20091098 Ver 1_401 Application_20091009

0 9 1 0 9 8
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To:
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd, Ste 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
We are sending you the following items via: Hand Delivery
Date: 10/15/09 1 Project No, 109.17749A
Re:
Horse Park of the South
Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina
IPPAI
COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION
5 10/15/09 Pre-Construction Notification Application
REMARKS
Attached is our application for the above referenced site. Please sign below indicating that you have received our
application.
For questions or comments regarding this report, please contact Michael Brame.
,4 f. O C r 1,5 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WErLf!!JSANDSTr'PM aTE4BRAXN
Received by: Date:
.Y
ECS GARLN S, LL "Setting the Standard for Service"
_
EgUp
Geotechnical - Construction Materials - Environmental - Facilities
October 15, 2009

Ms. Cyndi Karoly
North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
401 Wetlands Unit
2321 Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Subject: Pre-Construction Notification Application
Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Horse Park of the South
Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina
ECS Project 09-17749A
Dear Ms. Karoly:

U /
`=J S V
U'1ETLANDS AND STORMWATER BRANC,4
Please find five copies of the Pre-Construction Notification Application for the above referenced
site. The site is located in Reidsville (Figure 1) and consists of an approximate 146.78 acre
tract. The tract contains undeveloped wooded land and fields. The site is being evaluated for
development with the Horse Park of the South and an associated access road.
The tract contains tributaries to Jones Creek. In order provide access to the site from Barnes
Street, an access road must be constructed. The road will cross an unnamed tributary to Jones
Creek, impacting 256 linear feet of perennial stream channel and 0.08 acres of wetland (Stream
Crossing Impact Exhibit, Sheet 2 of 2). In order to construct the necessary structures, including
the arenas, practice areas and barns/stables, it is necessary to impact 340 linear feet of
intermittent stream channel (Stream Impact Exhibit, Sheet 1 of 2).
On behalf of Rockingham County, I am requesting that a 401 Water Quality Certification be
issued to authorize the impact to 256 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 340 linear feet of
intermittent stream channel and 0.08 acres of wetland. There are no other stream or wetland
impacts associated with this project. We propose payment on a 1:1 basis to the EEP for
mitigation for the impact to 256 linear feet of perennial stream channel. The EEP acceptance
letter is attached.
4811 Koger Boulevard • Greensboro, NC 27407 - T: 336-856-7150 . F: 336-856-7160 www.ecslimited.corn
ECS Carolinas, LLP - ECS Florida, LLC - ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLC ECS Texas, LLP
Pre-Construction Notification Application
Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Horse Park of the South
Reidsville, Rockingham County, North Carolina
ECS Project 09-17749A
Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this
request or if additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely
consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
Michael T. Brame
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments: Pre-Construction Notification Application
401 Water Quality Certification Fee -$570.00
Stormwater Master Plan
Water Quality Pond Design Data
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Stream Impact Exhibits
EEP Acceptance Letter
Flood Insurance Rate Maps
Agent Authorization
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Soil Map
Figure 3 - Stream/Wetland Location Map
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms

Denise M. Poulos, LSS
Principal Scientist
2
,,. 1:3 8

W A
r
E ?? E n- ,ate
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version November 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ? Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ? Yes ® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes ® No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ® Yes ? No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below. ? Yes ® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes ® No
2. Project Information 1=1 M1 rw Ti 1" 11 ra ,IN
2a. Name of project: Horse Park of the South
2b. County: Rockingham UT 1-5
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Reidsville
2d. Subdivision name: ftl'LAWS AND STORMIKER BRANCH
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name on Recorded Deed: Rockingham County
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 1286-418, 1285-21, 1281-2165
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Michael Smith
3d. Street address: 371 North Carolina 65
3e. City, state, zip: Wentworth, North carolina 27375
3f. Telephone no.: 336-342-8349
3g. Fax no.: 336-342-8240
3h. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
Section A. Applicant Information, continued
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ? Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Michael Brame
5b. Business name
(if applicable): ECS Carolinas, LLP
5c. Street address: 4811 Koger Boulevard
5d. City, state, zip: Greensboro, N.C. 27407
5e. Telephone no.: 336-856-7150
5f. Fax no.: 336-856-7160
5g. Email address: mbrame @ecslimited.com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 891300199449, 891300193851, 891403203865
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 36.332675'N - 79.638042'W
1 c. Property size: 146.78 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Jones Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C
2c. River basin: Roanoke River Basin
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site contains undeveloped, wooded land and fields. US Highway 29 is located on adjacent property west of the site.
Commercial businesses and undeveloped wooded land are located west of US Highway 29. The site is bounded on the
north by Drum Road, single family residences and undeveloped, wooded land. Undeveloped, wooded land and
residences are located north of Drum Road. The site is bounded on the east by single family residences and Pickrell
Road. Single family residences are located east of Pickrell Road. The site is bounded on the south by undeveloped,
wooded land, fields, Holiday Loop Road and Barnes Street. Commercial and light industrial structures are located further
south.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
- 6,000 feet

3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a horse park, including the construction of barns that will contain 800
stables, an indoor arena, a covered arena, practice arenas, an A&T State University Equine Facility and barns that will
contain 800 stables.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The site will be cleared and graded so that buildings, arenas, parking areas and access roads can be constructed. The
Stormwater Master Plan, included as an attachment, shows the proposed site layout. Skidders, bulldozers, trackhoes,
pans, dump trucks, loaders and cranes will be used on the site. The access road that enters the site from the south will
impact 256 linear feet of perennial stream channel and 0.08 acres of wetland. A 54 inch RCP will be installed in the
location of the stream crossing. While the stream is being impacted, water will be pumped around the construction area.
A temporary dam will be constructed using sandbags and a temporary settling basin will be constructed downgradient of
the crossing that water will be pumped into before being discharged back into the stream channel. After the stream
crossing is prepared, the culvert will be placed using a crane. Rip rap, brought to the site in dump trucks, will be used to
protect the integrity of the pipe. After being installed, the water will be released through the pipe. The road crossing will
be brought to grade using dump trucks, bulldozers, trackhoes and pans. It will be paved after being brought to grade.
The slopes will be seeded and matted.
The barns and stables and associated grading will impact 340 linear feet of intermittent stream channel. A french drain
system with a 6 inch RPP and associated stone will be installed in the intermittent stream channel. The channel will be
prepared using a trackhoe. After being installed, the culvert/french drain system will be covered using on-site fill until
brought to grade. Bulldozers and pans will be used to do the work. The slopes will be seeded and matted to prevent
sediment from entering the streams. Upon completion, barns will be constructed in the location of the intermittent stream.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
s or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Cor
® Yes ? No ? Unknown
p
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ? Preliminary ? Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: ECS Carolinas, LLP
Name (if known): Michael T. Brame Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The site verification is scheduled for October 21, 2009. The site has not been verified.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ? Yes ®No El Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ® Pond Construction
Wetland Impacts
2
.
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
-- - -
2f
]
2a.
Wetland impact 2b.
Type of 2c.
Type of wetland 2d.
Forested 2e.
Type of .
Area of impact (acres)
number - impact (if known) jurisdiction
(Corps - 404,
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) DWQ - non-
404, other

W1 ®P ? T Fill -
Road Riparian -
Wooded
ED Yes ? No ® Corps
®DWQ 0.08
Crossing

W2 ?P?T El Yes [I No F1 Corps
?DWQ

W3 ?P?T El Yes El No ? Corps
?DWQ
-

W4 ?P?T ? Yes ? No
1 Corps
F
?DWQ

W5 ? P ? T ?Yes ? No [:1 Corps
? DWQ

W6 ?P?T ? Yes ? No ? Corps
?DWQ
Total wetland impacts 0.08
Comments: 0.08 acres of wetland will be filled. If the road crossing were shifted to the west, the wetland impacts would be
greater. If shifted to the east, the wetland impacts would be less but stream impacts would be greater because there are
more meanders.

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact 3b.
Type of 3c.
Stream name 3d.
Perennial (PER) or 3e.
Average stream width (feet) 3f.
Impact
length
number - impact intermittent (INT)? (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
S1 ®P ? T Culvert/ UT to Jones ® PER ? INT 5 256
Rip rapl Creek
S2 ® P ? T French UT to Jones ? PER ® INT 2 340
drain/Fill) Creek
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S4 ?P?T ?PER ?INT
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? INT
Total stream and tributary impacts 596
Comments: 256 linear feet of perennial stream will be impacted. More stream would be impacted if the culvert were shifted

LV ll 1r G- v1 • - -
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
4. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
4a. Will the project impact a protected ?Yes ®No
riparian buffer?
? Neuse ? Tar-Pamlico
4b. If yes, which basin? ? Catawba ? Randleman
? Other:
4c. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of
this form
.
Buffer impact Buffer
number - Reason mitigation Zone 1 impact (square Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) for impact Stream name required? feet) (square feet)
or Temporary
T

131 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
64 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B5 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
B6 ?P?T ?Yes ?No
Total buffer impacts
Comments: Protected riparian buffers will not be impacted by the proposed project. Voluntary 50 foot buffers are being left
along the streams on the site to protect water quality.
5. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water
of the U.S. then individual) list all open water impacts below.

Open water Name of
impact number
- Permanent waterbody
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
(P) or (if
applicable)
Temporary T

01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
Total open water impacts
r'nmmantc• TharP nrP no nrooosed impacts to open waters.
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued
6. Pond or Lake Construction
T6b, d or lake construction proposed, osed, then complete the chart below.
6a. 6c. 6d.
Open Wetland (acres)
water oposed use or
imparpose of pond Flooded
number Filled Excavated Flooded
P1 Stormwater
P2
P3
P4
6e.
Stream (feet) Upland
(acres)
Filled Excavated Flooded
3 Acres
Total) I I I I I
Comments: The stormwater pond is being constructed in an upland area on the western portion of the site.
6f. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
6g. Expected pond surface area (acres): 2.15 acres
6h. Size of pond watershed (acres): 87.21 acres
6i. Method of construction: Excavated in high ground
3 Acres
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1
Approximately 6,000 linear feet of stream channel and approximatelly 2 acres of wetlands are located on the
erformed a wetland and stream delineation on the site. The flags were surveyed and plotted on a map. Th
id

p
ee
prov
development was overlaid on the survey to avoid and minimize impacts to the jurisdictional areas. In order t
it is necessary to cross a perennial str
of Reidsville
the Cit
d b
i
,
y
y
re
access to the site from the south as requ
proposed stream crossing has been designed to cross the stream in an area where the stream and wetland impacts are
d t
o
the smallest relatibve to placing the road iacross other areas of the stream. Maximum allowable slopes are being use
minimize impacts from the road crossing.
In order to have a large enough area to accommodate a horse park/complex of the scale that is proposed on the site, it is
nthe northern portion of the proposed development area. A
d i
t
l
n
e
oca
necessary to impact an intermittent stream that is
50 foot undisturbed buffer is being placed along the perennial stream that the intermittent stream discharges into.
Retention walls have been designed to avoid additional impacts to the intermittent stream. and voluntary buffers. The
d buffers around the stream channels on the site to protect
b
di
t
ur
e
s
project has been designed with voluntary 50 foot un
water quality.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Water will be pumped around the construction area during the installation of the road crossing. The water will be pumped
d to re-enteri the perennial stream channel. A temporary retention basin
ll
b
i
owe
ng a
e
into a temporary catch basin before
will be constructed vat the down gradient end of the intermittent stream while the feature is filled. The intermittent stream
may or may not contain flow based on the conditions observed during the delineation. Temporary retention basins will be
constructed to remove sediment during grading of the site.

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ® Yes [I No
. impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): Z DWQ ® Corps
? Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ®Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 299 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Warm warm, cool, cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): NA square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: NA acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: NA acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: NA acres

r. r.,. pleto if ucinn a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ? Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Total impact Multi leer Required mitigation
Zone Reason for impact (square feet) p (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
Total buffer mitigation required:
6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6d. Comments: The site is located in a Class C watershed. There are no state mandated buffers. The client is proposing to
maintain 50 foot undisturbed buffers along both sides of the streams to protect water quality.
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
FE. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? ? Yes ® No
2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? ® Yes ? No
2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? ® Yes ? No
3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction
3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater ? Coastal counties
? HQW
management programs (check all that apply)? ? ORW
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the El Session Law 2006-246
approved stormwater management plan. ? Other:
3b. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Rockingham County
3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? ? Yes ® No
If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy
of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved
Stormwater management plan stamped as approved).
4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? 75%

4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for "high density" per ®Yes ED No
General Certifications 3704 and 3705?
4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the
stormwater management plan.
When developed, the site will have more than 24% impervious coverage. The stormwater runoff from all impervious
surfaces will be collected in a piped drainage system and will be conveyed to a stormwater wet detention pond designed
to provide 90% TSS removal. Runoff from the Horse Park site, the commercial subdivision and the NC A&T State
University site will all be conveyed to the stormwater pond.
4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted
®
Yes ? No
fnr aach ctnrmwntPr gMP?
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
orr e
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds Y es ®No
;
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of
S
t ? Yes ® No
e
ta
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ? Yes ® No
Comments: The site is receiving a grant from The Golden Leaf Foundation. To the
best of our knowledge a SEPA is not required for the proposed project.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
d
d
S
? Yes ® No
ar
s,
tan
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the=fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in E] Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project involves the development of an equestrian center. Measures have been taken to protect water quality at the
subject site. They include voluntary 50 foot stream buffers and minimization of impacts to streams and wetlands.
Additionally, standard erosion control measures will be implemented to prevent sedimentation of on-site and off-site
streams. It is not anticipated that this project will lead to additional development in the surrounding area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
A pump station will be constructed on the site that will pump sewage to lines located along Barnes Street, south of the
site. The lines ultimately convey sewage to the City of Reidsville Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
ndangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
E5aWill ? Yes No
abitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes ®No
impacts?
? Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
We reviewed the Endangered Species List that is maintained by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program for the
NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle that contains the site) and the Williamsburg, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle
Reidsville
,
that borders the site quadrangle to the east). There are no federally listed endangered or threatened species that have
been identified on either of the quadrangles. Based on our review of the database, the proposed project will not impact
endangered or threatened species or areas that may be considered potential habitat.
L
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There were no listed fish species on the endangered species list that reside in waters that cross the site. The waters on
the site are classified by the NCDENR Division of Water Quality as Class C waters. Based on the size of the streams, there is
no indication that trout inhabit the waters on the site. Small minnows were observed in the perennial streams.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We did not observe structures on the site that would be considered archaeologically significant. We did not observe
arrowheads or other artifacts on the site during our reconnaissance. To the best of our knowledge, there are no historic
or prehistoric cultural resources on the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? 7 11 Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NA
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM #s 3710891300J & 3710891400J
According to the maps, the site is located in Zone X, an area outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. Copies of the
maps are included as attachments.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information, continued
Michael T. Brame
L,4) 7 , ?4"?
October 14,
2009
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Date
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form - November 2008 Version
o

V?

N
?J
L
Z
O
a?

f-
Q ~ w
?
r- a
Z D
Z W
?Q
W W
Z F-

5
O
V)
W
U-
0
Y
a
W
(n J
2 Lai

V \I
J ?
e -"

wz
Qa
3
0
Q' F- I
w p
a
?
V)
3 ?z° 0o
z z5
W

3
W
a
a a oa

°
0
N
p ? z
m
O It

fi = U CD
W
Q H

z
J
J 4 F M

E

N
a
o
M a
?W
h W d
to
w

v?

Z
U a a n
N
lL Z
?
r

... d

$
N

o
W
~
o Y??o
a
0 o)
°
a g
3
O

T T
.i. >
o I
x
a m `"

z-
d
o °'
`°

CL

3-
i a 7 3
: a ` a
z
7?4-`- _ O

Z
a
----

U Z
a W
UJ a.
M O a
Om

U
r-
\ 1
y?
\
FProject: Horse Park of the South
Project No.: 09-154
Designed By: DKJ
Checked By: JNT Date: 10/14/2009
Revised: 1011412009
MATER QUALITY POND DESIGN
On-Site Drainage Area to Pond=
On-Site Proposed Impervious Area =
On-Site Future Impervious Area =
Total On-Site Impervious Area =
Total Project Site Area =
WATERSHED INFORMATION
87.21 acres Watershed =
65.40 acres Classification =
0.00 acres
65.40 acres 74.99% Drainage Area Impervious Percentage
87.21 acres 74.99%a Project Area Impervious Percentage
Offsite Drainage Area to Pond = 0.00 acres
Offsite Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Offsite Future Impervious Area = 0.00 acres
Total Offsite Impervious Area 0.00 acres
Total Watershed Area to Pond 87.21 acres
Graded Area to Pond = 65.40 acres
Temporary Sediment Storage Used = N
Temporary Sediment Storage = 0.00 ac-in.
Permanent Sediment Storage = 0.125 ac-in.
Current Composite Impervious Percentage = 74.99%
Maximum: Impervious Percentage = 75,00 %Q
Permanent Water Quality Pool Depth (3'min.) = 7.00 FT
Surface Area/ Drainage Area Ratio = 2.250%
Temporary Water Quality Depth to be Controlled = 1.0 Inch
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 705.50
Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 705.50
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 706.50
Elevation at Bottom of TWQ = 713.50
Elevation at Top of TWQ 715.75
Elevation at Emergency Spillway = 718.50
Elevation at Top of Dam = 720.00
Invert of Barrel = 705.50
Based on Max. Impervious %
Based on Max. Impervious %
Surface Area = 55,232 SF
Surface Area 55,232 SF
Surface Area = 59,014 SF
Surface Area = 93;342 SF
Surface Area = 107,428 SF
Elevation at Bottom of Pond = 705.50
Elevation at Bottom ofTWQ = 713.50
Surface Area = 55232 Square Feet
Surface Area = 93342 Square Feet
Allow 75% of Basin Volume To Water Quality Orifice =
305 Weat Fourth Street, Suite 1-A Phone [phone]
5timmel Aooociatea, P.A. Winoton Salem, NC 27101 Fax [phone]
39
Elevation at Bottom of PSS = 705.50
Elevation at Middle of PSS = 706.00
Elevation at Bottom of PWQ = 706.50
Surface Area = 55232 Square Feet
Surface Area = 57102 Square Feet
Surface Area = 59014 Square Feet
Volume Provided =
G
PERMANENT WATER QUALITY SURFACE AREA REQ'D 85475 Square Feet
Normal Pool Elevation = 713.50
Surface Area Provided = 93342 Square Feet
OK
Elevation at Bottom of TWO = 713.50
Elevation at Top of TWO = 715.75
Rv= 0.725 in
(Based on Max Imp.
Surface Area = 93342 Square Feet
Surface Area = 107428 Square Feet
Volume Provided =
F
Elevation at Top of Riser=
Elevation at Bottom of Water Quality Release Hole =
Maximum Release Rate =
Minimum Release Rate
Maximum Hole Size = 0.3365584
Minimum Hole Size = 0.13462336
715.75
713.50
2 Days
5 Days
7.86 in. dia.
4.97 in. dia.
ion at Normal Pool =
ion at Bottom Of Pond =
se Rate =
um Hole Size =
713.50
705.50
2 Day
0.634620605 10.79 in. dia.
305 West Fourth Street, 5uite 1-A Phone [phone]
Stimmel Aaaociatco, F.A. Winston Salem, NC 27101 Fax [phone]
Permit No
(to be provided by DWQ)
W A I'[ f,
NCDENR
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM a °-
401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM
WET DETENTION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form must be rifled out, printed and submitted.
The Required Items Checklist (Part 19) must be printed, rifled out and submitted along with all of the required information.
I.' PROJECT INFORMATION
Project name Horse Park of the South
Contact person Tom Robinson
Phone number [phone]
Date 1011412009
Drainage area number
II DESIGN INFORMATION
Site Characteristics
Drainage area 3,789,720 ftz
Impervious area, post-development 2,831,400 tC
% Impervious 74.71 %
Design rainfall depth 1.0 in
Storage Volume: Non-5A Waters
Minimum volume required
229,515 0'
1,238,864 ft3
OK
Volume provided
Storage Volume: $A Waters
1.5" runoff volume
Pre-development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
Post-development 1-yr, 24-hr runoff
Minimum volume required
Volume provided
Peak Flow Calculations
is the pre/post control of the lyr 24hr storm peak flow required?
1-yr, 24-hr rainfall depth
Rational C, pre-development
Rational C, post-development
Rainfall intensity,1-yr, 24-hr storm
Pre-development '1-yr,.24-hr peak' flow
Post-development 1-yr, 24=hr peak flow
Pre/Post I-yr, 24-hr peak flow control
Elevations
Temporary pool elevation
Permanent pool elevation
SHWT elevation (approx. at the perm. pool elevation)
Top of 10tt vegetated shelf elevation
Bottom of 1Oft vegetated shelf elevation
Sediment cleanout, top elevation (bottom of pond)
Sediment deanout, bottom elevation
Sediment storage provided
is there additional volume stored above the state-required temp, pool?
Elevation of the top of the additional volume
ft3
W
tf
0 ft3
ft3
-N (Y or N)
in
(unifless)
(unifless)
tnihr
tolsec
Wlsec
ft'/sec
OK, volume provided is equal to or in excess of volume required.
715.75 fmsl?-.? . _. .?.? _? ?.
713:50 frnsl
713.00 fmsl
714.00 first
713.00 tmsl Data not needed for calculation option #1, but OK if provided.
706.50 ftnsl
705,50 tmsi Data not needed for calculation' option #1, but OK it provided.
1.00 It
(Y or N)
715.8 fmsl OK
Form SW401-Wet Oetenhon Basin-Rev.7-8!13!09 Parts L & Ir. Design Summary. Page 1 of 2
Permit
Surface Areas
107
428 W
Area, temporary pool ,
953 ftZ
90
Area REQUIRED, permanent pool ,
2.40 (un(less)
SAIDA ratio
„w
Area PROVIDED, permanent pool, A.„ 93,342 W OK
_
bottom of 10ft vegetated shelf. Abuj) n
Area 86,293 ft`
,
Area, sediment deanout, top elevation (bottom of pond), Ab ,rte, 59,014 ft
Volumes
Volume, temporary pool
1,238,864 fe OK
Volume, permanent pool, Vp,n,W 514,515 ft3
Volume, forebay (sum of forebays if more than one forebay) 101,246 ft3
Forebay % of permanent pool volume 19.7%.% OK
SAIDA Table Data
90 %
Design TSS removal (Y or N)
Coastal SAIDA Table Used?
Mountainnedmont SAIDA Table Used? Y (Y or N)
SAIDA ratio 2.40 (unifiess)
Average depth (used in SAIDA table):
Calculation option 1 used? (See Figure 10-2b) Y (Y or N)
Volume, permanent pool, V,,,,,_w 514,515 ft' OK
Area provided, permanent pool, A,„. p, 93,342 ft` OK
Average depth calculated 5.51 it Check calculation. Need 3 it min.
Average depth used in SAIDA, d, (Round to nearest 0.511) TO it insufficient. Check calculation.
Calculation option2 used? (See Figure 10-2b) Y or N)
(
Area provided, permanent pool, Ap m_pw (
Area, bottom of 10ft vegetated shelf, Ab&,,w
Area, sediment cleanout top elevation (bottom of pond),. Abo_pow fe
'Depth' (distance blw bottom of 10ft shelf and top of sediment) fl
Average depth calculated it
Average depth used in SAIDA, da,,, (Round to nearest 0.5ft) it
Arawdown Calculations
Drawdown through orifice? Y (Y or N)
Diameter of orifice (if circular) 6.00 in
Area of orifice (if-non-circular) in'
Coefficient of discharge (Co) 0.60 (unitless)
Driving head (Ho) 2.25 it
Drawdown through weir? N (Y or N)
Weir type (unitless)
Coefficient of discharge (CW) (unitless)
Length of weir (L) It
Driving head (H) it
Pre-development l-yr, 24-hr peak flow elsec
Post-development 1-yr, 24-hr peak flow ft3/sec
Storage volume discharge rate (through discharge orifice or weir) folsec

Storage volume drawdown time 2.00 days OK, draws down in 2-5 days.
OK, drawdown time is correct.
Additional Information
Vegetated side slopes 3 :1 OK
Vegetated shelf slope 10 :1 OK
Vegetated shelf width 10.o it OK
Length of nowpath to width ratty 3 :1 OK
Length to width ratio 2.0 :1 OK
Trash rack for overflow & orifice? Y (Y or N) OK
Freeboard provided 1.0 it OK
Vegetated filter provided? N (Y or N) OK
Recorded drainage easement provided? Y (Y or N) OK
Capures all runoff atultimate build-out? Y (Y or N) OK
Drain mechanism for maintenance or emergencies Y
(to be provided by DWQ)
Form SW401-Wet Detention Basin-Rev.7-8/13M Parts !. & II. Design Summary, Page 2 of 2
i R Tr? c,? date. t :2-0 job 09-154 -
F? r, - -- -
i r
Stimme,
{J ?a.". ?L project: i ?orsf (- 2rK of 1Plf, 5outf;
? Landscape AfGtl1tP.Cti1fP 2
r,
`--^ Civil Engineering scale: ..1 -'you sheet ? of
3?6l-; r•
Somme' rA1,suciates, HN Land (Manning ? ,3? „oafs description: -,JRl[AMI ItvlPACI
exhibit
PERENNIAt?(?AM ` ill 75
RAT NING WAki ._ '•./ -
STRp v _?y vV `v t f?MPIStT `?V`?
_IM
Y _
! ? fir
i i? 'CV ? erg[ "
89.5
X\ fir \ t`.,i F
`,, ? 4 fir" ? \,?` ,' ? !'' t' ? ` •
It
cif
4 ?( s )oq
SCALE: 1 " =100'
s,? .??rli?1`*° 100 0 100

w 6? i h a e re_:

Landscape Architecture Y 1,
?,1 z,air

Civil Engineering

-Stirrmei a,scciate?, PA
Land Planning p "t t ,r;r
exhibit

date: 1 i2 09 Wit) #: t.c.-VA
PrOjeCt: Horse Park of th ` outh
scale: i ,=,00' sheet 1 of --
description: S- REAM i;ROSSINC;
IMPAM EXHIBIT
\. SQ' STREAM BOF'F>?
HORSE PARK . _
- SITE t
, XI
xW
3 37,3 .Ff,?
' PEg N14?L.?5iR INE_TUWQACT?? ! y -
760
755
750
745
740
735
730
725
720
11' --{ I 38' I r ii,
54' R
RIPRAP 2
APRON' 19 C STREAbI
--
WERt-
727. IPRAP 1
I OUT I RON
72 .20
760
755
750
745
740
735
730
725
720
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00
ITE
wiIIlii?lf/l//
w°
N
v ?
14985
tolls
SCALE: 1" =100'
100 0 100
1-3, stem
J7 a- e In 0
PROGRAM
October 5, 2009
Michael Smith
Rockingham County Facility Projects
371 NC Highway 65, Suite 200
Wentworth, NC 27375
Project: Horse Park of the South
Expiration of Acceptance: July 5, 2010
County: Rockingham
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept
payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that the payment will
be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these
agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must also com 1 with, all other stare, federal or local
This acceptance is valid for nine months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the
issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's
responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based
on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following
table
River
Basin CU
Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian._ Coastal Marsh
Impact Roanoke 03010103 0 0 299 0 0 0 0 0
Credits Roanoke 03010103 0 0 598 0 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies require
mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional mitigation, the
applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The mitigation will be performed
in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Andy Williams, USACE-Raleigh
Sue Homewood, NCDWQ-Winston-Salem
Michael Brame, agent
File
Sincerely, 9??4-37M-+a V
`--
Willi D. Gilmore, PE
Director
R?StDYY.GL9... E ... PYDtLGtl,GC9 our State
T
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net
Proposal for Wetland Delineation
Horse Park of f the South
Highway US-29 and NC 87
Rockingham County, North Carolina
ECS Proposal 04-14602 P
Januapy 12, 2004
XCS Cnviinas9 LLP
AGENT AUl{HG TION
TI Lis form author zes ECS to act as our meat in st eam/wedand. matters iuchuling U.S. Amy Carps of
Engineers and. North Carolina Division of Water Quality field verification and permit application.
Property Address: A Tract of land near Reidsville, NC bounded by
Highway Lis-29, Holiday Loop, Grooms Road, Pickrell
Road and Barnes Street Extension.
Owner h&mnation:
Name: Rockingham County North. Carolina
Address: 371 NC-65, Wentwroth, NC 27375
Telephone Number: 336-342-8349
Fax Number: 336-342-8240
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Signature A-/,< Bate 2 /-a - /,q

r
r'-
K_
Viewer

x
40 :
rN

r,.r i a w s,m.wrin? r. nrxwe? (*?ay.mir.. Rn/wr. hN ixs irwrri
' .a.n> a ?.....wR• ? ?r.sri rs+ewa ?.. ? w+w..swmw .+ ..e ri. n.
? '-? ? ernwi. ? w?ien..^. •+«, r . .. v., r,.ass. w.w.. v ware.w ?+.i .s,s..?
?' / . dili.? APr 4iiMi MMSWa ? _K ?wT. Wn Wit LLiwyu If(i+ H+i'i
i MSC
a"
T-
-
e
1
' ?w mr*a waoiv. a rw ..-us.
•wr wy .w.r. #.9 i...iii M1..,... r a... .., r mt
aFr?wr ers.?ro ra r.+uniro mi cx ?..z..w .. iw
ro mn?P 14 a+vp MMti M?'MW B.r9. w.-. rr.'a
tx4 a rrY v. iv gyn. sfyy? a B3.•`.]r. -.-...
P/?r+rw M!• wN 4,1 b Fw 4?aw+.rrx.w M see •'CM. ,
3 -7 fv?tit y ???
I?4.FY RP
1 W t.4WG Q
fts1 &A"o,-i
"TI M?7TKW,
waty cJ W
U.€. Saw.

q'3?` J
Scale: 14
./V
_ t
A0* A
., +
J
.
F.
V
,__
SITE
7 7,
I[ _
t+ Af t Bill
a• ?dke#
•
-
# C rr- `tit I . °=„ ,,
6
INV
40
N SOURCE: FIGURE 1
'+. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
REIDSVILLE, NC QUADRANGLE SITE LOCATION MAP
DATED 1972, REVISED 1994 & HORSE PARK OF THE SOUTH
WILLIAMSBURG, NC QUADRANGLE UP US HIGHWAY 29 & NC HIGHWAY 87
DATED 1972 REIDSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1" = 2,000' CAROLINAS ECS PROJECT NO. 09-17749A
Y
17-7
Ads
rcor' ? .', r w
' pnb

?. r

THE STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY ECS. THEY
HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
tit
'SA
.. ,r _ ..
Ows,
r
-, a
PA,
y, low
DP-3 n
• * < ? s .3
It,
f Y u' /??
h e -4 T),
41
'06 b 7, 1
} 1 ' k r ?a.
?. ` r a_ r +?6 r? y1 ,^ h "+'
DM
X '
, "44
} s 1 ?k aiR _c rrl1? 3+ ? 'T.?- ':4 2 ; ? f .,
t
r
t `? ?,,'?; ?`?e .,° s?i,w ?y L ; >wg ?,„ , ? 'h _ ?C*# ;!?+' .,,1 a a• .. ..
.?*f. r r` ?>w
? ) . .'",?IYl?^ .X'. 1"- ? :: 'ems ? !? ?`1, "?, a 1 ?. ? {i` ,'?`? +,e.....X.,+. "4
"?? r ? #:• d 4 F ?' y+lRf f?" tAt? 'TI ?i ? ?-
??
LEGEND
y I ?? Approximate Location of Perennial Stream
;' ,+ ` `?; i • _ . Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream
?"c ` • ??' 4W Approximate Location of Wetland
Approximate Location of Pond
f + ,'`, + DP-I A roximate Location of Data Point
k
SOURCE: FIGURE 3
2007 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FROM STREAM/WETLAND LOCATION MAP
THE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, NC HORSE PARK OF THE SOUTH
GIS WEBSITE AND FIELD NOTES `P US HIGHWAY 29 & NC HIGHWAY 87
PREPARED BY ECS PERSONNEL REIDSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
NOT TO SCALE CAROLINAS ECS PROJECT NO. 09-17749A

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Horse Park of the South Project No: Date: 09/09/2009
Applicant/Owner: Rockingham County County: Rockingham
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP 09-17749A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Wooded/Beaver Activity
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ®No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
r !'ITT A T191%XT -
V it V1': l t] 11v1l
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator

Eulalia viminea

Nepal microstegium Herb FAC+

Impatiens pallida

Pale touch-me-not Herb FACW
Juncus sp.

Rush sp. Herb FACW

Carex sp.

Sedge sp. Herb FACW

Typha latifolia

Broad-leaf cattail Herb OBL
Alnus serrulata

Smooth alder Tree/Sap FACW+

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100% FAC Neutral: 100%
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other Primary Indicators
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ® Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ® Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
® Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 6" ? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 3" ? Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Date: 09/09/2009
Project No:
Project/Site: Horse Park of the South ty: Rockingham
Applicant/Owner: Rockingham County E
09-17749A North Carolina
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP
D: DP-1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Madison sandy clay loam
® No
? ?Y
i
l
Map Symbol: MbE2 es
on
us
Mapped Hydric Inc
: ?Yes ®No
d T
M
Drainage Class: Well drained ype
appe
Field Observations Confirm
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic kanhapludults
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-2 2.5y 4/4
0%
Loam

3-12 2.5Y 4/1 10YR 4/4 25% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol
? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Sulfidic Odor ? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Aquic Moisture Regime ? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Reducing Conditions ? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
WII 1LFllN ll "r IL' itLVlu?t11av1. -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? ®yes ? No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Horse Park of the South Project No: Date: 09/09/2009
Applicant/Owner: Rockingham County County: Rockingham
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP 09-17749A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Wooded
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
ATION
VEGET
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator

Acer rubrum

Red maple Tree/Sap FAC

Liriodendron tulipifera

Tulip poplar Tree/Sap FAC

Lonicera japonica

Japanese honeysuckle Vine FAC-

Toxicodendron radicans

Poison ivy Vine FAC

Liquidambar styraciflua

Sweet gum Tree/Sap FAC+

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 80% FAC Neutral: 50%
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.

HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other Primary Indicators
? Inundated
? Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
® No Recorded Data ? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
Field Observations ? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0" ? Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
? Water-Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12" ? Local Soil Survey Data
? FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12" ? Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are not present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2
Y ':
DATA FORM
E ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Elnpvpe ite: Horse Park of the South Project No: Date: 09/09/2009
/Owner: Rockingham County County: Rockingham
tors: ECS Carolinas,LLP 09-17749A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Madison sandy clay loam
Map Symbol: MbE2
Drainage Class: Well drained
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? []Yes ® No
Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ®Yes ? No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic kanhapludults
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.
0-12 7.5YR 4/6 0% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
? Histosol
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
? Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors
? Concretions
? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain in Remarks)

Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
L--
TTI?.f TAT ? TTAI?l
L` 1LL11\L LL11iau.aia.caaav.. -
V
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ?Yes ® No
Hydric Soils Present? -]Yes Fq No
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology and hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetfonn) Page 2 of 2
• DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Horse Park of the South Project No: Date: 09/09/2009
Applicant/Owner: Rockingham County County: Rockingham
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP 09-17749A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-3
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Wooded
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? ?Yes ® No Transect ID:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? ?Yes ® No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator Plant Species (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Eulalia viminea
Nepal microstegium Herb FAC+
Woodwardia areolata
Netted chainfern Herb OBL
Acer rubrum
Red maple Tree/Sap FAC

Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100% FAC Neutral: 100%
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
? Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
? Aerial Photographs
? Other

® No Recorded Data

Field Observations

Depth of Surface Water: 0"

Depth to Free Water in Pit: >12"

Depth to Saturated Soil: 8" Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
? Inundated
® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
? Water Marks
? Drift Lines
? Sediment Deposits
? Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
® Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
® Water-Stained Leaves
? Local Soil Survey Data
® FAC-Neutral Test
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of2
n f
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAN D DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Horse Park of the South Project No: Date: 09/09/2009
Applicant/Owner: Rockingham County County: Rockingham
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP 09-17749A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-3
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Madison sandy clay loam
Map Symbol: MbE2
Drainage Class: Well drained
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ?Yes ®No
Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: ?Yes ®No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic kanhapludults
Profile Description
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure, etc.

0-12 2.5y 4/2 1OYR 4/6 25% Loam

Hydric Soil Indicators:
F-1 Histosol
? Concretions
? Histic Epipedon
? Sulfidic Odor
? Aquic Moisture Regime
? Reducing Conditions
® Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors ? High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
? Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
? Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
? Listed on National Hydric Soils List
? Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are present.
1VrTT A Nn "F.TFRMTN A YMN
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NYes U No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? NYes U No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ®Yes ? No
Hydric Soils Present? 1`71 ? No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2