NCG060108_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160908

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO. I /V C& (' cD O J Dk
DOC TYPE I HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE ❑ 1(p U 9 Ok
YYYYMMDD

f
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCGO60108 Effective: 12/01/12 Expiration: 10/31/17 owner: Butterball LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mt. Olive Turkey Processing Facility
County: Duplin 1628 Gamer Chapel Rd
Region: Wilmington
Mount Olive NC 28365
Contact Person: Christopher Ray Lee Title: ORC Phone: [phone] Ext.291
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection pate: 04/20/2016
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification:
Phone:
Entry Time: 11:30AM Exit Time: 12:30PM
Phone:
Reason for inspection: - Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: FoodfTobaoco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ® Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
® Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: i

Permit: NCG064t48 Owner- Facility: Butterball LLC
Inspection Date: 04120t2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Vasa: ROutine
Inspection Summary:
Met with Josh Batchelor onsite for a NPDES SW inspection. The SWPPP was in two parts, the SWPPP and the 1CP.
The SWPPP should be integrated into the ICP. The ICP should be updated regularly, for example, the plant manager was
not recently updated The plan should be used as a workbook to document all activities related to stormwater permit
maintenance. The yearly training attendance was not completed. I suggested to Batchelor that he should provide training
for his department during monthly safety/ operations meetings, record attendance, and insert into ICP. The spill response
record was not completed If no spills occured on site, then yearly documentation should be completed as "no spills this
year." Best management practices should be defined and maintenance of each measure should be recorded on a regular
basis.
Outfalls t and 2 are considered as part of wastewater permit. Outfall 3 is regulated under the 8tormwater permit
Sampling records (analytical and quantitative) should be combined for each sampling date for comparison purposes.
Sampling records should be maintained in the ICP,
A quick review of the analytical sampling results indicated a consistant problem with fecal coliform results in outfail #3 with
numbers reaching 20,000/mL. Submit all sampling results for last 5 years. Please review the tier system and evaluate
where your facility should be.
Submit coorespondence with former NCDEO (NCDENR) employees regarding the stormwater permit and outfall #3 as
Batchelor indcated former employees may have made concessions that I do not have a record of.
There is a significant quantity of turkey feathers in the front and rear of the property
Page: 2

Josh Batchelor
From: Lankford Ruffin
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 10:52 AM
To: Josh Batchelor
Subject:' FW: Outfall monitoring at road
RECEIVE
MAY 0 2- 1016
From: Lankford Ruffin
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 4:08 PM
To: Lankford Ruffin <[e-mail]>
Subject: FW: Outfall monitoring at road
From: Lankford Ruffin
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:14 AM
To: Josh Batchelor <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Yep. Section 8 of the SWPPP actually explains the fecal situation for Outfall 001, but having the e-mail validates that we
didn't just make it up in the event DENR misplaces the e-mail....
From: Josh Batchelor
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:07 AM
To: Lankford Ruffin <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Outfall monitoring at road
Perfect... thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 17, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Lankford Ruffin <[e-mail]> wrote:
Josh,
Add this to your SWPPP.
Thank you.
Lankford
From: Willis, Linda [mailto:linda.willis ncdenr. ov]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:39 AM
To: Lankford Ruffin <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Lankford
1

`i.
Please reduce the monitoring at that outfall for Fecal Coliform to semi annual frequency. (in other
words, sample in accordance with the permit requirements specified on page 4 of 8 of Part II of the
permit text). Since the outfall is still draining an industrial area that can pose exposure (secondary
containment) and I noted a greasy scum on the surface of the stormwater at that outfall.. 1 won't be
able to eliminate it as an outfall for sampling. I do know that oil and grease can be a sink for fecal
coliform bacteria, however, you demonstrated that your industrial areas where Fecal Coliform
exposures exist are not plumbed to that outfall, so the source of bacteria may well be from
wildlife. After,careful consideration, I am exercising the ability for the RO to allow a decrease in the
monitoring`frequency for the parameter of concern (Fecal Coliform) as described on Page 7 of 8 of Part II
of your NPDES Permit. Please continue to compare all other parameters at that outfall to the
benchmarks and'apply the tiered responses in accordance with the permit.
Please contact me if you have any questions whatsoever concerning this correspondence. Also, please
use this correspondence as confirmation of the DWQ response to your request to eliminate the tier 2
requirements for the outfall at the road. Thank you for your patience Lankford.
Sincerely,
Linda Willis
Environmental Engineer I
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Lankford Ruffin [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:47 AM
To: Willis, Linda
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Linda,
Have you had a chance to review the material? I ask, because I would like to have Linda Lamb finalize
the updated ICP (SPCCP & Storm water Plan). I think the only question is, can we do qualitative
monitoring at Outfall # 1? Given that the off-loading of N2 is the only product of concern, and given that
the off-load area does have a controlled sump, unless precedence shows otherwise, I would think
qualitative monitoring would satisfy the requirements.
Your thoughts?
Regards,
Lankford
From: Willis, Linda[mailto:linda.willis(@ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:44 PM
To: Lankford Ruffin
Cc: Josh Batchelor
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Thank you Lankford. I'll need some time to address this.. I have to beg your patience.

Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Lankford Ruffin rmaiIto: [e-mail],
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:24 PM
To: Willis, Linda
Cc: Josh Batchelor
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Linda,
I'm forwarding these Outfall #1 analyzes on Josh's behave, as he is out sick right now. Also, I have
attached a drawing that shows that the RTE process drains are tied to lift stations. These lift stations
send water to our offal and from there goes to the wastewater treatment plant. The statement on the
drawing "To Be Tested", are referring to drains that still need to be linked to the correct lift station. The
point of this drawing is to document that an exercise was taken by Engineering to understand where the
process drains went; and the point for our purpose is, none go to storm water. I hope this answers the
necessary questions. If not, just give me a call.
Regards,
Lankford
From: Willis, Linda[mailto:linda.willis(o)ncdenr.govl
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:58 PM
To: Lankford Ruffin
Subject: Outfall monitoring at road
Lankford,
I received your call today, I'm going into a meeting at 1 pm. Will you please prepare a copy of your
annual monitoring results for that outfall for me and send it to me via email? It's actually due in
March. Also, please forward to me the details of the investigative work your staff conducted
concerning areas draining to that outfall. Can you send me all that in one concise email please? What
may be an issue yet is the fact that your secondary containment is pumped to this outfall so I'm not
certain our central office will agree it is appropriate to eliminate your requirement to monitor, but we
can address if fecal is appropriate. They may want to see analyses from samples collected upstream in
the ditch. So, if you have that info too, }Tease forward that to me as well.
Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and
may be disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it. contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Christopher Ray Lee
Butterball LLC
1628 Garner Chapel Road
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Dear Mr. Lee,
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
April 21, 2016
Subject: Certificate of Coverage NCG060108
Mount Olive Turkey Processing Facility
Duplin County
A site inspection for the Mount Olive Turkey Processing facility was conducted on December
21, 2011 by Division Representative, Linda Willis. The site inspection was in response to the
request to reduce the monitoring frequency for Fecal Coliform bacteria at one of the facility's
outfall locations. Enclosed is a copy of the compliance inspection report for your records. The
facility was found to be in significant compliance with permit requirements. The efforts taken by
staff to maintain good housekeeping practices is outstanding.
Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed inspection report, please contact Linda
Willis at 910-796-7343 or email address [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jim Gregson
Wilmington Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure: CEI Report
CC:DWQ CO Files w/o encl
DWQ WiRO NCG060 Duplin (L Willis)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: 91 MD7.63001 FAX: 919M7-6492
Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmafive Action Employer
NorthCarohna
Natumlly

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCGO60108
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10131/12 Owner: Buttefiall LLC
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mt Olive Turkey Processing Facility
1628 Gamer Chapel Rd
Contact Person: Christopher Ray Lee
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 01/1812011
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis
Secondary Inspector(s):
Josh Batchelor
Title: ORC
Certification:
Mount Olive NC 28365
Phone:glg-658-6743
Ext.291
Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM
Phone:
Phone: 919-65"743 ext 2291
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Other Inspection Type: Technical Assistance
Permit Inspection Type: FoodiTobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■ Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG080108 Owner - Facility: Butterball LLC
Inspection Date: 0111812011 Inspection Type: Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Other
Inspection Summary:
Josh is in the process of finding the source of fecal. This facility slaughters and cooks turkey. The previous employee
handling stormwater thought the high fecals were from the roof drains to their collection outfall. Josh walked the roof and
saw no signs of bird droppings that would pose problems. I recommended he sample the ditch upstream of their
stormwater outfall to see what the background fecal levels looks like. I also recommended he look into the floor drains in
the facility to ensure no cross connections were present from the slaughteringlwashdownloffal collection areas. I
recommended he call me in the near future if the fecal continues to be high so that I can conduct another site inspection.
If his fecal is in line with upstream fecal counts, I would support going back to semi annual monitoring for the remainder of
2011. If it higher than the background levels, they would need to stay within the higher tiers and continue to evaluate their
site for potential sources.
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
Yes No NA NE
■npn
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: Josh was concerned that the stormwater monitoring for Fecal Coliform was
out of hold time. The sample was collected at 6pm on Jan 17th 2011 and was
submitted to the lab this morning. Wondered if they should run the sample and report or
wait for a storm event during work hours.
Page: 2

BiITTERBAII'
April 27, 2016
MAY. 0 Z:2016
Mr. Brian Lambe
Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
127 Cardinal Dr. Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: Compliance Evaluation Inspection, NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG 060108
Mt. Olive Turkey Processing Center, Duplin County.
Dear Mr. Lambe:
This memo and attachments are in response to the subject inspection conducted on April 20,
2016, and the written report received from you following that inspection. There were some
administrative concerns noted and questions about fecal coliform counts for one of the three
permitted outfalls. The fecal coliform (FC) issue will be addressed first, and then the
administrative concerns.
First, it should be noted that your report identifies the outfall in question as outfall 43. It is in
fact outfall #1. There is history with outfall #1's FC readings, which Butterball and with
direction from the NCDEQ (NCDENR at the time) put an approach in place to address
programmatic and problematic FC readings that were consistently popping up at outfall #l. The
correspondence between NCDENR and Butterball, along with the e-mail from Linda Willis of
NCDENR that directed Butterball to perform qualitative monitoring semi-annually are attached;
along with the records you requested.
With respect to the feathers, we do conduct site cleanup around the outside areas of the Plant.
The feathers, unfortunately, are just impossible to keep up with. The feathers coming off the
birds are just a natural part of their existence, however your point is noted, and we will continue
to perform site cleanup as best we can.

BUTiER®All
As for the administrative.concerns; it should be noted that the Integrated Contingency Plan (ICI')
is a combined SWPPP, SPCCP, and Spill Response Plan. This is an approach Butterbafl felt was
best to serve these. regulations given their overlap in certain areas. As for the training records,
which are attached, we have a training group that handles all training for the site. These records
are kept with the training group, and can be requested as needed. These records are attached and
depict who's been trained and when their next annual training is due.
There were no reportable spills in 2015, and as such, no record of spills were recorded. We are
not aware that we are required to document "no spills." As such, is this a requirement or a
preference? Our concern is ensuring that we don't violate a requirement, and as such, we would
have to come up with an administrative approach to ensure that responsible personnel remember
to document no spills — as this could easily be forgotten to do in the event of no spills.
1 hope this response along with the attachments addresses your observations and concerns. If
you have additional questions, please call me at 919-658-6743.
Sincerely,
Joshua Batchelor, ORC
Wastewater and Sprayfield Manager
ook-,-
Butterball, LLC
cc. Lankford Ruffin
Corporate Environmental Manager
Butterball, LLC

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060108
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12
Effective: Expiration:
Contact Person: Christopher Ray Lee
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/21/2011
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title: ORC
Certification:
Owner: Butterball LLC
Facility: Mt Olive Turkey Processing Facility
1628 Garner Chapel Rd
Mount Olive NC 28365
Phone: [phone]
Ext291
Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Other Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Pubtic Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1
r]

Permit: NCG060108 Owner - Facility: Butterball LLC
Inspection Date: 12/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Other
Inspection Summary:
This facility has had issues with high fecal coliform at their outfall at the front of the facility. They conducted investigations
to determine if any process areas drain to that outfall. A secondary containment structure discharges to this drainway and
therefore could not be eliminated from their monitoring requirements. The secondary containment serves the liquid
nitrogen storage area. Grease/oil scum was noted at the discharge from the pipe that is underground, coming from the
facility. An investigation by Butterball personnel did not find any connectivity from production areas for this discharge.
Correspondence concerning this site inspection was sent via email by L. Willis on February 10, 2012.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG060108 Owner - Facility: Butterball LLC
Inspection Date: 12/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
#Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Reason for Visit: Other
Comment. WiRO is allowing this permittee to reduce monitoring frequency for fecal
coliform bacteria to semi annual frequency. They conducted a study to establish
whether any process areas drain to the outfall at the front of the site that discharges to
the road side ditch. They have been experiencing high fecal counts at the road
discharge which could be contributed by wildlife as well as the trucks hauling turkeys
into the. facility.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
Yes No NA NE
■000
■❑00
■nnn
■nnn
■ ❑ Q ❑
■nnn
■nnn
■ 0 0 0
■n❑Q
■ Cl Q ❑
■ ❑ ❑ n
■n0l0
■nnn
■nnn
e0D0
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■ 0 ❑ 0
Yes No NA NE
■nnn
■ El 0 0
Page: 3

Permit: NOG060108 Owner -Facility: Butterball LLC
Inspection Date: 12/2112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: Representative outfall status is not granted for this site.
Reason for Visit: Other
■ Q Q
■00D
Page: 4

r�
ffA
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mike Bliss
Butterball LLC
PO Box 589
Mount Olive, NC 28365-0589
Dear Permittee:
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, R E.
Director
December 4, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal
Mt Olive Turkey Processing Facility
COC Number NCG060108
Duplin County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage unifier stormwater General Permit NCG060000
the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued General Permit. This permit is
reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated October
15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
The following information is included with your permit package:
• A new Certificate of Coverage (COC)
• A copy of General Permit NCGO60000
• A copy of the Technical Bulletin for the General Permit
• Two copies of the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Form
• Two copies of the Qualitative Monitoring Report Form
The General Permit authorizes discharges of stormwater, and it specifies your obligations for discharge
controls, management, monitoring, and record keeping. Please review the new permit to familiarize yourself
with all the changes in the reissued permit. Your facility has six (6) months from the time of receipt of the
permit to update your current SPPP to reflect all new permit requirements.
The first sample period of your permit begins January 1, 2013. Your facility must sample a "measureable
storm event" beginning during the periods beginning January 1 and July 1 of every year (or, if applicable,
report "No Flow," as outlined in Part III, Section E). Also, please note that Tier 3 Actions in Part II of your
permit are triggered by benchmark exceedances on four occasions beginning on the effective date of this
permit and do not count prior exceedances.
The more significant changes in the General Permit since your last COC was issued are noted either in the
Draft Permit Fact Sheet that accompanied the public notice (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wg/ws/su/current-
notices), or in the Response to Comments / Summary of Changes and Technical Bulletin documents that are
posted on the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website with the new General Permit. Please visit
http://portal.ncdenr.orgZweb/wg/ws/su/npdessw (click on 'General Permits' tab) to review that information
for your specific General Permit carefully.
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone:[phone]NC FAX:[phone]
Internet: www.ncwatr,ouaIi .or
An E•;ual Opportunity 1 ",'armr• Pre AJon Employer
One
N0rthCarolina
"; latu'rally

Mike Bliss
December 4, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Some of the changes include:
Part II:
• Section A: The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) section, if applicable, has been updated
to the most current language of our permits. Additional conditions for specific industry sectors have
been added to the SPPP requirements in some cases.
• Sections B, C: Failure to perform analytical stormwater monitoring may result in the Division requiring
that the permittee begin a monthly sampling scheme.
• Sections B, C: A lower TSS benchmark of 50 mg/I for HQW, ORW, PNA and Tr Waters applies to these
more sensitive waters.
• Sections B, C: The monitoring parameter Oil & Grease (O&G) has been replaced by the parameter
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) for vehicle maintenance areas, and in some cases, other
analytical monitoring requirements.
• Sections B, C, D: Inability to sample due to adverse weather must be recorded in the SPPP, or in
separate on -site records if your General Permit does not require an SPPP. Adverse weather is defined
in the "Definitions" section of the permit.
• Sections B, C: The term "Representative Storm Event" has been replaced by "Measurable Storm
Event." A measurable storm event is defined in the permit.
• Section D: If the permittee fails to respond effectively to problems identified by qualitative
monitoring, DWQ may require the permittee to perform corrective action.
Please review Parts III and IV to understand the Standard Conditions of your new NPDES General Permit,
including Compliance and Liability, Reporting, Monitoring and Records requirements; Operation and
Maintenance obligations; and Definitions. Please note that all samples analyzed in accordance with the terms
of this permit must be submitted to the Division on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms available on
the Stormwater Permitting Unit's website above. DMR forms must be delivered to the Division no later than
30 days from the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory. Also note that existing
permittees do not need to submit a renewal request prior to expiration unless directed by the Division.
Your coverage under the General Permit is transferable only through the specific action of DWQ. This permit
does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR, nor does it
relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law,
rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree. If you have any questions regarding this permit
package, please contact the Division's Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone].
Sincerely,/ I�
for Charles Wakild, P.E.
cc: DWQ Central Files
Stormwater Permitting Unit Files
Wilmington Regional Office

c�
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060108
STORMWATER
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-21S.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Butterball LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at:
Mt Olive Turkey Processing Facility
1628 Garner Chapel Rd
Mount Olive
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as Northeast Cape Fear River, a class C;Sw waterbody in the
Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements,
and other conditions set forth in Parts I, 11, II1, and 1V of General Permit No. NCG060000 as
attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4, 2012.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this 41h day of December, 2012.
for Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

'A
��Jp
HCDEH R
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Christopher Ray Lee
Butterball LLC
1628 Garner Chapel Road
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Dear Mr. Lee,
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Urector
June 22, 2012
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage NCG060108
Mount Olive Turkey Processing Facility
Duplin County
A site inspection for the Mount Olive Turkey Processing facility was conducted on December
21, 2011 by Division Representative, Linda Willis. The site inspection was in response to the
request to reduce the monitoring frequency for Fecal Coliform bacteria at one of the facility's
outfall locations. Enclosed is a copy of the compliance inspection report for your records. The
facility was found to be in significant compliance with permit requirements. The efforts taken by
staff to maintain good housekeeping practices is outstanding.
Should you have any questions concerning the enclosed inspection report, please contact Linda
Willis at 910-796-7343 or email address linda.will is a ncdenr.gov.
Sincyrely,
14
sJim Gregson
IWilmington Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure: CEI Report
CC:DWQ CO Files w/o encl
DWQ WiRO NCG060 Duplin (L Willis)
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaleraualitv.ora
One
NorthCarohna
At hmiiik
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

1
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060108 Effective: 11/01/07 Expiration: 10/31/12 Owner: Butterball LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Mt Olive Turkey Processing Facility
County: Duplin 1628 Garner Chapel Rd
Region: Wilmington
Mount Olive NC 28365
Contact Person: Christopher Ray Lee Title: ORC Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/21/2011 EntryTime: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:30 PM
Primary Inspector: Linda Willis p� (� U Z�` ��Z Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Other Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: IN Compliant fl Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG060108 Owner - Facility: Butterball i.lC
Inspection Date: 12121/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Other
Inspection Summary:
This facility has had issues with high fecal coliform at their outfall at the front of the facility. They conducted investigations
to determine if any process areas drain to that outfall. A secondary containment structure discharges to this drainway and
therefore could not be eliminated from their monitoring requirements. The secondary containment serves the liquid
nitrogen storage area. Grease/oil scum was noted at the discharge from the pipe that is underground, coming from the
facility. An investigation by Butterball personnel did not find any connectivity from production areas for this discharge.
Correspondence concerning this site inspection was sent via email by L. Willis on February 10, 2011
Page_ 2

Permit: NGG060108 Owner - Facility: Butlerball LLC
Inspection Date: 12/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason far Visit; Other
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0000
Is000
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
la
❑
❑
# floes the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
In
❑
Q
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑
❑
❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
®❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑
O
0
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
Q
l!
❑
. # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
®❑
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
®❑
❑
❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
®❑
0
❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
®
n
n
n
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
®
n
❑
❑
# Does the Plan include'a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
®
n
n
0.
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Is
❑
0
❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ®❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ®❑ ❑ n
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ® ❑ Q .❑
Comment: WiRO is allowing this permittee to reduce monitoring frequency for fecal
coliform bacteria to semi annual frequency. They conducted a study to establish
whether any process areas drain to the outfail at the front of the site that discharges to
the road side ditch. They have been experiencing high fecal counts at the road
discharge which could be contributed by wildlife as well as the trucks hauling turkeys
into the facility.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? Ii n ❑ In
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ® (_i ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG060108 Owner -Facility: Butterbali LLC
Inspection Date: 12/2112011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Other
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0 ® 0 0
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? Eg CCl 0 Q
Comment: Representative outfall status is not granted for this site.
Page: 4

Willis, Linda
From: Lankford Ruffin [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:10 PM
To: Willis, Linda
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
I'll review and get back to you if there are questions. Thanks much for all your help.
Lankford
From: Willis, Linda [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:39 AM
To: Lankford Ruffin
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Lankford
Please reduce the monitoring at that outfall for Fecal Coliform to semi annual frequency. (In other words, sample in
accordance with the permit requirements specified on page 4 of 8 of Part II of the permit text). Since the outfall is still
draining an industrial area that can pose exposure (secondary containment) and I noted a greasy scum on the surface of
the stormwater at that outfall.. I won't be able to eliminate it as an outfall for sampling. I do know that oil and grease
can be a sink for fecal coliform bacteria, however, you demonstrated that your industrial areas where Fecal Coliform
exposures exist are not plumbed to that outfall, so the source of bacteria may well be from wildlife. After careful
consideration, I am exercising the ability for the RO to allow a decrease in the monitoring frequency for the parameter
of concern (Fecal Coliform) as described on Page 7 of 8 of Part it of your NPDES Permit. Please continue to compare all
other parameters at that outfall to the benchmarks and apply the tiered responses in accordance with the permit.
Please contact me if you have any questions whatsoever concerning this correspondence. Also, please use this
correspondence as confirmation of the DWQ response to your request to eliminate the tier 2 requirements for the
outfall at the road. Thank you for your patience Lankford.
Sincerely,
Linda Willis
Environmental Engineer I
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Lankford Ruffin Emailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:47 AM
To: Willis, Linda
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Linda,
Have you had a chance to review the material? I ask, because I would like to have Linda Lamb finalize the updated ICP
(SPCCP & Storm water Plan). I think the only question is, can we do qualitative monitoring at Outfall # 1? Given that the
off-loading of N2 is the only product of concern, and given that the off-load area does have a controlled sump, unless
precedence shows otherwise, I would think qualitative monitoring would satisfy the requirements.

tq Gfn o Leo 11, `6
Willis, Linda
From:
Lankford Ruffin [[e-mail]
Sent:
Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:24 PM
To:
Willis, Linda
Cc:
Josh Batchelor
Subject:
RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Attachments:
Stormwater Quantitative Form Dec 2011.x1sx; Stormwater Quantitative Form Nov 2011.x1sx;
Stormwater Quantitative Form Oct 2011.x[sx; Stormwater Quantitative Form Sept 2011.xlsx;
Stormwater Quantitative Form Feb 2011.xlsx; Stormwater Quantitative Form Jan 2011 #
2.xlsx; Stormwater Quantitative Form Jan 2011 #1.xlsx; RTE-floor drains lift station-D-
SIZE.pdf
Linda,
I'm forwarding these Outfall #1 analyzes on Josh's behave, as he is out sick right now. Also, I have attached a drawing
that shows that the RTE process drains are tied to lift stations. These lift stations send water to our offal and from there
goes to the wastewater treatment plant. The statement on the drawing "To Be Tested", are referring to drains that still
need to be linked to the correct lift station. The point of this drawing is to document that an exercise was taken by
Engineering to understand where the process drains went; and the point for our purpose is, none go to storm water. I
hope this answers the necessary questions. If not, just give me a call.
Regards,
Lankford
From: Wiliis, Linda [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:58 PM
To: Lankford Ruffin
Subject: Outfall monitoring at road
Lankford,
I received your call today, I'm going into a meeting at 1 pm. Will you please prepare a copy of your annual monitoring
results for that outfall for me and send it to me via email? It's actually due in March. Also, please forward to me the
details of the investigative work your staff conducted concerning areas draining to that outfall. Can you send me all that
in one concise email please? What may be an issue yet is the fact that your secondary containment is pumped to this
outfall so I'm not certain our central office will agree it is appropriate to eliminate your requirement to monitor, but we
can address if fecal is appropriate. They may want to see analyses from samples collected upstream in the ditch. So, if
you have that info too, please forward that to me as well.
Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Caw and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Thank you.

Your thoughts?
Regards,
Lankford
From: Willis, Linda [mailto:linda.willis(a)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:44 PM
To: Lankford Ruffin
Cc: Josh Batchelor
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Thank you Lankford. I'll need some time to address this.. I have to beg your patience.
Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Lankford Ruffin fmailto:lruffin(albutterball.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:24 PM
To: Willis, Linda
Cc: Josh Batchelor
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Linda,
I'm forwarding these Outfall #1 analyzes on Josh's behave, as he is out sick right now. Also, I have attached a drawing
that shows that the RTE process drains are tied to lift stations. These lift stations send water to our offal and from there
goes to the wastewater treatment plant. The statement on the drawing "To Be Tested", are referring to drains that still
need to be linked to the correct lift station. The point of this drawing is to document that an exercise was taken by
Engineering to understand where the process drains went; and the point for our purpose is, none go to storm water. I
hope this answers the necessary questions. If not, just give me a call.
Regards,
Lankford
From: Willis, Linda [mailto:linda.willis(cbncdenr.govI
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:58 PM
To: Lankford Ruffin
Subject: Outfall monitoring at road
Lankford,
I received your call today, I'm going into a meeting at 1 pm. Will you please prepare a copy of your annual monitoring
results for that outfall for me and send it to me via email? It's actually due in March. Also, please forward to me the
details of the investigative work your staff conducted concerning areas draining to that outfall. Can you send me all that
in one concise email please? What may be an issue yet is the fact that your secondary containment is pumped to this
outfall so I'm not certain our central office will agree it is appropriate to eliminate your requirement to monitor, but we
can address if fecal is appropriate. They may want to see analyses from samples collected upstream in the ditch. So, if
you have that info too, please forward that to me as well.

Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named an the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Thank you.

Willis, Linda
From: Lankford Ruffin [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:47 AM
To: Willis, Linda
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Linda,
Have you had a chance to review the material? I ask, because I would like to have Linda Lamb finalize the updated ICP
(SPCCP & Storm water Plan). I think the only question is, can we do qualitative monitoring at Outfall # 1? Given that the
off-loading of N2 is the only product of concern, and given that the off-load area does have a controlled sump, unless
precedence shows otherwise, I would think qualitative monitoring would satisfy the requirements.
Your thoughts?
Regards,
Lankford
From: Willis, Linda fmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:44 PM
To: Lankford Ruffin
Cc: Josh Batchelor
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Thank you Lankford. I'll need some time to address this.. i have to beg your patience.
Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
From: Lankford Ruffin[mailto:lruffin(,@butterball.coml
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:24 PM -
To: Willis, Linda
Cc: Josh Batchelor
Subject: RE: Outfall monitoring at road
Linda,
I'm forwarding these Outfall #1 analyzes on Josh's behave, as he is out sick right now. Also, I have attached a drawing
that shows that the RTE process drains are tied to lift stations. These lift stations send water to our offal and from there
goes to the wastewater treatment plant. The statement on the drawing "To Be Tested", are referring to drains that still
need to be linked to the correct lift station. The point of this drawing is to document that an exercise was taken by
Engineering to understand where the process drains went; and the point for our purpose is, none go to storm water. I
hope this answers the necessary questions. If not, just give me a call.
Regards,
Lankford

From: Willis, Lindafmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:58 PM
To: Lankford Ruffin
Subject: Outfall monitoring at road
Lankford,
I received your call today, I'm going into a meeting at 1 pm. Will you please prepare a copy of your annual monitoring
results for that outfall for me and send it to me via email? It's actually due in March. Also, please forward to me the
details of the investigative work your staff conducted concerning areas draining to that outfall. Can you send me all that
in one concise email please? What may be an issue yet is the fact that your secondary containment is pumped to this
outfall so I'm not certain our central office will agree it is appropriate to eliminate your requirement to monitor, but we
can address if fecal is appropriate. They may want to see analyses from samples collected upstream in the ditch. So, if
you have that info too, please forward that to me as well.
Linda
** Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed
to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulations.**
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Thank you.

� 5tatio„
5tatirm

Willis, Linda
From:
Lankford Ruffin [[e-mail]
Sent:
Tuesday, January 17, 2012 11:22 AM
To:
Willis, Linda
Cc:
Josh Batchelor; Linda Lamb ([e-mail])
Subject:
Drains
Attachments:
RTE-floor drains lift station-D-SIZE.pdf
Linda,
The Mt. Olive Engineering group provided me a drawing that was developed to show which drains went to either the
Further Processing (FP) Cook Lift Station or FP Raw Lift Station. The Lift Stations pump the water to the offal, which goes
to the wastewater treatment plant. Further, the statement on the drawing "To Be Tested", is referring to drains that
needed to be identified as to which lift station it went to; not if it went to one. As such, no RTE drains we're found to be
tied to storm water— as it should be. I hope this satisfies the questions for modification to managing Outfall 1.
Regards,
Lankford Ruffin
Corporate Environmental Manager
Butterball LLC.
One Butterball Ln.
P.O. Box 2389
Garner, NC 27529
(w) 919-255-7989
(cell) 919-397-2347
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity
named on the a -mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Thank you.

!' O�0, WA rFR Michael F. Easley, Governor
Williarn G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
C Alan W, Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 4, 2006
Mr. Michael Bliss DEC r'
Butterball, LLC ?a�b
PO Box 589
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Subject. NPDES General Permit NCG060000
Certificate of Coverage NCG060108
Butterball, LLC
Formerly Carolina Turkeys
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Bliss:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your request to change the your name under the General Permit,
received on October 13, 2006.
Please find enclosed the revised Certificate of Coverage. The terms and conditions contained in the General
Permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This revised Certificate of Coverage is issued under the requirements of
North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
If you have any questions, please contact the Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone], extension 502.
Sinccrely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BV
XEEN .'ICKI c
Alan W. Klimek P. E.
ce: DWQ Central FAcs
Wilmington RegiogaL ffice, Water Quality Sceticm�
Stormwatet Permitting [Tait
No thCarolina
Alahira!!J
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.enr.state.nc,us 512 N. Salisbury St, Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone].623-6748
An Equal OpportunitylAffrmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060108
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
BUTTERBALL,LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
BUTTERBALL,LLC
1628 GARNERS CHAPEL ROAD
MOUNT OLIVE
DUPLIN COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as a UT to the Northeast Cape Fear River, a class C SW stream, in the Cape Fear
River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, 11, I11, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG060000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4, 2006.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit. • .
Signed this day December 4, 2006. O,RIOINAL SIGNED I?W
I PIC'(I
•tip
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

o�aF w a r,�;qQ�
7
r
> =i
Mr. Michael Bliss
Butterball, LLC
PO Box 589
Mt. Olive, NC 28365
Dear Mr. Bliss:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 4, 2006
Subject: NPDES General Permit NCG060600
Certificate of Coverage NC-G060108
Butterball, LLC
Formerly Carolina Turkeys
Duplin County
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your request to change the your name under the General Permit,
received on October 13, 2006,
Please find enclosed the revised Certificate of Coverage. The terms and conditions contained in the General
Permit retrain unchanged and in full effect. This revised Certificate of Coverage is issued under the requirements of
North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
If you have any questions, please contact the Stormwater Permitting Unit at [phone], extension 502.
Sincerely,
ORIGIN_,A+�L S{iIGF�iNED BY
Alan W. Klimek P. E.
CC. D\k'Q Central Files
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
I-5tormwater Perrnitting.Unit).
N7to7rthCarolina
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet h2o.ennstate.nc,us 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal QpportunitylAffirmalive Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060108
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
BUTTERBALL, LLC
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
BUTTERBALL, LLC
1628 GARNERS CHAPEL ROAD
MOUNT OLIVE
DUPLIN COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as a UT to the Northeast Cape Fear River, a class C. SW stream, in the Cape Fear
River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts 1, 11, I11, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG060000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective December 4, 2006.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect.for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day December 4, 2006. ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
'tE NPICA
Alan W. Klimek, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G, Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W, Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
August 23. 2002
WFNDELL CAMPBELL
CAROLINA TURKEYS - MOUNT OLIVE
PO BOX 589
MT OLIVE, NC 28365
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Renewal
Carolina Turkeys - Mount Olive
COC Number NCG060108
Duplin County
Dear Permince:
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG060000, the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This permit is reissued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December G, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package -
A new Certificate of Coverage
A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG060000
A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility
for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or
decree,
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Aisha Lau of the Central Office Stormwater
and General Permits Unit at [phone]. ext. 578
Sincerely,
Bradley Bennett, Supervisor
Stormwater and General Permits [)nit
cc: Central Files
Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files
Wilmington Regional Office
e�
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
t- 800-623-7748

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG060000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG060108
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1. other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
CAROLINA TURKEYS
is hereby authorized to discharge stornrwater from a facility located at
CAROLINA TURKEYS - MOUNTOLIVE
1628 GARNERS CHAPEL RD
MOUNT OLIVE
DUPLIN COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as a UT to the Northeast Cape Fear River, a class C SW stream, in the Cape Fear
River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in
Parts I, I1, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCGO60000 as attached.
This Certificate of coverage shall become effective September 1, 2002.
This Certificate of Coverm c shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day August 23, 2002.
for Alan W. Klimek, P.E_, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Deceniher 27. 2001
DAN BLACKSHEAR
CAROLINA TURKEY
P O BC)\ 589
MOUNTOLIVE. . NC 28365
Subject: NPDfwS Sulrnttiv:'iwr Permit Rcnc-al
CAROLINA TURKE Y
COC Number lNCG060108
Duplin County
Dear Pe:rnlittee:
Your facility is currently covered t'Or stormwater discharge under General Permit NCGUh(X)OO. This permit expires
oil August 31, 2(iO2. The Division still] currently in the process of rewriting this Permit and is scheduled to have
the permit reissued by late summer of 2002. Once the permit is reissued. your iucility would he eligible for
continued coverage under the reissued permit,
In order to assure .our Continued covera;-c under the general permit, you must apply to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) for renewal of your permit coverage. To make this renewal process easier, we arc; inforining you irl
utivancc that your permit will he ctpirinIa. E.1100SCLI yolu will find a General Permit Coverage Renewal
Application Form. The application rllust be corlipletcd and returnee[ by March 4, 2002 in order to assure continued
c0v01'age: under the Ircneral per,nit.
1 1lilure to request renewal within this time period nuly result in a civil assessment of at least $250,00, Lar,rcr
penalties rtlay be: assessed dependill-I un the delinquency of the rcqucst. Discharge of smrmwater from yclur facility
without coverage under a valid siorrim-ater NPDES permit would constiluti a violation ol' NCGS 143-215,1 and
could result in aSseSSnlCnts of Civil penalties of up to $10'.000 per d:ty.
Please note that recent federal legislation hits extended the "no exposure exclusion" to all operators of industrial
facilities in any of the I I categories of "stored water discharccs associated With indusirial activity." (except
construction activities). If you teed your facility can certify a condii ion of "no exposure:". i.e. the lacilty industrial
malcrial - and operations arc not exposed to slorm►vater. You can apply for the no CxPosur'e; exclusion. For additional
illf0rnruion contact the Central Oilice; Stortnwater Staff menlhcr listed below or check the Storntwater 8: General
Permits Unit Web Site at httl3:/Ih2o-etr.slatu.nc.us/tie/stormwater-hint
II'the still ,ject storrnwater discharge to waters oi'the stale has been terminated. please complete idle enclosed
Rescission Request Form. Mailing- instruc:linns are fisted to the bottom of the form. You will be nolliffcd when the
rescission process has been conlpletccl.
Il' you have: any questions regarding [lie permit renewal procedures please contact Ed Fleck of the; Wilmington
Re;�iona! Office at 910- 395-3900 or Aisha Lau of the Central Office Stormwater Unit at [phone]. ext. 578
Sincel-ely.
Bradley- Bennelt_ Supevvisor
Slorilnvaier and General Permits Unit
cc: CerltralI -ides
Wilnlin own Reuiunal OFlice
j�ta
NCDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1-800-623-7748

NPDES FACILITY AND PERMIT DATA 01/21/98 11:26:22
UPDATE OPTION TRXID 5NU KEY NCGO60108
PERSONAL DATA FACILITY APPLYING FOR PERMIT REGION
FACILITY NAME> CAROLINA TURKEY COUNTY) DUPLIN 08
ADDRESS: MAILING (REQUIRED) LOCATION (REQUIRED)
STREET: P.O. BOX 589 STREET: 1628 GARNERS CHAPEL RD
CITY: MOUNT OLIVE ST NC ZIP 28365 CITY: MOUNT OLIVE ST NC ZIP 28365
TELEPHONE [phone] DATE FEE PAI➢: 05/06/97 AMOUNT: 400.00
STATE CONTACT> ULMER PERSON IN CHARGE DAN BLACKSHEAR
1=PROPOSED,2=EXIST,3=CLOSED 2 1=MAJOR,2=MINOR 2 1=MUN,2=NON-MUN 2
LAT: LONG: N=NEW,M=MODIFICRTION,R=REISSUE> R
DATE APP RCVD 05/06/97 WASTELOAD REDS / /
DATE STAFF REP REDS / / WRSTELOA➢ RCVD / /
DATE STAFF REP RCVD / / SCH TO ISSUE / /
DATE TO P NOTICE / / DATE DRAFT PREPARED / /
DATE OT AG CON REDS / / DATE DENIED / /
DATE OT AG CON RCVD / / DATE RETURNED / /
DATE TO EPA / / DATE ISSUED p1/2\/�. ASSIGN/CHANGE PERMIT
DATE FROM EPA / / EXPIRATION DATE 08/31/9
FEE CODE ( 0 ) 1=(>10MGD),2=(>1MGD),3=(>O.IMGD),4=((O.1MGD),5=SF,6=(GP25,64,79),
7=(GP49,73)B=CGP76)9=(GP13,34,30,52)0=CNOFEE) DIS/C 73 CONBILL C )
COMMENTS: PREVIOUSLY NCS000065 FAX [phone]
MESSAGE: -* ENTER DATA FOR UPDATE 4-

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health aid Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 15, 1993
Mr. Donald F Simon
Carolina Turkey
P.O. Box 589
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Subject: General Permit No. NCG060000
Carolina Turkey
COC NCGO60108
Duplin County
Dear Mr.. Simon:
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on October 1, 1992, we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general
permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and the
Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated
December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit
application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Environmental Management. The Division of Environmental Management may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage. -
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area
Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Mr. Bill Mills at telephone number 919/733-
5083.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By
coleen H. Bul3 €:s
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. E.
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DMSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Carolina Turkey
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
Carolina Turkey
SR 1501
Mount Olive
Duplin County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Northeast Cape Fear River in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts 1,11, III
and IV of General Permit No. NCG050000 as attached
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective October 15, 1993.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day October 15, 1993.
ori�inai Signed By
Coleen H. Sw ns
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

r `+: as .crt��i
�'w �" g w� � �'s:.5
j�f,'�Fly�{'' tµi�
✓.'�a,
� ,�, t ' ,+�i!Zj
-f' •y ••�.•)�`i
�.%. � h'l31s�
.5 ems'.' :se
�`
�__
) 1
`-�« �: a�7�:;:r,a:' V" �-,�
,M{ S Y ,t L�•"� � F µla V) �
�: �' W� _ 'i•-\�� -: .Y ti
a�:'ntY� �S,•,3'.. '7 � �� �
�+-.4'=� �� � �
•- t th?f! ° ,� ,. ~
1.4 r F-.
rr•-M' - r a t
K' j `�. �:a.�'d � �
t"' J �� �s.'1Y °�.�,�: •�
k.4 _/ I I �__' \.
r 'i „��� .� icy .�'.
�f �) � ..!'. � � � 3."r,
NEa
�•.: r s' �
.1�'1: _ '�=f
� I,•�: - •�.f x�� �:5� �_ �
,-;.�ifc.,r ... t e, i �� -
,�;r :+ Y. _
/ma�yy `b �' ^C YYY
Sea. � :-� �
�� i��� � I
Gem
�. \\ 17 `�
r �•C� �
♦ l •r~~ �—^�
�✓ �
% �
l�\ Y56 � �,� ,- a
._-.:� / t�- ';r
/: 1y�t /y��RL
j_��' (�"
i ,_/• � J/ '^ '�i
� � _�� �''=� '�:,s?
1 0■ \
-Radford J�
, a,.4+ 0 �
IGa-?jam- �•90 ���w •f,.`,_.i�
r� f \�.�esn....��
/� -i .' 1 ' ':r '� t:�e'�
tt l'i.
'• j1 [ie. 7+c
r
.tio _-
a{' .1� isf_.ai4r%
_
. I
w
�.
'N
cm
l 04 h=
'�' � ±// r[[¢y-,1•��) y.se"i
?�yr��-"�•
! �f�,Y\� �'�r�'
`r
ram.: 40s�.•. -� �•
//
•"
��� `S�'Ps .7i "
P _^� a' ��`a
-� Z f.�e 4 .._ c�
r _
.� - �` 44••"iill"�
,
�//
' �
~--�••�s� ' .Y.�-�` a
•'i. µii�� -i*"r c.i',�
•
' ; `rf �F
. _',wtis :4
�•d� mod, F-
1
'' .'Y % 5 i . -� �
s+.'e {' rlf'++ a r .�
t'^� _. ��_ �f+
ti;F;���,,�t
h :� J 3 :'.+ f \_
a' c� '; ,i L per: v
'�•9' � �Y/ 1'�. ��- ~: Y-.
/J � cQ.S X">•+:'
y
�v .� • �{r,
'� \y
/
/
y� �
&«F
"'X� 9'
1 t }rySY_7,<
7,'� _ �a �
"!f`i,�1I,P
i• r �? ,j�ti t _ y `
•�-v_Y!r-ti o
y - a ��
..."' =r% �.':`'i' _ -
',�+ q- .��J'.- � 7-mot//
7 -3?. f
+ ~r�
fir.
}?7r ` t_
+e.7' / #� ��,•Br;�
.ac.R.� Mr�.�!! ,+',:
ref;
•.Cem
9. � �lT"
;. �� Jirt �"� ,� �
t iy /' / l
It '�"-'� � �•�- - � f�-_ y
fcR �' "
�r � ^ 't� %
s''
rry.,5 1
�r:C�.i � '� :e`Vs,. � S
�•-'.:
� ;�. .`
.1 A . � 1.�, r� ��
4:f : t '_ i.
s:r
/�%l - '•.ems
lu. ,
r•, 'iW -'S'r
k _- p �'}-�.�"`qr
c, max` } �e •h . M.
\
�i�f
� • �
i�€ #/ �i �
�1\'c� �
�� ��1'r+"r� f... �• .N�
! 'S��
f•*rrv\
_ 'fi'..•^K+l �';�+'�1-`
'• ,1.r Y'y�, w :3. i'l
^�1 �5.�
1 �
f,y... �n-''_. "ILµr-�1Yr•�_
�a 3A
�t Wit.;' �
•'s/�+�i'� ' ' i'4�3? \
. �.4 � .!
.�l` f ,fV..• 1;
Blt2Zat'C 5 t d4.5 ✓ �
e^Y �i]'OSS1 OaCtS�
�N a=�e i'•�4
h Cem
�^z : i;"f. y���p.. ;• ,
f
_
y ,
�'.
�
or
�, :
~Cem
�/ +
� \`�`_� r s•-'-s .c. -
\ i523 + `�'-:i'i�!
1.... r'-i.'{{ .; i�„t-. / `�
•�� �
. � y'
�' ��� 11
rCeri2
.
AM)
�
�,o'iyti+r+tR,.i^ Ti4�
1;."•
F-. �� �' _J Win, s.}�lR/
'
� w�r
�7'�`�� s1ti
. 1 T1�5�
rip r �� 'A�
S' ax ti¢S,k 'a7 k fi'A. '
����r .. ! <Q�
r.4„j._
,.� �" kv .� y� �., � I501
O
� •; V iya .,,.�. t
fj�f 2� Me C er Ci �R3
9'� Il�iri,.r,.` �r�' {i`
� i � i r 4 ���+
� af� � �
.� • " I' • �
ry�� • '1 �i �'� � �* �h.-
C •5 r'f. \ - 2•a+"� �'r.R+i
� � '� ` �"#'t!iS' rt t�` '�
� 4\ �- "Y„ • y, sa
yg�,df
� _- r x '
F� ,r'Y�•'" r. f�•7, ,�•�'� 4_� �,',tif
�i'' l', '�-. 11`..=`L�'• C
.$� rtt'�{'•f �'0.-•• - ,,r-.�•v'
��,,,'y, �' � ''�.3p �,;T4r.
�$
gs•3�kr,�,�:.�o�} '
j_{yy';�3k '�,1
a' �'.. -3.
�
mac• )
?11 %Li
i
173i`.''-ice
134
f+ ; . � .'2-.. rb� eA..... •
55' RED HILL 5.8 0, M 1. 235
�fi. 4Q'�
:..r+' - f 'fiP
:!ci> , h!r!ia�_'', .d•
-'
S'ar
•::f` .;..,, Ey} -. r
'i4 -� , tf
10,
JA95
'494
f
1
993
IZ
_...N
238 SUAVE'-AfSTON-YIi C.N1�-.891 --35*07'30"
237000.E 7r52'30"
z ROAD CLASSIFICATION 47
?MO Primary highway, Light -duty road, hard or Fps
hard surface._..,,____ improved surface__. �sF
Secondary highway,
00 9000 10p00 hard surface_.____.....__ � Unimproved road,._
0 Interstate Route O.U. S. Route O State Route
WILLIAMS, N.C.
QUADRANGLE LOCAri4N NW/4 SEVEN SPRiNCiS 15' QUADRANGLE
CONTOURS AND ELEVATIONS N3507.5—W7752.517.5
EpUEST IN METERS
1980
DMA 5454 111 NW —SERIES V842 MODEL

FACILITY
COUNTY
NPDES
MAP #
DSN FLOW!
SUB BASIN
L ATT It TU ODE
E:�-m ttig' S REffi7i
STRE ►:M CLASS -
IDISC,HARGE CUSS
EXPIRATION DATE
,I p -r`,I v
CA %uL-► f-- r-
L4PLld
�, L1 0-(n 0 1 co 13
C-1 .2--7- k(kw
0 �/A-
o � -off
3 0�
-7. -1 0 154 5
tI
FJ
UNM kM tFb •r7'Z1 8U7�y ! cr lVf)��S-r
cApe-
�g7v2o-1 C,,fA-rieA
bsa- � I - q -f

1
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
i
waTF
o�°F9 Technical Bulletin for N.C. General Stormwater
r
Y Permit NCG060000
I Technical Bulletin for NCGO60000 Last Revised 11/15/2012 I
What is regulated by this General Permit?
This General Permit regulates stormwater discharges from the following industrial manufacturing activities:
✓Food and kindred products; Tobacco products; Soaps, detergents and cleaning preparations; Perfumes, cos-
metics and other toilet preparations; Drugs; Public warehousing and storage; and like activities
What does my permit require me to do?
✓Develop and implement a written stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) (Part 11, Section A).
,,'Develop and implement an assessment of best management practices associated with off loading, handling and
spill prevention of rendered fats and oils that are stored and used at the facility (Only facilities that use or process
animal fats / byproducts) (Part 11, Section E).
✓ Provide secondary containment for bulk storage of liquid materials (Part 11, Section A).
✓Conduct semi-annual self -monitoring of the pollutant content in stormwater discharges, and report the results to
DWQ (Part 11, Sections B and C).
✓Conduct semi-annual visual inspections of stormwater pollutant sources, control measures, conveyances, and out -
falls (Part It, Sections A and D).
✓Respond to monitoring results that exceed the numerical benchmarks with management actions to reduce the
level of pollutants in the stormwater discharges. The numerical benchmarks are considered as 'action levels.'
Why?
,/The General Permit seeks to reduce industrial pollution in rainfall runoff from manufacturing businesses by re-
quiring site managers to be aware of, and control, the potential for polluted runoff.
✓Federal and state laws and regulations require the control of industrial pollution in stormwater runoff.
✓Those laws and regulations reflect the public's support for providing for clean natural waters in our state and
nation.
What has changed since the last renewal in 2007?
• The required content of the SPPP has been expanded slightly and clarified in minor ways in several paragraphs.
• The permittee may now sample discharges from any measureable storm event, rather than from a representative
event. This change should make it easier to obtain a sample from a qualifying rain event.
• The permit text now clarifies that failure to sample due to adverse weather, or due to no discharge during the nor-
mal monitoring period, may be excused. However, the permits now require additional monthly monitoring for un-
excused failures to monitor.
• Vehicle Maintenance Areas (VMA) shall be monitored for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) rather than Oil &
Grease (O&G).
• VMA monitoring is now triggered by the total oil usage for motor oil plus hydraulic oil. The trigger remains at a total
of 55 gallons per month, average.
• A lower TSS benchmark of 50 mg/L applies for discharges to especially protected water classifications.
• Facilities that use or process animal fats / byproducts must now complete an assessment of best management prac-
tices (BMPs) associated with off loading, handling and spill prevention of rendered fats and oils that are stored and
used at the facility (Part 11, Section E).

I PAGE TECHNICAL BULLETIN FOR N.C. GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT NCG060000 LAST REV. 1111512012
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to monitor all outfalls?
Yes. However, you may request ROS
(Representative Outfall Status). If ROS is
approved, this status allows analytical
monitoring at fewer outfalls. To request
ROS, submit a ROS Request Form.SWU-
ROS (from our website) to the DWQ
.Regional Office.
What if I can't collect a storm -
water discharge in 30 minutes?
When distances separate multiple out -
falls and preclude collection within 30
minutes of each discharge event, begin
collection within 30 minutes and then
continue until all outfalls are sampled.
Documentation must be kept in the
SPPP.
Can I take more samples than
is required by my permit?
Yes. The permittee may take multiple
samples at any time while under permit
coverage. The permittee may find the
extra sampling useful to quickly identify
causes of benchmark exceedances. All
sampling for the permit parameters
must be reported to DWQ on the DMR
forms.
What if I can't sample because
of bad weather?
Adverse weather is dangerous or it may
limit access for sampling personnel.
Your documentation of adverse weather
and the reasons for not sampling must
be included in your SPPP. A substitute
sample may be taken during the next
qualifying storm event.
What if I don't address visual
monitoring problems?
If you do not respond to problems seen
in visual monitoring, DWQ may require
that you increase the visual monitoring
frequency, apply for an individual per-
mit, implement in -stream monitoring,
install or modify structural stormwater
controls, or implement other controls.
What if I forget to monitor?
DWQ may require monthly monitoring
for a specified time period.
Why did you replace Oil &
Grease with TPH in VM areas?
The TPH test only targets chemicals de-
rived from crude oil. The Oil & Grease
(0&G) test recovers fats from animal &
vegetable sources and chemicals from
crude oil. Because TPH is more specific,
it is a better parameter for vehicle main-
tenance areas. The TPH method we are
specifying is EPA 1664A (SGT-HEM). It is
important to note that DWQ is not speci-
fying the more expensive Gas Chromato-
graph (GQ TPH method. DWQ found lab
costs for EPA 1664A (SGT-HEM) to be
comparable to O&G test costs. To test
these parameters in stormwater, labs
must perform this test in accordance
with EPA procedures, but do not need to
be certified. (Vote: A lower benchmark
applies for TPH: 15 mg/l (not 30 mg/1).
Why are there two benchmark
values for TSS?
The 100 mg/L benchmark applies to
most rivers, lakes, and creeks in North
Carolina. However, some other waters
must receive special protection under
North Carolina water quality rules, and
in these two permits discharges to them
are subject to the more protective
benchmark of 50 mg/L. Those waters
classified as Trout Waters, High Quality
Waters, Outstanding Resource Waters,
and Primary Nursery Areas receive this
extra protection in these permits.
Where and when do I send the
monitoring reports?
See your permit text, Part 111, Section E.
Who can help me?
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Offices:
Must I use a North Carolina
certified laboratory?
No. North Carolina water quality rules
do not require that analyses of storm -
water be accomplished by a certified
facility. Please note however, federal
rules at 40CFR136 do require that test-
ing for these two permits be by EPA -
approved lab methods. Analysis by a
North Carolina certified lab is often the
easiest way to insure compliance with
federal rules.
Note that pH is a special case, and
must be measured within 15 minutes
of the sample recovery. You must ei-
ther train on -site staff to conduct pH
testing, or contract with commercial
services to test pH in accordance with
EPA field testing methods.
Must a P. E. sign and stamp my
SPPP?
No. North Carolina water quality rules do
not require that the SPPP be the work
product of a North Carolina P.E.
Who inspects me, and for what?
Staff from the DWQ Regional Offices
shown below will inspect your facility.
They will typically ask to see your SPPP
and will check to see if it is complete and
up to date. They will typically ask to see
your recent monitoring results. They will
typically tour the facility with a focus on
the stormwater discharge outfalls and on
your general housekeeping as a way to
assess the potential for polluted storm -
water discharges. Our staff will always
follow up their Compliance Evaluation
Inspection with a summary letter to you,
restating their findings and, if necessary
indicating whether enforcement action
will be considered in response to those
findings.
Asheville Office ............. [phone] Washington Office.......... [phone]
Fayetteville Office.......... [phone] Wilmington Office.......... [phone]
Mooresville Office......... [phone] Winston-Salem Office...... [phone]
Raleigh`Officg..M....ti........ (919) 791.4a#N Central Ofiice�.... (9�807-6300
DWQ Stormwater Permitting Unit: http://Portalncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su
T

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit- NCG060310 Effective: 12101/12 Expiration: 10/31117 Owner: Nash Johnson & Sons Farms Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Big Ed Feed Mill - Rose Hill
County: Duplin 3362 US Hwy 117 N
Region: Wilmington
Rose Hill NC 28458
Contact Person: Michael Newton Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 01/01/2016 Entry Time: 10:00AM Exit Time: 10:01AM
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: FoodlTobaccolSoapslCosmetiWPublic Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant [] Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG060310 Owner • Facility: Nash Johnson & Sons Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 01/01/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: NCG060310 Owner - Facility: Nash Johnson & Sons Farms Inc
Inspection Date: 01101/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Vail: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ 1111 ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 3