19990140 Ver 1_Complete File_19990205

CJC/ 10/ 77 L"- J ! CI`IV 1 RlN W"ICI'1 1 1"IL 7CRV 11..CJ 7 7000N14-10
cip
December 16, 1998
Jefferson Pilot Life Insurance Company
100 N. Greene Street
Greensboro, NC 27401
IRJ. iGJ VVG
G S SON
RE: Property on New Garden Road Developed by Jefferson Pilot Life Insurance Company
Dear Sirs:
We have been requested by you to review a map prepared by Evans Engineering, Inc., entitled
"Possible Pond Location Map," showing the property consisting of approximately 414 acres
lying south of Bryan Boulevard and between New Garden Road and Jefferson Road in the city of
Greensboro, formerly owned in its entirety by Jefferson Pilot Life Insurance Company CUP"),
some of which now has been conveyed by it to other entities. We have reviewed the map which
shows possible locations of permanent runoff control structures for each of the parcels into
which the JP property has been or is being subdivided and have determined that such structures
constructed for each of the parcels as shown on the map would meet the watershed requirements
of the City of Greensboro without utilization of the approximately 22-acre lake that is located
essentially in the center of the property. We should note the probability that development
activities on the respective parcels might collect and direct the flow of runoff such that fewer
permanent runoff control structures than those shown on the map would be required to meet our
watershed requirements.
It is the strong preference of the City of Greensboro, however, that the large lake be used as a
permanent runoff control structure, rather than a proliferation of smaller structures.
Sincerely,
Ell Beth Treadway
Director of Environmental Services Department
so P.O. Box 3136 - Greensboro, NC 27402.3136 , www.d.sreensboro.ne.us - (336) 373.206.5 - M# 333-6930
k
Iva AN I
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor Division of Azchives and History
Betty Ray McCain, secretary Jeffrey J. Gvwv Director
January 8, 1999
John Thomas
Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27615-6846
Re: Jefferson Pilot Corporation, Nationwide Permit
Application, Action ID 199920074, Guilford
County, ER 99-7611
Dear Mr. Thomas:
We have reviewed the additional information submitted by your office and the
National Park Service concerning the above project and offer the following
comments.
As a result of the December 14, 1998, meeting between you, my staff, and
representatives of Jefferson Pilot where'we received additional information about
project changes in the permit area, we have revised our recommendations for
archaeological investigations.
Archaeological site 31 GF224* * has been destroyed by ground disturbing activities
by the Guilford County Board of Education. Archaeological investigations of this
area would be pointless and we withdraw our recommendation for evaluation of the
site for National Register eligibility.
It is our understanding that archaeological site 31 GF223 * * is now outside the
permit area and, therefore, not subject to Section 106 review. Thus, evaluation of
its National Register eligibility will not be undertaken.
Based on the information submitted by the National Park Service concerning the
skirmish known as the Battle of New Garden, it is our opinion that there is a high
probability for portions of the Jefferson Pilot tract to contain archaeological
evidence of this eighteenth century conflict. We recommend that the area from
New Garden Road east to the lake and from the northern boundary of the school
property to the northern side of Hobbs Road be surveyed by an experienced
archaeologist. This area corresponds to parcel 5B (Park Option) on the project
plans. A map indicating the boundaries is enclosed.
The archaeological investigation should include intensive historic research of the
skirmish, beginning with the references cited in Mr. Vogel's letter (copy attached)-
The most intensive survey should be directed to the third of the tract along New
/XN
ZO'd Z2:9I 666I'90'Z0 AMOldln93M H9I31b6 WOMB
%1..
John Thomas
January 8, 1999, Page 2
Garden Road. The use of a metal detector during this investigation would be
appropriate. The topographic map indicates there may be a springhead located
within the middle third of the tract. Based on current knowledge, it is likely that
the bench area adjacent to the springhead may contain a small Woodland period
campsite. The easternmost third of the tract, due to the sloping topography should
be subjected to a reconnaissance level investigation.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
43avid Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
Enclosures
cc: Wayne Wright, Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
Andrea Fox, Jefferson Pilot
Robert Vogel, Guilford Courthouse National Military Park
20'd Zt:91 6661'90'ZB A80iuing3a H9131UN W0dJ

0
a:
1
1
RS-12
f•
fl
f 1
1 1
1
.i

i r
00 'd
RS-1 ?
ROAD
rYLN G-- ---------------?_--
O
n R£%?&
G£:ST 6661190'Z0
?r liq CX15riNc
l
V
Q I PROPOSE
CHURCH
tt SiT?
jcrrER
' S.sPEA
RS?12 ,
MJOiuin934 H9I31tfN W04:1
JAN 07 '99 12:24 FR JEFFERSON PILOT 336 691 3717 TO 98192797 P.02/05
a : 0
DEVELOPMENT COST REJMURSEN(ENT AG -??
fps Ro??
THIS DEVELOPMENT COST RESIBURSEMENT AGREE. v .?
day of February, 1998, by and between JEFFERSON PILOT LIM INS C ANY, a
North Carolina corporation ("Jefferson-Pilot"), and the GUILFORD C BOARD OF
EDUCATION (the "School Boar(r"),
RECITALS:
A. Contemporaneously herewith, Jefferson-pilot is conveying to the School Board the
real property referred to as 'Lot 1, School Site on the Master Development plan for Jeff?rson-
Pilot dated October 10, 1997, last revised November 4, 1997, and more particularly described on
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herran (thc "Property,). The Property is one of
seven parcels owned by Jefferson-Pilot included on the Master Development Plan (the seven
parcels shall be referred to as the "New Garden Development").
B. As required by the City of Greensboro, Jefferson-Pilot has agreed to construct
Certain improvements on and adjacent to the New Garden Development, such as road widening
and road and sewer construction, all as described in the Master Development Plan.
C. The School Board has agreed to pay a portion of the costs for the construction of
certain of these improvements relating to the New Garden Development, which improvements
will benefit the Property.
D. Jefferson-Pilot and the School Board desire to set forth the School Board's share
of these improvements costs and the manner in which Jefferson-Pilot will be reimbursed for the
costs.
AGR'EEM 14T:
NOW, TfMREFORE, for and In consideration of the above recitals, and the premises and
mutual promises hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency of which is hereby aalmowledged, the parties
hereto hereby agree as Wows:
1. Jefferson-Pilot will construct or will cause the construction of the improvements
required in connection with the development of the New Garden Development as set forth on the
Master Development Plan (the "improvements"), The projected costs for the Improvements ore
set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, entitled 'Allocation of Projected
Site Development Costs for the JP New Garden Road Property",
2. The School Board shall reimburse Jefferson-Pilot in the manner described below
for its prorata share of the costs actually incurred by Jefferson-Pilot in the construction of the
Improvements according to the schedule set forth on Exhibit -B', with such reimbursement
.r
JAN 07 '99 12:25 FR JEFFERSON PILOT 336 691 3717 TO 98192797 P.03i05
amount not to exceed the School Board's allocable share of the Improvements costs estimated on
Exhibit B". During the construction of the Improvements. Je$'esson_Pilot ahall deli v to the
School Board a monthly statement certified by an Officer of Jefferson-Pilot setting forth the
School Board's prorata share of the Improvements Costs for construction actually completed
during such time period (the 'Statement") along with supporting documentation showing
Jefferson-Pilot's payment of such costs. No Statements will be sent during
Jefferson-Not did not PaY anY construction invoices. The School Board shall pay month dW
an amounts due under the Statem= within thirty (30) days Moor the date of the Statement.
3. The School Board represents and warrants that an actions necessary to authorize
the School Board's execution of this Agreement and the payment of the School Board's prorate
share of the Improvements costs As set forth on Exhibit 'a" have been taken.
4. In the event that any of the amounts set forth in the Statement(s) is not paid when
due, interest shall accrue on such unpaid amount at the rate of seven percent (7%) per annum
U=U paid.
5. Jefferson-Pilot shall submit the Statements to the School Board at the address set
forth below, and the School Board shall send all payments to Jefferson-Pilot at the address set
forth below.
Guilford County Board of Education
712 North Eugene Street
Greensboro, NC 27401
Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance Company
P.O. Box 20407
Greensboro, NC 27420
6. This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties with
respect to the reimbursement of the costs for the Improvements. It may only be amended or
Modified by an ag wmmt in writing signed by the parties hereto. This Agreemenrt shall be binding
upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
7. The School Board agrees to join in the execution of a Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions in a form to be agreed upon by Jefferson-Pilot and the School Board,
which Declaration will provide for a continuing financial obligation by the School Board limited to
its proportionate share of the cost of maintaining retention or detention
other drainage or erosion control devices serving the New Garden Developmentasrequired byd
? C of nY Greensboro.
.l
--au rK it1-f tMDUV PILOT 336 691 3717 TO 98192797 P.04/05
IN•'U MESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto have signed Phis Agreement the day
and Year f= above written.
JEFFERSON-PILOT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
By:
AY'TEST: V President
B
Secretary
GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
w+?o
By:
Tts G x m i9+V
ATTEST. 11
I 6EC RErr?R-y

** 50 ' 30t w _Fi101 sac
O b O' ¦
ssugmIA1?1 Zia
a
P.
? f KCY eN'w?"??M??'? j O?M C7
I ?g rr + ?e
Q
40
! r
O r
¦
M i O G
e!- N Q__ , N
V ?I!/ CJ It N?»l i ltN
=-,w M .40
¦Ti i v, b
¦ w ? ? A
` r
? ?( E
rg. Me?r?g<rJ??s? °?? ??H m a
4Mto» a .. -
o jp 11 w
0'd if
?" O?C?. CS Cj?O °C Si M d
1 '! sCC
qq p p ? Q? b
Q, 4i p T ¦ IF K a
a a
4 P,: $ I
a A
d'O od" 8
r x 31 c
4 Cp { M w II N 4°
? I
tu .9 M10
log
as? 1? a o?
t In
01 ?9i?
--Vol LF
&Ir 41
16.
72
$ o
S0iS0'd L6LZ6i86 Ol LZLS, ti69 9CE 10-1Id NOS?GA=9f 21d 92:Zi 66, LO NUf
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 5, 1999
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
JAMES B. HUNTJR r a,
GOVERNOR

a
WAYNE MCDEVITT
: SECRETARY

a.
le. y.'fr
'
r

v
a }
a

'4? h Y
CERTIFIED MAIL P-536 305 468
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dr. Jerry Weast, Superintendent
Guilford County Schools
712 North Eugene Street
Greensboro, N.C. 27406
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE

Subject: Notice of Violation
Failure to Obtain
404/401 Water Quality\ Certification
Jefferson Elementary School-New Garden Rd.
Guilford County
Mr. Weast:
On December 8, 1998 a site visit of the Jefferson Pilot property was conducted
by Mr. John Dorney and Mr. Ron Linville. The visit determined that the school
system had impacted jurisdictional waters (classification WS-III, NSW).
Specifically, a jurisdictional tributary to Horsepen Creek had been piped
without the issuance of a US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit and a
Section 401 Certification which is issued by the State of North Carolina. Without
these, the project is in violation of requirements of the United States Clean Water Act
Section 301. Additionally, this activity is not in compliance with NCAC 15A 2H
.0500 which requires application for these impacts.
It is our understanding that the US Army Corps of Engineers has indicated that
they will permit this activity as long as the 401 Certification is acquired.
It is necessary that you respond to this Notice of Violation within 30 days of
your receipt of this letter. A 404/401 Joint Application form is enclosed for your
585 WAUGHTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27107
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER

WETLAND, STREAM, AND BUFFER INSPECTION FORM
Compliance Evaluation Inspection: (pull down
menu: 401 CEI. Buffer CEI)
? Complaint (pull down menu: wetland, stream,
wetland & stream, buffer)
? Follow-up inspection: (pull down menu: Number
of visits 2nd, 3?d, etC.)
? Other types of investigations
County: ?•?
River Basin (pull down):
Nearest Stream Name:-
Lat. _ Long. _
OWNER
Name: ?G f 1?
Address: 45- AL'IPAI
Phone No.
"
A? T'
-Date of Inspection: C;''I 0e_1
-Rezional Office: (Pull down menu: ARO, FRO, MRO, WaRO.
WiRO, WSRO, RRO)
-Rejional Office Trackl.gLg No.
-Project Name: ^" .
S
Project Name:
DWQ #: py O/V0
Project Type: (pull down menu: dustrial,
_ Subdivision (residential), Single Fami y, Road Project (n -
DOTt , Utility Lines, Forestry, Agriculture, CAMA, Military ther
REPRESENTATIVE
t Name:
Phone No.: -
LOCATION: I
'?o ,tom,
INSPECTION FORM TYPES (Note: highlighting one or combinations of the following will bring a new screen)
? 40l/Water Quality Certification - CEI
? Stream/Wetland Compliant- NO WQ Certification
? Riparian Buffer Complaint and CEIs
a
in i %zin (`T:T?TTFT( 4TTON _ CM
401 WQ Certification Issued an Containing the following Stipulated Conditions:
:i Stream Impacts (LF): ` .3
Wetland Impacts (acres):
j Stormwater Management: ?fIQ?7 w
Mitigation: (Pull down menu. P, on-site. off site (non-wRP), mitigation l nk) 4
? Special nditions:

Inspection Conditions:
Project Status: om l Under Construction
Stormwater Management: om Iia Non-compliant
Special Conditions: Non-compliant
Estimate Non-compliant Stream Impacts: Linear Feet
Estimate Non-compliant Wetland Impacts: Acres
Not Started

Not applicable
Notes:

/ / " is.ws S

RIPARIAN BUFFER COMPLAINTS AND CEIs
Stream Information:
Stream Name:
Stream Classification:
Buffer Rules: (pull down menu: Meuse, Tar-Pam, Randleman, Water Supply Watershed)
Inspection Conditions:
? Confirmation that the stream is subject to the rule by DWQ staff. (e.g. for Neuse and Tar-Pam the stream
must be depicted on either a USGS map or Soil Survey. If the buffer rule is in a Water Supply the stream
must be depicted on the most recent versions of the U.S.G.S. 1:24000 (7.5Minute) scale topographic maps or
as determined by local government studies map.
Confirmation description:
Linear feet of buffer impact
Linear width of buffer impact
Estimate acreage of buffer impact
Estimate acreage of Zone I
Estimate acrease of Zone '_'
Buffer Use Observed: (Pull down menu: Airport, Archaeological activities, Bridges, Dam maintenance, Drainage of a pond. Driveway
crossing, Forestry. Fertilizer application, Greenway trails. Mining activities, Non-electric utility. on-site sanitary sewer systems, Overhead
electric utility lines. modified natural stream maintenance, play ground equipment, protection of excising structures. Railroads. Scientific
studies and gauging stations, Stormwater Management, Stream restoration, Temporary Sedimentation and Etusiuu Conuoi. Underground
electric lines. vegetation management, Water dependent structures, Water Supply, Water Wells. Wetland Restoration, other )
? Buffer Use Designation: (pull down menu: Exempt, Allowable, Allowable w/ Mitigation, Prohibited)
? DWQ Authorization needed
? DWQ Authorization received (pull down menu: compliant, non-compliant)
Comments:
Resolution:
? Compliant - NO Further Action Required
Non-Compliant
? Notification to Local Delegated Authority
? Notice of Violation
? Notice of Violation - Recommendation for Enforcement
? Other
tiTRFAM/WFTLAND COMPLAINT - NO WO CERTIFICATION ISSUED
Inspection Conditions: NO 401 Certification ?
? Estimate Stream Impacts: Linear Feet
? Estimate Wetland Impacts: Acres
? Description of Activity:
Resolution:
? NO ACTION REQURIED/COMPLIANT
Non-Compliant
? Notification to USACE
? Notice of Violation
? Notice of Violation - Recommendation for Enforcement
? Other
NOTES:- ?-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 30, 1999
Guilford County
DWQ Project # 990140
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dr.Michael Priddy:
Assistant Superintendent
Guilford County Schools
900 English Rd.
High point N.C. 27262
Dear Mr. Priddy:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 363 feet
of waters for the purpose of constructing the Jefferson Elementary School, as you described in your application dated 25 February
1999. After reviewing your application, we have decided that this fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number
3108. This certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit Number 26 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. In addition, you
should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment
and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply Water shed regulations. This approval will expire
when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application.. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the
attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
1. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all lots with remaining jurisdictional wetlands and waters to notify the
state in order to assure compliance for future wetland and/or water impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place within 30 days of
the date of this letter or the issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-
7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any questions, please telephone John Domey at 919-733-1786.
?S' c eFr,-,"-\
. Stevens
Attachment
cc: Wilmington District Corps of Engineers
Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
John Dorney
Central Files
Eddie Mac Eldowney; Davis, Martin, Powell and Associates
Division of Water Quality - Non. Discharge Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Rd., Raleigh, NC 27607 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
Re: jefferson elementary
Subject: Re: jefferson elementary
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:39:00 +0500
From: "James Ronald (Ron) Linville" <[e-mail]. ne.us>
Organization: NC DENR Winston Salem
To: "John Dorney" <[e-mail]. nc.us>
Recommendations were to present some options discussed with
their engineer. I am flexible on this one. Will leave it up to you
since you have seen site. Engineer indicated that they will be
leaving tree buffer along lower portion of property. We could say
that they should leave remaining and exisiting buffers in place for
both streams with natural vegetation for stormwater and nutrient
management in lieu of a stormwater pond. This should be acceptable
to them and should not jeopardize their agreement with JP (who
knows?). They may add more units later to this site and if we don't
protect now, they may do more damage. Should indicate that any
future impacts will require another DWQ notification and review.
Date: Mon,
29 Mar 1999 11:08:27 -0800 From: "John Dorney"
<[e-mail]> To:
"James Ronald (Ron) Linville" <[e-mail]> Cc:
[e-mail] Subject: jefferson
elementary
got your recommedation to require stormwater for the school. we have
never required stormwater for an elementary school since the imprevious
surfaces are rather low. also with downstream lake and stream
mitigation on-site, i would say this suffices? do you still want
stormwater added? if so mr. ramsey will need to review and decide.
I of 1 3/29/99 4:23 PNI
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Ron Linville
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: 1arry Coble
Date: 3/19,199
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Jefferson Elem. School County Guilford
Project Number 99 0140
Recvd From DWQ
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 2/5/99 Recvd By Region 3/17/99
Project Type after the fact
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
NBR Steam P-@) N F_ 16-11-5-(0. rWSllI NSW x306.0 363.00
?? PT O N F F-1 -?I -(
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y pO N Did you request more info? Q Y ( N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y Q0 N
Is Mitigation required? Q Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue 0 Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss)
Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1

dmp
DAVIS - MARTIN - POWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERING LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING
218 GATEWOOD AVENUE • SUITE 102
HIGH POINT, NC 27262
PHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]
February 25, 1999
Guilford County Schools
Jefferson Elementary School
Project E-2177
John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management, DEHR
Water Quality Section
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney:
On behalf of the Guilford County Schools we have enclosed a comple a of pptfcation Form for
Jefferson Elementary School. The Guilford County Schools is requesting Corps of Engineers and
State Water Quality approval in accordance with the "Notice of Violation" received on February 8,
1999 from Larry Coble. Along with the application form we have enclosed the following supporting
information to assist you and your staff in the review of our application:
1. Partial copy of the Jefferson Pilot wetland maps prepared by Evans Engineering.
2. Copy of a letter from the Elizabeth Treadway, Director of Environmental Services
supporting JP's concept of utilization of the large lake for a permanent runoff control
structure.
3. Copy of the Overall Development plan for the Jefferson-Pilot property showing the school
site and the location of the lakes.
4. Copy of a letter from the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
5. Copy of a contract between Guilford County Schools and Jefferson-Pilot for transfer of the
school property and agreement on cost participation for certain infrastructure
improvements.
6. Copy of Sketch plans showing various development schemes considered for this site.
7. Copy of the overall site development plan.
Our firm evaluated a geotechnical report and inspected the subject channel and made the
determination that this was a wet weather drainage channel. The existence of the wetland maps
prepared by Evans Engineering were made for Jefferson-Pilot and were not provided to Guilford
County Schools. However we feel that JP would have provided these to us if they were asked to do
so. The USGS topographic map for the project area did not show a blue line for a stream
designation. Since we did not suspect a wetland issue, based upon our review of the available
information, we did not inquire about potential wetland mapping.
During the Schematic Design Phase, several different layouts were examined. After much discussion
with the City of Greensboro Planning and Transportation Staff a layout was selected to insure safe

John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management February 25, 1999 Page 2
ingress and egress from the school site. Design constraints such as the size and shape of the
property, the limitation on the number of driveway access points on New Garden Road, and the need
to provide sufficient vehicle "stacking" for student unloading helped to shape the layout that is
currently constructed on the site. Because of these design issues, impacts to the subject channel
could not have been avoided.
The Guilford County Schools request approval of the Water Quality Certification based on the
approved development plan from the City of Greensboro. This plan utilizes the existing Jefferson-
Pilot lakes for watershed protection. The Guilford County Schools will be part of a property owners
association. The property association will be required to maintain the lakes for water quality
protection.
We appreciate your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional
information please do not hesitate to call.
Very Truly Yours,
DAMS-MARTIN- OWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ddie MacEldowney
Charles E. Powell
EM/CEP/cma
c: Clay Clayton
Dr. Michael Priddy
Larry Lindsay
John Thomas
File
J .. q
DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLI
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGSNEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITS TSE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT.
1. OWNERS NAME: Quilford C`nnntW g^hnnlc -
2. MAILING ADDRESS: 900 English Road
SUBDIVISION NAME:
CITY: Hieh Point STATE: NC ZIP CODE: 27262
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE) : Jefferson F1 m ntary Srhnnl
3. . TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME) : (WORK) : [phone]
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL, ADDRESS,
PHONE NUMBER:
Dr. Michael Priddy, Assistant Superintendent
Guilford County Schoos, 900 English Road, High Point NC 27262
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):-
COUNTY : Guilford NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Greensboro
1

PECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD
NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.) : NL lxc.cYJ?e(o?d`
y::2om -'11K r i? L A:D&rrj Poo" A-r4i *up -V--c.£m i rfb ?-n ?

6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: UT of Horsepen Creek
RIVER BASIN:
7a. IS PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
EXPLAIN: (ORW), WATER
HIGH -QUALITY OR WS-II)? YESQ[)] OUTSTANDING [x] IF RESOURCE
SUPPLY (WS
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ ] NO [x]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OF
PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401
CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES [ ] NO [x] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:'
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE:
363 L.F. of Stream Channel from groundwater seep area
2
T
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS) : The citing of the school accnriarPd rirj.uPwauc were determined nfrer mnrh rliccussion with the
City of Greensboro Transportation Deparrmenr. The layout was selected to safeln nrrmmndare the
anticipated school traffic School safety requires ample stacking capacity of rare rn kpi-p these; cars from
disrupting traffic on New Garden Road Atcn bus traffic must remain -Ppt-rnt, P from car traffic. These
constraints along with the topographic fP rurec of the site rewired the errP-nm impacrs_ Al" City of
Greensboro development conditions required construction jf the cul-de-sac.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH ND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL, HABITAT
IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE
CONTACTED: (ATTACH RESPONSES
FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE
(SHPO) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET)
PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED:
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE OF
PUBLIC (STATE) LAND?
YES [I NO [ J (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE.NORT14 CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICY ACT?
YES [ J NO ?J
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA
,DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES [I NO [ J
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING
COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS. CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH,
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER
REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC
MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
4
It. \
GUILFORD QUA
NORTH CAROLINA-GUI O • D p
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPO HIC) 1Y
55' 598 599 600 1740000 FEET 60k 1 79°52'30"
36°07'30"
i
?g00 • ??? X00 l
?? •' • _ -?, / N??? 3998
r
00
57 6
390 Y
?- s 3997
8a7 )l -u
vj/
1 ?? • 00 pg 8p0 ) O l "'`?' ?. ?? . 87e ??? 808 860 000
q 0
o`€:. ,,? n? ?? - FEET
e? • ° R
m St.
° \? ( / O '? • `' \ ^ - 3996
'? A ?oo / ?? _ ? 10
ce ° .9 "?.
3995
- 880 00 y t ?' 00
°
n 11 3994
? ? J
?? d o • 5'
a,
\ 0
90 ot I1 :_ ° ? ?_•?'O? • ?? 5-3993
7
sr dw3RMYX"V ^hi'
--------------?Tlai7P'9A9A4Jli?T-----------------
?O
?6P ? g
?
l y ? a ?
? J, lee 3 ,
\` I ? SOP
? o
\ 1 2 6
O
x
1
1 O
II ? 0 ??
11 I
1
i ? w I f
I i
-?I----- ___j- 9! r/ddT7Y W-*#M 0 w _ _ -------
1

?
j I
I

i i
?
Il
I
i
1 w
x
I
m ct
i x
3
m
m
x

pS

I 3 ice
f m

I x
I
rl

M
m

I ?
I
g
Q ? W
tZ 1 ?
0
h
W
? h
I /
i
I
I
O
I
I
I
1 ?
I
l
I i ? I ;I4

I
Z
r
,
I
?
N

?
jzt
?JISYIw Z
C?
?5.95-

i
l I 1 2 q h^?,`
I O °j
I I I f1? O ?y A
14
I o
R
? o
\ K
? l
i -
r Of
r'
? W
\ w
I I ??
3? 0
r? ,
I
Y '?I
Izi
k
o
r llJl/ ?
h
I'll a
, /l. / , .
-' ?` ? ? ,11 rrl
sv` - ?? l?r

t
I
`

• •

1 ,
,
, 11
/ f
b y

? r

?C r

?a
r:
0
N
W
O_ N
Y
O ? ? `:
???
?Y?
<€o^
.?FF Q ?
0 f S
a=?
??B .$?
ry
? 3
9
•
?N
0
? ?
9. . V
?? ? ?
??
?P¢
??, ? / ?
? /Y?) a° ? ? _ ?
2 ? <W
S ?o ff? ?
,?0
0
'?
? ?
86?
0 ? ?
8 ? ?
4 ,
Sq.O ?
0
?0
GREENLEE RD' TOTAL AREA OF HEw LOT -28.261 ACRES
Q
0 Q
f
0 0 PARlat'IC TAeuunoN
? Z
3 SPACES/CLASSROOM x 30 ROOMS 90 SPACES U
3 SPACES/OFFICE X 13 OFFICES • ? SPACES 0
TOTAL SPACES REOU8tE5 .129 SPACES
•
? / aF 9' X 18' SPACES PRONGED • 1J3 SPACES
f OF HANDICAPPED SPACES FRONDED • 8 SPACES
TOTAL NUMBER ? SPACES FRONDED ¦ 1? SPACES
GRAPHIC SCALE
?? ??
(oar)
rw-w•
?laln
Y NN
N
C O N
n
??i$
? z ? i
_ ???
U
p
Zt? g' v
J =
V
&Z
Ci?a
Z N
i
t
0
O
??
??
'?/ 10
rn
o
cn
F N
M N
w^ C O H
Y I?
11 ff ? 2
1 Z ? ? ?
2
U ^
O
.?F ° ?
o F ? _
_ c =???
c?8 ?o?€
Z? N
! Y1 =
Fe? S
f
¦ `
Q
(?
w
O O
0
?• ? ° ? ?
? ? b
?? ?
P?9
??
a? ? ? ? e ?
? 20 ?R?? ?
? 8 ?o ?a ?
Q ? m
0
"?
? ?
5 ?
a
0
?o ?
S
? J
/
?U
EE RD,
?EEw. Torsi AREA OF NEw Lor . 26.261 ACRES Q
o Q
Z
JQ
o ?
p / PARKING TABULAflON 'A O
/ ? 3 SPACES/CLASSit0011 x 3o RooNS • 9o SPACES V W
3 SPACES/DfFICE X 13 OFFlCES ? 39 SPACES 0
TOTAL SPACES REWIRES ? 129 SPACES Q
O
/ Of 9' X td' SPACES FRONDED ¦ 123 SPACES
/ OF NNrDICAPPED SPACES FRONDED ? 6 SPACES
TOTAL NUIiBfR Of SPACES PROWDED ? 129 SPACES
J y?
QJW
??Z
0
N
W
O N
O ? `:
a ?aa
:• ?
???
<€a
.?FF Q ?
0 f S
a=?
??B .$?
ry
? 3
9
•
?N
0
? ?
9. . V
?? ? ?
??
?P¢
??, ? / ?
? /Y?) a° ? ? _ ?
2 ? <W
S ?o ff? ?
,?0
0
'?
? ?
86?
0 ? ?
8 ? ?
4 ,
Sq.O ?
0
?0
GREENLEE RD' TOTAL AREA OF HEw LOT -28.261 ACRES
Q
0 Q
f
0 0 PARlat'IC TAeuunoN
? Z
3 SPACES/CLASSROOM x 30 ROOMS 90 SPACES U
3 SPACES/OFFICE X 13 OFFICES • ? SPACES 0
TOTAL SPACES REOU8tE5 .129 SPACES
•
? / aF 9' X 18' SPACES PRONGED • 1J3 SPACES
f OF HANDICAPPED SPACES FRONDED • 8 SPACES
TOTAL NUMBER ? SPACES FRONDED ¦ 1? SPACES
GRAPHIC SCALE
?? ??
(oar)
rw-w•
?laln
Y NN
N
C O N
n
??i$
? z ? i
_ ???
U
p
Zt? g' v
J =
V
&Z
Ci?a
Z N
i
t
0
O
??
??
'?/ 10
rn
o
cn
F N
M N
w^ C O H
Y I?
11 ff ? 2
1 Z ? ? ?
2
U ^
O
.?F ° ?
o F ? _
_ c =???
c?8 ?o?€
Z? N
! Y1 =
Fe? S
f
¦ `
Q
(?
w
O O
0
?• ? ° ? ?
? ? b
?? ?
P?9
??
a? ? ? ? e ?
? 20 ?R?? ?
? 8 ?o ?a ?
Q ? m
0
"?
? ?
5 ?
a
0
?o ?
S
? J
/
?U
EE RD,
?EEw. Torsi AREA OF NEw Lor . 26.261 ACRES Q
o Q
Z
JQ
o ?
p / PARKING TABULAflON 'A O
/ ? 3 SPACES/CLASSit0011 x 3o RooNS • 9o SPACES V W
3 SPACES/DfFICE X 13 OFFlCES ? 39 SPACES 0
TOTAL SPACES REWIRES ? 129 SPACES Q
O
/ Of 9' X td' SPACES FRONDED ¦ 123 SPACES
/ OF NNrDICAPPED SPACES FRONDED ? 6 SPACES
TOTAL NUIiBfR Of SPACES PROWDED ? 129 SPACES
J y?
QJW
??Z