Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG080630_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20171031STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET NCG PERMITS PERMIT NO. /V C�jO�'��3b DOC TYPE Y HISTORICAL FILE Ll MONITORING REPORTS DOC DATE ❑ aol 9 I D c3I YYYYMMDD Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCGO801330 Effective: 11/01/12 Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner: Norfolk Southern Railway Company SOC; Effective: Expiration: Facility: Norfolk Southem Railway Co -Gaynor St County: Forsyth 600 Gaynor St Region: Winston-Salem Winston Salem NC 27115 Contact Person: Larry G Western Title; Phone: 540-981-4239 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 06/1012014 Entry Time: 09.00AM Primary Inspector. Aana Taylor -Smith Secondary Inspector(s): Certification: Phone: Exit Time: 11.30AIN Phone: 336-771-5000 Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Transportation wNehicle Maintenance/Petroleum Bulk/Oil Water Separator Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Question Areas: Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 Permit: NCG080630 Owner - Facility_ Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inspection Date: 06/10/2014 Inspection Type = Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Rouline Inspection Summary: Inspection conducted by City of Winston-Salem staff. Please refer to local program inspection letter (in file). Page: 2 Permit: NCGO80630 Owner - Facility: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inspection Date: 0611012014 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Dues the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a'Narrative Description of Practices"? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BM1P summary? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been Implemented? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: SDOs not included on site ma Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Facility must include dateltime for each QM event Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted Its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were ail outfalis observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfali status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Page: 3 F•: Public Worsts Department StormwatertErosion and Sedimentation Control Program City a wamnSa&m P.O. Box 2511 Wh=nSalem, NC 27102 Ciryliak 311 (336.727.8000) Fax 336.748.3173 un=V9nmrrmrrnmaMm July 21, 2014 Mr. Randy Byars Senior -General Foreman Norfolk Southern Railway Company 600 Gaynor Street Winston-Salem, NC 27105 Dear Mr. Byars: The Stormwater Division of the City of Winston-Salem would like�to thank you for your time and professional courtesy regarding the June 10, 2014 inspection of Norfolk Southern Railway Company. I As per your request, a copy of the completed surface water inspection form has been enclosed to you. Part 4 of this report (Required Actions to be completed by Facility) contains Annotations 4146 that Norfolk Southern Railway Company must complete. Please provide documentation that verifies Norfolk Southern Railway Company successful completion of the corrective measures to me by October 21, 2014 1 The Stormwater Division reserves the right to enter and inspect Norfolk Southern Railway Company as often as necessary to determine compliance with permit requirements of NCG080630. Thank you for your continued support and implementation of the City of Winston-' Salem's Stormwater Program. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (336) 747-6964. Sincerely, ,11_4� 64vl Ladonta Clark Stormwater Inspector Phone: 336.727.6964 Cell: 336.416.2403 Fax: 336.748.3173 �1 C.oarr�i Maya Allen 30�: vnfan H. &ute.1N>>or Pro Tunpenr. Ne�nu Wind: DmLr [l. Adam., .. -_• Wied: Dsa B .ae, Sn u wsi W.& Robm C. a-& W— Wrrd; Melly Lr 01 Soud� Wird: m ndx 1Nawbe . Nordrow W+rd: Derwin L Moni6oma�s Eot A�.d: j2 eTaylat Jc. Se th-m Wind: Gry 4[an:gc: L« D. Cwriry Call or 336-727-8000 ' citylink@cityofws.org t, Stormwater/Erosion Control Division Surface Water Inspection for Industrial Sites General Information A) Official Company Name: Norfolk Southern Railway Company B) Physical Address: 600 Gaynor Street C) Telephone Number: (336) 724-4348 Office D) Mailing Address, if different from above address: E) Authorized contacts to represent company in environmental regulatory issues: Primary contact: Randy Byars Title: Senior General Foreman Contact number(s): Work: (540) 5244276 Mobile: (540) 529-511, Email address: Randy.Byars@nscorp.com Secondary contact: JeffHandy Title: General Foreman Contact number(s): Work: (540) 524-4974 Mobile: (540) 597-5221 Email address: 3effrey.Handy(a�nscorp.com F) SIC Code Number of business: [SIC] G) NC Stormwater NPDES Permit Number: Permit Category: 4011 NCGO80630 Vehicle Maintenance Areas — Rail portation H) Any other control authority permit(s) (air quality control, wastewater, hazardous waste) & number(s): NIA 1) Brief description of industrial activities that occur on -site: Rail Car Inspection, Service and Maintenance (wheels, brakes, axles, hoses, etc., welding & torch cutting, parts replacement), Locomotive Switching and Fueling. J) Ultimate Receiving Waters: TMDL stream ®Yes 1. Best Management Practices a. List the nonstructural controls Brushy Fork DNo Part 1 - Stormwater Controls the I . The facility utilizes third party off -site vehicle maintenance & repair for all company vehicles. 2. No storage tanks/fueling dispensers are located at this facility. All diesel fuel is dispensed by licensed contractors to locomotives directly from highway tanker trucks having automatic shut off devices. I The facility uses limited amounts of petroleum products which are stored inside in drums equipped with secondary containment. b. Are the BMPs reasonable & appropriate for the facility? ®Yes ❑No Immediately clean up oil spill in the jack shack building in accordance with gdod housekeeping practices. c. Are BMPs installed correctly, maintained, and effective operating condition? ®Yes ❑No Comments Immediately clean up oil leak frorn hydraulic oil jack, and replace per our conversation at the facility. 2. Provide a brief description of other controls that manage/prevent/minimize stormwater iii noff (e.g., erosion and sediment controls, inlet protection/control at storm drains, diversion structures): The facility site is primarily covered with ballast & gravel which allows for ground infiltration of stormwater. The facility maintains vegetated areas on the site where practical to help filter and slow i down stormwater flows in these areas. Part 2 — Miscellaneous 1. Any evidence of discharge to receiving waters/MS4? (e.g.: stormwater runoff, dry weather; discharge, co - mingling of process wastewater): ®Yes ❑No I Comments: All outfalls ultimately discharge into Brushy Fork Creek. 2) Do the stormwater outfalls on -site correspond with those listed on the site reap and in ®Yes ❑No Please provide a physical location description of each Stormwater discharge outfall on site map. Provide a narrative description of the potential pollutants that could be expected to be present in the stormwater discharge from each outfall. [1 3) Summary of Stormwater Discharge Outfalls SDO Identification Potential Pollutants that could be discharged Physical Location L titude and Longitude OUTFALL 001 Petroleum products ? 36- 08' 03" N 80- 14' 0 1 " W OUTFALL 002 - 004 Petroleum products ? 36- 08' 03" N : 80- 13' 59" W OUTFALL 005 Petroleum products ? 36- 07' 52" N 80- 13' 59" W Site Overview Part 3 _-- SPPP Review_(can be_completed in office)' Yes No I Notes Is there a SPPP? ✓ Update for SPPP is nearing Does SPPP include a certification statement by the responsible ✓ Up to dati ' corporate officer? Does the general map depict the facility's location on a USGS quad ✓ ma orequivalent ma with receiving waters or MS4) listed? Identification of impaired waters or watershed (if applicable)? ✓ Brushy Fork Narrative Description of these Industrial Activities: Storage Practices Unloading/Loading Activities ✓ Outdoor Processes Particulate Generating/Control Processes ✓ ✓ Waste Disposal Does site map denote drainage items: flow direction, boundaries, % ✓ Provide aldescription of the impervious, and structures? Also includes SDOs, industrial activity physical location for each of the areas, and site to o ra h ? outfalls A list of major spills that have occurred within the past three years ✓ No spills with corrective actions to prevent futurespills)? A signed, annual certification that the facility has been tested for non- Vol Up to dat stormwater discharges from the site? Comments: NOTE: Please update the City of Winston Salem, Stormwater Division's contact information to NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY Spill Notification List. The contact for spill notification is: Mr. Keith Huff, Stormwater Director, (336) 747-6962 — office and (336) 406- 3332 - cell phone. Mr. Hull's email address is keithhl r(_r,cityofws.ozg, for providing written notification. 1 ' Stormwater Management Strategy Yes No I Notes Does SPPP incorporate the nine'baseline controls: Feasibility Study (technical & economic review to minimize pollutant exposure) Secondary Containment (table summary of tanks, stored materials, release records) BMP Summary (listing of site structural/nonstructural practices) SPRP & Procedures (identified, responsible personnel w/ signatures & dated) PM & GH (inspection of material handling areas & regular cleaning schedules) Facility Inspections (biannual inspections of facility and all stormwater systems) Employee Training (annual basis for staff who perform SRP and PM functions) Responsible Party (specific position(s)-developing, implementing, & revising SPPP) Amendment & Annual Update (ofmajor spills, nonsw flows, BMPs, sampling data N/A I� Does SPPP contain completed routine inspection reports/records regarding reportable implementation of the nine baseline controls i.e. SPPP Implementation)? Analytical Monitoring Yes No I Notes Are samples collected within 30 minutes of measurable rain events Norfolk' Southern Railway and at least 72 hours since the last storm event? Company -'does not utilize more than 55 gallons of new motor of I per month, so they are not required to conduct anal)jical.monitorin Are sampling events 60 days apart? (EXCEPTiON: 'Pier 2 & 3 responses) N/A I , Is analytical monitoring complete (including schedule) for each N/A SDO? (EXCEPTION: ROS) N/A Any exceedences of pollutant parameters when compared against the permit benchmark values? NIA Has Facility implemented appropriate, selected actions to reduce pollutant concentrations, in response to benchmark exceedences (if applicable)? Qualitative Monitoring Yes No i Notes Is qualitative monitoring being performed during measurable storm ✓ Include the start and end time events? of each measureabie storm event Is qualitative monitoring complete (including schedule) for each ✓ SDO? Are monitoring events 60 days apart? (EXCEPTION: Tier 2 & 3 responses) N/A ✓ Any observable, excessive amounts of pollutant indicators in stormwater discharge at SDOs? �I Part 4 —Required Actions to be completed by Facility I. Please replace dumpster's broken drain plug in order to prevent stormwater 1 2. Immediately clean up oil leak in the jack shack building and maintain good 1 practices. 3. Please repair or replace the leaking hydraulic lift module, in order to prevent pollution. 4. Please provide a description of the physical location of each Stormwater disc on the site map. 5. Starting next qualitative monitoring event, please include the start and end to measureable storm event. 6. Please update the City of Winston Salem, Stormwater Division's contact infi NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY's Spill Notification List. Company Representative(s) that participated in inspection: Randy Byers Title(s): Senior General Foreman Start of Inspection: 9:00 am Completion of inspection: 11:30am Date: 6/10/2014 Signature of Stormwater Inspector: Title: Stormwater Inspector ution. sekeeping Irmwater -ge outfall of each .ation on Picture #1 Broken durnpster plug Please replace broken dumpster plug, in order to prevent stormwater pollution. Picture 92 Oil leak in jack shack building Immediately clean up oil leak in the jack shack and maintain good housekeeping practices. Picture # 3 Leaking hydraulic Lift Module Please repair or replace the leaking hydraulic lift module, in order to prevent stormwater pollution. City of Winston-Salem Stormwater Division Surface Water Inspection for Industrial Sites Part 1— General information A. official Company Name: Norfolk Southern Railway Company B. Physical Address:600 Gaynor Street, Winston Salem, NC 27105 C. Telephone Number: D. Mailing Address, if different from above address: Same E. Primary contact who is authorized to represent company in environmental regulatory issues: a. Name: Jeff Barns b. Title: Environmental Operational Engineer c� Contact Number(s): 540.520.6479 �d dEmail: bjbarnes@nscorp.colma o 0 F. SIC'Code number of business: 4011 G. NC S#ormwater NPDES•Permit Number: NCG080630 al,.. Facility. Type: Railroad TransportationLine=Haul operation ' ! �ArtiJ_`\ \ I f I ' ' 1 I �!I r) f 1 IQ fEe _ „N DL,.�'r N. �Any;other'control authority Permit(s) (air quality control, wastewater,.hazardousEwast)e)&numbers 1None U.1 {f I. "Brief description"of industrial activities that occur on -site: J.- Receiving;Water(s) / M54: Brushy fork Creek Part 1— Stormwater Controls 1. Best management Practices A. List the non/structural controls employed by the facility: 1.Ballast Infiltration 1. Strom drains and subsurface. 2.Conveyance System 1. For the collection and diversion of StormWater runoff_ 3.Vegetation zone 1. Intermediate in drainage areas. B. Are the BMPs reasonable & appropriate for the facility: XX Yes No C. Are BMPs installed correctly, maintained, and effective operation condition: XX Yes No 2. Provide a brief description of other controls that manage/prevent/minimize stormwater runoff (e. g., erosion and sediment controls, inlet protection/control at storm drains, diversion structures): 1.Vegetation, rock, and silt fencing. Part 2 —Miscellaneous 1. Any evidence of discharge to receiving waters/MS4? (e.g., stormwater runoff, dry weather discharge, co -mingling of process wastewater): Yes XX No i. Inspection was just after a rain event so dry weather was not observed. Do the stormwater outfalls on -site correspond with those listed on the site map and in SWPPP? XX Yes No N/A Part 3 — SWPPP Review (can be completed in office; General 1) Is there a SWPRO, d ,� _ �� C\,R .o Yes, . __ No-, . _ p a 2) Does SWPPP,Jdentfy,a specific�osltion(s)-fo; responsible party purposes(e:g=`ovralcoordination, development, �� im Iementation7& revision. �--_ � � � � � � � � � � � Yes 6 No � 3) Does,SWPPP'de ignat� acility personnel responsible for 1 � .° J Q� im lementin-SRP.,?..x-," .- ��] Yes No 4 Does,SWPPP lriclude a certification statement? Yes No Only Yr. 2005 5) Are employee' tralningr cords regarding stormwater pollution Missing Yr. 2009, prevention topics--included-in SWPPP? Yes No 2010, 2011 Comments: Training has not been conducted for Year 2011 at the time of inspection. Site Map NOTES 1 Is there a site map? Yes No 21 Drainage atterns/outfalls Yes No 3) Identification of potential pollutants likely to be dischar ed from each drainage area? Yes No Map does not identify do potential pollutants it is in the narrative. 4 Narrative description and locations of check if present): 1. Storage practices XX 2. Unload in/Loading activities XX 3. Outdoor processes XX 4. Particulate generating/control processes XX Contractor pick up waste and have 5. Waste Disposal XX manifest on file 'No Not listed on Map in 5 Name of receiving waters or MS4's listed? Yes narrative. 6) Locations of significant materials exposed to All material are under stormwater? Yes No cover 7) Locations and descriptions of major spills occurring within the 3 previous years w/ corrective actions to prevent futurespills)? Yes No None was stated Stormwater Controls NOTES 1) Does the SWPPP describe the non-structural controls that will be�used to prevent/reduce discharge of pollutants>in stormwater runoff?, o nYes No n —1-ter it rill 2) Does the SWPPP"describe the structural,controls b nl that will be used to(prevent/reduce discharge of a pollutants in stormwater runoff? { �� Yes No a 3) Does the"SVVPPP_ describe other,6or troll that will be �— I (UAV r I used to preventlredU_-- ite�trackinglor fjl� wing of� —� L J sediment, dust and raw,,final; o.r waste products, or ; Mh other solid materials_antlfloati-n . debris Yes No 4) Does t'he SVVPFP incorporate the 8 baseline controls (good housekeeping, BMPisurnmary, feasibility study, PM, SRP procedures-Jacility-inspections, and comp rehensive'site evaluations, employee training, secondary containment, and sediment control? Yes No 5) Does the SWPPP describe the pollutant or activity to be controlled by BMPs and assessed the need of implementation through data collected? Yes No 6) Does the SWPPP describe the pollutant or activity to be controlled by BMPs and assessed the need of implementation through data collected? Yes No Non-stormwater Discharges NOTES 1) Certification that the facility has been tested for non- stormwater discharges from the site? Yes No Last one was in 2005 2) Description of testing method, drainage points, observed results, date, and signature? Yes No Monitorina 1) Are samples collected within 30 minutes of measurable weather events occurring 72 hours after Yes No previous measurable weather event? 2) Were samples collected and preserved in accordance with 40 CFR 136? Yes No 3) Was proper chain -of -custody procedures followed? Yes No 4) Was analytical and qualitative monitoring complete? Yes No 5) Any exceedences of pollutant parameters in regards to benchmark values? Yes No RDq,4q M—N's a C'M 0 0 0 l { � f juired Actions to be completed by Facility. t permit requirements (i.e. feasibility study, amendment of SWPPP, activity conducted at the facilities.) 2. Training records for spill response and prevention are needed; please submit to the Stormwater Division. 3. An updated signed certification statement validating your SWPPP. 4. A statement that no significant spills have occurred on site for the past 3 years. 5. Preventative maintenance records. 6. An non-stormwater discharge certification statement 7. A narrative description of potential pollutants which could be expected to be present in stormwater discharge for each outfall. 8. Signed certification statement of SWPPP 9. Cleanup active spills of all vehicles leaking fluids according to your developed SOP to prevent leaks from happening. 10. Document training, there has not been any conducted since 2006; please submit to the Stormwater Division. Y 11. Conduct feasibility study for the oil water separator removal 12. Conduct feasibility study for moving to representative outfall status. The City of Winston-Salem Stormwater Division is requiring that Items #1-12 to be completed before December 15, 2011. Norfolk Southern Railway Company shall keep the Stormwater Division updated on milestones and activities completed in its progression to comply with these required actions this will be done on a monthly basis. The Stormwater Division may conduct follow-up inspections in order to ensure completion of mandated activities. Educational Resources: 1. NC Stormwater Manual for Industrial Users: a. http:Hh2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/storm water.html. b. http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/bmp-manual Company Representatives) that participated in inspection name and title(s): Jeff Barns, Environmental Operationa 1%er q ; D 1 QUo 2D"Zi Start of Inspection:.09:00 �I Completion:of.Enspe on:11:35 Date•ofi p ct�0% 011 p 5ignat :rd-"-Stormwater Inspector and title: William D. Baugher, Stormwater Inspector Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCG080630 Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Norfolk Southern Railway Company SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Norfolk Southern Railway Co - Gaynor St County: Forsyth 600 Gaynor St Region: Winston-Salem Winston Salem NC 27115 Contact Person: Larry G Western Title: Phone: 540-981-4239 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 10/1112011 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 11:35 AM Primary Inspector: Ron Boone Phone: 336-771-4967 Secondary Inspector(s): U,2S/,2G1 Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Transportation wNehicle Maintenance/Petroleum Bulk/Oil Water Separator Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: Q Compliant ! Not Compliant Question Areas: ■ Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 14 Permit: NCG080630 Owner -Facility: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inspection Date: 10/1112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Inspection actually conducted by Bill Baugher, City of Winston Salem Stormwater Division. Page: 2 r /Of Permit: NCGO80630 Owner - Facility: Norfolk Southern Railway Company Inspection pate: 10/11/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ❑ Q ❑ ■ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ■ ❑ Q Q # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? n n n ■ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ❑ ❑ n ■ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? n n n # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ■ n n n # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? n n n ■ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Missing training records for 2009, 2010, and 2011. Qualitative Monitoring Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? Comment: None Analytical Monitoring Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? Comment: None Permit and Outfalls # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? Comment: None Yes No NA NE ■nnn Yes No NA NE ■❑❑❑ ❑❑n■ Yes No NA NE ❑❑n■ nnn■ pnen n■n❑ Page: 3 F WA jF Michael F. Easley, Governor `oho RQ� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources co 7 r Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality August 23, 2002 GILBERT O TURNER NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO - GAYNOR ST 312 WEST LIDDELL STREET CHARLOTTE, NC 28206 Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal Norfolk Southern Railway Co - Gaynor St COC Number NCGO80630 Forsyth County Dear Permittee: In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG080000, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This permit is reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983. The following information is included with your permit package: A new Certificate of Coverage A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG080000 A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree. If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Delonda Alexander of the Central Office Stormwater and General Permits Unit at (919) 733-5083, ext. 584 Sincerely, Bradley Bennett, Supervisor Stormwater and General Permits Unit cc: Central Files Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files Winston-Salem Regional Office e"A RKHR N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 733-7015 Customer Service 1- 800-623-7748 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCGO80000 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCGO80630 STORMWATER DISCHARGES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater frotn a facility located at NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO - GAYNOR ST 600 GAYNOR ST WINSTON SALEM FORSYTH COUNTY to receiving waters designated as a UT to Brushy Fork, a class C stream, in the Yadkin - Pee Dee River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, TV, V. and VI of General Permit No. NCGO80000 as attached. This certificate oi'coverage shall become effective September 1, 2002. This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit. Signed this day August 23, 2002. for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.. Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission w a 7 �9Q� 5 � r_ GILBERT O TURNLIZ NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION 312 WEST LIDDELL ST CHA.RI-01 'E. NC 28206 Dear Permiltce: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D. Acting Director Division of Water Quality December 27. 2001 Subject NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION COC Number NCGO806 30 horsvth COurlly Your facility is currently covered for storinwaler discharge under General Permit NCG080000. This permit expires on August 31, 2002. The Division staffis currently in the process of rewriting this permit and is schedulul to have the permit reissued by late summer ol'2002. Once the Permit is reissued. your facility would he clillible for continued coverage under the reissued permit. 4 In order to assure your continued coverage under the general permit. you must apply to the Division ol' Water Quality (DWQ) for renewal of your permit coverage. To make this renewal process easier. we are informing you in advance that your permit wi11 he expiring. Enclosed you will find a General Permit Coverage Renewal Application Form. The application must be completed and returned by March 4, 2002 in order to assure continued coveraoc under the ,cneral permit. Failure to request renewal within this tittle period may result in a civil assessntcnl of at least $250,00. Larger penalties may be assessed depending on the delinquency of the request- Discharge of stornlwater from your facility without coverage under a valid stornlwater NPDES permit would constitute a violation ol' NCGS 143-215.1 and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $ 1.0M00 per day. Please note that recent federal legislation has extended the "no exposure exclusion" to all operators of industrial facilities in any of the 1 1 catcoorics of "storm water discharges associated with industrial activity." (except construction activities). If you feel your facility can certify a condition of "no exposure". i.e, the facilty industrial materials and operations arc not exposed to storrmvater, you can apply for the no exposure exclusion. For additional information contact the Central Office Storrrrwater Sta€'I' member listed below or check the Storntwatu' & General Permits Unit Web Site at hop://h2o.ertr.state.ne.us/su/storwwater.litml l€' the; subject stornlwater discharge to waters of the: state: has been terminated, please complete the enclosed Rescission Request Form. Mailing instructions are listed on the bottom of the form. You will be notified when the rescission process has been completed. [f you have any questions regarding the permit renewal procedures please contact Corcy Basinger of' [Ile Winston-Salem Re,ional Office at 336-771-4600 or Delonda Alcxanderof the Central Office Stormwater Unit at (919) 733-5083. ext. 584 Sincerely. Bradley Benncti, Supervisor Stormwater and General Permits Unit cc: Central Files Winston-Salem Regional Office e�* NCDENR N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 733-7015 Customer Service 1-800-623-7748 State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. Hunt, Jr,, Governor Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director Mr. Gilbert O. Turner Norfolk Southern Railway Co. 312 West Liddell Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28206 Dear Mr. Turner: NCDENR February 11, 2000 Subject: General Permit No. NCG080000 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. COC NCG080630 Forsyth County In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on April 2, 1998, we are forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1983. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding. Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Tony Evans at telephone number 919/733-5083 ext. 548. Sincerely, Kerr T. Stevens cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-9919 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper N STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG080000 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG080630 STORMWATER DISCHARGES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Norfolk Southern Railway Company is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at Norfolk Southern Railway Company 600 Gaynor Street Winston Salem, NC Forsyth County to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Brushy Fork, Class C, in the Yadkin River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations. monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, 1I, 111, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG080000 as attached. This certificate of coverage shall become effective February 11, 2000. This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit. Signed this day February 11, 2000. for Kerr T. Stevens, Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission JU r'i ti r + �.� 5 �'. i-i�.s j " Jr - 9 1+! %"- . v , c'•' !' f I l "ti �.r� i� • ��\ 1F t•/ •'.'�� � `J•• . 1 I(r X'-^i:l'-r' +l€irf. . `�( ,.L Llt ji ���yr� t •: l` tt F( • `.`J ��y ' •4 ti���S {-, % - ,r i' l,y�. �J�. j;i Irk`• �� �.;•' i '•: N—.t i , �� l� �It {�j� ��J• •'� �� c r �r"� �`yb j� +f; ( { .. r J, ' ��• • '� � � --!t: ;�• r- '�i:' S �`p�e 1 �i • 'lC� y.l-� �: '��/�� - e�/j�,;Tony,- q� 7` ��i�{ � 3•t�p�f •`� '� �.`�•{.�l�ti.986�'(�-r•'/��\ k_ •`���J�'� ,.'o��:',`'[i �J�Jrjc `z°j,f aouz y �� Q� •` (( . .• i �.ii _ 11 1 . �v.•w• �.%�Il. 1 t 1 d � rt�i• 1 `\� �• `J f' F� ! a'.. °� �Z2nmani SKI'. ti` "• €-moo ti -.. ,�� V: ih+1%P71� r- -� : -Y� ��97tri�•1 °^^-"���i�• J• K Tl 1 \'__... !.. .�+.'�. ,,, _-a_.1 ,�.. sl•a ':4� '!Ql+--.sr�� �� c..'•�•... .. Y e t f t u ... 'i � ���.... -,s�•. • 9sr ! .:_� •' :� -•r _" � ;� f>��13T N �1 ( r $• ff 1,;�,r hti dral.:5p;spy _• r" y �� Tc€ 1` S;:a� r• �l�e f �0 r � ,����� � f j � �l f � � Sc }� ' ' ti :/'7 � j� � • 't •S'.. r •F%�.�� I � ��� ��y '�(""�'U-----����:� ti� , /r,•• a I f �.. � .,,_Ti`.-•��;• .� + � f� � 1. � (� ! ��'�" •. �is- � � + -.' •�:: � ���„��bi� c-Pletusan IL^•' f �ZA�/' � �i!�.� J�`J jj`f-.',_, ',< �;•.JJ����•1� +•, - ~ ]� i 1'L�,,fli /`r f'-�1(((J///- ;�_..:;%;`. {"�; :1dS+f1--'�i :€� •+; �t��,'rUp%�„�i•+lpjTr j(;�� ,� 1pi} 11 > W ; •- r J ,%.. {. wain»` ASS ya':. �i. �:- >r�._ ,,- r:::..J✓,X,#+F •' / I ' •� :'� . t��yxr� � ( -,,• '+ �%!?a`2��/U;�I�;t-t��•�y�,�F ( +..• 9 \ •�; IS..x, ��� •j,l �%fir! �• � ��:�1 `-- . ji � � �'' / .1 /. , �. :� S: �+ �s�� � • `• r ;-�,�-,%its 7\�js a: i.� E _ .'i: tj I ��_;��:�TJ;+�� rl �'�- r-. � ,. .%�.:.r- 86s�J Rti� �.�-�_; �.�. ;;; I'��r'' • / -�'' (��� ll�- _ 's��•�� —r•� _ . � ! Trfr.l��,��'I •;y,. r. ems,.:, a_ :,,,. ... '- _ !'' s'- f rt.. .F. y � � ' a`��� . \�-: � '::.r•.�i' .:, iv �'r c •4 l; a4.- �,.j' o. i /,7• F... •Shp 3 e/ f�T l`�a;:�i ` i 'r,�`��t=L�'-� ���""� .:c-1«'::.�• :4gF `':�:a�.�— _TeXm�pte`7�! r \;1:4 .; �= , a . "�:� � �• y :::"'. :ase ' �� /'- r., ;�r-j'--/ i. �..�; �".-fit � �_--,+�-' ' C''`.' - :;,•., sji, �f; l,'�1�'-.! i •' ;�! _ .s��.' :1` � `f(• t' � ��::jij=lt 'r �',,•\ � t`� F, ° �"y ��i` ���i,�Y•, ' �{�i�t "i'`.a �, n , i �;' �'f.a .i / ��4�� '� l •/ •aY -;� at '� ' l� w i, � n :•ti f i ti1'*b, s1��� � - *� C��`I� ��., �. �_T.. ��� J-• . � �' ro �p�;� �$! ��� 45���..� q, • ,.� Lr s. li J+d f .� ] \A11�RT� 39gy �_ � 'l�[a, 's�. 7� f! C � Gar PPPXii" - r qu ` O w � j`t tx 000 t ,ice= A` �• '► F % a �-- �`• 3, �'ti\'�A� 1 i5� :,• ; ( +t lk.11 co$o 30 fVort 1 a`:> rn?f'a NO L t � ■ + � 1 :t.7 •�►)\ 7 '� to • ri- � 7 r� 1T ' VAIN rr� r l �� e•� � 61- 7J a1.J �► �.f ..y, L •�.sC�� ��:�ro_okwaod f��✓ L ���� ,'c ;� , °'��"�"• ,. - �� : -3',�. f a n �t }'lt';. �� }4- 5fl `a•�?y 4ti;v,�� f{�� tS>;,,T r ,F�pralti .� .`Y� F w� . S qq Hari } .. ; •'(� ' f_ 1948� `t q • I.� .r ° >�. Ei'Seh 1�F, ( �. }• t L( la �� i :i� �� C� �:�. �! ' ��t'; ' '• " � � L t ' °s58 1369 570 1 640 00o rCEr S71 12'3Q' f 51z 80°15' W,NSTON-SALEM fCO0JR Mapped, edited• and published by the Geological Survey HrGx Forrvr 2n mr. Control by USGS. NOSrNOAA• and North Carolina Geodetic Survey * • f—-_ _r= Culture and drainage in part compiled from aerialphotographs kN roao t' g pa P j c_ k taken 1948. Topography by plane -table surveys 1951 t Polyconic projection. 30.000-toot grid ticks based on s• I North Carolina coordinate system rO7 MIL§ i 0.29, 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks• 19 w,e zone 17. showrf in blue ' 1927 North American Datum To place on the predicted [North American Datum 1983 uTM GRID ANo lIJa6 MAGNETIC NORrrr move the projection lines 10 meters south and DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SIIErr MI 19 meters west as shown by dashed corner ticks Revisions shown in purple and woodland compiled from Red tint indicates area in which only aerial photographs taken 1982 and other sources. This Ol A SOLDER RESC landmark buildings are shown information not field checked. Map edited 1986 Purple tint indicates extension of urban areas Gopynyhl ((] 1997, MapteCh, Inc. Markers Name: NCGO80630 Norfolk and Sv4vwn Railway Short Name: NCG080 Coordinates: 036' 08' 01.7" N, 080' 14' 00.5" W Comment: County: Forsyth, Map #: C18NW, Subbasin #: 03-07-04, Recv. Stream: UT Brushy Fork, Stream Class: C tl f NPDES FACILI_TY_AND PERMIT. DATA 09/06/00 11:51:35 UPDATE OPTION TRXID 5NU (FCEY_NCG080630 '_ PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYING FOR PERMIT REGION FACILITY NAME> NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. COUNTY> FORSYTH 04 ADDRESS: MAILING (REQUIRED) LOCATION (REQUIRED) STREET: 312 WEST LIDDELL STREET STREET: 600 GAYNOR STREET CITY: CHARLOTTE ST NC ZIP 28206 CITY: WINSTON-SALEM ST NC ZIP 27115 TELEPHONE 704 378 3841 DATE FEE PAID: / / AMOUNT: .00 STATE CONTACT> EVANS PERSON IN CHARGE GILBERT 0. TURNER 1=PROPOSED,2=EXIST,3=CLOSED 1 1=MAJOR,2=MINOR 2 1=MUN,2=NON-MUN 2 LAT: 3608020 LONG: 08014000 N=NEW,M-MODIFICATION,R=REISSUE> N DATE APP RCVD 04/02/98 WASTELOAD REQS DATE STAFF REP REQS 04/21/99 WASTELOAD RCVD DATE STAFF REP RCVD 04/21/99 SCH TO ISSUE DATE TO P NOTICE / / DATE DRAFT PREPARED 02/08/00 DATE OT AG COM REQS / J DATE DENTED DATE OT AG COM RCVD / / DATE RETURNED DATE TO EPA / I DATE ISSUED 02/11/00 ASSIGN/CHANGE PERMIT DATE FROM EPA / 1 EXPIRATION DATE 08/31/02 FEE CODE ( 0 ) 1=(>10MGD),2=(>1MGD),3=(>O.lMGD),4=(<O.1MGD),5=SF,6=(GP25,64,79), 7=(GP49,73)8=(GP76)9=(GP13,34,30,52)0=(NOFEE) DIS/C 73 CONBILL { } COMMENTS: MAIN CONTACT IS LOHMAN THOMPSON (504) 981-5184 WAS NC0046931 -, MESSAGE: *** ENTER DATA FOR UPDATE *** NC00403 I; Norfolk and Western Railway Subject: NCO046931; Norfolk and Western Railway Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:48:51 -0400 From: Tom Belnick <tom belnick@h2o.enr.state.nc.us> To: Bradley Bennett<bradley_bennett@h2o.enr.state.nc.us> CC: Dave Goodrich <dave goodrich cr h2o.enr.state.ne.us>, Bob Sledge <bob_sledge@h2o.enr.state.nc.us>, mike mickey <mike_mickey@wsro.enr. state. ne. us>, Matt Matthews <matt_matthews@h2o.enr.state.ne.us> Based on concurrence from Bill Mills, WSRO, and RgTox, I'll be fowarding the individual NPDES permit renewal package for the subject facility to the Stormwater Unit, for conversion to coverage under the Stormwater General Permit NCG080000. Mailto:tom belnick@h2o.enr.state.nc.us N.0 DENR-DWQ/NPDES Unit P.O.Box 29535, Raleigh NC 27626-0535 Work: (919) 733-5083 ext. 543 Fax: (919) 733-0719 ( of) 4/21/99 1:49 PM Nc00469L31 WA Rejo'1 Aevortie Subject: NCO04693.1 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 11.16:00 +0500 From: "Mike Mickey" <MIKE_MICKEY a ws ro.e nr. state. nc. us> Organization: NC DENR Winston Salem To: Tom_Belnick@h2o.enr.state.nc.us Sounds good to me. A lot of the stormwater language is already incorporated into their individual NPDES permit (See Part I). Change it. MMM. Mike Mickey 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, N.C. 27107 Phone: (336)771-4608 ext. 264 Fax: (336)771-4630 I of 1 4121/99 11:22 AM 1;e: NCON6931- Norfolk&Western Railway; Forsyth County 14t TOxRn°5rtnse Subject: Re: NC0046931- Norfolk&Western Railway; Forsyth County Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:22.40 -0400 From: "Matt Matthews" <matt_matthews@h2o.enr.state.nc.us> Internal Organization: NC DENR DWQ To: Tom Belnick <tom belnick@h2o.enr.state_nc.us> CC: mike mickey <mike_rnickey a wsro.enrstate.nc.us> , Bill Mills <bill mills@h2o.enr.state.nc.us> , Kevin Bowden<kevin_bowden@h2o.enr.state. nc.us> , Kristie Robeson<kristie_robeson@h2o.enr.state. nc.us> I have no objections to converting this one to a general storm water permit. Tom Belnick wrote: > This facility is up for NPDES permit renewal. It is located in Forsyth > County in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin (030704), with a discharge to > an unnamed trio to Brushy fork. The facility is a railroad yard with > the only discharge being Stormwater runoff. The facility no longer > refuels at the terminal, and there is no product transfer. The current > permit includes annual monitoring/limits for total flow, O&G, TSS, > turbidity, pH, and Acute Tox (Fathead Minnow, Episodic). > > Since there does not appear Co be any process water generated, I asked > Stormwater Unit (Bill Mills) if this facility could be converted to a > General Stormwater permit. Bill said the new NCGO80000 General > Stormwater Permit, which was reissued in 1997, now includes railroad > facilities. Thus, the permit could be converted if there are no > objections by WSRO or AgTox. > If we switch to a General Permit, there would no longer be a Cox test > requirement. The facility had previously requested that the Cox test be > removed from their permit back in I993, but the WSRO (Lee Spencer) > objected, stating that Cox test results of ambient stream samples in > this area have been very poor. The WSRO did not believe that the > facility was responsible, but felt it imperitive to continue sampling to > prove the assumption. I checked the recent AgTox Summary Sheets, and the > facility passed the acute Cox test (>100*) in 95, 97, and 98, with Not > Reported in 96_ The receiving stream is not listed in the 1998 303(d) > list for toxicity concerns. > Mike and Matt- please let me know what you think about this one. > Thanks. > Mailto:tom belnickOh2o.enr.state.nc.us > N.0 DENR-DWQ/NPDES Unit > P.O.Box 29535, Raleigh NC 27626-0535 > Work: (919) 733-5083 ext. 543 > Fax: (919) 733-0719 Matt Matthews NC DENR/Division of Water Quality Aquatic Toxicology Unit 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 v-(919) 733-2136 1:-(919? 733-9959 MailTo:Matt Matthews@h2o.enr.state.nc.us ------------------------------------------ of 1 4/21/99 1037 AM vision of Water Quality MEMO FDate: AQ To: Subject: ` G✓i-a �- rr � 7'a t4-1 �- �00 �i NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources PO Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-05351 Phone: 733-5083 NCO046931- Nortolk&Western Railway; Forsyth County .j" Subject: NC0046931- Norfolk&Western Railway; Forsyth County Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:05:52 -0400 From: Tom Belnick <tom_belnick@h2o.enr.state. nc.us> To: mike mickey <mike_mickey a wsro.enr.state.nc.us>, Matt Matthews <matt_matthews@h2o.enr.state.nc.us> CC: Bill Mills <bill_mills@h2o.enr.state.nc.us> This facility is up for NPDES permit renewal. It is located in Forsyth County in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin (030704), with a discharge to an unnamed trib to Brushy Fork. The facility is a railroad yard with the only discharge being stormwater runoff. The facility no longer refuels at the terminal, and there is no product transfer. The current permit includes annual monitoring/limits for total flow, O&G, TSS, turbidity, pH, and Acute Tox (Fathead Minnow, Episodic). Since there does not appear to be any process water generated, I asked Stormwater Unit (Bill Mills) if this facility could be converted to a General Stormwater permit. Bill said the new NCG080000 General Stormwater Permit, which was reissued in 1997, now includes railroad facilities. Thus, the permit could be converted if there are no objections by WSRO or AgTox. If we switch to a General Permit, there would no longer be a tox test requirement. The facility had previously requested that the tox test be removed from their permit back in 1993, but the WSRO (Lee Spencer) objected, stating that tox test results of ambient stream samples in this area have been very poor. The WSRO did not believe that the facility was responsible, but felt it imperitive to continue sampling to prove the assumption. I checked the recent AgTox Summary Sheets, and the facility passed the acute tox test (>100%) in 95, 97, and 98, with Not Reported in 96. The receiving stream is not listed in the 1998 303(d) list for toxicity concerns. Mike and Matt- please let me know what you think about this one. Thanks. Mailto:tom belnick@h2o.enr.state.nc.us N.0 DENR-DWQ/NPDES Unit P.O.Box 29535, Raleigh NC 27626-0535 Work: (919) 733-5083 ext. 543 Fax: (919) 733-0719 1 of 1 4/21/99 10:06 AM srr."it: L I FIUc1 I1 IUAW IIy Iesllny a Il-I9lol) I top lily SU I III I lary �.... .. ... ..... VACIH FV °()I a den hliacltr Teslilra 1'eun.:hr 1i111: OJ'A ; uLw tek,r ki 11NII aM, Cr, Clu Sim I,U'A- Y 1995 59. 18 •- -•• 59.2 --- --- - MV38 73 --- 38. 73 59. 16 •- - • ' Wuu m235Ah11 0egin:12l1/1997 F-m4orircy: Q I'll'• t M.F Jun Sep {hc • FhN Cunryi:Single 1996 >90 59.10 59.10.59-10 79.37,79 4 Fail I.... Do PaI.,>90 >96 >90 307.79 S:uun,y: Cloy laud Itcgi"Ir MRU Sulg'mm:MUMS IV97 79,F'aes >90 >90,Pass ••• Pass Pots --- --- M.Pas. •• --- Pass "- I PF: 0-20 SI x,d 7Uu8 ... foss _ Paaa Pau Pass 7OItl:0-2 IWCI'ht61 1999 Ncuturt WW'I1' 1'em1 dhr lies: 56'A: uiRNl cap 7.56tCo chr lllll 661A. 4 1995 --- - F.t■ -- --- PASS ••• --- Pass --- --- Pats NC003619W10i Bcgi0:1111l1995 Frvyucm):Q WF . h1:11'J9n&'I-DvNonCuusp:Singln ID96 •- --- fags --- --- Pass ••• --- Pats •- --- Sass G,unly: Calawtu Region: hlko Sulllwsin: (.11435 1997 •- -- Pass -- »• Pass » -.- Pane -- --- Pass IT: 5,41 SIcsl:d 1998 -.. F'aa. Pass _ Pat. _ Pass 7QIt):60 IWQ'AISf,32 1799 -•• -- I'ns• NW r"IL And W4SI rll It ails a) Co. HikpL 2411H I.C'511 AC III (IN; 1i115 F I I I I GRA111 191r5 ••• NC j4(,9j1WI Ilcglu991111993 Pre'l--y: SUWS)IA NuuCump: 191116 -•• -- 71R C1,uuly: FcOyydl {tcgi.nn WSRO Suhlra>ila: 1'AUIN luul --- .-• ... ... >IW ..• ... ... ... ... ... ... IT: VAR sl..d I908 -.. >100 _- 7Q I U: 0 I WCI % ): I UU 1999 ... ... Nu, foci Sa W."', Kail,s a) 1".. PERM CI IR LINE 29% V 1995 Pwl I 2n 5 Pars Nt1-IXJ_J!4W011 Regin:571J1194 I IvItwlw'y: Q I'A= I Maim, Sa'I11 kc N.11 .anp.SI NGLI: I1YJa •.. •.. I"aa Irn4•... --- 1•aas ... .. ",.. ... --. I•„e• C,nuny. 0.1rid. a Hug1Ou: WSKO Sul,hwiN: YAUttI Mill ... ... Pau -- Pass Pass Pass PF: 0.317 SLuvl luuff • • 1,451 I'.as lass 1'au 7Q10:1.2 MCC%y29.0 IU!)9 ••- .-. Not lh WilhvsI WN"I'I• PCIIlt clu lieu: LS'6 lNewl.rin511r)9) 095 >lal ... ..- >IN) ... .., s100 -- -- Ia3 >1w --• NCUU2016111101 11 01I t0r111995 Plrt(uvtley:Q I'll" , Jill Alx Jul OLI NuuCn,up:Smgle 1990 >IDU -- --- >1110 --- -- '100 --- --- >100 --- --- C,iunly: Wilk- kcgi,mc WSW Suhllasin: YAV0I s9:17 >100 -' NR.>too - .1W ... ID0 rTr 2.0 Slxud 1998 >100 �100 •-- ... P... Pass ... ... 7QI0: 1960-1%VQ'AJ:I.5 1999 Pass ••- Nurv-.1 WW"I'P I'clnt dig Iiue 275E V IU95 ... .-- P." ... --- Pass ... --- Pass. ... ... Past NCIXI2I(,28 11 Ikgh, 121111994 Flcqucney:Q PlF r hlarlun Sepi),-e NunCungl:Siugle I998 •» •- Pam ••• •-- Pass •-• -- Flags --- Pasa C-11ty: S1mdy Rrg6o: MKU Suldiusiu: YA1113 1997 Pass »• PA.$ -• Pass Pass Ill': 075 SI-ij 1996 ... .-- Pass ... -.- Pass --- ... Pau __- ... P.0 7Q10_ 42.0 1WC('Al2-68 1999 -.. ... I luklmra AVW'FI' I'LR61 CHR LIM: 191, 2.6tA Q RCL I IGI ROCKY R. V IW5 PASS --- --- Pass ••• •-• Pass -- --- Paae - -•• NC(XII3532AK7I It,gia: IJNtins rmijt wj} QPIF ♦ Jat AIn JaI(ht Moi(;ueup:51NGLlE I" Pass --- -- Palo Fag Fad.l.a,e Pam P..' I'nuuly; Shsnly If p"'.: h11LU Nuhha,m: VA1)13 I9U7 IMT.na Fad I.,. --- Pas.�-- {'F:0Sit SL..b IWO 11ae. •• -- I'nll Inil I'- I'nu •�- ��• l..d I.a I'n.. 7Q10:.1.3 1WC('h'):19 10-39 Pass •-- ' Utcidcnlal(:hcnliral Cut IIIWI 11crill cllr film d 61A. 9 1995 307 12.7(e) --- -•• Iz.)[aF -'- 12.7(si t2.71s) -" - 5, 19,,01 >12 NCULAM875/W1 Ilegiva11171996 Flalucney':Q P& - CA, May Aug No- Nuu(.',ouP:Singlc I1i96 »• >124,) - >12 >12(!) 12 I'„u1uy: Ncw 1€a0a1r. krgi.m: WIRC1 Sulda,sinrf-1'1:2} Ing? ... .12 -- ... 511.1 --- ••• It N.) .- ... •07'..I .,. PP:0.785 slcsld ,van ... ,Isi•1 --' '-- uunf^l -• ... .Fl fvr .-. ..- •'rl •1 i ... 7910:25 IWCt.34:4.6 1999 -•• B.I (I [it Fart MVFP PERM CJIR LIM:22'A; IF IT 1.2 PEiRh1 Cilk LIM 28151. V 1995 Cass Pess NCW-112291W 1 licgill (,n11995 hivquency: Q ll/V + Mar Jun Scp Ucc NogCOmp:S1N(',IX 4996 --- Pa.. Pau - WW'.k. Pass Pass C.mnty:MclA,wrl1 Hegi.m:ARLI Sa(dusitl:C'I1130 1 p9T -- -- Pase --- --- Pass •'• •- Fnd Pass --- P.- IT: 0 80 a't,A t:d i li'Ji1 ••. -.. P.I. -.... Ibag ••• -•- P.S. --. .•• I'as4 1QI04.d0 IWc('A):21.96 1999 ... ... nuli Suppl)'INK Penns w lou: 80A. 1995 Fall 1'A.s -- LAW Pass --- Pas. Pau NCVx%25SA)01 Ilogil-111DIII98 Flcquc'ucy: Q PIP + filar A,rI S.1, L}cc I N„µC,nrI,, Sit,gh: r998 •-• ••. Pass -- Pau - -- Pau Pa.. COuu1y: C+Idwcll Rcgiuu: ARC) Suhimin: YAW 1997 ••• •-- Pass --- --- Pass Pasa Pasa PP: U45 S) ciaE 1998 ••• Pasa Pan - VA Pass 7QI0; 8 00 IWCt z 1-8.0.1 1999 ... --- ( WAS.1.Ih II Snn Fa lit Pala lair lisn: M4 V 1995 ••• Pass{sl --- ••• Pas.(.) --- •- Pass(s) --- ••• Pat$(-) •-- NCW25243AKJl llegin;4/M994 Fteyuc„ey: Q I'll' ♦ hrh May Aug Nov NouCu.np:Siugle 19% ••• Faii(s)1 -" ^' P...1.) -- --- Pas:is) --- ••• P.St -^• Cmnly: Orange Region: PRO Sullh;1siw CIT06 1997 - Pass -- ... Pase(.) ... --. Tassfs) - ... Pass(Al -•• 1,13; I00 SI-Id 1998 ... Pas. --- ••• Pak. --- -- Pass -- ••• Paas(sl -•• 7010: 1,1 11YCt' 02.SJ 1999 ••• Pass(s) . 1 PIC 1995 Uaw Avallalde LF.G1aNll: Plikhl = I'cnnit Ru,luilcri-I I.Cl' = Adii0pil lralkc Luucr- Tailict F".'10cncy = Alsmiu•Iing ricslft'Wy: Q• (A.mlcd)L; Jd- hi„nlllly'; I1M- 0innalihiy; SA- Semiannually: A- AuuuaFly; OWU-dilly -IwII diw'harging; U- Uixxnginurd nanui.aiuE .vquiren,c ll.'gin = Irit 0IWIlth Jcqui,cd 7010 = Recei vil IV s9 e9ul VOW 0u.v cl ilcl i, Ill (CI'S) r = tp,nrtelly uumiuning i0creuscs It, IIXII ly ul.nl fuilwc nr Nk MOutln dla( tralrllg umst.w'sof - c.t. )uu, Apr. Jul, Oct NanCOmq,= Cullum C mrpliaucc Requirs mew I'1' = 1'e11111111'J if.,w• Ih1t d)1 I WC;0. = Inan Carl) w'i>iC L ,IKl:nkala,u 1'!)' = i'aaall'N,I Ie•I ,At_ = Acute L.I IK = t.111IM11 I law K.lalo'W I - E=allw,.1 hliuuuw: •-Cciindaldnlia yI'. Ioy - Mysid slninq,; CI,V-1-Ixtntie vatue; 1' • Mortuliry W Stahl I MC100 gc al WFIXsl CIlo%a'nllalnm: 91 • 14ir m11W Isy {)WQ Aqu:ui• TOIL 111kil; Iq • IL:a1 k'sl Rcls u+iug N,naA.nc •• = W a nw icquhcd; NR - NOt iel-wd Fx iliq Acsivily SIJIIII [ I - (u'xlise• N - Na.cly Issuudt'fu c.,u mm: 1t • Ac'iisc Iml u.a •tixlwiging: I -MI' r d=ra uxuilslde It" 11AIIId1 in tImmi.nl: a (NIC signaanc itecdrd sa '� State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality James B. 'Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director Gilbert O. Turner Norfolk Southern Railway Company 312 West Liddell Street Charlotte, NC 28206 Dear Permittee: September 21, 1998 i Subject: Modification of NPDES Permit No. NCO046931 Winston-Salem site Forsyth County The Division is beginning the second five-year cycle of river basin planning and permit renewals. An examination of the basin planning schedule has revealed that the timing of permit renewals does not allow an evenly distributed workload as first envisioned. This results in problems with the efficiency and effectiveness of the NPDES program. In an effort improve customer service, and after thorough review of the water Quality issues in your area, the Division is changing the permit renewal schedule for all NPDES permits in your sub -basin. This permit modification changes the expiration date of the subject permit to May 31, 1999. Please find enclosed the revised permit cover page. Insert the new cover page into your permit and discard the old page. All other terms and conditions contained in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This permit modification is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. If you have already submitted a permit renewal application for the subject facility, the Division will retain the application until your permit is due for renewal. No additional forms or fees will be required. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit modification are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter, .This request must be a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding. If you have questions about this modification, please contact Charles Weaver of my staff at the telephone number or address listed below. cc: Central Files Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section Roosevelt Childress, EPA &PDES13nit Files Point Source Compliance Enforcement Unit Sincerely, il�_Preston Howard, Jl /.,P.E. P.Q. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 919 733-5083, extension 511 (fax) 919 733-0719 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Charles_Weaver@h2o.enr.stote.nc.us Permit No. NCO046931 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE 40 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Norfolk Southern Railway Company is hereby authorized to discharge treated wastewater from a facility located at Winston-Salem site Winston-Salem Forsyth County to receiving waters designated as subbasin 30704 in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin. in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective September 21, 1998. The permit and authorization to discharge shall expire on May 31, 1999. Signed this day September 21, 1998. U Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director Division of Environmental Management By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Notice of Invent 'a Extend The Duration of NPDE'S Discharge Permits in the Yadkin River basin - ;U11JECi': The Division or Water Quality plans to Extend the duration of existing WOES Permits for the following facilities: Immu Facility County IC007D637 Piedmont Convertirig, Inc. DAVIDSON 4CON3941 Heater Utilities - Twin Creeks DAVIDSON 4COD70033 Quail Run Mobile Home Park DAVIDSON ZC00100AS BillsTmckStop. Inc. DAVIDSON 4COM4626 PPG Industries - Lexington DAVIDSON 4CO059118 Captain Stevens Searood Restaurant DAVIDSON 4CUD84423 Davidson water, Inc. - WTP DAVIDSON, 4CO023604 Thomasville Furniture - SFD Plant DAVIDSON 4C005936 KIItop Living Center DAVIDSON 4COW 1599 Davidson Co. Schools-Centml Middle/Senior High DAVIDSON 4CO029947 Davidson Co. Schools-Chun=hlarnd Oeneniary DAVIDSON 4CO042071 Davidson Co. Schoe"urthwest FAci nentary DAVIDSON -icow072 DavidsoniCo.Schools-SilverWicyElementary _ DAVIDSON 4COW249 Davidson Co. Schools -Southwood Elementary DAVIDSON 4CO042036 Davidson Co. Schools -Tyro Jr. High DAVIDSON 4CDQ31950 Davidson Co. Schools -West Davidson H.S, DAVIDSON 4CO061204 Scriden Acres Mobile Home Division FORSYTH 4C0046931} Norfolk Southcm Railway Company FORSYTH .IC6057223 Head Mobile Home Park FORSYTH 4CM51499 Three R's Mobile Home Park FORSYTH 4CO057509 Carolina Water Service -Sequoia FORSYTH 4CO065587 Mid -South WaterSy'slemslFrye Bridge FORSYTH 4CO035871 ABB Flakt, Inc-Makt products FORSYTH 4COOS0853 Lucent Technologies. InciSalem Business Park FORSYTIf 4C0004707 R3 Reynolds - Downtown FORSYTH 4C0055D93 R3 Reynolds - Tebaecoville FORSYTH 4CM86011 City of Winston-Salem) Neilson WTP FORSYTH ' 4COD79821 City of Winston-Salem I Thomas WTP FORSYTH 4CO037334 City of W aistomSalem / Elledge WTP FORSYTH 400050342 City al'Winstan•Salem/MuddyCreekW`M FORSYTH 4COOR3739 Crown Central Petroleum Corporation FORSYTH 1CM67385 BPScrviccStation - Site #24'•• FORSYTH ,'COD841 15 Wachovia Southern Oil Co. FORSYTH I 4CODS4760 Usair Smith -Reynolds Maintenan FORSYT14 'C:WS5138 Canoes Foods-S. Main St; 0826 FORSYTH 1COD371$A Oak Haven Mobile licur a Park ROWAN 4CO061034 Rowan Associates & Mcreaotile, Center ROWAN 1COU42439 Wcst5idc Swim & Rxgact Club ROWAN JCM45675 Majestic Pmperties • Rowan Site ROWAN :C0025593 Town of Spencer -WWTP ROWAN JC0027502 Town of Landis - WTP ROWAN 4CO035921 Rowan-S4Aury SehoolslFaith Elcmeniary ROWAN 4CO034703 Rowan-Safisbury Schools/ KnoflwoodElcmeniary ROWAN JC3049905 Inman Asphalt, Inc. - Salisbury - ROWAN 4CDO5487 Color Tex Finishing Corporation - ROWAN 4CO004774 Duke Power - Buck Steam Station ROWAN 4CO021884 City of Sallsbury - Gmni Creek W WTP ROWAN 4CO023892 City of Salisbury . Town Cmck W WTP ROWAN 'urposc: The facilities listed above all discharge into the Yadkin River basin. Other rerroils in the Yadkin River basin have expiration dates in calendar year 1999. The ecilities listed above have pennix expiration deter in 1908. In order for the Division to .valuate all pttmit rcncwal requests in the Yadkin River basin during the same calendar -car, the Division plans to extend the expiration dates of the permits for the facililies kited above. Nocooditions in the existing perrnia will be changed or modified. This is �n administrative change tD better align permitting and $asinwide Planning operations viihin the Division of Water Quality. On the basis of preliminary staff rev ieW of Article I Chapter 143. General Statutes of North Carolina (and other lawful standards and cgulations). the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to mend the duration of the NPDES permits listed above, subject to specific pollutant imitations and special conditions. NFORMATION: A copy of the existing NPDFS permits and a sketch showing the Dcation of each discharge is available by writing or calling: NORTH CAROLINA DAVIDSON COUNTY AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly commissioned, qualified, and authorized by 1,aw,to ad i ister oaths, personally appeared .....t?,kf'4.who being firstdulysworn deposgs and says; that he is fa d`1 of The Thomasville Times', Inc., engaged in the publication of a newspaper known as The Thomasville Times, published, issued, and entered as second class mail in the City of Thomasville in said County and State; that he (she) is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published in The Thomasville T•tmes on the following dates. .� r .................. .............................. .... ...................................... .......-.__---::.:.; and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document, or legal advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina. This..... .{.l....day of �1.:...�.................. 19..9.2' .. Sworn to and subscribed bef r me, this ..:.:i .- dayof...,.a.......... J No ary Public My Commission Expires ........................... Mr. Charles Wcaver NC DENE - DWQ . NPDES Unit ' P.Q. Box 29535 Raleigh, Nonh Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone Number: (919) 733-5083. text. 511 €7tc existing permits arc on file at the Division of Water Quality, Archdale Building. 512 f 4orth Salisbury Street (Room 9251, Raleigh, North Caml inn. Tney may be inspected luring normal office hours. Copies of the informalion an rile are available upon request '� l „ t end payment of the costs of reproduction, ; j a I"'00 . )ate: July 27, 1998 ;gin_ _ c'. .. _ � _ •..:yrrGr, r '- - _ For -A. Preston Howard, fn, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality - '=11: s. Re: Norfolk Southern Railroad Facilities Subject: Re: Norfolk Southern Railroad Facilities Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 06:45:24 -0400 From: Charles Weaver <charles_weaver@h2o.enr.state.nc.us> To: Jeff Lowe <Jef Lowe@radian.com> CC: tbelnick@h2o.enr.state.nc.us Mr. Lowe, the Division has not received a renewal application for the Linwood site (NC0029246). The copy of Short Form C submitted for the Winston-Salem site (NC0046931) is the same -application we received. All three permits cover the combined discharge of wastewater & stormwater. Attached to this message is an electronic copy of Short Form C in Microsoft Word97 format. You can print as many coies of the form as you need. If you need the form sent to you in a different format, reply to this e-mail. For additional technical questions regarding the renewal of the aforementioned permits, contact Tom Belnick of the NPDES Unit at (919) 733-50133, extension 543. Mr. Belnick will be the review engineer for these permit renewals. Reply to this e-mail if you have additional questions. CHW Name: Short Form C.DOC Short Form C.DOC Type: Winword File (application/msword) Encoding: base64 Name: Short Form C - instructions. DOC Short Form C - instructions. DOC Type: Winword File (application/msword) Encoding: base64 1 of 1 7/29/98 7:10 AM Norfolk Southern Railroad Facilities Subject: Norfolk Southern Railroad Facilities Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 15:45:11 -0500 From: Jeff_Lowe@radian.com (Jeff Lowe) To: Charles_weaver@h2o.enr.state.nc.us Mr. weaver, This is a follow up to Dave Favazza's, of.Radian International, fax (2/25/98) to you regarding several Norfolk Southern Railroad facilities permit status. I have reviewed your response fax (3/3/98) to Dave and would like to request several copies of the renewal applications for the Linwood (NC0029246) and Winston-Salem (NC 0046931) sites, the existing permit covers both wastewater and stormwater discharges. I also have a copy of and NPDES Permit application Short Form C for the Winston-Salem site from Mr. Gilbert Turner, Sr Engineer Environmental Operartions, Norfolk Southern, signed 2/20/98. I am wondering if this permit application was received and does it only cover storm water runoff. I am also curious if you have a similar NPDES permit application short form C for the Linwood Site? Thanks for your help, if you have any questions please call me or Linda Giumond at 770-414-4522. Jeff Lowe 1 of 1 7/29/98 7:09 AM State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality .fames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Wayne McDevitt, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director July 27,• 1998 Gilbert 0. Turner Norfolk Southern Railway Company 312 West Liddell Street Charlotte, NC 28206 Subject: Status of NPDES Permit NCO046931 Forsyth County Dear Permittee: 3 , After a thorough review of the Yadkin -Pee Dee River basin management plan and water quality issues relevant to the subject facility, the Division of Water Quality has decided to extend the duration of the subject permit. The expiration date of your permit will be changed in order to allow the Division to review all NPDES discharge permits in the Yadkin River Basin during calendar year 1999. All terms and conditions in the existing permit will apply until a new expiration date is assigned by the Division. Extension of existing Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements does not exempt the subject facility from the new Enforcement Policy recently enacted by the Division. Attached to this letter is a copy of the Public Notice that is being published to announce the planned extension of your permit. After Public Notice has been made by the Division, the expiration date of your permit will be changed via a permit modification. No draft permit will be sent out with the Public Notice, as none of the conditions in the existing permit will be modified. The Division appreciates your patience and understanding to date regarding the rescheduling of the subject permit. If you have already submitted your renewal application package, no additional fees or documentation will be required as a result of this change to your permit's expiration date. If you have questions about this proposed modification or about the permit renewal process, contact Charles Weaver of my staff at the telephone number or address listed below. Sin�cerely� d �P . A_ Preston Howard, er,P.E. cc: Central Files Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section NPDES File P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 919 733-5083, extension 511 (fax) 919 733-0719 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Charles_Weaver@h2o.enr.state.nc.us State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management James B. Huni,'Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director September 3, 1993 Scott Kroll Norfolk and Western Railway.Co. 110 Franklin Road, SE Roanoke, VA 24042 Subject: NPDES No. NCO046931 Norfolk and Western Railway Error correction Forsyth County Dear Mr. Kroll: A review of the subject permit by the Division of Environmental Mangagement revealed an error in the effluent limitations page. The Acute Toxicity Testing Requirement was incorrectly listed as a composite sample. That test should be a grab sample. Enclosed please find the corrected pages. These pages should be inserted into your current permit and the incorrect page discarded. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150E of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding. Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. Part II, E.4. addresses the requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge. This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Susan Robson at telephone number 919/733-5083. Z c rely, reston rd, Jr., P. . Director cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA Winston-Salem Regional Office Compliance Central Files Kim Brantley Aquatic Toxicology Unit P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-5083 FAX 919-733-9919 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% rscycled/ 10% post -consumer paper SECTION B: MINIMUM MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (CONT.) NCO046931 5 -a - ,�e,rjj„f 1.5Z Limitations and Mguj tnring Requirements. -Stormwater discharges from RAILROAD SWITCHING AND HANDLING AREA, FUELING APRON, and FUEL AND LOCOMOTIVE AREA and stormwater discharges from oil water separators shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: Stormwater Discharge Qharacteristics Measurement Sample Sample Freguencvl 2)me Location2 Total Flow3 MG3 1/year3 SDO Oil and Grease 45 mg/l 1/year Grab SDO Total Suspended Solids 45 mg/l 1/year Grab SDO Turbidity 50 NTU 1/year Grab SDO PH 6.0 to 9.0 Standard(SU) 1/year Grab SDO Acute Toxicity4 Episodic4 Grab SDO 1 Measurement Frequency - 1/year - shall mean Stormwater runoff associated with petroleum bulk stations and terminals shall be sampled once within six months of certificate of coverage issuance and, where possible, prior to implementing SMPs and development of the SMP Plan at existing operations. Thereafter, sampling shall be conducted four times during the remaining permit term at intervals of greater than nine months apart and collected during the months of April through November. 2 Sample Locations: SDO - Stormwater Discharge Outfall 3 'Total flow shall be measured continuously or calculated based on the amount of area draining to the outfall, the amount of built -upon area, and the total amount of rainfall or estimated by the measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event. Total precipitation and duration of the event measured shall be a representative storm event: ,storm Event Units Monitoring Reaurement_g Characteristic Total Event Precipitation inches 1/year Event Duration hours 1/year 4 Acute Toxicity, Fathead Minnow, Episodic; See Part III, Condition E. NOTE: See Part III, Condition/Section F for stormwater definitions. General definitions appear in Part II, Section A. State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources A 4 Division of Environmental Management 000% James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary F1 A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director August 19, 1993 F.M. Roach, Jr. Norfolk and Western Railway Company 110 Franklin Road, S.E. Roanoke, Virginia 24042-0013 Subject: Permit No. NCO046931 Norfolk & Western Railway Forsyth County Dear Mr. Roach: In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on August 26, 1992, we are forwarding herewith the subject state - NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated December 6, 1983. The Division staff has reviewed your request for deletion of the toxicity monitoring requirement, as spelled out in you letter dated June 29, 1993. Pursuant to the North Carolina Administrative Code [15A NCAC 213 .0505(d)], toxicity testing may be required in NPDES permits. Due to the lack of information regarding the toxic potential of this discharge, the staff feels it is necessary to keep the monitoring in the permit. Upon the completion of the five episodic toxicity tests, Norfolk and Souther may submit the results and request the Division reconsider the appropriateness of the continued requirement for annual monitoring. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 -7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding. Please take notice this permit is not transferable. Part II, EA. addresses the requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required. P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone 919-733-7015 FAX 919-733-2496 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper Norfolk and Southern Railway August 19, 1993 Page Two If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Ms. Coleen Sullins at telephone number 919/733-5083. Sincerely, Original Signed By Coleen H. Sullins A. Preston Howard, Jr. Director cc: Mr. Jim Patrick, EPA Winston-Salem Regional Office Permit No. NCO046931 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Norfolk Southern Corporation is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at Norfolk and Western Railway Company 600 Gaynor Street Winston-Salem Forsyth County to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Brushy Fork in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, and III hereof. This permit shall become effective September 1, 1993 This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 1998 Signed this day August 19, 1993 Original Signed By Coleen H. Sullins -A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director Division of Environmental Management By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit No. NC0046931 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET Norfolk Southern Corporation is hereby authorized to: 1 . Continue to operate existing oiVwater separation systems located at Norfolk and Western Railway Company, 600 Gaynor Street, Winston-Salem, Forsyth County (See Part III of this Pen -nit), and 2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into an unnamed tributary to Brushy Fork which is classified Class C waters in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. NCO046931 PART I •,lr • � elf.: � • � • .rr; • • ; • : ,� : r : � . .: ; During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity. Such discharges shall be controlled, limited and monitored as specified below: 1. The Permittee shall develop a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, herein after referred to as the Plan. The Plan shall include, at a minimum, the following items: a. Site Plan. The site plan shall provide a description of the physical facility and the potential pollutant sources which may be expected to contribute to contamination of stormwater discharges. The site plan shall contain the following: (1) A general location map (USGS quadrangle map or appropriately drafted equivalent map), showing the facility's location in relation to transportation routes and surface waters, the name of the receiving water(s) to which the stormwater outfall(s) discharges, or if the discharge is to a municipal separate storm sewer system, the name of the municipality and the ultimate receiving waters; and accurate latitude and longitude of the point(s) of discharge. (2) A narrative description of storage practices, loading and unloading activities, outdoor process areas, dust or particulate generating or control processes, and waste disposal practices. (3) A site map drawn to scale with the distance legend indicating location of industrial activities (including storage of materials, disposal areas, process areas and loading and unloading areas), drainage structures, drainage areas for each outfall and activities occurring in the drainage area, building locations and impervious surfaces, and the percentage of each drainage area that is impervious. For each outfall, a narrative description of the potential pollutants which could be expected to be present in the stormwater discharge. (4) A list of significant spills or leaks of pollutants that have occurred at the facility during the 3 previous years and any corrective actions taken to mitigate spill impacts. (5) Certification that the stormwater outfalls have been evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges. The certification statement will be signed in accordance with the requirements found in Part II, Standard Conditions, Section B #11. Stormwater Management PIan. The stormwater management plan shall contain a narrative description of the materials management practices employed which control or minimize the exposure of significant materials to stormwater, including structural and nonstructural measures. The stormwater management plan, at a minimum, shall incorporate the following: (1) A study addressing the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations and/or storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to stormwater. Wherever practicable the permittee shall cover all storage areas, material handling operations, manufacturing or fueling operations to prevent materials exposure to stormwater. In areas where elimination of exposure is not practicable, the stormwater management plan shall document the feasibility of diverting the stormwater runoff away from areas of potential contamination. (2) A schedule to provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials, storage of Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) water priority chemicals, or storage of hazardous materials to prevent leaks and spills from contaminating stormwater runoff. If the secondary containment devices are connected directly to NCO046931 stormwater conveyance systems, the connection shall be controlled by manually activated valves or other similar devices [which shall be secured with a locking mechanism] and any stormwater that accumulates in the containment area shall be at a minimum visually observed for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens and dry weather flow, prior to release of the accumulated stormwater. Accumulated stormwater shall be released if found to be uncontaminated. Records documenting the individual making the observation, the description of the accumulated stormwater and the date and time of the release shall be kept for a period of five years. (3) A narrative description shall be provided of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be considered such as, but not limited to, oil and grease separation, debris control, vegetative filter strips, infiltration and stormwater detention or retention, where necessary. The need for structural BMPs shall be based on the assessment of potential of sources to contribute significant quantities of pollutants to stormwater discharges and data collected through monitoring of stormwater discharges. (4) Inspection schedules of stormwater conveyances and controls and measures to be taken to limit or prevent erosion associated with the stormwater systems. C. Spill Prevention and Response Plan. The Spill Prevention and Response Plan shall incorporate a risk assessment of potential pollutant sources based on a materials inventory of the facility. Facility personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the plan shall be identified in the plan. A responsible person shall. be on -site at all times during facility operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff through spills or exposure of materials associated with the facility operations. d. Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Program. A preventative maintenance program shall be developed The program shall document schedules of inspections and maintenance activities of stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Inspection of material handling areas and regular cleaning schedules of these areas shall be incorporated into the program. C. Training schedules shall be developed and training provided at a minimum on an annual basis on proper spill response and cleanup procedures and preventative maintenance activities for all personnel involved in any of the facility's operations that have the potential to contaminate stormwater runoff. Facility personnel (or team) responsible for implementing the training shall be identified in the plan. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall identify a specific position(s) responsible for the overall coordination, development, implementation, and revision to the Plan. Responsibilities for all components of the Plan shall be documented and position(s) assignments provided. The permittee shall amend the Plan whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance which has a significant effect on the potential for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters. This Plan shall be considered public information in accordance with Part II,Standard Conditions, Section E.10. of this permit. NCO046931 PART I SECTION B: MINIMUM MONITORING AND KEPORMG REQUIREMENTS (unless otherwise approved in writing by the Director of the Division of Environmental Management) The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis. Implementation of the plan shall include documentation of all sampling, measurements, inspections and maintenance activities and training provided to employees, including the log of the sampling data and of activities taken to implement BMPs associated with the industrial activities, including vehicle maintenance activities. Such documentation shall be kept on -site for a period of five years and made available to the Director or his authorized representative immediately upon request. 2. The Director may notify the permittee when the Plan does not meet one or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within 30 days of such notice, the permittee shall submit a time schedule to the Director for modifying the Plan to meet minimum requirements. The permittee shall provide certification in writing (in accordance with Part 11, General Conditions, Section B, #11) to the Director that the changes have been made. Inspections of the facility and all stormwater systems shall occur at a minimum on a semiannual schedule, once in the fall (September -November) and once during spring (April - June). The inspection and any subsequent maintenance activities performed shall be documented, recording date and time of inspection, individual(s) making the inspection and a narrative description of the facility's stormwater control systems, plant equipment and systems. Records of these inspections shall be incorporated into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. 4. Sample collection and visual monitoring for color, foam, outfall staining, visible sheens and dry weather flow, shall be performed at all stormwater discharge outfall locations. If a facility has multiple discharge locations that are required to be sampled, the permittee may petition the Director to sample at a reduced number of outfalls if it is established that the stormwater discharges are substantially identical. Visual observations shall be recorded for all outfall locations. SECTION B: MINIMUM MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (CONT.) NC0046931 5.a. Specific Li ,italions and Monitoring,Reguirements. Stormwater discharges from RAILROAD SWITCHING AND HANDLING AREA, FUELING APRON, and FUEL AND LOCOMOTIVE AREA and stormwater discharges from oil water separators shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: Stormwater Discharge Characteristics Measurement Sample Sample Freauenc 1 Lme Location2 Total Flow3 MG3 1/year3 SDO Oil and Grease 45 mg/l 1/year Grab SDO Total Suspended Solids 45 mg/l 1/year Grab SDO Turbidity 50 NTU 1/year Grab SDO pH 6.0 to 9.0 Standard(SU) 1/year Grab SDO Acute Toxicity4 Episodic4 Composite SDO 1 Measurement Frequency - 1/year - shall mean stormwater runoff associated with petroleum bulk stations and terminals shall be sampled once within six months of certificate of coverage issuance and, where possible, prior to implementing BMPs and development of the BMP Plan at existing operations. Thereafter, sampling shall be conducted four times during the remaining permit term at intervals of greater than nine months apart and collected during the months of April through November. 2 Sample Locations: SDO - Stormwater Discharge Outfall 3 Total flow shall be measured continuously or calculated based on the,amount of area draining to the outfall, the amount of built -upon area, and the total amount of rainfall or estimated by the measurement of flow at 20 minute intervals during the rainfall event. Total precipitation and duration of the event measured shall be a representative storm event: Storm _Event Units Monitoring Reggilements Qharagterigtic Total Event Precipitation inches 1/year Event Duration hours 1/year 4 Acute Toxicity, Fathead Minnow, Episodic; See Part III, Condition E. NOTE: See Part III, Condition/Section F for stormwater definitions. General definitions appear in Part II, Section A. NCO046931. 5.b. This permit regulates stormwater discharges. Non-stormwater discharges which shall be allowed in the stormwater conveyance system are: (1) Uncontaminated groundwater, foundation drains, air -conditioner condensate without added chemicals, springs, discharges of uncontaminated potable water, waterline and fire hydrant flushings, water from footing drains, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands. (2) ' Discharges resulting from fire -fighting. If the storm event monitored and reported in accordance with this permit coincides with a non-stormwater discharge, the permittee shall separately monitor and report all parameters as required under the non- stormwater discharge permit and provide this information with the stormwater discharge monitoring report. PART I •y- V • I • • 1'ff. M, •1 The permittee shall comply with Final Limitations and Controls specified for stormwater discharges in accordance with the following schedule: Existing Facilities: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall be developed and implemented within 12 months of the effective date of this permit and updated thereafter on an annual basis. Secondary containment, as specified in Part I, Section A, 1. b. 2. of this permit, shall be accomplished within 12 months of the effective date of issuance of this permit. 2. Permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance necessary to operate the permitted stormwater controls at optimum efficiency. Part III Permit No. NCO046931 E. Acute Toxicity Monitoring (Episodic) The permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and subsequent testing will occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this permit. After monitoring of the first five toxicity tests, the permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement. The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test. Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. Part III ; Continued NCO046931 Condition/Section F - Stormwater Definitions Best_Man-agement Practices (BMPs) Schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the United States. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operation procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage. Liquid raw materials, manufactured products, waste materials or by-products with a single above ground storage container having a capacity of greater than 660 gallons or with multiple above ground storage containers having a total storage capacity of greater than 1,320 gallons. Overburden Any material of any nature, consolidated or unconsolidated, that overlies a mineral deposit, excluding topsoil or similar naturally -occurring surface materials that are not disturbed by ruining operations. 4. Point Source Discharge Any discernible, confined and discrete conveyance, including but specifically not limited to, any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, roiling stock, or concentrated animal feeding operation from which pollutants are or may be discharged to waters of the state. 5. RepresentativCStorm Event A storm event that is between 0.2 and 0.8 inches of rainfall and which has a duration of greater than 3 hours and that is preceded by at least 72 hours in which no storm event measuring greater than 0.1 inches has occurred. 6. Runoff Coefficient The fraction of total rainfall that is not infiltrated into or otherwise retained by the soil, concrete, asphalt or other surface upon which it falls that will appear at the conveyance as runoff. 7. Secondgy Containment Containment for the contents of the single largest tank plus sufficient freeboard to allow for precipitation. 8. Section 313 Water Priority Chemical A chemical or chemical category which: a. Is listed in 40 CFR 372.65 pursuant to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, also titled the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act of 1986; b. Is present at or above threshold levels at a facility subject to SARA title III, Section 313 reporting requirements; and C. That meet at least one of the following criteria: (1) Is listed in appendix D of 40 CFR part 122 on either Table II (organic priority pollutants), Table III (certain metals, cyanides, and phenols) or Table N (certain toxic pollutants and hazardous substances); (2) Is listed as a hazardous substance pursuant to section 31 l(b)(2)(A) of the CWA at 40 CFR 116.4; or (3) Is a pollutant for which EPA has published acute or chronic water quality criteria. 9. Significant Materials Includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or production; hazardous substances designated under section 101(14) of CERCLA; any chemical the facility is required to report pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as ashes, slag and sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater discharges. 10. Significant Spills Includes, but is not limited to: releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under section 311 of the Clean Water Act (Ref: 40 CFR 110.10 and CFR 117.21) or section 102 of CERCLA (Ref: 40 CFR 302.4). 11. Stormwatpr Runoff The flow of water which results from precipitation and which occurs immediately following rainfall or as a result of snowmelt. 12. Ten Year Design Storm The precipitation event of a duration which will produce the maximum peak rate of runoff for the watershed of interest resulting from a rainfall event of an intensity expected to be equalled or exceeded, on the average, once in ten years. 13. Total Flow The flow corresponding to the time period over which the sample collection occurs. The total flow calculated based on the size of the area draining to the outfall, the amount of the built -upon surfaces within the drainage area, and the total amount of rainfall occurring during the sampling period. 14. Visible Sedimentation Solid particulate matter, both mineral and organic, that has been or is being transported by water, air, gravity, or ice from its site of origin which can be seen with the unaided eye. 15. 25-yar, 24 hour storm event The maximum 24-hour precipitation event expected to be equalled or exceeded, on the average, once in 25 years. NPDES FACILITY AND PERMIT DATA 04/06/98 10.22:55 UPDATE OPTION TRXID 5NU KEY NCO046931 PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYING FOR PERMIT REGION FACILITY NAME) NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY CO COUNTY> FORSYTH 0.1 ADDRESS: MAILING (REQUIRED) LOCATION (REQUIRED) STREET: 110 FRANKLIN ROAD, SE /ENV.PR, STREET: 600 GAYLOR STREET CITY: ROANOKE ST VA ZIP 24042 CITY: WINSTON SALEM ST NC ZIP 27102 TELEPHONE 703 981 5185 DATE FEE PAID: 68/26/92 AMOUNT: 200.00 STATE CONTACT> SHANKLIN PERSON IN CHARGE GIBSON BARBELL 1=PROPOSED,2=EXIST,3=CLOSED 2 1=NAJOR,2=MINOR 2 1=NUN,2=NON-MUN 2 LHT: 3BO8040 LONG: 0801403O N=NEW,M=NODIFICRTION,R=REISSUE> R DATE APP RCVD 08/26/92 WASTELOAD REQS 01/26/93 DATE STAFF REP REQS 08/26/92 WASTELOAD RCVD 05/17/93 DATE STAFF REP RCVD 10/08/92 SCH TO ISSUE 07/30/93 DATE TO P NOTICE 05/14/93 DATE DRAFT PREPARED 05/21/93 DATE OT AG CON REQS / / DATE DENIED DATE OT AG CON RCVD / / DATE RETURNED DATE TO EPA / / DATE ISSUED 08/19/93 ASSIGN/CHANGE PERMIT DATE FROM EPA / / EXPIRATION DATE 07/31/98 FEE CODE C 4 ) 1=C>IOMGD),2=(>lNGD),3=(>O.1MGD),4-(<O.1MGD),5=SF,6=(GP25,64,79), 7=(GP49,73)8=(GP76)9=(GP13,34,30,52)0=(NOFEE) DIS/C 60 73 CONBILL C ) COMMENTS: MESSAGE: ... ENTER DATA FOR UPDATE *** NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT August 4, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: Coleen Sullins, Supervisor Permits and Engineering THROUGH: Steve Mauney, Supervisorb�I*� WSRO - WQ FROM: Lee G. Spencer Environmental Engineer P VED FECHN CAL SUPPORT BRANCH SUBJECT: Request for Deletion of Toxicity Testing Requirement Norfolk and Western Railway Company Permit No. NCO046931 Forsyth County This office does indeed object to this request. We currently have a severe pollution problem in this receiving stream. Toxicity test results of ambient stream samples in this area have been very poor. In addition, three water quality violations and four action level exceedances have been found. While this office does not think the Norfolk and Western Facility is responsible for this pollution problem, it is imperative that sample results be obtained to further verify this assumption. It would indeed seem to be in this Company's best interest -to conduct this sampling. If you would like more information regarding this matter, please advise. cc: Susan Wilson Central Files WSRO MEMO DATE: SUBJECT: ! V 6 0 4 S I OWL "V-� ��'j - From: North Carolina Department of Environment Health, and Natural resources ea m� �-��- -2 P.^ f ] . NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY 110 FRANKLIN ROAD, S.E. ROANOKE, VIRGINIA 24042-0013 O3oTo,i u� $P-usKr +v�lL June 29, 1993 File 7410.013 Ms. Coleen Sullins NPDES Permits Group North Carolina DERNR P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Re: Renewal of NPDES No. NCO046931 Norfolk and western. Railway Company 600 Gaynor Street Winston-Salem, Forsyth County Dear Ms. Sullins: This is in response to Mr. Steve V. .Tedder's May 28, 1993 correspondence in which was transmitted the public notice and the draft permit package regarding the renewal of the above noted permit. Norfolk and Western Railway Company (NW) has carefully reviewed the draft permit package and finds one area to be unacceptable as presented. The specific part of the permit which NW finds unacceptable and wishes to contend is identified in the following paragraph along with appropriate justification. NW respectfully requests that this part of the permit be waived as described below. Acute ToxicitV As outlined in Part III, Condition E of the draft permit, the permittee shall conduct five acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in EPA Document 600/4-85/013. Sampling and subsequent testing are to occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this permit. After the first five toxicity tests, one test would be required annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. NW does not believe that acute toxicity testing is necessary at this location for the following reasons: (a) The processes involved in generating the waste streams at this facility (i.e., light repairs and maintenance type activity) do not include materials which would reasonably be expected to contribute to a toxic effluent beyond background instream levels. -7/ Ms. Coleen Sullins June 29, 1993 Page 2 of 2 (b) Under the existing permit for this location, NW has consistently been in compliance with the existing parameters for the past 20 months. NW feels that this past history of compliance is a strong indication that this facility is a well operated, well maintained system and that no additional monitoring requirements are necessary at this location. Based on the foregoing discussion, NW believes that the activiities at this site do not pose a reasonable threat to the water quality of the receiving stream and that the acute toxicity testing outlined in the draft permit would merely create an unnecessary administrative burden. We therefore request that the Acute Toxicity Testing outlined in the draft permit be deleted from the final permit. Norfolk and Western Railway Company recognizes and shares the Department of Environment, Health, and Natural -Resources concerns and efforts to preserve the quality of the state's waters. We believe that the terms and conditions of the draft permit along with the proposed modification as presented herein will serve to preserve the integrity of the receiving stream while allowing the essential operations of this facility to continue. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jerry B. Warren at (703) 981-4994 or myself at (703) 981-4154. Sincerely, F. M. Roach, r. Director Environmental Protection 7410U013.002 DIVISION'OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT July 28, 1993 1,1i1OL C91:7:�►1�1�1�1 TO: Coleen Sullins f l FROM: (Susan A: Wilson THROUGH: Carla Sanderson SUBJECT: Norfolk and Western Railway Co. (NPDES No. NC0046931) UT Brushy Fork, Yadkin River Basin Forsyth County The Rapid Assessment Group (RAG) offers the following comment with regard to Norfolk and Western's objections to the draft permit: Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B .0505 (d), the Division may require toxicity testing in NPDES permits. Due to lack of information regarding the potential toxicity of this discharge, toxicity monitoring is required in Norfolk and Western's permit. The Rapid Assessment Group believes that episodic toxicity testing during the first five discharge events and annually thereafter, will not be overly burdensome to the facility and will provide the Division with information regarding the potential impact of the discharge to the zero 7Q10s receiving stream. cc: Steve Mauney, WSRO NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NCO046931 PERMITTEE NAME: Norfolk Southern Co oration FACILITY NAME: Norfolk and Western Railway Company Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 0.002 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): Industrial (% of Flow): 100 % Comments: O/W Separators for rail yard STREAM INDEX: 12-94-12-6 RECEIVING STREAM: an unnamed tributary to Brushy Fork Class: C Sub -Basin: 03-07-04 Reference USGS Quad: CI8NW, Walkertown (please attach) County: Forsyth Regional Office: —Winston-Salem Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 2/28/93 Treatment Plant Class: 0?, I? Classification changes within three miles: > 3mi. Requested by: Prepared by: Reviewed by: 604F . � Jule Shanklin 1 /7h/Al Date: S / 93 5 /3 Modeler Date Rec. # SPwJ I L&L-A 137_0_ Drainage Area (mi ) Avg. Streamflow (cfs): G r 7Q10 (cfs) 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0 30Q2 (cfs) p Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acut Chronic Instream Monitoring: 0 Parameters Upstream Location Downstream Location L571 A 1 A. I Effluent Characteristics g winter BOD5 (mg/0 NH3-N (mg/1) D.O. (mg/1) TSS (mg/1) s F. Col. (/100 ml) pH (SU) TOWtDITY N-rU 50 opt 45 tAm fA(o N[ToP_ To F AL Fw,-j bOitbL - 66 AR6+S112Ep cokln Al [n1 12 116 u uau st-Y nX 6&,Cd f- Out E vF Q,ulLT- tlPVtJ i 7-A nex l AAJO TiiE _&IX. pq*W a oP V M toP 9} A;;ii(L • t ' u - r' Tt—ro rt�uNr MAL L s15 A Cox s C-NrA-nv6 0-tVrzV r7ve"T.. f GT0VAW4fE?L rPOI,LUTL04 Paeu rJTtanti PLAN gf:v-u 1JQgWf,N15 5KOU.17 U7 PAD IN FeAM1T D ED +. gip."• '�liS!, 1 •, -„ .. r r - t-,1`'7— 1 l' .,1+ •/,•r.;�• • . _ i•: •��f, i • .. %litii i. rsi � ;71.�1h� ". _� � is •1 J 1i � .fir ., t=1• �:f .•• ���.f . ..t. .•�5�1 �. 51 c-•F � .f�i. �. 1..~� F1• •';_tfr� -ti r1 .L�• • r .. ' . 06 �. F'•w; 4 ; �; : 4"• r rr• /�1yC� • •��,• ti t a. f :.• ; +J : � `c•7r- `� •1 t'Y amp,, I:i�� FEET ! dtid ••` '}.r 5a • ♦ T :',�d B� 30= + y64 8d° 15' Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Survey Control by USGS. NOSINOAA• and North Carolina Geodetic Survey Culture and drainage in part compiled from aerial photographs taken 1948. Topography by plane -table surveys 1951 Polyconic projection. 10,000-foot grid ticks based on North Carolina coordinate system 1000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, zone 17. shown in blue 1927 North American Datum To place on the predicted North American Datum 1983 move the projection lines 10 meters south and SIP L�m Vfi, 5170 1 I640000 FEET 531 12•3V Y.STOIJ-SALEM fCa URTtl, NIr7N PO;NT 70 W. 1 I NM loon a CN ' 1076..L 9 MILS t. VTM GlnO AND 1986 MAGNETIC NORTH DFCLINA. ION AT CEN[ER OF SHFF.T A. (1). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS During the period be innin on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the 9 P 9 9 P 9 P� permittee' +: Is authorized to discharge through outfall .00.1 stormwater and contaminated wastewater originating from' ' '. i. point sources including, but not limited to, bulk storage tank areas, product transfer areas, loadingi unloading areas, etc. Such discharges shall be -limited and monitoring by the permittee as specified below: Effluent Characteristics Flow Oil & Grease �p { it lei . j ij'� Discharge -Limitations _K_R_/da_y fibs/day) Other Units (Seeec-i-fvY)- Daliq Avg. Daily Max. DailyAvg. —`6a`ily�x. 30 mgfi 60 mg/1 Monitoring R29ulrements Measurement Sample **Sam le Frequency Location Weekly Instantaneous E 2/Month Grab IE s * Monitoring will be conducted during normal working hours. -This permit imposes no -limitation on the discharge of stormwater runoff uncontaminated by any Industrial or commercial activity and not discharged through any oil -water separator or other treatment equipment or facility. ** Samples taken 1n:' li with the monitoring requirements specified above shall be taken at the following locations) : ,Thi nearest sslble point after final treatment but prior to actual discharge to or mixing with the receiving, -ale <&_ rid , tax { r.. 4 E - Effluen�;.yA ``•�,:;i.>'���' 0 3 The pH shal t b4e.e" thgn�6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be ` monitored wee • at the Tgffiy�ent by grab samples. o Thereshall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. f Z n III Q y AD G%tit a-- j - 1+� f�lsi�!lf�2�� dF s7ll�/bf l�r� raG.2 �! - ; � ili3T"f- l�f{'•-F_��I-�=?�7f1�'�..� � iL/ j.�V>aQTAi I'J (51C-:fg 13) %s cc—a�f>- vekPI4 79v -- - - - f � 4,fY Ak-. �r G or o 7a�- i 3/6 7 SPO(-' 5itl 03)- �8! - ` `�`� ` •. _.:lF `z� i� - !o arc athAjgml�., 46=. - Z-1 77-1-6 To IVo AAA11)TF+J4A1rAT 7 - [ S F;tc/& 7� iiA/1tL. i�� IS Nr� ���DuGT. i2AnlS��2 ��� ties ✓�s�i� �-�pr_�i,�r_ �,� S�a,� ►l I1 i7s gyn _[N-Hs�ILcT�o N _ r ' �r?C.�Gv.��%�/t'�Cnl�L_��....� .,.��! ✓G1� ---�t�._G�lr r��' �o uP Pal Ts .�.....�-.�..� �.,_„_....,�,�„i/�,�- � i . -� ,- ,�,1 u,-„�,v a •r - �....-�-.- - — 2 �oN /110 It i I � ( I � I 1 � I I t RECEIVED N.C. Dept. of EHN APR2-M3 FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Winston-Salem Request # 7326 Regional Office Facility Name: Norfolk and Western Railway Co. NPDES No.: NCO046931 Type of Waste: Industrial - 100% Facility Status: Existing c; Permit Status: Renewal =<,, Receiving Stream: UT Brushy Fork Stream Classification: C �ES ` = `' Subbasin: 030704 County: Forsyth Stream Characteristic: - = _ Regional Office: WSRO USGS # estimated Requestor: J. Shanklin Date: :- Date of Request: 1/26/'93 Drainage Area (mil) <1 Topo Quad: C18NW Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0 Average Flow (cfs): <1 30Q2 (cfs): 0.0 IWC (%): 100.0 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) Per Jerry Warren (facility contact person), the facility no longer does refueling; the discharge is in response to storm events. No product transfer is done and very minimal maintenance is done here. Norfolk & Western has no plans to apply for a stormwater permit under the group application (thoughtthat NPDES permit would suffice). TSB recommends renewal with existing limits and the addition of turbidity and TSS limits. After more information about railway terminals is received (from EPA for group permits), the limits may change at the next permit renewal. The facility should be encouraged to implement BMP's to reduce stormwater flows. Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: ?6e?vl Recommended by: i4an, akn .. Date: 3 u Reviewed by OInstream Assessment: Date: Regional Supervisor: Date: Permits & Engineering: Date: •3 RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: APR 2 8 1993 Type of Toxicity Test: Existing Limit: Recommended Limit: Monitoring Schedule: Flow pH (SU): Oil & Grease (mg/1): Recommended Limits Flow pH (SU): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Turbidity (NTiU): TOXICS/CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Acute Full range episodic first five events, then annually Mon. Avg. Daily Max. monitor 6-9 30 60 Monthly Average Daily Max. Mon. Freq. WQ or EL monitor 6-9 45 45 50 Total flow shall be measured continuously or calculated based on the amount of area draining to the outfall, the amount of built -upon area, and the total amount of rainfall. Total precipitation and duration of the event measured shall be a representative storm event. (See page three for special monitoring requirements.) L' T Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow New pretreatment information Failing toxicity test Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures new guidance for storm discharges, etc Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. •s _X_ No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. 3 MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Aftuagy of Existing_T, reatmet Has the facility destrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes I No If no, which parameters cannot be met? Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _N_ (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? N (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. Facility Name fid 44L u j W' 5,r9 W 7-4I r~ WA I (4• Permit # fjC 6 g 3) Pipe # ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (EPISODIC) The permittee shall conduct FIVE acute toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/013 entitled "The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24 hour static test, using effluent collected as a single grab sample. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. Sampling and subsequent testing will occur during the first five discrete discharge events after the effective date of this permit. After monitoring of the fast five toxicity tests, the permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the next calendar year. The annual test requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement. The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Rd. Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test. Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. 7Q 10 O cfs Perms itted Flow VV- My GD lWC /Q Basin & Sub -basin o307o4 (LApa4) Receiving Stream ui gau,;Ay Foarc- County _62R6yTM Recommended Date T ZZ )jiSNAatrE is If,.) ge-t-AT,od 71 STORM GVWT . EAM Fathead 24 Version 10191 cc: Permits and Engineering Technical Support Branch County Health Dept. Central Files WSRO Date October 6 1992 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS„ County Forsyth t. NPDES Permit No. 0046931; PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 'RE EKED 1. Facility and Address: Norfolk and Western Railway Company TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH 600 Gaynor Street ` Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106 2. Date of Investigation: September 8, 1992 3. Report Prepared by: James C. Watson, Environmental Engineer 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Mr. Scott Kroll, Manager Environmental Engineering (703) 981-4154 , 02_ Wf CkP,&Q -70't' 5. Directions to Site: From the junction of Glen Avenue and Akron Drive in Winston-Salem, travel southwest on Glen Avenue to Gaynor St. Make a left turn and continue to the Norfolk and Western locomotive fueling and terminal area. 6. Discharge Point(s) - List for all discharge points Latitude: 360 08' 04" Longitude: 800 14' 03" Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicated treatment plant site and discharge point on map. USGS Quad No. C18NW or USGS Quad Name Walkertown Quadrangle 7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): The railroad and switching and holding area covers approximately 5-10 acres, most covered with graveled railroad bed. The fuel and locomotive terminal is approximately 0.7 acres and the fueling apron is 0.48 plus acres. 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The area is essentially flat, however, the land parallel to the west side is higher and that on the east is lower than the entire yard. 9. 10. Location of nearest dwelling: No residential areas are within 500 feet of the oil/separation system. The surrounding area is industrial and commercial. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: U.T Brushy Fork Branch a. Classification: "C" b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Yadkin Pee -Dee 03 07 04 c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The are can best be described as industrial and commercial. There are no other known dischargers within the immediate area. PART II ^ DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. Type of wastewater: . % Domestic 100% Industrial a. Volume of Wastewater: 0.0017 MGD (Design Capacity) b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater: This system is used as an oil/water collection and oil/water separation system only. Daily amounts discharged cannot be specified, since the water is discharged on an intermittent basis. C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater: N/A d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A in development should be required approved not needed 2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in pounds per day: N/A a. Highest month in the last 12 months: lbs/day b. highest year in last 5 years: lbs/day 3. Description of industrial process (for industries only) and applicable CFR Part and Subpart: N/A 4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or existing): This existing system consists of two station oil/water separation systems with a common skimmed oil holding tank, consisting of five upright tanks with internal skimmers, weirs, and piped to collect the separated oil and discharge clean water. 5. Sludge handling and disposal scheme: There is no sludge generated from this system, only debris collected in the system over time. This will be disposed of within the bounds of the rules and regulations of DEM. 6. Treatment plant classification: (attach completed rating sheet) This system is an oil/water separator and is not classified. 7. SIC Code(s) 4013 Wastewater Code(s) Primary 60 Secondary Main Treatment Unit Code: !� 3 g, pd PART III -- OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants Funds (municipals only)? N/A 2. Special monitoring requests: N/A 3. Additional effluent limits requests: N/A 4. Other: N/A PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS I recommend the permit be reissued. Signa ure of report eparer Water Quality Regional Supervisor Da