Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG100151_Inspection Report_20191111ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. RECAN Secretory S, DANIEL SMITH Director Lifetime Audi Parts Attn: Mark J. Kuchera 1010 Harvest Street Durham, NC 27704 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality November 11, 2019 Subject: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION Lifetime Audi Parts Durham Facility, Certificate of Coverage-NCG100151 NPDES Stormwater General Permit-NCG100000 Durham County Mr. Kuchera: On November 1, 2019 a site inspection was conducted for the Lifetime Audi Parts facility located at 1010 Harvest Street, Durham County, North Carolina. A copy of the Compliance Inspection Report is enclosed for your review. The site visit and file review revealed that the subject facility is covered by NPDES Stormwater General Permit-NCG100000, Certificate of Coverage-NCG100151. Permit coverage authorizes the discharge of stormwater from the facility to receiving waters designated as Goose Creek, a Class WS-IV;NSW waterbody in the Neuse River Basin. As a result of the inspection, the facility was found to be in compliance with the conditions of the NCG100000 permit. Please refer to the enclosed Compliance Inspection Report for additional comments and observations made during the inspection. Please be advised that violations of the NPDES Stormwater General Permit are subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000 per day for each violation. If you or your staff has any questions, comments, or needs assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please contact me at (919) 791-4200 or by e-mail at Thad. valentine(a)ncdenr.gov. Sincerely, Thad Valentine Environmental Senior Specialist Nortli Carolina Departtncnt of Ernironmcntal Quality I Division of Enei 9y. Miucral and Land Rrsourc'es 512 North Sa6buryStreel 10210a'll Service Center Ralei(jh, N,)rtflCtlrc)linil 2761"i It)12 �a eiimGc,men.uc a:� �� 919 7070200 Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCGIO0151 Effective: 111OV18 Expiration: 05i31i21 Owner: Lifetime Audi Parts SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Lifetime Audi Parts County: Durham 1010 Harvest St Region: Raleigh Durham NC 27704 Contact Person: Mark J Kuchera Title: Phone: 315-534-2865 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORCIs): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Inspection Date: 1 V01 i2019 EntryTime: 10.00AM Primary Inspector: Thaddeus W Valentine Secondary Inspectorls): Certification: Phone: Exit Time: 12-30PM Phone: Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Used Motor Vehicle Parts Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Cluestion Areas: Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page 1 of 3 Permit; NCG100151 Owner -Facility: Lifetime Audi Parts Inspection Date: 1110112019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Prov-de some type of training material for your employees and train them yearly and new hires when they start. Add an additional responsible party to the plan Talk with your enviromental consultant and find out why the samples taken where either the wrong samples or the correct samples were not taken. Start sampling for the correct paramelers.The Lead sample has two consecutive exceedances which puts you in tier two Tier two requires that you start monthly sampling at the outfall with two consecutive exceedances and that you follow the requirements as outlined in the tiered response in your permit. Please start monthly sampling for all the required monitoring data at the outfall with exceedances and review your permit to better acquaint yourself to the requirements Page 2 of 3 Permit: NCG100151 Owner -Facility: Lifetime Audi Parts Inspection Date: 11/01/2019 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a'Narrat:ve Description of Practices'? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of s-gnificant spills occurring during the past 3 years? N ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? N ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Sp,ll Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevent -on Plan been implemented? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment- The plan needs to include trainina media for the emDlovees with a sign off sheet and there needs to be at least one additional person listed as responsible parties Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semr-annually? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Comment: No Qualitative monitorina is being done. Start monitorina the aualitative Dortion of the outfall dischraes Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The analytical data that is beina taken is not the correct analvtical monitorina required by vour Permit Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage ava-lable at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? N ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ E ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The site was inspected for a representative outfall status request, but it is denied due to the lack of sample data and correct sample data Page 3 of 3