NCG080653_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20170328

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/v C&0 s 0�b,>
DOC TYPE
[P/HISTORICALFILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ (nOI { U3 �O
YYYYMMDD

t �r`
GREENSBORO
!FORTH CAROLIHA
WATER RESOURCES
March 28, 2017
Chuck Manuel, Terminal Manager
USF Holland.
201 Stage Coach Trail
Greensboro, NC 27409
RE: Industrial Compliance Inspection
Inspection location: USF Holland
201 Stage Coach Trail
SW Permit #: NCGO80653
Dear Mr, Manuel:
On March 22, 2017 the City of Greensboro Stormwater Management Division completed an
industrial compliance inspection of USF Holland. Local regulations permit an inspection of
industrial facilities under authority granted by City of Greensboro Code of Ordinance Chapter
30, Article 12, Section 7.1 (C-5). This inspection consisted of two parts: a review of the facility
files/records and an on -site facility inspection.
The inspection was performed by Sherri Scalcione, Ian Dunn and Zack Mackenzie. The following
deficiencies/observations were noted during the inspection.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Flan/Spill Plait Review
Update the SWP3 plan annually, it is suggested that the review date and signature appear as
either an attachment page after the cover or on the cover page itself. Please refer to the permit
Part 11, Section A, item number 7 for the full description of the information the plan requires
updates to annually.
Site Maps and SWP3
• Once verified with the State all outfalls should be noted on the plan. See notes below
regarding monitoring deficiencies.
Spill Prevention and Response Plan
• No deficiencies observed.
PO BOX 1170 • GREENSBORO NC 27402-1170 • WWW.GREENSBORO-NC.GOV • 336-373-CITY (2489)

Mr, Chuck Manuel
USi' Rolland NPDES Compliance Inspection letter
Dated 3/28/i7
Page 2 of 2
Monitoring
• Monitoring has not been completed since 2013. Mr. Manuel states they have
contracted GEOS Environmental to get in compliance with this portion of the permit.
• The map used for the previous inspection in 2012 has 2 outfalls marked. Mr. Manuel
indicated the plan is to sample outfall #l, please coordinate with the State to ensure all
outfalls are monitored as required by the permit.
Employee Training
• No deficiencies observed
Site Inspection
Preventative Maintenance/Good Housekeeping
• No deficiencies observed.
Nun-Stormwater Discharges
• Mr. Manual stated that the lift station pump went out in January and last week the float
malfunctioned resulting in overflows. In addition to these events, the City has record
of this occurring in 2002 and again in 2010 during routine inspections of the dry
detention basin. Please contact Ron Boone with the State to ensure that USF Holland
is in compliance with the 02T rules (see email dated 3/23/17 for additional details).
Be advised that failure to report overflows wiff result in a notice of violation from both
the City of Greensboro and NCDEQ.
It is recommended that USF Holland take appropriate actions to correct the noted deficiencies. If
you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact me at 336-412-6202 or
Sherri. [e-mail].
Sincerely,
C-At A —
Sherri Scalcione, Water Quality Specialist
City of Greensboro, Water Resources Department
cc: Peter Schneider, Water Quality Supervisor
Glen White, N.C. Dept. of Environment Quality
Industrial Inspection File
uItl cnOS PO BOX 1170 - GREENSBORO NC 27402-1170 • WWW.GREENS BORO-NC.GOV • 336-373-CITY (2489)

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG080653 Effective: 11/01/12 Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner: Usf
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: USF Holland Inc - Greensboro
County: Guilford 201 Stage Coach Trl '
Region: Winston-Salem
Greensboro NC 27409
Contact Person: Jean Godwin Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/22/2017
Primary Inspector: Glen White
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Entry Time 10:OOAM Exit Time: 11:00AM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Transportation wNehicie Maintenance/Petroleum Bulk/Oil Water Separator Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

permit: NCGO80653 Owner - Facility: Usf
Inspection Date: 03122/2017 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Inspection conducted by Sherri Scalcione, Ian Dunn & Zack MacKenzie of Greensboro Water Resources Department on
March 22, 2017. Deficiencies were found. Outfalls not properly identified and no monitoring has been performed. See COG
inspection letter in WSRO hard files for full letter text.
Glen White
NCDEQ - DEMLR
Page: 2

Permit: NCGO80653 Owner - FaclIIty:Usf
Inspection Date: 03I22I2017 Inspection Type; Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (LISGS) map?
®❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
®❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
B
❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan includea Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
®❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
N
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
!
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Siteplan needs to be updated with outfall information once verified.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ®❑ ❑
Comment: Monitoring not conducted.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: No analytical monitoring is being conducted.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfails observed during the inspection? ❑ M ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ E ❑ ❑
Comment: Outfalls not properly identified and no monitoring is being conducted according to the permit.
Page: 3

Permit: NCGO80653
SOC:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12
Effective: Expiration:
County: Guilford
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person:QeanGodw,�i)nDirections to Fac
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title:
Inspection Date: 06/27/2008 Entry Time: 11:30 AM
Primary Inspector: William C Basinger
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Owner: USF Holland Inc
Facility: USF Holland Inc - Greensboro
201 Stage Coach Tri
Greensboro NG 27409
Phone: [phone]
Exit Time: 12:30 AM
Phone:
Phone:[phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Transportation wNehicle Maintenance/Petroleum Bulk/Oil
Water Separator Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
U Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

f
Permit: NCGO80653 Owner - Facility: USF Holland Inc
Inspection Date: 06/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
Zr n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
en
n
n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
zr❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
J' 1 n
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
RT ❑
❑
n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
JAG ❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
'PT ❑
n
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
,[i1' n
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
,� ❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
Z ❑
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
,EI ❑
n
n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
I n
n
n
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
Cl
❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No
NA
NE'
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
2r n
❑
n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
kr ❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? fi ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? `f�l ❑ ❑ n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? IN ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

NORTH CAROLINA
.DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
FAX TRANSMITTAL
Water Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27107
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
TO: der 4 S'a
FAX NUMBER:
FROM: (mike.mickevancdenr.Rov)
DATE:`�—
Number of pages (including cover page):
COMMENTS: tJcw' \��

Nl
I I
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Govemor
Stephen Wonch
USF Holland Inc - Greensboro
750 E 40th St
Holland, MI 49423
Dear Permiee:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Director
March 5, 2012
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
USF Holland Inc - Greensboro
COC Number NCGO80653
Guilford County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Your facility is currently covered for stormwater discharge under General Permit NCGO80000. This permit expires on
10/31/2012. The Division staff is currently in the process of renewing this permit. When a draft is available for
notice and public comment, it will be posted on our website at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/public-notices.
Please continue to check this website to review and comment on proposed changes to the permit. Once the permit
is reissued, your facility would be eligible for continued coverage under the reissued permit.
To assure consideration for continued coverage under the general permit, you must apply to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for renewal of your permit. Enclosed you will find a Permit Coverage Renewal Application Form. The
application must be completed and returned by May 4, 2012. Letters confirming our receipt of the completed
application will not be sent.
Failure to request renewal within the time period specified may result in a civil assessment of at least $250.00.
Larger penalties may be assessed depending on the delinquency of the request. Discharge of stormwater from your
facility without coverage under a valid stormwater NPDES permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and
could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
"No exposure exclusion" is now available to industrial facilities in any of the categories of "storm water discharges
associated with industrial activity," (except construction activities). If you feel your facility can certify a condition of
"no exposure", i.e. the facility industrial materials and operations are not exposed to stormwater, you can apply for
the no exposure exclusion. For additional information contact the Central Office Stormwater Staff member listed
below or check the Stormwater Permitting Unit Web Site at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/npdessw#tab-5.
If the subject stormwater discharge to waters of the state has been terminated, please complete the enclosed
Rescission Request Form. Mailing instructions can be found on the bottom of the form. You will be notified when
the rescission process has been completed.
If you have any questions regarding the permit renewal procedures please contact Robert Patterson of the Central
Office Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone].
Sincerely,
-ley
Bradley Bennett
Supervisor, Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
location: 512 N. Salisbury Si. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 91 M07-6300 4 FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623.6748
Internet: www.nrwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 4 Atrirmative Action Employer
None hCarolina
Naturally

&WAT`t,� Permit Coverage
Renewal Application Form
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Certificate of Coverage Number
Stormwater General Permit NCG080000 NCGO>30653
The following is the information currently in our database for your facility. Please review this information carefully and make all
corrections/ additions as necessary in the space provided to the right of the current information,
Owner Affiliation Information
Owner / Organization Name:
Owner Contact:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail address:
* Reissued Permit will 6e mailed to the owner address
USF Holland Inc
Stephen Wonch
750 E 40th St
Holland, MI 49423
616-395-5000 Ext.
616-395-5057
Facility/Permit Contact Information
Facility Name: USF Holland Inc - Greensboro
Facility Physical Address: 201 Stage Coach Trl
Greensboro, NC 27409
Facility Contact:
Leon Daniels
Mailing Address:
201 Stage Coach Trl
Greensboro,NC 27409
Phone Number:
336-851-1680 Ext,
Fax Number:
336-855-7025
E-mail address:
[e-mail]
Aischarne Information
Receiving Stream:
Stream Class:
Basin:
Sub -Basin:
Number of Outfalls
Horsepen Creek
W S-III; NSW
Cape Fear River Basin
03-06-02
Impaired Waters/TMDL
Does this facility discharge to waters listed as impaired or waters with a finalized TMDL? ❑ Yes ❑ No J Don't Know
for information on these waters refer to 17dp y/hlo.enr state.nc.us/su/Impaired Waters TMDL/
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of my knowledge and
belief such information is true, complete and accurate.
Signature
Print or type name of person signing above
Date
Title
SW General Permit Coverage Renewal
Please return this completed renewal application form to: Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

February 8, 2012
Bobby Coffey
USF Holland
201 Stage Coach Trail
Greensboro, NC 27409
RE: Industrial Compliance Inspection
Inspection location: USF Holland
201 Stage Coach Trail
SW Permit #: NCG080653
Dear Mr. Coffey:
On February 7, 2012 the City of Greensboro Stormwater Management Division completed an
industrial compliance inspection of the USF Holland. Local regulations permit an inspection of
industrial facilities under authority granted by City of Greensboro Code of Ordinance Chapter
30, Article 12, Section 7.1 (C-5). This inspection consisted of two parts: a review of the facility
files/records and an on -site facility inspection.
The inspection was performed by Sherri Scalcione, and the following deficiencies/observations
were noted during the inspection.
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan/Spill Plan Review
Site Maps and SWP3
♦ No deficiencies observed.
Spill Prevention and Response Plan
♦ No deficiencies observed.
Monitoring
♦ No deficiencies observed.
Employee Training
♦ Keep updated training records with the SWPPP plan.

Site Inspection
Preventative Maintenance/Good Housekeeping
♦ No deficiencies observed.
Non-Stormwater Discharges
♦ No deficiencies observed.
It is recommended that USF Holland take appropriate actions to correct the noted deficiencies. If
you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact me at 336-412-6202 or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Sherri Scalcione, Water Quality Specialist
City of Greensboro, Water Resources Department
cc: Peter Schneider, Water Quality Supervisor
Mike Mickey, N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Jean Godwin, USF Holland
Chuck Hoffman, Mid -Atlantic Associates, Inc.
Industrial Inspection File

& \NATFR
Michael F. Easley, Governor
0
State of North Carolina
"'iiliam G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>
Coleen H. Sullins., Director
Division of Water Ouality
30 June 2008
Mr. Barry Coffey, Terminal Manager
USF Holland
201 Stage Coach Trail
Greensboro, NC 27406
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit
Permit No. NCG080653
Representative Outfall Status Request
USF Holland
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Coffey: .
The Winston-Salem Regional Office staff have reviewed your request dated April 30, 2008 for a
determination that stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) 001 be granted representative outfall status for
stormwater outfall 002. Based on the information and maps provided and a site visit on Friday, June
27, 2008, we are approving this request. In accordance with 40 CFR §122.21(g)(7); you are authorized to
sample outfall number 001 as a representative outfall. This approval is effective with the next sampling
event. We also want to remind you that the permit still requires Qualitative Monitoring be
performed at all SDOs, regardless of representative status.
Please remember that any actions you initiate in response to benchmark exceedences as directed in the
tiered response provisions of your permit must address all drainage areas represented by SDO 001, where
appropriate.
Please append this letter to your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) to document that
representative outfall status has been approved. If changes in drainage areas, structures, processes, .
storage practices, or other activities occur that significantly alter the basis of this approval, you should
reapply to this Office for the Representative Outfall Status based on the updated information. If you
have any questions or comments concerning this letter, please contact me at (336).771-5000 or at
corey.basinger0ancmail.net.
Sincerely, '
W. Corey Basinger
Environmental Engineer
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Office/Stormwater Permitting Unit
Central Files-SWP
NorthCarolina
,11 atura!!f
North Carolina Division of Rater Quality 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterquatity.org Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

& WAT`C^
Michael F. Easley, Governor
O� QG
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0
Coleen H. Sullins., Director
_.
Division of Water Qualit
30 June 2008 5 Li
Mr. Barry Coffey, Terminal Manager
USF Holland
201 Stage Coach Trail
Greensboro, NC 27406
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit
PPrwu R fes
Permit No. NCG08 53
epresentative outfall Status Request
USF Holland
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Coffey:
The Winston-Salem Regional Office staff have reviewed your request dated April 30, 2008 for a
determination that stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) 001 be granted representative outfall status for
stormwater outfall 002. Based on the information and maps provided and a site visit on Friday, June
27, 2008, we are approving this request. In accordance with 40 CFR §122.21(g)(7), you are authorized to
sample outfall number 001 as a representative outfall. This approval is effective with the next sampling
event. We also want to remind you that the permit still requires Qualitative Monitoring be
performed at all SDOs, regardless of representative status.
Please remember that any actions you initiate in response to benchmark exceedences as directed in the
tiered response provisions of your permit must address all drainage areas represented by SDO 001, There
appropriate.
Please append this letter to your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) to document that
representative outfall status has been approved. if changes in drainage areas, structures, processes,
storage practices, or other activities occur that significantly alter the basis of this approval, you should
reapply to this Office for the Representative Outfall Status based on the updated information. If you
have any questions or comments concerning this letter, please contact me at [phone] or at
core�,[e-mail].
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger
Environmental Engineer
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Office/Stormwater Permitting Unit
Central Files-SIVP
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Phone [phone]
Internet %vN,%s,.ncwatergualitv.org Fax [phone]
0
�Q
g
co
4 AJt c
.A afur
Customer Semite
1-S77-623-6748
An Equal CpportunitylAfBrrnative Action Employer — 50% Recydedf10% Post Consumer Paper

� o�0� war�9Q�
01W7
Mr. Bane Coffey, Terminal Manager
USF Holland
201 Stage Coach Trail
Greensboro, NC 27406
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
USF Holland
NPDES Permit No. NCGO80653
Guilford County
Dear. ;Vlr. Coffey:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
30 June 2008
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of water Quality
A Compliance Evaluation Inspection was performed on the USF Holland general stormwater permit (NCG080653) on
Friday, June 27, 2008 by Corey Basinger of the Winston-Salem Regional Office. Mr. Darin McClure, PE was also present
for the inspection.. The inspection consisted of two parts: an on -site inspection of the facility and an in -office file review.
The following are the findings from the subject inspection.
1. Permit
The NPDES general stormwater permit (NCG080653) became effective on November 1, 2007 and expires on October 31,
2012.
It. Records/Reports
The Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) was prepared by Mid -Atlantic Associates, Inc. and appeared complete
and well organized. A review of the reports revealed no discrepancies. A copy of the data is kept on file. All applicable
data is collected as per the NPDES general permit requirements.
Ili. Facility Site Review
The subject facility discharges stormwater pursuant to NPDES Permit NCG080653. The facility also discharges
wastewater from an oilAvater separator to the City of Greensboro sanitary Sewer system.
IV. Effluent & Receiving Waters
USF Holland discharges to an unnamed tributary to I-lorsepen Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin.
V. Self -Monitoring Program
USF Holland conducted the required qualitative and quantitative monitoring since 2007 when the SPPP was written.
VI. Operations and Maintenance
The following items must be addressed:
1) the oilJwater separator must be unclogged to ensure proper operation and to prevent an illegal discharge to
surface waters;
2) pallets should be stored under roof or be covered at all times;
3) it is suggested that curbs be added at all open bay doors at the maintenance shop and truck wash station. N6"°hCarolina
Xalurally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Phone [phone] Customer Service
Winston-Salem Regional Office Winston-Salem, NC 27107 Fax [phone]
Intemet: www.ncwaterquatily.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycfed110% Post Consumer Paper

I.
VI1. Other
Please contact this Office when the above items have been completed. If you should have any questions or concerns
regarding this report, please contact Corey Basinger at [phone].
Sincerely,
Steve W. Tedder
Water Quality Supervisor
Cc: Darin McClure, PE (N id -Atlantic Associates, Inc., 409 Rogers View Court, Raleigh, i�TC 27610)
Guilford County Health Dept.
Central Files, WSRO

Form Approved
��.
OLtB No.2040-0057
Approval Expires
8-31-98
United States Environmental Protection Aeencv- Washington. D.C.- 20460
Section A: National Data System Coding
Transaction Code NPDES No. YrIMo/Day Inspection Type Inspector FacilityType
N 5 NCG060653 08-06-27 C S 2
Facility Evaluation Rating BI QA ..........Reserved...........
4 N N
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected:
Entry Time:
Permit Effective
USF Holland
1 125 hrs.
Date: Nov. 1, 2007
Located at 20I Stage Coach Trail in Greensboro, NC
Exit Time:
Permit Expiration
1240 hrs.
Date: Oct. 31, 2012
Name(s) of On -Site Representative(s): Tille(s): Phone No(s):
Mr. Barry Coffey Terminal Manager 336-851-1680
Mr. Darin McClure, PE Consultant 919-250-9918
Name, Address of Responsible Official:
Title: Terminal Manager
Mr. Barry Coffey
Phone No. 336-851-1680
Contacted? Yes
USF Holland
201 Stage Coach Trail
Greensboro, NC 27409
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (check only those areas evaluated)
X Permit X Flow Measurement X Operations/Maintenance NA Sewer Overflow
X Records/Reports X Self -Monitoring Program NA Sludge Handling/Disposal NA Pollution Prevention
X Facility Site Review NA Compliance Schedules NA Pretreatment
X Effluent/Receiving Waters NA Laboratory X Stormwater
Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments
See attached letter for further details regarding the subject inspection.
Name s) and Sign ture(s} of Inspectors:
Agency/Offce/Telephone:
Date:
DVtiTQ I VVSRO / [phone]
Signature of Re fewer:
Agency/Office:
Date:
DWQ / WSRO I [phone]
al— 30 -ao
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94)

i
Permit: NCG080653 Owner - Facility: USF Holland Inc
Inspection Date: 06127/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ® n n n
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
®
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
®
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
❑
n
n
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®n
n
n
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
®❑
n
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
®
❑
❑
n
# Dees the Plan include a Spilf Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
®
Cl
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
®.❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
®n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®
❑
n
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
n
n
n
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
®
❑
❑
n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
®
n
n
n
Comment: 1) verify discharge from OIW separator to City, (2) move pallets under roof,
(3) unclog OAN separator drain in truck wash area, (4) suggest adding curbs at open
bay doors on shop
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ®❑ n n
Comment:
Analytical Monitorin Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ® n hl n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ® ❑ ❑ n
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
M
❑
n
n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
n
❑
n
n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Divis+on?
❑
❑
®
❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non Stormwater) discharges?
®❑
n
n
Page: 3

Permit: NCGO80653 Owner- Facility: USF Holland Inc
Inspection Date: 06/27/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: Representative Outfall Status granted based on site visit. Documentation
to follow.
Page: 4

MID -ATLANTIC
A S S 0 C I AT E S, I N C.
Engineering & Environmental Solutions
409 Rogers Vic it, Cmirt / RuleighI Norrlr Caralina I27610
800 -486 -7568 / 919-250-99181919-250-9950 Facsimile
sru�».muannli�re.camr
April 30, 2008
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: REQUEST FOR REPRESENTATIVE OUTFALL STATUS
USF HOLLAND
201 STAGE COACH TRAIL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
MID -ATLANTIC PROJECT NO. 00OR1222.07
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of USF Holland and YRC Worldwide Enterprise Services, Inc-, Mid -Atlantic Associates,
Inc. requests representative outfall status for the above referenced site. The facility is permitted to
discharge stormwater under the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality, General Permit NCG080000. Stormwater currently
discharges off site at two outfalls (See Attached Drawing 2.1). Potential pollutants associated with
stormwater_ discharges at each outfall include oils, greases, petroleum, vehicle fluids, and
suspended solids- Based on our recent evaluation of the site and its stormwater outfalls, it appears
that the stormwater discharge from Outfall 1 is representative of discharges from each outfall at the
site. It also appears that the discharge at Outfall 1 would be the "worst -case" discharge of the two.
We appreciate your consideration of this request. If you -have any questions, please feel free to
contact me at 919-250-9918.
Sincerelv,
MID -ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
Wayne andolph
Senior Project Manager
Attachment:.. Drawing
cc: Ms. ,lean Goodwin, YRC Worldwide Enterprise Services, Inc.
1222.07/2-26-08/Request for Representative Ou1fall Status/WEWaso

N
RETENTION
DU
SCRAP tLwIO-AST
OUTFALL If1
ASPHALT
TRMRISERDUMP
TRUCK
MAINTENANCE
-GALLON TRUCK
OIL
AST , C� AIR COMPRESSOR PARKING
GALLON
I EMPLOYEE
EW OIL �+ PARKING
`� 5-GALLON
DRUM STORAGE ASPHALT
I 1
1 1
" 1 1
1
DUM 1
FREIGHT LOADING BUILDING ' 1
-cLzLrzaa+' za.�- ++a_E GRASS
BUILDING
1 ASPHALT
TRUCK
PARKING
I I DUMPSTER
ASPHALT GRASS
GRASS
MINOR ♦ OUTFACEz
DRAINAGE
FEATURE
MINOR
DRAINAGE
i FEATURE
1
ti
v
LEGEND
y SPILL/DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
® STORM DRAIN/DROP INLET
—c c—c— CABLE LINE
a
100'
-X X—%— FENCE (CHAIN LINK) - - _ - _
- - . DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY 1
— — PROPERTY BOUNDARY
DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY 2
APPROXIMATE
SCALE: 1 "= 100'
_.
DRAWN
BY: `5
DATE:
MAY 2008
" SITE MAP
DRAFT
J0B
00OR1222.09
-ATLANTIC
USF HOLLAND
MIII
ASSOCIATES, INC.
201 .
STAGE COACH TRAIL
CHECK: &vp7�
NO:
Engineering & EnvrronmentalSolutions
GREENSBORO,
NORTH "CAROLINA
HECK: ��'1
Na
01-1222o1-os
APPROVAL:
DOWG
21
REFERENCE: MID -ATLANTIC FIELD NOTES.

MID -ATLANTIC
A S S 0 C I A T E S. I N C.
Engineering & Environmental Solutions
409 Rogers View Court 1 Raleigh / North Carolina 127610
800-486-75681919-250-99181919-250-9950 Facsimile
www.maaonline.com
April 30, 2008
�-�
----------------
W�
Care 'si rt �
RECEI.VED—
N.C. Not of ENft
JU 0 5 2008
' i�utcn•Salem
egiaoaf office
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources %
Division of Water Quality I
Stormwater and General Permits Unit `:�
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617�
as .r+,
Subject: REQUEST FOR REPRESENTATIVE OUTFALL STATUS
USF HOLLAND _
201 STAGE COACH TRAIL
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
MID -ATLANTIC PROJECT NO. 00OR1222.07
To Whom It May Concern:
On behalf of USF Holland and YRC Worldwide Enterprise Services, Inc., Mid -Atlantic Associates,
Inc. requests representative outfall status for the above referenced site- The facility is permitted to
discharge stormwater under the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality, General Permit NCGO80000. Stormwater currently
discharges off site at two outfalls (See Attached Drawing 2.1). Potential pollutants associated with
stormwater discharges at each .o.utfall include oils, greases, petroleum, vehicle fluids, and
suspended solids. Based on our recent evaluation of the site and its stormwater outfalls, it appears
that the stormwater discharge from Outfall 1 is representative of discharges from each outfall at the
site. It also appears that the discharge at Outfall 1 would be the "worst -case" discharge of the two.
We appreciate your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please feel free to
contact me at 919-250-9918.
S=.ncereN
MID -ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
/14k%-1
Wayne andolph
Senior Project Manager
Attachment: Drawing
cc: Ms. Jean Goodwin, YRC Worldwide Enterprise Services, Inc.
1222.0712-26-08/Request for Representative Outfall. Status/VVER/aso

L"Lw Quo i,
-Y Wxrw — I

1
RETENTION
OUTFALL !1
TRASH
RISER
DUMPSTER
SCRAP METAL
DUMPSTER`
,
TRUCK
MAINTENANCE
250-GALLON
p
WASTE OIL
AST
AIR COMPRESSOR
,
DO -GALLON I
NEW OIL
♦
AST I
,,
♦ 5-GALLON
%,DRUM STORAGE
ASPHALT
♦
�
I
� 4
1
01
TRUCK
PARKING
4
R
R
ASPHALT
R
EMPLOYEE
PARKING
{
i
1
- 1
DUM FREIGHT LOADING BUILDINGi
PST%
I
�— --Mar
__- �r SL�� �� BUILDING GRASS
I
1 ASPHALT
I TRUCK
PARKING
I DUMPSTER
ASPHALT V�K x—x 7i-`—`—I �I ���T--^�� � n n
GRASS
MINOR ® DRAINAGE OUTFACE g2
FEATURE
MINOR
DRAINAGE
FEATURE
I
ti
a
LEGEND
y SPILL/DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION
0 MONITORING WELL LOCATION
STORM DRAIN/DROP INLET
0
100'
—c C c— CABLE LINE
—x I x— FENCE (CHAIN LINK) - - - - -
- - - DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY 1
— — PROPERTY BOUNDARY
DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY 2
APPROXIMATE
SCALE: 1'- 100'
DRAWN6Y:
DATE:
MAY 2008
SITE MAP
DRAFT
JOB
OOOR1222.09
ID -ATLANTIC
USF HOLLAND
m ASSOCIATES, INC.
201
STAGE COACH TRAIL
CHECK: wg7L,
NO:
Engineering & Environmental Solutions
GREENSBORO,
NORTH CAROLINA
ENG
HECK.
CA
01-122201-09
APPROVAL:
DOWG
21
11 REFERENCE: MID —ATLANTIC FIELD NOTES. 11

Approving Representative Outfall Status - Transition to Regions
Subject: Approving Representative Outfall Status - Transition to Regions
From: Bethany Georgoulias <Bethany.Georgoulias@ncmailnet>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:10:55 -0400
To: Al Hodge <Al.Hodge@ncmaiLnet>, Ed Beck <Ed.Beck@ncmailnet>, Belinda Henson
<Belinda.Henson@ncmaiLnet>, Danny Smith <Danny.Smith@ncmailnet>, Steve. Tedder@NCmai Lnet,
Roger Edwards <Roger,Edwards @ncmaiLnet>, Rob Krebs <rob.krebs@ncmailnet>
CC: Bradley Bennett <bradley.bennett@ncmailnet>, Bill Diuguid <Bi11.Diuguid@ncmailnet>, Mike
Randall <mike.randall@ncmaiLnet>, Ken Pickle <ken.pickle@ncmaiLnet>, Kelly Johnson
<Kelly.P.Johnson@ncmailnet>, robert.patterson@ncmaiLnet, Jennifer Jones
<jenniferJones@ncmailnet>, bridget.munger@ncmailnet, John Hennessy
<[e-mail]>, Niki Maher <niki.maher@ncmailnet>, Shelton Sullivan
<Shelton.Sul Iivan@ncmailnet>, katie.merritt@ncmaiLnet
Regional Supervisors,
At our last East/West Consistency Meetings, we asked the regions what they thought
about reviewing and approving/denying requests for Representative Outfall Status
(ROS). Up to now, we have handled these in the Central Office. The responses were
very positive, and we felt it was an appropriate transition because usually we rely
on a site visit by the region to verify conditions at the site support representative
outfall status.
We have set up a process for tracking requests and approvals, and with this e-mail we
are providing guidance for your staff to handle these requests. We plan to provide
additional guidance at future Consistency Meetings or other meeting opportunities,
but we wanted to get something out to you in the interim (which is why it's -noted as
"draft.") -- especially since we are already working with regional staff on some ROS
requests.
The tracking process is in the last part of the attached memo, but here's a summary
of what -regional -staff should do:
1. Copy the ROS request letter (and site plan if submitted) to the Central
Office/SPU.
2. Update RIMS under the Events Tab with the date for "Representative Outfall Status
Requested."
3.•A template letter of ROS approval is attached. Please feel free to modify it as
necessary.
4. If you deny the ROS request, list specifically the basis for denial. if the denial
is temporary, note the conditions that need to be corrected before a re -visit and
granting of ROS.
S. Be sure to remind the permittee that qualitative monitoring (visual and odor
characterization of the discharge) is still required _at all outfalls_. Also remind
the permittee that a tiered response (if required by their permit) must be
implemented in the other represented sub -drainage areas.
6. Copy the final ROS approval or denial letter to (1) Central Office/SPU and (2) DWQ
Central Files.
7. Update BIMS under the Events Tab with date for "Representative Outfall Status
Approved.' Be sure to _include information in the Comments section about which
outfalls are representative_.
Please distribute to all appropriate staff. We will begin forwarding all requests for
ROS to the regions from now on. If anyone needs assistance from the Central Office on
any of these requests, please let us know. Also, if you have any concerns or
of 2 6/4/2008 9:14 AM

kpproving Representative Outfall Status - Transition to Regions
questions, please let me or Bradley know.
Thanks so much,
BG
Bethany Georgoulias
Environmental Engineer
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
Stormwater Permitting Unit
tel. [phone], ext. 529
fax [phone]
Content -Type: application/msword
Representative Outfall Status Letter.doc
— — — ! Content -Encoding: base64
I •I Content -Type: application/rnsword !
''Rep Outfall Status —Guidance Memo.doc
Content -Encoding: base64
l of 2 6/4/2008 9:14 AM

wArF94
C 7
� r
o �r
June 4, 2008
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
To: Regional Office Staff
From: The Stormwater Permitting Unit, Central Office
Subject: Draft Guidance on Reviewing Requests for Representative Outfall Status
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
At the last East/West Consistency Meetings with the Regional Offices, regional staff indicated their
willingness and preference to review and document approval of representative outfall status (ROS) requests from
stormwater permittees. Before now, these requests were processed by the Central Office (CO). However, in'the
past many requests were neglected or approvalldisapproval was left undocumented. Below is a draft checklist of
review points and steps for approving and tracking representative outfall status in BIMS. We will go over this
topic at either the next Consistency Meetings or other opportunity, but we wanted to provide guidance in the
interim. If a request comes to the regional office in the meantime that you would prefer CO staff to handle, we will
be glad to coordinate review with you until we can provide more training.
1. A word about a Representative Outfall Status request:
a) Our permittees may be eligible for representative outfall status based on the physical facts at their site
and on some other qualifying criteria. However, granting of ROS is at DWQ discretion. We owe the
permittee an evaluation but not a specific outcome. The SPU has routinely denied ROS based on review
of the submittal documents.or report from the regional office (RO).
2. Guidance on evaluating the initial request:
a) Does the permittee's letter identify a physical basis for the request? (in other words, does it state that the
character of the stormwater pollution, or the potential stormmater pollution or exposure is similar in the
sub -drainage areas under consideration?) REQUIRED, unless b. applies.
b) Or, if not very similar, has the permittee indicated that the representative outfall includes the sub -drainage
area with the most stormwater pollution, or the potential for the most pollution or exposure (i.e., the
"worst" sub -drainage area?) REQUIRED if a. does notapply.
c) While the objective of ROS is to reduce the monitoring burden on the permittee, reducing the permittee's
costs is absolutely conditional on establishing the representativeness of the outfall. We cannot grant
ROS simply because we think the permittee deserves.a financial break.
d) Has the permittee provided a site drawing to show which outfalls he/she is proposing to be considered
representative of which other outfalls, and which ones will continue to be sampled as single outfalls?
A'MCarolina
Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax [phone]
An Equal opportunrty/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledh 0% Post Consumer Paper

Draft Guidance — Reviewing Requests for Representative Outfall Status
June 4, 2008
e) Consider the type of industrial activity. For example, landfills (NCG12) and mines (NCG02) have
changing footprints with perhaps higher potential for activities in a sub -drainage area to change, which
might affect our discretion. Also, ready -mix concrete (NCG14) and mines may have wastewater
discharges on site with the potential for the two waters to commingle, which might affect our discretion.
f) If the request is for an individual permit, are the monitoring parameters the same across all the outfalls
being considered as representative/represented?
g) Vehicle Maintenance Activity (VMA) outfalls may not be represented by non-VMA outfalls, and vice -versa.
3. Review the file materials and BIMS:
a) Receiving water classification? This may affect our discretion. For example, approving ROS for
discharges to ORW/HQW receiving waters may not be appropriate.
b) Receiving water special circumstances? Impaired? For what? Is there a TMDL? For what? Are there
threatened or endangered species? All could affect our.discretion.
c) Has the permittee paid up? Could withhold ROS until he/she has paid past -due amounts.
d) Past compliance history should affect our discretion. Check file and/or BIMS for violations, enforcement,
comments, history, etc. and consider how this should weigh into a ROS approval.
e) Has past monitoring been complete? If the permittee has ignored past monitoring, may consider denying
ROS approval until there is enough monitoring data to support the assertion of similar or less stormwater-
pollution potential in the sub -drainage areas to be represented. How much is "enough"? Ideally a
minimum of eight (8) to 10 samples, but may consider fewer if other evidence supports ROS request.
4. Visit the site:
a) Do the physical facts verify the characterization that one outfall should be considered representative of
another?
b) Check out the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) — is it descriptive of site conditions? Is the
permittee using the SPPP as a management tool and living record? Does it demonstrate that the
permittee is actively aware of and managing stormwater discharges from the site? If you think it is
warranted, consider requiring an updated/sufficient SPPP before continuing review of the ROS request.
c) How is general housekeeping? if poor, consider whether the operator can confidently assert that one
outfall is representative of others.
d) Try to pre-empt any misunderstanding about ROS: it allows the analytical monitoring at one outfall to be
considered as representative of other outfalls. ROS does not change the monitoring frequency required;
nor does it change the required monitoring parameters; nor does it reduce the qualitative monitoring
required at all outfalls.
e) You may also need to explain that the final determination is based on the physical facts and DWQ's
discretion. We are not obligated to approve a ROS request.
_ f) Emphasize with the permittee that if the permit requires a tiered response to benchmark exceedences,
then an exceedence at the representative outfall requires a response action in ALL of the sub -drainage
areas represented by the one outfall.

Draft Guidance — Reviewing Requests for Representative Outfall Status
,Jude 4, 2008
5. Procedure for tracking and documenting representative outfall status:
a) Copy the ROS request letter (and site plan if submitted) to the Central Office/SPU.
b) Update BIMS under the Events Tab with the date for 'Representative Outfall Status Requested."
c) We are providing a template letter of ROS approval for your use (electronic file attached). Please feel
free to modify it as necessary.
d) If you deny the ROS request, list specifically the basis for denial. If the denial is temporary, note the
conditions that need to be corrected before a re -visit and granting of ROS.
e) Be sure to remind the permittee that qualitative monitoring (visual and odor characterization of the
discharge) is still required at all outfalls. Also remind the permittee that a tiered response (if required by
their permit) must be implemented in the other represented sub -drainage areas.
f) Copy the final ROS approval or denial letter to (1) Central Office/SPU and (2) DWQ Central Files.
g) Update BIMS under the Events Tab with date for "Representative Outfall Status Approved." Be sure to
include information in the Comments section about which outfalls are representative.
cc: Stormwater Permitting Guidance Materials File
Non -point Source Compliance and Assistance Unit (NPSC&AU)
DWQ Supervisor, Raleigh Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor, Mooresville Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor, Asheville Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor, Winston-Salem Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor, Wilmington Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor, Washington Regional Office
DWQ Supervisor, Fayetteville Regional Office

City
January 18, 2007
USF Holland
Attn: Mr. Rich Hockett, Operations Supervisor
201 Stage Coach Trail
Greensboro, N.C. 27409
SUBJECT: Industrial Compliance Inspection
Inspection location: USF Holland
201 Stage Coach Trail
SW Permit #: NCG 080653
Dear Mr. Hockett:
)oro
On January 11, 2007, the City of Greensboro Stormwater Management Division completed an industrial
compliance inspection of the USF Holland terminal. Local regulations permit an inspection of industrial facilities
under authority granted by City of Greensboro Code of Ordinance Chapter 27, Article 1, Section 27-9(e). This
inspection consisted of two parts: a review of the facility files/records and an on -site facility inspection.
The inspection was performed by Michael Borchers and the following deficiencies/observations were noted during
the inspection.
Site Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
♦ The facility does not have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan as required by NCDENR DWQ
General Permit No. NCG080000.
♦ The facility inspection program is inadequate. The last facility inspection was performed on January 3,
2005. The facility is required to inspect all Stormwater systems on at least a semi-annual schedule.
Spill Prevention and Response Plan
♦ The facility does not have a Spill Prevention and Response Plan as required by NCDENR DWQ General
Permit No. NCG080000.
♦ The facility does have some spill cleanup materials however the materials are inadequate for
containment and not readily accessible.
Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping
♦ A program should be implemented to provide for routine trash pick up around the perimeter of the site.
♦ Numerous vehicle fluid leaks evident, particularly around the vehicle maintenance building. A good
housekeeping program should be promptly implemented to contain vehicle fluid leaks/spills.
Employee Training
♦ Since the permit was issued in September 2000, no employee training has occurred on spill response
procedures or prohibited Stormwater / wastewater discharges.
Non-Stormwater Discharge
P.O. Box 3136 • Greensboro, NC 27402-3136 9 www.greensboro-nc.gov + [phone] • TTY # 333-6930

♦ No analytical monitoring had been conducted as required by the subject permit.
♦ Evidence of vehicle oil release /spill was observed in the area adjacent to the vehicle maintenance
building.
Based on the above deficiencies, the City of Greensboro will notify the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR). USF Holland may be notified by NCDENR in advance of this inspection so
proper scheduling of personnel can take place. Furthermore, any penalties assessed against the City by the State
as a result of this non-compliance may be assessed against USF Holland.
If you have any questions concerning this letter or the enclosed inspection report, please contact me at 373-2494.
Respectfully,
Michael Borchers, P&E Supervisor
City of Greensboro, Stormwater Management Division
Enclosure: Industrial Inspection Report
cc: Kenny McDowell, Manager of Stormwater Management Division
David Phlegar, Water Quality Supervisor
Corey Basinger, N.C. Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Industrial Inspection File
P.O. Box 3136 • Greensboro, NC 27402-3136 • vv",w.areensboro-nc.gov • [phone] + TTY 4 333-6930

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCGO80000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG080653
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
USF HOLLAND INC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
USF HOLLAND INC - GREENSBORO
201 STAGE COACH TRAIL
GREENSBORO
GUILFORD COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as Horsepen Creek, a class WS-III NSW stream, in the Cape Fear River Basin in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, II, III,
IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCGO80000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective September 1, 2001
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day August 23, 2002.
6 —
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 23, 2002
SUZ1E ANDREWS
USF HOLLAND INC - GREENSBORO
201 STAGECOACH TRAIL
GREENSBORO, NC 27409
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
USF Holland Inc - Greensboro
COC Number NCGO80653
Guilford County
Dear Permittee:
Your facility was recently granted coverage under stormwater general permit NCG080000. This letter serves as
your notification that the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has reissued the general permit and that your facility's
coverage will continue under the conditions of the reissued general permit. Please review the new permit to
familiarize yourself with the changes in the reissued permit. The permit is reissued pursuant to the requirements of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between the state of North Carolina
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
* A new Certificate of Coverage
* A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCGO80000
* A copy of the Analytical Monitoring Form (DMR)
* A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility
for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or
decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Bill Mills of the Central Office Stormwater
and General Permits Unit at [phone], ext. 548
Sincerely,
t5
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office
17
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Custemer Service
1- 800-623-7748

FWArF
O� RpG Michas! F. Easley
Governor
{! C� r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
1 Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph-D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 19, 2002
Mr. Stephan J. Wonch
USF Holland Inc.
750 East 401h Street
Holland, MI 42423
Subject: General Permit No. NCGO80000
USF Holland Inc.
COC NCG080653
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Wonch:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on February 11, 2002, we are forwarding
herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This permit is
issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies of sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you,
you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit application. Unless such demand is
made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water
Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of
coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division
of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other
Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mack Wiggins at telephone number 919/733-
5083 ext. 542.
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Files
Stortnwater and General Permits Unit Files
Sincerely,
i[1f 1t3u1tYt �i• +�1,�ri •�
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D
9*A
Z6MR
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]

1'.. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG080000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG080653
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
USF Holland Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
USF Holland Inc.
201 Stage Coach Trail
west of Guilford
Guilford County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Horsepen Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,1I, II1, IV,
V, and VI of General Permit No. NCGO80000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective April 19, 2002
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day April 19, 2002 nn
t ■��>�l�l� Cl�l1�
for Gregory 1. Thorpe, Ph.D, Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

01
000
�� � `'l f�, /1 • �.^ e o e •ram .� t � — - I ` �-
iNi fJ f� ' �� • iJ 1
EM
�C%' C � r •!s vi l . • _ '� �i. �' sad � �.
In
�t
o j
BM f5 i �J u ! �. a n r �' •.
gy
� `� ', ` � •.dry �� so � � — ! �. f •�. - � .. _� lkf- �.:�.
;� t � �• p C,s�O`Iln • • � � �.Y. � �, i l / � l�. - R�: +°j�{� I ,
• r ! �• Pec`slmfav�
• o , o* �. � +, !�• sGo � `! . � . Ch
•r
J�, ,=•' t • z. P
f It
c.
Y -
11
,L1 �-••, - 1 j tiF i J - �>
� �' _ � .sC�� n • i '. t^ .! tZ- -� Hey ,�? � � � r ?�e �
`"� °' ��i ` y, t � ,' � _.z"�° f t � yam,' • � � gip, �.-i.. �;�- � I. t.! _ \. � `�
Copvri9ht (C) 1997, Maptech. Inc

Markers
Name: Discharge Site-NCG080653
Short Name: Dschrg
Coordinates: 0360 04' 46.0" N, 0790 54' 50.5" W
Comment: USF Holland inc.,Subbasin-030602, Cape Fear River Basin, Guilford County,
Horsepen Creek, Class-WS III NSW, Quad C19SE