20191553 Ver 1_401 Application_20191113

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
r Yes r No
ID#*
20191553
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:*
Select Reviewing Office:*
Submittal Type:*
401 Application
Zan Price:eads\gaprice
Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No
How much is r $240.00
owed?* r $570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: Joel Lenk
Vft is submitting the inforrration?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Mayfair Glen, Trib to Haw Creek Low -head Dam Removal
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Buncombe
Please upload all files that need to be submited.

Oickthe upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
P19084-AGENT_AUTHORIZATION FORM Mayfair
685.66KB
Glen .PDF
P19084-Mayfair Glen PCN-Form-v1_3 Dec 2008-
298.46KB
WORD version.pdf
P19084-Mayfair Glen Photos with Desc rfs.pdf 673.55KB
P19084-Mayfair Glen Stream Profile Measurements
34.38K6
& Calcs20191112.pdf
P19084-Mayfair Glen StreamProfile Drawing Set-
1.92 MB
20191014.pdf
Only pdt or Iv17 files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:
PCN and associated files.
P Bychecking the boxand signing box below, I certifythat:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

01Do�o� W AT F9pc
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? If yes, answer
1 h below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Mayfair Glen Low -Head Dam Removal
2b.
County:
Buncombe
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Asheville
2d.
Subdivision name:
Mayfair Glen
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
NA
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
MAYFAIR GLEN PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
4286 / 0141
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Sue Luther
3d.
Street address:
8 PRAIRIE PATH
3e.
City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28805
3f.
Telephone no.:
614-565-9132
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
mayfalrglen3(a)_gmail. com
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Joel Lenk
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Quible &Associates, PC
4d.
Street address:
90 Church St Ste B
4e.
City, state, zip:
Black Mountain, NC 28711
4f.
Telephone no.:
828-280-8375
4g.
Fax no.:
NA
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Joel Lenk
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Quible &Associates, PC
5c.
Street address:
90 Church St Ste B
5d.
City, state, zip:
Black Mountain, NC 28711
5e.
Telephone no.:
828-280-83-75
5f.
Fax no.:
NA
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9658-58-5358-00000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.590929 Longitude:- 82.514355
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c.
Property size:
2.93 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Tributary to Haw Creek
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin: map is available at
[French Broad
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
Page 3of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Deteriorated low -head dam causing streambank erosion, sedimentation, and impediment to aquatic passage. The
condition is threatening nearby infrastructure, homes and property.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There are no wetlands within the project area. There do not appear to be wetlands on the property.
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
520 linear feet of perennial stream
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Remove low -head dam and associated debris, stabilize and restore the streambank, improve aquatic passage.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing deteriorated low -head dam and associated infrastructure will be removed. Rock and concrete material not
reused in the project will be removed from the site and disposed of properly. The dam has a total maximum height above
the downstream channel invert of approximately 5.65 feet. The total project length will not exceed 100 linear feet.
Stream flow will be pumped around the project area and a filter bag(s) will be used to trap sediment at the downstream
end of the pump around system. Sediment trapped behind the dam (estimated to be 10 cubic -yards maximum) will be
removed once the pump around has dried the area sufficient for mechanical removal. Sediment will be removed from the
stream using a small track -mounted excavator and hand tools and will be transferred directly into a truck/loader bucket
without stockpiling sediment on the ground. Sediment removal will not proceed past/deeper than the elevation of the
original streambed. The eroding streambanks on the river left and right will be stabilized using natural channel design
techniques including geo-lifts, minor grading and benching. Pre-existing stream dimensions will be restored within the
project area. Three rock cross -vanes will be installed to step the stream down gradually from the elevation of the
foundation of the dam to the downstream channel elevation without creating vertical drops in channel flow greater than
one feet. Stormwater piping exiting the river -left streambank will be repaired, extended and terminated at the channel
invert elevation and stabilized with appropriate rock outlet protection. All disturbed areas of the streambank below two-
times bank full elevation and within 20 feet of the stream will be stabilized with a combination of riparian seed mix
(ENRST Seeds NC Mountain Riparian Mix-ENRMX-304 or similar), an annual grain suitable for the season, native live
stakes (Silky Dogwood, Elderberry, Ninebark), wheat straw mulch and 400 gram per square meter coir fabric installed per
manufacturer's specification. The project area will be irrigated in periods of dry weather until a six-inch stand of grassy
vegetation is established over the entire site. The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) website
has been reviewed for the project area an NC SHPO has been provided this PCN to ensure no historic structures will be
impacted by the project. Attachments to the PCN include an Agent Authorization Form, Stream Profile Drawing including
construction details and Photographs with Descriptions of the project area.
Page 4 of 12

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes ❑ No ®Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: The project will take place in a perennial stream.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 5of12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non-404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Sediment
UT to Haw Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
2.5
<100
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
131 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 7of12

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1. Use of Natural Channel Design Techniques. 2. Specifying use of a pump -around system so that project can be built in the
dry.
3. Specifying and detailing soil erosion and sediment control measures. Specifying sequencing of the project such that
tasks are completed, and the project is stabilized at the end of each working day. Contracting with an experienced restoration
contractor.
b.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
1. Construction assistance by the engineer who is experienced in design and construction of stream channel stabilization
and restoration. Construction by an experienced stream restoration contractor. Working during periods of dry weather.
Construction of the project as designed. Installation of soil erosion and sedimentation control measures before the site is
disturbed, as possible. Correct set up and operation of the pump around system. Installation of geo-lifts and coir matting
as specified by the manufacturer and engineer. Installation of seed, fertilizer, mulch and matting as specified by the
supplier and irrigation during dry weather until a hearty stand of grassy vegetation exists over the enter site.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If yes, you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9of12

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This
is a low -head dam, streambank and
stream restoration project that will reduce impervious surface, improve stream function
and aquatic passage.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This project will not generate wastewater.
Pagel 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
https://www.fws. Gov/ralei�zh/species/cniylist/buncombe. html
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
https:Hncdenr.maps. arcgi s. com/gpps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6e 125 ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
This project is taking place within an established subdivision where disturbance from construction has disturbed the area
within the last 10 years.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Buncombe County GIS and NC FIRM websites.
Joel D. LenkC�
Z
10/22/19
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Appf nt/Agent's S gnature
(Agent's signature is v d only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 12 of 12

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. Common Area PLAN NO. 1 PARCEL ID: PIN: 9658-58-5358
STREETADDRESS: 8 Prairie Path, Asheville, NC 28805, Buncombe County (2.93 acres)
Please print:
Property Owner: Mayfair Glen Property Owners Association, C/O Sue Luther Chair
Please Print:
Property Owner(s): Ashley Farmer, Carol and Sterling Berberian, Roland and Thelma Cousins Pat
Leonard, Deb Davis, Betty Boyle, Rubin Feldstein, George and Sue Luther, Julie Ga_pin, Helen
Brown, Hoyt and Lora Ponder, Marie Drum, Jerry and Thelma Uhler, Pat and Joe David Fore Theo
Van Duyn, Bill and Susan Brock, Kay Harger Pam and Peter Gretz, Greg Phillips Sara and Dwayne
Stutzman, Marge Ottofy, Southwood Apartments LLC.
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Joel Lenk , of Ouible & Associates, PC
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone: i4-)
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
-dr-
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: m - Y-- (� / / Date:

kXliAll
Ae
•,
Ar CAM
40

Mayfair Glen - 8 Prairie Path, Asheville, NC 28805
Low -head Dam Removal, Photos with Descriptions October 22, 2019
Photo 3. View north of dam foundation. Upstream most cross -vane will be constructed at the
Photo 4. View northeast of abandoned pumphouse associated with dam. This structure
appears to be less than 50 years old and is planned to be removed as part of the project. The
NC SHPO has been copied on the submittal of this PCN document.

Mayfair Glen - 8 Prairie Path, Asheville, NC 28805
Low -head Dam Removal, Photos with Descriptions October 22, 2019
AW
•.4 '�"
S.,�.��n
�^ter � .,a;r►- s .._ r l�
`u&
Photo 5. View north of low -head dam area with sketch of generalized restoration superimposed.

Mayfair Glen, Trib to Haw Creek
Stream Profile
Measurements Calculations
Station
Feature
Rod Height
Instrament Height
Relative Elevation Difference
Difference x5 w/Vert Exag.
00+00
Concrete Sill/US nickpoint
4.52
104.52
100
Pool
00+16
Head of Riffle
4.71
104.52
99.81
0.19
0.95
Riffle
00+33
Toe of Riffle
4.91
104.52
99.61
0.39
1.95
Pool
00+42
Pool
5.61
104.52
98.91
1.09
5.45
Pool
00+50
Head of Riffle
5.08
104.52
99.44
0.56
2.8
Run
00+57
Toe of Riffle
5.41
104.52
99.11
0.89
4.45
00+85
Head of Sediment Upstream of Dam
5.66
104.52
98.86
1.14
5.7
01+06
Sediment US of Dam
5.85
104.52
98.67
1.33
6.65
01+47
Max Elevation of Sediment Us of Dam
5.52
104.52
99
1
5
01+50
Dam Foundation/Elevation of US X-Vane
6.39
104.52
98.13
1.87
9.35
01+51
Thalweg DS of Dam
8.63
104.52
95.89
4.11
20.55
01+58
Head of Riffle/Dam Debris
7.75
104.52
96.77
3.23
16.15
01+58
Top of relic spillway
5.34
104.52
99.18
0.82
4.1
01+78
Toe of Riffle/Dam Debris/US end of Pump House & RL Wall
10.28
104.52
94.24
5.76
28.8
02+11
DS End of Project and RL Wall
11.5
104.52
93.02
6.98
34.9

i4,b
i
VICINITY MAP
Off OF
AW
STA: 01 +47 STA: 00+85 STA: 00+50
Relative Elevation: 99.00 Relative Elevation: 98.86 Relative Elevation: 99.44
Feature ID: Max Hei ht Sediment Feature ID: Toe of Riffle / Feature ID: Head of Riffle
g
Start of Sediment US of Dam -■,
fi- --- -- --- --- -------------------
STA: 01+58 - STA:00+57
STA: 01+06 Relative Elevation: 99.11
Relative Elevation: 96.77 STA: 01+50 Relative Elevation: 98.67 Feature ID: Toe of Riffle
Feature ID: Head of Riffle/Dam Debris Relative Elevation: 98.13 Feature ID: Sediment US of Dam
Feature ID: Dam Foundation/Weir
Proposed Location & Elevation of
■ Rock Cross -Vane to be Incorporated
STA: 01+51 U with Dam Foudation
STA: 02+11 Relative Elevation: 95.89
■ Feature ID: Thalweg IDS of Dam
Relative Elevation: 93.02 _ _--
Feature ID: IDS End of Project STA: 01+78
Relative Elevation: 94.24
Feature ID: Toe of Riffle/Dam Debris
NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS PRELIMINARY — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION, LEGEND
RECORDATION, SALES OR CONVEYANCES — THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR
DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY! EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS Concrete Sill /Dam Structure
DOCUMENT IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE DATA AND IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY.
ALL INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO ANY REQUIREMENTS Proposed Rock Cross -vane Invert
BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY, ENTITY OR AUTHORITY.
_ - Measured Channel Invert
QUIBLE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR THE
COMPLETENESS OF ANY INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT AND IS NOT RESPONSIBLE - - - "Estimated Water Surface Elevation
FOR ANY ERROR OR OMISSION OR ANY LOSSES OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE
USE OF THIS INFORMATION.
STA:00+33 STA:00+00
Relative Elevation: 99.61 Relative Elevation: 100
Feature ID: Toe of Riffle Feature ID: Existing Concrete Sill
�■ STA:00+16
STA: 00+42 Relative Elevation: 99.81
Relative Elevation: 98.91 Feature ID: Head of Riffle
Feature ID: Pool
0 20 40
� � 1
Horizontal Scale: 1 inch = 20 feet
.�*
a Z* W�a�a
N Z U U m N
I
T
U vqj �Z} ON U I
J �,:v Ot UZ Ot
0 a�F Z Y � Y
y W
Z rA N y CS N C N
ZV
* wd`-'0-_2
� �
Z `V (n 3 �
JW Z unm �®
•rlpW wav 0,
T� O* N 4 3 �I COO y
0. M .0
• �y/,� * O y E
VJ U' Z Z p N ._ C3 O
Z W a N N N
U = N N
W O N U�i�
W- *, rodoa
Z
A� o81
w
0
_ _ U
[Z7 Z
m
y
O
44
V
w
J
J
Q
v_
M1, O
U
O
N
=II
Q
z �
J W
O L,
U N Z
= W
J
Q' Q
O N
Z
U_
a
O �
W Z J F-
Q�
/
�
Z Q
O O
�� QOwQz
}z m o-
a wQw oLID w
J0QOQw
II
II
�vi Cc�0 `n0v=r`nzOfo
<o�o
L
ow w O F
N F- U1 p 6 0 F-Z Z Ul U) U1
Q W
U
O
W W Z0Z-QZ W U,
OU =~ U 1 H W W O J W p
}�
H_U ~ MU), UN J zz W
F,
^
N Ul0~=H LZ, W W' ^ZO
W Z U O d
ZQOdw Jn OLO_U1Z
� p 0 F- w
�
W
C) 0 �Q=Of0�oz
"°°
(B
CO
om�oozo}
(f)
LU
Q w w
oomw No=zWmw'
F- U U
U
U
N
i>
N
r
mN
r
m
wm
of
w
wN
< \
Ch
Of
3
U
O
a
of
w
o
U
U

2 •-30' F-A
SCOUR
B� I HOLE
t
1
FIT ROCKS -
TIGHTLY TOGETHER ;
ON SIDE OF VANE
NOTES: TOTAL DROP I LA
NOT TO EXCEED 6 Q,Aw
INCHES OVER EACH
STEP FOR WARM W
WATER FISH SPECIES
FLOW
ROCK CROSS VANE PLAN
B
KEY INTO BANK FOR A
MINIMUM LENGTH EQUAL TO
BANK HEIGHT. VEGETATE
KEY EXCAVATION WITH
LIVE CUTTINGS/CLUMPS
BEFORE BACKFILL.
TOE OF BANK
LEAVE GAPS BETWEEN UPPER
LAYER OF ROCKS EQUAL TO Y4
TO Ys ROCK DIAMETER
I
EXISTING cn i
FLOW 2 STREAM BED
BACKFILL
EXCAVATION
WITH COBBLE 1' TO 2'
AND CHINK ANTICIPATED GAPS SCOUR HOLE TYPICAL ROCK DIMENSIONS AND PLACEMENT
ROCK VANE SECTION A
LIVE CUTTINGS/ LIVE CUTTINGS/
CLUMPS CLUMPS
FOOTER ROCKS SHOULD BE
ROCK VANE SECTION B -50% LARGER THAN OTHER
NOTES: THE ROCKS SHOULD BE RECTANGULAR OR NEARLY SO AT THE
ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT. THE ROCK TO ROCK CONTACT SHOULD BE
SOLID. IF ROCKS ARE NOT PERFECTLY FLAT, THE THICKER END SHOULD BE
PLACED DOWNSTREAM. FILL GAPS WITH SMALLER STONES.
ROCK CROSS VANE DETAIL
N.T.S.
NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION,
RECORDATION, SALES OR CONVEYANCES - THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR
DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY! EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS
DOCUMENT IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE DATA AND IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY.
ALL INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO ANY REQUIREMENTS
BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY, ENTITY OR AUTHORITY.
QUIBLE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR THE
COMPLETENESS OF ANY INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT AND IS NOT RESPONSIBLE
FOR ANY ERROR OR OMISSION OR ANY LOSSES OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE
USE OF THIS INFORMATION.
"NOTE: PROVIDE A 6" X 6" ANCHOR
TRENCH AT THE TOW OF THE SLOPE.
USE WOODEN STAKES AND PINS
MINIMUM LENGTH OF 12"
AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE
ANCHOR THE MATTING
IN A 6" X 6" INITIAL
ANCHOR TRENCH
PREPARE SOIL INCLUDING
GRADING, APPLICATION OF
LIME AND SEEDS
SLOPE
L
D
>1:1
3.0'
2.0'
2:1
4.0'
2.0'
3:1
6.0'
3.0'
4:1
8.0'
3.0'
NOTES:
1. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
2. NOT TO SCALE
INSTALLATION OF SLOPE MATTING ON STREAM BANKS
N.T.S.
TOP FABRIC
FILL MATERIAL
BIOD-BLOCK
rw\�*,. leiZ
BOTTOM FABRIC
ROCK LATER TO
STRENGTHEN TOE
AND FOUNDATION
Itd=n 1*0
FILL MATERIAL
BIOD-BLOCK
BOTTOM FABRIC
ROCK LATER TO
STRENGTHEN TOE
AND FOUNDATION
NOTES:
1. LIVE PLANTS AND CUTTINGS SHOULD BE USED IN EITHER SITUATION.
2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
3. NOT TO SCALE.
BIOD—BLOCK COIR BLOCK SYSTEM TERRACED COIR BLOCK SYSTEM TERRACED APPLICATION�GEOLIFT)
N.T.S.
a .0�
Z* w o v v
N Uzi U �47N a0
O H • Z} E N
Q U
of aA Z
E�� F Z V tY
M i ^ N a N E
Ln O
U O .N. N
u
Z a d o ai
J W Ln m to X x
w
Z
(V
MzOW4w�'m rno
•v w
rl U,N4 aMmao
O* w 3 M C
�rA �oyvv�n£
VJC Li Z Oc J O
zw OIlINN
11c N a0
w O N U
c�� c' c
%
Z
w tp L
�wW °�°aoa
N
A �
!�
U
w
m
aO
Z
o
m
m
N
II
E
O
w
.n.
a
V
N -
x
=
J
Q
O
z
`"
J
a-
CE
Q
o
U
z¢
orrn aozwa�z w
U K¢ Z pw N m~ J Z 2i
aw w Z0_0
ZQ�gw
� N of 0 } U F O
Oo�xFwUQ aw=- w~O[nw� FZ-apo
N Vn
O~¢=ul 0:2JO
. �.m-,,zUZI <oUwJI
UUwvz
Qp_=rww_D
II of
o
Z U Odh D—pOZ
O-Uw0
-dz¢w
dpwZ
w
ow �a�iz �¢�ofnw<
U j O J OF-
0 m z O p j 0 w
w w
6 pmw Vlpw zL�w wz
(noJ =� J�Om�O
_ ¢ w U w U
F w ,n U
r °f
�t m m C
w a 2! (A o Q Q
a m 3 - p
� d � U
w
U
o

No
PPEERUMENNG OATM �TH VEGETATION
ST 31:
SEM-MOMIK6eaMr0911_ae>EsAam
REBEL II FESCUE 130 LSS.
COMMON BERMUDA'SAHARA! 215 LBS.
(MULLED)
VARIES VARIES
TYPICAL BANKFULL BENCH CROSS SECTION
N.T.S.
NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT IS PRELIMINARY — NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION,
RECORDATION, SALES OR CONVEYANCES — THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR
DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY! EXISTING INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS
DOCUMENT IS BASED ON BEST AVAILABLE DATA AND IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY.
ALL INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO ANY REQUIREMENTS
BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY, ENTITY OR AUTHORITY.
QUIBLE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR THE
COMPLETENESS OF ANY INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT AND IS NOT RESPONSIBLE
FOR ANY ERROR OR OMISSION OR ANY LOSSES OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM THE
USE OF THIS INFORMATION.
SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC (TYP.)
RD
ISNED STONE 8' MAX STRENGTH FAIBRIC WITH NG FOR TWIREAFENCE
MAX SPACIN X A TRENGTH
FABRIC WITHOUT WIRE FENCE
GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE/EXIT DETAIL
N.T.S
SEEDING DALES: APRIL 16 - AUG. 15:
SEE -mum= 6E2LICkTKIN RATES/ACRE
SEEDING OATES: SEPT. 1 - MARCH 31: I OERMAN MILLET 40 LOS
SEED_IIIffiIBE 6EELCA ffi-a 1E ACK
REBEL II FESCUE 250 Lai
COMMON BERMUDA'SAHARA! 215 LBS.
(UNMULLfD)
SEEDBED PREPARATION:
LOOSEN SOILS TO A DEPTH OF 6-8 INCHES USING A RIPPER, HARROW, OR CHISEL PLOW, BREAK IF CL005, REMOVE UNACCEPTABLE GROWTH (STICKS ROOTS), STONES
(COT'), AND OTHER MATERIALS, AND WON THE TOP 3-4 INCHES OF THE SOIL INTO A SSEEOBFD. THE AREA TO BE BEIDED SHALL BE RE -COMPACTED UTIUBNG A
CULTIPACIER ROLLER AND A SMOOTH EVEN SOIL SURFACE MTH A LOOSE, UNIFORMLY FINE TEXTURE SHALL BE THE FINISHED OWE.
SOIL AMENDMENTS:
OBTAIN A SOIL TEST TO DETERMINE APPLICATION RATES AND FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS Of SOIL TESTS WHEN A SOIL TEST IS NOT P05SIM& APPLY 3,000 LB/ACRE
GROUND AGRICULTURAL UMESTONE AND 1.000 LB/ACRE 10-10-10 STARTER FERTILIZER.
MULCHING:
APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE GRAIN STRAW OR EQUIVALENT COVER OF ANOTHER SUITABLE MULCH. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING MTN ASPHALT, WTTIND, ROVING OR BY
CRIMPING NTH A MULCH ANCHORING TOIL
MAINTENANCE:
SATISFACTORY STABILIZATION AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIRES A COMPLETE VEGETATIVE OD1iER. EVEN SMALL BREACHES IN VEGETATIVE COVER CAN EXPAND RAPIDLY
AND, IF LEFT UNATTENDED, CAN ALLOW SERIOUS SOIL LOSS FROM AN OTHERWISE STABLE SURFACE. A SINGLE HEAVY RAIN IS OFTEN SUFFICIENT TO GREATLY ENLARGE
BARE SPOTS, AND THE LONGER REPAIRS ARE DELAYED, THE MORE COSILY THEY BECOME. PROMPT ACTION WILL KEEP SEDIMENT LOSS AND REPAIR COST DOWN. NEW
SEEDLINGS SHOULD BE INSPECTED FREQUENTLY AND MAINTENANCE PERFORMED AS NEEDED. IF RILLS AND GULLIES DEVELOP, THEY MUST BE FILLED IN, RE -SEEDED, AND
MULCHED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE DIVERSIONS MAY BE NEIL NEEDED UNTL NEW PLANTS TAHOD.
MAINTENANCE AS
EXTEND BEYOND THE SEEDING PHASE. (COMPLETE VEGETATIVE COVEN Is REQUIRED REGARDLESS OF COUNTY
ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AND FINAL PAYMENT WILL NOT BE AWARDED UNTIL COMPLETE ESTABLISHMENT OF VEGETATIVE COVEN.)
WEAK OR DAMAGED SPOTS MUST BE RELSIEO, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, AND DEEDED AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE. REFERTILIZATION MAY BE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN
PRODUCTIVE STANDS
SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS
y y
/✓�
WIRE .0
a
FENCE -
W
uj
_
J
W
W
o PLASTIC OR WIRE
XTIES (EACH POST)
Ld
FILTER /\ I \ FLOW ~
STEEL FABRIC ��j -Nk
POST BACKFILL TRENCH
AND COMPACT
THOROUGHLY
FLOW
N / 4"X8" COMPACTED
BACKFILL TRENCH
SILT FENCE DETAIL
N.T.S
NOTE:
ALL STORMWATER INLET STRUCTURES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH INLET PROTECTION.
00 .
a �
rrZ* w���a
N UZC' U "0"
O H • Z} o N I U
fAA1 QLLJ
Z
of PM IE Z V t Y
M i ^ N ° N E
Ln
U O .N
u
u ° N
01 /�/I�� Z a d
J W Ln m N X X
IJ - °t ° 3
Z „ (�inZ a 3t<aw
(V Z ° n m m
•MOWa�v rnw
rl UC-)N' '6C"
O* 3 M C
W C'7 Z Z O N J 00 O
Z W O V N N
0: � � N a0
w O N U
z
�EE: °�°aoa
z
_ AU
e+1 m
C~
o g
a z o
m 04
C~ O J W
W a O� L`
A N —
= LLI
J
z N
J
clf
y w Q
r LL-
o
U
Z Q
orin aozwaoz in
U �QZ -Z0,m OJO�of
N aa6W:W ��QZ=gig=
TUn (YLU
owa- 0 F-a
NU- "1p�0 F- Z Z VI(n(n
0U=�n�Z�w�¢OJwo
�O F--- ul zO�z w
=(fin (nOH=r EU KLd O
Q � ZUO fl �O Z Z
U w—� wOv
a�E¢ ��J oU w
O W �CSS Z 0 Q� fY���Z
U j O J D m~ O O j}
w w
O omw 'oEzEwww>
cnOJ =J�0 -MC,
= Q r w U w U
F w Un U
r °f
H m m C
w O Z 3 Q\
a °< 2 c , o
d w
U
o