20191430 Ver 1_401 Application_20170803

Cleat vvater Environmental Consultants, Inc,
August 3, 2017
Mr. David Brown
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638
�nr��R�r, cc�renv, cans
g �r ao r 7--
RE: Hunter -Highway 280 (+/- 18 AC)
Nationwide Permit 18
USACE Action ID SAW-2008-0763
Henderson County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Brown,
The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of Airport Road
Acquisitions, LLC represented by Mr. Tom Hunter. The project site is located off French Broad
Lane in Henderson County, North Carolina, and was recently purchased by Airport Road
Acquisitions, LLC. GIS data for Henderson County has not yet been updated to reflect this
information. The applicant is seeking a Nationwide Permit 18 for wetland fill associated with
commercial development at the site. The site was delineated on October 28, 2016, November 7,
2016, and January 30, 2017. A request for a preliminary determination is included (Attachment
A).
The proposed project site was previously verified on September 25, 2008 and is associated with
USACE Action ID SAW-2008-0763. A copy of this verification has been included for reference
(Attachment B).
Additionally, copies of this package have been sent to Ms. Andrea Leslie of the NC Wildlife
Resources Commission and Mr. Byron Hamstead of the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Kaylie A. Yankura
Biologist
cc:
NC Wildlife Resources Commission —Andrea Leslie
US Fish and Wildlife Resources Commission —Byron Hamstead
et
32 C1aS�ton Stre
Asheville, NC 28801
828-698 9800 Tei
R. Clement Riddle, P.W.S
Principal

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NW P) number: 18 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
1 h below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Hunter -Highway 280
2b.
County:
Henderson County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Fletcher, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Airport Road Acquisitions, LLC (GIS Parcel Data for Henderson
updated to reflect the current property purchase/owner)
County has not been
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
001141/NA, 001563/NA, 00093A/NA
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Tom Hunter
3d.
Street address:
2520 Asheville Hwy
3e.
City, state, zip:
Hendersonville, NC 28791
3f.
Telephone no.:
N/A
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form -- Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
R. Clement Riddle
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
ClearWater Environmental
Consultants, Inc. (CEC)
5c.
Street address:
32 Clayton Street
5d.
City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e.
Telephone no.:
828-698-9800
5f.
Fax no.:
n/a
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1 a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9642779241; 9642872274; 9642877114
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.422076 Longitude:-82.530899
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
+/- 18 AC
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
UT French Broad River
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
French Broad/06010105
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed project site is currently undeveloped. The project parcel is bordered by a public golf course to the south,
NC Highway 280 and Asheville Regional Airport to the northwest, the WNC Ag Center to the North, and US Interstate 26
to the east. Land use beyond the immediate vicinity is primarily commercial and residential, interspersed with light
industrial use.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There is approximately 0.415 acre of wetland located on -site.
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
There are no streams located on -site.
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to authorize approximately 0.099 acre of wetland fill for the development of an
automotive dealership and service center.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project involves the placement of an approximate total of�0 099 acre of fill material within Wetland 2 (W2) and 1Netland.,3"
(Wq so that the,proposed,site can be graded and developed for the construction of an automotive dealership and servic `
center (Figure 3.1). App"roxirdately 0.04 acre of Wetland2 would remain intact and, incorporated within the site plan .�This area
would be surrounded by a retaining wall located to the south of the wetland and a fill slope to the north. The fill slope
surrounding the preserved portion of Wetland 2 would be stabilized, matted, and seeded upon the completion of construction.
Typical earth moving and construction equipment would be utilized.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other: USACE — Amanda Jones
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A final
jurisdictional determination for the site (USACE Action ID SAW-200&0763) was issued on September 25, 2008 and is
included
in Attachment B. The site was delineated by CEC on October 28, 2016, November 7, 2016, and January 30, 2017. A
PJD request is attached.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Site plans for the western portion of the tract are not complete. However, this area is likely to be built on in the future.
C.
Proposed Impacts Inventory
1.
Impacts Summary
la.
Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
®
Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑
Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c,
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ® T
Impact #1 -
PEM
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.069
Wetland Fill (W2)
® No
® DWQ
W1 ®P ❑ T
Impact #2 -
PEM
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.03
Wetland Fill (W3)
® No
® DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.099
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
39•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404) 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
0.
4c,
4d,
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g, Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar -Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact.
required?
B1 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
This project would utilize the minimum amount of fill necessary for commercial development at the site (approximately 0.099
acre). A retaining wall is being planned in order to minimize wetland impacts �Jmpacts to approximately 0.315 acre of wetland
and 0.06 acre of open water would be avoided. >,
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All construction equipment would be operated from high ground. Sediment and erosion control measures and best
management practices would be utilized on site.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the
U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation
Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a
description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules)
— required by DWQ
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of
the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation
is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu
fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required
by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian
buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes ❑ No
❑
Comments:
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>_ 24%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
®
Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The proposed project is subject to review and approval by Henderson County. Documentation
of approval can be forwarded if
requested.
®
Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑
DWQ Stormwater Program
❑
DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Henderson County
®
Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑
❑
NSW
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑
Water Supply Watershed
❑
Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑
Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑
Coastal counties
❑
HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑
ORW
(check all that apply):
❑
Session Law 2006-246
❑
Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑
Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑
Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑
Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation
of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is located in a previously developed residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation corridor.
The proposed project would not result in additional development which could impact
nearby downstream water quality.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge)
of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater would be treated at the local municipal facility. An existing sewer line is located
at the site.
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d, What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS County data and the Natural Heritage Program GIS data.
CEC consulted the FWS's "Northern Long -Eared Bat Consultation Areas" map for Henderson County. The project is not located
near any known occurrences of hibernacula or maternity sites. It is the opinion of CEC that the project would have "no effect" on
the northern long-eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS. Impact will not occur in a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places records maintained by the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and available on
SHPO's HPOWEB GIS Service. The Rugby Grange (HN0042) and The Meadows (HN0004) are listed on the National Register
and are located within approximately 2 miles of the project site. The Calvary Episcopal Rectory and Church (HN1059) is on the
study list/has been determined as eligible, and is located approximately 2 miles from the project site. Development activities will
be contained to the 22-acre site and it is the opinion of CEC that project construction will not negatively affect the integrity of
these historic sites.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The applicant will comply with the Henderson County 100-yr
floodplain ordinance.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program. FEMA map number
3700964200K, effective January 6, 2010.
8.3.17
R. Clement Riddle
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form ®Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

I U I IICI III JI IVVay GU%Mj ` I / I V r.v�
i
i
f ;.I vil
4
Legend "�,`
Approximate Project Boundary
Henderson County,
North Carolina
i
��e�rWater
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
t
I•tL k
Approximate
Project Boundary
Aki
t r >4 aT a i
4P
IIP
t '
5 ':
it &
3 rk fkpyif
VI
i{rIf
�0 125 250 500 I
Feet
Aerial Photograph
NCCGIA (2015)
Figure 5

iut tUci i 11 31 ivvay Gl✓lJ kit I v I-,%�/ I
100-YR Floodplain
Legend
Approximate Project Boundary
100-YR Floodplain
�p
4
IJ
Is
Approximate
Project Boundary
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
��ear�/arer FEMA Floodplain Map
Henderson County, FEMA Map Service Center
North Carolina Map Panel 9642
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 6

N p
c N
E r
ca= dC C) LL
«t
Le�oc9'@tea f, d
W {, z
Sam ma; 3E= W'3f ''All d 'li
An °u dw���o P /` f/ dKALLAKN
KILL
n Eodq-€oon��o l `�' ( j
�ygoAD AD 0
u�cKALI; j% �' t ; 'C
do
gym= a�1.0 g� % f
Ad0rt �z g�=x SO S 1 �l A It O
«a E m c w E m o c E y c v r. \ f; �� INK
4�( rf J N
\ n v � z1v t -
0o.E„ UN eF y i
=n-3cco tc °1��0 B�,B 3 (r,
,
Ec0 _
'
yd.= ,
_
d CD
a
c
KALIn c
m
Add I
r Air I ALKALI
c�£3 Em2�°44,
At
AS A
Ad m A Ca
KKKKA uj a do Ito Add
" N � )
�� m�Q0rn�o`' ; r C O
�aa zos���8 s .. ° a°i
-` �o
w h M
Add
U i Q d
o o ff+ t _ti f� 0
INA, Al
3ANAL
A, i ��
- ..> 1
033
IN,o N�� \ 'Lot, Add di t 11
T /(
Re ti c b -t ; l �Ad N
O O O "' , .,. - - cd
O O C _ -co
vVLAL '� 1 N td
,It
Cool m Id 0 Ad
Ie
3 H + ��m
A- . i o
N I cow Kt
! r' t U z
{ -ti
AN�di AK'tAzA AioAVftlAII;lAAIA LV AAA �LAAA -tAN l%%'
ArA
IL
IAA
IAN
ddA
LL
oAA
AI
AfAK
ASd
�s '., _ N
/l x,
K
`�� U
'. �}
ITT:
�r
k
- - /
t� d ! ..
-A,
1
ri 'C
r{/
t
I
} �° l
6
i �
dAAd
od
AA
AIL
r�
t Z U O
?- r -
ON
zAcd
'e L - r U
a
r r- i,a, { o O ,
e-
}) m° s
dil
IN
o
i
/// r
tj
IAtAAA
III
�i
s _
a
/ C d FFr-�ii
1
yy ` 4A @ C O p 1
Cdd
co
V .fl D
No
1))(i'(1 f �((�(�))))i
"+�tir'JiI�JA Aid,1�\'c '` �— iz

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: Hed:[:CfZ crwn l Zbo City/County: HENOERSorJ (c,)rj" Sampling Date: to I zb I t(,
AppiicanUOwner. Stale: r.I ( Sampling Point: VJ \
Investigator(s): Y�A'I Section, Township, Range:
and form (hi IIslope, terrace, etc.): J)E pee Sz7o r,-t Local relief (concave, convex, none): LorlcnJ E Slope (%): �) r-
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L R 1�7 N Lat: 3 5 . 4 Z14 �1$ Long: — Z S 3 ° `t 2 G Datum: "N i> a i
Soil Map Unit Name: ko - lei N eons, LoAn�N NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Y No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _� No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes �� No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
WE-rL�Nt� t .
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that cooly)
_ Surface Water (All) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Water Marks (81) — Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (BS)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Surface Water Present? Yes No � Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
L
Remarks:
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (Blo)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
— Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Yes No x Depth (inches):
Yes X No Depth (inches); 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �C No
gauge,
previous ins
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern IJ�ountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: V�J I
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
26 Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: Z (B)
44 Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I ' (A/B)
6.
= Total Covet Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: OBL species x 1 = 3 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species r x 2 = 3
1. SAn L-K rJ LG a n 0 t
° — FAC species x 3 =
2. FACU species " x 4 = L)
3. UPL species o x 5 =
49 Column Totals: (A) Co o (B)
5.
69 Prevalence Index = B(A = 1 3 3
3 a = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: t `' 20% of total cover: le 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1 5 ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1 �( 3 • Prevalence Index is 53,0'
2 _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
31 _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4,
5• 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
61 be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) approximately 20 it (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1, 5 <-%2pu% ° y ��E ¢S rJ S Is / �/ (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
30 approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH•
4.
5t Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 it (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
7 Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
60 plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g, it (1 m) in height,
10.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
11,
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: • S 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
3
0
50% of total cover;
remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
tIC�P�ncr�0� Yce
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
L)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
US Army Carps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

Sampling Point, w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
U 1 2 l o'l iz A (r q 5 l o y R 5 3 _�— �_ C c `I L O AM
'Type: C=Concentration, Q=Depletion, RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol(Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
ZLocali
Dark
_ 5udace (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
and hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _� No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSile: 43�13�EIUI�"+r�'NT�Uwny 2�,o City/County: HGNbE:E�utJ 46�rJl'i Sampling Date: 1oIZL
ApplicanUOwner. Slate: w i L Sampling Point: 11 P L 1
Investigator(s): 21! Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,): FLa60 ?LAznJ Local relief (concave, convex, none): t A 1 Slope Z. (� r•
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): d- R ;2 nJ Lai: 5 . 4 tZ I(, Z Long: — $ 7- Datum: tNP O & i
Soil Map Unit Name: D & A � D.E �n r'ct� r ? o -ro Z PE ¢ce r1 n S� "'cS NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes >r No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
H dro h tic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
y p y g Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
t
\1 t
DLNV�) I AYE To r1C01cM'�`� t c vJET� A1J>J Z ,
HYDROLOGY
Primar�ndicators (minimum of one is required• check all that aaolvl
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Data
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_
Surface Soll Cracks (B6)
_ Sparsely vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Paltems (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
— Microtopographic Relief (134)
FAC-Neulral Test (D5)
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Nox�
.
Recorded
(stream gauge,
photos,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants,
Sampling Point: � 10 t- t
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1. C�yERc.l ALt3r> A
�c0
2. I7i �yS �Z�GLrlLPe1P S t) U�r
3, QVCCws �
fJ
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
r
L
� 9 =Total Cover
% of total cover: ( cl 20% of total cover: G
= Total Cover
50% of total cover; ZO% or total cover;
Shrub Stratum (Plot size; 1 S )
1. A CC rL 2u A 2u M FAc
2. 1 72 ToDCNpl?ue.s JVL1.P1r G2n �_
� ° =Total Cover
509'° of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: Z
Herb Stratum (Plot size: S )
1. LZGus-ryzuN^ 5FE •tjtjsfc 5 y 1=A
2, So2CfFl�M{A�EPENSE S Y Ffat�J
3. IL o.J 91 t¢ aV+i 1 0r*-NA 3 y FA s
C-
Hance Test
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC;
ence IndeX
Total °� Cover oi;
Multiply bv:
(B)
(A1B)
OBL
FACW speciesy x 2 =
FAC species 13 x 3 = 2 bl
FACU species /t 5 x 4= t Y, o
UPL species 5 x 5= z 5
Column Totals: ro 3 (A) 2 �i zi (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 • ��
cators:
_ 1 • Rapld Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 • Prevalence Index is 53.01
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic,
Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 h (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 fi (6 m) or more in height and less
than
3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shru
b -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 [0 20 R (1 to 6 m) in height.
7, Herb All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
B plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g, ft (1 m) in height.
10. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height,
11.
1 S = Total Cover
5o% of total cover: • 5 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 o )
1.
5
50% of total cover:
Remarks: flnclude photo numbers here or on a separate
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation �
Present? Yes NoX
20% of total cover:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2,0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
n: (Describe to the depth needed to
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
U� 12 lo`/f? ��2 oU
D=
Hydric Soii Indicators:
_ H(stosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (55)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type;
Depth (inches):
or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
�7-l.•t IMAM
MS=Masked Sand
Dark Surface (57)
Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
and hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: a93 / I'IutJ fEfZ- N LC lawAV Coin CitylCounty: )if rJt1EQ orJ ccyrai� .. Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 1N Z
Investigator(s): VN Z If n Y Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): DEFfES 2)'AO 1 Crcul Local relief (concave, convex, none): CorJ CA\J E Slope (%): �.
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LP e N Lat: 35 14 1I.2_t S S0! Long: �SZ j 152 9 �7 S Datum: tJ A 1)
Soil Map Unit Name: DEA Ik AN(n L-&AM pro 7 t}EFCCOV 'S14PES NWIclassification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �� No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes >(_
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
NYI�RnLOGY
Yes � No
Yes No
Yes X No
is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that agglyl
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X. Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Drift Deposits (83) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Inundation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Remarks:
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_
Yes No �_ Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes Y No Depth (inches): 4?� A
gauge,
aerial photos,
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ DrySeason Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes i< No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern fviounlains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: vJ 2
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worKsneet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: d ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. AeE 2 Py Pi �u nA Y l%AC. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3
4
5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size;
1.
C�
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
A:
5.
=Total Cover
% of total cover: Z 15 20% of total cover: ,
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
� 1
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of
totaI cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.MtGDSJC( Z fir
2.SyNL�iC f i c�rcuS y�
3. LO 0 S C E 0 la TA Po t�1 T r A �_
4.
r7
1
11
Wood Vine Stratum (Plot size:
4
5
� =Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 20% of total cover: + 2
34 )
= Total Cover
504b of total cover: • 20% of total cover:
Remarks: {Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
4�v P,we, Ca pECE-'r�`t hnc�E� SCcUStI_ t,iroc c�
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
q (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: to) r' (A/B)
OBL
Prevalence Index worksheets
Total % Cover of: Multiply by,
species O x 1 = D
FACW species �_ x 2 = Oq
FAC species x 3 = Z:
FACU species U x 4 = D
UPL species o x 5 =y
Column Totals: t t (A) 3 I (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 - �1
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is 550%
3 • Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 • Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
of Five
approximately
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
2D ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBFI),
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indic
Sampling Point: W 1,
Depth Matrix
(inches) color (moist) %
/7. 100
2z ) 2 l u `1(z
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Hislic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Redox Features
Color (moist) % jypeL Loc Texture Remarks
1 oy 1 ti l U .D� C
MS=Masked Sand Grains. zL
Dark Surface (57)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
x Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N.
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pare Lininq, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
and hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: H Utah g - hluai%NJM Z Yi ry City/County: 11 tJOEgS oN c C.,N) 1 `I Sampling Date: It I I G
ApplicanUOwner:
State: N ( Sampling Point: �1 f l- Z
Investigator(s): •�N R VA`I Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): IiF PR'E `_ 'loj! Local relief (concave, convex, none): COtJC NQ1; Slope
1, 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):t2 (L N LaC 3G , 9 2 14 G � LongN : $ Z " S 2 �) Q ° t Datum: A ny
Soil Map Unit Name: rI) A �D(t.ArjCC) LOAM, UTo Z PEQN��GS
LCn 5uoNWlclassifiication:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _� No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Noxe within a Wetland? Yes No —�—
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that applyl
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Drift Deposits (83) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe;
Describe Recorded Data
_
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Suriace (BB)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Microlopographic Relief (D4)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
N
Yes o x Depth (inches):
Yes No JC Depth (inches}:
Yes No %� Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No -
gauge,
I photos,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants,
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
2.
3.
4.
2 � =Total Cover
% of total cover: S 20% of total cover
:
lino Stratum (Plot size: Iti )
4
Sampling Point: d P L Z
nce Test
Number of Dominant Species
Thal Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Z (A)
Total Number of Dominant (e)
Species Across All Strata:
Perc
ent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: S 0 (A7B)
Prevalence Index workshee
Total % Cover of:
OBL species �
FACW species �0
FAC species
FACU species _ 1
UPL species �d
Column Totals: -' -t
Multiply bV:
x1= h
x2= d
x3= �(O
x4=
x5= O
(A) r 5 Z (B)
Prevalence Index = B7A = 3 I �
=Total Cover rHydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
of total cover: 20% of total cover: _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: i S ) _
1, LTGu S77 R v m 'S T NC N S E _(O _ y C v — 3 •Prevalence Index is �3.0'
P� c / Z N AC L) _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
2• i r F y �� data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
F7
� 2 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 20% of total cover: Z •
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. M i Gt?O 5 r- 7 rtv� vx!"zrlEJrv� S Y F��
z.LEtpS-tee otz3zCoLtA10s 5 y
3, (_�NZcERA �/�PGI�LG/1 ZL
4.
7
E!
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 (t (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 (t Ifi m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
It (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
I'L = Total Cover
50% of total cover: �._ 20% of total cover. Z � 41
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1
5
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% or total cover:
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
AtLEn, \•\AS 3EF�1 rntwE\7. % 3Ru\�� - rrc,4�Erl�
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �/
Present? Yes No /�
US Army Carps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPL Z
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Type Lac' Texture Remarks
O-
`1 fz 4
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) _ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches); Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0