20150261 Ver 2_FINAL PJD PACKAGE_20191101

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- SAW-2015-00501
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Union Chapel WTP
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional VGovernment ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The project site is located in a managed pine plantation with occasional natural forested areas. General land use in the vicinity of the
project consists of managed pine plantations, agriculture, residential development, and industrial mining activities.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Onslow Water and Sewer Authority (ONWASA)
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: SAW-2015-00501
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B lb]:
0 Union Chapel Church Road 34.831162,-77.5535.83
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 433901460654-433902671801
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: ONSLOW COUNTY
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: RICHLANDS
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a] : CATH E RI N E LAKE
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 030203020103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
L✓J Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Englneers-
Wkminglon District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
htt ://www.saw.usace.gn .mil/Missioiis/Re ulatot PerinitPro ram/Cbrttact/Co►nt Locator.as x,
by tailing 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTI'EREGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28 801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Waite Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTONREGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number. [phone]
Ail requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT MUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
. Street Address: 0 Union Chapel Church Road
City, State:
County:
Jacksonville, North Carolina
Onslow
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): NIA
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Dustin Pringle
Mailing Address: 4245 Main St. Suite 1000
Virginia Beach, Virgina 23462
Telephone Number: (757)-355-6690
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
W1I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental. Consultant'
E] Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
ElOther, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION2
Name: Onslow Water and Sewage Authority
Mailing Address: 228 George Town Road P.4 Box 1415
Jacksonville, North Carolina, 28450
Telephone Number: 910-937--7521
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter,
a Documentation of ownership also needs to he provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version; May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
21 Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJD&please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
Vicinity Map
❑� Aerial Photograph
✓❑ USGS Topographic Map
V Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.arniv.aril/Poitals/59/docshevulator Ire gdocs/JD/RGL, 08-02 App A Prelim JD Form tillable. df
$ Please see btt ://www.saw,usace.aKm .mii/Missions/ReQulatot, -Permit-Pro ranVJurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subj ect to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may he made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AM), which wi 11 be made available to the public on the District's website
and onthe Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated norcan anAJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
L
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
34.831162
Longitude:-77.5535.83
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 lxl7 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that Iack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary.Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://,�v�vw.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/RevitIatory-Permit-
Progran2/.l uri sd i ct i on/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
QI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 6.36 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIIF>[CATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U,S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Dustin Pringle
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner 0 Authorized Agents
11/1/2019
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid ail jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
0 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
V I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
H
A Corps JD is required in order obtainmy local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
E] I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDODUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 1 1 /1 /20 1 9
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Onslow Waterand Sewer Authority(ONWASA), 228 Georgetown Road, Jacksonville, NC 28450-1415
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: OnsIOW County City: Richlands
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.831162 Long.:-77.553583
Universal Transverse Mercator: 18
Name of nearest waterbody: CATHERINE LAKE
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): 08-20-2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
DP.WA-1
34.8308399124167
-77.5533502176121
0.010 Acres and 507 S.F.
non -section 10-non-tidalwetland
Section 404
DP.WB-3
34.8277997542165
-77.5420075349231
0.060 Acres and 2578 S.F.
non -section 10-non-tidalwetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:ESRI USGS, ESRI NGS 2013
FEJ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
W U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
030203020103
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: www.nres.usda.gov
[] National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has. not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later 'urisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

❑wiv field ftd
MC4
°." R
v
n
c
ci
Rlpdnda
u`
'c
7
Project Location
Legend
DELINEATION LIMITS
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin,
USGS, Intermap, INCCREMENT
' `P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI,,
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Interma INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
E ri China (Hong Kong), Esri p,
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, © Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
DATE: 11/12/2014 FIGURE 1:
UPDATED: 9/30/2019 OVERALL VICINITY MAP
Kimley)))Horn ONWASA - UNION CHAPEL WTP
SCALE: 1 IN = 1,000 FT ONSLOW COUNTY, NC

V r
� f�a
- -- IZZ3
r,
1 f
�+
r
t J Cerra
I
wa,InW
f
i
15
e
I
•` f
1
r
r
r
Project Location -
1127�
Legend
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, DELINEATION LIMITS
USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT
P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI,
Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
DATE: 11/12/2014 FIGURE 2: OVERALL
UPDATED: 9/30/2019 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Kimley)))Horn ONWASA - UNION CHAPEL WTP
SCALE: 1 IN = 1,000 FT ONSLOW COUNTY, NC

XF
N
"; 4-rA
0 . . . . . . . . . .
7
� •Y�y � S
r •-
r
L,
Rlchlndc
Project Location
Fi.l1 Al - ri
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, r
USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT
a P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI,
Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri
Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, © 9
DATE: 11 /12/2014
Kimley)))Horn UPDATED: 9/30/2019
SCALE: 1 IN = 1,000 FT
.'.�y. ..:
t Y
�-.{_ P.M •_ 'may •� i .
r
Legend
DELINEATION LIMITS
• DATA POINTS AUGUST2019
WETLANDS
FIGURE 3: OVERALL
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
ONWASA - UNION CHAPEL WTP
ONSLOW COUNTY, NC

i
low r
r
Its
On
Lwow
A e"
fi
• Ngm
i
a
z -
- LX
We
LA
lift
- Legend
DELINEATION LIMITS
DATA POINTS AUGUST2019
NRCS Soils
BaB - Baymeade fine sand
Ln - Leone fine sand
}
. Ly - Lynchburg fine sandy loam
Mu - Murville fine sand
-� NoB - Norfolk laomy fine sand
• � Wo - Woodington loamy fine sand
yy Y
DATE: 11/12/2014 FIGURE 4:
UPDATED: 9/30/2019 NCRS SOILS MAP
Kimley)))Horn ONWASA - UNION CHAPEL WTP
SCALE: 1 IN = 1,000 FT ONSLOW COUNTY, NC

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Union Chapel WTP 018484011 City/County: Onslow County Sampling Date: 8/20/2019
Applicant/Owner: ONWASA State: NC Sampling Point: DRWA.1wET
Investigator(s): Dustin Pringle & Tammy Fox Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Drainage Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2-3%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.83083991 Long:-77.55335022 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: NoB - Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
x Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x
No Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP.WA.1 WET
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Pinus taeda
5
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
5
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1= 0
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
FACW species 90 x 2 = 180
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FAC species 52 x 3 = 156
1.
Ilex coriacea
80
Yes
FACW
FACU species 2 x 4 = 8
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
No
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Morella cerifera
15
No
FAC
Column Totals: 144 (A) 344 (B)
4.
Arundinaria gigantea
10
No
FACW
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.39
5.
Pinus taeda
2
No
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
122
=Total Cover
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
61 20% of total cover:
25
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Carex
20
Yes
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Pteridium aquilinum 2 No FACU
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
37
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
19 20% of total cover:
8
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP.WA.1WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-24 10YR 2/1 100
Mucky Loamy sand
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
x Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil consists of mucky mineral and was darker than 10YR 2/1
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Union Chapel WTP 018484011 City/County: Onslow County Sampling Date: 820/2019
Applicant/Owner: ONWASA State: NC Sampling Point: DP.2.UPL
Investigator(s): Dustin Pringle & Tammy Fox Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Level or Nearly Level Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.82970885 Long:-77.55343902 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: NoB - Norfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No water or saturation present 24 inches below ground surface.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP.2.UPL
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda
50
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FAC species 140 x 3 = 420
1. Quercus nigra
80
Yes
FAC
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
2. Ilex coriacea
30
Yes
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3. Quercus rubra
10
No
FACU
Column Totals: 185 (A) 530 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.86
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
120
=Total Cover
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
60 20% of total cover:
24
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Ilex coriacea
5
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
5
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3 20%
of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP.2.UPL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 3/3 90
7.5YR 4/6 10
Sandy Loam
6-24 7.5YR 3/3 50
7.5YR 4/6 50
Sandy Loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Union Chapel WTP 018484011 City/County: Onslow County Sampling Date: 8/20/2019
Applicant/Owner: ONWASA State: NC Sampling Point: oP.WB-3-WET
Investigator(s): Dustin Pringle and Tammy Fox Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.82779975 Long:-77.54200753 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Mu - Murville fine sand NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 5
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 5
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP.WB-3-WET
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acerrubrum
30
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
45
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
FACW species 125 x 2 = 250
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
1.
Persea borbonia
50
Yes
FACW
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
2.
Arundinaria gigantea
15
Yes
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Acerrubrum
10
No
FAC
Column Totals: 175 (A) 405 (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.31
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
75
=Total Cover
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Ilex coriacea
50
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
50
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
25 20%
of total cover:
10
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Smilax bona-nox 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP.WB-3-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/1 100
Sandy loam
5-24 10YR 2/1 100
Mucky loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
X Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Mucky texture starting at 5-inches.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Union Chapel WTP 01848011 City/County: Onslow County Sampling Date: 8/20/2019
Applicant/Owner: ONWASA State: NC Sampling Point: DPA-UP
Investigator(s): Dustin Pringle & Tammy Fox Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Level or Nearly level Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.82786202 Long:-77.54413042 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Mu - Murville fine sand NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
No saturation or water present 24 inches below ground surface
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP.4-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 28
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
3. Arundinaria gigantea
4. Ligustrum sinense
5. Magnolia virginiana
6. Ilex coriacea
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 25
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Arundinaria gigantea
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Carex
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
30
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
15
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
55
=Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
_ 20% of total cover:
11
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
10
Yes
FAC
FACU species 25 x 4 = 100
10
Yes
FACU
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
10
Yes
FACW
Column Totals: 120 (A) 355 (B)
10
Yes
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.96
5
No
FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
5
No
FACW
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
- Prevalence Index is !-3.01
50
=Total Cover
_3
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover:
10
10
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 2 height.
10 Yes
5 Yes FAC
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DPA-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-24 10YR 3/1 100
Clay Loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Union Chapel WTP City/County: Onslow County Sampling Date: 8/20/2019
Applicant/Owner: ONWASA State: NC Sampling Point: DP.5-UP
Investigator(s): Dustin Pringle & Tammy Fox Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Level or Nearly Level Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-1 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.82780966 Long:-77.54607231 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: BaB - Baymeade fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: UPL
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Marl
Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Drainage ditches are interconnected with holding areas throughout wetland. No Hydrology present with recent rainfall.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP.5-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4. Quercus rubra
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 28
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2. Persea borbonia
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Magnolia virginiana
5. Quercus nigra
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: _
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Smilax bona-nox
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
30
Yes
FAC
15
Yes
FAC
5
No
FAC
5
No
FACU
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC
5 (A)
5 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
55 =Total Cover
OBL species 0
x 1 =
0
20% of total cover:
11
FACW species 30
x 2 =
60
FAC species 110
x 3 =
330
40 Yes
FAC
FACU species 5
x 4 =
20
20 Yes
FACW
UPL species 0
x 5 =
0
10 No
FAC
Column Totals: 145
(A)
410 (B)
10 No
FACW
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
2.83
5 No
FAC
I Hvdrophvtic Vegetation Indicators:
85 =Total Cover
43 20% of total cover: 17
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
_ =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: height.
5 Yes FAC
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP.5-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 3/1 100
Sandy
8-18 10YR 2/1 100
Sandy
18-24 10YR 3/2 70
LoamyClay
10YR 2/1 30
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Observed high amounts of uncoated sand grands within 0-1 8-inches which shows signs of significant drainage
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Union Chapel 018484011 City/County: Onslow County Sampling Date: 8/20/2019
Applicant/Owner: ONWASA State: NC Sampling Point: DP.6-UP
Investigator(s): Dustin Pringle & Tammy Fox Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Level or Nearly Level Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): <2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Lat: 34.83646422 Long:-77.53588361 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ly - Lynchburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, atlantic coast flatwoods NWI classification: PF04B
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation No , Soil No , or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Right-of-way is mowed and maintained
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP.6-UP
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Pinus taeda
50
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25 20% of total cover:
10
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
25
Yes
FAC
2. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
3. Acer rubrum
5
No
FAC
4. Magnolia virginiana
5
No
FACW
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 23
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Stenotaphrum secundatum
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Acer rubrum
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 27
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
45 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. or FAC
4 (A)
4 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
0
x 1 =
0
FACW species
5
x 2 =
10
FAC species
144
x 3 =
432
FACU species
0
x 4 =
0
UPL species
0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals:
149
(A)
442 (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
2.97
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50 Yes FAC Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2 No FAC present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 No FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
54 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 11 height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Split matrix created by creation of right-of-way.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP.6-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/1 100
Sandy
4-8 10YR 4/1 60
Sandy 40% 10YR 5/2
8-24 10YR 2/1 80
Sandy 20% 10YR 6/4
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
_Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0