NCG120047_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20181031

PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
DOC DATE
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
Iv CG2 �abo`t7
L� HISTORICAL FILE
E. MONITORING REPORTS
YYYYMMDD
i

Compliance Inspection Report
t A
Y
Permit NCG120047 Effective 11/16117 Expiration 10131118 Owner Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
SOC Effective Expiration Facility Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
County Haywood 3898 Fines Creek Rd
Region Asheville
Waynesville NC 28786
Contact Person Robert Hudson Title Phone [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC Certification Phone
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Representatives)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 0311312018 Entry Time 10 30AM Exit Time 12 30PM
Primary Inspector Rick C Brooks Phone [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s)
Melissa King
Reason for Inspection Routine
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Phone
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
1�
Page 1

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Inspection Date 03/13/2018 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary
Rick Brooks (DEQ) and Melissa king (DEQ) met with Robert Hudson and John Preston of Santek at the Solid Waste
Facility (White Oak Landfill) The facility does not currently have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan but is In the
process of implementing one Records were readily available and well organized Majority of outfalls were observed during
the inspection Next inspection will evaluate the implementation of the SPPP and outfalls that have been determined to fall
under NCG12
Page 2

Permit NCG120047
Inspection Date 0311312018
Owner Facility Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a Narrative Description of Practices ?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Reason for Visit Rouline
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑❑■❑
❑❑■❑
❑❑■❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑■❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑❑■❑
❑❑■❑
Comment NCG120000 does not reauire a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Santek has the maiont
of elements of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan including a site map with outfall locations
and documentation of employee training Santek Is in the process of compiling and
implementing a SPPP Next inspection will review the SPPP
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi annually? 0111113
Comment Facility is conducting qualitative monitorlrnLas required
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 110 ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment Facility is conducting analytical monitonng as required
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status is it property documented by the Division? ❑ Cl MCI
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑ M
Comment Malonty of outfalls were observed during the inspection Some sediment basin outfalls may be
reclassified under NCG01 Next inspection will help determine changes to outfalls
Page 3

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Tracy E Davis, PE, CPM
Director
November 18 2013
e-(fq SeAt t s fi 1ir3
Mr hn Preston
,h Sante Environ tal of NorthCarolina,LLC
�} clo Whit andfill
3 reek Road
Waynesville, rth Carolina 28786
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E Skvarla, Ill Secretary
Mr Stephen King
Director, Solid Waste Management
Haywood County
278 Recycle Road
Clyde North Carolina 28721
SUBJECT NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection
Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary Landfill (Haywood County Landfall)
Permit No NCG120047
Haywood County
Dear Mr Preston and Mr King
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
October 31 2013 The facility was found to be in compliance with permit NCG120047 The
assistance provided by John Preston was greatly appreciated
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference
Please contact me at [phone] or lonathan steppCa7ncdenr qov, if I can be of any further
assistance
Sincerely,
Jonathan Stepp
, A, O'� -'"W
Environmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
Enclosure
ec Bethany Georgoulias
Geological Survey Section • Land Quality Section
1612 Mad Service Center Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1612.919 707 92001 FAX [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street Raleigh North Carolina 27604 • Internet htt II ortal ncdenr or Iweblirl
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

�;' �
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Tracy E Davis, PE, CPM
Director
November 18, 2013
Pat McCrory, Governor
John E Skvaria, III, Secretary
Mr John Preston Mr Stephen King
Santek Environmental of NorthCarolina,LLC Director, Solid Waste Management
cla White Oak Landfill Haywood County
3898 Fines Creek Road 278 Recycle Road
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786 Clyde North Carolina 28721
SUBJECT NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection
Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary Landfill (Haywood County Landfill)
Permit No NCG120047
Haywood County
Dear Mr Preston and Mr King
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
October 31, 2013 The facility was found to be in compliance with permit NCG120047 The
assistance provided by John Preston was greatly appreciated
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference
Please contact me at [phone] or ionathan steppAncdenr aov, if I can be of any further
assistance
Sincerely,
Jonathan Stepp
Environmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
Enclosure
ec Bethany Georgoulias
Geological Survey Section - Land Quality Section
1612 Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 1612.919 707-92001 FAX [phone]
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet htto., i1portal ncdenr org/webA
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled t 10% Post Consumer Paper

Permit NCO120047
sac
County Haywood
Region Ashevllle
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective 11/01/12 Expiration 10/31/17 Owner Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Effective Expiration Facility Haywood Co White Oak Sanitary
3898 tines Creek Rd
Contact Person Stephen King
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC
Secondary ORC(s)
On -Site Representative(s)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 10/31/2013
Primary Inspector Jonathan Stepp
Secondary Inspectors)
Waynesville NC 2B786
Title Phone [phone]
Entry Time 01 30 PM
Reason for Inspection Follow up
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Certification Phone
Exit Time 02 45 PM
Phone
inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Page 1

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Santek Environmental of North Carolina LI-C
Inspection Date 10/3112013 Inspection Typo Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Follow up
Inspection Summary
The primary purpose of this inspection was compliance assistance Sentek continues to do an excellent job of qualitative
and analytical monitoring at the Haywood Co -White Oak Landfill Please review the observations and comments below
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted Its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Comment The facility is currently in a Tier Two response action and has had two
consecutive sampling events within the benchmark range A third sample was
attempted but no discharge occurred The permittee has been advised to report no
discharge on the monitoring report and collect a sample when a discharge does occur
If the results of the third successful sampling event are within the benchmark rangels
then the sampling obligation for the Tier Two response action has been met
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Parmit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ El ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑,
# If the facility has reprosantative outfall status is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment The facility would like to discontinue sampling at outfall 001 Upon initial
inspection it appears that outfall 001 receives drainage from an area that is outside of
the active boundaries of the landfill Haywood Co -White Oak landfill should further
investigate the drainage area to confirm that stormwater does not come in contact with
any of the associated industrial process, including unintentional contact with leachate
from garbage truck traffic on the adjacent road Upon completion of the evaluation,
Haywood Co -White Oak Landfill may request that outfall 001 be removed from the
monitoring list The request should be sent to the Asheville Regional Office
Page 2

��
MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Waklad, P E;
Governor Drector
January 14, 2013
Mr Join Preston, Santek Environmental of North Carolina, LLC
clo White Oak Landfill
3898 Fines Creek Road
Waynesville, NC 28786
Mr Stephen King, Director, Solid Waste Management — Haywood County
278 Recycle Road
Clyde NC 28721
SUBJECT NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection
Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
Permit No NCG120047
Haywood County
Dear Mr Preston and Mr King
NG()-1309
John E Skvarla, III
Secretary
This Ietter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
December I2, 2012 The facility was found to be in compliance with permitNCG120047 The
Division of Water Quality appreciates all the efforts put into the landfill by Santek (as well as the
County, prior to this year), to bring it into compliance with the stormwater permit and with water
quality standards
Enclosed. is a ropy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference
Please contact me at [phone] or Susan A Wi lson(a-Incdenr ggh if I can be of any further
assistance
Sincerely,
Susan A Wilson
I
Environmental Engineer
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc Central Files
Asheville Files
Mr Marty Stamey, Haywood County Manager, 215 N Marti St, Waynesville, NC 28786
S CG 12 L9ndfi!I MT/Wood Ca landf lllwhite Oak rF 12 2012WB 1220121I,7R.CEI White Oak LF 12 2012 doc
Look& 2090 U S Highway 70 &vxm9tloa. Noatlt Camlim 2ffM Qiie
Phone M296-45001 FAX V&299 7D13 NQn't�%�arO�l II�
lntemet7w Vj03ateigts Wag fa _ r
M E%d Opp tmtyIAt -r w Anus Emgt0ef

Permit NCG120047
SOC
County Haywood
Region Asheville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective 11/01/12 Expiration 10/31/17 Owner Santek Envrranmenta; of North Carolina LLC
Effective Expiration Facility Haywood CG-While Cak Sanitary
3898 Fines Greek Rd
contact Person Stephen Kin9[fJ4,4 1%ns,-uAJ Title
01rections to Facitrty
System Classifrcatrons
Primary ORC
Secondary ORC(s)
On -Site Representativeje)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 1711212012 Entry Time 10 00 AM
Primary inspector Susan A Wilson
Secondary lnspector(s)
Reason for Inspection Rnudlne
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COG
Faciltty Status ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas
M Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Waynesville NC 28786
Phone 82M27-8042
Certiftcation
Exit Time 01-O0 PM
Phone
Phone [phone]
Inspection Type Compliance Fvaluabon
Page 1

Permit NCG12W47 owner Facintyr Santek Ermrorirnental of North Cartfna LLC
hispectmn Date 12/12/2012 inspection Typo Cornpfiance Evahrat;on Rmon for Visit Routme
Qualliattve Monitonng Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted rtss Qualitative tatondt3nng semj-annuafiy� ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment Santek has performed all the required qualitative monitoring for each outfall
(and tools photos as well)
Anafytrcal Monitoring Yea No NA NE
Has the faoiiiiy conducteC its Analytical monitoring'? ■ ❑ Cl ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Arralyticai monitoring From Vehlde Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment Analytical monitonng was performed by Santek 702012 (slightly later than
the required semi-annual period Santek notified DWQ of this) Sampling was
conducted 12110/2012 (for the second semi-annual period)
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NF
# is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the slte'7 ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were al; ouffalls observed during the inspecttoril ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the faerlity has representative outfall status is it property documented by the DK%bn? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non slormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment At the time of the inspection - they had not yet received their new
Cerpficato of Coverage (but the older cne was on file)
Page 3

*A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D Simons PG PE
Director and State Geologist
June 28, 2012
INSPECTION REPORT
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman Secretary
Attached is a copy of the inspection report prepared following an onsite inspection of the
above referenced project This report is intended to inform you of the project's compliance with
the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973
Please review this report carefully as it may contain corrective actions needed or
comments, which will assist you in meeting the required performance standards of the Act
It is our desire that any and all possible problems be discussed and resolved at the
earliest possible time To facilitate this effort, please contact me if you have any questions
Sincerely,
Charles Koontz 0
2090 US Highway 70 Swannanoa, North Carolina, 28778-8211
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
http //portal ncdenr orglgroup/lr/land-quality
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employes
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Land Quality Section 2090 U S Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 [phone]
County � r� Project �y % %r
% 3 4- River basin �'t-t�ct4 $tea
Person financially responsible _ ✓!� s Project # P009 - poi
Address (p SO a.� STVe tW §vt.4 /do Cleve /,q�v_ p r�jVM 3731/ Case #
I Project location Nffi Ve OAK
Pictures No 9 YL5 ❑ Prints [I Slides ❑ Video ❑ Digital ❑
2 Weather and soil conditions New d
initial inspection Yes ❑ No
1 is site curitntiv tinder notice of violation° Yc.s [.J No
a Is the sitt, in comph ince +vith S P C A and rules' Yes' No L
no check vtolattons below
lolatlolts
u -o 'iginrus ul p1 In G S 1 13 (a) and 1 :)A N C a C aB 010"11 I
^ g Inadequate bufftr 7onr, C S I t 3 A �7(1)
b f iilur, to lollutt ippro%cd plan G S 113A
h GradLd yJopLs and tills too,teep
r, ( idurk. to ,ubrnit r(,,�ittd pl in G S I I -)A -)4 1(b) `ind
G S 113A D7(2) or ])A N (_ AC 4B 0124(d�
I f 1 C dB 0, I wl i t
_
1 L nprott cied ueposi d ,lopes G S 1 I -)A
f Iii(t } GI it Ids wt Iuatt Yrou &k%er C, S I I _ -(3i anti
j J I .ttlure to niatlinin erosion uoniml me,tsvrea
1C JB0107(blorI)1\C 1C 4B0[.'4(t,)
1C kC 4B0113
lnuil`� lint nit i, ire, to i..tain �tdimtn( on wL G S I I +a ,-I
_^ k Oihar (dt,,trlbc l ----_ -- —�_- --
f Blurs to Ilk, Ill rt S011 MIL mta,tirL, I , \ \CAC 4B 010
_
6 Poteiiti it \1'l?F ti Permit tai itil>n' 4, _ `u Dt,LriM,
4i 1, ,a+JI lit niation bail we occurred since Litit Insptetiou" N ., — t e, uh�r ' iti 1 �l !E h ii Ipnl+ \OYI
L I, i lit 1 ' + 11 - MlllL W nL r l,t 1 In it t(Ilrai a t(�no Ir, ill '„
< IL I Othi r p om r 1 —
1)�_ II II_L NIO_ht II)MILIast ,I.,tri ------
----- — Ftt�i✓OsI�—� EROjiOYi
C1114i Lk (11 ill( i+Ith to hits
1 t i>I! +il+t I+tNIH, i+4dt(I
chec*�
-------
Z--
A L q v ,qoC_ - -- - --- --- - _� _ _ - -- - - - - -- - _ --- --
Ht port hs —� ZS—A*4V7 Z_ Othcrs present---
D'i14 ilf Inspi. tt11)(1--L1��7 -i2 _Time arriving on sits �Q lOI�I•/ dime leaving site /off Z� Fl _
(t

�• •
NCDENR
Nc T" C�[" De Tn[NT or
ENVIRONMENT A 0 Ns,TUH7 Re Rces
t
FACILITY COMPLfANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Seehon
UNIT TYPE (check all that d
ply to this audit with same?errrnt nurriber)'
Land
X
LCII)
YW
Transfer
conpnst
S1AS
COUNTY Haywood
MSWLF
PERMIT NO 44-07
closed
RHW
White
incur
T&P
FIRM
MSIAILF
goods
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
CDLF
racT&P1
Tore
Industrial
DYMO
SDTF
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
Date of Audit 3I22/07 Date of Last Audit-] 2/15106
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Community
Waynesville, N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES (Decimal Degrees) N 35 66343 W 082 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Steven King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT)
Steven King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Depaitment
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Jim Patterson, NCDENR-Solid Waste Section
Steven King, Haywood County Solid Waste Department
STATUS OF PERMIT
Active- Permit to operate issued November 8, 2006
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Comprehensive audit ofMSW landfill
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS) (citation and explanation)
15 A NCAC 13b 1626(2)(a) states that all MSWLF units must cover disposed solid waste with six inches of earthen
material at the end of each operating day Haywood County was operating in violation of this requirement in that waste at
the previous working area at the back of the landfill has not been covered with at least six inches of soil cover A
compliance date of May 15, 2007 has been established to correct this violation
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N C G S 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations If the violatron(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules

0
i i]iACILTI Y COMPLIANCE AUDF° �EPORT
` Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2of2
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit)
NIA
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
1 A new solid waste Director, Steven King has been employed by Haywood County Steven has his SWANA MOLO
certification
2 Alan Parker and Ronnie Wilson have both attended the SWANA Landfill Operators Course The dates of this training
was October 27-28, 2005
3 Financial assurance approval on 2/15/07
4 Methane gas wells tested on 3/19/07
5 Need to seed completed areas of landfill
6 Windblown litter being picked up at the time of the audit
7 Leac.hate impoundment inspection report dated June 9, 2006 No problems were observed
8 Work soil being done on leachate seep No leachate has left liner system
9 Work on recovering areas where soil cover is thin
10 Working face has moved from western end of landfill to the eastern end This area is closer to the access road and
should help solve some of the problems with mud being onto the roadways Good work
11 Geotextile fabric is being used under the gravel in the landfill road This too seems to be helping with mud on road
problems
12 Work on removing trees and shrubs growing around the leachate lagoon
Pleas contact me if you e any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
,me&,_ r' Z,._., ( signature) Phone [phone]
6a•l "Regional Representative
Distribution orillinal signed copy to facility -- signed copy to compliance officer-- e-mail or eapy to super
beiivered on f Click and type dato I by
hand delivery
US Mail
6ed No I _j
�/P"V
ff
/ -,4ic

xja
NODE R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P E
Governor Director
December 5 2012
William Dillard
Santel, l-nvironrn(,ntal of North Carolina I I C
650 25'h St NW Ste 100
Cleveland TN 3731 1
Dear Mi Dillard
Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject NPDES General Permit NCG 120000
Certificate of Coverage NCG 120{}47
1 laywood CountN-Whiie Oak Sanitary
Cleveland Count%
Division personnel received your request to revise your Stormwater permit Certificate of Coverage to
accurately reflect your new company and facility narne
Please find enclosed the revised Certificate of Coverage The terms and conditions contained in the
General Permit remain unchanged and in full effect This revised Certificate of Coverage is issued under
the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215 1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U S Environmental Protection Agency
If you have any questions, piease contact the Stormwater Permitting Unit at 919-807-6300
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED 81
KEN PICKLE
for Chat les Wakild, P 1r
cc Mooiesvilk, Regional Office
Cential Files
Stormwatei Permitting Unit
Wetlands and Stormwater Brandy
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1617
Location 512 N Salisbury St Raleigh North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] FAX 91M07 64941 Customer Service 1 877-623 6748
Internet www rimaterquality org
One
NorthCarohna
An Equal Opportunity i Affirmative Acton Employer

STA fE OF NORI H CAROLINA
DEPART MENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NA I URAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG120000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No NCG 120047
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission,
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended,
Santek Environmental of North Carolina, LLC.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
I laywood County -White Oak Sanitary
3898 I'inc.s Crc.tl. Rd
Waynesville
Cleveland County
to receiving waters designated as the Pigc,on Rivet, a class C waterbody in the I'renc.h Broad River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring i ecltitrements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts 1, 11, M, IV, V and VI of General Permit No NCG 120000 as attached
This certificate of coverage shall become effective Dc.cc rnbei 5 2012
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit
Signed this day Dcr,cnibcr 5 2012
for
ORIGINAL SIGNED M
KEN PICKLE
Charles Wakild, P E , Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

A ��
In
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of Water Quality
Charles Waklld, P E
Director
William Dillard
Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
650 25th St Nw Ste 100
Cleveland, TN 37311
Dear Permittee
December 4, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Haywood Co White Oak Sanitary
COC Number NCG120047
Haywood County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under stormwater General Permit NCG120000
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued General Permit This permit is
reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U S Environmental Protection Agency, dated October
15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended)
The following information is included with your permit package
• A new Certificate of Coverage (COC)
• A copy of General Permit NCG120000
• A copy of the Technical Bulletin for the General Permit
• Two copies of the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form
• Two copies of the Qualitative Monitoring Report Form
The General Permit authorizes discharges of stormwater, and it specifies your obligations for discharge
controls, management, monitoring, and record keeping Please review the new permit to familiarize yourself
with all the changes in the reissued permit Your facility has six (6) months from the time of receipt of the
permit to update your current SPPP to reflect all new permit requirements
The first sample period of your permit begins January 1, 2013 Your facility must sample a "measureable
storm event" beginning during the periods beginning January 1 and July 1 of every year (or, if applicable,
report "No Flow," as outlined in Part III, Section E) Also, please note that Tier 3 Actions in Part II of your
permit are triggered by benchmark exceedances on four occasions beginning on the effective date of this
permit and do not count prior exceedances
The more significant changes in the General Permit since your last COC was issued are noted either in the
Draft Permit Fact Sheet that accompanied the public notice (http //portal ncdenr org/web/wq/ws/su/current-
notices), or in the Response to Comments / Summary of Changes and Technical Bulletin documents that are
posted on the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website with the new General Permit Please visit
http //portal ncdenr org/web/wq/ws/su/npdessw (click on 'General Permits' tab) to review that information
for your specific General Permit carefully
1617 Mad Service Center Raleigh North Carolina 276991617
Location 512 N Sahsbu y St Raleigh North Carob is 27604
Phone 919$07 6300' -AX 91"07 6492
I,iternet www rimatero alit o}Jrc
it ES it Opportunity 1 A a' -Act n Employer
Ne ithCai olina
, -iturallty

William Dillard
December 4, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Some of the changes include
Part II
• Section A The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) section, if applicable, has been updated
to the most current language of our permits Additional conditions for specific industry sectors have
been added to the SPPP requirements in some cases
• Sections B, C Failure to perform analytical stormwater monitoring may result in the Division requiring
that the permittee begin a monthly sampling scheme
• Sections B, C A lower TSS benchmark of 50 mg/I for HQW, ORW, PNA and Tr Waters applies to these
more sensitive waters
• Sections B, C The monitoring parameter Oil & Grease (O&G) has been replaced by the parameter
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) for vehicle maintenance areas, and in some cases, other
analytical monitoring requirements
• Sections B, C, D Inability to sample due to adverse weather must be recorded in the SPPP, or in
separate on site records if your General Permit does not require an SPPP Adverse weather is defined
in the "Definitions" section of the permit
• Sections B, C The term "Representative Storm Event' has been replaced by "Measurable Storm
Event " A measurable storm event is defined in the permit
• Section D If the permittee fails to respond effectively to problems identified by qualitative
monitoring, DWQ may require the permittee to perform corrective action
Please review Parts III and IV to understand the Standard Conditions of your new NPDES General Permit,
including Compliance and Liability, Reporting, Monitoring and Records requirements, Operation and
Maintenance obligations, and Definitions Please note that all samples analyzed in accordance with the terms
of this permit must be submitted to the Division on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms available on
the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website above DMR forms must be delivered to the Division no later than
30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory Also note that existing
permittees do not need to submit a renewal request prior to expiration unless directed by the Division
Your coverage under the General Permit is transferable only through the specific action of DWQ This permit
does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR, nor does it
relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law
rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree If you have any questions regarding this permit
package, please contact the Division s Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone]
Sincerely,/
/�1� ct l( - f �l' 2v, e L'1
for Charles Wakild, P E
cc DWQ Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Asheville Regional Office

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG120000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No NCG120047
STORM WATER
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1 other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended,
Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Waynesville
Haywood County
to receiving waters designated as PIGEON RIVER (Waterville Lake below elevation 2258), a
class C waterbody in the French Broad River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations
monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, 11, 111, and IV of General
Permit No NCG120000 as attached
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4, 2012
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit
Signed this 41h day of December 2012
for Charles Waklld, P E Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NCG120047
SOC
County Haywood
Region Asheville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective 11)01112 Expiration 10/31/17 Owner Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Effective Expiration Facility Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Contact Person Stephen King
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Representative(s)
Related Permits
Title
Inspection Date 10131/2013 Entry Time 01 30 PM
Primary Inspector Jonathan Stepp
Secondarylnspector(s)
Reason for Inspection Follow-up
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ■ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas
Storm water
(See attachment summary)
Waynesville NC 28786
Phone [phone]
Certification
Exit Time 02 45 PM
Phone
Phone
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Page 1

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Saniek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Inspection Date 10/31/2013 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Follow up
Inspection Summary
The primary purpose of this inspection was compliance assistance Sentek continues to do an excellent lob of qualitative
and analytical monitoring at the Haywood Co -White Oak Landfill Please review the observations and comments below
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Comment The facility is currently in a Tier Two response action and has had two
consecutive sampling events within the benchmark range A third sample was
attempted but no discharge occurred The permittee has been advised to report no
discharge on the monitoring report and collect a sample when a discharge does occur
If the results of the third successful sampling event are within the benchmark rangels
then the sampling obligation for the Tier Two response action has been met
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
01
# If the facility has representative outfall status is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Comment The facility would like to discontinue sampling at outfall 001 Upon initial
inspection It appears that outfall 001 receives drainage from an area that Is outside of
the active boundaries of the landfill Haywood Co -White Oak Landfill should further
investigate the drainage area to confirm that stormwater does not come In contact with
any of the associated industrial process, including unintentional contact with leachate
from garbage truck traffic on the adjacent road Upon completion of the evaluation,
Haywood Co -White Oak Landfill may request that outfall 001 be removed from the
monitoring list The request should be sent to the Asheville Regional Office
Page 2

oho{ yjrrlrERQG
7 �
� O Y
ate'
Beverly En4cs Perduc Govt nor
Dct Prccmuu Secretary
Nor[% Carohw Dgartincni of En rirenAi n' an+! Yaturai ilctour�ca
Cckca t' Sutli" Dirccrar
DIV18:0n of Water Quahi y
I _
v t
r, Y�RACEYA,R�PRi��C1T`C�i�_`*�<;�
� 7 ..tr-1k � � k�.� • s� �'a.- ^4.,.w .= x�r1 r ^acT' �-s�.,� ,J^
-y,PE TWO YS��,V'(KW_ rCF�►>\i�Er��7�I�,��� f �`;w :� ; _
I Please enter toe permit number for which the change is requested
I NPDES Pernut (or) Certificate of Coverage
r 1 ' 1 S 2f 7
fi Permit status prior to requested change
a Permit issued to (company name) Haywood County__
b Peison lt,gally responsible for perinrt jps2 h S Kin
First NIf Last
Directer - Recycling and Solid Waste Man_ Bement
'!tile
278 Recycle Road_ _
Permit Holder Marling Address
_Ljyde Hr 28721
City 5 ate Zip
_ ( 828 ) 627-8042 (828 ) 627-8137
Phone Faz
c Facility name. (discharge) HarNood County - White Oak Sanitary _
d Facility address T 3898 Fin s Cr ek Read
Addresq
Waynesville NC 28786
City 5tatt ,
e Facdity contact person Joseph S King 828 ) 627-8042
First / MI / Last Phone.
Re used fV2006
III Please provide the. following for the requested change (revised permit)
a Request for change is a result of ❑ Change in ownership of the facility
❑ Name change of the facility or owner
If other please expfair Change in operator of the facility
b Pernut issued to (company name) Santek Envtronmenta[_of North Carolina, LLC
c P(.rson Icgally responsible foi permit Wllllam M D lard
Lq
APR 2 Or
DENR -
wetland,, try
First Mi Last
Executive V P of Operations
Title
650 25th Street, NW, Suite 100
Pernut Holder Marhag Address
Cleveland TN 37311_
City state Zip
(423 ) 476-9160 mdiilard2santekenviro com
Phone 6 mail Address
d facility name (discharge) Haywood County - White Oak Sanitary
e Facility address 3898 Fines Creek Rd
Address
Waynesville NC 28786
City stare Zip
f Facility contact person _Joseph S King
First Nil Last
(828 ) 627-8042 _ sklng@haywoodnc net
Phone E mail Address

PERMITNAME/QWiN1SRSHIP CHANGE FOPM
Page 2 o12
N PLrtrut Cuntact infoi mutton (r difrerent from the person legally responsible for the perrrut)
Perin contact William G Martin
F rsl NO last
Environmental Comofiance Coordinator
Title
650 25th Street, NW, Suite 100
Mailing Address
Cleveland TN 37311
Ctry Stale Ztp
423 ) 476-916C wmartfn santekenviro coin
Phone 8-r atl Address
V Will the pernutted facility continue to conduct the same industrial activities conducted prior
to this ownership or name change'
® Yes
Ej ?4o (please explain)
VI Required Items THIS APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED UNPROCESSED IF II FIMS
ARE INCOb1PLETE OR MISSING
This completed application is required for both name charigt, and/or ownership change
requests
[] Legal documentation of the transfer of ownership (ouch as relevant pages of a contract deed
or a bill of sale) is re ulred for an ownership irhangc request Articles of incorporation are
not ,ufiicient for an ownership change
Tl,e certifit ations below mast be c.omplered and signed by bath the permit holder prior to the change, and
the new applicant in the case of an ownership change request For a name change request the signed
Applicant's Certlf,cation is sufficient
P fRM T��E C RTIFICATION (Permit holder prior to ownership change)
1 osep attoe Fa RA application for a name/ownership change has been revtewc d and is accurate and
complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that if all required parts of this application are not
completed and that if all required supporting information is not included this application package will be
returned as incompI to
Stgn Lure are
APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
I WilliamprlAYMNis application for a nameJownership change has been reviewed and is accurate and
complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that if all required parts of this application are not
completed and that if all required supporting infOrmatxon is not included this application package will be
returned as incomplete
ice✓ 1 / % — 9-
Signature Date
PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETE APPLICA PION PACKAGE TO
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
1617 Matt Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
Revised 712M

SANTE K`
ENVIRONMENTAL
650 251h 5treel N W Suite 100
Cleveland Tennessee 37311
[phone]
Tnll Free [phone]
fax [phone]
Email mad@santekervtro corn
Internet www santekermro cam
[Aa'(j%itsntU44)milr t
t[Kat Cttwrem.>r.crxo fkAPIA7y
April 6, 2012
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
SW General Permit Coverage Renewal
Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re Stormwater General Permit Coverage Renewal
Haywood County (White Oak) Sanitary Landfill
COC Number NCG 120047
Haywood County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern
Santek Environmental of North Carolina, LLC (Santek) is submitting the enclosed
renewal application form to the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality, in order for the
Haywood County (White Oak) Landfill to continue coverage under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit NCG120000
Santek became the operator of the Haywod County (White Oak) Sanitary Landfill
on December 1, 2011 and submitted a permit name / ownership change form to
the NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, on January 10, 2012 A copy of the
permit name / ownership change form is included in this submittal
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call at [phone]
Sincerely,
Will Martin
Environmental Compliance Coordinator
Enclosures
cc Bradley Bennett, Supervisor — Stormwater Permitting Unit, NCDENR
Stephen King, Recycling and Solid Waste Director, Haywood County
Marty Stamey, County Manager, Haywood County
Matt Dillard, Executive V P of Operations, Santek
Rob Burnette, P E , Executive V P of Engineering, Santek
Ron Vail, P E , Engineering Department Manager, Santek
John Preston, Facility Manager, Santek
Prated on recycled paper

Permit Name / Ownership Change Form
Haywood County (White Oak) Sanitary Landfill
COC Number NCG120047

�lc_ (C� IQC�'
i
Panuary 10, 2012
F
[Mr Bradley Bennett
SA NI T E forth Carolina Department of £nvironmt.nt and Natutdl RLsourLI-S
EiNVIRON�Nj EN iAL Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection Section
wo7't-sir,at h%11 sJ1a10G �1617 Mail Service Center
Crc-,ma -- 7ernessaa 373
',423,-76 „en Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-161
TN1I F,, - (OLCP67 " Q
-al (423)1-19
Re SurfaU Water Protection SL(,tlOn Permit Narnt, / Owncrship Change Form
Inllrn° r, rsanle'el wl) on Haywood County - White Oak Sanitary Landfill
Permit Number NCG120047
te��, ct,u Szrt"7�r , iiK�e,
toeat Crcacyn.+ art P-11 c1. 17
Mr Bennett
antek Environmental of Noith Carolina, U,C (Samey) is submitting a permit
arne/ownc,rship change form for the Ilaywood County - What Oaf. Sanitary
andfill (Landfill) Haywood Countv remains the owner of thf. Landfill, and
antek became the operak, of the. Landfill on DeLcrnb,-r 1, 2011
f you have any questions or comments, please fi~el tree to call at [phone]
inee re, ly,
Will Martin
Environmental Compliance Coordinator
nclosure
Susan A Wilson, Division of Water Quality, NCDENR
Joscph S King, Recycling and Solid Waste Director, Haywood County
Marty Stamey, County Manager, Haywood County
Cheryl Dunson, Executive V P of Marketing, Santek
Matt Dillard, Executive V P of Operations, Santek
Rob Burnette, P E , Executive V P of Engineering, Santek
Ron Vail, P E , Enginrering Department Manager, Santek
John Preston, Facility Manager, Santek
Fnn:M an rwA'A paw

S _AN T E K'
ENVIRONMENTAL
650 25th Sir eel N W Suite 100
Cleveland Tennessee 3731t
[phone]
loll Free [phone]
Fax [phone]
Email madasanAenvirocorn
Internet wwN santekenwo corn
Luhditff jntr7snt.rfI,IeT
Lo. It CfMe o a n rr ti N 7Fnt�7 j
April 6, 2012
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
SW General Permit Coverage Renewal
Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re Stormwater General Permit Coverage Renewal
Haywood County (White Oak) Sanitary Landfill
COC Number NCG 120Oo047
Haywood County, North Carolina
To Whom It May Concern
Santek Environmental of North Carolina, LLC (Santek) is submitting the enclosed
renewal application form to the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of Water Quality, in order for the
Haywood County (White Oak) Landfill to continue coverage under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit NCG120000
Santek became the operator of the Haywod County (White Oak) Sanitary Landfill
on De(ember 1, 2011 and submitted a permit name / ownership change form to
the NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, on January 10, 2012 A copy of the
permit name 1 ownership change form is included in this submittal
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call at [phone]
Sincerely,
Will Martin
Environmental Compliance Coordinator
Enclosures
cc Bradley Bennett, Supervisor — Stormwater Permitting Unit, NCDENR
Stephen King, Recycling and Solid Waste Director, Haywood County
Marty Stamey, County Manager, Haywood County
Matt Dillard, Executive V P of Operations, Santek
Rob Burnette, P E , Executive V P of Engineering, Santek
Ron Vail, P E , Engineering Department Manager, Santek
John Preston, Facility Manager, Santek
Pr and on recyc ed p,rei

Ar
WAt Permit Coverage
F Renewal Api)JIcation Fonn
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Stormwater General Permit NCG120000
Certificate of Coverage Number
MCG120047
The following is the information currently In our database for your facility Please review this information carefully and make all
corrections/ additions as necessary in the space provided to the nght of the current information
Qviner Affilifiltiann ion * Re&sued Permit wr/1 bye mailed to the owner address
Owner/ Organization Name Haywood Co Santek Environmental of North Carolina, LLC
Owner Contact William M Dillard
Mailing Address 215 N Main St 650 25th Street, NW, Suite 10Q
Waynesville, NC 28786 ffeveland, TN 37311
Phone Number 828-452-6629 Ext 423 303-7101
Fax Number 628-452-6715 [phone]
E-mail address mdillard antekenvir corn
Facility/Permit Contact irrfarmation
Facility Name Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
Facility Physical Address 3898 Fines Creek Rd
Waynesville, NC 28786
Facility Contact
Mailing Address
Phone Number
Fax Number
E-mail address
Discharge Inforrnatlon
Receiving Stream PIGEON RIVER (Waterville Lake below elev,-don
Stream Class C
Basin French Broad River Basin
Sub -Basin 04-03 05
Number of Outfalls
Impaired WatQMfTMQL
Does this facility discharge to waters listed as Impaired or waters with a finalized TMDL? ❑ Yes W No ❑ Dont Know
for information on these waters refer to h* //h2o enrsOte nc us/su/lmpairea Waters 77tfDLI
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of my knowledge and
belief such informatton true, complete anrmrl'�
Signature / �- - Bate ^ rr Z
William M Dillard
Print or type name of person signing above
Please return this completed renewal application form to
APR 9 10i%
�UHLITY
$irrater Branch
Executive V P of Operations
Title
SW General Permit Coverage Renewal
Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

Permit Name / Ownership Change Form
Haywood County (White Oak) Sanitary Landfill
COC Number NCG120047

?� }JanLiar` 10, 2012
1
- 'ivfr Bradley B�-nneLt
- 'i""orth Carolina Department of Environmtrit and tN'atlual RCSoitrc,-5
E IV1,�0Jf !mill=+\I IDlvrsion of Wat,,r Quality - SL1rFace Wat,-r Protection Section
2,t�s 0r V P SL,tAIrA 1617 Mail Service Center
cd iar '+riaas�ai,
y�cr. 1Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
You t2? Arj-s- a ,,,,
(55
�,�, el ir« „o ,- 'Re Surfacc Water Protection Section Permit NnmE / Ownership Change Form
in m' r" at[- ' r^ °" Haywood County - White Oak Sanitary Landfill
r
Permit Number NCG 120047
Dear Mr Bennett
Santek Environmental of Noith Carolina, LL C. (Santek) is submitting a pernut
!name/ok�n�.rship change Form For the 1layMod County - White Oak Sanitary
Landfill (Landfill) Haywood County remains the owner of thi, Landfill, and
Santek bccame the operator of the Landfill on Pecembtt 1, 2011
1
IF you nave any questions or comments, please ftel fruc to call at [phone]
IStricerely,
Will Martin
vironmental Compliance Coordinator
Enclosure
cc Susan A Wilson, Division of Water Quality, NCDFNR
Joseph S King, Recycling and Solid Waste Director, Haywood County
Marty Stamey, County Manager, Haywood County
Cheryl Dunson, Executive V P of Marketing, Santek
Matt Dillard, E-ceeutive V P of Operations, Santek
ca�<cr tr �t�ia,, iir~at, Rob Burnette, P E , Executive V P of Engineering, Santek
Ron Vail, P E , Engineering Department Manager, Santek
John Preston, Facility Manager, Santek
Punted on myte4 paper

Or �+lArrC� Rc� r{� Ea+cs Pcrdae Ga�ernar
O`�fQG
Dee Fri -man Se retury
7 �t Nor i Carolina D,Wimcnl at Gtnrorim nt 3nd Natural Rctaur .j
O Y
Cole n F SUUI,SS director
Diaswn of Waicr Qualtly
x9t W�, PER3 `I.i� l�"� 'W�?rCT N w �7RYI r ;r
1 Please enter the perrrut number for which the chaoge is requested
IMES Permit (or) Ccravcatc of Coverage
U Permit status pLior to requested change
a Pernut issued to (company name) Haywood Cotin,h
b Aersarl legally responsible ftir perc*ur Joseph S Kinc_1
Firsc hit Last
Director - Recycling and Solid Waste I'danant
This
278 Recycle Road
Pcr-mt Haider MaJmg address
clvde NC 28721
ctly sic 210
( 823 � 627-8042 (828 ) 627-8 f 37
Phone Fa.(
c Facility namt- (discharge) Haywood County - White Oak Sanitary
d Facility address 3898 Fines Creek Road
Addrnq
Waynesville NC 28786
City state f ,
e FiLilir/ contact person Joseph S King $28 ) 627-8042
First / NEI/ Last Pironc
III Please provide the, following for the requested change (revised permit)
a Request for change is a result of ❑ Change in ownership of the facility
❑ Name change of the faciliry or owner
If otherplease erplerin Change in operator of the facility
b Permit issued to (conipany name) Santek Environmental of North Caro#Ina LLC
e Parson legally responsible foi permit William M Dillard
First Nff La5t
Executive V P of Oclerations
Tide
650 25th Street, NW Suite 100
Permit Holder Mat ling Address
Cleveland TN 37311
City State Zp
(423 ) 476-9160 md ilia rd@santekenvi ro corn
�Phanc H mail Address
d facility name (dice barge} _Haywood County - White Oak Sanitary
e Fnciliry address 3898 Fines Creek Rd
Address
Waynesville _ NC 28786
Ciry 'Slate Zip
f Facility contact person JoSeohh S _ _ King
Frei Mr Last
(828 ) 627 8042 sking@weodnc net
Pharic E mail Address
Ra,lue Si2ocs

PMAYEIOW,,�SRSHIP CHA,NG-r- FORM
Pagj 2 o. 2
TV Perrru t contact info[ niation (i' d,iterent from the person legally responsible for he permit)
Permit contact William G Martiri
Frit ING Iav
Environmental Comohance Coordinator
'file
650 25th Street, NW, Suite 100
Mating AJdress
Cleveland TN 37311
fir/ Scare Zap
0423 } A76-9160 wmartinQsantekenviro cam
°hone F marl Address
V WW the permitted fAtthty continue to conduct the same industrial activities conducted prior
to this ownership or name change'
® Yes
❑ No (ple3se explain)
V1 Required Items THIS APPLIC4,TION WILL BE R.ETMNT D UNPROCESSED IF I i EMS
ARE IiNCOVIPLETE OR 1ti11SSING
[ This completed application is required for both name change and/or ownership change
requests
❑ Legal documentation of the transfe- of ownership (such as relevant pages o` a contract deed
or a bill of sale) is required for an ownership change request 4ni0es of incorporation are
not sufficient for an ownership change
TI c certifitatiors ticlow must be completed and signed by both the pertrut holder prior to the change, and
the new applu,ant to the case of an ownership change request For a name range request the signed
Applicant's Ccrtir,c.ation is sufficient
P�It 4T E C TIFICATION (Perrruc holder prior to ownership change)
I os8p at2e��MM application tar a name/ownership change has been reviewed and is accurate and
complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that i, all required parts of thts application are not
completed and chat if all required supporting information is not included taus application package will be
retlzIlyd as :ncompl t-,w // Ll
Sig tore ate
APPLICANT CFRT1F7CkTi0N
I iNilltam��itl��ris application for a narrielownership change has been reviewed and is accurate and
complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that If all required parts of this application are not
completed and that if all required supporting information is not included this application package will be
returned as incomplete I
WFZI
Signature
/-9-/z
Dare
PLEASE SEND THE COMVIPLETE APPLICA PION PACKAGE TO
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolioa 27699-1617
Remed M008

F WAr& Michael F Easley Governor
William G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W Klimek P E Director
Division of Water Quality
3/18/2004
CER I IFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
DAVID MOCK
CONCRETE SUPPLY CO -KINGS MOUNT
PO BOX 5247
CHARLOTTE NC 28225
Subject FINAL NOTICE NPDES Storrnwater Permit Renewal
Concrete Supply Co -Kings Mount
COC Numhci NCG 140047
Clevcl ind County
Dear Perinittec
Your f icilny is currc,ntly covered for stormwater discharge under General Permit NCG140000 Phis permit will
expire on July 31 2004 North Carolina General Statute 143 215 1((-) require% that an application for permit
coverage renewal be Filed in a timely manner A prior notice of rcnewat w is sent for this site on December 1,
2003 To date, no response has been reccned by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) In order to as,,ule your
continued coverage under the general permit, you must apply to DWQ for renewal of your permit coverage
Enclosed you will find a general perinit renewal application form The, application must be completed and returned
by April 19 2004 in order to assure continued cover ige under the general pernnt
Failure, to request renewal by April 9 2004 can result in a civil assessment of at IL ist $250 00 L irger penalties
may be assessed depending on the delinquency of the requc,,t Discharge of Storrnwater from your tactility without
coverage under a valid stormwater NPDES permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215 1 and could
result in assessment,, of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day
II you have, uiy quc,,lion,, rcgardmg the permit icnewal procedures please c.cmtact Bill Milk of the Centi it Offie.e
Stormwater Unit at [phone] ext 548
Sincerely
Bradley Bennett Supervisor
Storrnwater and General Permits Unit
cc Central Files
SWGPU files
Mooresvilk Regional Office
F4►
©r+A
NCDENR
N C Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623 7748

F WATF
�0�o RQt✓ Michael F Easley
Governor
William G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W Klimek P E Director
Division of Water Quality
July 31, 2003
C Jack Horton
Haywood Co
CIO 1 Recycle Rd
Clyde, NC 28721
Subject NPDES COC # NCG120047
Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
Compliance Schedule Correction
Haywood
Dear C Jack Horton
It recently came to the Division's attention that the compliance schedule in the NCG120000 permit is
incorrect The compliance refers to requiring a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan which is not a
requirement of this permit The corrected compliance language that should go under Part III, Section A 1 is
shown below We have also attached a new page reflecting this change for your permit file (Part III page 1 of
11) This new page should replace the current page in your permit
SECTION A COMPLIANCE AND LIABILITY
Compliance Schedule
The permittee shall comply with the permit in accordance with the following schedule
Existing Facilities Upon the effective date of the Certificate of Coverage the permittee shall comply
with all of the conditions detailed in Part II, Section A Final Limitations and Controls for Stormwater
Discharges
New Facilities Upon the beginning of discharges from the operation of the industrial activity the
permittee shall comply with all conditions detailed in Part 11, Section A Final Limitations and Controls
for Stormwater Discharges
If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact Aisha Lau at
[phone], ext 578
cc Stormwater and General Permits Unit
Asheville Regional Office
Central Files
awn
NCDENR
Customer Service
1 800 623 7748
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED By
BRADLEY gg
Alan W Klimek,RE7T
Division of Water Quality 1617 Mad Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1617 [phone]

Michael F Easley Governor
William G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
t3 Y
Alan W Klimek P E Director
Division of Water Quality
August 23 2002
C JACK HORTON
HAYWOOD CO-WHI I E OAK SANI I ARY
278 RECYCLE ROAD
CLYDE NC 28721
Subject NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
HAYWOOD CO WHITE OAK SANITARY
COC Number NCG 120047
H iywood County
Dear Permittee
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG 120000 the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit 'I his permit is reisuted
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between the state of North Carolina and the U S Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6 1983
The following information is included with your permit package
* A new Certltic, ite of Coverage
* A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG 120000
* A copy of the Analytical Monitoring Form (DMR)
* A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transter able except after notice to DWQ Fhe Division m iy require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the CertitlLate of Coverage This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility
for compliance with any other apphcable federal, state or local law rule %tandard ordinance, order judgment or
decree
It you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Aitiha Lau of the Central Office Stormwater
and General Permits Unit at [phone] ext 578 i
Sincerely
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
cc Central Piles
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Asheville Regional Office
ALMA
NtDENR
N C Division of Water Quality 1617 Mad Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623 7748

M;chael F Easley Governor
William G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J Thorpe Ph D
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
❑LLWnhLC 27 2001
C JACK }IOR ION
HAYWOOD CO-WHI I E OAK SANITARY
C/0 I RI -CYCLE RD
CLYDE NC 28721
SUbJCLt NPDI:ti Stoi ntw ttt,i PL1 m11. RLIIL W II
I M WOOD CO-W HI 11: OAK SANI I ARY
Ct>CNunthLi NCG120047
11 IN wood County
DL a PLI ItllttLL
You1 t Ictllty Iti LutrLntly CotiuCd lot storntw 1I1-1 d11,Lh ugL under GLnc is d PLtnut NCG 120000 1111', pLlnut LtP1ILti
on Augutit 3I 2002 I hC Di%tuon CI III IC Cu1lLntl) in Chi- PIOLLtiti of ILi+rlung 1h1' PLI m1t Ind lti a hLdulul 1011 INC.
IIIL PCrnIIt rL1',SULd by I ItC unlnllcr of 2002 Onct lhu perinit 11, IC11,1,Llul vour factlity could hC LhglhlL Ior
LOntuluLd CO%Lrwt- undo dic rit1,1uCd lkinut
In 01(IL1 to 1S',IIL jOUI COnttnuCtl CON Ur HgL ul)tlLI IhC ,Lncrll PLtntit you Irlutit apply to the DIN I1,1011 OI W nu
QU Ility (DWQ) [Or rLIIL k II o1 youl PCrmil L1lVLI IgL I ill ILL 1111, IL1ILw 11 procuv, C P IU wC trC inloiming you in
tdv HILL th It }Otn punut will hL Lvhnmg EIILIo',Ld Nou k+Ill Ilnd I (.Cncr tl PCrtntt GI»Era�;c RcnCtii rl
Appht- itlon I orrn ThL glPhc tUon mint hi. Con1hILILLI Ind ICtuInLLI h� N1 HrCh 4 2002 In oidLI to ttiSUIC LirrlUnuui
Loki tgL undCl IhC gcnci it p,rmrt
FIIIurC to 1L(ILIU L rLlILw 11 within 1111', IIIIIL PLI Iod In iy IC4ult to I Ltvil ItitiLtiSnlCnt of II IC Itit',,250 00 C. w,Cr
PCn 1111L, nl Iv hL 1SSLtiud dLPuxlnlg On the clLJnuluLnCy of thL ICLIuLSI Dltichar+,C nl ,Ionttw 11LI hrnn gout I iLllrty
wlthoUt LMLI IgL under I t did titoi nlw uCr NPDES PL11n1t would cow titutL I v lot Itiou of NCG 143-215 I tnd
COkIld 104111 In IStiLstiln,nh Of (IN 11 p,na1110, 01 ttP to w 10 000 pLr d I\
PIC to 1101L th It Icu.nt ICdLI 11 ILgI'd loon h 1, LxICntlL I tIlL no LrPutiulL LxciutilOII to III uperltorti A Intlutirl1 11
f ILIhtILti in illy of lht- 1 I L 11LgoIICti of �,tonn w ItL1 di"Ch ngC. P,1,OLI Iti-d with nu11.1ti111 11 ILtINIty (LrLLpt
u11',tl001011 aLUvill,ti) Il }Ou ICCI dour I ICthty C In CutttN I Londltton Of uo LXPo',uIL I L IhL I Iuhv nulu1,lri II
Ill IILI I ilti uld OPL1 I11011t IIL II01 LXpo,,Ld to simillw ltui you Can Illply for th4 $10 CYPotiuIL LALILIti1011 I-OI Idd111on,tl
nllorm ituln Cont Ict thL Unit- it O I ILL S101 mw ItCI St Ill nlLnlh,r h,.tCd blow Or LhCck the SIornlw ItLr & GLICI It
PLl-inw, Unit WLb 5itc it hill) //1120 Lill- ',I ItL nL utihul1,I0IIM% IILI hUill
II ihL tiuhlLLt ,lornlwIILl ditiLll 11gL to w IIL1ti ul fhL tit IlL 11 Is bCLn ILIIIIIII ItCLI p1L tti, LOMPILIL lh, LnCletiul
Rtscw,ion RLtluLtit Norm M iihng IltitruLtrml. uC Iltilul On th, ho11or11 (11 th(, Ionn You will hL nOIIlILd wh,n 0U,
rCSLItislon (MOLL I, h 11, hLLll a I)II)ICILd
It \ou 11 1tC Inv yuLstlom rLg udin" IhL PLInII1 ICIILti� 11 PIOLLduILti PIC V L Lont ILI JIm kLid of thL AQIL\ III,
RLg1011 11 (NhCL tt 828 251 0208 or AI,,II I L ILI Of thL Ccnli 11 OTALL '�I(nIl1W,nLI Unit It (g 1 g) 733 50ti3 Lxl 578
'IIIILLJLIy
131 Idl,v 131,1110t SuPCI noI
�101I w uLi Ird GU7C1 11 I',I1111tti Un11
cc CLItt111I-IkS
r��liL 111L, ++Ion it OHICC
DNA
NCDENR
N C Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623 7748

,-
Y Stlte of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B Hunt, Jr, Governor
Jonathan B Howes, Secretary
A Preston Howard, Jr, P E , Director
March 25, 1994
Mr Jack Horton
Haywood County White Oak Sanitary Landfill
1 Recycle Rd
Clyde, NC 28721
Subject General Permit No NCG120000
White Oak Sanitary Landfill
COC NCG120047
Haywood County
Dear Mr Horton
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on January 19, 1994, we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge finder the subject state - NPDES general
permit This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated
December 5, 1983
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit
application Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Environmental Management The Division of Environmental Management may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr Bill Mills at telephone number 9191733-
5083
Sirmui signed BY
Coleen H Sullins
A Preston Howard, Jr , P E
cc Asheville Regional Office
P O Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626 0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Haywood County White Oak Sanitary Landfill
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
White Oak Sanitary Landfill
Route 4
Waynesville
Haywood County
to receiving waters designated as Pigeon River in the French Broad River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III
and IV of General Permit No NCG120000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective March 25, 1994
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day March 25, 1994
Original Signed By
Coleen H Sullins
A Preston Howard, Jr, P E
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

ELEV 2258
_�� ile O_'..'�

v 1.
FACILITY
" FACILITY
COUNTY
`
COUNTY N �,
"¢ r)� PCfr )a 0047
F f to N15� 4v N1p
Ll , 9E -5 ° 4 P CS
{py _ LC ' j p) E
"[AM
��++ P s � STREAM Pj qwn Rt vm
3Tz. r i ti
�T � 1 r�``! I��S
DISCI ►,� ."E TYPE
` �f3�;��R,�;�ETYPE 5W
EXPIRATION DOE
EXPiP,A R ION DATE 00J 31 ���

Memo To Fi
Author S A Wilson
Date 8/12/2013
Re White Oak Landfill — Haywood Co — Santek Environmental
After the inspection December 12 2013 — it was noted that some outfall monitoring was likely not
necessary — and representative outfall status could be requested
To date — no request has been received However — before this file gets turned over to DEMLR with
the reorganization, I wanted to contact them to tell them to request ROS for some outfalls
I will send John Preston (Santek) and Stephen King (Haywood Co) an email to tell them to request
ROS for
SDO2 can represent SDO1
SDO5 can represent SDO6 (this needs to be confirmed, but I believe SDO6 is pumped to the basin for
SDO5)
SDO4 — they should request that this outfall be eliminated This area is completed vegetated with
surroundings vegetated There is no disturbed areas draining directly to this outfall (and where the
upper road is — there is greater than 200 ft of sheetflow to the 'basin) This outfall has had
exceedances to fecal coliform — for which we can only attribute to wildlife

INE
rya � � ;�?'r
s
650 251h Street N VV Suee 100
Cleveland Tennessee 37311
(423) 303 T101
Email majAsantekenvvo com
Internet www santekenvua com
June 24, 2013
NCDENR
Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re Tier Two Monitoring (SDO-4)
Haywood County (White Oak) Landfill
NPDES Permit Number NCG120047
To Whom It May Concern
RECE11lE j
JUL - 8 2013
DWQ/Surface Water Prrotecton 5acttan
Achcvtlfe Re lanai p��
In accordance with the Tier Two monitoring requirements located in Part II(B) of
General NPDES Permit (NCG120000), stonnwater discharge outfall (SDO-4)
became subject to monthly monitoring followmg two consecutive Total
Suspended Solids (TSS) detections above the benchmark value (100 mg/L) which
occurred on July 2, 2012 and December 10, 2012 Since January 2013, a monthly
sample has been collected or no discharge has been reported at SDO-4 A
monthly sample was collected in May 2013 However, tins sample was not
collected in the proper sample containers and was delivered to the laboratory past
the hold time requirements Therefore, the sample was not analyzed by the
laboratory Site personnel involved with collecting the improper sample have
been contacted, and this issue has been resolved
A proper sample was collected at SDO-4 on June 18, 2013, and the results will be
included in the next monthly discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted to
NCDENR (Division of Water Quality) Tier Two monitoring will continue at
SDO-4
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call at [phone]
Sinceiely,
Will Martin
Environmental Compliance Coordinator
cc Susan A Wilson, Division of Water Quality, NCDENR
Joseph S King, Recycling and Solid Waste Director, Haywood County
Marry Stamey, County Manager, Haywood County
Matt Dillard, Executive V P of Operations, Santek
Rob Bumette, P E , Executive V P of Engineering, Santek
Cheryl Dunson, Executive V P of Marketing, Santek
Ron Vail, P E , Engineering Department Manager, Santek
John Preston, Site Manager, Santek

Wilson, Susan A
From Will Martin <wmartin@santekenviro com>
Sent Wednesday January 30, 2013 9 06 AM
To Wilson, Susan A
Cc John Preston
Subject RE re inspection report for White Oak LF/ NC
Susan,
I spoke with John Preston about the address issue at the landfill Feel free to send anything related to the landfill to me
at the Cleveland, TN address I will make sure John gets a copy The address is in my signature below Please let me
know if you have any questions
Thank you,
Will Martin
Sant,-k Wash SCrvm-s Inc
6>0 2Ui St NW Stnte 100
CIC, Lland IN 37311
(423) 3 03 -7 101 ph
(423 )-179- t 9,2 1\
�i niartin Ga santLk nviro corn
SANTEK
IVkAIT.A.
WasteServices
From John Preston
Sent Wednesday, January 30, 2013 8 40 AM
To Will Martin
Subject FW re inspection report for White Oak LF/ NC
From Wilson, Susan A [mailto susan a wilson(@ncdenr gov]
Sent Monday, January 28, 2013 11 11 AM
To John Preston
Subject re inspection report for White Oak LF/ NC
John -
I put the landfill mailing address on the inspection report and it was sent back (which reminded me that I think you guys
told me they would not deliver to that physical address) What mailing address should I send it to for you? All we have
otherwise is the TN address I have some supplemental information with that I want to make sure you get
And — I received the last analytical results last week and that is Just a puzzle
Thanks,

Susan
Susan A Wilson - Susan A Wilson@ncdenr gov
North Carolina Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection
2090 U S 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Notice E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties
No virus found in this message
Checked by AVG - www ayg com
Version 2013 0 2890 / Virus Database 2639/6063 - Release Date 01/28/13

Za;w�
4.
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Waklld, P E
Governor Director
January 14, 2013
Mr John Preston, Santek Environmental of North Carolina, LLC
c/o White Oak Landfill
3898 Fines Creek Road
Waynesville, NC 28786
Mr Stephen King, Director, Solid Waste Management — Haywood County
278 Recycle Road
Clyde NC 28721
SUBJECT NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection
Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
PermitNo NCG 120047
Haywood County
Dear Mr Preston and Mr King
John E Skvarla, III
Secretary
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
December 12, 2012 The facility was found to be in compliance with permit NCG120047 The
Division of Water Quality appreciates all the efforts put into the landfill by Santek (as well as the
County, prior to this year), to bring it into compliance with the stormwater permit and with water
quality standards
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference
Please contact me at [phone] or Susan A Wilson a,ncdt nr gov, if I can be of any further
assistance
Sincerely,
{
Susan A Wilson
Environmental Engineer
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
RECEIVED
JAN 2 3 2013
DwQ Wfb= Water %0ftflM &xd=
cc Central Files
Asheville Files
Mr Marty Stamey, Haywood County Manager, 215 N Main St, Waynesville, NC 28786
S 1SWP1HaN Aood\StormHaterlNCG12 Landfills\Havuood Co landfi111Whrte Oak LF 12 201210Ei 12 20121LTR Cl;l White Odk LF 12 2012 doc
Location 2090 U S Highway 70 Swannanoa North Carolina 28778 One
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] NOrthCarohna
Inlemet www ncwaterquahty org NRturRCly
An Equal Opportunely 1 nffirmative Action Employer

Permit NCG120047
SOC
County Haywood
Region Asheville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective 11/01/12 Expiration 10/31/17 Owner Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Effective Expiration Facility Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Contact Person Stephen Kinglf0N Title
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Representative(s)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 1211212012 Entry Time 10 00 AM
Primary Inspector Susan A Wilson
Secondary Inspector(s)
Reason for Inspection Routine
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ■ Compliant El Not Compliant
Question Areas
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Waynesville NC 28786
Phone [phone]
Certification Phone
Exit Time 01 00 PM
Phone [phone]
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Page 1

Permit NGG120047 Owner Facility Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Inspection Date 1211212012 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary
Susan Wilson and Tim Fox met with Jeff Hunter (Santek) to perform the site Inspection Santek operates the landfill for
Haywood County (and has operated it since late December 2011/January 2012)
Santek has done an exemplary job of continuing with improvements at the landfill All the outfalls are properly labeled all
are observed and photographed weekly and after 1/2 rainfall event Analytical monitoring has been conducted as
required (and Mr Martin informed DWQ of the benchmark exceedances after the July 2012 sampling) DWQ is unsure
why the fecal coliform benchmarks were exceeded at certain outfalls (and TSS at certain outfalls) Santek should
continue to investigate these areas as more data is gathered There is groundwater flow through some basins (which
may or may not be contributing to the issue) DWQ will work with Santek on these issues The facility appears to have
adequate BMPs and is doing an exemplary job with continued maintenance at the landfill
Some improvements still need to be made (the entrancelhaul road area) - and per Mr Hunter this is scheduled to be
done within the year
DWQ will work with Santek to remove monitoring for some outfalls and/or establish Representative Outfalls Status for
some
This inspection was discussed with Mr John Preston afterwards (he was unable to be present during the inspection)
Based on observation of the tributary below Outfall SDO-08 (sediment was removed from this tnbutary)
NOV-2011-PC-0235 that was issued to Haywood County will be closed out (this letter will be sent to Mr King)
The fence line below SDO-8 and SDO-5 should be kept clear of debris to allow flow through
Page 2

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Inspection Date 12/12/2012 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment Santek has performed all the required qualitative monitoring for each outfall
(and took photos as well)
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment Analytical monitoring was performed by Santek 7/2/2012 (slightly later than
the required semi-annual period, Santek notified DWQ of this) Sampling was
conducted 12/10/2012 (for the second semi-annual period)
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status is it properly documented by the Division')
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges'?
Comment At the time of the inspection - they had not yet received their new
Certificate of Coverage (but the older one was on file)
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
nn■n
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■nnn
nn■n
■nnn
Page 3

A .
.iw—I A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild P E
Director
William Dillard
Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
650 25th St Nw Ste 100
Cleveland TN 37311
Dear Permittee
December 4 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
COC Number NCG120047
Haywood County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage understormwater General Permit NCG120000
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued General Permit This permit is
reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina Genera! Statute 143-215 1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U S Environmental Protection Agency, dated October
15 2007 (or as subsequently amended)
The following information is included with your permit package
• A new Certificate of Coverage (COC)
• A copy of General Permit NCG120000
8 A copy of the Technical Bulletin for the General Permit
Two copies of the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form
• Two copies of the Qualitative Monitoring Report Form
The General Permit authorizes discharges of stormwater, and it specifies your obligations for discharge
controls management, monitoring, and record keeping Please review the new permit to familiarize yourself
with all the changes in the reissued permit Your facility has six (6) months from the time of receipt of the
permit to update your current SPPP to reflect ah new permit requirements
The first sample period of your permit begins January 1, 2013 Your facility must sample a "measureable
storm event" beginning during the penods beginning January 1 and July I of every year (or, if applicable,
report No Flow as outlined in Part III, Section E) Also, please note that Tier 3 Actions in Part 11 of your
permit are triggered by benchmark exceedances on four occasions beginning on the effective date of this
permit and do not count prior exceedances
The more significant changes in the General Permit since your last COC was Issued are noted either in the
Draft Permit Fact Sheet that accompanied the public notice (http _portal ncdenr orslweb/wq/ws/su/current
notices), or in the Response to Comments / Summary of Changes and Technical Bulletin documents that are
posted on the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website with the new General Permit Please visit
http //portal ncdenr org/web/wq/wslsu/npdessw (click on'General Permits' tab) to review that information
for your specific General Permit carefully
1617 Mail Service Cenler Raleigh North Carolina 27599 1617
Locator 512 N Salisbury St Raieigh North Carolina 27604
Phone 91MI-M [ FAX [phone]
Internet www ncwate[g iahly arg
An Equal Opportunil Affamabve Action Employer
NorthCarohna
;Vatui,il �l�

William Dillard
December Q, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Some of the changes include
■ Part II
• Section A The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) section, if applicable, has been updated
to the most current language of our permits Additional conditions for specific industry sectors have
been added to the SPPP requirements in some cases
• Sections B, C Failure to perform analytical Stormwater monitoring may result in the Division requiring
that the permittee begin a monthly sampling scheme
• Sections B, C A lower TSS benchmark of SO mg/I for HQW ORW, PNA and Tr Waters applies to these
more sensitive waters
• Sections B, C The monitoring parameter Oil & Grease (O&G) has been replaced by the parameter
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) for vehicle maintenance areas and in some cases, other
analytical monitoring requirements
• Sections 8, C, D Inability to sample due to adverse weather must be recorded in the SPPP, or in
separate on site records if your General Permit does not require an SPPP Adverse weather is defined
in the "Definitions" section of the permit
• Sections B, C The term "Representative Storm Event" has been replaced by "Measurable Storm
Event " A measurable storm event is defined in the permit
• Section D If the permittee fails to respond effectively to problems identified by qualitative
monitoring DWQ may require the permittee to perform corrective action
Please review Parts III and IV to understand the Standard Conditions of your new NPDES General Permit
including Compliance and Liability, Reporting, Monitoring and Records requirements Operation and
Maintenance obligations and Definitions Please note that all samples analyzed in accordance with the terms
of this permit must be submitted to the Division on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms available on
the Stormwater Permitting Emit s website above DMR forms must be delivered to the Division no later than
30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory Also note that existing
permittees do not need to submit a renewal request prior to expiration unless directed by the Division
Your coverage under the General Permit is transferable only through the specific action of DWQ This permit
does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR, nor does it
relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state or local law
rule, standard ordinance, order judgment, or decree If you have any questions regarding this permit
package, please contact the Division's Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone]
Sincerely
for Charles Wakild, P E
cc DWQCentral Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Asheville Regional Office

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG120000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No NCG120047
STORMWATFR
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143 215 1 other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended
Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Haywood Co White Oak Sanitary
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Waynesville
Haywood County
to receiving waters designated as PIGEON RIVER (Waterville Lake below elevation 2258), a
class C waterbody in the French Broad River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations
monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, 1I,11I and IV of General
Permit No NCG120000 as attached
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4 2012
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this 411' day of December 2012
for Charles Wakild, P E Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

r
FILE
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources'
Division of dater QUallty
Pat McCrory Charles Waklld, P F JDhr F Skvarla, Ill
Governor Director Secretary
January 14, 2013
Mr John Preston, Santek Environmental of North Carolina, LLC
c/o White Oak Landfill
3898 Fines Creek Road
Waynesville, NC 28786
Mr Stephen King, Director, Solid Waste Management -- Haywood County
278 Recycle Road
Clyde NC 28721
SUBJECT NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection
Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
Permit No NCG 120047
Haywood County
Dear Mr Preston and Mr King
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
December 12, 2012 The facility was found to be in compliance with permit NCG 120047 The
Division of Water Quality appreciates all the efforts put into the landfill by Santek (as well as the
County, prior to this year), to bring it into compliance with the stormwater permit and with water
quality standards
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliarce Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference
Please contact me at [phone] or Susan A Wilson( .ncdenr goy; &I can be of any further
assistance
Sincerely, //]]
Susan A Wilson
Environmental Engineer
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc Central Files
Asheville Files
Mr Marty Stamey, Haywood County Manager, 215 N Main St, Waynesville, NC 28786
S 1SWP1}iaywood\StormwaieANCG12 LandrillsVlaywood Co )andfilllWhrtc Oak IT 12 20t 2TF1 12 2012 M CEt White Oak LF 122012 doe
Location 2090 US Highway 70 Swannanoa North Garohna 28778 One
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] NolthCalr allria
lntemet www ncwaterquahty org
An Equal Opporlunity % Affrmalive ACtlon Employer

-. f
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit NCG120047 Effective 11/01/12 Expiration 10/31/17 Owner Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
SOC Effective Expiration Facility Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
County Haywood 3898 Fines Creek Rd
Region Asheville
Waynesville NC 28786
Contact Person Stephen King/10, d Title Phone [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC Certification Phone
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Representative(s)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 12/12/2012 EntryTime 10 00 AM
Primary Inspector Susan A Wilson
Secondary Inspector(s)
Reason for Inspection Routine
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas
■ Storm Water
See attachment summary)
Exit Time 01 DO PM
Phone [phone]
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Page 1

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Inspection Date 12112/2012 Inspection Type Compliance Evafuatmn Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary
Susan Wilson and Tim Fox met with Jeff Hunter (Santek) to perform the site Inspection Santek operates the landfill for
Haywood County (and has operated it since late December 20111January 2012)
Santek has done an exemplary job of continuing with improvements at the landfill All the outfalls are properly labeled all
are observed and photographed weekly and after 1/2 rainfall event Analytical monitoring has been conducted as
required (and Mr Martin informed DWQ of the benchmark exceedances after the July 2012 sampling) DWQ is unsure
why the fecal coliform benchmarks were exceeded at certain outfalls (and TSS at certain outfalls) Santek should
continue to investigate these areas as more data is gathered There is groundwater flow through some basins (which
may or may not be contributing to the issue) DWQ will work with Santek on these issues The facility appears to have
adequate BMPs and is doing an exemplary job with continued maintenance at the landfill
Some improvements still need to be made (the entrance/haul road area) - and per Mr Hunter this is scheduled to be
done within the year
DWQ will work with Santek to remove monitoring for some outfalls and/or establish Representative Outfalls Status for
some
This inspection was discussed with Mr John Preston afterwards (he was unable to be present during the inspection)
Based on observation of the tributary below Outfall SDO-08 (sediment was removed from this tributary)
NOV-2011-PC-0235 that was issued to Haywood County will be closed out (this letter will be sent to Mr King)
The fence line below SD0-8 and SDO-5 should be Kept clear of debris to allow flow through
Page 2

Permit NGG120047 Owner Facility Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Inspection Date 12l1212012 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ 0 0
Comment Santek has performed all the required qualitative monitoring for each outfall
(and took photos as well)
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ 0 ❑ Q
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ El ■ ❑
Comment Analytical monitoring was performed by Santek 7/2/2012 (slightly later than
the required semi-annual period, Santek notified ❑WQ of this) Sampling was
conducted 12110/2012 (for the second semi-annual period)
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed dunng the inspection?
# if the facility has representative outfall status is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment At the time of the inspection - they had not yet received their new
Certificate of Coverage (but the older one was on file)
Page 3

Wilson, Susan A
From Mark Shumpert [MShumpert@haywoodnc net]
Sent Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4 26 PM
To Wilson, Susan A
Cc Stephen King, Marc Pruett
Subject White Oak Landfill NPDES monitoring
Attachments WOLF_NPDES xls 5-4-11_ETS pdf
Susan,
Please find attached the spreadsheet we discussed today This file includes the data for the
landfill and MRF The "Tier One" tab represents the last two quantitative sampling events at
the landfill Notice that SDO-8 was back in compliance as of the May sampling and the SDO-5
issue in May was due, I believe, to mules from an adjacent property getting into the new
Phase 3 cell (this has been witnessed and addressed) and then the stormwater collected in
that cell was pumped into Basin 5 I believe I have been sending you our lab results, but
just in case, I have also attached the Certificate of Analysis from Environmental Testing
Solutions for the last sampling event
Best regards,
Mark Shumpert, PE
Haywood County Engineer
1233 N Main St , Box 2
Waynesville, NC 28786
828-356-2114 (0)
828-452-6767 (F)
828-400.2362 (C)
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic mail
message and any attachments hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) sent in
response to it, may be considered public record and as such are subject to request and review
by anyone at any time
1

EnvtronmertalTesting Solutions Inc
Certificate of Analysis
Project name Ha)~%ood County Landrill
Collection date 4 May I I
Date received 4 itilar 11
Sample identification SDO #2 - Grab
PO Boy 756:)
A,hr_N Illf_ NC 28802
Phone [phone]
Fax (828) :z0 Q368
Project nuni4r 110504 502
Sample number 82554
Parameter
Method
Result
RL Units
Bate
Analyst Footnotes
Aital)zed
Chemical Oxygen Demand
H aCH 8000
<50
50 mg/L
it my i i
KEK
Solids, Total Suspended
SM 2540 D
63
50 mg/L
s btoy ii
CDJ
Bacteria fecal Coliform
SM 9222 D
100
1 cuil100ml
4 Mm ti
CDJ 1
Sample identification SOO # 5 - Gr ib
Sample number _ 82555
Parameter Method Result RL Units Bate Analyst Footnotes
4nalviced
Chemical Oxygen Demand HACH 8000 <50 50 mg/L ii may ti KEK
Solids, Total Suspended SM 2540 D 23 50 mg/L s May i t CDJ
Bacteria Fetal Coliform SM 9222 D 4300 1 cn!l100ml s may I I CDJ
(� Sample identification SDO # 6 - Grab Sample. number
82556
P irameter
Method
Result
RL Units
Date
Analvst Footnotes
Analyzed
Chemical Oxrgtn DLrnand
HACH 8000
<50
50 mg/L
ji ytay ii
KEK
Solids Total Suspended
SM 2540 D
<5 0
] 0 mg/L
s \fay i i
CDJ
Bacteria recal Coliformn
SM 9222 D
>60
1 wvtuon,t
5lttaw It
CDJ
Sample identification SDO # 8 Grah Sample number 82557
Parameter Method Result RI Units Date Analyst Footnotes —
Chemical Ox}gen Demand HACH 8000
Solids, Total Suspended SM 2540 D
Bacteria, Fecal Coltform SIv19222 D 400 7 0/4
footnotes
RL = Rcporttngm Liit Values are reported down t�
1 Non Ideal Count
Date revie.tied 010-03 11 —/V d' tv �+^ — .a svu r,4univer —oUU
Data mVley%ed by - Kelley F Keenan SC Certification Number 99053
Signature �J�
q(G NC Drinking Water Certification Number 37786
1-his report should not he reproduced e\ept in its �nim.N %�iihoui the writicn consent of Fri%ironmonial fatting Solutions Inc
the results in this report relate onl} to the. 54MPIL5 submitted for analysis

13- Mr Kubalak will keep measures in place so as to prevent his livestock, fain
animals, and peis from entering the affected work area In the event that any of
Mr Kubalak's animals becomes stuck or trapped in the work area, it will be his
responsibility to remove those animals at his cost
14- Mr Kubalak and the county acknowledge that reasonable field adjustments may
be required to allow for unforeseen conditions or better options for the subject
work, once the pond is drained
15- As far as the routing structure for the strearn, Mr Kubalak agrees to creep any and
all his animals from damaging the routing structure In the event of dainage to the
routing structure caused by any thing other than the restoration effort paid for by
the county, Mr Kubalak agrees to pay for all costs associated with repairing the
damage
16- Mr Kubalak acknowledges the drainage facility for his pond is old and is likely
defective as a result Mr Kubalak acknowledges the age and drainage facility
conditions are not the fault of the county Mr Kubalak agrees to accept
responsibility for all existing conditions of the pond's drainage facility (outflow
pipe, reset --barrel, valves, etc ), and he holds the county Harmless for the existence
and condition of the aging drainage facility If Mr Kubalak restorers or replaces
any part of or all of the pond's drainage facility, it shall be done in a manner so as
to not impede the timefi=e of the county's sediment removal activity, and it
shall be done solely at his expense
17-CLOSURE STATEMENT AND OFFER OF GOOD FAITH AGREEMENT
TO MONITOR CONDITIONS, The County and Mr Kubalak agree that
certain complications can anse from natural erosion as well as artificial impacts as
streams flow through different properties Long term specific needs to preserve
the water quality of the stream flowing from the county's property and onto Mr
Kubalak's property cannot likely be envisioned in entirety at this time It is the
county's full intention to correct the aforementioned conditions of Mr Kubalak's
pond as they currently exist to the mutual satisfaction of both parties As well, the
County very much appreciates Mr Kubalak's generous nature, palience, and
willingness to work in a cordial fashion with the County to see the current
sediment problems resolved Going forward, the County requests and encourages
lines of communication between County representatives and Mr Kubalak to
continue in a positive manner The County commits to Mr Kubalak to "take all
reasonable measures" (NCAC 15A 04E 0105) to control the movement of
sediment on its property to the extent compliance will be met in order to protect
his property from sediment damage In addition, the County agrees to rnomlor its
property as is required by the National pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit, and to maintain all structures, measures, devices, ground covers, and
storm water controls upon County property in compliance Nvith the North Carolina
Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (NCGS § 113A-50 through § 113A-66, and
NCAC Title 15A Chapter 4 rules as applicable to sediment control in North
Carolina) Finally, the County agrees to allow Mr Kubalak to inspect the
County's property in the subject watershed at any reasonable time during work
hours on work days However, time County does request that Mr Kubalak inform

inatrumantp 2008004246 boo 33 Page 1296
F,)(MlT 44AIk
BEGINNING at a stake in the Northwest comer of the property h"n dmscnbed, such corner buv the
tnimsmdon of Prescut Road, thence North 60 degmcs Fast 244 feet to a stake, tbomr, North 13 degrees
15 rrunutm East 330 feet to a stake at a crabappte tree, dmoe North 58 degrocs 30 minutes East 462
feet to a large rock on a branch on Teague's comer thmoo down rice right side ofthe branch 382 feet to
a 20-inch poplar. thence South 81 degrees 34 minutes Bast 388 feet to a point, thence South 64 degrocs
30 minutes East 50 fed to a point, thence South 26 degrm 30 rmrautes East 288 feet to a stake at a
fence comer, thence South 46 degr= 30 minutes Fast 230 feet to a poplar, thence South 25 degrees 15
mumtes East 250 feet to a stake, the w South I 1 degrees Fast 103 feet to a I0•inch locust, theaoe
North 50 deg =15 minutes West 185 feet, thence Noilh 30 degrees Wast 107 fcrt to a stake, t ff"
North 42 degrm 45 murates West 166 fart to a stake, thence South 3 dcgrm 45 minx0es Wass 421
fbet to a large locust; thatce South 33 degrm 30 aiirudes West 166 feet to a locust, thence South 60
degrm 30 minutes West 178 feet to a stake in the E. M Teague corner; them North 20 degrees West
100 feet to a stake, thence North 54 degrees 30 minutes West 154 fed to a Make, thence North 43
degt= 30 minutes West 135 fed to a stake, ftnm North 15 depm West 291 feet to a stake, thence
North 31 dcp= West 100 feet to a stake, the= North 47 dagreos 15 muustes West 93 foci to a stake,
6= North 68 degrees 30 minutes West 178 feet to an old gate post, the point of BEGINNING. and
containing 24 3 scree, move or less, lee, any pordoa of the property descrrbod hminabove lying within
the real property as described in DeM Book 204 at Page 174, Haywood Cour4y Registry
TOCETMR WITH and INCLUDING a nghl of way noticing fturn the gate post ea the point of
BEGU4N NG of this trad to the Stato Highway, more fully desMbcd m a Dead found to Deed Boole
2% at Page 97, Haywood County Regatry
WNG that same property conveyed to Mary F Reece by geed dated September 7, 1983 a'A
reaordad in Deed Book 344 at Page 165, Hayarood Cdumy Registry
ALSO l3EINO Tract One of that deed dated March 22, 2002 from Lurda Corneal, unrnarned to Herbert
& Kubalak to Book 517, page 2033, Haywood Comity Registry

lnstFument# 2008004246 Book, 733 Page "..94
tuu•
I- -bd,'Admk a
1! C)�1.,W
Ruive Mm $ 0 00
iiiiiiilmlii#iiiiil
20080"24B
HAYW00000 NCIFE O00
AWMmm artoo,am
04-11-2008 04 20 06 PM
AhYa MURRAY
mommmems
U-,
SK RB 733
NORTH CAROLINA GENIKRAL WARRANTY DEED PG 1294-1206
1'aroel iden"a NO Rl -1t99 _ Vaiw by Cmnty on the — day of
$r
Ma111$om to Derck M Wenzel, Wenuel & Wa-g4, PLLC,160 N Mlin Street, Sulte 12, Wtm*vifir, WC 2436.____
Tbls insmuncat was preoued by- Wesae! dt 1 c ual, Pi.i C, 160 N Main Street, Suite 12 Waynesville NC 28786
>;trttf description for do hv&m
77<i18 DERD amide this th day of _ _ April . n—& by u►d between
9orbert E, Kubalak (3AAN�'OR Hubert E. Kubalsk ands wA NTEE ife
Mawacn R Kebalak
362 Eagit Crest Lane
Waynpvtle, NC 28785
The dtalgastloa Ortatm and Omntee as usedhereb abail6clude said parties. theirbel mlomsms. snd aasigaa, and,ball houde
alp„ tag, plursl, mawilm, fardaiaa or neuter as required by cocb=t.
Wn1VmBTH, trial do Gruttm, for a valuable eonslds ukm DAM by tbn Granw, the t+ M44 ofw" a bmnby admo%4adged, bas
and by these preumis does grm� bargain. sell and saucy unlo the i#mWa to foe Am*. all Hrat oaWn 101 or pawl of bad dUmW
w the pity of White Oak _ Townsblp, _ Harwood I Cmmty, Naar tls OUM VA
more p"cuLrty described as t Hows
See exbNt "A' attachtd hereto and made a pxd heuof by rermnco
NO TITLE EXAMINATION BY PREPARER
THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONVEYENCE IS TO CREATF A TENANCY BY THE ENT1RETl8S
The propcAy bmWjbm described was w4thi d by 13raator by mt =mW temftd in Boole Wpage 2033
A msp sho wing the above described prop" is aoeardcd in Plat Boole page
NC Bar Asspcittlon Form No 1.3 ® 1976, Revised 0119r. 2002
Printed by Agmemout with the NC Bar Auoclidioar 1981 SofWm CoMm6n, 333 G Six Forks VA, av` nk NC 27609

S1 ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF _A��6bd ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
1, , a Notary said County and State, do hereby
certify that HERBERT E KUBALAK and MAUREEN R KUBALAK personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument
WI I"NESS my hand and official seal this the 6 day of , 2011
'AE R
b
My commission expires {
NOTARY
PUBLICNotary Public
77
C,O Printed Name of Notary
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF a4 ACKNOWI 1rDGEMENT
I, Q n a Notary of said State and County, do
hereby certify that MARTY STAM2Y, personally appeared before me this day and
acknowledged that he is Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners of Haywood County, a
body politic and corporate, and that by authority duly given and as the act of the said Board, the
foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Chairman, sealed with its corporate seal and
attested by himself as its Clerk
WI ITIESS my hand and official seal this the /I*_ day of -[hog 2011
My commission expires
,``�1114,,,,♦
wrRQpV. Cc+.
Ec,�_
P4826 7565 9524 . 2-
Notary Public
",- -1--
Printed Name of Notary

A ITES7
HAYWOOD COUNTY
sy
Marty S# ey ar S Swanger, Chair
County { ger/Cleric to Board Haywood County Board of CommLssiorim,
-#462e 7563 9529. 1

[N WITNESS WHEREOF, the partiee, hereto hate executed this Agreement, all as of the day and
year first above written
Ph' � 0-9-01 1 MOW WO -R WW
"ME
(SEAL)
-04926 7563 9529 L 2-

13 Temunation Unless otherwise terminated, this Agreement shall terminate ten
(10) years from this date Licensor may terminate the license hereby given at anytime by giving
Licensee at least thirty days written notice of such termunation, except that Licensor may, at their
election, terminate the permission forthwith at any tirne if Licensee fails to comply with or abide
by each and all of the provisions hereof or keep all and singular Licensee's promises herein
Upon termination of the license by Licensor and upon request of Licensor, Licensee must
remove any and all of the Improvements from Licensor's Property Failure of Licensee to do so
within 45 days of such nonce of termination shall entitle Licensor to remove such Improvements
and recover all of its cost and expenses in doing so from Licensee
W WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, all as of the day
and year first above written
(SEAL)
Herbert E Kubalsk
Maureen R KubaiRk
r4326 1565 9529 v 3-
__ (SEAL)

Improvements are itemized on Exhibit B attached hereto Licensee shall not conslruci or install
or permit the construction or installation of any bare ter or other obstruction which would
prohibit, restrict or hinder the use of the Property by the Licensor
6 Indemnification Licensee shall indemnify Licensor and hold L ieensors harmless
from any and all liability for personal injuries, Property damage, or for loss of life or Property
resulting from, or in any way connected with, the condition or use of the Property by Licensee,
or the Licensees' invitees, customers, or guests of the Licensee, or from the use by anyone of the
Improvements or any means or ingress thereto or egress therefrom Licensor shall not be liable
to Licensee if for any reason whatever Licensee's occupation or use of the Property hereunder
shall be hindered or disturbed
7 Modification The terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Agreement
may be extended, abrogated, modified, rescinded or amended in whole or in part only with the
consent of Licensor and Licensee and only in writing
8 Applicable Law This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of
the State of North Carolina
9 Notices Any notices or other communications to be given hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be deemed to have been given if delivered in person or mailed by United States
certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the parties at the
following addresses, or to such other address as shall be given in writing by one party to the
other
As to Licensor
362 Eagle Crest Lane
Waynesville, NC 28785
As to Licensee
County Manager
215 North Main Street
Waynesville, NC 28796
10 Recording Licensor and Licensee hereby agree to record this Agreement at the
request and expense of Licensee
I 1 Waiver No waiver of any condition, covenant or restriction of this Agreement by
either party shall be deemed to imply or constitute a further waiver of the same or any other
condition or covenant of this Agreement
12 Captions The captions of the various paragraphs of this Agreement are for
convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement and do not in ally way limit or amplify the
terins and provisions of this Agreement
,V4326 7165 9529 v I

S I ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
LICENSE AGRrrMEN I
COUNTY OF HAYWOOD
t HIS L1C ENSL AGRUMEN I (the "Agreement") is made as of May 2011 by
and between Herbert E Kubalak and wife Maureen R Kubalak("Licensor"), and Haywood
County, North Carolina a body Ponta and corporate, and subdivision of the State of North
Carol i na("Licensee")
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Licensor is the owner of that certain real property and related improvements located ui
White Oak Township, Haywood County, North Carolina and more particularly described in
Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property") Licensee is
the owner of certain real property and related improvements located adjacent to Licensor's
Property in White Oak Township, Haywood County, North Carolina upon which is located what
is known is the White Oak Landfill, and adjacent future expansion and buffer areas Licensee
desires to make improvements on the property of the Licensor, including removal of sediment
from an impoundment and construction of a temporary access and haul road (the
"Improvements") Accordingly, the parties hereto desire to enter into an agreement to set forth
their respective rights and obligations regarding (i) construction of the Improvements and (ii) use
of and maintenance of the Improvements
NOW, I HEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows
1 Grant of License Licensor hereby grants to Licensee, subject to all of the terms
and conditions hereof, a license to make the Improvements upon and to have the right of ingress,
egress and regress over and upon the unimproved portion of the Property for itself, its clients,
customers, patrons, and other related invitees However, Licensee does not have the rights
granted herein to the exclusion of the rights of the Licensor to use the Properly in any matter it
wishes
2 Personal License Only It is agreed between Licensor and Licensee that this
license is personal to Licensee and shall not inure to the successors or assigns of Licensee
3 Licensee Has No Interest or Lstate Licensee agrees that it does not and shall not
claim at any time any interest or estate of any kind or extent whatsoever in the Property, by
virtue of this license or Licensee's occupancy or use hereunder and Licensor conveys no interest
in the. Property to Licensee by this Agreement
4 Maintenance of Improvements The [improvements shall be maintained by
Licensee, at its sole cost and expense Any repairs or other changes made by Licensee shall
require the prior consent of Licensor
5 Improvements All of the Improvements to be made by Licensee shall be
approved in writing by Licensor on a copy of a plan accurately showing the Improvements The
94326 1563 9529 v I-

SCOPE OF WORK
1 Stream is to be diverted around pond through 8" pipe
Pipe inlet to be formed using sand bags
2 Pond is to be pumped out at a rate not to exceed 3 feet
per day
3 Sediment is to be removed from the pond to restore original
depth Removal is by the use of trackhoe and trucks
4 After excavation, vegetation around the pond is to be restored
5 Diversion pipe is to be removed and the pond refilled

lygp %Q z e"CrL z -
C%.n �
355500

i inch = 267 034678 feet
ALPHAUVW414149
Owau_10KU8AlAK FiERMFZT E
Owmir-20KU8ALAK MAUREEN R
AlW 1D3W EAGLE CREST LN
Agtq 2C
CMu MYNESVILLE 14C 28785
L ap9R ! 1''-1 MM 294
LbouIRN_2
AdMD2d 1 ❑ 3441165
AMO 2❑
Cmic Aawllg 67
Prop Addrf3961 EAGLECREST LN
SUM DmD4wato8
Bats Prkoco
Sr60Iv m n c;
Loid ViIMA016=0
eIL�YIIiIOai/83o
KKI 'A"0236160
Diner %bkminlouvA
AMad VakuD136796
Helekf0 ArOSWWO
Yr_Rat 105
AocLNW0J95Q7
TQWmhoCV4btlM OAK
Tal�-Cad"OG01 F14
Bdp_Lbe_Ca bOD MH
Bi%L-Llq_DamOVYEWMG MANUFACTURED HOL
OonKi nCy_Ca0h7SF MH
OCa wlCy DftC0SWMEFAMILYMANUFACTUREDHOU&N
Lard_CaWD01 02 04 11
I" GocS3140YESITE.OPENLANDWOODWiOWiERFRC
M.10 TD10A17C2814149
TID�l_LAtIlW AMCILM PIW
TWWI km IC04.21
T&W 20OW70291414a
Tsebfld L4bWGAmaurt Pad
TwftW,-/M11X3W.21
PrW_Drrr~;361 EAGLECREST LN 362 EAGLECREST LN
OCUECTIXA 40
SMAPEM*6051111138 M754
SH APE MODsare 43WI
SHAPE OW231210
THIS MAP tS PREPARED FOR THE INVENTORY OF REAL PROPERTY FOUND WrnlIN THIS JUWSDICTION AND IS COMPILED FROM RECORDED DEEDS. PLATSAND OTKER PUBLIC RIECOIMAND DATA. USFn OF TMS MAP ARE HERESY NOTIFIED THAT THE
AFORLMENT0N D PUBLIC PRIMARY INWORMATION SOURCES SHOULD 8E CONSULTED FOR VERIRCATMON OF THE W-ORMAMON CONTAINED ON D t5 MAP HAYWOOC COUNTY MWME,S NO LECI&L. RE%-<*MRn C Y FOR THE INFORMATION CONTAINED
ON THI$ MAP

A*

wt.. kk' '� ! r i' i • E 7 iMu
IWO-
WN -
: •.�}� 7 . Ar y- i r r - � e ! ' �lL�'.J�•iN.'A!i:1�-� !. • . � • . .: - i�r • �„ - ! ! ' i - 1 r.
���Ji •Y
• • • -• .•
s
I�yiI�SR.k�7.s:jf�.7ti'Jl:.rt'�Ylif-aS'1I.L71�!l.tL!t�.f�.�_' ' l�.K.��tl�l!J.l!t•:�Li. � ! l! '
a�t��`f�'r l--� '�►*`;c`:'E a'�rY i -"� r-";ir.
�'�L,if}. �C ' I1 1 .rE •�� kA I'. ♦I�A'.i!€�: T}•:w
• f`�t 1 ' € '�,f,'li`"T�, t i i•-3���'�;1 ��•�E■7J�=3�r1rFl-�- Ltrw7_- /.
��t��.l�._y!.t. �A�-� F 1i��ii}+__ :11 � �i t alr ♦ 7•� s � e _ 7],l,�sr r: �,- . fr-
�
Jr ! k. !F'��JJ.I�'! �.i • . �€ 7 1�4�r1 f;}`!h�-r ! � � �J
i�s����E���.�=.� r,_nw.l�i���i�;��•E��E��f<�"•r�. e. �ii`]. € .�"r�- �-'r. �t�. �f= -A •
!L`q-5 i4AMI`�IHIS[I?L��IJ • e €/
' C•
_!
a�
/ = S71LfireL`��i-. is 1/l ;; c �: 1 1 :.1. �W,fJ •!vi a.
Page 11 of 11

F
Supplementary Information
1
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the protect involve an expenditure of public (federal{statellocal) funds or the
0Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal state) land?
lb If you answered "yes to the above does the protect require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
;?"No
(North Carolma) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c
If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter )
Comments
2
VlDlatlons (DWQ Requirement)
2a
is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes
XNo
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0204)?
YZE s
Q�
2c
1f you answered yes" to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this protect (based on past and reasonably anticipated future )mpacts) result in
❑ Yes
XNo
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no " provide a short narrative description
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from
the proposed protect or available capacity of the subject facility
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Pi otection Rules'
ePrhlo
1 b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes XNo
2c
1f this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why 440 eAIX(J6 /A-) ,
2d
If this project GOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government s jurisdiction is this rroject?/Ck�C�t�l,
��•
❑ Phase 11
3b
Which of the following locally -implemented stomiwater management proqrams
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
r

5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
b Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a Will the protect result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation9 If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form -- please
contact the State for more information
LJ Yes �' o
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
total impact
(square feel)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
_
1 5
I —
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 8 of 11

s�mna�t _ rastt.,oti ion �ncE 311'�t�ctat��n
A�oid_ance°andll nirrii a on
! d s ri a �a.,�urg,� a �roi r ini
szet ee.��a used m -cts�n �le?as ro ct
77
�
SC ea S 9 U
dpe",�o A 72,14 e
2 Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the protect require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes O No
2b If yes mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ D1NQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
protects
❑ Mitigation bank
Payment to in -lieu tee program
❑ Pennittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
_
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
49 Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form -- Version 1 3 December 10, 20D8 Vernon

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds, the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T _
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5) Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If protect will impact a protected npanan buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ❑Other
Protect is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
66
6e
6f
69
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
_impact
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
133 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments
Page 6of11

Proposed..Inventory
Impacts
1il�.��/�(R�4.�.L�h't:.'4�rf'F�Y4'47:��G�t• t[�•L.I(.!`}.7��..■(
!1 • 11
y1j y y�� y,} y _• p����/C
i�.. _{
id�(�..-3'�L:XC�"��.�SC.!,kl`JtillJf�t t t t ' [�`R R.!fi�:�ii'7F �•�•� ��� � _ .� I � t i:._ iJ: ! - ♦ - I, fl: lTil3•
• '
It
k' s•
(
M ell
.1 M., (-
Corps
■
.
Corps`
■
iO
■i
El Corps
■ ■
■ !
lip
"In; . OR, .. !.' •i41{r'".f1:it'•,� r ' u !
d t�
-
t
IJ [�alrJ!' forY..a
I Si ■'r
w
ER
■P INT■)WQ
• rps
•r
■Corps
■ ■
■
El DWQ
EJ PER
El Corps
■�•INTPER
��■
�_
Page 5 cif l l

imatnt-w;
IONIM MIN
Page 4 of 11

,�ro�ect� rafo rnatfon a,nd rtor.P��1ec�H1�
I Property Identification y
I Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel IU)
Z.P Z
i` i coord�nat Ehk pclma a rees Z at�idan
i yr p z » t
t
�.�_ r,Y.�144�i�l�tttl�Y�llaq
ONksD�� �I) I}~��s��if�t�• .,�
ac:e�kYa ers
—
o a r l& qd O C O S
�ifa _ �% �O /G ✓ 1 G�
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
V w 8� Fie e t
dacrit�l"as1
3 Project Description
i
3a a in o e e Na se e T tt is
is A
pZ7
f �77a �' t.� I % xI 7,044 ale IV, i4 1 Truer f i •� j
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
° M e e' Iri fo k e
f
s` F Fa 3 M-1
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company A4v .G`,.5.
Name (if known)
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

atio
Miff
o
0
`r �a e.�s ame
_
4.')A)CX _21
A
�;'��ru n �farm�
_oa
a itva
el
5a Name
-
5b Business name
(tf applicable)
5c Street address
5d City state zip
5e Telephone no
5f Fax no
5g Email address
Page 2 of 11

O� .use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A Applicant Information
rya
u
t
b i e
1 c Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
IJ2<es
❑ No
1d Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authonzation
le Is this notification solely for the record For the retard only for DWQ 401 MUM=i
because written approval is not required? Certification
❑ Yes ZNo
1f Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
�-TN0
19 Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties It yes answer 1h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1 h Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concem (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
mum
AW f ap*Z)
IMF
2e NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
733 Z 12,9�5t
Ely
Us M
-----------------
';y
�i
jUN - 3 2011
r re
lhtgiEFl QL,ALlTY SECTION
r plS{:V_I t E GGIpyAL OFI ICE
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form -- Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
w

i
Haywood County Solid
278 Recycle Rd
Clyde, NC 28721
1 clephone (828) 627-804:
Fax [phone]
Stephen King
Sold Waste D€reefer
May 26 2011
Roger C Edwards
NCDENR Division of Water Qudhty
2090 US I Iighway 70
Swannanod NC 28778
Re Stream Standards Violations
Mr Edwards
ldywood County respLCtfully requests an extension for the submittal of a Sed
this is a follow up letter to the county s initial response on April 27 2011 Th
rt.gards to the Sediment Removal Plan the engineer has performed the necess.
sedimentation Addittonally, the engineer met with the adjacent property owni
place from the land owner to remove sediment from his farm pond An applic"
Corps of Engineers for removal of sediment for the adjacent property owners e
removal and transportation of the sediment to the landfill site are still being ev,
U S Army Corps of CrigmEers the adjacent property owner, the Haywood Cou
Division of Water Quality An additional submittal to the NCDENR-Division (
Waste
[-�yW0-7
&af+~�'�^�4S°r"'f
�r'hr�j^�w�.M ,.n .a� :ns ,..! µ W`i1-•"
.i f
M
JEAN - 3 2011
�h
WATER QUALITY S>'rCTIOtV
�-O -P -) 06`
K�r, V 7b -,> T� t S
n
ny
Based on our investigation it appears that the main source of sediment in one o _ _ — —_.. 11
(SB I) This basin was one of the, original balms and the outlet structure has bee tiviviivaeU to atlow sediment to escape during
heavy rain events The Count) is currently evaluating repair options to the outlet structure which has been provided by our consultant
he second impdcti.d ,tream was the iesult of a timbering operation on the landfill property The County has already taken steps to
si lye this disturbed area and has diverted surface water run-off through an existing sediment sediment basin
he County would appreciate an extension of 60 days for the submittal of a Sediment Removal Plan due the extensive coordination
effort mquircd for this work If you nerd additional information in making your decision to extend please contact me at your
convenience I welcome your input since we view the resources of your office as partners in helping the County work toward
acceptable r solutions to all parties
J
Stephen Ki
Maywood County Solid Waste Director
cc Susan Wilson DWQ
Andrea Keller DWM-ARO
Marc Pruett, Haywood County Erosion Control
Marty Sil Haywood County Manager
Jeff Bishop, McGill Associates
,q

Wilson, Susan A
From Mark Shumpert ]MShumpert@haywoodnc net]
Sent Wednesday, October 19, 2011 4 38 PM
To Wilson, Susan A
Subject White Oak Landfill, Haywood County
Hi Susan,
We received 1 1" of rain today and SDO #2 released muddy water SDO's 4 & 8 did well, which
is good news, and now we need to work on the structures upstream of #2, which has been
performing fairly well up to now
Best regards,
Mark Shumpert, PE
Haywood County Engineer
1233 N Main St , Box 2
Waynesville, NC 28786
828-356-2114 (0)
828-452-6767 (F)
828-400-2362 (C)
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic mail
message and any attachments hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) sent in
response to it, may be considered public record and as such are sub3ect to request and review
by anyone at any time
1

Wilson, Susan A
From Wilson Susan A
Sent Tuesday November 01, 2011 11 33 AM
To 'Stephen King'
Subject re Landfill Owner change and NOV
Stephen —
As we discussed on the phone — if Santek is taking over operations — they should be the holder of the stormwater permit
(as I'm sure ya'll will workout in their contract) Haywood Co/Santeck will need to fill out the name/ownership change
form for the stormwater permit (NCG120047) that I sent to Mark
With regard to the Notice of Violation (NOV) submitted to Haywood Co — from DWQ's perspective — that has been
resolved except for the issue of sediment that may be instream below SD08 (and the sediment below SD04 that has
gone to the neighbors pond) The other aspects of the NOV have been resolved (I was hoping I clarified that in the
10/21/2011 Inspection letter)
As soon as Santeck takes over operations — I would think that you guys would want them holding the DWQ stormwater
permit However from DWQ's perspective — Haywood County is responsible for the prior sediment impacts sited in the
NOV If, after Santeck takes over, there are problems at the landfill and additional sediment loss downstream of the
basins — DWQ will site the stormwater permit holder, if necessary
I hope this clarifies things a bit Please give me a call if it doesn't
Susan
Susan A Wilson - Susan A Wilson@ncdenr gov
North Carolina Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection
2090 U S 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Notice E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties

wdop C (�C—
Wilson, Susan A
From Mark Shumpert [MS hum pert@ haywoodnc net]
Sent Wednesday November 23, 2011 1 55 PM
To Wilson, Susan A
Subject Haywood Co landfill
Hi Susan,
Did you order all this rain? well, this rain has strained us at the White Oak Landfill and
we have released some muddy water We have received over an inch of rain the last 72 hours
and SDO's 2 & 8 have released some muddy water I believe the root cause of our problem in
these two locations is the need for more stone on the roads that drain to these outfalls
Santek Environmental has said that road maintenance will be one of their priorities when they
take over operations next Thursday SDO #4 is still performing well and did not release any
water to the stream that feeds Mr Kubalak's pond As soon as we dry out, I will see what we
can do to improve performance of SDO's 2 & 8, which for now will most likely be increasing
capacity by digging out captured mud
Happy Thanksgiving'
Mark Shumpert, PE
Haywood County Engineer
1233 N Main St , Box 2
Waynesville, NC 28786
828-356-2114 (0)
828-452-6767 (F)
828-400-2362 (C)
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic mail
message and any attachments hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) sent in
response to it, may be considered public record and as such are subject to request and review
by anyone at any time

Wilson, Susan A
From Wilson, Susan A
Sent Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11 15 AM
To 'Stephen King'
Subject Adjacent landowner issue (Haywood Co Landfall)
Stephen —
As we discussed on the phone, it is DWQ's understanding that the landowner (Mr Kubalak, downstream of basin SDO-4
that had incurred sediment deposition to his pond, may be working out a different agreement with the County
The County's main responsibility to DWQ is
1) Provide assurance that both parties are in agreement with the final plan of action
2) Make sure that basin SDO-4 is stable and not losing additional sediment
3) Make sure that the stream below SDO-4 is free of sediment to insure minimal future impacts to Mr Kubalak's
pond/land
If Mr Kubalak leaves the sediment in his pond (and both parties are in agreement), DWQ will not pursue cleanup of the
arm of his pond or within his pond (with him or the County) Since both parties will enter into an agreement — this is not
something that DWQ would want to pursue further
If Mr Kubalak nooses to clean out the sediment in his pond — DWQ can provide him guidance for this Any sediment
removed should be stabilized to ensure sediment is not deposited into surface waters and/or wetlands No sediment
from his pond should be allowed to migrate and impact downstream waters (this should be prevented if Mr Kubalak
chooses to remediate his pond himself)
Let me know if you'd like anything further from us
Susan
Susan A Wilson - Susan A Wilson@ncdenr gov
North Carolina Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection
2090 US 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Notice E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties

Cc
I�
4
--
1 r
D� g��s c �:Ztk�
S�fl Zs 76 qA .r )r sGr(_ e ►I
E 3-3
1
In .2�Gc.c '-'<R-
_ �QN ti v/Lt
r
�II

CJ�-� _t-.�•1 Ty - iJsP �G o n�
�F3 � 4
}
Pl,� Ph JJ 4! 1 R . P ! Af V r t-] rimer f- [
C
1 1 i
ZO
«, 5_ fin-`�-
I
, r

E'� J
l
l�
r

Wilson, Susan A
From Wilson, Susan A
Sent Wednesday January 18 2012 10 50 AM
To Jpreston@santekenviro com'
Subject Stormwater requirements for Haywood Co Landfill
John -
This is just a follow-up e-mail based on my site visa 1/10/11 As we discussed —via Stormwater permit NCG120047 —
qualitative monitoring at each outfall is to be conducted 1/week and after every 0 5 inch rainfall event DWQ had
worked diligently with the county to get them back on track with this requirement in the past year They had developed
a very good spreadsheet to document all rain events and when they did their qualitative monitoring I would
recommend that Santek continue to use what they had developed At the time of inspection —you were not aware of
this requirement
Another requirement is analytical monitoring on each outfall semi-annually (please refer to the permit regarding what
needs to be monitored)
As we discussed — NC works a bit differently than most states — in that Erosion Control Plan approval is conducted by our
Division of Land Resources — so if you modify your disturbance — you should contact Laura Herbert or Charles Koontz at
[phone] to determine if you need approval for any modifications If any more Stormwater outfalls are created
through any modifications— stormwater monitoring would be required and the monitoring/site plan would need to be
updated
Stormwater requirements are regulated by the Division of Water Quality Please read over the Stormwater permit and
its requirements Again, I believe the County setup "good bones" for complying with the permit —you folks just need to
continue that Possibly, in the next year after we've seen a few more analytical monitoring results, you maybe able to
apply for representative outfall status on some of the outfalls
If you have any questions along the way — feel free to call me I'll print this note out for the files
Thanks,
Susan
�Q
Susan A Wilson - Susan A WilsonPncdenr gov
North Carolina Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection
2090 US 70 Highway
Swannanoa, INC 28778
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Notice E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties

Wilson, Susan A
From Wilson, Susan A
Sent Wednesday ,January 18, 2012 10 33 AM
To 'Stephen King'
Subject Follow up to inspection at Landfill
Stephen —
This is just a follow-up e-mail to the site inspection I conducted on January 10"
For the recycle center —just make sure (which I know you do more frequently) — you conduct and document your facility
inspections 2/yr (it would be a good idea to have a facility inspection "blank" to document it within your SWPPP
notebook) Also note employee training (and when it was conducted) within your SWPPP notebook
For the landfill — if the County conducted the analytical sampling — please forward a copy of that to me, care of this
office This was supposed to have been completed between July 1st and December 31" 1 had spoken with Mark about it
-- but since Santek took over — I wasn't sure if you guys were doing that or they were The landfill had exceeded some of
the bench marks last go -round and I want to see how they came out this time around The qualitative monitoring and
documentation was well done — and Santek should continue this effort
Also — we inspected downstream of SDO8 — there were some pockets of sediment between the outfall and the fence line
that should be removed There was also an accumulation of sediment and debris at the fence line which should be
manually removed The accumulated sediment and debris is causing the two tributaries to find another pathway (and
undermine the fence) Let me know how/when you plan to do that (via e-mail is fine)
We also inspected downstream of SDO4 (above Kubalak's pond) It appeared that any sediment in the tributary had
likely migrated down to the pond (substrate/rock material was noted in the tributary, which is good) 1 did not believe it
was necessary to remove the minor amount of sediment at that tributary
In order to close out NOV-2011-PC-0235 — if you folks would manually remove sediment and debris below 5DO4, we can
likely close out the NOV
Let me know if you want something more formal from me (I'm trying to keep it pretty Simple for everyone) I plan to
print out this e-mail for our files as documentation of what you guys need to finish
Thanks,
Susan
Susan A Wilson - Susan A Wilson@)ncdenr gov_
North Carolina Dept of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection
2090 US 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Notice E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
therefore may be disclosed to third parties

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT 01- ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG120000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No NCG120047
STORMWATER
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143 215 1 other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended
Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Haywood Co White Oak Sanitary
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Waynesville
Haywood County
to receiving waters designated as PIGEON RIVER (Waterville Lake below elevation 2258) a
class C waterbody in the French Broad River Bann in accordance with the effluent limitations
monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in Parts 1 11 111 and IV of General
Permit No NCG120000 as attached
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4 2012
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit
Signed this 4t' day of December 2012
"�_
for Charles Wakild P E , Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

William Dillard
December 4, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Some of the changes include
• Part II
• Section A The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) section if applicable has been updated
to the most current language of our permits Additional conditions for specific industry sectors have
been added to the 5PPP requirements in some cases
• Sections B, C Failure to perform analytical stormwater monitoring may result in the Division requiring
that the permittee begin a monthly sampling scheme
• Sections B, C A lower TSS benchmark of 50 mg/I for HQW, ORW, PNA and Tr Waters applies to these
more sensitive waters
• Sections B, C The monitoring parameter Oil & Grease (O&G) has been replaced by the parameter
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) for vehicle maintenance areas and in some cases, other
analytical monitoring requirements
• Sections 6 C D Inability to sample due to adverse weather must be recorded in the SPPP or in
separate on site records if your General permit does not require an SPPP Adverse weather is defined
in the "Definitions" section of the permit
• Sections B, C The term "Representative Storm Event" has been replaced by 'Measurable Storm
Event " A measurable storm event is defined in the permit
• Section D If the permittee fails to respond effectively to problems identified by qualitative
monitoring, DWQ may require the permittee to perform corrective action
Please review Parts III and IV to understand the Standard Conditions of your new NPDES General Permit,
including Compliance and Liability Reporting Monitoring and Records requirements Operation and
Maintenance obligations and Definitions Please note that all samples analyzed in accordance with the terms
of this permit must be submitted to the Division on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms available on
the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website above DMR forms must be delivered to the Division no later than
30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory Also note that existing
permittees do not need to submit a renewal request prior to expiration unless directed by the Division
Your coverage under the General Permit is transferable only through the specific action of DWQ This permit
does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DEN nor does it
relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal state, or local law,
rule, standard ordinance, order judgment or decree If you have any questions regarding this permit
package please contact the Division's Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone]
Sincerely
b/' UJ
for Charles Wakild P E
cc DWQ Central Files
Stormwater Permsmng Unit Files
Asheville Regional Office

41"w"A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Charles Wakild, P E
Director
William Dillard
Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
650 25th St Nw Ste 100
Cleveland, TN 37311
Dear Permittee
December 4, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Haywood Co White Oak Sanitary
COC Number NCG120047
Haywood County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under stormwater General Permit NCG120000
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued General Permit This permit is
reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143 215 1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U S Environmental Protection Agency dated October
15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended)
The following information is included with your permit package
• A new Certificate of Coverage (COC)
• A copy of General Permit NCG120000
• A copy of the Technical Bulletin for the General Permit
• Two copies of the Discharge Monitoring Report tDMRj Form
• Two copies of the Qualitative Monitoring Report Form
The General Permit authorizes discharges of stormwater and it specifies your obligations for discharge
controls management monitoring and record keeping Please review the new permit to familiarize yourself
with all the changes in the reissued permit Your facility has six (6) months from the time of receipt of the
permit to update your current SPPP to reflect all new permit requirements
The first sample period of your permit begins January 1, 2013 Your facility must sample a measureable
storm event" beginning during the periods beginning January 1 and July 1 of every year (or, if applicable
report "No Flow " as outlined in Part III, Section E) Also please note that Tier 3 Actions rn Part 11 of your
permit are triggered by benchmark exceedances on four occasions beginning on the effective date of this
permit and do not count prior exceedances
The more significant changes in the General Permit since your last COC was issued are noted either in the
Draft Permit Fact Sheet that accompanied the public notice (http //aortal ncdenr ore/web/wgjws su current
notices), or in the Response to Comments / Summary of Changes and Technical Bulletin documents that are
posted on the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website with the new General Permit Please visit
http //po tal ncdenr ors/web/wq/ws/su/nodessw (click on 'General Permits tab) to review that information
for your specific General Permit carefully
1617 Mail Service center Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1617
Location 512 N Salisbury St Raleigh North Carolina 27604
Phone 91M07.6300 k FAX 91M07 6492
Internet www new to rrr�uality ara
An Equal Opponumty i Anumabve Acton Employer
NorthCarohna
Naturally

w A -
Haywood County Solid Wa
278 Recycle Rd
Clyde, NC 28721
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Stephen King
Solid Waste Director
N C Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Attn Ms Susan Wilson
Division of Water Quality
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Dear Ms Wilson
set E C E � V E.
MAY - 2 2011
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ASh-VILLr- RF'.IC)\IAL OFr=ICE
RE NOV-201 1 -PC-0235
White Oak Landfill
April 28, 2011
This letter is in response to the Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement, dated
April 11, 2011, and received by Haywood County Solid Waste shortly thereafter I will respond
to each item of the letter and describe what the County is doing, or plans to do, to address the
violation
Permit Condition Violations
r
1 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
According to a 'General Permit Text Error Note' in the County's NPDES Stormwater
Permit Coverage Renewal letter dated November 1, 2007, "An SPPP is not a required �c
element of General Permit NCG120000 ° The County respectfully requests that this
violation be removed since a SPPP is not required for the landfill per its General Permit
that covers the period 11I2007 to 10/2012 A draft site plan showing eight Stormwater
Discharge Outfalls and fuel containment areas has been developed and submitted to 1
your office for review and comment
2 Qualitative Mondonng
Qualrtative monitoring has taken place intermittently for the last several years and is now
being performed consistently in accordance with permit requirements, and has been
since the fall of 2010 We believe some records from before 2010 were lost by former
employees of the Solid Waste Department Standing operating procedures for this
monttoring have existed since January of 2008 and the current landfill manager will
ensure continued compliance
Wdh regard to recording uncontrolled releases of mud or muddy water or visible
sedimentation found off site, we will begin immediately to keep a log of such instances
3 Analytical Mondonng
Analytical monitoring is now being conducted and recorded in accordance with permit
requirements Standing operating procedures for this monitoring have existed since
January of 2008 and the current landfill manager will ensure conttnued compliance A
Tier One response has been generated for SDO #8 (formerly Pigeon SDO) based on the
10/2010 analytical monitoring report

NOV Response, Page 2 of 2
4 Approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan
We have approved Sediment & Erosion Control Plans for Phase 1 (inactive), Phase 2
(active), and Phases 3 & 4 (future) This violation is based on the current landfill
configuration", which we assume refers on -going efforts (e g sediment traps, slope
drains, and stilling basins) to control erosion and sedimentation that may not be shown
on existing plans In response, the landfill manager and County Erosion Control Director
met with Chip Koontz at the DENR Land Quality office on April 25, 2011 Based on this
meeting, the County will, as soon as possible, provide Mr Koontz with a drawing
showing existing effective and ineffective measures, as well as, a narrative regarding the
current state of erosion control at the landfill
5 Twenty four Hour Reporting
The County will immediately implement this reporting requirement for "any
noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment" The County requests
some clanfication regarding the difference in offsite sedimentation reporting thresholds
for Part II, Section C and Part III, Section E 8
Stream Standard Violations
Sediment has been deposited in two tributaries to the Pigeon River, one on the west side of the
landfill and the other on the north side The west side deposition is primarily in a pond
belonging to a property owner adjacent to the landfill The removal of sediment from this pond
and the stream channel upstream of the pond will be done in the next couple of months once
engineered plans and legal agreements are approved by all parties Several erosion control
projects have recently been completed on the west side of the landfill property, including gravel
on roads, hydroseeding, and sediment basin repairs These improvements have already proven
successful in eliminating further sediment impacts to the western tributary
Sediment removal in the north tributary is going to be difficult at best due to terrain, grade, and
access issues The County respectfully requests an extension for this sediment removal project
due to on -going repairs to the sediment basin (SDO #8) that is responsible for the sediment
loss We would like to complete repairs to this basin before commencing with stream channel
restoration efforts so that the work does not have to be done twice We are getting quotes to
have a contractor come in and expedite the repairs and hope to have those complete by the
middle of May At that time, we will revisit the sediment removal plan and work with DWQ to put
something together We appreciate your patience and understanding in this matter as the
County is eager to get into compliance with all stream standards
Best regards
r - ! a- )4-���
Mark Shumpert, PE
Haywood County Engineer/Landfill Manager
cc Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste
Marc Pruett, Haywood County Erosion Control

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Haywood Co
Inspection Date 03/08/2011 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Reason for Visit Routine
Comment The site plan and SWPPP should be updated and include all stormwater
outfalls at the site Haywood County should contact the Division of Land Resources
and ensure that they have an updated, approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan
It was very confusing at the time of inspection regarding what/where all the designated
stormwater outfalls are Many basins are completed and DWQ would consider these
outfalls to be designated stormwater outfalls (that require qualitative and analytical
monitoring)
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑000
❑❑❑e
Page 4

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Haywood Co
Inspection Date 03/08/2011 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plait
Yes
No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Narrative Description of Practices ?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the fatality provide and document Employee Training?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Comment Haywood County Is in the process of completing a plan (essentially started
as of 9/2010) An SOP has been developed -which should be incorporated and
followed as part of the Plan (in addition to the other required components of the plan)
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Comment Qualitative monitoring started as of 9/2010 The County seems to be
missing data prior to 9/2010 There is some data from 2008
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
Comment Analytical monitoring was conducted 10/2010 Prior data is missing or had
not been completed Some of that data exceeded the benchmarks (TSS and Fecal -
from Pigeon SRO) The County should conduct the required analytical monitoring
semi-annually for all stormwater discharge outfalls Since the benchmarks have been
exceeded - Tier 1 response is required now (See Part II, Section B of the permit)
Subsequent sampling shall be reviewed in terms of an updated site plan
Vehicle maintenance is conducted inside a covered building w/no floor drains
Analytical monitoring for vehicle maintenance activities is not required
Page 3

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Haywood Co
Inspection Date 03/08/2011 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Inspection Summary
Susan Wilson (DWQ) and Andrea Keller (DWM) met with Stephen King Marc Pruett, and Mark Shumpert of Haywood
County at the Solid Waste Facility (White Oak Landfill)
Mr Shumpert and Mr Pruett gave a site tour of the area The site has been modified from previous Sediment and
Erosion Control approval plans (that Division of Land Resources have an older plan) Haywood County should contact
ARO — Division of Land Resources as soon as possible and submit a revised plan for approval ARO-DLR will be copied
on this inspection report and the DWQ will request that DLR staff conduct an on -site inspection at the landfill
As stated in the inspection report — the site was very confusing due to lack of an approved plan and lack of a stormwater
site plan New basins in which stormwater runoff is routed are considered stormwater outfalls and subject to qualitative
and analytical monitoring An updated Stormwater Management Plan is crucial to DWQ's and the County's understanding
of the site and stormwater monitoring and management requirements
It was noted that below the older basin (that is currently being worked on/corrected), sediment has deposited (UT to
Pigeon River) An off -site pond has also been affected in another area (and Haywood County is working with the
adjacent landowner to clean out the tnbutary and pond)
A Notice of Violation will be sent to the County regarding missing elements and requirements of the permit as well as
off -site sediment deposition
Page 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit NCG120047 Effective 11/01/07 Expiration 10/31/12 Owner Haywood Co
SOC Effective Expiration Facility Haywood Co -White Oak Sanitary
County Haywood 3898 Fines Creek Rd
Region Asheville
Waynesville NC 28786
Contact Person Stephen King Title Phone [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC Certification Phone
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Represontative(s)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 03/08/2011 Entry Time 01 30 PM
Primary Inspector Susan A Wilson
Secondary Inspector(s)
Reason for Inspection Routine
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas
M Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time 05 30 PM
Phone [phone]
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Page 1

ATLA.
WDENR �
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Charles Waklld, P E
Pat McCrory Director John E Uvarla, III
Governor Secretary
January 14, 2013
Mr Stephen King, Director
Solid Waste Management — Haywood County
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, NC 28721
Subject Incident Closure
Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
NOV-201 I-PC-0235
Haywood County
Dear Mr King
The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) conducted a follow-up inspection at the White Oak Landfill
on December 12, 2012 (a copy of which was sent to you as well) During that inspection, the
tributary below SDO-8 was inspected to assess the results of the prior sediment removal
The issues regarding this tributary have been satisfactorily resolved The written response from
April 28, 2011, the subsequent stabilization efforts at the landfill, the qualitative and analytical
monitonng conducted at the outfalls, and the sediment removal from the unnamed tributary to the
Pigeon River below SDO-8 have resolved all the outstanding issues related to NOV-201 I-PC-0235
It is the DWQ's understanding that Haywood County is working with the landowner, Mr Kubalak,
downstream of SDO-4 to resolve issues related to sediment in his pond The DWQ has not and will
not intervene in that effort unless requested [the stream above his pond appeared free of sediment
impacts during previous follow-up inspections]
This letter in no way precludes this office for taking action on this or any other future violation
Violations are subject to civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000 00 per day for eacli
violation
The DWQ appreciates the efforts of Haywood County, followed up by Santek, to comply with the
requirements of the stormwater permit and resolve the NOV
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION SECTION—ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Location 2090 U S Highway 70 Swannanoa North Carolina 28778
Phone [phone] FAX [phone]
Inteff et www ncwaterquality org
An Equal Opporunity ` Affirmative ACtion Employer
NorthCarohna
Naturally

Mr King
White Oak LF
Page 2 of 2
Should you have any further questions or concerns, please contact Susan Wilson at [phone]
or Susan a xtilson riicdeni Vigo-,
Sincerely,
r
Susan A Wilson, Environmental Engineer
Surface Water Protection Section
r
cc Karen Higgins-- WBSCP Unit
Mr Marty Stamey, Haywood County Manager
ARO File Copy
S LSWPkHaywood\Sto mwateANCG l2 Landfills\Haywood Co landfilllWhge Oak LF NOV 2011 PC 0235 Closure 1 2013 dm

LF- I L E C C- Y
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
April 11, 2011
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED — 7010 1870 0003 0874 6369
Mr Stephen King, Director
Haywood County - Recycling and Solid Waste Management
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, NC 28721
SUBJECT Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement
NOV-2011-PC-0235
Haywood County — Solid Waste — White Oak Landfill
NPDES General Stormwater Permit — NCG 120047
Haywood County
Response Deadline April 29, 2011
Dear Mr King
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
March 8, 2011 Susan Wilson, Division of Water Quality (DWQ) and Andrea Keller, Division of
Waste Management (DWM) met with Marc Pruett, Mark Shumpert, and you at the Haywood
County -- White Oak Landfill off Fines Creek Road in Haywood County The facility was found
to be in violation of permit NCG120047
The following violations were noted during the Division of Water Quality inspection
I Permit Condition Violations
I Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
➢ A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) has not been developed and properly
implemented The plan should be completed and in place by May 31, 2011 A site
plan map with all stormwater discharge outfalls should be included, as required, with
the SPPP A copy of the updated site plan should be submitted to the DWQ - ARO
2 Qualitative Monitoring
➢ Qualitative monitoring has not been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit
requirements
Location 2090 US Hghway 70 Swannanoa North Carolina 28778
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Customer Service 1.877.623 6748
Intemet www ncwaterqualdy org
EOM Equa! Opportunity 1 Affirmative Aclion Employer
Nne
orthCarolina
Naturally

Mr King
Apnl11,2011
Page 2 of
➢ Also included in this Section of the permit (Part II, Section C) is the requirement to
record and explain uncontrolled releases of sediment offstte This was not recorded as
required
3 Analytical Monitoring
➢ Analytical monitoring has not been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit
requirements
4 Approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan
➢ There was no approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan (through the Division of
Land Resources) based on the current landfill configuration
5 Cwenty Four Hour Reporting
➢ Notification was not made to the DWQ within 24 hours and no 5 day report was
submitted regarding sediment loss to the tributaries This is required by Part III,
Section E S
II Stream Standard Violations
As stated previously, sediment has been deposited in two tributaries to the Pigeon River, a
Class C stream in the French Broad River Basin Deposition of sediment is a Water Quality
Stream Standard violation — Other Waste (in -stream sediment), 15A NCAC 2B 0211 (3) f
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference
In order to rectify the instream sediment deposition, the following will be required
Please submit a Sediment Removal Plan (Plan) to this office for review and
approval The Plan must address removal of accumulated sediment from all surface
waters You must secure an environmental consultant experienced in stream
restoration to assist you with developing your Plan, and obtaining any necessary
approvals It is recommended that your consultant contact Ms Wilson of the
Asheville Regional Office for additional guidance during Plan development The
Plan should include
• A narrative explaining how sediment will be removed, including, techniques,
manpower and tools to be used
• A proposed schedule with dates that indicate when you expect to begin and
complete the removal of sediment
• A diagram of the stream channel, referenced with photo documentation of
sediment impacts before and after removal
• A narrative explaining how and where the removed sediment will be disposed
and stabilized

Mr King
Apttl 11 2011
Pagl 3 of 3
• Please explain how turbidity standards will not be exceeded
b Once the work is complete, a final report documenting the results of the sediment
removal activities should be submitted to Ms Wilson
The DWQ understands that Haywood County is working with an adjacent landowner to remove
sediment from an unnamed tributary to the Pigeon River and the owner's pond Briefly document
this as part of the Sediment Removal Plan (in addition to noting the other tributary, below the older
sediment basin, which has sediment deposition)
Please explain why these problems occurred and when Haywood County anticipates being in full
compliance with the stormwater permit The Division understands that Haywood County is now
making progress towards overall compliance
Thank you for your attention to this matter This Office is considering sending a recommendation
for enforcement to the Director of the Division of Water Quality regarding these issues and any
future/continued violations that may be encountered Your above -mentioned response to this
correspondence will be considered in this process This office requires that the violations, as
detailed above, be abated immediately These violations and any future violations are
subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000 00 per day for each violation Should
you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact Susan A Wilson at (828) 296-
4665 or susan a wilson a,ncdenr vzov
Sincerely,
Roger C Edwards, Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Asheville Regional Office
Enclosure Inspection Report
cc ARO File Copy (w/enclosure)
Andrea Keller, DWM-ARO (w/enclosure)
Janet Boyer, DLR — ARO (w/enclosure)
Marc Pruett, Haywood County Erosion Control
Marty Stamey, Haywood County Manager
1 yler Crumbley, USACE
S 1SWP%11aywood\StormwaterlNCG12 LandrrkislHaywood Co landfi111CF1 NOV 2011 PC 0235 Landfill 4 2011 doc

Postal
�-mQERTIFIED
MAIL,,., RECEIPT
°-
qwxrrfesfic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage
Pro�ided)
0 ICIAL
US
a
co
Postage
$
r�
Certified Feel
; '
'v'9,y
C3
i Q
Return Recei pt Feg
(Endorsement Roqulred)
fir. �4
�Postmirk
, }
9
M
Restricted Delivery Fee
{Endorsement Ruqulred)
n N
�13
Total Postage & Fees
$
r
��
t::] ',
Stephen King, Director
,L
�,✓
-q
Haywood County
4
r-
,'' Recycling and Solid Waste Management 4 �
`
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, NC 28721
___-._.._...

SENDER:. DELIVENY
■ Complete Items 1 2 and 3 Also complete A. Signature
r 4 If Restricted Delivery Is desired X _ _ ❑ Agent
■ Wour name and address on the reverse T J i—� ❑ Addressee
9 1 P1, inted Name)' �-C t of Delivery
North andCarolina
Nat Department of
Environment and Natural Resources t t
Division of Water Qualrtyssdifterentfrom i enx7 ❑ yes'
NCDENR Surface Water Protection Sectionflvery address below ❑ No i
2090 U S Highway 70 Swanil anoa NC 28778 �A' --- ' r
tf ti
p
Stephen King, Director Y
Haywood County n M
Recycling and Solid Waste Management 3 service � '
278 Recycle Road - CertitMill❑ Express MaIIClyde, NC 28721 egiRetum Receipt ndise
❑ InsuO D114111lll1rlllrllrll11111111InI 4 Restrict[ff FQ ❑ Y
7010 1870 0003 0874 6369
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M 1540,

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Ir1-tbTass MpII
�Sisdgeees`Fa�
MPermrt-
NQ_
• Sender Please print your name, address, and 2tP+4 it Ais lb x +L
SUSAN WILSON' t
NCDENR DWQ SWP
2090 US HIGHWAY 70
1 SWANNANOA NC 28778
=� � �ii�IIIIEIi+lki�11111111111E[II!!}IliffllllkiilflFli�lFii]llfi
/A

vo "r' 3� t ` uf i,r ti r 17 �11C $�i�7?7tv)T-
k
a _
r
VF
r�
U ��47 - Y ! 5-"Y-' F` `'t ,j y_/r�-
-yr�,c� 7JL� �/r►h s r''''Z� '�J7/-�� � C—� �"'' � � S-�Yi7' S�4vM'�-��
J w
F:zr ""/ r7-; / . - - rV
t
1

W E_LA c 129
E� 1
Y_� _lhknoz __ 45 .his_ l
`� �� r h;
M� �j�i��i-"'1
ti
{
l
�r
r
�1
r i

/A - -
Ir
goo
C�
II
I�
--�/
CJatLY
I}
I�
41

I '
�kczv �
tN
r?
s
Yj 1 Y Nn<N , rrd � ,�a�+�d'2 �l (��4 V
r
a
,�♦ v L

+ � t
lU
u�y
oojj by p `� ( N G ' L.(N �r
�I i.... GAT �iG►�� N �� ��Z� �
Y f
l
}
y
0
V �
J

Permit NCG120047
SOC
County Haywood
Region Asheville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective 11/01/12 Expiration 10/31/17 Owner Santek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Effective Expiration Facility Haywood Co White Oak Sanitary
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Contact Person Stephen King
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Representative(s)
Related Permits
Waynesville NC 28786
Title Phone [phone]
Inspection Date 12/1112012 EntryTime 10 00 AM
Primary Inspector Susan A Wilson
Secondary Inspector(s)
Reason for Inspection Routine
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas
0 Storm Water
Certification Phone
Exit Time 10 30 AM
Phone [phone]
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
(See attachment summary)
oq- �� tj��a �► �� N
Page 1

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility San tek Environmental of North Carolina LLC
Inspection Date 121l l/2012 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit
Routine
Inspection Summary
Qualitative Monitoring LW �' 1`�'� /Za
Yes No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted Its Qualitative Monitoring semi annually?
n n
n
n
Comment IVKA-
I
Analytical Monitoring C�1� ,b�p�fi;}y�t,Ncr �,�rp,2. .(a��/t2�)
f (
Yes No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
n n
n
n
# Has the facility conducted Its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
n n
n
n
Comment
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
n n
n
o
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
n n
n
n
# If the facility has representative outfall status is it properly documented by the Division?
n n
n
n
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
n n
In
n
Comment rhj � 1-K& H"S �h-�
3 PLO
>5CH)
ors,- '.1-
570 �- (2,
r
k Z/jO /(2 Page 2
t

AAv
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Colleen H Sullins
Governor Director
October 21, 2011
Mr Stephen King, Director
Haywood County - Recycling and Solid Waste Management
278 Recycle Rd
Clyde, NC 28721
r��
� Y
Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
SUBJECT NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection -Follow-up
(Ref NOV-2011-PC-0235)
Haywood County -White Oak Landfill
NPDES General Stormwater Permit No NCG120047
Haywood County
Dear Mr King
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
October l 1, 2011 The Division of Water Quality (DWQ) appreciates the efforts performed by
Haywood County to achieve overall compliance at the site
Enclosed is d copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference
Due to the potential privatization of the landfill, DWQ does not believe elimination (or
representative outfall status) of outfall monitoring should be granted at this time However, this
may be considered in the future
DWQ will conduct another inspection later this year to determine if sediment removal is necessary
below SDO8 Because this could not be determined on the day of inspection, DWQ will not close
out the Notice of Violation (NOV) with this follow-up inspection However, other issues brought
up in the NOV dated April 11, 2011 have been satisfactorily resolved
Please contact me at [phone] or Susan A Wilson@ncdenr gov, if I can be of any further
assistance
Sinc ly, Gc-�
usan A Wilson Environmental Engineer
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc Central Files
Asheville Files -
ARO/DWQ; Andrea Kellar (e-copy)
S 1SWPli IaywoodlStormwaterlNCG 12 1 andfillMaywood Co Iandfi1110E1 NCO120047 1 ollow up 102011 doe
Location 2090 U 5 Highway 70 Swannanoa North Carolina 28778 olle
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Customer Service 1 877.623 5748 NorthCaroltna
Internet www ncwaterquality org Naturally
An Equal Opportunely l Affirmative Action Employe

12!
Permit NCG120047
SOC
County Haywood
Region Asheville
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective 11/01/07 Expiration 10/31/12 Owner Haywood Co
Effective Expiration Facility Haywood Co White Oak Sanitary
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Contact Person Stephen King
Directions to Facility
System Classifications
Primary ORC
Secondary ORC(s)
On Site Representative(s)
Related Permits
Inspection Date 10/1112011
Primary Inspector Susan A Wilson
Secondary Inspector(s)
Waynesville NC 28786
Title Phone [phone]
Certification Phone
Entry Time 10 40 AM
Beason for Inspection Follow up
Permit Inspection Type Landfill Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas
. Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Exit Time 01 10 PM
Phone [phone]
Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation
Page 1

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Haywood Co
Inspection Date 10111l2011 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Follow up
Inspection Summary
Susan Wilson (DWQ) and Andrea Keller (DWM) met with Stephen King Marc Pruett, and Mark Shumpert of Haywood
County at the Solid Waste Facility (White Oak Landfill) on October 11 2011 This visit was a follow-up inspection from
the Inspection conducted March 8, 2011
All stormwater discharge outfalls (SDOs) have now been identified (for a total of 8) The County has performed much
work on the site to bring it Into compliance The basin for SDO8 is much more stable (with grass/gravel) than it was
during the Inspection conducted in March The basin for SD04 Is also more stable and the prior problems seem to have
been corrected
Haywood County maintains a spreadsheet for qualitative monitoring (which is well kept) and notes Analytical monitoring
was conducted on most outfalls in May 2011 (some outfalls do not discharge regularly — and usually only in response to
heavy rainfall events -- so sampling is difficult) Benchmark values were exceeded in some instances and the County
performed the required Tier 1 response
Due to the vegetation below SD08, the UT to Pigeon River could not be inspected for prior sediment impacts to
determine If removal is necessary A follow-up visit (by DWQ) will be conducted in the winter after vegetation die -off
The County has applied for a 404 permit to dredge the pond below S004 which has sediment Impacts As stated
previously the site above the pond is much more stable at this point
DWQ and the County discussed representative outfall status and/or removal of some identified outfalls However, at this
time (and since the landfill may be privatized), DWQ would prefer that monitoring be maintained for another year to
ensure a smooth transition etc
Page 2

Permit NCG120047 Owner Facility Haywood Co
Inspection Date 10/11/2011 Inspection Type Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Follow up
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually'? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment Qualitative monitoring Is required weekly and after 1/2 Inch rainfall event
(which the facility is doing)
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA Nt:
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment Analytical monitoring has been conducted if bench marks were exceeded
- they were noted and followed up with Tier 1 response
Several outfalls do not discharge except during very heavy rain events so sampling
seems to be difficult
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA ME
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status is It properly documented by the Division? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Page 3

i
7
s
I

k]
3 01 0000 W 083 00 30 00 W 083 00 00 00 W 082 59 30 00 W 082 59 00 00 W
f
%)
�O
[
JJ
e
r /
z
f) j[
O
z
z
c��
r
CD
CD—
y
r
LO
,6C
ell
p
CD—
f
nn
�E
f
CD—
CD
v
rn
o
' ••
o ' `
Kubala Pond
+ ice. �"
E �fi ' `^
�4
n
CD —
Shop rea
Z
M
LO
h�
« y]'
Z
C.3
Z
CD
co
V,
5
`
Cm
LO
p
3 01 0000 W 083 00 30 00 W 083 00 0000 W 082 59 30 00 W 082 59 0000 W
SCALE 1 24000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 700
FEET

Wilson, Susan A
From Mark Shumpert [MShumpert@haywoodnc net]
Sent Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2 49 PM
To Wilson, Susan A
Subject Haywood Co Landfill
Hi Susan,
We received 2 5" of rain yesterday and for the most part the landfill held up really well
The basins are working better, but I need to fix a leak in the riser barrel of SDO-4 because
a small amount of muddy water was released despite the skimmer being in the dry At SDO-8,
our repair appears to be working well but the stone filter around the outlet structure did
let some slightly muddy water get to the outlet pipe Once we dry out, we will fix the leak
and add some stone to SDO-8
Best regards,
Mark Shumpert, PE
Haywood County Engineer
1233 N Main St , Box 2
Waynesville, NC 28786
828-356-2114 (0)
828-452-6767 (F)
828-400-2362 (C)
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic mail
message and any attachments hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) sent in
response to it, may be considered public record and as such are subject to request and review
by anyone at any time
1

Wilson, Susan A
From Mark Shumpert [MShumpert@haywoodnc net]
Sent Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8 51 AM
To Wilson, Susan A
Subject RE Haywood County Landfill Reporting
Hi Susan,
Well, we had a month of more reasonable weather, but this week we received 2 3" of rain in
two days and despite much work done to it, SDO#4 has released muddy water We have made
tremendous strides in the last month to improve our erosion and sedimentation control
measures and I hope you will be able to come out sometime so that I can show you our
progress I am going to evaluate SDO#4 and try making additional improvements until it works
the way it should
Best regards,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
FromWilson, Susan A [mailto susan a wilson(@ncdenr gov1
Sent Friday, Dune 24, 2011 9 04 AM
To Mark Shumpert
Cc Stephen King
Subject RE Haywood County Landfill Reporting
Thanks for letting me know, Mark I know we've had those crazy microbursts - hope it's over
for awhilel
Susan A Wilson - Susan A Wilson(@ncdenr gov North Carolina Dept of Environment and Natural
Resources Asheville Regional Office Division of Water Quality - Surface Water Protection 2090
U S 70 Highway Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Notice E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and therefore may be disclosed to third parties
-----Original Message-----
FromMark Shumpert [mailto MShumpert@haywoodnc nett
Sent Thursday, June 23, 2011 2 47 PM
To Wilson, Susan A
Cc Stephen King
Subject Haywood County Landfill Reporting
Good afternoon Susan,
This email shall serve as written notification of two non-compliance events related to
surface water discharge at the White Oak Landfall in Haywood County On June 19, we received
over two inches (2 6") of rainfall, and on June 23, we received another inch (1 0") of
rainfall These events resulted in the release of muddy, or sediment laden, water from SDO's
3, 4, and 8 We are attempting to repair and/or improve all three of these locations, but
the constant rainfall has hampered our efforts As soon as we get a break in the weather,
all work will be completed and notification provided to your office
Best regards,
i

Mark Shumpert, PE
Haywood County Engineer
1233 N Main St , Box 2
Waynesville, NC 28786
828-356-2114 (o)
828-452-6767 (F)
828-400-2362 (C)
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 132, Public Records, this electronic mail
message and any attachments hereto, as well as any electronic mail message(s) sent in
response to it, may be considered public record and as such are sub3ect to request and review
by anyone at any time
2

Wilson, Susan A
From Mark Shumpert [MShumpert@haywoodnc net]
Sent Thursday June 16 2011 2 22 PM
To Wilson Susan A
Cc Stephen King, Marc Pruett
Subject Haywood County Landfill
Susan,
This email shall serve as written notification of two non-compliance issues related to surface water discharge at the White
Oak Landfill in Haywood County On Sunday June 12 we received two inches (2 0") of rainfall as recorded on Monday
morning This event resulted in the release of muddy or sediment laden, water from SDO 4 and probably SDO 8, though
by the time I got to it on Monday the discharge was nearly clear We are in the process of removing mud from SDO 4 and
believe once we do this and add new filter stone to the face of all baffles, this structure may perform better SDO 8 is still
being repaired and we are doing the best we can to complete the work and prevent any future release of sediment in
runoff discharge
Yesterday evening, June 15, we received two and a half inches (2 5 ) of rainfall at the landfill With some water still in our
basins, this storm only served to make matters worse for us With this storm we experienced a sediment loss from
SDO's 3, 4, and 8 The first pass of this storm produced torrential downpours, almost 1 5" in less than an hour, and
crippled our conveyance and containment systems Then the second wave hit us and added another inch of rainfall to our
already overwhelmed systems Repairs to SDO 8 will soon be complete if the weather cooperates I am investigating
SDO 4 to ensure it has adequate capacity and functionality for future storms This week marked the first time that I have
seen sediment -laden discharge from SDO 3 and I believe it is due to recent grading activities on the access road I use to
reach SDO 3 We will address this with stone or grass as soon as possible
Please let me know if you need anything else
Best regards
Mark Shumpert PE
Haywood County Engineer
1233 N Main St, Box 2
Waynesville, NC 28786
828-356-2114 (0)
828-452-6767 (l=)
828-400-2362 (C)
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 132 Public Records this electronic mad message and any attachments hereto as well as any electronic mail
message(s) sent in response to it may be considered public record and as such are subject to request and review by anyone at any time

Wilson, Susan A
From Marc Pruett [MPruett@haywoodnc net]
Sent Tuesday May 10, 2011 2 40 PM
To Wilson Susan A, Keller, Andrea
Cc Stephen King Marty Stamey, Mark Shumpert
Subject work at the Haywood County landfill
Attachments wolf 051011 007 1pg, wolf 051011 008 1pg wolf 051011 019 ]pg wolf 051011 025 ]pg
Hi Susan and Andrea
1 have attached some pictures for you that I took today at the landfill I hopc they will show acceptable efforts
by the County to gain c,omphance I here are three photos of the old Sediment Basin #1 for you to see as well as
one of the hydroseeding at the entrance Our thought on the basin area is that we need to fix the basin before we
restore the stream In other words, we want to stop any further sediment transportation to surface waters by
repairing the critical control structure first
On the basin I am very impressed with the methodology Mark Shumpert used and in the guidance he gave
to the operators Here is what I want you to see l hey created a forebay as a settling basin in the upper end of
the larger structure to allow settlement as well as hold water while the larger structure was set up in order for
work to progress Also, a secondary, linear holding area for water was created away from the work area, and it
is being pumped from the outlet end What this has effectively done is to clear the work area of water, allow the
water to settle and gain clarity, and recharge the stream with better quality water The pictures show that the
excavation equipment is placed upon large stone rip rap and I am encouraged that much of the work area is
dry and stiff enough to allow the equipment adequate work space
I hank you for working with us We will continue to keep you informed of our progress
Respectfully,
Marc.
Marc Pruett, CPESC
Program Director
Haywood County Erosion Control
1233 North Main Street, Annex 1I
Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
T 828-452-6706, I~ 828-452-6767
mpt uettnhaywoodne net
Confidentiality Notiet
I his message is rnttndtd ex(.]usrvely IOr the rndrs rdu d or enIny to which I is addressed I his eommunu, ttron may contain inIormatron that is proprietary privileged
Loll lidtntrdl or otherwise legally tkempt from drSClnSure
If you are not the named iddrLM L you trt not duthorwtd to rtad print retam copy or dissemmate this messagt or any p in of it It you have received this message in
error pleas(. nouf) th(. sender immcdtately either by phone [phone]) or reply to this t in ul and delete all eopres of this message,
10 ensure compliance. with the requirements impostd by the IRS we inform you that any U S federal tar advice contained in this communication (including the
attachments) is not mtLnded or wrnitn to be used for the purpo%L of (a) avoiding penalties under the Internal RtNenue Code or (b) promoting marketing or
rteommendmg, to another party any transdeuon or tax related matterls]
1 o provide you with a eommumeation that could be used to avoid penalties under the Internal Revenue Code w ill necessarily entail additional investigations analysis
and conclusions on our part

Pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 132 Public Records this electronic mad message and any attachments hereto as well as any electronic mail
message(s) sent in response to it may be considered public record and as such are subject to request and review by anyone at any time

SCALE 1:24000
0 1000 2000 3000 4D00 soon 6000 7
— —FEET —

w fj "I
F
/� +IF7 �''s U��1� /Ivo •+/
r
AT),
r
00
h
�1
"gi

y
r
J,
�M
r
f
1
i
/
�
r
t
+
a
�
3
r
lV
.n•
� r
Y
PNy
r
4
l
r
3
j
e

I
Fd� 1yo5 ��zinLS� •'�'� �- ��o j
-7;; v
62
ti ti \ 5 n _ �` C : l• . `tn 1ly�ICZ� , , Q�t ►'�b�Z+1V��
� V
' •�
1
7• ft< �i �i b� ° r 1.
J
w a �r1
`
[ � j� ros/`'/j
POW
h
s�
rz1 _� . 1 �'} r, a � � � ] � � N�Crl�e„� Qi�Fs� �,1G}rJ�� Y � • _
l'
P
�14
s sodr 3� • e�• S��:s �y 3 5,/t .
r
\
�5 M �� �rJv✓ rr7� �f� V
Y r
4�

l/L/ may{ �� YG i a
,
ACA
1 J
(mil %Z7
l
h R
v 1 �J � py \ � \ � � + ti r � 1 �Y • �� S' e 9 } t \ '? 1 �' a
r
,
� Y
l r !lL%�l.t G ��lL e c!'�h'� P&LW t Px4t,
of r,,a-oJs
t
i 190 µ,
xr � , �i' ,,.� `Ry 1 ��►-: �v^ �" `' R� � h d � h r �w :r }a_ C �h, —
r t,
a

v
Y
i
�

L
Y
i i
i
.Y
G.
x
t/��
lI V-��zI♦
3 �`-i • 1/ YV C� g- 1
r� 1`�� Z IPA/
w
ram©
oG
fbo LE
i
Qf Gl(�]y
uo r
00
�8,93

40 00 W 083 00 00 00 W 082' 59 30 00 W
z
N��
�/4ti� 1
}/
In
f
.t
Y, j 5 ;J
it
I� I
M
o
KR j3
I
I r
l
�
i
ti ✓}r ill
�I
r-•.
ti �.
` `[vim
r t
� I
i
,
it 4.1 1
r�
4
Z
pCD-
11
1�
I...� +�I�'�1 f �`r._
f
tj] � .
yl I4 1 ,! f
I
Z
o
01
CDAeq
o
p
..�.z� .�6� -"�
•-� ! I I� . � f ' i �
t C 0 Toy
So 00 W 083 00 00 00 W 082 59 30 00 W
SCALE 1 12000
0 1000 .-- _. 2000 3000
— FEE1. _

1;" 00
b� �

�/'H14 p14r� 94)
D_
A- i
6�.j U� (�
4�s
c �bL,
� j�' ( j r &—Low
�.pctrA."b-
Al
PA?--T
5 E�
G

i
.f
.. .
t
,�
�, ,
{ _ {
�.
� � Y � j•i r` �� • �- � ` u k � �� 1 ; t
Y
� �� ` �
]7�
k � 7
3

®-17 G�
°�
s R�
aCL)'1-
L
-,w 1711) 1v-V
r
mfl w%Xj -4'P,5 , cy- -'mod -t4V�j l C
� I
h
r45
&I
r- ,

1
Cam.�ao
c•� �Pg �- -Th
�jrc R e 5 _3=tens IN
U�c -
Oro — S {�i�130
i
J
fo L-7 ie `
,1
tiY ry

4
e-L
SWLuN+3 �/ PLtr DI%
&Ni7? 147_
—"
77 06 2� y "L2-1, e
LL64.?C77 AMPS 1- �3't�r-i-- j � ,�1G�%��
PCN.44,F,7 'A...
3
TMZ,r�
4oV;�— r L / "--,7 _ AA) , ;Q, .5 4-77��
s
r

�I
r
i�
I
i
I'
i
�i
I
I�

STORMWATF R DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
Certificate of Coverage No NCG SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR
(This monitoring report shall be recened by the Division no later than 30 days
from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory )
FACILITY NAME
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLL(S)
CERTIFIED LABORATORY(S) Lab ##
Lab ##
COUNTY
PHONE NO �)
(SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE OR DESIGNEE)
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate
eomplete to the best of my knowledge
Part A Vehicle Maintenance Actri ty Monitoring Requirements (onl) if, on a-.erage, more than 55 gallons per month of new motor oil is used)
Outfall
No
Date
Sample Collected,
mo/dd/yr
Total Rainfall,
inches
New Motor Oil Usage,
Annual average
al/mo
00556
00530
00400
Oil and Grease,
mg/L
Non -polar O&G/TPH
(Method 1664 SGT-HEM),
if a I
Total Suspended Solids,
mg/L
pH,
Standard units
Benchmark
-
-
-
30
15
100
6 0 — 9 0
Note If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value or outside the benchmark range for pH you must implement Tier 1 or Tier 2 responses in the General Pernut
Mail Original and one copv to
Division of Water Quality
Ann Centr it Files
1617 Mai Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments %sere prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons %ho manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knoKing N iolations "
(Signature of Pernuttee) (Date)
Form SWU-254-062310
Page I of 1

t0� WA%p ' ichael I gley i3overnor
Erg
Secretary
North Carolina Depart ent of En ronment and Natural Resources
Alan w Klimek P E Director
Division of Water Quality
t7 �
Asheville Regional Office
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION SECTION
October 16, 2006
Mr Bobby Cogdill
Solid Waste Director
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, NC 28721
SUBJECT Technical Assistance Visit
Haywood County Landfill
Permit number NCG120047
Haywood County
Dear Mr Cogdilll
Enclosed please find a copy of the technical assistance report from the visit conducted on
October 12, 2006 1 appreciate the county's request for guidance for complying with its
stormwater permit NCG120047 I am pleased with the maintenance of structural controls as
well as with the maintenance of visual monitoring records
Please refer to the enclosed report for observations and comments If you or your staff
have any questions, please call me at 828-296-4664
Sincerely,
Laurie L Moorhead
Environmental Specialist
Enclosure
Cc Mark Pruitt, Haywood County Erosion and Sediment Control
ARO - Stormwater Compliance Files
Central Files
2090 U S Highway 70 Swannanoa NC 28778 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] Customer Service 1 877 623 6748
It",
Al turally

United Slates Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved
E n /� Washington U C 204fi0
r/1
OMB No 2040 0057
Water Compliance inspection Report
Approval expires 8 31 98
Section A National Data System Coding (i e PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I nI 2 J_5j 31 HCG120041 111 121 06/1()112 117
18 191 SI 201
! r�l I I
Remarks
21IIIJI_LLJjj_118
Inspection Work Days Facility Self Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CA
- - Reserved — - -
67I 169 701 I 71 LI 721 N I
73 L j J 74 751 I I I I I I 180
I��
Section B Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Dale
POTW name and Nli permit Number)
Haywood co -white Oak Sanitaz}
10 06 All 06/10/12
02/09/01
Exit TimelDate
Permit Expiration Date
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Waynesville 1K 28786
11 15 AM 06/10/12
01/08/31
Name(s) of Ot iie Representative(s)ITitles(s)IPhone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Bobby Cogdill 278 Recycle Rd Clyde Nr- 28121//82B-627-8042/ NO
Section C Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Operations & Maintenance N RecordslRepotts
f acuity &te Review
Storm Water
Section D Summary of Find inglComments (Attach additional sheets of narrative
and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Names) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/ONice/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Laurie L Moorhead ARO WO//828-29n-4500 Lxt 4664/
f
*"'� A )
to/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer AgencylOfficelPhone and Fax Numbers
Date
W WQ//020-296-4500/
4� 131,9C.
Rcger C. Hdwards ARO
EPA Form 3560 3 (Rev 9 94) Previous editions are obsolete
Page # 1

Ar
NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type
3l IICGIL20047 {11 12� 06/10/12 117 18LDI
(cont )
Section D Summary of FindingtComments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
The Haywood County landfill is doing a good job of capturing stormwater runoff from the landfill before it
reaches surface waters The landfill has 3 ponds that intercept stormwater and all were either in good
condition at the time of visitation or were in the process of being cleaned out Pace Analytical collects some
surface water samples and analyses the samples every 6 months for compliance with the landfill's Division
of Waste Management permit tab data were not reviewed at the time of visitation
The permit was on -site, visual monitoring records were kept appropriately and were reviewed and the
landfill manager was familiar with the permit requirements Discussion and clarification was sought on the
visual inspection requirements of every 7 days and within 24-hours of a 0 5 inch rain Monitoring records
are to also contain maintenance documentation of basin clean outs, etc Weekly, routine monitoring was
discussed as being easier to remember than 7 days post every 0 5 inch rainfall event
Secondary containment of the fuel and diesel tanks were not properly maintained at the time of visitation
Evidence of leaks was apparent and diesel fuel was oozing from its concrete containment basin Open
drains at the time of visitation are responsible for this failure Plugs need to be installed in both cases,
contaminated soil must be removed and properly disposed of, and roofs should be erected to prevent
excess liquid from accumulating In the concrete pads and basins This will eliminate the need for pumpage
and haul of contaminated stormwater
The landfill manager plans to investigate the design storm capacity of the 3 sediment basins as analytical
monitoring is not required if a pond is sized to capture the 10 year124-hour storm event Additionally, the
landfill manager intends to see where Pace Analytical collects all surface water samples so that should
surface water monitoring be necessary Pace will collect samples in the appropriate location for compliance
with NCG120047
Page # 2

a
Permit NCG120047
Inspection Date 10/12/2006
Owner Facility Haywood Co White Oak Sanitary
Inspection Type Technical Assistance
Operations & Matntenanee Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters for ex MLSS MCRT Settleable Solids pH DO Sludge ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Judge and other that are applicable?
Comment Both the fuel and diesel fuel tanks at the vehicle maintenance area were
leaking at the time of Inspection Secondary containment has been provided In that
concrete pads and walls surround both tanks However floor drains In both were open
and the diesel tank was leaking diesel Both drains need to be plugged, contaminated
soil removed and roofs erected
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less) Has the permittee submitted a new applicabon?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the fac{lily as described in the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment
Page # 3

Tecamcal Assistance Visit
Subject I echntcal Assistance Visit
From Bobby Cogdtll <bcogdill a haywoodnc net>
Date Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12 33 35 -0500
To laurte moorhead@ncmail net
Laurie
This E-mail is to address the questions you had during your October
visit to the White Oak Landfill
1- The sediment basins are sized for the 25 year/24 hour storm event
2- Pace Analytical collects six surface water samples including a sample
from each
of the three branches leaving the landfill perimeter
3- The containment basin plugs are in and the roof covering the `uel
tanks is under
construction The framework is up and the metal for tl-ie roof .as
scheduled to be
here next Tuesday, 11-28-06
Please let me know if you have any other questions that need to be
addressed
Sincerely,
5ohby Cogdill
I W 1 t 1 /21 /2006 8 12 AM

MlLhaei r i-asiey Governor
William G Ross Jr Secretary
North Carolina Department of i-m imnment and Natural Resources
Alan W Klimek 1' L Director
Division of Water Quality
March 31, 2006
Haywood Co
3898 Fines Creek Rd
Waynesville, NC 28786
Subject General StorMWAter Permit Inspections
Haywood Co -White Oak SanItary
Permit No NCG 120047
Haywood County
Dear Sir or Madam
Your facility holds a general permit from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to
discharge stormwater associated with industnal activities performed at your facility Please be
advised that the Asheville Regional Office will be performing. NPDES stormwater inspections
sometime in the near future
If this office has not previously inspected your facalrty, you should be prepared to demonstrate
compliance with all trims and conditions included in the permit Specifically, we will be
i,valuating the following your stormwatei pollution prevention plan, stormwater outfall
locations, qualitative and analytical monitoring data and any other activities required by your
petmit Please note that any data reported to the State must be analyzed by a facility that has a
North Carolina laboratory ceitifieation, either as a full laboratory or as a facility certified to
perform on -site field testing If you have any questions regarding the generation of your
facility's data, please feel free to call Gary Francies at [phone]
Copies of the general permits and accompanying documents can be arcs ssed from the following
webpage hill) //wives ncwslier quahly orglyulFolins—Documents h11779r107 nm'atel GP
If you have any questions, plc asc contact me in the Asheville Regional OffiLe at [phone]
Sincerely,
Kerry Becker
Environmental I echnician
cc NPS Compliance & AssistanLe Oversight Unit
SWP-Central Files
ARO Files Na°` Carolina
Naftira!!y
North Carolina Dnrsion of Water Quality 2090 U s N«1 70 SNk innanoa, NC. 28778 Prone [phone] lax [phone]
Internet http ffwww riCwaterquaIay org/
An Equal Opportun"lAfrrnatrve ACWn Employer

1 x
1
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G Martin, Governor
William W Cobey, Jr, Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO
FROM
SUBJECT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 12, 1993
Roy M Davis
Forrest R Westa
Ann B Orr
Regional Manager
Haywood County Landfill Leachate Management Issue
Haywood County
As we discussed last week, the Water Quality staff met with
representatives of Haywood County on Wednesday January 6, 1993 to
discuss this issue The County has completed a soil scientist
evaluation of the landfall site for the feasibility of an on -sate
treatment/disposal system This study was directed by the Water
Quality Program to satisfy requirements for a complete evaluation of
all leachate management options The report concludes that the soil
in the area of the landfill is viable for the application of
pre-treated leachate The County has applied for a Pump and Haul
Permit to process the leachate at the Waynesville WWTP so that a
September start up of the landfill can proceed The duration of the
Pump and Haul Permit would be set in order to allow adequate time to
place an on -site system in service (2 to 3 years)
At the Wednesday meeting, our direction to the County was to have them
finalize the pump and haul application (add additional pretreatment
and secure a Pretreatment Permit from Waynesville) and begin
development of an on --site treatment/disposal application package It
is the general position of the Water Quality staff that on -sate
treatment/disposal has great potential to be the most environmentally
sound, cost effective option available The County has shown an
interest in the on -site option due mainly to cost (i e
transportation) considerations of the pump and haul option
tnterchange Building 59 Vroodhn Place AShewlle IBC 2880E • Telephone [phone]
An Fqual Oppominity Affirmative Acnon Fmpinyer

y
Roy M Davis
Memorandum
January 12, 1993
Page Two
With regard to the requirement to develop an on --site
treatment/disposal application package, the County expressed concern
that this Agency might not approve (issue a permit) for this option
I indicated that Division representatives would discuss and settle
this issue as soon as possible and communicate to them a final
decision Because of the program -wade potential impacts, we need to
resolve this question so that this landfill pro3ect and others can
proceed
If you would like to discuss this further, please let me know
xc Steve Tedder
Max Haner

`O�QF W AT
Bevetty Eaves Perdue, CoverRnr
v� r QDco Prcemaa Secretary
� Noah Carolina Department of Snvitoomcni and NAMMi Rcsourcea
D 'c
CalOen H 5uYtris Director
Division of Water Quaftry
ILI
�rFa�iin4.dil.. 1 _ 4.k 'S "'l{S'! .(U �i G 6 �.klr^Ri}
i'r+Yl+_�i►�+��'"c+�t�ao
I Please enter the permit number for winch the change is requested
NPDES Permit (or) Certificate of Coverage
0 11 z
lI Permit status nrlor to requested change
a Permit issued to (company name) Haywood County
b Person legally responsible for permit Joseph S King
First ME last
Director - Recycling and Solid Waste Management
Title
278 Recycle Road
Penne Holder Maduig Adelms
Clyde NC _ 28721
City State Zip
828 627-8042 828 627-8137
Phone fax
c Facility name (discharge) Haywood County - White Oak Sanitary
d Facility address 3898 Fines Creek Road —
Address
Waynesville NC 28786
City state Zip
e Facility contact person Joseph S King ( 828 )627-8042
First I MI 1 Last Phone
M Please provide the following for the requested change (revised permit)
a Request for change is a result of ❑ Change in ownership of the facility
❑ Name change of the facility or owner
If otherpfease explain Change m operator of the facitty
b Permit issued to (company name) Santek Environmental of North Carolina, LLC
c Person legally responsible for permit William M Dillard
First Mr Last
Executive V P of Operations
Title
_650 25th Street, NW, Suite 100
Permit Holder Mailing Address
Cleveland TN 37311
City State Zip
(423 ) 476-9160 mdilia rd@santekenviro com
Phone E mail Address
d Facility name (discharge) Haywood County - White Oak Sanit_ary
e Facility address 3898 Fines Creek Rd
Address
Waynesville NC 28786
City State Zip
f Facility contact person Joseph S King
First he LAst
(828 ) 627-8042 skmg@aywoodnc net
Phone E mail Address
Revised EUMOB

PERMIT NAMEIOWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
Page 2 of 2
IV Permti contact hdor matron (if different from the person legally responsible for the permit)
Permit contact William G Martin
Pint Mt Last
Environmental Cotnt)llance Coordinator
Title
650 25th Street, NW, Suite 100
Maituig Address
Cleveland TN 37311
City State Zip
(423 ) 476-9160 wmarttn@santekenvtro corn
Phone E-mail Address
V WIII the permitted facWty continue to conduct the same industrial activities conducted prior
to this ownership or name change'
® Yes
❑ No (please explain)
Vl Required Items THIS APPLICATION WILL BE RETURNED UNPROCESSED IF ITEMS
ARE INCOMPLETE OR MISSING
[ This completed application is required for both name change and/or ownership change
requests
❑ Legal documentation of the transfer, of ownership (such as relevant pages of a contract deed,
or a bill of sale) is required for an ownership change request Articles of incorporation are
not sufficient for an ownership change
The certifications below must be completed and signed by both the permit holder prior to the change, and
the new applicant in the case of an ownership change request For a name change request the signed
Applicant's Certification is sufficient
PF�oRM) T E C TIFICATION (Pet=t holder prior to ownership change)
I p . hA application for a name/ownershtp change has been reviewed and is accurate and
complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that if all required parts of this application are not
completed and that if all required supporting information is not included, this application package will be
returned as ineainpl to
Sign ture ate
APPLICANT CERTIIE<'ICATION
I William, IN ffif tAn application for a name/ownership change has been reviewed and m &,curdte and
complete to the best of my knowledge I understand that if all required parts of this application are not
completed and that if all requited supporting information is not included, this application package will be
returned as incomplete
Signature Date
PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETE APPLICATION PACKAGE TO
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
1617 Mail Scrvice Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699-1617
Revised 712009

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
wnrE9Qc
y Technical Bulletin for N.C. General Stormwater
� r
Permit NCG120000
Technical Bulletin for NCG120000 Landfills Last Revised 10/25/2012
What is regulated by this General Permit?
This General Permit regulates stormwater discharges from landfills (including construction and demolition
landfills) and associated on -site activities
What does my DWQ stormwater erm►t require me to doe
✓implement your approved Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan (Part li, Section A)
✓ Implement your solid waste permit from the Division of Waste Management (Port 11, Section A)
✓Install secondary containment for bulk storage of liquids, including petroleum products (Port il, Section A)
✓Conduct semi-annual testing of the stormwater discharges, and report results to DWQ (Part iI Sections B and C)
-'Conduct semi-annual visual monitoring of stormwater discharge flows for the characteristics listed in the permit,
and keep the records of the visual monitoring on your site (Part !l, Section D)
✓ Inspect your sediment and erosion control measures and your stormwater control measures weekly, and after
every]/2" rain Keep the records of the inspections on your site (Part il, Section D)
✓ Respond to monitoring results that exceed the numerical benchmarks with management actions to reduce the
level of pollutants in the stormwater discharges Note that the numerical benchmarks should be considered as
`action levels; rather than permit limits, and so would not alone generate permit violations (Part !l, Sections
B,C,and D)
Why�
-'The General Permit seeks to reduce pollution in rainfall runoff from landfills by requiring site managers to be
aware of, and to reduce, contamination in stormwater runoff
✓Federal and state laws and water regulations require the reduction of pollution in stormwaterfrom landfills
-'Those laws and regulations reflect the public's support for clean natural waters in our state and nation
What has changed since the last renewal in 200P
• Although they were previously subject to water quality regulation according to federal rule, the General Permit
now specifically clarifies that construction and demolition landfills may be regulated by this permit
• The permittee may now sample discharges from any measureable storm event, rather than from a representative
event This change should make it easier to obtain a sample from a qualifying rain event
• The permit text now clarifies that failure to sample due to adverse weather, or due to no discharge during the nor-
mal monitoring period, maybe excused However, the permit now provides that additional monthly monitoring
for unexcused failures to monitor may be required by DWQ
• The permit now provides that sampling is not required outside of the facility's normal operating hours
• Visual monitoring of the discharge flows for the characteristics listed in the permit has been reduced in frequency
from weekly to semi-annual However, inspections of the sedimentation and erosion control measures have been
retained as a weekly obligation
• The permit text now clarifies that if DWQ relieves the permittee from monthly monitoring under Tier 2, that relief
would continue into subsequent permit renewals, unless DWQ's relief letter provides otherwise
• Vehicle Maintenance Areas (VMA) will be monitored for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) rather than Oil &
Grease (O&G)
• VMA monitoring is now triggered by the total oil visage for motor oil plus hydraulic oil The trigger remains at a
total of 55 gallons per month, average
• A lower TSS benchmark of 50 mg/L applies for discharges to especially protected water classifications

FACE TECHNICAL BULLETIN FOR N c GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT NCG120000 LAST REV 1012512012
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to monitor all outfalls?
Yes However, you may request ROS
(Representative Outfall Status) If ROS is
approved, this status allows analytical
monitoring at fewer outfalls To request
ROS, submit a ROS Request Form SWU
ROS (from our website) to the DWQ
Regional Office
What if I can't collect a storm -
water discharge in 30 minutes"
When distances separate multiple out
falls and preclude collection within 30
minutes of each discharge event begin
collection within 30 minutes and then
continue until all outfalls are sampled
Documentation of the site circum
stances must be kept with the sampling
records on site
Can I take more samples than
is required by my permitN
Yes The permittee may take multiple
samples at any time while under per
mit coverage The permittee may find
the extra sampling useful to quickly
identify causes of benchmark ex
ceedances All sampling for the permit
parameters must be reported to DWQ
on the DMR forms
What if I can't sample because
of bad weather?
Adverse weather is dangerous or it
may limit access for sampling person
nel Your documentation of adverse
weather and the reasons for not sam
pling must be included in your on site
records A substitute sample may be
taken during the next qualifying storm
event
What if I don't address visual
monitoring problems?
If you do not respond to problems seen
in visual monitoring DWQ may require
that you increase the visual monitoring
frequency, apply for an individual per
mit, implement in stream monitoring,
install or modify structural stormwater
controls, or implement other controls
What if I forget to monitor?
DWQ may require monthly monitoring
for a specified time period
Why did you replace oil &
Grease with TPH in VM areas?
The TPH test only targets chemicals de
rived from crude oil The Oil & Grease
(0&G) test recovers fats from animal &
vegetable sources and chemicals from
crude oil Because TPH is more specific
it is a better parameter for vehicle main
tenance areas The TPH method we are
specifying is EPA 1664A (SGT HEM) it is
important to note that DWQ is not specs
Eying the more expensive Gas Chromato
graph (GQ TPH method DWQ found lab
costs for EPA 1664A (SGT-HEM) to be
comparable to 0&G test costs To test
these parameters in stormwater, labs
must perform this test in accordance
with EPA procedures, but do not need to
be certified Note A lower benchmark
applies for TPH 15 mg/I (not 30 mg/1)
Why are there two benchmark
values for TSS7
The 100 mg/L benchmark applies to
most rivers, lakes, and creeks in North
Carolina However, some other waters
must receive special protection under
North Carolina water quality rules, and
in this permit discharges to them are
subject to the more protective bench
mark of 50 mg/L Those waters classified
as Trout Waters, High Quality Waters,
Outstanding Resource Waters, and Pri
mary Nursery Areas receive this extra
protection
Where and when do I send the
monitoring reports?
See your permit text Part 111, Section E
Who can help me?�
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Offices
Must I use a North Carolina
certified laboratory?
No North Carolina water quality rules
do not require that analyses of storm
water be accomplished by a certified
facility Please note however, federal
rules at 40CFR136 do require that test
ing for this permit be by EPA approved
lob methods Analysis by a North Caro
lina certified lab is often the easiest
way to insure compliance with federal
rules
Note that pH is a special case, and
must be measured within 15 minutes
of the sample recovery You must ei-
ther train on site staff to conduct pH
testing, or contract with commercial
services to test pH in accordance with
EPA field testing methods
Who inspects me, and for
what?
Staff from the DWQ Regional Offices
shown below will inspect your facility
They will typically ask to see your Sedi
mentation and Erosion Control Plan to
see that it is being fully implemented
They will typically ask to see your re
cent monitoring results They will type
tally tour the facility with a focus on
the stormwater discharge outfalls and
on your general housekeeping as a way
to assess the potential for polluted
stormwater discharges Our staff will
always follow up their Compliance
Evaluation Inspection with a summary
letter to you restating their findings
and, if necessary indicating whether
enforcement action will be considered
in response to those findings
Asheville Office [phone] Washington Office [phone]
Fayetteville Office [phone] Wilmington Office [phone]
Mooresville Office [phone]
Raleigh Officg_(919) 79
Winston Salem Office [phone]
Central Office (9 8076300
DWQ Stormwater Permitting Umt hup 11portal nalenrorg/web/wg1"1su
M

Permit No NCG120000
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO NCG120000
TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
for
Landfills
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, this permit is hereby issued to all owners or
operators, hereinafter permittees, which are covered by this permit as evidenced by receipt of a Certificate
of Coverage by the Environmental Management Commission to allow the discharge of stormwater to the
surface waters of North Carolina or to a separate storm sewer system conveying discharges to surface
waters in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein
Coverage under this General Permit is applicable to
♦ All owners or operators of stormwater point source discharges associated with activities categorized as
landfills, including construction and demolition debris landfills, which are permitted by the North
Carolina Division of Waste Management under the provisions and requirements of North Carolina
General Statute 13OA-294
♦ Stormwater point source discharges from like industrial activities deemed by the Division of Water
Quality to be similar to these operations in the process, or the discharges, or the exposure of raw
materials, intermediate products, by-products, products, or waste products
Except upon DWQ determination of similarity as provided immediately above, the following
activities and associated discharges are excluded from coverage under this General Permit
♦ Stormwater point source discharges from open dumps, hazardous waste disposal sites, land clearing
and inert debris landfills, or discharges of wastes (including discharges of leachate as defined in 15A
NCAC 13B 0101(11))
The General Permit shall become effective on November 1, 2012
The General Permit shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2017
Signed this day October 25, 2012
Ot rciinal signedby Matt Matthews
for Charles Wakild, P E , Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Pewit No NCG120000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I INTRODUCTION
Section A General Permit Coverage
Section B Permitted Activities
PART IIMONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED DISCHARGES
Section A Final Limitations and Controls for Stormwater Discharges
Section B Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Section C On -Site Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Monitoring Requirements
Section D Qualitative Monitoring and Visual Inspection Requirements
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER GENERAL PERMITS
Section A Compliance and Liability
1
Compliance Schedule
2
Duty to Comply
3
Duty to Mitigate
4
Civil and Criminal Liability
5
Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
6
Property Rights
7
Severability
B
Duty to Provide Information
9
Penalties for Tampering
10
Penalties for Falsification of Reports
11
Onshore or Offshore Construction
12
Duty to Reapply
Section 11 General
Conditions
1
General Permit Expiration
2
Transfers
3
When an Individual Permit May be Required
4
When an Individual Permit May be Requested
5
Signatory Requirements
6
General Permit Modification, Revocation and Reissuance, or Termination
7
Certificate of Coverage Actions
8
Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee Recluireinents
9

Section C Operation and Maintenance of Pollution Controls
1 Proper Operation and Maintenance
2 Need to Halt or Reduce not a Defense
3 Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Section D Monitoring and Records
1
Representative Sampling
2
Recording Results
3
Flow Measurements
4
Test Procedures
5
Representative Outfall
b
Records Retention
7
Inspection and Entry
Section E Reporting
Requirements
1
Discharge Monitoring Reports
2
Submitting Reports
3
Availability of Reports
4
Non Stormwater Discharges
5
Planned Changes
b
Anticipated Noncompliance
7
Spills
8
Bypass
9
Twenty-four Hour Reporting
10
Other Noncompliance
11
Other Information
PART IV DEFINITIONS
Permit No NCG120000
m

Permit No NCG120000
PART 1 INTRODUCTION
SECTION A GENERAL PERMIT COVERAGE
All persons desiring to be covered by this General Permit must register with the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) by the filing of a Notice of Intent (NOI) and applicable fees The N01 shall be submitted and a
certificate of coverage issued prior to any point source discharge of stormwater associated with industrial
activity to the surface waters of the state
Any owner or operator not wishing to be covered or limited by this General Permit may make application
for an individual NPDES permit in accordance with NPDES procedures in 15A NCAC 2H 0100, stating the
reasons supporting the request Any application for an individual permit should be made at least 180 days
prior to commencement of discharge
This General Permit does not cover activities or discharges covered by an individual NPDES permit until the
individual permit has expired or has been revoked Any person conducting an activity covered by an
individual permit but which could be covered by this General Permit may request that the individual permit
be revoked and coverage under this General Permit be provided
If industrial materials and activities are not exposed to precipitation or runoff as described in 40 CFR
§122 26(g), the facility may qualify for a No Exposure Exclusion from NPDES stormwater discharge permit
requirements Any owner or operator wishing to obtain a No Exposure Exclusion must submit a No
Exposure Certification Notice of Intent (NOI) form to the Division must receive approval by the Division,
must maintain no exposure conditions unless authorized to discharge under a valid NPDES stormwater
permit, and must recertify the No Exposure Exclusion annually
Any facility may apply for new or continued coverage under this permit until a Total Maximum Daily load
(TMDL) for pollutants for stormwater is established A TMDL sets a pollutant -loading limit that affects a
watershed, or portion of a watershed draining to a specific impaired water For discharges to
watersheds affected by a TMDL, coverage under this permit may depend on the facility
demonstrating it does not have reasonable potential to violate applicable water quality standards
for those pollutants as a result of discharges If DWQ determines that discharges have reasonable
potential to cause water quality standard violations the facility shall apply for an individual permit 180
days prior to the expiration date of this General Permit Once that individual permit is effective, the facility
will no longer have coverage under this General Permit
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the permittee is
authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity Such discharges shall be controlled,
limited, and monitored as specified in this permit
Part I Page 1 of 2

Permit No NCG120000
SECTION B PERMITTED ACTIVITIES
Until coverage under this permit expires or is modified or revoked the permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater, to the surface waters of North Carolina or to a separate storm sewer system, which has been
adequately treated and managed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this General Permit
Any other point source discharge to surface waters of the state is prohibited unless it is an allowable non-
stormwater discharge or is covered by another permit, authorization, or approval The discharges
authorized by this General Permit shall not cause or contribute to violations of Water Quality
Standards
Where wetlands are located on or nearby landfilling operations, discharges authorized by this permit and
site operations must meet applicable wetland standards as recorded in 15A NCAC 2B 0230 and 0231, and
water quality certification requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H 0500
This permit does not relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable
federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order judgment or decree
Part I Page 2 of 2

0
Permit No NCG120000
PART 11 MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED DISCHARGES
SECTION A LIMITATIONS AND CONTROLS FOR S'I'ORMWATER DISCHARGES
During the period beginning on the effective date of the Certificate of Coverage and lasting until expiration
of the General Permit, the permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater Such discharges shall be
controlled, limited and monitored as specified below
1 Prior to commencement of land disturbing activities, the permittee shall submit for approval a
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan (plan) to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Energy Mineral, and Land Resources, or an approved local program,
pursuant to the requirements of NC G S 113A-541 and in conformity with the rules adopted by the
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Commission
The permittee shall implement the approved plan The approved plan is a requirement or condition
of this General Permit Deviation from the approved plan, or approved amendment to the plan,
shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this General Permit A signed copy of the
approved plan shall be maintained on the site at all times
3 Prior to constructing or operating a landfill the permittee shall obtain a permit for a sanitary landfill
from the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management,
pursuant to the requirements of NC G S 130A 294 and inconformity with the rules adopted in 15A
North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 13B Section 0500 or Section 1600 The landfill
permit is a requirement or condition of this General Permit Deviation from the landfill permit, or
approved amendment or revision of the landfill permit, shall constitute a violation of the terms and
conditions of this General Permit A signed copy of the landfill permit shall be maintained on the
site at all times
4 Secondary Containment Requirements and Records Secondary containment is required for bulk
storage of liquid materials ink .iding petroleum products, storage in any amount of Section 313 of
Title I[I of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthgrization Act_(SARA) water priority, chemicals,
and stg agp in any amount o_f hazardous substancu in order to prevent leaks and spills from
contaminating stormwater runoff A table or summary of all such tanks and stored materials and
their associated secondary containment areas shall be maintained If the secondary containment
devices are connected to stormwater conveyance systems, the connection shall be controlled by
manually activated valves or other similar devices, which shall be secured closed with a locking
mechanism Any stormwater that accumulates in the containment area shall beat a minimum
visually observed for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens and dry weather now, prior to
release of the accumulated stormwater Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to be
uncontaminated by any material Records documenting the individual making the observation, the
description of the accumulated stormwater and the date and time of the release shall be kept for a
period of five (5) years For facilities subject to a federal oil Spill Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure Plan facility compliance with any portion of the SPCC plan fully consistent with
the requirements of this permit may be used to demonstrate compliance with this permit
5 Equipment utilized during the land disturbing or landfill operational activities on a site shall be
operated and maintained in such a manner as to prevent potential or actual pollution of the surface
or ground waters of the state Fuels, lubricants, coolants, and hydraulic fluids, other petroleum
products, and spent fluids shall be disposed of in a manner so as not to enter the waters, surface or
ground, of the state and in accordance with applicable state and federal disposal regulations Any
Part II Page 1 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
spilled fluids shall be cleaned up to the extent practicable and disposed of in a manner so as not to
allow their entry into the waters surface or ground, of the state
SECTION B ANALYTICAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges shall be performed as specified in Table 1 All analytical
monitoring shall be performed during a measureable storm event at each stormwater discharge outfall
(SDO) Only SDOs having stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity must be sampled See
Definitions
A measurable storm event is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted
site outfall The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior The 72-
hour storm interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is
representative for local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee obtains
approval from the local DWQ Regional Office See Definitions
Table 1 Analytical Monrtonng Requirements
Discharge
Characteristics
Units
Measurement
Frequencyl
Sample
TypeZ
Sample
Location3
Chemical Oxygen Demand
mg/1
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Fecal Coliform
# per 100 nil
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended Solids
I mgzl
semi annual
Grab
SDO
Total Rainfa114
I inches
semi-annual
I Rain gauge
FQQtnotes
1 Measurement Frequency Twice per year during a measureable storm event
2 Sample collection must begin within the first 30 minutes of discharge and continue to all outfalls until completed
3 Sample Location Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) unless
representative outfall status (ROS) has been granted by DWQ A copy of the DWQ letter granting ROS must be kept
on site DWQ s ROS letter remains in effect through the subsequent reissuance of this permit and as long as the
pertinent site conditions and operations remain unchanged, unless the ROS letter provides for other conditions or
duration
4 For each sampled measureable storm event the total precipitation must be recorded from an on site rain gauge
(Where isolated sites are unmanned far extended periods a local rain gauge reading may be substituted for an on site
gauge, upon prior DWQ written approval)
The permittee shall complete the analytical samplings in accordance with the schedule specified in Table 2
below, unless adverse weather conditions prevent sample collection (see Definitions) Inability to sample
because of adverse weather conditions must be recorded on the Discharge Monitoring Report, along with a
description of the adverse conditions and their duration Sampling is not required outside of the facility's
normal operating hours
A minimum of 60 days must separate Period 1 and Period 2 sample dates unless monthly monitoring
has been instituted via other requirements of this permit The permittee must report the results of every
discharge sample taken within the monitoring period (see Part ill, Section E)
Failure to monitor semi-annually per permit terms may result in the Division requiring monthly
monitoring for all parameters for a specified time period No discharge" from an outfall or inability to
collect a sample because of adverse weather conditions during a monitoring period, for example does not
constitute failure to monitor, as long as it is properly reported
Part I1 Page 2 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
Table 2 Monitoring Schedule
Monitoring Period' z
Sample Number
Start
End
Year 1- Period 1
1
January 1, 2013
June 30 2013
Year 1- Period 2
2
July 1 2013
December 31, 2013
Year 2 - Period 1
3
January 1, 2014
June 30, 2014
Year 2 - Period 2
4
July 1, 2014
December 31, 2014
Year 3 - Period 1
5
January 1 2015
June 30 2015
Year 3 - Period 2
6
July 1, 2015
December 31, 2015
Year 4 - Period 1
7
January 1 2016
June 30, 2016
Year 4 - Period 2
8
July 1, 2016
December 31, 2016
Year 5 - Period 1
9
January 1, 2017
June 30, 2017
Year 5 - Period 2
10
July 1, 2017
October 31 2017
Footnotes
1 Maintain semi-annual monitoring during permit renewal process [unless monthly monitoring has been triggered
via other permit requirements ]
2 if no discharge Occurs during the sampling period the permittee must submit a monitoring report indicating No
Flow within 30 days of the end of the sampling period
The permittee shall compare monitoring results to the benchmark values in Table 3 The benchmark values
are not permit limits but should be used as guidelines for the permittee's response actions to control the
discharge of pollutants in site stormwater Exceedances of benchmark values require the permittee to increase
monitoring, increase management actions, increase record keeping, and/or install stormwater Best
Management Practices [BMPs) in a tiered program
Table 3 Benchmark Values for Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Discharge Characteristics
Benchmark Value
Chemical Oxygen Demand
120 m
Fecal Coliform
1000 colonies per 100 ml
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
100 m8ZI
TSS CORW HQW, Trout, and PNA waters
1 50 rn L
Each separate parameter benchmark exceedance triggers a separate tiered response for that parameter at that
outfall Seethe descriptions of Tier One, Tier Two, and Tier Three response actions below In the event that
DWQ releases the permittee from continued monthly monitoring under Tier Three, DWQ s release letter
remains in effect through the subsequent reissuance of this permit, unless the release letter provides for other
conditions or duration
Part 11 Page 3 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
Tier One
If The first valid sampling results are above a benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range, for
any parameter at any outfall,
Then The permittee shall
1 Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving
sampling results
2 Identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark value exceedence
3 Identify the potential and select the specific source controls, operational controls, or physical
improvements to reduce concentrations of the parameters of concern
4 Implement the selected actions within two months of the inspection
5 Maintain an on -site record of each instance of a Tier One response Include the date and value
of the benchmark exceedence, the inspection date, the personnel conducting the inspection,
the selected actions, and the date the selected actions were implemented
Tier Two
If During the term of this permit the sampling results are above the benchmark values, or outside
the benchmark ranee, for any specific parameter at a specific discharge outfall two times in a row,
Then The permittee shall
1 Repeat all the required actions outlined above in Tier One
2 Immediately institute monthly monitoring for all parameters Conduct monthly monitoring at
every outfall where a sampling result exceeded the benchmark value for two consecutive
samples Monthly (analytical and qualitative) monitoring shall continue until three
consecutive sample results are below the benchmark values, or within the benchmark range
3 Submit a monthly monitoring report indicating No Flow' if no discharge occurs during the
sampling period
4 Maintain a record of the Tier Two response and monitoring results on site
Tier Three
During the term of this permit, if the valid sampling results required for the permit monitoring
periods exceed the benchmark value for any specific parameter at any specific outfall on four
occasions, the permittee shall notify the DWQ Regional Office Surface Water Supervisor in writing
within 30 days of receipt of the fourth analytical results DWQ may but is not limited to
• require that the permittee revise, increase, or decrease the monitoring frequency for some
or all parameters,
• rescind coverage under the General Permit, and require that the permittee apply for an
individual stormwater discharge permit,
• require the permittee to install structural stormwater controls
• require the permittee to implement other stormwater control measures,
• require the permittee to perform upstream and downstream monitoring to characterize
impacts on receiving waters
Part II Page 4 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
SECTION C ON -SITE VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENTMAINTENANCE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Facilities which have any vehicle or equipment maintenance activity occurring on -site which in aggregate
uses more than 55 gallons of new motor oil and hydraulic oil per month when averaged over the calendar
year shall perform analytical monitoring as specified below in Table 4 All analytical monitoring shall be
performed during a measureable storm event at all SDOs which discharge stormwater runoff from the
vehicle maintenance areas, in accordance with the schedule presented in Table 2 (Section B )
Table 4 Analytical Mom oring Require ents for On -Site Vehicle Maintenance
Discharge Characteristics
Units
Measurement
Fre uenc 1
Sample
T e2
Sample
Location3
1i
standard
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Non -Polar Oil & Grease/TPH
EPA Method 1664(SGT-HEMJI
mg/I
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended Solids
Mg/1
senu-annual
Grab
SDO
Total RamfallQ
inches
semi-annual
Rain gauge
New Motor Oil Usage
al month
semi-annual
Estimate
Footnotes
1 Me-isurement Frequency Twice per year during a measureable storm event
Z Sample collection must begin within the first 30 minutes of discharge and continue to all outfalls until completed
3 Sample Location Samples shall be collected at each SDO receiving runoff from vehicle and equipment
maintenance areas unless representative outfall status (ROS) has been granted by DWQ A copy of the DWQ letter
granting ROS must be kept on site DWQ s ROS letter remains in effect through the subsequent reissuance of this
permit and as long as the pertinent site conditions and operations remain unchanged unless the ROS letter
providi.s for other conditions or duration
4 For each sampled measureable storm event the total precipitation must be recorded from an on site rain gauge
(Where isolated sites are unmanned for extended periods a local rain gauge reading may be substituted for an on site
gauge upon prior DWQ written approval)
Monitoring results shall be compared to the benchmark values in Table S Exceedences of benchmark values
require the permittee to increase monitoring, increase management actions, increase record keeping, and/or
install stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) in accordance with the tiered response provisions of
Part 11, Section B
Table 5 Benchmark Values for On -Site Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Activities
Discharge Characteristics
Benchmark Value
H
Within the range 6 0- 9 01
Non -Polar Oil & Grease/TPH
EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM
15 Mg/1
Total Suspended Solids TSS
100 MEZI
LTSiS0RW HQW, Trout, and PNA waters
50 m L
Footnote 1 If pH values outside this range are recorded in sampled stormwater discharges but ambient
precipitation pH levels are lower, then the lower threshold of this benchmark range is the pH of the
precipitation (within instrument accuracy) instead of 6 S U Readings from an on site rain gauge must be
documented to demonstrate that background concentrations were below the benchmark pH range of 6 9
Part I1 Page 5 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
Failure to monitor semi annually per permit terms may result in the Division requiring monthly
monitoring for a specified time period "No discharge from an outfall or inability to collect a sample
because of adverse weather conditions during a monitoring period, for example, does not constitute failure
to monitor, as long as it is properly reported
SECTION D QUALITATIVE MONITORING AND VISUAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
Qualitative monitoring shall be performed twice per year and concurrent with the analytical monitoring
requirements in Part 11 Sections B and C for the characteristics listed in Table 6 Qualitative monitoring is
for the purpose of quickly evaluating the effectiveness of the stormwater controls No analytical tests are
required The permittee shall maintain a written record of the qualitative monitoring events on site
Table 6 Qualitative Monitoriniz Reumrements
Discharge Characteristics
Monitoring
Locationl
Color
SDO
Odor
SDO
Clarity
SDO
Floating Solids
SDO
Suspended Solids
SDO
Foam
SDO
Oil Sheen
SDO
Erosion or deposition at the
outfall
SDO
Other obvious indicators
of stormwater pollution
SDO
Footnote 1 Qualitative monitoring shall be performed at each stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) regardless of
representative outfall status (ROS) unless ROS has been granted specifically for qualitative monitoring A copy of
DWQ s letter granting ROS must be kept on site DWQ s ROS letter remains in effect through the subsequent
reissuance of this permit and as long as the pertinent site conditions and operations remain unchanged, unless the
ROS letter provides for other conditions or duration
Visual inspections shall be conducted to ensure that all stormwater controls, including all sedimentation
and erosion controls, are intact, in good repair, fully functional, and are otherwise being properly
implemented Inspections shall be conducted at least once every seven calendar days, and within 24 hours
after any storm event of greater than 0 5 inches of rain per 24 hour period The permittee shall maintain a
written record of each visual inspection on site
In the event an atypical condition is noted ata stormwater discharge outfall, the permittee shall maintain on -
site records of both the suspected cause of the condition and the corrective actions taken
If the permittee s qualitative monitoring or visual inspections indicate that existing stormwater controls are
ineffective, or that significant stormwater contamination is recurring condition the permittee shall
investigate potential causes, evaluate the feasibility of corrective actions, and implement feasible corrective
actions within 60 days A written record of the permittee's investigation evaluation, and response actions
shall be kept on site Records related to qualitative monitoring and visual inspections need only be
submitted to DWQ upon the Division's specific request for those records
Part II Page 6 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER GENERAL PERMITS
SECTION A COMPLIANCE AND LIA131LITY
1 Comnhance Schedule
The permittee shall comply with Limitations and Controls specified for stormwater discharges in accordance
with the following schedule
Existing facilities already operating but applying for coverage under this general permit for the first time
Secondary containment as specified in Part 11 Section A Paragraph 4 of this permit shall be accomplished
within 12 months of the effective date of the initial Certificate of Coverage All other requirements
conditions limitations, and controls contained in this permit become effective immediately upon issuance of
the Certificate of Coverage
New facilities applying for permit coverage for the first time and existing facilities previously permitted and
applying for renewal under this general permit All requirements conditions limitations, and controls
contained in this permit become effective immediately upon issuance of the Certificate of Coverage
2 Duty to Comply
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this general permit Any permit noncompliance constitutes
a violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and is grounds for enforcement action, for permit termination
revocation and reissuance, or modification or denial of a permit upon renewal application [40 CFR 122 41]
a The permittee shall comply with standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the CWA
for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or
prohibitions, even if the general permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement
b The CWA provides that any person who violates section(s] 301, 302, 306 307 308, 318 or 405 of the Act
or any permit condition or limitation implementing any such sections in a permit issued under section
402 or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3) or
402(b)(8) of the Act is subject to a evil penalty not to exceed $37 500 per day for each violation [33 USC
1319(d) and 40 CFR 122 41(a)(2)]
The CWA provides that any person who negligently violates sections 301 302 306, 307 308 318 or 405
of the Act, or any condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under
section 402 of the Act or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under section
402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act is subject to criminal penalties of $2 500 to $25,000 per day of
violation or imprisonment of not more than 1 year, or both In the case of a second or subsequent
conviction for a negligent violation a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than
$50,000 per day of violation or by imprisonment of not more than 2 years or both [33 USC 1319(c)(1)
and 40 CFR 122 41(a)(2))
d Any person who knowingly violates such sections or such conditions or limitations is subject to criminal
penalties of $5 000 to $50 000 per day of violation or imprisonment for not more than 3 years or both
In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing violation a person shall be subject to
criminal penalties of not more than $100,000 per day of violation or imprisonment of not more than 6
years or both [33 USC 1319(c)(2) and 40 CFR 122 41(a)(2)1
e Any person who knowingly violates section 301 302, 303 306 307, 308, 318 or 405 of the Act or any
permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 402 of
the Act and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death
or serious bodily injury shall upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $250 000 or
imprisonment of not more than 15 years or both In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a
Part 1I1 Page 1 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
knowing endangerment violation a person shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500 000 or by
imprisonment of not more than 30 years or both An organization, as defined in section 309(c)(3)(8)(m)
of the CWA shall, upon conviction of violating the imminent danger provision be subject to a fine of not
more than $1000 000 and can be fined up to $2 000 000 for second or subsequent convictions [40 CFR
122 41(a)(21]
f Under state law a civil penalty of not more than $2S 000 per violation may be assessed against any
person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions or requirements of a permit
[North Carolina General Statutes § 143 215 6A]
Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section 301
302 306 307 308 318 or 405 of this Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such
sections in a permit issued under section 402 of this Act Administrative penalties for Class I violations
are not to exceed $16 000 per violation with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to
exceed $37 500 Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed $16 000 per day for each day during
which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class 11 penalty not to exceed $177 500
[33 USC 1319(g)(2) and 40 CFR 122 41(a)(3)]
3 Duly to Mitigate
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this general
permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment [40 CFR
122 41(d)]
4 Civil and Criminal Liability
Except as provided in Part III Section C of this general permit regarding bypassing of stormwater control
facilities nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from any responsibilities
liabilities or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143 215 3 143 21S 6 or Section 309 of the Federal
Act 33 USC 1319 Furthermore, the permittee is responsible for consequential damages such as fish kills
even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended
5 Oil and hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this general permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the
permittee from any responsibilities liabilities or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject to
under NCGS 143 215 75 et seq or Section 311 of the Federal Act 33 USC 1321
6 Property Rights
The issuance of this general permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property,
or any exclusive privileges nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal
rights nor any infringement of Federal State or local laws or regulations [40 CFR 122 41(g)]
7 Severability
The provisions of this general permit are severable and if any provision of this general permit or the
application of any provision of this general permit to any circumstances is held invalid the application of
such provision to other circumstanceq and the remainder of this general permit shall not be affected thereby
[NCGS 150B 23]
S Day to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time any information which
the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and
reissuing or terminating the general permit issued pursuant to this general permit or to determine
compliance with this general permit The permittee shall also furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority upon
request copies of records required to be kept by this general permit [40 CFR 122 41(h)]
Part III Page 2 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
Penalties for Tampering
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate
any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this general permit shall upon conviction
be punished by a fine of not more than $10 000 per violation or by imprisonment for not more than two years
per violation or by both If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of
such person under this paragraph punishment is a fine of not more than $20 000 per day of violation or by
imprisonment of not more than 4 years or both [40 CFR 122 41]
10 Penaligg for Falsification of Reports
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any False statement representation, or
certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained tinder this general
permit including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall upon conviction be
punished by a fine of not more than $10 000 per violation or by imprisonment for not more than two years
per violation or by both [40 CFR 122 41]
11 Onshore or Offshore Construction
This general permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical
structures or facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters
12 Duty to Reapply
Dischargers covered by this general permit need not submit a new Notice, of Intent (NOl) or renewal request
unless so directed by the Division If the Division chooses not to renew this general permit the permittee will
be notified to submit an application for an individual permit [15A NCAC 02H 0127(e)]
SECTION B GENERAL CONDITIONS
General Permit Expiration
General permits will be effective for a term not to exceed five years at the end of which the Division may
renew them after all public notice requirements have been satisfied If a general permit is renewed existing
permittees do not need to submit a renewal request or pay a renewal fee unless directed by the Division
New applicants seeking coverage under a renewed general permit must submit a Notice of Intent to be
covered and obtain a Certificate of Coverage under the renewed general permit [15A NCAC 02H 0127(e)]
Tranafeis
The certificate of cover age issued pursuant to this general permit is not transferable to any person without
prior written notice to and approval from the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122 61 The Director may
condition approval in accordance with NCGS 143-215 1 in particular NCGS 143 215 1(b)(4)b 2 and may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage or a minor modification to
identify the new permittee and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the CWA [40
CFR 122 41(l)(3) 122 61] or state statute The Permittee is required to notify the Division in writing in
the event the permitted facility is sold or closed
When an Individual Permit Mav be Required
The Director may require any owner/operator authorized to discharge under a certificate of coverage issued
pursuant to this general permit to apply for and obtain an individual permit or an alternative general permit
Any interested person may petition the Director to take action under this paragraph Cases where an
individual permit may be required include but are not limited to the following
The discharger is a significant contributor of pollutants
Conditions at the permitted site change altering the constituents and/or characteristics of the
discharge such that the discharge no longer qualifies for a general permit
the discharge violates the terms or conditions of this general permit
Part III Page 3 of 9

Permit No NC6120000
A change has occurred in the availability of demonstrated technology or practices for the control or
abatement of pollutants applicable to the point source
Effluent limitations are promulgated for the point sources covered by this general permit
A water quality management plan containing requirements applicable to such point sources is
approved after the issuance of this general permit,
The erector determines at his or her own discretion that an individual permit is required
4 When an Individual Permit May be Requested
Any permittee operating under this general permit may request to be excluded from the coverage of this
general permit by applying for an individual permit When an individual permit is issued to an
owner/operator the applicability of this general permit is automatically terminated on the effective date of
the individual permit
S Signatory Requirements
All applications reports or information submitted to the Permitting Issuing Authority shall be signed and
certified (40 CFR 122 41(k)]
All Notices of Intent to be covered under this general permit shall be signed as follows
(1) For a corporation by a responsible corporate officer For the purpose of this Section a responsible
corporate officer means (a) a president secretary treasurer or vice president of the corporation in
charge of a principal business function or any other person who performs similar policy or decision
making functions for the corporation or (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production
or operating facilities provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions which
govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making
major capital investment recommendations and initiating and directing other comprehensive
measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations
the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather
complete and accurate information for permit application requirements and where authority to sign
documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively or
(3) For a municipality State Federal or other public agency by either a principal executive officer or
ranking elected official [40 CFR 122 221
b All reports required by the general permit and other information requested by the Permit Issuing
Authority shall be signed by a person described in paragraph a above or by a duly authorized
representative of that person A person in a duly authorized representative only if
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall
operation of the regulated facility or activity such as the position of plant manager operator of a well or
well field superintendent a position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having
overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company (A duly authorized representative may
thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position) and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 122 22]
c Changes to authorization If an authorization under paragraph (b) of this section is no longer accurate
because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility a new
authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted to the
Director prior to or together with any reports information or applications to be signed by an authorized
representative [40 CFR 122 22)
Part III Page 4 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
d Certification Any person signing a document under paragraphs a or b of this section shall make the
following certification [40 CFR 122 22] NO OTHER STATEMFNTS OP CERTIFICATION WILL BE
ACCEPTED
"Y certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
orsupervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properlygother and
evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system
or those persons directly responsible forgathering the information the information submitted is to the best
of my knowledge and belief, true accurate, and complete I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information including the possibility of fines and imprisonment far knowing violations
6 General Permit Modification. Revocation and Reissuance. or Termination
The issuance of this general permit does not prohibit the Permit Issuing Authority from reopening and
modifying the general permit, revoking and reissuing the general permit or terminating the general permit
as allowed by the laws rules, and regulations contained in Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 122
and 123 Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 2H 0100 and North Carolina
General Statute 143 21S 1 et al
After public notice and opportunity for a hearing the general permit may be terminated for cause The filing
of a request for a general permit modification revocation and reissuance or termination does not stay any
general permit condition The Certificate of Coverage shall expire when the general permit is terminated
Certificate -of Coverage Actions
The general permit may be modified revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause The notification of
planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any general permit condition [40 CFR
122 41(f)]
Annual _Administer ing and Compliance Monitoring Fee Requirements
The permittee must pay the administering and compliance monitoring fee within 30 (thirty) days after being
billed by the Division Failure to pay the fee in timely manner in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H 0105(b)(2)
may cause this Division to initiate action to revoke coverage under the general permit
SECTION C OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROLS
Proper Operalmn-and Maintenance
The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and
control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with
the conditions of this permit Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls
and appropriate quality assurance procedures This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary
facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to
achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit [40 CFR 122 41(e)]
Need to Halt or Reduce Not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or
reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this general permit [40
CFR 122 41(c)]
Bypassing assing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Bypass is prohibited and the Director may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass unless
a Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life personal injury or severe property damage and
b There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass such as the use of auxiliary control facilities retention
of stormwater or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime or dry weather This
condition is not satisfied if adequate backup controls should have been installed in the exercise of
reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of
equipment downtime or preventive maintenance and
Part III Page 5 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
c The permittee submitted notices as required under Part III Section E of this general permit
If the Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above the Director may approve an
anticipated bypass after considering its adverse effects
SECTION D MONITORING AND RECORDS
Representative Sampling
Samples collected and measurements taken as required herein shall be characteristic of the volume and
nature of the permitted discharge Analytical sampling shall be performed during a measureable storm
event Samples shall be taken on a day and time that is characteristic of the discharge All samples shall be
taken before the discharge loins or is diluted by any other waste stream body of water or substance
Monitoring points as specified in this general permit shall not be changed without notification to and
approval of the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 122 410)]
Recording Results
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this general permit the permittee
shall record the following information [40 CFR 122 41]
a The date exact place and time of sampling or measurements
b The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements
c The date(s) analyses were performed,
d The individual(s) who performed the analyses
e The analytical techniques or methods used and
f The results oFsuch analyses
Flow Measurements
Where required, appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific
practices shall be selected and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of
monitored discharges
4 Test Piocedure
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC regulations published pursuant to
NCGS 143 215 63 et seq the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts and to regulations published pursuant to
Section 304(g) 33 USC 1314 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as Amended and Regulation 40 CFR
136
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this general permit all test procedures must produce
minimum detection and reporting levels and all data generated must be reported down to the minimum
detection or lower reporting level of the procedure If no approved methods are determined capable of
achieving minimum detection and reporting levels below general permit discharge requirements then the
most sensitive (method with the lowest possible detection and reporting level) approved method must be
used
Representative Outfall
If a facility has multiple discharge locations with substantially identical stormwater discharges that are
required to be sampled the permittee may petition the Director for representative outfall status If it is
established that the stormwater discharges are substantially identical and the permittee is granted
representative outfall status, then sampling requirements may be performed at a reduced number of outfalls
6 Records Retention
Part III Page 6 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
Qualitative monitoring shall be documented and records maintained at the facility Copies of analytical
monitoring results shall also be maintained on site 'fhe permttee shall retain records of all monitoring
information including
o all calibration and maintenance records
o all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation
o copies of all reports required by this general permit
o copies of all data used to complete the Notice of Intent to be covered by this general permit
These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 5 years from the date ofthe sample
measurement report or Notice of Intent application This period may be extended by request of the Director
at any time [40 CFR 122 41] if this volume of records cannot be maintained on site the documents must be
made available to an inspector upon request as immediately as possible
Inspection and Entry
The permrttee shall allow the Director or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor
acting as a representative of the Director) or an the case of a facility which discharges through a municipal
separate storm sewer system an authorized representative of a municipal operator or the separate storm
sewer system receiving the discharge, upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may be
required bylaw to
a Fnter upon the permrttee s premises where a regulated facility or activity as located or conducted or
where records must be kept under the conditions of this general permit,
b Have access to and copy at reasonable tames any records that must be kept under the conditions of than
general permit
c Inspect at reasonable tames any facilities equipment (including monitoring and control equipment),
practices or operations regulated or required under this general permit and
d Sample or monitor at reasonable times for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise
authorized by the Clean Water Act any substances or parameters at any location [40 CFR 122 41(1)]
SECTION E REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1 Drscharg, Monitoring Reports
Samples analyzed an accordance with the terms of this general permit shall be submitted to the Division on
Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms provided by the Director DMR forms are available on the
Division s websate http://i2orW.nLdeni.org/web/`wg/ws/su/nDdess Submittals shall be delivered to the
Division no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the
laboratory
When no discharge has occurred from the facility during the report period the permttee as required to
submit a discharge monitoring report within 30 days of the end of the specified sampling period giving all
required information and indicating NO FLOW as per NCAC T1SA 02B 0506
If the permrttee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this general permit using test
procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 and at a sampling location specified in this general permit or
other appropriate instrument governing the discharge the results of such monitoring shall be included an the
data submitted on the DMR
The permrttee shall record the required qualitative monitoring observations on the SDO Qualitative
Monitoring Report form provided by the Division and shall retain the completed forms on site Qualitative
monitoring results should not be submitted to the Division except upon DWQ's specific requirement to do so
Qualitative Monitoring Report forms are available at the websate above
Part Ill Page 7 of 9

Submitting -Reports
Two signed copies of Discharge Monitai ing Reports (DMRs) shall be submitted to
Central Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1617
3 Availability of ReDarts
Permit No NCG120000
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215 3(a)(2) or Section 308 of the Federal Act,
33 USC 1318 all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be available for public inspection at the
offices of the Division As required by the Act analytical data shall not be considered confidential Knowingly
making any false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal penalties as provided
for in NCGS 143-215 6B or in Section 309 of the Federal Act
4 Non_Stormwater Discharges
Ifthe storm event monitored in accordance with this general permit coincides with a non-stormwater
discharge, the permittee shall separately monitor all parameters as required under all other applicable
discharge permits and provide this information with the stormwater discharge monitoring report
5 Planned C� hanges
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned changes at the permitted
facility which could significantly alter the nature or quantity of pollutants discharged [40 CFR 122 41(I)1
This notification requirement includes pollutants which are not specifically listed in the general permit or
subject to notification requirements under 40 CFR Part 122 42 (a)
6 Anticipte _Noncompliance
The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director of any planned changes at the permitted facility which
may result in noncompliance with the general permit [40 CFR 122 41(1)(2)]
7 SIL, U
The permittee shall report to the local DWQ Regional Office within 24 hours all significant spills as defined
in Part IV of this general permit Additionally the permittee shall report spills including any oil spill of 25
gallons or more any spill regardless of amount that causes a sheen on surface waters any oil spill regardless
of amount occurring within 100 feet of surface waters and any oil spill less than 25 gallons that cannot be
cleaned up within 24 hours
8 Bypass
Notice [40 CFR 122 41(m)(3)]
a Anticipated bypass If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass it shall submit prior
notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass including an evaluation of the
anticipated quality and affect of the bypass
b Unanticipated bypass The permittee shall submit notice within 24 hours of becoming aware of an
unanticipated bypass
Twenty r Vr_RepoMng
a The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any noncompliance
which may endanger health or the environment Any information shall be provided orally within 24
hours from the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances A written submission shall also
be provided within S days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances
Part III Page 8 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance and its causes, the period
of noncompliance including exact dates and times and if the noncompliance has not been corrected
the anticipated time compliance is expected to continue, and steps taken or planned to reduce
eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance [40 CFR 122 41(I)(6)]
b The Director may waive the written report on a case by case basis for reports under this section if the
oral report has been received within 24 hours
c Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be reported to the Division s Emergency Response
personnel at [phone] [phone] or [phone]
10 Other Noncompliance
The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under 24 hour reporting at the time
monitoring reports are submitted [40 CFR 122 41(1)(7)]
11 Other Information
Where the Permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a Notice of Intentto be
covered under this general permit, or submitted incorrect information in that Notice of Intent application or
in any report to the Director it shall promptly submit such facts or information [40 CFR 122 41(l)(8)]
Part III Page 9 of 9

PART IV DEFINITIONS
Act
See Clean Water Act
Permit No NCG120000
Adverse Weather
Adverse conditions are those that are dangerous or create maccessibility for personnel such as local flooding
high winds or electrical storms or situations that otherwise make sampling impractical When adverse
weather conditions prevent the collection of samples during the sample period the permittee must take a
substitute sample or perform a visual assessment during the next qualifying storm event Documentation of
an adverse event (with date, time and written narrative) and the rationale must be included with your
records Adverse weather does not exempt the permittee from having to file a monitoring report in
accordance with the sampling schedule Adverse events and failures to monitor must also be explained and
reported on the relevant DM
Allowable Non Stormwater Discharges
This general permit regulates stormwater discharges Nan-stormwater discharges which shall be allowed in
the stormwater conveyance system are
a All other discharges that are authorized by a non stormwater NPDES permit
b Uncontaminated groundwater foundation drams, air conditioner condensate without added chemicals,
springs discharges of uncontaminated potable water waterline and fire hydrant tlushmgs water from
footing drains irrigation waters flows from riparian habitats and wetlands
c Discharges resulting from Fire -fighting or fire fighting training or emergency shower or eye wash as a
result of use in the event of an emergency
4 Best Management Practices fBMPs
Measures or practices used to reduce the amount of pollution entering surface waters BMPs may take the
form of a process activity, or physical structure More information on BMPs can be found at
httn.//cf//cfpubepa,gov/npdcs/stocmwatfr/menu,ojlmps indexcfm
5 BvDass
A bypass is the known diversion of stormwater from any portion of a stormwater control facility including
the collection system which is not a designed or established operating mode for the facility
6 Bulk Storage of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above ground
storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage
containers located in close proximity to each other having a total combined storage cap-icity of greater than
1 320 gallons
7 Certificate of Coverage
The Certificate of Coverage (COC) is the cover sheet which accompanies a general permit upon issuance and
lists the facility name location, receiving stream river basin effective date of coverage under the general
permit and is signed by the Director
8 Clean Water Act
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act also known as the Clean Water Act (CWA) as amended 33 USC
1251 et seq
9 Division or DWO
The Division of Water Quality, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
10 Director
The Director of the Division of Water Quality the permit issuing authority
11 EMC
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
Part IV Page 1 of 4

Permit No NCG120000
12 Gra am l
An individual sample collected instantaneously Grab samples that will be analyzed (quantitatively or
qualitatively) must betaken within the first 30 minutes of discharge
1 i Hazardous Substance
Any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 116 pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act
14 Land011
A disposal facility or part of a disposal facility where waste is placed in or on land and which is not a land
treatment facility, a surface impoundment an injection well a hazardous waste long term storage facility or a
sup face storage facility
15 Mea5ureable Storm Event
A storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site outfall The previous measurable
storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior The 72 hour storm interval may not apply if the
permuttee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for local storm events during the
sampling period, and obtains approval from the focal DWQ Regional Office Two copies of this information
and a written request letter shall be sent to the local DWQ Regional Office After authorization by the DWQ
Regional Office a written approval letter must be kept on site
16 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (M54)
A stormwater collection system within an incorporated area of local self government such as a city or town
17 No Exposure
A condition of no exposure means that all industrial materials and activities are protected by a storm
resistant shelter or acceptable storage containers to prevent exposure to rain snow snowmelt or runoff
Industrial materials or activities include but are not limited to material handling equipment or activities
industrial machinery raw materials intermediate products by-products final products or waste products
DWQ may grant a No Exposure Exclusion from NPDES stormwater permitting requirements only if a facility
complies with the terms and conditions described in 40 Ci+R §122 26(g)
18 Notice ten
The state application form which when submitted to the Division officially indicates the facility s notice of
intent to seek coverage under a general permit
19 Permit lssuwaAuthority
The Director of the Division of Water Quality (see Director above)
20 Permittee
The owner or operator issued a Lei tific.att, of Covr-ragL pursuant to this general permit
21 Point SourCe Di
Any discernible confined and discrete conveyance including but not specifically limited to any pipe ditch,
channel tunnel conduit well or discrete fissure from which stormwater is or may be discharged to waters of
the state
22 Representative-utfall Status
When it is established that the discharge of stormwater runoff from a single outfall is representative of the discharges
at multiple outfalls the DWQ may grant representative outfall status Representative outfall status allows the
permittee to perform analytical monitoring at a reduced number of outfalls
23 Secondary Containment
Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment structure plus sufficient
freeboard to allow for the 25 year 24 hour storm event
Part IV Page 2 of 4

ij
Permit No NCG120000
24 Section 313 Water Priority Chemical
A chemical or chemical category which
b Is listed in 40 CFR 372 6S pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know
Act of 19B6
c Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title III Section 313 reporting
requirements, and
d Meets at least one of the following criteria
i Is listed in appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on Table 11 (organic priority pollutants) Table HI
(certain metals cyanides and phenols) or Table IV (certain tGX1C pollutants and hazardous
substances),
u Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40 CFR 116 4 or
in Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria
2S kygrrg Property Damage
Substantial physical damage to property damage to the control facilities which causes them to become
inoperable or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to
occur in the absence of a bypass Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in
production
26 Signifiont Material
Includes but is not limited to raw materials fuels materials such as solvents detergents, and plastic pellets
finished materials such as metallic products raw materials used in food processing or production hazardous
substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCLA any chemical the facility is required to report
pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA fertilizers, pesticides and waste products such as ashes slag and
sludge that have the potenti-il to be released with stormwater discharges
27 Significant Spills
Includes but is not limited to releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities
under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref 40 CFR 110 Sand 40 CFR 117 3) or section 102 of CERCLA
(Ref 40 CFR 302 4)
28 Stormwater Discharge Dutfall (,SDO)
The point of departure of stormwater from a discernible confined or discrete conveyance including but not
limited to storm sewer pipes, drainage ditches channels spillways or channelized collection areas, from
which stormwater flows directly or indirectly into waters of the State of North Carolina
29 Stormwater Runoff
The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or as a
result of snowmelt
30 Stormwater A ciat d with Indu trial
The discharge from any point source which is used for collecting and conveying Stormwater and which is
directly related to manufacturing processing or raw material storage areas at an industrial site Facilities
considered to be engaged in industrial activities include those activities defined in 40 CFR 122 26(b)(14)
The term does not include discharges from facilities or activities excluded from the NPDES program
31 Stormwater Pollution Prevention 1'kn (SPPPI
A comprehensive site specific plan which details measures and practices to reduce stormwater pollution and
is based on an evaluation of the pollution potential of the site
32 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
TMDLs are written plans for attaining and maintaining water quality standards in all seasons for a specific
water body and pollutant A list of approved TMDLs for the state of North Carolina can be found at
hitp.1/go.rtal.ncdenr.org/web/wil/gs/gitUilWdi
Part IV Page 3 of 4

Permit No NCG120000
33 Toxic Pollutant
Any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act
34 Vehicle Maintenance Activity
Vehicle rehabilitation, mechanical repairs painting fueling lubrication vehicle cleaning operations, or
airport deicing operations
3S Visible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter both mineral and organic that has been or is being transported by water air
gravity or ice from its site of origin which can be seen with the unaided eye
36 25 year, 24 hour Storm Event
The maximum 24 hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average once in 25
years
Part IV Page 4 of 4

NCDENR
Ww . C 0_ uA 7�lW EM of
f ti0404MU I .4MJ NAIUtiI I L.LI M U
Division of Water Quality 1 Surface Water Protection
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
REPRESENTATIVE OU FFALL STATUS (ROS)
REQUEST FORM
FOR AGENCY U"E ON[ Y
Date Received
Year
Moh
1]av
if a facility is required to sample multiple discharge locations with very similar stormwater discharges, the
permrttee may petition the Director for Representative 0utfall Status (ROS) DWQ may grant Representative
Outfall Status if stormwater discharges from a single outfall are representative of discharges from multiple
outfalls Approved ROS will reduce the number of outfalls where analytical sampling requirements apply
if Representative Outfall Status is granted, ALL outfalls are still subject to the qualitative monitoring
requirements of the facility's permit —unless otherwise allowed by the permit (such as NCGO20000) and DWQ
approval The approval letter from DWQ must be kept on site with the focrhty's Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan The facility must notify DWQ in writing if any changes affect representative status
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area (seepage 3)
(Please print or type)
1) Enter the permit number to which this ROS request applies
Individual Permit (or) Certificate of Coverage
N C S I I I I N C G
2) Facility Information
Owner/Facility Name
Facility Contact
Street Address
City
County
Telephone No
State
E mail Address
Fax
ZIP Code
3) List the representative outfalls) information (attach additional sheets if necessary)
Outfall(s) is representative of Outfall(s)
Outfalls' drainage areas have the same or similar activities?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Outfalls' drainage areas contain the same or similar materials?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Outfalls have similar monitoring results?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ No data*
Outfall(s) is representative of Outfall(s)
Outfalls' drainage areas have the same or similar activities?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Outfalls' drainage areas contain the same or similar materials?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Outfalls have similar monitoring results?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ No data*
Outfall(s) is representative of Outfall(s)
Outfalls' drainage areas have the same or similar activities?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Outfalls' drainage areas contain the same or similar materials?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Outfalls have similar monitoring results?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ No data*
*Non-compliance with analytical monitoring prior to this request may prevent ROS approval Specific
circumstances will be considered by the Regional Office responsible for review
Page 1 of 3
SW U ROS 2009 Last revised 12/30/2009

_r
Representative Outfall Status Request
4) Detailed explanation about why the outfalls above should be granted Representative Status
(Or, attach a letter or narrative to discuss this information ) For example, describe how activities and/or
materials are similar
5) Certification
North Carolina General Statute 143-215 6 B(i) provides that
Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record,
report plan or other document filed or required to be maintained under this Article or a rule implementing this
Article, or who knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact in a rulemaking proceeding or contested case
under this Article or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device
or method required to be operated or maintained under this Article or rules of the [Environmental Management]
Commission implementing this Article shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor which may include a fine not to exceed
ten thousand dollars ($10,000)
I hereby request Representative Outfall Status for my NPDES Permit I understand that ALL outfalls are still
subject to the qualitative monitoring requirements of the permit, unless otherwise allowed by the permit
and regional office approval I must notify DWQ in writing if any changes to the facility or its operations
take place after ROS is granted that may affect this status If ROS no longer applies, I understand I must
resume monitoring of all outfalls as specified in my NPDES permit
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application and that to the best of my
knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate
Printed Name of Person Signing
Title
(Signature of Applicant)
(Date Signed)
Please note This application for Representative Outfall Status is subject to approval by the
NCDENR Regional Office The Regional Office may inspect your facility for compliance with the
conditions of the permit prior to that approval
Final Checklist for ROS Request
This application should include the following items
❑ This completed form
❑ Letter or narrative elaborating on the reasons why specified outfalls should be granted representative
status, unless all information can be included in Question 4
a Two (2) copies of a site map of the facility with the location of all outfalls clearly marked, including the
drainage areas, industrial activities, and raw materials/finished products within each drainage area
❑ Summary of results from monitoring conducted at the outfalls listed in Question 3
❑ Any other supporting documentation
Page 2 of 3
SWU ROS 2009 Last revised t2/3012009

Representative Oulfall Status Request
Mail the entire package to
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
at the appropriate Regional Office (See reap and addresses below)
Notes
The submission of this document does not guarantee Representative OutfalI Status (ROS) will be granted as
requested Analytical monitoring as per your current permit must be continued, at all outfalls, until written
approval of this request is granted by DWQ Non-compliance with analytical monitoring prior to this request
may prevent ROS approval Specific circumstances will be considered by the Regional Office responsible for
review
For questions, please contact the DWQ Regional Office for your area
Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Phone [phone]
Washington, NC 27889
FAX [phone]
Phone [phone]
Fayetteville Regional Office
FAX [phone]
Systel Building,
225 Green St , Suite 714
Wilmington Regional Office
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Ave
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Mooresville, NC 28115
585 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, NC 27107
Phone [phone]
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
Water Quality Main FAX [phone]
Raleigh Regional Office
Central Office
1628 Mail Service Center
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 1628
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Phone [phone]
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
FAX [phone]
Page 3 of 3
SWU ROS 2009 Last revised 12/30/2009

Permit No NCG120000
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO, NCG120000
TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
for
Landfills
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, this permit is hereby issued to all owners or
operators, hereinafter permittees, which are covered by this permit as evidenced by receipt of a Certificate
of Coverage by the Environmental Management Commission to allow the discharge of stormwater to the
surface waters of North Carolina or to a separate storm sewer system conveying discharges to surface
waters in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein
Coverage under this General Permit is applicable to
♦ All owners or operators of stormwater point source discharges associated with activities categorized as
landfills, including construction and demolition debris landfills, which are permitted by the North
Carolina Division of Waste Management under the provisions and requirements of North Carolina
General Statute 130A-294
♦ Stormwater point source discharges from like industrial activities deemed by the Division of Water
Quality to be similar to these operations in the process, or the discharges, or the exposure of raw
materials, intermediate products, by-products, products, or waste products
Except upon DWQ determination of similarity as provided immediately above, the following
activities and associated discharges are excluded from coverage under this General Permit
♦ Stormwater point source discharges from open dumps, hazardous waste disposal sites, land clearing
and inert debris landfills, or discharges of wastes (including discharges of leachate as defined in 15A
NCAC 13B 0101(11))
The General Permit shall become effective on November 1 2012
The General Permit shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2017
Signed this day October 25, 2012
Original signed by Matt Matthews
for Charles Wakild, P E , Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No NCG120000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I INTRODUCTION
Section A General Permit Coverage
Section B Permitted Activities
PART IIMONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED DISCHARGES
Section A Final Limitations and Controls for Stormwater Discharges
Section B Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Section C On -Site Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Monitoring Requirements
Section D Qualitative Monitoring and Visual Inspection Requirements
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER GENERAL PERMITS
Section A Compliance and Liability
1 Compliance Schedule
2 Duty to Comply
3 Duty to Mitigate
4 Civil and Criminal Liability
5 Oil and Hazardous Substance Liability
6 Property Rights
7 Severability
8 Duty to Provide Information
9 Penalties for Tampering
10 Penalties for Falsification of Reports
11 Onshore or Offshore Construction
12 Duty to Reapply
Section B General Conditions
1 General Permit Expiration
2 Transfers
3 When an Individual Permit May be Required
4 When an Individual Permit Maybe Requested
5 Signatory Requirements
6 General Permit Modification Revocation and Reissuance, or Termination
7 Certificate of Coverage Actions
8 Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring Fee Requirements

Section C Operation and Maintenance of Pollution Controls
1 Proper Operation and Maintenance
2 Need to Halt or Reduce not a Defense
3 Bypassing of Stormwater Control Facilities
Section D Monitoring and Records
1
Representative Sampling
2
Recording Results
3
Flow Measurements
4
Test Procedures
5
Representative Outfall
6
Records Retention
7
Inspection and Entry
Section E Reporting
Requirements
1
Discharge Monitoring Reports
2
Submitting Reports
3
Availability of Reports
4
Nan-Stormwater Discharges
5
Planned Changes
6
Anticipated Noncompliance
7
Spills
8
Bypass
9
Twenty-four Hour Reporting
10
Other Noncompliance
11
Other Information
PART IV DEFINITIONS
Permit No NCG120000
in

Permit No NCGI20000
PART I INTRODUCTION
SECTION A GENERAL PERMIT COVERAGE
All persons desiring to be covered by this General Permit must register with the Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) by the filing of a Notice of Intent (NO1) and applicable fees The NO[ shall be submitted and a
certificate of coverage issued prior to any point source discharge of stormwater associated with industrial
activity to the surface waters of the state
Any owner or operator not wishing to be covered or limited by this General Permit may make application
for an individual NPDES permit in accordance with NPDES procedures in 15A NCAC 2H 0100, Stating the
reasons supporting the request Any application for an individual permit should be made at least 180 days
prior to commencement of discharge
This General Permit does not cover activities or discharges covered by an individual NPDES permit until the
individual permit has expired or has been revoked Any person conducting an activity covered by an
individual permit but which could be covered by this General Permit may request that the individual permit
be revoked and coverage under this General Permit be provided
If industrial materials and activities are not exposed to precipitation or runoff as described in 40 CFR
§122 26(g) the facility may qualify for a No Exposure Exclusion from NPDES stormwater discharge permit
requirements Any owner or operator wishing to obtain a No Exposure Exclusion must submit a No
Exposure Certification Notice of Intent (NOI) form to the Division, must receive approval by the Division,
must maintain no exposure conditions unless authorized to discharge under a valid NPDES stormwater
permit and must recertify the No Exposure Exclusion annually
Any facility may apply for new or continued coverage under this permit until a Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) for pollutants for stormwater is established A TMDL sets a pollutant -loading limit that affects a
watershed, or portion of a watershed, draining to a specific impaired water For discharges to
watersheds affected by a TMDL, coverage under this permit may depend on the facility
demonstrating it does not have reasonable potential to violate applicable water quality standards
for those pollutants as a result of discharges If DWQ determines that discharges have reasonable
potential to cause water quality standard violations, the facility shall apply for an individual permit 180
days prior to the expiration date of this General Permit Once that individual permit is effective, the facility
will no longer have coverage under this General Permit
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the permittee is
authorised to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity Such discharges shall he controlled,
limited, and monitored as Specified in this permit
Part I Page 1 of 2

Permit No NCGI20000
SECTION B PERMITTED ACTIVITIES
Until coverage under this permit expires or is modified or revoked, the permittee is authorized to discharge
stormwater, to the surface waters of North Carolina or to a separate storm sewer system, which has been
adequately treated and managed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this General Permit
Any other point source discharge to surface waters of the state is prohibited unless it is an allowable non-
stormwater discharge or is covered by another permit, authorization, or approval The discharges
authorized by this General Permit shall not cause or contribute to violations of Water Quality
Standards
Where wetlands are located on or nearby landfilling operations, discharges authorized by this permit and
site operations must meet applicable wetland standards, as recorded in 15A NCAC 2B 0230 and 0231, and
water quality certification requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H 0500
This permit does not relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable
federal state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree
Part I Page 2 of 2

Permit No NC6120000
PART II MONITORING, CONTROLS, AND LIMITATIONS FOR PERMITTED DISCHARGES
SECTION A LIMITATIONS AND CONTROLS FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES
During the period beginning on the effective date of the Certificate of Coverage and lasting until expiration
of the General Permit, the permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater Such discharges shall be
controlled, limited, and monitored as specified below
1 Prior to commencement of land disturbing activities, the permittee shall submit for approval a
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan (plan) to the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Energy Mineral, and Land Resources, or an approved local program,
pursuant to the requirements of NC G S 113A-54 1 and in conformity with the rules adopted by the
Sedimentation and Erosion Control Commission
2 The permittee shall implement the approved plan The approved plan is a requirement or condition
of this General Permit Deviation from the approved plan, or approved amendment to the plan,
shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this General Permit A signed copy of the
approved plan shall be maintained on the site at all times
Prior to constructing or operating a landfill the permittee shall obtain a permit for a sanitary landfill
from the N C Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management,
pursuant to the requirements of NC G S 130A - 294 and in conformity with the rules adopted in 15A
North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 13B Section 0500 or Section 1600 The landfill
permit is a requirement or condition of this General Permit Deviation from the landfill permit, or
approved amendment or revision of the landfill permit, shall constitute a violation of the terms and
conditions of this General Permit A signed copy of the landfill permit shall be maintained on the
site at all times
4 Secondary Containment Requirements and Records Secondary containment is required for bulk
storage of liquid materials includingpetroleumproducts, storage in any amount of Section 313 of
Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) water priority chemicals,
and storage in an nt of hazardous in order to prevent leaks and spills from
contaminating stormwater runoff A table or summary of all such tanks and stored materials and
their associated secondary containment areas shall be maintained if the secondary containment
devices are connected to stormwater conveyance systems, the connection shall be controlled by
manually activated valves or other similar devices which shall be secured closed with a locking
mechanism Any stormwater that accumulates in the containment area shall beat a minimum
visually observed for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens and dry weather flow, prior to
release of the accumulated stormwater Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to be
uncontaminated by any material Records documenting the individual making the observation, the
description of the accumulated stormwater, and the date and time of the release shall be kept for a
period of five (5) years For facilities subject to a federal oil Spill Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure Plan, facility compliance with any portion of the SPCC plan fully consistent with
the requirements of this permit may be used to demonstrate compliance with this permit
5 Equipment utih7ed during the land disturbing or landfill operational activities on a site shall be
operated and maintained in such a manner as to prevent potential or actual pollution of the surface
or ground waters of the state Fuels lubricants, coolants, and hydraulic fluids, other petroleum
products, and spent fluids shall be disposed of in a manner so as not to enter the waters, surface or
ground, of the state and in accordance with applicable state and federal disposal regulations Any
Part I1 Page 1 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
spilled fluids shall be cleaned up to the extent practicable and disposed of in a manner so as not to
allow their entry into the waters, surface or ground, of the state
SECTION B ANALYTICAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Analytical monitoring of stormwater discharges shall be performed as specified in Table 1 All analytical
monitoring shall be performed during a measureable storm event at gach stormwater discharge outfall
(SDO) Only SDOs having stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity must be sampled See
Definitions
A measurable storm event is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted
site outfall The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior The 72-
hour storm interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is
representative for local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee obtains
approval from the local DWQ Regional Office See Definitions
Table 1 Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Discharge
Characteristics
Units
Measurement
Frequencyl
Sample
Type2
Sample
Location3
Chemical Oxygen Demand
m I
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Fecal Coliform
# per 100 ml
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended Solids
m l
Semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Rainfall4
inches
semi-annual
Rain gauge
-
Footnotes
1 Measurement Frequency Twice per year during a measureable storm event
2 Sample collection must begin within the first 30 minutes of discharge and continue to all outfalls until completed
3 Sample location Samples shall be collected at each stormwater discharge outfall (00) unless
representative outfall status (ROS) has been granted by DWQ A copy of the DWQ letter granting ROS must be kept
on site DWQ s ROS letter remains in effect through the subsequent reissuance of this permit and as long as the
pertinent site conditions and operations remain unchanged, unless the ROS letter provides for other conditions or
duration
4 For each sampled measureable storm event the total precipitation must be recorded from an on -site rain gauge
(Where isolated sites are unmanned far extended periods a local rain gauge reading may be substituted far an on site
gauge upon prior DWQ written approval)
The permittee shall complete the analytical samplings in accordance with the schedule specified in Table 2
below, unless adverse weather conditions prevent sample collection (see Definitions) Inability to sample
because of adverse weather conditions must be recorded on the Discharge Monitoring Report, along with a
description of the adverse conditions and their duration Sampling is not required outside of the facility s
normal operating hours
A minimum of 60 days must separate Period 1 and Period 2 sample dates unless monthly monitoring
has been instituted via other requirements of this permit The permittee must report the results of every
discharge sample taken within the monitoring period (see Part III, Section E)
Failure to monitor semi-annually per permit terms may result in the Division requiring monthly
monitoring for all parameters for a specified time period 'No discharge" from an outfall or inability to
collect a sample because of adverse weather conditions during a monitoring period, for example, does not
constitute failure to monitor, as long as it is properly reported
Part 11 Page 2 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
Table 2 Monitoring Schedule
Monitoring Penodl2
Sample Number
Start
End
Year 1 - Period 1
1
January 1, 2013
June 30, 2013
Year 1 - Period 2
2
July 1, 2013
December 31, 2013
Year 2 - Period 1
3
January 1, 2014
June 30, 2014
Year 2 - Period 2
4
July 1 2014
December 31, 2014
Year 3 - Period 1
5
January 1, 2015
June 30, 2015
Year 3 - Period 2
6
July 1, 2015
December 31, 2015
Year 4 - Period 1
7
January 1, 2016
June 30, 2016
Year 4 -- Period 2
8
July 1, 2016
December 31, 2016
Year 5 - Period 1
9
January 1, 2017
June 30, 2017
Year 5 - Period 2
10
July 1, 2017
October 31, 2017
Footnotes.
1 Maintain semi-annual monitoring during permit renewal process (unless monthly monitoring has been triggered
via other permit requirements )
2 If no discharge occurs during the sampling period the permittee must submit a monitoring report indicating No
Flow' within 30 days of the end of the sampling period
The permittee shall compare monitoring results to the benchmark values in Table 3 The benchmark values
are not permit limits but should be used as guidelines for the permittee's response actions to control the
discharge of pollutants in site stormwater Exceedances of benchmark values require the permittee to increase
monitoring, increase management actions, increase record keeping, and/or install stormwater Best
Management Practices (BMPs) in a tiered program
Table 3 Benchmark Values for Analytical Monitoring Requirements
Discharge Characteristics
Benchmark Value
Chemical Oxygen Demand
120 m
Fecal Coliform
1000 colonies per 100 ml
Total Suspended Solids TS5
100 m
TSS ORW, HQW, Trout, and PNA waters
1 50 m L
Each separate parameter benchmark exceedance triggers a separate tiered response for that parameter at that
outfall Seethe descriptions of Tier One, Tier Two, and Tier Three response actions below In the event that
DWQ releases the permittee from continued monthly monitoring under Tier Three DWQ's release letter
remains in effect through the subsequent reissuance of this permit, unless the release letter provides for other
conditions or duration
Part 11 Page 3 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
Tier One
If The first valid sampling results are above a benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range, for
anv parameter at anv outfall,
Then The permittee shall
1 Conduct a stormwater management inspection of the facility within two weeks of receiving
sampling results
2 Identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark value exceedence
3 Identify the potential, and select the specific source controls, operational controls, or physical
improvements to reduce concentrations of the parameters of concern
4 Implement the selected actions within two months of the inspection
S Maintain an on -site record of each instance of a Tier One response Include the date and value
of the benchmark exceedence the inspection date, the personnel conducting the inspection,
the selected actions, and the date the selected actions were implemented
Tier Two
If During the term of this permit, the sampling results are above the benchmark values, or outside
the benchmark range, for anv specific parameter at a specific discharge outfall two times in a row,
1 Then The permittee shall
1 Repeat all the required actions outlined above in Tier One
2 Immediately institute monthly monitoring for all parameters Conduct monthly monitoring at
every outfall where a sampling result exceeded the benchmark value for two consecutive
samples Monthly (analytical and qualitative) monitoring shall continue until three
consecutive sample results are below the benchmark values, or within the benchmark range
3 Submit a monthly monitoring report indicating "No Flow" if no discharge occurs during the
sampling period
4 Maintain a record of the Tier Two response and monitoring results on site
Tier Three
During the term of this permit, if the valid sampling results required for the permit monitoring
periods exceed the benchmark value for any specific parameter at any specific outfall on four
occasions, the permittee shall notify the DWQ Regional Office Surface Water Supervisor in writing
within 30 days of receipt of the fourth analytical results DWQ may, but is not limited to
• require that the permittee revise, increase, or decrease the monitoring frequency for some
or all parameters,
• rescind coverage under the General Permit, and require that the permittee apply for an
individual stormwater discharge permit,
• require the permittee to install structural stormwater controls,
• require the permittee to implement other stormwater control measures
• require the permittee to perform upstream and downstream monitoring to characterize
impacts on receiving waters
Part It Page 4 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
SECTION C ON -SITE VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Facilities which have any vehicle or equipment maintenance activity occurring on site which in aggregate
uses more than 55 gallons of new motor oil and hydraulic oil per month when averaged over the calendar
year shall perform analytical monitoring as specified below in Table 4 All analytical monitoring shall be
performed during a measureable storm event at all SDOs which discharge stormwater runoff from the
vehicle maintenance areas, in accordance with the schedule presented in Table 2 (Section B )
Table 4 Analytical Morn oring Require ents for On -Site Vehicle Maintenance
Discharge Characteristics
Units
Measurement
Frequencyl
Sample
Type2
Sample
Locahon3
H
standard
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Non -Polar Oil & Grease/TPH
EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM
mg/l
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Suspended Solids
m l
semi-annual
Grab
SDO
Total Rainfal14
inches
semi-annual
Rain gauge
New Motor Oil Usage
al month
I semi-annual
Estimate
-
Footnotes
1 Measurement Frequency Twice per year during a measureable storm event.
2 Sample collection must begin within the first 30 minutes of discharge and continue to ail outfalls until completed
3 Sample I ocation Simples shall be collected at each SDO receiving runoff from vehicle and equipment
maintenance areas unless representative outfall status (ROS) has been granted by DWQ A copy of the DWQ letter
granting ROS must be kept on site DWQ s ROS letter remains in effect through the subsequent reissuance of this
permit and as long as the pertinent site conditions and operations remain unchanged unless the ROS letter
provides for other conditions or duration
4 For each sampled measureable storm event the total precipitation must be recorded from an on site rain gauge
(Where rcoiated sites are unmanned for extended periods a local rain gauge reading may be substituted for an on site
gauge, upon prior DWQ written approval)
Monitoring results shall be compared to the benchmark values in Table 5 Exceedences of benchmark values
require the permittee to increase monitoring, increase management actions increase record keeping, and/or
install stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs), in accordance with the tiered response provisions of
Part 11, Section B
Table 5 Benchmark Values for On -Site Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Activities
Discharge Characteristics
Benchmark Value
H
Within the range 6 0- 9 03
Non -Polar Oil & Grease/TPH
EPA Method 1664 SGT-HEM
15 mg/l
Total Sus ended Solids (TSS)
100 mg/1
TSS ORW HQW, Trout, and PNA waters
50 m L
Footnote 1 If pH values outside this range are recorded in sampled stormwater discharges but ambient
precipitation pH levels are lower then the lower threshold of this benchmark range is the pH of the
precipitation (within insti ument accuracy) instead of 6 S U Readings from an on site rain gauge must be
documented to demonstrate that background concentrations were below the benchmark pli range of 6 9
Part 11 Page S of 6

Permit No NCG120000
Failure to monitor semi-annually per permit terms may result in the Division requiring monthly
monitoring for a specified time period 'No discharge from an outfall or inability to collect a sample
because of adverse weather conditions during a monitoring period for example does not constitute failure
to monitor, as long as it is properly reported
SECTION D QUALITATIVE MONITORING AND VISUAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
Qualitative monitoring shall be performed twice per year and concurrent with the analytical monitoring
requirements in Part II Sections B and C for the characteristics listed in Table 6 Qualitative monitoring is
for the purpose of quickly evaluating the effectiveness of the stormwater controls No analytical tests are
required The permittee shall maintain a written record of the qualitative monitoring events on site
Table 6 Oualitative Monitorine Requirements
Discharge Charactenstics
Momtonng
Locahonl
Color
SDO
Odor
SDO
Clarity
SDO
Floating Solids
SDO
Suspended Solids
SDO
Foam
SDO
Oil Sheen
SDO
Erosion or deposition at the
outfall
SDO
Other obvious indicators
of stormwater pollution
SDO
Footnote 1 Qualitative monitoring shall be performed at each stormwater discharge outfall [SDO) regardless of
representative outfall status (ROS) unless ROS has been granted specifically for qualitative monitoring A copy of
DWQ's letter granting ROS must be kept on site DWQ s ROS letter remains in effect through the subsequent
reissuance of this permit and as long as the pertinent site conditions and operations remain unchanged unless the
ROS letter provides for other conditions or duration
Visual inspections shall be conducted to ensure that all stormwater controls, including all sedimentation
and erosion controls, are intact, in good repair, fully functional and are otherwise being properly
implemented Inspections shall be conducted at least once every seven calendar days and within 24 hours
after any storm event of greater than 0 S inches of rain per 24 hour period The permittee shall maintain a
written record of each visual inspection on site
In the event an atypical condition is noted at a stormwater discharge outfall, the permittee shall maintain on -
site records of both the suspected cause of the condition and the corrective actions taken
If the permittee's qualitative monitoring or visual inspections indicate that existing stormwater controls are
ineffective, or that significant stormwater contamination is a recurring condition, the permittee shall
investigate potential causes, evaluate the feasibility of corrective actions, and implement feasible corrective
actions within 60 days A written record of the permittee s investigation, evaluation, and response actions
shall be kept on site Records related to qualitative monitoring and visual inspections need only be
submitted to DWQ upon the Division's specific request for those records
Part 11 Page 6 of 6

Permit No NCG120000
PART III STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR NPDES STORMWATER GENERAL PERMITS
SECTION A COMPLIANCE AND LIABILITY
1 he ule
The permittee shall comply with Limitations and Controls specified for stormwater discharges in accordance
with the following schedule
Lxcstmg facilities already operating but applying for coverage under this general permit for the first time
Secondary containment, as specified in Part 11 Section A, Paragraph 4 of this permit, shall be accomplished
within 12 months of the effective date of the initial Certificate of Coverage All other requirements
conditions limitations and controls contained in this permit become effective immediately upon issuance of
the Certificate of Coverage
New facilities applying for permit coverage for the first time and existing facilities previously permitted and
applying for renewal under this general permit All requirements, conditions limitations and controls
contained in this permit become effective immediately upon issuance of the Certificate of Coverage
2 DAY to Camnly
The permittee must comply with all conditions of this general permit Any permit noncompliance constitutes
a violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and is grounds for enforcement action, for permit termination
revocation and reissuance or modification, or denial of a permit upon renewal application [40 CPR 122 41]
a I he permittee shall comply with standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a) of the CWA
for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or
prohibitions even it the general permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement
b The CWA provides that any person who violates section[s] 301, 302, 306, 307, 308 318 or 40S of the Act
or any permit condition or limitation implementing any such sections in a permit issued under section
402 or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under sections 402(a)(3) or
402(b)(8) of the Act is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $37,500 per day for each violation [33 USC
1319(d) and 40 CI'R 122 41(a)(2)]
I he CWA provides that any person who negligently violates sections 301 302 306 307 308 318, or 405
of the Act, or any condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under
section 402 of the Act or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under section
402(a)(3) or 402(b)(8) of the Act is subject to criminal penalties of $2,500 to $25,000 per day of
violation, or imprisonment of not more than 1 year or both In the case of a second or subsequent
conviction for a negligent violation a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than
$SO 000 per day of violation or by imprisonment of not more than 2 years or both [33 USC 1319(c)(1)
ind 40 CPR 122 41(a)(2)]
cI Any person who knowingly violates such sections or such conditions or limitations is subject to criminal
penalties of $5,000 to $50 000 per day of violation or imprisonment for not more than 3 years or both
In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing violation, a person shall be subject to
criminal penalties of not more than $100 000 per day of violation or imprisonment of not more than 6
years or both [33 USC 1319(c)(2) and 40 CPR 12Z 41(a)(2)]
e Any person who knowingly violates section 301 302, 303 306, 307, 308 318 or 405 of the Act or any
permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under Section 402 of
the Act and who knows at that time that he thereby places another person in imminent danger of death
or serious bodily injury shall, upon conviction be subject to a fine of not more than $250 000 or
imprisonment of not more than 15 years or both In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a
Part I I1 Page 1 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
knowing endangerment violation, a person shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500,000 or by
imprisonment of not more than 30 years or both An organization, as defined in section 309(c)(3)(13)(m)
of the CWA shall upon conviction of violating the imminent danger provision be subject to a fine of not
more than $1 000 000 and can be fined up to $2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions [40 C.FR
122 41(a)(2)1
t Under state law a civil penalty of not more than $25 000 per violation may be assessed against any
person who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions or requirements of a permit
[North Carolina General Statutes § 143 215 6AJ
Any person may be assessed an administrative penalty by the Administrator for violating section 301
302 306 307 308 318 or 405 of this Act, or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such
sections in a permit issued under section 402 of this Act Administrative penalties for Class I violations
are not to exceed $16 000 per violation with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to
exceed $37 500 Penalties for Class II violations are not to exceed $16 000 per day for each day during
which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class 11 penalty not to exceed $177,500
[33 USC 1319(g)(2) and 40 CFR 122 41(a)(3)]
3 Duty to Mitigate
The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this general
permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment [40 CFR
122 41(d)]
4 Civil and Criminal Liability
Except as provided in Part III Section C of this general permit regarding bypassing of stormwater control
facilities nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from any responsibilities,
liabilities or penalties for noncompliance pursuant to NCGS 143 215 3 143 215 6 or Section 309 of the Federal
Act 33 USC 1319 Furthermore the permittee is responsible for consequential damages such as fish kills
even though the responsibility for effective compliance may be temporarily suspended
5 Oil apd Hazardous Substance Liability
Nothing in this general permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the
permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject to
under NCGS 143 215 75 et seq or Section 311 of the Federal Act 33 USC 1321
6 Property ht
The issuance of this general permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property
or any exclusive privileges nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal
rights, nor any infringement of Federal State or local laws or regulations [40 CFR 122 41(g)]
7 Severability
The provisions of this general permit are severable and if any provision of this general permit or the
application of any provision of this general permit to any circumstances, is held invalid the application of
such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this general permit shall not be affected thereby
[NCGS 150B 23]
8 Duty to Provide Information
The permittee shall furnish to the Permit Issuing Authority, within a reasonable time any information which
the Permit Issuing Authority may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying revoking and
reissuing, or terminating the general permit issued pursuant to this general permit or to determine
compliance with this general permit The permittee shall also furnish to th(. Permit Issuing Authority upon
request copies of records required to be kept by this general permit [40 CFR 122 41(h)]
Part III Page 2 of 9

Permit No NCG 120000
PgnaJ.lie_s_for Tampering
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate
any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this general permit shall upon conviction
be punished by a fine of not more than $10 000 per violation or by imprisonment for not more than two years
per violation or by both If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of
such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by
imprisonment of not more than 4 years or both [40 CFR 122 411
10 Penalties for Falsification of Reports
The Clean Water Act provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or
certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this general
permit including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance shall upon conviction, be
punished by a fine of not more than $10 000 per violation or by imprisonment for not more than two years
per violation or by both [40 CFR 122 411
11 Onshore or Offshore ConstrCistion
This general permit does not authorize or approve the construction of any onshore or offshore physical
structures or facilities or the undertaking of any work in any navigable waters
12 Duty to Reapply
Dischargers covered by this general permit need not submit a new Notice of Intent (NO[) or renewal request
unless so directed by the Division If the Division chooses not to renew this general permit the permittee will
be notified to submit an application for an individual permit [15A NCAC 02H 0127(e)]
SECTION H GENERAL CONDITIONS
General Permit Expiration
General permits will be effective for a term not to exceed five years at the end of which the Division may
renew them after all public notice requirements have been satisfied If a general permit is renewed existing
permittt.es do not need to submit a ri<newal request or pay a renewal fee unless directed by the Division
New applicants seeking coverage under a renewed general permit must submit a Notice of Intent to be
covered and obtain a Certificate of Coverage under the renewed general permit [15A NCAC 02H 0127(e)]
The certificate of covet age issued pursuant to this general permit is not transferable to any person without
prior written notice to and approval from the Director in accordance with 40 CFR 122 61 The Director may
condition approval in accordance with NCGS 143-215 1, in particular NCG5 143 215 1(b)(4)b 2 and may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage or a minor modification to
identify the new permittee and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the CWA [40
CFR 122 41(l)(3) 122 61] or state statute The Permittee is required to notify the Division in writing in
the event the permitted facility is sold or closed
When an Individual Permit Mav be Reauired
the Dlrlctor m-iy require any owner/operator authorized to discharge under a certificate of coverage issued
pursuant to this general permit to apply for and obtain an individual permit or an alternative general permit
Any interested person may petition the Director to take action under this paragraph Cases where an
individual permit may be requited include but are not limited to the following
a The discharger is a %igniticant contributor of pollutants
b Conditions at the permitted site change altering the constituents and/or characteristics of the
discharge such that the discharge no longer qualifies for a general permit,
c 'I he discharge violates the terms or conditions of this general permit
Part III Page 3 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
A change has occurred in the availability of demonstrated technology or practices for the control or
abatement of pollutants applicable to the point source,
Effluent limitations are promulgated for the point sources covered by this general permit
A water quality management plan containing requirements applicable to such point sources is
approved after the issuance of this general permit
The Director determines at his or her own discretion that an individual permit is required
When an Individual Perm►
Any perm►ttee operating under this general permit may request to be excluded from the coverage of this
general permit by applying for an individual permit When an individual permit is issued to an
owner/operator the applicability of this general permit is automatically terminated on the effective date of
the individual permit
Signatory Requirements
All applications reports or information submitted to the Permitting Issuing Authority shall be signed and
certified [40 CFR 122 41(k)]
a All Notices of Intent to be covered under this general permit shall be signed as follows
(1) For a corporation by a responsible corporate officer For the purpose of this Section, a responsible
corporate officer means (a) a president secretary treasurer or vice president of the corporation in
charge of a principal business function or any other person who performs similar policy or decision
making functions for the corporation or (b) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production
of operating facilities provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions which
govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making
major capital investment recommendations and initiating and directing other comprehensive
measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations
the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather
complete and accurate information for permit application requirements, and where authority to sign
documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively, or
(3) For a municipality State Federal or other public agency by either a principal executive otticer or
ranking elected official [40 CFR 122 22]
b All reports required by the general permit and other information requested by the Permit Issuing
Authority shall be signed by a person described in paragraph a above or by a duly authorized
representative of that person A person is a duly authorized representative only it
(1) The authorization is made in writing by a person described above
(2) The authorization specified either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall
operation of the regulated facility or activity such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or
well field, superintendent, a position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having
overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company (A duly authorized representative may
thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position ) and
(3) The written authorization is submitted to the Permit issuing Authority [40 CFR 122 221
c Changes to authorization If an authorization under paragraph (b) of this section is no longer accurate
because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new
authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section must be submitted to the
Director prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized
representative [40 CFR 122 22]
Part III Page 4 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
d Certification Any person signing a document under paragraphs a or b of this section shall make the
following certification [40 CFR 122 221 NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL BE
ACCEPT F D
l certify under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel property gother and
evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system
or those persons directly responsible forgathering the information, the information submitted is to the best
of my knowledge and belief true accurate and complete 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations
General Permit Modification. Revocation and Re►ssuance. or Termination
The issuance of this general permit does not prohibit the Permit Issuing Authority from reopening and
modifying the general permit revoking and reissuing the general permit or terminating the general permit
as allowed by the laws rules and regulations contained in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations Parts 122
and 123, Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 2H 0100, and North Carolina
General Statute 143 215 1 eta]
After public notice and opportunity for a hearing the general permit may be term►n ited for cause The filing
of a request for a general permit modification, revocation and reissuance or termination does not stay any
general permit condition The Certificate of Coverage shall expire when the general permit is terminated
Certificate of Covgrage ,Mons
The general permit maybe modified revoked and reissued or terminated for cause the notification of
planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any general permit condition [40 CFR
122 41(f)]
Annual Administering and Compliance Monitoring) g RCquirements
The permittee must pay the administering and compliance monitoring fee within 30 (thirty) days after being
billed by the Division Failure to pay the fee in timely manner in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H 0105(b)(2)
may i.ause this Division to initiate action to revoke coverage under the general permit
SECTION C OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROLS
Proper Operation and Ma►atejadplcg
The permittee shall at all tines properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and
control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with
the conditions of this permit Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls
and appropriate quality assurance procedures This provision requires the operation of back up or auxiliary
facilities or similar systems which are installed by a permittee only when the operation is necessary to
achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit [40 CFR 122 41(e))
Need to Halt or Reduce Not a Defense
It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an Enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or
reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the condition of this general permit [40
CFR 122 41(c)]
Bypassing ssing of_Stormwater Control Facilities
Bypass is prohibited and the Director may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass unless
a Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life personal injury or severe property damage and
b I here were no feasible alternatives to the bypass such as the use of auxiliary control facilities retention
of stormwater or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime or dry weather 'I his
condition is not satisfied if adequate backup controls should have been installed in the exercise of
reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of
equipment downtime or preventive maintenance and
Part III Page 5 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
c The permittee submitted notices as required under, Part III Section E of this general permit
if the Director determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above, the Director may approve an
anticipated bypass after considering its adverse effects
SECTION D MONITORING AND RECORDS
Representative Samphne
Samples collected and measurements taken, as required herein, shall be characteristic of the volume and
nature of the permitted discharge Analytical sampling shall be performed during a measureable storm
event Samples shall be taken on a day and time that is characteristic of the discharge All samples shall be
taken before the discharge loins or is diluted by any other waste stream, body of water or substance
Monitoring points as specified in this general permit shall not be changed without notification to and
approval of the Permit Issuing Authority [40 CFR 122 41(l)]
Recording Results
For each measurement or sample taken pursuant to the requirements of this general permit, the permittee
shall record the following information [40 CFR 122 41]
a The date exact place and time of sampling or measurements
b The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements
c The date(s) analyses were performed
d The mdividual(s) who performed the analyses
e The analytical techniques or methods used and
f The results of such analyses
Flow Measurements
Where required, appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific,
practices shall be selected and used to ensure the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of
monitored discharges
Test Procedures
Test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall conform to the EMC regulations published pursuant to
NCGS 143 215 63 et seq, the Water and Air Quality Reporting Acts and to regulations published pursuant to
Section 304(g) 33 USC 1314 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as Amended and Regulation 40 CFR
136
To meet the intent of the monitoring required by this general permit all test procedures must produce
minimum detection and reporting levels and all data generated must be reported down to the minimum
detection or lower reporting level of the procedure If no approved methods are determined capable of
achieving minimum detection and reporting levels below general permit discharge requirements then the
most sensitive (method with the lowest possible detection and reporting level) approved method must be
used
Representative Outfall
If a facility has multiple discharge locations with substantially identical stormwater discharges that are
required to be sampled the permittee may petition the Director for representative outfall status If it is
established that the stormwater discharges are substantially identical and the permittee is granted
representative outfall status then sampling requirements may be performed at a reduced number of outfalls
Records Retention
Part III Page 6 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
Qualitative monitoring shall be documented and records maintained at the facility Copies of analytical
monitoring results shall also be maintained on site The perm►ttee shall retain records of all monitoring
information including
o all calibration and maintenance records
o all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation
o copies of all reports required by this general permit,
o copies of all data used to complete the Notice of Intent to be covered by this general permit
These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 5 years from the date of the sample
measurement, report or Notice of Intent application This period maybe extended by request of the Director
at any time [40 CFR 122 41] If this volume of records cannot be maintained on site the documents must be
made available to an inspector upon request as immediately as possible
7 Inpec0on_and Entry
The perm►ttee shall allow the Director or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor
acting as a representative of the Director) or in the case of a facility which discharges through -i municipal
separate storm sewer system, an authorized representative of a municipal operator or the separate storm
sewer system receiving the discharge upon the presentation of credentials and other documents as may he
required by law to
a Enter upon the perm►tree s premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or
where records must be kept under the conditions of this general permit,
b Have access to and copy at reasonable times any records that must be kept under the conditions of this
general permit,
c Inspect at reasonable times any facilities equipment (including monitoring and control equipment)
practices or operations regulated or required under this general permit and
d Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise
authorized by the Clean Water Act any substances or parameters at any location [40 CFR 122 41(1)]
SECTION E REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
:haree Nlonitorinc R
Samples analyzed in accordance with the terms of this general permit shall be submitted to the Division on
Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms provided by the Director DMR forms are available on the
Division s website (htt /►wrtal nLLIL[Ir.org/w.cblwQ/ws/su/npdeNsw] Submittals shall be delivered to the
Division no later than 30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the
laboratory
When no discharge has occurred from the facility during the report period the perm►ttee is required to
submit a discharge monitoring report within 30 days of the end of the specified sampling period giving all
required information and indicating NO FLOW as per NCAC T15A 02B 0506
It the permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this general permit using test
procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 and at a sampling location specified in this general permit or
other appropriate instrument governing the discharge the results of such monitoring Shall be included in the
data submitted on the DMR
The perm►ttee shall record the required qualitative monitoring observations on the SDO Qualitative
Monitoring Report form provided by the Division and shall retain the completed forms on site Qualititive
monitoring results should not be submitted to the Division, except upon DWQ s specific requirement to do so
Qualitative Monitoring Report forms are available at the website above
Part III Page 7 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
Submitting Reports
Two signed copies of Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) shall be submitted to
Central Niles
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh North Carolina 27699 1617
3 Availability of Reports
Except for data determined to be confidential under NCGS 143-215 3(a)(2) or Section 30B of the Federal Act,
33 USC 1318 all reports prepared in accordance with the terms shall be available for public inspection at the
offices of the Division As required by the Act analytical data shall not be considered confidential Knowingly
making any false statement on any such report may result in the imposition of criminal penalties as provided
for in NCGS 143 215 6B or in Section 309 of the Federal Act
4 Non-Stormwater_Di�charges
If the storm event monitored in accordance with this general permit coincides with a non stormwater
discharge the permittee shall separately monitor all parameters as required under all other applicable
discharge permits and provide this information with the stormwater discharge monitoring report
5 Planned Changes
The permittee shall give notice to the Director as soon as possible of any planned changes at the permitted
facility which could significantly alter the nature or quantity of pollutants discharged [40 CFR 122 41(1)]
This notification requirement includes pollutants which are not specifically listed in the general permit or
subject to notification requirements under 40 CFR Part 122 42 (a)
6 Anticipated_hloammpllatL
The permittee shall give advance notice to the Director of any planned changes at the permitted facility which
may result in noncompliance with the general permit [40 CFR 122 41(1)(2)]
7 Saills
The permittee shall report to the local DWQ Regional Office within 24 hours all significant spills as defined
in Part IV of this general permit. Additionally the permittee shall report spills including any oil spill of 25
gallons or more any spill regardless of amount that causes a sheen on surface waters, any oil spill regardless
of amount occurring within 100 feet of surface waters, and any oil spill less than 25 gallons that cannot be
cleaned up within 24 hours
8 Bypass
Notice [40 CFR 122 41(m)(3)]
a Anticipated bypass If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass it shall submit prior
notice it possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass, including an evaluation of the
anticipated quality and affect of the bypass
b Unanticipated bypass The permittee shall submit notice within 24 hours of becoming aware of an
unanticipated bypass
Twenty four Hour Reporting
a The permittee shall report to the central office or the appropriate regional office any noncompliance
which may endanger health or the environment Any information shall be provided orally within 24
hours from the time the permittee became aware of the circumstances A written submission shall also
be provided within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances
Part III Page 8 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance and its causes, the period
of noncompliance including exact dates and times and if the noncompliance has not been corrected
the ^intic►pated time compliance is expected to continue, and steps taken or planned to reduce
eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance [40 CFR 122 41(1)(6)]
b The Director may waive the written report on a case by case basis for reports under this section if the
oral report has been received within 24 hours
c Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be reported to the Division s Emergency Response
personnel at [phone], [phone] or [phone]
10 Other Noncom lin ance
The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under 24 hour reporting at the time
monitoring reports are submitted [40 CFR 122 41(l)(7)]
11 Other Information
Where the Permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a Notice of Intent to be
covered under this general permit or submitted incorrect information in that Notice of Intent application or
in any report to the Director it shall promptly submit such facts or information [40 CFR 122 41(l)(8)]
Part III Page 9 of 9

Permit No NCG120000
PART IV DEFINITIONS
Ash
See Clean Water Act
Adverse Weather
Adverse conditions are those that are dangerous or create inaccessibility for personnel such as local flooding,
high winds or electrical storms or situations that otherwise make sampling impractical When adverse
weather conditions prevent the collection of samples during the sample period, the permittee must take a
substitute sample or perform a visual assessment during the next qualifying storm event Documentation of
an adverse event (with date, time and written narrative) and the rationale must be included with your
records Adverse weather does not exempt the permittee from having to file a monitoring report in
accordance with the sampling schedule Adverse events and failures to monitor must also be explained and
reported on the relevant DMR
Allowable Non Stormwater Discharges
This general permit regulates stormwater discharges Non-stormwater discharges which shall be allowed in
the stormwater conveyance system are
a All other discharges that are authorized by a non stormwater NPDES permit
b Uncontaminated groundwater foundation drains air -conditioner condensate without added chemicals,
springs, discharges of uncontaminated potable water, waterline and fire hydrant flushings water from
footing drains irrigation waters flows from riparian habitats and wetlands
c Discharges resulting from fire fighting or fire fighting training, or emergency shower or eye wash as a
result of use in the event of an emergency
4 Best Management Practices fBMPs
Measures or practices used to reduce the amount of pollution entering surface waters BMPs may take the
form of a process, activity or physical structure More information on BMPs can be found at
httn //cf/ pub (-pa gov/npdes/stormwater/mc nuoibmj2s/mde.x cfm
5 Bypass
A bypass is the known diversion of stormwater from any portion of a stormwater control facility including
the collection system which is not a designed or established operating mode for the facility
6 Bulk Storage of Liquid Products
Liquid raw materials manufactured products waste materials or by-products with a single above ground
storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage
containers located in close proximity to each other having a total combined storage capacity of greater than
1 320 gallons
7 Certificate of Coverage
The Certificate of Coverage (COC) is the cover sheet which accompanies a general permit upon issuance and
lists the facility name, location receiving stream river basin effective date of coverage under the general
permit and is signed by the Director
8 Clean Water Act
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act also known as the Clean Water Act (CWA) as amended 33 USC
1251 et seq
9 Division or DWQ
The Division of Water Quality Department of Environment and Natural Resources
10 Director
The Director of the Division of Water Quality the permit issuing authority
11 EMC
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
Part IV Page 1 of 4

Permit No NCG120000
12 drab Sample
An individual sample collected instantaneously Grab samples that will be analyzed (quantitatively or
qualitatively) must be taken within the first 30 minutes of discharge
13 Hazardous Substance
Any substance designated under 40 CFR Part 116 pursuant to Section 311 of the Clean Water Act
14 Landfill
A disposal facility or part of a disposal facility where waste is placed in or on land and which is not a land
treatment facility a surface impoundment, an injection well a hazardous waste long-term storage facility or a
surface storage facility
15 Meassire lble Storm Event
A storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site outfall The previous measurable
storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior I he 72-hour storm interval may not apply if the
permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for local storm events during the
sampling period and obtains approval from the local DWQ Regional Office Two copies of this information
and a written request letter shall be sent to the local DWQ Regional Office After authorization by the DWQ
Regional Office a written approval letter must be kept on site
16 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MSJ
A Stormwater collection system within an incorporated area of local self government such as a city or town
17 No Exposure
A condition of no exposure means that all industrial materials and activities are protected by a storm
resistant shelter or acceptable storage containers to prevent exposure to rain, snow snowmelt or runoff
Industri-il materials or activities include but are not limited to material handling equipment or activities
industrial machinery raw materials intermediate products, by-products, final products or waste products
DWQ may grant a No Exposure hxciusion from NPDES Stormwater permitting requirements only if a facility
complies with the terms and conditions described in 40 CFR §122 26(g)
18 Notice of Intent
The state application form which when submitted to the Division, officially indicates the Facility s notice of
intent to seek coverage under a general permit.
19 Re-mitissuingAuthorgy
ThL Director of the Division of Water Quality (see Director' above)
20 Permittee
The owner or operator issued a ( ertificdtL of Coverage pursuant to this general permit
21 Paint Source Discharge of Stormwater
Any discernible confined and discrete conveyance including but not specifically limited to any pipe, ditch
channel tunnel, conduit well or discrete fissure from which Stormwater is or may be discharged to waters of
the state
22 Repirrxsentative_Outfail Status
When it is established that the discharge of stormwater runoff from a single outfall is representative of the discharges
at multiple outfalls the DWQ may grant representative outfall status Representative outfall status allows the
permittee to perform analytical monitoring at a reduced number of outfalls
23 Secondary Containment
Spill containment for the contents of the single largest tank within the containment sti ucture plus sutficient
freeboard to allow for the 25 year 24 hour storm event
Part IV Page 2 of 4

Permit No NCG120000
24 Section 313 Water Priority Chemical
A chemical or chemical category which
b Is listed in 40 CFR 372 65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title 111 of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know
Act of 1986,
c Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title IH Section 313 reporting
requirements and
d Meets at least one of the following criteria
i Is listed in appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on Table II (organic priority pollutants), Table III
(certain metals cyanides and phenol%) or Table 1V (certain toxic pollutants and hazardous
substances)
u Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 311(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40 CFR 116 4 or
in Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria
25 Severe Property Damage
Substantial physical damage to property damage to the control facilities which causes them to become
inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to
occur in the absence of a bypass Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in
production
26 �Iglj&ant Materials
Includes but is not limited to raw materials fuels, materials such as solvent%, detergents, and plastic pellets,
finished materials such as metallic products, raw materials used in food processing or production hazardous
substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCLA any chemical the facility is required to report
pursuant to section 313 of Title I[I of SARA fertilizers pesticides and waste products such as ashes slag and
sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater discharges
27 Significant Spills
Includes but is not limited to releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities
under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref 40 CFR 110 3and 40 CFR 117 3) or section 102 of CERCLA
(Ref 40 CFR 302 4)
28 Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
The point of departure of Stormwater from a discernible confined or discrete conveyance including but not
limited to storm sewer pipes drainage ditches channels spillways or channeli7ed collection areas from
which stormwater flows directly or indirectly into waters of the State of North Carolina
29 Stormwater Runoff
The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or as a
result of snowmelt
30 Stormwater Associated with [ndustt [al Activity
The discharge from any point source which is used for collecting and conveying stormwater and which is
directly related to manufacturing processing or raw material storage areas at an industrial site Facilities
considered to be engaged in industrial activities include those activities defined in 40 CFR 122 26(b)(14)
The term does not include discharges from facilities or activities excluded from the NPOES program
31 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
A comprehensive site specific plan which details measures and practices to reduce stormwater pollution and
is based on an evaluation of the pollution potential of the site
32 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
TMDLs are written plans for attaining and maintaining water quality standards in all seasons for a specific
water body and pollutant A list of approved TMDLs for the state of North Carolina can be found at
http.JLnortal ncdenr orgJweb/wqJps1mW1mdl
Part IV Page 3 of 4

Permit No NCG120000
33 logic Pollutant
Any pollutant listed as toxic under Section 307(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act
34 Vehicle Maintenance Activity
Vehicle i ehabihtation mechanical repairs painting fueling lubrication, vehicle cleaning operations or
airport deicing operations
35 Mi5ible Sedimentation
Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water air
gravity or ice from its site of origin which can be seen with the unaided eye
36 25-year. 24 hour Storm Event
The maximum 24 hour precipitation event expected to be equaled or exceeded on the average once in 25
years
Part IV Page 4 of 4

NCDENR
NORM CAROLINA () P RTMCNT OP
E.WONMCNT AND NATnRAL, RCSOIMcCR
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Sold Waste Section
UNIT TYPE (check all that ap
3ly to this audit with same Permit number) I I I
Lased
LCID
YW
Transfer
Contposi
SLAS
COUNTY Haywood
MSWLF
PERMIT NO 44-07 amendment
Closed
IkiW
1lrhae
lncin
T&P
FIRM
MSWLF
goods
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
CDLF
X
Tire
Tire
Irldustnal
DEMO
SDTF
Collection
monoflll
Landfill
Date of Audit 3/22/07 Date of Last Audit 12/15/06
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Construction and Demolition Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Community
Waynesville, N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES (Decimal Degrees) N 35 66343 W 082 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Steven King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT)
Steven King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Jim Patterson, NCDENR-Solid Waste Section
Steven King, Haywood County Solid Waste Department
STATUS OF PERMIT
Active- Permit to Operate issued November 8, 2006
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Inspection of construction and demolition landfill
NOTICE OF VIOLATION(S) citation and explanation)
Permit Operational Condition number 29 in the approved effective Permit to Operate states that waste shall be covered with
six inches of suitable cover at least once per week Haywood County was operating in violation of this condition in that
waste has not been covered weekly with cover material A compliance date of May 15, 2007 has been established to
correct this violation
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N C G S 130A 22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations If the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS List all noted last audit
NIA

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDU )SPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 2
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
1 Seeding needs to be done on completed areas
2 Some erosion noted below drainage discharge pipes Address this issue
3 Very little life remaining in the approved C and D landfill area
4 Service area foi this landfill is Haywood County
5 Alan Parker and Ronnie Wilson both have taken the SWANA Landfill Operator course The date of the I raining was
October 27-28, 2005
6 Steven King is the new Haywood County Solid Waste Director and has received his SWANA MOLO certificate
P,lensy contact me if ou.hve any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
( signature) Phone [phone]
Regional Representative
Distribution orilpgal signed copy to facility -- signed copy to coin fiance officer -- e-mail or co to super
elivered on Click aiiAlMdale I by
hand delivery
US Mai
if:ed No 1 ]
i4i _ L' `IG It r _J ?/ 3� J

T� r
fA_
CDENR
c.Amuc. ,.T or
Ewwo"-04T Amo NiavR, iiee cea
0
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
UNIT TYPE: check all that ap)ly
to this audit
with same Perrrirt number
Lined
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
sL S
COUNTY Haywood
MSWLF
PERMIT NO 44-07
Closed
HHW
while
Trim
T&P
FIRM
MSWLF
goods
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
CDLF
TtreTBcP/
Tire
industrial
DEMO
SDTF
Callechon
MOWMI
Landfill
Dates of Audit March 20, 2008
April 1,22008
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County C & D Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Commuruty
Waynesville, N C 28786
Date of last Audit February 7, 2008
GPS COORDINATES (Decunal Degrees) N 35 66343 E -82 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
828-627-8042
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT)
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Troy Harrison, Environmental Senior Specialist, NCDENR/Division of Waste Management (DWM)/Solid Waste Section (SI
Allen Gaither, Engineer, NCDENR-DWM-SWS
Steven King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Mark Shumpert, Haywood County Engineer
STATUS OF PERMIT
Active — Permit to Operate issued November 8, 2006
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Partial audit Inspection of leachate breakout at C & D landfill reported by Mr King on 3/19/08
roiloW up rrl5Pet:t10n an'Niicfva
NOTICE OF VIOLATIOMS) (citation and explanation)
15A NCAC 13B 0542 (1)(4) which states Leachate must be contained on -site or treated prior to discharge
In order to achieve compliance, Haywood County Landfill must immediately
Assure leachate is contained on site or properly treated prior to discharge, and
2 Assess the impact of the leachate release outside of the waste cell

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT i_ ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Z VL L
Further action may be required by the Division
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N C G S 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $15,400 per day may be assessed for
each violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations If the violation(s) noted here continue, you maybe subject to enforcement
actions including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any
such further relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS List all noted last audit
None
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
Construction and Demolition Debris Landfill Unit
On March 19, 2008 at Approx 10 00 AM, Mr Troy Harrison, DWM-SWS-ARO Received a call from Mr
Steven King, Haywood Co Solid Waste Director concerning a leachate breakout that morning Mr King took
photos and samples to be analyzed He was concerned that oil or diesel fuel had been dumped here since a
theft of fuel had been reported the previous week Mr Harrison was not able to go to the landfill that day due
to a previously scheduled appointment, and advised Mr King to take photos and document remediation
activity The weather was very windy and rainy that day
2 On March 20, 2008 Mr Harrison met Mr King at the Haywood Co T & P Facility and went to the C & D
Landfill together At the time of inspection, there were several additional leachate breakouts due to the rain V
day before Mr Hamson took several photos Mr Harrison observed three breakouts, in the capped slope o,
the landfill, Just above the drainage ditch above the upper entrance road to the landfill The leachate flowed
into the drainage ditch The leachate had a black color with a strong sulfurtchemical smell Several spill
control mats and socks had been placed to help contain the leachate The remainder of the leachate from this
area then flowed off of the footprint of the landfill There were also three leachate breakouts below the upper
entrance road but still on the landfill These appeared, at the time of investigation, to not have left the landfill
Looking at an overall photograph of the C & D Landfill, it appears that all of the leachate breakouts occurred
from the same general location
On March 20, 2008, Mr Hamson contacted Mr Dennis Shackelford, SWS Field Operations Branch -Eastern
District Supervisor for further instructions Mr Shackelford said that the liquid was leachate and must be
contained within the landfill site Mr Harrison then contacted Mr King and instructed him to contain the
leachate within the site of the landfill and he said that it would be done Mr King called Mr Harrison back for
instruction on how to handle the LCID that normally goes to the C & D landfill since the road will be
temporally out of service He suggested that this material be placed at the former grinding area until it can be
deposited in the landfill Mr Harrison contacted Mr Shackelford who agreed with the temporary solution
Mr Hamson then contacted Mr King and gave approval to put the LC1D at the former grinding area until
repairs are made to the C & D landfill
4 On March 24, 2007 Mr Hamson and Ms Deb Aja, SWS Field Operations Branch -Western District
Supervisor, received an e-mail from Mr King relaying the results of a preliminary field test using a
"Honba U-22" on March 19, 2008 The e-mail stated that lab results will be sent as soon as
available
On Apnl 1, 2008, Mr Hamson and Mr Allen Gaither, DWM-SWS Engineer met with Mr King at,
Mr Shumpert, Haywood County Engineer, for a follow up investigation The areas containing
leachate breakouts above and below the upper entrance road had been excavated No leachate was
observed flowing above the upper entrance road into the drainage ditch Leachate was observed still

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUD. .SPORT
Division of Waste Management
Soled Waste Section
Page 3 of 3
flowing into the lower drainage ditch and being contained on site
Please contact me tf u have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
Troy Harrison 8281296-4701
(signature) Phone
Regional Representative
Visit bill tion original; signed copy, to facility -tee-mail to compliance officer - e-mail or copy to auger
Delivered on April 17, 2008 by hand delivery X US Mail Certified No L_j

E-13A
i 4 UED E -NR
EM7AMNIENr CW
EmmRomp,Ew AND N.otwK fjesouRG[S
x
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
UNIT TYPE:, check all that apply
to this audit with same Permit number%
Lined
MSWI.F
x
LC1D
Yw
Transfer
Compost
SLAS
COUNTY Haywood
�
PERMIT NO 44-07
ctosed
i[ltov
wivre
Inem
T&p
FIRM
MSWLF
goods
s
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
CDLF
TrreT&P/
Coilectroa
Tire
Monofill
Industrial
Landfill
DEMO
SDTF
Date of Audit 09/29/08 Date of Last Audit 02/07/08
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Comimuruty
Waynesville, N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES (Decimal Degrees) N 35 66343
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
-lephone 828-627-8042
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT)
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
W -82 99866
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller, NCDENR, Division of Waste Management (DWM}, Solid Waste Section (SWS)
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Jeffery Bishop, Senior Project Manager, McGill Associates
STATUS OF PERMIT
Active- Permit to Operate issued November 8, 2006
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Partial audit of Municipal solid waste landfill
NOTICE OF VIOLATION(S) (citation and explanation)
NONE
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N C G S 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
,cation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations If the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
iding penalties, injunction From operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
,.lief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules
STA FUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit)
NIA

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT L ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 2
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
1 The NCDENRIDWMISWS was notified on 9/26/08 of leachate seep and repair activities at the MSWLF
The letter document from McGill Associates indicated the seepage was noted on 9/22/08 and that the
location of the seep with respect to the edge of liner was verified on 9/23/08
2 McGill Associates proposed "installing a trench type drain for the conveyance of leachate away from the
apparent seep area [and] toward the MSW Phase I sump area, a distance of approximately 40 feet "
3 Additional corrective actions stated in the letter indicated that landfill personnel will continue to monitor the
area and that the annual cleaning of the leachate system piping/sump area will be scheduled for the month of
October, 2008
4 During the onsite audit, two areas/pits had been excavated within the liner system in order to lay the trench
(per McGill letter, Figure 3) Survey stakes were visible and had been used as vertical guidance dunng the
excavation (to stay above the liner system by a minimum of 4 feet) Additionally, the edge -of -liner stakes
were visible and a clean soil berm had been placed along this edge to both protect the edge of liner area, and
to block any leachate release during the excavation activities
5 This area of excavation started inside the dirt berm within the line system, located approximately 29 yards
from the power pole on the edge of the roadway and above the leachate pond, and extended into the MSW to
approximately 43 yards from the power pole The upper trench was approximately 35'xl5'x12-15' deep
The lower trench, which had visible leachate pooling during the onsite visit (was being observed for proper
drainage), was approximately 20'xl 5'x5' No leachate was observed outside the trench The location of the
visible seepage was originally located between those two trenches, at a GPS coordinate location (degrees) c
N 35 66699, W -83 00031
6 According to d Bishop and S King, no seepage occurred outside the edge of liner system, all leachate was
contained within the liner during repair activities, and all additionally generated Ieachate from the
construction activities was pumped directly into the sump piping system which gravity feeds to the leachate
collection pond
7 It was discussed during the site audit that in the future, any similar situations should be communicated
directly to the compliance branch of the SWS (rather than the permitting branch) and with more expediency
in order to allow for visual confirmation of any existing site conditions
8 Additionally, it was noted to S King that the southern side of the MSW active working face, while seeded
and with adequate ground cover, was exhibiting erosion conditions which required repair/attention Erosion
gullies were observed in multiple locations, with depths of approximately 8-12 inches
Please contact me if you have anyAuestions or concerns regarding this audit report
Andrea Keller
828-2964700
Delivered on 9/29/08 by hand delivery US Mai] died No U

4T-•WVIFA
NCDENR
NOH CAROU" DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NARWAL Fftf&m1ROES
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
}UNIT TYPE' (checic`all°that a d
1y to Cis tiditwwith
same Permit number)
' "A
Lined
MSWLF
x
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAB
COUNTY Haywood
PERMIT NO 44 07
Closed
HHW
White
Inctn
T&P
FIRM
MSWLF
goods
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
CDLF
Tire T&P!
I'm
ln&5=1
iir:Mti
SDTr-
collcchon
Monofill
landfill
Date of Audit 11/14/08 Date of Last Audit 09/29/08
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Community
Waynesville, N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES N 35 66343 W -82 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen. King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT)
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller, NCDENR, Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste Section (SWS)
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
David Mingus, Jet Clean America
STATUS OF PERMIT
Active- Permit to Operate issued November 8, 2006
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Partial audit of Municipal solid waste landfill
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS
N/A
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
1 The NCDENR/DWM/SWS was notified on 9/26/08 of leachate seep and repair activities at the MSWLF
The site visit and audit on 9/29/08 documented the trenching and repair activities associated with the
leachate seepage

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT Rn.. ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 2
2 Additional corrective actions associated with the leachate seep stated that landfill personnel will continue to
monitor the area and that the annual cleaning of the leachate system pipmg/sump area will be scheduled for
the month of October The actual date of leachate line jetting/cleaning was November 14, 2009
3 During the onsite audit the subcontractor (Jet Clean America) was jetting lines on the NE side of the
MSWLF while landfill personnel dug up additional cleanout locations The contractor stated that some
blockage was occurring at the location where the jetting lines had become stuck and recommended that
camera work be included during next jetting/cleaning event
4 During the previous audit (9/26/08) it was noted that the southern side of the MSW active working face,
while seeded and with adequate ground cover, was exhibiting erosion conditions which required
repair/attention Most of the erosion gullies had been repaired/filled at the time of this audit However,
close attention should be paid to this region in the future
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
Phone [phone]
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
Delivered on 12/16/08 by hand delivery US Mail ertified No
cc Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Supervisor
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Donald Herndon, Compliance Officer

`4::
� I
NCDENRROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT"" NRTURM, RIEgDURCES
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
IUNIT TYPE�x
I in,-d
MSWLF
X
LCID
vw
X
Tran%f r
compml
X
SI As
COUNTY Haywood
PERMIT NO 44-07
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
Closed
MSWLF
HHW
White
goods
lncm
UP
X
FIRM
Closed
CDLF
X
TimT&P/
Collection
Tin,
Monofill
[ndusnal
Landfill
DFMO
SDTF
Dates of Audit .Tune 23, 26, and 30, 2009 Date of Last Audit 11/14/08
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Community
Waynesville N C 28786
Eel:;�YK�Z�]:.dal]:f►/:V:Y:��►1<c�YLXi��r.'�;��i19:�T�
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, N C 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller NCDENR, Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste Section (SWS)
Allen Gaither, NCDENR, DWM-SWS (06/23/09)
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Denise Baliew Haywood County White Oak Landfill Manager
STATUS OF PERMIT
Active- Permit to Operate issued November 8 2006
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Partial Audit
Closure Inspection of CDLF
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS
NIA
4REAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
The Section was notified on Monday, June 22nd of a leachate seep and repair activities at the MSWLF The
seep occurred in the same region as the issues noted in November of 2008, although higher up the inactive

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT RicrORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 2
disposal area from the sump/trench work conducted previously Planned inspection of the site was already
scheduled for Tuesday, June 23rd
2 During the June 23rd inspection of the MSWI_F, the following statements with regard to the leachate seep
were made by S King and D Ballew
a During operational hours on Saturday, June 20`h, a leachate seep/slight ponding was observed on the
MWSLF Phase One, Cell One, located above the leachate lagoon A certified landfill operator, in
attempting to repair the upper slope, excavated/pushed the intermediate cover off the slope The
excavation pushed soil, and some soil mixed with waste, outside the waste boundary (dozing through
the edge of waste (EOW) stakesj, and exposing waste on the upper slope
b Repairs were not completed by the end of the day on Saturday, June 201h and thus some waste was
left exposed over the course of the weekend Approximately 2 ih of rain fell on Sunday, June 21"
c On the start of the workday on Monday, June 22"d, S King and D Ballew observed the situation at
the seep/repair area They stated that while some soil mixed with waste was located outside the liner
system, no leachate release had occurred as the upper excavatton/pit captured the seeping leachate
(first noted on Saturday) The waste/soil mix was immediately removed and disposed of at the active
working face
d During repairs on Monday, June 22nd, a trench channel was excavated to direct leachate flow from
the upper seep/pit to the existing sump pump near the base of the slope (sump pump installed during
side slope repairs from November, 2008) L.eachate was piped (3" and 6" pipes) directly into the
leachate lagoon to ensure that no spill -over from the pit could occur It was also noted (by D
Ballew) that the valve control to the leachate pond had been adjusted (no knowledge as to when or
who altered the valve setting) to almost completely shut
06/23/09
Note that wet weather conditions slowed down repair timeline
e Haywood County took immediate corrective actions including the operator responsible for pushing;
the intermediate cap plus waste outside the liner system had been placed on administrative leave,
retraining of landfill operators, and D Ballew was looking into how to secure the valve control to
prevent accidental/unapproved adjustments

_ FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDI r .cEPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 3 of 3
3 Planned repairs to the area included covering/seeding the exposed slope, laying fill rock in the open trench
to create a preferential pathway to the lower sump pump, reshaping the base of the slope to original contours
and ditch lines, and replacing the EOW marker
4 Construction of the new cell had begun Dust control measures were to place during the audit D Ballew
stated that Land Quality had been on site to review erosion control permits
5 Closure audit of the CDLF was conducted Certified engineering documentation will be provided to Allen
Gaither to confirm final grades and cap thickness During site audit, the CDLF area had established
vegetation and had erosion control measures in place (including the construction of tiered slopes)
6 Well (potable groundwater well) discussion with D Ballew established that the exiting site well had
historically been located within 500-feet of waste disposal areas Unknown as to whether the well was
installed poor to waste or post -disposal activities Facility is looking into replacement of the well outside
the 500-foot buffer requirement and was advised to discuss abandonment requirements for existing well
with Aquifer Protection (Landon Davidson, 828-296-4680)
7 The T&P area for chipping and mulching has been collecting land clearing debris from the new cell
construction activities No processed materials noted at site during inspection
8 Follow-up audits on 06/26/09 and 06/30/09 confirmed repairs to the seep area Trench and pits had been
filled, all waste had been covered, grading had occurred Remaining items include replacement of EOW
marker and reshaping of the ditch previously located at the bottom of the slope, outside the EOW markers

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT RrrORT —�
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 4 of 4
9 It was noted during the inspection of the working face that the baled waste from the transfer Station was
being temporarily located at a MSWLF lift below the working face, then transferred to the working face to
be broken up and compacted, adding additional work processes to the waste management risking further
damage to equipment (from the freed baling wire) Additionally, the area where the bales were temporarily
staged (due to wet weather restrictions on the waste haulers) is experiencing a degradation of the daily
cover The more traffic works this area, especially in wet weather conditions, the more this area will
become rutted and the more waste will mix with soil
This area requires repair and a modification of traffic patterns to avoid violation of the 15A NCAC 13B
Section 1626(a) Operational Requirements governing the control of disease, vectors, fires, odors,
blowing litter, and scavenging with regards to daily cover, and will be inspected closely on subsequent
site inspections
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
Phone [phone]
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
Marled on 7Q. /10/09 by hand delivery U5 Mad 1--F No 1 j
cc Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Supervisor
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Donald Herndon, Compliance Officer

.v..r r
NCDENR
NOrrn+ C4 01-1" CEP RTMEW OF
izwIpo..E mo N/N Rz9 RCE3
r
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section 3
IUNIT TYPE
Lined
X
LCID
YW
X
Transfer
Compost
X
SI AS
COUNTY Haywood
MSWLF
PERMIT NO 44 07
Closed
HHW
While
Incur
T&P
X
FIRM
M S W LF
I
goods
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
Closed
X
Tire T&PI
Tirc
Industnal
DEMO
SDTF
CDLF
Collccuon
Monofiil
landfill
Dates of Audit 03/30/2010 (multiple site visit,,) Date of Last Audit Report 06/23/09
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338 White Oak Community
Waynesville N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES N 35 66343 W -82 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
'ACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
David Cotton, County Manager
215 N Main Street
Waynesville, NC 28786
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller, NCDENR, Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste Section (SWS)
Bill Wagner, NCDENR, DWM, SWS (08/21/09)
Paul Cnssman NCDENR DWN, SWS (03/30/10)
Stephen King Haywood County Solid Waste Director (08/07/09 08/22/09 08/25/09 3/30/10)
Denise Ballew, Haywood County White Oak Landfill Manager (08/22/09, 08125/09, 3/30/10)
Jeff Bishop McGill & Associates (08/25/09)
Dave Pasco, McGill & Associates (08/25/09)
STATUS OF PERMIT
Original Permit to Construct July 22 1992
Original Permit to Operate October 8, 1993
Permit Amendment June 30 1999
'ermit Amendment November 27, 2001
?ermit Amendment/PTO November 8, 2006
Permit Amendment /Modification PTC Phase 3 May 5, 2009

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT RjL eORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 2
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Comprehensive Audit
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS
N/A
NOTEI) VIOLATIONS
15A NCAC 13B 1626 Operational Requirements for MSWLF Facilities states The owner or operator of any MSWLF
unit must maintain and operate the facility in accordance with the requirements set forth in this Rule and in the operation
plan as described in Rule 1625 of this Section
15A NCAC 13B 1626 (1)(g)(u) states waste placement at existing MSWLF units designed and constructed with a base
liner system permitted by the Division prior to October 9, 1993 and approved for operation by the Division shall be within
the areal limits of the base liner system and in manner consistent with the effective permit
15A NCAC 13B 1626 (8)(d) states leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to discharge A NPDES
permit may be required prior to the discharge of leachate to surface waters
Haywood County self -reported waste outside of the base liner system on August 6 2009 During the August 7 2009 audit,
and ensuing follow-up site inspections, it was estimated that the violation occurred during the 2001-2003 time frame in
Areas 1 and 2 (see map below) On August 21 2009, a site inspection documented leachate release off the base liner
system in both Area 1 and Area 2 The release occurred onto soils already impacted by the waste outside of the liner in the
Phase 3 expansion region Removal of waste outside the liner system was completed by August 25, 2009 Assessment
activities relating to the leachate-impacted soils in the Phase 3 expansion region were directed by a Section hydrogeolgist
and were completed and reported to the Section by October 28, 2009
Haywood County was in violation of 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (1)(g)(u) for waste placement outside of the base liner system
and was in violation of 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (8)(d) for failure to contain leachate on site, within the base liner system,
that was not properly treated prior to discharge
In order to achieve compliance, Haywood County must, within 30 days, submit a plan detailing actions the County
will take to prevent waste outside of the base liner system during future rill activities associated with all current and
future waste disposal activities Other actions may be required of the Division at a later date
15A NCAC 13B 1626 (2)(c) states Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for 12 months or more,
but where final termination of disposal operations has not occurred, shall be covered with a minimum of one foot of
intermediate cover
During the August 2009 activities associated with the self -reported waste outside of liner violation intermediate soil cover
was removed from several locations (in Phase 1 and Phase 2 fill areas) Follow-up site inspections documented the
uncovered waste in Areas I and 2 (see map below) The inspection conducted on March 30 2010 confirmed the lack of
intermediate sotl cover in these regions
Haywood County is in violation of 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (2)(c) for failure to replace the nunimum of one foot of
intermediate soil cover over exposed waste resulting from activities in August 2009
In order to achieve compliance, Haywood County must, within 30 days, place a minimum of one foot of
intermediate soil cover over all exposed waste in Area 1 and Area 2

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDI, ..SPORT —
Division of Waste Management
Sohd Waste Section
Page 3 of 3
15A NCAC 13B 0203 (d) states that by receiving solid waste at a permitted facility, the permittee(s) shall be considered
to have accepted the conditions of the permit and shall comply with the conditions of the permit
In the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Facility Permit No 44 07 Permit to Operate and Permit to Construct, dated May 5,
2009 the following conditions are outlined
PART IV General Permit Conditions
5 By initiating construction or receiving waste at this facility the permittee shall be considered to have accepted
the terms and conditions of this permit
6 Construction and operation of this solid waste management facility must be in accordance with the Solid Waste
Management Rules 15A NCAC 13B, Article 9 of the Chapter 130A of the North Carolina General Statutes
(NCGS 130A-290, et seq ), the conditions contained in this permit, and the approved plan Should the
approved plan and the rules conflict, the Solid Waste Management Rules shall take precedence unless
specifically addressed by permit condition
ATTACHMENT 2 Conditions of Permit to Construct
PART I Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Unit Specific Conditions
Geologic, Ground Water and Monitoring Requirements
12 Any modification to the approved water quality monitoring sampling, and analysis plan must be
submitted to the Section Hydrogeologist for review
ATTACHMENT 3 Conditions of Permit to Operate
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
7 Groundwater, surface water, and methane monitoring locations must be established and monitored as
identified in the approved plans
During the March 30, 2010 Comprehensive Audit of the facility, and ensuing document reviews it was revealed that
several wells (groundwater and landfill gas) documented as part of the approved monitoring system had been destroyed in
the August -September 2009 time frame without notification to the Section Proper abandonment of these wells was not
conducted and submitted site plans did not accurately reflect site conditions at the time of submittal
Haywood County is in violation of 15A NCAC 13B 0203 (d) for failure to abide by General Permit condition No 6,
Permit to Construct condition No 12 and Permit to Operate condition No 7 in that modifications to the approved
Environmental Monitoring Plan were conducted without Section approval
In order to achieve compliance, Haywood County must, within 30 days, submit updated site maps which reflect
accurate well locations for both groundwater monitoring wells and landfill gas wells Additionally, any
modifications to the current approved Environmental Monitoring Plan, including but not limited to the
destruction, replacement, and/or abandonment of any wells on site, must be communicated in writing to the Section
Hyrdogeologist for review As the current explosive gas monitoring language and associated site maps found in the
Permit to Construct do not reflect current site conditions, a stand-alone Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan is required
This Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan must be submitted to the Section for review, within 60 days, in accordance with
15A NCAC 13B 1626 (4) and shall include, at a minimum, landfill gas well construction diagrams, a site map
indicating existing and proposed landfill gas wells, a schedule for installation for all proposed well locations, and a
monitoring data collection sheet indicating all site wells and reporting standards
Other actions may be required by the Division at a later date

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT RLrORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 4 of 4
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N C G S 130A 22, an administrative penalty of up to $15,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations For the violation(s) noted here, you maybe subject to enforcement actions including
penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further relief as may
be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
August 6-7, 2009
I The Section was notified on 08/06/09 (verbal communication from S King) that during the Phase. 3
construction activity waste was discovered outside the liner system (Phase 1, Cell 2 to Cell 4junction and
at the sump pump at the eastern edge of Phase 2)
2 During the Site inspection on 08/07/09, two areas of concern were noted
Area 1 is at the junction of Phase 1, Cells 2 and 4 It was estimated (by McGill and S King) that this
region was actively receiving waste in the 2000-2002 timeframe
Area 2 is located near a sump pump/cleanout line in the Phase 2 portion of the MSWI.F
1 \ 1
� 1
PNA5E i
I
lilai� I
spy
N
M,TIE&n
FOR CONSTRUCTION
5 _ _
BHEET
Noted during Site audit
a The county had taken the initiative to collect a water sample From the Phase 3 under -drain system in
order to verify that leachate had not impacted the water collecting in the basin of the Phase 3
construction
b It was communicated that Haywood County needed to directly contact Ervin bane, DENR DWM
SWS hydrogeologist assigned to 44-07, regarding required assessment activities for impacted areas

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIEPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 5 of 5
c Not all waste was cleared from the comer junction of Area I at the time of the site inspection (some
waste outside of liner), and waste appeared to have been spread outside the liner in Area 2
However, the Area 2 waste appeared to be incidental (mixed with soil — unable to determine cause of
waste in this area) It was communicated that this waste needed to be removed from outside the liner
(brought back up to the working face for proper disposal)
d In Area 1, during the attempt to uncover the liner system (in order to tie-in the liner with the new
Phase 3 liner system) a vertical wall of waste was exposed No dimensions were noted as to how far
the waste exceeded the liner system The vertical "wall" of waste was approximately 20-25' in
height and, during the time of the audit, extended onto the edge -of -liner shelf
Edge of Liner Shelf, Area 1
e It was stated (by Haywood County) that this area would be amended to pull the waste further back
off the liner (in order to stabilize the area) It was communicated to Haywood County that from a
compliance standpoint, the critical elements were remove all waste from outside the liner system,
contain all leachate within the liner, and manage the waste and impacted soils (return them to the
working face)
August 21-22, 2009
1 On site with Bill Wagner (8/21/09) to follow-up on waste removal/leachate containment
2 Area 1 exhibited leachate seeps from the vertical wall (exposed during attempt to clear to liner of Phase 1) Leachate
was leaving the liner system during the inspection and contacting soils in the new Phase 3 area in the region which had
liner
08/21 /09
The County was notified that the existing leachate containment was not adequate A follow-up meeting with the
County was conducted on 8/22/09 to discuss containment actions

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT Rr,rORT
Division of Waste Management
Soled Waste Section
Page 6 of 6--
• The County and Thale (contractors for Phase 3-4 expansion) had continued to dig out the Area 2 sump
pump region to verify the edge -of -liner (slope and ram events making progress difficult)
• The County had dug a ditchlcontainment berm in the sump area to contain the flow of leachate during
pumping activities,
• Approximately 480,000 gallons of leachate pumped from this sump area to the leachate pond over the
course of June and July to avoid leachate discharge in Area 2
August 25, 2009
1 On site to discuss containment options
County actions taken
• Continuous leachate pumping of the sump area (Area 2),
• Plans were in place to bypass the pump and tie in 2 lines temporarily to direct pump to leachate lagoon (will
require approval by permitting),
• Purchase of an electric submersible pump for continuous pumping from various locations across Phase I and
Phase 2,
• Waste to be removed from Junction location (above Area 1) to improve slope (being brought to the working
face) County stated that Thale is being utilized to move waste back to the working face, and
• All exposed waste injunction area would be covered with plastieltarps, and waste hauling would be
completed by the end of the week
Section (A Keller) to County in conclusion
• All waste outside liner must be removed (as best as can be determined, and safely)
• Area 2 needs additional effort to uncover liner edge,
• Leachate control should be the number one priority,
• Uncovered waste on the slopes above Area 1 and Area 2 require attention/soil cover,
• Continue to communicate with the Section on all activities/improvements, and
• Contact Ervin Lane immediately to discuss assessment options/requirements
October 28., 2009 update White Oak LF submitted an assessment report to the Section regarding the waste outside of
hnerlleachate release at Areas 1 and 2
November 10.2009 update verbal approval was given from the Section to the County regarding the assessment report and
the continued construction of the Phase 3 expansion It was stated that additional monitoring may be required at a later
date but that no further soil sampling was required to Areas 1 and 2
November 20, 2009 update Large storm/excessive rains hit area County update included
a Area l leachate contained within liner
Area 2 sump area being pumped with vac truck/tanker with approximately 1000-4000 gallons
removed/day, leachate contained within liner
Extra tank (for leachate) placed at leachate pond in order to increase capacity
Approixmately 1 25 million gallons of leachate hauled to Evergreen WWTP over course of
leachate event
March 30, 2010
I On site to conduct Comprehensive Audit of the White Oak LF (A Keller P Cnssman S King, D Sallew)
2 Permit to Construct authorized May 5, 2009
3 Service area is Haywood County leachate treated at the Waynesville WWTP, and recirculation of leachate is only
approved as an emergency management technique
4 Waste screening is conducted at the LF working face (I % = I load per day) Waste screening records were
reviewed at the scale house Approval was granted to dispose of several years worth of screening records (it was
suggested that records could be kept between audit reviews and for approximately the previous six months of
operation)

- FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIEPORT —
Division of Waste Management
Solo! Waste Section
Page 7 of 7
5 Asbestos is accepted on Thursdays only at designated areas, non-fnable only and with advance warning
6 Approved Alternative Daily Covers (ADC) tarps only at this time County has been approved to conduct a
demonstration period for a soil/mulch ADC mixture but demonstration has not been conducted at the time of the
audit
7 Waste tonna es were reviewed for the previous six months of operation
Month
Waste Acceptance (tons)
Set '09
3925
Oct '09
4035
Nov `09
3606
Dec '09
3426
Jan '10
3227
Feb '10
3113
8 Tramine records were reviewed
LF Operator
Expiration Date
Ronnie Wilson
5/3/2010 (LF Operator)
Billy Owenby
8/21/2012 (LF Operator)
Gregory Cordell
8/21 /2012 (LF Operator)
Denese Ballew
8/9/2011 (MOLD)
Stephen Kin
5/25/2010 (MOLO)
9 Access roads at the facility are required to be maintained in good condition The Phase 3 construction activities
had impacted the access roads the landfill and continued maintenance is advised
10 Groundwater and Landfill Gas Monitoring The current (approved) Operations Plan (submitted with the PTC
application dated May 5, 2009) was reviewed PIease note that the section on explosive gas control referenced
Appendix 3 — titled Explosive Gas Control Plan for Haywood County White Oak Landfill It appears as though
this Appendix 3, the current governing document for the LF is appears to be the same plan that was submitted in
the original PTC/PTO time frame (1992-93) The only map of LFG available at the time of the audit was a
DSAtlantic figure (dated September 7, 1994) that depicted six LFG wells (LFG-1 through LFG-6)
According to the LFG monitoring data the following data was recorded
LFG- l
LFG-2
LFG-3
LFG-4
LFG-5
LFG-6
3/30/2009
X
X
X
X
X
X
6/26/2009
X
X
X
Closed
Closed
Closed
9/29/2009
X
X
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
According to the Overall Site Plan (Sheet Cl in PTC and also included in the approved Environmental Monitonng
Plan) the following LFG wells are noted LFG-1, LFG-4, LFG-6 and the proposed LFG-7 through LFG-10
Ensuing conversations with site personnel indicated that LFG-4 was destroyed by accident/part of grading below
the leachate pond (as well as MW-3 and MW-3D) It also appears that perhaps LFG-4 was mistaken for LFG-3
during the June 26, 2009 sampling event
The destruction of these three wells was not communicated to the Section and proper abandonment was unable to
be conducted Additionally, it was not communicated that LFG-3, LFG-4 MW-3, and MW-313 were in the path of
construction and would require replacement The submitted maps do not reflect current site conditions
Issues of note
• The submitted Explosive Gas Control Plan did not reflect the current site condition,
• The submitted Environmental Monitonng Plan contained maps that did not reflect the current
site conditions at the time
0 LFG-2 (in existence as of 3/30/09) was missing from submitted documentation,

Page 8 of 8
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT Rjr,,-ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
• LFG-3 and LFG-5 were missing from submitted documentation,
• LFG-4 was destroyed without proper abandonment This well, according to approved
documents, was intended to be part of the monitoring network
• The most recent GW monitoring report stated that MW-4A was damaged and unable to be
sampled, and
• Recent communication to the Section discussed damage to MW-9
Please contact the Section Hydrogeologist (Zinith Barbee, 919-508-8401) to resolve this issues regarding
abandonment of wells, replacement of wells, and correction of associated documentation Environmental
Monitoring Plan In addition, an updated and accurate Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan should be submitted for
approval by the Section
1 1 Areas 1 and 2 noted above, did not have adequate soil cover in place on the intermediate sections of the existing
Phase/cell regions at the time of the audit While these regions have steep unstable slopes due to the excavation to
uncover the liner (for the Phase 3 expansion), the areas are required [I 5A NCAC 13B 1626 (2)(c)] to have one
foot of intermediate soil cover in place
y
Area 2 03/30/10
12 The treatment and processing area (grinding of land clearing debris) exhibited a large amount of stockpiled raw
material in place during the audit (no grinding had occurred) This area needs to be maintained and operated such
that materials are processed and ut1hLed on site
13 items 9, 11 and 12 refer to facility requirements which involve manpowerAtaffing Rule 15A NCAC 13B 1604
General Requirements for MSWLF Facilities states in Section (b)(2)(1) Proper Operation and Maintenance proper
operation and maintenance includes effective performance, adequate funding, adequate operator staffing and
training and adequate laboratory and process controls, including appropriate quality assurance procedures The

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDI. cEPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 9 of 9
County may wish to review the funding and staffing of this facility in order to insure that adequate staffing is
available to properly maintain the facility in compliance with all Division requirements
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
'5d� Phone [phone]
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
Mailed on 05/11/10 by
hand delivery
US Mail
Stephen King Certified No
[7006 2150 0005 2458 92111
David Cotton Certified No
[7006 2150 0005 2458 9235]
cc Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Supervisor
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Donald Herndon, Compliance Officer
Zenith Barbee, Section Hydrogeologist
Ed Mussler, Permitting Branch Manager

!F a+'
;Y
NCDENR
ww" CG-our.. 0WOM&K14 OF
E"vom"Miw "o NRURY. HEsauRCEs
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
UNIT TYPE ra
Mr ,9�'i t l ✓ < '� ;�k of ni
Lined
X
t C[[)
rw
X
Transfer
Compost
X
SI AS
COUNTY Haywood
MSWLF
PERMIT NO 44 07
Closed
E111W
White
Incur
'1&1'
X
FIRM
MS W LF
goods
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
Closed
X
Tire TV/
Tire
Industrial
DEiMO
SDTF
CDLF
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
Dates of Audit 06/11/10 Date of Last Audit Report 03/30/10
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Community
Waynesville, N C 28786
CPS COORDINATES N 35 66343 W -82 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
David Cotton, County Manager
215 N Main Street
Waynesville, NC 28786
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller, NCDENR, Solid Waste Section (SWS)
Deb Aja, NCDENR, SWS
Denise Ballew, Haywood County White Oak Landfill Manager
STATUS OF PERMIT
Original Permit to Construct July 22, 1992
Permit Amendment /Modification PTC Phase 3 May 5, 2009
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Partial Audit
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS
RESOLVED 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (1)(g)(n) for waste placement outside of the base liner system
RESOLVED 115A NCAC 13B 1626 (8)(d) for failure to contain leachate on site within the base liner system that was
not properly treated prior to discharge

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT Ri.. ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 2
ONGOING 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (2)(c) for failure to replace the minimum of one foot of intermediate soil cover over
exposed waste resulting from activities in August, 2009
In order to achieve compliance, Haywood County must, within 14 days, submit, in writing, a plan to address the
lack of intermediate soil cover This plan should be submitted to the Solid Waste Section Permitting Branch, Allen
Gaither at the Asheville Regional Office
ONGOING 15A NCAC 13B 0203 (d) for failure to abide by General Permit condition No 6 Permit to Construct
condition No 12, and Permit to Operate condition No 7 in that modifications to the approved Environmental Monitoring
Plan were conducted without Section approval
As the current explosive gas monitoring language and associated site maps found in the Permit to Construct do not
reflect current site conditions, a stand-alone Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan is required This Landfill Gas
Monitoring Plan must be submitted to the Section for review, by July 12, 2010, in accordance with 15A NCAC 13B
1626 (4) and shall include, at a minimum, landfill gas well construction diagrams, a site map indicating existing
and proposed landfill gas wells, a schedule for installation for all proposed well locations, and a monitoring data
collection sheet indicating all site wells and reporting standards
NOTED VIOLATIONS
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N C G S 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $15,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations For the violation(s) noted here, you may be subject to enforcement actions including
penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further relief as may
be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
The site inspection of 06/1 1/10, conducted by A Keller and D Aja, was scheduled as a follow-up
inspection to the Notice of Violations generated from the 03/30/10 comprehensive site inspection
2 During the site inspection on 08/07/09, two areas of concern were noted
Area 1 is at thejunction of Phase 1, Cells 2 and 4 It was estimated (by McGill and S King) that this
region wa,, actively receiving waste in the 2000-2002 timeframe
Area 2 is located near a Sump pump/cleanout line in the Phase 2 portion of the MSWLF

l
E
L`
Page 3 of 3
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDI PORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section 1
Area 1
A AA
M � il0
Area 2
1 7 /
3 Substantial work had been conducted in Area 1 since the previous inspection Excavation, soil
cover, and grading had been conducted in order to cover all ex osed wastes
06/11/10
4 Area 2 The north side of Phase 2 had experienced substantial saturation and slumping during the
excavation process In efforts to control leachate release and surface water impact,,, the County had
attempted to place tarps over the exposed waste regions (see photo below)
Additionally, the Phase 3 rain cover tarp (white) which separates surface water from the leachate
collection system (liner system with gravel) had been arranged such that leachate leaving the exposed
waste would be directed to the gravel/liner base system rather than the surface water collection
system

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT RtrORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 4 of 4
Height of slope is approximately 50 feet from the lowest point (sump pump region) to the first tier of
the Slope The County has attempted to place soil cover (intermediate soil cover) over the slope,
filling from above The slope still exhibits instability due to the saturation of the soils
The previously cited NOV for 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (1)(g)(ii) and 1626 (8)(d) has been resolved
In order to achieve compliance, Haywood County, within 30 days of receipt of the NOV, responded
in writing with steps the County will take to prevent waste being placed outside the liner limits In
addition to training activities, the County had installed concrete liner edge markers around the Phase
3 waste area and plans to install the concrete markers around the remaining edge -of -waste regions by
June 30, 1010 (see photo below)

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDI ..,EPORT 1
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 5 of 5
06/11/10
6 Ongoing NOV for 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (2)(c) was discussed with McGill Associates and Denese
Ballew on 06/09/10 The Section granted an extension on the original compliance deadline, pending
the receipt of a plan to address the lack of intermediate soil cover
7 Ongoing NOV for 15A NCAC 13B 0203 (d) for failure to abide by permit conditions Partial
resolution has been made of this NOV in that McGill Associates, on behalf of Haywood County,
submitted an updated site map which reflected current site conditions Additionally, all
modifications, replacements, etc of the monitoring well network (landfill gas wells and groundwater
monitoring wells) has been communicated to the Section Hyrdogeologist (Zenith Barbee) Final
resolution of this NOV requires the County to submit a stand-alone Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan
The compliance deadline for this plan is currently July 12, 2010
8 Access roads at the facility have been repaired since the previous site inspection and the completion
of the Phase 3 construction activities All roads were functional and in good condition
9 Windblown fencing was in place and the site was free of excessive windblown materials
10 The operators were managing a small working face, compaction was ongoing, and daily soil cover
appeared adequate
11 Staffing had increased since the previous site inspection The facility appeared well -managed, traffic
flow was controlled with barriers and signs at the active working face
12 Since the previous site visit, all materials located at the treatment and processing area (land clearing
and yard waste) had been ground in preparation for use in their ACM demonstration project The
County had submitted a request to conduct a 3 l soil/mulch ACM demonstration project Approval
for this ACM demonstration period was granted in a letter dated June 16, 2010 with a completion
date of October 15, 2010
13 The County intends to construct a public drop-off location (convenience center) within the facility
property boundary This activity must be captured in the Permit and Operations Plan Please contact

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT k�eORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 6 of 6
Allen Gaither (Solid Waste Section Permitting Engineer, allen_pai_t_hLr@_ncdenr ov) to discuss
Section requirements for this modification to the facility
Please contact me if you have any question, or concerns regarding this audit report
—� Phone [phone]
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
Mailed on 0647110 by hand delivery US Mail Certified No
ec Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Supervisor
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Donald Herndon, Compliance Officer
Zinith Barbee, Section Hydrogeologist
Ed Mussler, Permitting Branch Manager
Allen Gaither, Permitting Engineer

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WAS I E MANAGEMENT
SOLID WASTE SECTION
ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT AGREEMENT AND SETTLEMENT
IN RE HAYWOOD COUNTY
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources through its Division of
Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (the "Division"), and Haywood County ("County") hereby enter
into this Administrative Consent Agteement and Settlement ("Agreement") in order to amicably resolve
matters which arise out of a Compliance Order with Administrative Penalty (`Complian(,e Order") issued
by the Division to Haywood County on July 15, 2010, with an administrative penalty of $39,375 00 plus
investigative costs of $754 10, for a total amount owed of $40,129 10 lhc, Division issued this
Compliance Order with Administrative Penalty pursuant to the North Carolina Solid Waste Management
Act, and the rules which implement the act, for violations more specifically described in the Compliance
Order
Haywood County requested and received an opportunity to engage in an informal conference to
discuss the allegations presented in the compliance order Based on the facts and evidence presented as a
icsult of the informal conference, Haywood County and the Division have reached a settlement with a
reduction of the penalty and the terms for compliance Haywood County will not file a petition for a
contested case hearing pursuant to N C G S § 130A-22(e) The July 15, 2010, Compliance Order with
Administrative Penalty will constitute a final agency decision The Division and Haywood County agree
to the following settlement
A Haywood County agrees to pay the reduced sum of Thirty Two Thousand Seven Hundred
and Fifty Four Dollars and Ten Cents ($32,754 10), which constitutes the entire reduced
amount owed an administrative penalty of $32,000 00 plus investigative costs of
$754 10 Payment of this sum of $32,754 10 shall be made by money order or certified
check payable to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Division of Waste Management and sent to the Attention of Compliance Officer,
Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section, 1646 Mail Service Ccntcr,
Raleigh, N C 27699-1646 The $32,754 10 payment is due within 60 days of Haywood
County's execution of this Agreement
B The Division agrees to accept payment of $32,000 00 foi the penalty plus the
investigative costs of $754 10 as full and complete discharge of the obligation to pay the
original penalty amount of $39,375 00, provided that the County remits payment in
accordance with paragraph A In the event of default, the Division shall deliver written
notice to the, County of its default Such notice shall be deemed delivered upon

placement in the United States Mail postage prepaid and addressed to the County c/o its
County Manager, Haywood County, NC If the County fails to cure its default within ten
(10) days of the Division's wiitten notice, the unpaid original assessed penalty of
$39,375 00 plus the investigative costs of $754 10 shall become immediately due and
payable
C Haywood County expressly stipulates and acknowledges that by entering this Agreement,
it waives all defenses to collection of the penalty and that the issue in any action to
collect said penalty will be limited to the payment or non-payment thereof in accordance
with the terms of this Agreement
D The Division acknowledges that Haywood County completed Condition of Compliance
Number l and has submitted documents for review for Condition of Compliance
Numbers 3 and 4, as required by the Compliance Order dated July 15, 2010 Haywood
County agrees to comply with the following Conditions for Compliance, which replace
specific Conditions of Compliance in the Compliance Order dated July 15 2010
(a) Condition of Compliance 2 Within 30 days of issuance of the, Permit to Opet ate for
44-07 Phase 3, place a minimum of one foot of intermediate soil cover over all areas
where waste was exposed during activities relating to the August 2009 discovery of
waste outside the, base liner system
(b) Condition of Compliance 3 Within 30 days of execution of this Agreement, Submit
a detailed plan, including a timetable, to locate and properly abandon MW-3, MW-
3D, MW-9 and LPG-4, or, for any wells that cannot be located and properly
abandoned Submit a detailed Justification to Andrea Keller, Environmental Senior
Specialist, and, to Zinith Barbee, Permitting Branch Hydrogeologist, for review and
approval
Zinith Barbee
Permitting Branch Hydrogeologist, SWS
Raleigh Regional Office
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, NC 28778
(c) Condition of Compliance 4 Within 30 days of a request by DENR, provide any
information, documents, or revisions pertaining to the Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan
Submitted for icvicw in accordance with the Condition of Compliance Number 4 in
the Compliance Order dated July 15, 2010 The submittals should be sent to Andrea
Keller and Zinith Barbee

E Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the right of DCNR, the Division, or the Solid
Waste Section to initiate any action against Haywood County for any new or other
violation of the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act, the North Carolina Solid
Waste Management Rules, or any other law or rule Haywood County acknowledges
that, pursuant to N C G S 130A-22, each clay of a continued violation of any i equirement
of the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act, the solid waste management rules,
or any order issued under the act or rules constitutes a separate violation for which a
penalty of up to $15,000 00 per day may be imposed
F `1 his Agreement may not be amended orally or by performance Amendments must be
made in written form and signed by duly authorized representatives of both the Division
and the County
G The parties irrevocably waive any right to appeal from this Agreement, assuring such
right exists, except that either party may, at its option, seek judicial intervention to
enforce the terms of this Agreement
11 The parties agree and acknowledge that this Agreement sets forth all terms and
conditions between them concerning the subject matter of this Agreement, and that there
are no terms or conditions between the parties except as specifically set forth herein
This Agreement is effective on the last date that any signatory to the Agreement shall
affix his or her signature
In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby agree to the preceding terms as evidenced by the
signatures forth below
Paul S Ciissman, Chief
Solid Waste Scetion
Division of Waste Management
David Cotton, County Manager
Haywood County
Date
Date -

`r *i'
NCDENR
NJ H C;AROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Ew RO-EW ANu NAruRAL RraouncEs
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Grtcd
MSWL.F
X
LC D
vw
X
Transfer
compost
X I
sl_As
COUNTY Haywood
PERMIT NO 44-07
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
Closed
WWI F
HHW
White
onds
lncin
T&P
X
FIRM
Closed
CDLF
X
TrrcT&PI
Collcctwn
Tire
Monafill
Industrial
Landfill
DEMO
SDTF
Dates of Audit 09/21 /10 Date of Last Audit Report 06/11/10
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338 White Oak Community
Waynesville, N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES N 35 66343 W -82 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller, NCDENR, Solid Waste Section (SWS)
Stephen King, Haywood County SW Director
STATUS OF PERMIT
Original Permit to Construct July 22, 1992
Permit Amendment /Modification PTC Phase 3 May 5, 2009
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Partial Audit
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS
RESOLVED (06/11/10) 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (1)(g)(n) for waste placement outside of the base liner system
RESOLVED (06111/10) 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (8)(d) for failure to contain leachate on site, within the base liner
system, that was not properly treated prior to discharge
(ESOLVED 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (2)(c) for failure to replace the minimum of one foot of intermediate Soil cover over
exposed waste resulting from activities in August, 2009

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT RL. ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 2
RESOLVED 15A NCAC 13B 0203 (d) for failure to abide by General Permit condition No 6, Permit to Construct
condition No 12, and Permit to Operate condition No 7 in that modifications to the approved Environmental Monitoring
Plan were conducted without Section approval
Note The required Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan was suhmitted to the Section for review on July 12, 2010 The
Plan is currently under review and is not considered approved at this time
NOTED VIOLATIONS
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N C G S 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $15,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations For the violation(s) noted here, you may be subject to enforcement actions including
penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further relief as may
be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
1 The site inspection of 09/21/10, conducted by A Keller, was scheduled as a follow-up inspection to the
Notice of Violations generated from the 03/30/10 comprehensive site inspection and as a follow-up to
the fire occurrence notification
2 With regards to resolution for 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (2)(c), the following two areas of concern were
noted
Area 1 was at the junction of Phase 1, Cells 2 and 4, and met soil cover requirements during the
06/11/10 site inspection Area 2 was located near the sump pump/cleanout line in the Phase 2 portion c
the MSWLF, and was actively being worked on during the previous inspection to achieve compliance
Area 2 had been covered with intermediate soil coy
Additionally, the Phase 3 rain cover tarp (white) which separates surface water from the leachate
collection system (liner system with gravel) had been arranged such that any leachate leaving the Phase
2 region would be directed to the gravelfliner base system rather than the surface water collection
system
Stormwaterlrunoff was collected in the basin of Phase 3, on top of the rain cover tarp (per design) Due
to previous issues with leachate and exposed waste in the Area 2 region, the County (S King) had
contracted for water samples to be collected and analyzed in order to verify that no leachate
contamination had reached the stormwater catch basin

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDI i AEPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 3 of 3
4 Thale Construction Co Inc had been contacted to repair their recent construction of a secondary
containment line leading from Phase 3 to the leachate pond, which had failed in two locations
5 Access roads at the facility have been maintained since the previous site inspection and the completion
of the Phase 3 construction activities All roads were functional and in good condition
6 The operators were managing a small working face, compaction was ongoing, and daily soil cover
appeared adequate The facility appeared well -managed, traffic flow was controlled with barriers and
signs at the active working face, and the site was free of excessive windblown materials
Materials located at the treatment and processing area (land clearing and yard waste) had been ground in
preparation for use in their ACM demonstration project The County had submitted a request to conduct
a 3 1 soil/mulch ACM demonstration project Approval for this ACM demonstration period was
granted in a letter dated June 16, 2010 with a completion date of October 15, 2010
8 According to the verbal notification (received on 9/18110), a fire occurred at the working face, after
hours, on Saturday, September 18, 2010 The fire was small, localized, and extinguished within
approximately 15 minutes of the arrival of emergency response vehicles (per S King) Source/cause of
fire was unknown Note written notification (fire occurrence reporting form) is required within
14 days of the incident
Please contact me it you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
Phone [phone]
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
Mailed on 09/23/10 by hand delivery US Mail Certified No
cc Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Supervisor
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Donald Herndon, Compliance Officer
Zinith Barbee, Section Hydrogeologist

1�
NCDENR/.
NORTH CAROLINA [)EP NIENT OF
ENVIRONMENT "o NATURAL RESOURCES
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
IUN1T T,V,1V —y I � V, I v ` - ro,
Lined
MSWLF
X
LCID
YW
X
Transfer
Compost
X
SLAS
COUNTY Haywood
PERMIT NO 44-07
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
Closed
MSwI h-goods
HHw
white
Incur
T&P
X
FIRM
Closed
CDI F
X
Tire]&PI
Collection
Iir4
Monofill
Industrial
Landfill
DFMO
SDTP
Dates of Audit 03/0811 1 Date of Last Audit Report 09/21/10
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Community
Waynesville, N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES N 35 66343 W -82 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller, NCDENR, Solid Waste Section (DWM)
Susan Wilson, NCDENR, Surface Water Protection (DWQ)
Stephen King Haywood Co Sold Waste Director
Mark Shumpert Haywood Co WOLF Landfill Manager
Mark Pruett, Haywood Co Erosion and Sedimentation Control Director
STATUS OF PERMIT
Original Permit to Operate October 8, 1993
Phase 3 PTO Approval pending review with the Section
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Comprehensive Audit
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS None
NOTED VIOLATIONS None

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT k... ORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 5
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
On site at the Haywood County Transfer Station (444-08T) to conduct records review for the Comprehensive Site
inspection of the White Oak MSWLF The following records were reviewed and found in order
a Training records
• Martin Shumpert (MOLO) — expires 10/19/13
• Billy Owenby (LF Operator) — expires 8/21 /12
• Gregory Cordell (LF Operator) — expires 8/21 / 12
• Stephen King (MOLD) — expires 5/25/10
b Waste Acceptance The facility is permitted to receive approximately 6,600 tons per month Tonnage records
were available for review and the facility was accepting on average over the 2010 record review period,
approximately 3,582 tons per month
c Permit and Operations Plan Records available
d Landfill Gas Monitonng Updated LFG Plan was approved with current PTO (Plan dated February 25, 2011)
LFG data for 9/30/10 and 12/29/10 events was reviewed The data collection was conducted by McGill
Associates — no exceedences were noted
e Leachate Management Leachate is contained in an on -site leachate pond and hauled to the Maggie Valley
WWTP for treatment February and March 2011 records indicated that, respectively, approximately 204 000
and 540,000 gallons of leachate were pumped and hauled to the WWTP
f Financial Assurance facility documented the submittal of FA to the Section on 12/1/10 to D Herndon (SWS)
g Waste Screening Waste screening records are maintained at the landfill scalehouse and were available for
review (9/10 through 2/1 1 reviewed)
h Environmental Monitoring Records were available for review
On site at the White Oak MSWLF Present during inspection S Wilson, M Shumpert and A Keller Recent heavy
rain events occurred between March & and 7th with approximately 2 75" of rainfall recorded at the landfill (per M
Shumpert)
3 Roads were functional and in good condition Winciblown fencing was in place and the site was free of excessive
windblown materials
03/08/ 1 1
Repair of side slope~ and windblown fencing
4 The operators were managing a small working face, compaction was ongoing, and daily soil cover appeared adequate
(some waste flagging was noted and discussed with M Shumpert) Repair work to the active face side slopes was
underway at the time of the inspection — recent heavy rams had created erosion rills It appeared as though the

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDI ...EPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 3 of 5
drainage ditches in these regions had received silt run-off from the side slopes and may require further
maintenance
5 Use of fabric tarps as an alternative daily cover is approved by permit condition Please note that the ACM
demonstration project for use of a soillmulch ACM expired on October 15, 2010 No report summarizing the
demonstration of the ACM has been received by the Section and the current PTO does not authorize use of soil/mulch
as an ACM For the County to continue forward with plans to utilize any ACM, they must submit in writing (to A
Keller) a request for a new demonstration period
6 The facility appeared well -managed, traffic flow was controlled with barriers and signs at the active working face
During the inspection a waste -screening was performed at the working face in accordance with the facility Operations
Plan No issues were noted
7 Asbestos disposal was being managed away from the working face in accordance with Rule and Operations Plan
requirements
03/08/ 1 I
8 Monitoring points were inspected (groundwater, landfill gas surface water discharge points) All issues regarding the
DWQ NPDES General Stormwater Discharge Permit NCG120047 were addressed in the Notice of Violation issued
by DWQ (S Wilson) on April 11 2011
9 During the inspection of MW-14 and MW-15 it was noted that a back access road leaves the facility boundary before
re-entering (to access MW wells) and becomes a potential access point at this location The Operational Requirements
for MSWLF Facilities [ 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (6)(a)] requires that the facility shall be adequately vecured by means
of gatea churns berms fences, and other security measures approved by the Divivion to prevent unauthorized entry
Please address security requirements at this facility access point
10 Full separation was apparent at the Phase 3 liner to Phase 2 intermediate slope junction Standing water in the Phase 3
stormwater collection area was being discharged to a sediment basin Leachate from the Phase 2 junction routes to the
leachate collection pond No windblown was noted in this area

Page 4 of 5
03/08/1 1
l I The Treatment & Processing area was inspected It was stated (M Shumpert) that the facility tries to have an operator
available in this region during public drop-off of material to control unacceptable wastes in the Yard Waste piles (land
clearing and yard trash) Some plastics were noted in ground material — which is acceptable if this material is to be
used as ACM (note item #5 above) The T&P region has a steep slope on the back side — please ensure that managed
materials stay within the planned work region The composting area was observed (type 2) Material was present and
appeared to be windrowed Please be aware that the Soil Amendment Demonstration period expired on July 9,
2009 and a records review indicated that no certified Demonstration Report has been submitted to the Section
and the current PTO does not authorize use of soil amendment from the Type 2 compost area For the County
to continue forward with plans to utilize any soil amendments, they must submit in writing (to A Keller) a request for
a new demonstration period
12 A seep was observed on the north side of Phase 1 near the leachate pond It was identified to M Shumpert for repair
No leachate was observed leaving the disposal unit at the time of the inspection Also noted in this region was the
encroachment of woody vegetation inside the marked edge -of -waste boundary
03/08/ 1 1
Please remove all woody vegetation and materials that impede the facility s ability to inspect and maintain cap
integrity (briars etc)

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDI jL AEPORT
D fW M
ivision o aste anagement
Solid Waste Section
Page 5 of 5
13 Overall, the facility was in good operating condition from a solid waste management perspective Prior to amval or
site, M Pruett (Haywood County Erosion Control) discussed steps the county had taken to control off -site erosion
including, but not limited to, pond/cell construction (stalling basins), stabilization of access roads, maintenance of
sedimentation basin #4, and vegetation/stabilization of the site The facility is governed by a Sedimentation and
erosion control plan issued through the Division of Land Quality Please ensure that all site activities are in
conformance with approved plans
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
Phone [phone]
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
Mailed on 04/26/11 by hand delivery US Mail Certified No
ec Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Donald Herndon Compliance Officer
Susan Wilson, Division of Water Quality
Mark Shumpert, Haywood County
Mark Pruett, Haywood County

NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
CNIT TYPE
Lined
MSWLF
X
LCID
YW
X
Transfer
Compost
X
SLAS
COUNTY Haywood
PERMIT NO 44-07
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
CIoscd
MSWLF
HHW
White
9oods
Incur
T&P
X
FIRM
Closed
CDLF
X
Tire mpt
Collection
Tin,
Monofili
Industrial
Landfill
DEMO
SDTF
Dates of Audit 06/29/11 Date of Last Audit Report 03/08/11
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Community
Waynesville, N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES N 35 66343 W -82 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS
itephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N C 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller, NCDENR, Solid Waste Section (DWM)
Stephen King, Haywood Co Solid Waste Director
Mark Shumpert, Haywood Co WOLF Landfill Manager
STATUS OF PERMIT
Original Permit to Operate October 8 1993
Phase 3 PTO May 10, 2011
PURPOSE OF AUDIT
Partial Audit
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS None
NOTED VIOLATIONS None
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS
1 On site at the Haywood County White Oak MSWLF to conduct site inspection with S King and M Shumpert
Weather dry, partly cloudy, mid 80's
2 Roads were functional and in good condition despite recent heavy rains Windblown fencing was in place

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT R.L eORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 3 _ � ��� �......._.�._...._
3 The operators were managing a small working face, compaction was ongoing, traffic flow was controlled with barriers
and signs and daily soil cover appeared adequate Repair work to the active tare side slopes was underway at the
time of the inspection (seeding and matting)
6/29/11
The intermediate cover at the Phase 3 liner to Phase 2 junction was inspected No waste was visible and it appeared
as though the area satisfied Rule requirements for intermediate cover [ 15A NCAC 13B 1626 (2)(c) minimum of
one foot of intermediate cover]
6/29/ 11
During the previous inspection a seep was observed on the north side of Phase I near the leachate pond Also noted
in this region was the encroachment of woody vegetation inside the marked edge -of -waste boundary

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIj s#.EPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 3 of 3
The woody vegetation had been removed and the seep region had been repaired, seeded and matted
6 The facility was continuing to work on erosion control/sediment issues noted during the previous inspection including,
but not limited to, the repair and maintenance of sediment basins (shown below)
North of leachate lagoon Sed basin north of Phase 3 Sed basin SW of borrow area
7 Overall the facility was in good operating condition from a solid waste management perspective The scales were
undergoing annual calibration at the time of the inspection Please continue to ensure that all site activities are in
conformance with approved plans
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report
Phone [phone]
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
Mailed on 07/07/11 by hand delivery US Mail Certified No
ec Jason Watkins, District Supervisor
Donald Herndon, Compliance Officer
Susan Wilson, Division of Water Quality

f�
NCDENR
NO CAROLINA PEPARTMEWT OF
ENVIRONMENT Arlo NIIURA� RESMRCES
FACILITY COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
UNIT TYPE
Lined
X
LCIU
YW
X
Transfer
Compost
SLAS
COUNTY HAYWOOD
MSWLF
PERMIT NO 4407
Closed
Itliw
whae
MWP
T&P
X
FIRM
MSWLF
goods
FILE TYPE COMPLIANCE
Closed
X
IrL r&P
Tire
Industrial
DFMo
sDTF
CDLF
CnIlcLoon
Monnfill
Landfill
Date of Site Inspection 10/11/2011 Date of Last Inspection 06/29/2011
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338 White Oak Community
Waynesville N C 28786
GPS COORDINATES N 35 66343 E -82 99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER
Name Stephen King,
Title Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
Email address SKinn@haywoodnc net
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS
Stephen King Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Dnve
Clyde N C 28721
PARTICIPANTS
Andrea Keller — NCDENR Solid Waste Section
Susan Wilson — NCDENR Surface Water Protection
Stephen King — Haywood Co Solid Waste Director
Marc Pruett — Haywood Co Erosion Control
Mark Shumpert — Haywood Co Landfill Manager
STATUS OF PERMIT
Original Permit to Operate October 8, 1993
Phase 3 PTO May 10 2011
PURPOSE OF SITE VISIT
Site visit to follow-up with previous DWQ findings, partial SWS inspection
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS None
OBSERVED VIOLATIONS None
The item(s) listed above were observed by Section staff and require action on behalf of the facility in order to court, into or maintain compliance
with the Statutes Rules and/or other regulatory requirements applicable to this facility Be advised that pursuant to N C G S 130A 22 an
administrative penalty of up to S15 000 per day may be assessed for each violation of the Solid Waste Laws Regulations Conditions of a Permit
or Order under Article 9 of Chapter 130A of the N C General Statutes Further the facility and/or all responsible parties may be subject to
enforcement actions including penalties injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and
any such further relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules

. ACILITY COMPLIANCE INSPECTION KEPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 3
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Andrea Keller and Allen Gaither (NCDENR Solid Waste Section) met with County representative% (Stephen King
David Francis, Mark Shumpert, and several Santek Environmental representatives) on 10/03/201 l to discuss the
upcoming permit modification request and to provide technical assistance The Phase One of the RFP agreement was
discussed, including the update of the Operations Plan and contact information
On site on October 11, 2011 to review Stormwater outfall locations and erosion control measures as related to
the facility DWQ discharge permit Susan Wilson, NCDENR Division of Water Quality —Surface Water
Protection, present during inspection
2 Outfall locations (SDO-1 through SDO-8) were inspected and data collection was discussed along with details
regarding the off -site sediment issues at the facility (MShumpert and SWilson)
3 Roads were functional and in good condition and windblown fencing was in place Note that windblown must
be collected and returned to the working face daily The operators were managing a small working face,
compaction was ongoing, traffic flow was controlled with barriers and signs and soil cover appeared adequate
(ADC tarps were in use with soil cover utilized on a weekly basis in accordance with the facility Permit and
Operations Plan) Note that continuous maintenance of the soil cover is recommended in order to control
disease vectors, fires, odors, blowing litter and scavenging The scales had been recently removed/cleaned out
as part of general semi-annual maintenance activities (per M Shumpert)
4 The repair work underway during the previous site inspection (seeding and matting) had substantially
improved the soil erosion issues on the east side of the Phase 2 operations

_ FACILITY COMPLIANCE INSPECT REPORT '
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 3 of 3
5 The facility was continuing to work on erosion control/sediment issue~ noted during the previous inspection
including, but not limited to the repair and maintenance of sediment basins (leachate lagoon region -
sedtment basin location shown below)
At lagoon looking northward
At sed basin, looking toward the lagoon
6 The closed CDLF appeared to have well -established vegetation No erosion issues were noted at the time of
the inspection The access road off the back side of the closed CDLF was discussed during the inspection
(SKmg) and it was stated that the facility would place a fence/chain across the access road to control this
point of entry
7 Overall, the facility was in good operating condition from a solid waste management perspective Please
continue to ensure that all site activities are in conformance with approved plans
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this inspection report
Phone [phone]
Andrea Keller
Environmental Senior Specialist
Regional Representative
Sent on 10/14/2011
Emad
Sking@ haN woodne nu
Hand
delivery
US Mail
Certified No
ec Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Manager— Solid Waste Section
Jason Watkins, Western District Supervisor — SWS
Shawn McKee, Compliance Officer — SWS
Susan Wilson, Surface Water Protection — DWQ