I-5987 I-95_Final PJD_20191107

fop
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER
GOVERNOR
November 1, 2019
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
ATTN: Liz Hair
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
SECRETARY
SUBJECT: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package (PJD) for: STIP No. I-5987, I-95
Widening in Robeson and Cumberland Counties, North Carolina.
Ms. Hair,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes the widening of I-95 from NC 211 in
Robeson County (Exit 20) to I-95 Business (Exit 40) in Cumberland County, North Carolina (STIP I-5987).
CALYX Engineers and Consultants, an NV5 company (CALYX/NV5), has been retained by NCDOT to provide
environmental services, including stream and wetland delineations and regulatory coordination for the I-5987
project.
A jurisdictional determination requet package with all supporting information is attached for your review. Field
work was conducted on April 27, July 7 and 21, August 4, 11 and 18, October 6, November 3 and 8, 2018,
February 12 and October 14, 2019. CALYX staff members John Merritt, Jennifer Harrod and Mack Des Champs
conducted the site investigations. Sixty-seven (67) potential jurisdictional features (23 streams, 27 wetlands and
17 ponds) were identified within the study area (I-5987 Waters Upload Table). United States Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) wetland determination forms (wetland and upland) are included for each potential
jurisdictional wetland.
If you have any questions, require additional information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please contact me
by phone at [phone] or email at [e-mail]. This is a request for concurrence with our
assessment. We appreciate your assistance on this project.
Sincerel ,
Greg Price
Division Environmental Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Cc: Joanne Steenhuis, NCDWR
Mai ingAddresr:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL UNIT
PO BOX 1150
FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28302
Telephone: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-977-368-4968
Webmte: w nodot.gov
Location:
500 TRANSPORTATION DRIVE
FAYETTEVR.LE, NC 28301

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Arrny Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington Dstrict
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aWx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1-5987
City, State:
County:
Saint Pauls, NC
Cumberland and Robeson
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): N/A
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: CALYX Enqineers + Consultants, Inc.
Mailing Address: 6750 Tryon Road
Cary, NC 27518
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: John. [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: NCDOT Division 6
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1150
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1,739 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓ Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
34.80138
-78.99049
❑ A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re _ug latory-Permit-
Pro,gram/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
❑ Vicinity Map
✓❑ Aerial Photograph
✓❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
✓❑ NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.arM.mil/Portals/59/docs/re_ug latorregdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App_A_Prelim _JD_Form _fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Greg Price, NCDOT Division 6 DEO, P.O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: STIP PrOj. NO.: I-5987
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cumberland/Robeson City: St. PaUIS
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.80138 Long.:-78.99049
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD 83 US Feet
Name of nearest waterbody: Big Marsh Swamp, Little Marsh Swamp, Tenmile Swamp
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See Attached

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale& quad name: 24 K Hope Mills, St. Pauls, RenneM NW & NE Lumberton
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: U.S. Dept dAg, 19aa Cumberland Co.&19la Robeson Co.
0 National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: U.S. Fish and Wildlife, National Wetlands Inventory, Latest
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): NC Onemap Orthoimagery - Latest
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
F Other information (please specify): NC Div. of Emergency Management, Quality Level 2 (QL2) UDAR Data
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signaturgatfd date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

1-5987 Stream Delineations
Map ID
NCDWQ
Score
Classification
On
Topo
Ma
Comments
JD Review
Date
Reviewer
Figure Number
Big Marsh Swamp
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2L, 3L
Brisson Branch
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2N, 3N
Buckhorn Swamp
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
20, 2R, 30, 311
Cold Camp Creek
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2S, 3S
Cowpen Branch
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2G, 2H, 21, 3G, 3H, 31
Fivemile Branch
> 30
Perennial
Yes
New in PSA Extension: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2A, 3A
Gray's Creek
> 30
Intermittent
Yes
Recently heavily disturbed: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 2V, 3U, 3V
Horsepen Branch
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2S, 3S
Little Marsh Swamp
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2P, 3P
Long Branch
> 30
-
Perennial
Yes
Extended across road, Changed from Trib to
Perennial
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2S, 3S
Meadow Branch
> 30
Perennial
Yes
New in PSA Extension: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2A, 3A
Mercer Branch
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2M, 3M
Tenmile Swamp
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 2G, 3F, 3G
SI
N/A
N/A
No
Omitted; becomes part of wetland
7.10.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
Si
> 30
Perennial
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2N, 3N
SK
> 30
Perennial
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
20,30
SL
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2W, 3W
SM
> 30
Perennial
No
Extended
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2C, 3C
SN
> 30
Perennial
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2K, 3K
SO
> 30
Perennial
Yes
Extended in New PSA: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E
SP
> 30
Perennial
Yes
Changed from Trib (TQ) to Perennial (SP)
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2G, 3G
SQ
<30
Intermittent
Yes
Changed from Trib (TG) to Intermittent (SQ)
7.10.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2M, 3M
SR
<30
Intermittent
No
Changed from Trib (TL) to Intermittent (SR)
7.10.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2K, 3K
SS
> 30
Intermittent
No
New
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 3F
TA
N/A
Ditch
No
Omitted; Changed from Trib to Ditch
7.10.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
TB
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
TC
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
TE
N/A
Ditch
No
Omitted; Changed from Trib to Ditch
7.10.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
TF
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2N, 3N
TH
I N/A
I Tributary
I No
I No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2L, 3L

1-5987 Stream Delineations
Map ID
NCDWQ
Score
Classification
On
Topo
Ma
Comments
JD Review
Date
Reviewer
Figure Number
TI
N/A
N/A
No
Omitted
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
TJ
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2L, 3L
TK
N/A
Tributary
Yes
Reduced
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2V,2W, 3V, 3W
TL
N/A
N/A
No
Changed from Trib (TL) to Intermittent (SR)
7.10.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
TM
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2K, 3K
TN
N/A
Ditch
Yes
Omitted; Changed from Trib to Ditch
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
TO
N/A
Ditch
Yes
Omitted; Changed from Trib to Ditch
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
TP
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
21,31
TQ
N/A
N/A
Yes
Changed from Trib (TQ) to Perennial (SP)
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
TR
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2G, 3G
TS
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 3F
TT
N/A
Tributary
Yes
Reduced
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E
TU
N/A
Tributary
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E
TV
N/A
Tributary
Yes
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E
TW
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E
TX
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E
TY
N/A
Tributary
No
Omitted; Changed from Trib to Ditch
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
N/A
TZ
N/A
Tributary
No
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
213,313
TAA
N/A
Tributary/Ditch
No
USACE: Tributary both sides of road; DWR:
Tributray Northbound; Ditch Southbound
7.10.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 3F
TBB
N/A
Tributary
No
New in PSA Extension: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 3F
TCC
N/A
Tributary
No
New in PSA Extension: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
N/A = Not Applicable, for systems that were omitted or renamed

1-5987 Wetland Delineations
Map ID
Acres
NCWAM Classification
Comments
JD Review Date
Reviewers
Figure Number
WA
3.24
Bottomland Hardwood
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2S,3S
WB
3.23
Headwater Forest
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F,3F
WC
2.54
Bottomland Hardwood
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
20, 2R, 30, 3R
WD
6.67
Riverine Swamp Forest
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2P, 3P
WE
1.15
Bottomland Hardwood
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2M, 3M
WF
6.66
Floodplain Pool
Expanded
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2K, 2L, 3K, 3L
WG
0.01
Floodplain Pool
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
21,31
WH
0.29
Basin Wetland
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2H, 3H
WI
1.02
Bottomland Hardwood
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2H, 3H
WJ
2.54
Bottomland Hardwood
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2G, 3G
WK
9.13
Bottomland Hardwood
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 2G, 3F, 3G
WL
5.42
Bottomland Hardwood
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2N, 3N
WM
9.34
Headwater Forest
Expanded
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 3F
WN
0.27
Floodplain Pool
Extended in New PSA: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
20,30
WO
3.00
Floodplain Pool
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2W, 3W
WP
0.13
Hardwood Flat
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2T, 2U, 3T, 3U
WR
0.06
Floodplain Pool
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2R, 3R
WS
1.72
Floodplain Pool
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2S, 3S
WT
0.24
Hardwood Flat
USACE: Draw in by NWI; logged area
prevents proper delineation
7.10.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2S, 3S
WU
0.75
Floodplain Pool
No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2S, 3S
WV
1.14
Bottomland Hardwood
Expanded in PSA Extension: No
Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2K, 3K
WW
2.74
Riverine Swamp Forest
New in PSA Extension: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2A, 3A
WX
0.85
Non -Tidal Freshwater
New in PSA Extension: No Change
1.15.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2A, 3A
WZ
0.56
Floodplain Pool
Expanded
4.16.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2K, 3K
WAA
1.18
Headwater Forest
Expanded
5.7.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2T, 3T
WAB
0.31
Headwater Forest
New
5.7.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E
WAC
0.31
Headwater Forest
New
5.7.19
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E

1-5987 Pond Delineations
Map ID
Acres
On Topo
Ma
On Solis
Ma
Comments
JD Review Date
Reviewers
Figure
Number
PA
0.17
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
20,30
PB
0.13
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2W, 3W
PC
0.03
Yes
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2S, 3S
PD
0.36
Yes
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
PE
0.26
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
PF
0.03
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
PG
0.04
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
PH
0.03
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
PI
0.02
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
Pi
0.08
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 3F
PK
0.05
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 3F
PL
0.05
No
No
Man Made
No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2F, 3F
PM
0.23
No
No
Man Made
New: No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2N, 2M
PN
0.09
No
No
Man Made
New in PSA Extension: No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2E, 3E
PO
0.25
No
No
Man Made
New in PSA Extension: No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2T, 3T
PP
0.87
No
No
Man Made
New in PSA Extension: No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U
PQ
1.78
No
No
Man Made
New in PSA Extension: No Change
Liz Hair; Joanne Steenhuis
2U, 3U

1-5987 Waters
Upload
Waters Name
Cowardin
Code
HGM Code
Area
(acres)
Linear (ft)
Waters
Types
Latitude
(NAD83)
Longitude
(NAD83)
Local Waterway
Figure Number
Big Marsh Swamp
R2UB3
RIVERINE
412.60
RPW
34.80340
-78.99028
Big Swamp
2L, 3L
Brisson Branch
R2UB3
RIVERINE
1687.81
RPW
34.83223
-78.97591
Mercer Branch
2N, 3N
Buckhorn Swamp
R2UB3
RIVERINE
172.15
RPW
34.88555
-78.96037
Gallberry Swamp
2Q, 2R, 3Q, 3R
Cold Camp Creek
R2UB3
RIVERINE
218.17
RPW
34.91202
-78.95459
Gallberry Swamp
2S, 3S
Cowpen Branch
R2UB3
RIVERINE
662.48
RPW
34.74336
-78.99774
Tenmile Swamp
2G, 2H, 21, 3G, 3H, 31
Fivemile Branch
R2UB4
RIVERINE
534.88
RPW
34.65072
-79.01164
Lumber River
2A, 3A
Gray's Creek
R4SB5
RIVERINE
686.81
RPW
34.93399
-78.93158
Cape Fear River
2U, 2V, 3U, 3V
Horsepen Branch
R2UB3
RIVERINE
517.77
RPW
34.90901
-78.95848
Cold Camp Creek
2S, 3S
Little Marsh Swamp
R2UB3
RIVERINE
388.15
RPW
34.85852
-78.96524
Gallberry Swamp
2P, 3P
Long Branch
R4SB5
RIVERINE
153.16
NRPW
34.90061
-78.95754
Big Branch
2S, 3S
Meadow Branch
R21JB4
RIVERINE
269.63
RPW
34.64970
-79.01307
Lumber River
2A, 3A
Mercer Branch
R2UB3
RIVERINE
226.50
RPW
34.82723
-78.98249
Little Marsh Swamp
2M, 3M
Tenmile Swamp
R21JB3
RIVERINE
802.63
RPW
34.72777
-78.99593
Big Swamp
2F, 2G, 3F, 3G
Si
R2UB3
RIVERINE
696.90
RPW
34.83530
-78.97669
Brisson Branch
2N, 3N
SK
R2UB3
RIVERINE
270.24
RPW
34.84911
-78.97126
Little Marsh Swamp
20, 30
SL
R2UB3
RIVERINE
447.52
RPW
34.94006
-78.91662
Rockfish Creek
2W, 3W
SM
R2UB3
RIVERINE
219.70
RPW
34.67385
-79.00516
Saddletree Swamp
2C, 3C
SN
R2UB3
RIVERINE
326.39
RPW
34.79888
-78.98939
Big Marsh Swamp
2K, 3K
SO
R21JB3
RIVERINE
359.62
RPW
34.69999
-79.00242
Saddletree Swamp
2E, 3E
SP
R2UB3
RIVERINE
156.16
RPW
34.74020
-78.99682
Brisson Branch
2G, 3G
SQ
R2UB3
RIVERINE
266.25
RPW
34.82168
-78.98329
Tenmile Swamp
2M, 3M
SR
R2UB3
RIVERINE
49.80
RPW
34.79015
-78.99409
Mercer Branch
2K, 3K
SS
R21JB3
RIVERINE
184.37
RPW
34.72071
-78.99809
Cold Camp Creek
2F, 3F
TB
R4SB5
RIVERINE
1319.70
NRPW
34.93485
-78.93355
Big Marsh Swamp
21J, 3U
TC
R4SB5
RIVERINE
1504.52
NRPW
34.93422
-78.93420
Big Marsh Swamp
21J, 31J
TF
R4SB5
RIVERINE
206.05
NRPW
34.83433
-78.97628
Tenmile Swamp
2N, 3N
TH
R4SB5
RIVERINE
39.35
NRPW
34.81266
-78.98652
Tenmile Swamp
2L, 3L
TJ
R4SB5
RIVERINE
317.25
NRPW
34.80450
-78.98958
Tenmile Swamp
2L, 3L
TK
R4SB5
RIVERINE
1698.68
NRPW
34.94244
-78.92778
Tenmile Swamp
2V,2W, 3V, 3W
TM
R4SB5
RIVERINE
54.94
NRPW
34.78854
-78.99424
Tenmile Swamp
2K, 3K

1-5987 Waters
Upload
Waters Name
Cowardin
Code
HGM Code
Area
(acres)
Linear (ft)
Waters
Types
Latitude
(NAD83)
Longitude
(NAD83)
Local Waterway
Figure Number
TP
R4SB5
RIVERINE
107.53
NRPW
34.76776
-78.99673
Mercer Branch
21,31
TR
R4SB5
RIVERINE
1 45.01
NRPW
34.73402
-78.99777
Little Marsh Swamp
2G, 3G
TS
R4SB5
RIVERINE
1001.94
NRPW
34.71811
-78.99539
Tenmile Swamp
2F, 3F
TT
R4SB5
RIVERINE
39.68
NRPW
34.71030
-78.99723
Long Branch
2E, 3E
TU
R4SB5
RIVERINE
37.42
NRPW
34.70975
-78.99824
Big Marsh Swamp
2E, 3E
TV
R4SB5
RIVERINE
821.38
NRPW
34.70620
-78.99894
Grays Creek
2E, 3E
TW
R4SB5
RIVERINE
551.42
NRPW
34.70689
-78.99695
Grays Creek
2E, 3E
TX
R4SB5
RIVERINE
636.69
NRPW
34.70511
-78.99729
Saddletree Swamp
2E, 3E
TZ
R4SB5
RIVERINE
144.38
NRPW
34.66156
-79.00946
Saddletree Swamp
213,313
TAA
R4SB5
RIVERINE
1413.96
NRPW
34.71553
-78.99699
Saddletree Swamp
2F, 3F
TBB
R4SB5
RIVERINE
1870.86
NRPW
34.72054
-79.00057
Tenmile Swamp
2F, 3F
TCC
R4SB5
RIVERINE
185.87
NRPW
-78.93666
34.93031
Cold Camp Creek
2U, 3U
WA
PF01
RIVERINE
3.24
RPWWD
34.91078
-78.95496
Cold Camp Creek
2S,3S
WB
PF01
RIVERINE
3.23
RPWWD
34.71974
-78.99446
Tenmile Swamp
2F,3F
WC
PF01
RIVERINE
2.54
RPWWD
34.88569
-78.96085
Buckhorn Swamp
2Q, 2R, 3Q, 3R
WD
PF01
RIVERINE
6.67
RPWWD
34.85916
-78.96560
Little Marsh Swamp
2P, 3P
WE
PF01
RIVERINE
1.15
RPWWD
34.82723
-78.98256
Mercer Branch
2M, 3M
WF
PF01
RIVERINE
6.66
RPWWD
34.80204
-78.99026
Big Marsh Swamp
2K, 2L, 3K, 3L
WG
PFO
RIVERINE
0.01
RPWWN
34.76798
-78.99670
Cowpen Branch
21,31
WH
PFO
DEPRESSION
0.29
RPWWN
34.75286
-78.99745
Tenmile Swamp
2H, 3H
WI
PFO
RIVERINE
1.02
RPWWD
34.74349
-78.99704
Tenmile Swamp
2H, 3H
WJ
PFO
MINSOILFLT
2.54
RPWWN
34.73778
-78.99766
Tenmile Swamp
2G, 3G
WK
PFO
RIVERINE
9.13
RPWWD
34.72821
-78.99702
Tenmile Swamp
2F, 2G, 3F, 3G
WL
PFO
RIVERINE
5.42
RPWWD
34.83314
-78.97619
Brisson Branch
2N, 3N
WM
PF01
RIVERINE
9.34
RPWWD
34.72114
-78.99992
Tenmile Swamp
2F, 3F
WN
PFO
RIVERINE
0.27
RPWWD
34.84900
-78.97143
Little Marsh Swamp
20, 30
WO
PFO
RIVERINE
3.00
RPWWD
34.94106
-78.91660
Rockfish Creek
2W, 3W
WP
PEM1
MINSOILFLT
0.13
RPWWN
34.92529
-78.94090
Cold Camp Creek
2T, 2U, 3T, 3U
WR
PFO
RIVERINE
0.06
RPWWD
34.89399
-78.95875
Buckhorn Swamp
2R, 3R
WS
PF01
RIVERINE
1.72
RPWWD
34.90913
-78.95896
Cold Camp Creek
2S, 3S

1-5987 Waters
Upload
Waters Name
Cowardin
Code
HGM Code
Area
(acres)
Linear (ft)
Waters
Types
Latitude
(NAD83)
Longitude
(NAD83)
Local Waterway
Figure Number
WT
PFO
MINSOILFLT
0.24
RPWWN
34.90528
-78.95646
Long Branch
2S, 3S
WU
PF01
RIVERINE
0.75
RPWWD
34.90730
-78.95102
Cold Camp Creek
2S, 3S
WV
PFO
RIVERINE
1.14
RPWWD
34.79868
-78.98936
Big Marsh Swamp
2K, 3K
WW
PFO
RIVERINE
2.74
RPWWD
34.65073
-79.01157
Spreading Oak Branch
2A, 3A
WX
PEM1
RIVERINE
0.85
RPWWN
34.65251
-79.01217
Spreading Oak Branch
2A, 3A
WZ
PF01
RIVERINE
0.56
RPWWD
34.79967
-78.98773
Big Marsh Swamp
2K, 3K
WAA
PFO
MINSOILFLT
1.18
RPWWN
34.91982
-78.95125
Cold Camp Creek
2T, 3T
WAB
PFO
MINSOILFLT
0.31
RPWWD
34.70428
-78.99849
Tenmile Swamp
2E, 3E
WAC
PFO
MINSOILFLT
0.31
RPWWD
34.70725
-78.99694
Grays Creek
2E, 3E
PA
PUB
RIVERINE
0.17
RPW
34.84626
-78.96912
Tenmile Swamp
20,30
PB
PUB
RIVERINE
0.13
RPW
34.93722
-78.92131
Rockfish Creek
2W, 3W
PC
PUB
RIVERINE
0.03
RPW
34.90864
-78.95909
Horsepen Branch
2S, 3S
PD
PUB
RIVERINE
0.36
RPW
34.93336
-78.93712
Gray's Creek
2U, 3U
PE
PUB
RIVERINE
0.26
RPW
34.93513
-78.93426
Gray's Creek
2U, 3U
PF
PUB
RIVERINE
0.03
RPW
34.93611
-78.93495
Gray's Creek
2U, 3U
PG
PUB
RIVERINE
0.04
RPW
34.93599
-78.93447
Gray's Creek
2U, 3U
PH
PUB
RIVERINE
0.03
RPW
34.93682
-78.93575
Gray's Creek
2U, 3U
PI
PUB
RIVERINE
0.02
RPW
34.93628
-78.93537
Gray's Creek
2U, 3U
Pi
PUB
RIVERINE
0.08
RPW
34.72053
-78.99409
Tenmile Swamp
2F, 3F
PK
PUB
RIVERINE
0.05
RPW
34.71830
-78.99384
Tenmile Swamp
2F, 3F
PL
PUB
RIVERINE
0.05
RPW
34.71780
-78.99393
Tenmile Swamp
2F, 3F
PM
PUB
RIVERINE
0.23
RPW
34.83608
-78.97852
Mercer Branch
2N, 2M
PN
PUB
RIVERINE
0.09
RPW
34.70079
-79.00131
Saddletree Swamp
2E, 3E
PO
PUB
RIVERINE
0.25
RPW
34.92107
-78.94779
Cold Camp Creek
2T, 3T
PP
PUB
RIVERINE
0.87
RPW
34.92977
-78.93716
Cold Camp Creek
2U, 3U
PQ
PUB
RIVERINE
1.78
RPW
34.93004
-78.94124
Cold Camp Creek
2U, 3U
Note: Lengths of some features revised due to Project Study Area Extension

�1 Op31
e� Ra �SR
a {
\�^i3
Arabia Rd lSR 1003)
e
i oN
o
2,
v� 71 -
�' CQ
301
l
°o -
E' ;r
7
87
V N
t 1>
o —
CUMBERLAND
BLADEN
s4,Za
Great N1ar
..- sh Church ad, `
20
s,
1006)
-
m
- I
87
72 op , 301 \\eRd�S� P\ v
d � F
` �SR 10��'� 5
cken Rd � Ii � Qa I
r`
,3
r•
1_, Study Area
3 1.5 0 3 e
Miles
/ 1 inch = 3 miles
74 \ s Source: NCDOT, NCDEO, CALYX Engineers and Consultants
�6
Figure Date: 10/28/2019
OWNER
ai►Mi �� I& 1I
•�`j`ylji{ice; �+J�1`.����
r
Fay�tlefle
M /
A
_I �R
c ✓R
t
`, ..� �.
NORTH CAROLINA
o DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 6
error nnwsv°e
1-95 Widening from
US 301 (Exit 22) in Robeson County to
1-95 Business (Exit 40) in Cumberland County.
STIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and Cumberland Counties
Figure 1 - Project Vicinity

et
re AOL
r !•� '� `�V
16
+ram-
-L
Q _ Hope Quadr--'_� -� Cedar Creek Quad
- 'ark uad ! A `' r
IN
j ~ '
Ile
It
,r l :i. .
KING � / t� •, 1 � — ' �1 _ (( ice. � i r- � i � � a ,.� ,.�
_ -; � � ', — -_-..- - --__,,," nor' . �.... i � `_ �♦.,. _ . `� _ a� ��'-
Ao-
Alt. RqV
Rm
Alm
Dam Z
4-1
AL
♦• � _l _ ! _ Cs�u++ --_-_.r•`1�..--._ ,r. may,
:�- - � , - � -, co-.•. ti�
,,`•y I -._ - - � _r�_ _ �{ � .. �3 ' -�p[[ to � J• .__.A. { - i
1, ' - _ '`,�` __ I ' - .. += , -. � ,` -'�, ,`, , 1•�-''
4 It
� •r► -- - . � ' � '•n} 1 /
Rennert Quad1 r -• �- :,a -Sa�nt;Pauls Quad �.��_s�-�, - �- ' b Duart Quad �.
411111
+ — -• - tea•• s _ -s• .• ` +� � � '`" -� ` I
Ilk
io
Alf
IL
tic
46( . '� S , 'b _ w. 4 fit. •
TJ
46
E
ti L Northwest Lumberton Quad ---- 4_` A. - , Northeast Lumberton Quad? { ,I�wn Tar Heel _Quad
� i ram• - - { , c � •r•r- .� �
ILA
_ -_ _1 -_ '`--- __ _ _ , , j t-__ .• i ,_ ,.. � .- °o`'y NORTH CAROLI NA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
t DIVISION 6
• - - 1 �__) I He" SQoe
_ --.. _ - _ .: _ - - __ • Q.__ _ 1-95 Widening from
-T ,•,. US 301 in Robeson County (Exit 22) to
- 4
- 1-95 Business (Exit 40) in Cumberland County.
Study Area
•_• Lume�gr�on � � - � � J 2.5 1.25 0 2.5 STIP Project I-5987
- • �-' _ ---�
Miles .'Southeast,LUmberton Quad Robeson and Cumberland Counties
1 inch equals 2.5 miles
—woo'. hill k
Source: ESRI, CALYX Engineers and Consultants - -_r -__ t Topography Map
Figure Date: 1/18/2019COp
l_ _yam i

s
s .c-cnk
�',.r.
TIR AL
C
41
7i&-, 7i
t'
/
r s;
r.r��� a - t a�. g- �„ ��:� - � � I.Os;: • x '�y" .gym` Cm 301 :�// -<,;; � >~ r:'�
M1
- Mom' s �. s • I �'': h�., j�, yeE
s
VFW
i
2p
e z.
o
tdlit'
Fayette. ti . f ll,p y i
• - • •,tf146 e)► ��'�y r.�� "`\e "4 ;� 1sS � � -.�i M1�' /l r i 1, - :.�a +�:.. r
'� -+ . �..�. •% � -i r .., s OyJ'iyJ
Y
� .. ..
X.
Or
��
"'y._ -„_.' ` .r_ \ ,� r•--" �-s ^- t .r
i
i'
o.rrrrq,,
Map Index Interstate Municipal Boundary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT 1-95 Widening from
_ mo OF TRANSPORTATION US 301 in Robeson County (Exit 22) to
Study Area US Route IL County Boundary ,yN o {^N DIVISION 6 1-95 Business (Exit 40) in Cumberland County.
NC Route STIP Project 1-5987
1.5 0.75 0 1.5 Miles IQ Robeson and Cumberland Counties
Major Road
1 inch = 1.5 miles
Local Road Figure 2 - Field Verification Index
Source: NCDOT, NCOneMap, CALYX Engineers and Consultants Figure Date: 11/1 /2019

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
—• •— Intermittent Stream
—• — Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2A
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
a) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
meet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in N.M Carolina (21 NCAC
66.1600). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtained from to
listed below Streams located to
ces and Wetlands: All features In field were
corded using a mapping grade Tdmble Ge,XT or Geo6000 GPS recewer wit
supposed sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Erglneere+Consultants (formerly Celyxj
Aerial Photeg2phy: NCDOT

rs ■y f
' �� r11tr �.c�h `} "',� r� I "'� V`%�r1•�`�. .. �•ni:'� �::, y .� �� a _ .4 3�•:�44
} Mk '-A � h'�.. piJAMW
1 ; N
r
V.
_ '�� - ♦ sus• �:
� IF
1 _
too
�� -� �..�.9,�wel� aaa�w9.wllaw9a•
._ la
� s � , , ,•�� .F II, is -
�Y
�` Otis
IT
AiI
/ 999 7
u lwl IlIflR nn - s �,
i
l / y
S r lr'
I
'c'',I
:re
yy ifIH1A1.1 .11911 ,19 , 9 _ )
+a.t9M
I"I no
•k E° 9 411rvFm�191>w9„a9\+9 \
a• 34) u:+r,..
1
t 1 1 n
"1 g II
CD
COD
di
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
— —• Intermittent Stream
— — Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
sr Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25 27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2B
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
Th, Exhibt- F pl g p rposes only and f [ h h d not
meet The Sta d d f P tce for Land --y-,I, N M C (21 NCAC
56.1600). Th. E I Ti t ... p led from ava l bl - f f n bta d f to
tsted b St All 10Cated the
ur s and Wetlands: f t 1, held—,
,,,,led us ng pp g gr. de Trimble G-XT or Ge06000 GPS rece ver wit
supposed sub eter accuracy.
Sources NCOOT, NV5 Englneere+Consultants (formerly G.II
A-1 Photography: NCOOT

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
�I Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2C
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
a) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
s Streams antl All f-Wres w
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
—• — ••• Intermittent Stream
—• — Tributary Waters of US
® Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
sr Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2D
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This sho Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information wn hereon does not
eet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
66.t6613). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtained from Me
listed below Wegands: located in the field
s Streams and All f-Wres w
cordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble GeoXT or Geo606o GPS receiver, wiM
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV6 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

!
yf�� ::i"�iM�6 ✓. �' rit�6. �+i' �a �w+._d«iy p � "�
/! •dry. r✓_F" � • � A� �l Y � L N �.�«T'.L � Y J' � � A! % 'i' }-` '• -
� 36;- S f �'s?r�.r Yy t'e 7 'aS+� t },��sti..✓ �ti '� � ; < Y � � - � F• •f' E p
+ F t
IV
�r
.%'-;•T—
r 'k e �" r.�.'ff,� rr•`:s�U':E.S• f i�' ,� •�1w'�'. �'�'•• .� � t �� �
so
dt�.'' S^.�,�. �Y '� �rAt . cY fi `5',-.T� �� f •:f. C .�F•£`. s
� 4 1
•. e �� P N -
- r
., c ... ' ' f ,`Y "Kw,yP�7`i 'a,= m.' .. ..: yF •r-'y. � ` 't''`v `xl"�� _ � - - :y sn "'� i+��
TT
�ry ,.,.,.p;,r' �' � "'��'}=`r9 J ? � r "r,', w.c. +t, F 3,,. r.'Z �` ,�, _ } `�K. ;r ,s ►- �i � iY-g}
y.
- �; ry. �? '.� � ., 1 "+Tip .r�� ,�.,:i, �, _ \1~�0.'~i �` _ .'J�` •;;:.� ��` s�
,r•: ' F• �,ya . 'r z _ ..! f.J� ..!'._. '�l�"'A tr,. • r - -+ 'W �.., , i• �'a' s .}•
.. " e- s- � •f lyt� a,- �'.. r �, �� 1 r: :i,�i �i�"•,;n: ��' -- t�l:.� ''l n. _ iLE' .'.'.i F'.y "L..{�' _ 3.
�r1„r. �'F « . � j r♦- %. ./ '.I ,i . �,.� 64f : ��•• dt � i,^�.S y .Fir^ :.�y�l �'�.,.{. •r4 - >'^r - � ^�
an - �T3 't.a X"ti + { _ «�.x • ..Zn.:. S �) t f4 `' -,,�' -:: a ::S s�!: �f - j,..
r {�, •F-
'fir .P , i'k'.y Nj;. +� 4� •T'Y 6 Ft ,-;F �,�.."�!. ru.-.�^" -. ,I.< ,a .: -
n _ ,
e`:,F �- ,� r+ i r�^ 7.�C' d'<ri>.r `.a-(T.�Ka��'' .;�� �. ts� ►y: Y --r � �,{�.� � lam, '-
dY.., _ - .fir^ '�, _ ;.t'` "� �" eta* ids.+ v � "ti" r r'-• � -s++"� _ - ..
w
- `' .�+��,i." j..,s� ,. ' f k ':fir 4r jya�, �1 r �•s �� �` r ��,•�«t ��r v'�r• e
-` •-L,fiy,`t.t+,_Ft. ..,'• r :i' � {i"d%t,� r��f'tR �:•. � - �y.� �'•-
•' � ��t r �A� t _ � . � a•. yt r .�lt �
�tY ',� I„ t•`. /w - _,-Y L Sf` Y` Y ems.. ..' ,� .
zo

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
—• •— Intermittent Stream
—• — Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2F
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
aet The Standards of Practice for Ldntl Surveying in NOM Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtained ft. to
listed below located
ces Streams and Wetlands: All features In to field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or 3eo6000 GPS recewer it
supposed sub -meter accuracy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Celyx)
Aerial Photography: NCOOT

•i+ �: r:- aLegend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of L
Wetland
vr
Ponds
A, Data Points
0 Wet
0 Crew:
r
,
•
r
- Merritt,J.
`J. Harrod, B. Levat
A• 1
K Y7 j
- �-..ram. ,+ -� .-NovemberI _
,
and February 12, Ma
April 19
-�o :..- i y'wP�T .C�'.•-,`+•e- :i..'... -_�e• , "S+t hy` .�.,: rC A�, - Tip' 'iuy •4�® �
.
- l,.
r. tea• � � WJ'.
�.'x iTMY.. 1 Y
i Am
p a�H W-95 Widening fro
in Robeson Counl
to 1-95 Business
in Cumberland
TIP Project k
Robeson ar
Cumberland Coui
Map Date: 11/1/2019
i
=.tea, ! •.. `'
1! Q
GRAPHIC SC
:. r - >, .. .. 4 :*Feet
g teary [� ay an y
` 1. •'t; . „-yf{K:. ''' _ i

F �: MA
` �.:✓ �y,a ,L = ';sr .� � - � '��� � ��?�i�• �'} � t . v"_ .F.." � `+ '-A y]r ^ a`Il�` ,�i"" .y�,+
��y1'r.' � �(' i-. �--: wd Mx'�.1"- +:If _. •{�f �a`<<'!'�' �� +f A�- �+I��'.� \.:T
;;: •�; � �' �': - ;� - .,. ;, y� fir€';
7.1
�g�
tY��+"K ♦ t
����
'fru'dj�,..0
4: �H'�, 1 "A :�'r�
�
�+F
t
t
-:i
s.
r:
•r
Y
1•
yr,
s�4 .S
i
ti
,
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2H
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
Th s Exh'bit is for plan. purposes only antl f [ h wp hereon does not
meet The Sta tl tl f P tca for Land Sury - - N M C NC AC
Y 9 (
56 1666) Th ,l M1 ti [ mp letl hom bl - f t n b,s d f Me
I b lecatetl ,h f Itl
stetl s:
urges St antl d.bl, de: All XT W ,
portletl usp9 pp g g tle Trimble GeoXT or Geo6066 GPS rece ver wiM
-pp osetl sub eter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Engnears+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aerial Ph-graphy: NCOOT

-�_r • r � t r-�rl� r 1 ,t 3; r..sr /�,, �'4""�+,r_ � y�.,,�g s,,.
-P�a: it r C .r J � t 'i N,."!" YC Y'•: c. .r�"d�i.r A.'A ..'+ 7 ..k✓
g'.g'�c .r 4. raj. �`... ..., ... ;,f..i. f.: .•.. ;f- r..._. ..� vv. f. £�.. ..R. 1'1 t. :
:'S*.;:.: e�..g' �� r . _ r?,•-� � ' �r: r -.:�s rr a.,,_ ' n i �// � '�° py�f is � .,ds i r --
• �N , ai . t �'. sF t ; r ?'fit r '. • i 1 {' r - a 74 1 ',=� �Pfo-Yn�� i - � fly �.�•f f� ,.,.y1w�
� i' ..:�: /� �b-b��ssj,,(,, 1L ; r r •�, 1. , _C f� rt �fJ�r� j R� rt'"o-'o-t t v a! M1''t Cz .������r �� �'�'+
1. �. .s�3.r{ --;U c.•S%� ..r4 4•i. yf L � tf���o>..t �A' '�.j rr r>�-t�it1
.'� Ntf �'� �i ♦ i ar. di 1 �o- { r 6 f ,�>r ���ti!•�¢R�7 �,. �� a1 1������ r'S'�;
r ;i � r:. . s i t r 1 At r.. t 1 1,=� � � ,g. ram• � rr �s t'�' .�"� �j '�' { :�
��1: 1.•�1� F tr i` - 2'�'{ �•zff a'`t r�,t� ! �4 �''•.,'�"'� :fr a' y -r-/ gtf'3
' ' '�s � �! r 1' F�r�t; a �!¢,�m.�y r,c � �� tg� �, r `4`r-� ,1 `i fc. �"• (-a ', Ca,�
- �X ems,• <� +'fit �r � �`.r `l A' asFis, ' �-':a r�fti �£ f � •�5'i .� v� . � <t�t r5 . �y''i t r fi
})
rn?'t•;ibc-ui8 s-`� - f Y^%t� —7Z r•{-), e"'l P 3
-:_,.•+ram ,�i:-*^rw?" a �� �-_ •
■
Z
� Y4"�
kf r t d
4�
'� •� < . 4, _
rl
TP e
n r
i$. t • `�. ,,,,,y
. � � � ,�, .! -alt 1 faG M� '+'.S �L �t 6Ji`}t'•ri� :�
N
- �;'�` rE- r "t s.. '*any ••.l `�„�;d >�. Y 3�.,r 6 ,.. _
a 4 a .f*k.
11
�1
Y .� w
Y ti j�� 3*e
f• Y S iFj
1-95
in Ra
to
Map D�
zsMOP
m

ti A z.y
v
_
lip
yt
ow
y+' . -� ' t-,r• a F'v^ r d y�-•Y J K� j=$•g� • �' •�a .y+ r T Nt'^- z
r +'
7
,t ♦
� _ �� ' w �
:.� ..''�qY- .a` „s • r� *$.. a. � - hi iR i �J.a � '.' * i';t r " do
-.
s
-"'k:•y'".Qaa,'!. t y.4! -'``-s '�s-.@,-_, z :y*�s. ev :.�a..J�ai�Jl%:'..-l;,t♦.L 6 V•`.iY .._.+Tw�•�."'Ks'-.�IP+F�t.� �. y
,� '. '+. �:- ` `w 4' 2-' i F ... .� .:y-.: S. 'i, �r }rt '. '� 5 "�.J -`!?ij "U �' ♦�qia --.. t•. ♦. __ � - __ -
�+ - ; e p.. # _.rat s F ° ;�; : t4"�ef,<;; • r 'r ''Rd'.. i � ,, a e k�. �' . u *:�°♦ - +3y" K ,� -„ ..,;•. -,S #�' .` �°�`� _ - . --t _ ---+�+ew
�AIr
s •3%f "� f� xe ,�,�y.Ys�.aF— :ny
�'t •'�� 4 � e s 3
+.: x , A � 4� .� +y _ ,,, #' y'ti' �".-{- a A+°t•,"` ryw..�- s's :• 5 ��� • . �':fdq;,' - �.ri +r.�: _ s_. L �
u."A. 'y}r. F' J F-• �T4 r 1 i ?it
di, ` { J'w \"!: •!. 4 qs r• :'{ J , }1'.:r
'. •1 k
i
i,
'%v �Y`JOd. - -., � s ��a-. �,'� �i � Y
i� -,� � �pq A�1 +�v SY' �.�� !✓� rH`(4r w �'�Y-�"�y°44'vq °p �i'.-. ! R�-•C .
' •.dYa'.�ny..,,...., ,_. �T••',.--b f ;a�%'', �4 �c'6yq (.ta"+4.; t.,�
A .� 'qS .,, � a! �!��'t 5. vF F / E��.A•��,''',• � R �'-a f. -
<.�' _ _.. -♦ a �t , k A � ` � l_-ay ./L Si'�8 ity•d �i+y- � �� ♦ � + :�S" C: --
V o 4rl
av-
i
v • A,W -.
• � 'h' t -.�`r .ems .: r ��'' � � � ' � �j , 3 c ��
• � YY � .7y ��.+'��.�''�.rr '�'e ;� Y WO
■
w

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2K
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
0 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
s Streams antl All f-Wres w
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

Legend
QOriginal Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2L
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
a) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
s Streams antl All f-Wres w
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

O
� ' Q
'f "�" . , - d.� $Arts•_ � ._
tea, a ;,;w•=�.-c�s�•���6,:� -� �r;:.
w
k
'3K�• yAyall

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2N
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
0 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
eet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: located in to field
s Streams and All f-Wres w
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

r f
r � a• .a
:. - WO
.�
,a
Danville Dr _
n` t
1 i�,rr
meµ)^.2
k e
J
`41.
St9rd • .!;
elDr 7
P ,J•
AbV
` nzr �Freedo
Freedom Dr
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. Deschamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and FebruarC) y 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
20
Field Verification Map
I-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to I-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project I-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
Th E h'tit for pl g p rposes only and f [ h w h d not
t Th St tl tl f P tca for Land Sury N M C I NCAC
y g- (21
56.16013). ThE M1 ti [ mp letl hom ava I bl - f t bta d f Me
r t b wenands: r located
d l st aria All w I N field
tltl s n9 pp g g tle Tdmble GeOXT Or Geo6g00 GPS rece ver wiM
supposatl sub meter accuacy.
Sources NCOOT, NVS Englneere+Consultants (formerly Celyx)
Aerial PhotOgmphy: NCOOT

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
—•••—• Intermittent Stream
—•^— Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2P
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
aet The Standards of Practice for Ldntl Surveying in NOM Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtained ft. to
listed below located
ces Streams and Wetlands: All features In to field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or 3eo6000 GPS recewer it
supposed sub -meter accuracy.
Sources: NCDOT, NV5 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Celyx)
Aerial Photography: NCOOT

\C
�' O
'r'- ^� ��_�
,
w ♦ -
f _ p'
81u1a� 1,..'Y,t„c. ,�J - t
r �'.Y � j .�• ;, :"� a '- Lsr y� `�. �� - • p. '
_ 2-.� ,�{. '# ,>."-fir 'Y- _ VJS..
• +sr+l
sr, ... - "' .�:�,'
"- -r
_fib,' - e
7yy
- r�y��
r
�
_
}- �,,., ,- y'
�.
s
)
�. .rp,.n
/^Q)
"4 a •-x, p.�,. ,,. j 4 -
�:Y r� r �'
�._, may,
- - (�>��
1
-r
41 -
e a I✓ Ire
• t'F+ ,� f �/f y � � n _
-. r.. x � ' $, �
a
y{
0
tK. iN ,,,-1
�r
-
_, ryd4[ . liy"z
-_ a i. „,. ,1: s•r -; `
•Y y is"t�si',�, ,, h' ~yYs�. .,d. F�»
r 1 (�
.
i •i�� s+s dam/ ,
2 lie Lou D
,
'R�r`a'-�', - - 'w/► _ <' = y -� iS�i"+s'�e.�8+;;rye�1':7�rr• ;
.gib.
r !
Qs
�'P
j
- 7
pew t� .
r�
�J
l s
r
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2Q
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
Th E hih- for plann ng purposes only and f [ h wn hereon does not
t Th Sta d-, Pt for Land S— - N M Carol NCAC
of ... ne y ,, na (21
561600) Th E M1ti[ mpl,d hom ava bl - f t !,a d ft.Me
Ieted b Wetland$: to -,di W
St .,d All f-Wree field
=
ordetl nng pp g g d, Trimble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS —ver w0
-pp ... d sub eter an —y.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Celyx)
Aerial Ph.Wgaphy: NCOOT

Extension Study
� �,_g� 7•' b '�`'
a114TP
'•i L 3`
;c dy:1 xx't�i:' `i7+�� � � � ': `�y`,'�' :y. ",* :As t �y,' ,t %�'s �„ ..s,` �. ;t • •
�.. -;`'•- �v'. .,fir: *�j(�,r. .!'�.t`. '+.-� ,�}"� � •� '!�i. �'` r.q_r '�,s >;�'. i� -. �ip! �'��`��":ie ;}'.3
l",-.'•�i4yDr(5.�� �i- �a •a•\' �`f',. ,yc ` �_ 1`� .s.. IJ,�"�` ,� .y. e. '�•r� 's° is ��` _ > -3•
dr --�-'�, ,�Y ^, *,li. '_ �3. .mil• ;. ':�I - a .. �.,�r $';"� 'i .�", .�{ r /��k„. ., �..
'!- yam,,-ac '•;;' "�z'%i'.=rI ;`r'�e " i - r/\ _
Perennial Stream
x
Intermittent Strea
_ ty�'f'�i°"` v''e «°�;,y •.S T s.' .� K, n. - `r: i.s eF : 'f+..5�f� -•p a; "Ll*. t.. O ' •'�
= /•,,�,�3 «yam;+k. .�K"- ' .�*.'" -;�v. \.. x<: ♦Tributary Waters
f
a«,%'.<-,
? Wetland
�" i F.
`< :wPonds
f %,
r
Data Points
74
,�i.+' {. .G�� i� 2�tt. �. �y� ` y� 'die- •i l� �. �hV'
•
0 Wet
jr
.g^ i•i�+�'. r-:I�-:1� '�L Sy,;�V�+' mac;, �� _ a .�,' �,, .1'9+0.
r i
l<�` � ✓ � � a t-.s' /. /i ji,., / Y -.�•�t ,� `; i.' S � . ^ �:,..1 - • • B. I-
". :i D.
if
.' •
ter. �� �r October Nove•'
•February
April 19, May
a�WC R * +L� yy. 1 7 it.
October 1
Field Verific.-
in Robeson Cou
Y.
} to
in Curnberlar
F - �• t .TIP Project
RobesonCumberland Ci
;i
1
19
GRAPHICZ
f - II 200 400
/ 1, / - d•� s f a -�

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
® —• Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2S
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
a) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
—et The St.-- of Practice for Land Surveying in North Carolina (2, NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtained from to
listed below Streams All 10Cated to
ces and Wetlands: features In field were
�corded using a mapping grade Trimble G-XT or Ge06000 GPS —wer wit
pposed sub -meter accu acy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Erglreere+Consultants (formerly Celyx)
Ae-Photogmphy: NCDOT

�4,3,
s P 'ilr
ue
¢� y
-
s' 3v� !
IV
A& An NOW
iL
.,- i,�.-ter.-�.�---�--_- . - _-�—__ "_ _ — — ... .• - � � —_ .. "_.� — .' - - -,--' ��
arc � < ,� + .,�,,�•� ,� � �.
� r ��: yn�,y'Yy { sj.+., .s � �; 1, 'i; �.'r F'_ - k`s�. 'i� �.. ,n• .���� ' _
r
{+
.?,y.'"H,u *.Z� ° 1."."�',. - /�w.r ,�; ` : •• - f' - -t♦� s - ,
f.•{�. YJ1`f ??tt'��,; n'�44""GG Q Mkt +¢���r ..'.by Y
+.�"��'�,�-,�• �.t _ • . ; � �, %�' �' , 7j ,�: Jam,,. - � 't
�•�a - r` t
�yNO
yy
p�K. r�,`!xy`�, ,a' •t. .�' #.-....� �-.'� ".1 '
} ,
•r. *3.A.,.yl��g�,��� 23t', - � .�. Y �" '� .,� �,• :� �' ` �'a' ars,�
/��RAf '�•,��+.��, �.t,�.�q���1� � .a� , � J' `wr.� 1�ry.T S tt y i �"_/ ;,.
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
— ... —.... Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2T
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
G) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
Th E hih f pl g p rposes only and f t h w h d of
t Th St tl tl f P tce for Land Sury y g- N M C (21 NCAC
66 1666) Th. E M1 ti t -, led hom ava bl - f t bta d f Me
t b W lo-,d f ld
d St ms antl .,ds: All f W re
recordetl us ng a mapp ng gratle Tdmble GeoXT or Geo6066 GPS rece ver wiM
supposetl sub meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT NV6 Engnears+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aerial Photography: NCOOT

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2U
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
f) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
The Standards Practice for Land Surveying in NOM Carolina NCAC
aet of (21
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtained ft.to
listed below located the
ces Streams and Wetlands: All features In field were
corded using a mapping grade Trimble GeoXT or 3eo6000 GPS renewer it
supposed sub -meter accuracy.
Sources: NCDOT, NV5 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Celyx)
Aerial Photography: NCOOT

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
2V
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
G) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
The Stantlartls Practice for Land Surveying io N— Carolina NCAC
aet of (21
66.1600�. The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtained from the
listed below —.,ds: features located the
ces Streams antl All In field were
cordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble GeoXT 0, Ge0600o GPS —wer with
supposatl sub -meter accuracy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV6 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Cely,)
Aerial Photogaphy: NCOOT

>� .. ,� �` ' `�{ YEA � (Y f ��-'�,�.. •
a.
i - r
I` 9
:
.Y
x "�'-fF} yFf�' 11111111 11
wo
k .q .>> F� ;��,e' it '`, . `te.� ;.�''• � � I -
:�Data P;
CIO
PB
�. a +� a � r �; �..A,�1,,'��.�rS��Jnf/... ,��.,'-N4� r'G 'atpr� �trr !�; sa- `tr �, tyy,/� 'Ly - o.'Nj'. k.,'xf♦'-.yy�, - r�.,
41,
in
�1; .I , • '� 1f. �' ,�' y, ^�'T. f. .}'/ .: �1'�"_ :� 1 . �'. V i t �.! �', b AanF: 7• '.�.. r
- � % - it h > �y r �' Ve•.. - .�
�'. � "���`"�: q�i fjj i >� "L � C � � ��� '�,a�t4 �5 p rt u c,- !�" •S: �"`
- ' �.'� .-...<- �' ��• g' � �,. ih zt: a t _}e�: 1'�.n � ��-:' � � � 6.r, c ew v ti, S¢p�y i- ._
4-
ts• •
,"Fir '�` , .."Y.F. , ,a ^a. _,..f t� ':d.' ��-+...+F:�. �k+''. _ � ` 11 � C• `'u� .� k �` p
.QM1U'. `6� T _ "'i'a'�„i' ':i' S •'!' ' '•: ';�. .�F .4" � � ~�_�,{y; �w``�` �}�.�, F �, �'�-1�'��� - - art 9a ��k_h hk '"1.ti�a: m �`<
-
_ .� i.
•1 r y�i,:� '. ,.A 1,-"h +tea a--"' 7 CRMap a
_ r,

q_ s`� -.i/ \' I: ',` EI'if � �;v1} 1 �1'1� O\ • • \ � ( Tt � � �I �O( � '�` � �'/� •
g r } ��C) ��ti Cr,•
f1ir
to 1
►i� \/ l }
3 No
-
tyL,.r��
> ` ► f 3J 3L 3M > 3N 3Q ;
rna.N1ON 1
r.
,
J
Do EO AggNh 1 O _ - yt� bJ / ' \ i e yir•
/ \
=3
-
E
\\e SEAeoARD
Fayettev\ a ► ,_} \ j t �a i } ` �i' 1 \
• t'� t� � ., ,,� a\ ° � � r 3 � .%�' � ��\_ 1,
o
a.\—�iQG.tt \� 41 � fi� i Norpe �✓+ $ i y �\ \ �` - a�.�t � � i r ,p� r 1��G�F � � Y� S 1
r
M , @7 , 1 �o tt
\ �,. .. _` � ,. '� � ) �; • \\ a ca, '� � � /
t
Map Index Interstate Municipal Boundary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT 1-95 Widening from
_ ma OF TRANSPORTATION US 301 in Robeson County (Exit 22) to
Study Area US Route IL County Boundary ,yN o i^N DIVISION 6 1-95 Business (Exit 40) in Cumberland County.
NC Route STIP Project 1-5987
1.5 0.75 0 1.5 Miles IQRobeson and Cumberland Counties
Major Road
1 inch = 1.5 miles
Local Road Figure 3 - Field Verification Index
Source: NCDOT, NCO -Map, CALYX Engineers and Consultants Figure Date: 11/1 /2019

Legend
QOriginal Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3A
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
4) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
meet Tha Sta—odr of Practice for Land Surveying io N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). Tha Exhibit was comp,l,d from available information obtained from to
listed below Wetlands: All located in to fi0d
ces Streams and f ,.— were
scordetl using a mapping 9ratle Tdmble G-XT or Gao6000 GPS receiver wit
pposed sub-meteraccuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aadal Photography: NCOOT

Il • /
r �
4-77!
1
nad �
j
f
�r
• I
W.
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3B
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
a) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ar s Streams antl All f-Wres w re
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

N a
NwAi
k�
711\\\\_ n � qa"ssasoaeaaaag�
rA1 Vdopmomwdbr-ldmL -.-&
M+
`41
•
� O
s
�
�
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3C
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
a) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hmm available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ces Streams antl All f-Wres were
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT m, Gem6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
suppmsetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Phmtgraphy: NCOOT

0
/S / /
/ I i 4e
y
S •
•••
Cc
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
- Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3D
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
0 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
aet The Stantlartls of Practice for Land Surveying in NOM Carolina NC AC
df
66.1600). Tha Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
s Streams antl All features w
cordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV6 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

law
CJJ
it
)
0
g
a•.
•.3 �]
•
0
a
• Copyright:© 20
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
— Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3E
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was ...piletl hmm available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
s Streams antl All f-Wres w
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT m, Gem6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
suppmsetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aerial Ph-graphy: NCOOT

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3F
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
s Streams antl All f-Wres w
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS recewer wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

i
r
y1
Copyright:© 2013
a
r
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
- Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3G
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis For planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
eet The Standartls of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl fiom available inform h- obtained from to
li-d below, Sh-- Wega - All fea loc - in to field
ur es and - were
cortletl using a mapping gratle Tdmble GeoXT or G-6000 GPS receiver wit
supposed sub -meter ac —y.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Ph-gr-aphy: NCOOT

"� s �
`w
'r 1•�I 1
I
/
\KWHlop
�
•
owl
Ir soft
i�
+ Copyright:© 2013
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
- Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3H
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta —da of Practice for Land Surveying in — Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from_"_ listed below
Wegand1: Ipcatetl in to fieltl
Streams antl All fi-W,s w
—,d,d using a mapping _dTdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supp—d sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aerial Photography: NCOOT

1 �
sl r ' •
Jl%
w t
A
4
qJud 8 uad��At
• � c
r�
At
..%N%
ksh, It; 4
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
31
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hmm available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ar s Streams antl All f-Wres w re
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT m, Gem6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
suppmsetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aerial Ph-graphy: NCOOT

i
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
—•••• Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
3 Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3J
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl mfmrmatimn shown hereon does not
aet The Stand —,of Practice for Land Surveying in NOM Carolina (21 NC AC
66.1600). Tha Exhibit was compiletl hmm available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ur s Streams antl All features w re
cordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT m, Gem6000 GPS receiver wit
suppmsetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV6 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Ph-graphy: NCOOT

t
i
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
- Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3K
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
eet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiled hom available information obtained from to
listed below, —.,ds: located in to field
sources Streams and All f-Wres were
recorded using a mapping grade Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ---r wit
supposed sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

61,
Mkk
1
1► � i
t doom r f
J
A •
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
3 Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
K
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
a) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is For planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
eet The Standartls of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was ...piletl fiom available inform h- obtained from to
li-d below, Sh-- Wega - All fea loc - in to field
ur es and - were
cortletl using a mapping gratle Tdmble GeoXT or G-6000 GPS receiver wit
supposed sub -meter ac —y.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Ph-gr-aphy: NCOOT

i
f
•
•
%--7
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3M
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
0 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hmm available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ar s Streams antl All f-Wres w re
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT m, Gem6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
suppmsetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aerial Ph-graphy: NCOOT

`W 0001100000
s'91W
C.
I
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3N
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was comp,l,d hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: lo-,d in to field
ur s Streams antl All f-Wres w re
cordetl using a mapping tle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacygra.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

1 #
- -I W..,,
r
•
/y
•
i
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
— — •• Intermittent Stream
_- Tributary Waters of US
® Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
30
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
G) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE

w
dOp
ale
Ill Aft
4
;a
'oil
M
� asp
.-r I
s
Legend
ED Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
- Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
0 Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3P
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hmm available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ar s Streams antl All f-Wres w re
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT m, Gem6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
suppmsetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aerial Ph-graphy: NCOOT

f
J
ft
$1
r
40
d
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3Q
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
ID
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis For planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
eet The Standartls of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl fiom available inform h- obtained from to
li-d below, Sh-- Wega - All fea locatetl in to field
ur es and - were
cortletl using a mapping gratle Tdmble GeoXT or G-6000 GPS receiver wit
supposed sub -meter ac —y.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aenal Ph-g,phy: NCOOT

i
&A
loop
own ago
00,
�L
Copy
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
— — •• Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
® Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3R
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
ID
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hmm available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ar s Streams antl All f-Wres w re
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT m, Gem6000 GPS ,ece— wit
suppmsetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aerial Ph-graphy: NC DOT

4.
C1 I
N
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
- Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3S
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1) 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ar s Streams antl All f-Wres w re
pordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3T
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
ar s Streams antl All f-Wres w re
-pp.etl using a mapping gratle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
supposetl sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

•
• • _ . � el,
-r
WE
1
1
FA
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
.... ..... Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3U
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis for planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
aet The Standards of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
66.t66o). The Exhibit was compiled from available information obtained from Me
listed below —.,ds: located in the field
ces Streams and All f-Wres were
cordetl using a mapping gratle Tdmble GeoXT or Geo606o GPS receiver, wiM
supp... d sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV6 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

�`� ice:
ti
'0�
N7i
iie '*�� "IN
r I
i
. 1_
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
— —•••• Intermittent Stream
® — Tributary Waters of US
® Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
t Up
0 Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3V
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibit is for planning purposes only antl information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta d-, of Practice for Land Surveying in N— Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was ...piletl hom available information obtained from to
listed below —.,ds: locatetl in to field
s Streams antl All f-Wres w
cordetl using a mapping g,atle Tdmble G-XT o, Geo6000 GPS ,ec —r wit
-pp ... d sub-meter.--y.
Sources: NCOOT, NVS Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

s
r
—r --�
t
f• � Warf`
•
0
'i
A
WO
r'
W
i
r�
Imir
mil?
Legend
Original Study Area
Extension Study Area
Extension Study Area
Potential Jurisdiction Features
Perennial Stream
- a Intermittent Stream
Tributary Waters of US
Wetland
Ponds
Data Points
+ Up
Wet
Field Visits
Crew:
J. Merritt, T. Fox, M. DesChamps,
J. Harrod, B. Levan, T. Hall
Dates:
April 25-27, June 20, July 6 & 20,
August 3, 7-9 & 13-14,
October 5, November 1 & 8-9, 2018
and February 12, March 20-22,
April 19, May 10 & 14-15,
October 14, 2019.
FIGURE
3W
Field Verification Map
1-95 Widening from NC 211
in Robeson County (Exit 20)
to 1-95 Business (Exit 40)
in Cumberland County
TIP Project 1-5987
Robeson and
Cumberland Counties, NC
Map Date: 11/1/2019
0 1 inch = 400 feet
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 200 400 800
Feet
This Exhibitis For planning purposes only and information shown hereon does not
eet The Sta —d, of Practice for Land Surveying in Nort Carolina (21 NCAC
56.1600). The Exhibit was compiled tiom available information obtained from to
li-d below, Streams Wetlands: All fee located in to field
es and - were
cmrtled using a mapping gratle Tdmble GemXT or Gem6000 GPS receiver wit
supposed sub -meter accuacy.
Sources: NCOOT, NV5 Engineers+Consultants (formerly Calyx)
Aedal Photography: NCOOT

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SA -Grays Creek
Date: 08/10/2018
Project/Site:1-5987
Latitude: 34.933998
Evaluator: CALYX - J. Harrod, J. Lonnman
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.931586
Total Points:
Other: Hope Mills
Stream is at least intermittent if
EEI
Stream Determination:
e.g. Quad Name:
>19 or perennial if>30
Intermittent
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =14_5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1'. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -Channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple-
ool se uence
0
1
2
3
1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =2.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaflitter
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
C. Biology Subtotal =4 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=0.75; OBL=1.5 Other=0
0
'perennial stream may also be identified using other methods. See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
No water throughout channel during site visit; adjacent planted
pine stand to the NE recently cleared; culvert goes under 1-95
near CAT facility, channel there takes 90 degree turn shortly after
exiting culvert, channel straightened w/ less alluvial deposits.
Sketch:
Bank
Bankfull Width (feet) 3-5
Water Depth (inches) 0
Channel Substrate Oand
I*

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co. Sampling Date: 4/25/2018
State: NC Sampling Point: WA -wet
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (oho): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.91256 Long: -78.95447 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: PF01/4C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q/ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Q Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
© Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
a Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
El Algal Mat or Crust (64)
a/ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA -wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
6
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
60 Yes FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Acer rubrum
20 Yes FAC
3 Ulmus americana
10 No FAC
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
gp Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 45
20/o ° of total cover: 18
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20 Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Lindera benzoin 20 Yes FACW
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
40 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. NSA
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5 Yes FAC
2 Smilax laurifolia
5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
10 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location. No dominant vegetation present in the herb stratum.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA -wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 2/1 100
Mucky
1-10 10YR 2/1 100
Sandy silt
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
©
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Soil was too saturated to get deeper sample. Hydric soil was present at this site.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co.
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.90857 Long: -78.95875
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 8/14/2018
Sampling Point: WA,WS,WT,WU-Up
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No
within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled location does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
El Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
I__L Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
N/A
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this site.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA,WS,WT,WU-Up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Quercus laurafolia
15
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Pinus taeda
10
Yes FAC
3 Liquidambar styraciflua
5
No FAC
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
71.4'3 /o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
30
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover: 15
20% of
total cover: 6
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
1 Acer rubrum
10
Yes FAC
FACU species 40 x 4 = 160
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
2
3
Column Totals: 95 (A) 315 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.32
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
©2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Eupatorium capillifolium
30
Yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Arundinaria gigantea
10
Yes FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
40
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Lonicera japonica
10
Yes FACU
2 Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
15
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover: 3
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA,WS,WT,WU-Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-10 10 YR 3/2 80
5 YR 3/4 20 C M, PL
Sand
10-18 10 YR 4/2 70
10 YR 4/1 20 D M
Sand
5 YR 3/4 10 C M, PL
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co.
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: INC
Investigator(s): Jennifer Harrod - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.718794 Long: -78.993934
Soil Map Unit Name: Coxville Loam NWI classification: PFO
Sampling Date: 11/9/2018
Sampling Point: WI3-wet
Slope (ova): 0
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
Rain within the last 48 hrs. Partially cloudy.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
�( Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 3
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 2
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Pockets of standing water and drainage patterns throughout wetland. Downed trees throughout.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WB-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
Pinus taeda
5
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 6
3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
P t fD tS
ero ominan pecies o
5 Tcen That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: OO.00 �o (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
8
35
OBL species 0
x 1 =
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5
20% of total cover: 7
FACW species 55
x 2 =
110
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species 52.5
x 3 =
157.5
1 Arundinaria gigantea
45 Yes FACW
FACU species 10
x 4 =
40
2. Ligustrum sinense
10 No FACU
UPL species 0
x 5 =
0
Persea borbonia
10 No FAM
Column Totals: 117.5
(A)
307.5 (B)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
65 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. Sedges spp. 10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
© 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
No NI be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Campsis radicans 7.5 Yes FAC
2 Vitis rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
3 Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
4.
5.
•. = i otai saver
50% of total cover: 8.75 20% of total cover: 3.5
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-1 10 YR 2/2 100
fiborous
1-13 10 YR 2/1 90 10 YR 3/3 5 C PL
SilL
5 YR 3/4 5 C M
SilL
13-18 10 YR 5/2 60 10 YR 4/1 40 D M
SHL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
©
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co. Sampling Date: 11/9/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: INC Sampling Point: wB, WAB, waC-up
Investigator(s): Jennifer Harrod - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.718043 Long: -78.993976 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Coxville Loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No m Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Rain within the last 48 hrs. Partially cloudy.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
L_L Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
No Depth
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W8, WAS, WAc-up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2 Morus rubra
15
Yes
FACU
3 Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
P t fD tS
ecen ro ominan pecies o
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.00 �o (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
8
45 = Total Cover
OBL species 0
x 1 =
0
50% of total cover: 22.5
20% of total cover: 9
FACW species 0
x 2 =
0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species
x 3 =
0
1 Ligustrum sinense
10 Yes FACU
FACU species
x 4 =
0
2. Albizia julibrissin
10 Yes NI
UPL species 0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
3.
4.
5.
6. _
7. _
8. _
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. Euonymus americanus 10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Lonicera japonica 25 Yes FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes = No
EL
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WB, WAB, WAC-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-5 10 YR 3/2 100
S
5-8 10 YR 3/2 60 10 YR 4/6 40 C M
S
8-18 10 YR 3/2 35 10 YR 5/6 65 C M
S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
©
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Sampling Date: 4/25/2018
Sampling Point: WC -wet
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (oho): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.88529 Long: -78.96127 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: PF01 C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co
State: NC
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Q Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 10
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC -wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Nyssa biflora
50
Yes
OBL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30
Yes
FACW
3 Acer rubrum
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
gp
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 45
20/o 0 of
total cover:
18
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Cyrilla racemiflora 15 Yes FACW
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
No
FACW
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4 Styrax americanus
10
No
FACW
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
55
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 27.5
20% of total cover:
11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft
1 Persicaria pennsylvanica 3C
2 Carex spp. 3C
3. Peltandra virginica 1�
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Ste"
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
No NI Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Yes OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 37.5 20% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax laurifolia 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WC -wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/1 100
Mucky Muck
2-8 10YR 2/1 100
Silt
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
©
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Soil greater than 8in was too inundated to stay in auger.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 10/4/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WC -up
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.88527 Long: -78.96121 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled area does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WC -up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
15
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2 Pinus taeda
10
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
25
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
0 12.5
50 /o of total cover:
0
20 /o of
total cover: 5
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Pinus taeda 5 Yes FAC
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Festuca sp. 5C
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
No N/A be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WC -up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-8 7.5YR 3/2 100
Sand
8-16 10YR 4/6 90 7.5YR 3/2 5 M
Sandy Loam
7.5YR
5/8 5 M
Sandy Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Sampling Date: 4/26/2018
Sampling Point: WD-wet
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.86106 Long: -78.96565 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: PF01/2F
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co
State: NC
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
R High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
© Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
a Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
El Algal Mat or Crust (64)
a Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
El Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 2
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Much of wetland permanently inundated.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WD-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
9
1
Acer rubrum
40
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes FAC
Pinus serotina
30
Yes FACW
Total Number of Dominant 9
3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
Persea borbonia
10
No FACW
5
Percent of Dominant Species o
OO.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
110
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 55
50 /o of total cover:
°
20 /o of
total cover: 22
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1
Symplocos tinctoria
20
Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Persea borbonia 20 Yes FACW
3.
Ilex sp.
20
No NI
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
60
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover: 12
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
Osmunda cinnamomea
15
Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Woodwardia virginica
10
Yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3
Arundinaria gigantea
10
Yes FACW
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
35
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5
20% of total cover: 7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1
Smilax laurifolia
5
Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
5
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover: 1
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WD-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 100
Sandy loam Thin muck layer
6-10 10YR 6/1 80 7.5YR 6/8 20 C M,PL
Loamy sand
10-18 10YR 6/2 75 10YR 5/8 25 C M,PL
Loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
©
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 10/4/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: INC Sampling Point: WD,WM-up
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.86106 Long: -78.96551 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Pactolus loamy sand NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled area does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WD,WM-up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
8
1 Pinus taeda
25
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Persea borbonia
25
Yes FACW
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No FACU
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
88.89 �O
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
55
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 27.5
50 /o of total cover:
°
20 /o of
total cover: 11
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Persea borbonia
10
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Ligustrum japonicum 5 Yes FAC
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
15
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Pteridium aquilinum
5
Yes FACU
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Arundinaria gigantea
5
Yes FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
5
Yes FACW
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
15
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax laurifolia
5
Yes FACW
2 Gelsemium sempervirens
5
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
10
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WD,WM-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/2 70 7.5YR
6/4 10 M
Sand
7.5YR 6/2 20 M
Sand
6-10 10YR 5/4 95 10YR 2/2 5 M
Sand
10-18 10YR 5/4 90 10YR 2/2 5 M
Sandy Clay Loam
10YR 6/2 5 M
Sandy Clay Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Sampling Date: 4/26/2018
Sampling Point: WE -wet
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.82818 Long: -78.98276 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: PF01 C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
R High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 2
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Much of wetland permanently inundated.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WE -wet
e
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
6
1 Nyssa biflora
60
Yes OBL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Acer rubrum
30
Yes FAC
3 Pinus taeda
10
No FAC
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
100
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
0 50
50 /o of total cover:
0
20 /o of
total cover: 20
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Nyssa biflora
20
Yes OBL
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
35
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 17.5
20% of total cover: 7
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Carex spp.
5
No NI
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Woodwardia virginica
5
Yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Carex albolutescens
5
Yes FACW
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
15
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
0
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Preen t,> Y F No a
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
ss
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Portion under power line is maintained. It is comprised of: Typha latifolia, Juncus effusus, Peltandra
virginica, & polygonum spp.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WE -wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 100 5YR 4/6 20 C M,PL
Mucky loam Thin muck at top
6-18 10YR 6/1 100
Loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
©
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 8/8/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WE, WL-up
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.83297 Long: -78.97713 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loan NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled area does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WE, WL-up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
7
1 Quercus nigra
40
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes FAC
3 Quercus laurifolia
15
No FACW
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5•
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
85
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 42.5
50 /o of total cover:
°
20 /o of
total cover: 17
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Ilex opaca
20
Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Quercus nigra 10 Yes FAC
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Carex spp.
5
No NI
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8•
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
5
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes FAC
2 Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes FAC
3 Smilax rotundifolia
5
Yes FAC
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
15
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover: 3
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WE, WL-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/4 70 10YR 3/2 30 D M
Sand
6-18 10YR 5/3 90 10YR 3/3 10 D M
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 4/26/2018
Sampling Point: WF-wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (oho): 0
Lat: 34.80398 Long: - 78.98969 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
R High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
© Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
a Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
El Algal Mat or Crust (64)
a/ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 6
4
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Much of wetland permanently inundated. Wetland hydrology present at this site.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WF-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
7
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
40 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Acer rubrum
30 Yes FAC
3 Pinus taeda
25 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5•
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
95 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 47.5
50 /o of total cover:
° 19
20 /o of total cover:
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Acer rubrum
20 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Illex opaca 10 Yes FAC
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. Woodwardia virginica
70 Yes OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Osmunda cinnamomea
15 No FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5
20% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
5 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover: I
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WF-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/1 100
Loam Thin muck present
2-10 10YR 6/1 100
Sandy loam
10-18 10YR 5/1 70 10YR 2/1 30 D M
Loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
©
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
©
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 10/4/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WF,WV,WZ-up
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.80421 Long: -78.98965 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loan NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled area does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WF,WV,Wz-up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: N/A
) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
3
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
25 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5•
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
25 = Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
N/A )
FAC species 135 x 3 = 405
1
FACU species 0 x 4= 0
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
2
3
Column Totals: 135 (A) 405 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
© 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
0 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: d
Herb Stratum (Plot size: N/A
)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Festuca sp.
40 No N/A
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
N/A )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
70 Yes FAC
2 Vitis rotundifolia
40 Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
110 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 55 20% of total cover: 22
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WF,wV,wz-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/3 5 M & PL
Sand
2-18 10YR 4/3 90 10YR 4/6 5 M
Sand
10YR 4/2 5 M
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Coxville loam
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 4/27/2018
Sampling Point: WG-wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Lat: 34.76798 Long: - 78.99672 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
R High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 4
2
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WG-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. N/A That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
2.
3. _
4.
5. _
6.
7.
8. _
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. _
7. _
8. _
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. Carex sp. 50
2. Polygonum spp. 30
3. Peltandra virginica 20
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. _
I U0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species 100 00%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species
x 3 =
0
FACU species
x 4 =
0
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
No NI be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
No NI Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Yes FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes � No
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No vegetation in tree, sapling/shrub, or woody vine strata. Hydric vegetation is present at this
location.
= Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WG-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 2/1 100
Sandy loam
4-18 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 2/1 10 C M
Loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
©
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soil is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 10/4/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WG,H-up
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (oho): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.76040 Long: -78.99740 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes NWI N/A
classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled area does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WG,H-up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
4
1 Pinus taeda
75 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Prunus serotina
5 No FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5•
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
80 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 40
20/o ° of total cover: 16
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Acer rubrum
10 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.
4•
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8•
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Gelsemium sempervirens
5 Yes FAC
2 Vitis rotundifolia
5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
10 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WG,H-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-1
Duff
1-4 10YR 3/2 100
Sandy Loam
4-9 10YR 4/3 90 10YR 5/8 5 M
Sandy Loam
10YR 4/2 5 M
Sandy Loam
9-18 10YR 5/6 85 10YR 5/8 5 M
Sandy Loam
10YR 4/3 10 M
Sandy Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Coxville loam
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Lat: 34.75311 Long: - 78.99746
NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 4/27/2018
Sampling Point: WH-wet
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
R High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 6
4
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WH-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum
40
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
40
Yes
FAC
Pinus taeda
15
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 8
3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
P t fD tS
ero ominan pecies o
5 Tcen That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: OO.00 �o (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
8
95
OBL species
x 1 =
0
= Total Cover
° 47.5
50 /o of total cover:
°
20 /o of total cover:
19
FACW species
x 2 =
0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species
x 3 =
0
1. Acer rubrum
15 Yes
FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
0
2. Persea borbonia
10 Yes
FACW
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Symplocos tinctoria
10 Yes
FAC
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
35 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 17.5
20% of total cover: 7
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Arundinaria gigantea
30 Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
10 Yes FAC
2 Smilax laurifolia
10 Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
20 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WH-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 2/1 100
Loam
7-18 10YR 4/1 100
Loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
©
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Sampling Date: 4/27/2018
Sampling Point: WI -wet
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.74323 Long: -78.99772 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam, Bibb soils NWI classification: PF01 Fh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
R High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
© Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
a Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
El Algal Mat or Crust (64)
a/ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 4
2
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WI -wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Nyssa biflora
50
Yes
OBL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2 Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
11
3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4 Pinus taeda
10
No
FAC
P t fD tS
ecen ro ominan pecies °
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 81 82 �O (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
8
110 Total Cover
=
OBL species
x 1 =
0
0 55
50 /o of total cover:
0 22
20 /o of total cover:
FACW species
x 2=
0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species
x 3 =
0
1. Acer rubrum
15 Yes FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
0
2. Nyssa biflora
15 Yes FACW
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Magnolia virginiana
15 Yes FACW
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
3.
4 Ilex coriacea 15 Yes FACU
5 Persea borbonia 10 No FACW
6.
7.
8.
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. Woodwardia virginica 30
2 Juncus effusus 10
3 Carex sp. 5
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes OBL be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Yes OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
No NI
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
45 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Toxicodendron radicans 5 Yes FAC
2 Smilax laurifolia 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WI -wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 5/1 100
Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
©
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Soils too inundated to get deeper
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 10/4/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WI, WJ, WK-up
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.73923 Long: -78.99748 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loan NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled location does not meet the criteria for wetland status.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
N/A
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Wl, WJ, WK-up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
15
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2 Acer rubrum
10
Yes FAC
3 Pinus taeda
10
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
35
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 17.5
20/o 0 of
total cover: 7
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Acer rubrum
25
Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Persea borbonia 5 No FACW
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Festuca sp. 5C
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
No N/A be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2 Toxicodendron radicans 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WI, WJ, WK-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/2 100
Silt Loam
6-16 10YR 4/3 80 5YR 3/4 10 M
sandy Loam Predominantly sand
10YR 2/2 10 M
Sandy Loam
16-18+ 10YR 2/2 100
Sandy Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Soils too inundated
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Sampling Date: 4/27/2018
Sampling Point: WJ-wet
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.73778 Long: -78.99765 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: PF01 C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q/ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
a/ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Q Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 0
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WJ-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer rubrum
50
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
40
Yes
FAC
3 Nyssa biflora
20
No
OBL
Total Number of Dominant 8
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
P t fD tS
ero ominan pecies o
5 Tcen That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: OO.00 �o (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
8
110 Total Cover
=
OBL species
x 1 =
0
0 55
50 /o of total cover:
0 22
20 /o of total cover:
FACW species
x 2=
0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species
x 3 =
0
1. Acer rubrum
30 Yes FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
0
2. Magnolia virginiana
15 Yes FACW
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Lindera benzoin
10 No FAM
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
3.
4.
5.
6. _
7.
8.
55 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27.5 20% of total cover: 11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. Woodwardia virginica 35
2 Osmunda cinnamomea 15
3. Rubus argutus 10
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes OBL be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Yes OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
No FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2 Smilax laurifolia 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WJ-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 2/1 100
Muck
2-6 10YR 2/1 100
Silt loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
©
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Soils too inundated
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Sampling Date: 4/27/2018
Sampling Point: WK-wet
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.73044 Long: -78.99786 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: PF01 C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson
State: NC
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WK-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
9
1 Nyssa biflora
40
Yes FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Acer rubrum
30
Yes FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera
15
No FACU
Total Number of Dominant 9
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4 Pinus taeda
15
No FAC
5
Percent of Dominant Species o
OO.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
100
= Total Cover
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
50% of total cover: 50
20% of
total cover: 20
FACW species 105 x 2 = 210
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
1. Nyssa biflora
20
Yes FACW
FACU species 15 x 4 = 60
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
2. Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC
3 Ilex coriacea
15
Yes FACW
Column Totals: 195 (A) 475 (B)
4 Persea borbonia
15
Yes FACW
2.44
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
© 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
65
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 32.5
20% of total cover: 13
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Juncus effusus
15
Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Carex sp.
10
No NI
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
25
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12.5
20% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax laurifolia
10
Yes OBL
2 Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
15
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover: 3
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WK-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 5/1 100
Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
©
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Soil inundation prevents getting deeper sample.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod, J. Lonnman - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 8/07/2018
Sampling Point: WL'Wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Lat: 34.83336 Long: - 78.97672 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth 10
Saturation Present? Yes
(inches):
No Depth 8
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WL'Wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
7
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Quercus nigra
25
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
7
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
55
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 27.5
50 /o of total cover:
°
20 /o of
total cover: 11
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Magnolia virginiana
40
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2 Quercus nigra 15 Yes FAC
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
55
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 27.5
20% of total cover: 11
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Leucothoe axillaris
75
Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Osmunda cinnamomea
10
No FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
85
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5
20% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
25
Yes FAC
2 Vitis rotundifolia
15
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
40
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: 8
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WL-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 2/1 95
7.5YR 3/3 5 C PL
Silt sand 2in fibrous roots
7-12 10YR 3/2 95
7.5YR 3/3 5 C PL
Sandy loam
12-18 10YR 4/3 10
10YR 4/1 10 D M
Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
©
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co.
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: INC
Investigator(s): Jennifer Harrod - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.721426 Long: -78.000527
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains sandy loam, 0-2% slopes NWI classification: PFO
Sampling Date: 11/8/2018
Sampling Point: WM-wet
Slope (ova): 0
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
IWI iW10iTiMi7aFEE:11I'm
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q/ Drainage Patterns (B10)
�( Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 6
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 2
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location. No surface water at data sheet location but pockets of
standing water throughout the wetland thus, captured on form as surface water. Rain > 48 hrs.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WM-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Pinus taeda
20 Yes FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes FAC
3. Acer rubrum
5 No FAC
Total Number of Dominant 5
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
35 = Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover: 17.5
20% of total cover: 7
FACW species 65 x 2 = 130
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
1 Clethra alnifolia
45 Yes FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
2. Leucothoe axillaris 35 Yes FACW
3. Persea borbonia
10 No FACW
Column Totals: 140 (A) 355 (B)
4. Quercus nigra
10 No FAC
2.54
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
© 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
100 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover: 20
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. NSA
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax laurifolia
5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
5 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover: 1
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WM-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-8 10 YR 4/1 90 10 YR 6/6 5 C M
SHL
10 YR 4/2 5 C M
SilL
8-18 10 YR 4/1 70 10 YR 6/4 30 C M
SilL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
©
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co. Sampling Date: 11/8/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: INC Sampling Point: WM-up
Investigator(s): Jennifer Harrod - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Headwater Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.722466 Long: -78.999671 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains sandy loam, 0-2% percent slopes NWI N/A
classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Rain within the last 48 hrs.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 0
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WM-up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Quercus alba
10
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Quercus falcata
5
Yes FACU
3 Acer rubrum
5
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
55.56 �o
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
20
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 10
20/o ° of total cover: 4
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Cornus florida
5
Yes FACU
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Prunus serotina 5 Yes FACU
3. Quercus nigra
5
Yes FAC
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4 Symplocos tinctoria
5
Yes FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. NSA
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes FAC
2 Gelsemium sempervirens
5
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
10
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WM-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10 YR 3/2 85 10 YR 4/4 15 C M
SL
6-18 10 YR 4/4 85 10 YR 3/2 15 C M
SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
1" Duff layer
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb soils
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: INC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 8/9/2018
Sampling Point: WN-wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Lat: 34.84886 Long: - 78.97167 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
R High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q/ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth 2
Saturation Present? Yes
(inches):
No Depth 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at this location. Pockets of surface water throughout.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WN-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Acer rubrum
10
No FAC
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
No FAC
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
83.33 �o
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
55
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 27.5
50 /o of total cover:
°
20 /o of
total cover: 11
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Ligustrum sinense
60
Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2 Sambucus canadensis 35 Yes FACW
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
95
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 47.5
20% of total cover: 19
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Boehmeria cylindrica
40
Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
40
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
20
Yes FAC
2 Vitis rotundifolia
15
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
35
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 17.5
20% of total cover: 7
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WN-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3/2 85 10YR 3/4 15 C KPL
Silt Loam
6-18 10YR 2/1 100
Silt Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
©
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co. Sampling Date: 8/9/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WN-up
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.83297 Long: -78.97713 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Soils NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled area does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WN-up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35 Yes FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5•
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 25
20/o ° of total cover: 10
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Lingustrum sinense
20 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2.
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Rubus argutus
10 Yes FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
5 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover: 1
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WN-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 3/3 100
Sandy Loam
6-18 10YR 5/4 70 10YR 3/3 20 D M
Sandy Loam
10YR 6/3 10 D M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam
City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co. Sampling Date: 8/9/2018
State: NC Sampling Point: WO -wet
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Lat: 34.94179 Long: -78.91598 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01/4C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
Q Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 6
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth 7
Saturation Present? Yes
(inches):
No Depth 5
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WO -wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
6
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Pinus taeda
15
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
7
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
85.7 1 o �o
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
45
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 22.5
50 /o of total cover:
°
20 /o of
total cover: 9
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Acer rubrum
10
Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Alnus serrulata 10 Yes FACW
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Carex sp.
30
No NI
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Juncus effusus
20
Yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Woodwardia areolata
5
No OBL
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
55
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27.5
20% of total cover: 11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes FAC
2 Smilax laurifolia
10
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
20
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WO -wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 100
Organic mixed with duff
6-18 10YR 2/1 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
©
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location. >6 in too saturated to stay in auger.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co. Sampling Date: 8/8/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: INC Sampling Point: WO -up
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.94137 Long: -78.91712
Soil Map Unit Name: Autryville loamy sand, 0-2 percent slopes N/A
NWI classification:
Slope (%):
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No m Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No m Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled area does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WO -up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
3
1 Pinus taeda
35 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Liriodendron tulipifera
10 Yes FACU
Total Number of Dominant
6
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
50.00 �o
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
45 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 22.5
50 /o of total cover:
° 9
20 /o of total cover:
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Fraxinus pennsylvannica
30 Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Ouercus falcata 15 Yes FACU
3_ Persea borbonia
10 No FACW
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
® 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
55 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 27.5
20% of total cover: 11
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. NSA
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
15 Yes FAC
2 Lonicera japonica
5 Yes FACU
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
20 = Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Present? Yes No EL
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WO -up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 6/3 100
Sand Duff/Mixed Organics=50%
1-18 10YR 6/3 100
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co. Sampling Date: 8/9/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: INC Sampling Point: WP-Wet
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (oho): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.92592 Long: -78.94024 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Candor sand, 1 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: PEM1Cx
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (135)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 4
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 0
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WP-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. N/A That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 00.00 �o (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
8
p
OBL species
x 1 =
0
= Total Cover
°
50 /o of total cover:
°
20% of total cover: 0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species
x 3 =
0
1 Pinus taeda
10 Yes FAC
FACU species
x 4 =
0
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes FAC
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
20 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Arundinaria gigantea
100 Yes FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1000 sq. ft. )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
0 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 0
20% of total cover: 0
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No dominant vegetation present in the tree or woody vine strata.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WP-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 2/1 100
Loam
1-8 10YR 5/2 90 2.5YR 4/4 10 C KPL
Sand
8-16 10YR 4/4 100
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
©
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks: Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Hope Mills/Cumberland Co. Sampling Date: 10/4/2018
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: INC Sampling Point: WP-up
Investigator(s): John Merritt - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.92596 Long: -78.94032 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Candor sand, 1-8 percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
The sampled area does not meet the criteria for a wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NSA
NSA
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WP-up
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1000 sq. ft. ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
3
1 Pinus taeda
25 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Acer rubrum
10 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5•
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
35 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 17.5 20/o ° of total cover: 7
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot
size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Vaccinium sp.
35 No N/A
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Myrica cerifera 5 No FACW
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
40 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum i Plot sze:
(
1000 sq. ft.
)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot
size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
5 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WP-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/4 80 7.5YR 3/3 20 M
Sandy? Tacky - Berm area (Likely with fill)
6-18 10YR 5/2 65 10YR 5/6 20 M
Sandy?
10YR 5/3 15 M
Sandy?
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co.
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Long: Long: -78.95883
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk loamy sand, two to six percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 8/10/2018
Sampling Point: WR-Wet
Slope (%): 4
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
This location has an previously approved JD for the Fayetteville Outer Loop Project.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
R High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Q/ Drainage Patterns (B10)
�( Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
L_L Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth 5
Saturation Present? Yes
(inches):
No Depth 3
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology evident in
saturated soils with a high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WR-Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 32.5
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Acerrubrum
2 Quercus laurafolia
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 20
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
2 Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
65 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
65 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 13
20 Yes FAC
40 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 8
= i otai cover
20% of total cover: 0
25 Yes FAC
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover: 7
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
5 (A)
5 (B)
100.00% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species
x 3 =
0
FACU species
x 4 =
0
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WR-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 2/1 100
Loamy sand
5-12 10YR 4/3 90 10YR 4/4 10 D M
Loamy sand
12-18 10YR 3/2 75 10YR 5/3 25 C M
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
©
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co.
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.89398 Long: -78.95875
Soil Map Unit Name: Norfolk loamy sand, two to six percent slopes NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 8/14/2018
Sampling Point: WR-Up
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
El Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
El Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
N/A
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WR-up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
6
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species o
83.33 �o
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
35
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 17.5
20/o ° of
total cover: 7
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
40
Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2 Juglans nigra 30 Yes UPL
3. Ligustrum sinense
15
No FAC
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
85
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 42.5
20% of total cover: 17
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Rubus argutus
75
Yes FAC
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
75
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 37.5
20% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes FAC
2 Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
20
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WR-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-8 7.5YR 4/2 100
Silt
8-18 10YR 4/3 90 10 YR 5/4 10 C M
Silt loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb soils
City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co
State: INC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 8/14/2018
Sampling Point: WS-Wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Lat: 34.90875 Long: - 78.95899 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q/ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 1-3
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth 2
Saturation Present? Yes
(inches):
No Depth 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WS-Wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
8
1 Acer rubrum
65
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Quercus laurafolia
20
Yes FACW
Total Number of Dominant
8
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
85
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 42.5
50 /o of total cover:
°
20 /o of
total cover: 17
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Magnolia virginiana
35
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Clethra alnifolia 10 Yes FACW
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
45
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 22.5
20% of total cover: 9
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Woodwardia areolata
40
Yes OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Osmunda regalis
35
Yes OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8•
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
75
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 37.5
20% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Toxicodendron radicans
10
Yes FAC
2 Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
20
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WS-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-18 10 YR 2/1 90
5 YR 3/3 10 C PL
Slit
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
©
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains sandy loam, 0-2% slopes
City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Lat: 34.90541 Long: -78.95651
Sampling Date: 8/14/2018
Sampling Point: WT-wet
Slope (%): 0
Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01/4A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No
within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location. Previously forested, the location
had recently been clear cut.
This location has a previously approved JD for the Fayetteville Outer Loop Project.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
I__L Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 3-6
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth 2
Saturation Present? Yes
(inches):
No Depth 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Pockets of surface water throughout
and a high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WT-Wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Pinus taeda
10 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
5
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
1 00.00 o �o
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
10 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 5
50 /o of total cover:
° 2
20 /o of total cover:
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 s q•ft.
FAC species x 3 = 0)
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2 Acer rubrum 5 Yes FAC
3
Column Totals: o (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
©2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Carex sp.
40 No NI
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Acer rubrunn
15 Yes FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
55 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27.5
20% of total cover: 11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
10 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
10 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Recently cleared.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WT-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 2/1 95
7.5YR 3/4 5 C M Silt loam
8-11 10YR 4/1 95
10YR 5/2 5 C M Sandy loam
11-18 10YR 4/1 70
10YR 5/2 30 C M Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
©
Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
©
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Per the verification USACE
requested this wetland be drawn using the NWI layer as debri
from recent clearing prevented a complete assessment of hydric soils throughout the
wetland. The soils profile
description, reported above, is from a localized area within the
wetland where soils were accessible.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam
City/County: Parkton/Robeson Co
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 8/14/2018
Sampling Point: WU'Wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Lat: 34.90733 Long: -78.95105 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01/2F
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q/ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 1-3
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth 2
Saturation Present? Yes
(inches):
No Depth 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WU'Wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
40
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Quercus palustris
40
Yes FACW
Total Number of Dominant
5
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
80
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
50/o of total cover: 40
20/o ° of
total cover: 16
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1 Persea borbonia
30
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2.
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8•
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Vaccinium sp.
35
No NI
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8•
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
35
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5
20% of total cover: 7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
10
Yes FAC
2 Smilax laurifolia
10
Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
20
= Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover: 4
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WU-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-4 10 YR 2/1 100
Loamy sand Fibrous roots/Organic material
4-10 10YR 4/1 85
10YR 5/3 15 C PL
Sand
10-18 7.5YR 4/1 60
7.5YR 6/3 40 C M
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
©
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Sampling Date: 8/10/20 1 8
Sampling Point: WV -wet
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; J. Lonnman - CALYX Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Bottomland Hardwood Forest Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P Lat: 34.79939 Long:-78.9891 2 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam NWI classification: PFO1 C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
Q Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q/ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth 2
Saturation Present? Yes
(inches):
No Depth 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Surface water present in pockets throughout.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WV'Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Acer rubrum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 42.5
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Acerrubrum
2 Persea borbonia
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 42.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Woodwardia areolata
2 Osmunda cinnamomea
3 Arundinaria gigantea
4 Carex sp.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 52.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Toxicodendron radicans
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
85 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
85 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
60 Yes FAC
85 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
50
Yes OBL
30
Yes FACW
15
No FACW
11)
Kl. nil
= i otai cover
20% of total cover: 21
20 Yes FAC
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
6 (A)
6 (B)
100.00% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species
x 3 =
0
FACU species
x 4 =
0
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WV -Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 3/3 5 C M,PL
Silt loam
10-18 10YR 2/1 80 10YR 4/1 20 C M
Sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
©
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; M. Des Champs - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Meggett fine sandy loam
City/County: Lumberton/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 2/12/2019
Sampling Point: WW-wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Lat: 34.651081 Long: - 79.011515 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01 B
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 1-4
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 6
4
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Surface water present in pockets throughout.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WW-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Quercus palustris
5
Yes FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
10
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
0 5
50 /o of total cover:
0
20 /o of
total cover: 2
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Quercus palustris
5
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Pinus taeda 5 Yes FAC
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft
1. Carex sp. 8E
2 Juncus effusus 2E
3 Scirpus atrovirens 5
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
No NI be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Yes OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
No OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 57.5 20% of total cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WW-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/2 100
Silt loam
2-18 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M,PL
Silt loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
©
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod, M. Des Champs - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains Fine Sandy Loam
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Lat: 34.72671 Long: - 78.99529
NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 2/12/2019
Sampling Point: WW,WX-up
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil are not present; hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
L_L Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
N/A
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WW,WX-up
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Acer rubrum
40
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2 Nyssa biflora
5
No OBL
Total Number of Dominant
7
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
P t fD tS
ero ominan pecies o
5 Tcen That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57. 4 �o (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
8
45
OBL species
x 1 =
0
= Total Cover
° 22.5
50 /o of total cover:
° 9
20 /o of total cover:
FACW species
x 2 =
0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species
x 3 =
0
1 Liriodendron tulifera
5 Yes FACU
FACU species
x 4 =
0
2. Ligustrum sinense
2.5 Yes FAC
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Liriodendron tulipifera
25 Yes OBL
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum i Plot sze:
(
1000 sq. ft.
)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Fragaria vesca
5 Yes UPL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Carex spp.
2.5 No NI
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
7.5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3.75 20% of total cover: 1.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Lonicera japonica
5 Yes FACU
2 Rubus argutus
5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5•
10 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WW,WX-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-3 10 YR 5/2 95 10 YR 5/8 5 C M
Silt Loam
3-12 10 YR 5/2 90 10 YR 5/8 10 C M
Silt Loam
12-18 10 YR 6/2 90 10 YR 5/8 10 C M
Silt Loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod; M. Des Champs - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): None
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Coxville Loam
City/County: Lumberton/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Lat: 34.652506 Long: - 79.012165
NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 2/12/2019
Sampling Point: WX-wet
Slope (ova): 0
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
[3 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 1-4
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 6
4
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Surface water present in pockets throughout.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WX-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Quercus palustris
5
Yes FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
10
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
0 5
50 /o of total cover:
0
20 /o of
total cover: 2
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Quercus palustris
5
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Pinus taeda 5 Yes FAC
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 5
20% of total cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft
1. Carex sp. 8E
2 Juncus effusus 2E
3 Scirpus atrovirens 5
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
No NI be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Yes OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
No OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 57.5 20% of total cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1. N/A
2.
3.
4.
5.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WX-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/2 100
Silt loam
2-18 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M,PL
Silt loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
©
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod, M. Des Champs - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Johnston loam
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 2/12/2019
Sampling Point: WZ-wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (oho): 0
Lat: 34.799672 Long: - 78.987734 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
a/ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): Unknown
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Much of wetland permanently
inundated therefore not able to determine water table level. Pockets
of water throughout. Wetland
hydrology present at this site.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WZ-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
8
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
40 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Acer rubrum
35 Yes FAC
3 Pinus taeda
25 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant 8
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5•
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
100 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 50
50 /o of total cover:
° 20
20 /o of total cover:
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Acer rubrum
30 Yes FAC
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Illex opaca 10 Yes FAC
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
40 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum i Plot sze: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. Woodwardia virginica
40 Yes OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Osmunda cinnamomea
10 Yes FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
5 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 2.5
20% of total cover: 1
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation is present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WZ-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-2 10YR 2/1 100
Loam Thin muck present
2-8 10YR 6/1 100
Sandy loam
8-18 10YR 5/1 75 10YR 2/1 25 D M
Loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
©
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
©
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod, M. Des Champs - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains Fine Sandy Loam
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Lat: 34.92045 Long: - 78.95133
NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 2/12/2019
Sampling Point: WAA-up
Slope (%): 2
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soils are not present at this location. Hydrophytic vegetation is
present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
El Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2)
aI Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
L _L Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
Q Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Q Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Q Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
0I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
L_L Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
N/A
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology is not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA -up
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1 Pinus taeda
1000 sq. ft. )
2 Acer rubrum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 42.5
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Pinus taeda
2. Juniperus virginiana
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. N/A
50% of total cover: 7.5
1000 sq. ft. )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Gelsemium rankinii
2 Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
80 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
5 No FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
85 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
10 Yes FAC
G AL. Cl l I
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
= i otai cover
20% of total cover: 0
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
4 (A)
4 (B)
100.00% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply
by:
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species
x 3 =
0
FACU species
x 4 =
0
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WAA-up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/3 95 10YR 6/8 5 C M
Sand
6-9 10YR 5/3 80 10YR 6/8 15 C M
7.5 YR 5/8 5 C M
Sand
9-18 10YR 5/3 80 10YR 6/8 15 C M
10YR 8/2 5 D M
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are not present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT
Investigator(s): J. Harrod, M. Des Champs - CALYX
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-P
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains Fine Sandy Loam
City/County: St. Pauls/Robeson Co.
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Sampling Date: 2/12/2019
Sampling Point: WAA-wet
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Lat: 34.919985 Long: -78.950952 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification: PF01/2F
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No 0
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No Within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
0 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
0 Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Moss Trim Lines (816)
0 Water Marks (B1)
0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
0 Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
0 Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Q/ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 0
No Depth 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
(inches):
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Surface water present in pockets throughout.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAA-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1000 sq. ft. ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1 Pinus taeda
50 Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2 Acer rubrum
25 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5•
Percent of Dominant Species o
1 00.00 �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
75 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
° 37.5 ° 15
50 /o of total cover: 20 /o of total cover:
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot
size: 1000 sq. ft. )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1. Leucothoe axillaris
20 Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Persea borbonia 10 Yes FACW
3.
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
®2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
713 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum i Plot sze:
(
1000 sq. ft.
)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. NSA
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot
size: 1000 sq. ft. )
1 Smilax laurifolia
5 Yes FACW
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
5 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WAA-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 2/1 100
Silt Sandy Loam Beyond 6" too wet to get out of hole
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
© ❑
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Best Professional Judgement
(BPJ) that the hydric soils criteria is met at this location. Due
to saturation and dark chroma soils, redox that is likely present is difficult to see. Given that
multiple hydrology indicators and good hydric vegetation is present, soils can be assumed.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987 City/County: Saddletree/Robeson
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT -Division 6 State: NC
Investigator(s): John Merritt Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Roadside ditch Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-T Lat: 34.70428 Long:-78.99849
Soil Map Unit Name: Coxville loam and Rains sandy loam NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 5/14/2019
Sampling Point: WAB-wet
Slope (%): 1
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No
within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
0 Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
© High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
a Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Q Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
El Algal Mat or Crust (64)
a Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 18
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 0
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAB-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: N/A
) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
2
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
2
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
1 00.00 o �o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0 Total Cover
=
OBL species x 1 = 0
° o ° 0
50 /o of total cover: 20 /o of total cover:
FACW species x 2= 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
N/A )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1.
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2.
3
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
©2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
0 = Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft.
( )
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Myriophyllum aquaticum
20 Yes OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Carex sp.
10 Yes NI
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Juncus effusus
10 Yes FACW
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
Polygonum sp. 10 Yes NI
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7,
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
N/A )
1
FAC
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
0 = Total Cover
Vegetation
FT
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Present? Yes No ❑
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: wAB-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 2/1 90 10YR 4/6 5 C M, PL Silty loam
0-4 10YR 6/1 5 D M
4-20 10YR 2/1 100
Sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
©
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location. This soil does not meet any of the current soil
indicators listed in the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the Untied States, Version 8.2.
However, it does meet the criteria for hydric soil as described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 1-5987
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT - Division 6
Investigator(s): John Merritt
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR-T
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains sandy loam
City/County: Saddletree/Lumberton
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Lat: 34.70725 Long:-78.99694
NWI classification: N/A
Sampling Date: 5/14/2019
Sampling Point: WAC-wet
Slope (%): 1
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Q No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation 0, Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes © No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes = No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes = No
within a Wetland? Yes Q No Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soil are present at this location.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
a Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Q Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
R High Water Table (A2)
a Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q Drainage Patterns (B10)
Q Saturation (A3)
a Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Water Marks (B1)
© Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Sediment Deposits (62)
a Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Q Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Drift Deposits (133)
0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
El Algal Mat or Crust (64)
a Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑I Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
IInundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Q FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a/ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 0
0
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes© No�
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology present at
this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WAC-wet
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Acer rubrum
50
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes FAC
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20
Yes FACW
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
1 OO.00 o �o
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
100
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = 0
50% of total cover: 50
20% of
total cover: 20
FACW species x 2 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
FAC species x 3 = 0
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
Yes FACW
FACU species x 4 = 0
UPL species x 5 = 0
2. Ligustrum sinense 15 Yes FAC
Column Totals: o (A) 0 (B)
3
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
©2 - Dominance Test is >50%
7.
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
30
= Total Cover
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1000 sq. ft
1. Arundinaria gigantea 2E
2 Carex sp. 1 E
3. Juncus effusus 1E
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
55
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Yes N/I Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Yes FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
= i otai cover
50% of total cover: 27.5 20% of total cover: 11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 10 Yes FAC
2 Smilax laurifolia 5 Yes FACW
3.
4.
5.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic vegetation present at this location.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes FTNo
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: WAC-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 2/1 90 5YR 4/6 10 C M, PL
Sandy clay loam
7-16 10YR 5/1 85 5YR 4/6 15 C M, PL
Loamy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
©
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
©
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Hydric soils are present at this location.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies user rvianuai version om
USACE AID #
NCDWR#
Project Name
1-5987
Date of Evaluation
5/14/2019
Applicant/Owner Name
NCDOT - Division 6
Wetland Site Name
WAB
Wetland Type
Headwater Forest
Assessor Name/Organization
CALYX -NV5/John Merritt
Level III Ecoregion
Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
Nearest Named Water Body
Tenmile Swam
River Basin
Lumber
USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03040203
County
Robeson
NCDWR Region
Fayetteville
® Yes ❑ No
Precipitation within 48 hrs?
Latitude/Longitude (deci-deqrees)
34.70428/-78.99849
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
❑ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
❑ NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
® Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
❑A ❑A Not severely altered
®B ®B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch <_ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
❑B ❑B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
®C ®C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ®A ®A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B ❑B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑D ❑D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ®A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
❑B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
❑C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ®A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
❑B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
®A ®A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
❑B ❑B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS
5M
2M
®A
®A
❑A
> 10% impervious surfaces
❑B
❑B
❑B
Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
❑C
❑C
❑C
>_ 20% coverage of pasture
®D
®D
❑D
>_ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
®E
®E
❑E
>_ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
❑F
❑F
❑F
>_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G
❑G
®G
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer— assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
❑Yes ®No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >_ 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
❑D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
❑s 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
❑Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
❑Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
El Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet
❑B ❑B From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
❑F ❑F From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
®H ®H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
❑A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
❑B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
®C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition — assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
❑A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
®B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
❑C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size — wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
❑A
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
❑D
From 25 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
❑E
From 10 to < 25 acres
❑F
❑F
❑F
From 5 to < 10 acres
❑G
❑G
❑G
From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H
❑H
❑H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
®I
®I
®I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑J
❑J
❑J
From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
❑K
❑K
❑K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness — wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
❑A Pocosin is the full extent (>_ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
❑B Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas — landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A
❑A
>_ 500 acres
❑B
❑B
From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C
❑C
From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 50 acres
❑E
❑E
< 10 acres
❑F
®F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
❑Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >_ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
❑A 0
®B 1 to 4
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition — assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
®A >_ 25% coverage of vegetation
❑B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
o ❑A ❑A Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
❑B ❑B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U ®C ®C Canopy sparse or absent
>,
o ❑A
❑A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
co ❑B
❑B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
®C
®C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
s ❑A
❑A
Dense shrub layer
1E ❑B
❑B
Moderate density shrub layer
CO ®C
®C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
-0 ❑A
❑A
Dense herb layer
_ ®B
®B
Moderate density herb layer
❑C
❑C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
❑B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
®C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
❑A Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D
�
`.,•ya. ��. a �.. \ti:�
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
❑A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
❑B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
®C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name WAB Date of Assessment 5/14/2019
CALYX -NV5/John
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Merritt
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Ratina Summa
Function Sub -function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention Condition LOW
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
LOW
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
MEDIUM
Function Ratina Summa
Function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
LOW
Water Quality
Condition
LOW
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Condition
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW