NCG030251_MONITORING INFO_20190122

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/V
DOC TYPE
❑HISTORICAL FILE
12K MONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
Z
YYYYMMDD

Stormwater Discharge- Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral and and Resources General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCGO3� _.�S'''
FACILITY NAME
COUNTY T
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLE ,n, i 1
LABORATORY Q, v � 1' Ja s Lab Cert. 0 `�'}----
Comments on sampl llection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR
SAMPLE PERIOD [] Jan -June �-J y-Dec
or El Monthly' month
RECEIVE TO CLASS QORW [�HQW []Trout [[PNA
❑Zero -flow []Water Supply [—].SA
JAN 2 2 2019 M6ther -
CENTRAL FILES PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
DWR SECTION
No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected 1
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Total Copper
Total Lead
Total Zinc
Non -Polar 0&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics-5H
Urganics
Benchmarks
_
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L°
6.0 — 9.0
0.010 mg/L
0.075 mg/L
0.126 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
Parameter Code
-
46S29
C0530
00400
01119
01051
01094
00552
78141
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
' For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
'The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
See General Permit, Section B, Table 1 to identify the especially sensitive receivingwaterclassifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2018-05/31/2021 SWU-245, last revised 11/1/2018
Page 1 of 3
,jo

l eta.ihals-, 1!1.). Inc01001a10 I Solvent management plan into ills' Stalnnw ltrr Pnilt,lirlll I'rr vc'nl1 1) I'1a;3 rL:i;' `i() CI'•'llry, c)II'4 lli{ r++i�lltrl'rllr'ilt 1[)1 { If) lilUllil:If )I'}{;
r bf, walvod11112 solvent in:111:11.jun1r_°nl plon Oiall include ,I list Ut III[• t0l;Ii Iflkil r'trl'•.11ill (Ul1WpU11111)� +.iyt'rI ind Illt, ollivr t'l,1IttvI1L-- Ilitod In MA kpvnor.,l
)'! i_11t. [01 t4tj ,,A! 1;1t;iliiir?5 (!It'CIiIII F, I e'llipl ev tIII • fT0 li mIIitomIt, waivor, tIir rti'.(Io,isor Qi, ll --jpri I I w in] 1�-,Wtnl; CI;ttlIILAUGa AdtCnwr it,
tlN.pll 0I)1111 Illy IIItItlily Ell 1N.- Itl•E4IM IW [Wr,.11M dircclty f,'l.Iluel•,ibll' lur t1l.,I1.1gIng Eurllt)11.111t.1' W1111 lilt' 11r•rltlil It,rllllt VI]III, I r';Ir 11rell IvIll Ill! I01,11 1tlxl( olI,.Ilnr',,
{ 110). t ( orllly ilutt 11) tile. 1)1'!,l Ili my knuwIo4I ,e anil I)lairl, Ill) dilloplul" r)i ( ol)(1-1111 rltt'd tuxit Ill p,Ifllr -, 11111.0 Ihr 51t1t-111W.11r1 ul ;Il t"Is will.. 11 .114' I-XIlQWl1 t() r.Illtt, ill jr
,t.) 111SLdII•h rltl i+lit WN I)Cr(ll 1'041 ;our lilirig till' I:l,t -Iltsr•hoig. • 1t antlt1r1111; r,`pol l I It111111'f r el Illy ll),It till , 1.11 illly 1', IlrY hll'I tlf'1)11U 1; Illy .Ill IN, 111 UV)!,)elfri of till-
•.ulvt`111 11)•Irt.)r;t!r1lt'I)I 111:rIt im.II)lloll Ill till! i11111l14Vallt[ 111111tilltill 11;eVel)Itull Hall "
r4dTII,• (t'iil;t 11.11110)
0�.-�y�v.�
talc (frill tillrl
51f!l,.1111,1' �,
wits: Results 1►tust he reported in tlttmerlcal format. Do not report 13riow 1. mit, 60L, : ('CIL, Ntt.ltjAvIt't:1, NI ), (te :)ttuv 5trnilar non rltllrlt:t Irol
inrnliii. Wien result•, me let-,lokv il)r' apples ablC Ilmils, tgd in the format, pip wllt'rt' xX I� liho minion .1l valur' ni till dcit't null
(lfrlll, ) CI)nrlitt{; 11E1H1, t'tr . it, --
Note: If yuu report a sueriplc value trj cxcess of the benehmarle, you )oust implement firer 1. Tier 1, ar her resf)nnsc>s See Generul P rmrt tc;xr.
Part H. Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: nnly for facilities averaging 55 gat of new oil per month,
_ n Nu disc'haige this perrucl:)
- -' --_� Illatu Sample Calieelled1 F24 huur rerinfall amount, Meta Motor Oil ur IN on -Polar 081G{ Total Total Suspended
Outhlli Na,
Imo/dcl/vrl I lrtches' Hydraulic Oil L's.rgc Pettofettrn Ilyctrocarbnns Solids
tiel)elrmarlr. -- - - 15 ttng/L 100 mg/1_ or So tul,/1 '
— - -- - - 116529 l !•!r p11 Qi!';5Z TT rt3S :0 1 umrt;et2r I.UtiC ----�- -
r
Footnotes from Rm-1 A also apply to Pr&:rt A
fflO e• l f ya!e report r: sarl7ple ueiue in c:.cess of the bcnrhmurk, you must implement Ter 1, Fier 2, or Tier 3 response,-. See General Permit text.
1'rrmti l7^t1 :11/iJJf11,; [}j/it/,lrZt SWt! 2,15,I.E•,l rcylUtt 11/1/711t1i
I'.tpr 7 Ot �

.—ItI AAP1(1 NAk{I I{ MONIII iWI\11G Vi Mf ,I
— :,,'i3.YFi:lf:.il:lt[C r.yrj 111J1Nri ft;l rllii,"iIt1177 Bd� iIIP I:BICfllly. `',1 I'i IIIVIIITAi%C,- 11''.FCIIoN II.--
o• •' LXLI I I)AFJC1 5 114 11 IU:}tP; I OR I I if ',r,.MI I'AItA AL II1, At '11.11 "AMI Ott [ I At I 1111C.6,LII TIER Z RLQUjftE.lY71?NTS. ,1 I. 1'1 I{0.9i i r'f,Ij I 0 •rl t I iC1N !'
• I W111 3 1IA'. Yc.11lld I A{'1111'i IIAI14 1 M M01IL lit IH,IIMAICK i XCLLI)T NCl S 1('rH I III, SA MI PARAMI. )LIf AT ANY ON! IN I I I Al I ' YES n NO I:]
WYES, IIAV..'d;111itIN1AClli11III kt,'Mk.1t1tl_I;t{iNAI.+.fli1(1,i YESQNoE]
111 tAONAI :JI• -R 1• CON I ACI N't1 W
Mail orI origintrr copy o fhis lllbT, int rtadinrl ali "flies gisthargq' rr��uarfsts riidiira w�1 ds 4�s,c�j rc>cc'_rpt ojthe lob results (orvt end ojmanutnring period in the
case of '7Vta L�ischurae' re�rc�rts� Irs:
DIVI•arin of Walt•I (Zu,dlty
ftllll IMLI Lt:nlral I IIrl.
1 i J t Nr�. I rI ' i I V I I.[' t, ('I I t L't
1',.itt'q'It,MIMICt1f1111.1 '/0'19161
"I rr ruly, iiode 1 I;t=n,Illy u1 ld:v. tlt,tt LIrI-, dirrunuctit art:i :dl artadimrnr•. wr'rr IitvI1,),111) urttk•r Iity IIit"( line tit '.L111r'rvr,Wn In I:.: •,Vsicctt Lit-,hlfcnL,tl Itr
+.•nlr' Llta! h!t,Ihlirll r, ['^.nn[[l't (}I Ultla ly f-',,ttlLct at to CV,Ikll,ite tI IL, r ful nw"rt In ,I If will rl•tl e:,t ,r-tj I H! IIIy 1HIIklr: yr trl lirt' fr: •r•,nn rlr (rrr prl i Why nk.1[ial;l' till• •.y .I [.,II, [>I
=':T.r to r r[r•. [kU0 11� rr-0111r,il•h 1•11 1:•ttlt r11q; t Itf• s!1lnntt,t[utn, 111:• 1111u1 iliolirttt • U111111 It•rl 1'. Ire II1,. 1IV ,t [11 :rty knrtwloell [ .1titI It( -Irs'1, trttr. •Irrttr,ikr•, ,nul t f.ritrttlt'[t' i
at:.tw.:rr• r;t :' 11u r. . r, 1„usf+I'.'nt itr ti trrl[•• 11.1 • ltlnnrL1Ir11 :.,{,r ilslrtrru,[lu,r: Inr lutlutl; III$ Im ".bully of LrII • :t,cl 1;uI1tnotinivnl Inr kncrwtnl; Ulnk.ttturt'r. '
4igo�rlure of Pr:mrttt<�• is a•
t'rtnllt I�.tk< it/1J:[lii l7�iJ3i/i^f?I _ -- 1WJ �. I.hd IUVL�cr[ 11,'.l�rll3:a_

En4ronmental
Quality
Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO)
Qualitative Monitoring Report
For guidance on filling out this Joan, please visit hops:/Idcq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/
npdes-stormwater-gps
Permit No.: N/CI[t}I cD/--b I•:D1,3l:�l or Certificate of Coverage No.: N_/C/G/ CV 3 /0 {a/S/ l I
Facility Narpg: `LAY �� / Chip t: ( 4 I r A'
County:
R
Date of Inspection:
Time of Inspection:
Total Event Precipitation (inches): 1. o
Phone No n i---- .
All permits require qualitative monitoring to be performed during a "measurable storm event."
I
A "measurable storm event" is a storm event that results in an actual discharge from the permitted site I
outfall. The previous measurable storm event must have been at least 72 hours prior. The 72-hour storm I
interval does not apply if the permittee is able to document that a shorter interval is representative for j
local storm events during the sampling period, and the perminee obtains approval from the local DEMLR
Regional Office.
By this signature, I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
(Signature of Permittee or Designee)
1. Outfall Description:
Outfall No.Structure (pipe, ditch, etc.):
Receivine5tream:
strial Activities that occur within the outrfall drainage area:
Des/tribe the 1
R
Page I of 2
SWU-242. Last modified 05.01/2018

2. Color: Describe the color of the d
(light, medium dark) as descriptors:
using basic colors (red, brown, blue, etc.) and tint
3. Odor: Describe any distinct odors that the discharge may have (i.e., smells strongly of oil, weak
chlorine odor, etc.): L e'11
4. Clarity: Choose the number which best describes the clarity of the discharge, where 1 is clear
and 5 is very cloudy:
0 2 3 4 5
5. Floating Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of floating solids in the
stormwater discharge, where 1 is no solids and 5 is the surface covered with floating solids:
0 2 3 4 5
6. Suspended Solids: Choose the number which best describes the amount of suspended solids in
the stormwater discharge, where 1 is n'oo solids and 5 is extremely muddy:
d
1� 2 3 4 5
7. Is there any foam in the stormwater discharge? O Yes 0 No.
8. Is there an oil sheen in the stormwater discharge? OYes ® No.
9. Is there evidence of erosion or deposition at the out -fall? o Yes ® No.
10. Other Obvious Indicators of Stormwater Pollution:
List and describe
Note: Low clarity, high solids, and/or the presence of foam, oil sheen, or erosion/deposition may be
indicative of pollutant exposure. These conditions warrant further investigation.
Pare 2 of 2
SWU-242. Last modified 06!01/2018

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Report of Analysis
ARM Environmental Services, Inc.
11164 Downs Road
Pineville, NC 28134
Attention: Tim McCorkle
Project Name: Watts Water SW
Lot Number:TL21101
Date Completed:01/07/2019
1
01/07/2019 10:58 AM
Approved and released by:
Lab Director - Greenville: Lucas Odom
A413
-+� 4ccaeoirro
000cir
The electronic signature above is the equivalent of a handwritten signature.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] wNwu.shealylab,com
Page I of 28

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SC DHEC No: 32010001 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENIR No: K9 NC Field Parameters No: 5639
Case Narrative
ARM Environmental Services, Inc.
Lot Number: TL21101
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary
following this Case Narrative. The sample receiving date is documented in the header information
associated with each sample.
All results listed in this report relate only to the samples that are contained within this report.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most
current approved NELAC standards, the Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. ("Shealy") Quality
Assurance Management Plan (QAMP), standard operating procedures (SOPS), and Shealy policies. Any
exceptions to the NELAC standards, the QAMP, SOPS or policies are qualified on the results page or
discussed below.
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Shealy Project Manager listed on the
cover page.
PesUPCBS by GC
The closing continuing calibration verification (CCV) associated with sample TL21101-001, TL21106-001
did not meet acceptance criteria. Sample matrix is suspected to have contributed to this failure. The
samples in this batch contributed to DDT and Methoxychlor being killed from the pest column. As such
the samples are not being rerun for fear of killing the columns again.
SVOCs by GUMS
The laboratory control sample (LCS) for analytical batch 93936 marginally exceeded control limits for the
following analytes: 2-Chloronapthalene.
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
105 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, Sr, 29172 [phone] Fax (B03) 791-9111 www,shealylab,com
Page 2 of 28

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Sample Summary
ARM Environmental Services, Inc.
Lot Number: TL21101
Sample Number Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
001 002 Aqueous 12/20120181130 12/21/2018
(1 sample)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 3 of 28

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Detection Summary
ARM Environmental Services, Inc.
Lot Number: TL21101
Sample Sample ID
Matrix
Parameter
Method
Result Q
Units
Page
001 002
Aqueous
TSS
SIvE 2540D-
6.1
mg/L
5
001 002
Aqueous
Lead
200.8
3.3
ug/L
9
001 002
Aqueous
Zinc
200.8
79
ug/i_
9
(3 detections)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 4 of 28

Client:ARM Environmental Services, Inc. Laboratory ID:TL21101-001
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled; 1212012018 1130
Date Received-.1212112018
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (TSS) SM 254OD-2011 1 12/27/2018 2207 KFE 93502
1 1 - HEM 116648 1 01/02/2019 1017 ARP 93808
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q li Units Run
TSS SM 2541 6.1 1.4 ni 1
Si - HEM (non -polar materiai) 1664B NO 4.3 1 1
Volatile Organic Compounds by Gi
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 624.1 624.1 1 12/22/2018 0648 STM 93178
Parameter
CAS
Number
Analytical
Method
Result 0
Li
Units
Run
Acrolein
107-02-8
624.1
NO
5.0
uglL
1
Acrylonitrile
107-13-1
624.1
ND
5.0
uglL
1
Benzene
71-43-2
624.1
ND
1.0
ug/L
i
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
624A
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
624.1
ND
1.0
uglL
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
624.1
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
624.1
ND
1.0
uglL
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
624.1
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
624.1
ND
2.0
uglL
1
2-Chloroethylvinylether
110-75-8
624.1
NO
5.0
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
624.1
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
624.1
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
624.1
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
624.1
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
624.1
NO
1.0
uglL
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
624.1
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
624A
ND
2.0
uglL
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
624.1
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
624.1
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroothene
75-35-4
624.1
ND
1.0
uglL
1
cis- 1,2-Dichlofoethene
156-59-2
624.1
ND
1.0
uglL
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
624.1
ND
1.0
uglL
1
1,2-Dichlompropane
78-87-5
624.1
ND
1.0
ug/L
1
cis- 1,3-Dichioropropene
10061-01-5
624.1
ND
1.0
11
1
trans-1,3-DichIoropropene
10061-02-6
624.1
ND
1.0
Li
1
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
624.1
ND
1.0
uglL
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
624.1
ND
1.0
ugR
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
624A
ND
1.0
uglL
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
624.1
ND
1.0
uglL
1
Toluene
108-88-3
624.1
NO
1.0
ug/L
1
LOG = Limit of Quantitafion B - Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND = Not detected at or above the LOG N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 4D %
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www,shealylab.com
Page 5 of 28

Client:ARM Environmental Services, Inc. Laboratory ID:TL21101-001
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1212012018 1130
Date Received:1212112018
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCIMS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 624.1 624.1 1 12/22/2018 0648 STM 93178
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
LOQ
Units
Run
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
624.1
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
1, 1, 1 -Trichlo roethane
71.55-6
624.1
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79.00-5
624.1
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
Trichloroethene
79.01-6
624.1
ND
1.0
uglL
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
624.1
ND
1.0
ug1L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
624.1
NO
1.0
ug1L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
Bromofluorobenzene
100 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
91 70-130
Toluene-d8
102 70-130
Semivolatile Organic Comoounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method
1 625.1
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
625.1 1 01/0512019 0030 JCG
Prep Date Batch
12/2712018 1734 93463
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
LOQ
Units
Run
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
Acenaphthylene
208-96-8
625A
ND
1.6
uglL
1
Anthracene
120-12-7
625.1
NO
1.6
ug1L
1
Benzidine
92-87-5
625.1
ND
8.0
uglL
1
Benzo(a)anth race ne
56-55-3
625.1
ND
1.5
uglL
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
191-24-2
625A
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
101-55-3
625.1
ND
1.6
uglL
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
625.1
ND
1.6
uglL
i
bis (2-Chloro-1-methylethyl) ether
108-60-1
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
625.1
ND
1.6
uglL
1
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
111-44-4
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
2-Chlorophenol
95-57-8
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
7005-72-3
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
Chrysene
218-01-9
625.1
ND
1.6
uglL
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
53-70-3
625.1
ND
1.6
uglL
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = QLantilation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND = Not cetected at or above the LOO N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Shea3y Environmental Services, inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax (8o3) 791-9111 www.shealylab.com
Page 6 of 28

Client:ARM Environmental Services, Inc. Laboratory ID:TL21101-001
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1212012018 1130
Date Received:12/2112018
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 625.1 625A 1 01/05/2019 0030 JCG 12/27/2018 1734 93463
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
LOQ
Units
Run
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
625.1
ND
8.0
ug/L
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
534-52-1
625.1
ND
8.0
ug1L
1
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
625.1
ND
8.0
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
625.1
ND
3.2
ug/L
1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
625.1
ND
3.2
ug/L
1
Di-n-octylphthalate
117-84-0
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
i
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as azobenzene)
103-33-3
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
625A
ND
8.0
uglL
1
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Flttorene
86-73-7
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
77-47-4
625.1
ND
8.0
ug/L
1
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
193-39-5
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Isophorone
78-59-1
625A
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Naphthalene
91-20-3
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
625.1
ND
3.2
ug/L
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
625.1
ND
8.0
ug1L
1
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
62-75-9
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
621-64-7
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (Diphenylamine)
86-30-6
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
625.1
ND
8.0
ug/L
1
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
Phenol
108-95-2
625.1
ND
1.6
ug1L
1
Pyrene
129-00-0
625.1
N❑
1.6
ug/L
1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
625.1
ND
1.6
ug/L
1
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND = Not.deiected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 %
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 7 of 28

Client:ARM Environmental Services, Inc. Laboratory ID:TL21101-001
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled: 1212012018 1130
Date Received:1212112018
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q °% Recovery
Limits
2-Fluorobiphenyl
73
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
92
24-127
Nitrobenzene-d5
88
38-127
Phenol-d5
93
28-128
Terphenyl-dl4
108
10-148
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
89
41-144
Oraanochlorine Pesticides and PCBs
Run Prep Method Cleanup
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 608.3 3665A
608.3 10 01/04/2019
0615 CHG
12/27/2018 1405
93455
2 608.3 3665A
608.3 1 01/02120191353
CHG
12/27/2018 1405 93455
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
LOQ
Units
Run
Aldrin
309-00-2
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
Aroclor 1016
12674-11-2
608.3
ND
0.40
uglL
2
Arocior 1221
11104-28.2
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1232
11141-16-5
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1242
53469-21.9
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Arocior 1248
12672-29.6
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Arocior 1254
11097-69-1
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
Aroclor 1260
11096-82-5
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
2
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
58-89-9
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
alpha-BHC
319-84-6
608.3
ND
0.40
ug/L
1
beta-BHC
319-85-7
608.3
ND
0.40
uglL
1
delta-BHC
319-86-8
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
Chlordane
57-74-9
608.3
ND
4.0
ui
1
4,4'-DDD
72-54-8
608.3
ND
0.40
ug/L
1
4,4'-DDE
72-55-9
608.3
ND
0.40
uglL
1
4,4'-DDT
50-29-3
608.3
ND
0.40
u91L
1
Dieldrin
60-57-1
608.3
ND
0.40
uglL
1
Endosulfan 1
959-98-8
608.3
ND
0.40
u91L
1
Endosulfan 11
33213-65-9
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
Endosulfan sulfate
1031-07-8
608.3
ND
0.40
u91L
1
Endrin
72-20-8
608.3
ND
0.40
u91L
1
Endrin aldehyde
7421-93-4
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
Heptachlor
76-44-8
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
Heptachlor epoxide
1024-57-3
608.3
ND
0.40
ug1L
1
Toxaphene
8001-35-2
608.3
ND
4.0
ug1L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Run
2 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
Q % Recovery Limits
Decachlorobiphenyl
87 20-131
96
20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
73 30-132
69
30-132
LOG = Limit of Quanttation 8 = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND = Not detected at or above the LOG N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 8 of 28

Client:ARM Environmental Services, Inc. Laboratory ID:TL21101.001
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1212012018 1130
Date Received:1212112018
ICP-MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 200.2 200.8 1 01/03/2019 0924 BNW 12/26/2018 1123 93289
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
LOQ
Units
Run
Copper
7440-50-8
200.8
ND
10
ug/L
1
Lead
7439-92-1
200.8
3.3
2.0
u91L
1
Zinc
7440.66-6
200.8
79
10
ug/L
1
LOQ = Limit of QuanttaSen B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
NO - Not detected at or above the LOQ N = Recovery is out of criteria P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 h
H = Out of holding time W = Reported on wet weight basis
Shealy Environmental Services, inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
f
Page 9 of 28

QC Summary
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.sheatylab.com
Page 10 of 28

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: TQ93502-001 Matrix. Aqueous
Batch:93502
Analytical Method: SM 254OD-2011
Parameter Result Q Dil LOQ Units Analysis Date
TSS ND 1 1.0 ni 12/27/2018 2207
LOO = Limit of Quafttabon
DL = Detection Limit
LOD = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result � LOQ and � DL + = RPD is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the LOO
Note-. Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 11 of 28

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: T093502-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:93502
Analytical Method: SM 254OD-2011
Spike
Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mglL) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
TSS 250 250 1 100 90-110 12/2712018 2207
LOG = Limit of Guantilation
DL = Detection Limit
LOD = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GG columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result < LOO and ? DL + = RPD is out of criteria
ND - Not detected at or above the LOG
Note:, Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services. Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive west Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 12 of 29

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: U093808-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:93808
Analytical Method: 1664B
Parameter Result Q Dil LOCI Units Analysis Date
SGT - HEM (non -polar material) ND 1 4.0 mgtL 01/02/2019 1017
LOO = Limit of QuanGtation
DL = Detection Limit
1_00 = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 4D*A N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result < LOO and , DL t = RPD is out of criteria
ND - Not detected at or above the LOO
Note:. Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 13 of 28

Inorganic non-metals - !_CS
Sample ID: UQ93808-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:93808
Analytical Method: 1664E
Spike
Amount Result % Rec
Parameter _ (ni (mg1L) Q Dil % Rec Limit _Analysis Date
SGT - HEM (non -polar material) 40 37 1 92 64-132 01102)2019 1017
LOQ = Limit of Quontitalion
DL = Detection Limit
LOD = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result � LOD and a DL + = RPO is out of criteria
NO = Not detected at or above the LOO
Note= Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 14 of 28

Volatile Organic Compounds by GUMS - MB
Sample ID: T093178-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 93178 Prep Method: 624.1
Analytical Method: 624.1
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
LOG
Units
Analysis Date
Acrolein
ND
1
5.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Acrylonitrile
ND
1
5.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Benzene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Bromodichloromethane
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Bromoform
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Chlorobenzene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Chloroethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
2-Chloroelhylvinylether
ND
1
5.0
u91L
12/21/2018 2255
Chloroform
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Dibromochloromethane
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1
1.0
ug1L
12/21/2018 2255
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1
1.0
ug1L
12121/2018 2255
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1
1.0
ug1L
1212112018 2255
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND
1
2.0
ug1L
12/21/2018 2255
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1
1.0
ug1L
12/21/2018 2255
1,2-Dichloroethane
NO
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
1
1.0
u9/L
12/21/2018 2255
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1
1.0
uglL
12/21/2018 2255
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/24/2018 2255
Vans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
1
1.0
u91L
12/21/2018 2255
Ethylbenzene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Methylene chloride
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Toluene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Trichloroethene
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
42/21/2018 2255
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Vinyl chloride
ND
1
1.0
ug/L
12/21/2018 2255
Surrogate
Q % Rec
Acceptance
Limit
Bromotluorobenzene
99
70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
88
70-130
Toluene -dB
101
70-130
LOD = Limit of Quantilation P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
DL = Detection Limit J = Estimated result < LOO and > DL + = RPD is out of criteria
LOD = Limit of Detection ND = Not detected at or above the LOD
Note-, Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy (environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 15 of 28

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - LCS
Sample ID: T093178-002 Matrix:. Aqueous
Batch:93178 Prep Method: 624A
Analytical Method: 624.1
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
Parameter
(ug1L)
(ug1L)
Q Dil
% Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
Acrolein
200
180
1
91
60-140
12/21/2018 2124
Acrylonitrile
40
42
1
105
60-140
12/21/2018 2124
Benzene
20
20
1
100
65-135
12/21/2018 2124
Bromodichloromethane
20
19
1
93
65-135
12/21/2018 2124
Bromoform
20
20
1
99
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
20
20
1
99
15-185
12/21/2018 2124
Carbon tetrachloride
20
18
1
89
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
Chlorobenzene
20
20
1
101
65-135
12/21/2018 2124
Chloroethane
20
21
1
105
40-160
12/21/2018 2124
2-Chloroethylvinylether
20
19
1
94
1.225
12/21/2018 2124
Chloroform
20
19
1
96
70-135
12/21/2018 2124
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
20
19
1
94
1-205
12/21/2018 2124
Dibromochloromethane
20
19
1
94
53-149
12/21/2018 2124
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
20
21
1
106
65-135
12/21/2018 2124
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
20
21
1
105
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
20
21
1
106
65-135
12/21/2018 2124
Dichlorodifluoromethane
20
18
1
88
60-140
12/21/2018 2124
1,1-Dichloroethane
20
20
1
98
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
1,2-Dichloroethane
20
19
1
94
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
1,1-Dichloroethene
20
19
1
96
50-150
12/21/2018 2124
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
20
20
1
102
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
20
20
1
101
70-130
12/2112018 2124
1,2-Dichloropropane
20
18
1
90
35-165
12/2112018 2124
cis- 1, 3-Dich loropropene
20
17
1
86
25-175
12/21/2018 2124
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
20
17
1
85
50-150
12/21/2018 2124
Ethylbenzene
20
20
1
102
60-140
12/2112018 2124
Methylene chloride
20
19
1
93
60-140
12/21/2018 2124
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
20
21
1
104
60-140
12/21/2018 2124
Tetra chloroethene
20
20
1
102
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
Toluene
20
20
1
101
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
1,2,4-Trcchoorobenzene
20
20
1
102
60-140
12/21/2018 2124
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
20
18
1
90
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
20
20
1
101
70-130
12/21/2018 2124
Trichloroethene
20
20
1
101
65-135
12/21/2018 2124
Trichlorofluoromethane
20
18
1
88
50-150
12/21/2018 2124
Vinyl chloride
20
18
1
92
5-195
12/21/2018 2124
Acceptance
Surrogate Q % Rec Limit
Bromofluorobenzene 96 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 87 70-130
Toluene-d8 98 70-130
LOQ = Limit of Quantita8on
OL = Detection Limit
LOD = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result < LOG and > DL + = RPD is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the LOG
Notez,Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 16 of28

Volatile Organic Compounds by GUMS - LCSD
Sample ID: T093178-003
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 93178
Prep
Method: 624.1
Analytical Method: 624.1
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
% RPD
Parameter
(ug1L)
(ug/L) Q
Dil
% Rec
% RPD
Limit
Limit
Analysis Date
Acrolein
200
180
1
88
3.0
60-140
20
12/22/2018 0540
Acrylonitrile
40
40
1
100
4.5
60-140
20
12/22/2018 0540
Benzene
20
20
1
102
2.0
65-135
20
12/22/2018 0540
Bromodichloromethane
20
18
1
92
0,98
65-135
20
12/22/2018 0540
Bromoform
20
18
1
90
10
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
20
20
1
98
1.8
15-185
20
12/22/2018 0540
Carbon tetrachloride
20
18
1
90
0.91
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
Chlorobenzene
20
20
1
99
1.7
65-135
20
12/22/2018 0540
Chloroethane
20
21
1
103
2.3
40-160
20
12/22/2018 0540
2-Chloroethylvinylether
20
19
1
94
0.15
1-225
20
12/22/2018 0540
Chloroform
20
19
1
95
1.5
70-135
20
12/22/2018 0540
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
20
18
1
92
2.0
1-205
20
12/22/2018 0540
D ibromochloro methane
20
18
1
90
4.4
53-149
20
12/2212018 0540
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
20
20
1
99
6.5
65-135
20
12/22/2018 0540
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
20
20
1
102
2.7
70-130
20
12/2212018 0540
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
20
19
1
97
9.0
65-135
20
12/22/2018 0540
Dichlorodifluorom ethane
20
17
1
83
6.4
60-140
20
12/22/2018 0540
1,1-1)ichloroethane
20
19
1
93
5.0
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
1,2-Dichloroethane
20
18
1
92
1.7
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
1,1-Dichloroethene
20
19
1
94
1.5
50-150
20
12/22/2018 0540
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
20
20
1
101
1.1
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
20
20
1
98
3.2
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
1,2-Dichloropropane
20
18
1
88
3.2
35-165
20
12/22/2018 0540
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
20
17
1
83
3.8
25-175
20
12/22/2018 0540
trans- 1, 3- Dichloro pro pene
20
16
1
78
9.3
50-150
20
12/22/2018 0540
Ethylbenzene
20
20
1
100
1.2
60-140
20
12/22/2018 0540
Methylene chloride
20
18
1
92
1.0
60-140
20
12/22/2018 0540
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
20
20
1
99
4.8
60-140
20
12/22/2048 0540
Tetrachloroethene
20
20
1
98
4.5
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
Toluene
20
20
1
101
0.60
70-130
20
12/22J2018 0540.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
20
19
1
94
8.8
60-140
20
12/22/2018 0540
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
20
18
1
90
0.87
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
20
20
1
100
0.73
70-130
20
12/22/2018 0540
Trichloroethene
20
20
1
101
0.74
65-135
20
12/22/2018 0540
Trichlorofluoromethane
20
17
1
86
2.6
50-150
20
12/22/2018 0540
Vinyl chloride
20
19
1
94
2.3
5-195
20
12/22/2018 0540
Acceptance
Surrogate 0 % Rec Limit
Bromofluorobenzene 99 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 90 70-130
Toluene-d8 98 70-130
LOG - Limit of Guantitaton P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
DL = Detection Limit J = Estimated result < LOG and � DL + = RPD is out of criteria
LOD = Limit of Detection ND = Not detected at or above the LOG
Note%Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 17 of 28

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - MB
Sample ID: T093463-001
Batch: 93463
Analytical Method: 625.1
Matrix: Aqueous
Prep Method: 625.1
Prep Date: 12/27/2018 1734
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
LOQ
Units
Analysis Date
Acenaphthene
ND
1
1.6
ug1L
01/0312019 1132
Acenaphthylene
ND
1
1.6
uglL
01/03/2019 1132
Anthracene
ND
1
1.6
ug1L
01/03/2019 1132
Benzidine
NO
1
8.0
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Benzo(a)anthracene
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Benzo(a)pyrene
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
NO
1
1.6
ug1L
01/03/2019 1132
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
NO
1
1.6
ug1L
01/03/2019 1132
Benzo(k)fluoranlhene
NO
1
1.6
uglL
01/03/2019 1132
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
NO
1
1.6
ug1L
01/03/2019 1132
Butyl benzyl phthalate
ND
1
1.6
ug1L
01/03/2019 1132
bis (2-Chloro-l-methylethyl) ether
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01103/20191132
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
NO
1
1.6
uglL
01/03/2019 1132
2-Chloronaphthalene
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
2-Chlorophenol
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Chrysene
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
3,3'- Dich lorobenzid ine
ND
1
8.0
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
2,4-Dichlorophenoi
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Diethyiphthalate
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Dimethyl phthalate
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
2,4-Dimethylphenol
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Di-n-butyl phthalate
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyl phenol
NO
1
8.0
ug/L
01103120191132
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
1
8.0
u1
01/03/2019 1132
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND
1
3.2
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
25-Dinitrotoluene
ND
1
3.2
ug1L
01/03/2019 1132
Di-n-octylphthalate
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as azobenzene)
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthaiate
ND
1
8.0
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Fluoranthene
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Fluorene
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Hexach lo robe nzene
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 l 132
Hexachlorobutadiene
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ND
1
8.0
uglL
01/03120191132
Hexachloroethane
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
NO
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Isophorone
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
L00 = Limit of Quantitation
DL = Detection Limit
LOD = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of cnteria
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL = RPD is out of criteria
No = Not detected at or above the LOO
Note: -Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 18 of 28

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - MB
Sample ID: TQ93463-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 93463 Prep Method: 625.1
Analytical Method: 625.1 Prep Date: 12/27/2018 1734
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
LOQ
Units
Analysis Date
Naphthalene
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Nitrobenzene
ND
1
1.6
uglL
01/03/2019 1132
2-N itropheno l
ND
1
3.2
uglL
01 /03/2019 1132
4-Nilrophenol
ND
1
8.0
uglL
0110W2019 1132
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
ND
1
1.6
uglL
01/0312019 1132
N-Nitrosodi-n-propyiamine
ND
1
1.6
uglL
01103120191132
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (Diphenylamine)
ND
1
1.6
ug/L
01/03/2019 1132
Pentachlorophenol
ND
1
8.0
uglL
01/03/2019 1132
Phenanthrene
ND
1
1.6
uglL
01/03/2019 1132
Phenol
ND
1
1.6
uglL
01/03/2019 1132
Pyrene
ND
1
1.6
ug1L
01 /03/2019 1132
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND
1
1.6
ug1L
01/03/2019 1132
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND
1
1.6
ug1L
01/03/2019 1132
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q
% Rec
Limit
2-Fluorobiphenyl
41
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
35
24-127
Nitrobenzene-d5
55
38-127
Phenol-d5
40
28-128
Te rphenyl-d 14
80
10-148
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
N
38
41-144
LOO = Limit of Quantilation P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
DL = Detection Limit J = Estimated result < LOQ and y OL + = RPD is out of critena
LOD = Limit of Detection NO = Not detected at or above the LOQ
Note: -Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 19 of 28

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - LCS
Sample ID: T093463-002
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:93463
Prep Method:
625.1
Analytical Method: 625.1
Prep Date: 12/27/2018 1734
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
Parameter
(uglL)
(u91L)
Q Dil
% Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
Acenaphthene
20
13
1
65
47-145
01/0312019 1329
Acenaphthylene
20
12
1
60
33-145
01/0312019 1329
Anthracene
20
17
1
86
27-133
01/0312019 1329
Benzidine
100
49
1
49
1-150
01/0312019 1329
Benzo(a)anthracene
20
19
1
93
33-143
01/03120191329
Senzo(a)pyrene
20
17
1
83
17-163
01103120191329
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
20
19
1
96
24-159
01103120191329
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
20
20
1
98
1-219
01/0312019 1329
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
20
20
1
99
11-162
01/0312019 1329
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
20
16
1
80
53-127
01/0312019 1329
Butyl benzyl phthalate
20
21
1
106
1-152
01/0312019 1329
bis (2-Chloro-1-methylethyl) ether
20
16
1
79
36-166
01/0312019 1329
4-C h loro-3-m ethyl phenol
20
15
1
76
22-147
0110312019 1329
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
20
13
1
65
33-184
01/0312019 1329
bis(2-Chloroelhyl)ether
20
19
1
94
12-158
01/0312019 1329
2-Chloronaphthalene
20
11
N 1
57
60-120
01/0312019 1329
2-Chiarophenol
20
13
1
63
23-134
01/0312019 1329
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
20
13
1
67
25-158
01/03/2019 1329
Chrysene
20
19
1
95
17-168
01/0312019 1329
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
20
19
1
97
1-227
01/0312019 1329
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
20
12
1
58
32-129
01/0312019 1329
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
20
11
1
57
1-172
01103120191329
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
20
11
1
56
20-124
01/0312019 1329
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
20
17
1
84
1-262
01/0312019 1329
2,4-Dichlorophenol
20
14
1
68
39-135
01/0312019 1329
Diethyl phthalate
20
17
1
87
1-120
01/0312019 1329
Dimethyl phthalate
20
17
1
85
1-120
01/0312019 1329
2,4-Dimethylphenol
20
11
1
56
32-120
01/0312019 1329
Di-n-butyl phthalate
20
21
1
104
1-120
01/0312019 1329
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenoi
20
18
1
90
1-181
01103120191329
2,4-Dinitrophenol
40
24
1
59
1-191
01103120191329
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
20
18
1
89
39-139
01103120191329
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
20
16
1
79
50-158
01/0312019 1329
Di-n-octylphthalate
20
17
1
87
4-146
01103120191329
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine(as azobenzene)
20
21
1
103
1-150
01/0312019 1329
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
20
22
1
108
8-158
01103120191329
Fiuoranthene
20
19
1
94
26-137
01/0312019 1329
Fluorene
20
14
1
71
59-121
01/0312019 1329
Hexachlorobenzene
20
18
1
88
1-152
0110120191329
Hexachlorobutadiene
20
11
1
55
24-120
01103120191329
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
100
32
1
32
1-150
01103120191329
Hexachloroethane
20
13
1
63
40-120
01103120191329
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
20
19
1
97
1.171
01/03/2019 1329
Isophorone
20
16
1
80
21-196
01/0312019 1329
LOO = Limit of Quantitation
DL = Detection Limit
LOD = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 4D% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result < LOQ and i OL + = RPD is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ
Note: -Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 20 of 28

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - LCS
Sample ID: TQ93463-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:93463 Prep Method: 625.1
Analytical Method: 625.1 Prep Date: 12/27/2018 1734
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
Parameter
(ug/L)
(ug/L) Q
Dil
% Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
Naphthalene
20
14
1
68
21-133
01/03/20191329
Nitrobenzene
20
15
1
74
35-180
01/03/20191329
2-Nitrophenol
20
14
1
69
29-182
01/03/20191329
4-Nitrophenol
40
33
1
84
1-132
01/03/20191329
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
20
15
1
74
1-150
01/03120191329
N-N'itrosod'i-n-propylamine
20
18
1
89
1-230
01/03120191329
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (Diphenylamine)
20
17
1
83
1-150
01/03/2019 1329
Pentachlorophenol
40
40
1
101
14-176
01103/20191329
Phenanthrene
20
17
1
86
54-120
01103/20191329
Phenol
20
13
1
64
5-120
01/03/20191329
Pyrene
20
19
1
97
52-120
01/03/20191329
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
20
12
1
60
44-142
01103/20191329
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
20
14
1
68
37-144
01103120191329
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Rec
Limit
2-Fluorobiphenyi
60
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
44
24-127
Nitrobenzene-d5
80
38-127
Phenol-d5
66
28-128
Terphenyl-d14
107
10-146
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
76
41-144
LOO = Limit of QuantiWon P - The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
DL = Detection Limit J - Estimated result - LOO and > DL = RPD is out of criteria
LOD = Limit of Detection ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, tnc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www,shealylab.com
Page 21 of 28

Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs - MB
Sample ID: TQ93455-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 93455 Prep Method: 608.3 Cleanup: 3655A
Analytical Method: 608.3 Prep Date: 12/27/2018 1405
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
LOCI
Units
Analysis Date
Aldrin
ND
1
0.040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
Aroclor 1016
ND
1
0.40
ug/L
01/02/2019 0000
Aroclor 1221
ND
1
0.40
ug/L
01/02/2019 0000
Aroclor 1232
ND
1
0.40
ug/L
01/02/2019 0000
Aroclor 1242
ND
1
0.40
ug1L
01/02/2019 0000
Aroclor 1248
ND
1
0.40
ug/L
01/02/2019 0000
Aroclor 1254
ND
1
0.40
ug/L
01/02/2019 0000
Aroclor 1260
ND
1
0A0
ug/L
01/02/2019 0000
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
ND
1
0,040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
alpha-BHC
ND
1
0,040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
beta-BHC
ND
1
0.040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
delta-BHC
ND
1
0.040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
Chlordane
ND
1
0.40
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
4,4'-DDD
ND
1
0.040
ug1L
01/04/2019 0514
4,4'-DDE
ND
1
0.040
ug1L
01/04/2019 0514
4,4'-DDT
ND
1
0.040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
Dieldrin
ND
1
0.040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
Endosulfan I
ND
1
0.040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
Endosulfan II
ND
1
0,040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
Endosulfan sulfate
ND
1
0.040
ug1L
01/04/2019 0514
Endrin
ND
1
0.040
ug/L
01/0412019 0514
Endrin aldehyde
NO
1
0.040
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
Heptachlor
ND
1
0.040
ug1L
01/04/2019 0514
Heptachlor epoxide
NO
1
0.040
ug1L
01/04/2019 0514
Toxaphene
ND
1
0.40
ug/L
01/04/2019 0514
Acceptance
Surrogate
0 % Rec
Limit
Decachlorobiphenyl
64
20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
52
30-132
LOG = Limit of ouantitation P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
DL = Detection Limit J = Estimated result � LOO and n DL = RPD is out of criteria
LOD = Limit of Detection ND = Not detected at or above the LOG
Note: -Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive west Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.sheatylab.com
Page 22 of 28

Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs - LCS
Sample ID: T093455-002
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 93455
Prep Method: 608.3
Cleanup: 3665A
Analytical Method: 608.3
Prep Date: 1212712018 1405
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rae
Parameter
(ug1L)
(u91L) Q
Dil %Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
Aldrin
0,80
0,59
1 74
54-130
01104/2019 0529
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0,80
0.63
1 79
43-130
01/04/2019 0529
alpha-BHC
0,80
0.59
1 74
49-130
01/04/2019 0529
beta-BHC
0,80
0.57
1 72
39-130
01/04/2019 0529
delta-BHC
0,80
0.64
1 81
51-130
01/04/2019 0529
4,4'-DDD
0,80
0.65
1 82
48-130
01/0412019 0529
4,4'-DDE
0,80
0.63
1 79
54-130
01/04/2019 0529
4,4'-DDT
0.80
0.72
1 90
58-130
01/04/2019 0529
Dieldrin
0.80
0.68
1 85
36-146
01/04/2019 0529
Endosulfan 1
0.80
0.63
1 78
57-141
01/04/2019 0529
Endosulfan 11
0.80
0.60
1 74
22-171
01/04/2019 0529
Endosulfan sulfate
0.80
0.60
1 75
38-132
01/04/2019 0529
Endrin
0.80
0,66
1 83
51-130
01/04/2019 0529
Endrin aldehyde
0.80
0.63
1 78
60-140
01/04/2019 0529
Heptachlor
0.80
0.59
1 74
43-130
01/04/2019 0529
Heptachlor epoxide
0.80
0,64
1 80
57-132
01/04/2019 0529
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Rec
Limit
Decachlorobiphenyl
66
20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 60 •30-132
LOO = Limit of Quantitation P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
DL = Detecton Limit J = Estimated result < LOO and a DL + = RPD is out of criteria
LOD = Limit of Detection ND = Not detected at or above the LOQ
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 23 of 28

ICP-MS - MB
Sample ID: TQ93289-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch:93289 Prep Method: 200.2
Analytical Method: 200.8 Prep Date: 12/26/2018 1123
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
LOQ
Units
Analysis Date
Copper
NO
1
10
uglL
01/03/2019 0808
Lead
NO
1
2.0
uglL
01/03/2019 0808
Zinc
NO
1
10
uglL
01/03/2019 0808
LOD = Limit of Ouantitaton
OL = Detection Limit
LOD = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40 % N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result < LOG and > DL + = RPD Is out of crito6a
ND = Not detected at or above the LOG
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.sheaiytab.com
Page 24 of 28

ICP-MS - LCS
Sample ED: T093289-002
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 93289
Prep Method: 200.2
Analytical Method: 200.8
Prep Date: 12/26/2018 1123
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
Parameter
^Copper
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Q Dil % Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
100
96
1 96
85-115
01/03/2019 0813
Lead
100
100
1 100
85-115
01/0312019 0813
Zinc
100
96
1 96
85-115
01/0312019 0813
LOq = Limit of Qua ntitaton
DL = Detection Limit
LOD = Limit of Detection
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result , LOO and - DL * = RPD is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the LOD
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 25 of 28

Chain of Custody
and
Miscellaneous Documents
Shealy Environmental Services. Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive west Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www,shcaiylab.com
Page 26 of 28

�CD
� v
m �
SHEALY ENVIRONMEWAL SERVICES, INC.
o = ,�i3E�iLY Chain o1 Custody R9172
eeord A ,a;e r�o �lao i-a1 97oa� Fax�lvc. aai 7sumbia. SC ?911z
T�
02 vmvr.sheaMab.com
m m
RepartraCan6r.Y T. rr�vrtr rYn. lF.mair
C) 3 � ..is (ALgrsh 8� J narc �Yi:I�
N ems' 1 1 Alsyru PsorAManaS �r
4a
l4ArScr w* r DRrO %A sfA s ►•'
jmi�ISfiT31J►BFiD�l6t�jl�flL�•rG9D7�J�13'JM�TP�l! � � K �� � � j� � � � `� t
DtO
0
I ! i
N O
v W I I
O r
m ro
i
N
a
knot/ Mo by
3 fi�4S�rthOe by
-5. fWCMZMW bV
>(Ptbrta&aaars�rrroetadlhrra�odlydlxr. &errapretxep�ar J
lush (*MOY) D Rehvn tc C5? at O DisprBr by C Rol -Hap% 0 Pa wb4 = SIB IrrM
j Dare ►krs r. b
Ore T" P FM
2. 0 J.i!f YY• ram/ yY A
1�jlltiTi� I
!Dare :Tw.e 4. taba'e try6
I 2. 5
: All samplafare mialm d for four vmaks (ram nwalpr OAB LA ON1 v
urleu^s other arransrernerrta are MSCa P-,vnvd on t r =w. Yes w r. Path
DISTRWUMIN. 'AWME s rkLUV,rrerjn w MbaraArp P^ -Q&=Wek PW9,FeidtYlenr U,;,y
Number 6 7 4 4 6
OmM No.
PW—Lly—i
TL21101
trp
IF
r
CC RewA pmen!q (Spedryl
Urn
A till XOP
AM
- 'zl'!r—a-5
zswx ramo.�L� 'z:
v,r„umanr rm:.noer: � nD• ass Eta nwr.C1BdJ 28rt
cn
2
n
Z
C
z
ic
Z
r
M
C
0
M
Z
0

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SbivrYb�wuVol :nner.dlS"-Vto-.roe. tit tul I
i :.nneMNtfmncr.MF•'dlnlRf'•tA hM;:Li%vVUW:P :1:]a
Sample Receipt Checklist (SR `)
Client: - —Aj2 wi Cnnler Inspected hVidate: LKA 1 17..171 ]-or*: 7'L- Z Dt3
Mcans infrercipt %HNI ❑ C'liont 0 irYti Fcdlix Other.
Yesl
0 No
1, Wae custody seals went On the cooler?
Yesl
D Nol
0 NA
2. If custody seals were Present. were they intact and unb
ken?
H Strip ID: j&jZ7 S Cldorine Strip ID:
riginal teipperatura upon receipt! Derived (Carrected) ternperauna upon receipl:
Lhu:'LohodTcmpc'rut Blank ❑APdris't Buldcs IR Cwn ID:Iit Vu
d of coolmrt: Wet Ice L Ice Packs Lj M fee Ll Nolte
Tested by:-
id Snap -Cup ID:
Cartuclian F'ecwr. "C
(] Yes
❑ No
` 1+A
3" If remptxature of any cooler eatoeeded ti"0°C, was Praj
pM was Notified by: phone! email ! face-to-face (circl
t Manager Notified?
one)"
U Yes
El No
1 ° I+A
a. is the omnrnercial caurler's zki", Slip atrached to 1hi
farm?
Ycs
❑ No
5. Vl•c= propercmikaly pnxxxiurt:s frelinyuishcd-rcxriv
) followed'?
YC5
U No
G. Were sample IDs Iisted on the WC?
Yesi
❑ Nu
7, Wert sample IUe listed rnt all sample containers?
? Yes
❑ Na
5. Was collection date & time listed on the COC7
Yrzj
❑ No
9. WuN wllut:lit►n date & time listrrl on all .ample otmtlti
crs?
Yes
D No
10. Did all containcr label information (ID, da-.c, time) aV
ae with the CiiC?
Y"cz
❑ No
I I- Were tests oo be performed listed on the COG?
� �
❑ Vn
12. Did all urnples arrive in the proper con ainers foreach
(unbrokcn, lids on. ctc•Xl —
test and..+rtr in good condition
Yes
L" i No
13. Was adequate sample volume available?
Yoe$
❑ No
14. Were all samples received within ti the hniding time
r atl hours, whichever comes tirsCl
'' Yra
yo
15. Were any samples containers missktWvAt s, (cir0c tv
c) sumplcs Not listed on C.` 0
'
�_ Yes
❑ No
/V
16. For VOA and RSK-175 sarnp4a, were bubbles prese
any of the VOA vials?
>'pea -size' (:'+v'orGmm in diameter) in
Ye..1
Nn
L J NA
17. Wm, all DROfinetaWnutrient samples received at a pl
I nf <2?
Yes
=0
JZNA
18. Wcrc all cynni:dc samp3os received at a pH = 12 and st
Ifid; srunples rcec4ed ul u pH:- 9?
}��-�
u va
�" 1�fA
19' Were a applicable N11j� KK.cyam r�phennlafi25 (<
chlorine'?
,5mg L) samples free o rest >a
❑ Yes
❑ No
ry(NA
f0]
20. Wete cllew reinwkVmquests (l.c, nxlueswd dilutions,
correctly truttscribed frarn life COC intu Ilre wmmtatt sx
VNISD designations, etc...
on in LIh4S.'
Yes
7-1 No
21. Wlms the Suotc number ligtczl on the container• label? If
yes, t7u0re
ample PrLnwrva Lion (h,7u,Y W vumplutod fur tiny samplc(s) incorrectly preserved
3r with headspace-)
Sample(s) were received Ineormectly p
in sample receiving with all- of Circle C4iv: H2504, HNO3, HCI, NaOH tisirq
ir,ne of preservation 11"root= dtall unr prrscrvt lit a is r►trtlrtl, plt ate tt
crvad and tvere aldjumed acwttlingly
SR ,4 _ .
c in tine comments below"
ttmplu(s) _ _ were receive
I with bubbles '�G mm in diameter.
amples(s) _ _ wcrc mccivcd with TRC %
djuslcd ucuordingly in stunplc rccritring with sodium dtiosulfate (Na_S�0.1) tuith Sh
4.5 mg�l" (ir419 i! "e) ar,d were
ly in:
5R batalade labels applied by. d_ I I,+
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Page 28 of 28

1
Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date Submitted: August 6, 2018
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030281
FACILITY NAME Tipper Tie, Inc.
COUNTY Wake
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES
LABORATORY
Lab Cert. #
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2018
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' July i _ (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flaw ❑Water Supply ®SA
❑Other
RECEIVED, PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
AUG 0 9 2018
CENTRAL F,1 FILLS \w ® No discharge this period?z
11
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Total
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics'
Benchmarks
100 mg/L or 50 mg/LQ
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg1L
1 mg/L
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
° See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

It,
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
&12e1-71 T 7Joca oi S
N2mee (Print name)
Title {Print title) 01
S- 6-18
(Signature) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not_repor_t Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported_ in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?'
.Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
_
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier Z or Tier 3 responses. See Genera! Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS, SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ® NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ® NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this QMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
of Permittee)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
8-6-/S
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

-- \ q
V,
Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
For North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 01/31/18__
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251
FACILITY NAME Watts - Spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark Kennard
LABORATORY
Lab Cert. # _
Comments on sample collection or analysis: No flow
observed at the outfall
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
5 M K COLLECTION YEAR 2017
REC��5 MPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ®July -Dec
FEB NIB or ❑Monthly-' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
CENTRAL FILES ❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
DWR SECTION ®Other c
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
® No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Total
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks ===>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L°
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
2-no discharge
12/05/18 _
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format "<XX m L" where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
lnches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks ===>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART AAND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
+ 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 dot's of receipt of the lob results (or of end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are sigpif penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of
IL)1�
(D te)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual „Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
For North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251
FACILITY NAME Mueller Steam Specialty
COUNTY Robeson
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES
Date submitted 07/27117
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2017
SAMPLE PERIOD ® Jan -June ❑July -Dec
or ❑Monthly'.__ (month)
/ DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
LABORATORY TBL Lab Cert. # REUV Y Vi ❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
Comments on sample collection or analysis: No flow observed at ®Other Class C, SW
outfalls #1 or #2 ��� � g 20i7
CENTRAL FILES PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
OWR SECTION
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
® No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics5
Benchmarks =__>
-
_
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L°
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfali.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3 The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
" See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433,11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

"Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the Stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PqL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period:
Outfall No.
Date Sample
1
Collected
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier .1, Tier 1, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS, SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge"' reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results or at end of monitoring eriod
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality _
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
am aware that there are s' nificant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
']1,-)1,
(Signature of PerrNitte)e) (Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-anniez9 Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
For North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG0302.51
FACILITY NAME Watts - Spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark Kennard
LABORATORY
Lab Cert. # _
Date submitted 07127117
Comments on sample collection or analysis: No flow
observed at the outfall
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2017
SAMPLE PERIOD ® Jan -June ❑July -Dec
or ❑Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW [—]Trout ❑PNA
RECen V Er) ❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
15�Other c
AUG 08 2017
t
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
® No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Tota1
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L'
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
2-no discharge
06/05/17
0.55
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
a See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

4
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the Stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
Stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?Z
Outfall No.
Hate Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
1S mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

r
* See Gener5l Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 1, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
am aware that there are ificant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
>9 04L � � --�,n I I I
(Signature of r 'ttee) (Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
For North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 01/27/17
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251
FACILITY NAME Watts _Spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark Kennard
LABORATORY Lab Cert. # T
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2016
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ® July -Dec
RECEIVED or ❑Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
����j ❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
CENTRAL FILES ®Other c
_DWR OSECTION
F#L E PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
U0r__--%V
P Z
No discharge this per,ad?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected`
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics'
Benchmarks
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L°
6.0 — 9.0
0,007 mg/L
' 0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1
12/29/16
0.29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
12/29/16
0.29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3
12/29/16
0.29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
12/29/16
0.29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5
12/29/16
0.29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
12/29/16
0.29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7
12/29/16
0.29
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition ar, found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469,31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected"
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches;
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks ===>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or SO mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART Ii SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART It SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original -and one copy of this DMR, including_ all "No Discharge" reports,_ within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of monitoring_period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or .
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
am aware that there are Og<fcant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
[Signature of
(Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

IIIWAEM
A Watts Water Technologies Company
February 16, 2016
815 Chestnut Street • North Andover, MA • 01845-6098 • Tel. [phone] •Fax: [phone]
BY CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Central Records
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
F?ECEI VED
FEB 2 3 2016
CSIq7'R,4L FILES
DWR SECTION
Re: Dischart!e Monitoring Report and Notice of Comoliance Status
Watts Regulator, 100 Watts Roa orth Carolina
Certificate of Coverage Numbei NC603025
To Whom It May Concern:
In accordance with certificate of coverage referenced above and requirements of general
permit number NCG030000 ("General Permit"), please find enclosed discharge monitoring
report ("DMR") for monitoring year 4, period 1, monthly monitoring (January 2016) regarding
Watts Regulator ("Watts") facility at 100 Watts Road in Spindale, North Carolina ("Facility").
Consistent with the February 3, 2010 Approval of Representative Outfall Status, Watts obtained
quantitative data for samples from outfalls 001, 002, 004 and 006.` Based on the enclosed
results reflected in the January 2016 DMR, these outfalls remain in Tier III status. In addition to
the required outfall sampling, Watts obtained samples for PH from outfalls 003, 005 and 007.
Those data are also reflected on the enclosed DMR.z
Upon receiving July 2015 sampling results, Watts engaged environmental consulting firm
of Hart & Hickman ("H&H") to develop additional best management practices ("BMP") for the
Facility. Given that all four of the monitored outfalls are in Tier III status, monthly monitoring
data continues to be used to evaluate the effectiveness of these additional BMPs and the need for
further improvements. Additional activities continued during the sampling period, and though
the outfalls remain in Tier III status, analytical sampling shows overall continued improvement.
As mentioned in previous correspondence, a meeting was requested with representatives
of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR) to discuss results of a storm
water compliance audit performed and Watts' efforts to implement additional BMPs at the
Facility.
On January 27, 2016, we were pleased to host Darlene Kucken from DEMLR Asheville
Regional Office who reviewed the site stormwater program and toured the Facility. As part of
the discussion, we reviewed data contained in documentation from H&H that was attached to
recently submitted DMR reports, which included results of background sampling during the
months of October and November 2015. In short, the data indicate that copper and zinc present
in the Facility's storm water discharge likely originates from "non -industrial" sources — either
the Facility's roof (which is not exposed to industrial operations) and the roadway adjacent to the
Watts Regulator Company Since 1874 watts.com

,.,
Facility's storm water outfalls. The results also suggest that the Facility's additional BMPs will
resolve previous exceedences of the lead benchmark.
A follow-up letter dated February 3, 2016, was received from Darlene Kucken indicating
the Facility is being relieved of Tier III monitoring requirements and is no longer required to
perform monthly sampling of storm water outfalls. Accordingly, Watts will resume semi-annual
sampling of storm water outfalls and submit the next DMR following conclusion of the January
to June 2016 monitoring period.
Letter from Ms. Kucken also requested Watts continue investigative sampling of roof drains,
road runoff, and actual precipitation for three to four additional storm water sampling periods.
Watts plans to obtain these samples on a monthly basis and submit them directly to Ms. Kucken.
Finally, letter from Ms. Kucken asked that Watts provide documentation of how often the roof at
the Facility will be whitened and research the potential for roof whiteners to contribute zinc to
the Facility's storm water. Watts will work with H&H to evaluate existing literature on this
issue. If research determines that roof whitening agents may be contributing zinc to storm water
discharged from the Facility, Watts will investigate whether there are practicable steps that can
be implemented to reduce that contribution and propose appropriate revisions to our storm water
pollution prevention plan. Watts will provide Ms. Kucken with the results of this effort when the
next DMR is submitted. In addition, at that time, Watts will plan to discuss possibility of making
outfall 002 as the Facility's sole representative outfall for monitoring.
Please contact me at [phone] at your convenience if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Chu
Director, Environment, Health and Safety
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Enclosures
cc: Central Records, Division of Water Quality

aceAnalytical
www.paoolabs wn
January 20, 2016
Mark Kennard
Watts Water Technologies
815 Pickens Street
Chesnee, SC 29323
RE: Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
Dear. Mark Kennard:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on January 12, 2016.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Nicole Gasiorowski
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
PCpi
lge0
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 1 of 14

Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalytica! Huntersville, NC 28078
www.pacelahs.00m
[phone]
e
CERTIFICATIONS
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
Charlotte Certification IDs
9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078 FloridalNELAP Certification #: E87627
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706 Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342 West Virginia Certification #: 357
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12 Virginia[VELAP Certification #: 460221
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648
Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
West Virginia Certification #: 356
VirginiafVELAP Certification #: 460222
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 2 of 14

aceAnalytical
www.pacelaba.wm
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
Sample: OU- 001 Lab ID: 92282687001 Collected: 01/08/16 09:55 Received: 01/12/16 14:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Oil and Grease
ND mg/L
5.0
1
01/20/16 07:14
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
53.6 ug/L
5.0
1 0111311617:30
01114/1616:29 7440-50-8
Lead
ND uglL
5.0
1 0111311617:30
01114/1616:29 7439-92-1
Zinc
36.0 ug/L
10,0
1 01/1311617:30
0111411616:29 7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
ND mg/L
5.2
1
01/13/16 09:35
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not t>e reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 3 of 14

aceAnalytical®
www.pacelatrsam
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
Sample: OU- 002 Lab ID: 92282687002 Collected: 01/08/16 10:10 Received: 01/12/16 14:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Oil and Grease
NO mg/L
5.0 1
01/20/16 07:14
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation
Method: EPA
200.7
Copper
24.8 ugIL
5.0 1
01/1311617:30 0111411616:32 7440-50-8
Lead
7.2 uglL
5.0 1
0111311617:30 01/1411616:32 7439-92-1
Zinc
22.0 ug/L
10.0 1
01/1311617:30 01/14/1616:32 7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
NO mg/L
3.1 1
01/13/16 09:36
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not t)e reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 4 of 14

aceAnalytical
waw.p3cgleb&0w
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
Sample: CU- 004 Lab ID: 92282687003 Collected: 01/08/16 10:15 Received: 01/12/16 14:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Oil and Grease
ND mg1L
5.0
1
01/20/16 07:15
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
65.5 ug/L
5.0
1
01/13/1617:00 01/14/1619:04 7440-50-8
Lead
5.8 ug/L
5.0
1
01/13/1617:00 01/1411619:04 7439-92-1
Zinc
109 ug/L
10.0
1
01/1311617:00 01/14/1619:04 7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
7.2 mg/L
3.3
1
01/13/16 09:37
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 14

aceAnalytrcal
WWW..pac"&Com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
Sample: OU- 006 Lab ID: 92282687004 Collected: 01/08/16 10:22 Received: 01/12/16 14:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Oil and Grease
ND mg/L
5.0
1
01/20/16 07:15
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
47.2 ug/L
5.0
1 0111311617:00
01/1411619:13 7440-50-8
Lead
ND ug/L
5.0
1 01/1311517:00
01/1411619A3 7439-92-1
Zinc
113 ug/L
10.0
1 01/1311617:00
0111411619:13 7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
ND mg/L
2.5
1
01/13/16 09:37
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not he reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 6 of 14

aceAnalytrcal
www.pacebbs.twm
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville. NC 28078
(704)8759092
Project: Stormwater- January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
QC Batch: GCSV123846
Analysis Method:
EPA 1664E
QC Balch Method: EPA 1664B
Analysis Description:
1664 HEM, Oil and Grease
Associated Lab Samples: 92282687001,
92282687002, 92282687003, 92282687004
METHOD BLANK: 1650466
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92282687001,
92282687002, 92282687003, 92282687004
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
Oil and Grease
mglL
ND 5.0 01/20/16 07:11
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1650467
Spike LCS
LCS % Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result
% Rec Limits Qualifiers
Oil and Grease
mg1L
40 37.7
94 78-114
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
1650468
92282919001 Spike
MS MS % Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Oil and Grease
mglL
ND 40
38.3 96 78-114
Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the "Units' column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 7 of 14

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabs com
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
QC Batch: MPRP/20464
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7
Associated Lab Samples: 92282687001. 92282687002
METHOD BLANK: 1646195
Associated Lab Samples: 92282687001, 92282687002
Parameter Units
Copper uglL
Lead ug/L
Zinc uglL
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Analysis Method: EPA200.7
Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Matrix: Water
Blank Reporting
Result Limit Analyzed
ND 5.0 01/14/1614:53
ND 5.0 01/1411614:53
ND 10.0 01/14/1614:53
Qualifiers
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1646196
Spike
LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter
Units
Cone.
Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Copper
ug/L
500
495 99 85-115
Lead
uglL
500
472 94 85-115
Zinc
uglL
500
456 91 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
1646197
1646198
MS
MSD
92282581001
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter Units
Result
Cone.
Cone.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper ug1L
21.8
500
500
533
538
102
103
70-130
1
Lead uglL
ND
500
500
423
418
84
83
70-130
1
Zinc ug/t_
3.9J
500
500
418
412
83
82
70-130
1
MATRIX SPIKE 8 MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
1646199
1646200
MS
MSD
92282660003
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter Units
Result
Cone.
Cone.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper uglL
357
500
500
860
880
100
104
70-130
2
Lead ug/L
17.5
500
500
457
460
88
89
70-130
1
Zinc uglL
718
500
500
1150
1160
86
88
70-130
1
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the -Units- column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 8of14

aceAnalytical
%,%w.pacelab&=n
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
QC Batch: MPRP/20465 Analysis Method: EPA200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 92282687003, 92282687004
METHOD BLANK: 1646201
Associated Lab Samples: 92282687003, 92282687004
Parameter Units
Copper ug/L
Lead ug/L
Zinc ug/L
Matrix: Water
Blank Reporting
Result Limit Analyzed
ND 5.0 01/1411618:58
ND 5.0 01/1411618:58
ND 10.0 01/14/1618:58
Qualifiers
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1646202
Spike
LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Copper
ug/L
500
498 100 85-115
Lead
ug/L
500
468 94 85-115
Zinc
ug/L
500
452 90 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE 8 MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
1646203
1646204
MS
MSD
92282687003
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper ug/L
65.5
500
500
561
576
99
102
70-130
3
Lead ug/L
5.8
500
500
467
475
92
94
70-130
2
Zinc ug/L
109
500
500
549
558
88
90
70-130
2
MATRIX SPIKE 8 MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
1646205
1646206
MS
MSD
92282745010
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper ug/L
29.1
500
500
543
542
103
102
70-130
0
Lead ug/L
ND
500
500
405
409
81
82
70-130
1
Zinc ug/L
25.1
500
500
442
451
83
85
70-130
2
Results presented on this page are In the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an attemate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Page 9 of 14

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.corn
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
QC Batch: WET142441 Analysis Method: SM 2540D
QC Batch Method: SM 2540D Analysis Description: 2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 92282687001, 92282687002, 92282687003, 92282687004
METHOD BLANK: 1645853 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92282687001, 92282687002, 92282687003, 92282687004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND 2.5 01/13/16 09:34
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1645854
Spike
LCS LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result % Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids
mg1L
250
228 91
90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1645855
92282687001
Dup
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD
Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids
mg/L
ND
ND
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1645856
92282592001
Dup
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD
Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids
mg/L
ND
ND
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 10 of 14

aceAnalj6cal
wwwpacelaftmn
QUALIFIERS
Project: Stormwater - January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Hunlersville, NC 28078
[phone]
S - Surrogate
i,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) ,
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA
Method 8260,
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analyzes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 01 /20/2016 04:39 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 11 of 14

aceAnalytical
"W pacelabs com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: Stormwater- January
Pace Project No.: 92282687
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Analytical
Lab ID
Sample ID
QC Batch Method
QC Batch
Analytical Method
Batch
92282687001
OU- 001
EPA 1664B
GCSVl23846
92282687002
OU- 002
EPA 1664B
GCSV123846
92282687003
011,11- 004
EPA 1664B
GCSV123846
92282687004
OU- 006
EPA 1664B
GCSV123846
92282687001
011.11- 001
EPA 200.7
MPRPI20464
EPA 200.7
ICP118464
92282687002
0U- 002
EPA 200.7
MPRP120464
EPA 200.7
ICP118464
92282687003
011,11- 004
EPA 200.7
MPRP120465
EPA 200.7
ICP118465
92282687004
OU- 006
EPA 200.7
MPRP120465
EPA 200.7
1CP118465
92282687001
OU-001
SM 2540D
WET142441
92282687002
OU-002
SM 2540D
WET142441
92282687003
0U- 004
SM 2540D
WET142441
92282687004
OU- 006
SM 2540❑
WET142441
Date: 01/20/2016 04:39 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report Shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page12of14

/1 Document Name:
Analytical' Sample Condition Upon Recel
Document No.: .
F-CHR-CS-003-rev.17
Document Revised: 260Cf2
Page 1- of 2 `.
Issuing Authority:
Pace Huntersvilie Quality Of
A
Client Name: Project M. i
WO :92282687
Liu �-C'r': Te � ►. ,� j� . � �
Courier: ❑Fed Ex S ❑LISPS ❑Client � 1111111111111111111M❑Commercial ❑Pace ❑Other: 192282687
Custody Seat on Cooler/Box Present? ❑Yes PNo Seals Intact?
❑Yes ❑No I
Packing Material: ❑Bu le Wrap LJ ubble Bags ❑None ❑Other:_
Thermometer 1505
Used: Type of Ice: r Wet ❑Blue []None ❑ amples nn Ice, coolirig'process has begun
Cooler Temp Corrected ('C): Blologlcal Tissue Fi:ozen?' _ [:]Yes No ❑N/a rll
Temp should be above freezing to 6°C Correction Factor: 0.01C Date and Initials of Person Exam lning.Conterits: 17
USDA Regulated Soil { [] N/A, water sample)
Did samples on to in a quarantine zone within the United States: CA, NY, ar SC (check maps)? Did samples originate from a foreign source (internationally,
❑Yes LJ No Including Hawaii and Puerto Rich)? ❑Yes ❑No -
If Yes to either questlon, fill out a Regulated Sall Checklist and include with SCUR/COC paperworlt._•'
COMMENTS: .
Chain of Custody Present?
By" No
N/A
I.
Chain of Custody Filled Out?
Q es [IN,
❑N A
2.
Chain of Custody Relinquished?
es ONO
N/A
3,
Sampler Name and/or Signature on COC?
es QN,
QN/A
4,
Sam pies Arrived within Hold Time?-
- - es- • ONO- '❑N/A-
5: -
Short Hold Time Analysis (<72 hr)?
Yes ©o
N/A
6.
Rush Turn Around Time Requested?
Yes No
❑N/A
7.
Sufficient Volume?
es - NO
❑N/A
8.
Correct Containers Used?
Yes ❑No
❑N/A
9.
-Pace Containers Used?
es No'
❑N/q
Containers intact?
' Yes OC4,
❑N/A
10.
Filtered Volume Received for Dissolved Tests?
QYes No
❑ A
11. Note if sediment is visible In the dissolved container­
Sample Labels Match COC?
13es ❑No
[I NIA
,M .7 ...
12.
-Includes Date me ID/Anal sls Matrix:
All containers needing acid/base preservation have been
//
13,
checked?
©Yes ❑No
❑N/A
All containers needing preservation are found to be in
compliance with EPA recommendation?
(HNOs, HrSOa, HCI<2; NaOH >9 Sulfide, NaOH>12 Cyanide)
Yes ❑No
❑N/A
Exceptions: VOA, Collform, TOC, Oil and Grease,
DRO/8015 (water) DOC,LLHg
pYes I]No
❑N/A
Samples checked for dechlorizatlon
QYes ONO
❑ /A
14.
Headspace In VOA Vials (>5.6mm)7
Yes ONO
NI
1S. "
Trip Blank Present?
[]Yes ONO
N/ ,
16.
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present?
[]Yes[]No/A
Pace Trip Blank lot# ifpurchased):
CLIENT NOTIFICATION/RESOLUTION -;Field Datoegytred?'- ❑Yes • ❑No
i Person Contacted: Date/Time:
Comments/Resolution: `,;;r,.
Project Manager SCURF Review: Dale: 2L
P (�
Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affbeting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DE HNR Certification Office (i.e. Out of
hold, Incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers). Page 13 of 14

i�
,` PaceMalylics!'
Section A Section B
RCRLIled Gtient lnfnrma6— n.11 ;1 Prni I nfn..nal;­
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY 1 Analytical Request Document
The Chain -of -Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All retevant.fields must be completed accurately. °
v
Section C N
lm
Invoice Information: Pa e : 1 >)f 1 M
Company: Watts Water Technolonies
Report To: Mark Kennard
Attention: MAi'L V_e.tie?jA;!D
Address: 100Waits Rd
Copy To:
Companyblarw tjATrL Ijry—,e. ,• -, C3-
Spindale, NC 28160
Address:
R uato lA en
Emma; l q r ¢ , r. to ,,_; 't+•[
Purchase Order #:
Pace duple:
C '
Phone: • ^ • -' j -Lft - r' jFax
Project Name: Stormwatar - N•� Q-iL
Pace Project Manager: nicote.gasiorowSki labs,com,
- - State I Location
Requested Duo Date: 5 r
Project 0:
Pace Profile #; 7136
tp -AIC
..Re
uesled'Anat
sis
Filtered
YIN
G
t
1
z
MATRIX COOT_
COLLECTED
z
Preservatives
}.
`
Orin- wa . ow
a
u
O
w.ta WT
3
r
u
w..t. water vw
P p° P
SAMPLE ID
u
Od DL
One Character per box. v+w� wP
tiAct
w
,o
li
START
END
n
=
m
a
jA•Z,0.9I,-j
F
w.
,w.
Sample Ids must be unique T.�,,,° TB
%
W
TDATETIME
W,
ro
O
jp
�-•
iYLLI
`w
a
a,
Z
9
w
C
m
e
a
S
DATE
TIME
d
N
=
z
V.
z
z
z
p
r
P
¢
rt,5�
z
OV -oo
i11�5
i
•,
K
X
��+ J
4
C)IJ 00
v!
I
=5
i
_6-
I
.�+7
- 9
I
'10
I
,'1
I
`•ADDITIONAL` COGMFftffr r
I'- 'RELINOOISHFDBYIAFFILIATION,'
DATE 4-
r •TIME'
l� 7ACCEPTED BYfAFFi[lAT76N`
'„DATE-
i TIME.r
SAMPLE CONDmONS,
-
}.
31
t>tw
$AMPLER NAME AND SI6NA7U_RE .. • ,
E
r
m
P T amp of SAMPLER'
r NA-' A r�1i
z
o Z
m z
m z
S A7 RE o AMPLER:
DATE Signed:
7 o �-
q
u) c

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
For North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 02/16/16
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2016
FACILITY NAME Watts - Spindale SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
COUNTY Rutherford or ® Monthly' January (month)
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark Kennard DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert. # 12 5342 37706 ❑Zero -flow [:]WaterSupply []SA
Comments on sample collection or analysis: ®Other c
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 -->
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
inches
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organicss
Benchmarks =__>
- I
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 - 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0,067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1
01/08/16
0.14
<5.2
6.6
0.0536
<0.005
0.0360
<5.0
NA
2
01/08/16
0.14
<3.1
6.8
0.0248
0.0072
0.0220
<5.0
NA
3
01/08/16
0.14
N/A
6.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NA
4
01/08/16
0.14
7.2
6.6
0.0655
0.0058
0.109
<5.0
NA
5
01/08/16
0.14
N/A
6.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
01/08/16
0.14
<2.5 1
6.6
0.0472 1
<0.005
0.1130
<5.0
NA
7
01/08/16
0.14
N/A 1
6.1
N/A I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of,the rain gauge requirement.
a See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 5WU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), i certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX_m L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No dischorge this period?Z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
1
Collected
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table S, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ®NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ®NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Stanley Aiken — Regional Engineer at the Ashville Regional Office
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 da s of recei t of the lab results or at end of monitoring eriod
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there err<gnificant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature
-�J) S11
(Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report P
For North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 12/29/15
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251
FACILITY NAME Watts - Spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark Kennard
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert. # 12, 5342, 37706
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' November _ _ (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
®Other c
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Total
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organicss
Benchmarks
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/0
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1
11/18/15
0.17
.0225
7.2
0.068
.0092
.0443
<5.0
NA
2
11/18/15
0.17
.0163
7.3
.0403
<0.005
0.0645
<5.0
NA
3
11/18/15
0.17
N/A
6.7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NA
4
11/18/15
0.17
.0308
6.5
0.142
<0.0207
0.220
<5.0
NA
5
11/18/15
0.17
N/A
6.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
11/18/15
0.17
<100mg/L
6.4
0.0674
<0.005
0.196
<5.0
NA
7
11/18/15
0.17
N/A
6.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
G See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469,12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be Waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is im plementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX me/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
(vote: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part 8
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART li SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART li SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER ATANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ® NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ® NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Stanley Aiken — Regional Engineer at the Ashville Regional Office
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
12 / 29 /15
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG
FACILITY NAME Watts - Spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark
LABORATORY Pace Analytical
Comments on sample collection or an
Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report "c.
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG03000000
Date submitted 11/23/15
030251
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015 nu-py
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' October
Kennard DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
Lab Cert. # 12, 5342, 37706 ®Zero -flow ❑Water Supply [:]SA
alysis: ❑Other
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
®No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches;
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics5
Benchmarks ===>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L°
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
Z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
"See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mp,/L where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See Genera! Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches;
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 -- 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table S, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART 11 SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ®NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ®NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Stanley Aiken — Regional Engineer at the Ashville Regional Office
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results (or at end of monitoring period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
am aware that ther are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
1►)70l1,
(Signature 4fte nittee) (Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
For North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 11/04/15
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. N00030251
FACILITY NAME Watts - Spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark Kennard
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert. # 12, 5342, 37706
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
7,
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' September month
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
[]Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
®Other c
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 �l
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Total
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organics5
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1
09/24/15
3.43
5.0
6.4
0.0974
.0067
.0546
<5.0
NA
2
09/24/15
3.43
3.9
5.6
.0184
0.005
0.045
<5.0
NA
3
09/24/15
3.43
N/A
6.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NA
4
09/24/15
3.43
<100mg/L
6.0
0.157
<0.005
0.11
<5.0
NA
5
09/24/15
3.43
N/A
6.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
09/24/15
3.43
<100mg/L
6.8
0.0726
<0.005
0.11
<5.0
I NA
7
09/24/15
3.43
N/A
6.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
s Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469,31).
*See notes in Attachment regarding regional and site pH readings relative to benchmark and monitoring results.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(70), 1 certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,"
Mr. John Palotta
Name (Print name)
Vice President of Operations
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier1, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3 '

* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART AAND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ® NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ® NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Stanley Aiken — Regional Engineer at the Ashville Regional Office
Mail an oriainal and one copy of this DMR, includina all "No Discharae" reports. within 30 days of receipt of the lab results for at end of monitorina period
in the case of "No Discharge" reports] to:
Division of Water Quality "
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017
4 Nov 2015
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

aceAnalytical
www.pacefabs.wm
October 05, 2015
Mark Kennard
Watts Water Technologies
815 Pickens Street
Chesnee, SC 29323
RE: Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
Dear Mark Kennard:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on September 29, 2015.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Nicole Gasiorowski
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 1 of 13

laneMalj6cal"
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
www.pacalabs.Wm
(�
(704 )875-9092
CERTIFICATIONS
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
Charlotte Certification IDs
9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706
Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342
West Virginia Certification #. 357
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12
VirginiafVELAP Certification #: 460221
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030
West Virginia Certification #: 356
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712
VirginiaNELAP Certification #: 460222
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 2 of 13

aceAnalytical
wwN:pecedabs.00m
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: OU-001
Lab ID: 92269627001 Collected: 09/24/15 09:55
Received: 09/29/15 12:15 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DP
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
1664 SGT-HEM, TPH
Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ND mg1L
5.0
1
10/02/15 08:54
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA200.7 Preparation Method: EPA200.7
Copper
97.4 ug1L
5.0
1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:03
7440-50-8
Lead
6.7 ug1L
5.0
1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:03
7439-92-1
Zinc
54.6 ug/L
10.0
1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:03
7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
5.0 mg/L
2.5
1
09/30/15 03:53
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 1010512015 04:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 3 of 13

aceAnalytical o
www.paca►abs.cam
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
Sample: OU-002 Lab ID: 92269627002 Collected: 09/24/15 10:05 Received: 09/29/15 12:15 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
1664 SGT-HEM, TPH
Analytical Method: EPA 1664E
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ND mg1L
5.0 1
10/02/15 08:55
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
18.4 uglL
5.0 1 09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:07 7440-50-8
Lead
ND uglL
5.0 1 091301151&30
1010511501:07 7439-92-1
Zinc
45.0 ug/L
10.0 1 09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:07 7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
3.9 mg1L
3.6 1
09/30/15 03:53
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 10/05/2015 04:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 4 of 13

0
aceAnalytical
WWW4 acaJabs.WM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: 011.1-004
Lab tD: 92269627003 Collected: 09/24/15 10:15
Received: 09/29/15 12:15 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No, Oual
1664 SGT-HEM, TPH
Analytical Method: EPA 1664E
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ND mg1L
5.0 1
10/02/15 08:55
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
157 uglL
5.0 1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:10
7440-50-8
Lead
ND uglL
5.0 1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:10
7439.92-1
Zinc
110 uglL
10.0 1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:10
7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
ND mg/L
2.5 1
09/30/15 03:53
Date: 10/05/2015 04:33 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 13

aceAnalytical
www.pacefabs.cw
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: OU-006
Parameters
Lab ID: 92269627004 Collected: 09/24/15 10:25
Results Units Report Limit DF
Received: 09/29/15 12:15 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
1664 SGT HEM, TPH
Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ND mg1L
5.0 1
10/02/15 08:56
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
72.6 ug1L
5.0 1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:13
7440-50-8
Lead
ND ug/L
5.0 1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01A3
7439-92-1
Zinc
110 ug/L
10.0 1
09/30/15 18:30
10/05/15 01:13
7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
ND mg/L
2.9 ' 1
09/30/15 03:53
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 10/05/2015 04:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 6 of 13

(�55'cmnalyticalo
www.pac*kb&cam
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
QC Batch: GCSV122776 Analysis Method: EPA 1664B
QC Batch Method: EPA 1664B Analysis Description: 1664 SGT-HEM, TPH
Associated Lab Samples: 92269627001, 92269627002, 92269627003, 92269627004
METHOD BLANK: 157289E Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92269627001, 92269627002, 92269627003, 92269627004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons mg/L ND 5.0 10/02/15 08:24
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1572899
Spike LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits
Qualifiers
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/L
20 19.8
99
64-132
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
1572900
92268758006 Spike
MS
MS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
mg/L
ND 20
16.5
82
64-132
Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 10/05/2015 04:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 7 of 13

(�55'cie Analyfical
*"..pacelabs.rx n
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
QC Batch: MPRP119677
Analysis Method: EPA 200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7
Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 92269627001, 92269627002,
92269627003, 92269627004
METHOD BLANK: 1571115
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92269627001, 92269627002,
92269627003, 92269627004
Blank
Reporting
Parameter Units
Result
Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
Copper uglL
ND 5.0
10/05/15 00:29
Lead uglL
ND 5.0
10/05/15 00:29
Zinc ug/L
ND 10.0
10/05/15 00:29
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1571116
Spike
LCS
LCS % Rec
Parameter Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec limits Qualifiers
Copper uglL
250
238
95 85-115
Lead uglL
250
232
93 85-115
'
Zinc uglL
250
226
90 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1571117
1571118
MS
MSD
92269719002
Spike
Spike MS
MSD MS MSD
% Rec
Parameter Units Result
Conc.
Conc. Result
Result % Rec % Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper ug1L 50.2
250
250 313
302 105 101
70-130
4
Lead ug1L 9.0
250
250 252
242 97 93
70-130
4
Zinc ug1L 75.6
250
250 311
298 94 89
70-130
4
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 1571119
1571120
MS
MSD
92269439003
Spike
Spike MS
MSD MS MSD
% Rec
Parameter Units Result
Conc.
Conc. Result
Result % Rec % Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper ug1L ND
250
250 254
245 100 97
70-130
4
Lead ug1L ND
250
250 243
237 97 95
70-130
3
,Zinc ug1L 0.012
250
250 249
243 95 93
70-130
2
mglL
Results presented on this page are In the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 10/05/2015 04:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 8 of 13

e
5ac ie A na ly tical
wwwpacetabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
QC Batch: WET140482 Analysis Method: SM 2540D
QC Batch Method: SM 2540D Analysis Description: 2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 92269627001, 92269627002, 92269627003, 92269627004
METHOD BLANK: 1570311 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92269627001, 92269627002, 92269627003, 92269627004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mglL ND 2.5 09/30/15 03:51
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1570312
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L 250 232 93 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1570313
92269560010 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND ND
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1570314
Parameter
Total Suspended Solids
92269740002 Dup
Units Result Result
mg/L ND ND
RPD Qualifiers
Results presented on this page are In the units indicated by the "units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in fuii,
Date: 101OW2015 04:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 9 of 13

aceAnalytical
wwwPocelabs.cam
QUALIFIERS
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92269627
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MID L-Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis ofAcrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA
Method 8260.
N-Nilrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 10/05/2015 04:33 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 10 of 13

acmnalytical o
wwwpacelabs com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project:
Pace Project No.:
WATTS SPINDALE SW
92269627
Analytical
tab ID
Sample ID
QC Batch Method
QC Batch
Analytical Method
Batch
92269627001
OU-001
EPA 1664B
GCSV/22776
92269627002
OU-002
EPA 1664B
GCSV/22776
92269627003
OU-004
EPA 1664B
GCSV/22776
92269627004
OU-006
EPA 1664B
GCSV/22776
92269627001
OU-001
EPA 200.7
MPRP119677
EPA 2007
ICP117720
92269627002
OU-002
EPA 200.7
MPRP/19677
EPA 200.7
ICP117720
92269627003
OU-004
EPA 200.7
MPRP/19677
EPA 200.7
ICP117720
92269627004
OU-006
EPA 200.7
MPRP/19677
EPA 2003
ICP117720
92269627001
OU-001
SM 2540D
WET140482
92269627002
OU-002
SM 2540D
WET/40482
92269627003
OU-004
SM 2540❑
WET/40482
92269627004
OU-006
SM 2540D
WET/40482
Date: 10/05/2015 04:33 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 11 of 13

?ce�j��� Sample Condition U on-Recei t SCUR Page 1 of 2'
,FYDoctiment Number: Issuing Authority:
F-CHR-CS-003-rev.16 Pace Huntersville Quality Office
Client Name: Cv 4•Page 2 of 2 Is for Internal Use Only
Courier: ❑ FedE)❑ UP USP❑ ClierD Co merciC] Pace Other 0~tional a%_ f
Custody Seal on Cooler/Box Present: ❑ [� yes /no Seals intact: ❑ yes -❑ no pajihlt�t 's`'c4
PX.
ro'. iVame:•`
Packing Material: ❑ Bubble Wrap r42
Bubble Bags❑ None❑ Other
Thermometer Used: IR Gun , Type of Ice: et' tue ' None amples on Ice, cooling process has begun
Temp Correction Factor TCorrection
U
Corrected Cooler Temp.: 'C
Temp should be above freezing to 6•C
Biological Tissue is Frozen: Yes No to
Comments:
Date and Initials of person examinln
contents:
Chain of Custodx Present;
Yes No
❑N!A
1:
Chain of Custody Fitted Out:
0 es. QN,
❑N!A
2.
Chain of C I ustody Relinquished:
es
❑N!A
3.
Sampler blame & Signature on COC:
as ❑
❑NIA
4.
Samples Arrived within Hold Time:
01ercjNay''"❑N!
5..
Short Hold Time Analysis <72hr :
❑Yes ❑
►A
6.
Rush Turn Around Time Requested:
C]Yes o
❑NIA.
7.
Sufficient Volume:
es No
❑NIA
8:
Correct Containers Used:
-Pace Containers Used:
E Yes ❑
s ❑
,
❑N/A
❑N/A
9.
,
Containers Intact:
es ❑No
❑N/A
10.
Filtered volume received for Dissolved tests
❑Yes JQKo
❑Nr
1.
Sample Labels match COC:
-Includes date/time/ID/Analysis Matrix:
Yes ❑yo
❑N!A
12.
All containers needing preservation have been checked.
All containers needing preservation are found to be in
compliance with EPA recommendation.
exceptions: VOA, coliform, TOC, O&G, W-DRO(wafer}
es ❑N
DOyes Mo.
es ❑N
erm s unu
❑N1A
❑N!A
13.
Samples checked for dechlorination:
❑Yes ❑No
❑ /A
14.
Heads pace In VOA Vials >6mm :
❑Yes ❑No
N/A
Trip Blank Present;
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present
Pace Trip Blank Lot # if purchased):
❑Yes ❑No
❑Yes ❑No
N!A
❑NIA
Client Notification/ Resolution: Field Data Required? Y / N
Person Contacted: Dateffime:
Comments/ Resolution:
SCURF Review: 'm Date: _-ZrWO# : 92269627
SRF Review: Date:
5
Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance 10119
samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR 92269627 ddB BBB IIII /III 111 ill/ 1
Certification Office ( i.e out of hold, Incorrect preservative, out of temp, r
Incorrect containers)

i
CHAIN -OF -'CUSTODY 1 Analytical Request Document
The CAain•of-Custody is a LEGAL DOCUMENT. All reiavant fialds nXim be completed accurately.
.vnnr.PatehLssom
Section A
/��f^^
page
Section B - Section C
Required Dienj
! /
lnformaion: Requred Project lnfonnaliom lnnivalniomwticn: fr'IJC,�Y�IL. . .iT1Cf�Up wur+.�, 4�{1fCi'. COM
rrctC r0panT0:MARK VENNAQt7 Allanlon.MARie- i�x1AJAR&
7_'
:anpamr: I,
4ddrass I
O
-
Copy To:
o:•�'4szo C Ll
Cemp
eJaF S a.%/rTZM Ir04 IJoLC, 61
REGULATORYAGENCY
.`J''►FJVa)i1
/
1/C 'LL%tpl% /'�
J•fCk+c: .C'• UNc.�c. a f.GaM
Amress R�
GO '•JSAr.1J �N4 ZQ'
('7.
NPDES r` GROUNDWATER r DRINKING WATER
r UST r- RCRA i— OTHER
lYI O►" .KorT11C
W' .c:
a
Plun2 Orcer No.:
Pea Ouete
ftf- :
p Fax: A
Pfejeel N me:
Pace Prgeu
Site Location
STATF:
_ • • .
Raga tad Dui
DatarTAT: -s f D
Prcjeahlumper.
Pea Prow+: .! '„
I
-
Requested'Anatysis
Filtered
(Y1N)-•:•
.
^-. _ '
Section D
Matrix Cede.
Nneulrw Clore
lnwrraeua MATRIX r CODE
-
s
COLLECTEO
Preservatives -
S:
'.
•,
..
Drinking Waar �7C[ 1(�%
Wafer
g
$
t:
Waste Water W W
• Product .' p
U
sTnm
Soi_
dOL
�/
8
rl
m
SAMPLE
ID w>»
?
m
Sample
(A-Z. oaI.-) ar - AR
MUST BE UNiOUE 7« O
pwp
D
I
. a.
Z
2
5
p
V
F
ey
I
jDs
4
Uj
DATE ,
"ME
DARE
TIME
x
=
x
z
z
M
O
VA
U
¢
Pau PrD{act Not Lab I.D.
�• O�' -�
C7b
;Arr,
•
x
'
kx
k'
x
-A1fi1
z O L: +
O
aS
7
X
X
?e
x
k
)C
.
G
q/2Y
o=
x
'A
U
s
�
t
6
7
a
�
a.
`. "ITIONAL COMMENTS - ,•I REL1NQUtSNEDBYl AFFILIATION-{. ;•;'I, DATES•`^;-I1*,TiMSE ..'I. ,.,r, ACCEPTE0,8Yf AFFILIATION-',.yt- :1 o11TE---j, TIME- I SAMPLECONDmONS
Tr
SAMPLER NAIAE AND SIGNATURE - .: - cy co
S
PRWT Nam" of SAMPLER: C N J,4 q 2 1 "3
DATE 512ned (] (,/
SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: T 2 ( %S G ye y (ttIWwM:
Lrmp N41e'. By z Wwg V 4 farm you acc&Wq Pant NET 30 eaf Pny~t lemu ono tgrverg to wa owrges a i s% Per —M for wry rnwaa ml Paid w m 30 CMA F-ALL4420rdv.07. 15-May-2007

\� WAr r T
WATER TECHNOLOGIES
November 4, 2015
BY CERTIFIED ARIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Central Records
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVED
NOV 10 2015
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION"
Re. Discharee Monitoring Report and Notice of Compliance Status for Watts Regulator Facility located at t 100
Watts Road; Spindale, North Carolina (Certificate of Coverage Number NCG030251)
To Whom It May Concern:
In accordance with the certificate of coverage referenced above and the requirements of general permit number
NCG030000 (the "General Permit"), please find enclosed Watts Regulator's ("Watts") discharge monitoring report ("DMR") for
monitoring year 3, period 2 monthly monitoring (September, 2015) regarding our facility located at 100 Watts Road in Spindale,
North Carolina (the "Facility"). Consistent with the February 3, 2010 Approval of Representative Outfall Status, Watts obtained
quantitative data for samples from outfalls 001, 002, 004 and 006. Based on the results reflected in the September 2015 DMR,
these outfalls are in Tier III status. In addition to the required outfall sampling, Watts obtained samples for PH from outfalls 003,
005 and 007. Those data are also reflected on the enclosed DMR.'
Upon receiving the results of the July 2015 sampling reflected in the enclosed DMR, Watts engaged the consulting firm
of Hart & Hickman ("H&H") to develop additional best management practices ("BMP") for the Facility. Given that all four of
the monitored outfalls are now in Tier III status, monthly monitoring data continues to be used to evaluate the effectiveness of
these additional BMPs and the need for further improvements. Additional landscaping improvements have continued during the
sampling period, and though the outfalls have moved into Tier Ill status, analytical results shown significant improvement.
As mentioned in my previous correspondence, I would like to schedule a meeting with representatives of the Division
of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources in order to discuss the results of a stormwater compliance audit performed by AECOM
and Watts' efforts to implement additional BMPs at the Facility.. Please contact me at your earliest convenience at (978) 689-
6070 to arrange a time.
Sincerely,
Howard H. Chu
Director, Environment, Health and Safety
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Enclosures
cc: Central Records, Division of Water Quality
` As documented in the June 2015 DMR, the pH of precipitation in and around Spindale is commonly below the
benchmark range in the General Permit. Watts will continue to collect "neat" precipitation samples, analyze those
samples for pH, and include the summarized results in each DMR, in accordance with footnote 1 of Table 3 in the
General Permit.

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000 04%
Date submitted 09/30/15
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG0302SI
FACILITY NAME Watts - Sp_indale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark Kennard
LABORATORY_ Pace Analytical Lab Cert. # 12, 5342, 37706
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
L1
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec cl
or ® Monthly' August (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA�
®Zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA�
❑Other
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 —)
®No discharge this period?Z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/Total
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Toxic
Organicss
Benchmarks
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L°
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
S
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
° See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433,11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date; 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 5WU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format "<XX m L" where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?2
putfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
lnches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks =__>
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one cops! of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lob results !or at end of monitoring period
in the case o "No Discharge" re orts to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
4 V,
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017
9— 3J iS
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

IV WATT T
WATER TECHNOLOGIES
September 30, 2015
BY CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Central Records
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVE®
OCT 0 5 2015
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION
Re: Discharge Monitoring Report and Notice of Compliance Status for Watts Regulator Facility located
at 100 Watts Road; Spindale, North Carolina (Certificate of Coverage Number NCG030251)
To Whom It May Concern:
In accordance with the certificate of coverage referenced above and the requirements of general permit
number NCG030000 (the "General Permit"), please find enclosed Watts Regulator's ("Watts") discharge monitoring
report ("DMR") for monitoring year 3, period 2 monthly monitoring (August, 2015) regarding our facility located at
100 Watts Road in Spindale, North Carolina (the "Facility"), Consistent with the February 3, 2010 Approval of
Representative Outfall Status, Watts attempted to sample for quantitative data from outfalls 001, 002, 004 and 006.
Due to the lack of available qualifying rain events in August, we were unable to do so during August of 2015.
Based on the results reflected in the July 2015 DMR, and no -flow in August 2015, these outfalls remain in Tier II
status, and monthly monitoring of all four will continue.
Watts continues to engage the consulting firm of Hart & Hickman ("H&H") in developing and evaluating
additional best management practices ("BMP") for the Facility. Given that all four of the monitored outfalls are
now in Tier II status, monthly monitoring data will be available to evaluate the effectiveness of these additional
BMPs and the need for further improvements.
As mentioned in my previous correspondence, in light of the results of AECOM's compliance audit, and
the Facility's entry into Tier II status under the General Permit, I would like to schedule a meeting with
representatives of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources in order to discuss these matters further.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience at [phone] to arrange -a time.
Sincerely,
41z,
Howard H. Chu
Director, Environment, Health and Safety
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Enclosures
cc: Central Records, Division of Water Quality
26396012v1

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 8/10/15
i�
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251
FACILITY NAME Watts Regulator - 5 indale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Ademola Bakenne
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert. # 12, 5342, 37706
Comments on sample collection or analysis: A
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
SAMPLE PERIOD ® ]an -June ❑ July -Dec
or E] Monthly' (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow [:]WaterSupply ❑SAftw<
®Other C
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period?z
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH,
standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1
06/27/15
0.21
137
4.2
1.19
0.203
0.379
<5.0
N/A
2
06/27/15
0.21
8.1
4.6
1.53
0.156
0.555
<5.0
N/A
3
06/27/15
0.21
N/A
4.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
06/27/15
0.21
5.4
6.1
0.254
0.007
0.268
<5.0
N/A
5
06/27/15
0.21
N/A
6.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
06/27/15
0.21
17.1
6.0
0.225
0.0205
0.242
1 <5.0
N/A
7
06/27/15
0.21
N/A
6.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
I Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/l/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/2S/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Mr. John Palotta
Name (Print name)
Vice President of Operations _
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format,"<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part 13: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No dischorge this period ?2
Outfall No,
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks ===>
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
ti
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier I, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See Genera! Permit text.
FOR PART AAND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS, SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
+ TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMIt including all "No Discharge" re orts within 30 days o recei # o the lab results or at end o mani#orin eriad
in the case of "No Discharge" reports] to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR'ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
am aware t here are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Si a)re of Permittee) {pate)
Permit Date,11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

VIOWANM
A Watts Water Technologies Company 815 Chestnut Street • North Andover, MA • 01845-5098 • Tel, [phone] • Fax: [phone]
August 10, 2015
BY CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RECEIVED
Central Records AUG 14 2015
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources CENTRAL FILES
1617 Mail Service Center DWR SECTION
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Discharge Monitoring Report and Notice_ of Compliance Status
Watts Regulator, 100 Watts Road, Spindale, North Carolina
Certificate of Coverage Number NCG030251
To Whom It May Concern:
In accordance with certificate of coverage referenced above and requirements of general
permit number NCG030000 (the "General Permit"), please find enclosed discharge monitoring
report ("DMR") for monitoring year 3, period I (January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015) regarding
Watts Regulator ("Watts") facility located at 100 Watts Road in Spindale, North Carolina (the
"Facility"). Consistent with the February 3, 2010 Approval of Representative Outfall Status,
Watts obtained quantitative data for samples from outfalls 001, 002, 004, and 006. Based on the
results submitted with the DMR, these four outfalls are now in Tier II status and Watts will begin
monthly monitoring accordingly. Watts also obtained samples for pH analysis from outfalls 003,
005, and 007. Those data are also reflected in the enclosed DMR.'
Watts recently engaged the environmental consulting firm AECOM to conduct a
stormwater compliance audit at our Facility. Though results of this audit continues to be under
evaluation, Watts requested that AECOM revise the Facility's stormwater management plan
("SWPPP"), engaged Proctor Environmental Services, Inc., ("PES") to assist in implementing
AECOM recommendations, and — upon receiving the results of the recent sampling reflected in
the enclosed DMR — retained Hart & Hickman ("H&H") to develop additional best management
practices ("BMP") for the Facility. Given that ail four of the monitored outfalls are now in Tier
11 status, monthly monitoring data will be available to evaluate effectiveness of these additional
BMPs and the need for any further improvements.
In light of the AECOM compliance audit results and entry under the General Permit into
Tier II status by the Facility, I respectfully request a meeting with representatives of the Division
of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources in order to discuss these matters further. As I will be on
shown in the documents attached to the DMR, the pH of precipitation in and around Spindale is commonly below
the benchmark ran,e in the General Permit. Watts will continue to collect "neat" precipitation samples, analyze
those samples for pH, and include the results with its next DMR (for July 2015), in accordance with footnote 1 of
Table 3 in the General Permit.
Watts Regulator Company Since 1874 watts.com

a previously -planned business trip to Asia Pacific during the weeks of August 17`h and 24`h, 1 am
available to meet during the weeks of August 31" or September 71h. Please contact me at your
earliest convenience by phone [phone]) or e-mail ([e-mail]) to arrange a
date and time.
Sincerely,
/Ij t/�_
Howard H. Chu
Director, Environment, Health and Safety
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Enclosures
cc: Central Records, Division of Water Quality

pH Data Information
Watts Regulator Site
Spindale, North Carolina
NC Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
The following pH readings were recorded from the seven outfalls at the Watts facility in Spindale, North
Carolina during the ,tune 2015 sampling event. These readings were taken at the laboratory, Pace Labs,
from laboratory -provided sample bottles filled during the sampling event for the sole purpose of obtaining
pH readings. A pH meter was not available at the site during the June 2015 stormwater sampling event.
Outfall No. pH Reading
001
4.2
002
4.6
003
4.9
004
6.1
005
6.0
006
6.0
007
6.1
Due to the variable pH readings collected (ranging from 4.2 to 6.1) and that three readings (Outfalls 001,
002, and 003) were outside the NC stormwater benchmark range of 6.0 to 9.0, a literature search was
conducted to determine if pH data could be found to verify historical regional precipitation pH readings.
The National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) monitors precipitation chemistry to measure
atmospheric deposition and study its effects on the environment. Sites in the NADP precipitation
chemistry network began operations in 1978 with the goal of providing data on the amounts, trends, and
geographic distributions of acids, nutrients, and base cations in precipitation. Their website,
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/dataLsiLtes/map/?net=NTN, summarizes results from 250 sites located around
the country. pH data collected from five nearby monitoring stations (Gatlinburg, TN, Franklin, NC, Mt.
Mitchell, NC, Greenville, SC, and Salisbury, NC, located relative to the subject site as shown on the
following map) are shown on the following graphs. Data indicate that pH readings ranging from
approximately 4.5 to 5 have been typical in the area around Spindale for the past 30 or more years.
In addition to the literature search, Watts has begun recording pH readings during precipitation events at
the site using an on -site, calibrated pH meter. The following data was collected during an 0.49 inch
precipitation event on July 25, 2015 from clean plastic bottles located at three areas of the site unaffected
by structures or foliage.
Sample No. Location PH Ring
1 North Central Fence 4.2
2 Northeast Fence, by Rain Gage 4.1
3 Southeastern, Gate A 4.0
Both the literature search and on -site pH readings indicate that the pH readings collected during the June
2015 are not unusual for this area of North Carolina.

National Atmospheric Deposition Program
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/data/sites/map/?net=NTN
The National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) monitors precipitation chemistry. The program is a cooperative effort between many different
group, including federal, state, tribal and local governmental agencies, educational institutions, private companies, and non -governmental agencies.
In 1977, U.S. State Agricultural Experiment Stations (SAES) organized a project, later titled the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP),
to measure atmospheric deposition and study its effects on the environment. Sites in the NADP precipitation chemistry network began operations in
1978 with the goal of providing data on the amounts, trends, and geographic distributions of acids, nutrients, and base cations in precipitation. The
network grew rapidly in the early 1980s. Much of this expansion was funded by the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP),
established in 1981 to improve understanding of the causes and effects of acidic precipitation. Reflecting the federal NAPAP role in the NADP, the
network name was changed to NADP National Trends Network (NTN). The NTN network currently has 250 sites.

Franklin. NC Site Data Trend for pH
5.3
5.2
5.1
5.0
• 4.9
i
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.4
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
http://nadp.sws.uiuc-edu/data/sites/map/?net=NTN
NTN Site NC25
0
Q
p
4 ,.
♦
1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Year
Annual
Criteria Met
Annual
®� Criteria Not;
Met
s
® Trend line

National Atmospheric Deposition Program
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/data/sites/map/?net=NTN
Gatlinburg, TN Site Data Trend for PH
oa
�p National Atmospheric Deposition Program
5.3
5.2
5.1
5.0
4.9
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.3
NTN Site TN11
'
?
@
•
� I
i I
I i
�
1978 1980 1982 1984 1986. 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Year
7 Annuat
®1 Criteria Met
Annual
®a Criteria Not
Met
® Trend fine

National Atmospheric Deposition Program
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/data/sites/map/?net=NTN
Mt Mitchell, NC Site Data Trend for pH
4�
p� National Atmospheric Deposition Program
5.3
5.2
5.1
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.4
NTN Site NC45
«- __.. ._... - _ _— ............... r
e --....
♦ i
i
• 1
I i i
1984 1996 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2D06 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Annuat
®i Criteria Met
Annuat
Criteria Not
Met
Nil Trend tine

National Atmospheric Deposition Program
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/data/sites/map/?net=NTN
Greenville SC Site Data Trend for pH
0O
ao National Atmospheric Deposition Program
4.56
4.54
4.52
4.50
4,48
4.46
G
4.44
4.42
4.40
4.38
4.36
4.34
1978
1980
NTN Site SC18
1982
o
Year
1984
1986
1988
®� Annual
a Criteria Met
Annual
®.I Criteria Not
Met
Trend tine j

National Atmospheric Deposition Program
http://hadp.sws.uiuc.edu/data/sites/map/?net=NTN
Piedmont NC Station, near Salisbury Site Data Trend for pH
vka
°an National Atmospheric Deposition Program
NTN Site NC34
5.4
5.2
5.0
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.2
•
— Annuaif
®� Criteria Met
Annual
®i Criteria Not
1 Met,
— Trend line
1976 1978 1990 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
V—

alceAnalj#ical e
wrr ,,pecelehS.0=
July 10, 2015
Tom Proctor
Proctor Environmental
RE: Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kircey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Dear Tom:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on June 30, 2015. The
results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNi standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
V�, c, -- Cs r„ -J
Liamm Carrubba
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page i of 14

�;a'ne'AnaVicalo
wew pacelebs.com
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
Charlotte Certification IDS
9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37705
North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
Asheville Certification IDS
2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648
Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification M 37712
CERTIFICATIONS
FloridalNELAP Certification #: E87627
Kentucky LIST Certification #: 84
West Virginia Certification M 357
urginivVELAP Certification #: 460221
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
West Virginia Certification #. 356
VirginiaNELAP Certification #: 460222
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 2 of 14

lane'Analyfical"
xww.pacelaba.com
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Mncey Ave. Suite 500
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID
Sample ID
Method
Analysts
Analysts
Reported
Laboratory
92256587001
OU - 001
EPA 1664E
SMS
1
PASI-C
EPA 200.7
JMW
3
PASI-A
SM 25400
MDW
1
PASI-A
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI•A
92256587002
OU - 002
EPA 1664E
JMS
1
PASI-C
EPA200.7
JMW
3
PASI-A
SM 2540D
MDW
1
PASI-A
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
92256587003
OU - 004
EPA 1664B
JMS
1
PASI-C
EPA200.7
JMW
3
PASI-A
SM 2540D
MDW
1
PASI-A
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
92256587004
OU - 006
EPA 1664B
JMS
1
PASI-C
EPA200.7
JMW
3
PASI-A
SM 2540D
MDW
1
PASI-A
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
92256587005
OU - 003
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
92256587006
OU-005
EPA9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
92256587007
OU - 007
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shell not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent or Pate Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 3 of 14

acmnalytrcal
WW'pecelafls.ww
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersvitle, NC 2807a
[phone]
Sample: OU - 001
Parameters
Lab ID: 92256587001 Collected: 06/27/15 14:12
Results Units Report Limit OF
Received: 06/30/15 09:30 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No, Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Oil and Grease
NO mg1L
5.0
1
07/09115 09:51
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200-7
Copper
1190 ug1L
5.0
1
07/01/15 17:35
07/03/15 06:25
7440-50-8
Lead
203 ug1L
5.0
1
07/01/15 17:35
07/03/15 06:25
7439-92-1
Zinc
379 ug1L
10.0
1
07/01/15 17:35
07/03115 06:25
7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
137 mg1L
16.7
1
07/01/15 12:46
9040 pH
Ana lylical Method: EPA 9040
pH
4.2 Std. Units
0.10
1
07/07/15 13:55
H6
Sample: OU - 002
Parameters
Lab lD: 92256587002 Collected: 06/27115 14:22
Results Units Report Limit DF
Received: 06/30/15 09:30 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664E
Oif and Grease
NO mg1L
5.0
1
07/09/15 09:51
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
1530 ug1L
5.0
1
07101/15 17:35
07/03/15 06:28 7440-50-8
Lead
156 ug1L
5.0
1
07/01/15 17:35
07/03115 06:28 7439-92-1
Zinc
555 ug(L
10.0
1
07/01/15 17:35
07/03/15 0618 7440-66-6
25400 Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
8.1 mglL
2.5
1
07/01/15 12:46
9040 pH
Analytical Method: EPA 9D40
pH
4.6 Std, Units
0.10
1
07/07/15 13:55 H6
Sample: OU - 004 Lab ID: 92256587003 Collected: M27/15 14:38 Received: 06/30/15 09:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF , Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Oil and Grease NO mglL 5.0 1 07/09115 09:51
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper 254 ug1L 5.0 1 07/01/15 17:35 07/03115 06:31 7440-50-8
Lead 7.0 ug1L 5.0 1 07/01115 17:35 07/03/15 06:31 7439-92-1
Zinc 268 ug1L 10.0 1 07/01/15 17:35 07/03/15 06731 7440-66-6
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 0711012015 10:59 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 4 of 14

lacieAnalj6caf"
nww.P I0bs.CoM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
980D Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: OU - 004
Lab ID: 92256587003 Collected: 06/27/15 14:38
Received:
06/30/15 09:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit DF
Prepared
Analyzed CAS No.
Qual
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
5.4 mglL 2.5 1
07/01/15 12:48
9040 pH
Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH
6.1 Std. Units 0.10 1
07/07/15 13:55
H6
Sample: OU -Doe
Lab ID: 92256587004 Collected: 06/27/15 14:50
Received:
06/30/15 09:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit DF
Prepared
Analyzed CAS No.
Qua[
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664E
Oil and Grease
ND mglL 5.0 1
07/09/15 09:52
200.7 MET 1CP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
225 ug1L 5.0 1
07/01/15 17:35 07/03/15 06:34 7440-50-8
Lead
20.5 ug1L 5.0 1
07/01/15 17:35 07/03/15 06:34 7439.92-1
Zinc
242 uglL 10.0 1
07/01/15 17:35 07/03/15 06:34 7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method. SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
17.1 mg1L 3.6 1
07/01/15 12:49
9040 pH
Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH
6.0 Sid. Units 0.10 1
07107/15 13:55
H6
Sample: OU -003
LabJD- 92256587005 Collected: 06/27/15 14:29
Received:
06/30/15 09:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limit DF
Prepared
Analyzed CAS No.
Qual
9040 pH
Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH
4.9 Sid. Units 0.1 D 1
07/07/15 13:55
H6
Sample: OU -005
Lab ID: 92256587006 Collected: 06/27/15 14:43
Received:
0613011509:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units Report Limlt DF
Prepared
Analyzed CAS No.
Quaff
9040 pH
Anatytical Method: EPA 9040
pH
6.0 Sid. Units 0.10 1
07/07/15 13:55
H6
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Date: 07/1012015 10:59 AM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 14

aceAnalXical
VrtYV.f f 8C2�803. [Of+l
i
E
I
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite too
Huntersville, NC 28076
[phone]
Sample: OU - 007 i Lab ID: 92256587007 Collected: 051271115 14:58 Received: 06/30/15 09:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Oual
9040 pH ; Analytical Method: EPA9040
pH ; 6.1 Std, Units 0.10 1 07/07/15 13:55 H6
Date: 07/101201510:59AM i
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, tnc..
Page 6 of 14

lane'Analyfical"'
xwwpacefa6scom
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
QC Batch: GCSV/21883 Analysis Method: EPA 1664B
QC Batch Method: EPA 1664E Analysis Description: 1664 HEM, Oil and Grease
Associated Late Samples: 922565870D1, 92256587002, 92256587003, 92256587004
METHOD BLANK: 1504908 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92256587001, 92256587002, 92256587003, 92256587004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Oil and Grease mg/L ND 5.0 07109l15 09:44
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Vincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersvilie. NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1504909
Spike LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result
% Rec
Limits
Qualifiers
Oil and Grease
mg1L
40 33.3
83
78-114
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
1504910
35195511005 Spike
MS
M5
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Oil and Grease
mgfL
<1A 40
38.1
94
78-114
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an attemale unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in fun.
Date: 07/10/2015 10:59 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 7 of 14

aceAnalytical
Kww.Pacerabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
QC Batch: MPRP118891 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA 200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples., 92256587001, 92256587002, 92256587003, 92256587004
METHOD BLANK: 1499491
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples:
92256587001. 922565B7002, 92256587003, 92256587004
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
Capper
ug1L
ND 5.0
07/03/15 05:08
Lead
ug1L
ND 5.0
07/03/15 05:08
Zinc
ug1L
ND 10.0
07/03/15 05:08
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1499492
Spike LCS LCS
%Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result % Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Copper
uglL
500 488 98
85-115
Lead
ug1L
500 479 96
85-115
Zinc
ug1L
500 471 94
85-115
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
1499493
MS
92256672009
Spike
Parameter Units
Result
Conc.
Copper ug1L
ND
500
Lead ug1L
ND
500
Zinc ug1L
0.046
500
mg1L
1499494
MSD
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
500
295
466
59
93
70-130
45 M1,R1
500
293
457
58
91
70-130
44 M1,R1
500
308
465
52
84
70.130
41 M1,R1
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
1499495
1499496
MS
MSD
92256444002
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper ug1L
81.4
500
500
602
593
104
102
70-130
2
Lead ug/L
54.8
500
500
506
502
90
89
70-130
1
Zinc ug/L
57.2
500
500
528
526
94
94
70.130
0
Results presented on this page are in the unils Indicated by the -Unlls- column except where an alternate unit is presentetl to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in dull.
Date: 07/10/2015 10:59 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 8 of 14

aceAnalytical
xww.pacelabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
SsoO KlnceyAve. Suite too
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QC Batch: WET138518
Analysis Method:
SM 2540D
QC Batch Method: SM 2540D
Analysis Description:
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples:. 92256587001, 92256587002, 92256587003, 92256587004
METHOD BLANK: 1499098
Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92256587001, 92256587002, 92256587003, 92256587004
Blank Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result Limit
Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids
mg1L
ND 2.5 07101/15 12:36
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1499099
Spike LCS
LCS °% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc. Result
% Rec Limits Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids
mglL
250 240
96 90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1499100
92256445010 Dup
Parameter
Units
Result Result
RPD Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids
mg/L
ND ND
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1499101
92256513006 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mg/L ND ND
Results presented on this page are in the units Indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Date: 07/10/2015 10:59 AM without the written consent of Pace Analyticat Services, Inc.. Page 9 of 14

aceAnalytical
KS.wpacelabs com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Hunletsville. NC 28078
(704)B75-9092
QC Batch: WET138635 Analysis Method: EPA 9040
QC Batch Method: EPA 9040 Analysis Description: 9040 pH
Associated Lab Samples: 92256587001, 92256587002, 92256587003, 92256587004. 92256587005, 92256587006. 92256587007
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1502780
922SM7001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
pH Sid. Units 4.2 4.3 1 H6
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1502781
92256690001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Qualifiers
pH Sid. units 7.3 7.4 1 H6
Results presented on Ihls page are in the units indicated by the "Units- Column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced. except in full,
Date: 07/10/2015 10:59 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 10 of 14

aceAnalytical
wwWvpacelabs.cam
QUALIFIERS
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc-
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28075
[phone]
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270, The result for each analyle is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Get - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chlaroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride,
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA
Method 8260.
N- Nitrosod iphenyl a mine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNl accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
LABORATORIES
PASI-A Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
PASI-C Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
H6 Analysis initiated outside of the 15 minute EPA recommended holding time-
M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery.
RI RPD value was outside control limits.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 07110/2015 10:59 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 11 of 14

laceAnaiXicale
rvusepacelahs.wm
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: WATTS SPINDALE SW
Pace Project No.: 92256587
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 2BO78
[phone]
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method
922565870D1
OU - 001
EPA 1664B
GCSV/21883
922565670D2
OU - 002
EPA 16646
GCSV/21883
92256587003
OU - 004
EPA 9664E
GCSV/21883
92256587OD4
OU - 006
EPA 1664B
GCSV121883
92256587001
QU-001
EPA200.7
MPRP118891
EPA200.7
92256587002
OU - 002
EPA200.7
tAPRP118891
EPA200.7
92256597003
OU - 004
EPA200.7
MPRP118891
EPA200.7
92256587004
OU - 006
EPA200.7
MPRPtIS891
EPA200.7
922565B7DO1
OU - 001
SM 2540D
WET/38510
92256587002
OU - 002
SM 2540D
WET138518
92256587003
OU - 004
SM 2540D
WFT138518
92256587004
OU - 006
SM 2540D
WET/38518
92256587001
OU - 001
EPA9040
WET138535
92256587002
OU - 002
EPA 9040
WET/38635
92256587003
OU - 004
EPA 9040
WET/38635
92256587004
OU - 006
EPA 9040
WET138535
92256587005
OU - 003
EPA 9040
W'cT/38635
92256587006
OU - DOS
EPA 9040
WET138635
92256587007
OU - D07
EPA 9040
WET138635
Date: 07110/2015 10:59 AM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc -
Analytical
Batch
ICP116955
ICP116955
I C P/ 16955
ICP/16955
Page 12 of 14

Document Name: document Revised: May 18, 2015
1?c�ak?lytl�i<• Sample Condition Upon Receipt (SCUR) Page 4 of 2'
Document Number: Issuing Authority:
F-CHR-CS-003-rev.16 Pace Huntersville Quality Office
Client Name: ��C�;-��1,(
Page 2 of 2 is for Internal Use Only
Courier: ❑ ed >_ ❑ UPS❑ USPS❑ Client❑ Commercial❑ Pace Other Q 4
5 }
Custody Seat on Cooler/Box Present: ❑ yes [3 no Seats intact: ❑ yes ❑ no
Packing Material: ❑ Bubble V❑p ❑ ubble Bag ❑ None
Other
Wet
Thermometer Used: IR Gun T1401 ype of Ice: Blue None Samples on Ice, cooling process has begun
Temp Correction Factor • T1401 No Correction
Corrected Cooler Temp.: / 'C
Temp should be above freezing to 6'C
Biological Tissue is Frozen: Yes No !!A Date and Inlflal of p son camining
oa g contents: - 1_
Comments:
Chain of Custody Present:
OYes ONO
ONIA
1.
Chain of Custody Filled Out:
ElYes ONO
ONIA
2.
Chain of Custody Relinquished:
$Yes ONO
ONIA
3.
Sampler Name & Signature on COC:
6Yes ONO
❑NIA
4.
Samples Arrived within Hold Time:
(SYes ONO
❑N(A
5.
Short Hold Time Analysis (<72hr):
❑Yes RNo
ONIA
6.
Rush Turn Around Time Requested:
❑Yes )SINo
©"IA
7,
Sufficient Volume:
ItYes ❑No
❑NIA
8.
Correct Containers Used:
-Pace Containers Used:
NYes ONO
&Yes ONO
ONIA
ONIA
9.
Containers Intact:
((yes ©No
❑NIA
10,
Filtered volume received for Dissolved tests
❑Yes 29No
❑NIA
11.
Sample Labels match COC: ` tNYes ONo ONIA
-Includes date/fimellD/Analysis Matrix: `` -T
12.
All containers needing preservation have been checked.
All containers needing preservation are found to be In
compliance with EPA recommendation.
exceptions; VOA, coWorm, TOC, o$G, Vdl•DRO (water)
MYes ONO
tgYes ONO
tKYes ONO
ONIA
ONIA
13.
Samples checked for dechtorination:
❑Yes Zblo
ONIA
14.
Headspace in VOA Vials ( >6mm):
❑Yes ❑No
ONIA
15.
Trip Blank Present:
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present
Pace Trip Blank Lot # (if purchased): - __
❑Yes ONO
❑Yes ONO
i?NIA
SNIA
16.
_..... .. _. _
Client Notification/ Resolution: Field Data Required? Y I N
Person Contacted: Date/Time:
Comments/ Resolution:
W`C!i J/ r nl hL.nl 1..�rc
SCURF Review: �- Date: 1�-30- I� 92�5658?
SRF Review: 1 ) Date: I C ?o • o
Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance
samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR
Certification Office ( i.e out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, 92256$87
incorrect containers)
Page 13 of 14

Pa'ceAnaly tical`
vrr.Proflrbc.rarr
SncVon A
KnggMd CIM: nt[rM�Iilm
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY 1 Analytical Request Document
Ile. Ch?m-cf.CvOody •. *LEGAL O'J VM:-fJ7. AI mrowrtf ddo rnue' be C.•nFtatgi ocnr Wy-
� f �
SettionB GectlonC
R*gnQrd PN,Kt:ntaane0an: try.Y Ief&wdltrl.
trFali% C. {�S W:Ltiij�t
r� W�Jr'�.
�a4ht Gl l..l�L l• .
.� v '✓ L.� �� w +��
nctiizss ; i�1t _
CWY Fo' li
Y T� �1
RE ULATORT AGENCY
L:E'! }
,., �
All
��
WPaES a^RWNOW,%T;;R (kRINKINGWATER
—
usT - RCRA 4TT•IE3?
nYa
rQ !/• J'•'
r_hra 0+rir Na:
a+[ot��h
Ratlronn;[ 6Gt
hh
;" L� J • Fes.
Fr•'Y`3N 7 J 1.• � • i �
rtavpu.'W
SJt+r Lo=alti0n
OquJcWODut VmWTA1:
Drdpa lum r.
Pam Pr64 *^
RCQIl
�4Let1+4J1AiY�+�
�iRCrcfl
���
64girr6 Kstrh:CopaS
=
�
?
'
Rugan4CIVIt Irev fmWks $AT.IA r,;
COLLFCTEC
Preseryypven
i
Otinlemti+;el1[ Q�y
!
. gClO'Jla7ar
lYoda[r P
n
�
Z a1M7rrE
t r L•:/.b
�
••
`
SINUS oltl S.
r
'
q
_
Y
SAMPLED Q. n!
A"Of
�
�
G
o
c
SA7S�r FJ'C.r
—
1.14Vk9i:i ld ATt
WeA.P5 A,$-r RE LNICIVE -49U4 'M
CY_'tcr a!
p
0
w
S
it,
a
F
;
ti
oG�yt
X
j a
L
O
�^
67
r
^-y
LZ J
�
CATr
Tn:E
lurk
T AfE
x
x
i
IS
E
.�
j
J
Paco Pro ort Ne,! Lah LD.
1
r ...
-�
i
2
/h
7(14(^may
:Q
f&— cf 4
i
Ix x
,/
V1CC
s
s
�( 00 3
!
b S
7
itu
a
V,1104
I
i
iG
1
11
'JZ
_
FF
1
ADOMONAL COMMUTO
R4JNOOI:WIM BY 1AFFILK11011
18 A'AE
ACCFMD BY) AFFUATtOh
DATE
11M
Wing eoumnollc
f
! vo
SAt/ViFR NA'r1E A M 514MATURE
H
' f7i:rlT KnrSLO y:SA4SYLR
S
4 �•
51tjYaTUF2 Y. ti.111Pi..5 N " 'Gres• g �p
IKnWOn^i;l V7 �� �•7
� /
v
C
1? e
.j,
A
•lryawri Sr', L': i, 1Frri%ss la prr;r'v is*-- i P-44,:NET'C bL-ra:Mrrs a"5',po-r01-,*'r-rF+i:ar F»iL!-Rr iOf;'�.07, 15, L,L'•• 'tiD:

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 8/27115
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251
FACILITY NAME Watts - Spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Tom Proctor
LABORATORYPace Analytical Lab Cert. it — 12, 5342, 37706
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' July _ (month)
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑zero -flow ❑Water Supply ❑SA
®Other c
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
No discharge this period?Z
Iac
�r."Nan-PolarO&G/,
r.
'
Date Sample,
24hou[ rainfall
7
;pH',
t •
t ; ,
'Lead
Total,7oici[
Outfall No T
t a
} -
Collected
amount;
76Laf Suspended Solids_
,t ;,� a +- t:,
` r
Standard uriitst
Copper �'
. ? "�
+
Zinc
I
Total'Pet[oleum
!'
5
Organics _
`>
r
}
Hydr&kbor
�(mo/dd%yri
r Inches}i ;>
�Y'kr .�W ,=�s .'
,'i#'w""O „
a,.•'w` r" _'.,
:.rNl
., i'
+_
Berahmarks =__»
Gr
= `
' 10o mg/L;or 50'mg%L°
! :6.0 - 9.0
O:Oo7 mg/L=;
='0.03 mg/!= r
'0.067-mgf L j
=•iS'mg/L
1 mg/L
1
07/14/15
0.32
22.6
4.7
.876
.107
.310
<5.0
NA
2
07/14/15
0.32
75.5
6.0
1.370
0.173
0.449
<5.0
NA
3
07/14/15
0.32
N/A
5.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NA
4
07/14/15
0.32
16.9
6.5
0.234
0.0125
0.204
<5.0
NA
5
07/14/15
0.32
N/A
6.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
07/14/15
0.32
18.4
6A
0.195
0.0198
0.282
<5.0
NA
7
07/14/15
0.32
N/A
6.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
a For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
*See notes in Attachment regarding regional and site pH readings relative to benchmark and monitoring results.
Permit Date: 11/i/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"[lased upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), l certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Mr. John Palotta -
Name (Print name)
Vice President of Operations
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part 6: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
No discharge this period?2
T� UutfaN�No:
_
?. Date Sample
Collected"'
(mo%dd]yrl
24-hourralnfall;•I
amount,
T Incfies3�
,tNon-polar O&G/TPH by;
EPA �166d {SGT-HEM)
"1
"';.Total 5uspended,Sollds
pH-
Benchmarks -- => - .
_
:15 meL .
100 mg/L of 50 mg/L*
6.0 = 9.0 5LI
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Permit Date: 1I/I/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2of3

* See General Permit text, Table S, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART it SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART 11 SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ No ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results_(or at end of monitoring period
in the case o "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there ar nificant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility f fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
""*�F Z7 J� 4—
(Signature of a ittee) (Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

%%IWATM
A Watts Water Technologies Company 815 Chestnut Street • North Andover, MA • 01845-6098 • Tel. [phone] • Fax: [phone]
RECEIVED
August 27, 2015 AUG 2 8 2015
Central Records — Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources CENTRAL FILES
1617 Mail Service Center DWR SECTION
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) and Notice of Compliance Status
Watts Regulator, 100 Watts Road; Spindale, North Carolina
Certificate of Coverage Number NCG030251
To Whom It May Concern:
In accordance with certificate of coverage referenced above and requirements of general
permit number NCG030000 ("General Permit"), please find enclosed DMR for monitoring year
3, period 2, monthly monitoring (July, 2015) regarding Watts Regulator ("Watts") facility at 100
Watts Road in Spindale, North Carolina ("Facility"). Pursuant to February 3, 2010, Approval of
Representative Outfall Status, Watts obtained quantitative data for samples at outfalls 001, 002,
004, and 006. Watts will continue monthly monitoring of these outfalls per the General Permit.
In addition to required outfall sampling, Watts obtained "neat" samples at the Facility for pH.
Consistent with footnote I of Table 3 in the General Permit, and the information enclosed
with the Facility's previous DMR regarding natural pl-1 of precipitation in Spindale, on August 6,
2015, the Facility measured pH of three "neat" precipitation samples with the following results:
At the Facility rain gauge — pH was 4.8;
Within the north central portion of the Facility - pH was 4.7; and
Adjacent to Gate A, within the southeast portion of the Facility — pH was 4.7.
These results indicate the Facility pH benchmark should be in range of 4.7 or 4.8. Accordingly,
pH measurements at outfalls 001 and 003 are within the appropriate applicable benchmark range.
As requested in the August 10, 2015, cover letter for the January — June 2015 monitoring
period DMR, [ would appreciate an opportunity to meet with representatives from the Division
of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources to discuss the results of a recent stormwater compliance
audit at the Facility by AECOM and continuing efforts to implement additional stormwater best
management practices ("BMP"). Please contact me at your earliest convenience by phone (978-
689-6070) or e-mail (howard.chu a watts.com) to arrange a date and time.
Sincerely,
/ Q
Howard H. Chu
Director, Environment, Health and Safety
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Enclosures
Watts Regulator Company Since 1874 watts.com

aceAnalytical
wwwpecelabs.cam
July 28, 2015
One Time Client
One Time Clients
Private Small Jobs
Huntersville, NC 28078
RE: Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
Dear One Client:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc,
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on July 15, 2015. The
results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
�1, 0— -'`zb,----
Liamm Carrubba
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
P, CR¢��
TNI
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 1 of 14

5aceAnalyticaI
wwwpxelans.com
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 IGncey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Charlotte Certification IDs
9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #. 37706
North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12
South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
Asheville Certification IDs
2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804
FloridalNELAP Certification #: E87648
Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712
CERTIFICATIONS
FloridalNELAP Certification #: E87627
Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
West Virginia Certification #: 357
UrginiaNELAP Certification #: 460221
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
West Virginia Certification #: 356
UrginialVELAP Certification #: 460222
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 2 of 14

aceAnalytical.
www.pacelabs.com
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
Lab ID Sample ID
92259490001 OU-001
92259490002 OU-002
92259490003 OU-004
92259490004 OU-006
92259490005 OU-003
92259490006 OU-005
92259490007 OU-007
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Method
Analysts
Analytes
Reported
Laboratory
EPA 1664E
JMS
1
PASI-C
EPA 200.7
JMW
3
PASI-A
SM 2540D
WRC
1
PASI-A
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
EPA 1664B
JMS
1
PASI-C
EPA 200.7
JMW
3
PASI-A
SM 2540D
WRC
1
PASI-A
EPA9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
EPA 1664B
JMS
1
PASI-C
EPA 200.7
JMW
3
PASI-A
SM 2540D
WRC
1
PASI-A
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
EPA 1664B
JMS
1
PASI-C
EPA 200.7
JMW
3
PASI-A
SM 2540D
WRC
I
PASI-A
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
EPA 9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
EPA9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
EPA9040
MLS
1
PASI-A
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This repots shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 3 of 14

aceAnalj4ical
www.pacdabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: OU-001
Lab ID: 92259490001 Collected: 07/14/15 08:51
Received: 07/15/15 09:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No.
Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664B
Oil and Grease
ND mg1L
5.0
1
07/21/15 14A5
200.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
876 ug1L
5.0
1
0712211519.00
0712711512:56
7440-50-8
Lead
107 ug/L
5.0
1
07/22/15 19:00
07/24/15 22:27
7439-92-1
Zinc
310 ug/L
10.0
1
07/22/15 19:00
07/24115 22:27
7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
22.6 mg/L
5.0
1
07/21/15 22:36
D6
9040 pH
Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH
4.7 Std. Units
0.10
1
07/22/15 15:15
D6,H6
Sample: OU-002
Lab ID: 92259490002 Collected: 07114/15 08:55
Received: 07115/15 09:45 Matrix:
Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No.
Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664E
Oil and Grease
ND mg1L
5.0
1
07/21/15 14:45
2D0.7 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
1370 ug1L
5.0
1
0712211519:00
0712711513:05
7440-50-8
Lead
173 ug1L
5.0
1
07/22/15 19:00
07/24/15 22:36
7439-92-1
Zinc
449 ug1L
10.0
1
07/22/15 19:00
07/24/15 22:36
7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
75.5 mg1L
6.2
1
07/21/15 22:39
9040 pH
Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH
6.0 Std. Units
0.10
1
07/22/15 15:15
H6
Sample: OU-004
Lab ID: 92259490003 Collected:
07114N
5 09:02
Received: 07/15115 09:45 Matrix:
Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No.
Qual
HEM, Oil and Grease Analytical Method: EPA 16645
Oil and Grease ND mg/L 5.0 1 07/21/15 14:45
200.7 MET ICP Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper 234 ug/L 5.0 1 07/22/15 19:00 07/2711513:08 7440-50-8
Lead 12.5 ug/L 5.0 1 07/22/15 19:00 07124/15 22:39 7439-92-1
Zinc 204 ug1L 10.0 1 07/22/15 19.00 07124/15 22:39 7440-66-6
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 07128/2015 10:01 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 4 of 14

aceAnalytical
www.pecelabs oo 1
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersviile, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: OU-004 'Lab lD: 92259490003 Collected: 07/14/15 09:02 Received: 07/15/15 09:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No, Qual
2540D Total Suspended Solids Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids 16.9 mg/L 3.3 1 07/21/15 22:39
9040 pH Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH 6.5 Std. Units 0.10 1 07/22/15 15:15 H6
Sample: Ott-006
Lab ID: 92259490004 Collected: 07/14/15 09:07
Received: 07/15/15 09:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed CAS No. Qual
HEM, oil and Grease
Analytical Method: EPA 1664E
Oil and Grease
ND mg1L
5.0
1
07/21/15 14:46
200.7 MET 1CP
Analytical Method: EPA 200.7 Preparation Method: EPA 200.7
Copper
195 ug1L
5.0
1
07/2211519:00
07/27/1513:20 7440-50-8
Lead
19.8 ug1L
5.0
1
07/22/15 19:00
07/24/15 22:42 7439-92-1
Zinc
282 uglL
10.0
1
07t22115 19:00
07/24/15 22:42 7440-66-6
2540D Total Suspended Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540D
Total Suspended Solids
18.4 mg1L
5.0
1
07/21/15 22:39
9040 pH
Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH
6.4 Std. Units
0.10
1
07/22/15 15:15 H6
Sample: OU-003 Lab ID: 92269490005 Collected: 07/14/15 09:12 Received: 07/15/15 09A5 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua[
9040 pH Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH 5.8 Std. Units 0.10 1 07/22/15 15:15 1-16
Sample: OU-005 Lab ID: 92259490006 Collected: 07/14/15 09:20 Received: 07/15115 09:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit OF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
9040 pH Analytical Method: EPA 9040
pH 6.4 Std. Units 0.10 1 07/22/15 15:15 H6
Date:0712812015 10:01 AM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 5 of 14

aceAnalXical
www.pacelabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Anatytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
(704)87$-9092
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
Sample: OU-007 Lab ID: 92259490007 Collected: 07/14/15 09:24 Received: 07115115 09:45 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
9040 pH
pH
Date:0712MO15 10:01 AM
Analytical Method: EPA 9040
6.4 Std. Units
0,10 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
07122/15 15:15
Page 6 of 14

ace Analytical
www.pacwabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
QC Batch: GCSV122022 Analysis Method: EPA 1664E
QC Batch Method: EPA 1664B Analysis Description: 1664 HEM, Oil and Grease
Associated Lab Samples: 92259490001, 92259490002, 92259490003. 92259490004
METHOD BLANK: 1514532 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92259490001, 92259490002, 92259490003, 92259490004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Oil and Grease mg1L ND 5.0 07/21/15 14:41
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & LCSD: 1514533
Parameter
Oil and Grease
Units
mg1L
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
1514534
Spike LCS LCSD LCS LCSD % Rec Max
Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qualifiers
40 36.2 35.9 90 90 78-114 1 30
Resutts presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units' column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 07/28/2015 10:01 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 7 of 14

laneA'nalytical'
wwwpecefabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
QC Batch: MPRPI19060 Analysis Method: EPA 200.7
QC Batch Method: EPA200.7 Analysis Description: 200.7 MET
Associated Lab Samples: 92259490001. 92259490002, 92259490003, 92259490004
METHOD BLANK: 1515627 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92259490001, 92259490002, 92259490003, 92259490004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed
Copper ug1L ND 5.0 07/24/15 22:12
Lead ug1L ND 5.0 07/24/15 22:12
Zinc ug1L ND 10.0 07/24/15 22:12
Qualifiers
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1515628
Spike
LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Copper
ug/L
500
479 96 85-115
Lead
ug/L
500
458 92 85-115
Zinc
ug/L
500
459 92 85-115
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
1515629
1515630
MS
MSD
92259490001
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper
ug/L
876
500
500
1380
1380
100
101
70-130
0
Lead
ug/L
107
500
500
572
577
93
94
70-130
1
Zinc
ug1L
310
500
500
774
779
93
94
70-130
1
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
1515631
1515632
MS
MSD
92259484001
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc,
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD Qual
Copper
ug/L
ND
500
500
535
484
107
96
70-130
10
Lead
ug/L
ND
500
500
509
459
102
92
70-130
10
Zinc
ug1L
ND
500
500
511
462
102
92
70-130
10
Results presented an this page are In the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 07128/2015 10:01 AM without the written consent of Pate Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 8 of 14

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
QC Batch: WET138989 Analysis Method: SM 2540D
QC Batch Method: SM 2540D Analysis Description: 2540D Total Suspended Solids
Associated Lab Samples: 92259490001, 92259490002, 92259490003, 92259490004
METHOD BLANK: 1515090 T Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92259490001, 92259490002, 92259490003, 92259494004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Suspended Solids mglL ND 2.5 07/21/15 22:36
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 1515091
Spike LCS
Parameter Units Conc. Result
Total Suspended Solids mglL 250 266
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1515092
92259490001 ❑up
Parameter Units Result Result
Total Suspended Solids mglL 22.5 27.4
Pace Analytical Services, tnc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LCS % Rec
% Rec Limits Qualifiers
106 90-110
RPD Qualifiers
19 D6
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the"Units" column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Date: 07/28/2015 10:01 AM without the written consent of pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 9 of 14

1ceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
OC Batch: WET139011 Analysis Method: EPA 9040
QC Batch Method: EPA 9040 Analysis Description: 9040 pH
Associated Lab Samples: 92259490001,92259490002,92259490003,92259490004,92259490005,92259490006,92259490007
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 1515546
92259490001 Dup
Parameter Units Result Result RPD Oualifiers
PH Std. Units 4.7 4.5 3 D6,1-16
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units- column except where an alternate unit Is presented to the right of the result. .
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 07/28/2015 10:01 AM without the written consent of pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 10 of 14

aceAnalytical
www.pacelahs.com
QUALIFIERS
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL-Reporting Limit.
Pace Analytical services, Inc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NG 28078
[phone]
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis ofAcrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA
Method 8260.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
LABORATORIES
PAST -A Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
PASI-C Pace Analytical Services - Charlotte
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
D6 The relative percent difference (RPD) between the sample and sample duplicate exceeded laboratory control limits.
H6 Analysis initiated outside of the 15 minute EPA recommended holding time.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 07/2812015 10:01 AM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 11 of 14

aceAnalytical s
wwwpacelabs.c=
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: WATTS SPINDACE SW
Pace Project No.: 92259490
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method
92259490001
OU-001
EPA 1664E
GCSV122022
92259490002
OU-002
EPA 1664E
GCSV122022
92259490003
OU-004
EPA 1664E
GCSV122022
92259490004
OU-006
EPA 1664E
GCSV122022
92259490001
OU-001
EPA200.7
MPRP119060
EPA 200.7
92259490002
OU-002
EPA 200.7
MPRP119060
EPA 200.7
92259490003
01.1-004
EPA 200.7
MPRP119060
EPA200.7
92259490004
OU-006
EPA 200.7
MPRP119060
EPA 200.7
92259490001
OU-001
SM 25401)
WET138989
92259490002
OU-002
SM 2540D
WET138989
92259490003
OU-004
SM 2540D
WET138989
92259490004
OU-006
SM 2540D
WET138989
922594900011
OU-001
EPA 9040
WET139011
92259490002
OU-002
EPA 9040
WET139011
92259490003
OU-004
EPA 9040
WET139011
92259490004
OU-006
EPA 9040
WET139011
92259490006
OU-003
EPA 9040
WET139011
92259490006
OU-005
EPA 9040
WET139011
92259490007
OU-007
EPA 9040
WET139011
Date:.0712812015 10:01 AM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Analytical
Batch
ICP117138
ICP117138
IC P117138
I C P117138
Page 12 of 14

/ ✓�`7CQAraalytica!
Sample Condition Upon Recell
Document Number:
F-CHR-CS-403-rev.16
Page 1 of 2k -
Issuing Authority:
Pace Huntersville Quality Office
Client Name:
Courier: ❑ Ox ❑ UPS❑ LISPS❑ Client❑��no
f4 mercial❑ Pace Other
Custody Seal on CoolerlBox Present: El yes Seals intact: ❑ yes
Packing Material: ❑ Bubble VDp ❑ b e B s ❑ None❑ Other
Thermometer Used: IR Gun T1401 Tvpo of Ice: /Wet Blue None
Tema Correction Factor T1401 No Correction
' Page 2 of 2 is for Internal Use Only
❑ no
Samples on ice, cooling process has begun
V
'C
Biological Tissue is Frozen: Yes N
Biolo g �
pate and Initlmining
a f er a ta
Corrected Cooler Temp.:
contents:
Temp should be above freezing to 6'C
Comments:
Ch:ain'of Cu . st6dy Present:
Ye ONO
❑NIA
1,
Chain of Custody ;gilled Out:
2<111 ONO
❑NIA
2.
Chain of Custody Relinquished:
s ©No
❑NIA
3,
Sampler Name & Signature on COC:
Y ❑No
❑NIA
4.
Samples Arrived within Hold Time:
Yes ❑No
❑NIA
5.
Short Hold Time Analysis (<72hr):
Dyes o
NIA
6.
Rush Turn Around Time Requested:
❑Y 0<0
❑NIA
7.
Sufficient Volume:
dyx ONO
❑NIA
8.
Correct Containers Used:
❑No
ZY
❑NIA
9.
-Pace Containers Used:
❑No
❑NIA
Containers Intact:
Yes ❑No
DN/A,
10.
Filtered volume received for Dissolved tests
Dyes ❑No
NIA
11.
Sample Labels match COC:
No
❑NIA
12, Cj
-includes date/time![D/Anal sis Matrix:
W
All containers needing preservation have been checked.
e ONO
❑wA
13.
All containers needing preservation are found to be in
❑NIA
compliance with EPA recommendation.
compliance
Z
exceptions: VOA, co:itorm, TOC, O&G, Wl-DRO (water)
❑No
Samples checked for dechlorination:
Dyes No
❑tar
14.
Headspace in VOA Vials ( >6mm):
Dyes ONO
Nly
15.
Trip Blank Present:
©Yes ONO
12<1
ZNIA
16,
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present
❑Yes ❑No
Pace Trip'Blank Lot # if -purchased): ---- ---
- — -
- -
-__------.--___---------.--T_.______ —_ —__-__--
Client Notification! Resolution: Field Data Required? Y ! N
Person Contacted:'DatelTime: ��- _ �' �f j n
Comments/Resolution: �_�,`�?,- Y�-�rt�(-�• ic.�_��s l•\i.
SCURF Review: Date:` Place label here
SRF Review: ��' Date: i JI i� Wp : 9225949Q
Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance
samples, a copy of this form.will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR �I I II I I��11 fII
Certification Office ( I.e out of hold, Incorrect preservative, out of temp, I 11 11 II 11
incorrect containers) 92259490
Page 13 of 14

/,-s
2aceAna0cal'
CHAIN -OF -CUSTODY 1 Analytical Request Document
The Chain•of-Custody i$ a LEGAL DOCUMENT, All relevant fields must be completed accurately.
• wwrr.pacelass.com
Section A Section B Section C
Page; i of ff
Required Client Information: Requirod Project Information: Invoice Information:
Company+ 70: Attention:
© 08
port
£ctGfD.`. �V1y-r4I,VF1� T G � CL ` C a 1;4
Address; � �� r�i-.a 1 ` Copy
S i Gf -
To:
Gall—L f/
Company Name:
REGULATORY AGENCY
l '1 r r�C t
, �j �V t
i 17 �,•
Address:
NPDES F- GROUND WATER ( DRINKING WATER
UST RCRA r OTHER
'
t TQj% r a Purchase
V C 1 l� i�i r.' • �( �S.• ltri
Order No.:
Paco Quota
Rolarorlw:
`�
F : 1' Prooct
Name: Jr
i f/¢ i
Pape Proiact
Site Location
thr (1
%Y •
{V ! i
A4anagar.
_w !7 &
t
Requested Due DateiTAT: Project
Number:
Paw Promo 0:
Requested
Analysis
Filtered
(YIN)
Suction D Matrix Codes
z
Required Chant Informatan MATRIX J CODE
o
n
COLLECTED
Pmservarives
>`-
Drinking water nzrN
Water WT
WeWater
U
CO
ComposnrE
WART
=JposrrE
Cw.1
Produc! P
SoilfSoGd
SAMPLE ID oil OL
wipe WP
(A-Z, 0.91: ) Air AR
v
r-
Z
f
t
o
Sample IDS MUST BE UNIQUE Tissue TS
p
L)
a
w
as
H
I
U
Otner OT
Lq
a
a
U
v_
�'
O
p
=
m`
c
r
v
—
DATE
TIME
DATE
TIME
a
7
2
S
X
Z
z
O
y-
Pace Project NO.I Lab I.D.
1
OtA—. 00 1
141610
.
2
— 1 6 ,
l
J� v
�7
<
5
6
CO-- 003
1
ate
I
I
I
"
i
I
I
'7.
-- Gas
• E
l
yyC
�y
9
10
11
112
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
REUN2= BX AFFILIATION
DATE
TIME
CCEP7 BY FF LIATION
DATE
TIME
SAMPLE CONDITIONS
S
6�
ORIGINALSAMPLER
NAME AND SIGNATURE
c
oST
Q
a z
?
PRINT Name of SAMPLER: �� �/j� y _
F
tY "
U
a
SIGNATURE of SAMPLER: DATE Signed
IMM1DD": %�
m
' mponenl Note. By signing this form you arc ace0;4ng Paw's NET 30 day payment terms and agreeing to lam charges of 1.5% pat month for any invoicps not paid wtnin 30 days. F-ALL-0-024rev.07. 15-Mav;1007

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
For North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted 01/29/15
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251
FACILITY NAME Watts - Spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Mark Kennard
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert. # 12, 5342, 37706
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2015
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ® Monthly' December (month
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow [:]WaterSupply ❑SA
®Other c 6"
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Total Suspended Solids
pH*,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
Organics$
Benchmarks =__>
-
-
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
6.0 - 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
1
12/22/15
1.31
<2.9
7.0
0.0500
<0.005
0.0732
<5.0
NA
2
12/22/15
1.31
<2.6
6.7
.0069
<0.005
0.0134
<5.0
NA
3
12/22/15
1.31
N/A
6.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NA
4
12/22/15
1.31
<2.5
6.8
0.0448
<0.005
0.0797
<5.0
NA
5
12/22/15
1.31
N/A
6.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6
12/22/15
1.31
<5.6
6.7
0.0161
1 <0.005
0.0669
<5.0
I NA
7
12/22/15
1.31
N/A
6.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
I N/A
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
z For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Name (Print name)
Title (Print title)
(Signature)
(Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L", where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
❑ No discharge this period?'
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L*
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
* See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ® NO ❑
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ® NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME: Stanley Aiken — Regional Engineer at the Ashville Regional Office
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR includin all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt oL the lab results or at end of monitoring eriod
in the case of "No Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
I z5 a c,
(Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

%1kjWA1=M
WATER TECHNOLOGIES
January 29, 2016
BY CERTIFIED MAIL — RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Central Records
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Discharge Monitoring Report and Notice of Compliance Status for Watts Water
Technologies Facilitv located at 100 Watts Road, Spindale, North Carolina (Certificate of
Coverage Number NCG030251)
To Whom It May Concern:
In accordance with the certificate of coverage referenced above and the requirements of general
permit number NCG030000 (the "General Permit'), please find enclosed Watts Water Technologies
("Watts") discharge monitoring report ("DMR") for monitoring year 3, period 2 monthly monitoring
(December 2015) regarding our facility located at 100 Watts Road in Spindale, North Carolina (the
"Facility'). Consistent with the February 3, 2010 Approval of Representative Outfall Status, Watts
obtained quantitative data for samples from outfalls 001, 002, 004 and 006. Based on the enclosed results
reflected in the December 2015 DMR, these outfalls remain in Tier III status. In addition to the required
outfall sampling, Watts obtained samples for PH from outfalls 003, 005 and 007. Those data are also
reflected on the enclosed DMR.'
Upon receiving the results of the July 2015 sampling, Watts engaged the consulting firm of Hart
& Hickman ("H&H") to develop additional best management practices ("BMP") for the Facility. Given
that all four of the monitored outfalls are in Tier III status, monthly monitoring data continues to be used
to evaluate the effectiveness of these additional BMPs and the need for further improvements. Additional
activities continued during the sampling period, and though the outfalls remain in Tier III status,
analytical results continue to reflect improved analytical results.
As mentioned in previous correspondence, a meeting was requested with representatives of the
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources to discuss results of a stormwater compliance audit
performed and Watts' efforts to implement additional BMPs at the Facility. On January 27 h, we were
pleased to host Darlene Kucken from the Asheville regional office who reviewed the site storm water
program and toured the Facility. As part of the discussion, we reviewed data contained in documentation
from H&H that was attached to recently submitted DMR reports, which included results of background
' As documented in the June 2015 DMR, the pH of precipitation in and around Spindale is commonly below the
benchmark range in the General Permit.
z Consistent with the February 3, 2010 Approval of Representative Outfall Status, the Facility did not sample
outfalls 003, 005 or 007.

sampling during the months of October and November 2015. In short, the data indicate copper and zinc
present in the Facility's stormwater discharge likely originates from "non -industrial" sources — either the
Facility's roof (which is not exposed to industrial operations) or the roadway adjacent to the Facility's
stormwater outfalls. The results also suggest that the Facility's additional BMPs will resolve the recent
results above the lead benchmark. These results confirm metals in the background samples with zinc and
copper concentrations at similar levels to the outfall samples. Please contact me at [phone] at your
convenience if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
141 " `' _
Howard H. Chu
Director, Environment, Health and Safety
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Enclosures
cc: Central Records, Division of Water Quality

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharee Mo_nit_orin . Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. N00030 2 5 1
FAauTy NAME Waft-SWICUte
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES iermftr VV W I URS
LABORATORY Pace c8l Lab Cert. 0
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Date submitted 112116113
12.5342,37706
Part A. Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2014
SAMPLE PERIOD ❑ Jan -June ❑i♦ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' _ , fmon[1
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
❑Zero -flow ❑Water supply ❑SA
Mother C
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
❑ No discharge this periad e
Outfali No.
Date Sample
,
Collected"
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches'
Total suspended Solids
pH,
standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
total Toxic
Organics s
genchmarks
1W mg/L or 50 mg/L
6.0 - 9.0
0.037 mg/L
0A3 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001
/1'%r7
/1 A C, r
I iaid i
.s
c-14,i, n
V iS
002
- S
µ �[
4u r
i
r
004
S
c -
�vL r�
! Sc
I Z
6F'1
006
Nv S�
�c —
'e'v� m—f <<
; J s�i
sss /,
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the al] the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Mark Kennard
Name (Print name)
Environmental Health & Safety
Title (Print title)
/- 7 -/S
(Signature) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection limit, BDL, cPQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format. "<XX ma/L'. where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text
Part 13: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
0 No discharge this period??
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 2664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks
Is mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L'
6.0 — 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
' See General Permit text, Table 5, Identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date:1111/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Nate: if you report a sample value In excess of the benchmark you must implement Tier 1, ner 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER ATTHE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACIUTY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO pw
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mall an original and one co»v of this DMR. incluchl a!! "No Discharge" reoorts. wlthln 0 days of recelat of the lob results for at end of monitoring period
In the case of "No Discharge" resorts! to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible forgathering the Information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, Including the possibility of fines and Imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature of Permitteef
/- 7 -/S
(Date)
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

January 7, 2015
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Semi -Annual Discharge Monitoring Report Submittal for July - December 2014
Watts Regulator- Spindale Facility, 100 Watts Drive, Spindale, NC
Storm Water Permit COC Number NCG030251
Dear Division of Water Quality,
As required by the referenced Storm Water Permit Certificate of Coverage, please find
enclosed the original and one copy of the semi-annual storm water Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) for the referenced facility. This DMR is being submitted by URS
Corporation on behalf of Watts Regulator as the following sample designated in Table 2 of
the permit:
Year 2 - Period 2 Sample #14 July 1, 2014 - December 30, 2014
Due to insufficient rainfall during sampling hours and insufficient dry periods between
rainfalls, no sampling was completed during this period.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions or if you need any additional
information.
Sincerel ,
J ifer Wheat
Environmental Scientist, URS, Corporation
Enclosures
URS Corporation — North Carolina
6000 Fairview Road, Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax
RECEIVED
JAN 12 ?01,9
CENTRAL FILES
DWR SECTION

Semi-annual Storm_water Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No, NCGO30000
Date submitted 112118113
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG03 0 2 5 1
FACILITY NAME watts - spindale
COUNTY Rutherford
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Jennifer wheat 1 uRs
LABORATORY Lab Cert. #
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2014
SAMPLE PERIOD ■❑ Jan -June ❑ July -Dec
or ❑ Monthly' month
DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
[]zero -flow []Water Supply [—]SA
NOther C
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
X No dischorge this period?2
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
Inches
Total Suspended Solids
PH,
Standard units
Copper
Lead
Zinc
Non -Polar O&G/
Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons
Total Toxic
nrganlcss
Benchmarks
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L
6.0 — 9.0
0.007 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.067 mg/L
15 mg/L
1 mg/L
001
002
004
006
' Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
'For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall, you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on -site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
"See General Permit, Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
-'Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11; for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12; for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the Stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Mark Kennard
Name (Print name)
Environmental Health & Safety
Title (Print title)
w -
(5ignature) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non -detect, ND, or other similar non -numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits, they must be reported in the format "<XX m L" where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: if you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging > 55 gal of new oil per month.
No discharge this period??
Outfall No.
Date Sample
Collected'
(mo/dd/yr)
24-hour rainfall
amount,
lnches3
Non -polar O&G/TPH by
EPA 1664 (SGT-HEM)
Total Suspended Solids
pH
Benchmarks ==-a
_
-
15 mg/L
100 mg/L or 50 mg/L'
6.0 - 9.0 SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
' See General Permit text, Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
■ A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART It SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER ATTHE SAME OUTFALLTRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANYONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO FNI
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO ❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an oriainal and one copy of this DMR, includina all "No Discharge" reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lob results for at end of monitoring period
in the case of Discharge" reports) to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
WW4-1- X�
(Signature of Permittee)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017
8
(Date)
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3

W_
Oj�
August 26, 2014
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVED
AUG 282014
CENTRAL FILES
DWQIBOG
Subject: Semi -Annual Discharge Monitoring Report Submittal for January — June 2014
Watts Regulator — Spindale Facility, 100 Watts Drive, Spindale, NC
Storm Water Permit COC Number NCG030251
Dear Division of Water Quality,
As required by the referenced Storm Water Permit Certificate of Coverage, please find
enclosed the original and one copy of the semi-annual storm water Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) for the referenced facility. This DMR is being submitted by URS
Corporation on behalf of Watts Regulator as the following sample designated in Table 2 of
the permit:
Year 2 — Period 1 Sample #13 January 1, 2014 — June 30, 2014
The sampling for Year 2 -- Period 1 did not occur due to lack of rainfall during sampling
hours. No sample was able to be taken and results therefor were not available.
Additionally, a Request for Rescission was submitted to the State of North Carolina on June
6, 2014. A decision on the request has yet to be determined.
With appropriate rainfall during the sampling hours of Year 2 — Period 2, sampling will occur
to remain in compliance with the current stormwater permit.
Please call me at [phone] if you have any questions or if you need any additional
information.
Sincerely,
Mike Fulkerson
Sr. Environmental Scientist, URS Corporation
Enclosures
URS Corporation — North Carolina
6000 Fairview Road; Suite 200
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax

STOR111WATP-It DISCIIARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
GENLRAL PERM[T NO. NCG030000 SAfiMPLLS COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: April 2011)
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG030251 This monitoring report is ducat the Division no later than 30 clays from
FACILITI' NAME Watts Reyulalor—Spindale Facility the date the facility receives the sampling results from the Ltburatory.)
PLRSON COLLECTING SAN11'LLS Lanette Small — URS Corporation
CER'TIFILD I.,AROI2ATOltY: Pace Analytical Services—Aslreyille Lab #40 113110Nl: NO. [phone]
Part A: Specific Monilorina Requirements
Otntfall
No.
Date
Sample
Collected,
mokldlyr
00530
(10400
01051
110556
78141
Total Suspended Solids,
mg/L
Jill,
Standard units
Lead, nigh,
Oil and Grease, mg,/L
Total Toxic Organics',
mglL
Benchmark
-
100
Within 6.0-9.0
0.033
30
1
001
04/20/2010
NIA'
NIA'
0.144
N/AZ
NIA"
002
04/20/2010
NIA'
Not Sam tled3
(1.068
NIA'
NIA'"
003
Not Sam pled
NIA"
Not Sampled-'
NIA-
NIA"
NIA"
C�� a
p. ..r
r.
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark ranee for pH, you must implement "Pier I. or Tier 2 responses.
See General Permit text.
No chemicals on the Total "Toxic Organic (1-1-0) list are used at the facility, and none have been used during the past 3 years. Therefore. the Solvent Management t at the
facility consists ol'a certification that the chemicals are not used at the facility. As a result, TTO monitoring is not required based on the waiver contained in the stormywater-n
permit.
2 Per Tier 2 sampling analysis guidance received from Chuck Cranford of the NCDENR DWQ Regional Office during his site visit on Tuesday, November 17, 2009, only s lilple
parameters affected by a Tier 2 response require monthly analysis.
Per Tier 2 pl-! sampling guidance received from Chuck Cranford of the NCDENR DWQ Regional Office via email dated 12/14/2009, samples for pH will not be collected on a
monthly basis. Samples for pH will only be collected during the semi-annual events along with "neat" rain samples for pH.
S .' w—isy?���r.�.Kl�,;,•,�:7+.,:�.�1:..�µ.: _.-_ r_.r? . Y;��-t,,.
Did this facility perform Vehicle i\4aintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oi] per month? _yes X no
#°'
�-
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity i lonitoring Requirements
3
Outfall
Nu.
Date
Sample Collected,
rnnolcidlvr
00556
00530
00400
s t I 11 LL= L
Oil and Grease,
m-,/L
Total Suspended Solids,
m g/L
pill,
Standard units
New Minor bi IT- age'
Annual avera.(fe a[/mn
Benchmark
-
30
1011
6.0-9.11
lu U (
f
=P 3 Q 2010
_.I QUALIT�SF-CTION
i
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for PH, you must implement Tier I or Tie 2 resp� 6n s�LE REGIONAi OFFICE ;r;r
See General Permit text. y l
STORM EVENT CHARACTERISTICS: flail Original and one-c(ijij" to:
Division of Water Quality
Date: 04/20/2010 (first event sampled) _ Attn: D1N'Q Central Files
Total Event Precipitation (inches): 0.28 1617 Mail Service Centel -
Date (list each additional event sampled this reporting period, and rainfall amount) Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
SWU-245-031308
Page 1 oC2

Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture electronic crystals, or
manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EMPA Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject
to the requirement to sample (for moral Cnishin; use the definition as found in 40 CFR 43,.1 I; for semiconductor manufacture use the definition as found in 40 C_FR 469.12: for
electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CM 469.22; and for cathode ray tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention I'lan may so certify, and the requirement for TI'O monitoring may be waived. The
solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. For those facilitics electing to employ
the Tf0 monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon my inquiry ol'the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics ("lTO), I
certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrtued toxic organics into the storntwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or stormwaler
runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the solvent management
Plan included in the Storinwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Ken Ledoux
Safety & Environmental Manager
�_L 64� SaIvy— �5-
(Signature) (Date)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based tin my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and complete. 1 ant aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
clp� <I -t Z-/D
(Signature ol-Pcrmittee) (Date)
SWIJ-245-031308
Page 2 of 2

May 3, 2010
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWW1Q Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Tier 11 Response Monthly Disc harge,Monitoring Report Submittal for April 2010
Watts Regulator — Spindale Facility, 100 Watts Drive, Spindale, NC
Storm Water Permit COC Number NCG030251
Dear Division of Water Quality,
Based on the analytical results for the Year 1-Period I and Period 2 samples for pH and lead at
Outfall 002 and pH at Outfall 003, the Watts Regulator-Spindale Facility proceeded to the Tier 2
response actions required by the North Carolina General Industrial Storm Water Permit
NCG030000 under the referenced Storm Water Permit Certificate of Coverage for these outfalls.
In addition. based on the analytical results for the Year 2-Period 1 and Period 2 samples for lead
at Outfall 001 the facility proceeded to the Tier 2 response actions required at this outlali.
Please find attached the original and one copy of the required April 2010 Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR) for the Tier 2 lead sampling at Outfalls 001 and 002. Based on Tier 2 pH
sampling "uidance provided by Chuck Cranford via email received on 12/14/2009, pl-I sampling
is only collected as normal during the semi-annual sampling events but not on a monthly basis as
part of the Tier 2 sampling. The DMR also indicates NA for all other test parameters at these
outfalls based on the Tier 2 sampling analysis guidance provided by Chuck Cranford of the
NCDENR DWQ Regional office during his site visit on 'I'uesdav, November 17, 2009. and
confirmed via email received 12/14/2009.
This DMR is being submitted by URS Corporation on behalfof Watts Regulator. Please call me
at [phone] if'you have any questions or if you need any additional information.
Sincerelv,
Lanette Small
Environmental Scientist. URS Corporation
ItinCIOSures
URS Corporation — North Carolina
6135 Park South Drive, Suite 300
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax

GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG030000
CERTIFICATE? OF COVERAGE -NO. NCC030251
FACI Ll'I'Y NAME N1`atts_R gnktor-SpindaEe_Facility
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES N/A
CERTIFIED LABORATORY: NIA
Part A: Specific Monitorint` Requirements
STOICNINVATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
MONITORING REPORT
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR YEAR: August 2010
'['his monitoring report is due at the Division no later than 30 days front
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
PIIONE NO. [phone]
Outfitll
No.
Date
Sample"Total
Collected,
m old dIy r
00530
00400
01051
00556
78 ,4'l
Suspended Solids,
mg/L
pll,
Standard units
Lead, mg/L
Oil and Crease, nig/L
Total'l;oxic Organicsr,
mg/I,
Benchmark
-
100
Wit hm 6.0-9.I1
0.033
30
1
001
Ariust 2010
N/A=
N/A'
No blow
N/A-
N/A'
002
1 August 2010
N/A"
Not Sant fled
No Flow
NIA-
N/AZ
003
August 2010
NIA'"
Not Sampled'
NIA'
N/A"
NIA-
Nute: I f you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must -implement Tier- 1 or Tier 2 responses. � rI
See General Permit teat. U
' No chemicals on the Total Toxic Organic (T'1-0) list are used at the facility, and none have been used during the past 3 years. Therefore, the Solvent Management Phtt) at the
facility consists of a certification that the chemicals are not used at the facility. As a result, TTO monitoring is not required based on the waiver contained in the storiii'Mter
permit.
` Per Tier 2 sampling analysis guidance received front Chuck Cranford of the NCDENR DWQ Regional Office during his site visit on "Tuesday, November 17, 2009,WMi ly sample
�mrameters affected by a Tier 2 response require monthly analysis.
Per Tier 2 pH sampling guidance received front Chuck Cranford of the NCDENR DWQ Regional Office via email dated 12/14/2009, samples for pH will not be collected o a
monthly basis. Samples for pH will only be collected during the semi-annual events along with "neat' rain samples for pl-I.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Maintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes \ no
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Monitorinp_ Requirements
Outfall
No.
Date
Sample Collected,
mo/dd/yr
00556
00530
00400
Oil and Grease,
m g/L
Total Suspended Solids,
mg/L
pill,
Standard units
New Motor Oil Usage,
Annual average gal/moI
Benchmark
-
30
100
6.0-9.0
- �t
1
Note: If you report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark range for pH, you must implement Tier l or Tier 2 responses
See General Permit text.
STORM FVE'NT CIIARACTEIII S['ICS:
Date: N/A (first event sampled)
Total Event Precipitation (inches): N/A
[)are (list each additional event sampled this reporting period, and rainfall antnunt)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617
SWU-245-031308
Page l of 2

Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, nuulufactLire semiconductors, manufacture electronic crystals, or
manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the FPA Effluent GL1ideli11CS for the facility subject
to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 4 33.1 1; for semlCondnetor 111anUfaClLlre L1Se the definition as fOLnld in 40 CFR 469. 12, for
electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stonmrvater Pollution Prevention Plan nlay so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring may be waived. The
solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. For those facilities electing to employ
the 170 monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
"Based upon Illy inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics (TTO), I
certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the storniwatcr or areas which are exposed to rainfall or siormwater
runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. l further certify that this facility is implementing the all tine provisions of the solvent management
plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Ken Ledoux
Safety & Environmental Manager
(Sign lure) (Date}
w"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
(Signature. of Yermittee) (Date)
SWU-245-03 t 308
Page 2 of 2

ff1'v
4pw a aA
September 9, 2010
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Tier II Response Monthly Discharge Monitoring Report Submittal for August 2010
Watts Regulator — Spindale Facility, 100 Watts Drive, Spindale, NC
Storm Water Permit COC Number NCG030251
Dear Division of Water Quality,
Based on the analytical results for the Year 1-Period 1 and Period 2 sam pies for pH and lead at
Outfall 002 and pH at Outfall 003, the Watts Regulator-Spindale Facility proceeded to the Tier 2
response actions required by the North Carolina General Industrial Storm Water Permit NCG030000
under the referenced Storm Water Permit Certificate of Coverage for these outfalls. In addition,
based on the analytical results for the Year 2-Period 1 and Period 2 samples for lead at Outfall 001
the facility proceeded to the Tier 2 response actions required at this outf all.
The sporadic and unpredictable nature of summertime thunderstorms in the Spindale, North Carolina,
area has resulted in no available sampling opportunities during a representative storm event for the
month. Please find attached the original and one copy of the required August 2010 Discharge
Monitoring Report (DM R) for Outfalls 001, 002 and 003 indicati ng no flow for the Tier 2 lead sampling
at Outfalls 001 and 002 and indicati ng not sampled for the Tier 2 pH sampling at Outfalls 002 and 003
based on Tier 2 pH sampling guidance provided by Chuck Cranford via email received on 12/14/2009.
Per this guidance Mr. Cranford indicated that pH samples should be collected as normal during the
semi-annual sampling events bu monthly basis as part of the Tier 2 sampling. The DMR
also indicates NA for all other test parameters at ese o—u—Ta is based on the ier sampling analysis
guidance provided by Chuck Cranford of the NCDENR DWQ Regional office during his site visit on
Tuesday, November 17, 2009, and confirmed via email received 12/14/2009.
This DMR is being submitted by URS Corporation on behalf of Watts Regulator. Please call me at
[phone] if you have any questions or if you need any additional information,
Sincerely,
.��rL;'fi.i_�.i 9 (-%Y - '•�"r'�L r�_ij �d-.
Lanette Small
Environmental Scientist, URS Corporation
Enclosures
URS Corporation — North Carolina
6135 Park South Drive, Suite 300
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax
-
OCT -72010 U

i
GENERAL PERAIIT NO. NCG030000
CERTIFICATE Oh COVERAGE NO. NCG030251
FACILITY NAME 11'aus Rc�ulator—Snindale hacility
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES N/A
CERTIFIED LABORATOR)': N/A
Part A: Specific Alooitorin g Re+ t iremenls
S•I.ORi111YATER DISCHARGE OUTFALL (SDO)
:MONITORING REPORT
SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING CALENDAR TEAR: Jttly 2010
This nionitlu•inb r'cport is duc at the Division no later than 30 days from
the date the facility receives the sampling results from the laboratory.)
PIIONE NO. _(828) 286-41 I-S
Outfall
No.
Date
Sample
Collected,
mo/dd/yr
00530
00400
01051
00556
78141
Total Suspended Solids,
nig/L
1)11,
Standard unit+
Lead, nag/L
Oil and Grease, mg/L
Total Toxic Organicsl,
nu4/L
Benchmark
-
100
11'ithin 6.0 — 9.0
0.033
30
1
001
July 2010
N/A
N/A-
No Flow
N/A�
N/A-
002
Jtily 2010
NIA'
Not Sampled-'
No Ploy
NIA'
N/A'
003
Juh, 2010
N/A.Not
Sant fled
Nh1'
NIA'
N/A'
Note: Ifyou report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or Outside the benchmark ran-c IOr pH, y'OLI Must II1lplCment Tier I Or -Tier 2 responses. i .
See General Permit text.
1 No chertticals on the Total Toxic Organic (TTO) list are used at the facility, and none have been used during the past 3 years. "Therefore, the Solvent Mana+-entcn�Plan at the
facility consists of a certification that the chemicals are not used at the facility. As a result, TTO rnonitorin" is not required !rased on the waiver contained in the stoint water
vermit. Per Tier 2 sampling analysis guidance received from Chuck Cranford of the NICDENR D\VQ Regional Office during his site visit on Tuesday, November 17,260�, only sample
)arameters affected by a Tier 2 response require monthly :analysis. —
Per Tier 2 pH sampling guidance received from Chuck Cranford of the NCDLNR DWQ regional Office ice via email dated 12/14/2009. samples for pi -I will not be collected on a
monthly basis. Samples for pH will only be collected during the semi-annual events along wills "neat" rain samples for pH.
Did this facility perform Vehicle Nlaintenance Activities using more than 55 gallons of new motor oil per month? _ yes X no
(if yes, complete Part B)
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Activity Nl01Lit0r•i1lg RNquirements
Outfall
No.
Date
Sample Collected,
mo/dd/ yr
00.556
00530
00400
Oil and Grease,
nig/L
Total Suspended Solids,
ni /L
Jill,
Standard units
New Motor Oil Usage,
Annual average gal/lno
Benchmark
-
30
100
6.0 — 9.0
-
Note: Ifyou report a sampled value in excess of the benchmark value, or outside the benchmark ranee fbr pH, you Must intplentcnt Tier 1 or'Ticr ?responses.
See General Permit text.
STORM EVENT Cl1ARACTERISTICS:
Date: N/A (first event sampled)
TWA Eve11t Precipitation (inches): NIA
Date (list each additional event sarnpled this reporting period, and rainfall anuutnt)
Total Event Precipitation (inches):
Mail Original and one copy to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: D11'O Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27099-1017
S%VU-245-031305
Page I of''

Total Toxic OI'ga111C5 saltll)ltll, i5 a])])11CalIlC 011l)' for those faCllttlC5 which perform metal finishing operations, MaIlUfaCWIT semiconductors, nlanulacture electronic Cl- s'S sls, ar
manufacture cathode ray tubes. For ptn'poses of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained ill the EPA Efllucllt GUIdCliile5 for the facility subject
to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition 115 fOtlIId i t 1 40 CFR 433.1 1; for setlllCOMIIICIOI' IllatlUfaCltlre use the defirlitiotl as found in 40 CFR 469.11 for
electronic crystal mallufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22: and for cathode ray tube mallufacture rise the definition FOliild ill 40 CFR 469.31).
Facilities that incorporate a solvent num:[gentent plan into the StormH'ater I'ullutforl PrCVCmtion Plan may so certify, and the requirement for "1TT0 111011il06lh may be waived. The
solvent ntana.-emcia plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General Permit. For those facilities electiii- to employ
the TTO monitoring waiver, the discharger shall sign the following certification statement:
• "fused upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the ])errnit nlorlitorimg requiremem for total toxic organics (TTO), I
certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no duulping of concentrated toxic organics into the stOn wvater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or stormwater
runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report. l further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the solvent man, enlerlt
plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
Ken Ledous
Safety & EmVil-011111e11[al Manager
< L-,-N �/ �- L, &--�
7
(Signature (Date)
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document mid all aitachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly bather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who niffll.t(;e tltc system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering (lie information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of Fines and imprisonment for kttt►wint, violations."
% D
(Signatu fermi c)' (Uatc)
SNVU-245-0 130S
Page 2 of 2

i
JLrly 29, 2010
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Tier 11 Response Monthly Discharge Nlonitoring Report Submittal for July 2010
Watts Regulator — Spindale Facility, 100 Watts Drive, Spindale, NC
Storm Water Permit COC Number NCG030251
Dear Division of Water Quality.
Based on the analytical results for the Year 1-Period I and Period 2 samples for pH and lead at
Outfall 002 and pl-I at Outfall 003, the Watts Regulator-Spindale l'acility proceeded to the Tier 2
response actions required by the North Carolina General Industrial Storm Water Permit
NCG030000 under the referenced Storm Water Permit Certificate of-Coverar-e for these outfalls.
In addition, based on the analytical results for the Year 2-Period 1 and Period 2 samples for lead
at Outfall 001 the facility proceeded to the Tier 2 response actions required at this oLutfall.
The sporadic and unpredictable nature of SLIillmertime thunderstorms in the Spindale, North
Carolina, area has resulted in no available sampling opportunities during a representative storm
event for the month. Please find attached the original and one copy of the required July 2010
Discharge Monitorim, Report (DMR) for OLltfalls 001, 002 and 003 indicating no flow for the
Tier 2 lead sampling at Outfalls 001 and 002 due to the lack of a representative storm event
during reasonable operating flours for the month of March and indicating not sampled Ior the
Tier 2 pl-I sampling at Outfalls 002 and 003 based on Tier 2 pFl sampling guidance provided by
Chuck Cranford via email received on 12/1 1/2009. Per this guidance Mr. Cranford indicated that
PH samples should be collected as normal during the semi-annual sampling events but not on a
monthly basis as part of the Tier 2 sampling. -rile DMR also indicates NA for all other test
parameters at these outfalls based on the Tier 2 sampling analysis guidance provided by Chuck
Cranford of the NCDENR DWQ Regional office during his site visit on Tuesday. November 17,
2009, and confirmed via email received 12/14/2009.
This DMR is being, submitted by URS Corporation on behalf of Watts Regulator. Please call me
at [phone] ifyou have any questions or ifyou need any additional information.
Sincerely,
I_anette Small
Environmental Scientist, URS Corporation
Enclosures
URS Corporation — North Carolina
6135 Park South Drive, Suite 300
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fax