20191524 Ver 1_401 Application_20191107

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
r Yes '- No
ID#*
20191524
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?* O Yes
IS No
Reviewer List:*
Select Reviewing Office:*
Submittal Type:*
401 Application
Zan Price:eads\gaprice
Asheville Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
I:
No

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: Alea Tuttle
Who is sutxritting the inforrra6on?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: 355 London Road
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Buncombe
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
1047_PCN_Submitted 11.4.2019.pdf 8.51VIB
Only pdf or Igre files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:

The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf ofMcMaster Real
Estate Group LLC represented by Mr. Matt McMaster. The project site is located off London
Road in Buncombe County, North Carolina. McMaster Real Estate Group LLC is seeking a
Nationwide Permit 29 for the conversion of wetlands to upland area suitable for construction, in
order to accommodate the development of four proposed subdivided residential lots.
A copy of this package has been sent to Ms. Andrea Leslie of the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission and Mr. Byron Hamstead of the US Fish and Wildlife Resources. A courtesy copy
of this application has also been sent to Mr. Zan Price of the NC Division of Water Resources,
Asheville Regional Office. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any
questions or comments.
V By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

CLearWater
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.cwenv corn
November 4, 2019
Ms. Amanda Jones
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2638
RE: 355 London Rd (+1- 0.7 Acres)
Nationwide Permit 29
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Jones,
The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted on behalf of McMaster Real
Estate Group LLC represented by Mr. Matt McMaster. The project site is located off London
Road in Buncombe County, North Carolina. McMaster Real Estate Group LLC is seeking a
Nationwide Permit 29 for the conversion of wetlands to upland area suitable for construction, in
order to accommodate the development of four proposed subdivided residential lots.
A copy of this package has been sent to Ms. Andrea Leslie of the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission and Mr. Byron Hamstead of the US Fish and Wildlife Resources. A courtesy copy
of this application has also been sent to Mr. Zan Price of the NC Division of Water Resources,
Asheville Regional Office. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
i
Alea K. Tuttle Aement dle, P.W.S
Biologist Principal
Copy Fwnished:
NC Wildlife Resources Commission— Andrea Leslie (Email)
US Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville —,Byron Hamstead (Email)
NC Division of Water Resources, Asheville — Zan Price (I -submittal)
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-698-9800 Tel

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder Assign Action ID Number in ORMFI
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: 355 London Rd
2. Work Type: Private 17 Institutional1-1 Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form Bad and 133e]:
The project will subdivide the existing residential lot into four separate lots. The purpose of the
project is to construct four residential single family homes
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41:
Matt McMaster Real Estate Group
S. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form AS —or ORM Consultant ID Number]: ClearWater Environmental Consultants
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 65b]:
7. Project Location -Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
355 London Rd, Asheville, NC. 28803; (35.55411,-82.532598)
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bia]: 9647-95-4277-00000
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Buncombe
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Asheville, NC
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Sweeten Creek
12. Watershed / S-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: 06010105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 7 Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29
Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Scott McLendon, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
-and-
NC D_WR, Webscape Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
I, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby authorize
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) to act on my behalf as my agent during the
processing of jurisdictional determination requests and permits to impact Wetlands and Water of
the US subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10
of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information as
needed at the request of the USACE or DWR.
Additionally, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, US Army Corps of Engineers
to enter upon the property herein described for the purposes of conducting onsite investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Wetlands and Waters of the US subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899.
Property Owner of Record: �.
Property Owner Address:
Phone Number: Q,
Email address:
Property Location:
Owner/Managing pf
Owner/Managing printed name: mo&�
Dater
32 Clayton Street,
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
www.cwenv.com

COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE, NORTH CAROLlNA
Web Property Record Card
9647-95-4277-00000
Date Printed: 10/21/2019
�« Back � Parcel Details'
I Owner information
Owners:
MCMASTER REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC
Address:
230 MONTFORD AVE
ASHEVILLE NC 28801
Properly Location:
355 LONDON RD
Taxing Districts
County:
Buncombe County
City:
ASHEVILLE
Fire:
School:
Year Exemption Valve
2011 1 77,200
Parcel Information
Total Property Value:167,800
Status:
Active
Deed Date:
9/4/2019
Deed Book/Page:
5807 / 0930
Plat Book/Page:
0154 / 0019
Legal Reference:
TRANSFER BY DEED
Location:
355 LONDON RD
Class:
RES
Neighborhood:
RES/AV/ASH-07
Subdivision:
GAY GREEN
Sub Lot:
12 & PT 11
Conservation/Easement: N
Flood:
N
Additional Tax Bill Adjustments
Ownershiu History
Transfer Date
Price
Legal Reference
Deed Book/Page
Qualified
Vacant When Sold
Seller Names
09/04/19
$205,00o
TRANSFER BY DEED
5807 / 0930
Yes
No
JOSEPH F SIMPSON
JOSEPH F 3IMPSON
06/29/76
$0
INHERITOR
1144 / 0713
No: C
No
MYRTLE L SIMPSON
Assessment History
Year
Acres
Land
Bldgs
Other Impr
Assessed
Desc
Exemptions
Deferred
Taxable
2019
0.68
40,200
127,600
0
167,800
0
0
167,800
2018
0.68
40,200
127,600
0
167,80o
ELD
o
0
167,800
2017
0.68
40,200
127,600
0
167,80o
ELD
83,goo
0
83,900
2o16
0.68
135,500
102,5000
138,000
10
0
138,000
2015
0.68
35,500
102,50010
138,000
10
0
138,000
2014
0.68
35,500
102,500
0
238,000
10
0
138,000
2013
0.68
35,500
102,5000
138,000
0
0
138,000
2012
0.68
28,700
125,700
0
154AOO
0
0
154,400
2011
0.68
28,700
125,700
0
154,400
0
0
154AGO
2010
0.68
28,700
94,600
0
123,300
0
0
123,300
2009
0.68
28,700
94,600
0
123,300
0
0
123,300
2008
0.68
28,700
94,600
o
123,300
0
0
123,300
2007
0.68
28,700
94,600
0
123,300
0
0
123,300
2006
0.68
28,700
94,600
0
123,300
0
0
123,300
2005
0.68
24,goo
71,4.00
0
96,300
0
0
96,300
2004
0.68
24,900
71,400
0 i96,300
1
0
0
96,300

2003
o.6$
124,900171,400
10
196,300
10
10
2002
0.68
124,900171,400
10
196,300
0
10
2001
0.68
125,700149,800
10 175,500
0
10
Land Data
Segment*
Total Acres: o.68 Land Value:
Acreage 40,200
Units Descripti
Other
Improvements
Value: o
on
1
0.68 Acreage
LOT IN AC
96,300
96,300
Building Structures
Res. Building ED Style Sq Feet Bsmt SgFt Bsmt Finished Year Built Grade Condition Value
1 A FRAME 1,274 96o 0 1980 C N 127,600
Refinement Description Built -Ins
Foundation PIERS Full Baths
Roof Type GAMBREL W/ COMP. SHGL. Fireplace/Gas Log
HVAC HEAT NO A/C Bedrooms
Section
SgFt
# Stories
OPEN PORCH
24
1
UNFINISHED BSMT.
96o
1
OPEN PORCH
24
1
DECK
2801
1
LIVING AREA LEVEL 2
314
1
LIVING AREA LEVEL 1
96ol
1
units
Basement Garage # Can 11
16 E 18 UnSkaohad SubArea
16 2 RUBA 960
6
20
8 RDK Yrm19&
6 $
4
R LA1 24
(Q00)
16 0 .3 16
RQPL
(24)
26
3
14
R LA2
a (314 )
20
Total Building Value:127,600

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing:
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
© Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
355 London Road
2b. County:
Buncombe
2c. Nearest municipality I town:
Asheville
2d. Subdivision name:
Gay Green
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
39. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
McMaster Real Estate Group, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
5807/0930
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Matt McMaster
3d. Street address:
230 Montford Ave
3e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
3f. Telephone no.:
843-478-2326
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
QX Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
R. Clement Riddle
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Clearwater Environmental Consultants Inc.
5c. Street address:
32 Clayton Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
828-698-9800
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History j
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9647-95-4277-00000
1 b, Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.55411 Longitude: -82.532598
1 c. Property size:
10,68 acres
2. surface waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Sweeten Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Upper French Broad River / 06010105
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site consists of a residential parcel with a dwelling unit and two gravel driveways. Part of the residential lot is forested and partially maintained as
mowed lawn and managed garden areas. The general land use in the vicinity is residential and commercial lots,
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.084
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project purpose Is to subdivide the existing residential lot into four separate lots, and to construct a dwelling unit within each of the 3 additional lots.
0
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes construction of three dwelling units, and improvements to the two gravel driveways. Typical earthmoving equipment would be use
l�
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property 1 project (including all prior Comments: Refer to Attachment ma and data
phases) in the past?
p
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? ❑Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
6. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for []Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions,
6. Future Project Plans
Ga. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
© Wetlands
2. Wetland Impacts
❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
If there are wetland
impacts proposed on the
site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.08
W2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
No
Corps
0.004
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.084
2h. Comments:
Wetlands W1 and W2 would be converted to upland areas suitable for construction using clean fill.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary
impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
type
Temporary
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d,
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g,
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10 1

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Wetland areas were unable to be avoided due to the small lot sizes, each consisting of approx 0.16 acres. Impacts are necessary in order to meet the
project purpose of providing site access and building the three proposed residential dwellings with driveway access.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All construction equipment would be operated from high ground. Sediment and erosion control measures and best management practices would be
utilized on -site.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes X❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S, or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes © No
within one of the NC I%I arian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 32 %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? 0 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
A stonTmater management plan will be reviewed and approved by the City of Asheville. The City of Asheville is a delegated local authority for the
review and approval of stormwater management plans
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? Asheville
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Asheville
❑X Phase 11
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP❑
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes 0 No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2008-246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes
X❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes
X❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project will not result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the roposed project or available capacity of the subject facility.
Ns
Wastewa er generated from project would be disposed of via existing sanitary sewer and treated at the Asheville municipal wastewater
treatment
facility.
Page 9 of 10
PC Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangened Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes X❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes © No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CEC Consulted the FWS List of Federally Endangered species, and NC Natural Heritage program data server. The site is not in a Hydrologic Unit
Code (HUC) identified as having known occurrences of hibemacula or matemity sites for Northern Long Eared Bats. (Attachment B)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystems IMS. Impact will not occur in a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑ No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places records maintained by the NCSHPO and available on SHPO's HPOWEB GIS Service. The Biitmore Estate
National Register Boundary (HPO Site ID: BN1835) is located +I- 0.6 miles west of the project. It is the opinion of CEC the project will have no effect.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project Occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? T-13
Yes X❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
CEC consulted FEMA FIRM Panel 37009647001 effective 1/6/2010 (Figure 7)
P. C t e.IA &,,
�)? 4,�//
�i
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
pplicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

355 London Rd (+/- 0.7 AC)
Mrea�
Asheville 11e4e g'* "000,
19 yao st Go u a
ri4d ffO p�ro� if
-
N \ i 1
IO
'r Aiax�' IS
O d
, .J
p 4 4 y a, 70
1 funnel RdSt 100
aq- +`74; 81
(1nrnQstan 5t#Iontiag Rd aC, � � 4.6
`�aidand Rd
P � Flo
81
9
10,10
Fain�orrr RYe
Winery vta ey
Maul
4dillYtaF Ave
d y Wyatt St
Project Boundary
�'p. 'fir 4e � �`�►� Rd
ark 114d
4
Park e�
r � V4
s�Sk �a
8116bee'O fcte
-AV
a
n N
C ¢ I
81ITMOrt lltmore
Legend°� ��,��� ���'�tcountn �.1u4 forest fp
o 0.5 1 2
I Project Area I5�ur�Ha � Miles
C--
Drawn by- BWY 5.31.2019: CEC Projectli 1047 tkv
ri dam
Buncombe County, . " Ler Vicinity Map
North Carolina Figure l
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28901

355 London Rd (+/- 0.7 AC)
- 91100.
N.
,
f M r" • I ya - � -
1
��� .y ^ � � �r .✓• , ^ � ♦ � ' � e _'..�, 'cam'. -
L;' ��. L— � ` : w r • � '� net � l ^• �' • • • � f
Project Boundary
.4 `t �" ■ � ri ��1� � ^• �' ail, s ♦. � `4y �'"� �t
J.
10
-
y
� "`��� � t fi e� i I �+/' F ■ ^w4 i � r 4 ;Y � r I � � .fir
I
.
Legend ' �� 4 � ; � � ,• �a-� �-�-r."'ti.�..�°�# �: X " � ��
a ' 4
----• N'[tn .0 0.2h 0.5 irk.
I Project Area
t -- ■ Miles
wn dY: ¢ - w'' --- _
f,
ph
Buncombe County, ' V ber USGS Topographic Map
North Carolina Asheville Quad
32 Clayton Street Figure 2
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

355 London Rd (+I- 0.7 AC)
! I'
f j .
i
Prpjed SOLI ldary
Ili '"J41
QW
rr ,y
*.
+ �.
r ..ter y� 1
r• - t � � �, - 'ter .. -r"i� - J N +'
Legend
— -- • o 1 0
i-- --- ? Project Area .� r zs so
Feet
0
)s$wnbV. $V1A;5�39.3A'la, v �_ f+rpA.ypi ICO p
Buncombe County, GRa' V Haber Aerial Map
North Carolina NCCGIA (2015)
32 Clayton Street Figure 3
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

355 London Rd (+/- 0.7 AC)
`
"� I
I J
i t
1 •
" - r OF •
project Boundary 1 44 �
ON
Alf
.i
w�
7mC 11 —
N r�
• s
OW 4W­1
Legend ;', r
N
— —I Project Area ' ►
Soil
e s l
CuD - Clifton -Urban land complex
0 25 `0 100
TmC - Tate -Urban land complexTIFeet
C;?'�w*•'ry.3y� �i_ii� eGilRi 1��,
Buncombe County, &" `e r USDA Soil Map
North Carolina Figure 4
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

355 London Rd (+/- 0.7 AC)
Impact W1 •OAM AC N,
yA Typical Residence
approximately 1376 sqft,
with 540 soft drivewav

355 London Rd (+/- 0.7AC)
" I .' 1. 1
Y
1,
I
5
i
rs -yF ifh b �'L 1=1
I.
•a s
Legend '£
ProjectAreaj
�:'N:Ffi iP5f.'I i♦`'F :rJI D'... 1/iwml.L_,
Buncombe County,
North Carolina
M,
A•
_T 'tea 11
IL
Project Boundery
tfi N
02, — 0.5
Miles
GearWaber FEMA Floodplain Map
FIRM Panel3700964700J
32 Clayton Street Figure 6
Asheville, North Carolina 28801

Attachment
Wetland Delineation

355 London Rd (+/- 0.7 AC)
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have been located within sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble mapping
grade Global Positioning System (GPS) and the subsequent differential oorrection of that data. GPS points may demonstrate
uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative cover, and/or multipath signal error.
I
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximate. These areas have been flagged in the field, however, they
have not been surveyed. Although Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our assessment, the US Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that can make final decisions regarding jurisdictional wetland and waters of the US
delineations. Therefore, all preliminary determinations are subject to change until written verification is obtained. CEC strongly
recommends that written verification be obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the property, beginning any site work, or making
any legal reliance on this determination.
A
I
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information available to CEC at the time of production. This map is for informational
° purposes only and should not be used to determine precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal descriptions.
This map shall not be construed to be an official survey of any data depicted. f
ad
Of.
41
At
4
Potential Waters of the US
We tland Wate n•s
Legend g #Name Area (AC) I .
N ,p" 111
' I Project Area
W1 0.08
- .. Potential Wetland Waters of the US W2 0.004Total 0.084
3" PVC Pipe r _ULM
.410 25 50 100
4' contour lines _ i ® meet
[Leal Eer Delineation Map
Buncombe County, North Carolina Site Delineated June 4, 2019
32 Clayton Street
Asheville. North Carolina 28801

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Conbol0, 0710•xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region RequlmmeMControl Symbol MMPT.-
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (AuthodW. AR 335-15, parag►aph 5-29)
Project/Site: 355 London Rd City/County: Asheville, NC Sampling Date: 6-4-2019
Applicant/Owner: McMaster Real Estate Group State: NC Sampling Point: W1
Investigator(s): AT, CA, AP Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130B Lat: 35.553976 Long:-82.532606 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CuD Clifton -Urban land complex NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology originates at base of hilislope. Landscape modified with mowing, ornamentallinvasive plants. Soil is disturbed: area consists
mainly of urban fill dirt. Wetland is on top of an underground sanitary sewer.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators minimum of two reuired
Primaa Indicators minimum of one is reguired,, check all that a I
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
X Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2) X
hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (810)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (CB)
—Drift Deposits (133)
!Other
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _._
lain in Rks)
(Explain Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—
Iron Deposits (B5)
^_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
—Shallow Aquitard (133)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: W1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Salix nigra
50
Yes
OBL
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Juglans nigre
5
No
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (AIB)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
55
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover.
28
20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 50 x 1 = 50
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1.
Rosa multitlora
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
2.
Elaeagnus angustifolia
10
Yes
FACU
FACU species 61 x 4 = 244
3.
Cercis canadensis
2
No
FACU
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
4.
Symphodcarpos orbiculatus
2
No
FACU
Column Totals: 146 (A) 414 (B)
5.
Hibiscus syriacus
5
No
UPL
Prevalence Index = BIA = 2.84
6.
Cyperus esculentus
5
No
FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
g.
X 3 - Prevalence index is 53.0'
34
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
17
20% of total cover:
7
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Ranunculus repens
20
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Festuce
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitlons of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7•
SapiinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
10
20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Healers helix
30
Yes
FACU
2.
Ampelopsis brevfpedunculate
5
No
UPL
3.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2
No
FACU
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
37
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
19
20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116a1-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Lo62 Texture
Remarks
0-3 10YR 412 85
7.5YR 4/6 15 c m Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
3-6 10YR 312 75
7.5YR 416 25 c m Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
6-12 10YR 312 75
7.5YR 416 25 c m Sandy
Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:
PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (Al6)
_Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (Al0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (Ffi)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1)
`_Thick
_Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
Dark Surface (Al2)
? Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si)
`_Sandy
s Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
X Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
? Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENO FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers oMB comror#: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET— Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement ConholSymbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Aud- W: ARasa-15, pamgmph 5-2a)
ProjecUSite: 355 London Rd City/County: Asheville, NC Sampling Date: 6-4-2019
ApplicantlOwner: McMaster Real Estate Group State: NC Sampling Point: UP 1
Investigator(s): AT, CA, AP Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR N, MLRA 130E Lat: 35.554202 Long:-82.632536 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CuD Clifton -Urban land complex NWI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X , Soil X or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland point to north of wetland and house
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply,)
—Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_Surface Water (Al)
—Hydrogen
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_High Water Table (A2)
Sulfide Odor (C1)
_Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) —Presence
—Sediment
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Deposits (B2) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Stunted
_Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
or Stressed Plants (131)
_Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery("
_ShallowAquitard (133)
—Water—Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UP 1
Tres Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test workshest:
1.
Pinus siftus s0 Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0% (A1B)
7.
Prevalence index worksheet
80 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover.
16
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
SaoltngfShrub
Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense 10 Yes
FACU
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
2.
FACU species 175 x 4 = 700
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals:. 175 (A) 700 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = 61A = 4.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
9.
_
3 - Prevalence Index Is 13.0'
10 -Total Cover
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover. 5 20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Hemerocallis fulva 10 Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must bE
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tres -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5,
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
s.
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Hens -All herbaceous (nonAvoody) plus, regardless
it.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 -Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover. 5 20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Hede►a helix 75 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5'
Hydrophytic
75 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 38 20% of total cover:
15
present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 0116.44G, JUL 2013 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Samplina Point: UP 1
Profile Description: (Describe to lire depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
{inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TypeLae Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 314 100 LoamylClayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
kocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
—Histic
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 146)
_ 2 cm Muck (Ala) (MLRA 147)
Epipedon (A2)
^ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147,148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19)
Layers (W
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
2 cm, Muck (A10) (LRR N)
yDepleted
_ Redox Dark Surface (FS)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
Below Dark Surface (All)
_Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127,147,148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
— Sandy Mucky Mineral (81)
,Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrbc,(S4)
MLRA 136)
~ Sandy Redox (85)
— Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122,136)
'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surfaoe (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-110, JUL 2018 Eastem Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

Attachment 8
Threatened and Endangered Species

Endangered Species, Threatened Species,Federal Species of Concern,
and Candidate Species,
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Updated: 06-27-2018
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Allegheny woodrat
Appalachian Bewick's wren
Bachman's sparrow
Blotchside logperch
BQg turtle
Carolina northern flyingsquirrel
Cerulean warbler
Eastern small -footed bat
rya
Hellbender
Longhead darter
Northern long-eared bat
Northern saw -whet owl (Southern
Appalachian population)
Paddlefish
Pygmy salamander
Rafinesque's big -eared bat
Red crossbill (Southern
Appalachian)
Southern Appalachian black -
capped chickadee
Southern water shrew
5-notfin chub {—uise shiner),
Yellow -bellied sapsucker
(Southern Appalachian population)
Scientific name
Federal
Record Status
Status
Neotoma magister
FSC
Current
Thryomanes bewickii altos
FSC
Historic
Aimophila aestivalls
FSC
Historic
Pericina burtoni
FSC
Historic
Glyptemys muhlenbergii
T (S/A)
Current
Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus
E
Current
Dendroica cerulea
FSC
Current
Myotis leibii
ARS
Current
Myods grisescens
E
Current
Cryptobranchus alleganiensis
ARS
Current
Percina macrocephala
FSC
Historic
Myods septentrionalis
T
Current
Aegolius acadicus pop. I
FSC
Current
Polyodon spathula
FSC
Historic
Desmognathus %Wghii
FSC
Current
Corynorhinus rafinesguii
FSC
Historic
Loxia curvirostra
FSC
Current
Poecile atricapillus practices
FSC
Historic
Sorex palustris punctulatus
FSC
Current
Ei monax monachus
T
Historic
Sphyrapicus varius appalachiensis
FSC
Current

Invertebrate:
Appal Chian elktoe
41asmidonta raveneliana
E
Current
French Broad crayfish
Cambarus reburrus
FSC
Current
Rustyizatched bumble bee
Bombus affinis
E
Historic
Southern Tawny Crescent butterfly Phyciodes batesii maconensis
FSC
Historic
Spice -fir moss -spider
Micrzohexura montivaga
E
Current
Tanriflleshell
Epioblasma florentina walkeri (=E. E
Historic and Obscure
walkeri)
Vascular Plant:
Blue Ridge Goldenrod
Solidago spithamaea
T
Current
Blue Ridge Ragwort
Packers millefolium
FSC
Current
Bunched arrowhead
Sagittaria fasciculata
E
Historic
Butternut
Juglans cinerea
FSC
Historic
Cain's reedgrass
Calamagrostis cainii
FSC
Current
Fraser fir
Abies fraseri
FSC
Current
Fraser's loosestrife
Lysimachia fraseri
FSC
Historic.
French Broad heartleaf
Ha=tylis rhombiformis
FSC
Current
Grays lily
Lilium grayi
FSC
current
Granite Dome Goldenrod
Solidago simulans
FSC
Current
Mountain Sweet Pitcherplant
Sarracenia rubra ssp. Jonesii
E
Current
Piratebush
Buckleya distichophylla
FSC
Current
Spua-"g avers
Geum radiatum
E
Current
Virginia spiraea
Spiraea virginiana
T
Historic
Nonvascular Plant:
a liverwort
Plagiochila sharpii
ARS
Current
a liverwort
Plagiochila virginica var.
FSC
Current
caroliniana
Appalachian Pocket Moss
Fissidens appalachiensis
ARS
Historic
Lichen:
Rock gnomelichen
Gymnoderma lineare
E
Current
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
ARS = At Rik pecies. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting
species proposed for listing.
FSC--Federal Species of Concern. FSC is an informal term. It is not defined in the federal Endangered Species
Act. In North Carolina, the Asheville and Raleigh Field Offices of the US Fish and. Wildlife Service (Service)
define Federal Species of Concern as those species that appear to be in decline or otherwise in need of
conservation and are under consideration for listing or for which there is insufficient information to support
listing at this time.Subsumed under the term "FSC" are all species petitioned by outside parties and other
selected focal species identified in Service strategic plans, State Wildlife Action Plans, or Natural Heritage

Program Lists.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (P,�
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit hM:/lwww.fws.gov/migrant _rybirds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearan T(S/A&
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - the species has been observed in the county within the last 50 years.
Historic - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.

■ . 002 Ray Cooper, Governor
NC DEPARTMENT OF
REM NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES Susi Hamilton, Secretary
Walter Clark, Director. Land and Water Stewardship
NC N H D E-10543
October 22, 2019
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: London Rd Subdivision; 1047
Dear ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although. there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence: the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at n n or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOU4CES
,Of 121 Vv IC`J4E .ipu r nn� E344+. N1. i?ti()% 10M MAIL �LRvICt CLNILU, kALLR.144 NS' 2A;9'i
QFC :y1,1 707.QV • FAX III AY19121

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
London Rd Subdivision
Project No.1047
October 22, 2019
N CN H D E-10543
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Oornrr�an Name
�lem4)t
Accuracy
14ede�al
State
Glrybal
State
Group
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Butterfly
35201
Erynnis martialis
Mottled Duskywing
1900-06
X
5-Very
Significantly
G3
S2
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or
33442
Calopteryx amata
Superb Jewelwing
2004-Pre
H?
5-Very
Significantly
G5
S1S2
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Reptile
10970
Crotalus horridus
Timber Rattlesnake
1960
H
5-Very
---
Special
G4
S3
Low
Concern
Reptile
10451
Glyptemys
Bog Turtle
1978-05-15
H?
4-Low
Threatened
Threatened
G2G3
S2
muhlenbergii
Similar
Appearance
Vascular Plant
26318
Corallorhiza wisteriana Spring Coral -root
1957-04
H
3-Medium
-
Significantly
G5
Sl
Rare Other
Vascular Plant
35766
Crataegus paliens
Pale Hawthorn
1916-05-28
H
5-Very
Significantly
G1G2
Sl
Low
Rare Limited
Vascular Plant
35768
Crataegus senta
A Hawthorn
1922-04-29
H
4-Law
---
Significantly
G2
S1?
Rare
Throughout
Vascular Plant
28497
Gaylussacia orocola
Appalachian Dwarf
1896-05-25
H
3-Medium
---
Significantly
G1
S1
Huckleberry
Rare Limited
Vascular Plant
36773
Rosa virginiana
Virginia Rose
1897-06-11
H
5-Very
Significantly
G5
SH
Low
Rare
Peripheral
Vascular Plant
38028
Sagittaria fasciculata
Bunched Arrowhead
1896-05-26
H
4-Law
Endangered
Endangered
G2
Sl
Vascular Plant
9299
Sarracenia jonesii
Mountain Sweet
2006-06-15
BCr
2-High
Endangered
Endangered
G4T2
Sl
Pitcher Plant
Vascular Plant
24002
Trifolium reflexum
Buffalo Clover
1897-06-02
H
3-Medium
---
Threatened
G3G4
S1S2
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Page 2 of 4

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
M�nagec� Area Name �5�t . .
Buncombe County Open Space Buncombe County: multiple local Local Government
government
Deflnitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httns //ncnhde.nahureserve,nra/content/hel❑. Data query generated on October 22, 2019; source: NCNHP, 03 Jul 2019,
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database,
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-10543: London Rd Subdivision
%
4 cl�
V06,
04 Ra
Oakley
Billmore 6 2 �4
ILI
P.,
ftk,gh p,,
25
L­U,
Vr
C3 IN
1� wtr Lamar Rd
Shiloh
PAIt Rd
IE
4d,
P0,
,
AreZ.
.&I A,
N
led
wLoAp
+E CIAV
..
wear .11 V Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 4 of 4
1:20,621
0 0.176 0.35 0.7 ml
G 0.275 0.55 1.1 km
SwEld. HERE. Gwwi*n. Orftmp, 1nermwrt P Cwp,, GEDW. USM,
FAO, NPS. NRCAN. G"Beft IGK KWmIw NL. Ordmm Swm. Emd Jaw�
WN Eid CNm CHNG KwW, (0) DPwd&GWftIP =RrImAn, And ft GIS
UwCvmmunity