310784_Inspection_20191031

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number f - F Tj 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tjo Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3 % Arrival
The"e: oo A^ Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Pi-eresL f WJ �2r �l Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact: ` -Title:
Onsite Representative: �l L cxCit< Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feede
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
_fX2SYL1-1311� IN
Non--
La er
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Region:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Co"
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [] No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
DIVA ❑ NE
D.KA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No L;Y stv ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ETIIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters / ❑ Yes E'Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
/
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
�-� ,{
� 'V °
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
[:]Yes
[-]No
❑ KAA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: b r
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): S
Observed Freeboard (in): 30
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
Q'*Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
No
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
C3
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Eaol�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
[ Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
[;],<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
/
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Q-14o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [;],11'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes D110 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Io ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ONo ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�Z ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. E Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections udge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [-]No ❑ NA ED-16
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IS "o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check --es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
�F/allure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No L.d�vt' ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes L�rvo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E3'i`Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [;J�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑-Mf
❑ Yes
D40
❑ Yes
l..d O
❑ Yes
UX01
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
j1z9- 2
wee "CA Jr o� �� � .� �� �tjid
14
qi cvle�e (A y tt I 1 j
rQM�^
�I� �^SI Q v`1c„ 1 T8
go v.r G� A-0
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
S�vA� 5�r�ey Zc�(4�� n A.
Ies , Tc,kt /�6�
5 4-q-Je . vi e r, rz
Phone: ` 1 i 1 S C-2I I
Date: '/� 16
2/4/20 5