20171338 Ver 1_Modification Email_20191112

Wanucha, Dave
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 8:19 AM
To: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Braquet, Stephanie; Wanucha,
Dave
Cc: Scott, Jordan C
Subject: RE: [External] RE: DI00181 Lasater Road B-5152--
Correction: We have a 23, 13, and 33. 1 should have looked before I assumed!
Also Dave sent us the modified 401 yesterday. We will plan to proceed with permitting the additional bank stabilization
now under the 13 that we have, and be in touch for the temporary impacts in the future.
Amy
-----Original Message -----
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 7:50 AM
To: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <Nicholle. [e-mail]>; Braquet, Stephanie
<[e-mail]>; Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Jordan C <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: D100181 Lasater Road B-5152
Nicholle,
We have an existing NW 14 for the project. Any changes to the existing permit require written concurrence since we are
working under a NW 14 (and corresponding GC from DWR), unless you would rather us consider the additional impacts
under a separate Nationwide. We haven't done this in the past with our USACE reps. Also, neither DWR or the USACE
requires mitigation for bank stabilization impacts. We are going to submit a permit modification package in the next
couple of months for an additional temporary impact to demo the existing bridge. If its okay, we'll handle the
additional 38' of bank stabilization at the same time.
If possible, we would like confirmation that the rip rap can stay on the banks. Thanks.
-----Original Message -----
From: Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:27 PM
To: Braquet, Stephanie <[e-mail]>; Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Jordan C <[e-mail]>; Euliss, Amy <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: D100181 Lasater Road B-5152
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Hello,
The question has been asked of the Corps whether or not compensatory mitigation would be required for the additional
38 linear feet of permanent riprap at Site 3 on the B 5152 project.

I've read the 2017 NWP 13, 23, and 33. I've read the Regional General Conditions to the NWPs.. and I read the WQC for
the 2017 NWPs. Please let me know if the following sounds correct.
All 3 NWPs (13, 23 and 33 require written WQ certification from DWR).
Regional Conditions for the 2017 NWPs and Regional Conditions for NWP 13 have been followed.. Total linear footage
for permanent stream bank stabilization is 110 linear feet (72 linear feet of stream bank stabilization was verified in
NWP 13 James L. issued -- this modification requests an additional 38 linear feet permanent of bank stabilization) for a
total of 110 linear feet.
The riprap was well -placed and of adequate size. The Corps will not require additional compensatory mitigation for the
additional 38 linear feet of permanent riprap.
From what I read.. the change of an additional 38 linear feet of riprap for B 5152 does not require a PCN for the Corps -
(i.e. it is not in wetlands, it does not take out stream bed.. it does not change the ESA and 106 calls on the project, etc.)
Written verification that the 38 linear feet of permanent riprap is also not required.
If DWR needs to review the modification for a written WQC, then perhaps DWR would want an application or some sort
of package sent to them - I'll let DWR answer that.
Please let me know if you know things are done differently.
Sincerely,
Nicholle Braspennickx
Regulatory Project Manager
704-774-7551
-----Original Message -----
From: Braquet, Stephanie [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 8:20 AM
To: Wanucha, Dave <[e-mail]>; Braspennickx, Nicholle M CIV USARMY CESAW (US)
<Nicholle. [e-mail]>
Cc: Scott, Jordan C <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] D100181 Lasater Road B-5152
Attached please find the Section 106 Compliance for the above -mentioned project. The project did require a survey by
NCDOT Human Environment, it was determined that Lasater Mill had lost it's integrity and is not eligible for listing and
resulted in "No Historic Properties Affected" finding. NCDOT Archaeologists also reviewed the project and determined
"No Historic Properties" would be affected.
If you need anything else or have further questions, please let me know.
Thanks

Stephanie Braquet
Division 9 Environmental Specialist
North Carolina Department of Transportation
336 747 7800 office
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
375 Silas Creek Parkway
Winston Salem, NC 27127-7167
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties.