NCG060276_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20181113

PERMIT NO.
DOC-TYPE
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
R� HISTORICAL FIDE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE ❑ 3
YYYYMMDD
7

GF
ROY COOPER
Go%'crnor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Seererary
WILLIAM E. (TOBY) VINSON, JR.
Interim Direcrar
Mr. Rob Cottle
Duplin Wine Cellars Inc.
PO Box 756
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Dear Mr. Cottle:
NORTH CAROUNA
Environmental Quality
November 13, 2018
RECEIVE®
NOV 15 2018
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Rescission of NPDES Stormwater Permit
Permit Number: NCG060276
Duplin County
On June 14, 2016 the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources received your
request to rescind NPDES Stormwater Permit Number NCG060276. Our Wilmington
Regional Office has reviewed information related to your request. It appears that there
are two current permits covering your facility. The regional office has indicated that
permit number NCG060323 should remain in place and NCG060276 can be rescinded. In
accordance with this situation Stormwater Permit Number NCG060276 is rescinded
effective immediately. Please continue to comply with permit NCG060323.
If you have questions about this matter, please contact the Asheville Regional Office at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Original Signed by Richard L, Riddle, Jr.
for William E. Toby Vinson, Jr., PE, CPESC, CPM
Interim Director
cc: Wilmington Regional Office - electronic
Central Files
ef -5f D- 1E
W�lw
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1612 Mail Service Center I Raleigh; North Carolina 27699-1612
919.707.9200

Bennett, Bradley
From: Bennett, Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:25 AM
To: Lambe, Brian
Subject: RE: Permit Rescission Requests
Hey Brian,
See comments below in red.
BB
From: Lambe, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 4:12 PM
To: Bennett, Bradley <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Permit Rescission Requests
So for the last one 210203, 1 think the property is sold to southern states concrete, who has a permit with us for
concrete. I'll see whats going on out there.
— I looked but didn't see any thing for an NCG14 for Southern States for this one? Maybe it's another
name? Should we go ahead with rescission of NCG210203? We will let you work with Southern States on any
permit needed under NCG14.
— More comments in email below for other permits.
Brian Lambe
Environmental Specialist
910-796-7313
State or North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension ' Wilmington, NC 28405
910 796 7215 T 1 910 350 2004 F I htU27HWrtal.ncdem- org/webA
From: Lambe, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2018 3:43 PM
To: Bennett, Bradley <bradley. ben [e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Permit Rescission Requests
NCG060276 is often misquoted as being 323. In my last report in 2016, 1 discussed with Rob Cottle to rescind the 323
permit. However, in 4/22/2009 Linda Willis has a comment in the Analytical monitoring section of her report noting
confusion of the permit numbers and sites. In 2010, Willis noted that no application has been submitted for the Yellow
Cut facility. All her reports were done under 276. In November of 2016, we issued ROS to 323 for outfalls on Yellow
Cut Road. I think 276 should be rescinded and go forward with 323.
— We will rescind NCG060276.
— NCG060323 is scheduled to renew and we will let this one move forward. Just curious, for this one in the 2016
inspection summary in BIMS it says there is no processing and indicates that a permit may not be needed?
NCGO80685 The Castle Street needs to be rescinded and a NOI submitted for their new facility. I spoke to the Megan
Matheny, Deputy Director, to explain this. I will be writing a report and letters.
— We can handle the rescission of NCG080685 and will let you work with them to get an NOI submitted for the
new location.

• . Division of Energy, Mineral & Land Resources
Land ualihSection/Stormwater Permitting Program
NC®E���N.�R National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NOIiTl1 GIiO1J- 1I�.FJM.I - a,
E�lIOMMCMT µp NQI➢1..L HMW0 ft=
RESCISSION REQUEST FORM
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year Month
Oa
Please fill out and return this form if you no longer need to maintain your NPDES stormwater permit.
1) Enter the permit number to which this request applies:
Individual Permit (or) Certificate of Coverage b 6 19 17
2) Owrler% Facility Information: Final correspondence, be mailed to the odrjress noted below
Owner/Facility Name
Facility Contact
Street Address
City o State &C ZIP Cade
County Dun E-mailAd�d�ress�
Telephone No. 14 9� — L/3// Fax: / �1
3) Reason for rescission request (This is required information. Attach separate sheet if necessary):
❑ Facility closed or is closing on . . All industrial activities have ceased such that no discharges of
stormwater are contaminated by exposure to industrial activities or materials.
6 . c 0".1
Y
❑ Facility sold to on IM . If the facility will continue operations under the new owner it
,]_.,/ may be more
�Q Other:
4) Certification:
to request an ownership'change to reissue to permit to the new owner.
t
I, as an authorized representative, hereby request rescission of coverage under the NPDES Stormwater Permit for the
subject facility. I am familiar with the information contained in this request and to the best of my knowledge and belief
such informatafks true_comnlete ancLeccurate.
Signa
Print or type name of person signing above
Please return this completed rescission request form to:
RECEIVED
JUN 212016
DENR-LAND QUALITY
19TOR11AWATER PERMITTING
DateL-1!
Title
NPDES Permit Coverage Rescission
Stormwater Permitting Program
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612�
tl
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1 12
L�
Phone: [phone] FAX: 919 807 &492 t4g;
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employ

North Carolina
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Mike Sprinkle
4600 South Highway 117
Teachey, INC 28464
Dear Mr. Sprinkle,
IVA
NC®ENR
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
February 9, 2011
Subject: Bunge North America Inc.
Certificate of Coverage NCG060326
Duplin County
A site inspection of the Bunge North America Inc. facility was conducted on November 18, 2010. This
inspection was conducted to determine whether the NPDES General Permit NCG060000 was required.
It was determined that the facility would require coverage under the General Permit. The Division
received a notice of intent from Bunge North America Incorporated and responded with the issuance of
a certificate of coverage NCG060326 on January 14, 2011. Enclosed with this correspondence is a
"Compliance Inspection Report". Please note the requirements to monitor your stormwater discharges
from the facility.
You should begin working on a written Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. It is not due until January
14, 2012. Please ensure in the meantime that good housekeeping practices and best management
practices are being exercised at the facility to prevent the pollution of stormwater. Please contact this
office immediately if you have any questions concerning this correspondence or the enclosed
inspection report.
Thank you for promptly applying for the NPDES General Permit (NCG060000). You may find the
permit text and monitoring report templates at the Division of Water Quality's website:
http://portal.ncdenr.or_q/web/wg/ws/su/npdessw. Technical assistance in complying with your permit is
available through the Wilmington Regional Office. You may contact me at the letterhead contact
information, by phone at 910-796-7343, or via email at Iinda.willisCaD-ncdenr.gov.
CC: DWQ WirO Files (NCG060 Duplin)
DWQ CO Files
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
,Phone. [phone] / FAX: [phone]
tnfernef: www,ncwatQrquality.oro
Sincerely,
Linda Willis
Environmental Engineer
Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
NorthCarohna
Naturally
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
5017. Recycled/ 10°. Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-6748

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060326 Effective: 01/14/11 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Bunge North America Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Bunge North America, Inc.
County: Duplin
4600 S Hwy 117
Region: Wilmington
Teachey NC 28464
Contact Person: Mike Sprinkle Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 11/18/2010 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis CgL�- LkA , . 21 B I z.olI Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine - Inspection Type: Technical Assistance
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
l`
Page: 1

Permit: NCG060326 Owner - Facility: Bunge North America Inc
Inspection Date: 1111812010 Inspection Type: Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCGO60326 Owner - Facility: Bunge North America Inc
Inspection Date: 11118/2010 Inspection Type: Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
❑
■
D.
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
®
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
❑
®
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0
❑
■
n
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
■
❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
n
F1
■
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: The written Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is due within one year of
receipt of coverage under the NPDES Permit. The date the SWP3 will be due is January
14, 2012.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
DOWD
Comment: The first semi annual qualitative monitoring period falls between the
January 1 - June 30, 2011 period.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
®❑
Q
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
■
❑
no
❑
Comment: The semi annual analytical monitoring period begins between January 1
and June 30, 2011.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑
Q
®
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑
®
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCGO60326 Owner - Facility: Gunge North America Inc
Inspection Hate: 11/18/2010 Inspection Type: Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: The site visit was conducted to provide technical assistance concerning the
need for the NPDES permit NCG060000. A review of the site supported the need for
the permit. There are two stormwater collection ponds that have outfalls to surface
waters. The site has a rail car offloading area with conveyor system to silos for truck
loading. The site was very clean at the time of the inspection.
D D 0 D
Page: 4

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
Mr. Mike Sprinkle, Facility Manager
Bunge North America, Inc.
4600 South 1-lwy 117
Teachey, North Carolina 28464
Dear Mr. Sprinkle:
January 14, 2011
Natural Resources
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: General Permit No. NCG060000
Bunge North America, Inc
COC No. NCG060326
Duplin County
In accordance with your application for a discharge pennit received on December 10, 2010, we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage (COC) to discharge under the subject state — NPDES
general permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of`North Carolina General Statute i 43-215
and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection Agency
dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in tills permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual pen -nit by submitting an individual perrmit
application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Water Qualitv, The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the
certificate of coverage. This pen -nit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act or any other federal or local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Bill Diuguid at telephone number
[phone].
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED 81
. Coleen 1-1:-Su ri�'r's
cc: Wilmington Regional Office FE& 0, 2 2011
Central Files BY;
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Attachments
16t7 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, Muth Corofha 27604 One
Phone: [phone]^01 rAX: 91;-807-64921 Cc:slorner Service: 1-877-623-6748 Nor1 }1 C at O l i n a
Internet: v:ww,ncwaterrauai�,y,org -j� �1� l��t�� //,
An Equal C)opvtunity'; A E,,:na,b:e A;:ion Employer f// �/ ` l ";;J!!/

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PER1%`H'r NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060326
STORMWA"I'ER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215. I, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Conunission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Bunge North America, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Bunge North America, Inc.
4600 South Hwy 117
Teachey
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as Mill Branch and Fussell Mill Branch, Class C: Sw water bodies, Cape Fear River
Basin, in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions '-,Cl forth in Parts 1.
11, 111, IV, V and VI of General Permit No. NCG060000, as attached.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective January 14, 2011.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Pennit.
Signed this day January 14, 2011.
ORIGINAL. SIGNED FIN
KEN PICKLE
Coleen 11. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of th.e Environmental Management Commission

r - �
onn
w
-�.�'
I�
'• I�
.�
,��!', �
!
is
--
_:I
SITE ) ,'
fi 'i
I r - Wpllf
1 �I C(.m
V! �= T ~_ �= 1: i t1 7 1 r 1�a�tr J
i
Nl
t) ! ; �N I _ if. ` ice. �i •'' i5 i•- )rc
I
r�-
Lat/Lon 34.7873' N, 78.0117° W L `�'1 r
Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map 1984 f - -4'
Target Quadrant Rose Hill I `r �-
Approximate Property Boundary
SITE LOCATION MAP Figure
ERM, NC PC WEST BEAR FORD TRACT, SOUTH HIGHWAY 117
R�� ISLAND CREEK TOWNSHIP, NORTH CAROLINA

-�(Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage
-� For s A
�' �Of��FICIAL U� .E
Postage
m
Certified Fee Z 0 Q 7
l� Return Receipt Fee
M (Endorsement Required) • '� C Hare .ti
Ol
Resirlcsad Delivery Fee
C3 (Endorsement Required)
ri Total Postage &Fees
r =1
, d SSyE ..4
ireO Box �:L70 �.1._�------------- -- --
or PO Baz

le Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item a If Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
�v
,2S
A.
X %L❑ Agent
Addressee
B. fved by {Printed Name} I Q. Dgte of pelivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1?f U Ye:
If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No
ervice Type
rtMed Mall ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number - -
(]'ransfer from service label, 7008 1140 0002 3401 3666
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-154o

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
• Sender: Please print your name, address; and ZIP+4tiin-tlii's box'
NC Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
1ii11i1�..FH, J!

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 15, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL #7008 1140 0002 3401 3666
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
David Fussell
Duplin Winery
P.O. Box 756
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
NOV-201 O-D V-0351
Duplin Winery
Making an Outlet
Rose Hill
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Fussell:
On September 15, 2010, Division of Water Quality (DWQ) representative, Linda Willis and 1, conducted a
surprise inspection at the Duplin Winery, located at 310 Yellow Cut Road, Rose Hill, Duplin County. This
inspection was in response to a citizen complaint that alleged that wastewater was being disposed illegally
at the winery. During the inspection we observed that there was an uncapped pipe with an outfall into a
ditch that is located several hundred feet east of the pretreatment basin. This ditch is part of an
interconnected network of ditches that eventually discharge into an offsite wetland north of the winery.
This wetland is considered waters of the State.
During this same investigation, Ms. Willis discovered the presence of what appeared to be wastewater in
the ditch north and west of the winery. Consequently, you and Mr. Cottle were asked to measure the
physical parameters of what appeared to be wastewater at this location, and to collect samples for BOD-5
day, chemical oxygen demand, and nutrients. The next day, September 16, 2010, Ms. Willis returned to the
site and collected samples for the same parameters at this location, and sent them to our Central Lab for
analyses. Ms. Willis also measured the physical parameters of what appeared to be wastewater, and the
dissolved oxygen measured 0.6 milligrams per liter, which confirmed that whatever was in the ditch was
septic.
Furthermore, Ms. Willis walked over the ditch network on the winery and Carolina Byproducts, and
observed that all the ditches were dry, except at this location. The rainfall records sukgest that the last
rainfall at the winery occurred on August 19, 2010.
You were also asked to excavate the buried pipe. You hired a contractor to excavate it on September 20,
2010, and Ms. Willis and Mr. Chris Baker from DWQ were there to observe this excavation. After
excavated, it was determined that this pipe had been cut about fifteen feet east of the pump house.
N. C. Division of Water QualiS
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28411
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Customer 5ervice.1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Af irmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
AWlld ally

Page 2 of 2
Duplin Winery
Rose Hill
Duplin County
In reviewing photographs of the pretreatment basin, it was observed that the freeboard on September 16,
2010, was below the intake of the pump, which requires an explanation, as this suggests that wastewater
was removed from the pretreatment basin by other means.
The most significant finding, however, is that the samples that you collected on September 15, 2010 and
the samples that Ms. Willis collected on September 16, 2010, confirm the presence of treated wastewater in
the ditch in question. Attached are the laboratory results from the samples taken on September 16, 2010 by
Ms. Willis.
The results of the samples collected from the ditch by the Division on September 16, 2010, indicate the
contents of the ditch are the same as the characteristics of the wastewater in the treatment lagoon. Making
an outlet to surface waters of the State is in violation of the North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1(a)(1): No person shall make an outlet to waters of the State unless that person has received a permit
from the Commission and has complied with all conditions set forth in the permit.
You are directed to respond to this letter in writing within 15 calendar days.of receipt of this Notice.
Your response should include the following:
1. Give a detailed explanation of how wastewater was introduced to the ditch;
2. Give a detailed explanation ofany steps taken to mitigate the presence of wastewater in the ditch;
3. Give a detailed explanation for the underground piping from the ditch to the effluent pump house;
4. Explain why the freeboard is below the pump intake, as shown on the photograph taken on July
22, 2010;
5. Give a detailed explanation of how you will ensure no further discharges of wastewater will occur
from your facility.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. This Office is considering sending a recommendation for
enforcement to the Director of the Division of Water Quality regarding these issues and any
future/continued violations that may be encountered. Your above -mentioned response to this
correspondence will be considered in this process. This office requires that the violations, as detailed
above, be abated immediately. These violations and any future violations are subject to a civil
penalty assessment of up to $25,000.00 per day for each violation. Should you have any questions
regarding these matters, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Wilmington Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: WiRO File (L. Willis) wlatt
DWQ CO NPDES Permitting Unit (Jeff Poupart) watt
DWQ Central Files w/att
DWQ WiRO APS (Charles Stehman) w/att

Counrr -'
DUPLIN
Sample 10:
AB63595
trivet Basin
CFF
A r X
PO Number O Rp
10IN7775
Report To
WIROSP
O� G Date Received:
0911712010
�_ Time Received:
09:25
Collectcr.
L WILLIS
Labworks Lcgin)D
HPARKER
Region:
WIRO
Report Generated:
9130110
Sample Matrix:
St.1RFACEWATER
Date Reported:
0913012010
Loc..Type:
Emergency Yes/No VisitlD
COC Yes/No � I
Loc. Descr.: CABIN BRANCH (a) DVPLIN WINERY (f
Location ID: WIRD5PNLC Collect Date: 09116/2010 Collect Time: 12:55 Sample Depth
Result/
Method
Analysis
CAS #
Anafyte Name
l'©L
Qualifier
Units
Reference
Date
Validated by
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
1.5
'C
9117r10
SMATHIS
MIC
BOD, 5-Day in liquid
2
29
mg(L
APHA5210B
9117110
MOVERNIAN
WET
Chemical Oxygen Demand in liquid
20
110
mg1L
Hach 8000
9/24/10
MOVERMAN
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.06
mg1L as N
Lac10-107-06-1-J
9122110
CGREEN
Total Kieldahl N as N In liquid
0.2
4.5
mg/L as N
Lachati07-06-2-H
9128110
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0,02
0.02 U
mg1L as N
Lac10-107-04-1-c -
9/2211a
CGREEN
Phosphorus_total as P in liquid
0.02
1.2
mg1L as P
Lact0-115-01-1EP
9/22/10
CGREEN
ti
L.6t / / :-- .
coy q1j :
Laboratory Section?> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 1919) 733-3908
ror a imaued desuipl'on of the gsrakrarr wdes refer lu '.fddi;kl!...: 7. ?:2nA .,.y1. t-i '1 ir•I,;,;;I,hi_, _'5 aQil.10 !rr,"-i dr __nt 1.!,_z'.iIl_.f,:!...' v- ..>L �j-L,.(/,! ,-ha,551+i';�
Page i of 1

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LAB FORM Lab Number: 5
SAMPLE TYPE
Date Received: 1/4)
r
couN,,,ry
PRIORITY
Time Received :.
RIVER BASIN :
AMBIENT QA
STREAM EFFLUENT
Received By ;
REPORT TO. WIRO
� COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF
CUSTODY
� LAKE ", � INFLUENT
SHIPPED -BY : Courier
EMERGENCY C SPECIAL STUDY
BCOMPLAINT
ESTUARY
Data Released:
COI,i.ECTOR{S} : L, (tJ; ( ; S
Visit ID�
r D
Date Reported
Estimated ROD Range-.
Station Location: C(LaI �rj ,� tt � r. w
Seed: Chlorinated:
Remarks:
station ih+
Date Regin ylmm/dd)
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Time Begin
Time End
Valur Type -A, A, Composite-T, S, 13
ROD 310
mglL
Chloride 940
mg/I-.
NH3 as N 6l0
mg/L
Li- Lithium 1 132 ug/L
COD High 340
mg/L
Chl a: 70953
µg/L
>C
TKN as N 625
mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 9: mg1L
7(
COD Low 335
mg/I.
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
mg/L
Mn- Manganese IC µg/1,
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616
41100 mis
P: Total as P 665•
mg/L
Na- Sodium 929 mgll.
Coliform: MF Total 31504
4/100 MIS
Color: True 80
c.n.
1104 as P 70507
mg/L
As- Arsenic.Tntal I pg/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615
p/100 mis
Color. (pH) 83
c.u.
P: Dissolved as 1' 666
mg/L
Se- Selenium 1 147 pgl[-
Colifomv Fecal Strep 31673
#/100 mis
Color, pf1 7.6 82
c.u.
K- Potassium
mg/L
IIg- Mercury 7190( pWL
Residue: Total 500
mg1L
Cyanide 720
mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027
µg/L,
Ba- Barium µglL
Volatile 505
mg/L
Fluoride 951
mg/L
Cr- Chromium:Total 1034
µg/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Fixed 510
mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880
mglL
Cu- Copper 1042
pg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Residue: Suspended 530
mg/L
Grease and Oils 556
mg/L
Ni- Nickel.1067
µgfL
Organonitrogen Pcsticiedes
Volatile 535
mg/L
Hardness Total 900
mg/L
Pb- Lead 1051
µgfL
Acid Herbicides
Fixed 540
mg/L,
Specific Cond. 95
µmhos/cm2
Zn- Zinc 1092
µg/L
pH 403
units
MBAS 38260
mg/L
V- Vanadium
pg/L
Base/Neutral&Acid Extractable Organics
Acidity to pH 4.5 436
mg/L
Phenols 32730
µg/L
Ag- Silver 1077
µg/L
TPH Diesel Range
Acidity to pH 8.3 435
moll.
Sulfate 945
mg/L
Al- Aluminum 1105
pg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415
mg/L
Sulfide 745
mg/L
Bc- Beryliium 1012
µg/L
Purgeahle Organics (VOA bottle req'd)
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410
mg/L
Bornn:'fotal 1022
pg1L
Ca -Calcium 916'
mg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
TOC 680
mg/L
Tannin & Lignin 32240
µg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037
µg/L
TKUBTL'•X Gasoline Range
Turbidity 82079
NTU
Hexavalent Chromium 1032
pg/L
Fe- Iron 1045
µg/L
Phytoplankton
Coliform Total Tube 31508
4/100 mis
COMMENTS :
LAB USE ONLY
Temperature
on arrival (°C}: j 'j
Sample Point %(2) Conductance (94)
Water'remp-C (10)
D.Q. (300) pH (400)
8.3 Alkalinity (822 4.5 Alkalinity (431) 4.5 Acidity (82243)
8.3 Acidity (82242)
Secchi depth m Salinity ppt (480)
Precipit-Wday (45)
Cloud Cover % (32) Wind Dir-Deg
(36 Strm Flow Sev (13 Turbidity Severity (13 Wind Velocity mp
Mcan Stan Depth.l} (64)

r1rC DM Laboraton Section Wesults
County:
DUPUN
Sample ID:
AB46506
River Basin
CPF
,Y'40A/Eic�
Q
PO Number#
9W5787
RepartTo
WIROSP
O�
Date Received;
07109/2009
=_
Time Received:
08:15
Collector;
K GLA71ER
K
Labworks LoginiD
SMATHIS
Region:
WIRO
Date Reported:
816109
Sample Matrix:
SURFACEWATER
Loc. Type:
RIVERISTREAM
Report Generated:
08106/2009
Emergency YeslNo
COC Yes/No
YES
VisitlD
Loc, Descr.: WINERY POUND AT EFFLUENT
999�w
I
Location ID:
WIROSPNLC
Collect Date: 07108/2009 Collect Time:: 12:10
Sample Depth
AUG 1 7 2009
r
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www,dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
B1-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; EsUmated
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
83- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
B4-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated
65-Too many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC)
J2- Reported value failed to meet OC criteria for either precision or accuracy; Estimated
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determinabon; Estimated
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated
Ni-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
LAB
NI -Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
NE -No established PQL
P-Elevated POL due to matrix interference and/of sample dilution
Q1-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
02- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
Xi- Sample not analyzed for this compound
Laboratory Section 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] Page 1 of 2

NC DWQQ Laboratory Section results Sample ID AB46506
LDCatiO ID: MROSPNLC Collect Date: 0710812009
Loc. Descr.: NNERY POUND AT EFFLUENT Cotiect Time:: 12:10
visit ID
CAS 9 Anatyte Name
PQL Result Qualifier
Units
Anafyst/Date
Approved By (Date
Sample temperature at receipt by tab
2.1
'C
❑SAUNDERS
SMATHIS
Method Reference
719109
719109
MIC
BOD, S-Day In liquid
2 19 G5
mg1L
ADESAI
MOVERMAN
Method Reference APHA52105
7110109
7116109
WET
Chemical Oxygen Demand in liquid
20 92
mg1L
MIBRAHIMI
MOV> RMAN
Method Reference Hach 8000
914109
V5109
Residue —Suspended In Muld
6.2 78
mg1L
AWILLIAMS
MOVERMAN
Method Reference APHA2540D-20th
7110109
7117/09
Sulfide In liquid 0.1 0.1 U mg1L JSTALEY CGREEN
Method Reference APHA4500-82-❑ 711=9 7113MS
NUT
Total Igeldahl N as N In liquid 0.2 5.4 mg1L as N MOVERMAN CGREEN
Method Reference Lachat107-06.2-H 7115109 7122109
NO2+NO3 as N In liquid 0.02 0.02 U mg1L as N MOVERMAN CGREEN
Method Reference L3cto-107-04-1-c 7/10*9 7122MG
Phosphorus —total as P in liquid 0.02 1.0 mg11- as P GBELK CGREEN
Method Reference LaclO-115-01.1EF 7/14109 7122109
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

Qoo'o�
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
❑ SAMPLE TYPE.
COUNTY Dupl'in
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN; Ca�Fear
ElAMBIENT QA
STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO : Wilmington
Regional Office COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
rNFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY VISIT ID
ESTUARY
COLLECTORS): Kipp Glazier
❑
LabAuut4
�7 - s �,
Date Received : �1 `Ij Lf�j[�}
Time Received: y�
Received By
Estimated ROD Range: Station Location: Winery Pound at effiucnt
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station ff/Loeation Cade Date Begin (yylmmldd) Date End (yylmm/dd) Time Begin Time End I Depth - DM, DR, DBM Value Type - A, H, L Composite-T, S, B Sample Type
09l07/OH 09/07108 1 12:10 PM 12:10 PM grab
XX
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 m
XX
COD Lou 335 mg/L
COliform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
Colif:xm: MF Total 31504 /100m1
Coliform: tube Fecal31615 /loom]
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
Residue: Total 500 mg/l.
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mglL
XX
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
H 403 units
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mgfL
Aridity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Alkafinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Conform Total Tube /100 ml
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mgfL
Chlorophyll a EPA 445.D modified option ugjL
Color. True 80 C.U.
Color. (pH ) 83 pH- C.U.
Color. pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mgfL
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 m
Grease and Oils 556 mgfL
Hudness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/cm
MBAS 38260 mg/1-
Phcnols 32730 u
Sulfate 945 mg/L
XX
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin u
Hexavalem Chromium ugfL
Bicarbonate m
Carbonate mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids m
NH3 as 610 mg/L
XX
TKN an N 625 mg/L
XX
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
XX
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mFJL
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgfL
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/4
Cr-Chrummm:Total 1034 u
Cu. Copper 1042 uFJL—
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn- Zinc 1092 u
V-Vanadium ug/L
A - Silver 1077 ug/L
Al. Aluminum 1105 ugfL
Be- Beryllium 1012 u
Ca. Calcium 916 mgfl-
Co- Cobalt 1037 ugfL
Fe- Iron 1045 _uWL
MO -Molybdenum ug/L
Sb-Antimony u
Sn-Tin ug/L
Tl-Thallium u
Ti-Titanium v
Hg-1631 ngfL
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg/L
Arsenic:Tota11002 uWL
Se -Selenium 1147 uglL
Hg- Mercury 71900 ug/L
Ba-Barium ugfL.
Orgaooehlorine Pesticides
Or anophosphorus Pesticides
Organonitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/Neutral&Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle req'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Phytoplankion
Tesnpenture on amval (°C):

Report to:
_Wilmington
NC DENR/DWQ Laboratory
Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number: AB46506
tation Location: Winery ditch at
outfall
Sample Type: effluent
Date collected: 7/8/09 12:10 pm
Affected Parameter(s): BOO
Sample ID:
County: Duplin
Region: Cape Fear
Priority: compliance /COC Collector: Kipp Glazier
Date received: 7/9/09 8:15 am Date analyzed: 7/10/09 1 1:30
Analytical Area (check one):
❑wai ❑ME TALS
❑NUF ®MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑Samples
❑hnproper container used
❑VOA vials with headspace.
❑Sulfide samples with headspace
❑Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
❑Mislabcicd as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑Holding time expired
El Prior to receipt in lab
❑After receipt in lab
❑Insufficient quantity Ebr analysis
❑Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑Sample not chemically preserved properly
00-1 out of range (record pl-1):
❑ Improper chemical
❑Residual chlorine present in sample
❑Color interference
❑Flcavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑Saniplc bottle broken in Iab - no reportable. results
❑Other (specify):
❑VOA ❑SVGA
❑ l' ST
)nQuality Control
❑lnstrument failure — no reportable results
❑Analyst error — no reportable results
❑Surrogates
❑None added
❑Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑Spike recovery
❑None added
❑Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑failed to meet criteria for precision
❑Internal standards
❑131ank contamination
®QC data reported outside of controls (e.g., QCS, LCS)
❑Incorrect procedure used
❑SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑Invalid instrument calibration
❑i levatcd detection limits due to:
❑Insullicientsample volume
Comments: The Gloucose/ Glutamic acid standard exceeded the range og 198 +/- 30.5 ing/L. The results obtained on GGA duplicates
were It 1.5 mg/L and 1 12 nig/L respectively.
Corrective Action:
❑Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
OAccepjed and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑ 1ple(s) on hold until:
Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:G5
❑Other (explain):
Notification Required? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Person Contacted: Date: n
Form completed by:
Lead Chemist Review (initial):
91BIOCHEM r—O
❑METALS
Branch Head Review (initial
NQC Reviewtx;��
SA/0 9
❑PEST
❑ VOA
Date: 7/ 15/2009
❑SVOA
Logged into database by (initial): � 2 - ? o f
QMFvrmsSLabaratoryLSAR I0123701 dbs

do n
County:
DUPLIN
River Basin
CPF
Report To
WIROSP
Collector.
K GLAZIER
Region;
WIRO
Sample Matrix:
SURFACEWATER
Loc. Type:
RIVERISTREAM
Emergency YeslNo
COC Yes/No
YES
II Location ID: WIROSPNLC
AUG 1 7 2009
W A rcA,0
(DLI ) r
VisitlD
Loc. Descr,: WINERY DITCH AT OUTFALL
Collect Date: 07108/2009 Collect Time:: 12:30
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Sample ID:
PO Number #
Date Received:
Time Received:
Labworks LoginlD
Date Reported:
Report Generated
—1 - a
Sample Depth
RED
R F F"'�
AB48505
9 W 5786
0710912009
08:15
SMATHIS
W6109
08106l2009
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www.dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
B1-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
N E-No. established PQL
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
P-Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
83- Countable membranes with more than 60 or 80 colonies; Estimated
64•Filter5 have counts of bosh >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated 41-Holding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
02- Holding time exceeded following receipt by lab
BS-Top many Colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC)
J2- Reported value failed to meet OC criteria for either precision or accuracy; EsSmatod PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument Sensitivity
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated U- Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
J5-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated X1- Sample not analyzed for this compound
NI -The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
LAB
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone] Page t of 2

NC (DWQQ La6oratory Section Xesufts Sample IA AB46505
Location ID: WIROSPNLC Collect Date: 07108/2009
Loc, Descr.: WINERY DITCH AT OUTFALL Collect Time:: 12:30
Visit ID
CAS p Analyte Name
PQL
Result
Qualifier
Units
Analyst/Date
Approved By /Date
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
2.1
°C
DSAUNDERS
SMATHIS
Method Reference
719109
719I09
mic
BOO, $-Day in liquid
2
71
G5
mgR
ADESAI
MOVERMAN
Method Reference APHAS210B
7110109
71151)9
WET
Chemical Oxygen Demand in liquid
20
170
J3
Mg1L
MIBRAHIMI
MOVERMAN
Method Reference Hach 8000
814r09
8/5109
Residue Suspended In liquid
6.2
151
mg/L
AWILLIAMS
MOVERMAN
Method Reference APHA2540D-20th
7110109
7117MS
Sulfide In liquid
0.1
0.1
U
mg1L
JSTALEY
CGREEN
Method Reference APHA4500-52-❑
7/10/09
7113M
NUT
Total 1goldahl N as N In liquid
0.2
12
mg1L as N
MOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lachat107-06-2-H
711909
7r22M9
NO2+NO3 as N in squid
0.02
0.02
U
mg/L as N
MOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10�107-04-1.c
7110109
7r22109
Phosphorus_total as P in liquid
0.02
3.9
mgA- as P
GBELK
CGREEN
Method Reference Lac10-115-01-1EF
7114109
7122109
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] Page 2 of 2

COUNTY
Duplin
RIVER BASIN:
Cape. Fear _.
REPORT TO
Wilmington Regional Office
Other c
COLLECTOR(S) :
Kipp Glazier
Coco,
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report I Water Quality
PRIORITY
AMBIENT QA
COMPLIANCE WCHArNOFCUSTODY
EMERGENCY VISIT ID
Qwlsqq6:2
❑ SAMPLE TYPE
STREAM
EFFLUENT
LAKE
INFLUENT
ESTUARY'
51>-111
Number
Date Received
Time Received
Received By !'��
Data Released :
Date Reported:
Estimated BOD Range: S4tion Location: Winery Ditch at Outfall
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station q/Localion Cade Date Begin (yy/mrnldd) Date End (y)ymm/dd) Time Begin Time $nd Depth -DM, DB, DBhi Value Type- A, H, L Composite-T, 5, B 1Sampk Type
09107A 09107/O8 1230 PM 17.30 PM grab
XX
BOD3t0 mg/L
COD High 340 m
XX
COD Law 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Feoal31616 /]OOmI
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /loom]
Coliform: cube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /100m1
Residue: Total 500 m
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 m
XX
Residue: Suspended 530 mgfL
Votadlc 535 m
Fixed 540 m
H 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 m
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mwL
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mgiL
Alkalinity to pIl 4.5 410 MWL
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube 1100 ml
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 mg/L
Chlorophyll a EPA 445.0 modified option ugfi,
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (p11 ) 83 H- c.u.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m
Fluoride 951 m
Formaldehyde 7 1 880 m
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/L
Sgecific Cond. 95 umhos/cm
MBAS 38260 mg/L
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg1l.
XX
Sulfide 745 mg[L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/L
Hexavalent Chromium u
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbonate m
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L
NH3asN6]0 myL
XX
TKN an N 625 mFfL
XX
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
XX
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
P: Dissolved as P 666 m
K-Potassium m
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ugR-
Cr-Chrnmium:Tolal 103.4 uy)L
Cu- Copper 1042 UWL
Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug(L
Zn- Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-vanadium ug/L
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/L
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ug/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co- Cobalt ] 037 ugq,
Fe- Iron 1045 u
Mo-Molybdenum uglL
Sb-Antimonyug/L
Sn-Tin ug/L
Thallium uglL
Ti-Titanium ug/L
Hg-1631 ¢

Report to:
Wilmington
NC D>FNR/DWQ Laboratory
Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number:
Cation Location
A B46505
Winery ditch at
outfall _
Sample Type: stream Priority: compliance /COC Collector: Kipp Glazier
Date collected: 7/8/09 12:30 pm Date received: 7/9/09 8:15 am Date analyzed: 7/10/09 11:30
Affected Parameter(s): BOD
Sample ID:
County: Duplin
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH [:]METALS
❑NU'l' NMICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑Samples
❑Improper container used
❑VOA vials with hcadspace
❑Sulfide samples with headspace
❑Samples not received, but listed on fieldshcel
❑Samples received, but not listed on fic[dshcet
❑Mislabcicd as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑I folding time expired
❑Prior to receipt in lab
❑After receipt in lab
❑Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑Sample not clicinically preserved properly
❑pi -I out of range (record pl f):
❑ lniproper chemical
❑Residual chlorine present in sarnp[c
❑Color interference
❑Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
❑Other (specify):
Region: Cape Fear
❑VOA ❑SVOA
❑PEST
Quality Control
❑ Instrument failure — no reportable results
❑Analyst error — no reportable results
❑Surrogates
[:]None added
❑Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑Spike recovery
❑None added
❑Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑Internal standards
❑Blank contamination
NQC data reported outside orcontrols (e.g., QCS, LCS)
❑Incorrect procedure used
❑SOI' intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑Invalid instrument calibration
[:]Elevated detection limits due to:
❑Insufficient sample volume
Comments: The Gloucose/ Glutamic acid standard exceeded the range og 198 +/- 30.5 mg/L. The results obtained on GGA duplicates
were 1 1 1.5 mg/L and l 12 mg/L respectively.
Corrective Action:
❑Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
❑Ac led and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
mple(s) on hold until:
Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:G5
❑Other (explain):
Notification Required? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Person Contacted: Date: A n
Form completed by:
Lead Chemist Review (initial):
RIBIOCHEM t^p
❑METALS
Branch Flead Review (initi;aAA
VQC Review (inid fl):
❑PEST
❑ VOA
Date: 7/ l 5/2009
❑SVGA
Logged into database by (initial): 411" 1../ ?. I
QA\FormsSLaboralary4SAR 10/23/01 dbs

DIVISION OF WATFR QUALITY
Chemistry Laboratory Report / Water Quality
❑ SAMPLETYPE
COUNTY Duplin
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN : Ca a Frar
AMBIENT QA
xx STREAM
EFFLUENT
REPORT TO Wilmington
Regional Office X�'. COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other :
EMERGENCY VISITIU
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : Kipp Glazier_
❑
Lab Number :
Date Received:
Time Received
Received By
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location: Winery Ditch at outfall
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station R/Location Code Date Begin Oytmmldd) Date End Cildmm/dd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DM, DR, DRM Value Type - A, H, 1, Composile-T, S, R I Sample Type
09/07/08 09/07/08 12:30 PM �12:30PM grab
XX
SOU 310 mglL
COD High 340 mg/L
XX
COD Low 335 mg/L
Colifor m: MF Feca131616 1100ml
Coliformc MF Total 31504 1100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
Colifomt: Fecal Strcp 31673 /loom]
Residue: Total 500 mg/L,
Volatile $05 51L
Fixed 510 mg/1-
XX
1 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 ntg/I,
Fixed 540 mg/L
pH 403 units
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pH 83 435 mg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mglL
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 me,
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube /100 ml
COMMENTS:
Chloride 940 m
Chloruph it a EPA 445.0 modified option . ug/L
Color: True 80 cu.
Color: (pll) 83 pl I— c.u.
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 mg/L.
Fluoride 95l mg/L
Formaldehyde 71890 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness Total900 mg/I,
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/em
MBAS 39260 m+
Phenols 32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg1L
XX
Sulfide 745 m
Boron
Tannin & Li nin ug/L
}lexavalent Chromium ug/L
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbonate mgR.
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L,
NII3 as N 610 mg/I,
XX
TKN an N 625 mg/L
XX
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
XX
P: Total as P 665 m
PO4 as P 70507 m+
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr•Chromium:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Copper 1042 ug/L
Ni•Nickel1067 ug/L
Pb- Lead 1051 ug/L
Zn• Zinc 1092 ug/L
V-Vanadium uWL
Ag- Silver W7 uglL
AI- Aluminum 1105 ug/i,
Be- Beryllium 1012 u dL
Ca- Calcium 916 mg7L
Co- Cobalt 1037 ug/L
Fe -Iron 1045 ugiL
MG -Molybdenum ug/L
Sb-Antinron ug11.
Sn-Tin u
TLThallium ug/L
Ti-Titanium ug/L
Hg-1631 n
Li -Lithium 1132 ug1L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg1L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg/L
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/L
Se- Selenium 1147 ug/L.
Hg• Mercury 71900 ug/L
Ra-Barium ug/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Organonitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/Neutra]&Acld Extractable Organics
TPII Diesel Range
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle req'd)
TPII Gasoline Range
TPH1BTEiX Gasoline Range
Phytoplankton
Temperature on arrival ( vC):

DIVISIOM1 OF WATER QUALITY
ChemistryLahoratory Report / Water Quality
SAMPLE TYPE
COUNTY Duplin
PRIORITY
RIVER BASIN: Cape Fear
AMBIENT QA
STREAM
xx EFFLUENT
REPORT TO Wilmington
Regional Office .1�'. COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
❑ LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
EMERGENCY VISITID
❑ ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : Kipp Glazier
Lab Number
Date Received
Time Received
Received By
Estimated ROD Range. Station Location: Winery Pound at effluent
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks:
Station #!Loca(ion Code Date Begin (yylmmldd) Date End [vylmmfdd) Time Begin Time End Depth - DN1, DO, DBd1 Value Type - A, H, 1. ComposilFT, S, R
09707f08 09107lOS 12:10 PM 12:10 PM �,SzmpleTyPC
rab
XX
BOD3L0 mglL
COI) l ligh 340 ro li.
XX
COD Low 335 mgll.
Caliform: MF Fecal31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Total 31504 1100ml
Coliform: tube Fecal 31615 /loom[
Coliform: Fecal Steep 31673 /IOOmI
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
V oWile 505 mg/L
Fixed 510 mg/L
XX
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Fixed 540 mg/L
If 403 units
Acidity to pit 4.5 436 mg/L
Acidity to pfi 8.3 435 mwL
Alkalinity to pi1 8.3 415 mglL
Alkalinity to pli 4.5 410 mglL
TOC 680 mg/L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube /I00 ml
COb1Isl FATS :
Chloride 940 mgl1.
Chlorophyll a EPA 445.0 modified option ug/L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color: (pH ) 83 H- C.U.
Color: pH 7.6 82 c.u.
Cyanide 720 mg/l.
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Ilardness Total900 mg/L
Specific Cand. 95 umhoslem
MBAS 38260 MO.
Phenols32730 ug/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
XX
Sulfide 745 mg/L.
Boron
Tannin & Lignin ug/l.
Eicxavalenl Chromium ug/L,
Bicarbonate mg/L
Carbonate mg![.
Total Dissolved Solids mg/I.
N113 as N 610 mg/L
XX
_TKN an N 625 mg/L
XX
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
XX
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l,
P: Dissolved as P 666 nt •!L
K-Potassium mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 ug/L
Cr-Chromlum:Total 1034 ug/L
Cu- Capper 1042 u
Ni-Nickel 1067 - u W L
Pb- Lead 1051 ugfL
Zn- Zinc 1092 u•
V-Vanadium ug/L.
AS- Silver 1077 ug/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 ug1L
Be- Beryllium 1012 ugfL
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
Co. Cobalt 1037 uWL
Fe- Iron 1045 ug/L
Mo-Molybdenum uglL
Sb-Antimony uWL
Sn-Tin ugfL
T1-Thallium uglL
Ti-Titanium uglL
Ei •-1631 ng/L
Li -Lithium 1132 ug/L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/L
Na- Sodium 929 m9fL
Arsenic:Tot211002 uglL
Se- Selenium 1147 ug/L
Hp- Mercury 71900 ug/L.
Ba-Barium ug/L
Organorhlorine Pesticides
Organopbosphonts Pesticides
Organonitrogen Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/Neutr-al&.Acid Extractable Organics
TPH Diesel Range
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle re 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPHBTEX Gasoline Range
Phyto lankton
Temperature on arrival ( °C)u

Report to: V,1Je1-,n r WATER QUALITY SECTION Page ofL
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENRIDWQ LABORATORY (check one): A CENTRAL I f ARO 11 WaRO
For Investigation of: �
€ -t t 4
i
f" ��
Sample collector (print name)
and DM -I forms completed by:
` -
G iC,a 42- Y
Sample collector's signature:
Field storage conditions and location (when applicable):
17
Lab Use Only
LAB NO.
STATION NO.
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
n-Gf
Hr►
05--v
v3oP'"!
JUL I
Q Mg
t
i7_
Relinquished by (signature):
D to
Time
R i b (sign ure •
t
-Time
Relinquished by (signature):
ate
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (Signature):
rate
Time
Method of Shipment (circle one): fate Courier Hand -delivered Federal Express UPS Other:
Security Type and Conditions:
Sealed by:
roic y:
LIA
INTRALABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
r
t •
r,
1 lr
r
r
®®
I
, W-O
IM rjlv_�=Hmi/
QA1FormslSample ReceivinglCOC form WQ 4/10/Oldbs

1,
Report to: -/1t021 WATER QUALITY SECTION Pageof�
CHAIN OF CUSTODY (COC) RECORD
NC DENR/DWQ LABORATORY (check one): \N CENTRAL I I ARO [ I WaRO
For Investigation of:
Sample collector (print name) and DM-1 forms completed by:
'Z ` `�
Sample collector's signature: 2
Field storage conditions and location (Men applicable):
. —
Lab Use Only
LAB NO.
STATION NO,
STATION LOCATION
DATE
SAMPLED
TIME
SAMPLED
NUMBER
OF
CONTAINERS
p
JUL i
0 Z009
19
y-
Relinquished b { ' tature):
Date l
Time
e iv0 b (signaej
Relinq r ed by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Relinquished by (signature):
Date
Time
Received by (signature):
Date
Time
Method of Shipment (circle one)- Late Courier Hand -delivered Federal Express UPS Other;
Security Type and Conditions:
Sealed by
INTRALARORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY - Lab Use Only
•� '•
BOTTLES
REQUESTED ANALYSES
RELINQUISHED
MOMi10
/ M11
QA1FormsLSample ReceivinglCOC form WQ 4/10/01dbs

October 14, 2010
Stormwater Permitting Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: NOTICE OF INTENT
NPDES Application
General Permit No. NCG 060000
Duplin Wine Cellars Inc.
Rose Hill, NC
Dear Sir,
I�EC 11VED�
OCT 18 2010
BY:
Enclosed is an original Notice of Intent, a copy, supporting information, and a check
in the amount of $100.00 for the referenced permit application. Please review and let me
know if additional information is required.
Thank you for your assistance. if you need to contact me, feel free to contact me by
phone at 910-289-4311, or by e-mail at rob t dL1llliilWiDC1W.co111.
Sincerely,
Rob Cottle
Director of Operations
cc: Rich Shiver

ection
County;
DUPLIN
River Basin
CPF
Report To
WIROSP
Collector.
J CONWAY
Region:
WlRO
Sample Matrix:
Surfacewater
Loc, Type;
RIVERISTREAM
Emergency Yes/No
COC YeslNo
Location ID: WIROSPNLC
VisitlD
Loc. Descr.: YELLOW CUT RD DITCH
Collect Date: 0412212009 Collect Time:: 17:30
Sample Qualifiers and Comments
Sample is very septic contain anaerobic bacteria and strong hydrogen sulfide sme
Magdi
4124109
Sample ID: AB432B7
PO Number It 9W3501
Date Received; 0412312009
Time Received: 08:15
Labworks LoginlD $MATHIS
Date Reported; 5121/09
Report Generated: 05/21/2009
Sample Depth
in, ti.r
MAY 2 8 2009
Routine Qualifiers
For a more detailed description of these qualifier codes refer to www,dwglab.org under Staff Access
A -Value reported is the average of two or more determinations
N3-Estimated concentration is < PQL and >MDL
Bt-Countable membranes with <20 colonies; Estimated
NE-Na established PQL
B2- Counts from all filters were zero.
B3- Countable membranes with more than 60 or BO colonies; Estimated P-Elevated PQL due to matrix interference and/or sample dilution
B4-Filters have counts of both >60 or 80 and < 20; Estimated Cl-Hotding time exceeded prior to receipt at lab.
65-Tao many colonies were present; too numerous to count (TNTC) Q2- Molding time exceeded following receipt by lab
PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit -subject to change due to instrument sensitivity
J2- Reported value Tailed to meet QC criteria for either precision or accuracy: Estimated
J3-The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; Estimated U. Samples analyzed for this compound but not detected
X1- Sample not analyzed for this compeund
J6-The lab analysis was from an unpreserved or improperly chemically preserved sample; Estimated
N1-The component has been tentatively identified based on mass spectral library search and has an estimated value
LAB
Laboratory Section>> 1623 Mail Service Center. Ralaigh, NC 27699-1623 [phone] Page 1 of 2

Sample ID AB43287
iC (DWQQ Laboratory section Kesurlts
Location VO: WIROSPNLC Collets Date: 15412212009
Loc. Desor.: YELLOW CUT RD DITCH Collect Time;: 17:30
Visit ID
CAS p Analyte Name
POL Result Qualifier Units
AnalysUDate
Approved By (Date
Semple temperature at receipt by lab
0.9 'C
DSAUNDERS
SMATHIS
Method Reference
4r23109
4r23109
NEC
BOD, &Day In liquid
2.0 780 G4 mgA-
ADESAI
MOVERMAN
Method Reference APHA52105
4123109
515109
Caltform, MF Fecal In liquid
1 890 01 CFU1100ml
BSWANSON
CGREEN
Method Reference APHA92220-201h
4123109
4130M
WET
Chemical Oxygen Demand In liquid
Method Reference Hach 8000
20 4000
mglL JSTALEY CGREEN
4/24109 4127r09
Resldua_Suspended In Ilquld 6.2 1600 M m9fL AWILLIAMS CGREEN
Method Reference APHA2$40P-20th 4129109 4130A9
Grease and Oil In liquid 10 10 U J2 mg& MIBRAHIM1 CGREEN
Method Reference EPA1684A 5113109 5)20109
NUT
NH3 as N In liquid
0.02
1.7
mg/L as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference LaOO-107-05-1-J
4124109
515109
Total Neldahl N as N In liquid
0.2
21
mg/L as N
MOVERMAN
CGREEN
Method Reference Lachat107-05.2-H
4124109
4130109
NO2+NO3 as N In liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mg/L as N
MAJAYI
CGREEN
Method Reference Lacl4-107-04-1-c
4r24109
51=9
Phosphorus —total as P In liquid
0.02
8.9
mg[L as P
GBELK
CGREEN
Method Reference LaclO-115-01-lEF
4129109
515fo9
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 1919) 733-3908 Page 2 of 2

COUNTY:
RIVER BASIN.
REPORT TO:
SHIPPED BY:
COLLECTOR(S) : 'r r
Estimated BOD Range:
Seed: Chlorinated:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LAB FORM`
El
TYPI�—
PRIORITY i/� �f
El AMBIENT D QA STREAM D EFFLUENT
COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE INFLUENT
EMERGENCY SPECIAL STUDY ❑ ESTUARY
VisitlD: C� 1
Station Location: +
Remarks:
Lab Number r
Date Received
Time Received
Received By
Station # A Date Begin (y Imm/dd)
6 �
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
I,�
Time Begin
f 3� tvt
Time End
Depth - DM, DB, DBM Value Type - A, 11, L
Composite-T, S, R
Sample Type
C G GNXX
13013310 mg/L
I
Chloride 940 mg/L
NH3 as N 6[0 mg/L
Li- Lithium 1132 ug/l,
COD High 340 mg/L
µg/L
TKN as N 625 mglL
Mg- Magnesium 927 mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
7NO2
plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
Mn- Manganese 1055 µg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 #/100 mis
Ll
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
Na-Sodium929 mg/L
Coliform: MF Total 31504 #/l00 nnN
Color: True 80 C.U.
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
As- Arsenic.'Total 1002 µg/L
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 #/100 mis
Color: (pH ) 83 c.u.
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
Se- Selenium 1147 µg/L
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 #/100 mis
Color: pH 7.6 82 c.u.
K- Potassium mg/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 µg/L
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Cyanide 720 mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 µg/L
Ba- Barium µg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Cr- Chromium:Total 1034 µglL
Organochlorine Pesticides
Fixed 510 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Cu- Copper 1042 µg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
V
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Ni- Nickel 1067 µg/L
Volatile 535 mg/L
Hardness Total 900 mg/L
Pb- Lead 1051 µg/L
Acid Herbicides
Fixed 540 mg/L
Specific Cond. 95 µmhoslcm2
Zn- Zinc 1092 µg/L
pH 403 units
MBAS 38260 mg/L
V- Vanadium µg/L
Base/Neutral&Acid Extractable Organic:
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Phenols 32730 µg/L
Ag- Silver 1077 µg/L
'TPII Diesel Range
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/L
Sulfate 945 mg/L
AI- Aluminum 1105 µg/L
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 µg/L
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle req'd)
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/L
Boron: Total 1022 µg/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
TOC 680 mg/L
Tannin & Lignin 32240 µg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 µg/L
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Turbidity 82079 NTU
Hexavalent Chromium 1032 µg/L
Fe- Iron 1045 µg/L
Phytoplankton
Coliform Total Tube 31508 -41100 mis
COMMENTS:
LAB USE ONLY
Temperature
on arrival (°C):
Sample Point % (2)
Conductance (94)
Water Temp-C (10)
D.O. (300)
pH (400)
8.3 Alkalinity (82244
4.5 Alkalinity (431)
4.5 Acidity (92243)
9.3 Acidity (82242)
Air Temp-C (20)
Secchi depth m
Salinity ppt (480)
Precipit-In/day (45)
Cloud Cover % (32)
Wind Dir-Deg (31
Strm Flow Sev (1351
Turbidity Severity (13
Wind Velocity -mph
Mean Strm Depth-R (64)
Strm Width-ft (4)

Report to: _WIRO
NC DENRIDWQ Laboratory
Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number:
Station Location:
AB43287
Yellow Cut Rd
Ditch
ample Type: Stream
.ate collected. 4/22/2009
Affected Parameter(s): Susl
Sample ID: I
County: Duplin Region: WIRO
Priority:
Date received: 4/23/2009
Residue
Analytical Area (check one):
®WCH ❑METALS
[]NUT []MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
®Samples
❑Improper container used
❑VOA vials with headspace
❑Sulfide samples with headspace
❑Samples not received,,but listed on fieldshect
❑Samples received, but not listed on fieldshect
❑Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑Holding time expired
❑Prior to receipt in lab
❑Aker receipt in lab
❑Insufficient quantity for analysis
®Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑pH out of range (record pH):
❑Improper chemical
❑Residual chlorine present in sample
❑Color interference
❑Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
❑Other (specify):
Collector:
Date analyzed
J. Conway/L. Willis
�4/28/2009
❑VOA ❑SVGA
❑PEST
❑Quality Control
❑Instrument failure —Do reportable results
❑Analyst error — no reportable results
❑Surrogates
❑None added
❑Recovery outside acceptance limits
[]Spike recovery
❑None added
❑Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑Failed to meet criteria for precision
❑Internal standards
❑Blank contamination
❑QC data reported outside of controls (e.g., QCS, LCS)
❑Incorrect procedure used
❑SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑Invalid instrument calibration
❑Elevated detection limits due to:
❑Insufficient sample volume
Comments: Sample was analyzed twice on 4/2812009. The sample produced 4880 mg/L with a 10 ml sample and 1600 mg/L with a 5
ml sample. At 10 ml, the sample seen on the filter visually appeared to exceed
�Kilter limits therefore, the sample was re -analyzed at
5 ml and produced 1600 mg/L. Since there is such a range between�b two values, the sample will be qualified with an M and the
lowest result will be reported.
Corrective Action:
❑Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
❑Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑Sample(s) on hold until:
®Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:M
[—]Other (explain):
Notification Required? ❑ Yes ® No
Person Contacted: Date:
Form completed by:[April William _��- Date: 4/29/2009
Lead Chemist view tial): /H
❑810CHE ❑PEST
❑MHCALS p' ,, ❑VOA
Branch Head Review (initial): f--f) 5 �— 0 f
-AJQC Review (initial):
S� fad
QA\FormsSLabo Sato rykS AR
❑SVOA
Logged into database by (initial): i S -1—
T GM/O l dbs

Report to: _WIRO
NC DENR/DWQ Laboratory
Sample Anomaly Report (SAR)
Lab Number:
Station Location
AB43287
Yellow cut rd.
ditch
-mple Type: Stream
1, ite collected: 4/22/09
Affected Parameter(s): DOD
Analytical Area (check one):
❑ WCH
❑NUT
Sample ID: 91
County: Duplin Region:
Priority: Collector:
Date received: 4/23/09 Date analyzed:
❑METALS
®MICRO
The following anomalies occurred (check all that apply):
❑Samples
❑Improper container used
❑VOA vials with headspace
❑Sulfide samples with headspace
❑Samples not received, but listed on fieldsheet
❑Samples received, but not listed on fieldsheet
❑Mislabeled as to tests, preservatives, etc.
❑Holding time expired
❑Prior to receipt in lab
❑After receipt in lab
❑Insufficient quantity for analysis
❑Sample exhibits gross non -homogeneity
❑Sample not chemically preserved properly
❑pH out of range (record pH):
❑Improper chemical
❑Residual chlorine present in sample
❑Color interference
❑Heavy emulsion formed during extraction
❑Sample bottle broken in lab - no reportable results
Other (specify): Evidence of Toxicity present.
CFR-WIRO
I Conway & L. Willis
4/23109
❑VOA ❑SVGA
❑PEST
[]Quality Control
❑Instrument failure — no reportable results
❑Analyst error— no reportable results
❑Surrogates
❑None added
❑Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑Spike recovery
❑None added
❑Recovery outside acceptance limits
❑failed to meet criteria for precision
❑Internal standards
❑Blank contamination
❑QC data reported outside of controls (e.g., QCS, LCS)
❑Incorrect procedure used
❑SOP intentionally modified with QA and Branch Head
approval
❑Invalid instrument calibration
❑Elevated detection limits due to:
❑insufficient sample volume
Comments: The following are the dilutions set up and the 5 day BOD calculated on this sample.
100%.............0.02mg/L ; 50%......... 0.12mg/L; 25%............ 0.32mgIL; 10%............. 46.2mg/L; 5%............... 130.4mg/L;
2%...............369mg/L; 1%................ 775mg/L.
The toxicity is generally characterized by a significant increase in the BOD value as the sample concentration decreases. The reported
value is calculated from the highest dilution representing the maximum loading potential. This should be considered an estimated
value.
Corrective Action:
[]Samples were rejected by DWQ Lab. Authorized by: Date:
❑Accepted and analyzed after notifying the collector or contact person and determining that another sample could not be secured.
❑Sample(s) on hold until:
❑Sample reported with qualification. Data qualification code used:G4
❑Other (explain):
Notification Required? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Person Contacted: Date: _
Form completed by:
Lead Chemist Review (initial):
"4'RI0CHEM-
tETALS
Branch Head Review (initial):
QAIQC Review (in a 5
Q A%FormsU_x boratory\.S AR
❑PEST
❑ VOA
Date: 5/5/2009
❑SVGA
Logged into database by (initial): 0" 9 S=8"
IUf23loldbs

r

Michael F. Easley, Governor
williatn G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of water Quality
November 1, 2007
David Fussell, Chairman of the Board
Duplin Winery
PO Box 756
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Duplin Winery
COC Number NCG060276
Duplin County
Dear Permittee-.
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under stormwater General Permit NCG060000 the Division of
Water Quality (DWG) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater General Permit. This permit is reissued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between the state of North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
• A new Certificate of Coverage
• A copy of stormwater General Permit NCGO60000
• A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the General Permit
• Five copies of the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form
• Five copies of the Qualitative Monitoring Report Form
The General Permit authorizes discharges of stormwater only, and it specifies your obligations with respect to stormwater
discharge controls, management, monitoring, and record keeping. Please review the new permit to familiarize yourself with all
the changes in the reissued permit.
The more significant changes in the General Permit since your last Certificate of Coverage include the following:
• Part I Section A — A new notation that the No Exposure Exclusion from permitting option may be available to the
permittee.
• Part I Section A — A new provision that facilities draining to 303(d) listed waters, or in watersheds with an approved TMDL,
may not be eligible for renewed coverage under the General Permit.
• Part 11 Section B Table 1 — An increased sampling frequency from once per year to twice per year.
• Part 11 Section B Table 3 — Benchmark concentrations now replace cutoff concentrations; the elimination of the option to
avoid sampling based on cutoff concentrations.
• Part 11 Section B — New provisions requiring the permittee to execute Tier One and Tier Two response actions, based on
the first benchmark exceedence (Tier One) and the second consecutive benchmark exceedence (Tier Two). Tier Two
requires that the permittee institute monthly monitoring instead of twice -per -year monitoring, until three consecutive
monitoring events show no benchmark exceedences.
• Part Il Section e — A new provision that tour exceedences of any pariicufar benchmark will trigger increased DWQ
involvement in the permittee's stormwater management and control actions. DWO may direct the permittee to apply for
an individual permit, or may direct the implementation or installation of specific stormwater control measures.
DWQ received a number of comments on a series of general permits similar to this one, A full response to comments can be
found at httpaHncwaterquality.org/su/industriaigpinfo.htm. Some comments resulted in permit modifications, others are
addressed in the response document or Fact Sheet. A few specific requests for clarification are addressed below.
1. What is the deadline for having a revised SPPP that reflects the provisions of the new General Permit? DWQ will require
that the permittee have a revised, complete SPPP no later than six months after the date of issue of that permittee's new
Certificate of Coverage.
2. Must analytical results be by a certified lab? What about pH measurements? All analytical results obtained to satisf y
NPDES permit requirements must be certified, as directed in North Carolina regulations at 15A NCAC 2H .0800, and as
administered by DWQ's Laboratory Section Certification Branch. This includes field pH measurements.
1�i'YhCtut>lina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Intemet: h2o.enr.state.ne.uslsufstormwaterhtml 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone] I-877-623-6748
An Equal OpportunilylAf6rmative Action Err ployer— 50% Recycled110 % Post Consumer Paper

Permit Reissuance Letter — Permit NCG060276
Page 2
Your coverage under the General Permit is transferable only through the specific action of DWo. The Division may require
modification and reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR, nor does it relieve the
permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order,
judgment, or decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package p4ease contact Bill Diuguid of the Central Office Stormwater Permitting
Unit at [phone], ext. 382.
Sincerely,
�7 I
for Coleen H. Sullins
cc: DWQ Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Wilmington Regional Office

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060276
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143 215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Duplin Winery
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Duplin Winery
505 N Sycamore St
Rose Hill
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as Cabin Branch, a Class C;Sw water in the Cape Fear River Basin in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1, II,
III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG060000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective November 1, 2007,
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day November 1, 2007.
for Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

wAr�9QG
Ul �
0 liii1<
January 24, 2007
David Fussell, Chairman of the Board
Duplin Wine_ry`,
PO Box 756
Rose Hill, IVC, 28458
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, RE, Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Duplin Wine
COC Number NCG060276
Dupnlinl County v�
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently covered for stormwater discharge under General Permit NCG060000. This permit expires on
August 31, 2007. The Division staff is currently in the process of renewing this permit. When a draft version is
available for notice and public comment, it will be posted on our website at http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/. Once
the permit is reissued, -your facility would be eligible for continued coverage under the reissued permit.
In order to assure your continued coverage under the general permit, you must apply to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for renewal of your permit. Enclosed you will find a Permit Coverage Renewal Application Form. The
application must be completed and returned by March 2, 2007 in order to assure continued coverage under the
general permit. Letters confirming our receipt of the completed application will not be sent.
Failure to request renewal within the time period specified may result in a civil assessment of at least $250.00.
Larger penalties may be assessed depending on the delinquency of the request. Discharge of stormwater from your
facility without coverage under a valid stormwater NPDES permit would constitute a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and
could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
Please note that "no exposure exclusion" is now available to all operators of industrial facilities in any of the
categories of "storm water discharges associated with industrial activity," (except construction activities). If you feel
your facility can certify a condition of "no exposure", i.e. the facility industrial materials and operations are not
exposed to stormwater, you can apply for the no exposure exclusion. For additional information contact the Central
Office Stormwater Staff member listed below or check the Stormwater Permitting Unit Web Site at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/NO_Ex—Address.htm.
If the subject stormwater discharge to waters of the state has been terminated, please complete the enclosed
Rescission Request Form. Mailing instructions can be found on the bottom of the form. You will be notified when
the rescission process has been completed.
If you have any questions regarding the permit renewal procedures please contact 13i1[ Diuguid of the Central Office
Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone], ext. 382.
Sincerely,
I —y
Bradley Bennett
Supervisor, Stormwater & General Permit Unit
Cc: Central Files
Wilrn� ington Regional Office
SWPU Files
N°" zcarro tlta
Wetlands and Sionmvater Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone]
Intemet h2o.enr.state.nc.vs 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh. NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

CFW",t9 Permit Coverage '
Renewal Application Form
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Certificate of Coverage Number
Stormwater General Permit NCG060000 NCGiD60276
The following is the information currently in our database for your facility. Please review this information carefully and make all
corrections/ additions as necessary in the space provided to the right of the current information.
Owner Information
Owner / Organization Name:
Owner Contact:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail address:
Facility Information
Facility Name:
Facility Physical Address
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number: .
E-mail address:
Permit Information
Permit Contact:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail address:
Discharge Information
Receiving Stream:
Stream Class:
Basin:
Sub -Basin:
Number of Outfalls:
duplin Win ry
David Fussell, Chairman of the Board
PLO Box _756
Rose�,Hill, NO 28458
910-289-38881xt.�
910-289-3094
Duplin Winer
505�-N�ycarnore St
RoseAill, NC 28458
Cabin Branch
C;Sw
CapepFea�r, River Basin
L; .
03-06-22
Facility/Activity Changes Please describe below any changes to your facility or activities since issuance of your permit. Attached a
separate sheet if necessary.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the best of my knowledge and belief
such information is true, complete and accurate.
Signature
Print or type name of person signing above
Date
Title
SW General Permit Coverage Renewal
Please return this completed renewal application form to: Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

°� wAr`9ay Permit Coverage
r Rescission Request Form
Y National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
General Permit NCG060000
Certificate of Coverage Number
NCG06027.6
Please fill out and return this form only if you no longer need to maintain your NPDES stormwater permit.
The following is the information currently in our database for your facility. Please review this information carefully and
make all corrections as necessary in the space provided to the right of the current information.
Facilily Information
Facility Name:
Facility Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number
Email Address
Permit Information
Permit Contact:
Mailing Address:*
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address
Duplln Winery
505 WS.ycamore St
RosgLHill, NG 28458
* This is the address to which the permit rescission notice will be mailed
Reason for rescission request (this is required information):
REQUEST AND CERTIFICATION
I, as an authorized representative, hereby request rescission of certificate of coverage NCG060276 under NPDES
Stormwater General Permit NCG060000 for the subject facility. I am familiar with the information contained in this
request and to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete and accurate.
Signature
Print or type name of person signing above
Date
Title
Please return this completed rescission request form to: SW General Permit Coverage Rescission
Stormwater Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

i Ot'rlA'h'
G
7
e3 `-
Mr. David G. Fussell
Duplin Winery
P-O. Box 756
12ose Hill, NC 28458
Dar Mr- Fussell:
GChZes
Michael F. Easley,,Governor
William G. Foss Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
MAY 1 12004
BY:
April 30. 2004
Subject: General Permit No. NCG060000
Duplin Winery
COC NCG060276
Duplin County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
Division o€ Water oualily
in accordance with your application For a discharge permit received on April 22, 2004 we are
Forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state — NPDES general
}permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated May
9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of -Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the
certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area ft'Ianagement
Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required -
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Jonathan Diggs at telephone number
[phone] ext. 537.
CC! /eIntral
mm1:1oton Regional Office
Files
Stormwater and General Permits Unit Files
pKALySIGNEC BY
WILLIAM C. MILLS
Ian W. Klimek. P.E.
N. C. Division of Water quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
: flEt 4
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

.:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060276
STORMWA`I'ER DISCHARGES
ATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulbated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Duplin Winery
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Duplin Winery
505 N. Sycamore St.
Rose Hill
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as UT to Cabin Branch, a class C Sw slream in the Cape Fear River Basin in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II. 111. IV,
V and VI of General Permit No. NCG060000 as attached.
`Yhis Certificate of Coverage shall become effective April 30, 2004.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Sighed this day April 30, 2004.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
WILLIAM C. MILLS
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

d
-ake,
--ZL✓—.- QuAcry?
nf
N �j
:,'lrl6' kiialwas e-
49, A
4 1 jr
4T�
'ON
4�;-- I "
S
S
9P !l;-`.
_71
wt
CeT -7
.:14 r
i 'fg"
\it
;05
��' —7c
3 E )jZJ'
it
IM -N5
T�
_in
-u
lkz' J-il'�
6 'NCG060276 -W
CCMS
-:A
K
k
Let
�7v
21
>3
KOUI'^
tF
grg
4?�" 1,x -
y
tl A
a
4-T
i A,
IT, I f-, ot
•4tj
E-A
A
Di posai,
JFrurr
. 1_4
-4
f
UOpyrighl (C;) 1997, Mlaplecr% lr)C.

Winery Waste Search
Linda Willis
Wilmington regional off ice
There are two processes you should be familiar with when investigating Winery
discharge done in different date, time perhaps climate depending on the geographic
location, state and country.
In order to study the characteristics of winery waste you have to understand two
ingredients and factors are well involved in the two process a) grapes b) fermentations.
a) Grapes: about 19.1% Carbohydrates (Sugar- fiber),<l% fat, <1% protein , 15%a
minerals and some metals such as Zinc and Iron and 59% Vitamins
The rest is Hzo and how knows such as Anthocyanins (red grape skin) and
Phenolics specially with red grapes it is called the dietary anti oxidant and that is
expected to be present in the waste post pretreatments done by the facility during
the pressing process recommended analysis COD maybe total coliform for
qualitative determinations, BOD5, TSS, pH and other Inorganic/metals
determination for details and organic as well for carbohydrates, fat and protein if
required or to run initial assessment to build removals or treatments
models/procedures
b) Fermentation: Simply converting Carbohydrates to sugar then alcohols finally to
acids and it could be some Aldehydes present in between mostly unstable and will
go either way alcohols or acids with yeast acting as a catalyst. It is 100% done
under anaerobic condition. Chemicals to expect are lactic and acetic acids protein
amino and fatty acids .Recommended analysis the same as grapes with the
addition of Oil and Grease maybe and other organic related tests color analysis
maybe needed for quick determination of actual wine waste and to determine the
quality and efficiency of the product.
How it work:
1) Grapes are pressed into juice and stored for later fermentation.
2) Processing is when the grape juice is fermented into wine and packed for
shipment.
In the following table based on an average flow of 1000 gallon of pressed grapes it
will show you the difference between the two characteristics and parameters of
interest, average data you may anticipate again location and the size of the facility
will affect the data and if you apply California rules be sure adjust your data and
treatment based on your state, county and area soil characteristics, data and climate.
What to expect:

Parameter
Pressing Process
Fermentation Process
BOD5
> 700 mglL
i 900 mg/L
BOD5
9 900 lb/day
i 0.5 lb per case of wine depends
Discharge
on the production which you
can obtain from the winery
sales
Example: 0.5 Liter size bottle
= 6 liter /case = 167 case/ 1000
gallon of follow = 84 lb/day
TSS
100 mg/L
> Depending on the facility
pretreatment facility post
discharging to WWTP to
lagoons
pH
7.4-7.9
6.5-8.0
COD
> 900 mg/L
> 1200 mg/L
Color
Will vary
Will vary depending on
depending on
pretreatment
pretreatment
Salinity
Will vary
Will vary depending on
depending on
pretreatment
pretreatment
Cnnclu inn%:
20% of wine production is waste therefore you can make initial assessments bayed on
production prior to any confirmation or/and justification with any laboratory analysis
several methodologies are applied such as composting, aerobic and anaerobic digestion,
pyrolysis, ozonation and wet oxidation the discharge shall implement control to minimize
the salinity due to high salinity will and wine ion in waste streams can cause lots of
headache such as reverse osmosis reject. In addition wwtp should maintain a pH in the
range of 6.5-8.5 units in order to deal efficiently with incoming winery discharge
(influent).
It is very simple if any run off will accumulate in a ditch such as yellow cut samples
sugar +dirt + soil+ bacteria+ oxygen + other unknown chemicals collected along the way
= biological and chemical problematic issues.

Energy, Mineral
and Land Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITV
April 26, 2016
Duplin Wine Cellars, Inc.
PO Box 756
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG060000
Certificate of Coverage NCG060276, 060323
Duplin Winery Processing Facility, Duplin Wine Cellars
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Fussell:
PAT MCCRORY
Goremor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
TRACY DAVIS
0irecinr
On April 25, 2016, Brian Lambe from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral,
and Land Resources (DEMLR), conducted a compliance evaluation inspection for Duplin Winery
Processing Facility and Duplin Wine Cellars located in Rose Hill, North Carolina. The following
observations were noted during the DEMLR inspection (please see the attached addendum for
additional information about your permit):
1) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SPPP
A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) has been developed, recorded, and properly
implemented.
Yes ■ No Efl However, more documentation is needed in the plan as it should be used as a working
book. Document employee training and site inspections.
2) Qualitative Monitoring
Qualitative monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
Yes ■ No ❑
3) Analytical Monitoring
Analytical monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
Yes ■ No ❑
Other Observations:
Enclosed is a representative outfall form. Please read the enclosed report and fill out the form
accordingly for 060276, Outfall 6 is the most apt outfall to capture any process water. Enclosed is a
recession request form for the 060323 permit. Since there is no processing on the facility, you may
submit the form.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during this inspection. Please be advised that violations
of the NPDES Stormwater General Permit may be subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, NC 26405
910 796 7215 T 1 910 350 2004 F I htm://oortal.ncdenr,ore/web!]r!

Duplin Wine Cellars, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
$25,000.00 per day for each violation. If you have any questions, comments, or need assistance with
understanding any aspect of your permit, please do not hesitate to contact me at 910-796-7314 or
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Brian Lambe
Environmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Checklist
cc: WiRO Files — Land Quality

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060323
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Contact Person: Rob Cottle
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Effective: 12/01/12 Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars
342 Yellow Cut Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
Title: Phone: [phone]
Inspection Date: 04/25/2016
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time: 03:OOPM Exit Time: 03:30PM
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food[Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant . ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
M Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

permit- NCGO60323 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 04125f2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routin-
inspection Summary:
Met with Rob Cottle regarding this permit. There is no processing on the facility. (Marie other on form, no processing).
There is no reason for the permit to exist. Please submit recission request.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG06=3 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 04/25/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ go ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfatls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stonnwaler) discharges? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment:
5torriwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ E ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Does the Plan include a `Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ E ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ M ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ N ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Does the Plan include a.Spili Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ IN ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ ❑ M1 ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑ ❑ 93 ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ❑ M ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

a
M
Permit: NCG060276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Compliance inspection Report
Effective: 12/12/12 Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Duplin Winery Processing Facility
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 04/25/2016
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title: President
certification:
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]B
Phone:
Entry Time: 02:OOPM Exit time: 03:00PM
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant [] Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page:

Permit: NOG060276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
inspection Date: 04/25/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Met with Rob Cottle, Director of Operations, regarding NPDES stormwater permit. Reviewed the SWPPP and sampling
results. Discussed reducing sampling points from seven to one. Sampling results were generally under the benchmarks.
The site is in very good condition as most of its operations are conducted under cover. The only thing that occurs outside
of cover is the unloading of grapes from trucks to shed, then from shed to covered sorting and squeezing areas. All
process water is treated as wastewater.
Page: 2

Permit; NCG060276 Owner • Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 04/25/2016 Inspection Typo : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
AnalVtical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ON ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas) ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 9 ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ®❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ®❑ ❑ []
Comment: Recommend reducingsampling points. The site has 13 outfalls. The ditch along the sides of
the property and through the middle of the property cannot be considered as alternative due to
the presence of the Valley Protiens spray fields. Representative sampling on conducted on 2-6,
12, and 13. Half the sampling points are roof drains. 3-6 are inlets near unloading area.
Recommend using 6 for representative sample for the site.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 03 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®❑ 0 ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
EM ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
W ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible attematives to current practices?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
® ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑ ®❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ®❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG060276 Owner - Facility: Duplin wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 0412512016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility inspection Program? ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? El ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The SWPPP should be updated continuously throughout the year. Documentation of employee
training should include summaEy of training and attendees. The res onsibie parties should be
listed with contact information within the document in the front to facilitate easy access in case
of an emergency. A thorough list of best management practices should be created. With the list
created, bi-annual inspections of these measures or processes should be documented.
Page: 4

Permit: NCG060276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 04/21/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Ccmplaint
Inspection Summary:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ■ 0 0
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ 0
# if the facility has representative outfall status. is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0 ■ ❑ fi
Comment: This facility has been discharging a wastewater from their wine processing
operations to a lagoon with an overflow structure that discharges to the ditch behind the
facility. The ditch is part of the headwaters to Cabin Branch. The ditch travels to the
west to the train tracks, turns north and empties into a wetland that is the headwaters to
Cabin Branch. DO was taken in the stream and was 0.5 mg/L. The ditch was full of
black septic wastewater with putrid odor.
Page: 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCGO60276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12
Effective: Expiration:
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/15/2010
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title: President
Certification:
Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Facility: Duplin Winery
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Complaint Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food[Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Q Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Other
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1
l

Permit: NCGO60276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 09/15/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
Site inspection was the result of a citizen complaint about Duplin Winery (see emails received by DWQ WiRO from Mr.
Currituck). The allegations were that there were illicit discharges to the ditch from the winery. Linda Willis and Rick
Shiver inspected the site (unannounced). The pipe in the ditch noticed during the July 22, 2010 investigation was still
uncapped and there was water in the ditch beneath the pipe outlet and in the connecting ditch perpindicular to the
receiving ditch which drains to a wetland located northwest of the winery. The water in the ditch had a septic
appearance. DWQ requested that the Duplin Winery take samples at two locations behind their lagoon. Parameters for
analyses requested were BOD-5 Day, COD, and nutrients. The Regional Supervisor requested the winery hire a
consultant (engineer) to map out all the floor drains/piping in the facility to determine the location of their outlets. Pictures
taken (on July 22, 2010, by staff) of the piping inside the pump house showed two stubs for connection to the filters.
DWQ requested the underground pipe be excavated to determine where the piping had been connected. The piping was
excavated on September 20th with Linda Willis and Chris Baker present to witness the excavation. The piping went
directly to the pump house but was severed approximately 15 feet or so from the pump house and in a location where a
recent (since July 22, 2010) excavation had occurred. Rob Cottle brought attention to the recent excavation to explain it
was put in at the time when the plumbing and electrical was put in for the effluent pump house. There was no vegetation
in the trench dug and when pictures taken during July 22, 2010 visit were reviewed, no stormwater trench in that location
was seen. The extra stub in the pump house was plumbed to just outside the building where it lay parallel to the line that
went to the effluent lift station The pipe in the ditch had been severed within a few feet of the dead end stub. A notice of
violation was issued to Duplin Winery on October 15, 2010 concerning the issues found at the facility on September 15,
16 and 20th, 2010, requesting an explanation for the underground pipe and why the wastewater level was below the
effluent pipe riser. The facility has yet to turn in an application for permit coverage under NCGO60 for the wine facility on
Yellow Cut Road.
Other
Comment: See summary, see incident number 201002864, see NOV-2010-DV-0351
Yes No NA NE
Page: 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12
Effective: Expiration:
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: President
Certification:
Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Facility: Duplin Winery
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Inspection Date: 07122/2010 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Tom Tharrington Phone:
Reason for Inspection:' Complaint Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: C) Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Other
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCGO60276 Owner- Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 07/22/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Complaint
Inspection Summary:
The ditches around the property were inspected for wastewater. In the past, wastewater had been directly discharged to
the ditch behind the facility. This ditch leads to a wetland to the north and west of the Duplin Winery property. This
wetland drains to Cabin Branch in Cape Fear River Basin.
Other
Comment: This facility continues to operate without coverage under NPDES
NCG060000. Pictures were taken. A pipe seen in the lagoon during this inspection
became missing during the September 15, 2010 inspection. A buried pipe with an outlet
to the ditch approximately 100 yards from the pump house was noticed. The pipe had a
quick fit on the end of it. Tom Tharrington instructed the operator (Rob Cottle) to
permanently cap the pipe.
Yes No NA NE
Page: 2

Permit: NCG060276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Duplin Winery Processing Facility
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: President
Certification:
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Inspection Date: 09/24/2009 Entry Time: 03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:15 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Christopher Baker Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCGO60276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 09/24/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
This site visit was to oversee the sampling locations of Envirochem and for DWQ to secure samples for sulfides. The
winery had installed a new lagoon, the old discharge pipe from the lagoon was lying next to the ditch where it had
previosly been buried to provide a discharge outlet for the lagoon. The lagoon did not appear to have any overflow pipes.
The waste remains in the ditch. Supervisor for the region wanted to wait on analyses before determining further action.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA N
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? D ■ n n
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 171 ■ Q C]
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? n ■ D Q
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ■ Q 01
Comment: The ditch behind the winery was sampled by Carolina Byproducts through
contract laboratory, environmental chemists. The regional office pulled samples for
sulfides.
Page: 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Duplin Winery Processing Facility
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: President
Inspection Date: 0912312009 Entry Time: 03:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis
Secondary Inspector(s):
Joanne H Steenhuis
Certification:
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Exit Time: 04:30 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type. Food/Tobacco/Soaps/CosmeticslPublic Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant O Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG060276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 09/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ Q ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? D ■ O
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0 ■ ❑ 0
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ■ D Q
Comment: The illicit discharge from the lagoon appeared to have been removed,
however, the ditch was full of wastewater again. Carolina Byproducts personnel
requested sampling of the ditch that crosses their property to protect their interests
concerning the origin of the wastewater. Joanne Steenhuis and Linda Willis could
determine flow direction of ditch and determined the ditch to be a dead end on the
winery property at Hwy 117. Hwy 117 ditches are not connected to the ditch behind the
winery. The ditch was flowing toward the West.
0
Page: 2

Permit: NCG060276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Duplin Winery Processing Facility
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/08/2009
Primary Inspector: Kipp Glazier
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title: President
Certification:
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Entry Time: 10:30 AM Exit Time: 01:30 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG060276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 07/08/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection summary:
observed facility at yellow cut rd:
retention pond
ditch
crush floor
sewer piping
Page: 2

Permit: NCGO60276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Duplin Winery Processing Facility
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: President
Certification:
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Inspection Date: 06/23/2009 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Richard S Shiver Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food(robacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCGO60276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 06/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The loading dock holds pallets with grapes in contained boxes. Boxes are picked up by fork lifts and loaded to a piece of
equipment that removes sticks and leaves. A big drum with an internal basket allows the grapes to fall through the holes
to a squeezer that liquifies the grapes enough to be pumped by adding rice hulls. The pressers press for 1 hour. solids
are removed and hauled to fields. No further information on the fields were provided. Cream of tartar comes off the
bottom of the fermenters (approx .03 to .05 Ibs11000 gallon, floor drains inside where the fermenters are goes to septic
tanks. Piles of cream of tartar were seen at the nw corner of the building. The lagoon out back is a 2 bay lagoon with the
first bay very dark (septic looking) in color. The waste in this bay has lime added to control pH. The second bay
discharges to the ditch via an overflow pipe. The facility generates approximately 7500 gallons of wastewater per day
which gets pumped to the lagoon and to the septic system. The consultant (Geno Kelly) had some analyses on the
wastewater in the lagoon. The analyses were primarily macro and micro nutrients. P, CA, N, K, Fe, Mn etc. no BOD or
COD was analyzed. The inspector and supervisor walked to the ditch in line with the overflow structure and witnessed a
discharge to the ditch. The ditch again, was full but no samples were taken. The consultant and Mr. Fussell were
informed that the discharge must be discontinued and they need to resolve their wastewater discharge issues. The
Wilmington Regional Staff requested the help of pollution prevention to help the winery sort out their problems. Neither
the consultant nor Mr. Fussell knew how much wastewater discharges to the ditch during the course of the month. It is
likely the discharge is not continuous throughout the year. The greatest volumes are generated during the grape season
August -November.
Page: 2

Permit: NCGO60276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Date: 06/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
D
■
❑
D
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
D
■
❑
D
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
D
■
D
D
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
D
■
D
D
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
D
■
D
D
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
D
■
D
D
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
D
■
D
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
D
D
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
■
❑
D
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
D
■
D
D
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
D
■
D
D
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
D
®
D
D
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
D
■
D
D
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
D
■
D
D
Comment: The site has yet to obtain an NPDES permit. Supervisor of DWQ
accompanied the inspection. The facility has not yet made application for an NPDES
permit for this facility.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
0
■
D
Cl
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
D
D
D
■
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
D
■
D
D
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
D
■
D
D
Comment: The facility still had a discharge from their lagoon that takes wastewater
from the winery. The contacts (Geno Kelly and Patrick Fussell) did not know where all
the pipes to the lagoon were coming from. Inspector asked for a schematic of the piping
system from the facility.
Page: 3

Permit: NCG060276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Duplin Winery Processing Facility
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: President
Certification:
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Inspection Date: 0412212009 Entry Time: 04:00 PM Exit Time: 05:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Jean Conway Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: FoodlTobacco!Soaps/CosmeticslPublic Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: n Compliant m Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCGO60276 Owner - Facility: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Inspection Late: 0412212009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Samples were taken in the ditch behind the winery processing plant for BOD, fecal coliform, COD TSS, grease and oil,
NH3 as N, TKN, NO2, NO3, and TP. The results were as follows:
SOD 5 day - 780 (1% solution).. sampling had to be diluted significantly due to toxicity problems (SEE AB43287 sample
ID State Lab in Raleigh)
fecal coliform - 890 (likely background given the nature of the ditch)
COD - 4000 mg/L
TSS - 1600 mg/L
Grease and oil - 10 (below quant level)
NH3-N - 1.7 mg/L
TKN - 21 mg/l_
NO2 & NO3 - .02 mg/L
TP - 8.9 mg/L
Inspector advised Mr. Fussell to remove the wastewater from the ditch. They complied within approximately 3 days and
sent pictures to Mr. Charles Stehman showing the ditch had been cleaned. APS worked with them to allow the
application of the wastewater on fields.
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
Yes No NA NE
D a D 0
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? D D ■
Comment: This site was not covered properly under the NCGO60 permit. The facility
with the permit is the retail store location. When DWQ representative asked why the
retail store was covered and not the manufacturing facility, Patrick >=ussel, operations
contact stated it was DWQ's issue for not catching the problem and correcting it. A
stormwater pollution prevention plan had been written for the retail store (that has no
exposure whatsoever). They had not been monitoring their stormwater discharges at
the retail store.
Page: 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060276
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Duplin Wine Cellars Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Duplin Winery Processing Facility
310 Yellow Cut Rd
Contact Person: David G Fussell
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: President
Certification:
Rose Hill NC 28458
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Inspection Date: 04/21/2009 Entry Time: 02:30 PM Exit Time: 03:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Jean Conway Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Complaint Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: FoodlTobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Q Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1