19990234 Ver 1_Complete File_19991217

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment ?
and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NC ENR
Bill Holman, Secretary
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
Kerr T. Stevens, Director ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
17 December, 1999
MEMORANDUM
To: Shannon Langley, Point Source Compliance Group
Through: John Dorney, ?Wetlands/401 Certification Group
From: Dave Penrose, Llands/401 Certification Group
Subject: Pomono Quarry, Guilford County, DWQ #990234 .
As part of the 401 Certification process, water quality data including benthic
macroinvertebrates were collected from Long Branch near the Pomono Quarry in Guilford
County. I've attached the Environmental Assessment conducted by Fish and Wildlife
Associates summarizing background information. Long Branch is a very small catchment
near this quarry and receives urban and industrial runoff from headwater reaches. However,
these data suggest that the quarry operations may have an impact to the stream system.
Much higher conductivity were found at two sites below the quarry compared to an
upstream reference site and some qualitative differences were noted in the aquatic fauna
between locations. I would like to suggest that a compliance inspection be conducted at this
facility. In addition, it is possible that a benthic macroinvertebrate survey is needed to
determine the potential sources of the water quality impacts.
wetlands/401 Unit 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX 1# 733-9959
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 5014, recycly(I/I0'Z post consumer raper
cc) ,0-1
ana Wildlife
P0. Box 241
Whittier, NC 28789
[phone]
Mr. Brian K. North, P.E.
Regional Enviro
Martin Ma mental Engineer
rietta Aggregates
P-O. Box 240635
Charlotte, NC 28224-0635
Dear Brian:
Associates
_ , Inc.
November 10, 1998
6926 Valley View
Cheyenne Place
' 82009
[phone]
A copy of the draft report for the environmental assessment of Lono
Quarry is enclosed. Please review and
provide comments or suggestions. g Branch' POmono
The environmental -
Species. assessment of Long Branch found several fish and macroinVe
All species would be considered tolerant.
aquatic
c community is strea
mfl°« At the time ops The primary factor 1i nebrate
amplino mitino
If you have any question about the report e flow was close to
zero.
Sincerely, give me a call at [phone].
r _ Gc.?y 7
Roger D. Bryan
Project Biologist
??.ilA
BASELINE ENVIR
ANCHONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT
,
LONG BR PO1MONp QUARRY
GUILFORD COIJ'NTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
Martin Marietta A°'C'Teoates
P.O. Box 240635
Charlotte, NC 28224_0635
Prepared by:
Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 241
Whittier, NC 28789
November 1998
Table of Contents
List of Figures .. .
List of Tables .......................... ii
Introduction ..................... iii
Methodology ................... 1
Results ....................... 1
Conclusions ............... 3
List of Figures
zu e
Location Map for Long Branch, Pomono Q
Martin Marietta a o Quarry ' ' " " " " " ' 2
A??e?ates, Guildford County, North Carolina
Baseline Environmental Assessment
Long Branch, Pomono Quarry
Martin Marietta Aggegrates
Introduction
Martin Marietta Aggregates plans to expand its quarry pit at the Pomono Quarry located
near Greensboro, North Carolina. As a part of the expansion, a section of Long Branch
will be relocated to facilitate pit expansion. In order to relocate the stream, a 404/401
permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers and NC Division of Water Quality,
respectively. These resource agencies, during informal consultation suge
survey of the existing aquatic resources within Long Branch to evaluate current a baselin.
conditions. The results of the baseline survey will be used to evaluate the success of the
stream relocation project.
Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc. (FWA) was retained by Martin Marietta to conduct the
baseline survey of Long Branch. FWA developed a study plan to provide a qualitative
assessment of species composition and relative abundance of fish and macro invertebrate
communities. The following report details the study methodology and results from the
baseline surveys on Long Branch.
Methodology ~
i
The study was conducted on Long Branch within the boundary of the Pomono Quarry 1
operated by Martin Marietta Aggregrates (Figure 1). Fish and macro invertebrate 3
communities as well as basic water quality were evaluated at three locations within the 3
quarry property. Two sites were located within the section proposed for relocation and a
third site was located upstream of the affected area (control site). The control site was ,
included for future reference and to evaluate changes in aquatic communities that are the
result of upstream activities.
Water quality parameters measured included water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH,
and conductivity. Qualitative assessments of fish and macro invertebrates communities
were conducted at each site. The biological surveys provide species composition, and
relative abundance.
A single pass survey was conducted with backpack electrofisher for evaluation of fish
populations at each site. A two man crew surveyed a representative stream section
approximately 100 meters in length at each site. Each study site included all habitat types
present within the stream (riffle, runs, pools, etc.). All fish collected were identified to
species, measured to the nearest millimeter, and weighed to the nearest gram. Following
the survey, all fish were released back into the stream. Species composition and relative
abundance were evaluated for each site.
l1 .r`
?2i I ? ? 111 ? ?(/ a I '.f• ti :y .tia\
1 / ff//.. I I,fT __.?T / • \?? (_ ,,, '?1.??`• i 3:w7 .C - Y ?_1
_ _.???? \„ • , _??.--1111 1 ??j'? C>"".??\•C,??i? ??• •t
`. U }}? ?. y}?' _ ?c('.iife.d yg? •'sJ / ' / \ .,?l?
1 ?-%d r ?/n Pomono
fir` Wr.?,.? L?/ ?l ?7l L l.. `^•\?.?; ?Y_
Quarry
_;
'J y ? •'1?.1 / ? ` _ ! r? r.. 1? ? ? ?'?.,,' r''???.s
29
/ •}' =''? ri1Ltco`r?
`S ••J l ?^.? ?Ori•'l- ??????c"??.I ii..yr / 14..4r j:__G: i - ''.' ^ ` I ?,__???? _?_ M...• -w :1w
r ??l?v "^'".?? `,air; _,,• ?/. I / i _` `\ \?? I ` ` ' r _? r _ -
4 =4
Aj\
v i3 % ? •,rr r •, S I' ? ?, ? o*rn. a. '?
110
52
?_Z4- AM
= f
4.1
^?-?`?+nov",
i . ? %- //` '`'"?; I?? '^!-''= ? it (i_ ^;,\, -•,?? `???? . _}+t...: .,.?
Gam, ,,,,,0 \/ y\c
_ -•T.u, ,LI `1?I \\`? L.. ' I ?i :.yam ' ?? a I ?+ra?mr .
gore 1. Location Itifa
Caro P for Long Branch, Pomono Q
Iina• Scale 1:150,000 (1 inch = 2.4 u?Y, Guilford Co
miles) unty, North

A qualitative survey for aquatic macroinvertebrates was performed at each
collections were performed within all habitat site. Benthic
Aquatic macro invertebrates samples were transferred into labeled, D ame
? i
preserved in 100/0 formalin for laboratory identification. kick net.
P c containers and
In the laboratory, all benthic samples were washed in a
Particulate matter (rocks, sticks, leaves) was visually 270 micron mesh screen. Large,
and then discarded. Oro Y inspected for macroinvertebrates
'enumerated. removed from each sample were preserved in 70% ethyl
alcohol, identified, and enumerated. Using available keys and taxonomic
material, identification was m reference
practical taxonomic level sually species
erea a anals s se ( to 60X) to the lowest
measures, such as species Y emphasized community
and Trichoptera). , erance values EPT (Ephemeroptera, Piecoptera,
Results
The water quality within Long Branch was characterized by low dissolved o?
concentrations, likely due to the limited flow within the stream at sam linogen
1). Temperatures were approximately 19 °C throng P time (Table
neutral (7.1-7.2) at all locations. Conductivity was ,Bout the reach. The pH was almost
control site, possibly due to in Puts from the quarry w higher at Sites I and 2 relative to the
operation.
The fish community within Long Branch contained 10 fish species Table 2
population was-dominated by chubs and sunfish species. Site I contained The
due to the limited habitat provided by the marsh/wetland. fined t th he fewest fish
small pools and silt substrate. The habitat was dominate y
Numerous fish were was collected from Site 2
bluegill, and redbreast sunfish (Table 2. mcIuding creek and bluehead chubs
into Long Branch ) Sunfish and largemouth bass likel
`
from the upstream pond during high flow events. Y immigrate
fishes were collected from pool habitats. Low The majorityof
samflow restricted the amount of riffle
or run habitat. The substrate consisted on cobble e and gravel with a fine laver of
throughout the reach. Undercut banks provided fish cover wi silt
thin Long Branch.
The control site was located upstream of the active quarry processing cent
community was dominated by warmouth sunfish (Table 2). er. The
Largemouth bass,
chubsucker, and creek chub were also present. Four fish spec
control site. from the
ies were collected
The fish community within Long Branch is dominated by tolerant s ecies
chubs. The length frequency of fishes Bugg p of sunfish and
est that the habitat
100 mm) that may originate in an upstream s pond () Table 3). ?pPo? o?y small fishes
reduced to near zero during sampling with marginal dissolved oxygen levels. These

Table 1. Water quality characteristics of Long Branch
Pomona Marietta Aggregates, Greensboro, North Carolina, Se Qua
rry, Martin
pt• 24, 1998.
Parameter
Site 1
Temperature (C)
19.8
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1)
5.0
PH
7.2
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
350
Site 2 Control Site
19.6 19.3
5.0 (:2. 3
7.2 7.1
345 110
Table 2. Fishes collected from Long Branch, Pomono Quarry,
Aggregates, Greensboro, North Carolina, September 24 1998 arietta
Species Site 1
Site 2 Control Site
Bluehead chub
Nocomis leptocephalus
` 19
Golden shiner
Notemigonus crysoleucas 1
Creek chub
Semotilis atromaculatus
23 4
Creek chubsucker
Erimyzon oblongus 2
12 6
Redbreast sunfish
Lepomis auritus 1
13
Pumpkinseed
Lepomis gibbosus
Warmouth
Lepomis gulosus -
_ 2 18
Bluegill
Lepomis macrochirus
` 45
Largemouth bass
Micropterus salmoides 7
3 5
White crappie
PomoxJs annularis
Total No. of Fish
No. Of Species 11 119 33
Catch per unit effort#/hr 4 9 4
83 357 208

Table 3. Length frequency of
gamefish species, Long Branch, Pomono
Quarry, Greensboro, NC, September 24, 1998.
Size
Grou mm Redbreast
Bluegill
Largemouth
sunfish
bass
26
-50
51-75 3 6 -- 1
76-100
2 27 12
101-125 16
126-150 3 1
2

Total 14
45 15

communities.
factors suggest that Long Branch at Pomono Quarrv has very limited Potential for aquatic
Qua has very limited
potential for aquatic
The aquatic macro invertebrate co
midges atic croive mmunity was dominated b
(Chi
collected b )' and cravfish (Deca oda by drag°?Y larvae (Odonata),
Y qualitative sampling p ) (Table 4). A total of 15 taxa.
c to 8. The on1 for the three sites. N to ra were
collected me Only
dae per sitamily. r
vent orates are coed were from the H Abe` Of
Ydropsychidae f anged from
The lack of riffle habitat and low di sodere col Grant by f Water
lit lack of le t potential for es Division of Water
oxygen values within Long Quality.
considered Poor due to limited taxa the site. The e,ustino 'Branch severely
and high tolerance values. . would be
Conclusions
The enviroamronmental assessment of Long
fish and in al assessment of ° Branch sugv
The abund o °eS that the stream contains suggests that the stream anc, of smalls ns tolerant
of him receive immigrants from sunfish in the absence of adult
,h flow. The drainage basin of Long an adjacent pond during
tu?ng periods
Sedimentation was evident Branch is largely ind
throu out the stream; ban.
7
TABLE. BENTHIC MACRO INVERTEBRATES, LONG BRANCH, GUILFORD COUNTY, NC, 9/24/98
SPECIES T.V. F.F.G. CONTROL SITE 1 SITE 2
MOLLUSCA
Gastropoda
Basommatophora
Physidae
Physella sp. 8.34 CG 1
ARTHROPODA
Crustacea
Decapoda
Cambaddae
Cambarus sp. 7.62 CG 1
Procambarus sp. 9.49. SH 2 2
Insecta
Odonata
Gomphidae
Gomphus sp. 5.8 P
Libellulidae
Libellula sp. 9.64 P 4
Megaloptera
Sialidae
Sialis sp. » a 1
Trichoptera
Hydropsychidae
Cheumatopsyche sp. 6.22 FC
Hydropsyche sp. FC
Coleoptera
Haliplidae
Peltodytes sp. 8.73 SH 2
Hydrophilidae
Tropisternus sp. 9.68 P 1 2
Diptera
Chironomidae
Ablabesmyia mallochi 7.2 P 1
1
Chironomus sp. 9.63 CG

Thienemannimyia gp.
3.42
P 3
2
CHORDATA

Amphibia 1
Caudata
TOTAL NUMBER OF ORGANISMS

TOTAL NUMBER OF TAXA 10 10 9
8 5
6
R
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Brian North
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Charlotte District Office
Post Office Box 240635
Charlotte, North Carolina 28224-0635
Dear Mr. North:
1 09MR?
•
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 17, 1999
Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
Proposed Pomona Quarry Expansion
WQC Project #: 990234 COE #: 199920611
Guilford County
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3264 issued to the Martin Marietta
Aggregates, Inc. dated 17 December 1999.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
i rel
. Stevens
Attachments
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
Mr. John Dorney
Mr. John Boaze; Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc.
Central Files
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27669-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section 401
Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500. It is issued to the Martin
Marietta Aggregates, Inc. resulting in acres of wetland impact in County pursuant to a revised
application filed on the 10th day of March 1999 to relocate 2025 feet of Long Branch to facilitate
quarry expansion.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into the
waters of Long Branch in conjunction with the proposed development will not result in a
violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore, the State
of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable portions of Sections
301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in accordance with the
application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your
application, as described in the Public Notice. If you change your project, you must notify us
and send us a new application for a new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must
be given a copy of the Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
with all conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future exceed one acre,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7).
For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below. In addition, you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-discharge
and Water Supply watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
Appropriate sediment and erosion control practices which equal or exceed those
outlined in the most recent version of two manuals. Either the "North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual" or the "North Carolina
Surface Mining Manual" (available from the Division of Land Resources in the
DEHNR Regional or Central Offices). The control practices shall be utilized to prevent
exceedances of the appropriate turbidity water quality standard (50 NTUs in all fresh
water streams and rivers not designated as trout waters; 25 NTUs in all lakes and
reservoirs, and all saltwater classes; and 10 NTUs in trout waters);
All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources has
released the project;
3. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into contact with
waters of the state until the concrete has hardened;
4. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands or other waters, compensatory
mitigation will be required since it is a direct impact from road construction activities;
5. Compensatory mitigation shall be done in accordance with the CORPS OF Engineers
April 29 Public Notice as modified in your submittals of 10 March and 4 October 1999.
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall become null and void
unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404 and/or coastal Area
Management Act Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This request must
be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C.
276 1 1-7447. If modifications are made to an original Certification, you have the right to an
adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon written request within sixty (60) days following
receipt of the Certification. Unless such demands are made, this Certification shall be final and
binding.
This the 16" day of December 1999
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Stev s
WQC #: 3264
_t?
LONG BRANCH
MARTIN-MARIETTA POMONO QUARRY
Guilford county
1 l October, 1999
John,
I looked over the file and it appeared to me that Martin-Marietta and their
consultants adequately addressed Ron Linville's concerns. However, I have
a couple of additional questions. In the March 10 letter to the Army Corps,
Martin-Marietta noted that the stream has a limited potential for fish and
benthic macro invertebrates primarily due to low DO and flow. In the EA
prepared by Fish and Wildlife Assoc. they also noted an increase in
conductivity in the stream below the quarry operation. My concern is that
the water quality of the stream has been affected by the operation of the
quarry. How does the quarry affect flow in the existing channel (augmented
flows, groundwater recharge potentials) and how will this change once
restoration is conducted? Do you think that I should do a site visit here as
well?
Penrose
ur t
(pA
C
4 Dti. yl
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Charlotte District Office - Carolina Division
P.O. Box 240635
Charlotte, North Carolina 28224-0635
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
March 10, 1999
Mr. John Thomas
United States Army Corp of Engineers
6508 Falls Of The Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Re: 404 Application for Relocation of Long Branch
Martin Marietta's Pomona Quarry
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Based on our meeting on February 15, 1999 and the comments discussed from each agency
representative, I am officially submitting two (2) copies a 404 application for approval to
relocate Long Branch within the property boundary of Martin Marietta's Pomona Quarry. A
?? . baseline environmental assessment of Long Branch was conducted in November of 1998. This
?0 study indicates that the impact of aquatic wildlife is due primarily to low dissolved oxygen,Aow
?S r stream-flow'f s tmg in a very limit-` ed potentidTfor a lis an macroin e ebrate community.
?pf 1 m " arietta p ans to re ocate approxima e y o s ream c annel around our proposed
D I pit. The new length of channel will be approximately 4150'. The proposed channel will be
constructed by excavation of natural rock along its entire length. This natural substrate reduces
the possibility for sedimentation damage and siltation of this proposed channel.
Field measurements were taken to establish the characteristics and morphology of Long
Branch. Methodologies developed from Rosgen (1996) were used to establish the stream
widths, meander, etc. from typical pool and riffle transects for use in the new channel
construction. Construction of the channel is currently underway, consisting of overburden
removal to expose the rock. The new channel will then be constructed following the cross-
sections shown on the attached maps. All of the construction of the channel will be conducted
in the "dry", beginning from the furthest most downstream end and progressing upstream.
Various cross-sections are proposed to incorporate different attributes within the channel.
These include riffles, pools, meandering, boulder placement. etc. These measures will aid in
the dissipation of high velocities.
Woody vegetation samplings are proposed along the top of the channel as shown on the
attached maps and will primarily be limited to the interior (mine side) of the new channel. The
outside western slope of the overburden adjacent to the new channel will be graded to a
maximum slope of 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) and will be vegetated upon completion. A
horizontal safety bench of 10' will remain before the extraction of the rock channel begins.
The western side of the channel is shaded by an established growth of pines and small
hardwoods. The placement of riparian vegetation (mature trees) will be incorporated in the
"pool areas" designed in the channel. This steam-bank vegetation will consist of various
species to aid in temperature control and wildlife enhancement. These plantings will include
species such as, Tag Adler, Pawpaw, Black Willow, etc. All plantings will be coordinated with
the North Carolina Forest Resources for planting specifications and recommendations. Upon
completion of the channel and stabilization of the exposed areas, Long Branch will be
introduced into the new channel.
Minor impacts of wetlands will be associated with this project. Additional areas considered
wetland impacts include an area of 0.23 acres (200' x 50') above an existing construction
access, 0.19 acres (550' x 15') of wetlands located below an existing rock dam sediment basin
located directly upstream of Long Branch, and an intermittent tributary located directly
upstream of the existing rock dam sediment basin. This area was determined to be 0.023 ac.
(500' x 2').
The Corp of Engineers and the North Carolina Water Quality Section will be requested to
inspect the project during and after construction is completed. Macrobenthos monitoring will
be conducted for_ three ye_ars after t e channel is relocated. Copies of this report will be
submitted to the Corp of Engineers and the North Carolina Water Quality Section. By copy of
this letter, seven (7) copies of this application have been submitted to the North Carolina Water
Quality Section for approval/certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. This
information should meet with your approval. If you have any questions, please contact me at
[phone] or e-mail me at brian. north a mart ininarietta.com.
Sincerely.
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
Brian . North, PE
Sr. Environmental Engineer
cc: John Dorney, NCDENR
Dean Hardy, MMA
619\404appl icati oncvr
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT TOMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33CFR 325) EXPIRES OCTOBER 1996
Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments re(.
this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden. To Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information/Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA, 22202-4302
and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-003), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form
to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404, Principle Purpose; These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting navigable water:
of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of
dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Disclosure:
Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor can the permit be is
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application i
sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application not
completed in full will be returned
ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE[
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Robert R. Winchester, Executive VP
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
P.O. Box 240635, Charlotte, NC 28224
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. Business
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Relocation of Long Branch at Martin Marietta's Pomona Quarry
13 NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
Long Branch
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Guilford
COUNTY
North Carolina
STA
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, (see instructions)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
825 Marietta Road, Greensboro, NC 27410
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From 1-40 west, take exit 212 (Chimney Rock Rd.) Turn right and quarry is located approximately 1/2 mile
on the left.
18. NATURE OF ACTIVITY (description of project, include all features)
Relocation of Long Branch within the property boundary of Martin Marietta's Pomona Quarry. The existing
length of Long Branch is approximately 2025'. The new length of channel will be 4155'. Based on a meeting
held February 15, 1999, the COE, North Carolina Water Quality, Fish and Wildlife and Land Quality reviewed
the proposed impacts of Long Branch and discussed their requirements for the proposed length of new Chanel.
19. PROJECT PURPOSE (describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
Relocation of Long Branch is required for future pit expansion and mining of native granite at the site.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. REASONS FOR DISCHARGE
NA
21. TYPE(S) OF MATERIAL BEING DISCHARGED AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH TYPE IN CUBIC YARDS
NA
22. SURFACE AREA IN ACRES OF WETLANDS OR OTHER WATERS FILLED (see instructions)
NA
23. IS ANY PORTION OF THE WORK ALREADY COMPLETED? YES X NO IF YES DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
Existing overburden is being removed in the area where the new channel will be constructed. At this time,
no impacts to Long Branch or associated wetlands have been made. Existing sediment and erosion control
meaeures have been installed and are being maintained to prevent off-site sedimentation.
24. ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, LESSEES, ETC., WHOSE PROPERTY ADJOINS THE WATERBODY (if more than can be
entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
All proposed improvements to Long Branch will be conducted on Martin Marietta property.
25. LIST OF CERTIFICATES OR APPROVALS/DENIALS RECEIVED FROM OTHER FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL AGENCIES FOR WORK DESCRIBE
IN THIS APPLICATION
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL" IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE ISSUED
NC DENR Mining Permit 41-05 (Permit will be aplied for and approved before Long
Branch is impacted.)
`WOULD INCLUDE BUT IS NOT RESTRICTED TO ZONING, BUILDING AND FLOOD PLAIN PERMITS
26. Application is hereby made for a permit to authorize work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake wok described herein am acting as the duly authorized agent
of the applicant.
0 5?K ?; 0 ? / -7-- d? -5;?F
!0M -
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may ne signed by a duly authorized
agent if the statement in Block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly
and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements
or represents or makes or uses any false writing or documentation knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry,
shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
619\individua1404permit
MARTIN MARIETTA MATREIALS, INC.
RELOCATION OF LONG BRANCH
POMONA QUARRY
NARRATIVE
Martin Marietta proposes to relocate Long Branch within the boundaries of the Pomona
Quarry, which is located in Greensboro, NC. The creek flows in the northeast to southwest
direction through the center portion of the property. The existing pit borders the creek for
approximately 5000'. Martin Marietta proposes to relocate t e ower approx>ma e 5' of
channe mto a new length of 4150', around the western portion of the property. An initial
baseline environmental assessment of Long Branch has been conducted. A copy of this report
is included in the permit application package. The proposed channel will be constructed by
excavation of natural rock along its entire length. This natural substrate reduces the possibility
for sedimentation damage and siltation of this proposed channel. Field measurements were
taken to establish the characteristics and morphology of Long Branch. Methodologies
developed from Rosgen (1996) were used to establish the stream widths, meander, etc. from
typical pool and riffle transects for use in the new channel construction. Construction of the
channel is currently underway, consisting of overburden removal to expose the rock. The new
channel will then be constructed following the cross-sections shown on the attached maps. All
of the construction of the channel will be conducted in the "dry", beginning from the furthest
most downstream end and progressing upstream. Various cross-sections are proposed to
incorporate different attributes within the channel. These include riffles, pools, meandering,
boulder placement, etc. These measures will aid in the dissipation of high velocities. Woody
vegetation samplings are proposed along the top of the channel as shown on the attached maps
and will primarily be limited to the interior (mine side) of the new channel. The outside
western slope of the overburden adjacent to the new channel will be graded to a maximum
slope of 2:1 (horizontal: vertical) and will be vegetated upon completion. A horizontal safety
bench of 10' will remain before the extraction of the rock channel begins. The western side of
the channel is shaded by an established growth of pines and small hardwoods. The placement
of riparian vegetation (mature trees) will be incorporated in the "pool areas" designed in the
channel. This steam-bank vegetation will consist of various species to aid in temperature
control and wildlife enhancement. These plantings will include species such as, Tag Adler,
Pawpaw, Black Willow, etc. All plantings will be coordinated with the North Carolina Forest
Resources for planting specifications and recommendations. Upon completion of the channel
and stabilization of the exposed areas, Long Branch will be introduced into the new channel.
The Corp of Engineers and the North Carolina Water Quality Section will be requested to
inspect the project during and after construction is completed. Macrobenthos monitoring will
be conducted for three years after the channel is relocated. Copies of this report will be
submitted to the Corp of Engineers and the North Carolina Water Quality Section. Minor
impacts of wetlands will be associated with this project. Additional areas considered wetland
impacts include an area of 0.23 acres (200' x 50') above an existing construction access, 0.19
acres (550' x 15') of wetlands located below an existing rock dam sediment basin located
directly upstream of Long Branch, and an intermittent tributary located directly upstream of the
existing rock dam sediment basin. This area was determined to be 0.023 ac. (500' x 2').
MWOn MOWS Aegrew S M
61 %narrative
,
Upper Colonial k
n
Piedmont Triad ational,
>. i
1
421 ''° .
68) J
421
s
F , „w uhf
4 Ire
i
I i,.,,.
II'? ... .,.e }
O\l?A.i 'IY
68
Quarry
-77?Pomona
y
i `
A
r ,J
a,
1 t r.\
t_
?t^
68 ?r1- r
, ? I J
?. ?Uwhdrrie Cb`unci ,Camp l..
,
USA
©
198_Den-
Fairfield Lake Dam
NORM
1. Trees to be planted dong the top of the as* mWooti n should
Ine4do the klowlrrg:
->V}ynk pin Elatkgum. Nock Omrx Chestnut oak
pvNmmon. SeMhaoth Oak and Mite Ash.
2. gpoa trees 10 to 12' apart tvoughout the length of channel
3. Trees wlI be plonted in oonpnoti n with the Division of Forest
Resource noonmendallaa during the monthe of Dwember and
FeWuwy. Tress rr be evenly dletrUted dung the Indicated area.
e. 'Root-wade' will be planted on both ddm of the channel In
'pooling areas adK
0. Hearn will meander bard on rip-rap PWWWt end G&tud
bottom slope of damsel.
? AS=AR M0Q =
¦ r ATFRISegigrL tt 00OfWN
ri wtr.
SCALE : 1' 200'
0 SO 100 200 300 400
Mfg TREES TO K PLANTED ALONG TOP Of STREAM
Ik?
o

dd ,..'
Ta+00
m.uu
20+00 r ' v

3

21+00 ,
STEP 1. BLAST CHANNEL
22+00
23+00

24+00 ,-
25+00

2e+00
STEP 2 PLACE BOULDERS TO PROTECT
OKRMIRDDI AND PLANT VEGETATION
O
27+00

Jlt , +
?
8}00 a
" ?I
0
1 Y
?ENPB??P
wii/?/Fr •.
MCP '
6 ,??. n uen
M S
N
h
8 1
Y
J•
CP
R
C>°

aaO STEP 3. FORM MAN CHANNEL
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIOecOUNS
WINO THE GONC_TR11G110N ENCE
38+00
3
aAmH 7+00 SCALE : 1" 200'
0 BO 100 200 300 400
38+00
Martin
M
c

TREES TO BC PLAITED ALONG TOP OF STREAM
1111
R
ALS
l0H1i. N.C.
N.C.
AIi
39+ CREEK RELOCATION CROSS-SECTION
m
/1111M[ ? EOIp11O1 M QOM 00
oMM"w?i NNr nml nc.now POMOMA QUARRY
CATAW13A COUNTY, N.C.
ARRY: POMONA
40+00 IOaNa
30P7
s

Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 241 6926 Valley View Place
Whittier, NC 28789 Cheyenne, WY 82009
[phone] November 10, 1998 [phone]
Mr. Brian K. North, P.E.
Regional Environmental Engineer
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 240635
Charlotte, NC 28224-0635
Dear Brian:
A copy of the draft report for the environmental assessment of Long Branch, Pomono
Quarry is enclosed. Please review and provide comments or suggestions.
The environmental assessment of Long Branch found several fish and macroinvertebrate
species. All species would be considered tolerant. The primary factor limiting the
aquatic community is streamflow. At the time of sampling ie flow was close to zero.
If you have any question about the report, give me a call at [phone]. 1??cJ
Sincerely,
Roger D. Bryan
Project Biologist
BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
LONG BRANCH, POMONO QUARRY
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
Martin Marietta Aggregates
P.O. Box 240635
Charlotte, NC 28224-0635
Prepared by:
Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 241
Whittier, NC 28789
November 1998
List of Tables
Table
Water quality characteristics of Long Branch, Pomono Quarry ..................... 4
September 24, 1998.
2. Fishes collected from Long Branch, Pomono Quarry ............................. 5
September 24, 1998.
3. Length frequency of gamefish species, Long Branch, Pomono Quarry ............... 6
September 24, 1998.
4. Benthic macro invertebrates, Long Branch, Guilford County, NC . .................. 8
September 24, 1998.
Baseline Environmental Assessment
Long Branch, Pomono Quarry
Martin Marietta Aggegrates
Introduction
Martin Marietta Aggregates plans to expand its quarry pit at the Pomono Quarry located
near Greensboro, North Carolina. As a part of the expansion, a section of Long Branch
will be relocated to facilitate pit expansion. In order to relocate the stream, a 4041401
permit is required from the Army Corps of Engineers and NC Division of Water Quality,
respectively. These resource agencies, during informal consultation, suggested a baseline
survey of the existing aquatic resources within Long Branch to evaluate current
conditions. The results of the baseline survey will be used to evaluate the success of the
stream relocation project.
Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc. (FWA) was retained by Martin Marietta to conduct the
baseline survey of Long Branch. FWA developed a study plan to provide a qualitative
assessment of species composition and relative abundance of fish and macro invertebrate
communities. The following report details the study methodology and results from the
baseline surveys on Long Branch.
MethodoloQv
The study was conducted on Long Branch within the boundary of the Pomono Quarry
operated by Martin Marietta Aggregrates (Figure 1). Fish and macro invertebrate
communities as well as basic water quality were evaluated at three locations within the
quarry property. Two sites were located within the section proposed for relocation and a
third site was located upstream of the affected area (control site). The control site was
included for future reference and to evaluate changes in aquatic communities that are the
result of upstream activities.
Water quality parameters measured included water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH,
and conductivity. Qualitative assessments of fish and macroinvertebrates communities
were conducted at each site. The biological surveys provide species composition, and
relative abundance.
A single pass survey was conducted with backpack electrofisher for evaluation of fish
populations at each site. A two man crew surveyed a representative stream section
approximately 100 meters in length at each site. Each study site included all habitat types
present within the stream (riffle, runs, pools, etc.). All fish collected were identified to
species, measured to the nearest millimeter, and weighed to the nearest gram. Following
the survey, all fish were released back into the stream. Species composition and relative
abundance were evaluated for each site.
Figure 1. Location Map for Long Branch, Pomono Quarry, Guilford County, North
Carolina. Scale 1:150,000 (1 inch = 2.4 miles)
A qualitative survey for aquatic macroinvertebrates was performed at each site. Benthic
collections were performed within all habitat types present with a D-frame kick net.
Aquatic macroinvertebrates samples were transferred into labeled, plastic containers and
preserved in 10% formalin for laboratory identification.
In the laboratory, all benthic samples were washed in a 270 micron mesh screen. Large,
particulate matter (rocks, sticks, leaves) was visually inspected for macroinvertebrates
and then discarded. Organisms removed from each sample were preserved in 70% ethyl
alcohol, identified, and enumerated. Using available keys and taxonomic reference
material, identification was in ith ereomicroscope (7X to 60X) to the lowest
practical taxonomic level sually species. ata analysis emphasized community
measures, such as species r erance values EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera,
and Trichoptera).
Results
The water quality within Long Branch was characterized by low dissolved oxygen
concentrations, likely due to the limited flow within the stream at sampling time (Table
1). Temperatures were approximately 19 °C throughout the reach. The pH was almost
neutral (7.1-7.2) at all locations. Conductivity was higher at Sites 1 and 2 relative to the
control site, possibly due to inputs from the quLny operatior?.
The fish community within Long Branch contained 10 fish species (Table 2). The
population was dominated by chubs and sunfish species. Site 1 contained the fewest fish
due to the limited habitat provided by the marsh/wetland. The habitat was dominate y
small pools and silt substrate.
Numerous fish were was collected from Site 2 , including creek and bluehead chubs, q
bluegill, and redbreast sunfish (Table 2). Sunfish and largemouth bass likely immigrate `
into Long Branch from the upstream pond during high flow events. The majority of
fishes were collected from pool habitats. Low streamflow restricted the amount of riffle
or run habitat. The substrate consisted on cobble and gravel with a fine layer of silt
throughout the reach. Undercut banks provided fish cover within Long Branch.
The control site was located upstream of the active quarry processing center. The
community was dominated by warmouth sunfish (Table 2). Largemouth bass, creek
chubsucker, and creek chub were also present. Four fish species were collected from the
control site.
The fish community within Long Branch is dominated by tolerant species of sunfish and
chubs. The length frequency of fishes suggests that the habitat supports only small fishes
(< 150 mm) that may originate in an upstream pond (Table 3). The streamflow was
reduced to near zero during sampling with marginal dissolved oxygen levels. These
Table 1. Water quality characteristics of Long Branch, Pomono Quarry, Martin
Marietta Aggregates, Greensboro, North Carolina, Sept. 24, 1998.
Parameter
Site 1 Site 2 Control Site
Temperature (C) 19.8 19.6 19.3
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1) 5.0 5.0 2.3
pH 7.2 7.2 7.1
Conductivity (umhos/cm) \"350 345J 110
Table 2. Fishes collected from Long Branch, Pomono Quarry, Martin Marietta
Aggregates, Greensboro, North Carolina, September 24, 1998.
Species _ Site 1 Site 2 Control Site

Bluehead chub
Nocomis leptocephalus -- 19 --
Golden shiner
Notemigonus crysoleucas 1 -- --
Creek chub
Semotilis atromaculatus -- 23 4
Creek chubsucker
Erimyzon oblongus 2 12 6
Redbreast sunfish
Lepomis auritus 1 13 --
Pumpkinseed
Lepomis gibbosus -- 1 --
Warmouth
Lepomis gulosus -- 2 18
Bluegill
Lepomis macrochirus -- 45 --
Largemouth bass
Micropterus salmoides 7 3 5
White crappie
Pomoxis annularis -- 1 --
Total No. of Fish 11 119 33
No. of Species 4 9 4
Catch per unit effort(#/hr) 83 357 208

Table 3. Length frequency of gamefish species, Long Branch, Pomono
Quarry, Greensboro, NC, September 24, 1998.
Size Redbreast Bluegill Largemouth
Group (mm)_ sunfish bass

26-50 3 -- 1
51-75 6 27 12
76-100 2 16 --
101-125 3 1 2
126-150 -- 1 --
Total 14 45 15
factors suggest that Long Branch at Pomono Quarry has very limited potential for aquatic
communities.
The aquatic macro invertebrate community was dominated by dragonfly larvae (Odonata),
midges (Chironomidae), and crayfish (Decapoda) (Table 4). A total of 15 taxa were
collected by qualitative sampling for the three sites. Number of taxa per site ranged from
5 to 8. The only EPT taxa collected were from the Hydropsychidae family. All
collected macro invertebrates are considered tolerant by NC Division of Water Quality.
The lack of riffle habitat and low dissolved oxygen values within Long Branch severely
limit macro invertebrate potential for the site. The existing community would be
considered Poor due to limited taxa and high tolerance values.
Conclusions
The environmental assessment of Long Branch suggests that the stream contains tolerant
fish and macro invertebrates taxa. The abundance of small sunfish in the absence of adult
fishes suggests that the stream receive immigrants from an adjacent pond during periods
of high flow. The drainage basin of Long Branch is largely industrial-and-urban.
Sedimentation was evident throughout the stream.
7
TABLE4. BENTHIC MACRO INVERTEBRATES, LONG BRANCH, GUILFORD COUNTY, NC, 9/24/98
SPECIES T.V. F.F.G. CONTROL SITE 1 SITE 2
MOLLUSCA
Gastropoda
Basommatophora
Physidae
Physella sp. 8.84 CG 1 1
ARTHROPODA
Crustacea
Decapoda
Cambaridae
Cambarus sp. 7.62 CG 1
Procambarus sp. 9.49 SH 2 2
Insecta
Odonata
Gomphidae
Gomphus sp. 5.8 P 1
Libellulidae
Libellula sp. 9.64 P 4
Megaloptera
Sialidae
Sialis sp. 7.17 P 1
Trichoptera
Hydropsychidae
Cheumatopsyche sp. 6.22 Fc 1
Hydropsyche sp. Fc 1
Coleoptera
Haliplidae
Peltodytes sp. 8.73 SH 2 1
Hydrophilidae
Tropisternus sp. 9.68 F 1 2
Diptera
Chironomidae 1
Ablabesmyia mallochi 7.2 P 1
Chironomus sp. 9.63 CG 3
Thienemannimyia gp. 8.42 P 2 1
CHORDATA 1
Amphibia
Caudata
TOTAL NUMBER OF ORGANISMS 10 10 9
TOTAL NUMBER OF TAXA 8 5 6
8
Martin
Aggregates
Charlotte District
P.O. Box 240635
Charlotte, North Carolina 8224-0635
_ Ielenhone: (704) 525-774
Fax. [phone]
October 4, 1999
Mr. John Dorney
North Carolina DENfR
4401 Reedy Creek Load
Raleigh, NC 27615
L,
WETLr„.ua u ?.?UI'?
WATER `,?.CT' F
wJ
e?
VJVA?
Re: 404 Application for Relocation of Low Branch - Additional Information
Martin Mariettars Pomona Quarry, Guilford County
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Based on your lette dated May 19, 1999 and our meeting in your office in late June, I am
providing the additi nal information that you requested. Fish and Wildlife Associates have
completed the Rosg n study, with assistance from Environmental Services, Inc. The study
outlines the channel characteristics of Long Branch that Mr. Ron Linville requested. I feel that
the submitted plans meet the requirements of the Rosgen study. I have attached a copy of the
report for your review.
Based on the success of the relocation of Clark's Creek at our Hickory Quarry, I feel that the •t-
majority of Mr. Linville's comments concerning the construction and stabilization of the new
channel can be accomplished based on the design previously submitted. Root-wads will be
provided along the side of the channel in the pool areas and anchored with boulders. Sprig
plantings adjacent to the creek will be obtained from existing species outlined on the plan or
obtained from the NC Forest Resources. The actual meandering of the flow within the new
channel occurs naturally based on the side-to-side slope of the constructed channel. The stream
relocation proposed at Pomona will be no different. Care will be taken to ensure adequate
erosion and sediment control measures are maintained during construction. All exposed slopes
will be seeded and stabilized prior to the introduction of Long Branch.
Guilford County approved our request for this project on September 22, 1999. Please inform
me of the next step in this process to obtain approval from the EMC as outlined in your letter.
Again, the Corp of Engineers and the North Carolina Water Quality Section are welcome to
inspect the project during and after construction is completed. Macr4henthos monitoring will
be conducted for three ears after the channel is relocated. Copies of this report will be
su mitted to the Corp of Engmeers an t e North Carolina Water Quality Section.
Please review the Rosgen study provided and feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
You can contact me at [phone] or e-mail me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
?& ?4K_
Brian K. North, PE
Sr. Environmental Engineer
cc: Dean Hardy, MMA
Jimmy Davis, MMA
619\101 additional inforequest
GUILFORD COUNTY
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
September 23, 1999
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622
RE: CASE #2-99 REQUEST FOR STREAM CHANNELIZATION APPROVAL
Following a public hearing on September 22, 1999 on a request for
approval to channelize a perennial stream as required by Section
7-1.9 of the Guilford County Development Ordinance, the Guilford
County Planning Board approved the request for the following
property:
Located on the south side of Chimney Rock Road (SR
1554) in Friendship Township. Being Guilford County
Tax Map 94-7031, Block 958, Parcels 3, 7, 2, and 8 and
Tax Map 94-7033, Block 957, Parcel 6. Zoned HI and RS-
40. High Point Watershed.
This decision is final unless it is appealed in writing to the
Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners within fifteen (15)
days of the September 22, 1999 Planning Board public hearing. If
appealed, you will be notified by the Clerk to the Board of
County Commissioners of the place, date, and time of the public
hearing.
eery truly yours,
DeLacy M. Wyman, Secretary
Guilford County Planning Board
/1
cc: Effie Varitimidis, Clerk to Board of County Commissioners
Warren Simmons, County Watershed Protection Engineer
Post Office Box 3427 • Greensboro, North Carolina 27402
Telephone: [phone]
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1100 WAKE FOREST ROAD, SUITE 200
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
[phone] FAX [phone]
7 September 1999
Mr. John L. Boaze
Fish and Wildlife Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 241
Whittier, NC 28789
RE: Stream Relocation Information for Quarry in Greensboro, North Carolina ER99-021
Dear Mr Boaze:
Thank you for contacting Environmental Services, Inc., (ESI) regarding the above referenced project.
We have collected and collated the necessary stream data, as requested by Mr. Ron Linville of the
NC Division of Water Quality. A disk containing the raw survey data is included in this package.
The following letter is a summary of our findings.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing channel which is subject to impact is approximately 2,200 feet in length, containing one
culvert crossing at the upper end, located within the Martin Marietta Quarry in Greensboro, North
Carolina. The 30-year average rainfall for the Greensboro area is approximately 42.6 inches per
year. The watershed for this stream is approximatel C 65 acres. A hydrogeomorphic investigation of the channel was conducted on 10 and 1 1 August Information gathered included a
longitudinal profile and riffle and pool cross-sections. The information was used to classify the
stream using a morphological classification system (Rosgen 1996). Information gathered indicates
the channel has a width/depth ratio of 18.5, an entrenchment ratio of 1.08, a channel sinuosity of 1.2,
and contains gravel substrate. Valley slope is 0.0095 and average water slope is 0.0079. The stream
is classified as an F4 stream type, which indicates a gravel bed, degrading stream channel on a slope
of less than 0.02 percent. The channel has downcut to the point that the original floodplain area has
been mostly abandoned.
The longitudinal profile reveals a poorly defined riffle/pool sequence throughout most of the reach.
An elevational change of 17.4 feet was noted from the proposed divergence point, north of the
culvert, to the proposed joining point. The stream shows sign of current beaver activity, with a large
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Mr. Boaze
7 September 1999
Page 2 of 3
dam located at station 12+90. Most of the stream has degraded to the point that the floodwaters
cannot readily access the floodplain. _- - - _-" The riffle cross section was taken at station 10+60, revealing a bankfull width of 12 feet, a bankfull
area of approximately 7.8 feet', a mean depth of 0.56 feet, and a maximum depth of 1.25 feet. The
pool cross section was taken at station 17+48, revealing a bankfull width of 15 feet, a bankfull area
of approximately 23 feet2, and a depth of 2.7 feet (See Attachment 1). P,L-?
REFERENCE REACH
An area which exhibited stable features was chosen to serve as a reference area. This channe S
section is located upstream from the proposed impact area. This channel section exhibited distinct
riffle/pool sequences, with a width/depth ratio of 13.6, an entrenchment ratio of 1.4, a channel'
sinuosity of 1.2, with a gravel substrate, an average surface slope of 0.005, and a pool to pool spacing
of 30 to 50 feet. The channel was identified as a 134c stream type, which indicates a gravel bed T o
channel with a series of rapids with irregularly spaced scour pools on a slope of less than 0.02
percent.
A longitudinal profile was taken along the reference reach. The profile indicated well defined pools
and riffles. The riffle cross section indicates a bankfull area of 7.1 feet', a bankfull width of 9.8 feet,
and a mean depth of 0.72 feet. The dimensionless ratios for this channel, which will be used to
design the relocated channel, include a width/depth ratio of 13.6, an entrenchment ratio of 1.4, and
a channel, sinuosity of 1.2 (See Attachment 2).
NEW CHANNEL DESIGN
It is our understanding that the relocated stream will occur within a 3,900-foot corridor and will be
created within an area of bedrock, culminating in a B 1 c stream type. In addressing Mr. Linville's
comments dated 19 April 1999, the excavated area which will contain the new channel should be
wide enough to include an area for a floodplain. The floodplain should be targeted for gravel/soil
deposition coupled with vegetation plantings. Vegetation should include herbaceous material and
overhanging, woody species, such as black willow and tag alder. During construction of the new
channel and floodplain, vegetation currently growing within the impact reach can be relocated to the
new floodplain. There is an abundance of large, woody vegetation, including black willow and tag
alder, which can be relocated so that the stems will overhang the new channel, creating shade and
diverse habitat. Because the channel is to be constructed in bedrock, the need for channel stabilizing
structures should not be necessary.
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Mr. Boaze
7 September 1999
Page 3 of 3
The target channel design should include a width/depth ratio of 13 to 14, an entrenchment ratio of
1.4 to 1.8, and a water surface slope of 0.003 percent. A sinuosity of 1.2 to 1.4 should be targeted
for the new channel.
The dimensions for the new stream channel should include a constructed floodplain with a minimum
width of 18 feet. The stream channel will be between 9 to 10 feet in width and will have some
sinuosity, but not extensive, approximately 110 to 120 feet of stream channel for every 100 feet of
corridor, creating a channel length of approximately 4,700 feet. Bankfull cross sectional area will
range between 7.1 and 7.5 feet2, with a mean depth of 0.72 ft. Pool-to-pool spacing will range from
30 to 50 feet, with long riffle sections producing extensive rapids. Pools will range from 2.5 to 3 feet
in depth.
We appreciate the chance to offer our services to you for this project. If you have any questions
concerning this project, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
EN O RVICES, INC.
Jan Gay
Senior Scientist
Attachment: Excel97 format data.
Data hard copies
Field notes
Martin Marietta Quarry, stream relocation project, Guilford County, North Carolina
Stream Classification Information
Impact Reach Channel Type F4
Drainage Area: 365 acres
Bankfull width: 12 feet
Mean Depth: 0.65 feet
Bankfull Cross-Section Area: 7.8 feetz
Width/Depth Ratio: 18.5
Maximum Depth: 1.25 feet
Width of Flood Prone Area: 13 feet
Entrenchment Ratio: 1.08
Water Surface Slope: 0.0079 ft/ft
Channel Sinuosity: 1.2
ref' 18- X- 5cdiw.
etev e--H &V-
s . $
2-
1-?
JA,
Elzs
A - Sec, . Q-a-,
c..04 C? ^ a ?odc' Qco r e Ar eA`
7-6-b-? . /A Ant 1 t P+-i- ? /?? e as u r ej cry ? Slc.7'? a ?,
C- o dG a C a y?L, A - W
/ ?z = ),02x3
C CL)

IGo( lv;?-f'4. ,rv? ea vco .,? - Sc c.
V do r4e*- - P I G. K n1 e. ' --4L r
?Cot
lO0( W: ( V -I2 w ?d .

.1I.1
cedc u (J( 'r,
T:w\ p' - Z-6we5"f" K hey ?-f l
5?257

13,,? Depi-IL
M."SUC,ej :4
CAg u
14
- ?-S" ?IZ = ? • 6 $'
T 1QC L u,5 c C U r vc-I u c c / 'ac-v% X?'V I I W 4,"L
. 1y. ?/?z I•??S
VaJ ley 5/6 pe = C ??, ?evw??c?, Val (,Oy
I ?. ! rC3v - v• coq S

?
0
C)
N rn

rn
O rn
LO
N 0)
cl: o.
c W

w

0
N

O
0

N

I
fl

C13
C_

O
O O
RS
a?
oU
`! Q
'ro
m =
U
O
t9 =2Z
a) a)
a 4-
f
E S

C CZ '0
N
2 U O G o

? O
O

?
0
•.
- U
Y I y
co
f0
co

N I
O
O
LO
7
N
N .?

c Cd

I
I U
? o W v?
.? o U') o In O
O O O O
CL r r r

rn
N CT)
O - - - - - - --- - -- -- -- - -- - -- --- - ---- -- -- - -- O O
(D C T
+ CD
C) CL
0 (D c 'a^
Q LU Cn
CO V J
C ? N
Cj) 2 ?
O
U)
cn
cn
O
U
a) °
o ?
v O
O
ACS
U
Q cz
U O
m as OZ
CC >+
w
CD
a CD ???
o
CL
a?. CU
?.
?c?-0
LL C J
o
C .?
R
i
i
` O
N
i
I
O
r I _
CQ
v
y C
C7 ?
W C/Z
L
U i
O O
N ,
O) U') co U7 r- U') (D LO LO U) v
O Ui O
O N O ti O (6
(0 T O `- O `- O `- O
d T T T T T
E
I
I

i

i

i

(a I,

0
i
I -

m
Y >

m

i
i i
i J
Y
C
? n
.

I

-
co

.._ -- -- -----

-

- rn
r ?

N CA
m T
+ L.0
r v cr a
<
000 l1J Cn
Cn
/
ai u
O 00/ O
[C
I
CU L.
U)
cn C)
tj
p
U
o
O
a

c Cl)
m _
N
m
m
? O
Cl)
CO
C-
I J
I it

i I ? 0
CCS
`

i c
? o U
Q ? 'C
Z' N O Z
D
7 i
d ?
'
I
'c CC
Cd
E S
N I 'E

C
I I
O cz V/l^
?
c j N ? O
? !

I

' ,artrt
V

i LO
i
I
Y
C
m
CO
L O
r
of
i y
u
i ?

W vs
U

U N
O l() r In O In rn
'- O O O O O
- In
C co
O
(0
L1 O O
O `
r ?-- O
E

Q1 ?
0 z ?-
o OQI < ?? n S 1
I? 3 3 v3 k q--) ? a3 . 3
t?
.?I
'I
I
i Q
0
I

o _
M LL
d
?
q'v Z-
i

MO ?3Q'(?
o OOM H

M
fw4 `
V ,

W I , S (N r %),)
> W u)+
E h O 01 O N (`? V to O b Q) O N P7 V to - a7 I- O M O N ("1 V (fl (D 1? m m O h f`
D . I ('] (7 (`? ('1 V C C V C V V Q V 117 In Ln LO M 1J7 to 117 1n 1L7 1D G O 17 (D (D (C (D tD w f`
U) to . I
I?
CL
¢j t
i ? ? W i K e•, `A, C? =? .... I
10
I J
r
t m >
Q) LL
J r _° lL h
QR
1 c?j in . (n LL ?? \,f) h ,J? :7 `9 d- L' Q` q a o G o
d) LL
_:! oe ??, o0 00 00 eo to r °p l50 '? Go Qo ?` Op (?
c
o a
i,
2
X

c•

`I
`I U im

1V, M.
I
CO
?

C:; 0

w y
M
!

j t
l O "

CL ' N C^, 7
o to O
r` O Q) N ('7 ? In (D 1? m O O C l h '7 17 10 f?

N C1 C1- N N GD O O

N N- Cl) `1 m .7 1•,

(") ('7 M M-(h
.--?-.....-??..-^..-.ew.•'r.n sTn?RCSI?}TJRI*!r. .. . , r .. _. - - •. ?" 1' ..'
0
0
q
A
a
w
w
a
y
\Vl?
1
ti
w
.ri
F
J

a

o ?

E
113 LL
^ 1
?
Op CD C,
1

° w
2 d - ?y r
0
a'
H
I
O
a
Ii?I
Q
°
w'
c

)Z ZS --6' CkA 4?
'0

;o
LL
W
?, ''? a ? M c ?`'? a- ? o? r? ? '? ._ ? ? ? ? , `?? v? In
LL'LL
SLL
I i

M LL
O

E co f.- co m O N P7 C N m r- m m C) m 0 Lo m LO Ln (o 1o N Lo ? (DD (D (ND (o (ac (D w cc w w ° t` r r r
m m v c v< v v v v v v m rn
oI
-
Cry
c?v 1D (K I
O
?
N

o W
2i I
2
O
C) J

S

:c
0 0
4

I
r
0
W
?.1
(? /
? nn n
o O in ?(h a\
AJ (nLL 10 a I o- eo 00 O o a- Go ,r^? CID s31?_ Q t? ?? cx? S 1r a o L?
?rl
.J o y.
O
.
E'-

a
mSLL
2:

M'
I O
J ?•.,? 1
n1 V r
Q-,
^3 r
J L?,. J
r... ''.;?1 l? ?• CI
r,
° \. ? ? O
r
W W m o N 0 f Z' CU U r .. ; rry `?`
I r? r? 1 r
) ^?j 1 r? ??)
z ~
J ?a
Vii , O
2 '?'; N -r n (o r- co a)
r
- ??
!D
m m c
CA rl
r! c'! •? r- m Cl)
N (! 1 ' 1 ' ! N N N t'1 (") T r~ ...

6
O I
x Q Z
W
O
a U
,LY's7
yl d
tau w
I
r. J.Y LL LL i
a ? ' ? I I
? Ili I ? I
I
J M LL
i co
0 I Q
LL
NW I ,,H^^
LL ? V/
U O n• O Q) .-- N M l1') (D 1? 07 O O N M V Ln (D h aO m O N M 7 Lf') cD n W O) O N Cl)
C
M M M M c V ? ?T v R V V V V to U7 Ln to UJ Ln Ln L!7 Ln to O tD (D (D (D CD c0 (D tD tD n• n• n• n. n

o
> I
L
I
Q
C O
Wj OI Z
>'UJI VI
Of. :D O !
n Q) J

CI
o QI I
= O
I
W
I
L
UL
Fn
U-)
-1 -Z7,
(b LL N-

j :
=.LL .
I

L
OI
tq ; U) I
I

I
Y;m' LL I I
CO

c
Imo : to
(••1 _ _ .... .... ... ,,. _ n N M ?T LA 'D n co m m ^i co -T tf) (D n CO rn O N M ? _.
v o, O Y O O o p 4. O o .? , p
f
h N
b?
Q

J
V
n

n
K 1

?IQ \r- J
to _ ,? CL
i
? 0 X o

roo _9 (07
00 C6 o z
c
?4

+ oo Q? OD 00 Oo

`J' o? M `q ? ? MOB car ? ?• o ? n>? 1-? r ? ? r ? ? o ?? M ? ? O
v
? rJ

"Z''
? ? ;, ? ? h C? ? ?- ?' ? ?, ?? 1_ r r ? I? f-. t= ? t- ?' ? C? 1 1? f-? ?-? t- t- ti ? ; - ?, ?-
q cf 0- ?9 Q CC c? O ,
h
w cr
An vx t-.
L
-? o O
a?
0
?f
II
Q

w
S

1

r
0
,w
i ; LL

I

j NCO 0` ?? Qj
I I I ? I
cn
M LL O t
I ??
10
a
~ LL
t r o? y' th i' + M M M
N ?'? 1

A (D 1? O M O LO M h M M O M n In (c f- M O O N M V U) co f-- M O O r 1` r f`
(h m m n Q Q O Q C V V V V a LO tn t ?I In in LO Ln u7 (O CO (O cD O O O (O W CO 1-
I
-j c:
a C
Q '
F-
W
- I
? L O
J a) CL >

C) in 4-?
LL
I
0'
q55 r-7,. zS rzS F, w
J LL
---
- -

lj a E -

..
, LL
._

-C
al'
I .
W LL
co
O v7
W
>
Of '' r
u m o t4 V) CL
_..?
O
J I"' O !'J ("1 -S (O N o0 Q? O N c7 -r ?, UJ f? tl. N (") 't
Q1
N N N N N ?fi (D W U
a -so o S? av -jam
OD 4 K Q' C 1 - r OC) QM" -- a' O Cf
J '

r

a
'C

1
- c
G
?o o M -
U
- 'a
n

,
y
c V'
q ?
r
4
o
?- Z& OB ??
JJ

4

r
? -1 T
O
7
,
0 z
w
i a-7 4- C
o + 4- YD c?
O.
o
?w
A NLL?Scv?M ?;n?o?DhL?O?c7?p,o??'c? ° a??o???hoQ-nS
", o= CO ?? d' o' 0?? cT 4OQ o Cb? a' O Q O? O; ?j?j p= 0.? OD
O I ? I
1' W LL Y
o O p ?1- ? ? ? ? o * ? S ? dJ O
w ?` r r r r T- C? c +
> W N 1
E I co co rn o Lo cc ti 0 m o N m c Un w r- co rn o c? c? a ?n w ? w rn o ^ ^ n
(n (/? = f M M M M C V 'r -q V tf V V 1A 1!) u7 n n A n l[7 D (C f0 (D to CO (O (D (G D t--
Lr)

a I.¢
''
c I z

a Lo
.
>
I = rr, y
O
i
s"-.8?? p s c? ?, -? <? p D x S v° O Y ?Q9
°- - v' ?f) ?- G rn C( ?J- M ?n flD mot' C`7 \? 7
a j (/J N LL ?r` Z~ .S?
co
d) LL
LL IF) \9? M? o o= p CS c o `c; o c e0

? ? 2 LL

C

N
° m LL
ii o

_ r p l °
N
` Q LL„ 1.1-
IIJ '?
' ? C ? I
N
(? T

F '

-
V
? e

I I'D \1D
J O !J C ?- i -? 't ir. ?L r a? cn r r r?

- rJ

Ist
co vs J
Ito ?? •-•-^„ V v

•

?' M
-77

r
h

o
? 0
(fit 0
M r,3
?

i
0
q' a- c

c•t ?
c-,
n
Z t-
a
-Z
r Ri

?, •? M ? o v ? N ? ? ? 3 ? j-- ,?-r1 ?l
M ? ??M r? o ?? Q?'6 ?9 r4 EL ? ?cc ? oc?_9
4
^ a _ O ca Q'

o O C? O Q

7
l
Martin Marietta Quarry, stream relocation project, Guilford County, North Carolina
Stream Classification Information
Reference Reach Channel Type B4c
Drainage Area: 350 acres
Bankfull width: 9.8 feet
Mean Depth: 0.72 feet
Bankfull Cross-Section Area: 7.1 feet2
Width/Depth Ratio: 13.6
Maximum Depth: 0.85 feet
Width of Flood Prone Area: 13.8 feet
D50: 13 mm
Entrenchment Ratio: 1.4
Water Surface Slope: 0.0052 ft/ft
Channel Sinuosity: 1.2
G, C v ( 474 ' ov,, 3
e ec?eu c?
?.? cr
.?z
-a Lo D
ct.F/0,? Z 13.6
U ir
?(-One
2\ ??mss Me-,4
o-r
w?,?? ?? ?' lob
c ems, w ?, d? ? ?.
e ? on
'4,+. o
I c mne
13. $ l].$ /•11o?
W oy-?. S Ip?
Q.0?g / ig5
fo-. -0o52
C?Jc, u 1A; 0,5 ?ca0 t -
. I ?". dY1 Qh?j u c -e? ?,c o, eta l' i o r -
Dz9
--- - - -a • 3 2 ---Q4

1 Z. 5 ?' f

?o A c e- IriMe-
?2.3 ?d• ?S - ?• ?3
Q
?Ook wJ+? l w\14-t

x.83
/? Pool ?q_?k/ Mme,,. ?
;?-321 O.3 Z 3.2-
Ca ICU ? cj- oVIs cP 3?
-?e.5 e he e, ?-?e mac, ?
p.9y / o,5s5 = FL. Toil
y6?5

ib.0 ?V S C v ? ?d? PL / LAA'
o.azlis?i O• ?o
Q` SIB - c
. I? / lp

rn
N O
O O
O
O Q
W U)
? U
? J
n 0y.
w
0
0
a
to
c?
o C
o
a O
? 0OU
0
CJ ro :«_ 't
U O
?Z
L u
?
2
a E?
5 .2 C4 sco 0
LU
m o cz(A?
O
L R
v
O.
d ?
b
O
0
w
a?
w ?' v
C ?
O ?
o
H a
? U

n-
io ? »r
Q C
c u1 n)
3

?

O T
tU. U
N .U+•
bA
J w a D
i
U
(0
j
? O
(0 i
N

1

I? O
V-
T
U
t0
7

N

c

m O
U
o

ma 5 ° Z
y
V C: ? I - o
T IM
L

N
m lV
E 7
a> U
c?U) a
m O
co
o

I

I
,- i 0
?
i i
o
v
i
i
i

N ? ? p

p w
c as
m ? ? C
I
W rA
? o
a?
C
N Ln

(O (D Lo Lo LO
T T
T Lr; T l? tt
T
" T LO M
T
? T
w
a) T T T T

Q)
r rn
CY) - - -- -- - -- - - --- - - -- o rn
CY)
Q (n c
W
U)
C ? u
N LL C.
U)
N
N
O
U
Q) C)
5
C_
O
c`? co U
U p
c?
Z' O
UZ
:3 I
C?
CD ?ro?
a? . a) U
m ' b
g co cn a
N
0
r ..
C~
V1
O ?
L .?
N
U O
C
N r O m co ti co LO co
N N r r r r r r r
r r r r r r r r r
? I
j
i
I
? I
Y
? I
i m

m
I J I

I ?
i
I
i Y

o
m
i j
i fU I it
Q?I I
N
C
O
n.

_O
I

N
?
m
i L
01

rn
LO r
O LO a
fa- U cc W
J U)
C ai u
U U
W U-)
O
v I
o I
0
a I
C)
v
I
j ?
I i I M
I I it ?
' I
cd
M i ccz 0O U
Oros
0
z
?-
04 w
a? m (U O
O
[0 (1) U
(0 r .
Lo Cn "?
I
m m o
J C4
I I
i
I
LO
I i I I
i
I ? ? o
r
I ? u
c
co °1 W
o
U t1) co In r- U? (0 LO Ln LO d LO M
C
CO r ti r (n `- ?n r d r M r
r r r r r r r r r r r r
y.._ r r r r r r
N
Q'

li
i
x
O
Wj
A
w
w
\I?
?L
w
Q
0
I ?
w
j
C N
x
O
O
m
A
w
w
w
?
G i •
N
. z
w
2
z
O
= ?'
' ° ?
' 1-- F-
- ?- `- cY` ? 4-- M ? h cV, _ nr.
? ? ?, 1, c?•? ?_ t? ? 3 1, ? I3 ` ` \3 1?

0
dLL
w
c? J - ? vl lam' J h ^ J (?' ?

?-"
? vo of
r?J`9
??`o
? ?p?
? ?5v
`9 ?9 ?)
v'v
? •??
.9v v c
v'v?
I j

m
LL rn M M 7?- C\ ?W
Q rt` T r 1
cD t? O G)
M M M M O N
r V V M Q (D
V V V V V O a O
7 V N N m V LO
U7 Ln Ln LO (D t. O T
U7 LO LD LO O N
(D D cD M Q Ln O
2 to S (D ti co Of O
co tD (D f? o
N c•f
I? n
- ? III III V
'? ? I I? I u 1
OI iz ¢t-ln
Q ! I W
10
~
>
W ` 11\ ;
Q- Ir t!! LL , U. LL T R \ (? (1 1 ?9 `g, V ?9 ?` vp o
' j •? y i i ! ', I I
I I '
V Y ? m LL Off. ) ? ? __ ._I
U' I V
OI Q ?1 ?- ?? q T
OI UI \ V
7
x? c
O
a?
.a ,
I
? O
•r
?a
..y

Q
Q
r
>w
Z?
0 N

z
? z
w
z
s
?o ?
z2 P?o

m LL

_ CD t`
M M CO M O
fh M V V N M
V V V V V V Q '7 Lo C4 M
?^1 N Ln T
U7 (D
LO N to tr CO Q) O -
to 11 CD O N M 7 to
(D cD O cD f,- co O
O cD O (D O N M
n f? f.

:J
2 E

?
N

j l
x o u w
13 ?' ? ? nn ? ? ?`? 3 t? M l3 ?? `? 13 ?-- cp ti ,- M 1-, 1° ?, ?3
i
?; -
i
a o of
t
l
4.
I.CL..-. 19 LL j
Q) >
?. I o SILL
w
? o a?i
I
?E:_=ILL • I
I .a :2 c
_I ! , Y;mLL
y U
! CO
.
Q io !I :
J ?9 I? N V V'
Z5 f op. . J
DT-
?? S
? n
s1
OI
O
a
a
w
w
I ?
=9
vc
?y
F ?
_J
Z
W
L
O
I"
i
i J
o
? LL
i>
m
w

LL LL
I

M LL
WI
OI
H LL
FQ-
N
O ? N O O N M V CD t` [O O O N N V O n O 0 O N N V u O n (D (D O N [7
c'7 Cl) (") (h C V V 7 V V V V V V ? ? Ln Ln 0 0 LO LO U7 U') (O cD cD cD cD cD CD t0 (D (D I-
Q
Q
I
W'
?. W
U),
O
O
a
a
w
v
i
?I
W
x
F
7

xl;

OI Z

p
^
11
'36
v
r' '
r I

Ui
c'? Q7: 4
y
f

l? a): LL
L

V
?
+
L
aci I
I
? 7 =I
2 C; LL I I
? ? i
I ?
I
I
I I
I
I I I
I
?

- ( ?
?r1
L ? Y m I
U u. i ail i
I ca
CO

Q

O Z
O

L Q Q

f_"_'

W

lj
O
Z
If : H

L
-?
-3-
}.
}- y
D ? 0 ?7 A
0 y N (h V L c0 r, a0 O O N Ih R LA (0 h ap _ O) ? O N N m -,t N N N N N 04 11 (o N

i N N
to
O? C4 1 O M N CO
NI N . (O C'') c'o

Silt. Clay .? <.062
Very Fine .062-125
Fine .125-25
S k

.
A

---x
tj
Medium .25-50 I
N
I
??
Coarse .50-1.0 D
t
2
0
04-.08 Very Coarse .
- ( --
08 - .16 Very Fine 2-4 ° u
Ll
.?
16-.22

. Fine 4-57
t?

71
.22-.31- --1 _ Fine
- - 5.7-8
-- -
"?' - --'
3
.31 -.44 Medium 8-11 3
6
',
.44-63 Medium 11.3.16 \/ J1?1 - ---- - --- - - -
-
- z
f q
63-.89 Coarse 16-22.6 E
L?? .
19 L. C64,
89 -1.26 _ Coarse 22.6- 32 ^? 6 0
S
1.26-1.77 Very coarse 32 - 45
t I?1 N I
_
-
1.77-2.5 _Very Coarse 45-64
2.5-3.5 Small
l 64.90 C
_
3.5-5.0 j Small 90 -128 B ^
5.0-7.1 ! Large 128 180 B O
7.1 10.1 Large 1BO-256 E: -- ----_ - _ - - _ - _ _ _ - x
10
1-14
3 - -
Small 256.362
-- B
-
.
. ( 0
14.3.20 Small 362 - 512 U1
20 - 40 Medium I 512 -1024 E^ - -
40.80 La ge-Vry Large_ 1024 -_2048
,
R
_. _
Bedrock --- -- _ -_: - - -- - - - --- - - -
TOTALS
E San ds Gravels iI C Cobbles- 1 E-- Boulders j- -.Bedrk50
100
CD >

45
90

80
I
? -40
m
I

35
70
'
I
-
60 30
W
m
z r±?
- 50 25
. , z li

- -

- - -

-

- I
r

z
2

l
40
j n
r*
a

15
30 1
e
10
20

10
,
o
O J
N W ? (J, m
'° N W A Clt m N W 'A V, ',?' or __ ._ N
JO'e0 O C. O O O O
0

° g W i- -? O

O
O O ....y g
f
CD
_ O

O

PARTICLE SIZE - Millimeters O ?
II /.
4
r
? I
I? ?.\ rt f f?,
!' J

r r.

?n

U1
I
^
?J

!1'

1

r?
r
C
\ Cy
w O
? O
six
?
N
rte

7
?J
x ?
0
o
'rv
T
?" r Q

lo?
F `-?_„_ ? rte. ?? -.,.-- -- ._

x
0
0
w
a
a
w
w
1
^?S
i
1
w
x
F

0
m
a
.a
w
w
V;
G
7
E
x
0
0
co
Q
a
1
V
^5
I?
W
x
H
C,
0
o z

o 4
U

R ti ?
v vO v

CL)
LLJ
LL,

- I

co

Q
O
o _
o
` ?\ vl
C1 ' `1 c U v *J
<) 4N

LLJ
\r
Q. i - .. c0
1
0 r
°) N c") V (D 1? c0 O N M V u7 cD cO Oh n r- i
CO (D c0 cD
cD (D c0 W D
C/) M c?+)
N = -
M M R V a r C V V V z c!7
V in LL7

0
0
N
z
,
u7
0
' to
f
'v 3

I i'S I
u
N
irr n

o LL

:
LL
r

2 c
IN
` i
?I II
I '
m WILL
I
> CL
O c,) co (.') c
1 U: 1 V) I? N O N M O N O ? O N N N N N N
.7 O I p t .- N ('7 v to O co m r r N N N N N
i7 ? J -
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 199920611
April 29, 1999
PUBLIC NOTICE
MARTIN MARIETTA AGGREGATES, Post Office Box 240635,
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28224-0636, has requested a Department
of the Army (DA) permit TO AUTHORIZE THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF
LONG BRANCH ASSOCIATED WITH PLANS FOR EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING
QUARRY PIT WITHIN THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY OF THEIR POMONA QUARRY,
LOCATED SOUTH OF CHIMNEY ROCK ROAD, SOUTHWEST OF GREENSBORO, IN
GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA.
The following description of the work is taken from data
provided by the applicant and from observations made during a
site visit by a representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans
submitted with the application show the relocation of
approximately 2025 linear feet of stream channel around a
proposed expansion pit for the quarry operations. The new
channel will be approximately 4150 linear feet long constructed
by excavation of natural rock along its entire length. The
existing stream flows through the active quarry and has been
degraded by past quarry ac-f-ivi-ties as evidenced-by unstab-T-e-
e'ro e eam oms- and the_presence- o-?
suustant-ia7 vegetative debris. Field measurements o? the
eX"is ing stream c aracteris-tics and morphology have been taken.
These measurements and methodologies, developed by Rosgen (1996),
were used to develop the plans to establish the relocated
stream's widths, depths, meander, pools, and riffles. Removal of
the overburden to expose the bedrock is currently underway on the
proposed stream relocation site. All of the construction of the
new channel will be conducted in the "dry," beginning from the
furthest downstream end and progressing upstream. Attached are
various cross-sections that are proposed to incorporate different
attributes within the channel. The planting of woody vegetation
samplings are proposed along the top of the channel as shown on
the attached plans. They will be primarily limited to the
interior (mine side) of the new channel. The outside western
slope of the overburden adjacent to the new channel will be
graded to a maximum slope of 2:1 and will be vegetated upon
completion. The western side of the channel is presently shaded
by an established growth of pines and small hardwoods.
Requests for public hearing shall state, with particularity, the
reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version
of the National Register of Historic Places for the presence or
absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being
eligible for inclusion therein, and this site is not registered
property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in
the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes
the extent of cultural resource investigations by the District
Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of the presence of such
resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific,
prehistorical, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by
work under the requested permit. 7
DA7
The District Engineer as determined, based on a review of
data f rnis-ied by tFie applic nt and onsite observation, that the
activity will nom.affect species, or their critical habitat,
designated as endangered or reatened pursuant to the Endangered
Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an
evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts,
of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public
interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed
activity may have on the public interest requires a careful
weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each
particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected
to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its
reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to
authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it
will be allowed to occur, are therefore determined by the outcome
of the general balancing process. That decision should reflect
the national concern for both protection and utilization of
important resources. All factors which may be relevant to the
proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics,
general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish
and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in
accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation,
shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and
conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership,
and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For
activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials
in waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the
discharge that would be authorized by such permit would not
comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1)
guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other
3
ofte-0i V W,

1
TA
D
!BA
REAM
ROM
-RAP
EA i
T'REES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STRFAM
NOTE.
FLMJRE STRFAM CONDITION AS SHOWN
ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-S=ON
IS AN APPROXIMATION. SrIE CONDITIONS
WILL VARY.
SCALE : I" - 200',
w
0 50 100 200 3w 1
RAIJaGH. N.C.
CREEK RELOCATION ON
POMOMA QUARRY
FA MUNTY, N.C.
POMONA
I ioaw.
IVICIVIUMANUUIVI
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Martin Marietta Materials
Project Number 99 0234
Recvd From APP
Received Date 3/12/99 Recvd By Region 3/16/99
Project Type Water Supply - III Stream Relocation
Region Winston-Salem
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
Stream O Y O N r 16-11-6-(2) WSIII NSW 30,602. 0.50 2.025.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream F_I 4,150.00
F_ I F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? O Y (ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y 0 N
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
1. Local water supply administrator (Jeremy Thomas w/ Greensboro @ 336-412-6202) should
concur with project
2_ Applicant should submit full F&WA report as part of it is missing from 401 submittal.
3. Before beginning stream relocation project, the applicant must submit plans and receive approval
from QWQ The followingjtems should be included:
a. Watershed size,. description and stormwater data for valley and basin,
h. Measurement and assessment data for the existing stream channel,
c. Measurement and assessment data for a reference reach within the same geophysical area.
County Guilford
County2
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facilty Name Martin Marietta Materials
Project Number 99 0234
County Guilford
Regiional Contact: Ron Linville
Date: 4/20/99
Comments (continued from page 1):
d. Applied fluvial g .omor phologic al desig n assessment and data for the proposed s tream relocation
showing bioengineering. p lan vie w dime nsions and longitudinal and cross sectional profiles (for riffles
and pools). Information s ubmitted must i nclude considerations for bank stress condi tions hankful and
floodprone areas. The ext ra lengt h of the relocated stream channel as relates to red uced stream

dimensions must be subst v
antially
addres
sed. The relocated channel. even though o
f smaller
dimensions, must provide continu ous . un interrupted flows for aquatic life As the n ew channel
design and construction m ust pro vide for continuous, uninterrupted low flows; it mus t also handle
stormwater events without aegrad ing or d egrading. (The aquatic community in the n ew stream
channel will likely be differ ent from that fo und in the original channel.)
e. Rootwad drawings sho wn in th e applic ation are not as routinely found in fluvial ge omorpholog' .arc I
restoration plans. A revise d secti onal roo twad design should be provided
f. Consideration of "chiss elling" o r "blasti ng in" the meandering channel. including ri ffles and per
/
should be given considera tion inst ead of creating meanders by backfilling with lose , i
rip-rap or
boulders.
U. The stream and floodpl ain area s will n eed to be designed with soil integration for the purposes of
providing successful reveg ettation and bio logical functions The adhesiveness of the restored channel
to bedrock should be addr essed t hrough bank stress and slippage considerations D esign specifics
mould be provided as app ropriate .
h. A planting schedule will need t o b pro vided for the mean water level
the floodpl ain and the
floodway. The schedule s hould m eet 401 ,
general certification minimum rPr?uirement s (The applicant
mould be provided a copy of our general requirements for sreambank r v g .talon )
i._ The headwaters and the tailwat ers of th is project must connect to the existing stre ams in a manner
that will not aggrade or de grade w aters a bove or below the project
i. The relocated channel s hould b e place d into a conservation easement with adequ ate buffers to
insure biological integri f or aquat ic. avia n and terrestrial organisms
k. Stormwater managemen t mayb e provi ded through the quarry's normal operations but will require
DWQ approval,
cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Martin Marietta Materials
County Guilford
Project Number 99 0234 County2
Recvd From App Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 3/12/99 Recvd By Region 3/16/99
Project Type Water Su pply - III Stream Relocation
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
ip Stream PT -@)N F- 16-11-6-(2) WSI11 NSW 30,602. 0.50 2,025.00
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream F_ F_- 4,150.00
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y Q N Did you request more info? Q Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y Q N Recommendation: Q Issue 0 Issue/fond Q Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
1. Local water supply administrator (may Thomas w/ Greensboro 936-412-6202) should
concur with project
2 Applicant should submit fell FttW report as part of it is mis ing from 401 submittal
3. Before beginning stream relocation project, the apnlicant mu st submit plans and receive approval
from DM, the followingst .ms should . he included:
a. Watershed i , d ription and stormwater data for valley and basin.
b. Measurement and assessment data for the existing stream r'hannel
Measurement an assessment data or a referenale reach within the m geophysical area
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name Martin Marietta Materials County Guilford
Project Number 99 0234 Regional Contact: Ron Linville
Date: 4/20/99
Comments (continued from page 1):
d. Applied fluvial geomorph ological desig n assessment and data for the proposed stream relocation
showing bioengineering-pla n view dime nsions and lon gitudinal and cross sectional profiles (for riffles
and ools). Information sub mitted must i nclude conside rations for bank stress conditions, bankful and
floo prone areas. The extra length of the relocated stre am channel as relates to reduced stream
dimensions must be substan tially addres sed. The reloc ated channel, even though of smaller
dimensions, must provide co ntinuous ,un interrupted flo ws for aquatic life. As the new channel
design and construction mus t provide for continuous, un interrupted low flows; it must also handle
stormwater events without a ggrading or d egrading. (Th e aquatic community in the new stream
channel will likely be differen t from that fo und in the orig inal channel.)
e. Rootwad drawings shown in the applic ation are not a s routinely found in fluvial geomorphological
restoration plans. A revised sectional roo twad design s hould be provided,
f. Consideration of "chissell ing" or "blasti ng in" the mea ndering channel, including riffles and pools,
should be given consideratio n instead of creating mean ders by backfillina with lose rip-rap or
boulders.
U. The stream and floodplai n areas will n eed to be desi gned with soil integration for the purposes of
Providing successful reveget ation and bio logical functio ns. The adhesiveness of the restored channel
to bedrock should be addres sed through bank stress an d slippage considerations. Design specifics
should be provided as appro priate,
h. A Ip anting schedule will n eed to be pro vided for the mean water level
the floodplain and the
floodway. The schedule sho uld meet 401 general certif ,
ication minimum requirements. (The applicant
should be provided a copy o f our general requirements for sreambank revegetaion.)
i. The headwaters and the t ailwaters of th is project mus t connect to the existing streams in a manner
that will not aggrade or degr ade waters a bove or below the project.
j. The relocated channel sho uld be place d into a conse rvation easement with adequate buffers to
insure biological integrity for aquatic, avia n and terrestri al organisms,
k. Stormwater management may be provi ded through th e quarry's normal operations but will require
DWQ approval.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Ron Linville
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor: I arry Coble
Date: 41120,199
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Martin Marietta Materials County Guilford
Project Number 99 0234
Recvd From APP
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 3/12/99 Recvd By Region 3/16/99
Project Type Water Supply - III Stream Relocation
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
ip Stream O Y O N F - 16-11-6-(2) WSIII NSW 30,602. 0.50 2,025.00
F_f - o Y O N F -I--F-f -F-F-I--
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Stream F_ I 4,150.00
F_ I F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y Q N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
1 Local water supply administrator (Jeremy Thomas w/ Greensboro Ca? 506-412-6202) should
concur wffith project
2 Applicant should submit full F&WA report as part of it is missing from 401 submittal.
3- Before beginning stream relocation project, the applicant must submit plans and receive approval
from DWO The following items should be included
a Watershed size, description and stormwater data for valley and basin.
b Measurement and assessment data for the existing stream channel.
n Measurement and assessment data for a reference reach within the same Ueophysical area.
Recommendation: Q Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Martin Marrietta Materials, DWQ#990234, Guill'ord Co.
LIZ ?, 'I, ?
Subject: Martin Marrietta Materials, DWQ#990234, Guilford Co. r 101/
Date: Mon 19 Apr 1999 15:41:34 +0500
From: "James Ronald (Ron) Linville" <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Winston Salem
To: "John Dorsey" <[e-mail]>,
"Todd St. John" <[e-mail]. nc.us>
CC: "Michael Parker" <Mi ke-Parker @ aro. enr. state. nc.us>,
"Mickey, Joseph H. Jr." <[e-mail]>mike.hintonC
Please place this project on hold. The application is incomplete
in that part of the Fish and Wildlife Associates report appears to be
missing. Also before a review of the new stream design can be
accomplished, the applicant needs to submit watershed basin size and
rainfall information as well as measurement and assessment data for
the existing stream channel, data for a comparative reference reach
in the area, and design data for the proposed stream relocation
(bioengineering dimensions and dimentionless ratio calculations must
be provided in order to show existing conditions and post relocation
conditions). Longitudinal profiles as well as pool and riffle cross-
sectional profiles should be included. Plan items, such as but not
limited to, bank stress conditions, bankful and floodprone areas need
to be included which indicate the ability of the new channel to
adequately handle normal flows as well as stormwater flow regimes.
The region is concerned that the pictured use of rootwads does not
appear to be like those routinely found in stream restoration design
work. The region would recommend that the meandering stream channel
be constructed in and on bedrock, if possible, instead of being made
to lay on top of the blasted area in a post blasting large stone
meander installation. However, whichever meander process is
utilized, it will be necesssary that the channel design include soil
integration and stabilization with vegetation within the floodplain
zone. As the relocated channel is to be longer than the original
channel, calculations must show that the extra length will be
accounted for by a reduction in stream dimensions so that a
continuous, uninterrupted flow regime can be insured for aquatic
organism migration. As this project will be somewhat innovative
and to be constructed in bedrock, the region would like to share the
review of this project with some experienced stream restoration
professionals and hydrogeologist in order to glen from their
insights. The region will not be able to start this review until
after the first week of May 1999. In the interim, comments will be
solicited from Rosgen Level 4 particpants (time allowing) utilizing
the existing application document.

e 1 4/20/99 8:22 AM
MEMORANDUM

TO: John Dorney Regional Contact-
Non-Discharge Branc WQ Supervisor:
Date: , P
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Facility Name Martin Marietta Materials County Guilford
Project Number 99 0234 County2
Recvd From APP Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 3/12/99 Recvd By Region
Project Type a "•• '.'-r,
RC1vt1

Certificates Stream APR ..4 1999
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Re Si,Jh
ip t3LH W-7-0 N 16-11-6-(2) WSIII NSW 30,602. 0.50 2,025.0"'?`? ??"°?`?t 41191

Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y O N Did you request more info? O Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O ISSue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Charlotte District Office - Carolina Division
P.O. Box 240635
Charlotte, North Carolina 28224-0635
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
April 5, 1999
Mr. John Thomas
United States Army Corp of Engineers
6508 Falls Of The Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615
Re: 404 Application for Relocation of Long Branch - Additional Information
Martin Marietta's Pomona Quarry r? , ? C, 1?
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Please find attached the additional information you requested. I have indicated the location and
area of impacts proposed for this project on the overall mine map. The notes pertaining to the
construction and stabilization of the new channel have been enlarged and color of the maps has
been revised. The narrative has also been revised to indicate the purpose and alternatives
discussed for relocation of Long Branch. The names of the two adjacent property owners
located on the north and south end of Long Branch were researched at the Guilford County
Courthouse. Ms. Sarah Yow, 5000 West Wendover Ave., Greensboro, NC 27419, owns the
property adjacent to Long Branch to the south. The North Carolina Department of
Transportation has purchased the Dan Nicholas property adjacent to Long Branch to the north
end of the property. The Guilford County Tax Department didn't have an address for NCDOT,
due to their tax-exempt status. This information should address your comments per our recent
phone conversation and should meet with your approval. Please notify me when the public
notice is officially advertised. I appreciate your assistance and cooperation concerning this
project. If you have any additional questions, please contact me at [phone] or e-mail
me at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
rPE
Sr. Environmental Engineer
cc: John Dorney, NCDENR
Dean Hardy, MMA
?0
b
619\404app1 icationcvr2
p 0??
Mlfw 1T IlElal
wR W
t/ IwlMw.w ?

w? wRfY WI
DOW?

? 1
O

? a
rM. r ?'1 mt? ?;. ^?
•r.-J ? it \ ?/ ?r
d? N

}

0
L

Rarr PU?nRr ? ww
Ar urr uss O^
A.wR Arm (___? Mumma awwl,rf???f?
wr 1FRN ? _ _ ? J R?Maa as?a MRm a
a? per aawRw
Ow RMS t- ¦RRa?R au?laal
MRi b0 Rt• alwt ?....
? r wRa ru
arw au
PROPOSED CHANNEL RHIOCJAMO7
POMONA QUARRY
wy ?•. MMYORD COUNTY, N.C
? Iw !1 O A ? ? ss,
N.
i

44W

pp,
N
e?s
VARIOUS
PLACEMI M
OF BOULDERS 10..,
00
Il+00
12,00
13,00
14,00
15+00
NOTE:
1. Trees to be planted along the top of the creek relocation
should include the following:
->V rginia Pine, Blackgum, Black Cheery, Chestnut Oak,
Persimmon, Sawthooth Oak and White Ash.
2. Space It= 10 to 12' apart throughout the length of channel.
3. Trees will be planted in conjunction with the Division of
Forest Resources recommendations during the months of
December and February . Trees will be evenly distributed along
the indicated areas.
4. "Root-wads" will be planted on both sides of the channel in
"pooling areas" only.
5. Stream will meandor based on rip-rap placement and wbeal
bottom slope of channel.
POOLING AREA
TYP. CROSS SECTION
MA
A
IF
SCALE : 1" - 200'
0 60 100 200 300 100
NOTE:
FUTURE STREAM CONDITION AS SHOWN
ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-SECTION
IS AN APPROXIMATION. SITE CONDITIONS
WILL VARY.
? TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STREAM
PLANTING ISLAND ON /
RIGHT TYP. CROSS SECTION

MA 1
)
;RA 1
CREAM
MOM
RIP-RAP
URA 1
09 1
400
MARTIN MARIETTA MATREIALS, INC.
RELOCATION OF LONG BRANCH
POMONA QUARRY
NARRATIVE
Martin Marietta proposes to relocate Long Branch within the boundaries of the Pomona
Quarry, which is located in Greensboro, NC. The creek flows in the northeast to southwest
direction through the center portion of the property. The existing pit borders the creek for
approximately 5000'. Martin Marietta proposes to relocate the lower (approximate) 2025' of
channel into a new length of 4150', around the western portion of the property.
This channel relocation will allow for future pit expansion to extend toward the northwest
portion of the property. Alternatives were discussed to eliminate the need and expense of such
a project. However, due to the amount of potential mineral reserves lost by creating an
individual pit in this area and the high level of existing urban impact associated with Long
Branch, relocation of this stream should not result in any major environmental impacts. The
existing community of fish and macroinvertebrates within Lon Branch was determined to be
tolerant ase on t e mina ase me environmental assessment conducted by is an i i e
ssociates, Inc. A copy o t is report is me u e m t e permit application package.
The proposed channel will be constructed by excavation of natural rock along its entire length.
This natural substrate reduces the possibility for sedimentation damage and siltation of this
proposed channel. Field measurements were taken to establish the characteristics and
morphology of Long Branch. Methodologies developed from Rosgen (1996) were used to
establish the stream widths, meander, etc. from typical pool and riffle transects for use in the
new channel construction. Construction of the channel is currently underway, consisting of
overburden removal to expose the rock. The new channel will then be constructed following
the cross-sections shown on the attached maps. All of the construction of the channel will be
conducted in the "dry", beginning from the furthest most downstream end and progressing
upstream.
Various cross-sections are proposed to incorporate different attributes within the channel.
These include riffles, pools, meandering, boulder placement, etc. These measures will aid in
the dissipation of high velocities. Woody vegetation samplings are proposed along the top of
the channel as shown on the attached maps and will primarily be limited to the interior (mine
side) of the new channel. The outside western slope of the overburden adjacent to the new
channel will be graded to a maximum slope of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) and will be vegetated
upon completion. A horizontal safety bench of 10' will remain before the extraction of the
rock channel begins. The western side of the channel is shaded by an established growth of
pines and small hardwoods. The placement of riparian vegetation (mature trees) will be
incorporated in the "pool areas" designed in the channel. This steam-bank vegetation will
consist of various species to aid in temperature control and wildlife enhancement. These
plantings will include species such as, Tag Adler, Pawpaw, Black Willow, etc. All plantings
will be coordinated with the North Carolina Forest Resources for planting specifications and
recommendations.
Upon completion of the channel and stabilization of the exposed areas, Long Branch will be
introduced into the new channel. The Corp of Engineers and the North Carolina Water Quality
Section will be requested to inspect the project during and after construction is completed.
Macrobenthos monitoring will be conducted for three years after the channel is relocated.
Copies of this report vv>-`H be submitted to the Corp O-f gineers and the N6r-ffi CdroTma Water
Quality Section. Minor impacts of wetlands will be associated with this project. Additional
areas considered wetland impacts include an area of 0.23 acres (200' x 50') above an existing
construction access, 0.19 acres (550' x 15') of wetlands located below an existing rock dam
sediment basin located directly upstream of Long Branch, and an intermittent tributary located
directly upstream of the existing rock dam sediment basin. This area was determined to be
0.023 ac. (500' x 2').
Mwft M WMU Ay'rp U M
vA
619\narrative
Re: Martin Marietta, Guilford Co, DWQ#990234
Subject: Re: Martin Marietta, Guilford Co, DWQ#990234
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 10:38:38 +0500
From: "James Ronald (Ron) Linville" <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Winston Salem
To: "John Dorsey" <[e-mail]>
Yes
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 10:50:17 -0700
From: "John Dorney" <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Martin Marietta, Guilford Co, DWQ#990234
is this the pomona quarry project?
"James Ronald (Ron) Linville" wrote:
> Discussed this with Rosgen and class in a general way. Rosgen agrees
> cursorily that it makes sense to build a stream in the bedrock as I
> suggested.
> This would be a stable stream form which could then
> have a floodplain and floodway built adjacent. That is why we need
> to look at the longitudinal profile for the project and consider
> stream and valley slope issues. Generally, if they reroute into a
> rock channel they can create a C1 or C2 stream. It would be
> different from existing stream which appears to be a C4 within an old
> F channel.
> Rosgen's biggest concern was why do they need to incise
> the new stream so much. Could it be elevated more? Series of C
> channels and Bs for elevational drops or with enough meanders all C
> streams. if so they could save a lot of money on blasting and
> construction. Incision could cause a blowout of bank materials due
> to shear stress as well as hinder plant viability, so on and so
> forth.
5/10/99 10:58 AM
i ofl
03-29-98
REFER TO PLANTING SCHEDULE FOR SEEDING INSTRUCTIONS. CDMPILED Pi10T00RANMETRICALLY BY
¦
60'-0" 30'-0" 60'-0" Raff'ehy BELL MAPPING COMPANY
MIN. Bmwn DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY
Tri-City • I ~ ~ _ ,~-1~
I ~
ti. M 2~ u 8 4 .n:. ~ 3
TO ~ • ~ ~ ,
_ 2• „
2' Carlos , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ \ ~ k, ! I 4'1 Carolina Tract) Black ; ;~H 1 , ~ ~ & Ecluiwpmeat C Carolina Tractor & Equipment Co.
1 tl
i n t i s'.. ~r ~ ~ f ~ ~ I ~ \ 150 -0 ; : . V~ ~ 11 E , , i ~ ,
{ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i 1 1t ~ ' ~ ) '1 ~ r~ ~'1 ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
TYPICAL SECTION AT BERM ' _ ~ I ~ 1 ~
NOT TO SCALE i ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~t t ~ ...1 ~i~ ' ~ /l ( ~ f ~ t ~ ~ ~ ,k,4, t ~
' ~ ~ ' i 1 ,,r---,----' ,7 1 1 ~ t ~ ~
~ \ ~ i ~ \ ,.,t.._, zs'
1 ,,~,~v. ~a_~~.~ ~ is
r` 1 ~ i ~ k R Anderson Este R. Anderson Estate i I + 14`
v i Q ~ ~ ~ 1 , ~
~ ~l I ' ~ li ~ ~ _ ~ ~ i) i (i i I I'30'Mex,
r ~
BERM 10' i , ' ~1,; SAFETY BENCH ! ~ ~ ~ R PiT~ ii1=1~ - -
i ~ ~ ar f i > , i . ~ r.,
~ 0 i ~ `s
i=il~~i
i. f ~ ~ s``~ l ~ ~ t, ~ ~ R, ll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y . Ii 11=
_ ~ , 1
~ ~ 1 ; 0 1 ifi f ~ , ~ ~ ~ I I I
~„u ~ f ~ ~ i C=
~ 20 TO 100 r ~ ~ % Wilson Trucking Wilson Trucking Co. ~ ~
~ F~ 4 ~ + ~ ` , PROPOSED CHANNEL CROSS-SECTION
i ''1 r ~ 1 ~ ~ r I J I not to scale
~ y _ ~ r , , ' ~ ; ~
~~~~i ~ l FFI~E ~ ,i :I Q k + ~ s
,if + , ~ l r' } ~ ~ ~ , ' i~ ~ I
~7 ' , ,nit 1 ,i , ~ f , , r',. I ~ :k ,l ~ ~ _ f , ~ - w~
BENCH DIAGRAM . w, i ~..~r, , ; ~ ~ 5 . _w_ . _ _ - - - °i ~ ~1 w~ m~~ . { ~ 1 , r ~ yF _ ~ _ . ...R x f ~1
NOT TO SCALE ~ i ~ ~ • POND eba ~E
~j' 1 ~
. C I ~ ; i
: ~ ~rd~ j~~ t Fr~t~ aid ~
1 ~ ~ a ,l ~ ~ Dan Nicholas Vii.
~'t {;j~ ~ t
pp~~~~~~~~ yy p~~~~ ~LL( Y Carohna F i I
UY61Y fI EesmR ~ ~ ~ y - LxwxD ~ Stonelnc. ~ ~ ~ ~ i<`~.~..~1 r'`, 1 f k .
1 70'x35'x4' 13 30'xl5'x3' ~ ~ aM~r;. r,.., J ~ ~ ~ 2 70 x35 x4' 14 44 xZZ'x3 ~ s ~ f , \ w•~ ,
3 70 x35 x4' 15 60x30'x3 ~ ~s ~ , r\ - ~ ~ ,r~.~ _.t.~
b r. tt, 4 70'x35'x4' 16 60'x30'x3' ~ w ~ • 1 j,) ~ ...-.w,.-- Y ~ / ~f ~ f~ unYV as t ! xi
5 65' x 35' x 4' 17 60' x 30' x 3' ~ r~ ,..r....__-.--------~--_,`~ 'ti g '~.ti. I ~ r-°. ' .~Kc t ` ~ E ~ ~ , ~
' 18 IOO x 50' x 3 ~ , 0 ~ t~~ t .c ~ i , 6 $0 x 25' x 4 ~ r ~ :tir<~ t ~ ~ _ ~ ' a i ' 7 44' x 22' x 3' 19 80' x 40' x 3' - ° m~ `"-4-~, i i ff v i l~/
0 ~ ~a . ~ t , 8 30'x15'x3' 20 80'x40'x3' r '
9 30'x15'x3' 21 SO'x40'x3' ~ , " ' ~ ~ -mi"""l 4 ~ s , ~ i
~ 1D 44' x 22' x 3' 22 60' x 30' x 3' ~ I' ~ ~ i ,w
11 44' x ' x 3' "A" 40' x 25' x 4' ~ f -J' f 22 12 30 x 15 x 3' B 70 x 36 x 4' ~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ i / l h \ l'
~ ~ ~ Settling ponds are part of the A, j,' ~ NOTE: ~ ~ ~
i~ ! l ~ ;P° • Traps sizes for 2 cleanoub per year ~ ~ nlming process and are. not I ~ ~ 'l a ' usedforerot~ancontrol ~ !l ! ~ p ,
The above erosion conhol meesmea were tarn from the ved erosion conhol 1m. ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ P ~ S s L ~ , ' ~I ~ r~ ir.~ ~ Pte, i , , i r i ~ ~ ~ UNDISTURBED
r 1 k t i' r j ' i) ~ixi rr ~(~,F/ ~,r ' ~ ~ ~ .~i~~~~\~ BUFFER
I ~ t,~
~ 1 ~ ~i~, ~ ~j f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 9th, '~f(f i' {t f
~ ~ k, ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ / '~l i ~ r G ff t ~~s f' ~('1~~~( II~~ ~ r, rZf ~ 7 F ~ ' ` I, P~i ~~t ~ ~r
~ 1 ~ I sets ~ r E ~ ~ %z t /~~~r. j Jj ~~~ILi. j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ff~tF ~ ~ ~ ' ~ r~'
o : 1 l ;1 ~ i/ l,~ I 1 ~ ~ . i I L~ j { ~ I t err ~Y ) ~ ( r \l to ~-L. ~I f f~ `~fjf ~jl,~~l ,
1 ~ + t (
R1P RAP CIiANNE ~ ~ E ~ , / l . i ~ ~ ? G , ! J ~
6"O Stone ~ ( i h r' r ~ >~~~f ~ • ~'I i ..1 ,ll ~ l za sta~~ea la ~ ~ ( i ,~,r < _ ~ k ~ _ 16{ i~" ' % / i' / F j~ f~~~~~~; ! lfi t~~
' f \ ~i~ r ~ , < ` ; ~ . H.B. Carboll
G.E. W er Ir. j i ' ! ;Ii • r ~ t , ; !r, , y ;;fix, ~ ; ` lj/ ~ l Il jf~', ~,~ljr,~~~~~{',t r~ ,5
i i, k ! ~ i~ l„ ( ~ / ( Cur „I,1 ~ k ~ ~ , ~ f ~ ~ , , ~l
`1 ' f~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I~JI,{.
` ~:4 ~ ~~l SHOP ~ s ~ 1 ~ u i f t .4..,.---~ ~ .,u~ ~ - ~ ~n ~ ~
~ , 1
~ A,. ~ ~ S11 r m .23 ACRES t7F / WASH-WATER ~,i ~ ~ / . , .u- 1~~ETLAIID IlNPAGT ~ q~ ~ "hi: ~ ~ ~ 1 ,
f F.L. Heath , , POND ~ ~ t 1 S~ ~~r, ~ ~r ~ f I{~ ~ f ~ {
f ~ giro- ~ - ~ ~ f 1f i . i ~ ~;r/E, +mr., a, +017.1 _f t~ ( ~ y~ ^ ~ ~
~A'/ .~':k 'V L, y \ 1 . , r,r - 4w
/ { k r ~ . Af ` ~ r f i 1
~5 5 r ~ ~ ' r ~ ~ ~
~ i~, S~ks''.4'. ~ .i~L ~.'r i4 Ii4L' t.'n.. j 1~ ",S'.. ~ S LWA 7' k 1' t^ ~ 5 y y l v r e. p 0 y "4 11rO + ~ x ~ d ~lr ` s rf<~
'x . r PR©PbSED ~ ~ Hrtes 19 ~~`~y s,re ~ ~i r /It{`fj/ '
~ ~ " USl r'' a ' + r ~ ! < E ~1AUL kOAD f ~ ' ~ ~ ,Y;~ ~ i k ; r }T a^'. , I - ~ '1 s ~ r ~a r ~ (Heirs) Clara
n ' - , xS t , l ti i „ 7~),~~,+~y,~~ ~+u~ ~ it t'I7;2vtP0RARY 'qt ~ i "+"s~ 1~' U s j~~ ; / 1~~ ~ , D. McClellan
< 1 ~C ~ - , y ~ ~ ~~REEK F 7., ~ ~ ~ f~~ , _ . r u
~ ' ~ ~ 05SING a ~ , , ~ "p ' } ~ 4. fi. .?J r r f tit. ' ~ ~ . a i ~ , #~sf r ~1~t ~ I~p It ~ s
Bann - r'~~~ k I~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ,,gyn. ~ - ~
~ ;p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K ~ v , ens I5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tk~ ~ g ~ ~ (~i[~~il / ,~z
t~ 4 kk ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ '7~;ANT w ; , , s.,, m.. Y - , _ k ~ fi I ~ t ~ ~t93 t . ~ _ 3 _ J (f ~~,f s t J ~ ~~ff)S ~~rF ~,a 501 l gt~' J
• f ~4- ~ c t i ; ~ i ~ AREA I,r 1~ f~.` ~~t r v ~ ~ i i, m ~ ti r/ ..,ra o'`,' BUFFER 1 ~t ~ ~ ~a~r f I/
P ~ = ~ 12 IaI,3fiURE Ply' r a _ ~ ~ _ ~ a
< ~ .r I: ~ ' ~ k 7.~ Acres . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M , ry ~ T ~ . .
~ ~ < ~ ~ J r r~ nrs a_ , , ~i-
/ - ` ,r
~rr ~ 1 ~ 'fir. - ~ ~ ;,,^r ` ~ - v V i . r ~ MIGFILY MPROXIMAiE
5i k~ i ~ l `y j,.~i a ) F ~ '`..mow ~,7. ~ l~ , ~ . I ~ .:Basin 2 ~ ~ < ~ ` I, c ~ ~ `/?r,i . I ti z ~ ~ a ~ ~ r / / ,i~ G.D. McClellan
1 t ww _:-'t f ~ t' ~ ~ ` .i _.,,4„~, 2.. a ~u :~f ~ ~ I (r , 7 ir~~ ~ ~ , airs
11 ' _ 1 ~ i t , ~~<3. ~b Y/'. ~y.9 „i_ /~~i / 11 fit' ~ F~:.`. `.I it _ / t t ' a { I v , , ~ W i7
l 5 ~ , . , / l ~ ~r t ~ f(( j~ -91 ( / ~ ' /fi f /r ~d.a~ j I r ,r
l~ ~ r, ~ 4 , , , ~ i . r . ~',r''~ r r r ~ ~ , ~~jj ~ t'~ f ~ ,
< ~ ~ r-~ ~I: in i0.023ACR135~ 'l ~d.',r, is 1~ F, bI ( 1 ) - ~ v ~ ~ . ~ - ~ ta: Y: ) I ' i ~ ~ ~1 :rte !I I, j[ ~ i _~INI'ERM[TThNTTRIBiiI'1'ARS ~ i,~~, ~ , II a' f ~t~' ~ ~ ! e ;
t ~ , a ' {:P:t l~ t~ . r~
VELGGITYDI~]T'ATOR i `r = ~ " ~ _ 1 i~, k~' ~ +w.i x~! 3 ~ ~ i , *L. s ~ t , 10't"sI0'Wx2"igIIGK ~ ~ ~ ``k, r ~ ~ i ne.J i i ~ i~ ~ ' r ~ ~ ii`i !1 *Y~
~ i i 1. ~ t / 1 t.' `t i GLASS B RIRRAP- ~ 20 i 1 l' / ti~ ~ i I ~ i ! 1, i < I; , ,t~; I
i<! ~...~.H~,..,,,..,.~ i t '.,'.fit..,.,`ff~i ( F r~lt' I~, :l' ~ ~ rf~,r .
1~, . ,
~ / r' / f ~ 1 ~ t'~ j' k z! .l ~ , ~ 0--'.`_ ~ ti, 2:15ides`topCS 10' $&9e A ~ ~ _ ~ ; C= ~ ' a` ` r' lid ' ~l~ r'' ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ ;
b _ ' i t 1 ark _ ti_ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ , , , ~ ~ ~ kt A.~ , il. ~~ii
~1 e ~ A98~ ` ~ ~ Bas~dl9' Vy ~ `t~~ ~F 1 4 ~ ~ . ! 7 _,r'/~ °a CXf r pis r - rf k. brr s?~ ~t
~ ~ I , I r r rf' / . , Sa'- ~ r ~1`1a ~E / ~ . ; _'l ~~t l r r ~ , i ~r ,Y'; 1 c~ rr r ~ INSTALb t Q~~L© ee ~ ~~~:.i..~',~,., ~ :1 e f~lF f f ! it p~XF i r _ _ r Id -w-
~ ~ " LS'N'X2'THtCK 3 ; ~ p, ; r ~ .err ~~.w - f~~ iffl ~ ' "650, aae ~ ~1 f`f,~ r , , f
- ~ ' e ~ ~ ~ , O TE`ItfPaRARY ~ . ~ ~ ~ ! . > s ~ ~ ~ i f 1 ~ ~f ~
' ~ ~ A RTfi CREW " ~ ' f ~ r i ~ ~f / t ~ ~~~t tr~~~lfjl l ~ Cl~aS`1Nf#- s,. r. ~ ] r ~ f, ! Jf: A ,,f )f~' rf l~/ ~~J V"'~ ~o''*-..,, t ~ - 1~'. ~ # t. r.'r~ t :,r` 1 r a l 1 i^"~ rl, ~ i. ti 't~ i.. ! l ~ ~ ` ~ fit, i Ij' - f < ~i~ ~ - '""w"''»~+". f~<
r s x r, ; ss r r 1 \Y' ~ ~ 1, t .I" , 7 1 ~ f 1. ; ' " 1 y i l Y f
,~1 ~ , ~ of ~ _ ~ I~, J ~ l , t . r ~ `'ti ' . , ~ - j B9sv15 a ",fin r"Y~ i ir... ~ I,y, fa,. r i . ~ w . „ ~ ~ ~
r , , n. ~ o ~ ll ll 'y{{
~ , , a , 'v~ s / ~ 1' ~ ROPE ~ E'_ _ ~ ~ - _ / ~ f! I, x
fr , , x ~ ~ i ~ ~ 9 L fi~ 1 ~'~-""fit ~ ~ ` ' •r'` .r ~ ( ~ f( /j V, r }~'4.rv.., I fS~ `~'A 4 e t,"'. ~ Y' _ ~ fa r., f ff
i~ , n , _ ` i ~ ` ? - . \ s ~ J ~ ~ r: 1 ~ f 1 Slug' & ~ erFeddB~r j
1 r ~ ~ 1. ~ t l y 1 w ~ }p 3i _ r \ y r ~ ~ f i t M•n K ~ - 1#7 $ P ~ ~r~ ~ ~ t ( ~ ~ , } t 1 L ~ ~ d ~i i ~1 i f r _ ~jYj,
{
~ ..._I' T d ; l t ~ ~ •a
~ ~ ~ 1 / i ~ , ~ s, f ~ i ".rain 91 F
t ~ ~ " . r,,,--,w , 3 ~ r, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.A t f ~ ~ 5 .r"" [ i ~ r i, ~ pi ~R /fir i ~ V~k~ a~~ r,; A \ 1. ..s l~`A .,3 ~r1 l ~ F At "`v,~..,,` "`^+.M?''` j"~f f r/ Y
i t f V \ \ yr" d ~ ~ ~r , ~ t
l ' ~ n~.~ ~ _ ~ , E.L. Love
, ~ ~ a1 r
~ ~ ~ . _ ~r
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t. s w., - > _.,_.~w ~ °w-,,~} 1 ~ ~ Ethel & 3 Ethel &
w p ~ Borry Frye
i / +.1. ~ ~ . , sty..: - A ippr
~'l Jf 1 _ 1'. ?u
, ~ t ; w, j i ~ r` r't t ti L c~~. ~F~ t 4 { I , i _ ~ ~x..: ~ J.D. Carroll ~ , _ . . t\ ~ ~ ~ A 1, r
~ 1,1 ~ ~,A~ i..~ ~ ~ r,; i
1 - ~ LEGEND: / ~ f` LEGEND:
~ ~ j ~i / „ l r, i ~ ~ , ~ I ( 1 r , : ; / PERMIT BOUT PERMIT BOUNDARY e• . TREES VY ,
r-' ~ `t\t~ ~.l t ir, ~
' ; - l ~ , _ ; ' , ~ _ ~ ~ PIT LIMIT ~ j" a:~ ~1 ~f ~ , ~ ,h E ~ f ~Y PIT LIMIT BUILDING Q
r ~ ; ~t'F LIT41~' ~ ~ ! ? ' ! i i ' ~ ' ' FUTURE PIT I
~ ~ ~ 1~ ' ~ 1 r . ~ ~ , r ~ ~ ~ ` ~vs~ FUTURE PIT LIMITS " 3x,, '.-y'•. - ,t, HORIZONTAL CONTRO borAW,TTREED AREAS ARE 4~,ROx,MATE
~ o ~ ,,4 ~::..s` ~ EA 1 1 , ~ PIT 10-YEAR ~ ~ h r"` i ~ ~ i PIT 10-YEAR _ VERTICAL CONTROL POINT O"
~ \ r J ~ t~ r ~ . ~.,r r"~.. l ~ i
i ~1 ~ j ~ ~ :;E 4 BUFFER BUFFER SPOT ELEVATION + 731.6
~ ~ r, , ~ ~ r~ ~ f ~ ~ n r ~l Claude Le ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . - t ~ ; i ~ x,.. - BERM BERM Ih INDEX CONTOUR`
r ~ ~ ~~rd , ` / r ~ s at & Erma Lewis 1 ~ . ~ j i ~ . ~ _ , .
/ ~ ' t °,o ~ ~f~ ~ ~f ~ ' . ~h ~ ~ ~w DIRT ROADS DIRT ROADS INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR a
SS ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ jib ~ ~3. S"~! 5 i . 5 ~J~~D l
f A 4 ~ ~ ' ~ ? , ~ ~ ~ PAVED ROAD' ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ r:_ 4 ~ , ~ E,A. Speacee Subdtvtston t , ~ PAVED ROADS CREEK
1 ~ ~ ~ PTT LIMIT ' ~ - i ~ , s I / / r ii` s ~ ~ ~ m' ~_,r-, \ a; i ~ $ a , ~ ~ ~ ~ STOCKPILE STOCKPILE CHAIN LINK FENCE
~ ~ 6 ~ ~ l i f y . fail - t~'r _ i ~ _ ~ r.° ~ a f ~ i~ s~ FQ~', t 1 ~ 1 r
K,~ ` ~ . ~ \ ~ ~ , r ~ BODY OF WA BODY OF WATER PIPE
a' ~ ~ t ~,,,a Oil-SITE - , ~~..,~~r` POLE
'~,,A~* ~ ; J'. ~ . ~ ; 1jItiPOSAL ~ ~ -`-~.~v M.~,. ~ '~~,k ` e. SETTLING CEL SETTLING CELL
~ F- ~ ~.x
d , i v+ti / s I 4S
xs, . i..,ly fj ``~,W ~
~ ~ arm , 6 .--_N~_- ~ ' ~ ~
Rackoam ~ X55 v~ r~'r BERM '
7 ;.d .,y 1 ho f
yy y 0 e ,
~ ' Hickory Grove Church ~ x IMPORTANT NOTE Martin Marietta Aggregates
l E r D SUFFER y. NOTE, CONTOURS IN TREED AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE - v
~--~s~ ~ ~ 1 PERMIT BOUNDARIES ARE xonrwNrat, HORIZONTAL DATUM - STATE PLANE CO-ORDINATES RALEIGH, N.C.
i j~ ~ A, E. Yow ~ ~ APPROXIMATE veR~~ ~ / j ~ f ~ - xnTTa VERTICAL DATUM - MEAN SEA LEVEL NATIONAL GEODETIC DATUM OF 1929 PROPOSED CHANNEL RELOCATION
E' ~ j Mabel P. Shields ~ ;
_ FII,I FILE NAME: DATE REVISION POMONA QUARRY

SCALE : 1" = 200' 1 I 3.2996 " "ow d ft GUILFORD COUNTY, N.C.
2 2-11-W Convemim to AomCAD My
3 3 QUARRY: POMONA 4 DWNBY: DATE: DWO.NO: JOB. NO.
0 100 200 400 600 800 D. BRIOBT 529/96 5 Cs BY: SCALE: SBEET NO. • 1 OF 1
. : 5 M. sCOTT 1"."
666ti ti6 ~ZE ~Eb 9Z yew t~~ :E1 92 uew ?uJ 5Mp'2-dwD4-66-E-IDUuPgO-euowod\sdew euowOd\euOwOd\0108 9\dNIIOadO\SNOISIAIO\AN3\:S

~T-0r j RX _ di I ~
~ma y' `
ti~,y~ ' ss rr~" ~ ~''.3 } 1
I r ~ ~~t~
0 i3'
O .
k:

;wG:

1 ~ a 8,c
0 0 u~V~~
T

I9 ~0 0
PIT AREA
mn
2+ 0 00
' ui
u.
af'~ ~ a rd~ b1 ~f 1sr° ~ Q at t~ . F S~ ~ S~ y r~
t ~a ~
~~u t s~ . ~
~ ~fi ~ 4
y,i 5 P ~ 4 ~ d uv F1 a - v E,S* f! u r fi a u .l i+ ~ ,x r A R Lx~ t~ t *a t # l 1,tas1 t~ui sr, 1+~` ~s r't? # v ! ,.u t 7 ~ ~ zrass u r s~Y #.uY f if
. "h. 21+00 r° .t i1r X~t V t ~~r E ~it;fir fir''" ~~lue { ~ s 4~, Ytr Y 4 t s -s ~ rx'~ sa r i s r r 1 SYi" iw t h1 ~ \ l ~ tai i r r v1 ~ s s i 4 ) rl ~Vi ~ s ~3 ~ r~ l ! r u `t ~(e s} YS"rPr#V aT 'f ar~vlJ a 'r~3/i 1 a r' .a r~u 7 r~Y t fY bj sa,~lr ~Y Vr:
i5 sw. t ~ r T` r 7r ai (~k lS r ~ w1 #~i w!'~~ 7 'sort Yr; 9~' ~ r ,u Xs tt ~Aa f ddi~ "~~kk i v, g a~ev s ~ ~r ,M1 as ti>i+nr~ `~f Lr y i sb, ~~r f~; y ,t t, o, v is~ 7;1,~ . Y4s n~-~ ~ Vx„S~X,n „tba v1 ~ lip'
STEP 1. BLAST C 1. BLAST CHANNEL
~ ~c",i ~ 1~,` y Y 22+00 t c ~ ~ a;` - sue- ~n~ry~t~~1 ~~F~'~i~~' r~
~ e,~~ r~s ~ ~ - ~ a ~ ~ x ~e~ ~ w+ ~ s , z
~ ir.
^"r i~r
s^ y
`~k il K. t
Vii. xy
+ 23 00
R00' r ~~~r~t~~ ROOT WAD t vl~~sr ~ a r"v',`
,'P
LARGE BOULDERS PLACED "
TO PROTECT ROOT WADS ~ 1 '
FROM HIGH WATER ~ „r~ ~v , 7~~'f';~~„ ~ip ,~s4z
24 00 ,,,i h ~ rvs,~'a
a. ~r '495.G.~ ~a
~dn~4;
PIT AREA ~ ,
gt''r!'~~.~;.
,r~-~
r'4~~~~ ,
2+ 5 00 - , ,
, a 0 1
5.
~ ~
I ~ yet
2d+00
STEP 2. PLACE BOULDE ;E BOULDERS TO PROTECT
OVERBURDEN AND PLA] 1 AND PLANT VEGETATION

x " ,
~ F " F ~ ~ ,,y 3
2/+00 ~~TK r ~ Y
+rF' ~ 5 ~',I ~ w~'., is
t ~ '5... k.~~~~
;h..

~0 8 Z
P ~y','. '.:y' J CHANNEL IS ESTABLISHED HY
RAKING BOTTOM AND PULLING - E`4'~ A~,~r`~t°~~`~ ~'~,,y ~`rr SMALLER STONES/RIP-RAP UP r ° Af ~
O O AGAINST LARGER BOULDERS u~ y~~~~~~ rs h~' ,~t~
\_A]X 1A7 ~ /
I .1
MEANDER OF STREAM ~ ' r's' WII.L OCCUR FROM
PLACEMENT OF RIP-RAP
O R
O ~ ` e {~t ~ ~ i~ry~: ~X
O l + "r u~u i ~ a ` PIT AREA F,, c`~~~J~~i r ~i~r tr r s,Y .
ey Ssi
/ A l \ .
~
R
cc9~ H.
~o
diY

kph STEP 3. FORM MAIN 35 W MAIN CHANNEL
TYPICAL CROSS SE 'ROSS SECTIONS
SHOWING THE CONSTRUC a 4STRUCTION SEQUENCE
36+00
vnx~ous
PLACEMCNT
OF BOULDERS 37+.~Q
38+p0
- TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STREAM SCALE 1 200'
0 30 60 120 180 240
NOTE: 39+po
FUTURE STREAM CONDITION AS SHOWN Martin Marietta Aggregates o
RALEIGH, N.C.
ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-SECTION
IS AN APPROXIMATION. SITE CONDITIONS CREEK RELOCATION CROSS-SECTION
WILL VARY. POMOMA QUARRY
CATAWBA COUNTY, N.C.
4x+-00
QUARRY: POMONA DWN BY: DATE: DWO. NO: JOB. NO.
D. BRIGHT 3299
M BY, SCAM s>MLIrNO. • 20F2 B. NORTH
sss~ ee:sz ei 9z EC:92:T 9E JeN ?u~ 6Mp'66-E-09s-X-eu0w0d\sdew euowod\euowod\OHO9 9\dNI~OadO\SNOISIAIO\AN3\:S
~

oo~o

~~Pr-r
1kp0
r~k~~
3k~o
4~0
`rx
a~
x$
j:
gip-Rap & Rnot-Wads
_e ~R ` in Pool Atea ONLY
~
O ~k hf~'h'~j ~sb ~0. ~~gjT rt r'.,
9X~o ~ "s' 's y fir' PIT AREA
i.. -u~if r
4 n~~'Si;' .',5 Is
~ 4M ~ ~ fan ~ 4th 6' i s~ r~rt ~ ~ f'J ~ t~' iu 4rry,P 3i ~~x ;r f v t ~ s+ft J~ f~^'3f it ro a tti tr fU~ v ~ t r ~r rr v tq r i'!~ frx r t r~ t r
VARIOUS tai~~l ~ t~`dbi4 ~r ~ r ~~v3~~d t / ~ ~ r'~r t r~~'Y/ w uvN~l~' Ga » fvF'r ~b h ~d~~~ ti~.rs~~ ~N~~+~s6a ~i~~ ~ ~ t ~ tk~ ~a"~ ~,~~~~~I' ~k~'~~xx
PLACBMENP ~r~ ~ ~ ~ a~~~6 ~ TAI ids r' ~ a 's, H~~ tr r 3 ~ ~ ~ ~Vi ~ 1 f~ ~lr
OF BOULDERS
IOy.~ 0
eoo TYP. C I1~~0 POOLING AREA
TYP. CROSS SECTION
12yb~
14'`0
PIT AREA
15+00
~ r vow- r'
.i' 5 SRI "E" M.
16+00
PLANTING PLANTING ISLAND ON
RIGHT TYP. C NOTE: RIGHT TYP. CROSS SECTION
1. Trees to be planted along the top of the creek relocarion
should include the following:
->Virginia Pine, Blackgum, Black Cherry, Chestnut Oak,
Persimmon, Sawthooth Oak and White Ash.
2. Space trees 10 to 12' apart throughout the length of channel.
3. Trees will be planted in conjunction with the Division of
Forest Resources recommendations during the months of
December and February. Trees will be evenly distributed along
the indicated areas.
SCALE 1 60'
4. "Root-wads" will be planted on both sides of the channel in
"pooling areas" only. NOTE: 0 30 60 120 180 240
FUTURE STREAM CONDITION AS SHOWN
5. Stream will meandor based on rip-rap placement and actual ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-SECTION Martin Marietta Aggregates AA
v
bottom slope of channel. IS AN APPROXIMATION. SITE CONDITIONS RALEIGH, N.C.
WILL VARY.
CREEK RELOCATION CROSS-SECTION
POMOMA QUARRY
CATAWBA COUNTY, N.C.
QUARRY: POMONA
- TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STREAM DWNBY: DATE: DWG.NO: JOB, NO.
D. BRIGHT 312/" CL By. SCAM SRWr NO,. 1 OF 2
B. NORTH
ew ?uJ 6Mp'66-C-39s-X-euowod\9dew euowod\euowod\Oa09 9\GNIIOHVO\SNOISIAIO\ANI\:S
666T 69 ~9Z ~VS 9Z ~eW [dj 6nP'6

e _ nn ~ .
g s ~ - - x s• . ; ~ _ _
t.r

~ W
nl ~ ~iIXi:.
0 O
k
0

k
k 2
0
k
.
4
~0 0
s x
0
0
x
~ o
0 x
0
0
y; a.
Rip-R Rip-Rop & Root-Wads
in P in Pod Area ONLY
X
0 ,
9 x ~ rrrnasn
0 0
VARIOUS ~ ~ t
PLACEMENT _ F z~~,'. ,y
OF BOULDERS Y
POOLIN( POOLING AREA
TYP, CROS' TYP. CROSS SECTION
2 0
0
3
x 0
0 ~

q 9 4a q~ ~ 1 ~t~~ v Prr AREA
1 t~ t~.,+. ~ ~ „ w~ i^.

00 16+
PLANTING ISL SLANTING ISLAND ON
RIGHT TYP. CROP iT TYP. CROSS SECTION
NOTE:
1. Trees to be planted along the top of the creek relocation should
include the following:
->Virginia Pine, Blackgum, Black Cherry, Chestnut Oak,
Persimmon, Sawthooth Oak and White Ash.
2. S ace trees 10 to 12' a art throu hout the len th of channel.
p P g g
3. Trees will be planted in conjunction with the Division of Forest
Resources recommendations during the months of December and
February. Trees will be evenly distributed along the indicated areas.
4. "Root-wads" will be lanted on both sides of the channel in
P
" oolin areas" onl . p 9 Y SCALE 1 60'
5. Stream will meandor based on rip-rap placement and actual
bottom slope of channel. 0 30 60 120 180 240
NOTE: FUTURE STREAM CONDITION AS SHOWN i
ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-SECTION
IS AN APPROXIMATION. SITE CONDITIONS
WILL VARY. Martin Marietta Aggregates v
RALEIGH, N.C.
CREEK RELOCATION CROSS-SECTION
POMOMA QUARRY
CATAWBA COUNTY, N.C.
~ TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STREAM QUARRY: POMONA DWN HY: DATE. 'O• NO JOB. NO.
D. HRIOHT 3/2M
ca. BY: SCAla $fl1~f NO.- 1 OF 2 H. NORTH 1" w

.y,~i'.~~i3 .~r~yti w rr ~v: er+ ~-c a w~:.:
y- , 'S 7' n~ ¢ 8~ .~G b ~ a~
1
I
X
O ,j'..; 0

8
0
0 ,..~b
1 9
0 0
PIT AREA
20 +00
F

21 +0 0
STEP 1. BLAST CHAT a - ~ _AST CHANNEL
9 22+00 ,,a n,~ ,>t. . ? S,.
~ 3 ~ ,,.y ~'kY.. 2

'>"t.
~ ~k ~
~ ° • ~
d,. ~
23+ 00
.
ROOT WAD 4 ROOT WAD ~
~ .
LARGE BOULDERS PLACED
TO PROTECT ROOT WADS FROM HIGH WATER
4
24+00
PIT AREA
25+00
rt.
26+00
STEP 2. PLACE BOULDERS OULDERS TO PROTECT
OVERBURDEN AND PLANT ~ PLANT VEGETATION
k
d>
3

7 2 / +00 h
Y'l.. ~ f
yA~. 5 .z
k a 2
CHANNEL IS ESTABLISHED BY
RAE o s~,~ RAKING BOTTOM AND PULLING SMALLER STONES/RIP-RAP UP ~ „t~Ea y ~'r~~`'.
O A( AGAINST LARGER BOULDERS r, ~r~ i~~-~~Sya+~r~,
X J 1`
V
MEANDER OF STREAM WILL OCCUR FROM
PLACEMENT OF RIP-RAP
0
X
M~ v
J ~,k ~ ~ PIT AREA
~ ~ ~~"C ~ l i~ R ~ ~~fi ` ,a c a ~ ~r.~fr g
~ Q
M n
1 4
`V /My-~ 'J
M'J J
X
J
O ~ STEP 3. FORM MAIN CHI MAIN CHANNEL
X
TYPICAL CROSS SECT ')S SECTIONS
SHOWING THE CONSTRUCTION RUCTION SEQUENCE
00 36+
VARIOUS
PLACEMENT
OF BOULDERS 3 7 +00
38 +00
~ TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STREAM SCALE 1 200'
0 30 60 120 180 240
NOTE; 39 +00
FUTURE STREAM CONDITION AS SHOWN Martin Marietta Aggregates AA
ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-SECTION
IS AN APPROXIMATION, SITE CONDITIONS RALEIGH, N.C.
WILL VARY,
CREEK RELOCATION CROSS-SECTION
POMOMA QUARRY
CATAWBA COUNTY, N.C.
40 +00 QUARRY: POMONA
DWNBY: DATE: DWO.NO: JOB. NO.
D. BRIGHT MM CS. BY: SCALM MUWNO.. 20F2
W NORTH 1" w

~a~ v ova a• ' ~ , t
2 ~e. ~E, r Tr,. efi~ ~ 1'r
~ ~ u f ~ .,t ,~d, y .I; ~ I Ie r
v~,

03-29-98
REFER TO PLANTING SCHEDULE FOR SEEDING INSTRUCTIONS. CDMPILED Pi10T00RANMETRICALLY BY
¦
60'-0" 30'-0" 60'-0" Raff'ehy BELL MAPPING COMPANY
MIN. Bmwn DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY
Tri-City • I ~ ~ _ ,~-1~
I ~
ti. M 2~ u 8 4 .n:. ~ 3
TO ~ • ~ ~ ,
_ 2• „
2' Carlos , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ \ ~ k, ! I 4'1 Carolina Tract) Black ; ;~H 1 , ~ ~ & Ecluiwpmeat C Carolina Tractor & Equipment Co.
1 tl
i n t i s'.. ~r ~ ~ f ~ ~ I ~ \ 150 -0 ; : . V~ ~ 11 E , , i ~ ,
{ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i 1 1t ~ ' ~ ) '1 ~ r~ ~'1 ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
TYPICAL SECTION AT BERM ' _ ~ I ~ 1 ~
NOT TO SCALE i ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~t t ~ ...1 ~i~ ' ~ /l ( ~ f ~ t ~ ~ ~ ,k,4, t ~
' ~ ~ ' i 1 ,,r---,----' ,7 1 1 ~ t ~ ~
~ \ ~ i ~ \ ,.,t.._, zs'
1 ,,~,~v. ~a_~~.~ ~ is
r` 1 ~ i ~ k R Anderson Este R. Anderson Estate i I + 14`
v i Q ~ ~ ~ 1 , ~
~ ~l I ' ~ li ~ ~ _ ~ ~ i) i (i i I I'30'Mex,
r ~
BERM 10' i , ' ~1,; SAFETY BENCH ! ~ ~ ~ R PiT~ ii1=1~ - -
i ~ ~ ar f i > , i . ~ r.,
~ 0 i ~ `s
i=il~~i
i. f ~ ~ s``~ l ~ ~ t, ~ ~ R, ll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y . Ii 11=
_ ~ , 1
~ ~ 1 ; 0 1 ifi f ~ , ~ ~ ~ I I I
~„u ~ f ~ ~ i C=
~ 20 TO 100 r ~ ~ % Wilson Trucking Wilson Trucking Co. ~ ~
~ F~ 4 ~ + ~ ` , PROPOSED CHANNEL CROSS-SECTION
i ''1 r ~ 1 ~ ~ r I J I not to scale
~ y _ ~ r , , ' ~ ; ~
~~~~i ~ l FFI~E ~ ,i :I Q k + ~ s
,if + , ~ l r' } ~ ~ ~ , ' i~ ~ I
~7 ' , ,nit 1 ,i , ~ f , , r',. I ~ :k ,l ~ ~ _ f , ~ - w~
BENCH DIAGRAM . w, i ~..~r, , ; ~ ~ 5 . _w_ . _ _ - - - °i ~ ~1 w~ m~~ . { ~ 1 , r ~ yF _ ~ _ . ...R x f ~1
NOT TO SCALE ~ i ~ ~ • POND eba ~E
~j' 1 ~
. C I ~ ; i
: ~ ~rd~ j~~ t Fr~t~ aid ~
1 ~ ~ a ,l ~ ~ Dan Nicholas Vii.
~'t {;j~ ~ t
pp~~~~~~~~ yy p~~~~ ~LL( Y Carohna F i I
UY61Y fI EesmR ~ ~ ~ y - LxwxD ~ Stonelnc. ~ ~ ~ ~ i<`~.~..~1 r'`, 1 f k .
1 70'x35'x4' 13 30'xl5'x3' ~ ~ aM~r;. r,.., J ~ ~ ~ 2 70 x35 x4' 14 44 xZZ'x3 ~ s ~ f , \ w•~ ,
3 70 x35 x4' 15 60x30'x3 ~ ~s ~ , r\ - ~ ~ ,r~.~ _.t.~
b r. tt, 4 70'x35'x4' 16 60'x30'x3' ~ w ~ • 1 j,) ~ ...-.w,.-- Y ~ / ~f ~ f~ unYV as t ! xi
5 65' x 35' x 4' 17 60' x 30' x 3' ~ r~ ,..r....__-.--------~--_,`~ 'ti g '~.ti. I ~ r-°. ' .~Kc t ` ~ E ~ ~ , ~
' 18 IOO x 50' x 3 ~ , 0 ~ t~~ t .c ~ i , 6 $0 x 25' x 4 ~ r ~ :tir<~ t ~ ~ _ ~ ' a i ' 7 44' x 22' x 3' 19 80' x 40' x 3' - ° m~ `"-4-~, i i ff v i l~/
0 ~ ~a . ~ t , 8 30'x15'x3' 20 80'x40'x3' r '
9 30'x15'x3' 21 SO'x40'x3' ~ , " ' ~ ~ -mi"""l 4 ~ s , ~ i
~ 1D 44' x 22' x 3' 22 60' x 30' x 3' ~ I' ~ ~ i ,w
11 44' x ' x 3' "A" 40' x 25' x 4' ~ f -J' f 22 12 30 x 15 x 3' B 70 x 36 x 4' ~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ i / l h \ l'
~ ~ ~ Settling ponds are part of the A, j,' ~ NOTE: ~ ~ ~
i~ ! l ~ ;P° • Traps sizes for 2 cleanoub per year ~ ~ nlming process and are. not I ~ ~ 'l a ' usedforerot~ancontrol ~ !l ! ~ p ,
The above erosion conhol meesmea were tarn from the ved erosion conhol 1m. ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ P ~ S s L ~ , ' ~I ~ r~ ir.~ ~ Pte, i , , i r i ~ ~ ~ UNDISTURBED
r 1 k t i' r j ' i) ~ixi rr ~(~,F/ ~,r ' ~ ~ ~ .~i~~~~\~ BUFFER
I ~ t,~
~ 1 ~ ~i~, ~ ~j f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 9th, '~f(f i' {t f
~ ~ k, ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ / '~l i ~ r G ff t ~~s f' ~('1~~~( II~~ ~ r, rZf ~ 7 F ~ ' ` I, P~i ~~t ~ ~r
~ 1 ~ I sets ~ r E ~ ~ %z t /~~~r. j Jj ~~~ILi. j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ff~tF ~ ~ ~ ' ~ r~'
o : 1 l ;1 ~ i/ l,~ I 1 ~ ~ . i I L~ j { ~ I t err ~Y ) ~ ( r \l to ~-L. ~I f f~ `~fjf ~jl,~~l ,
1 ~ + t (
R1P RAP CIiANNE ~ ~ E ~ , / l . i ~ ~ ? G , ! J ~
6"O Stone ~ ( i h r' r ~ >~~~f ~ • ~'I i ..1 ,ll ~ l za sta~~ea la ~ ~ ( i ,~,r < _ ~ k ~ _ 16{ i~" ' % / i' / F j~ f~~~~~~; ! lfi t~~
' f \ ~i~ r ~ , < ` ; ~ . H.B. Carboll
G.E. W er Ir. j i ' ! ;Ii • r ~ t , ; !r, , y ;;fix, ~ ; ` lj/ ~ l Il jf~', ~,~ljr,~~~~~{',t r~ ,5
i i, k ! ~ i~ l„ ( ~ / ( Cur „I,1 ~ k ~ ~ , ~ f ~ ~ , , ~l
`1 ' f~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ I~JI,{.
` ~:4 ~ ~~l SHOP ~ s ~ 1 ~ u i f t .4..,.---~ ~ .,u~ ~ - ~ ~n ~ ~
~ , 1
~ A,. ~ ~ S11 r m .23 ACRES t7F / WASH-WATER ~,i ~ ~ / . , .u- 1~~ETLAIID IlNPAGT ~ q~ ~ "hi: ~ ~ ~ 1 ,
f F.L. Heath , , POND ~ ~ t 1 S~ ~~r, ~ ~r ~ f I{~ ~ f ~ {
f ~ giro- ~ - ~ ~ f 1f i . i ~ ~;r/E, +mr., a, +017.1 _f t~ ( ~ y~ ^ ~ ~
~A'/ .~':k 'V L, y \ 1 . , r,r - 4w
/ { k r ~ . Af ` ~ r f i 1
~5 5 r ~ ~ ' r ~ ~ ~
~ i~, S~ks''.4'. ~ .i~L ~.'r i4 Ii4L' t.'n.. j 1~ ",S'.. ~ S LWA 7' k 1' t^ ~ 5 y y l v r e. p 0 y "4 11rO + ~ x ~ d ~lr ` s rf<~
'x . r PR©PbSED ~ ~ Hrtes 19 ~~`~y s,re ~ ~i r /It{`fj/ '
~ ~ " USl r'' a ' + r ~ ! < E ~1AUL kOAD f ~ ' ~ ~ ,Y;~ ~ i k ; r }T a^'. , I - ~ '1 s ~ r ~a r ~ (Heirs) Clara
n ' - , xS t , l ti i „ 7~),~~,+~y,~~ ~+u~ ~ it t'I7;2vtP0RARY 'qt ~ i "+"s~ 1~' U s j~~ ; / 1~~ ~ , D. McClellan
< 1 ~C ~ - , y ~ ~ ~~REEK F 7., ~ ~ ~ f~~ , _ . r u
~ ' ~ ~ 05SING a ~ , , ~ "p ' } ~ 4. fi. .?J r r f tit. ' ~ ~ . a i ~ , #~sf r ~1~t ~ I~p It ~ s
Bann - r'~~~ k I~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ,,gyn. ~ - ~
~ ;p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K ~ v , ens I5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tk~ ~ g ~ ~ (~i[~~il / ,~z
t~ 4 kk ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ '7~;ANT w ; , , s.,, m.. Y - , _ k ~ fi I ~ t ~ ~t93 t . ~ _ 3 _ J (f ~~,f s t J ~ ~~ff)S ~~rF ~,a 501 l gt~' J
• f ~4- ~ c t i ; ~ i ~ AREA I,r 1~ f~.` ~~t r v ~ ~ i i, m ~ ti r/ ..,ra o'`,' BUFFER 1 ~t ~ ~ ~a~r f I/
P ~ = ~ 12 IaI,3fiURE Ply' r a _ ~ ~ _ ~ a
< ~ .r I: ~ ' ~ k 7.~ Acres . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M , ry ~ T ~ . .
~ ~ < ~ ~ J r r~ nrs a_ , , ~i-
/ - ` ,r
~rr ~ 1 ~ 'fir. - ~ ~ ;,,^r ` ~ - v V i . r ~ MIGFILY MPROXIMAiE
5i k~ i ~ l `y j,.~i a ) F ~ '`..mow ~,7. ~ l~ , ~ . I ~ .:Basin 2 ~ ~ < ~ ` I, c ~ ~ `/?r,i . I ti z ~ ~ a ~ ~ r / / ,i~ G.D. McClellan
1 t ww _:-'t f ~ t' ~ ~ ` .i _.,,4„~, 2.. a ~u :~f ~ ~ I (r , 7 ir~~ ~ ~ , airs
11 ' _ 1 ~ i t , ~~<3. ~b Y/'. ~y.9 „i_ /~~i / 11 fit' ~ F~:.`. `.I it _ / t t ' a { I v , , ~ W i7
l 5 ~ , . , / l ~ ~r t ~ f(( j~ -91 ( / ~ ' /fi f /r ~d.a~ j I r ,r
l~ ~ r, ~ 4 , , , ~ i . r . ~',r''~ r r r ~ ~ , ~~jj ~ t'~ f ~ ,
< ~ ~ r-~ ~I: in i0.023ACR135~ 'l ~d.',r, is 1~ F, bI ( 1 ) - ~ v ~ ~ . ~ - ~ ta: Y: ) I ' i ~ ~ ~1 :rte !I I, j[ ~ i _~INI'ERM[TThNTTRIBiiI'1'ARS ~ i,~~, ~ , II a' f ~t~' ~ ~ ! e ;
t ~ , a ' {:P:t l~ t~ . r~
VELGGITYDI~]T'ATOR i `r = ~ " ~ _ 1 i~, k~' ~ +w.i x~! 3 ~ ~ i , *L. s ~ t , 10't"sI0'Wx2"igIIGK ~ ~ ~ ``k, r ~ ~ i ne.J i i ~ i~ ~ ' r ~ ~ ii`i !1 *Y~
~ i i 1. ~ t / 1 t.' `t i GLASS B RIRRAP- ~ 20 i 1 l' / ti~ ~ i I ~ i ! 1, i < I; , ,t~; I
i<! ~...~.H~,..,,,..,.~ i t '.,'.fit..,.,`ff~i ( F r~lt' I~, :l' ~ ~ rf~,r .
1~, . ,
~ / r' / f ~ 1 ~ t'~ j' k z! .l ~ , ~ 0--'.`_ ~ ti, 2:15ides`topCS 10' $&9e A ~ ~ _ ~ ; C= ~ ' a` ` r' lid ' ~l~ r'' ~ i ' ~ ~ ~ ;
b _ ' i t 1 ark _ ti_ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ , , , ~ ~ ~ kt A.~ , il. ~~ii
~1 e ~ A98~ ` ~ ~ Bas~dl9' Vy ~ `t~~ ~F 1 4 ~ ~ . ! 7 _,r'/~ °a CXf r pis r - rf k. brr s?~ ~t
~ ~ I , I r r rf' / . , Sa'- ~ r ~1`1a ~E / ~ . ; _'l ~~t l r r ~ , i ~r ,Y'; 1 c~ rr r ~ INSTALb t Q~~L© ee ~ ~~~:.i..~',~,., ~ :1 e f~lF f f ! it p~XF i r _ _ r Id -w-
~ ~ " LS'N'X2'THtCK 3 ; ~ p, ; r ~ .err ~~.w - f~~ iffl ~ ' "650, aae ~ ~1 f`f,~ r , , f
- ~ ' e ~ ~ ~ , O TE`ItfPaRARY ~ . ~ ~ ~ ! . > s ~ ~ ~ i f 1 ~ ~f ~
' ~ ~ A RTfi CREW " ~ ' f ~ r i ~ ~f / t ~ ~~~t tr~~~lfjl l ~ Cl~aS`1Nf#- s,. r. ~ ] r ~ f, ! Jf: A ,,f )f~' rf l~/ ~~J V"'~ ~o''*-..,, t ~ - 1~'. ~ # t. r.'r~ t :,r` 1 r a l 1 i^"~ rl, ~ i. ti 't~ i.. ! l ~ ~ ` ~ fit, i Ij' - f < ~i~ ~ - '""w"''»~+". f~<
r s x r, ; ss r r 1 \Y' ~ ~ 1, t .I" , 7 1 ~ f 1. ; ' " 1 y i l Y f
,~1 ~ , ~ of ~ _ ~ I~, J ~ l , t . r ~ `'ti ' . , ~ - j B9sv15 a ",fin r"Y~ i ir... ~ I,y, fa,. r i . ~ w . „ ~ ~ ~
r , , n. ~ o ~ ll ll 'y{{
~ , , a , 'v~ s / ~ 1' ~ ROPE ~ E'_ _ ~ ~ - _ / ~ f! I, x
fr , , x ~ ~ i ~ ~ 9 L fi~ 1 ~'~-""fit ~ ~ ` ' •r'` .r ~ ( ~ f( /j V, r }~'4.rv.., I fS~ `~'A 4 e t,"'. ~ Y' _ ~ fa r., f ff
i~ , n , _ ` i ~ ` ? - . \ s ~ J ~ ~ r: 1 ~ f 1 Slug' & ~ erFeddB~r j
1 r ~ ~ 1. ~ t l y 1 w ~ }p 3i _ r \ y r ~ ~ f i t M•n K ~ - 1#7 $ P ~ ~r~ ~ ~ t ( ~ ~ , } t 1 L ~ ~ d ~i i ~1 i f r _ ~jYj,
{
~ ..._I' T d ; l t ~ ~ •a
~ ~ ~ 1 / i ~ , ~ s, f ~ i ".rain 91 F
t ~ ~ " . r,,,--,w , 3 ~ r, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.A t f ~ ~ 5 .r"" [ i ~ r i, ~ pi ~R /fir i ~ V~k~ a~~ r,; A \ 1. ..s l~`A .,3 ~r1 l ~ F At "`v,~..,,` "`^+.M?''` j"~f f r/ Y
i t f V \ \ yr" d ~ ~ ~r , ~ t
l ' ~ n~.~ ~ _ ~ , E.L. Love
, ~ ~ a1 r
~ ~ ~ . _ ~r
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t. s w., - > _.,_.~w ~ °w-,,~} 1 ~ ~ Ethel & 3 Ethel &
w p ~ Borry Frye
i / +.1. ~ ~ . , sty..: - A ippr
~'l Jf 1 _ 1'. ?u
, ~ t ; w, j i ~ r` r't t ti L c~~. ~F~ t 4 { I , i _ ~ ~x..: ~ J.D. Carroll ~ , _ . . t\ ~ ~ ~ A 1, r
~ 1,1 ~ ~,A~ i..~ ~ ~ r,; i
1 - ~ LEGEND: / ~ f` LEGEND:
~ ~ j ~i / „ l r, i ~ ~ , ~ I ( 1 r , : ; / PERMIT BOUT PERMIT BOUNDARY e• . TREES VY ,
r-' ~ `t\t~ ~.l t ir, ~
' ; - l ~ , _ ; ' , ~ _ ~ ~ PIT LIMIT ~ j" a:~ ~1 ~f ~ , ~ ,h E ~ f ~Y PIT LIMIT BUILDING Q
r ~ ; ~t'F LIT41~' ~ ~ ! ? ' ! i i ' ~ ' ' FUTURE PIT I
~ ~ ~ 1~ ' ~ 1 r . ~ ~ , r ~ ~ ~ ` ~vs~ FUTURE PIT LIMITS " 3x,, '.-y'•. - ,t, HORIZONTAL CONTRO borAW,TTREED AREAS ARE 4~,ROx,MATE
~ o ~ ,,4 ~::..s` ~ EA 1 1 , ~ PIT 10-YEAR ~ ~ h r"` i ~ ~ i PIT 10-YEAR _ VERTICAL CONTROL POINT O"
~ \ r J ~ t~ r ~ . ~.,r r"~.. l ~ i
i ~1 ~ j ~ ~ :;E 4 BUFFER BUFFER SPOT ELEVATION + 731.6
~ ~ r, , ~ ~ r~ ~ f ~ ~ n r ~l Claude Le ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . - t ~ ; i ~ x,.. - BERM BERM Ih INDEX CONTOUR`
r ~ ~ ~~rd , ` / r ~ s at & Erma Lewis 1 ~ . ~ j i ~ . ~ _ , .
/ ~ ' t °,o ~ ~f~ ~ ~f ~ ' . ~h ~ ~ ~w DIRT ROADS DIRT ROADS INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR a
SS ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ jib ~ ~3. S"~! 5 i . 5 ~J~~D l
f A 4 ~ ~ ' ~ ? , ~ ~ ~ PAVED ROAD' ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ r:_ 4 ~ , ~ E,A. Speacee Subdtvtston t , ~ PAVED ROADS CREEK
1 ~ ~ ~ PTT LIMIT ' ~ - i ~ , s I / / r ii` s ~ ~ ~ m' ~_,r-, \ a; i ~ $ a , ~ ~ ~ ~ STOCKPILE STOCKPILE CHAIN LINK FENCE
~ ~ 6 ~ ~ l i f y . fail - t~'r _ i ~ _ ~ r.° ~ a f ~ i~ s~ FQ~', t 1 ~ 1 r
K,~ ` ~ . ~ \ ~ ~ , r ~ BODY OF WA BODY OF WATER PIPE
a' ~ ~ t ~,,,a Oil-SITE - , ~~..,~~r` POLE
'~,,A~* ~ ; J'. ~ . ~ ; 1jItiPOSAL ~ ~ -`-~.~v M.~,. ~ '~~,k ` e. SETTLING CEL SETTLING CELL
~ F- ~ ~.x
d , i v+ti / s I 4S
xs, . i..,ly fj ``~,W ~
~ ~ arm , 6 .--_N~_- ~ ' ~ ~
Rackoam ~ X55 v~ r~'r BERM '
7 ;.d .,y 1 ho f
yy y 0 e ,
~ ' Hickory Grove Church ~ x IMPORTANT NOTE Martin Marietta Aggregates
l E r D SUFFER y. NOTE, CONTOURS IN TREED AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE - v
~--~s~ ~ ~ 1 PERMIT BOUNDARIES ARE xonrwNrat, HORIZONTAL DATUM - STATE PLANE CO-ORDINATES RALEIGH, N.C.
i j~ ~ A, E. Yow ~ ~ APPROXIMATE veR~~ ~ / j ~ f ~ - xnTTa VERTICAL DATUM - MEAN SEA LEVEL NATIONAL GEODETIC DATUM OF 1929 PROPOSED CHANNEL RELOCATION
E' ~ j Mabel P. Shields ~ ;
_ FII,I FILE NAME: DATE REVISION POMONA QUARRY

SCALE : 1" = 200' 1 I 3.2996 " "ow d ft GUILFORD COUNTY, N.C.
2 2-11-W Convemim to AomCAD My
3 3 QUARRY: POMONA 4 DWNBY: DATE: DWO.NO: JOB. NO.
0 100 200 400 600 800 D. BRIOBT 529/96 5 Cs BY: SCALE: SBEET NO. • 1 OF 1
. : 5 M. sCOTT 1"."
666ti ti6 ~ZE ~Eb 9Z yew t~~ :E1 92 uew ?uJ 5Mp'2-dwD4-66-E-IDUuPgO-euowod\sdew euowOd\euOwOd\0108 9\dNIIOadO\SNOISIAIO\AN3\:S

~T-0r j RX _ di I ~
~ma y' `
ti~,y~ ' ss rr~" ~ ~''.3 } 1
I r ~ ~~t~
0 i3'
O .
k:

;wG:

1 ~ a 8,c
0 0 u~V~~
T

I9 ~0 0
PIT AREA
mn
2+ 0 00
' ui
u.
af'~ ~ a rd~ b1 ~f 1sr° ~ Q at t~ . F S~ ~ S~ y r~
t ~a ~
~~u t s~ . ~
~ ~fi ~ 4
y,i 5 P ~ 4 ~ d uv F1 a - v E,S* f! u r fi a u .l i+ ~ ,x r A R Lx~ t~ t *a t # l 1,tas1 t~ui sr, 1+~` ~s r't? # v ! ,.u t 7 ~ ~ zrass u r s~Y #.uY f if
. "h. 21+00 r° .t i1r X~t V t ~~r E ~it;fir fir''" ~~lue { ~ s 4~, Ytr Y 4 t s -s ~ rx'~ sa r i s r r 1 SYi" iw t h1 ~ \ l ~ tai i r r v1 ~ s s i 4 ) rl ~Vi ~ s ~3 ~ r~ l ! r u `t ~(e s} YS"rPr#V aT 'f ar~vlJ a 'r~3/i 1 a r' .a r~u 7 r~Y t fY bj sa,~lr ~Y Vr:
i5 sw. t ~ r T` r 7r ai (~k lS r ~ w1 #~i w!'~~ 7 'sort Yr; 9~' ~ r ,u Xs tt ~Aa f ddi~ "~~kk i v, g a~ev s ~ ~r ,M1 as ti>i+nr~ `~f Lr y i sb, ~~r f~; y ,t t, o, v is~ 7;1,~ . Y4s n~-~ ~ Vx„S~X,n „tba v1 ~ lip'
STEP 1. BLAST C 1. BLAST CHANNEL
~ ~c",i ~ 1~,` y Y 22+00 t c ~ ~ a;` - sue- ~n~ry~t~~1 ~~F~'~i~~' r~
~ e,~~ r~s ~ ~ - ~ a ~ ~ x ~e~ ~ w+ ~ s , z
~ ir.
^"r i~r
s^ y
`~k il K. t
Vii. xy
+ 23 00
R00' r ~~~r~t~~ ROOT WAD t vl~~sr ~ a r"v',`
,'P
LARGE BOULDERS PLACED "
TO PROTECT ROOT WADS ~ 1 '
FROM HIGH WATER ~ „r~ ~v , 7~~'f';~~„ ~ip ,~s4z
24 00 ,,,i h ~ rvs,~'a
a. ~r '495.G.~ ~a
~dn~4;
PIT AREA ~ ,
gt''r!'~~.~;.
,r~-~
r'4~~~~ ,
2+ 5 00 - , ,
, a 0 1
5.
~ ~
I ~ yet
2d+00
STEP 2. PLACE BOULDE ;E BOULDERS TO PROTECT
OVERBURDEN AND PLA] 1 AND PLANT VEGETATION

x " ,
~ F " F ~ ~ ,,y 3
2/+00 ~~TK r ~ Y
+rF' ~ 5 ~',I ~ w~'., is
t ~ '5... k.~~~~
;h..

~0 8 Z
P ~y','. '.:y' J CHANNEL IS ESTABLISHED HY
RAKING BOTTOM AND PULLING - E`4'~ A~,~r`~t°~~`~ ~'~,,y ~`rr SMALLER STONES/RIP-RAP UP r ° Af ~
O O AGAINST LARGER BOULDERS u~ y~~~~~~ rs h~' ,~t~
\_A]X 1A7 ~ /
I .1
MEANDER OF STREAM ~ ' r's' WII.L OCCUR FROM
PLACEMENT OF RIP-RAP
O R
O ~ ` e {~t ~ ~ i~ry~: ~X
O l + "r u~u i ~ a ` PIT AREA F,, c`~~~J~~i r ~i~r tr r s,Y .
ey Ssi
/ A l \ .
~
R
cc9~ H.
~o
diY

kph STEP 3. FORM MAIN 35 W MAIN CHANNEL
TYPICAL CROSS SE 'ROSS SECTIONS
SHOWING THE CONSTRUC a 4STRUCTION SEQUENCE
36+00
vnx~ous
PLACEMCNT
OF BOULDERS 37+.~Q
38+p0
- TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STREAM SCALE 1 200'
0 30 60 120 180 240
NOTE: 39+po
FUTURE STREAM CONDITION AS SHOWN Martin Marietta Aggregates o
RALEIGH, N.C.
ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-SECTION
IS AN APPROXIMATION. SITE CONDITIONS CREEK RELOCATION CROSS-SECTION
WILL VARY. POMOMA QUARRY
CATAWBA COUNTY, N.C.
4x+-00
QUARRY: POMONA DWN BY: DATE: DWO. NO: JOB. NO.
D. BRIGHT 3299
M BY, SCAM s>MLIrNO. • 20F2 B. NORTH
sss~ ee:sz ei 9z EC:92:T 9E JeN ?u~ 6Mp'66-E-09s-X-eu0w0d\sdew euowod\euowod\OHO9 9\dNI~OadO\SNOISIAIO\AN3\:S
~

oo~o

~~Pr-r
1kp0
r~k~~
3k~o
4~0
`rx
a~
x$
j:
gip-Rap & Rnot-Wads
_e ~R ` in Pool Atea ONLY
~
O ~k hf~'h'~j ~sb ~0. ~~gjT rt r'.,
9X~o ~ "s' 's y fir' PIT AREA
i.. -u~if r
4 n~~'Si;' .',5 Is
~ 4M ~ ~ fan ~ 4th 6' i s~ r~rt ~ ~ f'J ~ t~' iu 4rry,P 3i ~~x ;r f v t ~ s+ft J~ f~^'3f it ro a tti tr fU~ v ~ t r ~r rr v tq r i'!~ frx r t r~ t r
VARIOUS tai~~l ~ t~`dbi4 ~r ~ r ~~v3~~d t / ~ ~ r'~r t r~~'Y/ w uvN~l~' Ga » fvF'r ~b h ~d~~~ ti~.rs~~ ~N~~+~s6a ~i~~ ~ ~ t ~ tk~ ~a"~ ~,~~~~~I' ~k~'~~xx
PLACBMENP ~r~ ~ ~ ~ a~~~6 ~ TAI ids r' ~ a 's, H~~ tr r 3 ~ ~ ~ ~Vi ~ 1 f~ ~lr
OF BOULDERS
IOy.~ 0
eoo TYP. C I1~~0 POOLING AREA
TYP. CROSS SECTION
12yb~
14'`0
PIT AREA
15+00
~ r vow- r'
.i' 5 SRI "E" M.
16+00
PLANTING PLANTING ISLAND ON
RIGHT TYP. C NOTE: RIGHT TYP. CROSS SECTION
1. Trees to be planted along the top of the creek relocarion
should include the following:
->Virginia Pine, Blackgum, Black Cherry, Chestnut Oak,
Persimmon, Sawthooth Oak and White Ash.
2. Space trees 10 to 12' apart throughout the length of channel.
3. Trees will be planted in conjunction with the Division of
Forest Resources recommendations during the months of
December and February. Trees will be evenly distributed along
the indicated areas.
SCALE 1 60'
4. "Root-wads" will be planted on both sides of the channel in
"pooling areas" only. NOTE: 0 30 60 120 180 240
FUTURE STREAM CONDITION AS SHOWN
5. Stream will meandor based on rip-rap placement and actual ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-SECTION Martin Marietta Aggregates AA
v
bottom slope of channel. IS AN APPROXIMATION. SITE CONDITIONS RALEIGH, N.C.
WILL VARY.
CREEK RELOCATION CROSS-SECTION
POMOMA QUARRY
CATAWBA COUNTY, N.C.
QUARRY: POMONA
- TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STREAM DWNBY: DATE: DWG.NO: JOB, NO.
D. BRIGHT 312/" CL By. SCAM SRWr NO,. 1 OF 2
B. NORTH
ew ?uJ 6Mp'66-C-39s-X-euowod\9dew euowod\euowod\Oa09 9\GNIIOHVO\SNOISIAIO\ANI\:S
666T 69 ~9Z ~VS 9Z ~eW [dj 6nP'6

e _ nn ~ .
g s ~ - - x s• . ; ~ _ _
t.r

~ W
nl ~ ~iIXi:.
0 O
k
0

k
k 2
0
k
.
4
~0 0
s x
0
0
x
~ o
0 x
0
0
y; a.
Rip-R Rip-Rop & Root-Wads
in P in Pod Area ONLY
X
0 ,
9 x ~ rrrnasn
0 0
VARIOUS ~ ~ t
PLACEMENT _ F z~~,'. ,y
OF BOULDERS Y
POOLIN( POOLING AREA
TYP, CROS' TYP. CROSS SECTION
2 0
0
3
x 0
0 ~

q 9 4a q~ ~ 1 ~t~~ v Prr AREA
1 t~ t~.,+. ~ ~ „ w~ i^.

00 16+
PLANTING ISL SLANTING ISLAND ON
RIGHT TYP. CROP iT TYP. CROSS SECTION
NOTE:
1. Trees to be planted along the top of the creek relocation should
include the following:
->Virginia Pine, Blackgum, Black Cherry, Chestnut Oak,
Persimmon, Sawthooth Oak and White Ash.
2. S ace trees 10 to 12' a art throu hout the len th of channel.
p P g g
3. Trees will be planted in conjunction with the Division of Forest
Resources recommendations during the months of December and
February. Trees will be evenly distributed along the indicated areas.
4. "Root-wads" will be lanted on both sides of the channel in
P
" oolin areas" onl . p 9 Y SCALE 1 60'
5. Stream will meandor based on rip-rap placement and actual
bottom slope of channel. 0 30 60 120 180 240
NOTE: FUTURE STREAM CONDITION AS SHOWN i
ABOVE AT PARTICULAR CROSS-SECTION
IS AN APPROXIMATION. SITE CONDITIONS
WILL VARY. Martin Marietta Aggregates v
RALEIGH, N.C.
CREEK RELOCATION CROSS-SECTION
POMOMA QUARRY
CATAWBA COUNTY, N.C.
~ TREES TO BE PLANTED ALONG TOP OF STREAM QUARRY: POMONA DWN HY: DATE. 'O• NO JOB. NO.
D. HRIOHT 3/2M
ca. BY: SCAla $fl1~f NO.- 1 OF 2 H. NORTH 1" w