20191368 Ver 1_Additional Information Received_20191114

From: Vesely, Will C
To: Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Cc: Scarbraugh, Anthony
Subject: RE: [External] RE: PCN application review for US-NC-5096-Hobucken (DWR Project No. 19-1368)
(UNCLASSIFIED)
Date: Thursday, November 14, 2019 2:18:38 PM
Attachments: Hobucken - ACOE Letter - Request for Additional Information - Sianed.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:report.sl2am(i4nc.gov
Emily,
Attached is a response letter to your questions and the requested additional information.
Let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks,
Will Vesely, G.I.T.
Staff Scientist I Environmental
Terracon
1450 5th Street West, North Charleston, SC 29405
D [phone] I P [phone] I M [phone]
[e-mail] I www.terracon.com
-----Original Message -----
From: Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 1:30 PM
To: Vesely, Will C <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scarbraugh, Anthony <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: PCN application review for US-NC-5096-Hobucken (DWR Project No. 19-1368)
(UNCLASSIFIED)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Good afternoon Mr. Vesely,
I don't have Mr. Andy Ruocco's email address to include him on this correspondence, but I listened to the voicemail
left yesterday afternoon. Mr. Ruocco mentioned that NWP12 had been used for similar projects in North Carolina.
NWP39 (Commercial and Institutional Developments) is commonly used for projects similar to this one; however,
the proposed project location is within the 100-year floodplain, which excludes the use of this permit. The
Wilmington District strives for consistency, so please provide examples of NWP 12 being utilized for a culvert
crossing, an access road, and platform, completely constructed in Waters, including wetlands of the United States.
This email serves as official notice that the PCN application you submitted on behalf of Vertical Bridge, LLC for the
project in Pamlico County, North Carolina, is incomplete.
Please address the following:
1. The cross-section of fill in the Permit Drawings shows two (2) feet of fill. Will there be a slope, or how will this
fill be stabilized? One of the drawings shows silt fencing on the southern boundary of the impact area; however, this
is not sufficient. A more detailed cross-section needs to be provided.

2. The proposed WOUS crossing was not included in the impacts table. This needs to be calculated, and include a
cross-section of the crossing and culvert specifications.
3. In NWP 12 under the Access Roads section, it states that access roads must be constructed so that the length of
the road minimizes any adverse effects on waters of the U.S and must be as near as possible to pre -construction
contour and elevations. If not, they must be properly bridged or culverted to maintain surface flows.
a. There needs to be justification as to why the square platform area needs to be that far from the road and
why the access road cannot be shorter.
b. There are discrepancies between the PCN and the drawings of how wide the access road will be - will
the road be 12 feet or 24 feet wide?
c. A cross-section of the top, bottom, and slope height/widths of the road will be necessary to know if it
will be to grade, as referenced above.
c. The impacts table needs to separate the impacts (area) for the culverted crossing, access road, and square
platform after any changes occur from 3a. and 3b. above.
4. Once avoidance and minimization of impacts to aquatic resources have been applied, the Wilmington District
requires 2:1 for permanent impacts. The only exception is if an NCWAM form is prepared and shows that the area is
low quality, can the 2:1 ratio be reconsidered.
The PCN will be considered incomplete until the requested information is received. Based upon review of the
information you provide, additional information may be requested. If no information is received within 30 days, the
submittal will be administratively withdrawn, but can be reopened at any time by submitting the necessary
information.
Respectfully,
Emily
Emily B. Thompson
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 W. 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 3:57 PM
To: Vesely, Will C <Will.Vesely@ten acon.com>
Cc: Scarbraugh, Anthony <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: PCN application review for US-NC-5096-Hobucken (DWR Project No. 19-1368)
(UNCLASSIFIED)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Good afternoon Mr. Vesely,
After reviewing the PCN, the project proposed does not meet the conditions of NWP 12. The feature you intend to
cross would be considered a Waters of the U.S.; therefore, it would require a NWP 14 (Linear Transportation
Projects). NWP14 Regional Condition 4.8.2 authorizes 'only upland to upland crossings..." and based on the project
plans provided, there are no uplands.

The Corps follows the mitigation types in this order: avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation.
Avoidance means avoiding an aquatic resource altogether by selecting the least damaging construction type, spatial
location, etc. Minimization means managing the severity of the impact on aquatic resources at the site through, for
example, project design. Lastly, compensatory mitigation is required after avoidance and minimization measures
have been applied. Applicants must first check to see if a private bank is available, but if not, in -lieu (DMS) is the
next option. A 2:1 requirement would be necessary to maintain consistency with our program.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Emily
Emily B. Thompson
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 W. 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Scarbraugh, Anthony [mailto:anthony.scarbraughnncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 12:32 PM
To: Vesely, Will C <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] RE: PCN application review for US-NC-5096-Hobucken (DWR Project
No. 19-1368)
Will,
As stated in my previous email, the figures will need to engineering design specific for the culvert placement and
tower site development.
Thanks,
Anthony Scarbraugh
From: Vesely, Will C [mailto:Will.VeselyJn terracon.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 11:45 AM
To: Scarbraugh, Anthony <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [External] RE: PCN application review for US-NC-5096-Hobucken (DWR Project No. 19-1368)

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to [e-mail] <mailto:report.spam&nc.gov>
Anthony,
We are working on the culvert drawings and will have those to you shortly. For the cross -sectional fill slopes, are
you specifically talking around the culvert placement or at any area of the site being filled? All disturbed land will
be stabilized and sloped where appropriate with a minimum 3:1 slope upon project completion as applicable. A
cross-section view of the tower compound fill slopes is included in Exhibit 4 of the permit drawings and I can
update if needed to show the described slope.
Thanks,
Will Vesely, G.I.T.
Staff Scientist I Environmental
Terracon
1450 5th Street West, North Charleston, SC 29405
D [phone] I P [phone] I M [phone]
[e-mail] <mailto:will.vesely&terracon.com> I Blockedwww.terracon.com
<Blockedhttp://www.terracon.com/>
From: Scarbraugh, Anthony <[e-mail] <mailto:anthony.scarbraughg_ncdenr.gov> >
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 3:51 PM
To: Vesely, Will C <[e-mail] <mailto:Will.Veselykterracon.com> >
Cc: [e-mail] <mailto:Emily.B.Thompson&usace.army.mil>
Subject: PCN application review for US-NC-5096-Hobucken (DWR Project No. 19-1368)
Mr. Vesley,
After completing a preliminary review of the subject project, the Division of Water Resources has determined that
your application is incomplete and cannot be processed. The application is on -hold until all of the following
information is received:

Access Road and Cell Tower Site Design Specification
The application for the proposed road impacts to waters and wetlands lacked engineered design specification
detail. This design should include cross -sectional detail including fill slopes and culvert placement to maintain
wetland and water connectivity. (15A NCAC 02H .0502(g))
If all of the requested information is not received in writing within 30 calendar days of receipt of this letter, the
Division will be unable to approve the application and project may be denied.
Regards,
Anthony Scarbraugh
Terracon provides environmental, facilities, geotechnical, and materials consulting engineering services delivered
with responsiveness, resourcefulness, and reliability.
Private and confidential as detailed here (Blockedwww.terracon.com/disclaimer
<Blockedhttp://www.terracon.com/disclaimer> ). If you cannot access the hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED

November 14, 2019
Ms. Emily Thompson
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
2407 West 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
Irerracon
Re: Request for Nationwide Permit (Request for Additional Information)
US-NC-5096-Hobucken
Lowland Road
Hobucken, Pamlico County, North Carolina
Terracon Project EN197183
Dear Ms. Thompson:
On behalf of our client Terracon Consultants, Inc. is submitting the additional information requested
in your email dated October 23, 2019 regarding the Nationwide Permit review. The location in review
is an approximately 0.43-acre site located off Lowland Road in Hobucken, Pamlico County, North
Carolina. The approximate center of the review area is located at 35.2553370N,-76.5766570W.
Please find the attached additional information:
ACOE Request for Additional Information Updated Exhibit 11 —
Letter Dated October 23, 2019 Proposed Impacts
Updated Impacts Table to include Grading and Erosion Control
WOTUS crossing Plan
Cross-section of road crossing/detailed
culvert drawings
The site was selected based on availability and because it appeared to be uplands based on the
adjacent water tower and readily available desktop data such as the National Wetlands Inventory.
Based on conditions observed during the site visit, the entire site appeared to be wetlands based
partly on the overwhelming amount of Phragmites australis covering the site. The area proposed to
be developed will have less impact on hydrology with the current access road length running
adjacent to the water tower located immediately north and northwest of the site. If the access road
length was altered and shortened, the square tower compound would have to be placed where it will
cause a greater impact to the local hydrology as surface water becomes evident further south of the
proposed access road location. Please refer to the aerial photographs in the attachments, which
shows marsh wetlands south of the proposed access road location. In conclusion, we believe the
access road length and square tower placement is the ideal location to minimize hydrological
impacts based on the surrounding site conditions. The proposed access road will be 12' wide. The
access road is packaged together with the utility easement thus will be 24' wide total. The utility
easement is necessary in order to connect to utilities located along Lowland Road. In order to
minimize wetland impacts, the proposed access road / utility easement was reduced from 36' wide to
24' wide.
All stormwater runoff from the site will sheet flow to the south towards the receiving water body.
During construction, sediment control measures will be installed on the down -gradient side of land
disturbance activities as shown in the attached drawings. These practices will include the use of
appropriate grading and sloping techniques and erosion prevention and sediment control measures
Terracon Consultants, Inc. 1450 Fifth St W North Charleston, SC 29405-2326
P 843-884-1234 F 843-884-9234 terracon.com

Additional Information Request
Irerracon
capable of preventing erosion, migration of sediments, and bank failure. All disturbed land will be
stabilized and sloped where appropriate with a minimum 3:1 slope upon project completion as
applicable. Once the project is initiated, it will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner,
minimizing the period of disturbance to the environment.
If you have any questions regarding the attached information, please contact me at 843-884-1234,
843-203-7299, or will.vesely(cb-terracon.com.
Respectfully submitted,
Terracon Consultants Inc.,
Will Vesely, GIT
Staff Scientist
Andy Ruocco
Principal / Environmental Manager
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2

Vesely, Will C
From: Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 1:30 PM
To: Vesely, Will C
Cc: Scarbraugh, Anthony
Subject: RE: [External] RE: PCN application review for US-NC-5096-Hobucken (DWR Project No.
19-1368) (UNCLASSIFIED)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Good afternoon Mr. Vesely,
I don't have Mr. Andy Ruocco's email address to include him on this correspondence, but I listened to the voicemail left
yesterday afternoon. Mr. Ruocco mentioned that NWP12 had been used for similar projects in North Carolina. NWP39
(Commercial and Institutional Developments) is commonly used for projects similar to this one; however, the proposed
project location is within the 100-year floodplain, which excludes the use of this permit. The Wilmington District strives
for consistency, so please provide examples of NWP12 being utilized for a culvert crossing, an access road, and platform,
completely constructed in Waters, including wetlands of the United States.
This email serves as official notice that the PCN application you submitted on behalf of Vertical Bridge, LLC for the
project in Pamlico County, North Carolina, is incomplete.
Please address the following:
1. The cross-section of fill in the Permit Drawings shows two (2) feet of fill. Will there be a slope, or how will this fill be
stabilized? One of the drawings shows silt fencing on the southern boundary of the impact area; however, this is not
sufficient. A more detailed cross-section needs to be provided.
2. The proposed WOUS crossing was not included in the impacts table. This needs to be calculated, and include a cross-
section of the crossing and culvert specifications.
3. In NWP 12 under the Access Roads section, it states that access roads must be constructed so that the length of the
road minimizes any adverse effects on waters of the U.S and must be as near as possible to pre -construction contour
and elevations. If not, they must be properly bridged or culverted to maintain surface flows.
a. There needs to be justification as to why the square platform area needs to be that far from the road and why
the access road cannot be shorter.
b. There are discrepancies between the PCN and the drawings of how wide the access road will be - will the road
be 12 feet or 24 feet wide?
c. A cross-section of the top, bottom, and slope height/widths of the road will be necessary to know if it will be
to grade, as referenced above.
c. The impacts table needs to separate the impacts (area) for the culverted crossing, access road, and square
platform after any changes occur from 3a. and 3b. above.
4. Once avoidance and minimization of impacts to aquatic resources have been applied, the Wilmington District requires
2:1 for permanent impacts. The only exception is if an NCWAM form is prepared and shows that the area is low quality,
can the 2:1 ratio be reconsidered.

The PCN will be considered incomplete until the requested information is received. Based upon review of the
information you provide, additional information may be requested. If no information is received within 30 days, the
submittal will be administratively withdrawn, but can be reopened at any time by submitting the necessary information.
Respectfully,
Emily
Emily B. Thompson
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 W. 5th Street
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
[e-mail]
-----Original Message -----
From: Thompson, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 3:57 PM
To: Vesely, Will C <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scarbraugh, Anthony <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: PCN application review for US-NC-5096-Hobucken (DWR Project No. 19-1368) (UNCLASSIFIED)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
Good afternoon Mr. Vesely,
After reviewing the PCN, the project proposed does not meet the conditions of NWP12. The feature you intend to cross
would be considered a Waters of the U.S.; therefore, it would require a NWP 14 (Linear Transportation Projects).
NWP14 Regional Condition 4.8.2 authorizes "only upland to upland crossings..." and based on the project plans
provided, there are no uplands.
The Corps follows the mitigation types in this order: avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation. Avoidance
means avoiding an aquatic resource altogether by selecting the least damaging construction type, spatial location, etc.
Minimization means managing the severity of the impact on aquatic resources at the site through, for example, project
design. Lastly, compensatory mitigation is required after avoidance and minimization measures have been applied.
Applicants must first check to see if a private bank is available, but if not, in -lieu (DMS) is the next option. A 2:1
requirement would be necessary to maintain consistency with our program.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Emily
Emily B. Thompson
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 W. 5th Street

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑X Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.147
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.153
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.3
2h. Comments:
W1 - Fill for 80' x 80' Tower Compound
W2 - Fill for 24' x 279' Access Road
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
S6
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tem orar T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 P
Man -Made Ditch
Bridge
Other
0.01
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
0.01
4g. Comments:01 Impact will e a culverted crossing
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑X Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B 1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes No
B6
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: Not required, site not within regulatory water bodies.
Page 5 of 10

G
The findings depicted on this drawing RIPPER,d by the USACE or NCDEQ-DWR.
Approximate Total Wetland Waters of the US: 0.415 Acres
Approximate Total Non -Wetland Waters of the US:
32 Linear Feet / 0.010 Acres
Ditch locations depicted on this drawing were surveyed with aTrimble
-
Approximate Impact of Wetland Waters of the US: 0.300 Acres
Geo7x GPS with GNSS receiver in the field by Terracon Consultants on
'
Approximate Total Uplands: 0.005 Acres
5/16/19. Each survey point was at sub -meter accuracy.
'
�
Electrical Utility Line
' � Approximate Ditch Boundary �. ,
JIMMAI
F
..
(Non -Wetland Waters of the US)
Ditch A Boun'ary
(Non -Wetland Waters of the US)
,
S�/►•
SITE
Proposed Ditc�rossing /Culvert
Impact 01
ri1
IIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Proposed,Wetland Fill
��,
Impacts F'oryTorwer�Compound
Impact W1
(-0�147-acres)
D tch B�Center1Line
(No Significant Nexus)
Proposed Wetland Fill
Wetland Waters of the US
Impacts Fo Access Road
Legend
Impact W2
Approximate Site Boundary
(�0�153-acres)
Wetland Avoidance
(=0�15-acr s)
Wetland Avoidance
Approximate Impact Area (Fill) � =.f .• - -�
X��', .
.
� ', ��
� , s , lam"
� •' _ -
Non -Wetland Waters of the US
�'
Wetland Waters of the US '�#� r•,",
r• `�` i �-�
�` �-.,,
L
—' —' Approximate Off -Site Ditch ��� yy
Esn, HE - E, G
Wft (cJ p nSfir tM p e • ntributors, S • ur•
•graphics,
ONEMM&PDS,USDA,USg•-,Aer•G-ID I
N PrOJe`t No
Proposed Impacts EXHIBIT NO.
Drawn By:
EN 197183
IrerraconWv
US-NC-5069 Hobucken
Checked
By:
Lowland Road 11
0 50 100 200
JAR
Hobucken, Pamlico County, North Carolina
Feet Date:
1450 Frfth Street West N.Charleston, SC 29405
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

EXISTING VALVE
(TYP.) I
I
I
I
I
I
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT (TYP.)
EXISTING
TELCO
PEDESTAL
(TYP.) ~
MAINTAIN 18"
(MIN.) COVER
OVER PROPOSED
DRIVEWAY
CULVERT
I
I
I
I
II
I
N
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
EXISTING
OVERHEAD
UTILITY LINE (TYP.)
EXISTING UTILITY
POLE (TYP.)
EXISTING SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE
xx�x
-7-x-
x�x_
l �
I
I I X
I a.
I o
I X
I
I I
N =1 X
I �
I
I I x
I C3 I X
N/F
TOCB ENTERPRISES, LLC
PARCEL # 7525378194000
DB 624 PG 884
PROPOSED LESSEE 2' WIDE
NON-EXCLUSIVE GROUND
RING EASEMENT
(172+/- SQ. FT)
PROPOSE[
LESSEE 15-0"
,I 24'-0" LEASI
AREA (360+/
SQ. FT
PROPOSED
LESSEE 12'-0"
x 18'-0"
EQUIPMENT I
PLATFORM I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II x
PROPOSED
MULTI -TENANT
UTILITY
I
H-FRAME ON II
ELEVATED __
- PLATFORM -
INV (OUT) = -2.0 li I I
/ x x X X X— -x x
EXISTING SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE
PARENT PARCEL
WILLIAM C. FENTRESS
\RCEL # 7525367333000
DB 639 PG 121
(ENTIRE PROPERTY IS
)CATED IN FLOOD ZONE
"AE" BFE=7)
�X�
N/F
PAMLICO COUNTY PARCEL
# 7525362733000
DB 227 PG 948
APPROXIMATE
LOCATION 30" RCP
INV= -2.0
EXISTING EDGE OF CANAL (TYP.)
PROPOSED 30" RCP
DRIVEWAY CULVERT
INV (IN) = -2.0
I
PROPOSED - - -
CONSTRUCTION
EXIT CO Sd -C
I � 3:
EXISTING EDGE PROPOSED SILT
II N I OF CANAL FENCE (TYP)
I w (TYP.)
I LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE -
I o �� DENUDED LIMITS (TYP)
I
6" #57 CRUSHED STONE TO BE SPREAD
THROUGHOUT ENTIRE COMPOUND
COMPOUND BASE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN
SEE SCALE
TOP OF STONE
FINISH GRADE
MIRAFI 50OX GEOFABRIC
TEXTILE (OR EQUIVALENT)
SUB -GRADE TO BE COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR
i
I
1
PROPOSED 12' WIDE
GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE
PROPOSED C/L 30'
INGRESS -EGRESS & UTILITY
EASEMENT
12' (TYP. CROWN)
FINISH GRADE
10
�\ 6" #57 CRUSHED
STONE ON TOP \.
ACCESS ROAD DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
PROPOSED 80' X 80' FENCED AND
GRAVELED COMPOUND FOR TOWER
FACILITY, SEE SHEET C-3
PROPOSED 300' SELF SUPPORT TOWER
AND FOUNDATION(S)
(DESIGN BY OTHERS)
PROPOSED
GRAVEL
COMPOUND
PROPOSED
12' WIDE
DOUBLE
SWING GATE
-GRAPHIC SCALES-
30' 0 30'
SCALE: 1" = 30'
FULL SIZE @ 18x24
60' 0 60'
SCALE: 1" = 60'
8-1/2 xl 1 PRINT @
CUSTOM SCALE: 50%
NORTH ARROW
-GRADING NOTES
A. THE SITE IS RELATIVELY FLAT. CONTRACTOR TO GRADE
COMPOUND AND ACCESS DRIVE TO PROMOTE
POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
B. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN EXISTING DRAINAGE
PATTERN.
MIRAFI 50OX GEOFABRIC
TEXTILE (OR EQUIVALENT)
SUB -GRADE TO BE COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR
C. )
N�o oFEss
zz
SEAL
2413
G�NE�
'� �k�•W�•MP
Lpl0
O
P. MARSHALL &
ASSOCIATES
verticalbridge
SITE NAME:
HOBUCKEN
SITE ID:
US-N C-5069
verizon-v/
SITE NAME:
HOBUCKEN
LOCATION CODE:
263787
SITE ADDRESS:
SR 1230
HOBUCKEN, NC 28537
SITE COORDINATES:
LAT: 35.255283
LON:-76.576592
SITE TYPE:
RAWLAND - SST
NO
DATE
DESCRIPTION
ISSUED FOR
0
08.22.19
PERMITTING &
CONSTRUCTION
UPDATED RAID
1
09.09.19
CENTER
ADDRESSED
2
10.25.19
COMMENTS
DESIGNED: DA
DRAWN: DA
CHECKED: PWM
JOB #:
VB 19-003
GRADING & EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
C-10

FILTER FABRIC
MATERIAL
FLOW
�o
2"
STEEL
FENCE POST
Tc
z_
co 0
z_
z_
O
M
z_
NOTE: USE 36" DOT APPROVED FABRIC USE
STEEL POSTS
SILT FENCE DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
STEEL FENCE POST
BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER
MATERIAL IN 6" TRENCH
4'-0" MAX.
O
U
0
�z
�Q
�m
z�
0 <
iz w
11 P 1 A A I 1 r 1 1 I
DRIVEWAY CULVERT
CULVERT CROSS SECTION INV (IN) = -2.0
SCALE: V = 3' INV (OUT) = -2.0
V1`4LJL1\Ln I IVILIVI
CONSTRUCTION EXIT
NOT TO SCALE
P. MARSHALL &
ASSOCIATES
verticalbridge
SITE NAME:
HOBUCKEN
SITE ID:
US-N C-5069
verizonil
SITE NAME:
HOBUCKEN
LOCATION CODE:
263787
SITE ADDRESS:
SR 1230
HOBUCKEN, NC 28537
SITE COORDINATES:
LAT: 35.255283
LON:-76.576592
SITE TYPE:
RAWLAND - SST
NO DATE DESCRIPTION
ISSUED FOR
0 08.22.19 PERMITTING &
CONSTRUCTION
UPDATED RAID
1 09.09.19
CENTER
2 10.25.19 ADDRESSED
COMMENTS
3 11.08.19 ADDRESSED
COMMENTS
DESIGNED: DA
DRAWN: DA
CHECKED: PWM
JOB #:
VB 19-003
'%.
�\\\o'\0SAR
.oFESS/D�.ly,;/ EROSION CONTROL
•Q� �� �= DETAILS
EAL -
24136
C-1 1

PROPOSED LESSEE 18' H-FRAME
W/ INTEGRATED LOAD CENTER,
DISCONNECT, TELCO BOX, RRU'S
AND RAYCAPS
0
Lo
N
o o
00
PROPOSED LESSEE 3' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE
WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE EASEMENT (28+/- SQ. FT)
80'-0"
X
PROPOSED I o
LESSEE I o
x 3'-2" X 7-1 1 " I
30KW DIESEL
GENERATOR I
2'-0" I
24'-0" L-----
x
x
x
—;moo i
X X X
I I
1 PROPOSED 1
FUTURE 15' X 20' I x
LEASE AREA 1
(TYP. OF 4) 1
I I I
-----J L - - - - - - - - - -
PROPOSED LESSEE +/-13LF OF 2'
WIDE WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE
(8' MIN. CLEARANCE)
--- ------
PROPOSED 300' SELF
SUPPORT TOWER AND
FOUNDATION(S)
(DESIGN BY OTHERS)
PROPOSED LESSEE 12'-0" x 18'-0"
EQUIPMENT PLATFORM
- PROPOSED LESSEE 15-0" x 24'-0"
LEASE AREA (360+/- SQ. FT)
PROPOSED LESSEE 2' WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE
GROUND RING EASEMENT
(172+/- SQ. FT)
34'-0"
X
PROPOSED MULTI -TENANT
UTILITY H-FRAME ON
ELEVATED PLATFORM 5' X13'
(SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS)
X
PROPOSED 12' WIDE DOUBLE SWING GATE
PROPOSED C/L 30' INGRESS -EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT
PROPOSED 12' WIDE GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE
I
PROPOSED
GRAVEL
COMPOUND
12'-0"
I I
I I
I I
40'-0"
F
I I
L_— --
34'-0"
I
POSED 80' X 80'
�ED AND GRAVELED
APOUNDFOR
/ER FACILITY
GRADE
Ix�\
RIGID NONMETALLIC
CONDUIT COUPLING
RIGID NONMETALLIC CONDUIT.
PROVIDE SCH. 80 PVC OR EQUAL
PVC ADAPTOR
PVC SCHEDULE 40 SIZE
AS SHOWN ON LAYOUTS
UNDERGROUND CONDUIT STUB -UP
NOT TO SCALE
FINISHED GRADE OR
GROUND COVER -
10
co
UNDISTURBED SOIL
CONDUITS FOR TELEPHONE,
ELECTRICAL, & SHARING
WHERE APPLICABLE
CONDUIT SIZE, TYPE,
QUANTITY AND SEPARATION
DIMENSION TO BE VERIFIED
WITH LOCAL UTILITY
COMPANY REQUIREMENTS
GRAPHIC SCALES
10' 0 10'
SCALE: 1" = 10'
FULL SIZE @ 18x24
0 10' 20'
SCALE: 1" = 20'
8-1/2 xl 1 PRINT @
CUSTOM SCALE: 50%
TRENCH
3" (MIN)
(TYP)
6" (MIN)
(TYP)
MIRAFI 50OX GEOFABRIC
UNDERLAYMENT
CAUTIONARY TAPE
COMPACTED BACKFILL W/
SATISFACTORY NATIVE OR
IMPORTED SOIL
COMPACTED SAND BED
TRENCH DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
-NORTH ARROW -
S
E
O�'
p oFEsS/o�.ly
EAL
413
-% GINEE
c�
D 0
O
P. MARSHALL &
ASSOCIATES
r
vertica lbe
ridg
SITE NAME:
HOBUCKEN
SITE ID:
US-N C-5069
verizonv/
SITE NAME:
HOBUCKEN
LOCATION CODE:
263787
SITE ADDRESS:
SR 1230
HOBUCKEN, NC 28537
SITE COORDINATES:
LAT:
35.255283
LON:-76.576592
SITE TYPE:
RAWLAND - SST
NO
DATE
DESCRIPTION
ISSUED FOR
0
08.22.19
PERMITTING &
CONSTRUCTION
UPDATED RAID
1
09.09.19
CENTER
ADDRESSED
2
10.25.19
COMMENTS
DESIGNED: DA SOB #:
DRAWN: DA VB19-003
CHECKED: PWM
DETAILED
COMPOUND
PLAN
C-3