Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW8910401_Ltr re Corrected Notice of Inspection_20191031I ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary S. DANIEL SMITH Director October 31, 2019 NORTH CAROLINA Envtrantntntal Qualtty Porters Neck Company, Inc. NOV O 8 201'q ATTN: John A. Elmore, II, President c/o Jerry Mannen, Attorney DENR-LAND QUALITY Yow, Fox and Mannen STORMWATER PERMITTING 102 North Fifth Avenue Wilmington, NC 28401 Subject: Corrected Notice of Inspection - Not Compliant Porters Neck Plantation Master Permit State Stormwater Management Permit No. SW8 910401 New Hanover County Dear Messrs. Elmore and Mannen: On March 21, 2018, staff of the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources (DEMLR) inspected the subject project, located off Porters Neck Road in New Hanover County. The compliance report that was generated as a result of that inspection contained an error. The report stated that an Engineer's Certification for the project was in the file. In fact, the Master Permit had no requirement to submit an Engineer's Certification, and no such certification is in the Master Permit file. The corrected compliance inspection report attached, dated October 30, 2019, states that there is no Engineer's Certification in the file. This correction to the inspection report does not impact or change the deficiencies listed in the Notice of Violation which was issued on March 23, 2018. In addition, the Division's letter to Ms. Amy Wang, dated March 23, 2018, also contained an error. The letter incorrectly states that most the projects within PNP that required a separate permit have been certified. That statement should have read that most projects within PNP that required a separate permit have NOT been certified. In fact, a review of each and every individual permit file for Porters Neck Plantation (except for the Master Permit file as explained above) indicates that none of the required PE certifications have been submitted. If you have any questions, please contact me in the Wilmington Regional Office, telephone number (910)-796-7215. Sinqorely, Georgette Scott Stormwater Supervisor Enclosure: October 30, 2019 Corrected Compliance Inspection Report GDS\arl: G:\\\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\ 199 1 \910401 LD\2019 10 CEI_deficient 910401 cc: Jimmy Fentress, PE, Stroud Engineering John Payne, Special Deputy Attorney General Douglas R. Ansel, Assistant General Counsel ' 9ftkbgDEMLR, Director Amy Wang, Attorney for Porters Neck HOA WiRO Stormwater Permit File D E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources Wilmington Regional Office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 NCRP.i WgLJNA 910.796.7215 r J Compliance Inspection Report Permit: SW8910401 Effective:09/05/91 Expiration: Project: Porters Neck Plantation Master Plan Owner: Porters Neck Company Inc County: New Hanover Adress: 1202 Porters Neck Rd Region: Wilmington City/State/Zip: Wilmington NC 28411 Contact Person: John Elmore Title: Phone: Directions to Project: Type of Project: State Stormwater - Infiltration System State Stormwater - Low Density Drain Areas: 1 - (Futch Creek) (03-06-24) ( SA,HQW) On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 10/30/2019 Entry Time: 03:38PM Exit Time: 03:45PM Primary Inspector: Alida R LewisAl Secondary Inspector(s): Phone: 910-796-7215 Reason for Inspection: Follow-up Inspection Type: Transfer Renewal Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant Question Areas: 0 State Stormwater (See attachment summary) page: 1 Permit: SVV8910401 Owner - Project: Porters Neck Company Inc Inspection Date: 10/30/2019 Inspection Type Transfer Renewal Reason for Visit: Follow-up Inspection Summary: This inspection report is being corrected to fix an error. In the March 21, 2018 report, the inspector checked the YES box that an Engineers Certification was in the file. This October 30, 2019 corrected inspection report indicates that the NO box has been checked to reflect the fact that an Engineer's Certification was not required by the Master Permit and that no Engineers Certification is in the Master Permit file. The project was originally inspected on July 30, 2014, in order to determine if the project was in compliance for transfer. Issues with the 5080 BUA per lot were discussed with Rich Donaldson who indicated to Division staff that the 5080 sf had been implemented as an "average" since the beginning. This is in direct conflict with the current permit, which sets the 5080 sf as a finite maximum allowed BUA per lot. Mr. Donaldson indicated that there were records documenting all of the BUA that had been constructed in PNP and which provided evidence that the average BUA per lot in PNP was indeed at 5080 sf or less. Mr. Donaldson requested clarification from the Division as to how the Division would interpret the way that the deed restriction language had been recorded, i.e., as an average vs. a finite number. The Division requested clarification and assistance from the AG via email dated August 14, 2014, but received no written reply or guidance. Since no information was provided, the Division continued to press the permittee to amend the deed restrictions to reflect the permitted language. On September 4, 2017, the Division received a phone call from the permittee, John Elmore, who indicated that it would not be possible for him to amend the deed restrictions since he no longer had any standing in the HOA. In the interest of moving things along, on September 19, 2017, the Division sent the permittee an email offering to modify the permit to allow the continued use of the BUA averaging method. The permittee declined to modify the permit. It should be noted that the Division also notified the HOA that the HOA could request to have the permit transferred to them under SL 2013-121, without the signature of the permit holder, if the HOA owned the common areas of the project. The HOA did not want to follow this course of action because of the compliance issues. The question of how(if) the development of Eagle Point Golf Course has affected the original 744.9 acre project area has been raised in the past. Research has found a low density permit for Section 2 of PNP issued under SW8 921105. During the review of that application, the reviewer noted that the SW8 910401 permit needed to be modified to reflect the loss of that project area. Section 2 of PNP was later re -permitted in 1998 as Eagle Point Golf Course under SW8 980634 and covers the same project area as the SW8 921105 permit. The SW8 910401 permit was never modified to reflect the reduction in project area. page: 2 Permit: SW8910401 Owner - Project: Porters Neck Company Inc Inspection Date: 10/30/2019 Inspection Type Transfer Renewal Reason for Visit: Follow-up File Review Yes No NA NE Is the permit active? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Signed copy of the Engineer's certification is in the file? ❑ ❑ E ❑ Signed copy of the Operation 8 Maintenance Agreement is in the file? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ Comment: 1. The recorded deed restrictions on file describe the_5080 sf BUA limit as an overall subdivision -wide per lot average and not as a finite maximum On September 19 2017 in the interest of moving the transfer of the permit to the Association along the Division offered to modify the permit to reflect the language as it was recorded on June 13 1991 in DB 1555 at PG 957 The permittee declined the offer. Records of the running total of BUA were being kept but it is not known what happened to those records and it is not known what the current average BUA is within Porters Neck Plantation. Other Permit Conditions Is the site compliant with other conditions of the permit? Yes No NA NE ❑ E ❑ ❑ Comment: 2. Permit documents on file for SW8 921105 (Section 2 of PNP) indicate that Section 2 is the same proiect area as Eagle Point Golf Course under SW8 980634. Property records indicate that Porters Neck Company sold 229.49 acres of the original 744.9 acre property area to Eagle Point Golf Club LLC on April 29 1998. The SW8 921105 low density permit was sued on June 30, 1993. This permit file contains a table prepared by Mark Veenstra PE with McKim & Creed at the time, which lists the proiect areas and built -upon areas individually for Section 1 and Section 2. The file also contains hand-written "memos to the file" from the reviewer regarding the need to obtain a modified permit for Section 1 under SW8 910401 to account for the loss of proiect area. The SW8 910401 permit has not been modified to date, page: 3