NCG110143_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20190405

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
IV C"�
DOC TYPE
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ (i I 07 O S
YYYYMMDD

kOY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Interim Direcror
NORTH CAROLINA
E'nvironmentat Quality
April 5, 2019
CERTIFIED MAIL: 7013 1710 0002 1922 0329
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
City of Reidsville
Attn: Preston Mitchell
230 West Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY (NOD-2019-PC-0086)
Permit No. NCG 110143
Reidsville Waste Water Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Pen -nit Holder:
On April 3, 2019, Brandon Wise, inspector with the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) — Division of Energy, Minerals, and Land Resources met with
site contacts at the facility located at 407 Broad Street in Reidsville, to conduct a compliance
inspection as part of the NCDEQ's'mission to inspect all permitted site once a permit cycle. The
inspection consisted of review of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and each
of its components, review of the facility outfalls, as well as the review of the overall site
conditions.
The compliance inspection was conducted to ensure all site practices and facilities are in
working order. The inspection was also conducted as assistance to the City of Reidsville should
there be any questions about permit NCG110143. ,
Permit:
This facility has General Stormwater Permit NCG110143 to discharge stormwater from
industrial activity associated with Wastewater Treatment Device or System with a design
flow of 1.0 million gallons per day (MGD) or more under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System'(NPDES). The permit was originally issued on February 13, 2009 and this
version of the permit was issued on May 31, 2018 and will expire on May 31, 2023.
Records/Reiports:
This facility is required to develop and maintain a SWPPP in accordance with Part 11,
Section A of the permit. All qualitative and analytical monitoring records are required to be
maintained with the SWPPP for a minimum of five (5) years. Under this permit, analytical
monitoring is not required under current operating procedures. The facility records are lacking
�x: D
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy. Mineral and Land Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 Hanes Mill Road. Suite 3001 Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103
336.776,9800

Thank you for your attention to this matter. This office requires that a response outlining
a plan to fix the violations mentioned in this report is given to NCDEQ within 30 days of receipt
of this Notice. Should these violations not be properly resolved a Notice of Violation could be
issued along with potential for a civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000 per day per violation.
Your efforts to undertake activities to bring the subject site into compliance are not an admission,
rather they are actions that must be taken in order to being to resolve ongoing environmental
issues. Should you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact Brandon Wise
(336-776-9660 or [e-mail]) or Matt Gantt (336-776-9654 or
matt. [e-mail]).
Bran n Wise
Stormwater Specialist
Land Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Enclosures: Inspection Report
Qualitative Monitoring Form
cc: NCDEQ — DEMLR (WSRO) w/o enclosure
Sincerely,
Matt Gantt
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
PKQv North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy. Mineral and Land Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 l Winston-Salem. North Carolina 27103
..... '�'+\ '— 336.776.9800

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110143 Effective: 06/01/18 Expiration: 05/31/23 Owner : City of Reidsville
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Reidsville WWTP
County: Rockingham 407 Broad St
Region: Winston-Salem
Reidsville NC 27320
Contact Person: Preston Mitchell Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 04/03/2019 EntryTime: 10:55AM
Primary Inspector: Brandon L Wise
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Exit Time: 11:25AM
Phone. [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

permit; NCO110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 04103/2019 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ Cl
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
N ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑.
# Is the Plan reviewed.and updated annually?
❑ N ❑ ❑
# Does the.Plan include a Stormwater Facility inspection Program?
N❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Plan is put together very well, however Man has not been updated since 2015 and I was
informed a lot of the information is outdated.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes Na NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ E ❑ ❑
Comment: Last qualitative monitoring on record was May -of 2015
Anal3dical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ E ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
0
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it property documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ E ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: Illicit discharges were evaluated in 2015 however there are no records of it since then.
Page 3 of 3

Z.-
Environmental
Quality
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For guidance on f lling out this form, please visit https:/.Ideq nc.gov about/divi sionslener2y-mineral-land-
resources!energ mineral-land-perniitsrstormwater-pennitslnpdes-industrial-sw tabb4
Permit No.: N/Cl�l_I_I I 1,1_I or Certificate of Coverage No.: NICIGI_I I 1_I_I 1
Facility Name:
County: _
Inspector:
Date of Inspection:
Time of Inspection:
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Phone No.
All permits require qualitative monitoring to be performed during a "measurable storm event."
A "measurable storm event" is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site
outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior. The 72-hour storm
interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for
local storm events during the sampling period, and the permittee obtains approval from the local DEMLR
Regional Office.
By this signature, 1 certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
L Outfall Description:
Outfall No. Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receiving Stream:
Describe the industrial activities that occur within the outfall drainage area:
Page 1 of 2
SW-242, Last modified 07n-812017

All
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvada, III
Governor Director Secretary
9 May 2013
Kevin Eason, Director of Public Works
City of Reidsville
230 West Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO024881
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110000
Certificate of Coverage: NCG110143
City of Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Eason:
'Aana Taylor -Smith of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) conducted compliance evaluation inspections at the City of Reidsville Wastewater Treatment
Plant (WWTP) on 9 May 2013. Inspections were conducted for both the NPDES Individual Wastewater
Permit and NPDES General Stormwater Permit. The assistance and cooperation of Mr. Mike Burleson,
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) were greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized
below and checklists are attached for your reference.
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO024881
The plant is located at 407 Broad Street in Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina. The NPDES
individual wastewater permit authorizes the City of Reidsville to operate this 7.5 MGD plant, which
consists of coarse screening, grit removal, influent pump station, aeration basin with mechanical
aerators, final clarifiers, single media shallow sand infiltration, sludge thickeners, aerobic digesters,
sludge storage basins, disinfection via chlorination, de -chlorination, Parshall flume, and effluent pump
station. The permit authorizes the City to discharge treated wastewater into the Haw River, which is
currently classified as Class WS-IV (Water Supply IV), Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) in the Cape Fear
River Basin.
Site Review
The facility is very well -operated and maintained. Treatment units were online and functioning
properly at the time of inspection. Safety measures and maintenance at the site were excellent. Mr.
Burleson informed Ms. Taylor -Smith that the City has funded upgrades to the plant, which are
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown 5t Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 ne
Phone: [phone] FAK 336-771-46301 Customer Senrice:1-877-623-6748 N°orthC arolina
Internet: www-ncwaterquality.org ']� yra atul'y
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer y l `.

City of Reidsville WWTP
5/9/2013
Page 2 of 3
currently in the design phase. Please keep this office informed as to when construction for those
improvements begins.
Influent and effluent samples are collected by flow -proportional samplers. The tubing was very
clean and samplers were in good condition. Collected samples are kept below the 6° Celsius
required by the permit. Both influent and effluent flow meters are calibrated on a quarterly
schedule by Carolina Technical Services.
The outfall was also inspected and found to be in good condition. The discharge point appeared free
of pollutant indicators. Access to the discharge point was well -maintained, despite recent rains
raising the water level of the stream.
Documentation Review
Ms. Taylor -Smith evaluated laboratory data during the inspection. Comparison of lab reports and
field monitoring data with discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) showed no concerns or errors.
Chain of custody records were available and complete. The laboratory facility on site is currently
certified to perform all required testing with the exception of some metals and toxicity. Meritech
and Environmental One process the samples not run by the facility.
ORC visitation and operation/maintenance logs were reviewed and found to be complete and
current. Records of sludge hauling and generator service were also available. All records are very
thorough and well -organized. In addition to submitting an annual report, the WWTP also provides a
monthly report of plant operations, maintenance, and other data to the City of Reidsville.
The NPDES permit NC0024881 expired on 30 April 2011. The NPDES Unit of the DWQ received a
renewal application from the City of Reidsville on 19 October 2010. Copies of the draft permit were
sent to the City of Reidsville and the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the DWQ on 13 February
2013. Both the expired permit and a copy of the draft renewal permit were made available at the
time of inspection. The new permit will go into effect on 1 June 2013.
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCGlIO143
This certificate of coverage became effective in February 2009 and allows the City to discharge
Stormwater related to industrial activity from the WWTP to Little Troublesome Creek, which is currently
classified as WSW, NSW waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Site Review
The site was very clean and well -maintained. No secondary containment is necessary, as there are
no above -ground storage tanks (ASTs) on site that require containment. Outfalls were inspected and
found to be in good condition. No evidence of erosion or instability was noted at the outfalls and no
pollution indicators were seen in receiving waters.

City of Reidsville WWTP
5/9/2013
Page 3 of 3
Documentation Review
The Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SPPP) was reviewed and found to be complete,
comprehensive, and current. All required monitoring and inspections have been completed and are
well -documented. Employee stormwater training is conducted annually and has been thoroughly
documented. The facility is exempt from the vehicle maintenance analytical monitoring
requirement. No issues or discrepancies were noted.
We appreciate your efforts to effectively operate and maintain this treatment system. No additional
response to this letter is required. if you have questions regarding the inspections or this letter, please
do not hesitate to contact Ms. Taylor -Smith or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Surface Water Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Report— NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO024881
2. BIMS Inspection Report— NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110143
cc: Central Files w/ attachments
NPDES West Unit w/ attachments
WSRO — SWP w/ attachments

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 INI 2 ICI 3 NCO024881 11 121 13/06/09 17 181 C I 191 c �I I 20 U
U
Remarks
21111 1 11111111111I 1111 11111111 I111 1111Jill 1111_1I.16
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
671 1 69 70 j ++----�� � 71 U 72 LI 73 W 74 751 1 1 1 1 1 Li 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Reidsville WWTP
10:00AM 13/05/09
10/08/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
407 Broad St
Reidsville NC 27320
12:30 PM 13/05/09
11/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)lTtles(s)tPhone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
11/
John Michael Burleson/ORC/336-349-1102/
Name, Address of Responsible OfficiallTitle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
D Kelly Almond,230 W Morehead St Reidsville NC 27320/1336-349-103013363423649 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review . � Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Find in/Comments jLft2ch additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) AgencylOffice/Phone and Fax !Numbers Date
Aana Taylor -Smith WSRO WQ/1336-771-5000/
L/4Gi�(/LGl `7 MAY 'ZV ! 3
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/OfficeellPhho�n}e and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
3I NC0024881 I11 12I 13/05/09 1 17 18� _
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to attached inspection letter.
Page # 2

Permit. NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA - NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■ ❑ El ❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■ ❑ ❑ D
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
0000
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■ ❑ 0 ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: New permit just received - goes into effect June 1, 2013.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■ ❑ ❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 2417 with a certified operator on each shift?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the backup operator certified at one' grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■ ❑ ❑ 0
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Records are very well kept. United Water also submits monthly report to
City of Reidsville with information on plant operations, maintenance, data, etc.
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page # 3

I
Permit: NCO024881 Owner- Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified tab?- 0000
# Is the facility using a contract lab? ■ Q 0 0
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ ❑ ❑ Q
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? ■ 0 O 0
Incubator (BOO) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees? 0000
Comment: City of Reidsville performs some tests, others performed by Environmental
One or Meritech.
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available? ■ ❑ 0
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source? ■ Q Q Q
Is the generator tested under load? ■ Q 0 0
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection? ❑ Q ❑ ■
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site? ■ 0 Q n
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power? Q Q Q ■
Is the generator fuel level monitored? ■ Q 0
Comment: Generator tested weekly and once per month under load. Fuel vendor is
Rintz. Records of testing/maintenance are available.
Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected above side streams?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
Page # 4

Permit: NCO024881
Inspection Date: 05/09/2013
Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ f_i n ❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Upstream ! Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ 0 0 ❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated quarterly by Carolina Technical Services. Flow
charts are digital.
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ■ ❑ ❑ 0
Is the flow meter operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recordermatcfi the flow meter? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated quarterly by Carolina Technical Services. Flow
charts are digital.
Pump Station - Influent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
Comment: Additional SCADA is planned with upgrades to the plant in 2014.
PumD Station - Effluent
Yes No NA NE
Page # 5

Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2013 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Effluent Yes No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? 0011 ❑
Are all pumps present? ■ ❑ ❑ Q
Are all pumps operable? ■ 0 ❑ ❑
Are float controls operable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Additional SCADA is planned with upgrades to the plant in 2014.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA, NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑. ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Plant was very clean & well -maintained.
Q-. 42
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment: Screenings disposed of in landfill.
mow. s-------
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
Comment: Grit disposed of in landfill.
Nutrient Removal
Yes No NA NE
■
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
11
Yes No NA NE
Page # 6

Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville 1NVVTP
Inspection bate: 05/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Nutrient Removal Yes No NA NE
# Is total nitrogen removal required? n Li ■ 0
# Is total phosphorous removal required? ■ n n
Type Biological
# is chemical feed required to sustain process? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is nutrient removal process operating properly? ■ Q Q n
Comment: One bag of charcoal is manually added per shift. Feed equipment is
planned for upgrades to plant in 2014.
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/i)
Comment: Plant is planning to move to diffused air in 2014.
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater'?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/ of the sidewall depth)
Yes No NA NE
Ext. Air
Surface
Yes No
NA NE
■ 0
Q Q
■ n
n Q
■nnn
■nnn
■000
■000
■0D0
■DQQ
■❑00
■nnln
■0Cl0
Page # 7

Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date; 05109/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Comment: Sludge is measured once every three hours via sludge judge.
Pumps-RAS WAS Yes No NA NE
Are pumps in place? ■ ❑ Cl ❑
Are pumps operational?
■ ❑ ❑ 0
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Drying Beds
Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Is the sludge land applied?
❑ 0 ■ ❑
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: Drying beds are not currently in use. Plant is planning to add sludge
dewatering system in 2014.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No
NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■ n
❑ ❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■ ❑
❑
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
❑ ■
❑ 0
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
❑ ❑
■ ❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- -___)
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: Less than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine stored on site.
Page # 8

• Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2013 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary) Yes No NA NE
Type of operation:
Is the filter media present? ■ ❑ it ❑
Is the filter surface free of clogging? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the filter free of growth? 001113
Is the air scour operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the scouring acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ C1.
Is the Gear well free of excessive solids and filter media? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Filter media (sand) was changed in 2010 and is good for 7-8 years. Unit is
thoroughly cleaned quarterly.
De -chlorination Yes No NA NE
Type of system ? Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is storage appropriate for cylinders? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: High water due to recent rains
Page # 9

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110143 Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: City of Reidsville
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Reidsville WWTP
County: Rockingham
407 Broad St
Region: Winston-Salem
Reidsville NC 27320
Contact Person: Kevin Eason Title: Public Works Director Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
Related Permits:
John Michael Burleson
Inspection Date: 05/09/2013 Entry Time: 10:00 AM
Primary Inspector: Aana Taylor -Smith
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: • Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 0510912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Please refer to attached inspection letter.
Page: 2

Permit: NCO110143 owner - Facility. City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 05/09/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a 'Narrative Description of Practices"?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfalI locations and drainage areas?
■ 0
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ n
■ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
• ■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Comment: SPPP and all records were complete and very well -maintained. No ASTs
on site - no secondary requirement necessary.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
Cl ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: No vehicle maintenance on site.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
0110 ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■ n ❑ n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑ ❑ ■ 0
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

..-TL
Permit: NCGI 10143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE.
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? n n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? n Cl
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? n n
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?■
n n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
(;:ii)n n n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ✓
Ci) n n n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? tV
con
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ✓
® n n n
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
n n n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ✓
n n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?,/ UQYiJ� -1 -tU 1'0 �N
� n n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
Q n n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? r/
n n n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? `
(Z�@!)n n n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
<;�)o n n
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■� n n
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Np YyW AAVt e�
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
n n'Qn
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
n n
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls p q,+ 5
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
n n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■ n n n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
n
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? vth-j � ti
�■ n n o
Comment: db
Page: 3

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110143 'Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: City of Reidsville
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Reidsville WWTP
County: Rockingham
407 Broad St
Region: Winston-Salem
Reidsville NC 27320
Contact Person: Kevin Eason Title: Public Works Director Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 05109/2012 Entry Time: - 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:15 PM
Primary Inspector: Michael S Thomas Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

vvA
�EHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, .P. F.
Governor - Director
10 May 2012
City of Reidsville
Attn: Mr. Kevin Eason, Public Works Director
230 West Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection.
NPDES Permit NCO024881 &
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110143
City of Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Eason:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Mr. Mike Thomas of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the City of Reidsville's Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) on 9
May 2012. The assistance and cooperation of Mr. Mike Burleson, Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) was
greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized below.
The facility is located at 407 Broad Street, in Reidsville, in Rockingham County. The permit authorizes the City
of Reidsville to operate this 7.5 MGD plant which according to the permit, consists of coarse screening, grit removal,
influent pump station, aeration basin with mechanical aerators, final clarifiers, single media shallow sand infiltration,
sludge thickeners, aerobic digesters, sludge storage basins, disinfection via chlorination, de -chlorination, Parshall
flume and effluent pump station. Wastewater produced at the facility is discharged to the Haw River, which is
currently classified as C - Nutrient Sensitive Waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.
NPDES Permit NCO024881 Site Review
The facility is very well operated and maintained. All treatment units were online and functioning properly at
the time of inspection. Mr. Burleson informed Mr. Thomas that the City has funded improvements at the plant. The
improvements will include increasing -the power connections to the aerators and adding a sludge press. Please keep
this office informed as to when construction for these improvements begins.
Influent and effluent samples are collected by flow proportional samplers. The tubing was clean and in good
physical condition. Collected samples are kept below the 6° Celsius required by the permit. Both flow meters are
calibrated on a quarterly schedule.
Documentation Review
Mr. Thomas evaluated laboratory data during the inspection. Operation logs were reviewed and found to meet
all requirements. Laboratory records for both the WWTP lab and the contract lab were reviewed and found to be
accurate and complete. The laboratory at the facility is currently certified to perform all required testing with the
exception of some of the metals. Merritech and Environment 1 process the samples not run by the facility.
Laboratory chains of custody were complete and well organized_
North Carorma Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St Winston-Salem, North Carotin 27107 1��One 1'„ .
Phone: 336-771,%W 1 FAX: [phone] L Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 iV O Carolina
Internet www.ncwaterquality.org a�9'y�a/�4,
An Equal opportunoIAifirrnaMAction Employer i$L 6 (�

Compliance Evaluation Inspections NCO024881 & NCG110143
10/05/2012
Operation and maintenance records are complete and well organized. In addition, the operator visitation log was
reviewed and found to be complete and current.
The facility operates 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The assigned Operator in Responsible Charge, Mr.
Burleson, as well as, the other operators has the appropriate, current certifications to operate the facility.
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110143
Site Review
The site appeared to be very clean and well maintained. Drop inlets were clean with no excessive accumulation
of dirt or detritus. Mr. Thomas noted no issues with the stormwater collection system.
Documentation Review
This Certificate of Coverage became effective in February 2009 and allows the City of Reidsville to discharge
stormwater related to industrial activity from the WWTP to Little Troublesome Creek. Little Troublesome Creek is
classified as WS-IV (water supply), Nutrient Sensitive Waters, in the Cape Fear River Basin.
The Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SP3) has now been fully implemented. All required components
of the SP3 were complete and available for review. Staff training is now being conducted annually as well as when
new employees are hired.
Records of qualitative monitoring were available for review and were found to be complete. No vehicle
maintenance is performed at this facility therefore, no analytical monitoring is required.
We appreciate your efforts to effectively operate and maintain this treatment system. No additional response to
this letter is required. If you have questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Thomas or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Winston-Salem Region
Attachments:
I. 131M5 Inspection Report
=.-
C W^SRO;�SWP.wl if
Cents! piles w/i&h
NPDES West Unit

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 INI 2 151 31 14C0024881 111 121 12/05/09 } 17 181,11 19 I S I 201 I
I
Remarks
21
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved — --
671 69 70 U 71 U 721 N I 73LI_l__� 174 751 I II 1 I I 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial lasers discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Reidsville WWTP
10:00 AM 12/05/09
10/08/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
407 Broad St
Reidsville NC 27320
12:15 PM 12/05/09
11/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(sy'Fitles(syPhone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
111
John Michael Burleson/ORC/336-349-11021
Name, Address of Responsible OfficiaVTitle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
D Kelly Almond,230 W Morehead St Reidsville NC 27320//336-349-1030/3363423649 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program . Sludge Handling Disposal ■ Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Michael S Thomas WSRO WOW
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Offloe[Phone and Fax Numbers ate
oy � WD. "t — N41 Q-o &0,0 i t � -yEv
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPt3ES yr/molday Inspection Type
3 NCO024881 I11 12 12JO5/09 + 17 18
lCl
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(if the present permit expires in fi months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment:
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates; times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
Page # 3

0
Permit: NCO024881
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012
Owner -Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? ■ n n Q
# Is the facility using a contract lab? M n n ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ n
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+I-- 0.2 degrees? ■ ❑ 0 Q
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +I 1.0 degrees? ■ n n
Comment:
Standby Power
Yes
No NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
n n
n
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
n n
n
Is the generator tested under load?
■
0 I]
I]
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
n
n n
■
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
n n
n
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
n
fl D
■
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
■
❑ 11
Comment:
Influent Sampling
Yes
No NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
0 Q
❑
Is sample collected above side streams?
■
0 ❑
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
0 ❑
0
Is the tubing glean?
■
n n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
n 0
n
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
n n
n
Comment:
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ■ n Q C]
Is sample collected below all treatment units? ■ ❑ 13 Q
Is proper volume collected? ■ 0 D
Is the tubing clean? ■ n Q ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ n n
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ 0 0 ❑
Page # 4

Permit: NC0024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville VVVVTP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No NA
NE
Comment:
Upstream I Downstream Sampling
Yes
No NA
NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit
(frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■
n C3
❑
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes
No NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
n 0
n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■ . Q
n
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated quarterly.
Pump Station - Effluent
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
Comment:
Is right right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
■❑nn
■Qn❑
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■000
nnnn
0 0 0 D
0000
n❑nn
nn■n
nnnn
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■nnn
Page # 5

Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville vW TP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 Q ■ I]
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ Q
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately %. of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment:
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary)
Type of operation.
Is the filter media present?
Is the filter surface free of clogging?
Is the filter free of growth?
Yes No NA NE
■ El Q
■ 000
■000
■ ❑ Q 11
■ 000
■000
■ 0 11 D
■ 11 0 D
■ ❑ ❑ U
■ 0 U 0
■00D
Yes No NA NE
■ 000
■r000
■ 0100 .
Yes No NA NE
s0DD
■Qn0
■ 000
Page # 6

Permit: NC0024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary) Yes No NA NE
Is the air scour operational? ■ n Q n
Is the scouring acceptable? ■ ❑ 11 0
Is the dear well free of excessive solids and filter media? ■ n n ❑
Comment:
Anaerobic Digester.
Yes No NA NE
Type of operation:
Is the capacity adequate?
■ n ❑ n
# Is gas stored on site?
■ n n D
Is the digester(s) free of tilting covers?
■ n n n
Is the gas burner operational?
n Q 0
Is the digester heated?
■ n ❑ ❑
Is the temperature maintained constantly?
■ n ❑ n
Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■ ❑ ❑ n
Comment:
Drying Beds
Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
❑ n ■
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
❑ Q IS n
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
❑ 0 ■ 0
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
n Q ■ O
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
0 n ■ n
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds retumed to the front of the plant?
n ❑ ■ 0
# Is the sludge disposed of through county, landfill?
El Q ■ n
# Is the sludge land applied?
n n ■ n
(Vacuum filters Is of ?
N ) polymer mixing adequate.
n n ■ n
Comment:
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■ n n n
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■ n n 0
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■ n n 0
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
n n D 0
Page # 7

Permit: NCO024881 owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA NE
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
El ❑ ❑ ■
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
■ D 0 0
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
n ■ Q n
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
n n ■ D
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- -_)
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: Facility maintains less than 2500 pounds of chlorine gas onsite.
De -chlorination
Yes No NA NE
Type of system ?
Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Q 0 [1 ■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
■ n n n
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■ ❑ 0 Q
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
0110
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
D D ■
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Grit Removal
Yes No NA NE
Type of grit removal
a.Manuai
b.Mechanical
■
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
■ ❑ Q ❑
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
■ ❑ ❑ 0
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
■ ❑ 0
Comment:
Nutrient Removal
Yes No NA NE
# Is total nitrogen removal required?
000 0
# Is total phosphorous removal required?
■ 0 Q ❑
Type
Biological
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process?
❑ 0 ■
Page # 8

Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWfP
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Nutrient Removal Yes No NA NE
Is nutrient removal process operating properly? ■ n Q n
Comment:
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
0 fl n
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
0 n n
Are the diffusers operational?
0
0 ■ n
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
n ❑ Q
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
■
n n 0
Is the DO level acceptable?
n
n 0 ■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mgA)
❑
Q 0 ■
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes
No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■
n n n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
n
■
Is the flow meter operational?
■
n n n
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■
n 0 Q
Comment: Flow meters are calibrated quarterly.
Bar Screens
Yes
No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
n
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
n n n
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
n n n
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
0110
Is the unit in good condition?
■
n n D
Comment:
Page # 9

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110143 Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 06/31/13 Owner: City of Reidsville
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Reidsville WWTP
County: Rockingham 407 Broad St
Region: Winston-Salem
Reidsville NC 27320
Contact Person: Kevin Eason Title. Public Works Director Phone: [phone]
Directions to. Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date. 05/09/2012 Entry Time:- 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:15 PM
Primary Inspector: Michael S Thomas Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant it Not Compliant
Question Areas.
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1
0

Permit: NCG110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 05/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
0 Q
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
n
0 n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
El 0
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
n
n n
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
n n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
0
Q Q
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
0
Q n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
Q
D D
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
Q
0 D
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
Q
n n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
❑
n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
Q 0
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
0
Q Cl
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
0
Q 11
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
n
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
Q D
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
#-Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
0000
❑0■Q
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ Q 0 D
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ Q ❑ 11
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0 Q ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ 0 C-) 11
Comment:
Page: 3

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
3 June 2011
City of Reidsville
Attn: Mr. Kevin Eason, Public Works Director
230 West Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Permit NCO024881 &
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110143
-City of Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Eason
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Mr. Mike Thomas of the Winston-Salem Regional Office of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
conducted a compliance evaluation inspection of the City of Reidsville's Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) on
27 May 2011. The assistance and cooperation of Mr. Mike Burleson,'Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) was
greatly appreciated. Inspection findings are summarized below.
The facility is located at 407 Broad.Street, in Reidsville, in Rockingham County. The permit authorizes the City
of Reidsville to operate this 7.5 MGD plant which according to the permit, consists of coarse screening, grit removal,
influent pump station, aeration basin with mechanical aerators, final clarifiers, single media shallow sand infiltration,
sludge thickeners, aerobic digesters, sludge storage basins, disinfection via chlorination, de -chlorination, Parshall
flume and effluent pump station. Wastewater produced at the facility is discharged to the Haw River, which is
currently classified as C - Nutrient Sensitive Waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.
NPDES Permit NCO024881 Site Review
The facility is very well operated and maintained. At the time of inspection one aeration basin and one clarifier
was offline for maintenance purposes. Carbon continues to be fed into the aeration basin splitter box manually. The
addition of carbon combines with surfactants from industrial users to create thick, black foam on the surface of the
aeration basin. At the time of inspection this foam did not appear to be hampering the effectiveness of the plant
though it does create additional maintenance issues for the staff. Mr. Burleson informed Mr. Thomas that the City is
working on funding to make improvements to this system as well as some others at the plant.
Influent and effluent samples are collected by flow proportional samplers. The tubing was clean and in good
physical condition. Collected samples are kept below the 6° Celsius required by the permit. Both flow meters are
calibrated on a quarterly schedule.
Due to heavy rains this past winter the facility had to bypass the tertiary filters on a couple of occasions to
prevent damaging the filters. On each occasion, Mr. Burleson notified Mr. Thomas of the duration of the bypass.
North Carolina Division of Water Qualify. Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 9-877-623-6748
Inte net www.ncmterquaflty.org
An Equal Opportur;4XAffirmaM Action Employer
One
NorthCarolina
Aw rall'y

City of Reidsville W W'PP
Compliance Evaluation Inspections NCO024881 & NCG110143
6=011
Documentation Review
Mr. Thomas evaluated laboratory data during the inspection. Operation logs were reviewed and found to meet
all requirements. Laboratory records for both the WWTP lab and the contract lab were reviewed and found to be
accurate and complete. The laboratory at the facility is currently certified to perform all required testing with the
exception of some of the metals. Merritech and Environment 1 process the samples not run by the facility.
Laboratory chains of custody were complete and well organized.
Operation and maintenance records are complete and well organized. In addition, the operator visitation tog was
reviewed and found to be complete and current.
Mr. Burleson provided Mr. Thomas with a copy of the 2010 annual report for the facility, as required by the
permit. Annual reports from previous years were also available at the facility.
At the present time, the City of Reidsville has submitted an application for permit renewal for this facility. Until
the new permit renewal is received the facility is to continue to operate under the conditions specified in the present
permit.
The facility operates 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The assigned Operator in Responsible Charge, Mr.
Burleson, as well as, the other operators has the appropriate, current certifications to operate the facility.
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110143
Site Review
The site appeared to be very. clean and well maintained. Drop inlets were clean with no excessive accumulation
of dirt or detritus. Mr. Thomas noted no issues with the stormwater collection system.
Documentation Review
This Certificate of Coverage became effective in February 2009 and allows the City of Reidsville to discharge
stormwater related to industrial activity from the WWTP to Little Troublesome Creek. Little Troublesome Creek is
classified as WS-IV (water supply), Nutrient Sensitive Waters, in the Cape Fear River Basin.
The Stormwater Pollution and Prevention Plan (SP3) has now been fully implemented. All required components
of the SP3 were complete and available for review. Staff training is now being conducted annually as well as when
new employees are hired.
Records of qualitative monitoring were available for review and were found to be complete. No vehicle
maintenance is performed at this facility therefore, no analytical monitoring is required. -
We appreciate your efforts to effectively operate and maintain this treatment system. No additional response to
this letter is required. If you have questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Thomas or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Winston-Salem Region
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Report
Cc: WSRO. SWP wl atch.
Central Files wl atch
NPDES West Unit

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 1 51 31 N00024881 Ill 121 11/05/27 117 i61 CI 191 SI 20U
U
Remarks
21
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating Bi CIA Reserved
671 1 69 7o I._! � 711 1 721 NJ 73 LU 74 751 1 1 1 1 1 I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTUVname and NPDES permit. Number)
Reidsville WW'FP
09:00 AM 11/05/27
10/08/01
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
407 Broad St
Reidsville NC 27320
11:00 AM 11/05/27
11/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)rrittes(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
John Michael Burleson/6RC/336-349-1102/
Name, Address of Responsible OfficiallTitielPhone and Fax Number
D Kellyy.Almond,230 W Morehead St Reidsville NC Contacted
27320%36-349-1030/3363423649 No
Seddon C: Areas Evaluated During inspection (Check only those areas evaluated
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review EffluentlReceiving Waters
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Findin Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessayj
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/OfficelPhone and Fax Numbers Date
Michael S Thomas WSRO WQ///
f
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer AgencylOfficelPhone and Fax Numbers ate
-DerA 'WsPV
de Z -
EPA Farm 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPOES yrlmolday Inspection Type
3I NC002488 1 U 11/05/27 17 18 I
Section D Summary of Findin Camments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

Permit NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville VWVTP
Inspection Date: 05J2712411 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■
❑
0 n
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
n
C1 0
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
n
■
n n
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
n
n n
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
n
n n
Comment: Renewal has been submitted but new'permit has not been received.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■ n n n
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■ n n n
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab, reg. required 5 years)?
■ Cl n
Are analytical results consistentwith data reported on DMRs?
■ n n n
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■ n 0
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■ n Q Q
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■ n ❑ U
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 2417 with a certified operator on each shift?
■ 11 n n
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■ n n ❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■ ❑ 0 Q
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■ ❑ n n
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for.review'.>
■ 0 n
Comment:
Laboratory
Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■ n n n
Page # 3

Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville VWVTP
Inspection Date: 0512712011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are ail other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab? ■0 00
# is the facility using a contract lab? ■ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)? ■ 0 ❑ 13
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees? ■ 0 D ❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +1_ 1.0 degrees? ■ Q 00
Comment: Outside lab work performed by Merritech and Environment 1.
Standby Power
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
Is the generator tested under load?
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power'?
1s the generator fuel level monitored?
Comment:
Influent Sampling
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected above side streams?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE

Permit NCO024881 owner - Facility: Reidsville VVWP
Inspection Date: 05127/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Samplirig Yes No NA NE
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampring Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ ❑ 0 n
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? ■ ❑ n 1
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
n
Is the flow meter operational?
■ 0
n
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■ Q
n Q
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated quarterly.
Pump Station - Effluent
Yes No
NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■ Q
❑ fl
Are all pumps present?
■ ❑
n Cl
Are all pumps operable?
■ 0
❑ 0
Are float controls operable?
■ 0
0 0
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Q 0
■ 0
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■ 0
Q fl
Comment:
Pump Station - Influent .
Yes No
NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■ ❑
Q it
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
■ n
n 0
Are all pumps present?
■nQn
Are all pumps operable?
■ n
0 0
Are float controls operable?
■ n
❑ n
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
n n
■ n
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■ 0
❑ 0
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Yes No
NA NE
Is right of way to the outfaEl properly maintained?
■❑00
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
■ n
❑ n
Page 9 5

Permit: NCO024881 Owner -Facility: Reidsville P
VVVV -
Inspection Date: 05/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent PI a Yes No NA NE
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ 0 El
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solidsipin floc?
1s the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Pumps-RAS WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment:
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary
Type of operation:
Is the filter media present?
Is the filter surface free of clogging?
Is the filter free of growth?
Yes No NA NE
Down flow
■000
■❑❑❑
■nn00
Page # 6

Permit: NC0024881 Owner -Facility: Reidsville VVVV7P
Inspection Date: 05/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary Yes No NA NE
Is the air scour operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the scouring acceptable? ■ ❑ n ❑
Is the dear well free of excessive solids and filter media? ■ 11 Cl n
Comment:
Aerobic Di esker
Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the mixing adequate?
■ n n n
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■ it n ❑
# is the odor acceptable?
■ ❑ Q Q
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■ n n ❑
Comment:
Drying Beds
Yes No NA NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
❑ n ■ ❑
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
n n ■ ❑
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
n n ■ ❑
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
n, n ■ ❑
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
❑ n ■ n
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
❑ n ■ ❑
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Is the sludge land applied?
n n ■ ❑
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
n n ■ n
Comment: Drying beds no longer in use.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No NA NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■,n n n
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■ n n Q
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■ n ❑ ❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
n ❑ ❑ ■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■ n n n
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
n n n
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 lbs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
■ n ❑ n
Page # 7

Permit: NCO024881 Owner -Facility: Reidsville VW TTP
Inspection Date: 05127/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA . NE
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site? 00110
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- -__) 00072164
if yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Type of grit removal
a.Manuai
b. Mechanical
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
Comment:
Nutrient Removal
# Is total nitrogen removal required?
# Is total phosphorous removal required?
Type
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process?
Is nutrient removal process operating properly?
Comment:
Aeration Basins
06119/2009
Yes No NA NE
Gas
0n❑■
■000
■0D0
0GE11
0C)E0
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
■❑1]n
Biological
n■00
■nnn
Yes No NA NE
Page # 8

Permit NCO024881 Owner -Facility: Reidsville VV VCP
Inspection Date: 05/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation
Ext Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■ ❑ it
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■ ❑ Cl
Q
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
n ■ ❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
Q Q n
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mgA)
❑ ❑ ❑
■
Comment: Due to the interaction of surfactants coming from industrial users and the
carbon that is added manually to the basin and excessive amount of thick black foam
accumulates on the surface.
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes No
NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■ n
n n
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Is the flow meter operational?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Comment: Flow meter is calibrated quarterly.
Bar Screens
Yes No
NA NE
Type of bar screen
a. Manual
❑
b. Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■ ❑
n n
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Is disposal of screening incompliance?
■ ❑
❑
Is the unit in good condition? .
■ ❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Page # 9

Compliance inspection Report
Permit: NCG110143 Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: City of Reidsville
Soc: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Reidsville WIVfP
County: Rockingham 407 Broad St
Region: Winston-Salem
Reidsville NC 27320
Contact Person: Kevin Eason Title: Public Works Director Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: .
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 0512712011 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM
Primary Inspector: Michael S Thomas Phone:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WVVTP a 1MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant n Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

s
Permit NIM 10143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 05/2712011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■ 0
D 11
# Does the Plan include a General location (USGS) map?
■ Cl
U 11
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
■ C3
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■ 0
❑ Q
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
D ❑
■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■ 0
fi 11
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■ 0
❑ Cl
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■ n
D
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■ 0
Q El
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■ Q
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑
❑ D
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■ 0
0 �
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■ Cl
0 Q
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■ Q
n n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■ ❑
0 0
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ■ ❑ n 0
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ 0 Cl D
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ C) ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ D 0 01
Comment:
Page: 2

w�o
4 "
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resource:
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor pirector Secretary
18 March 2010
City of Reidsville
Attn: Mr. Kelly Almond, City Manager
230 West Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110143
Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Almond:
Thank you for your timely reply to our inspection letter and for providing a copy of the city's stormwater
pollution prevention plan cover sheet and certification page. We apologize for the misunderstanding and
inconvenience and will fully evaluate the city's stormwater plan during the next compliance evaluation
inspection at the wastewater treatment plant.
Please consider this letter an official retraction of the previously assigned non -compliant rating of the
city's stormwater pollution prevention program for the wastewater treatment plant. As the attached inspection
checklist reflects, the city's stormwater program for the wastewater treatment plant is now assigned a
compliant rating.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me or Mr. Boone at 336-771-4967.
Attachments:
1. Updated Inspection Checklist for NCG110143
Cc: WSROISWP
NPDES West Unit
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Qualify, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
NorthCaroiina
Natura!!rf

f
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110143 Effective: 02/13/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: City of Reidsville
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Reidsville WWTP
County: Rockingham 407 Broad St
Region: Winston-Salem
Reidsville NC 27320
Contact Person: Kevin Eason Title, Public Works Director Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Related Permits:
John Michael Burleson
John Michael Burleson
Certification:
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 02/2512010 ntr, Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Ron Boone,
l Phone: [phone]
Z-) [ � Ext.2202
Secondary Inspector(s): L
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP > 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 02/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
UPDATE: THE CITY'S STORMWATER PROGRAM FOR THE WWTP WAS NOT EVALUATED DURING THE
INSPECTION. MR. BOONE INQUIRED TO MR. BURLESON ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE CITY'S SP3 FOR THE
WWTP AFTER THE INSPECTION AND MISUNDERSTOOD HIS RESPONSE TO MEAN THAT THE SP3 HAD NOT YET
BEEN DEVELOPED. HOWEVER THE CITY HAS NOW PROVIDED PROOF WITH THE REPSONSE TO THE
INSPECTION LETTER THAT IT HAS DEVELOPED AN SP3 FOR THE WWTP. THE CITY IS THEREFORE DEEMED
COMPLIANT AT THIS JUNCTURE, ALTHOUGH THE SW PROGRAM WAS NOT FULLY EVALUATED. A FULL
EVALUATION WILL BE CONDUCTED DURING NEXT YEARS INSPECTION.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 02/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■ D
❑
D
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0 D
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
D D
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfail locations and drainage areas?
Q ❑
D
■
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
0 Q
❑
■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■ D
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■ D
D
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
D D
D
■
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
Q Cl
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑
fl
■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ D
D
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■ ❑
D
# is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? '
❑ ❑
Q
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■ D
n
D
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
D D
D
■
Comment: SP3 has not yet been fully developed and implemented. Please refer to
attached inspection summary letter. UPDATE: THE CITY'S STORMWATER
PROGRAM FOR THE WWTP WAS NOT EVALUATED DURING THE INSPECTION.
MR. BOONE INQUIRED TO MR. BURLESON ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF THE
CITY'S SP3 FOR THE WWTP AFTER THE INSPECTION AND MISUNDERSTOOD
'HIS RESPONSE TO MEAN THAT THE SP3 HAD NOT YET BEEN DEVELOPED.
HOWEVER THE CITY HAS NOW PROVIDED PROOF WITH THE REPSONSE TO
THE INSPECTION LETTER THAT IT HAS DEVELOPED AN SP3 FOR THE WWTP.
THE CITY IS THEREFORE DEEMED COMPLIANT AT THIS JUNCTURE, ALTHOUGH
THE SW PROGRAM WAS NOT FULLY EVALUATED. A FULL EVALUATION WILL BE
CONDUCTED DURING NEXT YEARS INSPECTION.
Qualitative Monitorin Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? D Q ❑ ■
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? D D ■ D
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page: 3

Permit: NCG110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 02/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■Inn
n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
n
■ n
n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
Q ■
11
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwaler) discharges?
Q
Q Q
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page: 4

,r
I
230 W. 7ir4u4ead Sewat • 7ta2r4 ea� 27320 • (336)
March 10, 2010
Mr. Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Re: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO024881 &
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110143
Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Tedder:
MAR 17 2H
4
� �•ii:RS:iJ YI-5d12 �' SS
�en'or.n a! �i`a S2 1
57" [phone]
Owee ad t&e Oof 4vt
Reidsville
AHMMMCM
11111.1
2008
I am pleased to see from your inspections report that overall the plant appears to be clean, well maintained
and in compliance with the applicable permits. This letter is in response to your request for action regarding
Item 7 (SP3 Plan) and 3d (Reporting).
The SP3 plan was not inquired about at the plant visit, but instead was inquired about after the visit by a
phone call from Mr. Boone to Mr. Burleson. Although I'm unsure where the confusion was made, the City
does, in fact, have a SP3 plan that was developed for us by Jewell Engineering Consultants and became
effective April 30, 2009. I've attached the cover sheet and the certification page as proof. We are due some
training as part of the program and that is scheduled for March 17th. The entire plan is available for inspection
at the plant if more information is needed.
Due to our concern about erroneous information being in the plant's record, we respectfully request a
retraction of the Compliance Report indicating that the plant was non -compliant for stormwater. Also, the
checklist should be revised to indicate that the documentation was "not evaluated" (NE) versus indicating
that it was 'not compliant".
It is my understanding that in regards to 3d, all reporting was made as required.

I trust that the information provided is sufficient for your needs and appreciate your attention to the issue
regarding the SP3 compliance report If there are any additional questions, please contact our Kevin Eason,
PE - Public Works Director,
Sincerely;
Y' C
l
D. Kelly Almond
City Manager
Encl: Cover sheet & certification sheet for SP3 plan
Cc Kevin Eason, PE Public Works Director
Nadine Blackwell United Water
Mike Burleson United Water
File

DRAFT
REIDSVILLE WWTP
REIDSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
STORMWATER POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN
Prepared in Accordance with
NPDES General Permit No. NCG110000
Certificate -of -Coverage No. NCG110143
Prepared by:
Jewell Engineering Consultants, PC
311-A South Main St.
Kernersville, North Carolina
[phone]
8916 Oregon Inlet Ct.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
[phone]
EFFECTIVE PLAN DATE
April 30, 2009

NCG110143
SWPPP CERTIFICATION
FORM 1
" I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my - inquiry of the person or
persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations" [see Part III, Section A, Paragraph 2
of the Permit].
Authorized Signaturel
Title
Phone No,
Date
SJ�erin�nde�lt
310-3�4-lie
�r,2gl�
o r GvZcsrp
3 36e-462- -14
SWPPT MEMBERS
The Senior Utility Plant Superintendent will appoint the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Team
(SWPPT) leader and members each year. Write the names and position of the team members in
the chart:
Consultants
Jewell Engineering
Consultants, PC
[phone]
Group, LLC
[phone]
Assistant Superintendent
iek FA N
Su ervisorl Maintenance
331c-a44w j w&
Sr,'Utiii y Plant Sitperintendent
A4 ) ke 80rLe50nl
SWPPT Leader
Utility Plant Supervisor
of Operations
M "ZOMALD
i;3&-344-- 1100
SWPPT Members
K[ Ac ► n e 6LAd4W 6 I
Supervisorllndustrial Waste
3360 -722- -a4-0
City of Reidsville
Stormwater
Division
[phone]
4iKe.Cott! NS
Su erv' or! Vnd�plication
b70
General Plant worker
33&-3 qg- 1 100
' Certification and all documents requiring a signature shall be signed by the plant supervisor at the facility or other authorized
designee.
Reidsville WWTP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Appendix A Form I

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
5 March 2010
City of Reidsville
Attn: Mr. Kelly Almond, City Manager
230 West Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
NPDES Individual Wastewater Permit NCO024881 &
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110143
Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Almond:
1. Ron Boone, of the Winston-Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the NC Division of Water
Quality (DWQ or the Division), conducted compliance evaluation inspections (CEI) of the
Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant for the subject permits on 25 February 2010. The plant
Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC), Mr. Mike Burleson, and his back-up ORC, Ms. Nadine
Blackwell, were present for the inspection. Their assistance and cooperation in setting up and
facilitating the inspection is greatly appreciated. Inspection checklists are attached for the
town's records.
NCO024881
General Information
2. The plant is located at 407 Broad Street, Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina. The
permit authorizes the city to operate this 7.5 MGD plant, which, according to the permit,
consists of coarse screening, grit removal,. influent pump station, aeration basin with
mechanical aerators, final clarifiers, single media shallow sand filtration, sludge thickeners,
aerobic digesters, sludge storage basin, disinfection by chlorination, dechlorination, parshall
flume and effluent pump station. The permit authorizes the city to discharge treated effluent
from the plant to the Haw River, this section of which is currently classified as Class C,
nutrient -sensitive waters (NSW) in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Site Review
3. The plant is well operated and managed; it was very clean and well maintained at the time of
the inspection. The following items were noted:
!North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Winston-Salem Regional Office
Location: 585 Waughtown St. Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107 One
Phone: [phone]M \ FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623.6748 NorthCarofina
Internet www.ncwaterquality,org Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

4
City of Reidsville
Attn: MrXelly Almond, City Manager
Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Reidsville Wastewater Treatment plant, NCO024881 & NCG110143
5 March 2010 \
Page 2 of 3
a. All components were well maintained and operational at the time of the inspection. No
discrepancies were noted.
b. Carbon is still being fed manually into the aeration basin splitter box.
C. Mr. Burleson discussed that the city is currently considering several plant
improvements, to include installation of a bulk carbon feeding system, improvements to
the solids handling systems, electrical system upgrades and upgrades to the aeration
basins.
d. The plant is currently experiencing flow slugs of an unknown source that caused high
total suspended solids in February and a bypass of the tertiary filters in early March.
Mr. Burleson has informed us that he and his staff are currently trying to pinpoint the
source of the slugs but so far have not been able to. The city and the operators are
reminded that the permit requires a 24 hour report and written 5 day report for treatment
plant bypasses. Please review that part of the permit and provide the necessary reports
as soon as possible. Please also keep us informed of the city's progress in locating the
source of the slugs.
e. The plant effluent was fairly clear but had a slightly tannic color. Despite the color it still
appeared to be high quality, with very little solids. The effluent flow is used for
reporting. The meter is calibrated at least annually and it matched the recorder at the
time of the inspection. Effluent samples are flow proportional.
f. The plant has a generator that can run the entire plant. According to Mr. Burleson, it is
tested regularly under load.
Documentation Review
4. The following documentation was reviewed:
a. Laboratory records, both in-house and contract, were reviewed. All records were
complete, accurate, well organized and available for review. At least five years worth of
records are kept on file. Laboratory records matched discharge monitoring reports and
no transcription or other errors were noted. The plant laboratory is currently certified to
perform all required testing except for a few of the metals. A contract lab is used for
these tests. All laboratory chains of custody were also complete, well organized and
available for review.
b. Operation and maintenance records were also complete, current well organized and
available for review.
C. An operator visitation log is kept and is complete and current.
d. An annual compliance report for 2008 was received by the Division on 16 February
2009 and is on file. Mr. Burleson had previous reports on file.
e. Mr. Burleson and Ms. Blackwell have current appropriate certifications to enable them to
operate the plant.
f. The plant has not had any limit violations over the previous twelve months.
N CG'I 10142
General Information
5. This permit/certificate of coverage became effective in February 2009. It allows the city to
discharge stormwater related to industrial activity from the WWTP to Little Troublesome Creek,

I
t City of Reidsville
Attm Mr.Kelly Almond, City Manager
Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO024881 & NCG110143
5 March 2010
Page 3 of 3
which is currently classified as WS-IV (water supply), NSW waters, in the Cape Fear River
Basin_
Site Review
6. The site seemed to be clean and well maintained. Mr. Boone noted no issues or
discrepancies.
Documentation Review
7. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SP3) has not yet been developed and implemented
and qualitative monitoring has not yet been accomplished.
8. Please reply to this letter in writing within 30 days of receiving it. Your response should
include a corrective action plan with implementation schedule for the deficiency listed above in
paragraph 7, as well as the plant bypass reports mentioned in paragraph 3d if they are not
submitted to the Division sooner. Please continue to help the Division to protect waters of the
State through your continued efforts to comply with all conditions of NC002488.1 and
NCG110143. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the inspection or this letter,
please contact me or Mr. Boone at 336-771-5000.
Sincerely,
1��..
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Winston-Salem Region
Division of Water Quality
Attachments:
1. Inspection Checklists for NC0021873 & NCG110142
Cc: -WSRO/SWP
NPDES West Unit
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, O.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/molday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I NI 2 U 31 NCO024881 Ill 121 10/02/2s 117 18LI 191 ll 20] I
1
Remarks
21 6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 81 QA — — - — -Reserved------ — ---- -
671 169 701 I 711 I 72INI 73t I I74 75 Li 80
1—]J
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:00 AM 10/02/25
06/10/01
Reidsville WWTP
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
407 Broad St
Reidsville NC 27320
12:00 PM 10/02/25
11/04/20
Name(s) of Onsite Rep reseritative(s)lTltles(S)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Sohn Michael Burleson//336-230-7188 /
Sohn Michael Burleson/ORC/336-349-1102/
Name, Address of Responsible Officialfritle/Phone and Fax Number
D Kelly Almond,230 W Morehead St Reidsville NC Contacted
27320//336-349-1030/3363423649 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance RecordslReports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory Storm Water
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signatur of Inspector(s) AgencylOffice/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2202/
V I3/U'�S, 2t? u
G�
ReviE
Signature of Ma a nt Q A er Agency/OfficelPhone and Fax Numbers Date
j —:� —/4
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yrlmolday Inspection Type
3I NC0024881 111 12 10/02/25 I17 18I_'
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page # 2

Permit: NC0024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WVVTP
Inspection Date: 02l2512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Influent
Yes
No NA NE
is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■
❑ D D
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
■
D ❑ D
Are all pumps present?
■
D ❑ D
Are all pumps operable?
■
❑ D D
Are float controls operable?
■
D D ❑
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
D
Cl ■ D
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■
D D
Comment: Inf PS has no SCADA or telemetry. Please refer to attached inspection
summary letter.
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes
No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
❑
■ ❑ D
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■
❑ Q Q
Is the flow meter operational?
■
n D 13
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
D
D ❑ ■
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Bar Screens
Yes
No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
n
b.Mechanical
■
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
■
D D D
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
■
n ❑ 0
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
■
D D D
Is the unit in good condition?
■
D n D
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
.. _
v_..
ki- un uc
Type of grit removal
a.Manual D
b.Mechanical ■
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter? ■ D D D
Is the grit free of excessive odor? ■ D n D
Page # 3

Permit: NCO024881 owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Grit Removal
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Nutrient Removal
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is total nitrogen removal required?
Cl
■
❑
❑
# Is total phosphorous removal required?
■
❑
❑
❑
Type
Biological
# Is chemical feed required to sustain process?
0
■
❑
❑
Is nutrient removal process operating properly?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: First third of aeration basin used as anoxic zone - aerator is kept off.
Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Aeration Basins
Yes
No
NA
NE
Mode of operation
Ext. Air
Type of aeration system
Surface
Is the basin free of dead spots?
■
❑
0
❑
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are the diffusers operational?
❑
❑
■
❑
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
■
❑
❑
❑
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
❑
■
❑
❑
Is the DO level acceptable?
❑
❑
❑
■
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mgll)
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Secondary Clarifier
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
❑
■
❑
❑
Are weirs level?
■
❑
0
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is scum removal adequate?
■
❑
❑
Q
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Is the drive unit operational?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page # 4

Permit: NC0024881 Owner -Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No NA
NE
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
■ Q El
n
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
■ n ❑
El
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately Y. of the sidewall depth)
■ n n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Pum s-RAS WAS
Yes No NA
NE
Are pumps in place?
■ Q Q
0,
Are pumps operational?
■ ❑ Q
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
■ n n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary)
Yes No NA
NE
Type of operation:
Down flow
Is the filter media present?
■ n n
n
Is the filter surface free of clogging?
■ n n
❑
Is the filter free of growth?
■ ❑ ❑
n
Is the air scour operational?
■ n n
n
Is the scouring acceptable?
■ n n
0
Is the clear well free of excessive solids and filter media?
■ n n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Aerobic Digester
Yes No NA
NE
Is the capacity adequate?
■ ❑ n
n
Is the mixing adequate?
■ n n
n
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
■ n n
n
# is the odor acceptable?
■ El n
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
■ n n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Drying Beds
Yes No NA
NE
Is there adequate drying bed space?
n ❑ ■
n
Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate?
n n ■
n
Are the drying beds free of vegetation?
n n ■
o
# Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds?
❑ n ■
n
Page # 5

t4
Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 02125/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Drying Beds
Yes No NA
NE
Is the site free of stockpiled sludge?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant?
❑ ❑ ■
❑
# Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill?
❑ D ■
❑
# Is the sludge land applied?
❑ n ■
❑
(Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate?
❑ ❑ ■
n
Comment: Drying beds no longer in use. Please refer to attached inspection summary
letter.
Disinfection -Gas
Yes No NA
NE
Are cylinders secured adequately?
■ ❑ Q
❑
Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight?
■ 0 n
Cl
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
■ n Q
❑
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
❑ f i ❑
■
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
■ ❑ n
0
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
❑ ❑ n
■
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
■ ❑ ❑
n
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000 - )
00072164
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
06/19/2009
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
De -chlorination
Yes No NA
NE
Type of system ?
Gas
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
❑ ❑ ❑
■
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
■ ❑ ❑
n
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
■ 0 Q
❑
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
0 01 ■
❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
❑ ❑ ■
n
Number of tubes in use?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No NA
NE
Page # 6

Permit: NCO024881
Inspection Date: 02125/2010
Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
■ D
D
D
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
■ Q
Q
Is the flow meter operational?
■ ❑
D
0
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
■ D
D
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Pump Station - Effluent
Yes No
NA
NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
■ D
D
n
Are all pumps present?
■ ❑
❑
13
Are all pumps operable?
■ D
❑
D
Are float controls operable?
■ Cl
Q
D
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
❑ D
■
D
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
■ D
n
n
Comment: Eff PS currently has no SCADA or telemetry installed. Please refer to
attached inspection summary letter.
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ■ Cl ❑ D
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? Q D ❑ ■
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
❑
D
■
D
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Operations & Maintenance
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
■
❑
D
❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids,
pH, DO, Sludge ■
❑
D
El
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Standby Power
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is automatically activated standby power available?
■
D
D
D
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
■
D
n D
Is the generator tested under load?
■
D
D
D
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
11
■
D
D
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
■
D
D
❑
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
❑
D
D
■
Page # 7

Permit: NCO024881 Owner -Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 02125/2010 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Is the generator fuel level monitored? ■ ❑ ❑ n
Comment. Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Laboratory
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
■
❑
❑
❑
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
■
❑
❑
n
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
■
n
❑
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
■
❑
Q
❑
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
■
Q
❑
❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Influent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
n
❑
n
is sample collected above side streams?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
D
0
Is the tubing clean?
■
n
n
n
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is sampling performed according to the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Effluent Sampling
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
■
fl
❑
❑
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
■
n
n
n
Is proper volume collected?
■
❑
❑
n
Is the tubing clean?
■
n
n
❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
■
❑
Q
❑
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? ■ L-1 ❑ ❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Upstream 1 Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ■ n ❑ n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Permit Yes No NA NE
Page # 8

Permit: NCO024881 Owner - Facility: Reidsville WWTP
Inspection Date: 0212512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
n
n
■
n
Is the facility as described in the permit?
0
■
0
0
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
❑
■
Q
Q
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
n
n
n
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
n
❑
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Record Keeping
Yes
No
NA
NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
■
n
❑
n
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
■
D
n
D
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
■
n
I]
n
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
■
n
n
n
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
■
0
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
■
Name of individual performing the sampling
■
Results of analysis and calibration
■
Dates of analysis
■
Name of person performing analyses
■
Transported COCs
■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
■
❑
n
n
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
■
D
0
D
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 2417 with a certified operator on each shift?
■
n
n
n
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
■
n
Cl
0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
■
n
Q
n
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
■
n
n
n
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
■
n
Q
n
Facility has copy of previous years Annual Report on file for review?
■
n
n
n
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page # 9

a
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG110143 Effective: 02113/09 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: City of Reidsville
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Reidsville WWTP
County: Rockingham
407 Broad St
Region: Winston-Salem
Reidsville NC 27320
Contact Person: Kevin Eason Title: Public Works Director Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Related Permits:
,John Michael Burleson
John Michael Burleson
Certification:
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
inspection Date: 02125/2010 E Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary inspector: Ron Boone Phone: [phone]
Secondary P ector(Ins s) : r Ext2202
� v,� j�10
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Municipal WWTP a 1 MGD, Stormwater Discharge, COC
Facility Status: D Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG110143 Owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 02/25/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG110143 owner - Facility: City of Reidsville
Inspection Date: 0212512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Does the Plan -include a "]Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
Q
Q ■ it
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
D ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
n
■ n n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
n n n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
Q ■ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
n
❑ ■ n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
n
Cl ■ n
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
n n ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
n
n ■ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
0
0 ■ 0
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
in
■ ❑ n
Comment: SP3 has not yet been fully developed and implemented. Please refer to
attached inspection summary letter.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
■ 0 ❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
Cl
❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
0
❑ ■ ❑
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No NA Nrm
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ 0 0 0
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ 0 ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? D ■ 11 D
Comment: Please refer to attached inspection summary letter.
Page: 3

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
RECEIVED
February 13, 2009 N-C, Dept of ENR
FEB 17 2M
wir stort-Salem
Mr. Kevin Eason, Public Works Director Regional office
City of Reidsville
230 West Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
Subject: General Permit No. NCG110000
Reidsville WWTP
COC NCG110143
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Eason:
In accordance with your application for a discharge permit received on January 28, 2009,
we are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state
— NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the
US Environmental Protection Agency 'dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to
the Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources,
Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local governmental permit that may be
required. `
If you have any questions concerning.this permit, please contact Robert Patterson at
telephone number [phone]
Sink SIGNED BY
KtN PICKLE
for Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Winston Salem Regional Office, Corey Basinger
Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch One
1617 Mail Service Center, Ralegh, North Carolina 27699-1617 North Carolina
Location: 512 N. Salisbury Raleigh, North Carolina 04 alurR!!lf
Phone: 919-SD7�3001 FAX::919�D7-64941 Customerr Service: i-877�23-'i748
ww Internet wricwaterquality.org
An EquEd Opportunity 1 Affimla6ve AcWn Employer

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG110000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG110143
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Reidsville
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant
407 Broad Street
Reidsville
Rockingham County
to receiving waters designated as Little Troublesome Creek, a class C; NSW water iri the Cape
Fear River Basin, in accordance with'the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I,11, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG110000 as
attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective February 13, 2009.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this 13a' day of February 2009.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
KEN PICKLE.
for Coleen H. Sullins., Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

NCG110143
Map Scale 1:30,000
City of Reidsville
Reidsville WWTP
Latitude: 361 19' 22" N
Longitude: 790 39' 30" W
County: Rockingham
Receiving Stream: Little Troublesome Creek
Stream Class: C; NSW
Sub -basin: 03-06-01 (Cape Fear River Basin)
V,ef11+�w��
AN
Facility Location

�OF WArFRQ Michael I .Easley, Governor
�O G William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
4 -C Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
31 December 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7008-0150-0002-7876-8775
Mr. Kelly Almond, City Manager
City of Reidsville
230 West Morehead Street
Reidsville, NC 27320
SUBJECT: NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG110000
City of Reidsville
Wastewater Treatment Plant, NCO024881
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Almond:
It recently came to our attention that the City of Reidsville does not have a general stormwater permit for
its Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). General stormwater permit NCG110000 is specifically for municipal
WWTPs that have an industrial pretreatment program or a design flow of 1.0 MGD or greater. The Reidsville
WWTP meets these criteria. This Phase I permitting program was established in 1990 for stormwater discharges
from various types of industrial facilities.
Attached you will find a Notice of Intent form to be used to apply for the permit. Please send the
completed form along with the $100 application fee and a USGS topographic map to the Raleigh address listed
on page 4 of the application on or before 16 January 2009. Please also send a courtesy copy of the form to the
address listed in the Tooter of this letter so we are aware of your submittal. A Technical Bulletin explaining the
requirements of the stormwater permit is also attached from your information.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�G
Rona d C. Boone
Environmental Specialist
NC Division of Water Quality
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Attachments:
1. NCG110000 Notice of Intent form
2. NCG110000 Technical Bulletin
CC: SWP - WSRO
Stormwater Permitting Unit
NPDES West Unit
Central Files
one
NCaro ina
j/vatur�ly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Winston-Salem Regional Office
Ph: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Surface water Protection Section
Fax: [phone]
Intemet: www.newaterquality.org 585 Waughtown Steet, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

U.S. Postal Service
I
CERTIFIED MAIL,,., RECEIPT
uI 1Coverage
I �
I�it bsite •E
ro 1�31
r•- .�►� tE rve
ru Cerlltled Fee s 70
?�
C) Return Receipt Fee Herev'
C3 (Endorsement Required) a o
C3
tE 9nt' euiFee rrecl) J N 0 5 2Q19
Lin
ra Total Postaw & Fees ! "+ 1
CO Mr. Kelly Almond LISPS
C3 City of Reidsville "'------- ---
n
230 West Morehead Street •-------------- 4
Reidsville, NC 27320
j ■ ,Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
l ■ Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece,
or on the front If space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Mr. Kelly Almond
City of Reidsville
230 West Morehead Street
I Reidsville, NC 27320
{
iynr u �P4
�ikl--]
❑ Agent Addressee
B. Name) C. Date of Delivery
�S
D. Is livery ad ress different frombarn 11 ❑ Yes
li YES, enter delivery address below: ' ❑ No
3. Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
Registered ❑ Return Recelpt for Merr hmdlse
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
Cj 7008 i1. 0150} 00021178i76 i8775 11 I
l PS Forrn 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return ecelpt, —� p �(�7/ 102595-0