20091107 Ver 1_401 Application_20091009

WATER
Resources
. ..........
City of Greensboro
October 14, 2009
09- 1 107
Us V1
OCT 6 2009 Administration
373-2055
(336 DENR WATER QUALITY BRANCH
S70RMhAT
)
Fax[phone] Division of Water Quality, yyETU+.NDSAND
PA I
401/Wetlands Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, _
Customer Service Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650
[phone]
Fax [phone] Re: Upgrade of Existing 30-inches RCP to 36-feet long RC Culvert at 5112
Hedrick Drive, Greensboro, NC
Water Supply
Mitchell Plant
To Whom It May Concern:
[phone]
Fax[phone]
The City of Greensboro will like to notify your office of the proposed Reinforced
Townsend Plant
Concrete Culvert upgrade at 5112 Hedrick Drive. The project's objective is to
[phone]
Fax [phone] upgrade existing 30-inch RCP of 224 feet in length with a 36-inch reinforced
concrete culvert, 292 feet long and also install 24 feet of energy pool with flood
bench. Working in the dry will help reduce damage to the downstream portion of
Water Reclamation the stream. Presently this existing 30-inch pipe is undersize and needed to be
North Buffalo Plant upgraded to a larger size due to road flooding, reduce road accident during
[phone]
Fax [phone]
heavy rainfall and to avoid property damage. Please see "No practical
alternative letter attached.
TY. Osborne Plant
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Also attached is the process fee of $240.00, vicinity map, plan view, topography
layout drawings and Stormwater infrastructure inventory map of the subject site
for your review.
Construction &
Maintenance Site: 5112 Hedrick Drive, off Horsepen Creek Road/Carlson
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Dairy Road, Greensboro, NC.
Site Condition: Under sized Culvert with road flooding & property damage.
Meter Services
[phone] If you have any further questions, please call me at [phone]
Fax[phone]
Sincerely,
Engineering
[phone]
Fax[phone]
de ldewtr----- _ J
Operations Management Supervisor
Stormwatcr City of Greensboro, Stormwater Management
Management
[phone]
Fax [phone] Attachment
P. O. Box 3136, Greensboro, NC 27402-3136 • www.greensboro-nc.gov • TDD [phone]
0, 9` 1 1 0 7
0F W A
rE9Oc
o?
y g
O ?C
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. SAW-2009-0h
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing i ---
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: N Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: #29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
N Yes ? No For the record only for Corps Permit:

N Yes ? No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
? Yes ?X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ?X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Existing 30-inch RCP Upgrade to a 36-inch long RCP at 5112 Hedrick Drive
2b. County: Guilford, NC
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Greensboro, NC
2d. Subdivision name: Carlson Farm
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: n/a p
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Charles A. Donna Russel D C T 6 2009
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 66602657 U
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): n/a WETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANCH
3d. Street address: 5112 Hedrick Drive
3e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27410
3f. Telephone no.: [phone]
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ?X Other, specify: Municipal
4b. Name: Ade N. Idowu
4c. Business name
(if applicable): City of Greensboro, Water Resources Department, Stormwater Division
4d. Street address: 2602 S. Elm-Eugene Street
4e. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27406
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.: [phone]
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: n/a
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1-301-0033-00856-00027
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: Longitude:
1c. Property size: 2.25 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Lake Brandt
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Horse Pen Creek
2c. River basin: Horse Pen Creek
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Subject site is primarily residential and general vicinity consist of golf course, residential, multi-use, institution, and public park.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 215
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To protect the existing structure (home) and stream banks by upgrading the existing 30-inch to a 36-inch RCP with a bend to help reduce stream bank
D
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavate, install 36-inch RCP and backfill with rubber tire track hoe. Contractor will remove existing pipe and backfill with backhoe with minimum disturl
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /

project (including all prior phases) in the past? ? Yes 0 No ? Unknown

Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? 0 Preliminary ? Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ?X Yes ? No ? Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NMP 404 - #24 with Action ID. SAW-2009-01769
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes ?X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ?X Streams -tributaries ? Buffers ? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 2b.
Type of impact 2c.
Type of wetland 2d.
Forested 2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other) 2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W2 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W3 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W4 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W5 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
W6 Choose one Choose one Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) 3b.
Type of impact 3c.
Stream name 3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)? 3e.
Type of
jurisdiction 3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet) 3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P Fill Unknown PER Corps 8 115.1
S2 Choose one
S3 Choose one
S4 Choose one
S5 Choose one
S6 Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
79.5 feet will be fill while 35.6 feet will be pipe with rip-rap.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable) 4c.

Type of impact 4d.

Waterbody
type 4e.

Area of impact (acres)
01 Choose one Choose
02 Choose one Choose
03 Choose one Choose
04 Choose one Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number 5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond 5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d.
Stream Impacts (feet) 5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ? Yes ? No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin? ? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico ? Catawba ? Randleman ? Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Stream name 6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required? 6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet 6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 P Pipe relocation/fill Unknown No 6,906 4,604
B2 Yes/No
B3 Yes/No
B4 Yes/No
B5 Yes/No
B6 Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments: In accordance with Jordan Lake rules and in lieu of no alternative this project will protect existing structure and no practical alternative
is feasible. Existing condition includes road safety, property damage, erosion and flooding. No Mitigation required
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
In accordance with Jordan Lake rules this project will protect existing structure and no practical alternative was feasible. Existing condition includes
road safety, property damage, erosion and flooding. Based on calculation of the drainage basin there is need for pipe upgrade. This project is required
to prevent future damage to 5112 Hedrick Drive and piping a short section of the existing stream with a bend will reduce erosion to the stream bank.
t^EA5e fit; t? '80 'FZACTIlCAL_ fli_1 1 ""' E * 4.611 -
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The new pipe installation will be installed in the dry before removing the old pipe system. All erosion control devices will be install before beginning
excavation. Seeding and mulching or a suitable ground cover shall be provided on all disturbed areas within 15 days/ 21 days or as soon as
practicable, which ever come first.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ?X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank
? Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Makin a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
n/a
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ?X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ?X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project is for replacement of an existing pipe replacementlimprovement.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief
narrative description of the plan:
n/a ,
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Greensboro/Guilford County
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
apply (check all that apply): ? USMP
? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
?Coastal counties
?HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ?ORW
(check all that apply):
?Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ?X No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ? Yes 0 No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ? Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
l
? Yes
?X No
etter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ?X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ?Yes ?X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ?Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
n/a
Page 9of10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
? Yes ?X No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? ? Yes ?X No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ? No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
? Yes ? No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Aerial Map and City of Greensboro Planning Department
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ? Yes ?X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
M>e A • 1. .,Lt l
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agen s ignature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.) Date
Page 10 of 10
No Practical Alternative
5112 Hedrick Drive
No Practical Alternative
Hedrick Dr. relocation of an existing 30" storm drainage pipe line.
At 5112 Hedrick Dr., Greensboro, NC the City maintains an existing 30" RC pipe used
for transporting offsite runoff and street drainage across the property. This pipeline is in
bad condition and undersized. The City of Greensboro has been receiving complains
from the owner of the property in subject for approximately nine months. As a result,
The City would like to relocate the pipeline as showed on the enclosed plan for the
following reasons:
• Water flowing through this pipe exfiltrates from the pipeline and affects
the ground water table to the point that it infiltrates the foundation and
basement of a house situated approximately 30 If from the pipe. The
basement is lower than the invert of the pipe.
• The pipe being undersized has caused the drainage system to back up in
heavy storms and has caused street flooding and hazards to the driving
public.
• The pipeline is currently located within an existing 50 foot wide Natural
Gas right of way. Piedmont Natural Gas Company has requested that any
replacement or upgrading must be outside of their right of way.
The City of Greensboro requests that this pipeline be allowed to be relocated under the
Jordan Nutrient Rules, effective August 11, 2009 for the reason of "protection of an
existing structure, facilities and stream banks when this requires additional disturbance of
the riparian buffer or the stream channel" (pg 43/95 of the Jordan Nutrient Rules)
The City of Greensboro feels that this project should be designated as "Allowable" and
hereby submits this request for a "no practical alternatives" determination as required by
Item 11 of the Rules.
The City of Greensboro hereby certifies that this project meets all the criteria under Item
11- (a) for finding practical alternatives by meeting these requirements:
The basic project purpose cannot be practically accomplished in a manner that
would better minimize disturbance, preserve aquatic life and habitat, and protect
water quality.
The pipeline must be replaced to remove the exfiltration and the street
flooding problem. It cannot be replaced in its current location because the
owner of the right of way (Piedmont natural Gas) has requested that any
replacement of maintenance be moved out of their right of way. The
relocation will improve water quality and preserve aquatic life by
removing the existing erosion problem at the end of the existing pipe.
Currently, the water coming out the end of the pipe must make a 90 degree
turn to stay in the channel. As shown in the picture, water flows straight
out the pipe and misses the channel altogether creating erosion which ends
up in the stream farther down. The new design will keep the outflow in the
channel after passing through an energy dissipator.
The use cannot practically be reduced in size or density, reconfigured or
redesigned to better the minimize disturbance, preserve aquatic life and habitat,
and protect water quality.
The City has designed the project to minimize disturbance to the stream.
The new location and design will reduce erosion through the use of a
proper energy dissipator which will in turn enhance the aquatic life
habitat.
Best management practices shall be used if necessary to minimize disturbance,
preserve aquatic life and habitat and protect water quality.
The construction of Best Management Practices would create additional
disturbance to the stream buffer, stream bank and the affected properties.
The proposed work is considered maintenance of an existing line. The
proposed design calls for the use of a construction entrance and silt fence
to minimize erosion and siltation reaching the stream. The new pipe line
will be installed in the dry. The pipe will be installed before the runoff is
diverted from the old pipe to the new pipe. This will prevent siltation from
the work area from reaching the stream. All seeding and mulch will be in
place and vegetation growing before and erosion control devices are
removed following the construction work.
The Corps of Engineers has issued a permit allowing the filling of a portion of the
existing channel. This portion of the channel is located within the PNG right of way
between the existing and proposed pipelines. The filling of this channel will cover an
exposed 12" high pressure gas main which will remove a potential to the neighborhood.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Action ID. SAW-2009-01769
r ? U.S. '-
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW-2009-01769 County: Guilford USGS Quad: Summerfield
GENERAL. PERMIT (REGIONAL, AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner/ Authorized Agent: City of Greensboro/Attn: Ide Idowu
address: 2602 S. Elm-Eugene Street
Greensboro, NC 27406
Telephone No.: 336-373-2619
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): Less than one acre; 5112 Hedrick Drive
Greensboro, NC, and is identified as Hedrick Drive 36-inches culvert upgrade
Description of projects area and activity: This authorization is for discharge of clean fill material within 116 linear
feet of jurisdictional stream associated with the replacement and upgrade of a 36-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe
(RCP), this includes a 36.6 foot riprap dissipation pad Theproiect must be conducted in accordance with the
application and drawings received on September 8 2009
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
? Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 29
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Andrew Williams at telephone number 919-876-8441 extension 26.
C>
Corps Regulatory Offic a Date: 25 September 2009
Expiration Date of Verification: 25 Septem r 20111
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit hqp://www.saw.usace.army.miUVvrETLANDS/index.htm] to
complete the survey online.
Page 1 of 3

Determination of Jurisdiction.
? Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
1 , There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
? The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The unamed tributary is a Relatively Permanent Water (RPW) and is a tributary to
Lake Brandt, an impoundment of Reedy Fork, (RPW). Reedy Fork flows to and thru Lake Townsend an impoundment of
Reedy Fork. Reedy Fork is a tributary to Haw River, a Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNW) of the United States. Haw
River is tributary to Cape Fear River a navigable waters of the United States. The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) was
indicated by: clear natural line impressed on the bank and the absence of terrestrial vegetation.
This jurisdictional determination is only for the waters proposed for impacts associated with this Nationwide Permit and does
not include any other waters/wetlands that my be located on the property.
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional
determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA
form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Dorothy Harrington, Regulatory Program Technician,
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 25 November 2009.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Disict Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory
Date 25 September 2009
Date 25 September 2014
Page 2 of 3
Summary of Authorized Impacts and 'I popirpd IA/Tidgat on
<Xction ID NWP / GP Open Water ac Wetland (ac) Unim ortant Steam (If) Important Stream (if)
# # Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
SAW-2009-
01769
1NW29
116

I
w
Impact Totals
Total Loss of Maters of the U.S. (ac)
_ Re uired Wetland Mitigation (ac) 0 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. (If) 116
Required Stream Mitigation (If) 0
Additional Remarks and/or Special Permit Conditions: N/A
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:
Ms. Sue Homewood
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Page 3 of 3
Action ID Number: SAW-2009-01769 County:Guilford
Permittee: Citv of Greensboro/Attn: Ide Idowu
Date Verification Issued: 25 September 2009
Project Manager: Dorothy Harrington
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
3331 HERITAGE TRADE DRIVE, SUITE 105
. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27587
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date
Aerial Map
5112 Hedrick Drive
6
I
a?
:3
?:
Topographic Map
5112 Hedrick Drive
?€
tt?
Construction Drawing
5112 Hedrick Drive
. -rn~ .';sr... ,m;";,. -e 9 ~~.r.,.,.;,. 's''~~%m^ask'.f~`~~'ct~~~~+"'~~~';.77~~"~~.`"~"`~i~4:S«k~~ ,ras'x~.,N.!a~.•~ .,;~vi~e i:4.+~:,.~..u,za-.v:,~w.~ ~i- ,y-., ~,..~,",~"'.a*- ' 's z~~~~~ . n ~ ,.T~~'''°~~"~+,,3€i3aT^s. ' ~ ? '"~auv.:~:~.?ic'~ta"~r~'~.,""nTM"~l:`~£°,~x~ ~ . _ ~ ,
G , EX NG i E ROI
GE EN~I NOP NOLF CONTRACTOR NOTES: ~ CONTRACT SNEET
a CO EE INI o g SEEDING AND MULCHING OR A SUITABLE GROUND COVER SHALL BE PROV];DED OF ~
- ~ ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 15 DAYS OR 21 CALENDAR DAYS (WH]:CHEVER
~ 1~ 512 HEDRICK DR. ~ IS SHORTER) FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE PIPE INSTALLATION. REFER TO THE ~ { ~ CONTRACT SPECTFTCATTONS FOR SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS.
~ _ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ i
1 XISTING 30" RCP. ~ 1 REMOVE 224 LF OF E ~ THE NEW .PIPE INSTALLATION IS TO BE PERFORMED TN THE DRY. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO
BACKFILL THE TRENCH WITH EXCESS 1~ 1 ~ ~ INSTALL THE NEW PIPE BEFORE REMOVING THE OLD PIPE SG THAT THE LOW FLOW
MATERIAL FROM THE NEW PIPE , WILL CONTINUE TO FLOW THROUGH THE OLD PIPE AND NOT THROUGH THE: WORK ZONE.
LOCATION OR WITH BORROW MATERIAL. S ~ COMPACTION REQUIRED TO PREVENT ~e C t~ ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED BEFORE BEGINN];NG
PR AERTY OWNER HAS EXTENDED F URE SETTLING PROBLEMS ~ , AfT R TLET AND ~ UT ' EXCAVATION AND INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED ON A ROUTINE SCHEDULE AND
4 IPES 0 THE NEW PIPE OU 5 ~ o D THE P ~ ~ I AFTER ALL RAIN EVENTS.
PIPE IS REMOVE , PROP. SILT FE E THE. XiST NG 30 p~,ti ~ EXISTING a ~ j ~ \ MANHOLES °'B" AND °'C°' TOPS ARE TO BE SET FLUSH WITH THE GROUND SURFACE. r
CONT CTO IS TO FIL~. THE ~ 1 HOLE .WITH d ®~P / ~ THE NEW MAN MANHOLE °'B" IS TO BE A COG STD. #401 MANHOLE WITH A FLAT TOP. MANHOLE °`C°'
SUITA E BA KFILL MATERIAL. ~ 825-- ~ ~ / / ~ „ ~ IS TG BE A COG STD. X401 MANHOLE WITH A CONE SECTION AND RING AND COVER
1 SET FLUSH WITH THE SURFACE.
5 1 m s / - / ~ o THE CONTRACTOR IS MADE AWARE OF THE EXISTING SEPTIC PUMP LINE. THE LOCATION
,~~..m~~. u i \ AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS CLOSE BUT APPROXIMATE.
. ~ . N \ THERE IS AN EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM I5 THE VICINITY OF THE EXCAVATION, BUT
1. THERE TS NO KNOWN fOCATTON OF THE PIPE LINES. ANY LINES CUT Dl1RINC THE PIPE
n , Q r ~ v T oP ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ,a ~ INSTALLATION SHALL BE REPAIRED 8Y THE CONTRACTOR.
~ N ~
'a~~ 'y .f~.. ,~o Ex . 30 MCP ~ ~ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 224 LF OF EXISTING :~0°' RC PIPE LINE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF THE PIPE AND FILL THE EXCAVAT];ON WITH SUITABLE
~ a „ ~ ~ t 2 ~ BACKFTLL MATERIAL EITHER FROM A BORROW PIT Ofl FROM THE NEW PIPE EXCAVATION.
® ~ , YI 1 ~ Q ~ ~ / .o / ~ o ~ mon THE BACKFTLL MUST BE COMPACTED TO ASSURE NO FUTURE SETTLING. THE EXISTING
~ aura f 1 I. ~ . ~ YARD INLET '°C" WILL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE EXISTING PIPE LT.NE AND BE REMOVED WITH THE PIPE.
o ee ~ ~ ~ a. ~
~ ~ n ~ ; ~ ~ J ~ 1 AFTER THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS EXTENDED HIS 4" DRAIN LINE THE G(~NTRACTOR .
~ I „1 S ~ SHALL FILL THE EXISTING CHANNEL FROM THE END OF THE OLD 30" P];PE TO MANHOLE "B°'.
~J ~ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DIG UP AND SANK THE POMPAS GRASS AT YARD INLET "C"
~ ~ C ~ \ AND RESET THEM AFTER THE YARD INLET HAS BEEN BUILT. THI5 WORK SHALL BE CONSIDERED
INCIDENTAL TO THE PIPE EXCAVATION.
_ RCP ~ 1 PRO 36" ~k~l i ~ FOR THE OUTLET CONDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE RTF' RAP PAD AS SHOWN
S ~ 1 _ _ - - w _ _ - .r - ~ ~ , , , a ~ / AND EXCAVATE AND CREATE BANKFUL BENCHES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CHANNEL AS SHOWN . IN THE DETAIL DRAWING.
~ " _ . _:.r.--- ~ - ~ ~ SEP IC PUMP LINE
i"" f ~,1 W \ . _ „ 1
~ , . , ~ . ____..I ~ , ~ ~ ,o V ~Y SEPTI ' YSTEM It9 ~ SYSTEM 1~ao ~
u.~ ~ ~ _ ~ TION BOX ® 9 , i SUTION BOX
CONSTRUGTIO ENTRANG ~ s3 ~ , ~ ROP. SIL FENCE . GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=20'
~ J~ , ` - ~ COG STD . # 36-A ~ I
~ -
~ nr INSTALL Si~fENCE
~'T, OUTLET UEVI E o ~ ~ DT U BED REA: 0.56 ~j ~ G S~'O, #4 \ 20' PROPOSED ~ ~ a CO ALL WORK, EQUIPMENT REA: 0.56 ACRES EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS
' TYPE B `~-DR GE EASEMENT ~ ~ SILT C CK D~ ,~S LIM T TO THIS A 1'"~ TO THT~ AREA .
~ ARMOR THE BANKFULL EXISTING BENCHES AND SLOPE Y~TTH EXISTING
.C.. , ' ' ~ ~ GROUND SEED, MULCH, AND GROUND - o
CHECK ~ N COTR FYBRE MATTING p OPOSED ROCK ~ ~ OI~TLC-~CONDITiO PR ~ ~ ~ ~
COG STD. #433-A. CLASS 1 P RAP. o DAM Q t ~ ` L = 2~ LF PROP. YI
_ ~ F ~ Lu ~ ~ ~ ~ W 8 ~ c, aS~ RCP ~ 1 -
~ \\V'~~~ T = 1.B=. ~ e ~ r~-~ R C g ~ _ g ~ Rim Elev. = 833.43
o ~ NTH FILTER FAB I P' . ~ ; TRJCT BANKFUL BENCHES TWO FEET WIDE PROP. cHANNEL PROP. CHANNEL PROP. MH ~ Station = 2+92.44
CONS SECTION TION 2r c CK TO SURFACE AT 2: I SLOPE. CROSS CROSS sEe AND SLOPE BA
l N-THIS SHEET im Elev. SEE .DETAIL O BANKFULL BANKFULL im Elev. = 834.97 Station = 2+42.03 ~
BENCHES BENCHES EZP S$atlOft 9' JJ 1
CLASS 1 RIP RAP
SECTION PROPOSED CHANNEL OUTLET

- ~y - _T--. _

~

~ - -
t~~ - -
- -
. .
- - ~
.
_
t-
_ _
- -
_ _
_ _ - _ .
---r- _

_ _
y _
_ _ _ - . -
_
T

- - _ -
_ T- . -rt-
_ _
_ -
- _
- - - ~ - ~ -.-r- _
- - - ~
. _ _ - - _ _ _
_ ; _ _
C ~
8.COft 36 RCP . 500 TYPE CONTRACT CONTRACTOR AS-BUILT UTN. DATE I[ 2 H. DATES SENC MARKS JOB NO. P ®04 94 Cn"wf OF
REVISION 7 9'' ray, I ji/ ._p r a~ DESIGNED 08/2B/09 BY CEO ENL-z-`,, ~
f3 ADWAY R~ _
E AER DETAILED08/28/09 BY CEO' L ET
WATER _ 09 1 61 R4- CHECKED BY EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM
=r - OF _SCALE 1'° = 20 FT 5112 HEDRICK DRIVE war~~a'R' r
wDEWALK w
- -