20091112 Ver 1_401 Application_20091009

EVANS ENGINEERING, INC.
ENGINEERS, PLANNERS, SURVEYORS
4609 DUNDAS DRIVE
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27407
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]

DATE: D " ? Dq
CLIENT: 23-0 P.M.
o c T
r'F.NR - WATER WAL.TY
PROJECT: ,s9 VVETLANI'DS AND sTCRIINNATElR BRANCH
TO:
16,s-o hi-41L S?nv?c? &NTPA)
lALtf&#1 N (- 276g9.165-0
A 17,
et- 2
.
7011 Aq-r
From: AvTmojw & L?-.-sTi-?.
TO BE DELIVERED [ ] TO BE MAILED [ X ] TO BE PICKED UP [ ]
WORLDWIDE EXPRESS [ ] FEDERAL EXPRESS [ ]
COMMENTS:
P( bl Ap&jC+j ron/ F09, TAL 124 UbNn kg&n /Uol.rm
6414"H ?t&fnkt &,ae-r
0

OF Pows f,"oFIff' e. 6Mkffl-WATf& hk&A&s-&k? A+N. ?I6 Pz+N
945 AL60 CIA/ 5146M I r-"13 7-0 /-UWtM ZC45. P4,46t t"04-MCT
Af- ArH CVMMFNr5 . -THj jK5 Fan- 7GUJ2 AFl-P.
s
0'-1112
o?oF w A rf;y
t I >_ y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
] 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ? No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: 120 Wind Road & 3800 N. Church Street
2b. County: Guilford
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Greensboro
2d. Subdivision name: Church Crossing Commercial Subdivision
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: No
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Kotis Holdings, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 6910 @ 1400 -1404
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Marty Kotis
3d. Street address: 1500 Mill Street, Suite 105 ?';'
3e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27408 ;r
3f. Telephone no.: 336-574-2000 T 1°3`;'7
3g. Fax no.: 336-574-2001 ENR - WATER Qok. - fy
3h. Email address: [e-mail] VrjTLAND0 ANDST0PU,N"AT IER RRMILM
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent El Other, specify: Owner
4b. Name: Kotis Holdings, LLC
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Kotis Holdings, LLC
4d. Street address: 1500 Mill Street, Suite 105
4e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27408
4f. Telephone no.: 336-574-2000
4g. Fax no.: 336-574-2001
4h. Email address: marts .kotisprop.com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Anthony D. Lester, P.E.
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Evans Engineering, Inc.
5c. Street address: 4609 Dundas Drive
5d. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27407
5e. Telephone no.: 336-854-8877
5f. Fax no.: 336-854-8876
5g. Email address: adlaevans-eng.com

Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 431-1-16
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.134°N Longitude: - 79.788°W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 17.36 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to South Buffalo Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C NSW
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently developed with an existing 64,600 SF shopping center. There are currently (4) undeveloped
outparcels. The immediate site is zoned shopping center and the surrounding area is a mixture of multifamily residential
and commercial businesses.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.09 Acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
485 LF Perennial Stream; 234 LF, Intermittent Stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Construction of parking lot and access drive to the proposed expansion of the shopping center.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
This project will entail the expansion of the existing shopping center and development of outparcel sites. Pans, dozers
and compaction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / © Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Environmental Services,

Name (if known): Andrew Williams .
Inc.
Other: Charlie Johnston
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
.
A representation of the USACE (Andy Williams) and NCDWQ (Sue Homewood) evaluated the site.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ® No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes X? No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
x? Wetlands Q Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ® P ? T Fill Headwater x? Yes Q Corps
0
017 Ac
Wetland ? No ? DWQ .
.
W2 © P ? T Fill Small-Basin ? Yes E] Corps
0
08 Ac
*
Wetland ? No ? DWQ .
.
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.097 Ac.
2h. Comments: *Wetland impact #2 is a former sediment basin
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent
DWQ -non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 EIP ? T Fill & Pipe UT ? PER
® INT ® Corps
? DWQ 2 Feet (239 LF)*

S2 El P ? T
Fill & Pipe
UT © PER
? INT ® Corps
? DWQ 6 Foot
Avg.
149 LF
Width
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 149 LF*
3i. Comments: * The intermittent reach of this stream has been designated by the USACE as unimportant and not requiring
compensatory mitigation.
Page 4 of 10
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction N/A
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1 I Stormwater Detention
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: The proposed pond is being built in an upland area.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 0.22 acres
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 6.12 acres
5k. Method of construction: Principal spillway will be a riser & barrel. Emergency spillway will be rip rap
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) N/A
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number - Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporarv (T) impact
B1 ?P?T
B2 ?P?T
B3 ?P?T
6i. Comments:
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Other:
? Catawba ? Randleman
6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
? Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached sheet.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Standard sediment and erosion control measures will be observed. The limits of construction will be flagged and silt fence
will be placed at the tops of slopes in order to protect the existing stream.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 0 Yes ? No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ® DWQ ® Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) N/A Type Quantity
3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. El Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 149 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ® warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): N/A square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: N/A acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan NIA
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Avoidance & Minimization
Item 1 a.
We (Kotis Holdings, LLC and Evans Engineering, Inc.) have worked very closely with
the NCDWQ (Sue Homewood) in developing this application. We first met with Sue in
hopes of having Proposal #1 (see attached map) approved. This plan proposed the filling
of 0.09 acres of wetlands, 239 LF of intermittent stream and 460 LF of perennial stream.
Sue informed us that the permit that we were asking for required a stormwater
management plan since our impervious surface area would exceed 24%. At this point,
we knew that we had to modify our layout to include some type of BMP device. We then
proposed a second layout (Option #2, filling of .09 acres of Wetlands, 239 LF of
unimportant intermittent stream and 300 LF of perennial stream) that disturbed a majority
of the higher quality stream south of the existing parking lot. We were then told to try to
minimize our impacts even further. It was at this point that we decided to leave most of
the perennial stream south of the existing parking lot undisturbed. This Option #3
consisted of filling .097 acres of wetlands, 239 LF of unimportant intermitten stream and
149 LF of perennial stream. This option was needed in order to tie the two existing pipe
outlets together and outlet them in one place. Therefore, the stream disturbance proposed
was reduced from 699 LF to 388 LF total.
C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required. N/A
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes 91 No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments: N/A
Page 7 of 10
C. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ), continued
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 66.6%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ® Yes ? No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The SWMP for this project includes (3) devices: (1) permanent wet detention pond and (2) bio retention cells. These BMP
devices have been sized for all the new impervious surface area.
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ® DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review N/A
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Greensboro

3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? Phase II
? NSW
apply (check all that apply): ? USMP
© Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ® No
attached?
Plan has been submitted to State DWQ but not approved.
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties

4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ? HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply): ? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes] No
SWMP is currently under review by the state.
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? [N Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes Z] No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
? Yes
? No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ? No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The sewage disposal for this site is via public sewer mains and therin, will travel to the City of Greensbor wastewater
treatment plant.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
F1 Yes FX] No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act El Yes ? No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Raleigh
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There is no fish habitat on site.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Visual inspection of site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)

8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
-T
? Yes] No
-
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood Map
W, )l1gM m, K6t;s ITL L -M I AA/'

J
9 1 l ??09
' '
Applicant/Agent
s Printed Name Alican?Ag
enh Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provide .)
Page 10 of 10
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
January 9, 2009
Anthony D. Lester
Evans Engineering, Inc.
4609 Dundas Drive
Greensboro, NC 27407
Re: Commercial Development
Dear Mr. Lester:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally-protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally-protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern' that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
I The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above-referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down-gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Mark Bowers of this office
at [phone] ext. 19.
Sincerely,
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
L-

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson
4
tu. STA7p Q,
C
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Peter B. Sandbeck, Administrator
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
January 26, 2009
Anthony Lester
Evans Engineering, Inc.
PO Box 10285
Greensboro, NC 27404
Office of Archives and History
Division of Historical Resources
David Brook, Director
Re: Wetland & Stream Disturbance, 120 Wind Road & 3800 North Church Street, Greensboro,
Guilford County, ER 08-3086
Dear Mr. Lester:
Thank you for your letter of December 23, 2008, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above-referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Peter Sandbeck
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Sen ice Center, Raleigh NC 27699-=4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599
r-9;J
r1?9osyystem
PROGRAM
December 22, 2008
Marty Kotis
Kotis Properties, LLC
P.O. Box 9296
Greensboro, NC 27429 Expiration of Acceptance: September 22, 2009
Project: Church Crossing Shopping Center County: Guilford
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must alsb,complly`with all.other state 'federal or }ocal
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.neeep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table.
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Ri arian Nan-:R arian Coastal Marsh
Impact Cape Fear 03030002 0 0 299 0.09 0 0 0 0
Credits Cape Fear 03030002 0 0 598 0.18 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Valerie Mitchener at [phone].
Sincerely,
.
illia .. Gilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Andy Williams, USACE-Raleigh
Sue Homewood, NCDWQ-Winston-Salem
Anthony Lester, agent
File
Pro" ourStag
WNW,
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net