20191527 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191105

DWR
IDIOM n of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
21nitial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
G Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned * Version#*
20191527 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required What amout is owed?*
* Fee received r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Central Office - [phone] Rob Ridings:eads\rgridings
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Sam's Branch Greenway - Grade Separated Corssing (TIP# 1L5530LA)
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Joshua Baird, PE
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
11/5/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Neuse River
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
27-(38.5)
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.662592
Longitude:
-78.442597
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
FA. Processing Information U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Johnston
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
r Yes r No
(NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number:
TIP #U-5530LA
WBS # (?)
44111.1.F5
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:

W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1b. What types) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r' Regional General Permit (RGP)
r' Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
fJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
F Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
F Individual Permit
33 - Temporary Construction
le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
W Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r- Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
C Yes r No
F. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
rJ Owner r- Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Town of Clayton (Linear Transporation Project)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
n/a
2c. Responsible party:
Joshua Baird, PE
2d.Address
Street Address
111 East Second Street
Address Line 2
city
Clayton
Postal / Zip Code
27520
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
State / Ftovince / fbgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
*
r- Yes r No
r Yes r- No

[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
William Sullivan
4b. Business Name:
Kimley-Horn
4c.Address
Street Address
421 Fayetteville St
Address Line 2
Suite 600
aty
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Cade
27601
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
02_SamsBranch_AA_signed.pdf
State / Rovince / ftion
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
513.42KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Clayton
2 Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
WA (Linear Transportation Project)
2c. Project Address
Street Address
46 Atwood Dr
Address Line 2
CKY
Clayon
Rostal / Zip Code
27520
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
%use River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
27-(38.5)
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located iri
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202011103
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
State / Rovince / fagion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project study area perpendicularly crosses North O'Neil Street just south of Atwood Drive in Clayton, Johnston County, NC. The study area is bounded to the south by the locally -
named Sam's Branch (UT to the Neuse River), to the east by the Ashcroft residential development, to the north by farmland, and to the west by Sam's Branch Greenway and forestland.
Land use in the vicinity of the project area is composed of residential developments, forestland, and farmland.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*

O Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
Sam's Branch Greenway - DWR Project No. 20100068; DWR Project No. 20160071 ver 2, USACE AID (SAW-2016-00301)
Project History Upload
SAW-2016-00301 NWP 14 for Sams Branch Greenway.pdf
Sam's Branch Greenway 401 Certification. pdf
5.89MB
727.58KB
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig2_U5530_USGS.pdf 715.27KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fig4_U5530LA_Clunnel_SoilSurvey.pdf 769.39KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
8
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to connect two segments of the Sam's Branch Greenway.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The project proposes construct a grade -separated pedestrian crossing under O'Neil Street to connect two previously disconnected greenway sections. The project will hold the
elevation of the existing O'Neil Street and route the greenway below the fillslope via a box culvert. The project will remove an existing stub of Sam's Branch Greenway and realign to
cross O'Neil Street at a more feasible location. Excavators, pavers, and other equipment typical of greenway projects will be used.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
U-5530LA_Roadway _Plans.pdf 699.63KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
Sa. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r: Yes r No O Unknown
Comments:
Kimley-Horn staff delineated the project area in 2014, 2018, and 2019.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Ross Sullivan, William Sullivan, Jason Hartshorn
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
BufferLetter_U-5530LA Sams Branch Greenway - Grade Seperated Crossing.pdf 3.02MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
The proposed Sams Branch Greenway Grade Separated Crossing is a complete project With two logical termini. No additional phases will result from the construction of this crossing.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory v
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands W Streams -tributaries ® Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
3. Stream Impacts

3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
F1
(�)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Construction Access
Tem ora
P rY
Other
Stream S2 (LIT to Neuse ��17777�13oth
]�;;Tlinear
River)
feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
0
31. Total stream and ditch impacts:
8
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
8
3j. Comments:
Temporary impacts to allow for construction access will result to stream S2. Temporary impacts will be restored to pre-ebsting conditions upon
completion of the project.
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR)
6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)?
Check all that apply.
V Neuse r Tar -Pamlico
r Catawba r Randleman
r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake
r Other
6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp . Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact 6d11
11
Site 1 - Greenway Crossing
P
Stream S2 (LIT to %use River)
No
1,365
1,609
Site 2 - Greenway Crossing
P
Sam's Branch (LIT to Neuse River)
No
9
104
6h. Total buffer impacts:
Total Temporary impacts:
Total Permanent impacts:
Zone 1
Zone 2
0.00
0.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
1,374.00
1,713.00
Zone 1
Zone 2
Total combined buffer impacts: 1,374.00 1,713.00
6i. Comments:
Permanent impacts to buffer zones 1 and 2 will occur as a result of the proposed greenway crossing.
Supporting Documentation
U-55301.A_Permit Drawings_(2019-11-04).pdf 1.17MB
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Impacts to streams and buffers were avoided and minimized to the extent practical throughout the planning and design of the project. Additionally,
measures were taken to completely avoid permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters within the project area. This includes shortening of the new
storrrnvater outfall and installing rip rap outside of the jurisdictional feature. Impacts to riparian buffer zones have been avoided to the extent practical
by aligning the greenway connection and tunnel primarily outside of the riparian buffer zones and by tightening proposed fill slopes where possible. All
temporarily impacted areas will be returned to pre-existing condition upon completion of the project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Impacts to streams and buffers within the project area will be minimized to the extent practical throughout the construction process by avoided these
areas whenever possible. Where feasible, construction equipment staging and access will be located in upland areas outside of the riparian buffer
zones. Additionally, silt fencing and other standard Best Management Practices (BMPs) and measures will be used throughout the construction
process to minimize runoff and impacts to nearby surface ureters. All temporarily impacted areas Will be returned to pre-existing condition upon
completion of the project.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?

r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Stream S2 is an intermittent channel and proposed impacts will be temporary in nature, therefore, no stream mitigation is proposed. Additionally, buffer impacts will result from the
proposed greenway connection and are therefore "Allowable" under the Neuse River Basin Buffer Table of Uses.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
W Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2019-11-04_LL55301A_EC Plans_Revised.pdf 7.75MB
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
3. Stormwater Requirements
3a. Select whether a completed stormwater management plan (SMP) is included for review and approval or if calculations are provided to document the project will not cause
degradation of downstream surface waters.*
r Stormwater Management r Antidegradation
Plan Calculations
3b. Stormwater Management Plan
LL55301-A_SMP_(2019-11-04).pdf
3c. Antidegradation Calculations:
252.08KB
Comments:
Stormwater will be treated through vegetated conveyances where possible. Stormwater runoff from the project site flows into Sam's Branch and ultimately into the Neuse River. Impacts
to water quality have been reduced by utilizing existing stormwater conveyances and mimicking existing drainage patterns. Runoff from the culvert is captured on the low side of the
culvert in an existing ditch. The 18" pipe system
outfalls (with rip rap outlet protection) in Buffer Zone 1 into an existing conveyance.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
r Yes r No
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House?*
r Yes r No
NEPAor SEPAFinal Approval Letter
LL55301-A Signature Page_051716.pdf 708.38KB
LL55301-A Consultation Form_Signed_WMC.pdf 56.43KB
LL55301-A PCE Checklist FINAL 5-17-16.pdf 3.55MB
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)

3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes
r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a single and complete project connection two previously disconnected greenway sections. No future development will result
from the construction of the proposed project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?
f Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r^ Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r^ Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
As of June 27, 2018, the t1SFWS lists six protected species as occurring in Johnston County: bald eagle, red -cockaded woodpecker, dwarf
wedgemussel, Tar River spinymussel, yellow lance, and MIChau)es sumac. Suitable habitat for red -cockaded woodpecker, Michaw>ts sumac, and bald
eagle is not present within the project area. Due to the lack of permanent impacts to aquatic resources, it is anticipated that the proposed project will
have no effect on dwarf wedgemussel, Tar River spinymussel, or yellow lance.
Consultation Documentation Upload
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes
r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
The NOAA EFH mapper was reviewed on 11/5/2019 and no EFH eras identified in or near the project area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r^ Yes
r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The HPOWEB GIS web mapper reviewed on 11/5/2019 and no National Registry or Study Listed sites are located within 0.5 mile of the project area. A
seeping letter was sent to the NCSHPO as part of the PCE process as to which a response of "No Comment" was received.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes
r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The pedestrian culvert is anticipated to reduce flood elevations. The Town of Clayton will ensure FEMA compliance prior to construction.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA DFIRM Panel 3720166900K (effective 06/2012018)
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Fig1_U5530_Vicinity.pdf 372.16KB
Fig3_U5530_Airlmage.pdf 1.67MB
Signature

fJ By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
William Sullivan
Signature
WIcMII* 6��
Date
11 /5/2019