NCG030517_MONITORING INFO_20190326

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS-,
PERMIT NO.
IV�co !
DOC TYPE
❑ HISTORICAL FILE
MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ �b� d 3 ��
YYYYM MDD

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted March 21, 2019
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030517
FACILITY NAME Mickey Truck Bodies Inc. RECEIVE®
COUNTY Guilford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Joshua Soto MAR 2 $ 2019
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 CENTRAL FILES
collection or analysis: GRAB OV/R ECTION�
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2019
SAMPLE PERIOD ® Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly) _ (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ® Water Suppiv [:]SA
[:]Other
---
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period?z
OutfalE No.
Date Sample
Collected)
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks ===>
-
-
100 mg/L or 5o mg/L4
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001—]Main Piant
2/27/19
0.11
23
7.2
0.00534
< 0.00310
0.186
< 2.70
NA
001— Uftgate
2/27/19
0.11
18
6.8
0.00219
< 0.00310
0.101
< 2.70
NA
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
a See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433,11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469,31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 5WU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may bewaived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), 1 certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the Stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal; of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period:2
Outfall No.
pate Sample
Collected}
(mo/dd/yr]:,.,
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (5GT-HEM):;
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-24S, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report o sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART lI SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART 11 SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ®NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
am aware that there are significant penalties foresubmitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
/d ) r
(Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

N L"k La
r..
Aeenrate. Timely. Responsive. innovative.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Leaf Environmental, Inc. (BE012)
Attn: Tim Monroe
PO BOX 14609
RTP, NC 27709-
RE: Laboratory Results for
Project Number: 206512, Project Name/Desc: 206512
ENCO Workorder(s): CCO1347
Dear Tim Monroe,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Friday, March 1, 2019.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative if applicable. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full, without the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Chuck Smith
Project Manager
Enclosure(s)
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only he reproduced In full. Page I of 9

www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE SUMMARY/ LABORATORY CHRONICLE
CllentID: Outfall 001 -Main Plant
Lab ID: CCO1347-01
Sampled: 02/27/19 09:15
Received: 03/01/19 17:00
Parameter
EPA 1664E
Preparation
EPA 1664B
Hold Date/Time(sl
03/27/19
Prep Date/Time(s)
03/11/19 18:01
Analysis Qate/Time(s]
03/12/19 15:27
EPA 200.7
Same
08/26/19
03/04/19 09:15
03/05/19 12:37
SM 254OD-2011
NO PREP
03/06/15
03/05/19 15:35
03/05/19 15:35
ClientID: OatfaB 001- Liftgate
Lab ID: CCO1347-02
Sampled: 02/27/19 09:30
Received: 03/01/19 17:00
Parameter
Preparation
Hold DatelTime(s)
Prep Date/Mme(s]
Analysis Date/Time(s]
EPA 1664E
EPA 16648
03/27/19
03/11/19 18:01
03/12/19 15:27
EPA 200.7
Same
08/26/19
03/04/19 09:15
03/05/19 12:39
SM 254OD-2011
NO PREP
03/06/19
03/O5/19 15:35
03/05/19 15:35
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 2 of 8

www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY
Client ID: Outfall 001- Main Plant
Lab ID:
CC01347-01
AnalZe
Resin
EhU
MIL
PAL
5iniU
MStho r4otes
Copper- Total
5.34
1
1.60
10.0
ug/L
EPA 200.7
Total Suspended Solids
23
5.0
5.0
mg/L
SM 254OD-2011
Zinc - Total
1B6
4.40
10.0
ug/L
EPA 200.7
Client ID: Outfall 001 - Liftgate
Lair ID:
CCO1347-02
Analyj
Results
Flag
M"
P_4l,
units
Method Notes
Capper- Total
2.1.9
3
1.60
10.0
ug/L
EPA 200.7
Total Suspended Solids
18
5.0
5.0
mg/1-
SM 254OD-2011
Zinc- Total
101
4.40
10.0
ug/L
EPA 200.7
FINAL T7115 report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 3 9 8

www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: Outfall 001 - Main Plant
Lab Sample ID: CCO1347-01
Received: 03/01/19 17:00
Matrix: Surface Water
Sampled-,02/27/19 09:15
Work Order: CCO1347
Project: 206512
Sampled By:Joshua Soto
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods
-
^ - ENCO Crory cYrhfred analyte [NC 5911
raam�ssewrr�wrsrna�r„ , .
AnalZe rCAS Numberl Results
BA9 URiu
PE H" EQL
BAU111
Method Ana vied @y Notes
Copper[7440-50-8]^ 5.34
J ug/L
1 1.60 10.0
9CO4014
EPA 200,7 03/05/19 12:37 JDH
Lead [7439-92-1]^ Ito
U ug/L
1 3.10 10.0
9C04014
EPA 200.7 03/05/19 12:37 JDH
Zinc[7440-66-6]^ 186
ug/L
1 4.40 1010
9CG4014
EPA 200.7 03/05/19 12:37 JDH
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary t-otree analyze INC 5911
8nplyte fCAS Number] Rcau,
EL49
knits
RE
MP&
E"
latih
Method
Analyzed
Ay Notes
Total Suspended Solids^
23
mg/L
2
5.0
5.0
9C05007
SM 254OD-201L
03/05/19 15:35
ASC
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Jacksonville certified analyte [NC 442)
Analyte rCAS Numberl Results
flag
Units
RE
MDL
ply
Batch
Method
Analyzed
Ay Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar
2.70
U
mg/L
1
2.70
5.00
9C11015
EPA 1664E
03/12/19 15:27
SMA
Material^
Description: Outfall 001 - Uftgate
Lab Sample ID:CC01347-02
Received: 03/01/19 17:00
Matrix: Surface Water
Sampled:02/27/19 09:30
Work Order: CCO1347
Project: 206512
Sampled By:Joshua Soto
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods
^ - ENCO Cary c rtfled anatyte (AC 5911
Analyte !CAS Nwnherl Results
fiag
Units
DE
MDL
p"
Batch
Method
Analyz
Ay Notes
Copper[7440-50-B]^
2.19
J
ug/L
1
1.60
i0,0
9CO4014
EPA 200.7
03/05/19 12:39
JDH
Lead [7439.92-1]^
3.10
U
ug/L
1
3,10
10.0
9CO4014
EPA 200.7
03/05/19 12:39
JDH
Zinc [7440-66-6]^
101
ug/L
1
4.40
10.0
9CO4014
EPA 200.7
03/05/19 12:39
JDH
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary c&trred analyte [NC 5911
Analyte rCAS Numberl Resul
Rul
Units
PE
MPL
ply
Batch
Method
Analyzed
fy Notes
Total Suspended Solids^
18
mg/L
2
5.0
5.0
9CO5007
SM 254OD-2011
03/05/19 15:35
ASC
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO JacAwnWle cerofied anatyte [NC 442]
J
'
Analyte rCAS Number] Results
fJ;ig
Units
l2E
Ha
E"
Batch
Method
Aid
By Note
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar
2.70
U
mg/L
E
2.70
5.00
901015
EPA 16648
03/12/19 15:27
SMA
Material ^
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in Poll. Page 4 of 8

www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control
Batch 9CO4014 - EPA 3009A
Blank (9C04014-BLKI) Prepared: 03/04/2019 09:15 Analyzed: 03/05/2019 11:05
Spike Source a/uREC RPD
AnAvte
Result
F.laa
P_0L
Units Level Result G/aREC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Capper
1.60
U
10.0
ug/L
Lead
3.10
U
10.0
ug/L
Zinc
4.40
U
10.0
ug/L
LCS (904014-851)
Prepared: 03/04/2019 09:15 Analyzed: 03/05/2019 11:17
Spike Source %REC
RPD
Anabde
Result Elac
PQL
Units
Level Resuft °/aREC Limits RPD
Limit Notes
Capper
188
10.0
ug/L
200 94 85-115
Lead
193
10.0
ug/L
200 97 85-115
Zinc
199
10.0
ug/L
200 100 85-115
Matrix Spike (gC04014-MSI)
Prepared: 03/04/2019 09:15 Analyzed: 03/05/2019 12:19
Source:0002872.01
Spike Source %REC
RPD
AnalYte
Result Elau
PS2L
Unim
Level Result 0/0REC Limits RPD
LFmi Notes
Capper
187
10.0
ug/L
200 5.39 91 70-130
Lead
193
10.0
ug/L
200 3.10 U 97 70-130
Zinc
201
10.0
ug/L
200 10.0 96 70-130
Matrix Spike Dup (9C04014-MSDI)
Prepared: 03/04/2019 09:15 Analyzed: 03/05/2019 12:22
Source: CCO2872-01
Spike Source %REC
RPD
_Analvte
Re ldt Flaa
P_QL
Units
Level ResulC a/aREC Limits RPD
�t Notes
Copper
193
10.0
ug/L
200 5.39 94 711-130 3
30
Lead
192
10.0
ug/L
200 3.10 U 96 70-130 0.6
30
Zinc
203
10.0
ugA
200 10.0 97 70-130 1
30
Post Spike (9C04014-PSI)
Prepared: 03/04/2019 09:15 Analyzed: 03/05/2019 12:24
Source: CCO2872-61
Spike
Source
0/aREC RPD
.Anande
Resuft Fiaq
POL
units
Level
Result
%REC
Limits RPD limit Notes
Capper
0.198
0.0100
mg/L
0.200
0,00539
96
80-120
Lead
0.188
0.0100
mg/L
0.200
0.000205
94
80-120
Zinc
0.205
0.0100
mg/L
0.200
0.0100
98
80-120
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 9C05007 - NO PREP
Blank (9C05007-BLKI)
Prepared & Analyzed: 03/05/2019 15:35
Spike Source %REC RPD
.Anallhe Result Elan POL units Level Resuft °/aREC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids 2.5 U 2.5 mg/L
LCS (9C05007-BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: 03/05/2019 15:35
Spike Source a/oREC RPD
�[lalvtq Result flag PUL units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids 98 2.5 mg/L 100 98 80-120
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as recelved by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 5 of 8

www.encolabs.corn
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 9CO5007 - NO PREP - Continued
Duplicate (9CO5007-DUPI)
Prepared & Analyzed: 03/05/2019 15:35
Source: CCO0064-01
Spike Source %REC
RPD
.Anatvtc
Result Flag
POL
Units
Level arsul1 0/ REC Limns
RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
150
33
mg/L
220
37 20 QM-12
Duplicate (9C05007-DUP2)
Prepared & Analyzed: 03/05/2019 15:35
Source: CCO2515-01
Spike Source o/aREC
RPD
-An"e
Result F.Ian
1'QL
Slats
Level guylt %REC Limits
RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
240
42
mg/L
180
30 20 QM-12
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 9C11015 - EPA 1664E
Blank (9C31015-BLK1) Prepared: 03/11/2019 18:01 Analyzed: 03/12/2019 15:27
Spike Source %REC RPD
-AnahU Result Flag P-0L units Level Result "/oREC Limits RPD MmLt Notes
01 & Grease (HEM-SGI) Non -Polar Material 2.70 U 5.00 mg/L
LCS (9C31015-B51) Prepared: 03/11/2019 18:01 Analyzed: 03/12/2019 15:27
Spike Source %REC RPD
-Ana1vte Result F.laa P_QL Units Level Alt 0/ RE Limi RPD 11111lt Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material 71.2 5.00 mg/L 80.0 89 64-132
LCS Dup (9C31015-BSD1) Prepared: 03/11/2019 18:01 Analyzed: 03/12/2019 15:27
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
-AnaLvte
Result Kim
POL
Units
Level
Result %REC
Ural S RPD
11111A Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material
9D.0
5.00
mg/L
80.0
112
64132 23
34
Matrix Spike (9C11015-MSi)
Prepared: 03/11/2019 18:01 Analyzed: 03/12/2019 15:27
Source: CCO1347-01
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
9nalvte
Re utt Elan
PQL
units
Level
Result %REC
Limits RPD
Mulit Not=
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Nan -Polar Materlal
140
5.00
mg/L
132
2.70 U 106
64-132
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 6 of a

www.encelabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DaEFINITIONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
] The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDQ and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument. This value is considered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
PQL PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit. The PQL presented is the laboratory MRL.
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative identification".
P Greater than 25% concentration difference was observed between the primary and secondary GC column.
The lower concentration is reported.
[CALC] Calculated analyte - MDL/MRL reported to the highest reporting limit of the component analyses.
QM-12 Precision between duplicate samples was outside acceptance limits.
FINAL T hIS report retates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 7 of 8

.-
ENVIRONMENTAL CON SERVATIC ULABORATORIES CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD www.encolabs.com
- 10775 cc&ml Pw Dr. - - 48W Fxocu:ive,Park C6urL Sdta 111 102-A Woot Muds Industrial Ct. -
r - Ortanda FL 32024 ,la&wnv91o, FL 32216.6069 Cary,, NC 27511'
,(407) 62G-5314 Fax (407) 850;6945 ' (g04) 296-3007 Fax (004) Zil&IM10 [phone] Fax [phone] Page of:
Cnent i'lama
Project Number
Requested
Analyses
Requested Turnaround
Leaf Environmental, Inc. (SE012)
206512
Times
Net n :eques:-�lojact to.
Address
P<) BOX 14609
Frai —_i Namemose
206512
- .
zncoCtancx try the taCi{i(y
ccogt
01VISTCLp ' -
PO p f Billing Into
R-rP, NG 27709•-
206512
Q
-Standard
Tat ..
i=ax
Reporting Contact
(919) 4"8536
(-
Tim Moni6e,,
r�
Cfl
N
_ Expedited'.
Sampler(%! Name, Attlietwn (Picot)
Bill Can
.���((
"
I
L
Samplansj Signature
Silts Locallon ; T-ane Zeno , P - '.
LabWorkordeCL r-- �.
w�•
J 4r�/i VF•J r Il (r 41I `•.' C'W!"�
V
1.0-
Preservatlan
(See
Codes)
(Gomb;nc
as nececs_rfl
"
Gorocliors
Aialrlx
Total h 0
hemq
CotivoimDate
T1mn.'
Comp/.Graft
(sac Coss)
Gmminvs.
_
Sample.%Ommeri ff
•':.
..II..��Somp/rt:�c/ri��DiFaWIdarmca:laa}..
Wifillio J�a (
'w in,Plant_
'oc '�`
tY% t
r�
SW.
r.5
7X
-'j�
rL
OutfalI 001 - Lit't ate
- `
. ��
-sw
5
X
X
X
r
r-
r
WPM
tC-e+.'F.1�''t%.-..
Tr
fS
E
Total # of Mrllainers
Sample Kit Pre;,arc-0 By .. .'
4j+a Tree
Relinqu: Jed By
baleelT e ' ..
Romived By
Datarlhslu:
CamTobnm,Spaclal Reporting Requirements
Relinquished By
Dalarnme
Herr By
Rc
OalraTnno
R�
catafJ'
-
Ga�olner r'a 8 Temps Oo Receipt condition Upon Receipt
Accepiabfe = Unacceptable
Matrix; GW-Groundwater SO-Soll DW Drinking Water. SE-Sed hem SW -Surface Wets., WW-Wastewater A -AI. O.Olner (datail in comments) _ Preservation: Wee FWQ N-H1,403 S-MG03 NO-NaOH D,olher (deta.l in comments)
180t0-AII samples sutmlttod to &NCO Laosara In accordance with dse.temts and condilions listed an the reverse ofthIs form, unless prior diriuen agmemenis exist'

Sample Preservation Verification
ENCO Cary
_hem'-'naf.:..r a.w:n ,z:�..:�r>� r,�,�i.nr�>•_ne^:svrw
Work Order: CC01347 Project: 206512
Client: Leaf Environmental, Inc. (BE012) Project #: 2.06512
Logged In: 01-Mar-19 17:04 Logged'.By: Rachel Ann-Yoni h i
Preservation Check Performed By: __ Dateffime:��{ E 7 � 0
C C01347-01
Cant
r
Type
Prep. i ' v
,Re �l�emen#'
pH Checked 1,
'`in{Cant[ol
,°+ �, Ky ;DatelTme ,
pH AdJusted y. Ad�usted��
>. ,.,,
1345&nt,UsedlCbmmen#s
C
250mLA +H28O4
<2
Y I N I
Y I N
I7
250rnlA+H2SO4
<2
Y I N. A
Y! N I. A
E
250rnLP+HNO3
<2.
N 1 NA
Y 1(6y NA
CCO1347-02
p.d)
pHCcked
mres e.
--pH
R_ea.gent;UeCamrenisOate
._..R:P
equirementCdntrolµ
,Adrtsted
-Adjustd, _
s. .
C
250mLA+H28O4
<2
Y I N h
Y -1 lU !
D
25OrimLA+H2SO4
e2
Y I N A�
Y 1 N 1
E
250mLP+ HNO3
<2
Y N 1 NA
Y/ N/ NA
Reagent Name ID
1
2
pH Strip ID:
PH Strips CBJ0741
C:\elmntlPrint\wko—FreservationUheCK.Fpt
Reagent Name Ib
3
A
Reagent Name ID
5
Page 1 of 1

STORMWATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SOO)
ANNUAL SUMMARY DATA MONITORING REPORT (DMR) 1 SPPP Annual Update DATA REVIEW FORM
Calendar Year 2018 RECEIVED
Individual NPDES Permit No. NCS❑❑❑❑❑❑ or NOV 0 5 2018
Certificate of Coverage (COC) No. NCG fl ❑o ❑s ❑i ❑
CENTI•tAL FILES
This monitoring report summary of the calendar year should be kept on file on -site with thefacilliy Sp. pp.
Facility Name: Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc.
County: Guilford
Phone Number: 3( 36 ) 888-2282
Total no. of SDOs monitored 3
Outfall No. Main Plant - 001
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No X
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No ❑■
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No ❑■
Parameter, (units)
Total
Rainfall,
inches
Total
Suspended
Solids
pH
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -polar
Oil & Grease
Benchmark
N/A
100 mglL
6.0 - 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mglL
15 mg/L
Date Sample
Collected,
mmlddlyy
04/04/18
0.14
20
6.5
0.0148
0.00349
0.730
3.49
10/10/18
0.38
14
7.0
< 0.00160
< 0.00310
0.205
12.8
SWU-264 - Generic Annual DMR
Last revised 5/02/2018

Additional Outfall Attachment
Ol tfall No. Liftgate - 001
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No ❑
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No ❑
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No ❑
Parameter, (units)
Total Total pH Copper Lead Zinc Non -polar
Rainfall, Suspended Oil & Grease
inches Solids
Benchmark N/A 100 mglL 6.0 - 9.0 0.007 mglL 0.03 mg1L 0.067 mglL 15 mg1L
Date Sample
Collected,
mmlddlyy
No discharge a cured frorr outfall during sp ing monitoring pe iod.
10/10/18 0.38 9.4 7.0 0.00570 < 0,00310 0.0858 5.75
SWU-264 - Generic Annual DMR
Last revised 5/02/2018

Additional Outfall Attachment
Outfall No. Lifigate - 002
Is this outfall currently in Tier 2 (monitored monthly)? Yes ❑ No ❑
Was this outfall ever in Tier 2 (monitored monthly) during the past year? Yes ❑ No ❑
If this outfall was in Tier 2 last year, why was monthly monitoring discontinued?
Enough consecutive samples below benchmarks to decrease frequency ❑
Received approval from DWQ to reduce monitoring frequency ❑
Other _ ❑
Was this SDO monitored because of vehicle maintenance activities? Yes ❑ No ❑■
Parameter, (units)
Total
Rainfall,
inches
Total
Suspended
Solids
pH
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -polar
Oil & Grease
Benchmark
N/A
100 mglL
6.0 - 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mglL
0.067 mglL
15 mglL
Date Sample
Collected,
mmlddlyy
M
M
=
=
M
M
M
M
���
No discharge o
cured frorr
outfall during sp
ing monitoring period.
Representative
outfall statt
s granted for Lift
ate Outfall 001 in
August 2018 - no
sampling required
for fall
monitoring peric
d.
SWU-264 - Generic Annual DMR
Last revised 5102.12018

I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a
system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person
o� persons who manage the system, or those persons directly.responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signz
Date
For questions, contact your local Regional Office:
DWQ Re ional Office Contact Information:
r1SHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
iM00RESVILLE REGIONAL OI F1CF
2090 US Highway 70
225 Green Street
610 East Center Avenue/Suite 301
Swannanoa; NC 28778
Systel Building Suite 714
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
[phone]
[phone]
RALEIGH REGIONAL O
'ASIIINGTON REGION AL OFFI
'ILiMINGT0iI REGIONAL_OFFICE
3800 Rnt-nett Drive
943 Washington Square Mall
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Raleigh. NC 27609
Washington, INC 27889
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
N3'[NSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
CENTRAL OFFICE
1617 Mail Service Center
i- "ToAreserve;;protect
450 Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
arid'entierlce
[phone]
[phone]
c.rUorlh".Carr�tFria's:►eater.::'°1 -- —
SWU-264 - Generic Annual DMR
Last revised 5/02/2018

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted October 24, 2018
,1
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030517
FACILITY NAME Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc.
COUNTY Guilford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Joshua Soto
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591
collection or analysis: GRAB
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2018
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ® July -Dec
or ❑ monthly' month
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ® Water Supply ❑SA
RECEIVED ❑Other
NOV 0 5 2018 PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
CENTRAL FlLe`
}NR SECT10nro,
❑ No discharge this period:
Outfall No.
Date Sample
1
Collected
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
s
Organics
Benchmarks ===>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/0
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001— Main Plant
10/10/18
0.38
14
7.0
< 0.00160
< 0.00310
0.205
12.8
NA
001— Liftgate
10/10/18
0.38
9.4
7.0
0.00570
< 0.00310
0.0858
5.75
NA
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is appiicab[e only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. 'For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
4"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
l/�✓� G'?,-X" Z�
Title�tle)
(Signature) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L_
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Non -polar o&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks ===>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• % BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS, SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER ATTHE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ®NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQCentrai Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and beiief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
ature of Permittee)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
1/ �z L -
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted July 26, 2018
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030517
FACILITY NAME Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc. ! c
COUNTY Guilford RECEIVED
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES IAA
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 AUG 0 1 Z018
collection or analysis: GRAB CENTRAL FILES
' DWR SECTION
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2018
SAMPLE PERIOD ® Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or- ❑ Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ® Water Supply [:]SA
❑Other
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 -)
® No discharge this period?'
Outfali No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
3
Inches
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Tota!
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg1C
6.0 - 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001- Liftgate
002 - Liftgate
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from anon -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
{Vote: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do_n_ot report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part 13: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PARTA AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ®NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR� including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or a_ t end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
am aware that `there re significant penaiti s for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of
Ai kv
(Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring_ Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted March 27, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030517
FACILITY NAME Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc.
COUNTY Guilford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Joseph Chase
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 u
collection or analysis: GRAB
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2018
SAMPLE PERIOD ® Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
_ ❑Zero -flow ® Water Supper ESA
I`�EL. NED []Other
MAY 14 2018 PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
❑ No discharge this period?Z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(rno/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non-Pofar O&G/Total
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics$
Benchmarks ==->
_
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001— Main
Plant
04/04/18
0.14
20
6.5
0.0148
0.00349
0.730
3.49
NA
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1of3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement forTTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period;2
Outfall No,
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks ==_>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
*See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOP -PART AAND PART MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES 1N A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART It SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ® NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"i certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
(Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

0 ENCO some
Accurate. Timely. Responsive. Innovative.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Monday, April 16, 2018
Leaf Environmental, Inc. (BE012)
Attn: Tim Monroe
PO BOX 14609
RTP, NC 27709-
RE: Laboratory Results for
Project Number: 206512, Project Name/Desc: 206512
ENCO Workorder(s): CB00360
Dear Tim Monroe,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Thursday, April 5, 2018.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative if applicable. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full, without the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Chuck Smith
Project Manager
Enclosure(s)
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 1 cf 8

..encolabs.com
SAMPLE SUMMARY/ LABORATORY CHRONICLE
Client ID: Outfall 001 -Main Plant
La61D; CB00360-01
Sampled: 04/04/18 08:15
Received: 04/05/18 16:22
Parameter
Preparation
Hold_DatelTime(s)
Prep Date/Timefsl
Analysis Date/Time(s]
EPA 1664E
EPA 1664B
05/02/18
04/11/18 16:04
04/12/18 18:12
EPA 200.7
Same
10/01/18
04/11/18 15:24
04/13/18 10712
SM 2540D-1997
NO PREP
04/11/18
04/10/18 14:55
04110118 14:55
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 2 of 8

� � �Cmm a
www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY
Client ID: Outfall 001 - Main Plant Lab ID: CB0O360-01
Analyte Results Flat? MDL Q Units Method Notes
Copper - Total 14.8 1.60 10.0 ug/L EPA200.7
Lead - Total 3.49 3 3.10 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material 3.49 7 2.70 5.00 mg/L EPA 16640
Total Suspended Solids 20 10 10 mg/L SM 2540D-1997
Zinc - Total 730 4.40 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7
HNAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in Full. Page 3 of 8

(� � �C—o
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: Outfall 001 - Main Plant Lab Sample ID: CB00360-01 Received: 04/05/18 16:22
Matrix: Surface Water Sampled:04/04/18 08:IS Work Order: CB00360
Project: 206512 Sampled By:Joseph Chase
1Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods ]
^ - ENCO Cary cerufled analyte (NC 59IJ
Analyte fCAS Numbed
Results
Flan Units
17F
MDL
POL
Batch
Method
Analyzed
By Notes
Copper[7440-50-8]A
1.4.8
ug/L
1
1.60
10.0
8D11029
EPA 200.7
04/13/18 10:12
JDH
Lead[7439.92-D]A
3.49
1 ug/L
1
3.10
10.0
8DII029
EPA200.7
04/13/1810:12
JDH
Zinc [7440-66-6]A
730
ug/L
1
4.40
10.0
8DII029
EPA 200.7
04/13/18 10:12
JDH
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENCO Cary -rhf-d ana/yte (NC 59I1
Analyte FCAS Numberl
Results
Flag Units
DF
MDL
PQLL
Batch
Method
Analyzed
Py Notes
Total Suspended Solids^
20
mg/L
4
10
10
010009
SM 254OD-1997
04/10/18 14:55
OMR
assical Chemistry Parameters
^ - ENC0100F50nVII, cefh6ed ana.
Analyte fCAS Numberl
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar
Material^
Results Fiau Units DF MDI. 4 Batch Method Analyzed 1y Notes
3.49 ] mg/L 1 2.70 5.00 8DII014 EPA 16648 04/12/IB 18:12 SMA
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 4 of 8

Awl
C,
.,,.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control
Batch 8D11029 - EPA 3005A
Blank (BD11029-BLKi) Prepared: 04/11/2018 15:24 Analyzed: 04/13/2018 09:51
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analvte
Result
F1aq
PQ!,
Units
Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Capper
1.60
U
10.0
ug/L
Lead
3.10
U
10.0
ug/L
Zinc
4.10
U
10.0
ug/L
LCS (8DII029-BSI)
Prepared: 04/11/2018 15:24 Analyzed: 04/13/2018 09:59
Spike
Source
°/ REC
RPD
Analvte
Result
Flap
pQL,
Units
Level
Result
%REC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Capper
201
10.0
ug/L
200
100
85-115
Lead
206
10.0
ug/1-
200
103
85-115
Zinc
211
10.0
ug/L
200
105
85-115
Matrix Spike (SD11029-MSI)
Prepared: 04/11/2018 1524 Analyzed: 04/13/2018 10:02
Source: C804894-13
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
AnalVte
Result
Flaq
POL
Units
Level
Result
%REC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Copper
206
10.0
ug/L
200
1.60 U
103
70-130
Lead
212
10.0
ug/L
200
3.10 U
106
70-130
Zinc
228
10.0
ug/L
200
9.27
109
70-130
Matrix Spike Dup (8D11029-MSD1)
Prepared: 04/11/2018 15:24 Analyzed: 04/13/2018 10:04
Source: CB04894-13
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
-Analvte
Mesuit
Sag
POI,
Units
Level
Result
o/ REC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Copper
210
L0.0
ug/L
200
1.60 U
105
70-130 2
30
Lead
213
10.0
ug/L
200
3.10 U
106
70-130 0.1
30
Zinc
222
10.0
ug/L
200
9.27
106
70-130 3
30
Post Spike (SDI1029-PSI)
Prepared: 04/11/2016 15:24 Analyzed: 04/13/201B 10:07
Source; CB04894-13
Spike
Source
o/aREC
RPD
-Analvbe
Result
Flau
POL
Units
Level
Result
o7oREC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Copper
0.210
0.0100
mg/L
0.200
0.00130
104
80-120
Lead
0,215
0.0100
mg/L
0.200
0.000526
107
80-120
Zinc
0.230
0.0100
mg/L
0,200
0.00927
110
80-120
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 8D10009 - NO PREP
Blank (8030009-BLKi) Prepared & Analyzed: 04/10/2018 14:55
Spike Source o/aREC RPD
Analvte Result Flaq POI. Units Level Result °/aREC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids 2.5 U 2.5 mg/L
LCS (8D10009-BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: 04/10/2018 14:55
Spike Source %REC RPD
.AnalSte Result Flaq POL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids 99 2.5 mg/L 100 99 80-120
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the f6b0ratory, and may only be reproduced In cull. Page 5 of 8

�e
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 8DIOOO9 - NO PREP - Continued
Duplicate (8D10009-DUPI)
Prepared & Analyzed: 04/L0/2018 14:55
Source: CA18904-01
Spike Source n/nREC
RPD
AnalVte
Result Flag
POL
Unit$
Level Result n/oREC Limits
'RPD
Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
310
50
rl
250
19
20
Duplicate (SD10009-DUP2)
Prepared & Analyzed: 04/10/2018 14:55
Source: CB00360-01
Spike Source %REC
RPD
_AnalVte
Result Flag
P0111,
Units
Level Result %REC Limits
RPD
Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
17
10
mill
20
15
20
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 8D11O14 - EPA 1664B
Blank (81)11014-BLK1) Prepared: 04111/201B 16:04 Analyzed: 04/12/2018 18:12
Spike Source %REC RP0
_Analyte Result Flag POI. Units Level Result o/nREC Limits RPD Limit Notes
all & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material 2.70 U 5.00 mg/L
LCS (8D11014-BSI) Prepared: 04/11/7018 15:04 Analyzed: 04/12/2018 18:12
Spike Source %REC RPD
.Analy a Result Flag ROL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material 67.1 5.00 mg/L 73.3 92 64-132
LCS Dup (8D31014-BSD1) Prepared: 04/11/2018 16:04 Analyzed: 04/12/2018 18:12
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
_AnalVte
Result Flag
P9L
units
Level
Result
%REC
Limits RPD
Limit Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Nan -Polar Material
79.6
5.00
mg/L
74.3
107
64-132 17
34
Matrix Spike (8D11014-MS11
Prepared: 04/11/2018 16:04 Analyzed: 04/12/2018 18:12
Source: CB00360-01
Spike
Source
o/aREC
RPD
_Analyt@
Result Flag
POL
Units
Level
Result
%nREC
Limits RPD
Limit Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material
72.6
5.00
mg/L
88.5
3.49
78
64-132
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 5 of 8

(� � �Cawe
www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
J The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The analyte was analyzed For but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentration indicated For this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument. This value is considered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation Factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
PQL PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit.
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence ($5% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative identification".
P Greater than 25% concentration difference was observed between the primary and secondary GC column.
The lower concentration is reported.
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in fuU. Page 7 of 6

10775 Central Port Dr. 4810 Executive Park Court, Suite 111 Y 1 D2-A Woodwinds Industrial Cl.
Orlando, FL 32824 Jacksonville, FL 32216-6069 Cary, NO 27511
L _ _ [phone] Fax [phone] [phone] Fax {904) 296-6210 [phone] Fax [phone] Page Of
Client Name
Project Number
Requested
Analyses
Requested Turnaround
Leaf Environmengta€, ]no- (BE012)
206512
Times
No : Rush requests subject to
Address
Project Name/Cese
PO BOX 14609
206512
�--•
acceptance by the facility
City/ST/Zip
PO tt I Billing Info
UP, NG 27709-
206612
0
Standard
cn`�
0
Contact
Tell
Fax
Reporting
(91 �) 484-8636
0 -
Tim Monroe
U1
Expedited
N1
r„cl
Sampler(s) Name, Affiliation (Print)
Boling Contact
;4• C1 C/�•,�g'
Tim Monroe
U)
DueCL
9
CO
sampled nature
S`kpteLacalionlTimeZane
Lab-.Workarder ' _t,;,-n:'
r���.
Preservation
(See
Codes
I Combine
as necessa
ry)
n, h_.w = t . . a-
Collection
Matrix
Total 11 of
Item a
Sample ID (Field ldent&cafion)
Collectian Date
Time
Comp! Grab
(see codes)
Containers
Sample Comments
sN� t
r ;art _ I�nGaII ,.ppint-
•.[ S
+d �
4� K, 2,
� '..f i
JM T,
-�{
kA ]
�
�4}
k.. lad'. I?Y �,,hl%� ��•
.. ..
v.F _
7. - I
a.., a' .
r, ..,F7~,•.
-
�
4(~ f
,: u^
<— Total of Containers
mpie Kit Prepared By
Date
ime
R II' fished By
�U`J L �'
Dale lTi a
;. }
Aecei .d By
Datemme
�b-/iY i > `�U
Co tslSpecial Reporting Requirements
s ed By
R11`211.q
Daterme
a ,v y
Date�me
ad By
DatelTlme
R eNed By
Datelnmo
C ter N's 8 Temps an Receipt =ndifi
Upon Receipt
Acceptable URacceptabla
Matrix : GW-Groundwater SO -Soil DW-Drinking Water SE -Sediment SW-SVr1aCe Water WW-Wastewater A -Air O-Other (detail in comments) Preservation. I -Ice H-HCI N•141403 S-1-12SO4 NO-NaOH O-Other (detall in comments)
Nota : All samples submitted to ENCO Labs are in accordance with Me terms and conditions listed on the reverse of this form, unless prior written agreements exist

Sample Preservation Verification
NO IA-P11-
M=
ENCO Gary L 6
9 ic: bu.00MO
Work Order: CB00360 Project: 206512
Client: Leaf Environmental, Inc. (BE012) Project 206512
Loggedln-. 05-Apr-18 17: GO Logged By: John C King
Preservation Check Per -formed By: DateMme: 4-,57-7,T
CB00360-01
pH Checked F/Z.
7-31-1 D-'f !' M-'-
Reagent
-C
MAV
Mew
C
250mLA+H2SO4
<2
Y / N / A
Y / N / A
D
250rnLA+H2SO4
<2
Y / N / 6AI
Y / N / Z-
E
250mLP+HNO3
<2 d�
N / NA
Y / &/ NA
Reaqent Name ID
1 1 1
2
pH Strip ID:
1 20
Reaqent Name ID
3
4
Rea.qent Name ID
5
6
C:\ELMNT1Print\wko-PreserV2tionCheck.rpt Page 1

ENVIRONMENTAUCONSERVATION LABORATORIES CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY RECORD
10775 riPort Dr.
Orlando, FL32824 Jacksonville, `FL 3221 fi 6069 Suite 1l 1 Woodwinds Industrial Cf.
Cary, NC 27511
(407) B26-5314 Fax [phone] 'Fax [phone] [phone] Fax [phone]
wwMencolabs.com
Page , Of
Client Azme -
Project Number
Requested
Analyses
Requested Turnaround
._C of inr,. ("B(D., V
2,.t13!i 1 2 r
Times
Note : Rush requests subject to
Address -
Project NamefDesc
-'acceptance by the facility
r;
CityW/Zip t.
PO # ! Billing Info
i 9•' .
Standard
t 4
Tel
Fax
Reporting Contact
Expedited
Samplers) Name, Affiliation (Print)
Billing Contact 1' v •:'+
tN
Due�—
T'i-r kx;,a, r-; e.
�;
.}try.
?. ;'•
1R
y
1 ''
Sampler(s)•Slgnature
Silo Location 1 Time Zone t_� ••�
Lab Workorc€er r- '- - -,
'r;.
� �yyii,({'-�i
i+. a f.��. , '. P"
�•` ;; � ".•' ip
-
"��r'l
Preservation
(See
Codes)
(Cembine
as necessary)_'�-"
r •• -
'`T -
Collection ,
Matrix
Total # of
'Containers
Item #
Sample. ID (Field Identification) -
Collection Date
Time
Comp! Grab
(see codes)
- Sample Comments
1�1i-��G'^
'
;: hfsy:i t^1:'t'} l It;lzr�
:.•
,�
_14—
<--Total # of C.nntAinPrR
Sample Kit Prepared ,9y.,, .1 1t'
Datemme
Relinquished By
Dateffismei + "' A
CommentslSpecial Reporting Requirements •
Relinquished By
F
�D{ate47fm�ye
z
.
allnquighed By -
'Dati F
^
r'
Cooler Ws & Temps on Receipt
Matnx: GW-Groundwater 50-Soil DW-Drinking Water SE -Sediment SW -Surface Water WWWastewater A -Air O-Other (detail in comments) Preservation: 1-Ice H-HCI N-
Note : All samples submitted to ENCO Labs are in accordance with the terms and conditions listed on the reverse of this form,
a
MMi

Page 1 of 2
Steven Gerrald
From:
Josh Soto [e-mail]]
Sent:
Tuesday, April 24, 2018 2A8 PM
To:
Steven Gerrald; Joseph Chase
Cc:
'Tim Monroe'
Subject: RE: April 4, 2018 - Stormwater Samples
Steven,
It is funny that you mention the lift gate plant as we have had rain now for a solid day and there is nothing at the
SDO location. If there is not water at that location with a r ' this hard I am afraid we will never get a sample, so
what do we do? T H"fg� the sample we.sent..you�w
Regards,c1,C�l�
Have a blessed day!
Josh Soto
EHS hInnager
j
Oim-ct- 33G-88a-P-2$2 ,
'.1303 Tr1 Ity AM,, : 3
fdobiie- 33 »3�2•Q498
MUCKROD/ES
P.C.13oa 20R<;. .i -
High:Polnt; k in6i1
JSatarrlick=yH�dy_tnrn
www.mickaybodycam
Josh Soto • EHS Manager • Mickey Truck Bodies • 336-888.2282 • [e-mail] •
www.mickeybDdy.com
Have a Blessed Day!
From: Steven Gerrald <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2018 2:33 PM
To: Josh Soto <[e-mail]>
Cc: 'Tim Monroe' <[e-mail]>
Subject: April 4, 2018 - Stormwater Samples
Josh,
Can you send me the pH result for the sample collected on April 4th for the DMR? Also, the cooler we received
had the bottles for the liftgate outfail but they weren't filled. I am going to go ahead and send you another cooler
with bottles as it has not yet been sampled.
Thanks,
Steven Gerrald, E.I.
Environmental Technician
4/27/2018

Greensboro, NC A
Piedmont Triad International
Weather History for KGSO - April, 2018
I April
-----------------
2018
View
Wednesday, April 4, 2018
Daily Weekly Monthly Custom
Temperature
O 2:31 PM EDT on April 27, 2018 (GMT -040(
Actual Average
Mean Temperature
58 °F
56 °F
Max Temperature
73 'F
67 °F
Min Temperature
43 °F
44 `F
Degree Days
Heating Degree Days
7
10
Month to date heating degree days
17
42
Since 1 July heating degree days
3321
3367
Cooling Degree Days
0
1
Month to date cooling degree days
0
3
Year to date cooling degree days
10
8
Growing Degree Days
10 (Base 50)
Moisture
Dew Point
44 °F
Average Humidity
61
Maximum Humidity
100
Minimum Humidity
21
Record
86 °F (1934)
21 °F (1943)

Actual
Average
Record
Precipitation
Precipitation
Month to date precipitation
Year to date precipitation
Snow
Snow
Month to date snowfall
Since 1 July snowfall
Snow Depth
Sea Level Pressure
Sea Level Pressure
Wind
Wind Speed
Max Wind Speed
Max Gust Speed
Visibility
Events
T = Trace of Precipitation, MM = Missing Value
Daily Weather History Graph
0.00 in
0.0
14.7
0.00 in
29.81 in
15 mph (West)
30 mph
39 mph
9 miles
Rain
0.11 in
0.49
10.24
0.00 in
0.0
7.5
0.93 in (2013)
T in (2013)
Source: NWS Daily Summary

F Temper. -Aire Demi Point Normal KghILow
60 45 -7
T
ml4nightl 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 noon '1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 1-1
in Hy Barometric Pressure
30A 4
30.0 -- ------ -
F­
29,9 ------
29.8 L
29.7
midnight 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 noon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
mph IjMnd Speed V(And Oust
4.1.0
26.0 ------ ------- .......
21.0 L
16.0
-J'
6.0
rnidniqhtl 2 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 noon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
360.0 N , _ 1 11
1 .1 .1
I N� P�
NJ
270.0
J 180,0
90.0
0.0 H
midnightl 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1-1 noon 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lr,��r
Search for Another Location
Airport or City:
KGSO
Submit
4
7
hPa
1019
1016
1013
1009
-1006
710b
Astronomy
Apr. 04, 2018
Rise
Set
Actual Time
7:01 AM EDT
7:44 PM EDT
Civil -Twilight
6:35 AM EDT
8:10 PM EDT
Nautical Twilight
--
6:05 AM EDT
8:40 PM EDT
Astronomical - Twilight
5:33 AM EDT
9:12 PM EDT
Moon
No Moon Rise
9:48 AM EDT (4/4)
Length- ofVisible-Light 13h 34m
Length ofDay 12h 42m
---
Waning Gibbous, 82% of the Moon is Illuminated

Apr 4 Apr 8 Apr 15 Apr 22 Apr 29
Waning Gibbous Last Quarter New First Quarter Full
Hourly Weather History & Observations
Time Temp. Windchill Dew Humidity Pressure Visibility Wind Wind Gust
(EDT) Point Dir Speed Speed
1:54 66.0 OF - 55.0 OF 68% 29.78 in 10.0 mi SSW 12.7 mph -
AM
2.54
Precip Events
NIA
AM
66.9 °F -
57.0 OF
70%
29.76 in
10.0 mi
SSW
18.4 mph
24.2 mph NIA
3:54
66.0 OF -
57.9 OF
75%
29.74 in
10.0 mi
SSW
17.3 mph
34.5 mph NIA
AM
4.54
64.9 OF -
57.9 OF
78%
29.71 in
10.0 mi
SSW
17.3 mph
- NIA
AM
5:54
64.9 °F -
59.0 °F
81%
29.72 in
10.0 mi
SSW
15.0 mph
- NIA
AM
6.17
63.0 °F -
59.0 OF 87% 29.78 in 1.8 mi West 15.0 mph 25.3 mph 0.06 in Rain
AM
6:24 62.1 OF -
57.9 OF 86% 29.78 in 5.0 mi West 16.1 mph 26.5 mph 0.10 in Rain
AM
A60,1 °F -
A M
57.0 OF 90% 29.75 in 8.0 mi WSW 9.2 mph - 0.12 in Rain
7.54
61.0 °F -
60.1 °F
97%
29.73 in
3.0 mi
South
8.1 mph -
0.01 in Rain
AM
8:17
62.1 °F -
60,1 OF
93%
29.74 in
10.0 mi
SSW
11.5 mph -
0.01 in
AM
8:54
63.0 °F -
59.0 OF
87%
29.73 in
10.0 mi
SW
8.1 mph -
0.01 in
AM
9:54
AM
66.0 °F -
61.0 OF
84%
29.70 in
10.0 mi
SW
13.8 mph -
NIA
10:54
AM
68.0 OF -
60.1 OF
76%
29.71 in
10.0 mi
WSW
13.8 mph
19.6 mph
NIA
11:30
AM
71.1 OF -
59.0 OF
66%
29.74 in
10.0 mi
West
16.1 mph
26.5 mph
NIA
11.54
AM
71.1 OF -
57.0 OF
61%
29.72 in
10.0 rni
West
17.3 mph
25.3 mph
NIA
12:54
PM
68.0 °F -
46.9 °F
47%
29.74 in
10.0 mi
WNW
23.0 mph
33.4 mph
NIA
1:54
PM
64.9 °F -
33.1 OF
31%
29.78 in
10.0 mi
WNW
21.9 mph
31.1 mph
NIA

Time
(EDT)
Temp. Windchill
Dew
Point
Humidity
Pressure
Visibility
Wind
Dir
Wind
Speed
Gust
Speed
Precip Events
2:54
PM
64.0 OF -
30.0 T
28%
29.80 in
10.0 mi
WNW'
24.2 mph
29.9 mph
NIA
3:54
61.0 OF -
28.0 OF
29%
29.81 in
10.0 mi
WNW
21.9 mph
29.9 mph
NIA
PM
4:54
62.1 T -
28.0 OF
28%
29.83 in
10.0 mi
NW
13.8 mph
-
NIA
PM
5:54
63.0 °F -
23.0 T
22%
29.86 in
10.0 mi
NNW
17.3 mph
29.9 mph
NIA
PM
6:54
59.0 'F -
19.0 OF
21 %
29.91 in
10.0 mi
NW
26.5 mph
33.4 mph
NIA
PM
7:54
55.0 OF -
21.0 OF
27%
29.94 in
10.0 mi
NNW
15.0 mph
24.2 mph
NIA
PM
8:54
53.1 T -
18.0 °F
25%
29,99 in
10.0 mi
NNW
13.8 mph
24.2 mph
NIA
PM
9:54
50.0 OF -
21.0 OF
32%
30.03 in
10.0 mi
NNW
6.9 mph
-
NIA
PM
10:54
48.0 OF -
21.0 OF
34%
30.05 in
10.0 mi
NW
17.3 mph
-
NIA
PM
11:54
46.0 T 41.9 OF
21.0 OF
37%
30.07 in
10.0 mi
NNW
8.1 mph
23.0 mph
NIA
PM

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted August 2, 2017
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030517 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2017
FACILITY NAME _Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc. SAMPLE PERIOD Jan -June ® July -Dec
COUNTY Guilford or ❑ Monthly' (month)
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Josh Soto DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 Comments on sample RECEIVED ❑Zero -flow ® Water supply [—]SA
collection or analysis: GRAB ❑Other
AUG 15 Z017
CENTRAL FILES
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results CWR SECTION
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period:
Dutfafl No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks =_=>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L°
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001
07/18/17
1.00
98
7.3
0.0257
0.00814
0.802
12.9
NA
'
I
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General `
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks ==_>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART 3 MONITORING RESULTS:
A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ® NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lob results for at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that quaiified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
l
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

ENCO Labortatmies
Acatrate, Timely, Responsive. h8movah"Ve.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Friday, July 28, 2017
Leaf Environmental, Inc. (BE012)
Attn: Tim Monroe
PO BOX 14609
RTP, NC 27709-
RE: Laboratory Results for
Project Number: 206512, Project Name/Desc: 206512
ENCO Workorder(s): CA09191
Dear Tim Monroe,
I
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Thursday, July 20, 2017.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without
the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Chuck Smith
Project Manager
Enclosure(s)
FINAL. This report relates only to the sample as recelved by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 1 of 8

www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE SUMMARY/LABORATORY CHRONICLE
client ID: Outfall 001 Lab ID: CA09191-01 Sampled: 07/18/17 15:15 Received: 07/20/17 16:00
P rameter Hold Date/TimeO Prep Date T' s Analysis Da a/Time(sl
EPA 1664E 08/15/17 07/26/17 09:07 07/26/17 15:30
EPA 200.7 01/14/18 07/24/17 12:29 07/26/17 12:51
SM 254OD-1997 07/25/17 07/Z4/17 17:10 07/24/17 lTla
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 2 of 8

www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY
Client ID: Outfall 001 Lab ID: CA09191-01
Anallyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units Method Notes
Copper - Total 25.7 1.60 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7
Lead - Total 8.14 3 3.10 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material 12.9 2.70 5.00 mg/L EPA 16648
Total Suspended Solids 98 12 12 mg/L SM 254OD-1997
Zinc - Total 802 4.40 10.0 ugJL EPA 200.7
14
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 3 of 5

www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: Outfall 001 Lab Sample ID:CA09191-01 Received: 07/20/17 16:00
Matrix: Surface Water Sarnpled:07/18117 15:15 Work Order: CA09191
Project: 206512 Sampled By: CLIENT
!Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods
- EMV Cary ce!Mt ed an364e (NC 5911
ft
Analyte [CAS Numberl Resul
Flag
Units
DF
MDL
PQL
Batch
Method
Analyzed
Notes
Copper[7440-50-B]A 25.7
uglL
1
1.60
10.0
7G24030
EPA200.7
0712611712:51
}MV
Lead [7439-92-1]A 8.14
]
ug/L
1
3,10
10.0
71324030
EPA 200,7
07/26/17 12:51
]MV
Zinc [7440-66-6]^ 802
og/L
1
4,4D
10.0
7G24030
EPA 200.7
07/26/17 12:51
]MV
Classical Chemistry Parameters
-ENCDCory cernfledanalyte[AC 5911
Anglyte rCAN.UrnberlResults
Flag
Units
1TF
MDL
PQ4
Bpkryi
MM d
Analyzed
� Notes
Total Suspended Solids' 98
mg/L
5
12
12
7G24039
SM 2540D-1997
07/24/17 17:10
OMR
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - CcrtJrjed ar>31y:e [AC 442J
Analyte rCASNumberl Results
Flag
gnLta
DF
MDL
POL
Batch
Method
Analyzed
mQteq
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar 12.9
MglL
1
2,70
5.00
7G26001
EPA 1664B
07/25/17 15:30
SMA
Material A
FINAL This report relates only to the sample a$ received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 4 of 6

www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control
Batch 7624030 - EPA 3005A
Blank (7G24D30-13LKI) Prepared: 07/24/2017 12:29 Analyzed: 07126I2D17 12:15
Spike Source Q/.REC RPD
Analvte
Resume
Fla-(]
PQL
Units Level Resul %REC Limits RPD iLmit Notes
Copper
1,60
u
10.0
ug/L
Lead
3.10
U
10.0
ugX
Zinc
4.40
U
10.0
ug/L
LCS C7G24030-BS1)
Prepared: 07/24/2017 12:29 Analyzed: 07/26/2017 12:17
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
-An01AQ
Result
Ffag
P_2
LJt.S
Level
Resul
%REC
Limits RPD
LIMU
Notes
Copper
212
10.0
ug/L
200
106
85-115
Lead
21D
10.0
ug/L
200
105
85-115
Zinc
216
t0.f)
ug/L
200
108
85-115
Matrix Spike( G24030-MS1)
Prepared: 07/24/2017 12:29 Analyzed: 07/26/2017 12:22
Source: CA10011-01
Spike
Source
o/ REC
RPD
AnaMe
Restit
Flaa
PQL
Knits
Level
Resul
%REC
Limits RPD
LLM.it
Notes
Copper
232
10.0
ug/L
200
14.4
109
70-130
Lead
215
10.0
ug/L
200
4.71
105
70-130
Zinc
267
10.0
ug/L
200
47.8
110
70-130
Matrix Spike Dup (7G24030-MSD1)
Prepared: 07/24/2017 12:29 Analyzed: 07/26/2017 12:25
Source: CA10011-01
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
ARa-flrtc
ReRrlt
Jag
PQL
its
Level
Resul
%REC
Limits RPD
LLMLt
!rotes
Copper
224
10.0
ug1L
200
14.4
105
70-130 3
30
Lead
211
10.0
ug/L
200
4.71
103
70-130 7
30
Zinc
263
10.0
ug/L
200
47.8
108
70-130 1
30
Post Spike (7G24030-PSI)
Prepared: 07/24/2017 12:29 Analyzed: 07/26/2017 12:27
Source: CAIODII-01
Spike
Source
°/.REC
RPD
Anahvte
Rsult
Flag
POL
Linita
Level
Resul
%REC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Copper
0.242
0.0100
mg/L
0.200
0.0144
114
80-120
Lead
0.229
0.0100
mglL
0.200
0.00471
112
80-120
Zinc
0.272
0.0100
mglL
1200
0.0478
112
8(-120
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 7624039 - NO PREP
Blank (7G24039-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/24/2017 17:10
Spike Source %REC RPD
Anahfle Result Flaq PQL Units Level Resul %REC Limits RPD L!mA Notes
TotalSuspended Solids 2.5 U 2.5 mg/L
LCS (7G24039-BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: D712412017 17:10
Spike Source %REC RPD
11malvte Rout Flaa P4L hits Level Res a/.REC Llm1t5 RPD iimmit Notes
Total Suspended Solids 94 2.5 mg/L 100 94 80.120
FNAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the Oboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 5 of 8

www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 7G24039 - NO PREP - Continued
oupEicate (7G24039-DUPI)
Prepared & Analyzed: 07/24/2017 17:10
Source: CA04761-01
Spike Source 0/aREC
RPD
.Anp—lyte
Result Flap
POL
Un[Ju
Level Resul %REC Limits RPD
ulnit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
280
50
mg/L
280 1
20
DupEicate (7G24039-DUP2)
Prepared & Analyzed: 07/24/2017 17:10
Source: CA08089-01
Spike Source %REC
RPD
_AOaMe
R_esuis Flag
PQI,
-urli�s
Level Result %REC Limits RPD
Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
170
50
mg/L
210 23
20 QM-12
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 7G26O01 - EPA 15648
Blank (7G26001-BLKi) Prepared: 07/2612017 09:07 Analyzed: 07/26/2017 15:30
Spike Source %REC RPD
Anatttg RCS1t flag POI Units Level Result °/nREC Limits RPD Limi Notes
oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Nan -Polar Material 2.70 U 5.00 mg/L
LC5 (7G26001-BSI) Prepared: 07/26/2017 09:07 Analyzed: 07/26/2011 15:30
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analvtg Resus Flag ROL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
011 & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material 80.8 5.00 mg/L 76.9 105 64-132
LCS Dup (7G26001-139131) Prepare: 07,2612017 09c07 Analyzed: 07/26/2017 15:30
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
nalytee
ltu-1411 Flan
PQL
U is
Level
Resu
%REC
Limits RPD
LiMA Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM -SG-) Non -Polar Material
70.8
5.00
mg/L
76.9
92
6+132 13
34
Matrix Spike (7G26001-MSI)
Prepared: 07/26/2017 09:07 Analyzed: 07/26/2017 15:30
Source: BA03003-02
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
_Apalvte
Result F1a9
PQL
Units
Level
Result
o/nREC
Limits RPD
Limit Notes
0it & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material
106
5.00
mg/L
99.0
13.3
94
64-132
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 6 of 8

www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
J The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where appiicable.
U The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument. This value is considered an estimate,
MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative identification".
P Greater than 25% concentration difference was observed 'between the primary and secondary GC column.
The lower concentration is reported.
QM-12 Precision between duplicate samples was outside acceptance limits.
RNAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 7 of a

'ENVIRONMFENT-At COL'4SERVATlOt4,L AB,ORATOFIIES,',cHAlw.�i3F-=CUSTODY-'.REr,600bj
j
:206512
FAX
V
-imiAtirw; IguiviC Ariftilim trorti
jz,
4`99,4'
VA
i4l- T-
1-1!L. U ILI
7—
f
7
Jf
—7
--t,
7 -j
.... ....................... .
I
L:
Elf!
QoVfTJJtl V�t FIJAJIdMJ Wj.
Ory-
7lAk
le
il.rill"

S'6*M,-Pl6 Proodrotioh WrificAtion
-
ENCO Cary
V ork -bigi R(dj& t 206512
V.
Mint'., Leaf E6*6niiiiin tal, Mc. (BE012) Prdjee 208512
loqqed In: 20:JuPI7 16.09
Logged By, Rachel Artn.-Ybnlssh
ADS 10 1 i01
,
3
p
ku,
-�um"OT( me��
f Ti
0
IM
W,
ikk, tli2SO4
'Y J N,: I
I.- NA
ILN NA ,
ongwi Name ID
R4dnt Name 10
4'1
Rea qdht WiWb 10-
5

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge (Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted March 27 2017
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG030517
FACILITY NAME Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc.
COUNTY Guilford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Josh Soto
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 Comments on sample
collection or analysis: GRAB
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2017
SAMPLE PERIOD ® Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' _ _Jmonth)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ® Water Supply [_]SA
❑Other
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
No dischome this period?`
.
Outfall ND:
:.Date:Sample
:.
.
24-hbur.rainfall
; .. ': :: ...:
Total Sus ended Solids
p
;pH,
-
to er
PP
-�
Lead
..�
Zrnc
...
Nan Polar 0&G
THtadl Petroleum .
'Total Toxic.
5
Collected'
amount,
Standard units~
y rocarbons
:Organics .
(mD/dd/yr) .:
::..-,._lncheS......'..
Benchmarks
100 mg/L.br 50 mg/L°
6 0 9 0
0.007. mg/L :
0 03 mg/L:
0:067 mg/L"
15 mg/L°: ..:.
T mg/L .
001
03/10/17
0.02
44
8.1
0.00725
0.00305
0.247
< 2.70
NA
rvioninry sampling (rnsieao or semi-annuar) must oegm witn ine secona consecutive oencnmarK exceeaance Tonne same paranrer.er at Lire same ❑~Lion.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469,22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31). .
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title) r
(Signature) (Date)
Mote: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
U No discharge this period?`
Date Saple 24 hbur rainfall
Outfall No mCollectedl t3, NonpolarO&TPHbyamoun
pHtal Suspended'Sohds To
{mo/dd/Yrj ;:Inches EPA :1664 SGT-HEM
15 mg/L i00. mg/ or 50 mg/L*, 6.0 '9:O:SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report o sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
+ TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ® NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end ofmonitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to: _ _ ��
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
G
(Signature of Perm
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
I/ 7/� -7
(gate)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Re ort
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
-• Date submitted August 19, 2016 V/
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030517 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2016
FACILITY NAME Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc. SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ® July -Dec
�(��+or ❑ Monthly' lrnonth)✓�
COUNTY Guilford ��� DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Josh Soto SEP 13 2u;o
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 Comments on sample ❑Zero -flow ®Water Supply ❑SA
collection or analysis: GRAB CENTRAL
S❑Other
DWRSECTION
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
f
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
i
Collected
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches"
Total Suspended Solids
PH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics i
Benchmarks =__>
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 -- 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
i mg/L
001
08/03/16
1.00
47
7.3
0.0129
0.0085
0.108
< 2.70
NA
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation -must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
° See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing; use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit -.-'For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.°
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you'report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FQR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS;
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ® NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end. of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and ail attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete,
am aware that there are significant penalt for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Il�
(Signature of Permittee) (Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring_ Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted February 3, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030517
FACILITY NAME Mickey Truck Bodies Inc.
COUNTY Guilford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Josh Soto
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 Comments on sample
collection or analysis: GRAB
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2016
SAMPLE PERIOD ® Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' month
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW [—]Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow X Water Supply [:]SA
RECEIVED ❑Other
FEB 0 9 2U16 PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Total
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001
01/15/16
0.55
17
7.3
0.00562
< 0.0031
0.165
< 2.70
NA
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance forthe same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the Ti'0 monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,"
Name (Print name)
Title (Print ti e)
(Signature) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?2
QutfalE Na.
Date Sample
Collected'
.(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT.-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table S, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART AAND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART 11 SECTION 3,
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES X NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an on final and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" re orts within 30 days of receipt of the lab results or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
41-7111'w
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharee Monitorine Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
C
Date submitted January 26, 2016
RECEIV
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030517 E_ FEB O 1 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
FACILITY NAME Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc. SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ® July -Dec
COUNTY Guilford CENTRAL FILES or ❑ Monthly' _ (month)
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Josh Soto DWR SECTION DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 Comments on sample �`�❑❑Zero-flow X Water supply []SAcollection or analysis: GRAB [ Other
L�J PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 -�
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
® No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/To#al
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waivf.d. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,"
14,IX _&K- ) f, , /I.
Name ((PPrint name) ,/�
/1 J `a`/�
Title (Print title)
1� Z,4 N
(Signature) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-24S, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS, SEE PERMIT PART II SECTIONS.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES XN011
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES X NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR,_including _all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of monitoring, period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
am aware that there are significant penaItifor submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
A�d
(Signature of Permittee) (Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted July 28, 2015
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 0 5 1 7
FACILITY NAME _Mickey Truck Bodies, Inc.
COUNTY Guilford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Josh Soto
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # NC 591 Comments on sample
collection or analysis: GRAB
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
Ile
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015�'��
SAMPLE PERIOD X Jan -June ❑ July -Dec G,
or ❑ Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ' ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow X waterSupply ❑SA
❑Other
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Total
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001
6/30/15
0.05
160
7.17
0.042
0.030
1.280
<3.15
NA
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance,for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the.following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and beiief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall ar
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B. Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, TaNe 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART AAND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES X NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES X NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Aana Taylor Smith
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR includin a!1 "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days o receipt o the lab results or at end of monitoringeriod
in the „case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision In accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
9-- -a - zr-
(Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

MICKEY
MICKEY TRUCK BODIESINc
Family owned and operated since 1904
Date: 7-31-15 WG 0 5 �Q15
Aana Taylor Smith c WR ES C ON
LES
DWQ Environmental Specialist
NCDENR- Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: General Stormwater Permit #NCG030517 Semi -Annual Stormwater Sampling Report
Event #5 (January -June 2015)
Dear Mrs. Smith,
Mickey Truck Bodies Inc. is a manufacturer of beverage delivery bodies, trailers and also build dry and
refrigeration van bodies. Primary operations at the facility include welding, cutting, and the bending/painting of
aluminum and steel for truck bodies. The facility includes offices, paint booths, dry booths and fabrication
plants.
According to a storm water sample that was taken on 6/30/15 and received on 7/28/15, we were noncompliant
on copper, zinc and total suspended solids. Copper tested at 0.042 mg/L, with the allowable limit being 0.007
mg/L. Zinc tested at 1.28 mg/L, with the allowable limit being 0.067 mg/L. Total Suspended Solids tested at
160 mg/L, with the allowable limit being 100mg/L. These allowable limits are according to our storm water
permit NCG030517.
On 7/30/15, we had an inspection of the facility to identify any factors that would have contributed to the
noncompliant results. This inspection was conducted by Joshua Soto, EHS Manager. Findings were that the
overages could have come from multiple locations throughout the facility.
Below are the items that we believe contributed to the high levels of Zinc, Copper and Total Suspended Solids:
• We use aluminum, steel, stainless steel, galvenneal and various other types of metals to manufacture our
product. Due to this, we have multiple units made from this material on the yard. Rain water washes
zinc and copper off these units and into the storm water drains.
• We use welding to build our truck bodies. This welding wire contains copper that could be washed off
of a unit's exterior welds and into the storm drains.
• We have multiple scrap dumpsters out on the yard that contain steel and aluminum. These metals all
contain zinc and copper that can be washed off by rain and into the storm drains.
• We have vehicles that are driving inside our facility throughout the day. These vehicles create brake
dust from the brake pads that are used to stop the unit, and this dust contains large amounts of zinc and
copper. Our facility is also surrounded on three sides by busy streets. When it rains, brake dust from
1305 'Trinity Ave • P.O. Box 2044 a High Point, NC 27261
Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.mickeyiruckbodies.com

our trucks and other cars driving down the road can be washed into our storm water drains, adding to .
this issue.
Dirt and sediment from the surrounding roads and the ground contain zinc and copper that could be
washed into our storm water drains.
• We store new aluminum and steel in racks that are out on the yard. When it rains zinc and copper could
be washed off and into the storm drain.
• Weeks of dry weather prior to the qualifying rain event may have allowed solids to buildup resulting in
higher levels during the rain event.
Mickey Truck Bodies will sample again no later than August 30, 2015 and provide these results to your office
showing all levels to be within compliance.
Following the site inspection Mickey Truck Bodies will incorporate the following action items to help reduce
the total suspended solids washed into the storm drain:
• Utilize an outdoor floor sweeper to collect large debris on the grounds that could be washed into the
storm drains.
• Install large drain filters at the drains closest to the trash compactors to catch any debris being washed
into the storm drain.
Mickey Truck Bodies would also like to request a change of our Authority Contact in our permit
NCG030517 from Dean Sink to Matt Sink.
Sincerely,
4'am J"-Z
Dean Sink
President/CEO
1305 Trinity Ave • P.O. Box 2044 • High Point, NC 27261
Tel: [phone] a Fax: [phone]
www.mickevtruckbodies.com

www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE SUMMARYI LABORATORY CHRONICLE
Client ID: Outfall 001
Lab ID: C500137-01
Sampled: 06/30/15 17:40 Received: 07/02/15 14:45
Parameter
Hold DatelTimels]
Prep Date/Time(s) Analysis Date/Timelsl
EPA 1664E
07/28/15
07/21/15
15:50 07/23/15 1016
EPA 200.7
12/27/15
07/06/15
08:25 07/09/15 16:35
SM 2540D-1997
07/07/15
07/07/15
10:09 07/07/15 10:09
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. I Page 2 of 9

(� �Gmo
www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE DETEMOM SUMMARY
Client 1D: Outfall 001
Lab ID. C500137-01
Analyte
Results Ffj3q MIL
PQL
[Jni
Method Notes
Copper- Total
41.5 1.60
10.0
ug/L
EPA 200.7
Lead - Total
30.1 3.1
10.0
ug/L
EPA 2003
Total Suspended Solids
160 25
25
mg/L
SM 254OD-1997
Zinc -Total
1280 3.8
10.0
ug/L
EPA 200.7
FINAL This report relates a* to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 3 Of 9

(e� �Cowo
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: Outfall 001 Lab Sample ID:C500137-01
Received: 07/02/15 14:45
Matrix: Surface Water Sampled:06/30115 17AG
Work Order: C500137
Project: 206512 Sampled By:)oshua Soto
(Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods
^ - EACO Cary ceftW analyze (AM' 591)
Analyte rCAS Number] Results Flaq
Units
r
MDL
P L
Batch
Method
Analyzed
P Notes
Copper [7440-50-8]A 41.5
uWL
1
1.60
10.0
5G06002
EPA 200.7
07/09/15 16:35
3DH
Lead[7439-92-1]A 30.1
ug/L
1
3.1
10.0
5GO6002
EPA200.7
07/09/1516:35
3DH
Zinc [7440-66-6] A 1280
ug/L
1
3.8
10.0
5GO6002
EPA 200.7
07/09/15 16:35
3DH
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - EAM Cary cem6ed anaAyte [NC 5911
Analyte rCAS Number? Results Flaq
Units
OF
MDL
POL
Batch
Method
Analyzed
By Notes
Total Suspended Solids^ 160
mg/L
10
25
25
5G07004
SM 254OD-1997
07/07/15 10:09
MMR
Classical Chemistry Parameters
^ - EACO-Zdasankge cert&ed enaoe (AC 4421
Analyte rCAS Number]
W & Grease (HEM-SG3) Ncn-Polar
Material^
Results Flag Units DF MDL POL Batch Method Analyzed P Notes
3.15 U mg/L 1.71 3.15 6.05 5G21010 EPA 1664B 07/23/15 10:16 SMA
FINAL
This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full. Page 4 =

(9 �(20
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods - Quality Control
Batch 5GO6002 - EPA 3005A
Blank (SG(16002-BLK1) Prepared: 07/06/2015 06:25 Analyzed: 07/09/2015 16:13
Spike Source o/aREC RPD
-An-alvte
Result
Flap
PQL
units Level Result °/uREC Limits RPD Llmi Notes
Capper
1.50
U
10.0
ug/L
Lead
3.1
U
10.0
ug/L
Zinc
3.8
U
10.0
ug/L
LCS (SG06002-BSI)
Prepared: 07/06/2015 08:25 Analyzed: 07/09/2015 16:18
Spike
Source
o/aREC
RPD
A-np vte
Resin
Raq
PQL
Uniti
Level
Resul
%REC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Capper
210
10.0 .
ug/L
200
105
85-115
Lead
215
10.0
ug/L
200
107
85 115
Zinc
210
10.0
ug/L
200
105
85-115
Matrix Spike (SG06002-MS1)
Prepared: 07/06/2015 08:25 Analyzed: 07/09/2015 16:24
Source: C508297-Ul
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
A-r allyW
ReSu3L
Flaq
POL
Units
Level
Result
%REC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Capper
260
10.0
ug/L
200
42.0
109
70-130
Lead
217
10.0
ug/L
206
3.1 U
108
70-130
Zinc
266
10.0
ug/L
200
51.0
108
70-130
Matrix Spike Dup (SG06002-MSDI)
prepared: 07/06/2015 08:25 Analyzed: 07/09/2015 16:27
Source:C508297-01
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
Ana vtc
Refit
Flag
P-0L
-Visits
Level
Resul
%REC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Copper
241
10.0
ug/L
200
42.0
100
70-130 7
30
Lead
204
10.0
ug/L
200
3.1 U
102
70-130 6
30
Zinc
250
10.0
ug/L
200
51.0
100
70-130 6
30
Post Spike (SG06002-PS1)
Prepared: 07/06/2015.08:25 Analyzed: 07/09/2015 16:29
Source: CS08297-01
Spike
Source
%REC
RPD
Analyte
Reslrlt
F a
R-QL
YRA5
Level
Resul t
o/ REC
Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Copper
0.23
0.C1
mg/L
0.200
0.04
96
80-1z0
Lead
0.2
0.01
mg/L
0,200
0.003
97
60-120
Zinc
0.2
0.01
mg/L
0.200
0.05
96
80-120
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 5GO7004 - NO PREP
Blank (5G07004-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/07/2015 10:09
Spike Source %REC RPD
AEI tee Result Flaq PPGLL L)"it$ Level Result °/aREC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids 2.5 U 2.5 mg/L
LCS (5G07004-BSI) Prepared & Analyzed: 07/07/2015 10:09
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyt-ee Result Flaq pQL LIr ir�t Level Resul %REC Limi RPD Limi Notes
Total Suspended Solids 99 2.5 mg/L 100 99 60-120
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in tul1. I Page 5 Of J

wwrw.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch 5GO7004 - NO PREP - Continued
Duplicate (SG07004-DUP1)
Prepared & Analyzed: 07/07/2015 10:09
Source: C500137-01
Spike Source %REC
RPD
-AnDlytc
Result Flag
POL
Knits
Level Result D/ REC Limits RPD
Limi Notes
Total Suspended Solids
150
25
mglL
160 3
20
Duplicate (SG07004-DUP2)
Prepared &Analyzed: 07/07/2015 10:09
Source: C506690-OI
Spike Source %REC
RPD
-Analyts
Result Flan
EQL
Units
Level Re ul D/DREC Limits RPD
Limit Notes
Total Suspended Solids
10 U
10
mg/L
10 U
20
Classical Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch SG.210.10 - Same
Blank (5G21010-BLK1)
Prepared: 07/21/2015 15:50 Analyzed: 07/23/2015 10:16
Spike Source %REC
RPD
AnalAte
Result
Flaq
PQL
Units
Level Result %REC Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGi) Nan -Polar Material
2.60
U
S.00
mg/L
LCS (5G21.010-BSI)
Prepared: 07/71/2015 15:50 Analyzed: 07/23/2015 10:16
Spike Source DAREC
RPD
Artalttte
Result
Elan
P_4L
Una
Level Resul D/aREC Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material
22.9
5.00
mg/L
21.3 108 6+132
LCS Dup (SG21010-BSD1)
Prepared: 07/21/2015 15:50 Analyzed: 07/23/2015 10:16
Spike Source D/oREC
RPD
Analyte
IRult
FJ�g
s' L
11 ri
Level Resul %REC Limits RPD
Limit
Notes
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material
23.6
5.00
mg/L
21.4 111 64-132 3
34
Matrix Spike (5G21010-MSI)
Prepared: 07/21/2015 15:50 Analyzed: 07/23/2015 10:16
Source: B502884.01
Spike Source D/oREC
RPD
Analyte
RluSullt
Flaq
PO4
Units
Level Result D/aREC Limits RPD
Limit
Notes.
Oil & Grease (HEM-SGT) Non -Polar Material
24.4
5.63
mg/L
23.5 2.93 U 104 64-132
FINAL This report relates anly to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In full. Page 6 Of 9

www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
] The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
U The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
E The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument. This value is considered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a "tentative identification".
Greater than 25% concentration difference was observed between the primary and secondary GC column.
The IomArer concentration is reported.
FINAL This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced In U. Page 7 of g

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION -LABORATORIES CHALWOF--CUSTODY RECORD wwW.0n'cclabs..cic rn
10775 CenVal Pu,i Ur, +1lI Ii? I;[n1;1111vp } ;111: Cnul{. auAa 1 I I tw, A':Jw,iwniaa 110.11 trlt+l (A. 0
nrinurld• L'.Q2 24 Jciaaurlvunr,rLbUIEl-ulr!l Gv'r.Nc7:TrilI co
1407i1'2G,6H r1,11071L5a-9915 W(Hi.;l',*JPJIYr r4l.00•11i'!IG,UlCl I!IIIiIAI]:aLKIh hia.{01;FJ•if:I•:ISta Pagg 'Qf ....
Vol Mama Pruletl N'umbe!' norunoled Annlyeab _ Ht t�tJt�Sq f1 TIJf[1i1;OUI7d 0.
' Tlnes�
ISINGERBGARRISbN"{E�[c0U)_ 2Qij512
mrilur's PrLtlacl t4rp,),u95G
rJ61p': I•{IIGA fat11Jl1AL'uaUtKgrt 10
PO.BOX 1.4609 _ _ 206512 ZJCcdplv6o tl' 010 rocillly
Clly;OT,'in - - " lFLin(Ql1lag lrtlu -
RTP.IBC 27709- I 206512 L7 a Standard
Shc - - T F'aJ• IWpolil*j C•Jrllr.cl %' Q
- [phone] () - Tim Monroe cn (� _ Expedited
Snnq)Inr{n) r4,atnc.h!I6tlutkini.Piin1) Billam crWrld '
hl (a1 Due —/—{—
. Tim Monroe U)
$nnlpll:(C) sll{n><lufq. T 5110 l.ryrn-lun ' Timv 7mn-.'. (5 (/J b•:t/tfJjfRDT[WA . Y
f` FCyJff� "d I'.9 Q h r; ram:- rtis-�- g
q i
n[oaurv:lllon {„r;a t;nl7e.i-IG�InlGinn 7y �r�rn .saf"1! 5 ��o% ?-
r Llll4mllw' Malrll tvjlr P 0. I l {
Iirm 0 5an#L ID (h00!aanitlirrjlwml I GaUgLllan aAu Tflnik U,P G',b t;ea oc-I 6:;*,nLllnnrp 1 1 Sample:Cor'nmrnls
igmoa, _�
'-3�a'- 5"-`1_ .,C� sir Y '�:_ x ' _.t
k
_ I
�r _�- :� "" � _ Y � _ . _-""'-t'_•�"- � .[ - F y t ;.' t z _ r s,i r�r;T A ; �� ry rf"�'?
k - -- <.-Toiul i? of Conl9isienq
Salr•Qlo kd Plnlp�IJalk Bg.
❑AOTlliia
ncAnQtllshr•] By
Fc1n-' ctBy
_
0a1eMallo
Qgjhu7no
PL)re)l • Ry
vodH T�,�. �I
zz
~T
JDawrr-Ima
CuriljnL'nypacl¢rRepohlllgH4quirnra7ts(a
DvclTilnu
i
al. 1;Ilii rJ}',
(I;fll]filnla
Rimnlvrnf By
DaIRIF17at
ianrar. ny� $ Tampa Gil RDtkl-pl-
fArld.'11pr1 Upon Hr rlvfit
ccopiable Unacceplabia
Al0ltllt: G1V•GrOunlJwllio� so-90E1 oYr:L'IlnFlrly=SYdIC+r: 9E5OrFrlinf!I'S}v.�JAncn YJn7�WWYf.e�LCwrlul A-Adr 0,411)�!r,(detllll In canlmplNu) Pra9rrvntian:l•11:11 rr-71�1•firlrvo7':ri1,25CM.rZo-PlaoH=o•.91rmr,(tle3laWup Cr�l�l'WnrS}
Nula -- Mh &iiW.es wbmllnJdJ ttl lETtC50 I.sbr Irrr In Ir4 orclpw4i ,s^It Iha jun m urd =ndIDann i+nr11•J IrlI Itur ruml:�z! Cl IhIl farm. unlns Poor wIL'Illn agre0l"I , orsirl.

Sample Preservation Verification
ENCO Cary.
w6rk Order C500137 Project-— 2U6512
Client: Leaf Envir6nmenW, Inc. (6E012)
Logged In: d2-Jul.A.5 14 '58
CW0137-01
PMe6t 20061
Logged.B.- AndrOw S Coons
sp.
ReaqU
flt
MilI�n�Hde
A
ILA+H2$04
52
Y l.','N 1 NA
1A1 NA
B
1 LA4:H2SO4
r2
y NA
Y I NA
E
250mLP+HNO3
­2 (1-Y)
N I NA
Y -,I) NA
-Reagent N4de 10.
2
Reagent Name: 10
3
4
Rea ,qdn1,Nai'ne ID
Page 9 of 9

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 4/7/14
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG0300000
FACILITY NAME _Mickey Truck Bodies
COUNTY Guilford
—PERSON .COLLECT.1NG.SAMP.LES. Steven.Gerrald
LABORATORY ENCO Lab Cert. # 531
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2014
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' March (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
_ T
❑Zero -flow ®Water Supply ❑SA
❑Other
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
El No discharge this period:2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected;
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Tota!
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organicss
Benchmarks ===>
_
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
SDO1
3/12/14
0.3"
47 mg/L
5.98
.0141 mg/L
.0073 mg/L
.762 mg/L
<1.60 mg/L
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31.).

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
----- — _ - Carl -Mickey -Jr.- - - - — -- ---- - --- _
Name (Print name)
Executive Vice President
Title (Print title)
C� �Z
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mgLU, where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.