NCG060209_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20171120

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO. /V C& p u c, a )
DOC TYPE I K HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE I p Oda (q I I A d
YYYYMMDD

Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Land Quality Section / Stormwater Program
w National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Energy, Mineral & PERMIT OWNER AFFILIATION DESIGNATION FORM
L and Resources 1._„
FOR AGENCY USE ONLY
Date Received
Year
Month
Dav
LNVIH0NMhN1ALUUAL11T `111M1Y UUa1 Lcyaur 1\c.11.lV IIJ1 UIc - 1 6111111r Al
Use this form if there has been: '11„.CITY
STOR ti�h'^'r��
NO CHANGE in facility ownership or facility name, but the individualRERIVini
who is legally responsible for the permit has changed.
If the name of the facility has changed, or if the ownership of the facility has changed,
do NOT use this form. Instead, you must fill out a Name -Ownership Change Form
and submit the completed form with all required documentation.
What does "legally responsible individual" mean?
The person is either:
• the responsible corporate officer (for a corporation):
• the principle executive officer or ranking elected official (for a municipality. state, federal or other public
agency);
• the general partner or proprietor (for a partnership or sole proprietorship);
• or, the duly authorized representative of one of the above.
1) Enter the permit number for which this change in Legally Responsible Individual ("Owner Affiliation")
applies:
Individual Permit (or) Certificate of Coverage
N I C I S N I C I G 1 0 1 6 0 12 10 19
2) Facility Information:
Facility name: Warsaw Feed Mill
Company/Owner Organization: Murphy -Brown LLC
Facility address: 2822 NC Highway 24 West
Address
Warsaw NC 28398
City State Zip
To find the current legaiby responsible person associated with your permit go to this website:
htt :llde .nc. ov/about/divisions/ener -mineral-land-resources/ener -mineral-land- ermits/stotmwater- ro am
and run the Permit Contact Summary Report.
3) OLD OWNER AFFILIATION that should be removed:
Previous legally responsible individual: Kraig _ Westerbeek
First M1 Last
4) NEW OWNER AFFILIATION (legally responsible for the permit):
Person legally responsible for this permit
Mark Pahl
First M1 Last
S wU-O\k i IE RAFF IL-2 3 hta rc h2017
Page 1 of 2

NPDES Stormwater Permit OWNER AFFILATION DESIGNATION Form
(if no Facility Name/Ownership Change)
5) Reason for this change:
A result of:
If other please erplain:
Vice Pesident
Mille
PO Box 856
Mailing Address
Warsaw NC 28398
CityState Zip
{ 910) 293-3434 [e-mail]
"telephone 1--mail Address
{ 910 ) 293-3138
tax dumber
Employee or management change
❑ Inappropriate or incorrect designation before
❑ Other
The certification below must be completed and signed by the permit holder.
PERMITTEE CERTIFICATION:
I. Murphy -Brown LLC . attest that this application for this change in Owner Affiliation
(person legally responsible for the permit) has been reviewed and is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this form are not completed, this change may not be
processed.
Signature Date
PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO:
Division of Energy.. Mineral, and Land Resources
Stormwater Program
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
For more information or staff contacts, please call [phone] or visit the website at:
http://deg.ne.gov/about/d i v is ions/ener&-mineral-land-resources/stormwater
Page 2 of 2
S WU-OWNERAFFTF. 23Mar20 17

Permit: NCG060209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06117t2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
0
0
0
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
0
Q
11
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
0
0
D
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
0
0
0
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
■
0
0
0
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
0
0
0
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
0
0
0
# Does the Plan include a HMP summary?
0
0
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
0
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
0
0
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■
0
0
0
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
0
0
0
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
0
0
11
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
1=1
0
11
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0
0
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
0
❑
❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■
❑
0
0
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
n
■
❑
0
Comment: The Trailer wash area has a wastewater permit WQ0023310. All other
drainage from the the sites involving truck maintainance and storage should be included
within this permit.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
0
0
0
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
0
0
0
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
0
0
■
0
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
■
0
0
0
Page: 3

Permit: NCGO60209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06/17/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment:
Page: 4

Permit: NCGO60209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Dale: 06117/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation ' Reason for Visit: Routine
InApection summary:
✓ ecet�d a Tier III notification for this site regarding TSS for outfalls 1 and 3.
Monitoring data suggests that there are consistant problems with COD and TSS. An analysis of the data should be
performed to evaluate the causation of the elevated levels. However, values of the COD and TSS appear to be improving
when referenced to 2009-2010 data.
Murphy Brown reps proposed to install rock check dams in the ditchlines for 1 and 3 outlets. This may prove to lower the
numbers. Filtration can provide some relief in regards to TSS and COD, but the filtration provided by #57 stone may not
be enough to impact the analytical results. However, this inspector feels it may be prudent to consider enlarging the
stormwater pond and routing the 1 and 3 outlets to the'pond. There are some downfalls to this idea as you may be
concentrating the problem, but in concentrating it, you may be able to treat it better. The problem root is in the quantity of
organic debris in the facility. Diligent housekeeping may also help in reducing numbers. Maintenance on the pond by
cleaning out the bottom will aid in this as well. Install permanent baffles, not silt fence, to increase flow path.
In any case, the problem needs to be evaluated. If the sampling continues to prove problematic, you will need to submit
alternative solutions to this office.
Inclusion of the vehicle maintainace areas will activate section C of the general permit if there is more than 55 gallons of
motor oil and or hydraulic oil per month. You will need to revise the SPPP to include these areas, minus the truck wash
areas covered by the recycle system. Evaluate additional for outfalls. I discussed this with the previous inspector. She
said that these areas need to be included.
Page: 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCGO60209 Effective: 12JO1112 Expiration: 10/31/17 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Warsaw Feed Mill
County: Duplin 2822 NC Highway 24 West
Region: Wilmington
Warsaw NC 28398
Contact Person: Katie A Elmer Title: PE Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection pate: 06/1712014
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 01:00 PM
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: FoodlTobaccolSoapslCosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Murphy—B turn LLC PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
December 30, 2013
NCDNER
Attn: Stormwater Permitting Unit
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Subject: Assessment of BMPs — Warsaw Feed Mill
To whom it may concern:
As required by Storm Water General Permit Number NC060000, Section E, please find below the
assessment of best management practices for the Warsaw Feed Mill, located in Duplin County
(Warsaw) North Carolina. This communication addresses the issues in the same numerical order
that they appear in Section E of the permit.
I . The Warsaw Feed Mill is utilized to manufacture animal feed strictly for the animals fed
by Murphy -Brown LLC. As a part of this process, grain feedstuffs in the form of corn,
wheat, sorghum, and soybean mill, are delivered to the facility by rail and truck where
they are ground, mixed, and pelleted into feed. Also added to these grain products are
small amounts of animal fat, micronutrients, and fillers. Inherent in this process is a need
to keep these feedstuffs dry, as any moisture not only hampers the milling process, but
can also ruin the quality of both the feedstuffs and the feed. At the Warsaw Feed Mill, all
dry grain and meal delivered to the facility are unloaded indoors. Manufactured feed is
also loaded out of the facility into trucks in an indoor facility. Animal fats from rail cars
and trucks are also offloaded indoors. These offloading areas are cleaned regularly. The
only material offloaded outside would be various and small amounts of liquid products
such as amino acids. These materials are unloaded on a concrete pad, and into above
ground tanks that are protected by secondary containment. These materials are pumped
into the tanks via solid connection with hoses and care is taken to prevent spillage.
2. The offloading systems, and their potential to create an incidental or accidental spill are
monitored regularly through various check lists by site management. En addition, the
SPPP plan for the facility is evaluated annually and modified as necessary. The fugitive
emission of dust from the milling process potentially creates the most exposure with
regards to storm water. As stated above, the offloading and onloading processes are
covered, and the entire internal system is protected by a pneumatic process as required by
the air permit for the facility. Hard surfaces that are exposed to rainfall are swept or
otherwise kept clean on a daily basis.
3. The manufacturing of feed, because it is grain based, is an attractant for various wildlife
including rodents and birds. By minimizing the amount of spilled material, practicing
extensive rodent control practices, and cleaning regularly, we feel we minimize their
numbers. However, we do not know of a feasible way to eliminate wildlife from our

facilities. We do not feel that the presence of rodents and birds creates a condition that
will lead to high fecal concentrations at any greater rate than a freshly cut corn, wheat, or
sorghum field.
4. We feel the ongoing monitoring of our Storm water Plan, along with modifications as
required, is sufficient to insure that this facility remains in compliance with its permit.
Through Murphy -Brown's ISO 14001 certified EMS, we feel we will be aware of
potential issues, and modify our systems accordingly to insure that compliance metrics
are being met,
Murphy -Brown appreciates the opportunity to submit this report and looks forward to working
with the Division to insure that environmental goals important to the citizens of North Carolina
are met. Please feel free to contact me at [phone], or by email at
kmi-Me,sterbeeW,murphybrownllc.com if there are questions or concerns regarding this
assessment.

Murphy- Brown LLC
To whom it may concern:
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
910-293-3434
910-293-7551 Fax
In accordance with the State of North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural
Resources Division of Water Quality General 'Permit No. NCG060000 Part iI Section B:
Analytical Monitoring Requirements, this is a Tier III notification for the Warsaw Feed Mill,
operating under Certificate of Coverage No. NCG060209, Outfalls #1 and #3 (as shown on the
attached site map) have exceeded the benchmark value of 100 mg/L. for Total Suspended Solids
on four occasions during the term of the current pen -nit. The fourth analytical results showing a
benchmark' exceedance were received on May 15, 2014. The sample collection dates for the four
exceedances are as follows: _. -
December 26, 2012
April 29, 2013
June 24, 2013
April 30, 2014
ECEIVE
J U N 13 2014
BY:
Measures are currently being taken to address thh s issue. Fee.] free to contact Garrett Melvin with
any questions, comments, or concerns, at (910)-293-5366 (office) or
arrettmclvin mu )h brownllc.com.
Sincerely,
(arsaw Feed ill Manger)
(Environmental Compliance)

CONSTRUCTION
NOTES:
1.
ALL PROPOSED CHECK DAMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
USING 67 STONE..
2.
CONSTRUCT PROPOSED CHECK DAM #1 TOP ELEVATION TO
MATCH TOP ELEVATION OF EXISTING S/W PIPE #1.
ATTACH TO EXISTING TREE ,
3.
CONSTRUCT PROPOSED CHECK DAM #2 TOP ELEVATION TO
(TO BE MARKED IN FIELD)
MATCH BOTTOM ELEVATION OF PROPOSED CHECK DAM #1.
4.
CLEAN OUT SECTION OF EXISTING DITCH BETWEEN EXISTING
UNDERFLOW DAM AND EXISTING S/W PIPE #3.
5.
CONSTRUCT STAIRCASE #1 TO ALLOW ACCESS TO BOTTOM
OF DITCH BETWEEN EXISTING S/W PIPE #2 AND EXISTING
S/W PIPE #3.
6.
CONSTRUCT STAIRCASE #2 TO ALLOW ACCESS TO BOTTOM
OF DITCH BEFORE CONNECTION WITH PROPERTY LINE DITCH..
7.
STAIRCASE STEPS ARE TO BE BUILT WITH 2"X8" TREATED
INSTALL EROSION CONTROL
LUMBER, WITH NO MORE THAN 8" OF RISE PER STEP.
COIR WATTLE
CONSTRUCT ONE VERTICAL HAND RAIL PER STAIRCASE SET.
EX. S/W PIPE #1
—
SD --SO — — SO — — SO
EX. S/W PIPE #4
APPROX. PROPERTY LINE DITCH
a
PROP. STAIRCASE #2
PROP. CHECK DAM #3
NORTH I
PROPERTY LINE
DITCH PLAN
PLACE CHECK DAM
SO THAT PROPERTY LINE
DITCH FLOW IS NOT DISTURBED
(MIN. 20')
EX. HAZ MAT
STORAGE SHELTER
EX. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
SOUTH RAIL
DITCH PLAN
EXISTING - EXISTING
RAILROAD UNDERFLOW I EX. S/W PIPE #2
DAM
PROP. CHECK DAM #1 -\ PROP. CHECK DAM #2
73'
73'
_m
15'
DITCH SECTION
TO BE CLEANED
PROP. STAIRCASE #1
�-loc
... �r ... ... ... alp
EX. S/W PIPE #3
EX. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
NTS

0
Construction 1. Place stone to the lines and dimensions shown in the plan on a filter fabric
Specifications foundation.
2. Kecp the center stone section at least 9 inches below natural ground level
where the dam abuts the channel banks.
3. Extend stone at least 1.5 feet beyond the ditch bank (Figure 6.83b) to keep
water from cutting around the ends of the check dam.
4. Set spacing between dams to assure that the elevation at the top of the
lower dam is the same as the toe elevation of the upper dam.
5. Protect the channel after the lowest check dam from heavy flow that could
cause erosion.
6. Make sure that the channel reach above the most upstream dam is stable.
7. Ensure that other areas of the channel, such as culvert entrances below the
check dams, are not subject to damage or blockage from displaced stones_
L = The distance such that points
A and B are of equal elevation
Figure 6.83a Space chock dams in a channel so that the crest of downstream darn is at elevation of the toe of ups"am dam_
6.83.2 Rev. 6/06

Murphy�­Brown.
OCT
To whom it may concern:
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
910-293-3434
910-293-7551 Fax
On Thursday October 17`h, 2013 at 4:00 p.m., the Murphy -Brown LLC Warsaw Feedmill,
operating under Stormwater General Permit No. NCG060209 released approximately 600 lbs. of
Di -Calcium Phosphate powder. Di -Calcium phosphate is a common ingredient in animal feed
produced at the mill, but the product was new with bone meal base versus the typical limestone
base. Properties of the bone meal base di -calcium phosphate have a tendency to compact. The
release was caused from a receiving area, when the bone meal based di -calcium phosphate
clogged up the bucket elevator system that elevates the product to the top of the ingredient's
designated storage bin. When the'system became clogged, the powdered substance pushed 1
through an expldion-panel, a safdty'mechanism'designed to -direct pressure in the event of an
explosion and fell into a pellet mill fan, which distributed a thin layer of material over the mill's
asphalt parking lot, an area of approximately 300' x 500'.
Upon awareness of the situation, the receiving process was halted, and all available
employees were directed to the parking lot with brooms to sweep up the spilled di -calcium
phosphate powder. The hand swept powder was placed in a dumpster. In the event of a rain
event, booms were placed in storm water swales to slow water flow from leaving the site, and a
woven synthetic liner was placed over the main storm water drain to divert storm water over a
grassed area, instead of directly into a ditch. At 8:00 p.m. a mechanical sweeper from HERB
Inc. was onsite sweeping the parking Iot. This mechanical sweeping continued until 12:00 a.m.
A vacuum sweeper from Thompson was also onsite collecting the spilled substance for areas the
sweepercould not reach`uritil 2:00 a.m. Friday; October 181h.
Several steps have been taken to prevent a reoccurrence. The purchase and delivery of
Di -Cal phosphate bone meal based has been discontinued for the Murphy -Brown LLC feed
mills, and plans to repair the explosion panel have been made.

Murphy -Brown LLC takes its responsibilities to comply with all applicable regulations
and prevent pollution seriously. We regret that this unfortunate incident has occurred and will
continue to monitor the situation.
Sincerely,
Garrett Melvin
Engineering & Technical Services

.TrnTaTne,0 in tne drainage area to reduce the
:)n basin. '
to emergency or to perform maintenance, the
emergency drain should be minimized to the
O�.
should inspect the embankment.
ed, it should be inspected once a montrang',I��
greater than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in
nd maintenance should be kept in a known set
est.�a
follows. Any problems that are found shall
em:
How I will remediate theproblem:
resent.
Remove the trash/debris.
it and/or
Regrade the soil if necessary to
ave formed.
remove the gully, and then plant a
ground cover and water until it is
established_ Provide lime and a
one-time fertilizer application.
or to
Maintain vegetation at a height of
tshort
I approximately six inches.
FFPa�ge�lEf4
OCT 0 3 2013
BY: .

M
Nelson, Christine
From: Scott, Georgette
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 3:02 PM
To: King, Morella s; Gregson, Jim
Cc: Rowland, Kevin; Nelson, Christine
Subject: RE: Report on food additive (powder) spill at Warsaw Feed Mill
Jim/Morella,
Christine and discussed this morning and Christine has responded and advised everyone. She will document the
conversation and put in the file.
Georgette
From: King, Morella s
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 7:04 PM
To: Gregson, Jim; Scott, Georgette
Cc: Rowland, Kevin
Subject: Report on food additive (powder) spill at Warsaw Feed Mill
Jim, Georgette:
Craig Westerbeek with Warsaw Feed Mill reported (Craig called Kevin and Kevin called me) that this evening they
accidenttely spilled about 400 lb of Di -calcium Phosphate (a powdered bird food additive) while transferring it from a
truck to the grain bin. The material was released at a high elevation up the grain bin and drifted across the parking lot,
turning everything white. They got an industrial sweeper and a vacuum truck and picked up everything they could. They
also deployed booms in case of rain.
What Craig wanted to do was to notify the stormwater group in case anyone else would make a complaint.
Wikipedia on Di -calcium phosphate: It is mainly used as a dietary supplement in prepared breakfast cereals, dog treats,
enriched flour, and noodle products. It is also used as a tableting agent in some pharmaceutical preparations, including
some products meant to eliminate body odor. It is used in poultry feed. It. is also used in some toothpastes as a tartar
control agent. Di -calcium phosphate is listed as insoluble in water.
Thank you,
Morella
I�Sr -
r�vv`�v�� uril1
�►^`� ko e�,5v�
C.
l�
V, 5 G-,C+.
�J1��QtW�`tiQ ANk. G.,�
��j

R
e�®
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of.Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Kraig Westerbeek
Murphy -Brown LLC
PO Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398-0856
Dear Permittee:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
December 4, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Warsaw Feed Mill
COC Number NCG060209
Duplin County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under stormwater General Permit NCG060000
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued General Permit. This permit is
reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated October
15, 2007 (or as.subsequently amended).
The following information is included with your permit package:
• A new Certificate of Coverage (COC)
• A copy of General Permit NCG060000
• A copy of the Technical Bulletin for the General Permit
• Two copies of the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form
• . Two copies of the Qualitative Monitoring Report Form
The General Permit authorizes discharges of stormwater, and it specifies your obligations for discharge
controls, management, monitoring, and record keeping. Please review the new permit to familiarize yourself
with all the changes in the reissued permit. Your facility has six (6) months from the time of receipt of the
permit to update your current SPPP to reflect all new permit requirements.
The first sample period of your permit begins January 1, 2013. Your facility must sample a " measureable
storm event" beginning during the periods beginning January 1 and July 1 of every year (or, if applicable,
report "No Flow," as outlined in Part III, Section E). Also, please note that Tier 3 Actions in Part II of your
permit are triggered by benchmark exceedances on four occasions beginning on the effective date of this
permit and do not count prior exceedances.
The more significant changes in the General Permit since your last COC was issued are noted either in the
Draft Permit Fact Sheet that accompanied the public notice (httg://portal.ncdenr.org/weblwg/ws/su/current-
notices), or in the Response to Comments / Summary of Changes and Technical Bulletin documents that are
posted on the stormwater Permitting Unit's website with the new General Permit. Please visit
htty.//r)ortal.ncdenr.org/web/wcl/ws/su/npdessw (click on `General Permits' tab) to review that information
for your specific General Permit carefully.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Ralegh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Intemet: www,ncwaterc­1j!y nrq
t ^ Equai Opportunity 1 AHir:: aivP Actbn Employer
Nor diCarolina
Natur,111Y

Kraig Westerbeek r
Decembpr 4, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Some of the changes include:
Part II:
• Section A: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) section, if applicable, has been updated
to the most current language of our permits. Additional conditions for specific industry sectors have
been added to the SPPP requirements in some cases.
• Sections 8, C: Failure to perform analytical stormwater monitoring may result in the Division requiring
that the permittee begin a monthly sampling scheme.
• Sections 8, C: A lower TSS benchmark of 50 mg/I for HQW, ORW, PNA and Tr Waters applies to these
more sensitive waters.
• Sections 8, C: The monitoring parameter Oil & Grease (O&G) has been replaced by the parameter
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) for vehicle maintenance areas, and in some cases, other
analytical monitoring requirements.
• Sections 8, C, D: Inability to sample due to adverse weather must be recorded in the SPPP, or in
separate on -site records if your General Permit does not require an SPPP. Adverse weather is defined
in the "Definitions" section of the permit.
• Sections 8, C. The term "Representative Storm Event" has been replaced by "Measurable Storm
Event." A measurable storm event is defined in the permit.
• Section D. If the permittee fails to respond effectively to problems identified by qualitative
monitoring, DWQ may require the permittee to perform corrective action.
Please review Parts III and IV to understand the Standard Conditions of your new NPDES General Permit,
including Compliance and Liability, Reporting, Monitoring and Records requirements; Operation and
Maintenance obligations; and Definitions. Please note that all samples analyzed in accordance with the terms
of this permit must be submitted to the Division on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms available on
the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website above. DMR forms must be delivered to the Division no later than
30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory. Also note that existing
permittees do not need to submit a renewal request prior to expiration unless directed by the Division.
Your coverage under the General Permit is transferable only through the specific action of DWQ_ This permit
does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR, nor does it
relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law,
rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree. If you have any questions regarding this permit
package, please contact the Division's Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone],
Sincerely,
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
cc: DWQ Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Wilmington Regional Office

,It
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060209
STORMWATER
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Murphy -Brown LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at:
Warsaw Feed Mill
2822 NC Highway 24 West
Warsaw
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as Turkey Creek, a class C;Sw waterbody in the Cape Fear River
Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts 1, II, II1, and IV of General Permit No. NCG060000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4, 2012.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this 41h day of December, 2012.
for Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

., L
Conway, Jean
• . i7•
From: Kraig Westerbeek[[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, October04, 2011 5:52 PM
To: Conway, Jean a
Subject: FW: Warsaw Mill �.
Jean, please see the email below that was returned to me by Linda's automatic reply system. Thanks.
0
From: Kraig Westerbeek
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 5:44 PM
To: Willis, Linda
Subject: Warsaw Mill
Linda, yesterday evening, there was a fat spill in the internal dike wall of the Warsaw Mill. Katie Elmer, PE, inspected the area
and•determined that this spill did not trigger any reporting requirements under our SPCC plans. Some fat, however, did drain onto
the paved driveway and down the slope towards an open gutter leading to our stormwater system. The absorbent boom that we
installed at the opening of this gutter that you saw during your last inspection, did a great job in stopping the flow. Upon
inspection, it did appear that a small amount may have slipped under the boom. Staff applied oil dry material to the paved area
several times, sweeping it up and disposing of it in the solid waste bin_ In addition, Safety Clean was called and pumped out the
dike wall area. We also shut off the discharge from our containment pond across the railroad track just in case any fat material
made it past the containments. We will continue to check the manhole downstream of the gutter, and clean any residual product
we may see there. In addition, we will continue to clean the paved area with oil dry as necessary. Can you offer any other
advice? There is no rainfall forecasted for several days, so I feel confident in our efforts to minimize any stormwater
contaminations. Thanks.
Confused about park production? Solve the mystery by clicking here?

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr- Kraig Westerbeek
Warsaw Feed Mill
2822 NC Highway 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Dear Mr. Westerbeek,
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
March 24, 2011
Subject: Warsaw Feed Mill
Certificate of Cover ge NCG060209
And NCG500619
Duplin County
Dee Freeman
Secretary
A site inspection of the Warsaw Feed Mill was conducted on February 2, 2011. The purpose of the
inspection was to provide follow up to the inspection conducted in August of 2010. Pursuant to the
inspection in August of last year, a Notice of Violation with Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV-
2010-PC-0995) was issued to the Warsaw Feed Mill forg�rmit condition violations found at the site.
Enclosed with this correspondence is a "Compliance lnspection Report' for the NPDES Permits held at
the mill site. The inspector, Linda Willis, has documented drastic improvements in good housekeeping
practices as well as best management practices to improve the exposure of pollutants of concern to
stormwater.
The efforts at the site are appreciated and it appears that the stormwater data has already begun to
demonstrate significant improvements. While continued efforts are required at the site to identify and
implement good housekeeping practices, the resulting improvements to stormwater discharges from
the site are encouraging and will be deemed adequate in addressing the violations issued to this
facility. The Notice of Violation with Recommendation for Enforcement (NOV-2010-PC-0995) action will
be closed with no further action to be taken.
Thank you for addressing the issues on site. You may contact me at the Wilmington Regional Office
(910-796-7215) should you have any questions concerning' the enclosed inspection reports or this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Wilmington Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
CC: DWQ WirO Files (NCG060 NCG500 Duplin)
DWQ CO Files
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone] / FAX: [phone]
Internet: wy w.ncw aterquQl�.ora
No�rthCarof na
;Vatura!!y
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service 1-877-623-048

- Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060209 Effective: 11101l07 Expiration: 10/31112 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Warsaw Feed Mill
County: Duplin 2822 NC Highway 24 West
Region: Wilmington
Warsaw NC 28398
Contact Person: Katie A Elmer Title: PE Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 02102/2011 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
c - . , z �t (t
Reason for Inspection: Follow-up Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: FoodrTobaccolSoapslCosmeticslPublic Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Pagel 1

Permit: NCGO60209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection pate: 02/0212011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Inspection Summary:
The site had marked improvements in good housekeeping and best management practices. The emergency containment
areas will remain as constructed, but more frequent inspections for those containment areas should be exercised. The
boiler blowdown is discharged to the second containment trap for ultimate discharge to the stormwater pond. The only
problem with this is if a spill of fat makes it to that containment basin, it will already have wastewater in it and the
containment space will have been taken up making a discharge of the fat to the stormwater pond a greater probability. It
would be best to plumb the discharge of boiler blowdown to the stormdrain system beyond the emergency secondary
containment structures.
Until the stormwater discharges are meeting benchmarks in the permit, the site can not be deemed compliant with the
permit conditions specified, however, the issues that were noted in the Notice of Violation with Recommendation to
Enforce (NOV-2010-PC-0995) have been largely resolved. The Division will afford some time for the improvements in
efforts at the site to be demonstrated in the data collected from future stormwater sampling efforts. In the meantime, the
compliance status will be "neither" "compliant" or "non compliant'.
The Notice of Violation will be officially closed.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG060209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 02/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Follow-up
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑
❑
❑
l;t
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑
❑
❑
S
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑
n
n
p
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: During the next scheduled inspection, a review of the SWP3 should be
conducted to ensure the appropriate amendments have been made to the plan to reflect
the improvements in best management practices and good housekeeping.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
❑
❑
❑
■
Comment: A record review should be conducted during the next scheduled site
inspection.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: The data has shown marked improvement since the last inspection. One
outfall on the north east side of the facility continues to be problematic. The area that
serves this outfall is the bulk loading area from the silos on the east side of the railroad.
The area is graveled and is difficult to keep clean. A sock that directs the raw material
from the silo shoot to the truck should be used to minimize loss of material while
loading. The facility was advised to continue to work towards improvements utilizing
better housekeeping efforts for that area. The inspector felt that with more stringent
housekeeping, improvements should be seen over time at this outfall.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
Page: 3

Permit: NCG060209 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 02/02/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Fallow -up
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfali status, is it property documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ■
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Please ensure that more frequent inspections of the site becomes part of
the daily/weekly routine and that meaningful inspections are conducted. When rail cars
are offloaded, inspections in that area should be conducted. Any spills should be
cleaned up immediately from the containment areas so that rain events do not comingle
stormwater with waste -materials.
Page- 4

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
Washington, U.C. 2Q460
EPA
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES ydrnolday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 I Ut 2 15I 31 NCG500619 ill 121 11/02/02 1 17 181 C( 191 cl 201 I
LJ LJ I J !J LJ
Remarks
21 ill 11111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J I I I I I I I I I 6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 OA ---------------------------Reserved------------------- ---
671 1 69 70 3 71 U 72I N I 73 � 74 75I [ I I I I ! 180
�--J
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time[Oate
Permit Effective Date
POT1N name and NPDES permit Number)
10:00 AM 11/02/02
07/08/01
Warsaw Feed Mill
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration Date
2822 NC Highway 24 west
Warsaw NC 28398
12:00 PM 11/02/02
12/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)IPhone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/TitlelPhone and Fax Number
Wayne Higgh,2822 NC Higghwayy 24 West Warsaw NC Contacted
28398//910-293-5 13/9102933004 Yes
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Linda Willis wTRO wo//910-796-7396/
YV&J, ,o MCLA. Z q o
if
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/OfficelPhone and Fax Numbers Date
% t- .4 -) [ l c=� l 0 , tr l
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES ydrno/day Inspection Type (cont,) 1
3r �NCG50O 19 111 121 11/02/02 117 isu
l Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
The discharge from the boiler blowdown was observed. It was clear of any suspended solids. The
discharge goes to an emergency secondary containment basin that ultimately discharges to a stormwater
pond, then to surface waters. Some concern was expressed that if a fiat spill were to make it beyond the
first containment to the second containment basin, it would likely not be contained since there would already
be wastewater up to the level of the discharge pipe in the basin. The analytical results for the boiler
blowdown were not reviewed at this time.
The facility is constructing a pH delivery system to control the pH of the discharge. Please ensure that all
additives used in the Boiler has been approved through the Biocide 101 form.
Page # 2

Glazier, Kipp
From: Glazier, Kipp
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 2:38 PM
To: - Shiver, Rick; Lewis, Steven
Cc: Willis, Linda; Conway, Jean
Subject: 01-Jul-09 - Lard Spill SIMS Incident # 200901733 - Murphy -Brown, LLC. Warsaw Feed Mill -
NCG060209
Jean Conway and I responded to the subject spill at the Warsaw Feed Mill on July 1, 2009.
The following are our observations:
• Approximately 5000 gallons of lard/fat used as a feed ingredient spilled at the rail -car unloading station.
• The spill occurred overnight between June 30, and July 1, 2009.
• The Mill Manager stated that he spill was not observed by Murphy -Brown, LLC., employees and was likely
caused by improper operation of valves at a rail -car unloading station.
• Lard flowed from the un-loading station into a containment ditch.
• An open slam -gate allowed the material to flow out of the containment area into two oil/water separators. A
small quantity of the lard than overflowed into a stromwater holding pound.
• Approximately 30 cubic yards of storm water mixed with lard will be disposed on a Triple S residuals land
application site in the off US24/903 By-pass in the vicinity of Kenansville, NC.
• The balance of the lard was collected by Carolina By-products for rendering.
« There did not appear to be any surface water impacts from the lard spill.
If you need additional information please advise.
[e-mail]
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Dr Ext
Wilmington, NC 28405
phone [phone]
fax [phone]
Reporting a SSO, by-pass, or spill after hours, holidays, or weekends telephone [phone].
http:lZwww.ncwaterquaIity.org/
E-mails to and from this address are subject to North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

'
of ��
s
i�-• \II..
t'
llf/ ti r
f �
p
,;ky�

.f +1 tk
LakePond
r
A.
r.
r
t

l
uVJ
r
c b c��M i-
ri1 nL-3"VecPan
JU C.G
Aj
l 1
GR....>��,�1 0 '. � i -� Cam► �
fn. 10
2a

07/01/2009 09:31 19197330059 PERCS PACE 01/03
07I01108 07: 31 AM vww, nrc. uvvg. 211 Attn: Page 3 of 3 e260707 F]_
NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER 1-Bo0-4e4-8892
wasuoVERNMENT USE ONLY***GOVERNMENT USE ONLY*+gym
Information rel.sased to a third party shall comply with any
applicable Federal and/or state Freedom of Information And Privacy Laws
Incident Report a 9103o1
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
*Report taken by: CIV KEVIN WILLIAMS at 07:41 on 01-JUL-09
Incident Type: RAILROAD
IMCICent Cause: UNKNOWN �O
Affected Area: J
Incident occurred on 01-JUL-09 at 07:39 local incldent time. +�
Affected Medium; BALLAST ONTO THE BALLAST AND RAIL CAR SHELTER
REPORTING PARTY I�4 /
Name: KATIE ELMER
Organization. HURPHY BROWN LLC.
Address; OLD COURT HOUSE ROAD
WARSAW, NC
MURPHY BROWN LLC, reported for the responsible party.
PRIMARY Phone: [phone] CELLULAR Phone: )919)4182184
Type of Organization: PRIVATE ENTERPRISE
SUSPECTED RESPONSIBLE PARTY (1
Name: KATIE ELMER t
Organization: MURPHY BROWN LLC.
Address; OLD COURT HOUSE ROAD
WARSAW, NC
PRIMARY Phone: [phone]
INCIDENT LOCATION
OLD COURT HOUSE ROAD County: DUPLIN
City: WARSAW State: NC Zip: 28398
RELEASED MATERIAL(S)
CHRIS Code, BCD Official. Material. Name: OIL, EDIBLE- LARD
Also Known As:
Pty Released: 0 UNKNOWN AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT
CALLER STATED STATED DUE TO UNKNOWN CAUSES THAT WAS A SPILL OF
ANIMAL FAT FROM A RAILROAD TANKER CAR. THE SPILL DID REACHED TWO
OIL WATER SEPARATORS AND THEN A DIKED CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE WHERE
THE SPILL WAS STOPPED.
SENSITIVE INFORMATION
INCIDENT DETAILS
Grade Crossing: UNKNOWN
Location Subdivision:
Railroad Milepost:
Tupe of Vehicle Involved:
Crossing Device Type:.
Device Operational: UNKNOWN
DOTCrossing Number:
Date and Time Servlce was/will be Restored:
Brake Failure, UNKNOWN
Federal Post -Accident 219.201 Sub Part C Testing Required: NO

07/01/2Oe9 08:31 19197330059 PERC5
07/01/02 07. 51 AN www. rsrc. uBcy. ail Attnf
PAGE 02/03
Page 2 aF a-0290707 62
Passenger Train Route: NO
Passenger Train Delay Expected: NO
Passenger Train Delay Handling:
---RAILROAD INFORMATION ---
Railroad Involved: UNKNOWN
Train Number: UNKNOWN
Train Type: FREIGHT Train Direction:
Train Speed: Track Speeds
Locomotives; Cars: i Deralied;
Suspected DOT Regulation Non CCmplianco; No
DERAILED CARS:
PCs. Carnumber Type Cargo
IMPACT
Fire Involvea: NO Fire Extinguished: UNKNOWN
INJURIES; NO Hospitalized:
FATALITIES: NO Empl/Crew:
EVACUATIONS:NO Who Evacuated
Damages: NO
Closure hype Ovocription of Ciasure
N
Air:
N
Road:
N
Watorway:
N
Track:
Empl/Crew: Passenger:
Passenger: Occupant;
Radius/Area:
Hours Direction of
Closed Closure
Environmental impact: UNKNOWN
Media Interest: NONE Community Impact due to Material:
Major
Artery: N
REMEDIAL ACTIONS
CALLER STATED THE CONTAINED THE SPILL AND THEY ARE IN THE PROCESS
OF CONTACTING SOME CLEAN UP CREWS.
Release Secured; YES
Release Rate:
Estimated Release Ouratlw
WEATHER
Weather: CLEAR, 70I1F
ADDITIONAL AGENCIES NOTIFIEO
Federal: NONE
State/Local: NONE
State/Local an scene: NONE
State Agency Number: NONE
NOTIFICATIONS BY NRC
USCG ICC (ICC ONI)
01-JUL-09 07:51 (30116693363
OHS I&A STATE AND LOCAL PROM OFFICE (RAL,EIGH, NC FUSION CENTER)
01-JUL-09 07:51 (202)5575179
OHS SOUTH CARGLINA FUSION CENTER (LE SENSITIVE ADVISORS & LIASON PROGRA
01-JUL-09 07:51 (202)8090151
DOT CRISIS MANAGEMENT CENTER (MAIN OFFICE)
01-JUL-09 07:51 (202)3661863
U.S, EPA IV (MAIN OFFICE)
(404)6504955

07/01/2009 08:31 19197330059 PERCS PAGE 03/03
07/01/09 v/. 51 All rrr. nrr,. uat9, wil Attu: rage s of' J *200707 a
U.S. EPA IV (NC/SC INCIDENTS)
01-OUL-09 07:51 (40416504955
NC DEPT OF EMERGENCY MGMT (MAIN OFFICE)
01-OUL-09 07:51 (800)8580368
NC OCCUPATIONAL ENVMTL EPIDEMIOLOGY (COMMAND CENTER)
01-JUL-09 07:51 (919)7075950
NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COORO CTR (MAIN OFFICE)
01-JUL-OS 07:51 (202)2829201
NOAA RPTS FOR NC (MAIN OFFICE)
01-JUL-09 07:51 (206)5254911
SECTOR NORTH CAROLINA (M90 WILMINGTON)
01-JUL-09 07:51 (910) 7722191
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DENR (MAIN OFFICE)
01-3UL-09 07: 51" (919) 7335083
TN BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (TBI)
01-JUL-09 07:51 (615)7444318
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
CALLER HAD LIMITED INFORMATION.
**+k END INCIDENT REPORT #910301 ***
Report any problems by calling 1-800-424-8002
PLEASE VISIT OUR WEB SITE AT http://www.nrc.uscq.mil

P= 4.56 in (10yr, 6 h r storm
Q*= (P-0.2S)^2 / P + 0.8S
S= 10001C N - 10
DA
AREA
ft2
AREA
ac
CN
S
Q*
in
ac-in
Vol
ft3
gal
1
73,969
1.70
82
2.20
2.689
5
16,574
123,971
2
22,193
0.51
82
2.20
2.689
1
4,973
37,195
3
89,959
2.07
85
1.76
2.964
6
22,219
166,196
4
46,751
1.07
82
2.20
2.689
3
10,475
78,354
5
53,879
1.24
95
0.53
3.984
5
17,888
133,802
6
88,318
2.03
88
1.36
3.253
7
23,939
179,066
7
20,519
0.47
88
1.36
3.253
2
5,562
41,603
8
16,448
0.38
88
1.36
3.253
1
4,458
33,349
9
53,124
1.22
82
2.20
2.689
3
11,903
89,035
10
17,475
0.40
82
2.20
2.689
1
3,915
29,288
11
36,921
0.85
95
0.53
3.984
3
12,258
91,689
12
23,477
0.54
89
1.24
3.352
2
6,558
49,055
13
12,155
0.28
89
1.24
3.352
1
3,395
25,398
14
4,866
0.11
85
1.76
2.964
0
1,202
8,990
15
6,736
0.15
98
0.20
4.324
1
2,427
18,155
16
7,805
0.18
98
0.20
4.324
1
2,812
21,036
17
20,624
0.47
98
0.20
4.324
2
7,431
55,587
18
30,084
0.69
98
0.20
4.324
3
10,840
81,084
19
11,851
0.27
85
1.76
2.964
1
2,927
21,894
20
2,103
0.05
82
2.20
2.689
0
471
3,525
21
47,107
1.08
98
0.20
4.324
5
16,974
126,965
22
23,810
0.55
98
0.20
4.324
2
8,579
64,174
23
5,106
0.12
98
0.20
4.324
1
1,840
13,762
24
16,703
0.38
98
0.20
4.324
2
6,019
45,019
25
100,364
2.30
98
0.20
4.324
10
36,164
270,505
26
12,343
0.28
85
1.76
2.964
1
3,049
22,803
27
7,541
0.17
85
1.76
2.964
1
1,863
13,932
28
6,896
0.16
85
1.76
2.964
0
1,703
12,740
29
18,633
0.43
85
1.76
2.964
1
4,602
34,424
30
19,665
0.45
85
1.76
2.964
1
4,857
36,330
31
20,138
0.46
85
1.76
2.964
1
4,974
37,204
32
9,420
022
92
0.87
3.660
1
2,873
21,493
Totals
926,983
21.28
73
265,725
1,987,623

r �j ,�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality Dee Freeman
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Secretary
Governor Director
February 16, 2009
Greg McLean, Director of Feed Manufacturing
Murphy -Brown LLC
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Warsaw Feed Mill
NPDES Permit NCG060209
Duplin County
Dear Mr. McLean:
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality conducted an inspection of the Warsaw Feed Mill on January 29, 2009,
This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the conditions and limitations
specified in NPDES Permit No. NCG060209.
The facility condition was found to be in compliance at the time of the visit. The facility appeared to be clean, and
properly operated with two areas of concern.
1. Analytical sampling results for COD and TSS have exceeded the benchmark values two consecutive
sampling periods at outfall 001 (COD) and 001 and 003 (TSS). Tier two guidelines explained in the NPDES
permit must be followed.
2. The problem with the broken valve connected to the outlet pipe in the stormwater pond at outfall•002 has
been repaired.
Minor spills of grain and production materials should be addressed by modifying BMP's and improved housekeeping.
These measures may help to improve the analytical monitoring data, which have had TSS and COD results above the
cut-off concentrations for this permit.
The operational staff provided documentation of the required qualitative and analytical monitoring at the time of the
inspection. There were no vehicle maintenance areas on this site. The site inspection also included lank containment
areas; boiler area and several stormwater ditch isolation valves. All of these areas appeared adequately maintained and
operated.
Should you have any questions concerning the inspection, please contact me at 910-796-7215.
Sincerely,
Jean Conway
Environmental Specialist
Surface Water Protection Section
cc: Wayne High, Murphy -Brown Mill Manager (P.O. Box 856, Warsaw, NC 28398)
Kevin Weston, Murphy -Brown, Environmental Compliance (P.O. Box 856, Warsaw, NC 28398)
NPDES NCG060000 (Duplin County)
NPS Assistance and Compliance Oversight Unit, CO, attm John Hennessey
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 One
Location: 512 N, Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 NorthCaroli na
Phone: 91 M07-63001 FAX: 91 M07-64921 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.nrwaterquality.org Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

! t
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCGO60209 Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10131I12 Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Murphy Brown - Warsaw Feed Mill
County: Duplin Sr 1108
Region: Wilmington
Warsaw NC 28398
Contact Person: Katie A Elmer Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 01/29/2009 Entry Time: 12:50 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Jean Conway Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COG
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCGO60209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 01/29/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: RouLne
Inspection Summary:
The facility is still having problems meeting the cut-off concentrations for COD at outfall 02 and TSS at 01 and 03. Will
require Tier Two monitoring. Boiler water discharge is being evaluated for chemical additive constituents and will be
changed to help improve quality of effluent from Outfall 02 which has pond with manual release pipe that is scheduled for
repaired once water level recedes. Outfall 01 is a ditch with steep slopes that may contribute to high TSS results. Wooden
boards are being used as a temporary measure to help direct and slow down stormwater flow before leaving property.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG060209 owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 01129/2009 Inspection -type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visa: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
a
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
❑ ■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
■
❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitorin
Yes
No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? a ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0000
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NGG060209 Effective: 09/01/02 Expiration: 08/31/07 Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Murphy Brown - Warsaw Feed Mill
County: Duplin Sr 1108
Region: Wilmington
Warsaw NC 28398
Contact Person: Wayne High Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
NCG500619 Murphy -Brown, LLC - Warsaw Feed Mill
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Entry Time: 10:40 AM Exit Time: 11:25 AM
Primary inspector: Tom Tharrington Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCGO60209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Visited this site to perform a compliance inspection. This facility was currently performing an annual clean out of one of
the storage silos adjacent to a unloading station. Grain was on the roadway around this unloading station where it may
be ground by vehicle traffic and transported to the stormwater system during a rainfall event. Areas inspected included
containment areas, boiler areas, fat unloading area, ditch isolation gates, oil seperators, stormwater pond and effluent
discharge. The oil seperator in the animal fat unloading station had fat on the water surface, with additional fat on
surfaces around the area. The ditch that conveyed stormwater from that area was isolated by a gate valve and the water
in the ditch was free of material. The stormwater pond was empty due to onngoing problems with the outlet piping seal.
Previous repairs have failed seal off the outlet pipe, repairs should be made to this pipe in a timely manner. 'Analytical
data indicates stormwater from this site has exceeded the cut-off concentrations limits indicating the loss of process
material through the stormwater system. Provided information regarding the N.C. Laboratory Certification program for field
parameter certification.
Page: 2

Permit: NCGO60209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, L!_C
Inspection Date: 0411712007 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
C
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
Cl
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
Cl
❑
# Does the Plan -include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
Cl
❑
❑
■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
C
❑
❑
Cl
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitorin
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Provided documentation during inspection.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑.
Comment: The facility has had results for TSS and COD that exceed the cut-off
concentration limits for this permit. These exceedances may be related to problems
with the outlet piping of the stormwater collection pond, this piping should be repaired in
a timely manner. Addressing housekeeping issues around grain and fat unloading
areas would also prevent these materials from reaching the stormwater discharge
during heavy rainfall events.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes
No
NA
NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG060209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 04117/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? n n n
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non storrnwater) discharges?
Comment: Effluent from this facility was light gray in color with black substrate in the
ditch bottom. It appears that material from the production area is periodically lost to the
stormwater system.
onn❑
Page: 4

Warsaw Feed Mill
Tier l inspection Report
January 20, 2009
Outfall 41 & #3 — T. S. S. - 123/ 152 Standard -- 100
1) Possible causes for high level
a) Open ditch grass sides, earth bottom
b) Grass cuttings in water stream
c) Overflow dam needs back filled
d) Flow in ditch from external sources.
e) Highway and road wash off
2) Possible corrective actions
a) improved clean up practices for feed and ingredients.
b) Review location of sample point.
c) Review actual location of outfall.
d) Rebuild overflow dam.
e) Increase frequency of separator clean -out.
Inspection by: Wayne High

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yrlmo/day inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
NI 2 151 31 NCG500619 111 121 09/01/29 117 18UC 19US
GI 201�
1 1-�J
—7
Remarks
211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 I_I.1_ I L I_ I I __I LL_L 1 j 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 116
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 131 QA ---- —-------- —------- ---Reserved- -------- -----------
671 169 70 U 71 I I 72U, 73 I I_I _I 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 I i 80
I
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
01:30 PM 09/01/29
07/08/01
Warsaw Feed Mill
Exit Time/Date
Permit Expiration bate
2822 NC Hwy 24 w
Warsaw NC 28398
02:30 PM 09/01/29
12/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Tilles(syPhone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Wayne High,2822 NC Highway 24 wesc Warsaw NC
28396//910-293-5513/9102933004 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit ® Records/Reports . ® Facility Site Review ■ Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of inspector(s) AgencylOffce/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Linda Willis WIRC WQ//910-796-7396/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9.94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
3� NCG500619 1" 121 09/01/29 117 181c1
(cent.} 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
The environmental manager is investigating a change in the boiler chemicals since COD values have been
exceeding cutoff concentrations in the old permit. Prior to the new tiered approach in the permit, no efforts
were taken by the permittee to resolve the high COD values. Now that two exceedances in benchmarks for
any parameter triggers monthly monitoring, the permittee is taking action to resolve these issues. WiRO
recommends they continue to address the situation until they can resolve the COD issue and resume semi
annual monitoring.
Page # 2

Permit: NCG500619 Owner - Facility: Warsaw Feed Mill
Inspection Date: 01/29/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes
No
NA
NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Is the facility as described in the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
■
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Yes
No
NA
NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
■
❑
❑
Cl
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
■
❑
❑
❑
It effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Page # 3

Permit Date Outfall T5S iOO pH Gli COD/ z a Oil & Grew Fecal Precip
NCG06020! 12/11/2008 1 (f2p 6.54 72 <5 NA 0.7
NCG060201 12/11/2008 2 42 6.42 22 5 NA 0.7
NCG06020, 12/11/2008 3 Q 6.48 70 <5 NA 0.7
NCG06020, 2/29/2009 1 (:ffp 63 <5 NA 2.1
NCG06020! 2/28/2009 2 46 19 <5 NA 2.1
NCG06020! 2/28/2009 3 7 45 <5 NA 2.1
NCG06020! 4/2/2009 1 7.04 90 <5 NA 0.4
NCG060201 4/2/2009 2 8.14 (ED- 22 NA 0.4
NCG06020! 4/2/2009 3 37 7.21 5 NA 0.4
ncg06O2O9 6/15/2009 1 12 NR 5 NA 0.4
ncg06O2O9 6/15/2009 2 11 R 95 NA 0.4
ncg06O2O9 6/15/2009 3 IR �5 NA 0.4
ncg06O2O9 7/27/2009 1 61 1 7 5 NA 1.5
ncg0602O9 7/27/2009 1 4frl) (2j�p <5 NA 1.5
ncg060209 7/27/2009 2 25 54 <5 NA L5
NCG060209 No Flow
NCG060201 12/2/2009 1 21 * 57 <5 NA 0.69
NCG06020' 12/2/2009 2 41 * 13 <5 NA 0.69
NCG060201 12/2/2009 3 Q15 <4 NA 0.69
NCG06020, 1/21/2010 1 54 NR 32 5 NA 1.25
NCG06020! 1/21/2010 2 60 NR (�D<5 NA 1.25
NCG06020! 1/21/2010 3 25 NR 48 <5 NA 1.25
ncg0602O9 2/9/2010 1 b 7.36 13 5 na 1.15
ncg06O2O9 2/9/2010 2 36 7.8 75 5 na 1.15
ncg06O2O9 2/9/2010 3 7.16 (00<5 na 1.15
ncg06O2O9 3/2/2010 1 7.31 141 5 na 0.8
ncg060209 3/2/2010 2 49 13 5 na 0.8
ncg060209 3/2/2010 3 3 6.91 15Q na 0.8
ncg0602Q9 8/12/2010 1 2 5.58 5 6 na 0.3
ncg06O209 8/12/2010 2 62 6.91 1 5 na 0.3
ncg06O2O9 8/12/2010 3 51.2 6.43 18 5 na 0.3
NCG060201. 10/14/2010 1 No,flow
NCG06020! 10/14/2010 2 23.9 7.86 Z03
5 4100 0.2
NCG06020! 10/14/2010 3 81 6.9 5 14000 0.2
NCG060201. 10/14/2010 4 No flow 0.2
NCG06020! 10/14/2010 5 No flow 0.2
NCG06020, 10/14/2010 6 No flow 0.2
NCG0602Q 2/28/2011 1 DRY
NCG06020' 2/28/2011 2 6.7 27 6 NA 0.3
NCG06020' 2/28/2011 3 26 6.5 79 5 NA 0.3
NCG06020! 3/30/2011 1 DRY
NCG06020! 3/30/2011 2 42.5 1 5 n/a 0.25
NCG06020! 3/30/2011 3 56.7 g66 P
27 6 n/a 0.25

- Z .,
NCG06020'. 1/26/2011 1 62.7 7.22 64 5 5000 0.2
NCG06020'. 1/26/2011 2 37.3 (29P 71 5 10. 0.2
NCG06020! 1/26/2011 3 20.2 8.28 14 5 260 0.2
NCG06020! 2010 1 No Flow
NCG06020, 11/3/2010 1 38.3 5 2400 0.2
NCG06020! 11/3/2010 2 38.6 105 5 219 0.2
NCG060201. 11/3/2010 3 42.8 1C) 6 12000 0.2
NCG06020, 6/27/2011 1 103 6.21 647 6 n/a 0.2
NCG06020' 6/27/2011 2 11 6.38 34 9 n/a 0.2
NCG06020, 6/27/2011 3 19 6.73 13 nja 0.2
NCG06020! 5/6/2011 2 73 6.89 18 5 n/a 0.2
NCG060201 5/6/2011 3 63 6.72 23 5 n/a 0.2
NCG060201. 5/6/2011 1 No Flow <5 n/a 0.2
NCG060201 NO FLOW
NCG06020, 11/29/2011 1 39 6.46 71 <5 N/A 1
NCG06020, 11/29/2011 2 35.2 6.74 44 <5 N/A 1
NCG06020! 11/29/2011 3 18.9 6.75 60 <5 N/A 1
NCG0602017/l/2011 - 7/30/2 1 No Flow
NCG06020 8/12/2011 1 No Flow
NCG06020, 8/12/2011 2 87 6.29 192 N/A 0.5
NCG06020! 8/12/2011 3 15 6.23 43 >5 N/A 0.5
NCG06020, 1/11/2012 1 27.4 7.04 <5 N/A 0.3
NCG06020, 1/11/2012 2 84.1 6.84 17 7 NA 0.3
NCG06020! 1/11/2012 3 81.5 7.15 102 <5 NA 0.3
NCG060201 Dec-12 1 No Flow
NCG06020, 1/11/2012 2 150 6.97 230 11 60000 None
NCG060201 5/9/2012 1 108 6.44 <5 NA 0.4
NCG06020, 5/9/2012 2 3 6.6 <5 NA 0.4
NCG06020! 5/9/2012 3 20 6.56 4 <5 NA 0.4
NCG060201 2/24/2012 1 85.3 7.09 cap 5 N/A 0.7
NCG06020! 2/24/2012 2 75.3 9.34 112 <5 N/A 0.7
NCG06020! 2/24/2012 3 36 6.82 66 <5 N/A 0.7
NCG06020, 3/31/2012 1 31.5 7.35 44 <5 N/A 0.4
NCG060201 3/31/2012 2 25 7.01 109 <5 N/A 0.4

NCG06020'
3/31/2012
3
17.3
7.05
66 <5
N/A
0.4
NCG06020'JUNE-NO FLOW
1
NCG06020'
7/11/2012
1
45.5
6.92
42 <5
N/A
1.4
NCG06020'
7111/2012
2
6.34
4 5
N/A
1.4
NCG06020'
7/11/2012
3
129
6.72
0 <5
N/A
1.4
NCG06020!
8/19/2012
1
10
7.41
47 <5
N/A
1.2
NCG06020:
8/19/2012
2
4
6.81
70 <5
N/A
1.2
NCG06020!
8/19/2012
3
55.5
7.65
37 <5
N/A
1.2
NCG06020!
9/30/2012
1
68.8
6.78
70
11 N/A
0.4
NCG06020'
9/30/2012
2
89
6.5
4$
10 N/A
0.4
NCG06020,
9/30/2012
3
193
7.06
65
5 N/A
0.4
NCG06020' 10/2012 NO FLOW
NCG06020,
12/26/2012
1
172
7.22
67 <5
N/A
0.9
NCG06020,
12/26/2012
2
68.3
7.28
82 <5
N/A
0.9
NCG06020!
12/26/2012
3
14
7.3
89 <5
N/A
0.9
NCG06020! 1/2013 NO FLOW
NCG06020'
2/11/2013
1
59
6.75
80
6 N/A
0.35
NCG06020,
2/11/2013
2
68.9
6.59
(MD
6 N/A
0.35
NCG06020'
2/11/2013
3
45.3
6.73
80
6 N/A
0.35
NCG06020'
3/12/2013
1
64.6
6.79
82 <5
N/A
0-35
NCG06020,
3/12/2013
2
44.7
6.52
62 <5
N/A
0.35
NCG06020,
3/12/2013
3
88.5
6.62
60 <5
N/A
0.35
NCG06020!
4/29/2013
1
150
6.77
106 <5
N/A
0.35
NCG06020'
4/29/2013
2
6
6.59
110 <5
N/A
0.35
NCG06020!
4/29/2013
3
102
7.16
106 <5
N/A
0.35
NCG06020! MAY, 2013
NO FLOW
NCG06020:
6/24/2013
1
109
6.84
46 <5
N/A
0.65
NCG06020,
6/24/2013
2
16.5
6.72
28 <5
N/A
0.65
NCG06020!
6/24/2013
3
0
6.8
35 <5
N/A
0.65
NCG06020, SIGNED 9/17/13
JULY 2013 NO FLOW
NCG06020'
8/17/2013
1
60.5
6.61
110
8 N/A
0.6
NCG06020'
8/17/2013
2
62.4
6.51
62 <5
N/A
0.6
NCG06020'
8/17/2013
3
70.5
6.46
90 <5
N/A
0.6

NCG06020:9/2013 NO FLOW
NCG060201 10/2013 NO FLOW
ncg060209
11/26/2013
1 37.3 7.46
33
16 N/A 0.7
ncg060209
11/26/2013
2 42.5 7.16
35 <5
N/A 0.7
ncg060209
11/26/2013
3 46.7 7.13
40
12 N/A 0.7
NCG06020,12/2013 NO FLOW

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr -, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, RE. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 8, 2007
Mr. Greg McLean, Director of Feed Manufacturing
Murphy -Brown LLC
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
Subject: NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Warsaw Feed Mill
NPDES Permit NCG060209
Duplin County
Dear Mr. McLean:
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality conducted an inspection of the Warsaw Feed Mill on April
17, 2007. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with the conditions
and limitations specified in NPDES Permit No. NCG060209.
The facility condition was found to be marginal at the time of the visit, with two areas of concern.
Production materials in adjacent roadways. - Grain was present on the roadway adjacent to a
truck unloading station, this grain was being crushed by vehicle traffic and could be conveyed
offsite by stormwater during rainfall events. A significant portion of the material present was
likely from an on -going annual clean out of one of the storage silos. The mill staff indicated that
sweeping of the roadway would be implemented in the future.
Minor spills and housekeeping surrounding animal fat off-loading area. - The off-loading of
animal fat for production purposes also was a source of potential contamination that could be
addressed with additional housekeeping. Animal fat was present on surfaces around the
unloading station and around the oil/water separator. No fat was observed in the ditch area that
conveys stormwater from this area to the discharge point at the time of the inspection.
These issues are reflected in the analytical monitoring data, which have had TS5 and COD results
above the cut-off concentrations for this permit. Additionally the effluent from the site was light gray in color with
visible solids and a black substrate was present along the effluent ditch indicating anaerobic biological activity.
Both of these issues are likely sources of production materials lost through the stormwater discharge outlet at this
site and should be addressed by modifying BMP's or improved housekeeping.
The site inspection also included tank containment areas; temporary boiler area, new boiler area and
several stormwater ditch isolation valves. All of these areas appeared adequately maintained and operated. The
stormwater pond was nearly empty at the time of the inspection because of leaks around the outlet pipe.
According to the Murphy -Brown staff, this outlet pipe has had several previous repairs, all of which have failed to
remedy the problem. Adequate repair of this outlet pipe should be completed in a timely manner.
No thCarolma
�J01,'fAl ii;
North Carolina Division or Water Quality 127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmirngton, NC 28405 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: www.ncm-aterquality,org Fax [phone] I-877.623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Afrrrmative Action Employer — 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

Page 2
Warsaw Feed Mill
Duplin County
NGG060209
The operational staff provided documentation of the required qualitative and analytical monitoring at the
time of the inspection. information regarding North Carolina Laboratory Certification requirements for field
parameter certification was also provided to the Murphy -Brown staff, this certification is required for the pH
analysis performed at this site. There were no vehicle maintenance areas on this site.
The results from future analytical and qualitative sampling events of the stormwater effluent shall be
maintained on -site and made available to North Carolina Division of Water Quality personnel during future
inspections.
Should you have any questions concerning the inspection, please contact me at 910-796-7215.
Sincerely,
Tom Tharrington
Wastewater Treatment Plant Consultant
Surface Water Protection Section
Wilmington Regional Office
cc: Katie Elmer, Murphy -Brown (P.O. Box 856, Warsaw, NC 28398)
Wayne High, Murphy -Brawn (P.O. Box 856, Warsaw, NC 28398)
DWQIRaleigh Central Files
f NPDES General Permit Inspection Files (Duplin County)

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060209 Effective: 09/01/02 Expiration: 08/31/07 Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration. Facility: Murphy Brown - Warsaw Feed Mill
County: Duplin Sr 1108
Region: Wilmington
Warsaw NC 28398
Contact Person: Wayne High Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
NCG500619 Murphy -Brown, LLC - Warsaw Feed Mill
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Entry Time: 10:40 AM Exit Time: 11:25 AM
Primary Inspector: Tom Tharrington ��"�^— Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: FoodlTobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Q Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG060209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? _.
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
m
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
❑
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Provided documentation during inspection.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes
No
NA
NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analyticai monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑
❑
■
❑
Comment: The facility has had results for TSS and COD that exceed the cut-off
concentration limits for this permit. These exceedances may be related to problems
with the outlet piping of the stormwater collection pond, this piping should be repair ed in
a timely manner. Addressing housekeeping issues around grain and fat unloading
areas would also prevent these materials from reaching the stormwater discharge
during heavy rainfall events.
Permit and Outfalls ' Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG060209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ .0 w
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit {non stormwater} discharges?
Comment: Effluent from this facility was light gray in color with black substrate in the
ditch bottom. It appears that material from the production area is periodically lost to the
stormwater system.
Page: 4

Permit: NCG060209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 04/1712007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
. . Inspection summary:
Visited this site to perform a compliance inspection. This facility was currently performing an annual clean out of one of
the storage silos adjacent to a unloading station. Grain was on the roadway around this unloading station where it may
be ground by vehicle traffic and transported to the stormwater system during a rainfall event. Areas inspected included
containment areas, boiler areas, fat unloading area, ditch isolation gates, oil seperators, stormwater pond and effluent
discharge. The oil seperator in the animal fat unloading station had fat on the water surface, with additional fat on
surfaces around the area. The ditch that conveyed stormwater from that area was isolated by a gate valve and the water
in the ditch was free of material. The stormwater pond was empty due to onngoing problems with the outlet piping seal.
Previous repairs have failed seal off the outlet pipe, repairs should be made to this pipe in a timely manner. Analytical
data indicates stormwater from this site has exceeded the cut-off concentrations limits indicating the loss of process
material through the stormwater system. Provided information regarding the N.C. Laboratory Certification program for field
parameter certification.
Page: 2

SPILL PREVENTION CONTROL
AND
COUNTERMEASURE PLAN
(SPCC)
for
M--urphy Brown Lw
WARSAW FEED MILL
2822 HWY 24 WEST
WARSAW, NC 28398
Original Date of Plan: January 9, 2004
Date of Last Plan Amendment/P.E. Certification: April 16, 2007
Date of Last Plan Review: April 16, 2007
Designated Person accountable for spill prevention:
WAYNE HIGH
FEED MILL MANAGER
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that I have examined the facility, and being familiar with the provisions
of40 CFR part 112, attest that this SPCC Plan has been prepared in accordance with
good engineering practices, procedures for required inspections and testing have been
established, and the plan is adequate for the facility.
Engineer:--K�afie A.
Signature: Ej
_ 3' 'i:..• ;
Registration Number: ,
Yet• Q ��^�� E
4 G2CF33 u
State: -
Date: o (- E

SPILL PREVENTION CONTROL AND COUNTERMEASURE
COMPLIANCE INSPECTION PLAN
REVIEW PAGE
In accordance with 40 CFR 112.5(b), a review and evaluation of this SPCC Plan is
conducted at least once every five (5) years. As a result of this review and evaluation,
The Warsaw Feed Mill will amend the SPCC Plan within six months of the review to
include more effective prevention and control technology if. (1) such technology will
significantly reduce the likelihood of a spill event from the facility, and (2) if such
technology has been field -proven at the time of review. Any amendment to the SPCC
Plan shall be certified by a Professional Engineer within six months after a change in the
facility's design, construction, operation, or maintenance occurs which materially affects
the facility's potential for the discharge of oil into or upon the navigable waters of the
United states or adjoining shorelines.
Review Dates Signature
1. April 16, 2012
2. April 16, 2017
3. April 16, 2022
* SPCC Plan amended and certified by a Registered Professional Engineer per 40 CFR 112.3(d)
MANAGEMENT APPROVAL
The Management of Murphy -Brown LLC has implemented this Oil Spill
Prevention and Countermeasures Plan to prevent the discharge of oil and hazardous
materials to navigable waters. If a spill does occur, all necessary precautions will be
taken to prevent the discharged oil and hazardous materials from reaching navigable
waters. Management will notify the appropriate authorities of any change in the plan or
discharge of oil or hazardous materials in the future. This plan will be made available for
review by agency personnel anytime during normal working hours.
Authorized Facility representative: Wayne High
Signature: Date: 3 d
Title: Feed Mfillmanager

INTRODUCTION TO A
SPILL PREVENTION CONTROL & COUNTERMEASURE PLAN
Federal Spill Prevention Standards (40 CFR 110, 40 CFR 112, 40 CFR 113 and 40 CFR
114) establish the procedures, methods and equipment requirements to prevent the
discharge of oil or hazardous materials from non -transportation related on -shore and off-
shore facilities into the navigable waters of the United States. This includes not only
direct releases, but also indirect releases to groundwater that, in most circumstances, may
migrate to surface water.
If the facility has the capacity to store oil or hazardous materials in quantities equal to or
greater than 42,000 gallons in underground storage, or 1,320 gallons in aggregate
aboveground storage, the facility is required to have a Spill Prevention, Control and
Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan. Oil, in this plan, includes.
• Petroleums;
• Fuel oils;
• Oily sludges;
• Oil refuse;
• Waste oils;
• Oils mixed with wastes;
• Oils mixed with hazardous waste;
• Hazardous materials, regardless of container size
• Animal Fats
An SPCC Plan identifies a facility's containment structures, equipment, and/or other
resources to prevent a spill from reaching surface waters. The SPCC Plan is required to
be a carefully drafted plan, prepared in accordance with good engineering practice, and
having the full approval of management at a level with authority to commit necessary
resources for the plan's implementation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
L .. FACILITY OWNER and OPERATOR..................................................................... l
A. Facility Owner, Address, and TeIephone............................................................. I
B. Facility Operator, Address, and Telephone ..........................
2. FACILITY CONTACT(s)......................................................................................... 1
3. FACILITY DESCRIPTION....................................................................................... 1
A. Facility Operations............................................................................................... 1
B. Facility Storage.................................................................................................... 2
C. Drainage Pathways and Distance to Navigable Waters ....................................... 2
4. SPILL HISTORY..........................................................................................._........... 3
5. POTENTIAL SPILL PREDICTIONS, VOLUMES, RATES, AND CONTROL.... 4
6. PREVENTION MEASURES PROVIDED............................................................... 5
A. Drainage Control.................................................................................................. 5
B. Bulk Storage Tanks/Secondary Containment...................................................... 6
C. Facility Transfer Operations................................................................................ 8
D. FaciIity Truck Loading/Unloading Operations.................................................... 9
E. Inspections/Record Keeping.............................................................................. 10
F. Site Security ................... .................................................................................... 10
G. Personnel Training and Spill Prevention Procedures.......... ............................... 11
7. SPILL CONTROL AND COUNTERmEASURE.................................................. 12
A. Immediate Action/Spill Control......................................................................... 12
B. In -House Reporting............................................................................................ 12
C. Reporting to Federal and State Regulators......................................................... 13
FIGURES
FIGURE I...............................................................FACILITY LOCATION DIAGRAM
FIGURE 2 ................ FACILITY LAYOUT AND SURFACE DRAINAGE DIAGRAM
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 - CERTIFICATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE
SUBSTANTIAL HARM CRITERIA CHECKLIST
APPENDIX 2 - SECONDARY CONTAINMENT CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX 3 - RECORD OF DRAINAGE, INSPECTION, and OIL REMOVAL
APPENDIX 4 - MONTHLY FACILITY INSPECTION CHECKLIST
APPENDIX 5 - EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST
APPENDIX 6 - SPILL REPORTING DOCUMENTATION FORM

I. FACILITY OWNER. and OPERATOR:
A. Facility Owner, Address, and Telephone:
Murphy -Brown LLC
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
[phone]
B. Facility_ Operator, Address and Telephone:
Murphy -Brown LLC
P.O. Box 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
[phone]
2. FACILITY CONTACT(s):
Name Title Telephone
Wayne High Mill Manager [phone] x5513
J.W. Creech Receiving Supervisor [phone] x5522
3. FACILITY DESCRIPTION:
A. Facility Operations -
Murphy -Brown LLC Warsaw Feed Mill is an animal feed production facility. It
imports grain and other raw materials, then processes these materials and ships out
finished feed for Murphy -Brown LLC's numerous hog farms. The mill stores fuel oil
and animal fats. A No. 6 fuel oil fired boiler heats feed ingredients. The boiler uses two
10,000-gallon above ground No. 6 fuel oil -tanks for storage. Along with this, a 10,000-
gallon diesel storage tank is used to fuel the backup generator. In addition 124,000
gallons of animal fat is stored in various tanks and used in feed processing. The facility
is located at SR 1108, Carroll's Rd, Warsaw, NC. Figures 1 and 2 show the location of
the facility and the surrounding area.

B. Facility Storage:
Tank ID Volume Contents
Above -around Storage Tanks MST's
Generator Area
Tank # 1
10,000 gallons
No. 2, Diesel Fuel
North Mill Area
Tank #1
8,000 gallons
Animal fat
Tank #2
8,000 gallons
Animal fat
Tank #3
8,000 gallons
Animal fat
North Mill
Bulk Motor Oil
250 gallons
Oil
Boiler Fuel Area
Tank 99 & 10
20,000 gallons
No. 6, Fuel Oil
LSS
12,000 gallons
LSS
South Mill
Bulk Motor Oil
250 gallons
Oil
South Triple -Silo Area
Tank #4
30,000 gallons
Animal fat
Tank #5
30,000 gallons
Animal fat
Tank #6
40,000 gallons
Animal fat
Betaine
12,000 gallons
Betaine
Choline
10,000 gallons
Choline
Alimet
12,000 gallons
Alimet
Underground Storage Tanks (UST's)
Not Applicable
Drums/Containers
Volume
Contents
North Mill
1 Drum
55 gallons
Oil
Compressor Room
1 Drum
55 gallons
Oil
Transformer Area
6 Transformers
2,940 gallons
Oil
Total: 203,550 gallons
C. Drainage Pathway and Distance to Navigable Waters
Murphy -Brown LLC Warsaw Feed Mill is located within 7,000 feet of Turkey Creek.
Any spilled product is expected to flow as identified in Section 6.A_1, and as indicated in
Figure 1.
2

4. SPILL HISTORY [112.7(a)]:
There have been no significant oil spills other than a :few gallons on the ground that did
not reach the waters of the state. These incidents were remediated in-house.
Facilities that spill more than 1,000 gallons of oil or animal fat into navigable waters or
onto adjoining shorelines in a single incident, or have two reportable oil spills of more
than 42 gallons within any 12-month period must submit the information detailed in
Section 7 of this plan_
SPILLH157gRY_
LOCATiIONIDATE
, IME'�of�SPILL
;srfk
TY'Ps ,&
f MC3tlNT
S IP LL'D
�.��. ,
C�A`USE�
i `,'
. .'
AEF.EETwn
WATERCGlURSES'
* ' a
AGES &}
DAMtV
COST if
FAGS'
�Yh•..,.�..� 1 �,�,
:�GLEAIVUP
COST
k 4 ��
CORRECTIVE`
; `ACTION �'
ti.3�* �..

5. POTENTIAL SPILL PREDICTIONS, VOLUMES, RATES, AND CONTROL
(112.7(b)]:
sj
- oTv Yii�
,10 TEL
Aboveground Storage Tanks
Generator Area
rupture; leakage
10,000
10,000
North
11,377
North Area
rupture; leakage
8,000
8,000
Northwest
18,716
North Mill Motor
rupture; leakage
250
250
Mill Floor
>250
Oil
Boiler Fuel Area
rupture; leakage
20,000
20,000
West
22,000
South Triple -Silo
rupture; leakage
40,000
40,000
North
50,668
Area
South Mill Motor
rupture; leakage
250
250
Mill Floor
>250
Oil
Truck Loading/Unloading Operations
North Mill tank
rupture; piping failure;
6,000
6,000
North
100
truck unloading
valve failure
Boiler fuel tank
rupture; overfill;
6,000
6,000
West
100
truck unloading
valve failure
Rail car unloading
rupture; piping failure;
25,000
25,000
South to ditch
200
valve failure
then North to
catch basin
South Triple -Silo
rupture; piping failure;
10,000
10,000
North
300
tank truck
valve failure
unloading
Other Equipment/Storage
Above ground
leakage;valve failure
55,000
55,000
North
0 to 40,000
pipelines
(depending on
location of failure)
2 gallon drums
drum rupture
55
55
within storage
110
area
6 transformers
Rupture
736 (max.)
736
Varies
Minimal, inspected

6. PREVENTION MEASURES PROVIDED:
Drainage Control Diversionary Structures and Containment 111.2.7(c)]
At Murphy -Brown LLC Warsaw Feed Mill all areas that store oil or fat have secondary
containment, including dikes, berms, walls, and curbing. In addition to the preliminary
protection of a secondary containment structures, the site also utilizes diversion ditches,
liquid/oil separators, training and inspections to prevent intrusion of fats, oils, and greases
from reaching navigable waters of the state.
A. Drainage Control [ 1 l 2.7(e)(1)(i-v)l :
Drainage from areas storing fats, oils and greases is controlled by secondary
containment structures.
(i) Drainage from diked (secondary retaining) areas:
Generator Area:
downgradient to the north and into an unnamed tributary of Turkey
Creek
North Mill Area:
downgradient to the northwest down paved drive and into a catch
basin that leads to the fat separator
Boiler Fuel Area:
downgradient to the west and across the ground; then accumulate
around the skimmer
Rail Fat Shelter:
downgradient to the south and into a catch basin; basin is
controlled by a gate valve; when valve is open drainage goes to a
skimmer then into an unnamed tributary of Turkey Creek
South Triple -Silo:
downgradient to the North and into a drainage ditch with a gate
valve; when open the ditch drains to an unnamed tributary of
Turkey Creek
Valves and sump pumps used in diked (secondary retaining) area
storage:
The Generator, North Mill, and South Mill containments have manual
ball valves for drainage. The Boiler Fuel and South Triple -Silo areas
use sumps to drain secondary storage containment areas. The sump
pumps are manually powered.
(iii) Plant drainage systems from undiked areas:
Undiked areas include the loading/unloading of the Generator, Boiler
Fuel, Rail Fat Shelter, South Triple -Silo, and Fat Tank Truck areas.

Drainage from these areas would follow the anticipated paths as
detailed in Section 6.A.i of this plan.
(iv) Facility drainage systems and equipment:
The secondary containment structures, diversion ditches, storm drains,
oil/liquid separation systems, as well as training and monthly
inspections are intended to prevent drainage to the navigable waters of
North Carolina. Accumulation of oil in a storm drain would be
removed by either feed mill personnel with absorbent pads or an
outside contractor via vacuum pump.
B. Bulk Storage Tanks/Secondary Containment [112.7(c)(2). i-xi) L
(i) Tank compatibility with its contents:
The AST's are constructed of welded steel in accordance with API
Standards 650 and 651 and are compatible with the contents that they
hold.
North Mill Area -- Manufactured by Eisenback Equipment Sales,
Camden, S.C., welded steel insulated with cone bottom constructed in
2006
Choline, Alimet and Betaine are polyurethane.
(ii) Diked area construction and containment volume for storage tanks:
Diked areas are constructed of either poured concrete walls or concrete
block. The concrete containment areas have been designed to be
sufficiently impervious to contain fats, oils, and greases. Maintenance
will be needed on a regular basis to maintain the integrity of the
structures.
(iii) Corrosion protection of buried metallic storage tanks:
There are no buried metallic storage tanks at the Warsaw Feed Mill.
(iv) Corrosion protection of partially buried metallic tanks:
There are no partially buried metallic storage tanks at the Warsaw
Feed Mill.

(v) Aboveground tank periodic integrity testing:
Tanks are regularly observed by facility personnel. Formal inspections
are conducted monthly to examine the exterior of the tanks and the
containment areas. These inspections are documented using the report
form that can be found in Appendix 4. In accordance with API 653,
every ten years, or more often when necessary based on visual
inspections or monitoring results, the AST's are inspected using a non-
destructive integrity test, repaired, if necessary, and painted.
(vi) Control of leakage through internal heating coils:
The rail tanker at the animal fat receiving station does have internal
heating coils. The steam condensate from the coils is released to the
ground where it will might flow into a catch basin with a gate valve
that when open leads to a skimmer. The operator will visually inspect
the condensate and take counter control measures if necessary when
unloading the tanker.
(vii) Tank installation fail-safe engineered:
Visual level indicators or operational level control sensors are
provided for each of the bulk storage tanks.
(viii) Observation of disposal facilities for effluent discharge:
Oil observed on the ground or a storm water invert which does not
lead to a separator shall be cleaned up immediately. Either by feed mill
personnel or an outside contractor. All waste oil shall be disposed of
in accordance with Federal, State, focal Laws and regulations.
(ix) Visible oil leak corrections from tank seams and gaskets:
Visible oil leaks are reported to the maintenance department, so that
they can be fixed immediately. The maintenance department informs
the Mill Manager when the repair has been completed or if additional
time is needed to obtain parts and remedy the leak. Measures will be
taken to minimize and mitigate the leak, while awaiting repair. Any
spilled oil is to be cleaned up immediately by mill personnel or an
outside contractor where appropriate. Oil spill cleanup supplies are
located in a spill kits located in the parts warehouse, salt storage
building, and near the #5 tank.

(x) Appropriate position of mobile or portable oil storage tanks:
55 gallons of oil is stored in 55-gallon drums in the North Mill and
Compressor Room, All drums are to be stored on portable
containments.
C. Facility Transfer Operations F112.7 e 3 i-v
(i) Buried piping installation protection and examination:
According to Murphy -Brown personnel there are not any buried oil
pipelines at Murphy -Brown LLC, Warsaw Feed Mill
(ii) Not -in-service and service terminal connections:
Terminal connections in the tank truck loading/unloading areas are
capped and valves in the product receiving piping are closed when not
in use. Pipelines that are out of service are to be evacuated and blank
flanged if not removed from the site. All aboveground piping is to be
marked with product contents, origin, and direction of flow.
(iii) Pipe support design:
Pipe runs and supporting structures must be properly designed, to
minimize corrosion and abrasion and accommodate expansion and
contraction.
Animal fat is transferred from receiving areas to storage tanks along
extended pipelines suspended on pipe supports. Pipe runs are
constructed near ground level with supports tied directly into an
adjacent wall or vertically into the ground surface and overhead along
a pipe bridge over the railroad track.
Boiler fuel supply from the No. 6 fuel oil tanks is transferred via an
overhead pipe rack.
Extended pipe runs for diesel fuel are connected via proper pipe
supports directly to adjacent walls or passes through walls.
(iv) Aboveground valve and pipeline examination:

Valves, pipelines and pipe supports are observed during the normal
mill operation and examined during the monthly inspection included in
Appendix 4. These inspections are documented.
(v) Aboveground piping protection from vehicular traffic:
Some aboveground piping is located within secondary containment
areas and is protected against impact of vehicular traffic by concrete
berms. Other aboveground piping is protected by barrier poles.
D. Facility Tank Car and Truck LoadinpiUnloadinp, Operations [112.7(e)(4)(i-
iv
(i) Loading/unloading procedures meet DOT regulations:
Murphy -Brown LLC Warsaw Feed Mill requires all drivers to comply
with DOT regulations in 49 CFR part 177 and facility standard
operating procedures. Unloading of product is performed by an outside
fuel supplier or facility personnel. A trained Murphy -Brown LLC
employee will be aware of all loading/unloading and fueling
operations.
(ii) Warning and barrier systems for vehicles:
Warning signs are to be posted in all the loading/unloading areas to
prevent vehicular departure before disconnecting flexible or fixed
transfer lines.
BEFORE DEPARTURE
• Contact MB Employee Before Starting
• Driver MUST OBSERVE the Unloading Process
• Contact MB Employee After Stopping & Close Valves
• Drain 1-lose After Disconnecting & Cap Line
• Report ALL Spills
(iii) Vehicles examined for lowermost drainage outlets before leaving:
Warning signs are to be posted in the loading/unloading areas to
remind Murphy -Brown LLC employees and outside carriers to remind
drivers to examine drain outlets prior to departure.

E. Inspections/Record Keeping rI I2.7(e)(8)l:
Monthly Inspections: Formal facility inspections are conducted monthly and
records of these inspections are documented and signed by the inspector or Mill
Manager. During the monthly inspections, all tanks, containment structures,
valves, pipelines, spill -prevention devices, and other equipment are inspected.
The checklist used for these inspections can be found in Appendix 4.
Wet Weather Discharge Inspections and Records: On an as needed basis, water is
released from secondary containment structures in such a manner as to not release
any oils or greases. To document this occurrence an employee will record their
activity and observations on the Record of Drainage, Inspection, and Oil Removal
form found in Appendix 3.
Length of time records kept: Inspection, training, and tank integrity testing
records are retained for at least three years.
F. Site Security [I l2.7(e)(9)6-v)l:
The facility maintains a variety of security measures on an ongoing basis. Feed
making and loadinglunloading of rail cars occurs 24 hours per day 7 days per
week. Employees are continually maintaining different aspects of the mill.
(i) Fencing and Gates:
The Warsaw Feed Mill is not fenced because it is not practical due to
the rail lines and frequent vehicular movement on and off the mill
premises. Security and/or utility personnel are on duty 24 hours a day
7 days per week.
(ii) Flow valves locked:
All secondary containment valves are to be locked when not in use.
(iii) Pump Locks:
There are no fuel dispensers at this facility.
(iv) Lighting adequate to detect spills:
If unloading activities are to be conducted during nighttime hours,
operation personnel shall provide adequate lighting for operations and
discovery of spills.
10

G. .Personnel Training and Spill Prevention Procedures [112.7(e)(10)(i-iii)l:
(i) Personnel instructions:
All new hires in the mill are required to have spill prevention training
that includes a complete review of Murphy -Brown LLC Warsaw Feed
Mill SPCC Plan. Employees are also instructed and tested on the job.
Once a year, refresher training and deployment exercises for spill
response are conducted. At a minimum, the training will include, oil
storage inventory procedures, spill prevention measures, spill control
and countermeasures, spill incident notification, and spill cleanup and
disposal.
(ii) Designated person accountable for spill prevention:
Mr. Wayne High is the designated person accountable for spill
prevention at Murphy -Brown LLC Warsaw Feed Mill.
(iii) Spill prevention briefings:
During mill meetings, spill prevention will be discussed. Any near
misses or incidents are discussed in these briefings in order to prevent
them from recurring. Employee feedback and recommendations are
encouraged in spill prevention and operation. Sign -in sheets, that
include the topics of discussion at each meeting, are to be maintained
for documentation.

7. SPILL CONTROL AND COUNTERMEASURES:
The spill prevention measures detailed in Section b are intended to contain any
discharged oil and prevent it from entering "navigable waters." However, should the
containment fail or prove to be inadequate, control and countermeasures to minimize
impact must be swiftly employed. The control and countermeasures program can be
summarized in two (2) key steps:
A. Immediate Action/ Spill Control
B. Reporting
A. Immediate Action / Spill Control
Action in a swift and responsible manner is the surest way to minimize impact in the
event of a spill. A procedure such as shutting off a pump, plugging a hole with a rag,
or closing a valve could mean the difference between a major and a very minor spill.
The first response to a release to a ditch is to dam the ditch downstream of the
product flow. Protection of resources beyond the facility's property boundary is the
most critical issue facing the cleanup effort. To dam the ditches at this facility
sandbags or area soil would be effective. However, since personnel safety is of the
utmost importance to management, extreme care in judgment must be used when
responding to a spill incident. If the spill has already occurred, or when immediate
action to minimize the spill has been initiated, reporting of the spill to the necessary
personnel is the next step.
(1) Spill Control Equipment:
Spill control equipment on site includes absorbent pads and booms,
granular absorbent, empty drums, brooms, and non -sparking shovels. Spill
equipment is stored in the parts warehouse, salt storage building and #5
tank area.
(ii) Remediation and Disposal:
Reference MB 007 for remediation and disposal.
B. In -House Reporting
Once the immediate actions have been taken to minimize a spill incident, it is
important that the appropriate in-house personnel be contacted PROMPTLY to
oversee further control procedures. At the facility the Mill Manager should be the
first person contacted in the event of a spill incident. The manager can be contacted
using the contact sheet in Appendix 5. If the manager cannot be located, then the
appropriate alternate contact person should be notified.
12

C. Reporting to Federal and State Regulators
The manager or his designated alternate is also responsible for reporting the
appropriate corporate, state, and federal authorities. Federal and state regulations
require prompt reporting of all oil spills which discharge into navigable water or a
contiguous area, which by definition can include storm drainage ditches on or
adjacent to the site. Federal regulations define a reportable spill as any discharge of
oil into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. Refer to diagram to
determine if releases are reportable.
At this facility, the Mill Manager is responsible for notifying individuals or agencies
outside of the facility during reportable spill events. In the event of a spill which meets
the reportable definition, as defined in the above diagram, the manager shall notify the
following:
13

National Response Center
Phone: [phone]
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
Phone: [phone]
To insure all pertinent information about the spill is located and recorded in the
{ company's files, a Report of Spill form as Shown in Appendix 6 must be completed.
The person reporting the spill should be sure to record the names of the persons to
whom the spill was reported and should not leave the scene of the spill until adequate
measures have been taken to remediate the area.
All "Report of Spill" forms are to be submitted to the Environmental Engineer and
the Director of Environmental Compliance at the Murphy -Brown LLC Warsaw office
within one (1) week of an incident.
(i) Written Report
If a spill has resulted in a discharge of 1,000 gallons or more of oil into,
upon or to adjacent shorelines of a navigable water, or if two (2)
reportable discharges of more than 42 gallons within any twelve (12)
month period have occurred, 40 CFR Subsection 112.4 requires that, in
addition to immediate telephone notification, a written report be submitted
to the EPA Regional Administrator and simultaneously to the state within
sixty (60) days of such occurrence. The report shall contain at least the
following information:
1. Name of Facility
2. Name(s) of the Owner/ Operator
3. Location
4. Day and year of initial facility operation
5. Maximum oil storage and handling capacity of the facility and normal
daily output.
6. Description of facility including maps, flow diagrams, topographic
maps.
7. A complete copy of the facility's SPCC plan.
8. The cause(s) of the spill, including a failure analysis of the system in
which it occurred.
9. Corrective action and countermeasure taken including description of
repairs and equipment required.
10. Preventative measures to be taken to prevent reoccurrence.
11. Other information requested by the Regional Administrator.
14

This reporting requirement shall be submitted to the Director of Environmental
Compliance for review and approval prior to submission. In many instances this
document will be developed with corporate assistance.
La

Permit: NCG060209
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 09/01/02 Expiration: 08/31/07 Owner: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Murphy Brown - Warsaw Feed Mill
Sr 1108
Contact Person: Wayne High Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
NCG500619 Murphy -Brown, LLC - Warsaw Feed Mill
Inspection Date: 04117/2007 Entry Time: 10:40 AM
Primary Inspector: Tom Tharrington
Secondary Inspector(s):
Warsaw NC 28398
Phone: [phone]
Certification:
Exit Time: 11:25 AM
Phone:
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/CosmeticslPublic Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant Q Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

-4 . 4
Permit: NCGO60209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 0411712007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Visited this site to perform a compliance inspection, This facility was currently performing an annual clean out of one of
the storage silos adjacent to a unloading station. Grain was on the roadway around this unloading station where it may
be ground by vehicle traffic and transported to the stormwater system during a rainfall event. Areas inspected included
containment areas, boiler areas, fat unloading area, ditch isolation gates, oil seperators, stormwater pond and effluent
discharge. The oil seperator in the animal fat unloading station had fat on the water surface, with additional fat on
surfaces around the area. The ditch that conveyed stormwater from that area was isolated by a gate valve and the water
in the ditch was free of material. The stormwater pond was empty due to onngoing problems with the outlet piping seal.
Previous repairs have failed seal off the outlet pipe, repairs should be made to this pipe in a timely manner. Analytical
data indicates stormwater from this site has exceeded the cut-off concentrations limits indicating the loss of process
material through the stormwater system. Provided information regarding the N.C. Laboratory Certification program for field
parameter certification.
Page: 2

. 1 3' Ir
Permit: NCG060209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 04/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes
No
NA
NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
■
❑
❑
Cl
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
S
❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑
❑
❑
■
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
■
❑
❑
❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑
❑
Cl
■
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
■
❑
Cl
❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
■
❑
❑
❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Provided documentation during inspection.
Anal3licall Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: The facility has had results for TSS and COD that exceed the cut-off
concentration limits for this permit. These exceedances may be related to problems
with the outlet piping of the stormwater collection pond, this piping should be repaired in
a timely manner. Addressing housekeeping issues around grain and fat unloading
areas would also prevent these materials from reaching the stormwater discharge
during heavy rainfall events.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfal€s observed during the inspection?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

ti .
Permit: NCG060209 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 04117/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ Q ■
#E Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: Effluent from this facility was light gray in color with black substrate in the
ditch bottom. It appears that material from the production area is periodically lost to the
stormwater system.
■ ❑ ❑ D
Page: 4

o�o� wA
r�RQ0
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
LAWTON LEWIS
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA - WARSAW
PO DRAWER 487
WARSAW, NC 28398
Dear Permittee:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 23, 2002
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
Brown's of Carolina - Warsaw
COC Number NCG060209
Duplin County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG060000, the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This permit is reissued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
A new Certificate of Coverage
A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG060000
A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility
for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or
decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Aisha Lau of the Central Office Stormwater
and General Permits Unit at [phone]. ext. 578
Sincerely,
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Wilmington Regional Office
N. C, Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone]
e�A
NCDENR
Customer Service
1-800-623-7748

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060209
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215_ I, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
MURPHY-BROWN LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA - WARSAW
SR 1 108
WARSAW
DUPLIN COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as a UT to Turkey Creek, a class C SW stream, in the Cape Fear River Basin in
accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, IL III,
IV, V. and VI of General Permit No. NCG060000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective September 1, 2002.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day August 23, 2002.
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

F \NATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
O�� RQG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Pesources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
0 Division of Water Quality
Dccemher 27. 2001
1= J FAISON JIt.
CARROLL'S FOOD INCORPORATED-WARSAW
P {:) DRAWER 856
WARSAW. NC 25398
Suhjcct: NPDES Storinwater Permit Renewal
CARROLL'S FOOD INCORPORATED-WARSAW
COC Number NCG060209
Duplin County
Dcar Permiuec:
YDur' facility is Currently covered for s[ormwater discherr��e under General Permit. rINCGOfi{){. W. This permit expires
on August 3 L 2002. The Division stal f is currently in the prtrCcss of rcwritin"I Iltis permit and is SCI]CdulCd to have
the permit reissued by late sununcr ol'2002. Once the pernit is rcissucd. your I'acility Would he eligihlc for
Continued coverage under the reissued permit.
In order to assure your continued Coverage under the general permit, you nnast apply to the Dirisi011 01' %Voter
Quality (DWQ) for renewal Of'VOLIr permit coverage. To make this renewal prtxxss easier. we arc informing, you in
advance that your permit will he expiring. Enclosed you will find a General Permit Coverage Renewal
Application Form. The application must he contpletetl and returned by March 4, 2002 in order to assure continued
Coverage under the general permit.
Failure io request renewal within this time period may result in a civil assessment of at least $250.00. Larger
penalties may be assessed dcpcncling on the delinquency of the request. Discharge of storiuwatcr From your facility
without C0VCra41C under- a valid storrnwater NPDES permit would constitute :t viola(ion of NCGS 143-215.1 and
could resuit in assessments ol' Civil penahics of up to $ 10.000 per d:rv.
Please note that recent federal legislation Itas CxtenclCd the "no exposure exCusion" W all operators of industrial
iltcilities in any of the I I cate"orics of " storm water dischar-cs associated with industrial activity." (except
Construction activities). [h you feel your facility can certily a Condition of "no exposure i.e. the I'acilty industrial
materials and operations are not exposed to stormwatcr, you can apply for the no exposure er-Clusion. For additional
information contact the Central Office Storntwater Staff niemher listed below or- check the Storniwater & General
Permits Unit Web Site at h[tpa/h2ir.enr.state.nc.us/su/stormwatcr.html
]f tltc Subject stormwatcr disch'll-C to waters oi, the state has hecn termin:netL please Complete the enclosed
Rescission Request Form. klailing insu-uctions are listed on [hc houom of tttc fnr'nr. YOU will he notiticd wlicil the
rescission process liar been completed.
If you have any questions regarding the perni[ renewal procedures please contact 1 d Beck of the Wihnill0lon
Regional Office at 910-395-3900 or Aishu Lau of the Central Office Siormwater Unit ai [phone], ext. 578
S l rleerC I V.
Bradley Bennett. Supervisor
Slormwaler and General Permits Unit
cc: Central Files
Wilmin-,ton Rcoionak Office
en
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1- 800-623-774B

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, I;VA
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality 1 • •
a J�
WL
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor � rT
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary ®C
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
September 11, 1997
F J FAISON JR
CARROLLS'S FOOD INC
P.O. DRAWER 856
WARSAW, NC 28398
Subject: Reissued Stormwater General Permit for Certificate of Coverage No. NCG060209
Duplin County
Dear Permittee:
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under the subject permit, the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This permit
is reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-2I5 .1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency
dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
■ A copy of the stormwater general permit.
■ A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Certification Form. This form certifies that you have
developed and implemented the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) required in your
permit. This form must be completed and returned to the Division within 30 days of receipt of
this letter. DO NOT send the SPPP with the signed form.
N Five copies of Analytical Monitoring forms.
E Five copies of Qualitative Monitoring forms.
■ A copy of a Technical Bulletin on the stormwater program with outlines program components
and addresses frequently asked questions.
n A corrected Certificate of Coverage if you indicated a name or address change on the Renewal
Form returned to the Division.
Your certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division of Water
Quality may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be requited by
DWQ or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Division of Air Quality, Coastal Area
Mana`ement Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permits that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit or other attached documents, please contact the
Stormwater Group at telephone number [phone]
Sincerely,
for A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. E.
P_O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 507o recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

y
St�!ie 'of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 28, 1995
F J Faison Jr
Carrolls'S Food Inc
P.O. Drawer 856
Warsaw, NC 28398
A&T.K?FA
00
v �SOL
[D E I --I iV F1
Subject: General Permit No. NCGO60000
Carrolls'S Food Inc
COC NCG060209
Duplin County
Dear F J Faison Jr:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on June 6, 1995, we are forwarding
herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general permit. This
permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated
December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit
application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Environmental Management. The Division of Environmental Management may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal
Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any question concerning this permit, please contact MR. ANTONIO EVANS at telephone
number 919C733-5083.
Sincerel3briginal Signed By
Goleen H. Sullins
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone.[phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10°lo post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCGO60000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCGO60209
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE_ ELIMINATION SXSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.I, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Carroll's Foods, Inc.
SR 1108
Warsaw, NC
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Turkey Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III
and IV of General Permit No. NCGO60000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective July 28, 1995.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day July 28, 1995.
Originp! Sighed By
Coieen H. Sullins
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

TURKEY QUADRANGLE C�
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
NW14 ROSE HILL 15' QUADRANGLE
761 2260QOO FEET 36 2 780 0 1 7' 30"
�cnh-35-
I U
VI—
ki
V
3117 E
%
0,
Houm of
(h'
Baltic
151
6-1
#
C,
307
45
FIE
15"
.
30
Ch
\ kk
Cem
:19
�-v
v-
%
52
\Z�, 6eml
2 5
J
i.N
I�N
OIL,'
Ir
ra
OC
C
1
173
5-7, 30m
13871
IN

FACILITY:ds C
COUNTY: IQ 1 n
NPDES: 0 CG C Co 0 9,0 9
MAP#: ( N 0
DSN FLAW: NIA
SUB BASIN: © 3 - U Co ~' (9
r
LATITUDE: 35
9 5 r
LONGITUDE: `18 Q 0
RECEIVING STREAIVL�[
STREAM CLASS:
DISCHARGE CLASS:
EXPIRATION DATE:
c st'i
STORMWATER
8Istlq�