20191531 Ver 1_Jessups Pond - JDFinal_20191105

mcgill
April 3, 2019
Ms. Emily Greer
US Army Corps of Engineers
City of Wilmington
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
RE: Jessups Pond Property
Jurisdictional Determination
City of Cedar Creek, North
Carolina
Dear Ms. Greer:
Shaping Communities Together
This letter is to request confirmation of Jurisdictional Determination on the referenced site. The
request is based on data, site observations, and a site visit on March 20, 2019. Specifically, we
are requesting confirmation of the historical jurisdictional limit of Jessup's Pond on the subject
property. The existing pond impoundment was damaged and breached due to Hurricane
Matthew in 2016. Jessup's pond has since been drained. The location of the Ordinary High -
Water Mark (OHWM) is shown and labeled on the attached Delineation Map. Included in this
letter are the following:
• JD Request Forms
• Agent Authorization Form
• Topographic Location Map
• Soils Map
• Delineation Map
• Photo Sheet
• Wetland Data Sheets
Please include McGill Associates on the copy list of all correspondence for this project. If you have any
questions regarding this information, please contact me at 828-386-1920.
Sincerely,
MCGILL ASSOCIATES, PA
JON SWAIM
Project Manager / Environmental Services
L:\Cary\Projects\2017\17.01903 - NCWRC - Jessups Mill
MCGILL ASSOCIATES 1013 STATE FARM ROAD, BOONE, NC 28607 / 828.386.1920 / MCGILLASSOCIATES.COM

NJ
me, l' Shaping C01111111111[t12s Together
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROJECT NAME: Jessups Pond Dam Repair Project
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DB:7730 PG:0519
PARCELID. 0480475020
STREET ADDRESS: 9021 Cedar Creek Rd
Please Print
Property Owner/Representative: State of North Carolina GarV Gardner
(If Representative) Title. Section Chief Engineering, NCWRC
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Jon Swaim of McGill Associates P.A.
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this permit or
certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's/Representative's Address (if different than property above):
116 W Jones St Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of our
knowledge.
Authorized Sign e-- Authorized Signature
Date: N i) Date:
1013 STATE FARM ROAD, BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA 28607 1 828.386.1920 1 www.mcgillassociates.com

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 9: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Jessup Pond
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and B3e]:
Dam Restoration
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: State of North Carolina
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Jon Swaim, McGill Associates, P.A.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
34.862585,-78.729078
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 0480475020
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Cumberland
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Cedar Creek
11. Project Information —Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Jessup Pond(Indian Creek)
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03030005
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit 9
Regional General Permit 9
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
::]Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 9021 Cedar Creek Rd
City, State:
Cedar Creek
County: Cumberland
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0480475020
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Jon Swaim
Mailing Address: 1013 State Farm Road
Boone, NC 28607
Telephone Number: 828-386-1920
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: State of North Carolina
Mailing Address: 116 W Jones St
Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone Number: 919-807-2425
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION'A
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
02
Print Name
Capacity: FI?-
Owner �✓ Authorized Agents
Cat
Date I
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
QI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
8 A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
' Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 2.44 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
34.862585
Longitude: -78.729078
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
F4 USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/28/19
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Jon Swaim, McGill Associates P.A., 1013State Farm Road, Boone, Nc 28607
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cumberland City: Cedar Creek
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.862585 Long.:-78.729078
Universal Transverse Mercator: 707590.22, 3860156.73
Name of nearest waterbody: Jessup Pond(Indian Creek)
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): 3/20/19
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Pond
34.862802
-78.729664
2.44 Acres
Open Water
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:LOCATION, SOIL, USGS, DELINEATION
Q Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
[] Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑N U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Jerome, V= 1,000'
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑■ FEMAIFIRM maps: SEE DELINEATION MAP
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
❑ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): 1-1-2015
or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): 3-20-19
.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Sigi a ure aF,unless
d to of
Regulatory staff member per n reqg PJD
completing PJD (R UIRE obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

�
z
n
�
�
x
n
n
o
n
o
�
y
0
0
0
D �
n T
r cn
a
"C
v �
Ci
w �3
b
na
Z
=
z
ad
�
c
O
aZ
�
n

n
u n
o Ln
v
� Q �
m
4
0
g
o a�
44z
f -1
n
z
op6I

34o 51' 55" N
I
34o 51' 35" N
Soil Map —Cumberland County, North Carolina
a
707370 707440 707510 707580 707650
707370 707440 707510 707580 707650
v
Map Scale: 1:3,000 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
` Meters
N 0 40 80 1E0 240
Feet
0 100 200 400 600
Map projection: Web Mercator Gonermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: lfrM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
am Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
707720
707720
a
707790
34o 51' 55" N
1
34o 51' 35" N
707790
En
3/27/2019
Pagel of 3

VQC
Q
ii
Mi
U)
m
(n
D
■
❑ N
❑
�� 4{
o o
+
0
�7d
C
il�G
C
C.
O
cn cn cn
0
cn
cn
cn
°-
A
v
m
r
r
L7
0
0
(�
co
0o
�
3.
co
co co
N
D (o
o S'
o
<
m
CL
m
o
O
�'
m
�'
CD
m
<
°
v
m
v
m
o
co
m
°
a
°.
°. °.
° Do
cn
cn
m'
O
°
'�
�
p
o
-
_mmm
°i
r
-o
-o -o
- O
m
o
o
o
0
2
0CL
m
o
m
c
c c
CD
Q
o
cn
-o
O
m
O
O
�'
N0
g' O
CD Z
o
O
D
O
W
�
0
12
;1
1
1
o,
1
>
m
r_
D
CL
r
C
a7 O
�'
(ncp
p -O
91
cn
N 7
pOj
N
�
CD
Q.
O
O 2.
O
O
N
Q
CD
2
O-
O
U)
O N
9
N
0
V
(CD
(D
N
O
u 0 3
w p
01
cn
O
cn cn
C O
o�
v D o-
n 0-0
C) cn
00 N
v
N (D
N N
_
N
O
3 N
01 0
ro
O
01 W
CD
O ,� ID �
0
-
-4v
O 01
0-0
•G C
D�
G 0
(D Q
.O-.
(D(D (D o
0
v �'o
C
m m
Qno
N' 3
cD
w
O- =
__
N .G
01
N. .0
O
N N S -
- Q 3
CD Cn
U) aj
•G
CD O
w Q O
-0
Q O
N
D
7 N
O
C 01 01 (D
a)
N N -O
CD
N 7
.G
(D (Q O
Q
N
(Q 01
CD
7 N
01 O
01
01 N
CD
�. 01 01 3
-O
N
3
(D
_.
O
CD
lD C
ID
O
00 D
Z
S
OS � CD 3
N
N
S
lD
G Ci
C
�' N
N 7
N U)
O '6 CD O
01
C 3
6
NO
O
Q
N
N. 0-
0 N
N O-
n.
Q -O �. -
CD
N
O
I S 01
lD
O (D
Q
,N.. O O N C
0
N
NCD
3 s o
3
N
' 7
N
CL
0 0 lD
(D O
01 .G
N fn Q -O
O
N
01
(O Q
O
O .G
3 . ID O-. 01
C
N
7
CD
G D m O
O
v
0
(n C)
(D o
-O
(D
O 7
- v o m
0
o (D
w
0
S N 7
CD
v
C
—
C
cn
O U) 7 S
o °1 v
U)
m n
3
3
CD 3
(D
O
O `G
C)
D
O C N Q 0
-u 0
01
G O O (j
3
Q
N Z
O O
Z
01 Q CD N Q
N 0-3 p
U) N
G7 N
N
CD
s�
D
o
ao
X
m N w
m
OD a
v
CD
m
.-. CD (D
U
C a) 0 3
Q
w .-.
CD
0 0
N
01
O
O
CD S (D
v 7
O
(D O =
T. _-
3o
-
N
-O
U)
O
._-•
CD - -
Q j N Q CD
s
CD
3
CD�
U)
o
O
v
NC
Q
O O
0CL
v
6
O C
3
�.
O- ID
U)v
N U)v
lD
Z
O
0I
3
G
01
fn
(D
—� m S
N 7 (D (n'
CD N -O_ � 01 7
N 01 Q (D 7
9'cD 003
(n (D N .�-. 0.
O Q O
'D O 3
0 3 � � v
0 01 G
Q N Ql< O
L N O
01 O 01 Q I
G 7 - N
(D O O N N
N 3 3 u) p
ID O v v v
N :2-2?
3 3 7 O 3
O (D (o (!
7 N 7 0 0
a) n-0 v
01 -O (D
O a)O �.
3io C
0
O 01 N 01
CD N O 7
Q O G O
CD O 0)
N U)
CD O. CD
Q
v
0
O
3
fn
(D
0
O
D
O
D
r
m
Q
m
z
v
D
z
n
N
O
z

Soil Map —Cumberland County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CaB
Candor sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
0.0
1.5%
LaB
Lakeland sand, 1 to 8 percent
slopes
0.3
9.5%
TR
Torhunta and Lynn Haven soils
0.1
2.0%
W
Water
2.6
86.9%
Totals for Area of Interest
3.0
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 3/27/2019
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

+ yl
$ Cl O
CD All
h CD`� +.V o
—�
' _ • _-.,���y' < �`:+ .ate-=' � �� � � '�r N `[ I
cn
CL
CL
nwow
r
f
f � L
ci��cs �`cnD3c o 'amc,��c,D�t •����'
a v,p�pOm� CAz�na�n0 ZpA� WOnNz 'lr
nOAn�mOOti ��p.Or�D� f•`.�;, '�';\-.'. �..
D=pvOZprL Z��'v�inDyD� cmN�vf�n0 � � ��� i
r
• vnmZ.1 M,l OZZQ2� Z>Zzl MH
jf yOZ inns Ow Atnp0.2>m SAnmDy�n
€ • Z m f^ = Om - c -
Otip�Zpnl1 D��DDp�D A ACm
C A�O?LI LI �Dmv'vine_ O m�m��`` w'
am
O rONDicn fn L1{ m=Av OOZEZ-
C�ZOOv'm ►1_ ri =3
n D mo O m ° m N m D m nOy m A o i' .�-. �. t - y• .�. -Fy .a�w rr+
Znv{i�Z11 m Zia
p_ O m n -
m D Z D 3
pmv �c m Amo mpm
O = 0
a� D
n
z y

P'
Photo One: View looking east at Jessup Pond
and at the Dam Failure.
-_--.;._•,.- fie_._ .ays,.�_�.,..-:.::..
_-
Photo Three: View looking southwest and at
Cedar Creek Rd.
Photo Two: View looking northwest and at
Jessups Pond
- � �� •l � � "1: AID
Photo Four: View looking west toward the
northern property corner at the Dam Failure.
JESSUP POND PROJECT
PHOTOSHF,F,T
PROJECT #
17.01903
MARCH, 2019 CUMBERLAND COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
�r �
mCg ' l' Shaping Communities TonethCT
1013 STATE FARM RDA❑ BaDNF, NC 2FM7 PH. 18281386-MO

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Jessups Pond City/County: Fayetville, Cumberland County Sampling Date: 3/20/19
Applicant/Owner: State of North Carolina State: NC Sampling Point: Pond In
Investigator(s): Jon Swaim Section, Township, Range: Fayetville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drained Pond Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 34.862171 Long:-78.729040 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: W, LaB NWI classification: PUBHh
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil X or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil sample taken to determine jurisdictional limits of 'normal pool level' of Jessups Pond and surrounding wetlands. Dam failure has resulted in
drainage of pond during hurricane Michael 2016.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
X Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Pond In
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Taxodium distichum 40 Yes OBL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Taxodium distichum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
40 =Total Cover
20 20% of total cover: 8
25 Yes OBL
25
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20 )
1.
Myrica cerifera
25
Yes
2.
Vaccinium corymbosum
10
Yes
3.
Ligustrum japonicum
10
Yes
4.
5.
6.
45
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
23
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1.
Juncus effusus
25
Yes
2.
Carex spp
35
Yes
3.
Scirpus cyperinus
25
Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
85
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
43
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
5
FAC
FACW
UPL
FACW
FAC
FACW
17
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 87.5% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 65 x 1 = 65
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
Column Totals: 195 (A) 415 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.13
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Pond In
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3
10YR 3/2
100
Mucky Sand Drained Pond Bottom
3-7
10YR 4/3
100
Mucky Sand Drained Pond Bottom
7-14
10YR 7/1
100
Mucky Sand Drained Pond Bottom
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
X Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirement Control Symbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
(Authority: AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Jessups Pond City/County: Fayetville, Cumberland County Sampling Date: 3/20/19
Applicant/Owner: State of North Carolina State: NC Sampling Point: Pond Out
Investigator(s): Jon Swaim Section, Township, Range: Fayetville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drained Pond Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 34.861857 Long:-78.728915 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: LaB NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Soil sample taken to determine jurisdictional limits of 'normal pool level' of Jessups Pond and surrounding wetlands. Dam failure has resulted in
drainage of pond during hurricane Michael 2016.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Pond Out
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:
_ =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
_ =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
_ = i oiai cover
20% of total cover:
_ =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Pond Out
MDsoiute uominam
inuicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus echinata
40 Yes
UPL
Number of Dominant Species
2. Pinus taeda
25 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Quercus phellos
10 No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28.6% (A/B)
75 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Pinus echinata
25 Yes
UPL
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Pinus taeda
15 Yes
FAC
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
3. Quercus phellos
5 No
FAC
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
4.
UPL species 120 x 5 = 600
5.
Column Totals: 205 (A) 885 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.32
45 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20 )
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Ligustrum japonicum
20 Yes
UPL
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
2. Festuca heterophylla
35 Yes
UPL
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
6.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Andropogon virginicus
30 Yes
FACU
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3.
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Pond Out
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 5/4 100 Sandy
6-12 10YR 6/6 95 10YR 7/4 5 MS PL/M Sandy
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0