-access, four-lane divided highway.
These sections extend from Twenty-third Street to Third Street in the City of Wilmington, and
total approximately 3.6 miles in length on new alignment. This facility will connect with the
previously constructed Section C of the Smith Creek Parkway on the eastern end, and the NC
117 Northeast Cape Fear River Bridge on the western end. When completed, the Smith Creek
Parkway will serve as a bypass around downtown Wilmington. allowing traffic to move more
easily from east to west and reducing congestion on Market Street.
The proposed project contains one area of coastal wetlands, two crossings of Smith
Creek, a culvert extension, and nine areas of impact to non-coastal wetlands (see attached
permit drawings). The area of coastal wetlands and the first crossing of Smith Creek are in
Section A of the project (U-92A Site 1 and U-92A Site 3, respectively). The second crossing
of Smith Creek and the culvert extension are in Section B of the project (U-92B Site 3 and U-
92B Site 5, respectively). In addition to the impacts associated with construction of the Smith
Creek Parkway, the existing 23`d Street bridge will also be replaced as part of this project, as
shown on the permit drawings for U-92B Site 3. Impacts to wetlands and streams for each
section are presented in tabular form in the packets of permit drawings.
We request that the proposed work be authorized under the appropriate Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) permit. Enclosed is a permit application for a CAMA Major
Development Permit, including permit drawings, roadway design sheets, mitigation plan, and
a check for the $475.00 application fee.
This project will also require a Clean Water Act Section 404 Individual Permit from
the Corps of Engineers and a Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Applications for these permits were
submitted to the Corps and DWQ in June 1999 at the Corps' request, in order to help satisfy
concerns about the mitigation for Section C of the Smith Creek Parkway. These applications
have now been activated, and are being reviewed. In addition to the Section 404 and 401
permits, this project will also require a Coast Guard permit. This application has been
submitted and is being reviewed.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Ms. Sue Brady at
[phone] ext.270.
Sincerely,
I/ C. &0-4
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Cc: W/attachments
Mr. Ed Brooks, NCDENR, Division of Coastal Management
CC: W/o attachments
Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Mr. P. A. Wojciechowski, NCDENR, Division of Marine Fisheries
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Ms. Deborah Barbour, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. D. R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Timothy Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer

FORM DCM-MP-1
W_ t
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
Name N. C. Dtpt. of Transportation
Address 1548 Mail Service Center
City Raleigh State NC
Zip 27699-1548 Day Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
b. Authorized Agent:
Name
Address
City State _
Zip Day Phone _
Fax
C. Project name (if any) U-92 A and B
Smith Creek Parkway
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s),
and/or project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County New Hanover
Revised 03/95
b. City, town, community or landmark
Wilmington
C. Street address or secondary road number
Smith Creek Parkway
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X_ Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
river, creek sound, bay) Smith Creek
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing 23' St. bridge with a new bridge.
Build two new bridges over Smith Creek. Realign
the eastern end of bridge over NE Cape Fear River
and extend RCBC on a tributary to Smith Creek,
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? New work
c. Will the project be for public, private or
commercial use? Public Transportation
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
methods of construction and daily operations
of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages. To provide public
transportation. Standard roadway construction
equipment will be used. Work bridges will be
used in the wetland areas.
V J
.h .
?' ?``vA Ei"I`ANT
FORM DCM-MP-1
' - m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
4. LAND AND WATER N/A
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW effluent, "wash down", and residential
or NWL 10 feet discharges.) Surface runoff
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Dorovan-Johnston Association: muck/sand; Wrightsboro-
Onslow-Kenansville Assoc.- sand/clay/loam o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
e. Vegetation on tract upland forest. tidal N/A
freshwater swamp swamp forest
f.. Man-made features now on tract
primarily new location
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land
use plan)
• Conservation _X_Transitional
• Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Industrial, Commercial, Residential
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? X Yes No
If yes, by whom? SHPO
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
* A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
* An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes ?X_ No
Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes - No
Coastal (marsh) X Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available)
Revised 03/95
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
;?? 4 +T
FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name _
Address
Phone
Name _
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone _
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
Revised 03/95
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the /0 -41 day of -,20
Print Name William D. Gilmore, P.E.
Signature `V - c '
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X_ DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts (5)
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.

Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Final
Existing Project
Un¢th Width DeDth Depth
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)
Revised 03/95

Roadw y Fill (See pe mit
dra ings)
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards N/A
b. Type of material to be excavated
wetland material
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? X Yes No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 196,000 yd3
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
To be determined by the contractor
b. Dimensions of disposal area N/A
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes X No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes X No
If yes, where?

Form DCM-MP-2

f
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes X No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION NSA
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of informadon)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water None
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh) , SAVs or other wetlands?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area See permit
drawings.
(2) Purpose of fill to construct
roadway embankment.
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practicies will be used.
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
Standard roadway rnnstrticti nn
equipment.
c. Will wetlands be crDssed in transporting equipment
to project site? X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. temporary work
bridges will be used
NCDOT, Smith Creek Parkway, U-92A/B
App 'cant or Name
Signature
Date (.1
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5 Northeast Cape Fear River (U-92A - Site 1)
BRIDGES AND = -l --
;
CULVERTS _

Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 567 feet
1. BMGES
h. Width of proposed bridge 66 feet
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) 39 feet
Concrete Prestressed Girders
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Northeast Cape Fear River If yes, explain
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 3.3 feet
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? Not affected in this area. Bridge is a draw bridge.
Yes _X_ No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge opening? Yes X No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) The eastern end of the
bridge will be realigned. It is not over
navigable waters m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? X Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain The wetlands were spanned to
Yes X_ No reduce impacts.
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
X Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
No USCG permit is required for this bridge.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
1
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed

b. Number of culverts proposed
3 EXCAVATION AND FILL
.
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL Yes X No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) (1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
f. Length of proposed culvert
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert any excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No Yes No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
C 0?4.JT? \
Form DCM-MP-S
Ir
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b
maintenance? Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above. C.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? _X_ Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail The existing water and sei
1____ a_ aL_ L-*.J __ - -1 __e_ 1_ ____ _ . ,
Site 1).
Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92A. Site 1
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92A ,Site 1
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
4. GENERAL
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard equipment to build a
bridge (crane. pile drivers. etc.)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? _X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. Temporary work
bridges will be used.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT. Smith Creek Parkway, U-92A
Applicant or Project Name
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation plan. -
Signature
•?
*4 (p -n
Date
Revised 03/95 _ _ ?. 1
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Smith Creek (near Castle Hayne Road)
U-92A, Site 3
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 3100 feet
1. BRIDGES
h. Width of proposed bridge 82 feet
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) 33 feet
Concrete prestressed girders
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Smith Creek If yes, explain
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 18 feet
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 26 feet
Yes X No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge opening? X Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain The new structure will limit
bridge vertical clearance to 26 feet.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? X Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain The wetlands were spanned to
Yes _X No reduce impacts.
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
_ Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
The U. S. Coast Guard indicated that the proposed
Navigational clearances will be reasonable.
Revised 03/95
LLr-
NT
Form DCM-MP-5
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert.
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? _X_ Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail Electricity. gas and phone
utility companies will be getting their own permits.
NCDOT will be handling water & sewer permits.
C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes _X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes _X No
MHW or NWL? Yes _X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled.
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: N/A
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92A. Site 3-
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation plan.
Revised 03/95
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practices
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard a uipment to build a bridge
(crane, pile drivers. etc.)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. Temporary work
bridges will be used,
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X _ No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT, Smith Creek Parkway -92A)
Applicant or Project Name
-L. 4- JL'-L
Signature
C/ /0 IL 2-

Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
23`d Street over Smith Creek
U-92B, Site 3
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-l. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 262 feet
1. BRIDGES
h. Width of proposed bridge 63 feet
a. Public X_ Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) N/A
21-inch concrete cored slab bridge
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X_ No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Smith Creek If yes, explain
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 18 feet
k.
Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 12.8 feet
_X_ Yes No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge 262 feet reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge 36 feet opening? X_ Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain The navigable opening will be
bridge 11.5 feet slightly increased due to the increased
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be clearance,
removed? (Explain) The entire bridge will
be removed and replaced with a new
structure m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
- X _ Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
No U. S. Coast Guard permit is needed for this bridge.
Revised 03/95 .? ._

Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
I
EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes _X No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL Yes ?Y_ No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) (1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
f. Length of proposed culvert
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert any excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No Yes No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
cci
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? _X_ Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail Electricity. gas and phone
utility companies will be getting their own permits.
NCDOT will be handling water & sewer permits.
above. C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below any temporary detour structures?
the MHW or NWL? Yes No Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2 If yes, explain in detail
above.
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practices
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled.
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92B. ,Site 3--
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway embankment
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? _Standard equipment to build a bridge
(crane, pile driver. ems)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? -Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on h.
highground? X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92B. Site 3
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway embankment
4. GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X_ Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation plan.
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail _
NCDOT. Smith Creek Parkway. U-92B
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
A/a . 20 e3 -
Date

Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Parkway over 23'd Street at Smith Creek
U-92B, Site 3
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-I. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 2106 feet
1. BRMGES 49 feet each
h. Width of proposed bridge 120 feet outside to outside
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
d
l 20 feet
ua
Concrete prestressed girders
structures j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge
Smith Creek If yes, explain
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 18 feet
k.
Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 26 feet
Yes X No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge opening? X Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain The proposed structure will limit
bridge vertical clearance to 26 feet. Downstream
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be structure has a vertical clearance of 11.5 feet,
removed? (Explain)
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? X Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain The wetlands were spanned to
Yes _X No reduce impacts.
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
The U. S. Coast Guard indicated that the proposed
navigational clearances will be reasonable.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-5
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert.
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
Revised 03/95
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
Yes X_ No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.

Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes -No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? __X_ Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail Electric. gas and phone
utility companies will be getting their own permits.
NCDOT will be handling the water & sewer permits.
C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: N/A
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-9213. Site 3
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway embankment
4. GENERAL
How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practices
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard equipment to build a bridge
(crane, pile drivers. etc.)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. Temporary work
bridges will be used,
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail _
NCDOT. Smith Creek Parkway, U-92B
Applicant or Project Name
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation plan.
Revised 03/95
Signature y
__ 44 I0 2aAa
Dat

Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
Culvert Extension, U-92B, Site 5
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge
1. BRIDGES N/A
h. Width of proposed bridge
a. Public Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
. Yes No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge if yes, explain
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL
k.
Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge opening? Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL - concerning their approval?
Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS potential? Yes X No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
Tributary to Smith Creek
b. Number of culverts proposed 1
3
EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. .
Type of culvert (construction material, style)
7 foot x 6 foot reinforced concrete box culvert a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
X Yes No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes X No (1) Length of area to be excavated 95 feet
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated 10 feet
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated 1 foot
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards +/- 35 cubic yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes X No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL Yes _X No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) The existing culvert (1) Length of area to be excavated
will be extended on the outlet end (2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
f. Length of proposed culvert 95 foot extension
(Proposed OAL = 226 feet) d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert 7 foot x 6 foot any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the to be determined by the contractor
MHW or NWL 4 feet (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
N/A
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area? N/A
Yes X No Yes No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95

Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes _X No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
- Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? _X_ Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail Electric, gas and phone utility
companies will be getting their own permits. NCDOT
will be handling the water & sewer permits,
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: N/A
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92B. Site 5
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
4. GENERAL
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practices
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard equipment to build a bridge
(crane. pile drivers, etc.)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail _
NCDOT. Smith Creek Parkway, U-92B
Applicant or Project Name
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation flan.
C_ wz?_ '?-
Signature
U4) 2-0
Date
Revised 03/95 -

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
July 10, 2000
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890 - -
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
ATTENTION: Mr. David Timpy
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: New Hanover County, Smith Creek Parkway (Sections A and B)
TIP No. U-92A/B, State Project No. 8.2250102
COE Action ID No. 199603836
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to
construct Sections A and B of Smith Creek Parkway, a controlled-access, four-lane,
divided highway. These sections extend from Twenty-third Street to Third Street in the
City of Wilmington, and total approximately 3.6 miles in length on new alignment. This
facility will connect with the previously constructed Section C of the Smith Creek
Parkway on the eastern end, and the NC 117 Northeast Cape Fear River Bridge on the
western end. When completed, the Smith Creek Parkway xvill serve as a bypass around
downtown Wilmington, allowing traffic to move more easily from east to west and
reducing congestion on Market Street.
On May 28, 1999, the North Carolina Department of Transportation submitted a
preliminary permit application for the subject project. This application was submitted at
the request of the Corps of Engineers in order to address concerns about the mitigation
for TIP No. U-92C (Section C of the Smith Creek Parkway). At this time, NCDOT
would like to activate the permit application for U-92A/B.
Summary of project impacts: Impacts to jurisdictional areas of TIP No. U-92A and B
consist of 6.9 acres of fill in wetlands and 875 feet of impact to streams.
Section U-92A: Impacts to jurisdictional areas of Section U-92A consist of
2.7 acres of fill in wetlands and 344 feet of impact to streams.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548 WEBSITE. WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH, NC
2. Section U-92B: Impacts to jurisdictional areas of Section U-92B consist of
4.2 acres of fill in wetlands and 531 feet of impact to streams..
3. Mitigation: We have avoided and minimized impacts to the maximum extent
possible. For the remaining impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and streams,
we propose compensatory mitigation at six sites. These are the Third Street,
McRae Street, Smith Creek, Waste Treatment, County Property, and North
Kerr Avenue Mitigation Sites. The mitigation plans for these sites are part of
this application. Stream impacts will be mitigated through an agreement with
the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program.
Due to difficulties in accessing the Smith Creek Mitigation Site, it will be
necessary to construct a temporary haul road across the wetland area located behind the
Corbett Package Company (from approximately Station 30+60 to Station 31+80, see
attached roadway design sheets). This haul road will allow access to the mitigation site
from the east, and will facilitate removal of debris and solid waste materials from the
mitigation site. The roadway will be 15 feet wide, and will have 3:1 side slopes. The
road will be placed as close to the edge of the right-of-way as possible, minimizing
impact to the wetland. After grading on the site is complete, the haul road will be
removed.
Due to on-site soil conditions, it may be necessary to use jetting to set the piles for
the proposed bridges at the intersection of the Smith Creek Parkway and the NC 117/
Third Street bridge over the Northeast Cape Fear River. If this is necessary, measures
will be taken to contain the resulting material, and remove it without undue disturbance
to the surrounding area. It is possible that this may be done from the proposed work
bridges.
NEPA DOCUMENT STATUS
A Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) for the Smith
Creek Parkway (A and B Sections) was approved by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) on March 30, 1998. This document describes the need for transportation
improvements in an east-west linkage corridor to avoid congestion in downtown
Wilmington, especially on Market Street. In addition, existing and projected conditions
of the study area were described, including natural systems and wetlands. Alignments
were evaluated with respect to cost, social and economic impacts, and environmental
consequences. The Record of Decision (ROD) was approved on August 13, 1998.
Copies of the FSEIS and ROD have been provided to regulatory review agencies
involved in the approval process. Additional copies will be provided upon request.
2. Section U-9213: Impacts to jurisdictional areas of Section U-92B consist of
4.2 acres of fill in wetlands and 531 feet of impact to streams..
3. Mitigation: We have avoided and minimized impacts to the maximum extent
possible. For the remaining impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and streams,
we propose compensatory mitigation at six sites. These are the Third Street,
McRae Street, Smith Creek, Waste Treatment, County Property, and North
Kerr Avenue Mitigation Sites. The mitigation plans for these sites are part of
this application. Stream impacts will be mitigated through an agreement with
the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program.
Due to difficulties in accessing the Smith Creek Mitigation Site, it will be
necessary to construct a temporary haul road across the wetland area located behind the
Corbett Package Company (from approximately Station 30+60 to Station 31+80, see
attached roadway design sheets). This haul road will allow access to the mitigation site
from the east, and will facilitate removal of debris and solid waste materials from the
mitigation site. The roadway will be 15 feet wide, and will have 3:1 side slopes. The
road will be placed as close to the edge of the right-of-way as possible, minimizing
impact to the wetland. After grading on the site is complete, the haul road will be
removed.
Due to on-site soil conditions, it may be necessary to use jetting to set the piles for
the proposed bridges at the intersection of the Smith Creek Parkway and the NC 117/
Third Street bridge over the Northeast Cape Fear River. If this is necessary, measures
will be taken to contain the resulting material, and remove it without undue disturbance
to the surrounding area. It is possible that this may be done from the proposed work
bridges.
:.EPA DD( UMENT STATUS
A Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) for the Smith
Creek Parkway (A and B Sections) was approved by the Federal Highway Administration
? (FHWA) on March 30, 1998. This document describes the need for transportation
is ?' au flasS ,,yes, li_t t } giz, ;orriT r f o a olrl'.con s4 1 i dV v1'F1tQ Y? 1Z
: ig ;gin, es? f.;ciall y On Market `; rect. In a.td Lion, existing and projected conditions
of the study area were described, including iratural systems and wetlands. Alignments
were evaluated with respect to cost, social and economic impacts, and environmental
consequences. The Record of Decision (ROD) was approved on August 13, 1998.
Copies of the FSEIS and ROD have been provided to regulatory review agencies
involved in the approval process. Additional copies will be provided upon request.
DESIGN STATUS
The schedule for the design of Sections A and B of the Smith Creek Parkway is
proceeding based on the letting of the construction contracts (Let Dates). As of May 24,
2000, the let date for TIP No. U-92A is November 2001 (production let date 1-16-01),
and the let date for TIP No. U-92B is November 2003 (production let date 9-17-02). The
drawings included in this permit application for Section B are Preliminary Designs, as
final designs are not yet complete.
RESOURCE STATUS
For information on the wetland delineations and protected species, please
reference the preliminary permit application, submitted May 28, 1999.
MITIGATION OPTIONS
The Corps of Engineers has adopted, through the Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ), a wetland mitigation policy that embraces the concept of "no net loss of
wetlands" and sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore and maintain the
chemical, biological, and physical integrity of Waters of the United States. Mitigation of
wetland and surface water impacts has been defined by the CEQ to include: avoiding
impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, and
compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Executive Order 11990 (Protection of
Wetlands) and DOT Order 5660.1A (Preservation of the Nation's Wetlands), emphasize
protection of the functions and values provided by wetlands. These directives require
that new construction in wetlands be avoided as much as possible, and that all practicable
measures are taken to minimize or mitigate impacts to wetlands.
The NCDOT is committed to incorporating reasonable and practicable design
features to avoid and minimize wetland impacts, and to provide full compensatory
mitigation of remaining wetland impacts. Avoidance measures were taken during the
planning and EIS/ROD phases; minimization measures were incorporated as part of the
project design. For a discussion of the avoidance and minimization measures that were
taken as a part of this project, please see the original permit application, submitted May
28, 1999.
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATORY MITIGATION ACTIVITIES
NCDOT proposes to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to
wetlands resulting from the construction of TIP No. U-92A and B, as well as the
remaining amount of mitigation required for TIP No. U-92C, through the use of six
mitigation sites. These sites are known as the Third Street Site, McRae Street Site, Smith
Creek Site, Waste Treatment Site, County Property Site, and Kerr Avenue Site. All are
located in the City of Wilmington and are adjacent to Smith Creek, except the Third
Street Site, which is adjacent to the Northeast Cape Fear River. The Third Street, McRae
Street, Smith Creek, Waste Treatment, and County Property Sites are adjacent to the
proposed project sections, and the Kerr Avenue Site is located approximately 2 miles
northeast of the eastern end of the project. These sites will help restore, enhance, and/or
preserve the function of the floodplains of the waterbodies impacted by the proposed
project. The Revised Mitigation Plan for these sites is attached. Acreage for each type of
mitigation at each site is given in Table 1.
Table 1. Wetland Mitigation for Sections A, B and C of the Smith Creek Parkway.
Mitigation (acres)
Mitigation Site Restoration Creation Enhancement Preservation Total
U-92C
Spring Branch 8.0 3.0 11.0
Bridge Maintenance 4.0 2.4 6.4
Finley McMillan 102.0 102.0
Total 12.0 2.4 0 105.0 119.4

U-92A/B
Third Street 13
1.3
McRae Street 1.1 12.7 13.8
Smith Creek 11.7 16 27.7
Waste Treatment Plant 0.8 0.8
County Property 1.9 1.9
Kerr Avenue 47.3 47.0
Total 12.8 4.0 12.7 63.3 92.8

Total U-92A/B/C 24.8 6.4 12.7 168.3 212.2
The Spring Branch and Finley McMillan Mitigation Sites have already been
completed, and planting on the Bridge Maintenance Site will be completed by June 15,
2000. The remaining mitigation required for Section C will be provided as part of the
mitigation for Sections A and B of this project. Table 2 gives a summary of the impacts
and mitigation (restoration/creation) provided for U-92 A/B/C.
Table 2. Wetland Impacts for U-92C and U-92A/B.
Section Impact (acres)
U-92C 20.4
U-92A/B 6.9

Total impacts U-92A/B/C 27.3
Total restoration/creation U-92A/B/C 31.2
located in the City of Wilmington and are adjacent to Smith Creek, except the Third
Street Site, which is adjacent to the Northeast Cape Fear River. The Third Street, McRae
Street, Smith Creek, Waste Treatment, and County Property Sites are adjacent to the
proposed project sections, and the Kerr Avenue Site is located approximately 2 miles
northeast of the eastern end of the project. These sites will help restore, enhance, and/or
preserve the function of the floodplains of the waterbodies impacted by the proposed
project. The Revised Mitigation Plan for these sites is attached. Acreage for each type of
mitigation at each site is given in Table 1.

- Mitigation (acres)
Mitigation Site Restoration Creation Enhancement Preservation Total
U-92C
Spring Branch 8.0 3.0 11.0
Bridge Maintenance 4.0 2.4 6.4
Finley McMillan 102.0 102.0
Total 12.0 2.4 0 105.0 119.4

U-92A/B
Third Street 1.3 1.3
McRae Street 1.1 12.7 13.8
Smith Creek 11.7 16 27.7
Waste Treatment Plant 0.8 0.8
County Property 1.9 1.9
Kerr Avenue 47.3 47.0
Total 12.8 4.0 12.7 63.3 92.8

Total U-92A/B/C 24.8 6.4 12.7 168.3 212.2
Table 1. Wetland Mitigation for Sections A, B and C of the Smith Creek Parkway.
T46 Spring Branch and Finley McMillan Mitigation Sites have already been
completed, and planting on the Bridge Maintenance Site will be completed by June 15,
2000. The remaining mitigation required for Section C will be provided as part of the
mitigation for Sections A and B of this project. Table 2 gives a summary of the impacts
and mitigation (restoration/creation) provided for U-92 A/B/C.
'able 2. Wetland Impacts fz)r .tJ-3,?...' and U-92AM. _
Section Impact (acres)
U-92C 20.4
U-92A/B 6.9

Total impacts U-92A/B/C 27.3
Total restoration/creation U-92A/B/C 31.2
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for Department of Army Individual Section 404
permits as required for the above-described activities. We also request a Section 401
Water Quality Certification from the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources Division of Water Quality (DWQ). We are providing copies of this
application to DWQ for their review. A check for $475, as required by the NCAA, to act
as payment for processing the Section 401 permit application has been submitted to the
Division of Coastal Management as a part of the application for the CAMA permit.
Copies of this check, the Revised Mitigation Plan and revised permit drawings are
included in this packet.
This project will also require a NC Division of Coastal Management CAMA
permit and a US Coast Guard permit. Applications for these permits have been submitted
and are under review.
If you have any questions or need additional information please call Ms. Sue
Brady at [phone] ext. 270.
Sincerely,
'C. 19 / N
William D. Gilmore, P.E., Manager
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, Division of Water Quality
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Garland Pardue, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. P. A. Wojciechowski, DMF
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. Tom Shearin, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Whit Webb, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Len Hill, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. D. R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Timothy V. Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. D. J. Bowers, P.E., Division 3 Engineer
Smith Creek Parkway (Sections A and B)
Compensatory Mitigation Plan
REVISED
Smith Creek Parkway
New Hanover County
TIP Project Number U-92A/B
State Project Number 8.2250102
COE Action ID Number 199603836
Prepared By:
Natural Systems Unit
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Raleigh, North Carolina
June 29, 2000
Smith Creek Parkway (Sections A and B)
Compensatory Mitigation Plan
REVISED
Smith Creek Parkway
New Hanover County
TIP Project Number U-92A/B
State Project Number 8.2250102
COE Action ID Number 199603836

Prepared By:
Natural Systems Unit
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Raleigh, North Carolina
June 29, 2000
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct
Sections A and B of the Smith Creek Parkway from Third Street to Twenty-third Street in the
City of Wilmington (TIP No. U-92A/B). The proposed project is a 3.6-mile divided four-lane
limited-access roadway. This facility will connect with the previously constructed Section C of
the Smith Creek Parkway on the eastern end, and the Third Street Northeast Cape Fear River
Bridge on the western end. When completed, the Smith Creek Parkway will serve as a bypass
around downtown Wilmington, allowing traffic to move more easily from east to west and
reducing congestion on Market Street. The alignment of the project is generally north of Smith
Creek, and crosses the creek twice. The environmental impacts of the project have been
addressed in several documents, most recently the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (FHWA, 1998). Efforts have been made to reduce the acreage of wetlands impacted
by this project. By analyzing several alternatives for potential impacts and extending bridges to
avoid wetlands, the total area of impacted wetlands was reduced to 6.9 acres. The total amount
of streams impacted by the proposed project is 875 linear feet.
2.0 IMPACTED WETLAND RESOURCES
2.1 Methodology
Impacted jurisdictional wetlands and streams were delineated using the parameters
provided in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual)" (DOA 1987).
The delineations were done in May 1995 and January 1999, and confirmed by the US Army
Corps of Engineers.
2.2 Affected Environment
A total of 6.9 acres of jurisdictional wetlands will be impacted by the construction of the
project. These wetlands are described as Coastal Plain Bottomland Hardwood Forest (5.5 acres)
and Tidal Cypress-Gum Swamp Forest (1.4 acres). These communities have been described in
the Natural Resources Technical Memorandum for Jurisdictional Wetlands, Biotic Communities
and Protected Species (HNTB 1994).
3.0 WETLAND MITIGATION SITES
Several sites will provide compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable impacts to
wetlands as a result of construction of TIP No. U-92A/B. These sites are:
• Third Street Site (at the Third Street Bridge)
• McRae Street Site (at the present location of McRae Street)
• Smith Creek Site (behind the Corbett Lumber Company)
• Waste Treatment Site (at the waste treatment plant on Division Drive)
• County Property Site (on New Hanover County property adjacent to Smith Creek)
• Kerr Avenue Site (near North Kerr Avenue)
These sites are all within the City of Wilmington, and are adjacent to Smith Creek, except
the Third Street Site which is adjacent to the Northeast Cape Fear River. The locations of these
sites are shown in Figure 1.
3.1 Site Descriptions
3.1.1 Third Street Site
This site is approximately 1.3 acres in size and is located where the Smith Creek Parkway
will join the Third Street Bridge at the Northeast Cape Fear River. Vegetation on this site
consists mainly of weedy species such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), kudzu (Pueria
lobata), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), as well as upland vegetation such as loblolly pine (Pinus
taeda), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), southern magnolia (Alagnolia grandiflora), grape
(Vitis rotundifolia), and greenbriers (Smilax spp.). Soils in this area are mapped as Urban,
indicating disturbance from development so that the soil properties have been altered to the
extent that a soil series cannot be recognized. Grading this area down and planting with
hardwood trees and shrubs will result in the creation of 1.3 acres of bottomland hardwood forest.
3.1.2 McRae Street Site
This site is approximately 13.8 acres in size, and consists of tidal marsh south of Castle
Hayne Road, adjacent to Smith Creek. Currently, McRae Street acts as a dike, with the only
hydrological exchange between the east and west sides of the road occurring through two 18-inch
diameter culverts. The proposed project design calls for removing the portion of McRae Street
that passes through the marsh and replacing it with a low bridge, approximately 6.5 feet above
the surface of the marsh. This will result in the restoration of 1.1 acres of tidal marsh wetland
within the present footprint of McRae Street and enhancement of 12.7 acres of tidal marsh
wetland to the west of the road, through restored hydrological connection. Soils in this area are
mapped as Dorovan, which is listed as hydric.
Vegetation on this site consists mainly of black needlerush (Juncus roemarianzts),
arrowhead (Sagittaria falcata), and narrow-leaved cattail (Typha angustifolia). Shrubs such as
black willow (Salix nigra), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and silverling (Baccharis halimifolia)
are present along the edges of the marsh, and there are numerous dead bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum) standing in the center.
3.1.3 Smith Creek Site
This site is approximately 27.7 acres in size and is located south of Castle Hayne Road
behind the Corbett Lumber Company, adjacent to Smith Creek. The mitigation plan for the
Smith Creek Site has already been written, as it was originally planned to offset wetland impacts
associated with construction of Section C of the Smith Creek Parkway. For a description of this
site, see the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Smith Creek, Spring Branch, and Dreyfours
South Mitigation Sites (NCDOT 1996). Since this Mitigation Plan was written, an additional 2.8
2
These sites are all within the City of Wilmington, and are adjacent to Smith Creek, except.
the Third Street Site which is adjacent to the Northeast Cape Fear River. The locations of these
sites are shown in Figure 1.
3.1 Site Descriptions
3.1.1 Third Street Site
This site is approximately 1.3 acres in size and is located where the Smith Creek Parkway
will join the Third Street Bridge at the Northeast Cape Fear River. Vegetation on this site
consists mainly of weedy species such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), kudzu (Pueria
lobata), multiflora rose (Rosa multijlora), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), and Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), as well as upland vegetation such as loblolly pine (Pinus
taeda), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiora), grape
(Vitis rotundifolia), and greenbriers (Smilax spp.). Soils in this area are mapped as Urban,
indicating disturbance from development so that the soil properties have been altered to the
extent that a soil series cannot be recognized. Grading this area down and planting with
hardwood trees and shrubs will result in the creation of 1.3 acres of bottomland hardwood forest.
3. 1.2 McRae Street Site
This site is approximately 13.8 acres in size, and consists of tidal marsh south of Castle
Hayne Road, adjacent to Smith Creek. Currently, McRae Street acts as a dike, with the only
hydrological exchange between the east and west sides of the road occurring through two 18-inch
diameter culverts. The proposed project design calls for removing the portion of McRae Street
that passes through the marsh and replacing it with a low bridge, approximately 6.5 feet above
the surface of the marsh. This will result in the restoration of 1.1 acres of tidal marsh wetland
- ?vxtl in the :nre ?nt i-)otn- int off.. !1P.-ae Street P a4_ enhancwment ;? 7 ,re o?tidal marsh _.--cAf wetland to the west of the read, through restored hydrological connection. Soils in this area are
mapped as Dorovan, which is listed as hydric.
Vegetation on this site consists mainly of black needlerush (Juncus roemarianus),
arrowhead (& gi traria falcata), and narrow-leaved rattail (TVpha. and us>tifoliry). Shrubs such as
15 taclt .a); ?W'X nl?:'r:?e ?v?jlrlC.L rEt rjt?ra), dSl: sllvPrli1s?(: 3ai"tS ?1!llti?11fG(%!l?
are present alcn6 tli -cdges of trc marsh, and there are numerous dead bald cypress (T axodiurn
distichum) standing in the center.
3. L' Smith Creek Site
This site is approximately 27.7 acres in size and is located south of Castle Hayne Road
behind the Corbett Lumber Company, adjacent to Smith Creek. The mitigation plan for the
Smith Creek Site has already been written, as it was originally planned to offset wetland impacts
associated with construction of Section C of the Smith Creek Parkway. For a description of this
site, see the Compensatory Mitigation Plan for. Smith Creek, Spring Branch, and Dreyfours
South Mitigation Sites (NCDOT 1996). Since this Mitigation Plan was written, an additional 2.8
2
acres of mitigation has been proposed for construction in the area under the proposed bridge.
This will result in the restoration of 11.7 acres and preservation of 16.0 acres of Tidal Swamp
Forest.
3.1.4 Waste Treatment Site
This site is 0.8 acres in size, and is located adjacent to the Bridge Maintenance Mitigation
Site (currently under construction), on the present site of a New Hanover County waste treatment
facility. This site is heavily maintained, and vegetation found here includes weedy species such
as fescue (Festuca spp.), henbit (Lamium amplexicaule), narrow-leaved plantain (Plantago
lanceolata), dandelion (Taraxacum offinale), geranium (Geranium spp.), vetch (Vicia spp.),
verbena (Verbena bonariensis), red clover (Trifolium pratense), blackberry (Rubus spp.), and
silverling. Soils in this area are classified as Urban, indicating disturbance from development so
that the soil properties have been altered to the extent that a soil series cannot be recognized.
Mitigation activities on this site will result in the creation of 0.8 acres of Tidal Swamp Forest.
3.1.5 County Property Site
This site is comprised of three adjacent areas, totaling 1.9 acres, and is located between
the CSX Railroad and Twenty-third Street on property currently owned by New Hanover
County. This site is currently upland, and vegetation found here includes loblolly pine, southern
magnolia, red maple (Acer rubrum), tulip tree, grapes, and greenbrier. Soils in this area are
classified as Kenansville fine sand (0-3% slope) in the eastern portions of the site and Craven
fine sandy loam (14%) in the western portion, both of which are listed as non-hydric. Mitigation
activities on this site will result in the creation of 1.9 acres of Tidal Swamp Forest.
1.6 Kerr Avenue Site
This site consists of approximately 47 acres of Cypress-Gum Swamp preservation, and is
located east of North Kerr Avenue and north of Smith Creek (Figure 2). Soils at this site are
classified as Dorovan in the southern portion and Johnston in the northern portion. These soils
are both listed as hydric. There are small areas of Murville fine sand and Baymeade fine sand in
the extreme northwestern side, both of which are listed as non-hydric.
This area is dominated by bald cypress, with loblolly pine in the higher elevation areas.
Other species in the canopy include red maple, sweetgum, water oak (Ouercus nigra), and
sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana). The understory is composed of sweet pepperbush (Clethra
alnifolia), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida), American holly (Ilex opaca), and sweetbay. Vines present
in this community include greenbrier, poison ivy, muscadine grapes, and Japanese honeysuckle.
ti ? .
4.0 WETLAND MITIGATION ACTIVITIES
4.1 Third Street Site
Mitigation activities on this site will involve grading down the area adjacent to and under
the Third Street Bridge, where the Smith Creek Parkway joins the bridge (see attached design
sheets). This area was historically upland and/or filled wetlands; it will be graded to an elevation
of 3.6 feet and planted with an appropriate selection of plant species. Shrub species such as
buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica), smooth alder
(Alnus serrulata), and red chokeberry (Aronia arbutifolia) will be planted near and under the
bridges. Bottomland hardwood tree species such as laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), overcup oak
(Q. lyrata), willow oak (Q. phellos), and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and will be planted
in areas farther from the bridges, as available. The trees/shrubs will be planted at a density of
approximately 680 plants per acre. Construction of this site will take place after all road and
bridge construction activities in the area are completed.
4.2 McRae Street Site
Wetlands will be restored by first removing the section of McRae Street that passes
through the marsh (see attached design sheets). Then the fill material associated with the road
will be removed and the site graded down to an elevation similar to that of the surrounding areas
of unfilled wetlands. If necessary, the soil will be rehabilitated in order to facilitate colonization
from the adjacent marsh. The road will be replaced on a low bridge, approximately 6.5 feet
above the marsh. No planting activities are planned for this site, as it already supports marsh
vegetation, and colonization of the graded area under portions of the proposed bridge is expected
to occur quickly.
4.3 Smith Creek Site
The mitigation plan for the Smith Creek Site has already been written and submitted, as it
was originally planned to offset wetland impacts associated with construction of Section C of the
Smith Creek Parkway. For a description of the site and proposed mitigation activities, see the
Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Smith Creek, Spring Branch, and Dreyfours South Mitigation
Sites (NCDOT 1996). This plan will be implemented as written, except for the expansion of the
area of wetland restoration to include the area under the proposed bridge over Smith Creek (see
attached design sheets). No trees will be planted in this area, as it will be under a bridge;
however, herbaceous vegetation will be planted.
The area not under the proposed bridge will be planted with bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum), big cordgrass (Spartina cynosuroides), and sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense). It is
uncertain whether the bald cypress will survive due to changes in the hydrologic regime of Smith
Creek. Increased tidal amplitude and natural sea level rise, as well as the increased salinity in
Smith Creek in the recent past, has caused a significant reduction in the density of bald cypress in
the wetlands surrounding the creek (Hackney and Yelverton, 1990). Trees as tall as possible will
be utilized for planting in the restoration area. This will allow the crowns to remain above the
4
4.0 WETLAND MITIGATION ACTIVITIES
4.1 Third Street Site
Mitigation activities on this site will involve grading down the area adjacent to and under
the Third Street Bridge, where the Smith Creek Parkway joins the bridge (see attached design
sheets). This area was historically upland and/or filled wetlands; it will be graded to an elevation
of 3.6 feet and planted with an appropriate selection of plant species. Shrub species such as
buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), Virginia sweetspire (Itea virginica), smooth alder
(Alnus serrulata), and red chokeberry (Aronia arbutifolia) will be planted near and under the
bridges. Bottomland hardwood tree species such as laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), overcup oak
(Q. lyrata), willow oak (Q. phellos), and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and will be planted
in areas farther from the bridges, as available. The trees/shrubs will be planted at a density of
approximately 680 plants per acre. Construction of this site will take place after all road and
bridge construction activities in the area are completed.
4.2 McRae Street Site
Wetlands will be restored by first removing the section of McRae Street that passes
through the marsh (see attached design sheets). Then the fill material associated with the road
will be removed and the site graded down to an elevation similar to that of the surrounding areas
of unfilled wetlands. If necessary, the soil will be rehabilitated in order to facilitate colonization
from the adjacent marsh. The road will be replaced on a low bridge, approximately 6.5 feet
above the;marsh. No planting activities are planned for this site, as it already supports marsh
vegetation, and colonization of the graded area under portions of the proposed bridge is expected
to occur quickly.
4 Sir. h C'ma, & to _
The mitigation plan for the Smith Creek Site has already been written and submitted, as it
was originally planned to offset wetland impacts associated with construction of Section C of the
Smith Creek Parkway. For a description of the site and proposed mitigation activities, see the
Co zipersatory Mitigation Plan for Sirith Creek, Spring Branch, and Dreyfours South Mitigation
5,w-s j-,NTCDOT 1::96). This Ian will b? llffl?lem nt d 2s written, except tr fle ;.pWASEm-i? th
area of wetland restoration to include the area under the proposed bridge over Smith Cree c (see
attached design sheets). No trees will be planted in this area, as it will be under a bridge;
however, herbaceous vegetation will be planted.
The area not under the proposed bridge will be planted with bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum), big cordgrass (Spartina cynosuroides), and sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense). It is
uncertain whether the bald cypress will survive due to changes in the hydrologic regime of Smith
Creek. Increased tidal amplitude and natural sea level rise, as well as the increased salinity in
Smith Creek in the recent past, has caused a significant reduction in the density of bald cypress in
the wetlands surrounding the creek (Hackney and Yelverton, 1990). Trees as tall as possible will
be utilized for planting in the restoration area. This will allow the crowns to remain above the
4
elevation of the highest tides and help to increase their chance of survival. The cypress trees will
be planted at a density of 108 trees per acre.
Herbaceous marsh vegetation (big cordgrass and sawgrass) will be planted over the whole
site, including the area under the proposed bridge, at a density of 4840 plants per acre. It may be
necessary to plant a 75:25 mix of Spartina:Cladium, rather than 50:50, due to difficulty in
obtaining Cladium. Colonization by other native species is expected to result in the development
of species composition in the mitigation area similar to that of the relatively undisturbed flood
plain of Smith Creek.
4.4 Waste Treatment Site
Mitigation activities on this site will involve removal of the existing waste treatment
facility and grading the area outside the fill slope of the proposed roadway to an elevation of
approximately 2.0-2.2 feet, adjusted as necessary to tie into the adjacent Bridge Maintenance
Mitigation Site and existing natural wetlands (see attached design sheets). The area will then be
planted with bald cypress, big cordgrass, and sawgrass. A mentioned above, it is uncertain
whether the bald cypress will survive due to changes in the hydrologic regime of Smith Creek.
Trees as tall as possible will also be used in the planted areas of this site. The cypress trees will
be planted at a density of 108 trees per acre.
Herbaceous marsh vegetation (big cordgrass and sawgrass) will be planted between the
trees, at a density of approximately 4840 plants per acre. It may be necessary to plant a 75:25
mix of Spartina:Cladium, rather than 50:50, due to difficulty in obtaining Cladium.
Colonization by other native species is expected to result in the development of species
composition in the mitigation area similar to that of the relatively undisturbed flood plain of
Smith Creek.
4.5 County Property Site
Mitigation activities on this site will involve grading the area outside the fill slope of the
proposed roadway to an elevation of approximately 2.0-2.2 feet. adjusted as necessary to tie into
the adjacent existing natural wetlands (see attached design sheets). The area will then be planted
with bald cypress, big cordgrass, and sawgrass. Again, it is uncertain whether the bald cypress
will survive due to changes in the hydrologic regime of Smith Creek. Trees as tall as possible
will also be used in the planted areas of this site. The cypress trees will be planted at a density of
108 trees per acre.
Big cordgrass and sawgrass will be planted between the trees at a density of
approximately 4840 plants per acre. It may be necessary to plant a 75:25 mix of
Spartina:Cladium, rather than 50:50, due to difficulty in obtaining Cladium. Colonization by
other native species is expected to result in the development of species composition in the
mitigation area similar to that of the relatively undisturbed flood plain of Smith Creek.

4.6 Kerr Avenue Site
Forty-seven acres of existing Cypress-Gum Swamp (Blackwater Subtype) at the Kerr
Avenue Site will be preserved (see Figure 2). There will be no construction activities (grading or
planting) at this site. The property will be preserved in perpetuity through the transfer of the
deed to a resource agency (public or private) acceptable to the appropriate regulatory agencies.
Covenants and/or restrictions on the deed will be included that will ensure protection of the site
in perpetuity.
5.0 MONITORING PLAN
5.1 Third Street Site
Hydrology:
Two groundwater monitoring wells (40-inch), a surface water gauge, and a rain gauge
will be placed in the planted area of the site. Data from these wells will be collected throughout
the year, with particular attention given to the growing season (February 27 through November
26). Hydrological success of this area will be determined using data from these wells to
demonstrate that inundation or saturation within 12 inches of the surface has existed
consecutively for at least 12.5% of the growing season.
Vegetation:
This site will be monitored through the use of a minimum of two 50-foot x 50-foot
sampling plots, placed within the planted areas. The total number of live trees/shrubs within
each plot will be counted during each monitoring period. The site will be considered successful
if there is a survival rate of 320 trees/shrubs per acre after three years and 259 trees/shrubs per
acre after five years.
5.2 McRae Street Site
No monitoring activities are planned for this property; the site will be graded down to
restore the hydrology of the area, and no planting is planned.
5.3 Smith Creek Site
Hydrology:
Water level data already collected from the Bridge Maintenance Mitigation Site (adjacent
to the Smith Creek Site and the Waste Treatment Site) indicates that an elevation of 2.5 feet
above sea level will result in flooding approximately 37% of the time. In order to ensure that the
Smith Creek Site accomplishes this, the elevations of a series of points located throughout the
site will be measured after grading is complete. This will ensure that the target elevation of the
site is met (2.5 feet above sea level). A tide gauge will be installed on the adjacent Bridge
Maintenance Mitigation Site to monitor the tidal regime in this stretch of Smith Creek and serve
as a reference for the Smith Creek, Bridge Maintenance, Waste Treatment, and County Property
Sites. This gauge will record the water depth in Smith Creek every hour for one growing season
6
4.6 Kerr Avenue Site
Forty-seven acres of existing Cypress-Gum Swamp (Blackwater Subtype) at the Kerr
Avenue Site will be preserved (see Figure 2). There will be no construction activities (grading or
planting) at this site. The property will be preserved in perpetuity through the transfer of the
deed to a resource agency (public or private) acceptable to the appropriate regulatory agencies.
Covenants and/or restrictions on the deed will be included that will ensure protection of the site
in perpetuity.
5.0 MONITORING PLAN
5.1 Third Street Site
Hydrology: .
Two groundwater monitoring wells (40-inch), a surface water gauge, and a rain gauge
will be placed in the planted area of the site. Data from these wells will be collected throughout
the year, with particular attention given to the growing season (February 27 through November
26). Hydrological success of this area will be determined using data from these wells to
demonstrate that inundation or saturation within 12 inches of the surface has existed
consecutively for at least 12.5% of the growing season.
Vegetation:
This site will be monitored through the use of a minimum of two 50-foot x 50-foot
samplirig plots, placed within the planted areas. The total number of live trees/shrubs within
each plot will be counted during each monitoring period. The site will be considered successful
if there is a survival rate of 320 trees/shrubs per acre after three years and 259 trees/shrubs per
acre after five years.
.. w
5.2 ivlc-Rae Street Site
No monitoring activities are planned for this property; the site will be graded down to
restore the hydrology of the area, and no planting is planned.

Hydrology:
Water level data already collected from the Bridge Maintenance Mitigation Site (adjacent
to the Smith Creek Site and the Waste Treatment Site) indicates that an elevation of 2.5 feet
above sea level will result in flooding approximately 37% of the time. In order to ensure that the
Smith Creek Site accomplishes this, the elevations of a series of points located throughout the
site will be measured after grading is complete. This will ensure that the target elevation of the
site is met (2.5 feet above sea level). A tide gauge will be installed on the adjacent Bridge
Maintenance Mitigation Site to monitor the tidal regime in this stretch of Smith Creek and serve
as a reference for the Smith Creek, Bridge Maintenance, Waste Treatment, and County Property
Sites. This gauge will record the water depth in Smith Creek every hour for one growing season
6
(February 27 through November 26). These data will then be compared to the elevation data to
confirm the period of flooding at the Smith Creek Site.
Vegetation:
Emergent herbaceous vegetation monitoring of the site will utilize a system of sample
plots randomly located within the previously delineated restoration area, using GPS software and
different coordinates each year. The location of the sample plots in the field will be determined
using real-time GPS. Sampling will take place at the end of the growing season. A total of 180
1.0-m' sample plots will be located in the planted area.
In order to assess the success of the site, sample plots will be taken in the planted marsh
areas. Specific success criteria for the marsh restoration will be frequency of emergent
herbaceous vegetation, determined by using the Braun-Blanquet Technique (see Appendix I) as
recommended by the National Marine Fisheries Service. Frequency will be determined by F=
(n,/ny) x 100, where F= frequency, nY the number of plots where emergent herbaceous
vegetation occurs, and ny total number of plots. Density (cover) will be determined by D=
EBB/n, where D= density, EBB = the sum of Braun-Blanquet scale values for all plots, and n= the
total number of plots. The site will be considered a success if the calculated value for density
is greater than or equal to 5.0 (75% cover) by the end of the fifth growing season. If
frequency falls below 70% at the end of any growing season, replanting will be undertaken to
reestablish the grass species. If Phragmites australis appears in any monitoring period, in more
than five sampling plots, then the Department of Transportation will consult with the Corps of
Engineers to develop potential control measures.
Bald cypress monitoring will utilize two 100.0 x 100.0 ft sampling plots. These plots
will be placed within the planted areas, and the total number of live trees within the plot counted
during each monitoring period. As mentioned above, changes in the hydrology of Smith Creek
have caused the decline in natural bald cypress populations, and it is uncertain if the planted bald
cypress trees will survive. NCDOT will not be responsible for the success of the cypress trees.
5.4 Waste Treatment Site
Hydrology:
The hydrologic success of this site will be evaluated in the same way described for the
Smith Creek Site. After grading is complete, the elevations of a series of points located
throughout the site will be measured to ensure that the target elevation (2.0-2.2 feet above sea
level) is met. These data will then be compared to data from the tide gauge located at the Bridge
Maintenance Mitigation Site to confirm the period of flooding.
Vegetation:
This site will be monitored using the same protocols described above for the Smith Creek
Site. A total of 30 sampling plots will be taken within the planted area. The success criteria will
be the same as those described for the Smith Creek Site.
7

5.5 County Property Site
Hydrology:
The hydrologic success of this site will be evaluated in the same way described for the
Smith Creek Site. After grading is complete, the elevations of a series of points located
throughout the site will be measured to ensure that the target elevation (2.0-2.2 feet above sea
level) is met. These data will then be compared to data from the tide gauge located at the Bridge
Maintenance Mitigation Site to confirm the period of flooding.
Vegetation:
This site will be monitored using the same protocols described above for the Smith Creek
Site. A total of 30 sampling plots will be taken within the planted area. The success criteria will
be the same as those described for the Smith Creek Site.
5.6 Kerr Avenue Site
No monitoring activities are proposed for this property, as the site will be preserved; no
grading or planting is planned.
6.0 WETLAND AND STREAM MITIGATION SUMMARY
NCDOT proposes to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to
wetlands resulting from the construction of TIP Project Number U-92A/13 through restoration
and preservation of Tidal Swamp Forest at the Smith Creek Site, restoration and enhancement of
Tidal Freshwater Marsh at the McRae Site, creation of Bottomland Hardwood Forest at the Third
Street Site, restoration of Tidal Swamp Forest at the Waste Treatment and County Property Sites
and preservation of existing Tidal Cypress-Gum Swamp on the Kerr Avenue Site. Acreages for
each type of mitigation at each site are given in Table 1.
Table 1. Wetland Mitigation for Sections A and B of the Smith Creek Parkway.
Mitigation Site Restoration Creation Enhancement Preservation Total .
Third Street 1.3 1.3
McRae Street 1.1 12.7 13.8
Smith Creek 11.7 16.0 27.7
Waste Treatment 0.8 0.8
County Property 1.9 1.9
Kerr Avenue 47.3 47.3
Total 12.8 4.0 12.7 63.3 92.8
8
5.5 County Property Site
Hydrology:
The hydrologic success of this site will be evaluated in the same way described for the
Smith Creek Site. After grading is complete, the elevations of a series of points located
throughout the site will be measured to ensure that the target elevation (2.0-2.2 feet above sea
level) is met. These data will then be compared to data from the tide gauge located at the Bridge
Maintenance Mitigation Site to confirm the period of flooding.
Vegetation:
This site will be monitored using the same protocols described above for the Smith Creek
Site. A total of 30 sampling plots will be taken within the planted area. The success criteria will
be the same as those described for the Smith Creek Site.
5.6 Kerr Avenue Site
No monitoring activities are proposed for this property, as the site will be preserved; no
grading or planting is planned.
6.0 WETLAND AND STREAM MITIGATION SUMMARY
NCDOT proposes to provide compensatory Mitigation for unavoidable impacts to
wetlands resulting from the construction of TIP Project Number U-92A/B through restoration
and preservation of Tidal Swamp Forest at the Smith Creek Site, restoration and enhancement of
- _: Tidal--Preshs;,ater.Mmhat the..McRae itF -.PTe . 031 of Bottomland Hard)yp dForest at the hied .X.-
Street Site, restoration of Tidal Swamp Forest at the Waste Treatment and County Property Sites
and preservation of existing Tidal Cypress-Gum Swamp on the Kerr Avenue Site. Acreages for
each type of mitigation at each site are given in Table 1.
....Table L . Wetland Mitigation for Sections A and. B of the Smith Creek Parkway.
' - Mitigation bite - Restoration Creation Enhancement ` Pre- =_- ati!w
a
al
Third Street 1.3 1.3
McRae Street 1.1 12.7 13.8
Smith Creek 11.7 16.0 27.7
Waste Treatment 0.8 0.8
County Property 1.9 1.9
Kerr Avenue 47.3 47.3
Total 12.8 4.0 12.7 63.3 92.8
NCDOT proposes to provide compensatory mitigation for 875 linear feet of unavoidable
impacts to streams. The North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program has agreed to provide a
total of 875 feet of stream channel restoration.
7.0 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Construction of all the wetland mitigation sites and on-site stream mitigation will be
implemented concurrently with the construction of TIP Project Number U-92A/B. The NC
Wetland Restoration Program has been contacted regarding the 875 feet of stream mitigation,
and has agreed to provide it. NCDOT has purchased and holds title to the Kerr Avenue Site.
8.0 AS-BUILT REPORT AND DRAWINGS
As-built descriptions, photographs, and plans describing the Smith Creek, Third Street,
Waste Treatment, and County Property Mitigation Sites will be provided to the appropriate
regulatory agencies within 90 days after the mitigation project is completed. This information
will include, but not be limited to, descriptions of vegetation establishment, vegetation
monitoring plot locations, ground and surface water gauges (if any), and final ground elevations.
9.0 ANNUAL REPORT PREPARATION AND SUBMITTAL
Annual reports for the Smith Creek, Third Street, Waste Treatment, and County Property
Mitigation Sites, including photographs (or copies thereof), will be prepared annually after field
monitoring activities are completed. Vegetation and hydrologic data will be included in these
reports, as well as information on any significant developments on the sites. Copies of these
reports will be submitted to the appropriate regulatory agencies by January 31 of each year
following monitoring for five years after planting the mitigation site.
10.0 CONTINGENCY PLANS
Establishment of cypress trees over the restoration area of the Smith Creek, Waste
Treatment, and County Property Mitigation Sites is proposed, although there is evidence that
they may not survive because of increases in salinity, tidal amplitude, and sea level (Hackney
and Yelverton, 1990). Consequently, cypress mortality may occur and the areas may develop
into emergent marsh communities. The vegetation success criteria will therefore be based on
emergent marsh vegetation.
Should noxious plant species become established on the Third Street, Smith Creek, Waste
Treatment, or County Property Sites, NCDOT will undertake appropriate control measures using
accepted chemical, biological, and/or cultural methods.
9

11.0 DISPENSATION OF PROPERTY
NCDOT will maintain ownership of the mitigation properties until all mitigation
activities are completed. Although no final plan for dispensation of the properties has been
developed, NCDOT may deed the properties to a resource agency (public or private) acceptable
to the appropriate regulatory agencies. Covenants and/or restrictions on the deeds will be
included that will ensure adequate management and/or protection of the sites in perpetuity.
12.0 REFERENCES CITED
Department of the Army (DOA). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Tech.
Rpt. 87-1, Waterways Experiment Station, COE, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
FHWA, 1998. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f)
Statement: Smith Creek Parkway from Third Street to Kornegay Avenue, Wilmington,
New Hanover County, North Carolina. State Project Number 8.2250101, U-92A/B,
Federal Project No. MAM-M-5851(2).
Hackney, C. T., and G. F. Yelverton. 1990. Effects of Human Activities and Sea Level Rise on
Wetland Ecosystems in the Cape Fear River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. pp. 55-61.
In: Whigman, D. F., ed. Wetland Ecology and Management: Case Studies. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
HNTB (Howard, Needles, Tammen, and Bergendoff). 1994. Natural Resources Technical
Memorandum for Jurisdictional Wetlands, Biotic Communities and Protected Species:
Smith Creek Parkway and Downtown Spur, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North
Carolina. State Project Number 8.2250102, U-92, Federal Project Number M-5851(2).
NCDOT. 1996. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Smith Creek, Spring Branch, and Dreyfours
South Mitigation Sites. Smith Creek Parkway, New Hanover County. TIP Project No.
U-92C, State Project No. 8.2250101, Federal Project No. MAM-M-5851(2).
Schafale, Michael P., and Alan S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina, Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation. NC Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources.
U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1977. Soil Survey of New Hanover County, North
Carolina. USDA Soil Conservation Service.
10
11.0 DISPENSATION OF PROPERTY
NCDOT will maintain ownership of the mitigation properties until all mitigation
activities are completed. Although no final plan for dispensation of the properties has been
developed, NCDOT may deed the properties to a resource agency (public or private) acceptable
to the appropriate regulatory agencies. Covenants and/or restrictions on the deeds will be
included that will ensure adequate management and/or protection of the sites in perpetuity.
12.0 REFERENCES CITED
Department of the Army (DOA). 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Tech.
Rpt. 87-1, Waterways Experiment Station, COE, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
FHWA, 1998, Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Final Section 4(f)
Statement: Smith Creek Parkway from Third Street to Kornegay Avenue, Wilmington,
New Hanover County, North Carolina. State Project Number 8.2250101, U-92A/B,
Federal Project No. MAM-M-5851(2).
Hackney, C. T., and G. F. Yelverton. 1990. Effects of Human Activities and Sea Level Rise on
Wetland Ecosystems in the Cape Fear River Estuary, North Carolina, USA. pp. 55-61.
In: Whigman, D. F., ed. Wetland Ecology and Management: Case Studies. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
HNTB (Howard, Needles, Tammen, and Bergendoff). 1994. Natural Resources Technical
Memorandum for Jurisdictional Wetlands, Biotic Communities and Protected Species:
Smith Creek Parkway and Downtown Spur, Wilmington, New Hanover County, North
Carolina. State Project Number 8.2250102, U-92, Federal Project Number M-5851(2).
NCDOT. 1996. Compensatory Mitigation Plan for Smith Creek, Spring Branch, and llreyio;:rs
South Mitigation Sites. Smith Creek Parkway, New Hanover County. TIP Project No.
U-92C, State Project No. 8.225010 1, Federal Project No. MAM-M-5851(2).
Schzafhie Mir.! Pand Alan, S. Weal ley..1990. C 'assificatio , of the Natural Communities of
?.a, -al tw:.'h2rc' ?Aprr??ximatio:.1r*h Carolira'N 4tural Iteiitagc Prop iii,
Division of Paiks and Recreation. NC Departmew% of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources.
U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1977. Soil Survey of New Hanover County, North
Carolina. USDA Soil Conservation Service.
10
NIAP
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 82250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROI
- BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
7-IF 1
A ?k, p
I-E I -i -LI

r
Fy
J

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.4250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
4

IE
e

SITE 4
EMD STATE PROJECT 8.22S0110
END F. A. PROJECT n-INHS-03.,
-L- STA.36+20.000
N S7202.1487
E 708038.6293
3
m
5l
V . ?
??yU lit
i
IS M167 -OI
SITE 3

SITE 2
_?
- -
t i `
,

SITE 1 ?-

(tea

-L- STA. 12+67.112
N 55631.2792 E 706563.6093
?Plll
Q` N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
LEGEND
LI:E 'NT LINE Wf
-WLB WETLANO BOUNDARY 4-6 PROPOSED BRIDGE 6
i Y WETLAND
?--wL 4-6 PROPOSED BOX CULVERT 6
DENOTES FILL IN 2 r PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
WETLAND
12'-48' IS
DENOTES FILL IN
2 (DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
'

SURFACE WATER
® EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54
PIPES
6
& ABOVE
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER 2
2
(POND) SINGLE TREE
® DENOTES TEMPORARY 2 2
r"L
`
•
-
"
"
FILL IN WETLAND . .
?
?-r
r?-r
.?--
r!
r
1 LINE
WOODS
EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND 2
DRAINAGE INLET
DENOTES TEMPORARY

FILL IN SURFACE
® 2
ROOTWAO 2
WATER
DENOTES MECHANIZED
•
2
= CLEARING
2
?- FLOW DIRECTION RIP RAP 2
TB
TQ
2-4
TOP OF BANK
WE 2 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER 2
- "
- EDGE OF WATER 5
OR PARCEL NUMBER
C 2 IF AVAILABLE
- -
- - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT

--F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL 2
2
---Ak-- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
2
- - NG- - NATURAL GROUND
- -P-- - PROPERTY LINE 2
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE 2
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE 2
EASEMENT
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED 2
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB- . EXIST. ENDANGERED 2
PLANT BOUNDARY
0
- - - - - - WATER SURFACE 2
X LIVE STAKES
X
X 2
OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPT
C
N
X
X .
.
.
C2D BOULDER 6 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
--- CORE FIBER ROLLS
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CAS'T'LE HAYNE ROAD.
SHEET OF DATE
V 3NI?HOiV V
•i Ill
Q J U 1
? 1 m
l
I l ?' I
l I l
I I I ? m II
cc) ?I I I
z .I I ?1 1
?- I 31r, , •
Q I I
I
I ?
I I ? •1 ?
55
9 O?
C4 ?

U "
z ? ;?Hw o
H j o F+?
q
z G,
?T.
z
9

x
°°
U
cv w
U
E E
U
@ Cl)
A
w W
? a cn
xzU
z
w
U z a ?? ?
z ?p

W
F
b
I?
z
I?
W I
Noy y ? I / I
0?2
?m
?fW I
caw
I I
s?w/ I i I Z
I O
I O
L 3
® C
I st I I =
" I ? I Z
z I _ Q
y W
> I ? 0 I O
I
o I ` I
IW.m I I °au
t ?m
31 ro 31rp _
N
~ r I
°z I I
( I
w I? I
m I;
ED
I
I I W
R 1,1 z'' node
I N<
I
<W
W 1?
2
0: CL
l
°zv
zu i
mm
W

U

.. O
N
O

O

m
w
z
_-
J
V
H
Q
F4
1--1 ? (\
O

W

x ? "" ? W z

C6 W W
??
U ? U F
?.
W
r W
'? U cn
(') ¢
Er
A A W ?. Z U v
x

w

N
W_
F-
N
O
Z
F-
W
co
O
v

2
I
M.
mm
P/ 31fo
ll7
?f
r i
Z b
N
Q
Z
Q
?

C,
W
O 1
I

? u f
I Y
F.m
??-•!-.,i .,max.^. n?::::

NQ
Zi
SW
r-W
a
0V
N
O
EZ:
O
. r
S
z
a
m
a
V
N
F-y
mN
O°

Cl)Q
W
\ O O
u
ts% Jr U

Z C7 W ca

? .
? z
?w

z 9

0
x
- (4 W
U L) H
? ? ?' w ti v3? H
° o z Fz" w

3W M
W

\
?J

MATCHLINE B
QO
\ ' Wm vJ
?
Ic, I Z \
x•.070-5q3 \ J°

1 ti ex??w a w F-
F-

' W

Z Ld
O
° Z
Ni0 7'01 SM3 _` /
L
cokA
1
/

I
f b N
w
`

• Q W
=3
v
r W
• /
/ ? b F- CC
• .
?
/
/ °V

w a
r
_ \

. cal
?
avow wu00? moo' \
ZZ NZ
N
1
m ? \
V

u wm C)

O

z
\? ` Q N ?r Q

w W
Wm
?. x

` U
x
wz
o
a ??
Q? ?. I d
w o
o
? z
I
/
.e I z
i
? . 9 U xv F
I
l a W U cn
I Al
o 0 ?
FzU
I z ?

_
o z
_ Wm

(V -Y/??l SIX3 'J O
I
- ?C Q
Itl )? CXI=?hV R N
w'J
I - Z3

N /

=3 Ltd
MATCHLINE B UZ
-Y a
/ /p?• o ?
? W Z
a
w .

r r 4 ?/ Z a
ZW
40 / U

Q

W
r

z
J '
02
? oa

Gzl
JNO7 a"06 U
? ?
Nry j 3a x, ?
y ? N
S
O W \
CIO
C W
" 2V
U mm O
\\ W I LV Q .4, 0 p W
V) 0
LLI
I- a.
mm ... r`i (.+ W C
a H(r
m? I z ??Uz
oo \ W ° W r-
"Z M 1 ?" p p c .?
I Z cv ; 4
/ H W
rj) w v
j o z Fzv cva
uj
0
Ile, ? \ ' Wm
All l?ii3 I \ / J O
WZ
_ Na
1?[r(?tw n W J
H- ~
W
W Z
OZ
ray a'+ivx3
N
W_ I
W?
MATCHLINE B
/ N
W Z F-
aW
a/ LIJ:z
i
,,??/ o<
• ?71 W2: LU
J
OU
Q //c? /
IAJ
t (F ? ` ?W Ifry?? .
^v n '` - .' avow "
?- 006 \ U
N/b13u
N
a ? \
Q W \ \
?
CD
W
\
O
U mm O
/ +/ \? F
t

0
? 0
J Q
W ?
H

S
O
N
I
.=W 1
Wu
f
l

o p .-.
E-'
r
?
z
0

f
Q
°-?
? o
w

+
z x u
a
z
? .? Q

0
? 0
z C-4
- ?
° /
W W l J 1
..\1I 1+.
1
U
? C) x z v

° U ? p W

N

O
co
+ ?
?
r
m
O
d

U
o ? cn

U
O

Z
E
O
CN\j
(? o
O? N?
N
7
z c
0
x U
w
o
o "
O
z ?' co
O F.
ca
a ti
9
z cam,
O
d w ?'
w
U a?
x zU
F?
? b
w
Q
Cl.
0
w
w

J N
J Q
lz
z
N Q
W J
OW
Z 3
W Z
N
W
I-
Q
J3
J
W
U
N Q
W
O
Z N
W Z
O .
N
O ?
W Z
N_ a
Z J
Q ~
W
=
U3
W Z
N U
W Z
F- ?
O
Z Li
W J
? U
e
G:a
Q
U
O
N
O
O

c
_

w
?
? C
o
t? 00 L
U ? ? ?
Z U ?
?

ra? ?, z

-7
CO
r \
? O x U U U..3
F.

14
z
U w
v
U ?• F-'
z
V) Lo

r
w

\ 4ia,
\?fL+3
\ ` b `U
Na
W J
F- ~
? W
O Z
ui
W
L'- r )
N Q
W LL
,- a
O =
Z N
W Z
O .
N
W Z
N_ Q
Z J
Q ~
2 W
V 3
W Z
(n 0
LL,
O Q
ZLJ-
W J
av
0
1
V -]NI-H3ld'rN
a Ln
• 4.7= ?C
W .?
a?

_a .
JO
WQ
\
\ ray
\[Sik3

a
x
N
U
V
J
U
E
O
N
Oc
O
L
Q
q a
E-
'?
0 > ?D ?Q q
® ?F, Ca

H
®
? Z cy
CO QG cn "''
F; 9 x U ?U
B.
3
ti U @ N
o o w
z 0 xzU
a
z
F'--'9
'7
COo --4
z x ?wz
?QLA.J= cam, '3 , a"
wcD -0 z °O V J
Q- U .a
i-w ?-4 U E-
0o G?1 j ti U V) @ F.
JCD
Y CS
/ Z cn ?
o?
/
i
O E
n /
w w
Z w
U ?f f J
a - zt ?3 ., U
11 yiy D.1src3 F F
u ?
r E ? }
E E ft \ Q
\ \ '` ^ Q w
w
>Y \ n
W
Wm
X0
V F
\ \ ?.
a?\ \ F-z
cn a
1-2 I - - t? X
w ww
CDt/;
Q
JD W
wQ / I O
Z
a U
0
t Y
N
a¢ ?N
? au
m 2W ?o
w W
/ w tim
mN
o? C)
wQ
I I ?
V 3NI-IH:)l'VW
Z, y r?
?y O Q E-
.l
LL)
COW
Mcr
LLI
... a a O O c4 ?-
, _ >-i ico L. z C1 V O
wm o O Z d CO [ w
COLLJ
a V) LV U g
z
z
/
z
°
W / Lij
z
J Lli
U ?f ? • J
Q J! Mid ?u Z.( L?x3 y V
lLt3 ?
u
E u z ?y ? Q
n E ?
LLJ
Q / ¢ >
\b `""rsi O
\ x3 - _ h
w
v. Q
W
\ \ \` ?7 Qm
fr° U Z:E
z
=w cn a
w
w
cov;
Na / \ -
-jo
I V
Al El)
atj
/ OW v,
¢ ` v
W
I O
cDtn
-jo
W< C)
V 3NI-IH3.i GVI O

s

i

?J

wm r
nmw
LJ
JCo

Uo
'

I

/
LLJ
C:)

a
?m
a
?o

o
10

?_
W
cov;
a
w° /
\

6 c
\+ W /

i'
/ Wi*
\ W
W=
\\ frm \\ /'y ov
W
WQ
?, / \ \ \ cc
°
\ au
W¢
\\ \ 13?d1t
a :v)
/ G +\
UJ
F- S
W .
coo
Q?
/ N_ Q
J?
/ W Q

a o Q p
9 Q 3 E. W

z GV

H U')
w
?
?
•?
0 ,
j

>
a
ti
?a
(n

z xzu
U ?- ?- x x

}
Q
O W
2 m
ui
U) l1J
w [o
U
: Z
W
H Z
N Co
W
W W
0
Z
U
N
O
C

z 5 t,
O Q =
VW

w
w
z
J
2
V
Q

dN
Q?
SW
W c
CoLn
F
NQ W/
JO
WQ /
1r--

z x
U
U
?
"? FU
Q

E- w
®
0
? Z
F

.^.,
H? U C. U

U cn
C j ®

Z
Q
°
c w
w
Hcr-
Nw
Q CO
V O
Z
W
N
N M
W UJ
w
H
O
Z
V
..a
d
u
O

1
O
cD
c
3e
ue L _
•m W rW
_ Cow
aQ
J Q
\ MW Jm
WQ] U?

C 1
Y V
V
y'
2
\ \ Vb
W m \ \ \
- \ r
• \\\ \ / tJ ` 1s
LLJ
W \'?\\ // Wm \\? 4' \?\\- Ot7
z \ \ \ 0j
cr- J ?y I 7 \ m
1 w
/ \ 4. \ U)
LLI
wm
Q
/ +.y sr3 = 7
cn =w / X LU
w w
W e
_ LU
JO
WQ /
Q fir.
4
LLJ
.-v I
z N
\ \ \ \

.
1?' a
T ?
W
?Y
J JNI?HHVC N
- U

CL
O
U
W
U ;
a?
Y
U <
Q ? u
a Wo a
w ?m t 1 tt
co
o ?o
?m

\

\ 2
Q
l
'v

n
C +
W
\ r-
vi
M
L
?
a
-J
J
V6
\ ¢
n
/ ats
0
m
Y
Q'
O
<
OU
ao
am '

/
:) 3NI-lH3idV4
z ~ ?.
O p?

o ?
Q ? x
a
?

?
I ? z z ? ?
:a
I ? ? x ?v3e
H

i
I
I

.
I
I "
I
I.o

U
Z

I
I
I
I
I
I
z
_J
G:`a
u
r-z
O
N
O
C-
O
r
Z
O
U
W
V
Y
U
a
F-
W
CO
cr
O
U
1•I
1,1
a
I,lo
.? j
Q
•I O
'I O
V
,.I O
7.I O
'•I ?
?I Q

. ?\
1
4C ?
?
1
I
I I
?
I
u?I
oll ?

_84-.
ore
UQ<
m m N \

W
N

C
2

I
J

3 3NIIHDiVA
z z?
M ?
" N

V
r?
9
® c?i :4
I z cR ful ;'w
F- V P
U
`n r
_-t
0 >
zU

1 ? ?I
r
i
L.n ?

I
I
I
I
?
I
? I
i?
I `U
}
V)
c °z
wQ
.?' ? p Z H
O ¢
I
I
I
I 0
U
z
I
I
u_

u_

CLZ
? Q J LULIZ
~W :2 ?
V) V) z
LLJ Z W _
F_ Z F- cr
uj? IO
O O ¢
ZJ Z W
V_I-i W J
°Li ° U
LJ
O
N
O
c?
O
M 1
r
z
a
O
U
W
V
Q
Y
v?
a
1 ?
W
I CO -
L"
O
U
?•I
l.lo
IQ
'I O
•I
. v
1.1 0
r/Q
I
I.I
III
I•I
'I
•I.
-n i
r'? ?
aC`
oQ: I
' ?

I ? i ? oll
VII
II'
- - t -
¢
o.- e
NUN

'
W W ?
m m N

I

W
b
N
.:j

L0 ,

i v, '
I s I {1

i

c
U
O
N
O
O
I
I
i
I
I
I

z .-

r 3
?T
+
'++ f v

Z = ?.

zu a
? x s
z

I?
I N
r nn
c wz
a
L'i I? CVS Z..
1 z
MEa ??
w,- z
~W ?-
I: ? WZ W Z
I u O O Q
7J Z W
3 I ;
""f I O
I
I ?
I 1
I
I t

i
\I
I
? '
N
Q ?

r'
:n
rlj L ?D C

Q ? Q ?D ? Ni
e. U .,

x v ° ¢ w
o Q n x

?.
p z
H
U ?4
a
Q .
q
9 , 3NI-IHOiVN
I
0
I +
N
0
_ oc
no
L'.
O
1 c-. ~ U U a cFn
?``III
7)1

VI
7?1
\Ij
11
7 N
VV
1
V
7l 1
1
O
t
1
711
I
o
711 +
7l l
I
1
??11
71'
O
t
rT`?
(?

1 - ` L)
+ x
C)
N
0
,o
„b„ 3NI-IHOiVN +
0
NI ?I tal NI I O
w
W
?I
V
- .v
u
t17
U_
F
0
,'I"

z
n aNT-114 1 I VW
N
i
O

0

+ un,

,
a

O

z
?

9
z

?
N
?,
?

?

w

x

cn

z
.?r

U

.
O
pl)
0
+

a
N

0 ?

0 ?
t T

0
+
1 ?

a
1 ? ? J
N F ?
z
O e
U

m ...
p F
v
N ?

0
-49
+
0 0

„0„ 3NI-lHOIVW
l
NI =I ?I N
I
q 'ZIKITlgn I VW
a1 101 N
0
?o
0
0
N
0
co
1
7
O p .--I
r.f
O 3 O ?D Er w r,
C? c d
5 d
" ?4 cn
o z
O x U U H O
3 0 z
cS °z?H? w
4'G
O
10
I?
Q
?u
F?
O
N
+
N
0
0
,o

J

? d
U
J

F' J
z ?
O U
N
Fr

p c:v

O
?
N N
0 0
F
C "

I
„8„ 3NI-IHOidW
I
N `° N
I 4 C --

f
F
LV
.?
G
cr., 14
„4„ 3NI-lHOiVIN o F
---- z z
r- 9 9
i _ z N
V
o W
i + O D U O
V v U r3
a v C Z U E•,
Z e.
+ z V)
o
m.
+
Q-: fp
S u W k=?1
? T
E ' \ O
e \ N
o p \ + [:?
?` U)
i - N Q
+ x
-- , N Co
0
3NI-IHOIVW +
0 0
N tt tD
N o ?

I I'D I N
i
?wm

z

F
L
0 a o a?
? ? H
0
+ z ?
? ..?w z Q

E-' O O ?., cif
z 0w
U
O
[ O x U
() a F
W U ti
O x z U
? Z ?'`?

+ U ?

N
h
0
m
T

O
.Q

O
? T
T

w

J U
E-
z .a
d
O
N U
F,

t ?
O
x C
o
N ?
N
0
_ .O
0 0

„D„ 3NI-IHO1dW
7 0 ?. O 9 c..
\\ 9 G 0 o H w Q?'
S U ?3 Q
Lr) Z o ?4E-z
\ °
'I \ w z 00 Q
Oo
n ti J
I I ? ? 1 cea ? v?@ H
=zu ca
I I 1" I ? z ?p
.? I ?? I I tl I
I I ?I I
w
,•
00
N
• W
I tL J v 3
L1 J N W
• L.i 'y?l ?`' Z
Z
W?- WZ
Z3 oa
zW
.? Lt lL I O ? o u
LL.
l•
T
I. u u>
W z
rl I
III I I W e?
In ( } N I
1 ( ; ?? I
ICI I ? 1 1
' lid ?' ?- I U! I V)
?' Q a I ? E
11 ( ? v? I ? I/ O
It W I V) N
I i t
11 aW
11 Z? 1
Q I 11 ? ?? I I I °

?1/11
I
i
I

I
I
/ I
? I
?I
I?
1
W
U
0
N
0
0
O \?
o ? \
1 \ \t` t 1
\ II
\ I ?"1
I
I 8 i i
I ?U
N
0 O
N_ J
Z ?-
Q W
-? T to 3
p w
??
NQ N0
ff J
0
?lJJ ~ WZ
Ow r <
z3 oa
w zw
LLJ -J
OZ .! O
U
III •
p'-a f

E
O
?n
1L 1a•0 o
U
IC:) ?N F N
0
U
:Lj
z
Q
J
1
E
O
G O
.. : D
00
o ? O ? a F?

E., c.
O >
O
c?
0 z
x w
J
F U
W BU
F
~
G ?

w
ti c
n
U
a
U
.. O xz

z ?a
a
Q
Z
O
U
W
V)
r
Q
Q
c.7
Z
U
Q
Q..
N..
W
Z
Q
0
w
0
0
co
w
O
z
a
w
0
W
N0
co
O

Q
O
w
w
L.U
d°
U
O
O
Ln
W J 0
U Y Q z
0 U =::D
ry ILl ZO
CO D ?-
0
z

O
Ln
z
LU O
Cr W
wN
o U'
N
0
U
W
LLJ
z
q
J
1
c o?
Q
o o 00
?.
U
LO
z U
?
?
-? ca
?z
Q

F'
O
O O
G .T.

0

o Z

x
6

;

o
a
C Q [:V ? ? `r' U
z

U
Z,

? N

Q
F--
W
a ?
a -
Z
O
F-

Y W
/ r?
J
W L
> `
L-?
N

CD
z
?
_ _.. , - n... -

Lai J O
O ? Q Z ?
U Z W
r,rij Z O
CO CD
Q
Z Z
a U
= cn

co O

F
o E
-' - z Ln
AV ', TERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESSES
P O BOX 210
CORBETT INDUSTRIES WILMINGTON, ITC 28402
DEAN HARDWOODS, INC.
ELIZABETH P. ADAMS, HEIRS
CIO REV. H.N. PARSLE
HOWARD L. ARMISTEAD, JR.
CSX TRANSPORTATION
1 COWAN ST.
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
177 #918 N HIGHLAND STREET
MEMPHIS, TN 38111
2108 SOUTH 17TH STREET
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
P O BOX -40466
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32203
D. B. HARDEE
EMMA M. BELLAMY, HEIRS
CORBETT PACKAGE COMPANY
NCDOT
WILMINGTON ASSOCIATES LTD.
PARTNERSHIP
133 SOUND VIEW DR.
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
P O BOX 3145
WILMINGTON, NC 28406
P O BOX 210
WILMINGTON, NC 28402
124 DIVISION DRIVE
WILMINGTON, NC 28401
1800 OLD MEADOW ROAD
MCLEAN, VA 22102
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250101 (U-0092A)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
BRUNSWICK STREET TO US 117
CASTLE HAYNE ROAD
SHEET OF DATE
O
0
ti
6
m
v
a

N ?
_°
m E
0)
0)
L
U
c U
W

a? -y
E z
-?°, L " O
? U
Q
U)
_
rn a> a>
U') F-

Q
N m E LO ° CL
. ca
v
W U E z
0
CL Q
LL
LL
w LL O
O
v
° to
E
v z
O
~
Q a
i ? 0
.. to
F- W

Q (A ° Z
L
L C O c ca
L
Ix
=
M -
U) LL 11 Q

o n
U)
C , °
0
O
cr
Z v O

F-
_
O
N °) =
N
C

N c*) r
o0
r
X
W
O W
C
(D ca N
CD O O O
°
Q L d )
? U ? O O O O _
F-

c
G LL.
?-
n
U O
D
0 ?
°
c

A
_
co >
m O L 0
p X v W
z W C:
Q O
J
W O j M
a - IU
?
E °o

o

° W

n?
>
a>
F-
o
W cn
C? Z

C: 'a c
l
o v
Lo v
co co
o °
0 O O
W W
- t C
)
N N r' o o
C W

LL N -'
O
O
O W
W
Co

J
a J_ Q
0
1 of
a) W a W 0- C)
n

=3 cn
o C)
x (D
n 0 U
Zg
O)

U)
Fr
C) LL
O
^ co Cl) w
O ?z
_ F- W
U F- r'- 0
j- } J J - J J ?- ?- ca z

(n O`
M
O
co
O
N
LO
CN Q
N m
LL }
O ?
N
N
N
.
LO
(+O
'
W

.-
r N
N N )
o r- r
fn O
J
Q
O O O
cn Z Z
r
z_
OQ
U rn
ly- o
w°
O?
Z
Q o
= p
W N
Z Co
F-
U
W
O
a
U-
0
F-
W
W
U)

c
c
iz:
a
n
Z
C

V) C rn
a)
O N N N
U L _•
c
W U
W m
? c ^
U C
O L ?.
d
U
0)75
U ^ q;r

co zt?
N a
?-
M
co
Q W U E
a

LL
C1 U) U
F
Q E C

W

LL
o m
v
(n ii

Cl) co
c CO o °
0
ca
Z
o
ii --
v
a? c -
' co
- co
Za o U 00 0 p cl?
0
Q v ° o o
G
c
C
~
U

N
c
°
c
I
v J CL _
> N fU9
L
E
v
L)
z W c
Q - -
r
Q
p
Q
O
m
(7
Z
F-
U)
X
W
W
F-
LL
O
J
Q
>
O
2
W
J w in
0 O
u m oo o 0 W M
a U ch '4? p W
E 0) ca o o p 1
-

F- U)
c
-
Z
?
O

c
co co
CN
LO
°
co W

co U,
co
o
W W
LL (D 0 p O N R
m (o
W
J
W J
? U ?
U
O N W
( d
U W CD p
Cl) p p M Z
U

C) -

o
g
m Cl) m M

0 w
O o w
c o o LL
O
T- t

E

}

J

J

J

J

O Z
O
(o ?.
N m
rn O
O In
co O
O O
N O
Ul O
N co Q
O m
LL
+
+
+
+ + + + + r 2

O
r
N
r
N
N
N
N
N N
m to UD

(n
W
J
Q
a: O N M
I
L ~ O
Z
?
Z

Z
} LL
O
O ?-
?
Q N Z
o Q
O
OQ ?
°

U) = W

O o
Q
F- LL
O =
o
OZ >
WN
O Z C6

W
p 0 F
U
w
i-
Z O W
w
CL a:
U)
VICINITY MAP

BEGIN
PROJECT /
421 ? ,

1
\
m ? New Hanover
County Airport
_

? Hightsville S.R. ?
' ?
131 ?

11 , I ° END
.
PROJECT
1 N
N

t ? I \ I I ?

r

.
C
U
C
N

I t ? it i

I
7 \
.
.
.
. o
I
I
? I
sus
I "1 ILMING,T ION

/
- 1 I t
i 74w
woloster
I I I 1 'Stl 1
I Wri h
tsville
/ 1` / I

?W
?-
! ' \ 1 Dow
17 I `
O \ ' ilshi
z i I
74E I
? v'?er%/ I d
i ?
U

N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092B)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
PROPOSED US 117 CONNECTOR TO
0.85 KM EAST OF 23RD STREET.
- SHEET OF DATE
SITE MAP

N 56820.6270 E 709921.8902
SlI°1['E MA1P
N 56820.6270 E 709921.8902
J N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPOI
`f, W DIVISION OF HIGHW
NEW HANOVER COL
- '_ PROJECT: 82450102 (U-
"' SMITH CREEK PARKWA
PROPOSED US 117 CONNE'
_ i -` 0.85 KM EAST OF 223RD
.
--WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY 4-6
L
WETLAND
4-6
DENOTES FILL IN 2
® WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN 2
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN 2
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
DENOTES TEMPORARY 2
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION 2
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
®
FILL IN SURFACE 2
WATER
• DENOTES MECHANIZED
• • • • • CLEARING 2
2
<? crt FLOW DIRECTION
TB 2-4
Z TOP OF BANK
WE 2
•- -_ EDGE OF WATER
- ?- - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT 2

- -F -
PROP. LIMIT OF FILL 2
2
-L-- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
2
- - NG- - NATURAL GROUND
- -PL - PROPERTY LINE 2
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE 2
EASEMENT
-POE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE

EASEMENT 2
- EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED 2
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED 2
PLANT BOUNDARY
0
- - - - -
- WATER SURFACE 2
X
X
X LIVE STAKES 2
X
X
BOULDER 6
- - - CORE FIBER ROLLS
LEGEND
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
RIP RAP
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
INE WT
6
6
15
6
2
2
2
2
2
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-00920
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FRO.1
PROPOSED US 117 CONNECTOR TO
0.85 KM EAST OF 23RD STREET.
SHEET OF DATE
CC)
w
z
J
2
U
F-
Q

i°
t 'f V .
Q: 7'1
w _
0
E° ® Q c+
® z
a
Q >_ B
tr
U ? z
z
F?
u
r-+
ill 1

z
P-L
0
r, o
N ?
t0
•dfi z '"'
9 c+
FUG
d
E- U in
c. o -? Lr
N
O ?
W Z
N_ a
Z rJ-
Q W
JN U+
W
4 OZ Z
NQ NV
J
~ W Z
F--
W H
Z? OG
W Z W
O Z W J
O U
Ll
J
U
0
N
o,
C)
V 3,\JllH3iVVN
a ?
V 3MI-IHDiV?Ai
LL-

L L N o\ N\ .51, \?i \ Li
co -L) \
Q Q
z
LLJ
J \
2
U
? \ xS0
\ \\ ai
LL-
y :
1n /
\ I
LL-
N \/ LL.
\ N
LL \ \ u p Z
Ll- \ \ ? N
CIO Q
CI 1 J
Li / \ \ a W
` J Ln V
LL.
W
Z
O
Z
Q
NJ NU
F- F- ?
Z O C
a? a -.i
/s om rj I
/ --?¢m
0o
ZZ
J / /
0
rym
?o
Ua
ZZ
V INI?HDiVli?

c .' Q
G rr, M
?? 9 a r

?;
L
U 7
77
`
'
7 c
t
.. a
@
Q
z cI
E-

v U

r G] z ,?,? E? 9 •4 U
V5

i
Y V)
VJ? Q
i Z
= NQ
Z
a LLJ
W
x
J V?
J N W Z
a
Z
W J LN 0
O?'? OQ
Z? Zw
W W J
O Z Q U
l i
r.?
V
V)
O
N
O
O

r
w

O(n? /
T /
Z Z / \ 1\ r

m
W
Z
J
U
H
Q
N
?Z
W Z
N Q
Z W
H
Q W
S
J V 3
y LL. Z ?
Jz WZ
IW- F-- H ?
W
0 oa
W z ? W J
O DV
¦
•
U
E
O
N
O.
_O

=m
'SJ\\
?p

CJa \ /
ZZ \ / /
/
\ ? W
0 \ -

z row
o ?r

?
Q r ? ? ? LU'.? ,7 C:
? ZN a
z N ?
p N
o z ? cli U?Q o
? U

A
U Z a ?C. o v

N
W Z
Z ?
Q W
JN V 3
LLI Z
LL z ?
N Q /)CD
J Z
O lil O Q
z 3-_ 7_ u1
Li w
/? ?z OV
m
w .
z
2

o 0 0 z
N re) re) rte- O W
? N ? c,pC
O p O Q Wp
c
( n 0 U WZM
z x C o Cow'
l
°v cz. j n?. h o
E- p -?
O o? o
a ? w UQ
M
I ° o ? 3
O C =OW v
U z 4. O.
I z 1
I °
I
I
O o
I n 00 JN
Z
- ? o ?a
J
I r + b 03
°z
o
\ o b
re)
„a U
? rn
° O U
Q N
C C
O c:U
0
U') O O
o O O
? o 0 0 0
L-n Un

Li
l?
O w
C-
0
^_ U
M
O I

0
1? O E

+ O
O OI

N ' h Q
N N

H J {./
d W

1 ?
?J
i
1
i
411 1 1
4iI
?I
I)
U
l21 Q /
wU E
cli
/ O O
/ w
/ O w
nr ?
/ x
w ¢
/ Q F
x
f'y C
¢ ¢
w LL
r
z 2

o A z U >z? .,
v
+ u-.
z U
c
y?
? z M
c?

z t
?- ??r
GV

V V, L , L:
x y
r,
C4 ? 9 s

00

u
+ ?J
cri
O
C4 T
+
irk?
N v
l ? .
O
co
0
+
0

V

U

z ?
? U
li

N ?
v
-
o o,
?°,i

e '
i
0
Q
O
O E
O
O
1? O E
n m
+ o
Nn1w
N - N
11 11 H
w J U
d W >

! L g Z b ,?..?
r

T
1 ? Z ? ? ?, •?'
1 ? O r;

Li
Ll

O w
C -C
O<

`
1

l

o

+
^_ U ?
I
J ?
?1

I
1
10
+
1
?J
r1
?1
+
1
\II
71i L?
u
1

-7-r- C4
U ?
C-ICJ
X=
/
,.rte
. t,. W
E E
C%J N V

;W'"- , ..

? w

f co ri
w s
f.- uj

r f ? ? U
=
__ py O 1-?n `.r
.. 1 S J C1
l z Z

W
W 10
t
J
\ .1

L
O
v
t

J 1
: U
2
Q OH U
rj (n
I ?x°? 3z
°
?o
F 0 0 "
-?
LT. z
N \ ED O Z Q? Lid Q O
k',' ?I I C W O x? V
k
'' I i U z a' ? O co
W
? I I z ??o
r \
r I
Z
O I
u
W I
O
x
s
z I Li ?\
I '1 Oo`n
W Z
?I
J
Li ? Q ~
I LL- ?? CIS ZZ
1 u_ u_ N a cn 0
W J W Z
~OW OQ
Q Z3r ZW
W J
pZ Qu
I •
I
Ll-I
I I?
i
I
ocn './
_ o
I ) v
J
I I\ ?
I 1 ? N
I I ?
I l
0
d 3NI?HO1dW z o ?,
O ,

°o

z
c? i?-- z
w z M

o

•' IN,
? ? w
H
-
/ U z a JCL .?
?
/
a.

k

4k

;pk
•? • 4
•

;pk
;ik

LLl LLI
F- 0
cQ
X CO

z O z
x-
7
O d C7
0- w
V
Q Q m
W
O
Z
U
W
?
Z O
N
r

C E

1? I O
1

V 3NI?HOiWq
m
w
z
v
a
4D
w
b
C?

i----[-
0
. o

-------
`r - /
r' _
MO'A L
----

? "° "?? 11
' ?=•• 1
? ? 1
I
\
a 1
\ ? 1
1

B
F
too \ \ ! I
`
\

I
1
4\ -
?ye

\ , d
1
1 /

\ 1
\ 1
\
\ 1
v\

SOL

\ y` ` ?? w

2
\
E' aZ\>
z \ a w \ 00

`. \ \ Z
o \
r \ I =

/

/

;A
/

/ Z
?o
/
z
VD
fL?
\!/ J
r

A?
L:1
d
U
rn
O
N
O
rz
0
o ?- w
,
? ? E? c ?p ?
p c:v
cL x x 3 z s
0 3NI-IHO1dW Z 0 ?? w Z?
% t-?a ° Q' Ov r.
E-' p 0 a? O
CO cn
Z z
Cam. U UC w
c o w o
z c-? ?x0
o
w
z
U
a
? J
U
LO
U
O
N
O
d 3NI?H?1?'W O

z
0
v
z
0
\ u
\ b \
\ 'r

i
r r
r

C
L,L
z
F-
a

?'All. -
0 3NI?HO1bW

-tk
:lk

Z
0

0
` • Y
\ r
\ v
\
tp
1
r
r r

d 3NIIHDIVW
z ?o
O ` F F
o

z o wz M

?o
?

Ems., v ^? U ::.
a. t, O
°z w -?

a. ? U
?
UD
0 ; w- O cn
z c. O
0 U

z
c X
c0
1 r "

w
F

N

O

O

o?
o O F
O G

'
v+
q :a
W
/ O
i

Paz M

- o
/ o
o z d • a? ? o

/a'
/ E-4 -4
O
u
W
W w a
H ,. z
roc
z to s

_
4 w
WO
n.
>(X

W
0.4
4 Y
4
i
z

J (T?
z u
/
/
V)
Z
O
NJ

/ Z F-
Q W

/ /
!i•!1 / /
U. Z Z
-
-i
LLJ V)

/ Y3-

/ ~
L,j
w F-

Zw
Li -j
.?

/
Ilk

/ p
? W
z d
z

!
J
?

3 I ~
I a N
V / +
I
I / O
1 /

O
t
MATCHLINE E
U
W
z
J
U
a

\ \ \ \ \ -M 44
\
\
\ \
\ \
\ \ NEW HANOVER
\ COUNTY AIRPORT \
\
\ \ \ \ F kF
\ \ \ \

F
nA
\ V/F
\
\
A \v /I

A

?

CITY OF IA19CION

t \ \

LL-
w
z_
J
U
F-
Q
F\ \ \\ \? W \\ \\
' ? / 1 G\ ` \ C4?C \1\
/ y
a \ \
i </ NG GJa9 \ ?pH?pa \\ \ \
too ? Tj 3y' \" a0 \ \
67 em Cp?C
too
\ V s \ \ \ \?

J V)
J Q
4 Z
V) Q
W -?
F- ~
o w
z
W
O Z
V)
O ?
w z
IV Q
z J
Q W
=w
U
W
:2 ?
V) 0
Z
L'i F-- M
oQ
zw
W J
O U
U
O ?
N
0
0
MATCHLINE E
U
W
Z
J
S
U
a
\ 1 \ \

?
\ \ \ \t
\ \ \ NEW HANOVER
COUNTY AIRPORT
\ \ \

\ ` \ \
F ?
1
F « \
?
\
7FA F
-N

A \v /I

Z \ - ?-

?

* F
\
F J
/
`
CITY OF 4 L
M'RGION ?\ .
= -

t \ \

z o

O `

r
z
o O
`
tD o ;. U
9
° O
L) U p
?z?
zM

LL. 0 •° O

LtJ
O
z Z
?a
z
J a
U

C ca
trl U V

? C)
z ?
a
C? a

\\\\ i\\ \\
_ ,p \\
1? BST n \
pp Tj $-;T
a0
V

c.
0
O
y

p 00
?I w Z .
IV Q
Z J
r
r?
vJ J a
w
V 3
J l/1
?Z LLJ Z
N N
J
LLJ Z

L'i
O w O
Z 3?- Z w
w
Z W J
O OCJ
6 0! .

\\ \ on
L4K
637 Z ?m CpN? \
U
O
N
O
O

p p F.r
y
cr
,
/ S ao
a
z
o
. I

11 I ?

?" ? ,

o ° d tiO
Q.

I I
Cx. o
z ?
CO ?, ?,
O
x F U)

,•? I
I
°
o z CY)
x O?4
ca
I' V a F" p co m
'
?? I H w Z
?
?
z Co
? Gr V)
I Q?
?o

. c
;pk
, I aQ
?' QW
Wa `?) I I
?f?i \\
Za I L
/ iLJ \\
f
s z ' \ \

rl p?, E
?
r

4

I
I
I
' \
\
P
o
\ I
? \
\ I
J
l\ S \
a
I
1 \ o

_ \

`
\
J
\\ a=

-
a-

W
Fz -
L`? O
C\j

0
PQ4

J 3N IIH JiVH

O
?
v o o N r Q o
U r

a'
?
`
F

c C w

O C
r•
V 3NIlHOIVW Q Z Ca
r
z C
' Q' x V o ? U c:

I

H

o
O »
?,?o
? z

c6 .?

tA
ry
z
p
F
U a @
1 H " U ?oC4
°
w
N r ? ?
p Cz?
z O
C can ?
O :4 :,,?
° ? 0
l1 m O U LU
W? ? + z Cl)

I
1

1 °

+

III
711

?{I
N
r +
?I

-7N Yl /
I

µµtt w
? I

1

c)
s a
F-
m
711 ITl
x 1
CC Q

m ? I
I
?

65/9
o
°D

c
? -?{ r n 41
? r o
+ .a U
4. z

? a W ? N
p U

?

O c
N
0
N
+
O O

< O N N O N
V 3NIIHOiVW
0
W
N
W
d
OOCC
a?
N
W
?l 0
m
I X
a6
CL- W
Q m
^1 2

NI fV

. ?f ? x v c lUc:.

0
1 E-F U v

?,! W ? ?
z O u z
?o
z W
W C7 I
.? I
1
_V
7?1
,

1 O
10
t
?I
1
\f
Ill t
1
I
-?1
f
O
?
v!
41l +
\
7l 1

\'1

1

Ill O
-71
71.

?
1 10
U
F .a
/ J
/, a W ?
N
F

E
O
O
N
+

N N O N

O
N
+
i
i
0. W
O
co
t

O
?O
t

O
Q
t
0
V 9NIIHOI"
0
,o
?O
N
N
M
nl
?O

O
N

? J

O
t
W

O
+ ? U
N
z J
?
O U

° a
O ?
W
E
N
v?
0
N
O O
O N
-I
i
N
ZS
P (V
M
1 11
W
0
N
W
0?
d c?
I
1
7 '
1
I
4i?l
I
?I
\ I
TI
0 1
N 1
wl7 ?I
i
I
1
;I
i
1
8 3NIIHOiVN a1
0
O
+

O
t
r?
?l
n
a al

O
O
? J
, U

9 J
.

O
.Q .
?
_N
+ r
N c
0
N
+
O 1 O I
p .pl cvl h 1
I O? c?
r ?

M

: L
( ? v

t z fCe r
1
c O ,OI N Ni 1 y ?„
JJ Cw : 1 - ? ?
e, Z U ., > 7
3 3NIIHOiVW 7 ?\ + 2 J L c•l N Z M
E
? .J r-
w
w p ? r? ?.
¢w
LL) Ll
W
i > w 0
Z?,y
z
w .? o U
+
T
ow ` a
o? <UJ
a c?
4 o
•o
I I +
w I
O
11
w
?w vl
~ ?I
O
N N
O cc t
aN 711
N
O
+ ?J
ru
' JJ
I
I
all
r.
X 11 I y,?
I L_.-1
O
+ W
IN,
°v ® W
+ >
j. I O
d I
8 3NIIHOIVW I o
N
O , O ,
I I
<I O .OI NI hl I I
c`

N 2 q
I L. y+ ?d o GU

0 4
?
a 3
x
U ?
v w o

az d

z
? ? ?
w o ?o?
o
O

F' O ? U ? ? w

•
a
?...
a w
n
U D
E? ca
U e.. a
"O? ca

0
i
R
a W
'P O .p N
0

o
N
1

a
v

o
E v ?

z
O ?
U

+ ? C
j
N v?-
0
N
O O
N
I N
0 3NIIHOIVW
QI ?I NI OI tOI °
_Hds
?. M
f?l
°? ?, Z °o A qC
? `W!
O { WO ?
d {1
n v ,C.?
?
Jr Nr
W
,°? (w O N
d U [;

?
o ,

1
? J ?
z 00
E-4
U°Gsl
\. >

O 00

o ;
1
E m 0
I-
?W
? J K
•a,. E°. -
1 1 _
1
F <W''1O 1 L -------------- I O
N ? NN N , I ? ?

I r
- - - - - - - - - - - - - --

I /
I
t /
?
I
1 ,-----; C/I
1 1 °
I
1 V
VIM 1
N

I ,

y I ' o
N

I r ?
I r
r °
? U
cn

I ?I z ?
a i 13, O U
- , JI
1 jI
°w N r

C
?I
I I
I I O ?
1 I
i I
1

0 N ?
O O
OI
pI I NI NI
? n, O N
?? COI NI NI t0
W
Q '
Q
Q
O
z
® r
??
r? ful
? z o 0
?
C '
U

N I
ao I
o O
? O
?. ??r?r++
`+Q
V v
r z p
0 1
a z
z
?/ CV
p
O M
„
11 U
a Q
° U ? Q
°
U
` ?
/
r 0 .
/
?
o
11 ? tl o Ci ?

p, ? U Ups
6CL
o

I? C \
N
U
W k4
Go
1 t \?i ?,
Q
E m
ti m
, ? o
o

>J C I
1 ? \ N

QW
Y t 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -?
?
^
Q
N¢1/?N off I
, 1 m
-C1? , t 1
1
--

1 /
1 1
J I ? O
i
1 t i
1 ?
1 1
1
1 _
t ? t
t

t .G I L.?J
-
1
r I I ?-T+?
--
.1 I N o
C_1
p
C7-
0
V
__.... •-.J-r=:..w• s .. ...:. .._ .. .-?., ... ._ ,:.i..d: _.. ?_'.1 .. •pr.u'-. ?^a.' _ ?•'::' .- .mac // a. .... v. r. -?:.1` '.

U

Q

0

1 I
1 I C\j
o
?o

O
0 0 0 0 0 ?

O
N
N ?

O C \j
W
1- ?
N U
0
0
a
0
a
W
R
<
Z
L
w
I
\ I
?\ a
I\ ?
U V
I ? N
. 1 ?
r•
I ?
l
I
I
q ? F E-
O
;?
?
?
N
?
w ? w
O C

z

z U ?
°
Q' o
w o
.. fR 0?
U

EC.
w
'
C c .
?O
0 z o ? o
w m ,?
a ? x U ? w

w
?
3 ca
ti U °
w?
° A ca x o M w
o x

cn a.
fir'
N
rya o O
k? W z
N Q
In Z r
Z Q W
W =3
rT Jr- J v
v/J JQ JN WZ
ti3 L-Z ?-
N W N Q N O
W U W J w Z
'o Q ~ F- ~ <
OLD O ? OQ
W O W W J
Z ON O O U
r
? f
r
f
f
r
w--1
U
O
N
O
c
-1 . 1
Z
0
<
0
a
N
2
F0
W
7
CL

\
1
\
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 ? \
1 `
r r
r r
r
r
r .
r
r
r
r
r
? r
r _
.r
r.
r ?
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
I/
i/
d
?IU
II
II
II
If
11
1 I
l{
I
i
I
l
11
1
`U
{
I
I
I
1
1 ?1

0 0 ?,
wpC

F ?
? ?. ? ? ago

v
a
o
?
a c
-?
o U °
x??
F

o
OR
z

\\ u
\ o.
N
W
Q
\ J 3
J
\ r fJ1 ?" U
U Yl/ NQ
_ W W
' _ Utz
\ ? 1 W
O Z
I
I
\ v
\. \ o
\ O
? O

sKa..-.
. 9

I
I d 1? ? ? z o ?v? :a
° ' ca
00
I i II \
\\ r' o o ? ?°

<
CL
_r'? I
I I \
\\
O
z
ap ? c.

o
1

- Z
_ -- ! cn ? o

0

-

I

C, W
Cj
? N a
W?
°z V)
?? \ \ _oZ

r

Y \ \ N

to

'a z
O
O
LO

M
N
(D
}
Z 0
m
?U) O

U o
Q
Of
CN 0
2
j

O = Z o
LL
~ =
,
u.
O
w
N
zO

z co
a
co
j
? p 1-
U W t-
Z O W
Z
a. CIO

w
c

N C
O ?
U L
c
W U

d d
?
?p C t
O
U C ? O

?
N v
,
- +
U
Q c E
N Co Co
Q N (0
r
? .
W U ? (O
r

W LL' >
Q d (? L

W
U
Q (n c
I
i m
c
? o L

? c` N O co

c .3. ? O
r O
O O
r
O
Z O O O
ii

C
N
? (O O (D r-_ O)
?- C O IQ ";r r O) ac) M
'= L •- O O M CD
Q L N
Q)
? U O O O O O

~

? (
j
Q c N
c
a .2

? L

0 X
Z W c
Q -
J N

a- m
N L
N >>
C
N
C C^ co N O M U1
N f0 ? M ? N 0
(
0
lL r O O O
?
N
7 O
U _N

O
?
O
O ?
0
?
0
0
?
i

? 0 0 U-) O O M t!] O O
O) N I? O co "T s N O

r co O O (- O O N 'If
N N V 'IT r r In LO LO
J

O
r N M V LO F-
? z I
0
Z

u 0 o
w
PROPERTY OWNERS
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
OWNER'S NAME
:ADDRESSES
ow
NEW HANOVER COUNTY 3320 CHESTNUT STREET
C/O TAX ADMINISTRATOR WILMINGTON, INC 28401
AMERICAN SKIN CO. P O BOX 1169
WILMINGTON, NC 28402
CSX RAILROAD P O BOX 10466
JACKSONVILLE, FL 32203 .
CITY OF WILMINGTON P -O BOX 1810
C/O CITY ATTORNEY WILMINGTON, NC 28102
APPLIED ANALYTICAL IND., INC. 1206 NORTH 23RD S'T'REET
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
WILLIAM M. MANGUM, III
P O BOX 895
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NC
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
i
PROJECT: 8.2250102 (U-0092B)
SMITH CREEK PARKWAY FROM
I PROPOSED L'S 11 CONNECTOR TO
0.8.) K)l EAST OF 23RD STREET
i
I.. ET OF
A

O
O y C
0 c E
In C L
` W U
c?
ai
m 'v
" w ^ +
+

°
z

O m
'
L
CD
r
r O E- LL
Z O
Cr U F-
Q
) M
} O
N cc I wQ Uo
F
- U + a
Q •XL aE co j?
d w U r Z(7 Ov
Q, 2 Z o
? f-O =o
w
F- ocn f6
L OZ ?N
< E z co

W W
U
Q v U
L Z
D d
v O W
LL 2
M U)
U) N

C 7 f0
O CD
O co
O
Z O 0 C)
ii.
N
C -O

C O C3 (D

V
O

r
O

O
f`

co

O)
Cl)
L N t L 7 O O C7 ?D
Q a?i U u, C) 0 0 C)
0

U

Q U)
0-0
CD a .-
c
m a? L

c:, zz

w -?
C
m
m
a
E -N L
N >>
F-
C

O
I w

` U) _

.0
E o
-
._...__
L.L O) CO I? O co V O N O

N
N
°
V
1j)
tt? 'IT

J
U) z N V to
n
F-

O
O
LO

M
m
io

ZO O
Z

Q o CO

o
d
O
j
?
co =
O
=
o
Of
=
~ o 0
?
3: OZ W N
Cl- O Z C6
W

U W t-
Z O W
2
U) Q-
U) c
o N to I?
`

0
U ?
a)

:D d o ?

E cv

co ? Q1 M co O 7

65

2 O O LO O O CO LO 0 O

04 CN I;t IT Lo LO Ln

? a?
N C ?

U L v
c
W U
a
m a
U C ? ?-- O
M
O f9
m V ?O
M

rnma
? C C U t ?-

Q wU E `r'
a

d U) U
E
Cf°
a
S N
-
F-

W
Q co a
LL. C U

LL.

c N O N
O
Z O O O

a
N OC1
•C a

(O
LO
N
?
M
O
?
co
?
(9 f0 L ca M O N O to
L N O O O O ?

U n
r

N f9
0 X
Z W c
Q
J N
W c

p, - U
d N
N
~ C
N
c
Cl) cfl co
lL w N Cl O ?

7 N
U N_

O
?
C O
O ?
0
d'
O
, i
M
i
O
?
?

O) co i` O M V O) N O
? CO 0 0 1? O O N 'IT

w J
Q
O N
M
C O
Z O
j
F-
wd: DOT U-92A&Bl
Subject: [Fwd: DOT U-92A&B]
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 11:01:49 -0400
From: Jeff Jurek <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC Wetlands Restoration Program-DENR
To: Rob Ridings <rob.ridings @ncmail.net>

Subject: DOT U-92A&B
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 10:51:40 -0400
From: Jeff Jurek <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC Wetlands Restoration Program-DENR
To: Joanne Steenhuis <[e-mail]>,
Scott McLendon <[e-mail]>
The purpose of this email is to notify you of the North Carolina
Wetlands Restoration Program's (NCWRP) intention to accept
payment into the Wetland Restoration Fund for compensatory mitigation
for stream/wetland impacts for the following project:
Project name: DOT U-92A&B
River Basin: Cape Fear
8digit catalog unit: 03030007
County:
DWQ Project # (if known):
COE Project # (if known): 199603836
CAMA Project # (if known):
Wetland impact:
Stream impact: 155 ft
Wetland mitigation:
Stream mitigation: 155 ft
If for any reason you feel that the NCWRP should not accept payment for
the above project, please notify me (Jeff Jurek) by
email or phone [phone] within 5 working days upon receipt of this
message. If no response is received within 5
working days, NCWRP assumes you concur with this payment.
...................
Jurek <[e-mail]>
1 of 2 E 6/9/00 11:19 AM
r
so•
m?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
22
?r
ETL{ '
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. 1501 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1501
GOVERNOR
July 10, 2000
Mr. Bob Stroud
Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Dear Mr. Stroud;
DAVID MCCOY
SECRETARY
;r7n too

Subject: New Hanover County, Construction of Smith Creek Parkway from Twenty-
third Street to Third Street, Wilmington, TIP No. U-92 A and B, State Project
No. 8.2250102.
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to construct
Sections A and B of Smith Creek Parkway, a controlled-access, four-lane divided highway.
These sections extend from Twenty-third Street to Third Street in the City of Wilmington, and
total approximately 3.6 miles in length on new alignment. This facility will connect with the
previously constructed Section C of the Smith Creek Parkway on the eastern end, and the NC
117 Northeast Cape Fear River Bridge on the western end. When completed, the Smith Creek
Parkway will serve as a bypass around downtown Wilmington, allowing traffic to move more
easily from east to west and reducing congestion on Market Street.
The proposed project contains one area of coastal wetlands, two crossings of Smith
Creek, a culvert extension, and nine areas of impact to non-coastal wetlands (see attached
permit drawings). The area of coastal wetlands and the first crossing of Smith Creek are in
Section A of the project (U-92A Site 1 and U-92A Site 3, respectively). The second crossing
of Smith Creek and the culvert extension are in' Section B of the project (U-92B Site 3 and U-
92B Site 5, respectively). In addition to the impacts associated with construction of the Smith
Creek Parkway, the existing 23`d Street bridge will also be replaced as part of this project, as
shown on the permit drawings for U-92B Site 3. Impacts to wetlands and streams for each
section are presented in tabular form in the packets of permit drawings.
We request that the proposed work be authorized under the appropriate Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) permit. Enclosed is a permit application for a CAMA Major
l
FORM DCM-MP-1
in. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities
4. LAND AND WATER N/A
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract N/A
n. Describe location and type of discharges to
b. Size of individual lot(s) N/A waters of the state. (For example, surface runoff
sanitary wastewater, industrial/commercial
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MEW effluent, "wash down", and residential
or NWL 10 feet discharges.) Surface runoff
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
Dorovan-Johnston Association: muck/sand; Wrightsboro-
Onslow-Kenansville. Assoc.- sand/clay/loam o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
e. Vegetation on'tract' upland forest, tidal * N/A
freshwater swamp, swamp forest
Y +
f.. , . ` Man-made features now on tract
primarily new location
:ft4.".': 1 t
g. What is the CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local land
use plan)
X Conservation _X _Transitional
X Developed Community
Rural Other
h. How is the tract zoned by local government?
Industrial, Commercial, Residential
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the
applicable zoning? X Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Has a professional archaeological assessment
been done for the tract? X Yes No
If yes, by whom? SHPO
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes X No
1. Are there wetlands on the site? X Yes -No
Coastal (marsh) X Other X
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? Yes
(Attach documentation, if available)
Revised 03/95
5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
* A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
* An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11" white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 710203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the

FORM DCM-MP-1
APPLICATION
(To be completed by all applicants)
b. City, town, community or landmark
1. APPLICANT Wilmington

C. Street address or secondary road number
a Landowner: Smith Creek Parkway
.
Name N.C. Dept. of Transportation d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? X Yes No
Address 1548 Mail Service Center
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g.
City Raleigh State NC river, creek sound, bay) Smith Creek
27699-1548 Day Phone [phone]
Zi
p
3. DESCRIPTION & PLANNED USE
Fax [phone] OF PROPOSED PROJECT

b. Authorized Agent: a. List all development activities you propose e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier,
Name and excavation and/or filling activities.
Replace existing 23`d St. bridge with a new bridge.
Address Build two new bridges over Smith Creek. Realign
the eastern end of bridge over NE Cape Fear River
State
Cit and extend RCBC on a tributary to Smith Creek.
y
Zip Day Phone b. Is the proposed activity maintenance or an
existing project, new work, or both? New work
Fax
C. Project name (if any) U-92 A and B C. Will the project be for public, private or
Smith Creek Parkway commercial use? Public Transportation
' d. Give a brief description of purpose, use,
Note: Permit will be issued in name of landowner(s), methods of construction and daily operations
and/or project name. of proposed project. If more space is needed,
please attach additional pages. To provide public
transportation Standard roadwayconstruction
equipment will be used Work bridges will be
2 LOCATION OF PROPOSED used in the wetland areas
.
PROJECT
a. County New Hanover
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-2
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
Average Fuel
E3dsft Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
groin
Rock
breakwater
Other
(Excluding
shoreline
stabilization)

!

Roadw y Fill (See pe rmit
dra ings)
1. EXCAVATION
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below
MHW or NWL in cubic yards N/A
b. Type of material to be excavated
wetland material
c. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
(SAVs) or other wetlands? X Yes No
d. Highground excavation in cubic yards 196,000 yd3
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL
a. Location of disposal area
To be determined by the contractor
b. Dimensions of disposal area N/A
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes X No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from the
owner.
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes X. No
If yes, where?
Revised 03/95
. FORM DCM-MP-1
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
number, landmarks, and the like.
* A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name See attached sheets
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
Name
Address
Phone
* A list of previous state or federal permits issued
for work on the project tract. Include permit
numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
* A check for $250 made payable to the Department
of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
* A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
* A statement of compliance with the N. C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A-1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of
public funds or use of public lands, attach a
statement documenting compliance with the
North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
6. CERTIFICATION AND
PERMISSION TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described
in the application. The project will be subject to
conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the (5-h day of , 20 D
Print dame William D Gilmore, P E
Signature l? C '
Landowner or Authorized Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
X DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
X DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts (5)
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE. Please sign and date each attachment in the
space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Northeast Cape Fear River (U-92A - Site 1)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 567 feet
1 BRIDGES
h. Width of proposed bridge 66 feet
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) 39 feet
Concrete Prestressed Girders
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X -No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
Northeast Cie Fear River
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 3.3 feet
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? Not affected in this area Bridge is a draw bridge.
Yes X No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge opening? Yes X No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain) The eastern end of the
bridge will be realigned It is not over
navigable waters m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? _X Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain The wetlands were spanned to
Yes X No reduce impacts
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
X Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
No USCGpermit is required for this bridge.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-2
e. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes X No
f. Does the disposal include any area in the water?
Yes X No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION NSA
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
Bulkhead Riprap
b. Length
c. Average distance waterward of MHW or NWL
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or NWL
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
(Source of information)
f. Type of bulkhead or rprap material
g. Amount of fill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap
(2) Bulkhead backfill
h. Type of fill material
i. Source of fill material
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1)
(2)
Amount of material to be placed in the
water None
Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill
b. Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAVs or other wetlands?
X Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area See permit
drawings
(2) Purpose of fill to -construct
roadway embankments. -
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practicies will be used.
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)?
S andard rnadwag nnstrcic,ti nn
equipment -
c. Will wetlands be crassed in transporting equipment
to project site? X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. temporary wnrk
bridles will be used
NCDOT, Smith Creek Parkway, U-92&/_B
Applicant or Name
f,
UX-
Signature tt
Date i'/
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? X Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail The existing water and sewer
lines to the bridge tender's house must be removed
and replaced on -Y Rp A- See drawings (U-92A
Site 1).
C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92A, Site 1
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? _ X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92A Site 1
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
4 GENERAL
How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practices
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard equipment to build a
bridge (crane. Zile drivers. etc.)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. Temporary work
bridges will be used
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT Smith Creek Parkway. U-92A
Applicant or Project Name
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation plan.
t /
Signature
904 l a 2, - r?
?
Date
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
3 EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL Yes X No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be if yes,
removed? (Explain) (1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
f. Length of proposed culvert
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert any excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No Yes No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
2. CULVERTS N/A
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MEW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert.
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
If yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: N/A
Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
require any highground excavation?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Smith Creek (near Castle Hayne Road)
U-92A, Site 3
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 3100 feet
1 BRID ES
h. Width of proposed bridge 82 feet
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) 33 feet
Concrete prestressed girders
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
Smith reek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 18 feet
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 26 feet
Yes X No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge opening? X Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain The new structure will limit
bridge vertical clearance to 26 feet.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? _X Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain The wetlands were spanned to
Yes X No reduce impacts
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
X Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
The U. S. Coast Guard indicated that the proposed
Navigational clearances will be reasonable.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
23'd Street over Smith Creek
U-9213, Site 3
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge 262 feet
1 BRIDGES
h. Width of proposed bridge 63 feet
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) N/A
21-inch concrete cored slab bridge.
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
Smith Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 18 feet
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 12.8 feet
_X Yes No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge 262 feet reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge 36 feet opening? X Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain The navigable opening will be
bridge 11.5 feet slightly increased due to the increased
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be clearance
removed? (Explain) The entire bridge will
be removed and replaced with a new
structure M. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes X No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
X Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
No U. S. Coast Guard permit is needed for this bridge.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes -No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? X Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail Electricity. gas and phone
utili , companies will be getting their own permits
NCDOT will be handling water & sewer permits
C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
(2) Width of area to be filled and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
(3) Purpose of fill Management Practices
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert (for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
result in any fill (other than excavated material dredge)? Standard equipment to build a bridge
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: N/A (crane_, pile drivers etc.)
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
(2) Width of area to be filled to project site? X Yes No
(3) Purpose of fill If yes, explain steps that will betaken to lessen
environmental impacts. Temporary work
bridges will be used. _
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
highground? X Yes No require any shoreline stabilization?
If yes, See drawings Yes X No
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92A. Site 3 If yes, explain in detail
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
NCDOT, Smith Creek Parkway (U-92A)
4 GENERAL Applicant or Project Name
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation plan
Signature
Date"^
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs X Other Wetlands
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92B, Site 3
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill RoadwU embankment
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-9213, Site 3
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadwakembankment
4 GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation plan.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? X Yes _ No
If yes, explain in detail Electricity, gas and phone
utility companies will be getting their own permits.
NCDOT will be handling water & sewer permits
C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practices
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard equipment to build a bridge
(crane, pile driver, etc.)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes _X No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT. Smith Creek ParkwaX U-92B
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
Date
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2 CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
3, EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL Yes X No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) (1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
f. Length of proposed culvert
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert any excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No Yes No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2 CULVERTS N/A potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
3, EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes X No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes No (1) Length of area to be excavated
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL Yes X No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) (1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
f. Length of proposed culvert
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert any excavation, please complete the following: N/A
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No Yes No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Parkway over 23rd Street at Smith Creek
U-92B, Site 3
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major (4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all removed? (Explain)
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
g. Length of proposed bridge 2106 feet
1. BRIDGES 49 feet each
h. Width of proposed bridge 120 feet outside to outside
a. Public X Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material) 20 feet
Concrete prestressed girders dual
structures i. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes X No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
Smith Creek
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL 18 feet
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge? 26 feet
Yes X No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge opening? X Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain The proposed structure will limit
bridge vertical clearance to 26 feet Downstream
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be structure has a vertical clearance of 11.5 feet.
removed? (Explain)
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? _X Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain The wetlands were spanned to
Yes X No reduce impacts
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n. Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
the MHW or NWL concerning their approval?
X Yes No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
The U. S. Coast Guard indicated that the proposed
navigational clearances will be reasonable.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
maintenance? Yes _ No any existing utility lines? X Yes _ No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal If yes, explain in detail Electric. gas and hn one
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands? utility companies will be getting their own permits.
Yes No NCDOT will be handling the water & sewer permits.
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above. C.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practices
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material d. Will the proposed project require any work
described in Item d. above) to be placed below channels? Yes X No
MHW or NWL? Yes X No If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled.
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92B. Site 3
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway embankment
4 GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation flan
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard equipment to build a bridge
(crane, Zile drivers, etc.)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? X Yes No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts. Temporar3? work
bridges will be used
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail _
Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT, Smith Creek Parkway, U-92B
Applicant or Project Name
Signature
Dam
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to
this proposed project.
Culvert Extension, U-92B, Site 5
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge
1 BRIDGES N/A
h. Width of proposed bridge
a. Public Private
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes No
C. Water body to be crossed by bridge If yes, explain
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL
k.
Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes, 1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
(1) Length of existing bridge reducing or increasing the existing navigable
(2) Width of existing bridge opening? Yes No
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing If yes, explain
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? Yes No
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)? If yes, explain
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above n.
the MHW or NWL
Have you contacted the U. S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes No
if yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95
. Form DCM-MP-5
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
2. CULVERTS potential? Yes X No
If yes, explain
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
Tributary to Smith Creek
b. Number of culverts proposed 1
3, EXCAVATION AND FILL
C. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
7 foot x 6 foot reinforced concrete box culvert a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
X Yes No
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge? If yes,
Yes X No (1) Length of area to be excavated 95 feet
If yes, (2) Width of area to be excavated 10 feet
(1) Length of existing bridge (3) Depth of area to be excavated 1 foot
(2) Width of existing bridge (4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing yards +/- 35 cubic yards
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
removed? (Explain) require any excavation within: N/A
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert? (2) Width of area to be excavated
Yes X No (3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
If yes, yards
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge of culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above require any highground excavation?
the MHW or NWL Yes X No
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be If yes,
removed? (Explain) The existing culvert (1) Length of area to be excavated
will be extended on the outlet end (2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
f. Length of proposed culvert 95 foot extension
(Proposed OAL = 226 feet) d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
g. Width of proposed culvert 7 foot x 6 foot any excavation, please complete the following:
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
h. Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the to be determined by the contractor
MHW or NWL 4 feet (2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
N/A
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow? (3) Do you claim title to the disposal area? N/A
Yes X No Yes No
If yes, explain If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes X No
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes X No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area below
the MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? X Yes - No
If yes, explain in detail Electric, gas and phone utility
companies will be getting their own permits. NCDOT
will be handling the water & sewer permits.
C. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detour structures?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within: N/A
- Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes X No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled? NCDOT Best
Management Practices
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? Standard equipment to build a bridge
(crane, pile drivers etc.)
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes X No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on h.
highground? X Yes No
If yes, See drawings
(1) Length of area to be filled U-92B. Site 5
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill Roadway fill
4 GENERAL
a. Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
X Yes No
If yes, explain in detail See attached
mitigation 121an.
Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes X No
If yes, explain in detail
NCDOT, Smith Creek Parkway U-92B
Applicant or Project Name
67
Signature
J-4-) 2
Date r° -
Revised 03/95
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dl? Date 06-09-2000
Warrant NO. 1018729 CONTROLLER'S OFFICE Y/. "?,
RntFir_N nir97aac-1-1-J; 43IR1 0298 004
INVOICE NUMBER INVOICE DATE PURCHASE RD
OR CONTRACT INVOICE AMOUNT (-) DISCOUNT (+) FREIGHT NET AMOUNT
06-08-2000 475.00 475.00
Q?®45

W 4 -6
Detach stub before depositing TOTAL: 475.00 475.00
Remarks TIP NO U- 92A
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
06-1059
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Warrant No. 101.8729 531
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1515 Date 06-09-2000
Pays Amount $475.00
to the
Order of
"?/????/?? :90tlIRa-i-1-1a-i ??a->-•-)?i-?->--.-1-?i-?-YiI PMHC AEY<tt £iVE, /CRro02EAa zclo -
N.C. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NA RESOURCES I
DIVISION OF C ENT C. Wayne Stallings
1638 'MAIL SERVICE CTR GhietFinanciai0 1-
RALE IGH NC 2 7 6 9 9 -163 8 Present to State Treasurer, Raleigh, North rolina
payable at par through Federal Res ystem
THIS FORFA CONTAINS M:CROPRINHNG
II' i0 i8 7 2 911' li:0 5 3 1 10 5941: 511100011160 ill'

,
I
<O
i n
m
z
c
3
W

O
"I .
Z

/ N
1e1i'
v A
m
[
o D
m
0
ZD
i
A
1

z
_O
n
m
N
0 a
3
o O

o c
z
?
O
i
0
n
- O
c
z

--
m
x
m
G)
x
z
m

a
N 3
0 0
O zZ

o '
I

7c_
FHI
F'
Ip
N
W
z
0
V
m
v
D 0;u
n
nZm
o
?0 m Z00
= Q I
7mO m
-n:4
v (A m
-i
C
afnZz
n 1
M n OO
rm;u
a
A O
z
v
m
0
N
N
O
0
N
N
LO
N
LO
N