19990147 Ver 1_Complete File_19990315

WETLAND, STREAM, AND BUFFER INSPECTION FORM
Compliance Evaluation Inspection: (pull down
menu: 401 CEI. Buffer CEI)
? Complaint (pull down menu: wetland, stream,
wetland & stream, buffer)
? Follow-up inspection: (pull down menu: Number
of visits 2'd, 3", etc.)
? Other types of investigations
-Date of Inspection: f, .6- ', 0
-Regional Office: (Pull down menu: ARO, FRO, MRO, WaRO.
WiRO, WSRO, RRO)
-Regional Office Trackin No.
-Project Name:

County: VtlI /
River Basin (pull down)
Nearest Stream Name:1
Lat.- _ _
%L Project Name:
Cu?p? DWQ#:" pl?
Project Type: (pull down menu: Commercial, Industrial,
Loner. _ w??on resT c-'Tenti?, Single Family, DOT, Road Project (non-
' DOT), Utility Lines, Forestry, Agriculture, CAMA, Military, Other
1
OWNER /I G
Name: ,•C,
Address: G O'!
Phone No. :
REPRESENTATIVE
Name: Addres . ,
Phone No.:
LOCATION:
6?/' IL t,/ c/;,- I I?V I
NSPECTION FORM TYPES (Note: hi_hlh_hting one or combinations of the following will bring a new screen)
401/Water Quality Certification - CEI
? Stream/Wetland Compliant- NO WQ Certification
? Riparian Buffer Complaint and CEIs
401 WO CERTIFICATION - CEI
401 WQ Certification Issued and of taining the following Stipulated Conditions:
:i Stream Impacts (LF):
:3 Wetland Impacts (acres): rL
:j Stormwater Management: YV
Mitigation: (Pull down menu: WRP on-site. )ff site 05t). nnneauon hank)
? Spacial Cu itions:
r
Inspection Conditions:
Project Status: Ikv1-1lezz4? m I Under Construction Not Started
Stormwater Management: Compliant Non-compliant <t?i ale
Special Conditions: t Non-compliant Not applicable
Estimate Non-compliant Stream Impacts: ?near Feet
Estimate Non-compliant Wetland Impacts: Notes:

RIP.ARIAN BUFFER COMPLAINTS AND CEIs
Stream Information:
Stream Name:
Stream Classification:
Buffer Rules: (pull down menu: Neuse, Tar-Pam, Randleman, Water Supply Watershed)
Inspection Conditions:
? Confirmation that the stream is subject to the rule by DWQ staff. (e.g. for Neuse and Tar-Pam the stream
must be depicted on either a USGS map or Soil Survey. If the buffer rule is in a Water Supply the stream
must be depicted on the most recent versions of the U.S.G.S. 1:24000 (7.5Minute) scale topographic maps or
as determined by local government studies map.
Confirmation description:
Linear feet of buffer impact
Linear width of buffer impact
Estimate acreage of buffer impact
Estimate acreage of Zone I
Estimate acreage of Zone 2
Buffer Use Observed: (pull down menu: Airport, Archaeological activities. Bridges. Dam maintenance, Drainage of a pond, Driveway
crossing, Forestry. Fertilizer application, Greenway trails. Mining activities. Non-electric utility, on-site sanitary sewer systems, Overhead
electric utility lines. modified natural stream maintenance. play ground equipment, protection of excising structures. Railroads, Scientific
studies and gauging stations, Stormwater Management. Strcam restoration. Temporary Sedimentation and Erosion Control. Underground
electric lines. vegetation management, Water dependent structures, Water Supply. Water Wells. Wetland Restoration, other )
? Buffer Use Designation: (pull down menu: Exempt, Allowable, Allowable w/ Mitigation, Prohibited)
? DWQ Authorization needed
? DWQ Authorization received (pull down menu: compliant, non-compliant)
Comments:
Resolution:
? Compliant - NO Further Action Required
Non-Compliant
? Notification to Local Delegated Authority
? Notice of Violation
? Notice of Violation - Recommendation for Enforcement
? Other
4TRPAVI/W[=TLAND COMPLAINT - NO WO CERTIFICATION ISSUED
Inspection Conditions: NO 401 Certification
1 Estimate Stream Impacts: Linear Feet
zi Estimate Wetland Impacts: Acres
:I Description of Activity:
Resolution:
? NO ACTION REQURIED/COMPLIANT
Non-Compliant
? Notification to USAGE
? Notice of Violation
? Notice of Violation - Recommendation for Enforcement
Other
NOTES:

199920473
DEM ID' CORPS ACTION ID!'
NWP 14
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):
PRE--CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS. THAT REQUIRE :
1) NOTIFICATION TO "M CORPS Or ENGINEERS
2) ARPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) 'COORDINATION WITS THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT.
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL-F.ANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRIN.
1. OWNERS NAME: LCDX Corp.
2. MAILING ADDRESS: C/o Mr. Rick LonRworth, 2650 Parper Road
Clemmons, NC 27012 SUBDIVISION NAME: Huntcliff Phase I &
CITY'. Stokesdal.e STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27357 _
'
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE)' Huntcliff Phase 1 & 2, located between haw River-Pd. (S 202F)
and Weatherstone subdivision, approx. 2800 LF east of NC 68, Guilford County
(see Attachment 1
3. TELEPHONE NU2•ISER (HOME) : [phone] (VIORK) : (336) 778-QO75
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIP_L, P.DDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER: N/A
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A IAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USG5 TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL, PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE): Stokesdale, NC
COUNTY: Guilford NEAREST TOWN OR CITY:
(See Attachment 1) Partial Copy of USGS Topographic Man "Summerfield- NC"
1
Nuntcliff, Phase 1 and 2 SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD
: Project (single family subdivision) lies to north of
NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.)
Haw River between Haw River and Haw River Road (SR 2028). Project-borders on
easterly side of Weatherstone Subdivision lying to east on NC 6R.
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER:' Haw River
RIVER BASIN: Cape Tear
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIL)A.L SALTVi.!TER
($A),.HICH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER
SUPPLY (WS-1 OR WS-II)? YES ( ] NO (XJ IF YES, EXPLAIN.
7b. 15 THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COaSTP-L
MANAGE11ENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ J IJO [X)
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A.COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR.
LIST OF COASTAL 'COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LA14D USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PER14ITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES CK ] NO ( ] IF YES, FROVIDE ACTION I. D. NUME)ER OF
PREVIOUS PER141T AND 1+NY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION): 404 No 199920473 (See Attachment 2) _
6b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE ,
FUTURE? YES ( ] NO [XI IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK!

9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL tIUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT of LP-ND: 148.7 AC
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OE ACRES OF WETLA110S LOCATED o;a FnoJECT SITE:
None - See 404 No. 199920473 Certification
2
i
10a. NUMBEW OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: None EXCAVATION: None
FLOODING: None OTHER! None ,
DRAINAGE: None TOTAL' ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: None
(See 404 Certification)
10b. (1) STREAM CHp.NNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF
RELOCATED, PROVXDE D1'5TANCE BOTH BEl"ORE AND AFTER RELOCATION)
(Attachments 3 through 7)
LENGTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
WIDTH BEFORE (bated on normal high water Contours): FT
WIDTH AFTER: ET
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: ET AFTER: ET
(2) STREAM GLIANNEL MPACTS WILL R SUL' FPO : (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: N /A PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHP-NNEL: X
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: N/A CONSTRUCTION OE .A. DAM/FLOODING: N/A
OTHER: N/A
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND 15 PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? N/A
MAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? N/A
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED A ATTACH PLANS: 6 1(2" X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): place pipe and stone aprons in existing stream bbeds. Lightweight track
backhoe, compaction equipment
13, PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Construct residential streets (Ribbon paving)
-across streams by installing CMP in stream bed.
N
3

19. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): N/A .
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERA..LLX LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT
.IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: (covered by 404 permit) (ATTACH RESPONSES
FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF 'HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: (covered by 404 permit).
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE All EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAUD?
YES [j NO P9 (If' NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT.FURSUA.NT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY ACT?
YES (I NO []
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES ( j NO [ j
IF ANSWER TO 174 IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FRO14 THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVXROM-iENTAL.MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIO143 REGARDING THE STATE CLEA.RING(IOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4
In mr.H.i

18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCF+.ARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS: N/A
a.' WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING-ALI, WETLAND, STREAMS,'LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26,
• 29, AND 36). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY
?1[,JST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1
INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO SE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING FROPERTY7
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT I5 PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL7
g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, it APPLICABLE.
NOTW: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
• 2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (XN TRX TTr'ENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY) , A LETTER,-FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEM&NT
PROGRAM.
L c-? c, 62,UA . 2 9-
OWNER's Amra a SIGNATURE DATE

(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVIDED (lag.))
5
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 15, 1999
Guilford County
DWQ Project # 990147
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
LCDX Corp.
c/o Mr. Rick Long Worth
2650 Harper Rd.
Clemmons N.C. 27012
Dear Mr. Longworth
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 494 feet
of waters for the purpose of constructing road crossing at Huntcliff Phase 1&2 as you described in your application dated Feb. 17,
1999 (with an update on February 18, 1999) and stream mitigation plan March 2, 1999. After reviewing your application, we have
decided that this till is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3103 This certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 14 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater,
Non-Discharge and Water Supply Water shed regulations. This approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA
permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the
attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to notify the
state in order to assure compliance for future wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of
the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
2. The stream mitigation plan dated March 2 1999 from Geoseince and Technology P.A. must be followed. In addition a vegetation and
Macrobenthos monitoring plan with success criteria must be submitted to DQW for written approval by May 15, 1999.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter
1508 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-
7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786.
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston Salem DWQ Regional Office
John Domey
Central Files
Ron Ferrell
Eric Fleek
Brenda Smith; GeoScience and Technology
Philip Ball, Philip Ball Co.
Stevens
Perr
990147.Itr
Division of Warr Quality - Non-Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer - 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Eric Black
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: 1 arry Coble
Date: 3/1 199
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name LCDX Corp. County Guilford
Project Number 99 0147 County2
Recvd From APP Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 2/17/99 Recvd By Region 2/26/99
Project Type residential streets
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Sup[
14 Stream O Y OO N F- 16 (I) 1_7 NSW
V
Mitigation " I
MitigationType
Restore
\J
Is Wetland Rating Shee
Have P
Is Mitigation required? C JOv )eny 41 /L"/l f 01
Provided by Region: I 114o'I I•Il-,?t, f'
Z?(
f sLi
Comments: o? c ces ( , ?
1lv C t.:7,
-The road crossings -4 lull td-Q 114a 1, dl iu L,- c? i u4 1 aii LI moan L,
(total impact = 382'). Crayfish were found upstream of the the first crossing C-4 so the applicant was
notified that mitigation would be required for these impacts.
-1 notified the applicant that a mitigates plan would have to be submitted to the Wetlands group.
before the application would be complete_ Notified Wetlands group on 2/24/99 to place p,ject on
hold until an acceptable mitigation plan has been submitted.
-The road crossing C-8 (112') was located on a separate tributary. No crayfish etc. + below 150'
threshold = no mitigation.
-The engineer has designed the road crossings with 2:1 slopes to minimize the stream impacts.
These crossings will require significant fill due to the topography of the property. As a result , it
appears that avoidance and minimization considerations have been met.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name LCDX Corp. County Guilford
Project Number 99 0147
Regional Contact:
Date:
Eric Black
3/1/99
Comments (continued from page 1):
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2

eoScknc5 &
5c1dogy9 P. A.
"Practical En,??ineerin?? &
Environmental Solutions"
2050 Northpoint Drive • Suite A • Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
March 2, 1999
Mr. Eric Fleek
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone]
C:tJ _,-:
p ?; c

RE: Stream Mitigation Plan
' LCDX Corporation Proposed Huntcliff Subdivision
Stokesdale, Guilford County, NC
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Action I.D.: 199920473
' Dear Mr. Fleek:

On behalf of LCDX, Inc., Geoscience & Technology, P.A. (GeoSci) is pleased to submit
this Stream Mitigation Plan for the Proposed Huntcliff Subdivision, Stokesdale, Guilford
County, NC. This plan completes the Pre-Construction Notification Application for
Nationwide Permit # NWP 14 submitted on February 16, 1999. A copy of the Pre-
construction notification is appended to this report for ease of reference. The mitigation
plan has been prepared in accordance with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission August 1998 Guidelines for Stream Relocation and Restoration in N.Qrth
Carolina. and verbal guidance provided in our telephone conversation of February 24,
1999. Additional guidance on the selection and application of mitigation techniques was
obtained from the Interagency Publication Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles.
Processes and Practices. Information regarding the contributing Agencies for this document
is provided in the References section of the stream mitigation plan.
Background
The referenced site is located between Haw River Road (SR 2028), and Weatherstone
Subdivision, approximately 2,800 linear feet east of NC 68, Guilford County, NC. A site
location map is provided in Figure 1. Representatives of LCDX and GeoSci met with Mr.
Eric Black, North Carolina Division of Water Quality Winston-Salem Regional Office, at
the proposed development site on February 22, 1999. The purpose of the site visit was to
establish the mitigation requirements for the proposed stream crossings as described in the
February 16, 1999 Pre-construction Notification Application.
Continents received during the on site meeting with Mr. Black have been used to determine
the requirements of the mitigation plan as follows:
1. Perennial status of streams where crossings are located: A determination was
made that proposed stream crossings C-4 (Perthshire Drive), C-5 (Chestershire
r

J

Mr. Eric Fleet
March 2, 1999
Page 2
Drive) and C-12 (Bardonshire Drive) are located on a perennial stream. This
was evidenced by the presence of crayfish in the stream channel at locations
upstream of the proposed crossings. Please refer to the Pre-construction
Notification Application, Attachment 3, Crossing Summary and Locations for a
diagram of the stream locations.
2. Length of stream requiring mitigation: Because the three stream crossings total
greater than 150 feet in length and are located within the same stretch of
perennial stream, mitigation is required for the combined length of crossing.
The stream distance requiring mitigation is 382 feet.
Stream Impact Avoidance and Impact Minimization
Stream impact avoidance and minimization have been accomplished for the project in
several ways.
• A 2:1 slope design has been used to minimize the area impacted by the stream
crossings.
• The use of headwalls at pipe outfalls decreases the length of riprap originally proposed
for the crossings and thus minimizes the length of stream impacted.
• The original layout of the proposed development was designed to place roads in the
ridge tops where possible and to limit the number of crossings. Crossing C-12
(Bardonshire) was not originally planned, but was required by the Town of Stokesdale
to establish a stub street to adjacent properties.
• A 50 foot undisturbed drainage buffer will be maintained along the stream where
crossings C-4, C-5, and C-12 are located. This buffer extends from the uppermost
property line of the proposed project to the lowermost property line at C-12
(Bardonshire).
• A 22-acre parcel from the project property will be deeded to Guilford County for
drainage way and open space use. Approximately 1,000 feet of stream are included in
this parcel.
Stream Mitigation
Stream Characteristics
The proposed mitigation plan is for approximately 400 linear feet of a section of the same
unnamed tributary to the Haw River in which three proposed stream crossings will be
located. Approximately 1,100 linear feet of the stream were surveyed on February 22-23,
1999 in order to determine stream characteristics and the most appropriate section for
mitigation. The mitigation section begins approximately 400 feet upstream of crossing C-
12 (Bardonshire). Figure 2 provides a plan view map showing the surveyed stream
location, stream parameter measurement stations, and primary mitigation points. Figure 3
shows the stream degradation features that are typical throughout the stream mitigation
section. Photographs of each stream cross section station are provided in Figures 4a
through 4f.
The stream cross section data was used to calculate the following stream parameters:
• Sinuosity =1.3
• Slope=0.012
• width:depth ratio=2.0 to 2.9

' Mr. Eric Fleet
March 2, 1999
' Page 3
Calculation information is provided in the attached tables.
' Based on the observed degradation features and the calculated stream characteristics, the
mitigation stream fits major stream type classification "F" (from Rosgen 1994,1996).
According to this stream classification, type "F" streams are degraded systems with overly
' wide channels and unstable banks. As the photographs in Figures 4a-4f show, the
segment of stream selected for mitigation exhibits these characteristics throughout.

Mitigation Methods
A combination of active and passive mitigation methods will be applied for this stream
mitigation project. The active mitigation method selected is the placement of rock vanes
(wing deflectors) in the severely eroding meander bends. These structures protrude from
the scoured stream bank without extending entirely across the channel. They deflect flows
away from the bank and create scour pools by constricting the channel and accelerating
flow. The property in the vicinity of the stream mitigation project is bouldery and rocky
and will provide native geologic material for construction of the rock vanes. The rock
vanes will be placed downstream from existing riffles to avoid backing up the water to the
extent that the riffles would be drowned out. Please see Figure 5 for a diagram of the
proposed mitigation structures. The use of rock vanes was selected over tree and root wad
revetment in order to avoid the stream disturbance necessary to anchor the root wad and
tree materials. Large logs from on site may be incorporated into the rock vanes in areas
where they can be stabilized without taking heavy excavation equipment into the stream.
Because stream shading will be provided by the existing trees in the drainage way buffer,
the stream cover provided by root wads and tree branches is not critical to this particular
stream mitigation scenario.
The combination of natural riffles, installed rock vanes and newly created pools will restore
the diversity of the physical habitat to the degraded system. Once the extreme erosion is
mitigated by the rock vanes, it is anticipated that the stream banks will naturally revegetate
and stabilize. Passive mitigation of the stream banks is preferred in order to avoid
disturbance of the surrounding vegetative buffer by the heavy equipment that would be
needed to actively reslope and stabilize the stream banks. Source plant material for the
natural revegetation and slope stabilization exists within the drainageway buffer that will
remain along the stream corridor.
Figure 6 shows the location of two pre-existing piped stream crossings that will be
removed during the development of the proposed Huntcliff subdivision. Photographs of
these crossings are shown in Figures 7a and 7b. The pipes at each of these crossings will
be removed and the stream banks regraded and seeded with grass-type cover. Each of
these crossings is approximately 10 feet wide, and will provide an additional 20 feet of
stream mitigation for this project.
Summary
The proposed stream crossings in the Huntcliff subdivision require mitigation of 382 feet
of stream. Stream impact avoidance and mitigation were considered in the design of the
subdivision and stream crossings. The stream impacted by the crossings was surveyed and
identified as a class "F" degraded stream system. A combination of active - native material
revetment with rock and/or log vane - and passive mitigation techniques were selected for
the stream mitigation project. The mitigation techniques were selected to
minimize disturbance to the stream system and employ practical on site materials, while
increasing stream habitat diversity and promoting long term stream channel stabilization.

Mr. Eric Fleet
March 2, 1999
Page 4
The total linear distance of stream mitigated for this project, including the pre-existing
crossing removal and rock vane installation, will be approximately 400 feet. This exceeds
the required mitigation of 382 linear feet of stream mitigation.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information to process
the 401 Certification Application for this project. I appreciate the time that you took last
week to provide guidance and input regarding the information required for this stream
mitigation plan.
With best regards,
GEOSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, P.A.
Brenda J. Smith, P.G.
Principal Scientist
Appendix: Pre-Construction Notification Application for NWP-14/ 401 Certification

N
4
r o
JJ It ?
O 9 Subject
Site L. ` O I
0
o?? t vao
}
?J
MR?
Title: Project: Scale: Gel?
?? Ll?
Site Location Map Huntcliff Phase 1 & 11 1" = 2000' `
Summerfield ?9 loo
USGS Quadrangle Job No.: Location. Figure No.: I'rnrnrni F.nRineering <?
linri ronrnenfnl Solutions"
Dated 1969, Revised 1994 99,11)-) Stokesdalc. NC 1 Winston-Salem, NC [phone]

Title:
Typical Stream
Degradation Features
)ject: Scale: crosc;
Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale ?1i ??
Techm
No.: Location: Figure No.: J)V "Practical Engin
Envirn
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 3 W;-t--c.1- nu
896-1300
t
Tille
4

Stream
Station Photos
Showing: Unstable
I/ t
)n #12
bank in overly wide channel.
Station #13
Showing: Unstable eroding bank with vegetation beginning to cave in.
Project: Scale:
Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale
Job No.: Location: Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 4a
i
NC [phone]
i
Title
Station #15
Showing: Unstable eroding bank.
Project: Scale:
Stream Huntcliff Phase I & 11 Not to Scale
Station Photos Job No.: Location: Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 0

NC [phone]
Station #14
Showing: Unstable eroding bank.
Tide:
Stream
Station Photos
Project: Scale:
Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale t" q d
No.: Location: Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 4c
NC [phone]
Showing: Eroding bank with vegetation beginning to cave in.
Title:
r, iJr
r ?t
It
-r ?
Showing: Extreme bank under cutting with vegetation beginning to cave in.
Project: Scale:
Stream Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale
Station Photos Job No.: Location: Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 4d

NC [phone]
Station #18
Chrttniinn• Rnnir i inrinr ni iftinn %AAfh vanntntinn haninninn fn rnva in
i
Title

t h .i
Station #20
Showing: Extreme bank under cutting with vegetation beginning to cave in.
Station #21
Showing: Bank under cutting with vegetation beginning to cave in.
Project: Scale: I
Stream Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale P
Station Photos Job No.: Location: Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 4e «„.

NC (336) 896-1.300
,;, 4
Station #22
Showing: Bank under cutting.
' Station #23
Showing: Bank under cutting in overly wide channel.
itle: Project: Scale:
Stream Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale
Station Photos Job No.: Location: Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 4f

, P. A.
gineering &
ironmenrai Solutions"
NC [phone]

0
C?
d
J
r
N
u
A,
1aN?

_u
a
t\
3
?. o
U
ody
a 20
C
o w
o
fi z
U
V
N
O h
cl
? Itt a
• w
w
•? N
1
M
&AY
00
? O 00
o? U
A4
t; z
a?
a o
3
I I (t
t
Pre-existing ?? t I
' ¦ Piped Stream
Crossing 2
Pre-ex1stinJj
Piped Stream
Crossing 1
fill
f
A
/?
AF 4 c? titi

Note: Map has been enlarged from original scale of 1" = 2000'.
Title: Project:
' Pre-existing Piped
i
S
C Huntcliff Phase I & II
tream
ross
ngs
Location Map Job No.:
99.122 Location:
Stokesda

Scale:
I" = 1000'
Figure No.:
NC 6
1300
Crossing One Looking East
Huntcliff Phase I & II
ob No.: Locatic
Scale:
Not to Scale
I Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 7a

Pok
9
er g c
iranmental Solutions"
NC [phone]
Crossing One Looking West

Crossing Two Looking East
Huntcliff Phase I & II
ob No.: Locatic
Scale:
Not to Scale
Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 7b

NC [phone]
Crossing Two Looking West
rn
CN
a
1
N
cc
D
C
O
1?
t5
N
N
O
1)
U
2
c0
I
A
1
1
1
c
1C)
rn
0
ca
w? 0 0 0 00 ? O? cD u) N O? O M
4 N N N N N ai vi 6 N N v
>
> y
Y ^
c0 ?
mL
p ., N
r O N N O N U) t0
r st
r H
r M O
O
H
O
« `
N N
0 N
0 ?
0 N
0 M
C M
C LO
C
O V-
0 M
0 0
0 ?
C
y
,
0
o
E
N cO m r m m Lo d r` Ln u) v I--
N ^
COv
C
2

"-' O
4 N
6 M
6 M
1'? N
06 0
06 't
6 't
0 N
0 r-
0
6

.-
0? 0 0 0
ti 0
l- 0
rl- 0
I- 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
O 0
ao
` >
O d
c W
m
U
c
m
m c C T- O O CO N CO CO O CO O
,. O
O"
O
> 1
O c V
O c V
O 6
O 6
O
f` 4
O
F- 6
O
F- 6
O
f` 6
O
f` 6
O
f` u)
O
F- I-:
O
F-
_
O (D
? W
c
t3 E
U) Z N M V
- u) W
V- I-
V- W
V- 0
V- 0
N
N c?
?r M
N
C
0
?
T
?
O
U 2
A
v..
O
N
cC
a
Title:
Station #17 Looking Downstream
Project: Scale:
Station 17 Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale
Stream Photos Job No.: Location: Figure No.:
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 81b
NC [phone]
Station #17 Looking Downstream
Showing: Eroding bank with vegetation beginning to cave in.
Title: Project: Scale:
o • m%c -
Station 17 Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale hn(D iggy-L.
Figure No.: r rn cenng
Stream Photos Job No.: Location: Sure Environmental Solutions"
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 8b Winston-Salem, NC [phone]
Station #17 Looking Upstream
Showing: Eroding bank with vegetation beginning to cave in.

Station #18 Looking Downstream
Title: Project: Scale:
Station 18 Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale 19 ]M s P. A.
Stream Photos r un K rrin
Job No.: IACa[IOn: Figure No.: Environmerun! Solutions"
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 8c Winston-Salem, NC [phone]
Station #18 Looking Upstream
Showing: Bank under cutting with vegetation beginning to cave in.
Station #19 Looking Downstream
Rhnwina: Steep eroding bank with overly wide channel.
Title: Project: Scale: ( ONCIM &
Station 19 Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale RM s ipo A.
ric
Job No.: Location: Figure No.: IV - Environments( Solutions"
Stream Photos er?n
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 8d Winston-Salem, NC [phone]
Station #19 Looking Downstream
Showing: Steep eroding bank with overly wide channel.
Title: Project: Scale: LJ o."* =? ?
Station 19 Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale 7 ck ?1..
llm® Ea T
Practical nK
`n
Job No.: Location: Figure NO.: IV- Environrnenml Solutions"
Stream Photos
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 8d Winston-Salem, NC [phone]
Station #19 Looking Upstream
Showing: Extreme bank under cutting with vegetation beginning to cave in.
h^.
re 'a?

Station #22 Looking Downstream
Ctaan Prnrlinn hank with overly wide channel.
Title: Project: Scale: reOs
Station 22 Huntcliff Phase I & II Not to Scale IM 9 P. A.
Stream Photos nr un ng wing
Job No.: Location: Figure No.: Environrnenml Solutions"
99.122 Stokesdale, NC 8e Winston-Salem, NC [phone]
Showing: Bank under cutting.
TRANSMITTAL
- a
i THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC.
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors
TO Mr. John Dorney (Attn: Jennifer)
Division of Environmental Management
NC DEHNR
4401 Reedy Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
305 Doub Road
Lewisville, North Carolina 27023
Telephone: [phone]
Pre-construction Notification Application (S
RE*- Huntcliff, Phase 1 and 2
Stokesdale, Guilford County, NC
GENTLEMEN%
We are forwarding the following Items In regards to the above referenced project.
( ) PLANS ( ) SHOP DRAWINGS ( ) PRINTS
( ) CONTRACT * (x) CALCULATIONS ( ) MYLARS
( ) DETAILS ( ) SPECIFICATIONS ( ) SEPIAS
( ) SKETCHES ( ) CHANGE ORDER ( ) OTHER
(x) FOR YOUR USE ( ) FOR YOUR APPROVAL ( ) FOR YOUR REVIEW
( ) FOR YOUR FILE ( ) FOR YOUR COMMENTS ( ) PER YOUR REQUEST
COMMENTS:
In looking over my submittal to you dated 2/16/99, I discovered errors on
Attachments 3, 4, and 7. I regret this error and am enclosing 8 copies each of
these attachments. Please enclose the corrected copies in my previously submitted
application.
Y,
THE
P. E., P.L.S.
NY, INC.
Date February 18, 1999
cc: Water Quality Regional Office
File E443

eoiscience &
cR(D
93 A.
"Practical Engineering &
Environmental Solutions"
2050 Northpoint Drive • Suite A • Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]
Mr. Eric Fleek
Division of Water Quality
NCDENR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone]
RE: Photographs of Stream Degradation Features
Stream Mitigation Plan Stations #16419 and #22
LCDX Corporation Proposed Huntcliff Subdivision
Stokesdale, Guilford County, NC
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Action I.D.: 199920473
Dear Mr. Fleek:
It was a pleasure meeting you at your office yesterday. As we discussed, I am sending
you additional photographs more clearly showing the degradation areas for the segments
of the proposed mitigation stream that we discussed yesterday. The steeply eroded
banks and overly wide channels are present throughout the stream distance selected for
mitigation, with the exception of approximately 10 feet of riffle/pool area at Station # 16
and approximately 10 feet of riffle/pool area at Station # 17. The attached Figures 8a -
8e show the steep eroded banks at Stations #16419 and #22 more clearly. The stream
mitigation linear distances are summarized in the attached Table, and demonstrate a total
of 439 linear feet of stream mitigation. This mitigation distance includes 20 feet
mitigated from the removal of two pre-existing stream crossings. This exceeds the
required mitigation distance of 382 linear feet.
Thank-you for the time that you took to look over this stream mitigation plan yesterday.
I sincerely appreciate your time and assistance on this project. Please let me know if you
have any further questions.
With best regards,
GEOSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, P.A.
_ ) UvkA - A
Brenda J. Smith, P.G.
Principal Scientist
March 6, 1999

?T T` 10,C L H t4\ C v? -r rQ R=
_TTr- rn 10t) (I) w 491 Avri.l cAT ic2t?
? ?XIS'f INS ':• ? • ?•?:?•? .•. •
WLA'TAMTON
.
,> tsA P.Tbm 5 NOI
--? f FALL RD.
1- 2000
¦
1,.
\\ N D t3 ?
. ?? e??s ?Rt as • ,? An •
P L (L 1?DS
10,

S u M Ail A P, Y K o,-111 s 1 r, G L F_ N C=T 1.4 s '.
5 tF2CEi" CuLVCRT S LC 4pIrm
?f:? jt•1 Iw?.rr
IQiPPAP morLrr
51f MP
PtP•TNsHIRL b R. c-4 4181
CN?sr??s?iae ??D, -5 54 r?/??WALL ICS' -3 Z'
f?R?lST?N v R, , C-B fie' 76'
?iQfiroN S r??RC DR. C -12 72 vilwo W4L 5!0' e' qo'
T_0rtq• L sTP- UAM IMPACT
194' 494'
NOTE,. Fin-- LDIJ6TH (T"v'f R_F_ FILL LcN6r4 $4 sr-D c N 2.1 FI t-LSI.OPCS)
-??)THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: T T
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors CApsr/M of S WwM4AY ANC LOCAT1 OA S
305 Doub Road
/ Lewisville, North Carolina 27023 Party Chief: Date
Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone] Design Checked SHT. NO. of
90%T CoVr PIKAL <10r 44r.
( 1
.0
..130 .
1,46' 146,
114, la,
I o41 ( °4t
r ,
it N 01 M Q ? ??N " • ?a? a .,,x, ? ° i / ?° ?•. O` `? \ ?? ? Imo;
I ?
M / ?, ?1 9? \ too
nor ?-
Ile
s4c
? ?n oZ ? ? ? V 0 h;,?a
?O N 4 :\
?•?j g ry/fir`. 6'. ••
LO
+1 ,?..
N-'N
IL -
1100
/ w -4 ? Co
M
o?
IR ? i M .?? 0000
re Al
10
n
?3,? a?N sffi?E ?? v_ F-
? uLvEer
f A)k4 rc
N1 OTH
2f
CL %
v n ?pR,4P' - 104
y
`U)
U O ?JAA
C% 0?
a. U1
Q Q r
40 /0 Is
p6

N
Z
9/
•'p,0 , ' M
6
S E MS D 1
4365, ?
Qu
K?
lei J a ? 11° ? ? ? _.---•?
J CV +?
??. • (NJ
n ?? O
V
_ z o
N.
r? N N
Cif
I1J0??y ?
Ci'- U) - •
Q
cn ' • ` r
no -N s 145.8
o Zo
\ 2 J
E? "N? o Q
26 00
ziI
CID
,n ?.. c• N 1 \C)
?t
M M• M it
-- o 1
%
of '
Bo
V
co
td
co
1
W
,-LOT (s I
r r K II. JONES
DB 4k7,3. PG I(
LO)--
ROBERT D. a S,
DO 4604, PG 2
LOT 6
DO D J. El C
DB 4605, PG .7

11
1 1?CCH fA I._1-1T FO R,'

r?
D
ba . rk' p,0 ..
rp. ,• ti •
S'T?Nt; •
:A71?S?ON
11""
VIgINIly AP
I'"m 2000'
5/v 12. m s HIM
b2 -

Su^^MAIzY 0(z C E,( D, LFN

5 f'ftC ?"
Cu L. V ER? PIP'
SILL .?4 "_ K
?QIPFAP m r1. -
51fP P POST w
1,ZCor1-I PK@i CvAMf'f .
1r1?NeT?+
PCQTNSNIKL nt?. ?-4 =>?e" qo' 8' 32' ?3or ..??o'.
CNrTsr?iesNi -5 5t w/?oWALL .146 ?4S'
K1?15'iT-1?I P g. 'Fa' 76' 112 ,
j9AtiroN5Fd,RE bR, C" 12, 72 w/No W4U. S!v' e' 40r 1 o4r t 041
Tarr- L_ z=-rP UM IMPACT 1941 494'
NOTE:,. Fin-- Lc•,Q6TH (TRgNsV1:RF_ F)W. LcN6r4 $kSCD ON 2:1 Fn.L51.0PES)
-)? THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: TT
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors CA&S*jPJ 4p X WWAOMY A N G LOdWrldA S
305 Doub Road
Lewisville, North Carolina 27023 Party Chief: Date
?`?' Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone] Design Checked SHT. NO. of
v dl
-Z (At, It
co 0
N N I ?a7 ? X, ?? p / 14 ?\ \ ?an I I??
Qeg
? Q
o
tv.
\ R4 i
i 6 Q? t-
9 ?
°2
? / o ICJ ? ? '` },
F?? K ` -4 - -?? •
?
41
c Q
000
/ M
M
?3?ar?N s?fi??e?E T??v vF- • / o b U ?,
ow=
tL v ?crar? ?Fr,c
Ili Q4Qo SSi ?,c,y 1 oq-' X04' w
CIO
5?7z1"A/ G?l? OTH (o '
CD .C
C) W • - Ole
J PRA P +
?- l 1 66 72 lvt P ?3 R FJD•. F M
Qi /
Q_ U
o_ dT 6
•w 43650
I
l._? Ed N eon
ll_ o o N N
-13}.3' go
145.8,
to %a, tip
00 ?01 61
+ o - Z H. JONES
1 DB 73, PG
J ;
26 -- N •
iq (6z
cu p ; N to ROBERT D. a S,
c • - 1 DB 4604, PG 2
own
LO
T 6
01 . DO D J. a c
Q ` DB 4605a PG
'H m %-

A T`l"f-, C H 14\ C yJ T r- o P,,.,
-Tr-m 10t) (I) ; 4(,)1 QPPLIcATIC?hi

EXIBYINc T01
WEAT?s
4a
'•
'I
? oar V
'41' 1 -
. VIgHly MAP
I-=
v rz
15A Kr6m 5 NCR!
ba -

SUKAAAA1zY <D?_ L.e;NG? S'.

5?rf2 C E?
C U L. V Ek'i PIPE
S) LG 4" 1 1 IN?. r
fQIPPgp m rL .
51f )LAP 9"T Covr

?.CN6,r1-1 Pf4m C`V44T•

I..J?NbT}i
PCR.THSHIlzi! vs, c_,Q„ ? 8" qa f3? 3z? 12 130

CNf=5TER5rliRE gyp,
C-5
5t•w/NoWAIL ICS'
8'
32'
Iq$, ,
?48?
>??15T1-N R, C -8 `La' 76' 9' 28? 1 2 ? I la,
AANroN s K0&r- DR. C - 12- 72 w/wo 1N4L 5(a' 8' 40' I o4? 104,
. T-OTR-L 'STP-UM IMPAC,r 194' 494'
NOTE:,. PIP- Lr--Q6TH (TIAt45vrR4 FILL Lcm6r4 8,4SED ow 2.1 Fi LLSLOQCS)
-?? THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: TT
Consulting Englneers and Land Surveyors " NMMARY AMP LCWAT1 e/VS
305 Doub Road
Umm Lewisville, North Carolina 27023 Party Chief: Date
Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone] Design Checked SHT. NO. of
0)"Z;v / 0 x
^'s 'a f •
1 ? ?r
9
Zvi
s .
d?k
Imo- o`? ?°o? 1 ??•:
.? 9??2ra ? ? o
Q
Q? ?-
r
y w t
/ LO
Q
Ow LA
1
O
13,4 Q7-0N .V#hM PAU V E o b U
alvER-f C42.
t L f ror??? ?Fr?-i,
Q lac ?QDSSir?,G ?,er? a4' l04'
C? ? .C /?1l6, nE PTN ? ?l
Z
C) a- l1 0 66 72''GMp WIHW .? a' 2i pR.AP •f 49'
C) C) IGR,4+' - 104'
U O Lij
64,?; CL ujI
0 a- Q
11.1 (v U ?- +1 ?.--?
Z < E N
1 < L1_ `" d o0
l1)?f--? v
i
? ZZO ?
co *2 6
#, Q z
Q J? +1
ILA ? ? \ ?-- • ? ' [" • ' ?
--30q
01 .
A A ?

0
C= It

zj/
?-r eMS SED
-S 4365, I
a
Qwu
.x
K*
3?
J ?
eo
-V
K4,11. JONES
DB 4,?73, PG R
LO C?
ROBERT D. a S,
DO 4604, PG 2
11x45,8•
1 ?
h
1 +I
z,
co
N 1 \O
U d.
NfPI i7
LOT 6
DO D J. a c,
?? DB 46051 PG .?
..mod: ::??:.1 i 1 ?.??.• r,..•?ai?v??11D?N1 ??? ?.. .1i ,
11
Tr-tA iot, (I) 491 Arri-icy not-(
SutiAMAPY 0 F C'Etrtcv LF- N ? ?.
s
• 5"I'?2 C ET' C u 1 V cr< -SI LO. P IpC
t.",t•1 -
R
~ P AP m r X7'1'
5,fFAP
FrxTNswizi! q0' S1 32?
CN?srES;s>?(RE ?D, -s 54? w/?o WALL ICS' S' 3z.'
KR?lSTT-N r7 ?, . C -?3 8' 76' 9' 2Z'
?AtiroNSrd?RC u?. C-f2 y2w??WL 5!0' e' qU'
TOrt!?L- s-r+-EAM 1"ACT
194' 494'
NOTE : PING Lc:,,,?6TH (TPM,5\/1ZR-F- 1--)LL Lc.NErN BASCD ON 2:1 Fi LLSLOPCS)
( THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: TT
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors fpsr)h/ Qr %WkH 4aY A N p /,, *<AT•IOALS
l 305 Doub Road P8rtChief : Date
leWsvllle, North Carolina 27023 Y
Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone] Design Checked SHT. NO. of
\ Y IJ N 1 1 1 t.
2000
1
V
4?-P?v e,
EXISTING Tpl
weaT??ERS

?A ?.TbN 5 N?kE

POST CoVr Pr.l. c1VNfT
4.,-ni617-1 I„ wg6rN

.148 ? ? 48?
I12? I I?'
t o4r t o4?

P•t1.
0 40-
• Did
1
C? NV-
?,?Q7?N s?fiyeE T?i?v V E• / o b U
u v?R'r
ol?= z
Q 04' 104'
U) 6,
..(_ /?1/6, ?f pT>'l ? it ? rl .. ?\ ?-?. •
? `? ?
W l1 5Co'- 72p WIVYVJ -} S'rAPP.4P+4.41
ICJ 1- \
(f )I
U C) llj '
CL U?
Q? 6
Li < l ° Q SE MSD
4365
o"WU
C%J *00:t
w X*
ui • • ,.; r?,G,
tM`• - O ,,J ' G • *? , 145.8o
W .r
° w _• 1 ... .
? M
1 co x,.01- 61
09- 0 co
? KfMl I. JONES
1 _ , DB 73, PG I(
r 26 ?'."c o 0 1 = ( LOCI` C?.?.
W
o itv It \ ROBERT D. a S,
o? ti c N 1 C:) DO 460
• 4, PG 2
LO
T 6
of DO D J. a C,
I k D8 4605, PG .7

11
T`T"fT, C H 4?& C f T r- 0 R,',
Z-Tlm 105 (1) ; 49) Arr t-icAncn-4
-VICINII)C MAP
a 2000' -
?P?? V
'•i
RIVER ROAD SR?? 8
EXIaTING Tor
WEAT1?? ?
n ?
y,
. 1 •
P.tli.
r • w
l3? 1-mm 5 Noe
ba .

S u AA M A rz Y ?0_ r ?: r? ??? ; t r I v L. F-
-5 -
. rgL k1"
C LA L_ V CRT
S1 Z-C.
1."1r1

RiP flP

12)IfRAP
PI:P-TNSrHIgc 17th. (!-4 =te;, 1101 6 3z'
CH?sr?Rs?i2E C-S 54 w/foWAiL leg 0 .80 32'
Kgrsrr o ?, , C-6 4'a- 76' 9' 2'
iRAtiroNst-OPM Vk. C- 12 T2 olp W4L 56' 8' qo'
T-OT4 L- S,-rP cAM IMPACT
194' 494'
NOTE ; PIPE LC-JJ6TH (TPAN--5VrRz FILL Lct46r4 F4SCD c q 2:1 F) LL,'SLOPC'S)
-)110) THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: ?T
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors cmossw (i S t4mm RY A N V J„,QC,A.'rJ OALS
305 Doub Road.
Lewisville, North Carolina 27023 Party Chief: Date
"- Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone] Design Checked SHT. NO. of
PAST Covr PKa ovN44 r,
4xiu6n-4 iXNaTt,
(30? ..13D?.
146' 148'
I?2? BIZ,
I o4r t o4'
OXIU
v
Q)
_10 ; -
i h
? 3n o2 C ? ? -.?1 O ,•'h,9
?• Q •
C\j
OC*
te 00%
0
If 00
/ , •? S? IK
? .M
41
O V ?o
/ Q M
Q
O'
OOP
ire A. 1
?,.. -AAA I
1
O
lo'bo
-? aL VERT C-?2 -
f ?z)
I j Q l04'
457(2j-1-7m eAhOTH
mp ViJ,HW -{- 8'(.IPPAP-i 40?
F bW l1 J 5fo?- 72''e
c.] C) ?DR? - 144
U, O Lli?
C; CL CM
1 1 1
v
C`
??- " - N
•-?-
-N s?
Q ?
26 o ?? •,
V ? o ? O
IL's - ? ? \ ?- ? • ? y, • J
1145.ao
1
6
19

ki
N
.vl
z
ft
C1 6
SE ' MSD 1.
43
4365, I
N Qu
N
J
`? go
lo?
,u
`.jam
W r?
r. r r
co OT 61
co IC 11. JONES
D8 73, PG I(
Lo)-- ciiz-
ROBERT D. a S,
DO 4604, PG 2
l
' 1 -
Q ?
cu
N 1 `O
1 ?

LOT 6
DOtjA D J. a C,
D13/4605, PG .7

?T--r A"7, cH c4\ Lt-1-r ro P=
Tr rn lot) (I) A 491 Amy icAno1',,(

SUM AA ARY Q7F LEC>;??Ir1G LF- 1J? ?S'.
• 5 r'f2C ET' C u V CRT .5 LG ?If I
?rAlti N p r mz,.Tr POST cwvr IF.ls Crk4f r.
PCRJNSH1Rtw DR, L'-4- -fe;1 q0 $? 32/ 1130? 130.
CHP:srrXs>aIRE ", C -s 5+'A4tWALL .I49' -e' 32' 1116 X48'
I KP-jsrT'w P g. , c -8 ?Le. 76' a' 26 11?.,
i9Ar,roN S ?-flRt: DR , , c -12 72 wlo WAS. 56' 8' qo' 04' t o4'
. TOr/I-L? sTr??aM IMPACT 194' 494'
l'`IOTrz; PIPC Lc,IJ6TH (TRq/.1. VrkZ FILL LcN6r4 134sCD ©N s.,j FII.LSLOPES)
-(? THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: 70(
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors G'RC?f r1?t fi !SNMMARY A N O L*<^1rj 4bA S
305 Doub Road
Lewisville, North Carolina 27023 Party Chief: Date
Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone] Design Checked SHT. NO. of
11

n 8 ? ;
?a? as • ,? ao
rS'Lli '
L(???OS
?X?B'f INS ON ? . ?'• • ?
I,
41`

Off` V
I?Y MAP
b2
d I V, # 1, 1 , 0)*'C' I dil
10
-14
r l?r, It
N N • ?a7 d' ??• ? Q ?
co ' - -

co
N
C? u

WN
lot oj?
looll
/ ?- All.
".'T
?. ?.,'o
%,
r /? ?• ? V W M '[V ? ??1u
7 y V O 0 ?\
``` `I
?.. o
,1 t
• am%
00
o
lZr
.0oo 41
• `V
0 ? M
I
J, f.1
ire Al
1
1 O _
o ?
9.4Q7 M sflhM JPAJ v o b U
c:) W_ z
_ J QD
W li 56'- 12 "dMP WIHVJ .} R?PPuaP f 40'? •?'-
Lij
CJ ?- Q?
CL U?
??.... Q; 6
o o ? Q ,
t`i 1 a N1? U s E Ms D
C\j
?Y lL r? ?
N N 3
tij
ti , ,-?;r • ,? _ - 145.8•
• O? 1 0161
.0 2 l 1<
o
F 1. JONES
1 DB 73, PG 8
• r tD ROBERT D. a S
ti c • - 1 DO 4604,
LOT 6
DO D J. a C
D8 4605, PG 7
*07

=urn ion, C) ; 491 Q?n??r?vr?
\\ ?i 0 a
. \` etfiis IPA as .RC. p'v
?csTU?
f G (1??
' • Orr.. ? cti
.
?.
• ? ?X?B?IN6 DN YIN?'
WLATIS??
?> 15/4 Pam s #1001
?,r .
X2/1
r FALL D.
Y _-
a

Suti-AMAAY OF
Lr1,<<?`1??r?? L.?IJ C-?T (-I s
5t?2L?ET CLAL Ck'r S LG pIP1=
1.GJ 14 jQrPPgp mJrL
?iIfPAP
PKQTNSNIR
CHI=5repumiR - gyp , -5 54''4)/ft WALL IC' S' 32'
Ksr?N R , _8 4-e' 76'
AAtiroN 5 Nd1RC nk , C -12 72 wlNo WAS. 56' 8' 4d•
. TO r14- l_ s-t P, 11A M I tAPACT
194' 494'
NOTE, PIPC LC-f-J6TH (T"VErt- f=)w- Lr.m6-t-4 USED ON 2:1 FILL5L-0PCS)
THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: VT N MUM .5
Consulting Englneers and Land Surveyors ?pssf?? i5 gmm4jLy A N O LCod*'r1-6A S 305 Doub Road
Lewisville, North Carolina 27023 Party Chief: Date
?- Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone] Design Checked SHT. NO. of
P"T Cow POKIL Cr?nr•,
4rw6n-4 i.xgdrfq
(3 (3 ..1 30 .
148 ' 146,
11z' A la,
too 104,
-
,,
V, co t4
sip to$
04 g
0 4
• tr 1 Q (n
ti
All-
h?? i
ors •
40
/ -? •V
/ LO ,?.
41 l `
OP 41
/ w V
Q ? M
,g t
O?
i 000 r1l
T ? W 4? 4
1
C?
6, A7-oAI .V#htE 179L v E / o b U
ol.LJ=
or ror4: 41--rc,(,,
l04'
I Q ? 104-,
_,? -- '577?.P-0,17 M Gil D 1 tl 61 0 !o , ..
C? :c 46, nE P, 4? .10
Z
c) W
f-- ll 5eoj- 72p W /HvJ .} 8'RiPRAP+4
Q C-) ?p12AF - 104
A? ,
U O uAl
Q CL U?
Q a- Q v
o Q
lilUQ(V1 U +?
y
z d • o z`?v .ma
A'zi-c
2
4 C-f
-- r N
tlj
J--
- (145,8•
. , F
co Ar
N J?
L
r nC Q N +1
U) Qt ti 9.76
1
Q 0000"00,e
co
N 1 \O
Y I V'
1 1

?N
z
aj,
0- 6
SE MS D
-S
4365
W
Wit
0o x
1>4G
:J ;e
8a ?
u
w ?
? r co OT 6 ?
16 I< f I. JONES
CD DB 73, PG R
L o)1%
?? -
ROBERT D. a S,
DO 4604, PG 2

LOT 6
DO D J. a C,
D1 4605, PG .7
t
rri C C H t4\ Cv? -r (-- 0 ("
Z--M-m iot) (I) ?- 491 Arr IcAT•?ol`1

RI)IFR D 8
WEA ?N gTo)
?>

wo "o ,
a

81A K-mm Is
b/l .

?UKAAA A A Y ?D t- 1r,? LF- " C=T 1 -4 S'.
• 5"tF2C ET C LA V E. RT SILL PIpr-
L"It4 r~p.r_r m rA .
510L'1P POST COVr
t'-fjs71-4 PKML crNtT.
LOW46TH
FrxTNSI+IRL. v x, d-4 -4e 10, 13 Sz' 130 ? . A 30'.
CHxbTERst4I RE C -s 67 ' GJ/t WALL ICS' 'S' 32' 146,
KR?srr? P )Z. , C -8 ?-e' 76' 9' 2Z 1 1?.*
?}?t`aN5hfIRL f7R. L°- ?2 72 w?i+v WAS. 56' 8' 40r I ??.? t o4?
T-brA STP r-M IMPACT A941 494
NOTE-; PtPC LeIIJ6TH (TRAN51/rkF- F)LL Lrtzr4 f3ASCD ©N 2:1 F) I.LSIXPES)
-?'? THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: TT
Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors CRes VIN 46 S NMHAaY ANC k*eAT1 eNS
305 Lew Doub Road
Lewisville, North Carolina 27023 Party Chief: Date
Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone] Design Checked SHT. NO. of
P?'
(Y)" dil
Z;v I li ? *x
1 QD
d
rv . Im A IF, 1
101,
/V 3U--
co
v ? ?O
,h ? a _SZ • V "?
LO
?? •d
S?
41
IL I L
OP 41
<<
O N.
W V
/ M
o? Z IR
. o / ^ o.
000
lirp
1 _
C?
L3,4Q7-VN V# e - P,w v E
C) l1J
j Q l?195fin,G !./1?7i? 04' /04'
CIO
-- v6,
_ ? /a ?,? PTt
U W r
f-- L ll ?, 66 - 72 O''c.Mp W Kw .t B'(z)PrAP•+40can 1 ? p nl4p - i O4
/ 'U)
U O tli
Ci Q
CL I-M
o Q
liJLJ QN, v d1 '?
rot N
l ? p :c
cr.- cnF
J-- ------
45.80

o' 4p

, 1'r vE i?
WOW
.u.
N1 p e
Q
oov--
0
r
t0
0 0_
o ? o
3
H

0 A6
Z
' MS D
',
-0SE4365, ?
N Qv
co
X11 ?
J ?
eo /
_u
?. r nrr. rnr w ?
`r .r r F< II. JONES
DB 73, I I(
LO)--
ROBERT D. a S,
DO 4604, PG 2
co
co
ou
1
1 +?
to
N 1 \O
lit
1
Al 17
LOT 6
3 DO DJ.aC
D8 4605, PG .l
CVN %-

99.122 Huntcliff Phase 1 II
Calculations
Sinuosity Calculation from
Stations 12 - 23
channel length
Sinuosity (K) _
valley length
Sinuosity (K) =
439
327
Sinuosity (K) = 1.3
Slope Calculation from Stations
12-23
Slope (s) _ rise
run
Slope (s) = 5.1
439
Slope (s) = 0.012
Page 1 of 1
2/26/99

1N'i7?G1pU GTION
1

L??

Why Is Stream Corridor Restoration
Important?
The United States has more than 3.5
million miles of rivers and streams that,
along with closely associated floodplain
and upland areas, comprise corridors of
great economic, social, cultural, and
environmental value. These corridors are
complex ecosystems which include the
land, plants, animals, and network of
streams within them. They perform a
number of ecological functions such as
modulating streamflow, storing water,
removing harmful materials from water,
and providing habitat for aquatic and
terrestrial plants and animals. Stream
corridors also have vegetation and soil
characteristics distinctly different from
surrounding uplands and support higher
levels of species diversity, species densi-
ties, and rates of biological productivity
than most other landscape elements.
Streams and stream corridors evolve in
concert with and in response to surround-
ing ecosystems. Changes within a sur-
rounding ecosystem (e.g., watershed) will
impact the physical, chemical, and
biological processes occurring within a
stream corridor. Stream systems normally
function within natural ranges of flow,
sediment movement, temperature, and
Introduction
There is a phenomenal resiliency in the
mechanisms of the earth. A river or lake
is almost never dead. if you give it the
slightest chance... then nature usually
comes back.
- Rene Dubos 1981
other variables, in what is termed "dy-
namic equilibrium." When changes in
these variables go beyond their natural
ranges, dynamic equilibrium may be lost,
often resulting in adjustments in the
ecosystem that might conflict with societal
needs. In some circumstances, a new
dynamic equilibrium may eventually
develop, but the time frames in which this
happens can be lengthy, and the changes
necessary to achieve this new balance
significant.
Over the years, human activities have
contributed to changes in the dynamic
equilibrium of stream systems across the
Fig. 1.1: Stream corridor
in the Midwest
Stream corridors have
great economic, social,
cultural, and
environmental values.
' FINAL MANUSCRIPT - 5111/98

STREAM CORRIDOR RESTORATION: PRINCIPLES,' PROCESSES AND RAC11CES
Human activity has profoundly affected rivers and streams
all parts of the world, to such an extent that it is now
extremely difficult to find any stream which has not been in
some way altered, and probably quite impossible to find
any such river.
- H.B.N. Hynes 1979

F1
IF!g. 1.2: Concrete-lined
channel.
' Stream systems across
nation have been
Bred for a wide variety
' of purposes.

ii
nation. These activities center on manipu-
lating stream corridor systems for a wide
variety of purposes, including domestic
and industrial water supplies, irrigation,
transportation, hydropower, waste dis-
posal, mining, flood control, timber
management, recreation, aesthetics, and
more recently, fish and wildlife habitat.
Increases in human population and
industrial, commercial, and residential
development place heavy demands on this
country's stream corridors.
The cumulative effects of these activities
result in significant changes, not only to
stream corridors, but also to the ecosys-
tems of which they are a part. These
changes include degradation of water
quality, decreased water storage and
conveyance capacity, loss of habitat for
fish and wildlife, and decreased recre-
ational and aesthetic values (National
Research Council 1992). According to the
1994 National Water Quality Inventory of
617,806 miles of rivers and streams, only
56 percent fully supported multiple uses,
including drinking water supply, fish and
wildlife habitat, recreation, and agricul-
ture, as well as flood prevention and
erosion control. Sedimentation and
excess nutrients were the most significant
causes of degradation (USEPA 1996) in
the remaining 44 percent.
Given these statistics, the potential for
restoring the conditions in our Nation's
rivers and streams and protecting them
from further damage is almost boundless.
What is Meant by Restoration?
Restoration is a complex endeavor that
begins by recognizing natural or human-
induced disturbances that arc damaging
the structure and functions of the ecosys-
tem or preventing its recovery to a sus-
tainable condition (Pacific Rivers Council
1996). It requires an understanding of the
structure and functions of stream corridor
ecosystems and the physical, chemical,
and biological processes that shape them
(Dunster and Dunster 1996).
Restoration, as defined in this document,
includes a broad range of actions and
measures designed to enable stream
corridors to recover dynamic equilibrium
and function at a self-sustaining level.
The first and most critical step in imple-
menting restoration is to, where possible,
halt disturbance activities causing degra-
dation or preventing recovery of the
ecosystem (Kauffman et al. 1993,
Kauffman et al. 1995) Restoration actions
may range from passive approaches that
involve removal or attenuation of chronic
FINAL MANUSCRIPT 5/11198

?IlstUrhancC ac1I%r11C,,. to actI%C reslOralrt)n
that Involves llitcl%'clitioll and instal lilt [()It
of llwasures to repalr damages to the
,traduce of stream corridors.
Rcstoration practitioners involved with
strcarn corridors take one of three hasic
approaches to restoration:
• Nonintervention and undistunccd
recover. where the strcarn
corridor is recovering rapidly, and
active restoration is unnecessary
and even detrimental.
• Partial urtcr-vention %nr ussisted
' ivcover?: where it strcarn corri-
dor is attempting to recover, but
doing so slowly or uncertainly. In
such a case, action may facilitate
natural processes already occur-
ring.
Srrh?tnnrtul intcrr celtirnr fnr
?nunct ?rrl Io (Il ? whew
rrcu?cn M rlr,uCd function, I,
he%ond the l pml capacity of the
,1 ?1>\,tc111 1141 ,1( H\c restorall(m.
nlcasurr, arc ncedcd.

I hr .Ix cItw goal, „t 111v particular
wslomt1on ,hould he defined within the
context of the current conditions and
dlsturbanccs in the watcrshcd, corridor.
and stream. In all likelihood, restoration
will not involve returning it system to Its
pristine or original condition. '['he goal
should he to establish self, sustaining
,treats functions
liccausc thls dorulnrnt Inay be a pnnran
refercnce on ccolol!ical restoration tier
:1:,111v u,cr,, it a ;lppr??lnlate that more
111,111 one d('111111 it of Ic,torill loll be
included Ilic tO11(m 111L definition ofrestoranon has heen adopted by the
?m 1ctV fin' 1-.cokwi it Restoration (SI.R)
I.rologic,11 restoratlun a the process of
assisting the rccovcl? and inanagernent of
ecological lntegnt\ l'.cological integrity
includes it ci lit( ill range of variability 111
hrodivcr,uy, ecological processes, and
fracture.. nron;11 '1111 historical cuntcv[_
and urstain,lhlc ? 111ti mil practices
FINAL MANUSCRIPT - 5/11198
INTRODUCTION
Restoration, Rehabilitation, and Reclamation
• Restoration is the process of repairing damage to the
diversity and dynamics of ecosystems (Jackson et al.
1995) Ecological restoration is the process of returning
an ecosystem as closely as possible topredisturbance
conditions and functions. Implicit in this definition is that
ecosystems are naturally dynamic. It is therefore not
possible to recreate a system exactly. The restoration
process reestablishes the general structure, function,
and dynamic but self-sustaining behavior of the
ecosystem.
• Rehabilitation is making the land useful again after a
disturbance. It involves the recovery of ecosystem
functions and processes in a degraded habitat (punster
and Dunster 1996). Rehabilitation does not necessarily
reestablish the predisturbance condition, but does
involve establishing geological and hydrologically stable
landscapes that support the natural ecosystem mosaic
(Jordan 1992).
• Reclamation is a series of activities intended to change
the biophysical capacity of an ecosystem. The resulting
ecosystem is different from the ecosystem existing prior
to recovery (Munster and Dunster 1996). The term has
implied the process of adapting wild or natural resources
to serve a utilitarian human purpose such as the
conversion of riparian or wetland ecosystems to
agricultural, industrial, or urban uses (Jackson et al
1995).
Restoration differs from rehabilitation and reclamation in
that restoration is a holistic process not achieved through
the isolated manipulation of individual elements. While
restoration aims to return an ecosystem to a former
natural condition, rehabilitation and reclamation imply
putting a landscape to a new or altered use to serve a
particular human purpose (National Research Council
1992),
Why is a Stream Corridor
Restoration Document Needed?
Intcrest in restoring strcarn corndur
cco"v,terrls 1, cxpanduu" nationally and
mwii ationall? Rc,cim h 1, undcrwav ;uuf
guldcltucs are beurg developed lot strcarn
corridor restoration in hoth the public and
private sectors I'he numher of ca"e
"cadre,, published papers. technology
cXr hangcs. resrarch prolcc ts, ;rnd ,\ nrpo-
,,la un both the technical and procc„

STREAM CQRRIDOR I??S'CCIRATION., PRINCIPLES,PROCIESSRS AA_ PRACTICES`

Streams Have >The Capability To /restore
Themselves-We trust be able to recognize
these sltaatlons.
"Each streafn,° says Christopher Hunter, "is a whole greater
than the sum of its geologic, climatic, hydrologic, and biologic
parts," Those who would save rivers must first see each river
whole, as a separate, vital, and unique group of elements and
energies that constantly seeks its owrt dyn2mic equilibrium.
?[-_..: a?/fee. i..?.?..I: Y!.?.......?..1 a.. to u '1'.. . -#, Ia. A <r;.*A..-y.. -

I

1

aspects of stream corridor restoration is
increasing.
Over the years, many federal agencies
have contributed to this growing body of
knowledge and have issued manuals and
handbooks pertaining in some way to
stream restoration. Much of this older
literature, however, is significantly
different from this document in terms of
philosophy and technique. Narrow in
scope and focusing on only specific
aspects, regions, objectives, or treatments,
it may be outdated and not reflective of
new restoration techniques and philoso-
phies. The result has been confusion and
concern both among government agencies
and the public on how to evaluate the
need for development and implementation
of restoration initiatives.
In response, this document represents an
unprecedented cooperative effort by the
participating federal agencies to produce a
common technical reference on stream
corridor restoration.
Recognizing that no two steam corridors
and no two restoration initiatives arc
identical, this technical document broadly
addresses the elements of restoration that
apply in the majority of situations encoun-
tered. The document is not a set of
guidelines that cover every possible
restoration situation, but it does provide a
framework in which to plan restoration
actions and alternatives.
What Does the Document Cover?
This document takes a more encompass-
ing approach to restoration than most
other texts and manuals. It provides
broadly applicable guidance for common
elements of the restoration process, but
also provides alternatives, and references
to alternatives, which may be appropriate
for site-specific restoration activities.
Moreover, the document incorporates and
reflects the experiences of the collaborat-
ing agencies and provides a common
technical reference which can be used to
restore systems based on experiences and
basic scientific knowledge.
As a general goal, this document promotes
the use of ecological processes (physical,
chemical, and biological) and minimally
intrusive solutions to restore self-sustain-
ing stream corridor functions. It provides
information necessary to develop and
select appropriate alternatives and solu-
tions, and to make informed management
decisions regarding valuable stream
corridors and their watersheds. In addi-
tion, the document recognizes the com-
plexity of most stream restoration work
and promotes an integrated approach to
restoration. It supports close cooperation
among all participants in order to achieve
a common set of objectives.
The guidance contained in this document
is applicable nationwide in both urban and
rural settings. The material presented
applies to a range of stream types, includ-
ing intermittent and perennial streams of
all sizes, and rivers too small to be
navigable by barges. It offers a scientific
perspective on restoration work ranging
' iv FINAL MANUSCRIPT -'5/11/98
t

t

1NT gpU.CTEGIN
from simple to complex, with the level of
detail increasing as the scale moves from
the landscape to the stream reach.
Note that there are several things that this
document is not intended to be.
• It is not a cookbook containing
prescribed "recipes" or step-by-
step instructions on how to restore
a stream corridor.
• While this document refers to
issues such as nonpoint source
pollution and best management
practices, wetlands restoration
and delineation, lake and reservoir
restoration, and water quality
monitoring, it is not meant to
focus on these subjects.
• It is not a policy-setting docu-
ment. No contributing federal
agency is strictly bound by its
contents. Rather, it suggests and
promotes a set of approaches,
methods, and techniques appli-
cable to most stream corridor
restoration initiatives encountered
It is axiomatic that no restoration can ever be perfect, it is
impossible to replicate the biogeochemical and climatological
sequence of events over geological time that led to the creation and
placement of even one particle of soil, much less to exactly
reproduce an entire ecosystem. Therefore, all restorations are
exercises in approximation and in the reconstruction of naturalistic
rather than natural assemblages of plants and animals with their
physical environments.
- Berger 1990.
by agencies and practitioners.
• It is not intended to be an exhaus-
tive research document on the
subject of stream corridor restora-
tion. It does provide, however,
many references for those desiring
a deeper understanding of the
principles and theories underlying
techniques and issues discussed in
general terms.
Who is the Intended Audience?
The document is intended primarily for
interdisciplinary technical and managerial
teams and individuals responsible for
Fig. 1.3: Stream corridor restoration can be applied In both (a) urban and (b) rural settings.
No matter the setting, vegetation and soil characteristics in the corridor differ distinctly from the surrounding
uplands.
(a)

(b)
' FINAL MANUSCRIPT -5/11198 v

Rig. 1.4: A stream
corridor
[he document provides
n overview of stream
corridor stnucture and
Ir ctions.

=STORATtON: PRINCIPLES, PROCESSES, AND PRACTICES
planning, designing, and implementing
stream corridor restoration initiatives. The
document may also be useful to others
who are working in stream corridors,
including contractors, landowners,
volunteers, agency staff, and other practi-
tioners.
corridor restoration initiative. These
features are:
• Chapter dividers that include
major chapter sections and reader
preview and review questions for
each chapter. Figure 1.5 presents a
summary of these questions by
chapter.
How Is the Document Organized?
The document is organized to provide an
overview of stream corridors, steps in
restoration plan development, and guide-
lines for implementing restoration.
The document has been divided into three
principal parts. Part I provides back-
ground on the fundamental concepts of
stream corridor structure, processes,
functions, and the effects of disturbance.
Part II focuses on a general restoration
plan development process comprised of
several fundamental steps. Part III
examines the information presented in
Parts I and I1 to consider how it can be
applied in a restoration initiative.
Because of the size and complexity of the
document, two features are used to assist
the reader to maintain a clear orientation
within the document. These features will
allow the reader to more easily apply the
information to specific aspects of a stream
• Short chapter summaries have
been included at the beginning
and end of each chapter that
explain where the reader has
been, where they are in the
document and where they are
going.
A special emphasis has been placed on
document orientation due to the special
mission that the document has to fulfill.
The document audience will include
readers from many different technical
backgrounds and with various levels of
training. The orientation features have
been included to reinforce the comprehen-
sive and interdisciplinary perspective of
stream corridor restoration.
How is the Document Intended to
be Used?
Use of the document mostly depends on
the goals of the reader. To begin with, a
vi FINAL MANUSCRIPT 51'[198

t
quick overview of the material is sug-
gestcd prior to more thorough reading. A
reader seeking only a general understand-
ing of the principles of stream restoration
may skip over some of the technical
details in the body of the document. Use
of document sections, chapters, and
headings allows each reader to readily
identify whether further, more detailed
reading on a subject will serve their
purposes.
The reader is urged to recognize the
interdisciplinary and technical nature of
stream restoration. While some technical
material may, on the surface, appear
irrelevant, it may in fact, be highly
relevant to a specific part of the process of
restoring a stream corridor.
Stream corridor restoration technologies i
and methodologies are evolving rapidly.
Readers are encouraged to add their own
notes on restoration and to make the
document more relevant to local needs
(c g-, a list o1 suitable native plant species
for streambank wvcgetation).
This document is being published in si
notebook form to allow insertion of:
INTRODUCTION
............ ......-----..- ._... - - - -- - ... T _.
Agencies Contributing to This Document
i
i
• United States Department of Agriculture':
Agricultural Research Service
Cooperative State Research, Education, and
Extension Service
Forest Service
Natural Resources' Conservation Service'
• United States Department of Commerce,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Marine Fisheries Service
United States Department of Defense:
. > Army Corps of Engineers
• United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development
• United States Department of the Interior:
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Reclamation
Fish and Wildlife Service
United States Geological Survey
National Park Service
• United States Environmental Protection Agency
• Updated material which will be
made available at the Internet
' sites printed in the Preface. f
• Addition of regional or locally
' relevant materials collected by the
reader. L
t

-- ----...--
Feedback
I
j Readers are encouraged to share
their restoration experiences and
provide feedback. They can do so
by accessing the Stream Corridor
Restoration home page on the
Internet URL address printed in the
Prafaca. Other sources of
information may also be found by
exploring the cooperating agencies'
home pages on the Internet.
• Federal Emergency Management Agency
• Tennessee Valley Authority
-- --------- --- --- - - - - -------- - ----- -----
A Note About Units of Measurement
Metric units are commonly used throughout the world, but
most data'published In the United States are In English units.-
; Although adoption of the metric system is on the increase in
the U.S.- and for many federal agencies this conversion is
mandated and being planned for--restorers of stream
corridors will continue to use data that are in either metric or
English units:
i
Appendix B contains a table of metric to English unit
conversion factors, in case a unit conversion is needed,
FINAL MANUSCRIPT - 5/11/98 vii
COAPS ACTION ID:' 199920473
DEN TD: .
NATIONWIDE ?MXT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT I)! NWP 14
PRZ-CONSTRUCTION NOTIVIC&TION' APPLICATION r
MR NATIONWID9 172PHiTS. THAT MQUIRE:
1) NdTXPICA,TION TO TM Conga' or $NaXnERS
3) "miCAnom FOR sEGTxON 401 CER incATToN
I 3) ' CWADZNA,TIoN NI'IE Tm NC DTVI9ION or coA9TAL MANAGuaNT .
SEND TFM ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY QF THIS.COMPLE'TE>S FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
F FIELD OFFICE OF THE CO1tps . or ENGIMRS (SEE AGWCX ADDRESSES S>:1.EET) . SEVEN
0) COPItS SHOULD $E SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL. MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDPZSSES SHEET). PL?F.AS.E PRINT.
1. OWN9AS NAME: LCDX Corp.
c/o Mr. Rick Longworth, 2650 Harper Road
2. MAILING ADDRESS:
Clemmons, NC 27012 SUBDIVISION NAME: n j,,.2
27357
CxxY: Stokesdale STATE. NC ZIP CODE:
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, -INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FAOM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE) : Huntcliff Phase 1 & 2 1 M2028)
and Weatherstone subdivision, approx. 2800 LF east of NC 68, Guilford County
(see Attachment 1) "
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME) : (3g) 77870075 (aIORK) : 336 778-0075,
4: IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S N*19 OR RESP041SIBLE CORPORATE 6FFZCIA1, ADDRESS..W
PHONe NumaER:' N/A

S. LOCATION OLD WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE): kesdale NC
St

COUNTY: Guilford
NEAREST TOWN -
o
OR CITY:
(See Attachment 1) Partial Copy o£ URGGToUoPraphi,C Map "SummCrfield
; UC??

: -- i
22
9T 66, OT 933 Eod 002, Oa
nUg 8 d I
I Hd 09ZSSb6922
n

fl

i

Nuntcliff, Phase 1 and Z SPSCIrIC'LOCATION (INCLUDe ROAD
' NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.): Project (single family subdivision) lies to north of
Haw River between Haw River and Haw River Road (SR 2028). Project-borders on
easterly side of Weatherstone Subdivi.siun Jyina to east on NC 6A.
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER.-- Haw_?iver
' RIVER BAS7CN : Cage Fear
7n. XS PROJECT LOCATED NEAA *WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDP-L SALTPi4TER
(SA) I HZCH QUALITY WATERS (HOW), OUTSTANDING ESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER
SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS-11)? YES . ( J NOS: (X ] IF YtS, EXPLAIN':
i

10a. NUMSEW OF ACRES OL'' WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROaECT aY:
IrXLLYNG: None EXCAVATION: None Y
MODING: None OTHERa None Y
bRAINAGE: None
R TOTAL'ACAES TO 13E IMPACTED: None

A-404-Certification)
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE XHPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (.rr
LOCxr?D, PROVIDE DXSTANC,E BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER .RELOCATION)
ICA ittachmenta 3 through 7)
NGTH BEFORE: - F AFTER: _?__ ....T
TH SCrORE (bated on normal high water contours):
TH ,AFTER:
?VIERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: PT AFTER: p? .
(2) STS C N_l j,_ ,MP?r-T$ Wx R St11,T Epg?[; (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
VN CHANNEL RELOCATION. N /A PLACEMENT OF PIPE 10 CKAUNZ:L: X
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: NSA CO:JSTRUCTI.O" OF,A VA I/FLOODING: N/A
?THER: N/A
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND 13 PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE: OF THE
ATERSHED DMINING TO THE POND? N/A
HAT xS THE EXPECTED FOOD SURFACE AREA? N/A

M2. DESCRIPTION or PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TXPC OF
ECHANICAL EOUIPHENT TO BE USED "(ATTACH PLANS: e 112 " X 11" DRAWINGS
ONLY): Elace pipe and stone aprons in existing stream beds. Lightweight track _
backhoe, compaction equipment

13, PURPOSE Or PROPOSED WORK: Canes etruct residential. streets QRibbon pavane)
1

1 EE:ST 66, 8T 933 Ead M,
3
00 -1109 d d I -111 Hd
J
89ESSt7691:2
1 1
• 1
n `f
1
1~ i
i
1
1
1

Puntcliff, Phase 1 and 2 -SPECIFIC-LOCATION (10CLU0E ROAD
NUMBERS, •1.ANDMARISS, ETC.) : Project (single family subdivision) lies to north of
Haw River between Haw River and Haw River Road (SR 2026). Project borders on
,
easterly side of Weatherstone Subdivision lying to east on NC fiR..
6. XMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER:- ]law E xa r
(LIVER BASIN: Cafe Pear
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR 'WA'GER CLASSXFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL, SA.LTMiATER
' (SA),.HYGH QUALITY WATERS (HOW), OUTSTANDXNG RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER
SUPPLY (05-I OR WS-11)? XE5 I ] NO IX ] IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN'A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OP COASTP-L
IMANAGF14ENT AREA Or ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN- (AEC)? YES ( ] NO (X)
70, IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A•'COASTAL COUNTY (SCE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
Be. NIA
HAvE ANY SECTION 404 PEP14ITS BEEN.PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR UStr ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES DC ] NO ( 'I IF "YES, PROVIDE ACTION I . D. N0.X5ZR OF.
t PREVIOUS PEP14IT AND ANY ADDITIONAL wroRMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY Or 401
CERTIFICATION): 404 No. 199920473 (See Attachment 2)
'6b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES ( ] NO [X) IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
I
w I
'9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NOMBER OF ACRES IN- TFLACT OF LAND: 14 87 AC
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMB&B OE ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PAO04CT SITE:
i None - See 404 No. 199920473 Certification '
r
' bz:ST 66. 8T Hdd b0d 082, 00 11U9 a dI11IHd e9ZSSb6922

14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST HE CARRIED
' dUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
XMPACTS) t N/A

' 15. YOU ARE REQUTR£D TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLXrE SERVICE
(USF'WS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY VEDirMLY LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT.
IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: (covered by 404 permit) (ATTACH RESPONSES
' FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
' (SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE; PRESENCE OF -HISTORIC
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED. BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: (covered by 404 permit)
' 17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [) NO PC) (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
' DOCUMENT .PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROL114A ENVIAONFIENTAL
POLICY ACT?
4
YES (J NO [ )
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REM EWER THROUGH THE NORTIT CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE7
YES [) NO [I
Ir ANSWER TO 17b IS YES,'THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVXRONMMNTA. MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
' QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATe CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD 8E
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS SAWETT, DIA&CTOR STAVE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
' NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
4

1

I SE:SZ 66. 8Z 933 Sad 082, 00 _OdH 8 dl-nIHd 89ESSP6922
1
1
, R
18. THE rOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE Or EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS: N/A
?. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOkx G• ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, 'LAKES
AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26,
291 AND 3$). ALL STREAMS (INTELiMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY
sT BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS SO FEET OR I
INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
D. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO 8E
' IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATXON WAS PERF'ORMED'BY. A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL -DATA
SHEETS RELEVANT 'To THE PLACEMENT OF THE'DSLINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE- STORMWAT-ER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED,
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDYNG PROPERTY?
r

u?n• .+?. a.a??..aa..a•?.?')V? J•aLL•1 IAT it LZ1V
1 ?? GEOLO
so-oo' (SAL SURVEY"
36.15= • k s92w1:.i,11,_ 6i 57'30"
1 .o11 .N T? ?• ? ? Stokei(We
_ u
4009 • r ?.'r _ .5 . F • 11
• v i \(J` ? II
u
L U
' f o
Golf coarse
SM tip
Ci?0188 ? C WX%T SHE [ ? • - ?' / • ` ' (? 1 ?
AC-14 MEIIA-
12'30"
boy
1 -a r ` k esg % r
C,I?? ,?CT? ? \? -- , ? ? , .? ?? _•?\ r 1 .../ .. is
i ?F? • 1
Nil
' ILL" ' .
92:9T 66 ,BT HBd gad 082, 09 -11UH 6 d I -II I Hd 89ZSSb69??

18. THE rOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION Ir
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCK,ARCE OF EXCAVA'T'ED OR FILL MATERI L
INTO WETLANDS1 NSA
a. ' WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWYNG• ALA, WETLAND, STREAMS, 'LAKES
' AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (Folk NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 16, 21, 26,
• 290, AND 30). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY
WE BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD OF, 1 INCH EQUALS SO FEET OR ?
' INCH EQUALS 100 FELT OR THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b, Ir AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BF,
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
C. IF DELINEATXON WAS PERFORMED'SY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA
' SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED-
e. WHAT 15 LAND USE OF SURSOUNDXNG PROPZATY?

' P. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT 15 PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
' g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION T?ETTER, IF APPLICABLE.
NOTW: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE •U. S . MAY NOT )3E IMPACTED PPLIOR TO :
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTXON 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) 'EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ZNVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (XN TIM 77*MWTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY)*, A LETTER FROM THE
' NORTH CAROLINA DIVXSION OF COASTAL MANAGEMNT STATING TH.E XROPQSED
ACTIVITY IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMtNT
PROORAM.
l0WNER'$;luXzll SIGNATURE EA DATE
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY '
' IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER. IS PROVIDED (16g.))
• 5

? M
' 9? SZ 66, 8Z H9d Lod 08L 00 -nUE d dl-nIHd 89ESSP6922
3_369455268 PHILLIP R BALL CO
r
{1
780 P09 FEB 18 199 15:38
..?% ?0.
F, 2000'
?yq It?MN $ Hi
i7lQ -

__- UMMAf2Y OF (.L ?
U L. v t a r rl?
T- SUE 1.?N6`tri
:l-T115;NlRS OR, C-¢ 4e lid.
Hr-tre rswge 54,AJ/4 watt t0Z `
Rf?.? aNSNIRE DR, . e-1?- 7P W/0WAL s!v
T-0 'ri• L. ?r?_ EAM { MpAc r
GPT 1 -4 51.
m VT'jp_r sr a«
' PlKs 010wr?
tPfAP I?WILAP ?N rl t,A'>,lbrfq
8? 32? ?34? .4 ?Q?.

e' 40 1 Olt off'
1941
NO-re : rim L0046TH (TPAlU\1lZR.F_ F )LL- Lrmsrf4 5ASpD ©N oa:l Fj LLc5w pFZ)
""'? THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC. PROJECT: T7 fi-
Consulting Englneers and Loh')d Surveyors A*%"Vjj4G X #^tM^Ay AAJ O 4*4p'.I 0n-&AL%
308 Doub Roaa
Lew Alle, North Caroflw 27023 Party Chief : Date
Telephone [phone] -FAX (910) 945•5268 ____ . . Design. Checked $HT. NO. of
awuw.w?nr? -

3369455268 PHILLIP R BALL CO _ 780 P10 FED 18 '99 15:38
gv It
-0 f f?'?? UP?, .aka- a S q .d
co k14
1 IVY ?, tf+?? ? .--M-
w
at
Q Wpb
h
I t - 1 •`,
1
17
91
3 _
07
o pu• +4v a
-1 j -W
aj,.
•Q.
-F ;
`HIV a C Q]
AN;
Q CO
M
O M
1 1 ??

3369455268 PHILLIP_ R BALL CO 780 P11 FEB 18 '99 15:39
10,
a
< rats, .6' ? .•r
zo
too
ICA
12
Alb
a ` •
Ilk LO
qA .4
pit
T?
3369455208 PHILLIP R BALL CO 780 P12 FEB 18 '99 15:40
w
.-?.. °-?Fr 4
lot Ste-
1 xs,\ap
L7R I Y.
rte,
X'701 5D E
00
A log
E Q. LL 2 UEfMt
' I 75 I -
t
Ov ?? •,45.? / ?{/7,'v ve.
duo vim- ?-----
c gs$5rN6 L.,r,-,vEa111'
-
AljorW
., a?161 OEpr)q
7lv 1$'RtPOP+ rze>
?
r
75.1
?io?.g•
'4C ,..
3369455268 PHILLIP R HALL CO 780 P13
• 0?aa
cr W uLvAL-i rt d -te
FEB 18 199 15:41
a x3r ??r
' Q ;' /,CAWS ??q.• ray-'
1--- tt .t!?'? 72''dnnp W/rW +3'R?PRAF?4Q,
' C7 r ? P Rzw , 144 .. .
l c.l
_ d1
¦ ?1
co
r
> U)
U O
I Cj Q cc +
CLQ1
l Lj Q
1
LtJ
, -1 1 \ A
ul v
O
f 40 -N"
?"rkee:4
41`11
C)
//?? ffVVU`
.? D
s r -4
V44-

6
SE MS D
-fit 4565
4w
or-
-, x
$o .
?u
OT
K t I. JONES
aB 73, PG
t_OO ?, .r.?......
ROBERT D. a S
DS 4604, PG ?
?a
IL
Q
A' .6
..LOT 6
DO. DJ.ac
Dp 4605, PG -7

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
' Wilmington District
' Action ID: 19.9920473 County:_,. Quilford
GENERAL PERMIT REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE VERIFICATION

Property
Owner: LCDX Corp.
c/o Rick Longworth
Address: 2650 Harper Road,
Clemmons, N.C. 27429
Telephone: 336-
Authorized
e t:
WISP R. Ball
Address: 305 Doub Road
Lewisville, NC 27023
Telephone: [phone]
Size and Location of Proper (yZaterbodyHighway name/number, town, etc l: LCDX Corp.'s
proposed Hunteliff subdivision property located off of Haw River Road (SR 2028), adjacent to the
Haw River, near Oak Ridge, in Guilford County, North Carolina.
beacription 21 Activity: Access road construction for the proposed Hunteliff subdivision resulting
' in approximately 0.05 acres of impacts to the jurisdictional waters of an unnamed tributary of the
Haw River.

-X -Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Section 404 and Section 10.
X -Nationwide Permit Number WP 14
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above wary
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General / Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program$
please contact John Thomas at telephone number [phone]„extension 25.
Regulatory Project Manager Signature
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.

CF:
' A `r-,- w w LJ R A C L 1-r AS
2,2=9Z 66, 8T e3d 80d 082,
03 -nd8 d dl-nIHd 89ESSP6922

3369455268 PHILLIP R BALL CO 780 P15 FEB 18 199 15:42
'F1 v1.:.tluv• ?riu Vvati t a-a a
so 00' S90°OOSE• e91 '• s92 n, ?, lr, N. 57'30"
36. 15=
1 [r201S - ? '' e I
v?
-r ,\ C ^ • 916 `\,• A ?p,• I J \•\
Obi
r -
t-'?
-Stokemidale
? : ? ,°r„zu 11 tt •?, . r ^ ? ? X1^.1
tl •? y
Y u
ILL LL
f-` • ri s? d 9 ..?..
JJ i _
cy- ' ? . r ?..??' / alp ? : `' ' `21?•
l' II o J
ell f?' 9QOr??l M , ' _ .1 ? •9,. ` ` ? 949 ? ??
p ill "•' s .:"f I• ' -
?? b09" ` r
ct%
to p( - •/' --. ?J4, > .'r
ILI!
nc ? ? . -•a, ?,-.? ,?? ?' ? ?-•-'--?` awl .-..- - ? ...
z a
Gall CAulso j l
ings
?. C1+o88" GNRfY x?? t0F u I `'!
I M .. ?• 1 I ?r : 1
1 f; • . /
x006 .,r \ ? ? '??F ?. / r` ,?1'? ?;??? ,'•??? -•?.!'•'', ya I.. "i•N •.
? - . ? _..?'''' • ;, ? '' ? 111 ) \t `t ?>- , 19 1 / e _ . is .
VO?,Mn?F?F?r?> ?JC.a•
1
1

3369455268 PHILLIP R BALL CO 780 P14 FEB 18 '99 15:42
THE PHILLIP R. BALL COMPANY, INC.
Consulting Engineers and fond surveyors ...?
305 Doub Rod. • • Ph. (3m) 945-9911
lewlsvlue, N.C. 27023 Fax (33g) 946-6268
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL LETTER
DATE: February 18, 1999 TIME:
TO, Mr. John Thomas
FAX NO. OF RECEIVING PARTY: I-919-876-5828
FROM= Phillip R. Ball, P_E., F.L.S.
SUBJECT: LCDX Corp Huntcliff Subdivision - ID 199920473
MESSAGE: A question has come up concerning the NWP 14 permit you issued on
the i ove project. -Since t ere are our cross jiff o peren 1
waters, does the NWP 14 cover all four (4) crossings? Total length -494 LF. -1A o impacts stream channel ii t e even re wa a
mis-communication on my park I am also sending a partial print of
USGS Map Summer ie , NC" wa.t t e location impac a eng
of all 4 locations. The perennial stream and its tributary across
Kristen Drive is also shown. ease in orm me at a ear ies
NWP 14 is appropriate for these conditions.
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER PAGE: 2
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL OF THE PAGES OR NAVE DIFFICULTY READING THIS
TRANSMITTAL, PLEASE CALL Phil Ball AT [phone].
CONF'IDENTIALIT'Y NOTE : ? ?
The information contained in t>tis facsimile message is legally privileged
and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual
or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copy of this telecopy is strictly profibited. If you have received this
telecopy in error, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the
original message-tows at the address above via the United States Postal Service.
Thank you.

44
\
4 \\\ \\
\ v
s\ \
oa'r` \ \
S° \ O \
\ \ 0oF \ •3 Y 1 C
C-? 40
\ 41 \
94
uoi;??? ?° o \1
c
\\\ ' I \\\ a> \\
\ \ 1
\ ? a> o \\ ? m \\\ \\
\ \ y p V (n \ ? l? \ \
\\ ?> do O'>
S aY \ I \\ 1
"4? E3
104
QD 100000
ones
` 0
1 0 ?/ ¦ 1
1
?
cu
cll
cui
L-i m p I
J'
=II
p ?2 w- -0 C04 cc',
U
`../
H
i--? 4+
N ?
H W
W
O
Lt 4--1
r-I r
O
U)
LO
r?
w
A ?
o
a

UQ
Co
?a
JJ V?
? O
??nn O
V1 E
?rg

0
z
w N
a
w
6
A
z
0
m
5
w
a
a?
w
A C\I
co
F
W 4 4
x O
O
O
co
e-1
co
O
co
CO
V
z
r.,
c?
U)
O
L?
m m m