20190928 Ver 2_Individual_20191030

U.J. /AMFVI T uumr-o yr CINum4ccr[J
OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003_a/
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY 2013�✓ /�
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division, and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Englneer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine PiOteci to esearch, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413 Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principa),Purofose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Charles Middle - Last - Poindexter
First - Dana Middle - :V Last - Lutheran
Company - Terraces Development, LLC
Company - Southern Environmental Group, Inc. (SEGi)
E-mail Address - cepiit<i;mac.com
E-mail Address - dlutheranOa segi.us
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 7923 Reunion Road
Address- 5315 S. College Road, Suite L
City - Wilmington State - NC Zip- 28411 Country- US
City - Wilmington State - NC Zip- 28412 Country- US
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Direct
[phone] 010) 202-4490
1910) 4-2711 (910') 228-IS41
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, (- (; i to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
SIGNATURE OF AP _IC NT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
The Terraces Subdivision
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
UT to Virginia Creek
Address Trellis Road
City - Surf City State NC Zip -
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 4.44999 Longitude: -W 7?.61 1 1
Latitude:
OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
jj��M('aState
@ 0
Tax Parcel ID 4215-87-9642-0000 Municipality Surf Cit\
LS V L5
Rill
Section - Township- T„p�:ai 1 Range -
U (, T 3 0
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
LEQ-WATER
Page 1 of 3
RESOURCES
01 & BU.EFgR PERk41TTINQ

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
One can find the site by taking US Hwy 17 North to Hwy 210, in Surf City. Take a right onto Hwy 210. Travel approximately 0.3 mile
and then take another right onto Alston Blvd., and another right onto Trellis Road (see Attachment 1 - Supplemental Information for
vicinity map).
18. Nature of Actively (Description of project, include all features)
The project consist of installing roads, infrastructure and attendant features that will support the 76, single-family subdivision.
See Attachment 1 - Supplemental Information for details of the proposed project.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The purpose of the project is to provide a small scale, single-family residential development, which is necessary to meet local demand,
in the Surf City area.
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
All proposed fill is necessary to facilitate the construction of roads and infrastructure (see Attachment 1 - Supplemental Information for
details of the proposed discharges into wetlands and waters of the US (WoUS)).
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
See Attachment 1 - Supplemental Information for details of the proposed fill areas.
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres 0.713 AC - Pennanent Impact
or 0.104 AC - Temporary Impact
Linear Feet See Attachment 1 - Supplemental Information for details of the proposed fill areas.
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
'gee Attachment 1- Supplemental Information for details of avoidance and minimization efforts, as well as the mitigation proposed to offse
1.he anticipated loss of wetland functional processes resulting from the filling of 0.713-acre of wetlands.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? QYes[X]No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (snare than can be enWW here, pease allach a supplemental W).
a. Address- See Attachment 2, for adjacent property owner information.
City - State - Zip -
b.Address-
city - State - Zip -
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
NA
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. 1 certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
SIGNATURE OF A PLI ANT DATE - OF AG T DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

Southern F nvironmental Group) Inc.
i3 15 South College Road, Suite r, • Wilmington, North Carolina 2841 2
�10.452.2J11 • rax: 910.452.28J9 • [e-mail]
www.segws
i
.5EGi
Attachment 1
The Terraces
Supplemental Information to the DoA Individual Permit
Prepared for:
Terraces Development, LLC
7923 Reunion Rd.
Wilmington, NC 28411
910-620-4672
Prepared by:
Southern Environmental Group, Inc.
5315 South College Road, Suite E
Wilmington, NC 28412
910.452.2711
Date:
22 October 2019

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information ,9F c3i
Table of Contents
Section
Title
Page
I.
Introduction
3
II.
Authority
3
III.
Location
3
IV.
Existing Conditions
3
A.
Water Classification
3
B.
Wetlands
4
C.
Vegetation
4
D.
Streams
4
E.
Biological Resources/Endangered Species
4
F.
Cultural Resources
4
V.
Project Description
5
VI.
Proposed Impacts
5
VII.
Alternative Analysis
6
A.
Off -Site Alternatives
6
B.
On -Site Alternatives
8
VIII.
Avoidance and Minimization
10
IX.
Mitigation
10
X.
Summary
11
Appendices
A.
Vicinity Map
12
B.
2018 Google Earth Aerial Photograph
13
C.
Pender County Parcel Information
14
D.
White Oak River Basin Map
15
E.
DWR Water Classification Letter
16
F.
Proposed Site Plan & Wetland Impact Map
17
G.
On -site Stream Photos
18
H.
NC State Historic Preservation Map
19
I.
Alternative Analysis Map & Avoidance and Minimization Exhibits
20
J.
Sample Deed Notification
21

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information ,1�5r_Cli
I. Introduction
Terraces Development, LLC, herein referred to as the "Applicant", is seeking to secure Department of the Army (DoA)
and NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) approvals, in the form of an Individual Permit (IP) and Major Water
Quality Certification (MWQC) respectively, to permanently impact 0.713-acre of Section 404 wetlands, on land
currently owned by Hwy. 17 Properties, LLC and for the purpose of constructing a small-scale, single family residential
subdivision, with infrastructure and attendant features.
II. Authority
The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) will evaluate this application and decide whether to issue, conditionally
issue, or deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1344).
III. Location
The site is a 39.87-acre tract of land, located off Hwy. 17, in Pender County, North Carolina. From the intersection of
US Hwy 210 and US Hwy 17, go east on US Hwy 210. Travel approximately 0.30 mile and take a right, onto Alston
Boulevard. Travel 0.40 mile and take a right onto Trellis Road. Trellis road dead ends at the entrance into the proposed
project site (see Appendix A). The site is located within the incorporated area of Surf City, NC and is surround by
residential development, to the south, undeveloped commercial and residential land, to the northwest and east
respectively, and commercial development, to the north (see Appendix B).
Project Area (acres): 40.56
Parcel ID: 4225-08-513 1 -0000
Nearest Town: Surf City
Nearest Waterway: Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Virginia Creek
River Basin: White Oak (0302030204)
Latitude and Longitude: 34.448721 N,-77.608124 W
IV. Existing Site Conditions:
Hwy. 17 Holdings, LLC acquired the property, in the summer of 2017 (see Appendix C). The decision to purchase the
property was based upon the location of the property being within the incorporated area of Surf City, it's close
proximity to two metropolitan areas (i.e. Camp Lejeune and Wilmington), proximity to shopping centers, schools and
US Hwy 17., as well as the ability to easily connect to sewer and water lines. The Pender County portion of Surf City
is part of the Wilmington Metropolitan Statistical Area, while the Onslow County portion is part of the Jacksonville
Metropolitan Statistical Area. According to worldpopulationreview.com', in 2019, the population, in Surf City, was
estimated at 2400.
A. Water Classification
Geographically, Surf City is located in the Outer Coastal Plain of North Carolina, which is low, flat land along the
Atlantic Ocean. The Outer Coastal Plain is made up of the Outer Banks and the Tidewater region. The Tidewater
is the area along the coast close to sea level. The mouths, of major streams and rivers, empty into sounds or the
ocean. Waters, at the project site, are part of the White Oak River system (see Appendix D). The origin of an
intermittent, unnamed tributary begins in the northeast corner of the project site. It transitions into a perennial
stream approximately 250 linear feet downstream and flows south, approximately 0.6 mile downstream, into
Virginia Creek, which then flows into the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The White Oak River and its tributaries
contain some of the most pristine and high -quality waters in the North Carolina. As designated by the North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) — Division of Water Resources (DWR), the stream
located at this site is classified as fresh water, secondary recreation -aquatic life class C (see Appendix E).
B. Wetlands
1 http://worldpool2ulationre%,iew.com/us-cities/surf-city-nc-i)ooulation
N

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information 15F C_li
There are Section 404 and 401 wetlands, and one stream located within the project boundary (see Appendix F).
The project boundary contains the following amounts of jurisdictional Waters of the US (WoUS).
Table 1. Summary of Jurisdictional Waters
Aquatic Resource
Amount
Streams
580 LF
Wetlands 404
+/- 15.8 AC
Isolated Wetlands 401
+/- 0.20 AC
To date, a large portion of the site has been logged and mowed (see Appendix B). A Headwater Forest, a large
Pocosin and upper reaches of a Swamp Forest wetland are contained within the project site (see Appendix F). The
main factor contributing to hydrology in these wetlands is geomorphic position, a high water table, drainage
patterns and downstream blockages.
C. Vegetation
Since most of the site, specifically the uplands and Pocosin areas, has been cleared of large trees, only small
saplings and shrubs, such as summersweet (Clethra alnifolia), fetterbush (Lyonia lucida) and Swamp Bay (Persea
palustris), have emerged, within the areas designated as Pocosin. The wetter Headwater Forest and Swamp Forest
wetlands have not been mowed, thus the overstory of the Headwater Forest consist mostly of red maple (Acer
rubrum), water oak (Nyssa aquatica) and sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciva), while the Swamp Forest is devoid
of an overstory. The understory of the Headwater Forest is comprised of muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) and laurel
greenbrier (Smilax laurifolia). The Swamp Forest is mostly comprised of Cattails (Typha) and common reeds
(Phragmites).
D. Streams
There is one stream within the property limits. Fresh, warm -water stream habitats include the streambeds, banks,
and stream corridor. The stream, at the project site, varies from 1 to 4 feet wide. Permanently rooted aquatic plants
are practically non-existent within the stream. The stream bed substrate is predominantly sand, with an abundance
of woody debris, which has been knocked down during past and more recent hurricanes (see Appendix G).
E. Biological Resources/Endangered Species
SEGi conducted a file review of records maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP). The desktop literature review involved a review of the FWS list of
protected species and Critical Habitat in Pender County, and the NHP Element Occurrence (EO) Data, on which
NHP identifies current and historic occurrences of listed species and for a specific locale. The FWS lists 8 species,
as occurring in Pender County, that are subject to Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7 consultation. There are
no Critical Habitat occurrences within the project limits. The NHP database identifies 35 element occurrences
(EO), within a 1-mile radius of the project site. However, due to the fact that the site has been mostly cleared of
larger trees and previous evaluations of the USFWS and NHP EO data, performed as part of the permitting process
for the adjacent Arbors Subdivision, SEGi concluded that the proposed development would not adversely affect
any known Endangered Species.
F. Cultural Resources
SEGi reviewed the Online SHPO GIS database (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/). During the database review, SEGi
did not identify recorded historical sites, on the subject site. The database review did not identify recorded historical
sites on the subject site or within 1,500 feet of the site (see Figure 3). The database review did not identify other
Indian religious sites, historic structures or historic places located within 1,500 feet from the site. A copy of the
viewer image is included as Appendix H.
Based on observations made in the field and the review of the Online SHPO GIS, SEGi did not identify significant
architectural or archaeological resources on the subject site or in the surrounding vicinity, therefore, the project is
not anticipated to have an adverse effect on cultural resources.
4„

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information r f�l
V. Project Description
The Applicant proposes to develop the subject property into a 76-lot, single family residential community. The
proposed development is consistent with the local zoning (i.e. residential) and is in harmony with surrounding land
uses. The applicant proposes to permanently impact 0.713-acre of wetlands and temporarily impact 0.104-acre of
wetlands and 10 linear feet of stream, to achieve the previously stated project purpose.
The proposed installation of the sewer lines, grading activities for proposed culverts and roadway crossings will be
implemented broadly in the following sequences:
1. The limits of waters of the U.S. and the extents of the disturbance limits will be surveyed and marked in the
field.
2. Install temporary and permanent sediment control devices.
3. Clear and grub.
4. Construct coffer dams and install pump around system.
5. Begin placement of fill.
6. Install culverts, utilities, etc.
7. Remove coffer dams and pump around system.
8. Restore stream banks to similar pre -construction conditions.
9. Place stabilization matting, live stakes, and seed.
10. Install roadway storm drainage and utilities.
11. Seed per NCDEQ requirements.
12. Finalize desired grades and devices:
• For permanent devices, finish construction, filling, grading, and paving (if necessary) to designed elevations.
• For temporary disturbances and devices, return to existing grades and remove equipment and materials from
locations.
13. Once disturbed areas are stabilized, the temporary control devices will be removed and the area seeded.
The sequence of the construction phases has been designed to minimize areas of bare and exposed soil. Erosion and
control measures will be inspected and maintained as needed to prevent issues with distribution of sediments to nearby
surface waters, including streams. Exposed and bare soil will be temporarily stockpiled and will be moved as quickly
as possible, with relation to project timelines. Disturbed areas will be reseeded in an effort to prevent erosion and
capture sediments.
Heavy machinery, such as a bulldozers, graders, back hoes, and excavators, will be utilized during the construction
process. The machinery will be used to clear the land, establish grade, stabilize the soil and to transport and deposit
the fill material into those areas denoted on the site plan. Only the minimal amount of vegetation will be removed from
the proposed impacts areas, within the Headwater and Swamp Forest resources.
VI. Proposed Impacts:
The construction of the proposed residential development would require permanently filling approximately 0.713-acre
of 404 jurisdictional wetlands and temporarily impacting 0.107-acre. There are fifteen permanent wetland impacts, six
temporary wetland impacts and one temporary stream impact associated with the development of The Terraces
Subdivision. The fifteen permanent wetland impacts are for road crossings. The two temporary wetland impacts are
associated with the installation of sewer and water lines. These utility lines will be installed using the "trench -cut"
method and, upon completion, stream beds and banks would be returned to original contours and stabilized with coir
matting. Work within the stream utility crossing areas will occur in the dry, via a pump around system/apparatus.
Sediment and erosion control devices and best management practices would be utilized during utility line installation
as well. These proposed impacts are summarized in the Table 2, on the following page:
5.

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information "-�)F Cli
Table 2. Summary of Proposed Impacts to WoUS
Impact
Area
Permanent
Wetland
Impact (AC)
Temporary
Wetland
Impact (AC)
Permanent
Stream
Impact (LF)
Temporary
Stream Impact
(LF)
Impact Purpose
A
0.119
0.024
0
0
Culverted Road Crossing and Sewer Line
B*
0.209
0.012
0
0
Culverted Road & Driveway Crossings
C
0.072
0.0
0
0
Road Crossing
D
0.067
0.0
0
0
Culverted Road Crossing
E
0.097
0.005
0
0
Culverted Road Crossing
F
0.049
0.004
0
0
Culverted Road Crossing
G
0.0001
0.0
0
0
Road Crossing
H
1 0.031
0.0
0
0
Culverted Driveway Crossing
I
0.025
0.0
0
0
Culverted Road Crossing
J
0.004
0.0
0
0
Road Crossing
K
0.029
0.0
0
0
Culverted Road Crossing
L*
0.0
0.049
0
10
Sewer Line Crossing
M*
0.012
0.0
0
0
Culverted Driveway Crossing
N*
0.0
0.014
0
0
Water Line Crossing
Total
0.713
0.104
0
10
*Riparian wetland impacts
In total, 0.22-acre of riparian wetlands and 0.493-acre of non -riparian wetlands will be permanently impacted. For
details of the proposed impacts, please see Appendix F.
VII. Purpose and Need:
The purpose of the project is to provide small-scale, single family housing development, in Surf City, a rapidly growing
area of Pender County, North Carolina.
VIII. Alternative Analysis:
Comprehensive off -site and on -site alternatives analysis has been conducted, as part of the Individual Permit process.
Section 404(b)(1) guidelines were relied upon, to perform the analysis. When evaluating off -site alternatives,
considerations, such as the presence, quantity and quality or functional value of wetlands and/or other waters of the
U.S.; the presence of any federally -listed Threatened and/or Endangered Species or their Critical Habitat; state listed
Threatened and/or Endangered Species, or other natural or regionally important resource factors that may be
significantly impacted, were explored.
A. Off -site Alternatives
Current Pender County Zoning Maps, Public or Private utility company service area information, historical aerial
photography, topographic and soils maps, and available current land use records, were used, to best determine if any
of the alternative sites met some or all of the following criteria:
1. Be located within the incorporated area of Surf City;
2. Provides sufficient buildable area for a small scale, single-family subdivision (i.e. min. 30 acres, max. 60
acres);
3. Minimal distance to sewer and water connection;
4. Has adequate access;
5. Appropriately zoned for single-family residential;
6. Close to schools;
7. Close to shopping centers; and
8. Close to Hwy. 17.
Table 3, below and on the next page, summarizes the alternative sites that met either some or all of the site selection
criterion:
6„

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information .9F_Cli
Table 3. Alternative Site Information
Map Key
Pender Co. PID
Size (AC)
Zoned
1
4225-56-0964-0000
37.41
Surf City / Commercial
2
4225-46-5793-0000
39.43
Surf City / Residential
3
4225-58-3160-0000
30.98
Pender County
4
4225-58-8687-0000
39.96
Surf City / Residential
5
4225-07-7336-0000
32.21
Surf City / Residential
6
4225-69-2162-0000
42.5
Surf City / Residential
7
4225-60-9716-0000
195.0
Surf City / Residential
8
4226-10-4335-0000
32.15
Surf City / Residential
9
4225-66-7142-0000
20.1
Surf City / Residential
10
4225-37-1501-0000
25.0
Surf City / Residential
11
4225-19-4405-0000
23.89
Pender County
12
4226-30-0545-0000
53.38
Pender County
13
4225-29-0053-0000
16.99
Surf City / Residential
The figure below illustrates the locations of the alternative sites that were evaluated, as part of the Off -site Alternative
Analysis.
Figure 1. Alternative Site Map
Of the sites listed in Table 3, only the highlighted sites met the Applicant's size and zoning criterion and, therefore,
were the only sites evaluated for practicability. Alternatives that are practicable are those that are available and
capable of being undertaken, after considering cost, logistics and existing technology. The table, on the following
page, summarizes each of the highlighted sites, for practicability.
7

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information F Cli
Table 4. Alternative Site Practicability Analysis
Practicability
Criterion
Preferred Alternative
Alternative 2
Alternative 4
Alternative 5
Alternative 6
Alternative 8
Category
Availability
Available for
The tract has been
Yes
Not Listed —
Not Listed —
Yes
Yes
Acquisition
purchased by the
Failed screen
Failed Screen
Applicant.
Logistics
Parcel Size (30-60
The tract offers
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
AC)
adequate buildable
area
Appropriate
The property is zoned
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
Zoning
residential and located
within the
incorporated limits of
Surf City.
Availability of
Pender County, Rocky
Yes
NA
NA
Yes
Yes
Utilities
Top Sewer District
Services the site.
Adequate Access
Access offAlston
Yes
NA
NA
No — Failed
Yes
Blvd. as well as
Screen
through Dogwood
Lakes
Technology
Topography and
There are existing
No — Tract
NA
NA
NA
No — adjacent
Other Site
utilities very close by,
within '/2 mile
to US Hwy 17
Conditions for
making connection
of SA waters
makes the site
Development
easier and less
undesirable
expensive.
for residential
development
Cost
Reasonable
The tract was
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Acquisition Cost
purchased at a fair
market value
Alternative Site 2: This site meets all of the Applicant's criteria, but it appears to be within 'h mile of a saltwater
(SA), which reduces the allowable built -upon area to 12%. Therefore, this site was rejected.
Alternative Site 4: This property is not listed, as being for sale. Therefore, this site was rejected.
Alternative Site 5: This site is not listed, as being for sale. Therefore, this site was rejected.
Alternative Site 6: This site appears to meet most of the Applicant's criterion, except it lacks adequate access.
Therefore, this site was rejected.
Alternative Site 8: This site also appears to meet most of the Applicant's criterion, but it abuts US Hwy 17 North,
which is a busy, 4-lane highway, and undesirable for residential development. Therefore, this site was rejected.
Proposed Site — The proposed site meets all of the Applicant's criterion, for development of a small scale, single
family subdivision, with associated infrastructure and amenities. Additionally, the Applicant already owns the
property and has invested a significant amount of time and money vet it. Therefore, this is the only alternative that
was accepted.
B. On -Site Alternatives Analysis
The following alternatives were explored:
Alternative 1— Utilization of other uplands within the tract to avoid impacts: This alternative was reviewed, but
utilization of the remining uplands would require significant additional wetland and stream impacts (see Appendix
I). Therefore, this alternative was rejected.
Alternative 2 — Minimizing the impact area:
The following strategies, to avoid and minimize wetland and stream impacts, were considered during the design
phase:
• Tactical road design;
8,

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information "_�)F_���
• Utilization of retaining walls;
• Utilization of bottomless -culverts;
• Utilization of shared driveways;
• Dedicating available buildable uplands to Open Space: and
• Reducing the number of lots.
With these strategies in mind, the following alternative site plans were explored:
Preferred Plan — TRC approved plan with 1 bottomless -culvert and retaining walls, at Impact Area B, and
shared driveways 1014119 (Proposed Plan — See Appendix F): The preferred plan consists of 76 lots and entails
permanently filling 0.713-acre of wetlands. This plan involves tactical road design and shared driveways
between lots 15 and 16, 17 and 18, and 55 and 56, which minimizes impacts to wetlands by 0.021-acre. At
Impact B, there is a proposed bottomless culvert with retaining walls (on each side of Impact B) at the stream
crossing, which reduced overall permanent wetland impacts by 0.029-acre and avoided 60 linear feet of
stream impact. Additionally, the Applicant removed three lots (i.e. 77, 78 and 79), where wetlands
significantly encroached into the property boundaries. While this effort may not avoid or minimize direct
wetland impacts, it shows the Applicant's desire to ensure secondary and/or unauthorized wetland impacts do
not take place, after the lots have been conveyed. This plan achieves the Applicant's objective and is the least
environmentally damaging, practicable alternative.
Option A — Preliminary Concept plan 5118117 (see Appendix I): This site plan proposes 66 single-family lots,
0.52-acre of wetland impact and 120 linear feet of stream impact. While wetland impacts are less than the
proposed plan, it was prepared prior to obtaining a formal wetland delineation and Pender County Technical
Review Committee(TRC) review. SEGi's wetland delineation revealed buildable uplands that were not taken
into consideration, when preparing the plan. Additionally, Pender County TRC required access into the project
to be through Trellis Drive, rather than via Rosedale Drive, as was proposed with this plan. For these reasons,
this option was rejected.
Option B — Post JD and TRC approved plan 2/13/19(see Appendix I): By utilizing the new-found uplands,
this plan proposes 79 single family homes. Tactical road design, such as reconfiguring the hammer -head, at
the terminus of Rosedale Drive and Balustrade Way, not utilizing all the available uplands, aligning roads to
cross wetlands perpendicularly, where possible, and reconfiguring Lot 71, to make room for the lift station
and access road, were the only minimization and avoidance methods incorporated into the plan. (Note: This
strategy was carried over onto all subsequent plans). This site plan entails permanently filling 0.704-acre of
wetlands and 60 linear feet of stream. This plan would require 0.009-acre less wetland impacts, than the
preferred plan, but would impact the more functionally valuable stream system, by 60 linear feet. Therefore,
this option was rejected.
Option C — TRC approved plan with multiple bottomless -culverts and retaining walls 06120119 (see Appendix
I): This plan also proposes 79 lots and incorporates 12 bottomless -culverts, across the site, and entailed
permanently impacting 0.49-acre of wetlands and no stream impact. While this plan requires the least amount
of impact to wetlands, the cost of doing so is not practicable. Additionally, the USACE reviewed and objected
to the plan, as they felt the structures would, in effect, act as fill. Therefore, this option was rejected
Option D — TRC approved plan with 1 bottomless -culvert, retaining walls, at all crossings, and shared
driveways 9116119 (see Appendix I): This plan proposes 76 lots and would require permanently impacting
0.494-acre of wetlands and no stream impact. While this plan is less impactf it to wetlands, it is infeasible.
According to the engineer, approximately 1,695 linear feet (4,575 SF) of retaining walls would be needed, to
facilitate this option, and minimizes wetland impacts by 0.219-acre.
Table 4. Retaining Wall Calcs for Wetland Impact Areas
IMPACT AREA
RETAINING WALL DESIGN
SF
LF
'A'
640
280
9 ,;

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information 9F Cli
'B'
1,695
410
'C'
350
175
'D'
385
165
'E'
525
200
V
175
130
'G'
0
0
'H'
355
140
'I'
235
105
'J'
135
50
'K'
0
0
V
0
0
'M'
80
40
'N'
0
0
'O'
0
0
TOTAL
4,575
1,695
The cost of installing retaining walls is approximately $22.00 per square foot. This cost does not include labor.
To utilize retaining walls, at every crossing, would cost approximately $300,000.00. Considering the cost to
mitigate the additional 0.219-acre of impact, at a 2:1 mitigation to impact ratio and through a private bank, who
only sells credits in 0.10-acre increments, the Applicant would be required to purchase 0.50-acre of wetland
restoration credit, at a cost of $23,1367.00. Under this option, the Applicant would be mitigating the additional
0.219-acre of wetland impact, at almost a 5.7:1 mitigation to impact ratio. Therefore, this option was rejected.
Alternative 4 —Avoiding all impacts to wetlands and streams: The Applicant investigated other potential means
for developing the property without impacting wetlands and has been unable to find a practicable alternative that
would achieve his stated goal. Therefore, this alternative was rejected.
Alternative 5 — Impact all wetland and streams: While this alternative would allow the Applicant to achieve his
stated goal, it would be extremely damaging to the environment. Therefore, this alternative was rejected.
Alternative 6 — No Build: Under the no build alternative, residential dwellings would not be built and the current
need for additional housing would not be met. Therefore, this alternative was rejected.
VIII. Avoidance and Minimization:
The avoidance and minimization strategies discussed in Section VI(B) were applied to the proposed, preferred plan.
Table 5. quantifies the acreage of wetland impact avoided, by incorporating those efforts:
Cable 5. Avoidance & Minimization - Wetland Impact Summary
Strategy
Avoided Wetland Impact Acreage
Avoided Stream Impact
Tactical Road Design
0.103 AC
0
Utilization of retaining walls
0.047 AC
0
Utilization of bottomless -culverts
0.016 AC
60
Utilization of shared driveways
0.021 AC
0
Reducing the number of lots
0.051 AC
0
Total 0.238 AC
Total 60
In conjunction with the avoidance and minimization efforts outlined in Table 4., large trees and other wetland
vegetation will only be removed where needed, in the Headwater Forest and Swamp Forest, and during the construction
process, best management practices will be utilized. Any temporary impact to wetlands, associated with the installation
of roads or other development activities, will be restored to their pre -construction conditions and allowed to revegetate
naturally or seeded with a wetland seed mix. Furthermore, the Applicant, during the design phase, tried to avoid having
wetlands encroach into the individual lots. For those lots, where this occurs, deed notifications will be recorded at the
New Hanover County Register of Deeds, to ensure unauthorized wetland impacts do not take place, after the lots been
conveyed. A draft of the notification has been attached as Appendix J.
IX. Mitigation:
The Applicant intends to offset the loss of chemical, biological and physical processes, which are anticipated to be
10`.

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information V C3i
removed, as a result of the unavoidable, permanent filling of 0.22-acre of riparian wetlands and 0.493-acre of non -
riparian wetland, by making payment to the Hofrnann Forest Wetland Mitigation Bank, for 0.50-acre of riparian
wetland restoration credit and 1.0-acre of non -riparian wetland restoration credit. A credit reservation letter, from the
mitigation bank, will be furnished to the agencies, upon the agencies' approval of the proposed mitigation plan.
X. Summary
In summary, Terraces Development, LLC has conducted off -site alternative analysis and investigated alternative site
designs, and the selected site and proposed plan achieves their stated purpose and need. Minimization was achieved
by incorporating tactical road design into site plan, utilizing only those uplands that were easily accessible, proposing
shared driveways, selective vegetation cutting, and using deed notifications to prevent unauthorized impacts to
wetlands, after the lots have sold. Unavoidable impacts to 0.22-acre of riparian and 0.493-acre of non -riparian wetlands
will be mitigated through the Hofinann Forest Wetland Mitigation bank, at a 2:1 mitigation -to -impact ratio. After a
thorough evaluation of on -site and off -site alternatives, to construct the planned subdivision, as well as examination of
the potential impacts to biological and cultural resources, the Applicant and SEGi have found the proposed plan to be
the least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative.

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information ,�iF Ili
Appendix A
Vicinity Map
White
Stocking
ss Burgaw
Holly Shelter
St Helena Game Land
acraw Holly Ridge
a2i
;urrie
2�0
Montague Rocky Point
u�f
_ iuop Pc��r•
Castle Hayne i cp ail Beach
P? :. ,island r:
a21
Wrightsboro
�a Kings Grant
Leland
Eagle Island 'a
Wilmington
9 T32 1
innabow Silver Lake 1�
t33
DS97
ea Breeze
Boiling Carolina Beach
pring Lakes GO
a
Eo
12
0

\'\Approximate Projec
I

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information F_(_li
Appendix C
Pender County Parcel Information
14.,

1:6,054
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi
0 0.075 0.15 0.3 km
PIN: 4215-87-9642-0000
Owner: HWY 17 HOLDINGS LLC
6310 SEAMIST CT
WILMINGTON, NC 28409
Deed Ref: 4644/2108
Hwy17 Holdings LLC N
g 1 inch = 505 feet
E
June 15, 2018 W
Property US HWY 17
Address:
Description: 39.87AC PB 60/115 ALSTON BURKE
Subdivision:
Tax Codes: G01 C53 R40
Sale Price: $400,000
Sale Date: 2017-06-07
Plat: 00600115
Account No: 975845
Township: TOPSAIL
S
Acres: 39.87
Land Value: $390,726
Building Value: $0
Total value: $390,726
Deferred Value: $0
Exempt Amount:
PCL Class: R
Heated Sq Feet:

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information ,�7F (_li
Appendix D
North Carolina River Basins Map
1
4 =t
RYcMna? .
�= -ve
1•ry Y++l� .l1-ial -
Clttiiia�t
A}
5JI)IH :Axa111?gl
ydr-r.
Y
Ca1.+�1
15„

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information 1�3F_l��i
Appendix E
NC DWR Water Classification Determination
16,.

Permit No.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original.
PROJECT INFORMATION
In order to determine the receiving stream for a project in a coastal county or whether a State Stormwater
Management Permit will be required for a project in a non -coastal county, the classification of the closest
downslope surface waters (the surface waters that any sheet flow or overflow from the project would flow toward)
must be determined. Please complete Sections I and II below. DWQ Staff will determine the receiving stream
classification, complete Section III, and return the completed form to you.
1. Project Name: The Terraces County: Pender
2.. Contact Person: Dana Luther
3. Mailing Address: 5315 South College Road, Suite E
4. City Wilmington State NC Zip 28412 Phone No. 910.228.1841
5. Name of closest downslope surface waters: Virginia Creek
6. Signature of contact person: Date: 6- 1 7- 19
7. Is a Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan or a CAMA Major Permit required? ®YES ❑NO
II. REQUIRED ITEMS
An 8.5" x 11" copy of the appropriate portion of a USGS quad sheet showing the projects property
boundaries, receiving stream, major roads or State Roads numbers, and nearest town or city must be
attached.
Mail the entire package to: NCDENR Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section — Stormwater
at the Appropriate Contact Address (see the following page)
III. CLASSIFICATION REQUEST (To be completed by Regional Office personnel)
1. Name of surface waters:
2. River Basin: Index No.
3. Classification (as established by the EMC):
4. Proposed Classification, if applicable:
5. State Stormwater Management Permit required?❑YES ❑NO
6. Signature of Regional Office personnel: Date
cc: DWQ - Regional Office
Consultant
Building Inspector
Central Files
swU-111-060608 Page 1 of 2

WINSTON-SALEM RALEIGH WASHINGTON
ASHE
W
SURRY STOKES
• ROCKWW KW
�fy i'
2 �
IHALIFA
arm
i rouu�+iurc
GATES
IfRTFORD
'�
A YMLKES
IC
'l
YAOKkN FOfSYTH
GUILF °R°
BERTIE
ASHEVILLEQN
y
EOGECOMB
N BUNCOMBE �IC004YEI1 �'rF CATAWBq
RfriYAN z
Rwvo�
CHATHAM
WAKE
1144,So"
DARE
`� b g uNCOLN
NCERSON R��D
G MU)5
,�
�
Zvi
PITT
HYDE
iER E iW IS, POLK �V
y
�
�y MOORE
~
NETT
S
Y�
CLAY
UNION
ANSON
i+i
O
OUPLN
MOORESVILLE
z
1
oNsrow
ROBESON BLADEK
PENDER
FAYETTEVILLE
COLUMBUS
WILMINGTON
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
BRUNSWICK
SURFACE WATER PROTECTION SECTION
Central and Regional Office Contact Information
For State Stormwater Permits
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
2090 US Highway 70
225 Green Street
610 East Center Avenue/Suite 301
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Systel Building Suite 714
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
[phone]
HOW & ORW Projects in Counties Above
[phone]
HOW & ORW Projects in Counties Above
HOW & ORW Projects in Counties Above
RALEIGH REGIONAL OFFICE
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
3800 Barrett Drive
943 Washington Square Mall
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Raleigh, NC 27609
Washington, NC 27889
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
HOW & ORW Projects in Counties Above
Coastal Stormwater, HOW & ORW Projects in Counties Above
Coastal Stormwater, HOW & ORW Projects in Counties Above
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
CENTRAL OFFICE
585 Waughtown Street
1617 Mail Service Center
- - — - - -
preserve, protect
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
6Rkj"To
and enhance
[phone]
[phone]
North Carolina's water.."
HOW & ORW Projects in Counties Above
Phase 2 Post -Construction Projects not covered by local
government or 20 coastal counties
SWU-111-040108 Page 2 of 2

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information F Cli
Appendix F
Proposed Site Plan and Detail Drawings
17'

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information 15r 3
Appendix G
On -site Stream Photos
Photo I Terraces Intermittent Stream Segment
Photo 2 Terraces Perennial Stream Segment
18 „

PROPERTY
BOUNDARY, TYP.
A
1
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT FOR
INSTALLATION OF WATER MAIN
IPROPOSED)\ ,i I
LOT LINE, TYP. A —
i
P-3 — 5>
V I
(C J
PROPOSED
SW/AL/E,, TYP. �~ _
EXISTING RPW
/ C77)
1,A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
TEMPORARY
WETLAND IMPACT
AMT
Overall Impact Map - EX-1
The Terraces
Town of Surf City, North Carolina
Date: 10.16.2019
PROJECT LIMITS
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY, TYP.
�
r2F;%
_L
— — r
WETLAND
EXTENTS.TYP.�
_ I
I
55-
_�� 55
IMPACT, TYP.
I - EXISTING UNNAMED
INTERMITTENT STREAM
TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACT FOR UTILITIES
CONSTRUCTION, TYP.
r
\ C' r)
(is \
10 LF TOTAL TEMPORARY
STREAM IMPACT
I
w
1 EXISTING UNNAMED
PERENNIALrSJT=
1 1 1 0 ;
I li � � J � I I ♦/ \\\;
ROSRDAL `-—
so PUBLIC R/
10 LF TEMPORARY
STREAMIMPACT
TEMPORARY WETLAND
IMPACT FOR INSTALLATION
—OF SANITARY SEWER MAIN
\I
I
ILEGEND
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACTS
I
I
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
STREAM
RPW
SWAMP FOREST (SF)
HEADWATER FOREST (HF)
POCOSIN (P)
SITE DATA
SITE ACREAGE = 40.56 AC. ♦!-
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT = 20 LF (TOTAL)
II I NOTE: SEE EX-2 AND EX-3 FOR FURTHER
( BREAKDOWN OF WETLAND IMPACT AREAS
1
SS-
ss_ z
C
/ W
^w
ROJ T LIMITS Q
W
PARAMOUNTE o
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
;i [phone] (0) [phone] (F) z
NC License #: C-2846
/ Pmjc #: 17180.PE
Scale: 1" = 60' at 22" x 34" C%
1"=120'at11"x17" W
Q
m7
z
North 0' 30' 60' 120' w
WETLAND IMPACTS
MPACTAREA
PERMANENT
IMPACT
TEMPORARY
IMPACT
SF
ACRES
SF
ACRES
'A'
5,197
0.119
1,037
0.024
'B'
9,083
0.209
520
0.012
'C.
3,127
0.072
0
0.000
'D'
2,936
0.067
0
0.000
'E'
4,211
0.097
218
0.005
'F'
2,121
0.049
179
0.004
'G'
6
0.0001
0
1 0.000
'H'
1,342
0.031
0
0.000
11,
1,072
0.025
0
0.000
'J'
193
0.0044
0
0.0000
V
1,265
0.029
0
0.000
'L'
0
0.000
2,124
0.049
'M'
525
1 0.012
0
0.000
'N'
0
0.000
591
0.014
TOTAL IMPACTS =
31,077
0.713
4,668
0.107

PROPOSED 12'
WIDE GRAVEL
DRIVEWAY TO
PUMP STATION
O
71 /
ICI "
LAPRON
ET
TEMPORARY WIMPACT, 1.
FOR UTILITIESRUCTION
PROPO
RAP
13M
5' WIDE PROPOSED
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
CROSSING WETLANDS
WITH GUARDRAIL
3
/ 3
A TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
FOR UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION
`PROPOSED PERMANENT CULVERT CROSSING
(2)41 LF- 4'WX2'H BOX CULVERTS
(WITH WINGWALLS PER NCDOT STANDARDS &
63 SPECIFI\ WITH CULV INS)RTS AT 73" SKEW)
IMPACT AREA W
SCALE: 1"=60' or 1"=30'
A = 5,135 SF (0.118 AC.) - PERMANENT
Al = 631 SF(0.014 AC.) -TEMPORARY
A2 = 406 SF (0.009 AC.) - TEMPORARY
/
EXISTING UNNAMED EX. WETLAND
INTERMITTENT
STREAM EXTENTS, TYP.
I(/
5' WIDE TEMP.
RUCTION BUFFS
BUFFER, TYP.
T
TEMP. STREAM
IMPACT#1 (5 LF)
PROPOSED RETAINING/
TYP. DESIGNED
/WALL,
BY OTHERS.
PERMANENT CULVERT CROSSING
(1) 40.5 LF #26 CONTECH ALUMINUM BOTTOMLESS
BOX CULVERT W/ 14'-5' SPAN & T-3' RISE (OR
SIMILAR APPROVED PRODUCT); NO INVERT ON
STRIP FOOTINGS. CULVERTS AT 72' SKEW. TIE
INTO RETAINING WALLS (DESIGNED BY OTHERS.
5' WIDE CONCRETE
SIDEWALK, TYP.
"TEMP. STREAM
/
r'S0'P7,
IMPACT #2 (5 LF) S '
EXISTING UNNAMED
.
PERENNIAL STREAM
'
IMPACT AREA'B'
SCALE: 1 "=60' or 1'=30'
B = 5,850 SF (0.134 AC.) - PERMANENT
B1 = 3,233 SF (0.074 AC.) - PERMANENT
B2 = 266 SF (0.006 AC.) - TEMPORARY
B3 = 253 SF (0.006 AC.) - TEMPORARY
PROPOSED 5' WIDE
CONCRETE SIDEWALK,
TYP.
EX. GRADE, TYP.
LEGEND
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACTS _ — _ STREAM PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT AREA
RPW ® TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
PROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON
OPROPOSED
FORCE MAIN
PORTICO COURT
JRLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
Wetland Impacts Plan View - EX-2
I 1 The Terraces
41'IMPACT AREA _ 1 5'
A
PROPOSED
GRADE, TYP.
-- ROPOSED CULVERT
- WINGWALLS, TYP.
OPROPOSED PROPOSEDO
SANITARY WATER MAIN
SEWER
PROPOSED (2)41 LF-4'WX2'H BOX CULVERTS WITH
WINGWALLS & CULVERTS AT 73" SKEW
WETLAND IMPACT AREA W
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET - PORTICO COURT
ROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
3 TRELLIS ROAD
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
16
T SPILL CURB
PROPOSED 5' WIDE
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
EX. GRADE, TYP. - — _-`"-_ EX. STREAM, TYP.
PROPOSED PROPOSED 5' WIDE
PROPOSED RETAINING OWATER CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP.
WALL, TYP. MAIN
AREA I S 1
" VERTICAL C&G
PROPOSED
GRADE, TYP.
PROPOSED (1) 40.5 LF #26 CONTECH
ALUMINUM BOTTOMLESS BOX
CULVERT W/ 14'-5' SPAN & T-3" RISE
AT 72" SKEW
WETLAND IMPACT AREA'B'
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET - TRELLIS ROAD
ROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
TRELLIS ROAD
I 50' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 1
1' SPILL CURB
2' VERTICAL PROPOSED
PROPOSED 5' WIDE C&G GRADE, TYP.
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
114' PER FT 1/I' PER FT
j I I
EX. GRADE, TYP. I EX. STREAM, TYP.
PROPOSED PROPOSED 5' WIDE
PROPOSED RETAINING OWATER MAIN CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP.
WALL, TYP.
PROPOSED (1) 40.5 LF #26 CONTECH
ALUMINUM BOTTOMLESS BOX
CULVERT W/ 14'-5" SPAN & T-3' RISE
AT 72" SKEW
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT (ED IMPACT AREA'B'
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET - TRELLIS ROAD
ROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
Town of Surf City, North Carolina
Date: 10.16.2019
B B'
UPLANDS ( -120'WETLANDIMPACTARFA ( UPLANDS
I I
PROPOSED (2)
4'Wx2'H BOXCULVERTS'�
PROPOSED ROAD I " "" " "' "' .' �
PROPOSED PAVEMENT "— . --...
2"-S9.5C SURFACE I=
6"-AGGREGATE BASE COURSE I� NV. UP 25.70
In PROPOSED
( WINGWALLS
WETLAND IMPACT AREA W
STA. 11+17 PORTICO ROAD
WETLAND CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES
- CROSS SECTION FACING DOWNSTREAM (SE TO NW)
- PROPOSED BOXED CULVERTS (2) 41 LF 4'WX2'H AT 73" SKEW
B
I '95' WETLAND
UPLANDS
T IMPACT AREA 7
Ig PROPOSED
I; GRADE,
TYP.
EX. GRADE.
TYP.
BOTTOMLESS
CULVERT
WETLAND IMPACTAREA'B'
STA. 17+00 TRELLIS ROAD
STREAM CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
B'
IMPACT AREA
' ELAN (UPLANDS z
I � O
I —I
08 i rTW2705
182' SLOPE r ,
// of ROPOSED PAVEMENT
2"-S9.5C SURFACE
6"-AGGREGATE BASE
W21. 99 w� COURSE 1�-I
ROPOSED RETAINING WALL. O
DESIGNED BY OTHERS. V
HEADWALL PANEL
ENTRENCHMENT.
FOLLOW CONTECH SPECS. O
w
Q
NOTES
rTl
- CROSS SECTION FACING DOWNSTREAM (N TO S)
- PROPOSE BOTTOMLESS CULVERT IS CONTECH PRODUCT #26-C6 ALUMINUM BOX CULVERT, ON FOOTING PADS (HS-20
rT,
RATING) WITH 14'-5- SPAN AND T-3" RISE (OR SIMILAR APPROVED PRODUCT). FOLLOW CONTECH PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
FOR CONSTRUCTION AND ASSEMBLY REQUIREMENTS.
p1--v MOLWTE
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC License #: C-2846
Ngmr #: 17180YE
H
O
z
rz�F�
\.J
H
Scale: 1" = 30' at 22" x 34" W
iv 727
Z
F--I
0' 15, 30' 60' w
North

\\
V
I DRIVEWAY CULVERT
/
I I
O PROPOSED O PROPOSED 2' VERTICAL C&G
UPLANDS a 10 UPLANDS
I T AREA
I PRIVATEDRIVEWAY
/
2' VALLEY C&G WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER
l _ ,. .....i
C
A' ' IMPACT
/
l
\
I (1) 18" RCP 32 LF
7=1 DRIVEWAY CULVERT
WETLAND IMPACT AREA'C'
PG39 32F-r
PROPOSED 1.: 2j
„
A
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET - TRELLIS ROAD
.:
DRIVEWAY l l
5' WIDE
CONCRETE
B, �, PROPOSED �T
VCONTOUR, TYP.
PROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON, TYP.
ROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
—
SIDEWALK. TYP.
"=', . M
'4'
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
- !_�
I a
-—
wl
2"-S9.5C SURFACE
M.
\
15' PRIVATE DRIVEWAY
6"-AGGREGATE BASE COURSE I
RIVEWAY #1: PROPOSED (1) 28 LF 15' RCP
s
CULVERT (BURIED 3")
11
s +0p cn
.
l
DRIVEWAY #2: PROPOSED (1) 32 LF 15' RCP
l
CULVERT (BURIED 4")
/ A
s
-tt S ROAj)
1fi+�� �-•
I
�
-3T-021MPACT AREA
I
DRIVEWAY #1: INV. UP 30.
1
PUBLIC R/IX)
I�
DRIVEWAY #2:INV. UP 28.20
12
,.
c
l�
PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS ON TRELLIS ROAD
TYPICAL WETLAND CROSS SECTION
IMPACT AREAS 'C' & 'M'
=
{.
NOT TO SCALE
SCALE: 1'=60' 1"=30'
PROPOSED GRADE.
..............
or
TYP
IMPACT C = 3,127 SF (0.072 AC.)
+
NOTES
IMPACT M = 525 SF (0.012 AC.)
EX. GRADE, TYP.
l
CROSS SECTION IS FACING DOWNSTREAM (W TO E)
PROPOSED (1) 41 LF 24" RCP CULVERT WITH HEADWALLS
LEGEND
19
/ PROPOSED LOT
5' WIDE CONCRETE
��// LINE, TYP.
/
{SIDEWALK,TYP.1
EX. WETLAND
CROPOSED EXTENTS, TYP
ONTOUR, TYP.
A'
D
� 2N'ET
PROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON
PROPOSED PERMANENT A
CULVERT CROSSING O
/ (1) 15" �RCP CULVERT WITH 9 j HEADWALLS (AT 56" SKEW
PROPOSED PROPERTY
l ' LINE, TYP.
IMPACT AREA 'D'
SCALE: 1'=60' w 1"=30'
D = 2,936 SF (0.067 AC.)
I
1
PROPOSED 5' WIDE-1—
CONCRETE SIDEWALK,
TYR
EX. GRADE. TYP.r
i/
PROPOSED RIP-7
RAP APRON
PROPOSED CULVERT
HEADWALL, TYP.
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACTS STREAM `_ -1 PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT AREA
RPW F= TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT AREA
L
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT STREAM IMPACT L__J TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
L-DRIVEWAY #1: PROPOSED (1) 28 LF
15" RCP CULVERT (BURIED 3') ROPOSED RIP
DRIVEWAY #2: PROPOSED (1) 32 LF RAP APRON
15" RCP CULVERT (BURIED 4-)
PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS ON TRELLIS ROAD
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
TRELLIS ROAD
50' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
- V IMPACT AREA
2 FT
VERTICAL
C&G
UPLANDS
PROPOSED ROAD
UPLANDS
PROPOSED CULVERT
HEADWALLS
—�
lv —` PROPOSED (1) 56LF 15" UI -` PROPOSED PAVEMENT
RCP 56" SKEW
NV. UP @ a l 2"-S9.5C SURFACE
1
EX. GRADE, TYP. l 39.70 �) 6'-AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
lw wl
la al
WETLAND IMPACT AREA'D'
STA. 12+05 TRELLIS ROAD
1
PROPOSED WETLAND CROSS SECTION
GRADE, TYP.
I
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES
"=
CROSS SECTION FACING DOWNSTREAM (NE TO SW)
PROPOSED (1) 56 LF 15" RCP CULVERT AT 56" SKEW
OPROPOSED 0 PROPOSED
WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED (1) 56 LF 15" RCP CULVERT WITH HEADWALLS PER
NCDOT STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS WITH CULVERT AT 56°
SKEW
WETLAND IMPACTAREA'D'
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET - TRELLIS ROAD
ROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
PARAMOUNTE
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
[phone] (0) [phone] (F)
NC Li— #: C-2846
P.j— #: 171800E
Scale: 1" = 30' at 22" x 34"
1"=60'at11"x17"
8727
0'
North

PROPOSED SWALE,
TYP.
PROPOSED PERMANENT CULVERT CROSSING
(2) 41 LF - 30" RCP (WITH HEADWALLS PER NC
STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS) W/ CULVERT
S WIDE TEMPORARY
EL WETLAND IMPACT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
'WATER MAIN 34
ss r"
jr2*
3 s,'.
E Ss �
P
PROPOSED RIP
RAP APRON
PROPOSED
CONTOUR, TYP.
61
IMPACT AREA 'E'
E = 4,211 SF (0.097 AC.) - PERMANENT
Et = 218 SF (0.005 AC.) - TEMPORARY
Wetland Impacts Plan View - EX-4
The Terraces
Town of Surf City, North Carolina
Date: 10.16.2019
PAVER LANE
50' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
30' WETLAND I -40' UPLANDS I -50' WETLAND V
I��A6S .1. I I ■ rIm" x . I UPLANDS
DOT I-55-80' IMPACT AREA I I
S AT 82° SKEW
...d,2 FT n GRADE. Y� Ire -III -1 1� III NI I r i�1� t Ire �I
PROPOSED 5' WIDE VERTICAL TYP la III f 1- - - Iw 1
CONCRETE SIDEWALK C&G w w I -=1I - -III
1=1 III-t I —I f l-III-
TYP I PROPOSED PAVEMENT I I
" I 2"-S9.5C SURFACE EX. GRADE, I PROPOSED CULVERT
EX. GRADE, TYP. - ` - I I 6"-AGGREGATE BASE COURSE �P' ° NV. UP 36.82 HEADWALLS
I PROPOSED (2) 41 LF 30"
I RCP AT 82" SKEW
PROPOSED RI PROPOSEDO PROPOSEDO
RAP APRON SANITARY WATER MAIN
SEWER WETLAND IMPACT AREA 'E'
PROPOSED CULVERT [PROPOSED (2) 41 LF 30" RCP CULVERTS WITH
HEADWALL, TYP. HEADWALLS PER NCDOT STANDARDS & STA. 12+15 PAAVER LANE
SPECIFICATIONS WITH CULVERT AT82' SKEW WETLAND CROSS SECTION
WETLAND IMPACT AREA'E' NOT TO SCALE
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET - PAVER LANE NOTES
- CROSS SECTION FACING DOWNSTREAM (NE TO SW)
ROAD CROSS SECTION - PROPOSED (2) 41 LF 30" RCP CULVERTS AT 82° SKEW
NOT TO SCALE
9M r z z
PROPOSED LOT PAVER LANE
1 \ LINE, TYP. � I 50' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY �-7
WETLAND
UPLANDS IMPACT AREA UPLANDS O
................
_- - ROPOSED BOX 5' WIDE TEMPORARY --
-50' IMPACT AREA
= -
U
��:�CULVERTS
40 WETLAND IMPACT FOR _ .... .. ._. -.._.
CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED ROAD�"1 0.80%SLOPE"' "
PG42 5
WATER MAIN -
Fl
5' WIDE CONCRETE A,j ` ClJ
SIDEWALK, TYP. I '• - ���� aI gT
` '^ VERTICAL IJ
- PAVER LANE/ -y�ROPOSED PAVEMENT F-I
PROPOSED GRADE, TYP - l-l-.� Ili 1-1 2"S9.SC SURFACE O
;v' B Iso' eueLlc x/��— - - Ira-Ptpt cT t -:,,. _ - -i �. -
PROPOSED CULVERT I� I 6"-AGGREGATE BASE COURSE L 1
EX. GRADE, TYP. --v�l I WINGWALLS
UP 38.70 �I
PROPOSED I PROPOSED CONCRETE
WETLAND 5 PAVERCT LAN 'F' Q
PROPOSED RIPON OSANITARYSEWER L WATERMAINO CONCRETE STA. 14+45 PAVER LANE w
PROPOSED7 RAP APRON SIDEWALK, TYP. WETLAND CROSSING - CROSS SECTION Q
CONTOUR, TYP. PROPOSED PROPOSED (3) 421 F-4'WX2'H BOX
�A HEADWALL, TYP. CULVERTS WITH WINGWALLS WITH NOT TO SCALE W
PROPOSED RIP PROPOSED PERMANENT CULVERT CROSSING CULVERTS AT 90° SKEW
RAP APRON (3) 42 LF - 4'WX2'H BOX CULVERTS
NOTES
(WITH WINGWALLS PER NCDOTCULVERTS
& WETLAND IMPACT AREA 'F' W
SPECIFICATIONS) WITH CULVERTS AT 90° SKEW -CROSS SECTION FACING DOWNSTREAM (NW TO SE)
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET- PAVER LANE - PROPOSED BOXED CULVERTS(3) 42 LF 4'Wx2'H WITH WINGWALLS AT 90°SKEW
60 I 34 ROAD CROSS SECTION
INOT TO SCALE
IMPACT AREA 'F' C
F = 2,121 SF (0.040 AC.) - PERMANENT
F1 = 179 SF (0.004 AC.) - TEMPORARY r I
V
I--1
LEGEND R e T �1T� Scale: 1" = 30' at 22" x 34"
— JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACTS _ — _ STREAM PA1 �l ' O V 1 \ E a
1 "= 60' at 11" X 17" I--1
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT AREA
E N O I N E E 1 N O t N G
RPW ® TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT AREA
STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA Wilmington, North Carolina (F)
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT ( ) O (9 ) (� 8403 w
910 791fi707 O 10 791-6760
NC License #: C-284G
ProjectZ I'I80.PE 0' 15' 30' 60'
North

Wetland Impacts Plan View - EX-5
The Terraces
Town of Surf City, North Carolina
Date: 10.16.2019
�55
y / / `PROPOSED
PROPERTY LINE, TYP.
z op
59
� V6�NGs 4j�
xoo
\sf
IMPACT AREA'G'
G = 6 SF (0.0001 AC.)
52
jl�
A A, B B' z
^' `J 15' PRIVATE DRIVEWAY -30' WETLAND
PROPOSED UPLANDSIMPACT AREA
UPLANDS O
{, �_—PROPERTY LINE, TYP.
.I -IMPACT AREA I I U
/l Ij PROPOSED DRIVEWAYIa al
PROPOSED RIP al f ���' — ---T --_Ift �-7
RAP APRON wl Fw I I PROPOSED PAVEMENT z
6 WIDE CONCRETE j u I I:a 2'-S9.5C SURFACE
SIDEWALK, TYP. H PROPOSED I I ROPOSED AYCULVE O
GRADE, TYP I I i RCP DRIVEWAY CULVERT 6'-AGGREGATE BASE COURSE r ,
114'PER FT... 114' PER FT I I INV. UP 34.47 I O
54 13M \ \ EX. GRADE, TYP. I IlkI
WETLAND IMPACT AREA'H' w
B' PRIVATE DRIVEWAY ON BALUSTRADE WAY (�
/ PROPOSED RIP WETLAND CROSS SECTION W
56 APRON, TYP. PROPOSED (1) 41 LF 24- RCP
PRIVATE DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY CULVERT NOT TO SCALE
WETLAND IMPACT NOTES r�
(1) A RCP 41 LF 55 - CROSS SECTION IS FACING DOWNSTREAM (W TO E) W
DRIVEWAY CULVERT � 1-1
3 WETLAND IMPACT AREA'H' -PROPOSED(1)41 LF 24" RCP CULVERT WITH HEADWALLS
PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AT END OF BALUSTRADE WAY
IMPACT AREA'H' ROAD CROSS SECTION
H = 1,342 SF (0.031 AC.) NOT TO SCALE O
z
z
c�
LEGEND Scale: 1" = 30' at 22" x 34"
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACTS STREAM PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT AREA p�,RA MouNTE iv
1"= 60' at 11" % 17" /1
n1 eI w e e a i w o
RPW TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT AREA
Wilmington, North Cazolinz
STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA (910) 791b707 (0) (910) 791-676 F) 0 (� F-i
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
Prq-#: 17180.PE 0' 15' 30' 60'
North

LEGEND
I
67 _
l t
PROPOSED T PERMANENT
CULVERT CROSSING 1
41 LF - 18" RCP CULVERT `S �
WITH HEADWALLS G ,
G,
68
% / i
5' WIDE CONCRETE +
SIDEWALK, TYP. _
� 69
IMPACT AREAS'I' & U
SCALE: 1"=60' or 1"=30'
1 = 1,072 SF (0.025 AC.)
J = 193 SF (0.004 AC.)
PROPOSED /
O /--LOT LINE, TYP. /
kk
O /
PROPOSED
PROPERTY /
I O.� LINE,
00
IMPACT AREA W
SCALE: 1"=60 or 1"=30'
IMPACT K = 1,265 SF (0.029 AC.)
Wetland Impacts Plan View - EX-6
The Terraces
Town of Surf City, North Carolina
Date: 10.16.2019
ROSEDALE DRIVE
50' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY I
13
B'
I
UPLANDS 1
—40'WETLAND
UPLANDS
60 IMPACT AREA I
PROPOSED CULVERT i
I.
HEADWALLS''
I�
.: fl
G4191
I�
:: .::. ....:�I
PROPOSED ROAD
2FT
VERTICAL
C&G
PROPOSED
I�
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
PROPOSED(1)41LF 18" �I PROPOSEDP PAVEMENT
_ .I
GRADE TYP
Ia
NV.UP RCP CULVERT al
PROPOSED 5' WIDE
: _
I
35.20 EI - ATE BASE COURSE
CONCRETE:
tia•PER Fr uArriERP�: :I
SIDEWALK, TYP. i
I
la
al
EX. GRADE, TYP.
PROPOSED RIP
OPROPOSED
OPROPOSED
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS'
APRON, TYP.
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STA. 18+00 ROSEDALE DRIVE
PROPOSED CULVERT
WETLAND CROSS SECTION
HEADWALL, TYP.
PROPOSED (1) 18" 41 LF RCP CULVERT
NOT TO SCALE
WITH HEADWALLS PER NCDOT
STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS
NOTES
- CROSS SECTION FACING
DOWNSTREAM (NE TO SW)
WETLAND IMPACT AREA ' I'
-PROPOSED (1) 41 LF 18"
RCP CULVERT WITH HEADWALLS
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET - ROSEDALE DRIVE
ROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
i
ROSEDALE DRIVE
50' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
IMPACT AREA
IF
I
l
:Ia
�I
u
1C
I
- 2FT VALLEY
PROPOSED 5' WIDE
C&G
CONCRETE SIDEWALK, I
�o
) EX. GRADE,
TYP. I
TYP.
- I
t 'PEn F1 174'PER PT
_
-
I
I
I
PROPOSED
O PROPOSED
I
O PROPOSED
GRADE, TYP.
WATER MAIN PROPOSED
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
WETLAND IMPACT AREA W
TYP. COLLECTOR STREET - ROSEDALE DRIVE
ROAD CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACTS — — — — STREAM - PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT AREA
RPW ® TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT AREA
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT STREAM IMPACT TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA
i
O
U
C
U
�^O1
I�
W
W
W
H
--- Scale: 1" = 30' at 22" x 34" C/)
pARAMOUNTE 1"=60'at 11"x17" /W
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 <11
[phone] (0) [phone] (F) �7
NC License #: C-2W �7
I--1
Project#: 17180.PE 0' 15' 30' 60'
North ;Z_�

Wetland Impacts Plan View - EX-7
The Terraces
Town of Surf City, North Carolina
Date: 10.16.2019
Ros /
CRC E EXISTING UNNAMED
i0 PERENNIAL STREAM \
s
10 LF TEMPORARY
STREAMIMPACT
ss
\Sg PROPERTY LINE,
TYP.
t <:
L \ N3
/ \ 10' WIDE TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
/
10'WIDE TEMPORARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN
WETLAND IMPACT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
SANITARYSEWER
EXISTING
+� \ WETLANDS, TYP.
\nrd
H
IMPACT AREA U IMPACT AREA W V
IMPACT L = 2,124 SF (0.049 AC.) - TEMP. IMPACT N = 691 SF (0.014 AC.) - TEMP.
O
V
O
w
Q
w
a
0
z
z
LEGEND Scale: 1" = 30' at 22" x 34"
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND IMPACTS STREAM PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT AREA PARAMOUNTE 1"= 60' at 11" x 17" ^w
RPW YllUlU!!G TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT AREA
STREAM IMPACT ruv!!!1/a TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AREA Wilmington, North Carolina 28403�7 TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT (910) 791f70i (0) [phone] (� �7
Pr license #: C-28480.PE /ham
Pmjett #: 17160.PE 0' 15' 30' 60'
North fi

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information ,9F - i
Appendix H
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Map
• ley
f
3�
2
f
17
PENDER
,T
y S
r71
Project Location
19

The Terraces S.D. Supplemental Information 9F
Appendix I
Alternative Site Plans
Minimization and Avoidance Exhibit
-'LLA5C- es i �1 low
20 O