20191505 Ver 1_401 Application_20191029

C�_ 6 / 91,50 J_�
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]: Ap
00
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑ 7
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Oakridge Motorsports
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 63d and 133e]:
Construction of commercial building.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
John Giambra
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: None known
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 61b]:
603 Oakridge Farm Hwy, Mooresville, NC 28115
35.60326,-80.81098
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 4667-196-472.000
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Iredell County
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Mooresville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Back Creek; WS-11, HQW
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: South Yadkin, 03040102
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # NWP 39 (ATF)
❑ Regional General Permit #
Q Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
F'RECOVEDIDENRI)WR
OCT 2 9 2019
"tor Rsaourrp:s
itrmitting $000A
Revised 20180615
Page 1 of 59

VIRONMENTAL
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Ms. Catherine M. Janiczak
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
October 24, 2019
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: Oakridge Motorsports - N 5.79 Acres
603 Oakridge Farm Hwy, Mooresville, NC 28115
Jurisdictional Determination and ATF NWP 39 Request
Cathy/Karen:
The applicant, Mr. John Giambra, is requesting approval of the enclosed JD and ATF
NWP 39. Atlas Environmental staff has been on site multiple times in July and August
to assess the unpermitted impacts. Atlas had previous delineation GPS information
from 2018. All features on property drain to Back Creek which is classified as WS-II;
HQW. Impacts include 292 linear feet of intermittent stream and 0.021 acre of
wetlands. The rip rap apron below the outlet of the culvert will be removed within the
stream to remove this impact.
Enclosed are the necessary jurisdictional determination and permit documents. Thank
you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please contact me if you need any
additional information.
Best regards,
dl&kZ VAO-,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
jrobertson0)atlasenvi.com
Digital copy to: Mr. Alan Johnson, DWR Mooresville Regional Office
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
Page 2 of 59

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
hqp•//www saw usace g,= mil/Missions/RegullatoryPertnitProaram/Contact/CountyLocator aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILNUNGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1
Page 3 of 59

A.
10
C.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 603 Oakridge Farm Hwy
City, State:
Mooresville, NC 28115
County: I redel I
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 4667-196-472.000
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Mr. John Giambra
Mailing Address: 108 Washam Road
Mooresville, N.C. 28117
Telephone Number: 570-885-2474
Electronic Mail Address: jmg131 [e-mail]
Select one:
aI am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Mr. John Giambra
Mailing Address: 108 Washam Road
Mooresville, N.C. 28117
Telephone Number: 570-885-2474
Electronic Mail Address: jmg131 [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017
Page 2
Page 4 of 59

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
161 /4 / 2 i
Print Name
Capacity: Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
JUr -Vv)ri
Date /i J 0.,7
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
Q✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
HA Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
` For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3
Page 5 of 59

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑� I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Pel Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 5•79 acres.
a✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017
Page 4
Page 6 of 59

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Wel
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.6026
Longitude:-80.8102
0 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11 x 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary, Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑ Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. h=://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Reizulatory-Permit-
Pro,gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5
Page 7 of 59

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary, Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
a Vicinity Map
W] Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
a Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
FNC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/J`D/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
' Please see hU://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017
Page 6
Page 8 of 59

VIRONMENaa{-TTA_LL�
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams - Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name:(A",(-
Property Owner of Record:�y
�'.1
l� �"'i f A
Contact Name:
k )q
Address:
ii ��"(�''1
�61�'1.
►c
Address:
S U. ` /-u
Phone/Fax Number:
?0 rd
Email Address:
/
7 4 X •
MQC-i
Project Address:
L,3 C)A16L,
jd-- - -
/yn /41,L�'
Project Address:
Al oa-'Q.��';
� l _
Tax PIN: -
Signature: )
Date: l U - / rj
A T AS Environmental Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
[e-mail]
www.adasenvi.com
Page 9 of 59

o�of
W ATF9QG
J -1
O T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Oakridge Motorsports
2b. County:
Iredell
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mooresville
2d. Subdivision name:
Not a Subdivision
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
not a DOT project
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
John Giambra
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
2571/677
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
not applicable
3d.
Street address:
108 Washam Road
3e.
City, state, zip:
Mooresville, NC 28117
3f.
Telephone no.:
570-885-2474
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 10 of 59

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner
4b. Name:
John Giambra
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
108 Washam Road
4e. City, state, zip:
Mooresville, NC 28117
4f. Telephone no.:
570-885-2474
4g. Fax no.:
n/a
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jennifer L Robertson
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
338 S Sharon Amity Road, #411
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28211
5e. Telephone no.:
704-512-1206
5f. Fax no.:
no fax
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 11 of 59

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
4667-196-472.000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.60326 Longitude: - 80.81098
1 c.
Property size:
5.8 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Back Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-II, HQW
2c.
River basin:
South Yadkin, 03040102
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The site has been graded and the culvert has been installed. The general land use in the vicinity is
commercial development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.021 acre
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 524 linear feet
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To construct a parking lot for the building that abuts the road and to provide
access to the back building on property.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: This project is for two commerical
buildings requiring land clearing and leveling. Heavy equipment will be used to prepare the site for construction.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
® Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Austin Baggarley, Jennifer Robertson, and
Jacob Sinclair
Agency/Consultant Company: Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
included with the NWP 39 package
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 12 of 59

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404, 10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.019
W2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.001
W3 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.001
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total wetland impacts:
0.021
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g•
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
CH 100
PER
Corps
3
292
S2 -
Choose one
PER
Corps
S3 -
Choose one
PER
Corps
S4 -
Choose one
PER
Corps
S5 -
Choose one
PER
Corps
S6 -
Choose one
PER
Corps
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts:
292
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 13 of 59

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number-
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts:
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 14 of 59

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The minimal footage of stream as possible was impacted to construct a building adjacent to the highway as well as construct
the stormwater bmp. Additional stream impacts will be removed at the rip rap apron.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Side slopes are designed as steep as possible to reduce impacts.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
® Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: none
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity none
Quantity none
Quantity none
3c. Comments: none
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
292 (0.25:1 ratio) linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
none square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
The storm water pond will be designed to treat a 25 year storm as opposed to a 10 year storm. The applicant is also
treating storm water above his project coming off the highway. A dry pond is required but the engineer will design for a
wet pond and we will plant a littoral shelf (constructed wetland).
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 15 of 59

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
none
none
3 (2 for Catawba)
none
Zone 2
none
none
1.5
none
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
none
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
not applicable
6h. Comments: no comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 16 of 59

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24% %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project is within Mooresville jurisdiction.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mooresville
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Mooresville
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
® Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 17 of 59

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments: n/a
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
® Yes ❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
® Yes ® No
2c. If you answered 'yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): the impacts are
already in place
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Sanitary sewer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 18 of 59

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDENR Natural Heritage Program Map Viewer and GIS Layer; iPAC FWS GIS Layer.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCHPO GIS Service.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: There is no FEMA floodplain on site.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodmaps GIS layer
Jennifer L Robertson
�A+
10/24/2019
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 19 of 59

o :E �+
w \
0 3 3 —n
3 ® \
>
0
O
b
x CC C O
r O
N r 7 W
b> OC TIC Q
O
O O 3
O a 0
o3
0 I
u
Date: July 31, 2019
0
Updated: N/A
JMG Construction Inc.
Mr. John Giambra
Highway 150 By -Pass
615 Oak Ridge Farm Highway
Mooresville NC, 28115
Coordimates: 35.60365,-80.93196
ONMENTAL
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211

6/27/2018 8430 University Executive Park Dr to 615 Oakridge Farm Hwy - Google Maps
Go gle Maps 8430 University Executive Park Dr to 615 Oakridge Drive 30.0 miles, 36 min
Farm Hwy
C-
_pp
to
ckbum Orun3e Sh—lils Ford
© �-'
`�
3r5 Crossroads n
615 Oakridge Correll
- _ Fenn Highway .-.
Others Lake Norman''^a
Crossroads of Catawba
Malden
oofeywllle
152 China Grove isz
. 553
0
IS.
j(.if
Mourne j Landis
Denver
rim
l Enochville
rn
to
3zt Westport. �;.
avidsom.,- R 38 min I
Il ]3 �
25.0 irmin .. '.
elius 3 Kannapolis
Lincolnton
\\\ 13 0
is
17
Q 36 mint �42 min
zz
isc
30 0 miles 29.4 miles
��-.-.....-me......
Iron Station is
-' ]
n
]3
3a� Lowesvil{e
terswlle �� �t Concord
High Shoals Alexis
(3
Hard,ns Lucia
-p¢erno i„f
1e
zrv Stanley
Ashebrook
Tryon park 31t 0 xt �`nrc�Gt+
j
7(i�
ns y Harrisburg (1^a»
1J
Dallas
Spencer
8430 University
zis Mountain Mt Hotly ]. r
ns G0,- gle
Executive Park Drive
Bessemer -City ® Ranio
°1 Lowell ]'3 Woodford
Map data ©2018 Google 2 mi r r
8430 University Executive Park Dr
Charlotte, NC 28262
Get on 1-85 N
3 min (0.9 mi)
t 1. Head north on University Executive Park Dr
0.2 mi
41 2. Turn left onto W W.T.Harris Blvd
0.4 mi
3. Turn right onto the Interstate 85 N ramp
0.3 mi
Take 1-485 Outer and 1-77 N to NC-150 E/W Plaza Dr in Mooresville. Take exit 36 from 1-77 N
24 min (25.7 mi)
4. Merge onto 1-85 N
2.0 mi
y' 5. Use the right 2 lanes to take exit 48 toward Huntersville
1.5 mi
x b. Merge onto 1-485 Outer
4.6 mi
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/8430+University+Executive+Park+Dr,+Charlotte,+NC+28262/615+Oakridge+Farm+Hwy, +Mooresville,+NC+281PWge 21 c f/99

6/27/2018 8430 University Executive Park Dr to 615 Oakridge Farm Hwy - Google Maps
' 7. Use the right lane to take exit 23 C-A for 1-77 toward Statesville/Charlotte
0.3 mi
41 8. Use the right lane to continue toward 1-77 N
0.8 mi
9. Keep right at the fork to continue on Exit 23B, follow signs for Interstate 77 N/Statesville and merge onto
1-77 N
16.4 mi
y' 10. Take exit 36 for NC-150 toward Mooresville/Lincolnton
0.2 mi
r► 11. Use the right 2 lanes to turn right onto NC-150 E/W Plaza Dr (signs for Mooresville)
0 Continue to follow NC-150 E
0 Pass by Burger King (on the right in 1.9 mi)
0 Destination will be on the left
7 min (3.3 mi)
615 Oakridge Farm Hwy
Mooresville, NC 28115
These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction projects,
traffic, weather, or other events may cause conditions to differ from the map results, and you
should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or notices regarding your route.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/8430+ University+ Executive+Park+Dr, +Charlotte, +NC+28262/615+Oakridge+ Farm+Hwy, +Mooresville,+ NC+28 1 Wge 22 9/99

6/27/2018 610 E Center Ave, Mooresville, NC 28115 to 615 Oakridge Farm Hwy - Google Maps
Go gle MapS 610 E Center Ave, Mooresville, NC 28115 to 615 Drive 2.1 miles, 6 min
Oakridge Farm Hwy
Cornelius P"I'k
4:71
Dewayne s Automotive
615 OWAIge
Farm HI W
1105
Atinslow Bay Commons
ata
Staples W Pl.
ar
q3t, In
4P
Walmart Supe�Qenlr, i5p6mi.]
2.1 melee
qh
W WL04' Ik 6 mitt
esville 1.0 man
01
va j% 'Ile qA 610 East Center Avenue
Town of MooreswIle
Golf Club Y
Merinos He -me
ru")'SN-ngs Warehouse
Mooresville Tax Service
%II 13�
Go ,gle
Map data @2018 Google 2000 ft,
610 E Center Ave
Mooresville, NC 28115
t 1. Head west on E Center Ave toward Cedar St
0.2 mi
r* 2. Turn right onto N Maple St
0.2 mi
3. Turn left onto E Iredell Ave
0.3 mi
f* 4. Turn right onto N Broad St
1.2 mi
ro 5. Turn right onto NC-1 50 E
0 Destination will be on the left
0.2 mi
615 Oakridge Farm Hwy
Mooresville, NC 28115
These directions are for planning purposes only. You may find that construction projects,
traffic, weather, or other events may cause conditions to differ from the map results, and you
should plan your route accordingly. You must obey all signs or notices regarding your route.
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/61 O+E+Center+Ave, +Mooresville,+ NC+28115/615+Oakridge+Farm+ Hwy, +Mooresville, +NC+28115/@35.5911 5%k 23 okgEl

Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4667196472.000
Inquiry Date: 10/24/2019
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not
certify the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping
data herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
Owner/Property Info
Tax Account Number: 80055934
Old Parcel Number: 0301Moo000A029
Owner Name: GIAMBRA JOHN M
Mailing Address: 108 WASHAM RD MOORESVILLE NC 28117
Property Location: OAKRIDGE FARM HW
Lot Number: Null
Legal Description: LOWERY NC150
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: 03
Neighborhood Code: 03059
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC)
Building Value: 0
Other Building Features: 0
Land Value: 191470
Tax Assessed Value: 191470
Deferred: 0
Land Information - Reoister of Deeds Online Search
Date Recorded Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page Land Area Land Type Zoning
Page 25 of 59

20180809 WD
2571 677
Null 5.802 AC GI
Tax Infonmation
Exemption Tax Code 1
Tax Code 2
Tax Code 3 Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null C ADVLTAX
CI03ADVLTAX
Null SC03ADVLTAX Null
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
Page 26 of 59

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: August 6, 2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: John Giambra, 108 Washam Road, Mooresville, N.C. 2811,
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Asheville Field Office, Charlotte Satellite Offic(
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Iredell City: Mooresville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:35.60326 Long.:-80.81098
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Back Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
■❑ Field Determination. Date(s): June 7, 2018
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
CH 100
35.60285
-80.81052
457 liner feet
non -wetland waters
404
CH 200
35.60361
-80.81054
67 linear feet
non -wetland waters
404
WL l000
35.60266
-80.81044
0.019 acre
Wetland
404
WL1100
35.60329
-80.81043
0.001
Wetland
404
WL 120o
35.60395
-80.81088
0.001
Wetland
404
Page 27 of 59

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
Page 28 of 59

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Topo, USGS Topo, LiDAR, WSS, NWI, NHD, HUC 12, HUC 8, Aerial, parcel maps
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
Wetland, upland and DWR stream ID
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑E
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: GIS datasets
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
a
GIS Datasets
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: GIS datasets
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: GIS datasets
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
■❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: GIS datasets
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): Aerial 2010 and 2017 from Google Earth
or
❑■ Other (Name & Date): site photos June 2018
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
Page 29 of 59

Legend
O Review Area
O Iredell Co. Parcels
o Streets
Delineation
0 Intermittent Channel
Wetland
:INMENTAL
Paae 1 of 4
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Ln
Project Name: Highway 150 By -Pass
V, 0 1 WON
r"dr 4_1
Location: Approx. 605 Oakridge Farm Highway, Mooresville, NC 28115
For: ]GM Construction Inc
Coordinates: 35.60326,-80.81098
' Sketch Map provided for illustrative purposes and
preliminary planning only. Not intended to be relied upon
for exact location, dimension, or orientation. All findings
and assessments are subject to verification from the
Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources, and/or other appropriate local authorities.
Do not reproduce map set except in its entirety.
ti
Date: June 27, 2018
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
Page 30 of 59

wig
M-O>.r
141
n; -As
7.111 fir+. a..
r
ra
g
,
i r • �
yy
•
i
,n
21 � � � y"'��, yb � �ls 1 •,��� 1 •-' }q*'�� a L�q Y''&�a �. ``��',��`4ti ��.��.���' '�1'�
k
of 44.
�.. ,ice` ,.•r ,�1's �. �t- g� � y� t.� yd ;
r
e�`a '4, '# °fey e ti . �y ` ,y � •,
-
A i,.' 3 Y t
sM„
It
Legend
14 pp
Review Area
r
y
�„
,vim .,
Iredell Co. Parcels
Streetsi
to Ar
Delineation
Intermittent Channel
Wetland
k ._>
�. •� r'
r'Wj
fW A

Potential Non Wetland
CH 100, -457 LF
Legend
O Review Area
O Iredell Co. Parcels
o Streets
Delineation
0 Intermittent Channel
= Wetland
•�
/fir.:: ' Av' I
Ln__%tAJl6QA
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Potential Wetland
WL 1000, -0.019 Ac
Project Name: Highway 150 By -Pass
Location: Approx. 605 Oakridge Farm Highway, Mooresville, NC 28115
For: JGM Construction Inc
Potential Wetland
WL 1100, -0.001 Ac
1"-25'
0 10 20 30 40 Ft
Paae 3 of 4
Detail 1 1 Coordinates: 35.60326,-80.81098
Date: June 27, 2018
Page 32 of 59

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Legend
O Review Area
O Iredell Co. Parcels
o Streets
Delineation
O Intermittent Channel
liiMl Wetland
l
Potential Non Wetland
CH 2O0, -67 LF
Potential Non Wetland
CH 100 cont, -457 LF
Project Name: Highway 150 By -Pass
Location: Approx. 605 Oakridge Farm Highway, Mooresville, NC 28115
For: JGM Construction Inc
Potential Wetland
WL 1200, -0.001 Ac
11 - 25'
0 10 20 30 40 Ft'
Paae 4 of 4 Detail 2 Coordinates: 35.60326,-80.81098 Date: June 27, 2018 Page 33 of 59

2 FT Topo Map
Legend
M Project Boundary
Delineation
Intermittent
Perennial
Wetland
2 Ft Contours
Project Boundary
o Streets
FA%
}i `1 pan �
Project Name: Highway 150 By -Pass
Location: Approximately 605 Oakridge Farm Hwy, Mooresville, NC 28115
For: JMG Construction Inc Attn: Mr. John Giambra
0 100 200 300 ft
Coordinates: 35.60326,-80.81098
Date: June 27, 2018
Page 34 of 59

USGS Topo Close
s -Ra d i + "T6t�e
'� f - ♦ 4
r r• .r
�3, �--
Legend
Q Project Boundary%
USGS Topo ,
r"
9
4L6�z
i _Z.V �� _% &-
Project Name: Hwy 150 By - Pass
Location: 615 Oak Ridge Farm Hwy. Moorseville, NC 28115
For: JMG Construction Inc. Attn: Mr. John Giambra
Coordinates: 35.6026,-80.8102
Date: June 15, 2018
0 500 1000 1500 FT
Page 35

USGS Topo FarWhip 15
ms
rp
•
`�. _ r - %J d,�" �-�•= �� �---- l:� �..:.' `��^� , 1 � ` ,� --� _ :� � _ � ��• zit, ��. ,, . `\.�
��l .�� �\ I �ii�-�1- `� f �.1- � •J � / � � % i ( 1 ,� \ 1 (1, �-i�RJ. �l � � ��� l
. \ 1
di L` 11
• � di _
J AV
I -_ 1 1 .m'\ ;-_'� _ �-/'.. �l -` / �i.k � /�' _/�� ,l! �� cam... �/ ���-' ,.sue r� ���` �..� \.ti` ••'• .,�
I � ♦. � /� f! .�'"+�\� �� � �� k5<i `%�--cam
= -•3j�,
� f /p7i 11
( 7 ,
Y o` r .� '--�g'�����'`✓ �� �rr <.:� :i �� i aC '.. �� � l i �. � � ��1�!�'�'fSf-. �% - ��-�o�J � jl \'� y;��``�f ._ �}` f. 1 `+,! /— �� �
aP- ri �' \ �. / //J� i",/ ) t�/ �l"_f y w ✓ -y 1. �v !C'. v, �:.. \.
Plant
til#
,t .�j��� I � � Su J ' (I � � I y / � / \�� � �. �1.�� �� 'A_• � \Q`��_ • J l%
. / � :,-- _ -•-1--- � i _�'' -"-� t \ I ,(/' �_ -`� *-^" � ,er. �,cs+} t �. .' `r_� i \ Ste-
Legend D _ �' -
n �4 i
' I •� � �1` ( c'-�ti'� � of = � � .+i� _ n'' ,� '` 'boo � 2 = ,•' •
Project Boundary .1�'��\ _ ti
„. 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 Miles
USGS Topo - _- _ -. � r _ $�• , .>� .
-� r-;
♦A
Project Name: Hwy 150 By - Pass
Location: 615 Oak Ridge Farm Hwy. Moorseville, NC 28115
For: JMG Construction Inc. Attn: Mr. John Giambra
Coordinates: 35.6026,-80.8102 1 Date: June 15, 2018 Page 36 of

x
n
Legend
0 Project Boundary
NWI
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
0 Lake
\ 1_ IRONMENTAL
QE
0
NWI Map
M
Project Name: Hwy 150 By - Pass
Location: 615 Oak Ridge Farm Hwy. Moorseville, NC 28115
For: JMG Construction Inc. Attn: Mr. John Giambra
Coordinates: 35,6026,-80.8102
',� A
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 Miles
Date: June 15, 2018
Page 37

516960 516990
r
S• p may not valid at this scale.
I I I
516960 516990 517020 517050
Map Scale: 1:1,480 iF printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5') sheet.
Meters
N 0 120 20 40 so
n � � ,m � t
517060 517110 517140 517170 517200
Project Name: Highway 150 By -Pass
1)�S Location: Approximately 605 Oakridge Farm Hwy, Mooresville, NC 28115
ONMENTAL For: JMG Construction Inc Attn: Mr. John Giambra
kA
L
517230 5172M
USDA Natural Resources
2" Conservation Service
Coordinates: 35.60326,-80.81098 Date: June 27, 2018

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
0
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
®
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
0
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
o-0
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
`
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
a
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
.#
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
MAP INFORMATION
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:12,000.
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
* Wet Spot
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Other
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Special Line Features
scale.
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Transportation
Rails
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
tH F
Web Soil Survey LIRL:
Interstate Highways
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
US Routes
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Major Roads
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Local Roads
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
Background
- Aerial Photography
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Iredell County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 22, Sep 26, 2017
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 18, 2011—Oct 25,
2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Project Name: Highway 150 By -Pass
ILocation: Approximately 605 Oakridge Farm Hwy, Mooresville, NC 28115
IFor: JMG Construction Inc Attn: Mr. John Giambra
USDA Natural Resources
2111111111111 Conservation Service
Coordinates: 35.60326,-80.81098
Date: June 27, 2018

Soil Map—Iredell County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Project Boundary
Map Unit Symbol
I Map Unit Name I
Acres in AOI I
Percent of AOI
CeC2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 6 to 10
2.5
46.3 %
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
PcE2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to
2.0
37.1 %
25 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
UmF
Udorthents-Urban land
0.8
14.8%
complex, 0 to 45 percent
slopes
Ur
Urban land
0.1
1.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
5.4
100.0
Project Name: Highway 150 By -Pass
ILocation: Approximately 605 Oakridge Farm Hwy, Mooresville, NC 28115
IFor: JMG Construction Inc Attn: Mr. John Giambra
USDA Natural Resources
2" Conservation Service
Coordinates: 35.60326,-80.81098
Date: June 27, 2018

T �oresville. NC. 28115, USA X Q
Show search re*s fo.r NC-15..
'-.* r -
-ii
'a w'mnao 01 Surface Water Classifications:
�� g+ .400 Stream lnc ex: 12-108-21-140.5)
Stream Nerne: Back Creek
Descrlpvory From sou roe to a po mt 0.2
x�t tir rnil a idownstrearn of
gsak CrO Rowsn County SR 1737
Classf:cavon: WS-II;HDW
f
i C1ate of Ga as.: August 2 1992
Rorer Bann- Yadkin Pee -Dee
What eoes the More nfa
Class. mean'
ifarl@Y�= 3� � Zoom to •••
Yer.
rlC.or Ave
cascaacc Ru
Brookwood 5t
Lai
r
�a
w'i +Sr Wx U1 l5�
` k
rs B
t : ` urke Cis
el�i County, State of North Car*
of ina DOT, 1=s6, HERE, G$rmi
Project Name: Highway 150 By -Pass
Location: Approximately 605 Oakridge Farm Hwy, Mooresville, NC 28115
IRONMENTAL For: JMG Construction Inc Attn: Mr. John Giambra
Coordinates: 35.60326,-80.81098 Date: June 27, 2018

i
i .
N `
�, � � � L,rprll� i r� t, _ tidy '�•. s� �,,'
+i
�I a
j(x ]
fti
r
r
Qg Q _ 1 '�

Troutman
Lake Norman North
Legend
Q Project Boundary
0 USGS Quadrangles
USGS Quad Map
Shepherds
0
Mooresville
Project Name: Hwy 150 By - Pass
I S
Location: 615 Oak Ridge Farm Hwy. Moorseville, NC 28115
,41 A
OINMENTAL For: JMG Construction Inc. Attn: Mr. John Giambra
Coordinates: 35.6026,-80.8102
Cleveland
0 1 2 3 Miles
Date: June 15, 2018
Page 43 of159

Stumpy Creek -Lake Norman
Little Creek -Lake Norman
Legend
0 Project Boundary
HUC 12
IRONMENTAL
Reeds Creek -Lake Norman
HUC 12 Map
Withrow Creek
a
Headwaters Rocky River
Project Name: Hwy 150 By - Pass
Location: 615 Oak Ridge Farm Hwy. Moorseville, NC 28115
For: JMG Construction Inc. Attn: Mr. John Giambra
Coordinates: 35.6026,-80.8102
Sills Creek -Back Creek
Upper Coddle Creek
0 1 2 3 Miles
Date: June 15, 2018
Page 44

Upper Catawba03050101
Legend
Project Boundary
HUC 8
.ii►
.iu
FV- 6
HUC 8 Map
q►
Project Name: Hwy 150 By - Pass
Location: 615 Oak Ridge Farm Hwy. Moorseville, NC 28115
For: JMG Construction Inc. Attn: Mr. John Giambra
Coordinates: 35.6026,-80.8102
South Yadkin03040102
Rocky03040105
0 1 2 3 Miles
Date: June 15, 2018
Page 45 of159

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 06/27/2018
Project/Site:IHwy 15o By -Pass D Form #I Ch ioo
Latitude: 35•6026
Evaluator: J Sinclair A Baggarley
county: Iredell
Longitude:-80.8102
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Mooresville
Stream is at least intermittent �5
Ephemeral Inteoffittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if 19 or perennial if 2! 30*
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 16
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrirnlnnv (Suhtntal = a 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
r'. Rinlnnv (Gi ihtntnl = r,
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
2
2
1
2
0
0.5
0.5
0
2
2
0
0
0
0.5
0.5
0
0
Page 46 of 59

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 06/27/2018
a y Hwy �5o By -Pass
Project/Site: HForm -P ss
Latitude: 35.6026
Evaluator: J Sinclair A Baggarley
county: Iredell
Longitude:-80.8102
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Mooresville
Stream is at least intermittent 20
Ephemeral InteVittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if;?: 19 or perennial if z 30'
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 13
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrirnlnnv (Suhtntni = :Z 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
r Rinlnnv (Ruhtntal = a
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
1
0
1
1
0
0.5
0.5
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 47 of 59

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies user manual version c.-i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Highway 150 By -Pass 2. Date of evaluation: August 12, 2019
3. Applicant/owner name: JGM Construction Inc 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Back Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.6026,-80.8102
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): CH 100 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): Approx. 292 LF
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.3 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 2.5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes El No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A� ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) [-]Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (z 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
El Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑l ®11 ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
El Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
El Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable
Page 48 of 59

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
®A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. []Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
to
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
F W
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
r
❑I
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
t L
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
02
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E
Little or no habitat
*****************************"***REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****"****************"`*"**
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that.occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes []No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Page 49 of 59

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. []No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ®Adult frogs
® ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ []Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water z 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs Qurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (Z 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent
Page 50 of 59

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ®C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
®D ❑D ®D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
❑A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
®B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. []Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Page 51 of 59

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Highway 150 By -Pass Date of Assessment August 12, 2019
Stream Category Pbl Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
LOW
LOW
(4) Microtopography
NA
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW
Page 52 of 59

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
John Giambra
Oakridge Motorsports
108 Washam Road
Mooresville, NC 28117
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 24, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 4/24/2020
Project: Oakridge Motorsports County: Iredell
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location impact Type I Impact Quantity
jls-digit Hue!
Yadkin 03040102 Warm Stream 292
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Jennifer Robertson, agent
Sincerely, -
J mes. B Stanfill
A�set Management Supervisor
DWQ1i:;1A:> ,�
YIM1uAY • Frw+V M/+111 Q�1lly�
North Carolina Department ofEnAronmental Quality I Division ofMitigadonServices
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Rakigti North Caroline 27699-1652
919.707.8976 Page 53 of 59

r ,lk �r� �+' " �. i
16
AK
e.
;-
fE
tj
s
err
�.,
-• ,�
'
I
At

a
.
• " ° 'fir ; �'�. ,�. �T
f �
sot
AA'-�- • ..
rx

—� ya
o`*�_-

Jennifer Robertson
From: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 10:48 AM
To: Jennifer Robertson
Subject: RE: Hwy 150 - John Giambra
Jennifer,
Scott said the proposal below is acceptable so you can move forward with it. Let me know if you have any
other questions. Thanks.
Catherine M. Janiczak
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office
Phone: [phone]
-----Original Message -----
From: Jennifer Robertson[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:29 AM
To: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Hwy 150 - John Giambra
Okay, thanks!
Thank you,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
Blockedwww.atlasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
-----Original Message -----
From: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:05 AM
To: Jennifer Robertson <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Hwy 150 - John Giambra
I haven't heard back from him. I forwarded your message again. I'll let you know his response. Thanks.
Catherine M. Janiczak
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office
Phone: [phone]
-----Original Message-----
Page57 of 59

From: Jennifer Robertson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:00 AM
To: Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] FW: Hwy 150 - John Giambra
Cathy,
Have you heard back from Scott about my request below?
Thank you,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] <tel:%28704%29%20512-1206> office
[phone] <tel:%28704%29%20512-1206> mobile Blockedwww.atlasenvi.com
<Blockedhttp://www.atiasenvi.com/> Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
From: Jennifer Robertson
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 2:03 PM
To: 'Janiczak, Catherine M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) ([e-mail])'
<[e-mail]. mil>
Subject: Hwy 150 - John Giambra
Cathy,
Following up on our phone conversation earlier today below is a summary of the Hwy 150 project that will need
to be an after the fact permit application.
I met with John and his engineer on site a couple weeks ago. We had completed a delineation on this
site a while back so I had a delineation map. I have attached the site plan which shows the delineation and
labels the impacts that need to be permitted.
292' of intermittent stream has been impacted by installation of a culvert, additional stream has been
impacted by the rip rap energy dissipator that Iredell County required, John has agreed to remove the rip rap
along the stream within the rip rap apron to restore this reach, in summary 292' of intermittent stream will need
to be permitted
I have attached the SAM form for the stream, the stream rates as low quality
I want to propose 0.5:1 mitigation for the 292' of stream impacts including 0.25:1 through payment to
DMS and 0.25:1 through storm water treatment on site that is above and beyond what is required. The storm
water pond would be designed to treat a 25 year storm as opposed to a 10 year storm. The applicant would
also treat storm water above his project. A dry pond is required but the engineer would design for a wet pond
and we would plant a littoral shelf (constructed wetland).
The DMS fee as proposed in the above scenario will be $38,372.45. John has told me that he will need
to get a loan to pay for the permitting and mitigation. I am not sure that he has the financial capability to pay
any more in mitigation fees. The mitigation scenario above would mitigate through DMS as well as improve
the stream immediately downstream of the project. This site was a mess with a lot of construction material
(concrete and boulders). The low quality stream flows through a power line right-of-way below the impacts.
Let me know if you and Scott are willing to accept the proposed mitigation plan so we can get the ATF
application submitted soon.
Thank you,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] <tel:%28704%29%20512-1206> office
[phone] <tel:%28704%29%20512-1206> mobile Blockedwww.atlasenvi.com
<Blockedhttp://www.atlasenvi.com/> Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
Page 58 of 59