20180182 Ver 2_PCN Form Submission_20191105

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20180182
2
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Central Office - [phone] Mac Haupt:eads\dmhaupt
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Kevin Tweedy
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
11/5/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Stewart's Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.4898
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Surry
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-80.6411
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable ureters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
P 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
27 - Restoration
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
19. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner R Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Greta Boyd
2b. Deed book and page no.:
00320/0098
2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
194 Cletius Moser Trail
Address Line 2
city
Mount Airy
Postal / Zip Code
27030
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Deborah Beasley
2b. Deed book and page no.:
00489/1175, 01446/0358, 01555/0895
State / Rwince / R-gion
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
rYes rNo

2c. Responsible party:
2d.Address
Street Address
286 Cletius Moser Trail
Address Line 2
City
Mount Airy
Fbstal / Zip Code
27030
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Edward Johnson
2b. Deed book and page no.:
01033/0644
2c. Responsible party
2d.Address
Street Address
139 Timeless Trail
Address Line 2
City
Mount Airy
postal / Zip Code
27030
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Kevin Tweedy
3b. Business Name:
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
3c.Address
Street Address
1150 SE Maynard Rd
Address Line 2
Ste 140
CRY
Cary
Fbstal / Zip (ode
27511
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if apprcpnate)
1c. Nearest municipality/town:
Mount Airy
State / Rmince / Region
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
State / Frmince / fegbn
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
State / Rovince/ f ion
NC
Country
us
3e. Fax Number:

2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
Boyd: 591900894216. Beasley:
591900797501,591908891501,
591908891924.Johnson:501000713049.
2b. Property size:
Moser:591902791649
25.4
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Ester Drive/Timeless Trail
Address line 2
Qty
State / Province / Ibgrn
Mount Airy
NC
Postal / Zip Cade
Country
27030
us
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Stewart's Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin-PeeDee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
03040101100010
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The Site is in a rural but developing area of Surry County. Land use within the UT1 and UT2 watersheds is 37 % pasture lands, 27 % deciduous forest lands, and 35 % residential. The
Project is impacted by farming practices, past stream channelization, riparian buffer loss, and direct cattle access. All four streams have either sustained significant cattle damage
and/or have been channelized to maximize cattle grazing activities.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
G Yes r No f Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
Red Barn, DWR 18-0182. SAW 2017-01927. Resubmitting for additional .05 acre wetland impact in WA and to denote blasting.
Project History Upload
SAW-2017-01927_RedBarn MitBank-NW P27verification. pdf
180182RedBarn(Surry)_401 approval Itr.October 2, 2019.pdf
1.6MB
1.05MB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Figure2_Topo.pdf 1.94MB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Figure8_Soils.pdf 2.29MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4.44
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
6283
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The Project will restore healthy headwater stream -wetland complexes in currently active, or recently active, cattle pastures in a watershed that is dominated by agricultural land use.
Riparian buffers at least 30 feet in width (50 feet or more in most areas) will be restored along stream reaches and provide significant improvements to wetland connectivity and function
within the riparian buffer.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Stream restoration approaches will involve raising the streambeds and/or re -meandering the channels through existing wetlands, thereby enhancing the stream and wetland resources
within the Project. Buffers in excess of 30 feet, and greater than 50 feet in most areas, will be restored along all proposed stream mitigation reaches for a total of 25.4 protected acres.
Wetlands will be rehabilitated through increased surface connection with restored channels and planting of native species. Functional uplift will come from excluding livestock from
project resources, restoring natural wetland and riparian vegetation, and restoring the project streams to a stable condition, connected to their adjacent floodplains. The exclusion of
livestock will remove a direct source of nutrients, coliform, and sediment from the system. Due to the extent of the bank erosion in all four project streams, and for UT3 in particular,
restoring a stable stream condition will reduce the amount of sediment in receiving waters. In -stream structures consisting of large woody debris will ensure channel stability and improve
aquatic habitat for native species. Stream restoration activities will employ heavy construction equipment. Large flat-bed tractor trailers will initially bring equipment and materials to the
site. Tracked excavators will be used to shape stream banks, excavate the floodplain, install stream structures, and perform general grading. Bulldozers may be required to reach final
grades. And finally, the vegetation installation will be supported by small utility vehicles such as medium size flat-bed trucks, single -ton trucks, and bob -cats for material delivery.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
AII_Sheets_reduced.pdf 44.94MB

5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the propertyor proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2017-01927
Sc. If Sa is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
EPR delineated potential aquatic resources 01/2017, 05/2018, & 07/2018. Field visit with William Elliott and Steve Kichefski (USACE) and Sue Homewood (DWR) November 2018. PJD
approved December 2018. Note-- attached Corps approval incorrectly states 0.4 acres instead of 0.04 acres of eAsting wetland in WD.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
SAW-2018-01441 (Red Barn Mitigation Bank)PJD.pdf 233.22KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory -
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands p Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Stream Realignment
P
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
WA
Both _]
0.110
(acres)
W2
Stream Realignment
P
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
WB
Both
0.130
(acres)
W3
Stream Realignment
P
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
WC
Pb
Both
0.100
(acres)
t::::]
Stream Realignment
P
Headwater Forest
WD
Yes
Both
0.007
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.347
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.347
2h. Comments:
There will be minor impacts to the wetlands onsite due to realignment of channel features, but restoration activities will increase the acreage of
wetlands on the Site and improve overall wetland function.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact
(?) Jurisdiction* length*

S1
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Urfa
Perennial
Both
12
1,170
Average (feet)
(Gr�ear feet)
3P
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Ur2a/Ur2b
Perennial
Both
1Aver�e(feet)
1(19near
fed)
S3
Enhancement
Tem ora
p ry
Stabilization
Ur2c
Perennial
Both
18
240
Average (feet)
pinear feet)
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Ur3a
Perennial
Both
10
1,526
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
SS
Enhancement
Temporary
Stabilization
U173b
Perennial
Both
5
186
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S6
Restoration
Permanent
Relocation
J
Ur3c
Perennial
Both
5
1,015
Average (feet)
I (Nnwr feet)
S7
Enhancement
Te ora ry
Stabilization
Ur3d
Perennial
Both
10
109
Average (feet)
(Iinmr feet)
S8
Enhancement
Tem ora
p ry
Stabilization
Ur4
Perennial
Both
5
89
Average (feet)
(Grv�rfeet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
5,659
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
628
3j. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
624
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Restoration practices will only occur in the designated stream length. Practices will follow natural channel design principles. Only natural material will
be used to construct stream features. Only native grass and woody vegetation will be planted on the stream banks. Agricultural BMPs will be
implemented to exclude cattle from streams, buffers, and wetlands to ensure these resources provide long-term stability and water quality
improvements. Fencing will be erected around the protected area to exclude livestock and posted signs will designate the protected area and state
that public entry is not allowed.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Disturbances will be minimized to the extent possible. Construction equipment access to the stream itself will be limited to the extent practical, and
erosion control practices will be used to minimize any potential impacts from sediment run off during construction. For additional information, see the
construction plans and specifications.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
d Yes O No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Proposed Project is a stream and wetland mitigation bank site
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r' Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Project is not located in an area with NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
No impervious surfaces will be created.

G. Supplementary Information n
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
C Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project does not involve development or creation of impervious surfaces.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No O WA
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
C Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r' No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property.
RedBarn_PCN_blasting_combined.pdf 644.31<13
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Emailed USFWS 03/2018, no response received. NC Wildlife Resources Commission response dated 04/2018 (attached) indicated no impacts to wild
trout waters.
Consultation Documentation Upload
Red Bam_NCNHP report_03132018.pdf 875.46KB
RedBarnMitigationBank_StewartsCr&Us_Surry_WRCComments.pdf 33.51<13
RedBarn_USF WS_Lttr.pdf 3.5MB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r- Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA EFH Mapper

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
C' Yes f• No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
HPOWEB review 03/2018, emailed SHPO 03/2018, response attached.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
RedBarn_NCSHPO_Lttr.pdf 3.47MB
ER 18 0628_3.pdf 99.54KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
F Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Most of UT1, Uf2, WA, WB, and WC within the 1 % Chance Annual Flooding Zone. No work is proposed on Stewarts Creek as a part of this project and
a Surry County Floodplain Development Permit has been obtained.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
DFIRM panel 3711501000J
Miscellaneous -
Comments
This ePCN is a resubmittal of Red Barn SAW-2017-01927 (approved 11/4/2019) and DWR 18-0182 (approved 10/2/2019). Permanent wetland impact for W1 has been modified to 0.11
ac from .06 ac, and a note about blasting has been added.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
RedBarn_Impacts.pdf
2.48MB
Signature -
,P By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kevin Tweedy
Signature
Date
11 /5/2019

.. \� -__ ,>I tJ.' �'_; Cps \, ( � :>i •C ten, � _
J )) 4
. - • 7-.� i
—_ .� - � v '2e-- 4 �t ..i .�• , 4<Irtwe -: _ I � _ s � t- � M / r ..
Fkld
57
R ✓ tc + ~ 1 Oast - t - `� .1- ` : ,�
� c. •� ���
- ,�i 1 Intl - ��! f •I
�. � � _ ._ - _ � _ •__�', ail, rb • �.:,.y `gyp
t � � • Lei �, � C �� .., '/=�f� '� •�... 1 �' � � � <�_ ,�/ � �` ,
�—
JO�G'7Seca
k TA
> - ` ' � If `� � ' <-� •l�� �+ � < ` •tea
lYl
Me.+btla� .'CN
Legend �
Study Area � a � �ri-� 'j y f �I�` � • � o ,� .� � � \ / ��� \� 1 0 ''� i $ - -
PREPARED BY:
0 1,500 3,000 RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE ECOSYSTEM
Feet ra PLANNING &
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP RESTORATION
FIGURE 2 SURRY COUNTY, NC DATE:
Jul_Y 2018

�yyy
LEGEND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SOILS
COLVARD AND SUCHES (CSA)
DILLARD FINE SANDY LOAM (DRB)
HATBORO LOAM (HAA)
- RHODHISS-BANNERTOWN COMPLEX (RBD)
TOAST-BANNERTOWN COMPLEX (TTC)
_ WATER (W)
0 250 500
Feet
FIGURE 8
RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE PREPARED ECOSYSTEM
SOILS MAP PLANNING &
RESTORATION
SURRY COUNTY, NC
AUGUST 201 9

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. I Ia nilton
May 1, 2018
Cidney Jones
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
Re: Red Barn Mitigation Site, Surry County, ER 18-0628
Dear Mr. Jones:
Thank you for your letter of March 16, 2018, concerning the above project.
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review&ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
C'�C� )�4c��-taau�
6TY" Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

FIGURE 3 1 SURRY COUNTY, NC I AUGUST 2019

ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
March 16, 2018
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street, Room 258
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site
Surry County, North Carolina
Catalogue Unit 03040101
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (EPR) is planning to conduct stream and wetland
restoration/enhancement activities for the above referenced project. We are requesting your
office to review and comment on any possible issues that may emerge with respect to
archaeological or cultural resources associated the proposed stream and wetland
restoration/enhancement project. Included in this package are USGS site topographic maps at
1:24,000 scale, and relevant site photographs.
The project is comprised of multiple parcels off Cletius Moser Trail and Timeless Trail,
approximately 0.5 miles south of NC 89 and 0.5 west of the City of Mount Airy in Surry County,
North Carolina (Figure 1). Figure 2 depicts the project on the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Dobson, NC 7.5-minute topographic map at 36.4898 N and-80.6411 E and is comprised
of six parcels, here indicated by the following Parcel ID Nos.: 501000713046, 591900791439,
591900797501, 591900894216, 591908883852, and 591908891501.
The Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site site was identified to provide in -kind mitigation for
unavoidable stream and/or wetland impacts. Segments of this stream network have been
identified as incised, eroding, and no longer connected to their floodplains. In total, almost 7,200
linear feet will be restored through the relocation of streams to their approximate historic
locations and reconnection with the historic floodplain. To that end, new channels will be
constructed within the existing pasture -land with excavation depths ranging from 1-4 feet. All
work will take place within a 24-acre conservation easements shown on the attached Figure 2.
There are no existing structures with the proposed conservation easement. The majority of the
site has historically been disturbed due to past and current management for cattle grazing and
rearing and crop production. Furthermore, no architectural structures or archeological artifacts
have been observed or noted during preliminary surveys of the site for restoration purposes.
According to SHPO's online GIS Mapping Application (http://clis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) accessed on
March 13, 2018, there are no historic structures located within 1 mile of the site.

Construction activities will take place within jurisdictional waterbodies requiring Section 401 and
404 permits from the NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the US Army Corps of
Engineers. Grading activities will require a Sediment and Erosion Control permit from the NC
Division of Land Quality. Portions of the site are located within a mapped FEMA floodplain and
will require coordination with Surry County Floodplain Administrators.
Please contact me at the above phone number or address with any question.
Sincerely,
Cidney Jones, PE
Water Resource Engineer
- PRO LADING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SER OCES TO SUPPORT A SUSTAINABLE ENU/RONMENT -

bye Q _
� t I
� bAy
r4ZG INIA
NOR fHCP. r=
Z
y
A
.off .. �O4 pr
CaDRd i �pd myde
Od
rn
- h C
52 4i%P 42
� 2
..M t Airy
�+ r
T i
s
1 4 Sr
i601_
a
a+
PROJECT LOCATION
36.489851 N
-80.641183 E
A
c%
�a
vaugnn NwY
��akerRa 89
,µsat>5d� Rd
1
t
n a
m �
t
o m
IE
Legend �%
Proposed Easement s f
's
�e 4t' Ararat i
PREPARED FOR:
0 1 2 RED BARN SITE
USACE
Miles VICINITY MAP
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
PREPARED BY:
FIGURE 1 SURRY COUNTY, NC ARESTORATION
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &

I ° c ) A reLow
�fr ,,North Surry I1
O1RhSch
cem k :��i /�: / - g391�• r ~may \ t � n �4`Y�
]M2 f�f "rrc�`,... II h•� _ �• i� ,, to - f
�J $an L ` �F tt1iZ •NI
^' "� ,u�`\ / / • Y `b )_ cud �� a ~ t • roust
O �' c
!� y : ✓ Drive it
l� ! f • W PIN
ELI
II E • • ��
-_ f N
I f� w•
0 If
Legend
Proposed Easement
PREPARED FOR:
0 1,000 2,000 RED BARN SITE
USACE
Feet USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
PREPARED BY:
FIGURE 2 SURRY COUNTY, NC ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
•• RESTORATION

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Govemor Roy Cooper Secretary; Susi H. Hamilton
March 13, 2018
Amy James
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
RE: Red Barn Mitigation Bank
Dear Amy James:
NCNHDE-5569
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates that there are
no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas
within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural
heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have
been surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists.
In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may
update our records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is
included for reference. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile radius of the
project area, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature
Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), Clean Water Management Trust Fund (CWMTF) easement,
or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler&ncdcr.gov or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Telexhone: 0191 7D7-8107 LOCATICN
1651 Mai Service Center wvow.ncnhv.org 121 West Jones S-reet
Ralsigh, NC 27699-1651 Ralsigh, NC 27603

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Red Barn Mitigation Bank
March 13, 2018
NCNHDE-5569
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program Easement NC Department of Agriculture, Division of Soil State
and Water Conservation
Surry County Open Space Surry County Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 13, 2018; source: NCNHP, Q1 January 2018. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-5569: Red Barn Mitigation Bank
_
o \s
WEIm st 'a E Elm st y
M
ut
.....................
c...ii it l.I.
.
s
m c
l n5t N
q;/zc 'A.
P1PPa Ra- Pve
eM'ndere'e
�
Toast +
r Ff \,.gePetd°roe V,,,nla 5l P
N
>;
W.PIne.Sr
ar H
°'"
o
cunm
�
a
1 Lov,ll
Q
Mt Airy
!
Cuts Ln
/ 89
�
2 Q
Qo9�a
V Calrar
Uhweod Dr
y
-
c
Roaeweed Dr,
"cklear at
_
/r P� G'c�r
St y1b
Ha
waA
'P110n tt
w,
ss Trr
BI—nt Rd
_ Cree �k
4 °S}
40 0
I O N ri'
E Haym°re S(
\ N
tons\
N How
rn
-
_
_
7: H.
C Hepial
L o(Surry Penn St cmv �
f \ 0
S
_
S�p�yhal Dr
\ L sunset s2
'. st
3
rur � Cree4
�
\
A,rvlpw Dr
\
Rceves Dr \
hbuntaln Vla \
Rd
O \
so
tielvue Dr
tro
\
M1Df \
Sl a
£ -
�p\dmmnAve
S
Ave \
PA're -
la
o eaf
µWn
Got Dtea 1
�
Pinevn wpr
",
0
.
Apolla D,
-
-,
WE
p°
3
March 13, 2018
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
1:25,398
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Sources' Esri, HERE, Garmin,, Intermap, increment P Carp_, GEBCC-, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong),—sstopo, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and
the GIS User Community
Page 3 of 3

9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
April 10, 2018
Cidney Jones
Ecosystem Planning & Restoration
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
SUBJECT: Red Barn Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Jones:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your March 16
letter regarding a stream restoration project on Stewarts Creek and unnamed tributaries in Surry County
You requested review and comment on the project. Our comments on this project are offered for your
consideration under provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et. seq.) and Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
Details were not provided in the letter on design of the project. The project is proposed as a mitigation
project and will involve stream relocation to historical locations and reconnection to the historic
floodplain.
This project should not impact wild trout resources. We recommend that riparian buffers that are to be
reestablished be as wide as possible, given site constraints and landowner needs. NCWRC generally
recommends a woody buffer of 100 feet on perennial streams to maximize the benefits of buffers,
including bank stability, stream shading, treatment of overland runoff, and wildlife habitat.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at (828) 803-
6054 if you have any questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
RESTORATION
March 16, 2018
Marella Buncick, Endangered Species Biologist
USFWS Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville NC 28801
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration, LLC
559 Jones Franklin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27606
Phone: [phone]
www.eprusa.net
RE: Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site, Yadkin River Basin, Cataloging Unit 03040101,
Surry County, NC
Dear Ms. Buncick,
Ecosystem Planning and Restoration (EPR) respectfully requests review and comment from the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the implementation of the subject
project. This request is to comply with the Nationwide Permit general conditions and to develop
the environmental documentation required by the proposed action. Project details are presented
below.
The project is comprised of multiple parcels off Cletius Moser Trail and Timeless Trail,
approximately 0.5 miles south of NC 89 and 0.5 west of the City of Mount Airy in Surry County,
North Carolina (Figure 1). Figure 2 depicts the project on the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Dobson, NC 7.5-minute topographic map at 36.4898 N and-80.6411 E and is comprised
of six parcels, here indicated by the following Parcel ID Nos.: 501000713046, 591900791439,
591900797501, 591900894216, 591908883852, and 591908891501.
The Red Barn Mitigation Bank Site was identified to provide in -kind mitigation for unavoidable
stream and/or wetland impacts. Segments of this stream network have been identified as incised,
eroding, and no longer connected to their floodplains. In total, almost 7,200 linear feet will be
restored through the relocation of streams to their approximate historic locations and reconnection
with the historic floodplain. To that end, new channels will be constructed within the existing crop -
and pasture -land with excavation depths ranging from 1-4 feet. All work will take place within a
24-acre conservation easement shown on the attached Figure 2.
Construction activities will take place within jurisdictional waterbodies requiring Section 401 and
404 permits from the NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the US Army Corps of
Engineers. Grading activities will require a Sediment and Erosion Control permit from the NC
Division of Land Quality. Portions of the site are located within a mapped FEMA floodplain and
will require coordination with Surry County Floodplain Administrators.
As of June 1, 2017, the USFWS lists four federally protected species and three federal species
of concern for Surry County, not including the Bald Eagle, which is protected under the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (Table 1). A brief description of the federally protected species
habitat requirements follows, along with the Biological Conclusion rendered based on field

assessments of the project area. Habitat requirements are based on the current best available
information.
Table 1. Federally listed species for Surry County
Common Name
Scientific Name
Federal Status
Habitat Present
Biological
Conclusion
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus
BGPA
No
N/A
leucocephalus
Bog turtle
Glyptemys
T (S/A)
Yes
Not Required
muhlenber h
Northern long-
Myotis
T
Yes
MA-NLAA
eared bat
septentrionalis
Robust redhorse
Moxostoma
FSC
No
N/A
robustum
Brook floater
Alasmidonta
FSC
No
N/A
varicose
Carolina hemlock
Tsuga caroliniana
FSC
No
N/A
Schweinitz's
Helianthus
sunflower
schweinitzii
E
No
No Effect
Small whorled
/sotria
T
Yes
No Effect
pogonia
medeoloides
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance with another listed
species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not subject to
Section 7 consultation. In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to Georgia) was listed as T(S/A)
(threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the collection and interstate and international commercial
trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private
landowners in North Carolina, part of the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
FSC = Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species Act. In North Carolina,
the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) define Federal Species of Concern as those
species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is
insufficient information to support listing at this time. Subsumed under the term "FSC' are all species petitioned by outside parties
and other selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage Program Lists.
N/A — Not applicable to FSC
MA-NLAA — May Affect -Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Bog turtle
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: April 1 —October 1 (visual surveys); April 1- June 15
(optimal for breeding/nesting); May 1-June 30 (trapping surveys)
Habitat Description: Bog turtle habitat consists of open, groundwater supplied (spring fed),
graminoid dominated wetlands along riparian corridors or on seepage slopes. These
habitats are designated as mountain bogs by the North Carolina Natural Heritage
Program, but they are technically poor, moderate, or rich fens that may be associated with
wet pastures and old drainage ditches that have saturated muddy substrates with open
canopies. These habitats, found between 700 and 4,500 feet above mean sea level in the
western Piedmont and mountain counties of North Carolina, often support sphagnum
moss and may contain carnivorous plants. Soil types (poorly drained silt loams) from which
bog turtle habitats have been found include Arkaqua, Chewacla, Dellwood, Codorus
complex, Hatboro, Nikwasi, Potomac — lotla complex, Reddies, Rosman, Tate —
- PRO LADING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SER OCES TO SUPPORT A SUSTAINABLE ENU/RONMENT -

Cullowhee complex, Toxaway, Tuckasegee — Cullasaja complex, Tusquitee, Watauga,
and Wehadkee.
Biological Conclusion: Not Required
Species listed as threatened due to similarity of appearance do not require Section 7
consultation with the USFWS. The wetland areas in the easement provide potential
habitat for the bog turtle. However, they are unlikely to occur due to the fact that the area
has been used intensively by cattle, and periodically for crops, for many years. In addition,
a review of NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) records indicates no known bog turtle
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Northern long-eared bat
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: June 1 — August 15
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the
mountains, with scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North
Carolina, NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and mines. Since this species is not
known to be a long-distance migrant, and caves and subterranean mines are extremely
rare in eastern North Carolina, it is uncertain whether or where NLEB hibernate in eastern
North Carolina. During the summer, NLEB roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in
cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees (typically >_3 inches dbh). Males and
non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat
has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds, under eaves of
buildings, behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses. Foraging occurs on
forested hillsides and ridges, and occasionally over forest clearings, over water, and along
tree -lined corridors. Mature forests may be an important habitat type for foraging.
Biological Conclusion: May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
Forested areas suitable as roosting habitat for the NLEB exist in the study area. However,
as of June 7, 2016, the USFWS does not indicate that Surry County contains any
confirmed hibernation or maternity sites for the NLEB. Therefore, this project will not
require incidental take and is exempted under the final 4(d) rule guidelines. In addition, a
review of NCNHP records indicates no known NLEB occurrences within 1.0 mile of the
study area.
Schweinitz's sunflower
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: late August -October
Habitat Description: Endemic to the Piedmont of North and South Carolina, the few sites where
this rhizomatous perennial herb occurs in relatively natural vegetation are found in Xeric
Hardpan Forests. The species is also found along roadside rights -of -way, maintained
power lines and other utility rights -of -way, edges of thickets and old pastures, clearings
and edges of upland oak -pine -hickory woods and Piedmont longleaf pine forests, and
other sunny or semi -sunny habitats where disturbances (e.g., mowing, clearing, grazing,
blow downs, storms, frequent fire) help create open or partially open areas for sunlight. It
is intolerant of full shade and excessive competition from other vegetation. Schweinitz's
sunflower occurs in a variety of soil series, including Badin, Cecil, Cid, Enon, Gaston,
Georgeville, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Misenheimer, Secrest, Tatum, Uwharrie, and Zion,
among others. It is generally found growing on shallow sandy soils with high gravel
- PRO LADING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SER OCES TO SUPPORT A SUSTAINABLE ENU/RONMENT -

content; shallow, poor, clayey hardpans; or shallow rocky soils, especially those derived
from mafic rocks.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
There is no suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower in the conservation easement.
Much of the easement is comprised of pasture land, grazed or maintained to the wood
edge. In addition, a review of NCNHP records indicates no known occurrences of the
sunflower within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Small whorled pogonia
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: mid -May - early July
Habitat Description: Small whorled pogonia occurs in young as well as maturing (second to third
successional growth) mixed -deciduous or mixed-deciduous/coniferous forests. It does not
appear to exhibit strong affinities for a particular aspect, soil type, or underlying geologic
substrate. In North Carolina, the perennial orchid is typically found in open, dry deciduous
woods and is often associated with white pine and rhododendron. The species may also
be found on dry, rocky, wooded slopes; moist slopes; ravines lacking stream channels; or
slope bases near braided channels of vernal streams. The orchid, often limited by shade,
requires small light gaps or canopy breaks, and typically grows under canopies that are
relatively open or near features like logging roads or streams that create long -persisting
breaks in the forest canopy.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Wooded hillsides in the conservation easement provide habitat for small whorled pogonia.
However, all restoration work will occur within the floodplains, and the hillsides will not be
impacted. In addition, a review of NCNHP records indicates no known occurrences of the
pogonia within 1.0 mile of the study area.
If EPR has not received response from you within 45 days, we will assume that the USFWS does
not have any comment or information relevant to the implementation of this project at the current
time. We thank you in advance for your timely response, input, and cooperation. Please contact
me at the above phone number or address with any question.
Sincerely,
Cidney Jones, PE
- PRO LADING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SER OCES TO SUPPORT A SUSTAINABLE ENU/RONMENT -

[NCNHP] North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2001. Guide to Federally Listed Endangered
and Threatened Species of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC. 134 pp.
[NCWRC] North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. 2006. Bog Turtle Fact
Sheet.http://www.ncwildlife.org/Portals/O/Conserving/documents/nongame_bogturtle_hires.pdf.
(Accessed: March 13, 2017).
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina: Third Approximation. Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, N.C.
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, NC. 325 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. NC County NLEB consultation areas.
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html (Accessed March 13,
2018)
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2016. Small -whorled Pogonia Fact Sheet.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/plants/smallwhorledpogoniafs.html. (Accessed: March
13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. NLEB Fact Sheet.
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/pdf/N LEBFactSheetOl April2O15.p
df. (Accessed: March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014. Northern Long -Eared Bat (NLEB) Interim
Conference and Planning Guidance. USFWS Regions 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6.
https://www.fws.gov/northeast/virginiafield/pdf/NLEBinterimGuidance6Jan2O14.pdf. (Accessed:
March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/es_schweinitz_sunflower.htm1. (Accessed: March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Asheville Ecological Services Field Office.
2011. Bog Turtle (Glyptemys
muhlenbergii).https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/listed_species/bog_turtle.html. (Accessed:
March 13, 2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Optimal Survey Windows for North Carolina's
Federally Threatened and Endangered Plant
Species.https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pdfs/survey_window_for_plants.pdf. (Accessed: March 13,
2018).
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1994. Schweinitz's Sunflower Recovery Plan. Atlanta,
GA. 28 pp.
[USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria medeoloides)
Recovery Plan, First Revision. Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 75 pp.
- PRO LADING ECOSYSTEM PLANNING AND RESTORATION SER OCES TO SUPPORT A SUSTAINABLE ENU/RONMENT -

bye Q _
� t I
� bAy
r4ZG INIA
NOR fHCP. r=
Z
y
A
.off .. �O4 pr
CaDRd i �pd myde
Od
rn
- h C
52 4i%P 42
� 2
..M t Airy
�+ r
T i
s
1 4 Sr
i601_
a
a+
PROJECT LOCATION
36.489851 N
-80.641183 E
A
c%
�a
vaugnn NwY
��akerRa 89
,µsat>5d� Rd
1
t
n a
m �
t
o m
IE
Legend �%
Proposed Easement s f
's
�e 4t' Ararat i
PREPARED FOR:
0 1 2 RED BARN SITE
USACE
Miles VICINITY MAP
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
PREPARED BY:
FIGURE 1 SURRY COUNTY, NC ARESTORATION
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &

I ° c ) A reLow
�fr ,,North Surry I1
O1RhSch
cem k :��i /�: / - g391�• r ~may \ t � n �4`Y�
]M2 f�f "rrc�`,... II h•� _ �• i� ,, to - f
�J $an L ` �F tt1iZ •NI
^' "� ,u�`\ / / • Y `b )_ cud �� a ~ t • roust
O �' c
!� y : ✓ Drive it
l� ! f • W PIN
ELI
II E • • ��
-_ f N
I f� w•
0 If
Legend
Proposed Easement
PREPARED FOR:
0 1,000 2,000 RED BARN SITE
USACE
Feet USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
PREPARED BY:
FIGURE 2 SURRY COUNTY, NC ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING &
•• RESTORATION

5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted
by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Blasting will occur in the project area at the location approximately shown on the attached map. The
project area is outside of a red HUC and will not occur within 0.25 mile of a red HUC boundary. Blasting
procedures will take place intermittently over an approximate two month period during site
construction. Potential bedrock outcrops exist at the site and will be utilized to generate rock for in -
stream structures. Excavated material from Stewarts Creek floodplain will be used to fill the holes
created by blasting back to original grade.

W
,.
,
,� 1�71J ion t'
Y
17
LEGEND
Stream Impacts
S1: 1170U
WI
F "
S2: 1948'
S3: 240'
S4: 1526' 9 r.
ST 109' Yt'
• r r
Wetland Impacts
-W1:0.11ac�,
W2-.0.13 ac
W& 0.10 ac
W4: <0.01 ac...,_ # .�•,, .
Existing Wetlands
Conservation Easement �� 4
PREPARED BY:
0 225 450 RED BARN MITIGATION BANK SITE
ECOSYSTEM
Feet IMPACTS MAP ra PLANNING &
RESTORATION
FIGURE 3 SURRY COUNTY, NC AUGUST 2019