20190995 Ver 2_401 Application_20191028

,�-b/p/D4'qSUo�
CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
To: Ms. Karen Higgins Date: October 2 19
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604 Pea)
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 29
UrrAs
Preston Park NWP 29 >«(PA $® tpil
Charlotte, North Carolinaf111i��9
(SAW-2018-00862, DWR ID 19-0995)
CWS Project No. 2018-0441
Dear Ms. Higgins,
The Preston Park site (Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel No. 20508102, 20508109, 20502387, 20507119,
20502118) is approximately 134.8 acres in extent and is located at 2601 Belmeade Drive in Charlotte, North
Carolina (Figures 1 and 2, Attachment 1). Cranford Drive Single Family Lots, LLC has contracted Carolina
Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide Section 404/401 permitting services for this project.
On behalf Cranford Drive Single Family Lots, LLC Carolina Wetland Services is submitting an updated
Pre -Construction Notification pursuant to NCDWR 401 WQC 4139 for proposed impacts to one jurisdictional
stream channel and four isolated, non-404 jurisdictional wetlands. These impacts include the filling of
wetlands and two road crossings over a stream. The previous version of this permit proposed one road
crossing. The proposed impacts are associated with developing the subdivision into a single-family
development. An executed Agent Authorization Form is attached (Attachment F).
A previous version of this permit was authorized under the DWR 401 WQC 4139 on August 22, 2019 (DWR
ID 19-0995). A check for the permit fee is included.
Please do not hesitate to contact Dan Zurlo at 717-460-3466 or [e-mail] should you have any
questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
Dan Zurlo
Project Scientist
Christine Geist, PWS, CE
Principal Scientist

ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED:
DESCRIPTION"
Attachment A -
Updated Impact and Construction Sheets
Attachment B -
Updated PCN
Attachment C - Additional Sheets to PCN
Attachment D - NCSAM Form
Attachment E -
NC DMS Acceptance
Attachment F -
Updated JD Map
Attachment G -
Photopa e
Page 2 of 3

Preston Park
Attachment Sheet
Attachment A:
October 25, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0441
Updated Impact and Construction Sheets

Fw
Preferred Site
. f Design; see impact
,rc_.1 terµ >,, sheet for wetland and , N
lJ 1 7 1 T r ! \;1 I,.
�r�. �\ r''` ��' _G J• Y _ t / P (�� 1 ,1'� i, SEE SHEET C-401 FOR STORM
/'� Stream impacts } `t1. CHARTS AND GRADING AND
rC41 O. \„ �n u.•r>r' t -c..' _ - �.. ' , l `�; DRAINAGE NOTES
�; _ _\'. ;,._, ' ,,� ` G„ .. - 4A _ • \ . _ _ \ ', C-400 FOR INDEXING ONLY.
- SEE SHEETS C�02 U
a
77�
"
,
_ _ x - , ` } ' ` C-411 FOR PLAN DETAILS.
r •d�"�r - ° � r % 3' ��` .) J - - SEE SHEET C-707
r-- .J,r `\ \ t
K ,
A
T t
h•''- �„
e t '/"Y ;t . v �+ � ��.", �. a �\ f r t'r�'. •"'��.,,�j" fit° / \ s -5:
E E
_y!``,\,`� � = � \ 7e` '�`"" / �Do��rIVFEA / A.a..4�•�' '"tea:.
` / `*\ �- •t n \,,,. ! }. p~ ;s ,x 1. s`mVUND�zoP�' l+wHaFEK � � \�' 1 \~w
CYNIANAG ZONE' ^t E,D C)SE
AV
IX e-
cr
1 1 }
n � \
\
I 1
1 l '
rr
t
t
` f
,. �`N\`y
\
a \%•.�
I�FORPCCOSUMMARY
Via• a �\/i�'SEE SHEETS r ••
ALL LOT FLOOD PROTECTION
q��1r.1�1•-� �� _ � IELEVATIONS.
r � ` K �u
Tay t
s 4
►.{vim � >��
�ass
W.
s�
//1! -
S All
BE ��p o0 IF
9�p \
►' \\ 4�' �. \.0
/� \1/i:• �'� e'.��r' /1\a': \�, \>�� 'I. +p� .r .�.� ./'vs :,�r�,/�..1 .... �. wry �e.�
Y 1
t
�$► � s rry � \ i 1
Via. �.\.�'�::dT1�'. �\. ��Ai►. �ie_�..�. �r.Al ti�:_a�. _..�I�S��a.,:...:��a,�t.�.,.�i�'C.a�.�1i�..�\v'%11�i�.�.ii�if�•�'�Lii7,E7"il�(IYit�vi�i�\�wru/�r'Y'�I_\�.�. a:
d' SN1 CAl70� M,
2p��FfSSI �yy
S Y =
1,•Bene/�D,•
oa
�W
Sim zz
LL � o0
z�g o o
p a DATE
z0611812019
O DRAWN BY
A. DALE
�a
•DESIGNED BY
=O
. ? J. HORTON
. CHECKED BY
x
-
0
C. TODD
• • = sulE
• a AS SHOWN
• o
)'n
5 \ihll R I _
F-
415 Ik.
4"
2
1 fi1
ti
EF
i
O
P t Q C $
LU
Cn
i
k Z
\ a B
r \
_ z
� a
�- v.� w
t
.{? ;
#, . �'
f -
SH��� _
Q
/>' ", ti X'ic k.„, � h� _'2. t /.'�bf = '-' �•' f�i+L `�, ! / .Y` � .\ "S�� � r (\ � J V
..0 ;�-"••�,"C�'.,..�;. ��_1,' _ z i I i ^I I \ \ I �`•., ;;\. `\'t` sr Aki.•r, w
ff ii e
EXI$nNG W OHaR6.QTfE WATE FORCE I
' B
Cis
Q f
_ a
HE��o !
r MWTAWS�MER EfSEMEM rEC'f* .,Y�i dt{;.I. t+, �: . 1 g 6
+P ,' f „ \ 7 t{.l yit �l' �' 'ii� - �.1 -.. ! \ g �'.- rc.,o oy* , r i } f \ kGnNG 6GF 'CE bWN/` %- 1 \ \,•`, f { { sd Ce 5
\ter \ r:- Y/�`t; �ss'.i `!' I.,` I�:.! - 4. ✓ O:.,-.:•q,-�-- ��. �!. _ r„ --�� .'c ._ \ - saw ar3v sEwE EasEMErrr, .," -1 -F.r ` 1+ t°fir.
t�-'' l ,,,, i f Y i .:';en• r \. 7 r 2
��.' y-•�^� •� `n �a?�\"?"`,^,\\ i r �.F ,,f+ffi� 1,�. _;,�...�. t J�;}; r:r ,. l \ G z r .rr �"'—=r ?r'•1;.��rr11 $@
\\� 'J\' ..� . r ` � t� , 1 �,"�! „id+7 f .{. t \ '3 .d• t:. T'! _5t" O S@
_Ffi
a�mRn�i�' Ei[ `,^r'' j'•� � ``.. �.� JrrwEnANDSTortEMMf ,3„�'r .'} s
it -
\"•t r J, . t\ \'_ !< , f�-f r ! , ;r^ �'{1`' : .. .sfF SCAIE'f* Tn'4•; ' + a
a \! rr - i1'-. rrr `:r ••! I `�„ ,, -C^ /:/` I u t --� \ - `\` } r/' \- t)a 4so ,. 0r g
's \' �^ ,\ .'.� 'r- s / t' ' �' /` r a ` _ `\ gig .dr ,�` "'r-J + t t, } t ;c .\ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - E '1:-` •(� \y '�. ��....Y.
J`
v\. r'
-y'
,.,),
1 '
��„ F f, rowsE� oiE
r
Ito-. \ Feu_. g
\ \ r -\\, ." - ' _ :r -,r= ,l.` o,,, , t \ .. ,,+ 1 a ,a t _ r \ 41946
f P r -
?} \, - K, 3f/ `'�.•. _ - �'} _ \'�\\- +? t _ - `- rSr�-',`r .\fl ~!' ranorvs rwrva,o iorruor vwEvxtE SHEET NO. �p
y ' _ a� / y f \ r ✓ Y._ sru wx C-409 m
22 •�.,� \��I. / �,,a,. r/,•�f'`fii7�,\' �����r•
\��`� \
r, .
%� ;w -��� Fps r \
7 1,, `aL %�, �=.��%/ ;, �
=r' \�
•
l: .� \ \�, LLB
`gyp tiM
d�•
'�_ .yam
��
-
� T� �y�.
s•: - /mil/,
i.
N I©' ©] U o,QiO UI©JLj Y
JNETL?N IN
4\ \
•�e� 1 k/ TO REMA
L

r s'-
/ a 7
° v C
o
\ \ro¢
w �
�r-
„.,�,,,, �`.s✓\ p`-` .y. 0.4B4AC.TREESAVE- r
z \
SANExIsnNG80'1— OTTE W1
WATER SANITARY
AC.TREEE SEWER EAS",
elp
VARIES, SEE
\\ -' 45 MANAGED USE ZONE ~
3�TM16 \ 30'STREAM SIDE ZONE
TOP OF BANK Y\t \!,
r
DEMOLITION NOTES: ,�t'/�Y, \
1, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COORDINATION AND SEQUENCING OF DEMOLITION AS DESCRIBED \'jl
By THESE DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR IS TOOBTAINALL PERMITS.
2. CONTRACTORISRESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATIMN DEMOLITIONORRELOCAnMN HAPPLICABLE
UTILITY COMPANIES, IE, GAS, CABLE, POWER, TELEPHONE, WATER SEWER. ETC.
'r3 3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO IMMEDIATELY FIX ANY ACTIVE UTILITIES DAMAGED WRING
CONSTRUCTION AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
J
A G NERATED SY THE DEMOLITION WILL BE HAULED FROM THES TE ND DISPo6E0OF PER
4 ALL MATEPo L E 1A
E LOCAL ORDINANCES. ., m
yi
B. INCUS ALL —ES. BLYD,CRANFORD OR. FRANKLIN ST SHALL REMAIN OPEN AND lRVOBSTRIX;TEO TO TRAFFIC AT
ALL TIMES.
S, ALLCONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL UTILIZE INDUSTRIAL DRIVE. CRANFORD AND FRANKLIN SHALL NOT BE
WED FOR COMSTIiUCTGN TRAFFIC.
T. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL WRING CONSTRUCTION PER MOOT STANDARD /
°2 O WINGSANDSPECIFlCATIONS
i B. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL DEMOLITION OR INSTALLATION WORK ALONG INDUSTRIAL BLVD, /
CRANFORD DR, AND FRANKLIN ST WITH THE TOWN OF PINEVILLE. J
J S. DEMOUTION OF STORM DRAINAGE AND s MTARY SEWER SYSTEM(S) BY CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW FOR /
J CONTINUOUS USE OF THE SYSTEM(S).
_ J
10. REOR REPLACE ANY ADJACENT CONCRETE CURBING AND'OR SIDEWALK DAMAGED AS PART OF
OEM
nWON PROCESS.
11. FOR THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS.CONTAINING MATERIALS AND THE DEMOUTION OF BUILDINGS, FEDERAL
ANO'OR LOCAL REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT THOROUGH INSPECTION BE CONDUCTED FOR
= A6BE6T06CONTAIWNG MATERALS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING A RENOVATION OR DEMOUTION ACTIVM. THE
A6SESTOSINSPECTIONMUSTBECONDUCTED BYANORTHCARWNAAC NTEDASBESTOSINSPECTOR
ALL REGUAATEDANDKp FRIABLE ASBESTOS -CONTAINING MATERIALS IDENTIFIED DURING THE SURJEY,
9 WHICHWILLSEDISTURBED, MUSTBEPROPERLY REMOVEDBYACCREDITEDINOVIDUALSBEFORE
BEGINNING THE RENOVATION OR DEMOUTION ACTIVITY.
ee 12. EXISTING DUEL!(S)SHALLBEABAIDONEDINACCORDANCENM WRTHCARWNAADMIMSTRATIVECODE:
1SANCACO20.0113
13. NOHEAVYEOUIPMENTALLOWED VMTHIN TREE PROTECTIONZONE.ANY REQUESTED USE MUSTBE
APPROVED BY THE TOWNS URBAN FORESTER.
14. EXISTING SIGNAGE SHALL BE CAREFULLY REMOVED AND STORED UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION AT WHICH
o TIME SHALL BE REINSTALLED AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE FINAL
LOCATIONS WITH CITY INSPECTOR.
E
1E. EXISTING UnUTY NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR R, SE VERIFY THE LOCATKS, DEPTH, RAI EXISTENCE OF ANY
raj UTILITIES (ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, WATER, SEWER, .TEI-EPHONE,OMISSION
GAS, . ORE DRAINAGE. ETC.) WITHIN
THE CONAST ON THE AREA PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. THE OMISSION NC OR EXCLUSION OF LOCATION LOC4nWSONTHEOUND ISNTTTO ANY
DAMAGE TO THENDERGROUND ORDEFINITELOCATION OF DISTURBED AREA: T9.O AC.
_ EXISnNNTRACT W. EXPENSE.
NSE. .ANY DAMAGE TO THE UNDERGROUND Ui1UTEb SHALL BE REPAIRED AT
TI£ CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
/Ili
Impacts Sheet;
Preferred Site Design
SHEET
C 1 OV INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
--.. < 1
\\ 0.04 ac. permanent impact due to fill to
/` K\ \\ non-404 jurisdictional, isolated wetland
�!l \ W2
0.06 ac. permanent impact due to fill to
EIS non-404 jurisdictional, isolated wetland I
SHEET „
A,C 105
\ EXISTING FENCE
\ \ TO ftElMIN
\\
\ \ \ 8E G FENCE TO
\\� \BE RE REMDVED.TYP. �
PROPERTY LINE N
BE REMOVED UPON /
RECOMBINATION
a I✓v � '
/
1
j�
/
M�PCN2R\ :Y ✓ \ �.
3' 6
K.
B
a
8
1 �
3, a
1
Ie
C-100 FOR INDEXING ONLY.
SEE SHEETS C-101 THRU C-110
FOR DEMOLITION DETAILS.
f
I
I
SHEETI]��',,��',
Exlsn"G S 1-S3 31
"'"1AND5 TO BE
REMOVED 118 If of permanent impact due culvert installation (S1, 15
GA4f A°. If) fill (S2, 76 If), and rip rap outlet stabilization (S3, 27 If) _
--- ExlsnNc E14�
WEMND To S4
REMOVED 40 (of 80 total) If of temporary impact due to dewatering.
0.� AC.
See detail sheet 1.
rPROPER E TO
LOV
BE V€D UPON��-�fl�gi�4�
BEC BINATIDN
_ ABANDONED
WATER
.i MAIN
EASEMENT
ro BE
.S REMOVEDUPON
YY
♦-% \�\ PLATTING I 1
\
OMITS OF CISTURBANCE= \`(�.�,i
]B.00x AC.
S4
40 (of 80 total) If of temporary impact
due to dewatering.
See detail sheet 1.
102 If of permanent impact due culvert
installation (S5, 68 If) and rip rap inlet/
outlet stabilization (S6, 34 If)
See detail Sheet 1
Temporary bridge to be installed before
culvert to allow access for Duke Energy
maintenance vehicles.
EXISTING WETLANDS
TO REMAIN
PROPERTYLINETO
BE REMOVED UPON
RECOMBINATION
i
.
I,c
—I E
102
-EASTINGSANITARY
EXIST NG��' !J� %.
SANTAftY
SEWER MAIN \
I
sEWEft FORCE MAIN
-
-vim--w
EXISTING BD
'A
CHARLOTTE WATER
0.15 ac. permanent impact due to fill to
non-404 jurisdictional, isolated wetland
0.04 ac. permanent impact due to fill to
non-404 jurisdictional, isolated wetland
SHEET
C101
IDS
WC.
PORTION
TOREMAIN.
G WEALS TO REMAIN O.ZOt AC.
EXISTING TO BE
REMOVED 0.09s AC.
0.04.A .
SCALE 1"=150'
/ {` ATE. aaT°<° eTA� ° wER nArtEs
LC
I' i%�-
a tow,M N.uE.lttE
• r oM
oN c-
=oQ-OfEssY��9'a
S
•a
1 r ��N'HEF.1 1- /201
M6/2019
ti I la
oILI
IN
Zfs � O
^z o
n DATE
1212012018
A. DALE
BY
.DESIGNED
O
•
1. HORTON
of
• K
CHECKED BY
r
• o
C. TODD
. a
CALSCALE
AS SHOWN
O
=O
J
J
D
I
O
N
O�
T'I
J
J
J
a
a
o
J
Haw
s
z
C z
G p
>
�W
zLu
Uz:
d
w°z
J J
�0
a
p
$
aF
ZI"I
U
(f)
�z
2
0
IJ,J
E
00
F�
�v
U
`mm
)06 N0.
41946
SNEU
g
GI00
��
L

go
zm
APPROXIMATE UNITE OF
I
PROP0.5ED
GF�06PoD
GRADE
HEADWA
;
I
:f&AWVALL
I
i)
I
RIPRAP
/ -
li
iI
��
f
I PROP.INV.
R1�
PROP. INY. OUT
! C>) 4T GRCULAR
I.Dg.
TO BE EDRIED 13'
y
yy
im
m
ZIM
540
535
-2-50 -2+00 -1+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 2+50
EMMETT DRIVE PROFILE
I CULVERT PROFILE - EMMETT DRIVE 1" = 40' 1
Fib
560
m
550
545
FZL
m
530
b
pi
20+00
HIGH PT STA = 21+53.8
HIGH POINT ELEV = 551.18
P4I STA = 21-69.38
AD.=-3,03%
LOW POINT STA = 23+86.67
K - 30.00
LOW POINT ELEV = 548.09
91' YC
m !
PVI ST' = 23+75.58
f
PVI EL)EV = 547.59
1
IN
A.L. 3.43%
W
Uj
Uj
-
m 1i29 VC
i
l
IEDGRADE
3'DP 550.81
m
INV IN 544.11 (E4)
/
INV OUT �44.06 (E2)
Efusnxo t�rArvWEc
W RCP
j
i
zlsnNCGaaGE
�
(3# I 39'
EWPTiCAL RCP.
TCI BE BUPoED P
Z2ym
p
nN
CULVERT CROSS SECTION - EMMETT DRIVE
21+00 22+00 23+00
EMMETT DRIVE
BAFFLE
N.T,S.
(3)42 RCP
HEADWALL
565
PROFILE BAFFLE
N.T.S.
560
STEEL PLATE BAFFLE
555
/ � I AD' EABE4ff
tOD BUFFER _Y/ Mon Rtt '
lPE
r
550
545
540
530
A
24+00
JOINT
AGCEES E4EEMENT� 'Eaa4.0p4 N -F� 105� i
„w \
GRAVEL FIRy� 547
�
ACCESE
r
E2
OUAEIEPOWERWW / -2WFOLE
FFSET
OFFSET
HEA N-L
.,
SA
BANK
/ h
1" = 40'
CULVERT PLAN VIEW- EMMETT DRIVE
d tiNDCARp!
Detail Sheet 1Ess''
i�sT 1d
OPHERn;a`
10/D /19
0! a
O -�
FU
�<NLL
SOagyq
W 00
p
Ln
ra.
Oy 0
0 E
$2
�k'
33Z
3
nan
ppp
D
M
LL�
777
amm
Nni
o
0
DATE
21"-={
L
06/16/20t9
DRAWN BY
A. DALE
21"
42 RCP
�
G
•
�
DESIGNED Sy
J. HORTON
BAFFLE
•
•
CHECKED By
N.T.S.
• p
C,TODD
• •
SCALE
a
AS SHOWN
NOTE: BAFFLES TO BE INSTALLED V FROM PIPE JOINT
u�0
S
EVERY OTHER SEGMENT, ALTERNATING SIDES. TOTAL
•
NUMBER OF BAFFLES = 10. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
CUT -SHEET FOR BAFFLES TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL
C
�
L
z
NT5
—if � FXI9jING 6B'GUKE /�''
�
o L
G
T�:i
O:'j-i
\ I 1gEE REMOVEDMro / / /
` r
U
LU
u
�/
C
/
W
.a.
Q^ C
` \ / PROPERtt um'
U)
d
Ir
LL OULU
ER
U
C
L F
O C
<[
4
�w�
O
W w r
�
d>
2
�o 1 BURIE013:, f
z O
V
COS
z
®
�
`
\
LL
LL
0^
t� 0
105 NO,
n•� 6m -
a\
JEW
41946
I
SHEET NO.
11, = 40'
C-415
L

555
550
545
540
535
t
'
APPROI(IMATE EMITS
OF
EOGRID
PROPOSED
I
GRADE
(
HEAD.
(
(3) 4r RCP, BLED
W
wPRAP
w
�ir
�
TTOM OF E-*TIND
REEK
mn
25
m�
g $
555 Detail Sheet 2
550
545
540
535
0+00 1-00 1-50
nFz nN nAKS I ANF PROFllF
CULVERT PROFILE - ORSON OAKS LANE 1" = 40'
I
HIGH PT STA
= 11-40.08
HIGH POINT M
EV = 547'34
PVISTA-
1+48823
PVI ELEV
547.55
LOW POINTTA= 13+33.50
K = 28.00
PVI STA t 13+51.88
BB VC
PVI ELEV=544.58
A.D.: 3.95%
m
n
om1z
I
K=35.00
138' VC
w
n w
M
�m
jw
mud
PROPOSEDG
m
W
I
!
��
10:0�1
Orj
W
�
i
W
yU
.00i
1 _
•1.459e
m
� sT0
TER
I
n, RCP
EVSnNG
(3) 4 Cin
R RCP, BURIED IS i
FJJSnNG
NEL
11+00 12+00 13+00
ORSON OAKS LANE
;CULVERT CROSS SECTION - ORSON OAKS LANE
`•�F;�N'CARO�''ai
S55/n
(3)4W RCP
- S -
HEADWALL
'sue /s, Nc HE
PHE
/NNH UT\10/O1/19
of
PROFILE PIPE BAFFLE
m 8
N.T.S.
p E
w � �-
O V
—°
00
o�a
w
0
24"�j
5
a
vSj U
U f
2
2 W
48"RCP
moo;
ti
ti O
-- -_ BAFFLE
n n
ua
N.T.S.
BAFFLE
g
qTU
LLFU
z
PIPE JOINT
NOTE: BAFFLES TO BE INSTALLED V FROM PIPE JOINT
F ry
n ry
EVERY OTHER SEGMENT, ALTERNATING SIDES. TOTAL
,Z.,
o e
m o
NUMBER OF BAFFLES = 8. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT
-- -- CUTSHEET FOR BAFFLES TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
m ti z
a
o
o
DATE
G
06/18/2019
i
V
DRAWN BY
L7
A. DALE
PN
O
DESIGNED BY
N.TT..S
•
• ?
J. HORTON
• =
-ECKED BY
• p
C.TODD
SCALE
AS SHOWN
• U
a
� o
� S
0
STEEL PLATE BAFFLE NTS
—
b 7 gg °v000 oo o Soo
/..
EVSVNG / °25'PoLE° ✓/°/ / ° \`
I V
/ 9
)CENTERLINE
9`
/ ° /J3 SOS OTEiJ f-USEOUEELDUKEEER ( l
BRIDGE IS OSEA COMPLET ENERGY]
TH o ° ° ° // / � / .5;.� • .•�° / WORK IN IS AREA IS COMPLETE.
-two, 1,.+ A.
_ � I I \ o p
f
05
1" = 40' CULVERT PLAN VIEW - ORSON OAKS LANE
11,=40'
c
N
OD �
,-a
cgo Y (
z � z f
LW Q O e
LLJ
U
J O Z e
Uz u J
J U)J(
LLJ z
Z n�
<
U
-a
o O
Z
0
F
(
IOB N0.
41946
SHEET NO,
C-416

Preston Park
Attachment Sheet
Attachment B:
Updated PCN
October 25, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0441

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
0 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Preston Park
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Pineville
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Cranford Single Family Lots LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
32957-18
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Susan Rosenblatt
3d.
Street address:
136 Main Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Pineville, NC 28134
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-363-1368
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Dan Zurlo
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services
5c. Street address:
550 E Westinghouse Blvd
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e. Telephone no.:
717-460-3466
5f. Fax no.:
N/A
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
20508102, 20508109, 20502387, 20507119, 20502118
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.093044 Longitude:-80.893479
1 c. Property size:
134.8 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Sugar Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
Lower Catawba 03050103
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists of agricultural land, deciduous forest, woody wetlands, and a maintained power line right-of-way. On -site elevations ranges
from 530-560 feet above mean sea level (Figure 2). Land cover within the project area consists of deciduous forest, agricultural land and woody
wetlands.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.87
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,608
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to construct a single-family residential subdivision.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See additional sheets (Attachment D)
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: See response to 5b in this section
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Dan zurlo
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina wetland Services
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The site was field verified by David Shaeffer of the USACE on June 15, 2018. A PJD was submitted for this site, however due the results of the field
verification we would like to withdraw the PJD application and re -submit an AJD application, Action ID: SAW-2018-00862 (Attachment B).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
See additional sheets (Attachment D)
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Fill
Small -Basin Wetland
Yes
DWQ
0.04
W2 P
Fill
Small -Basin Wetland
Yes
DWQ
0.06
W3 P
Fill
Small -Basin Wetland
Yes
DWQ
0.15
W4 P
Fill
Small -Basin Wetland
Yes
DWQ
0.04
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.29
2h. Comments:
All wetland impacts will be to isolated, non-404 jurisdictional wetlands. Impacts fall below the NC DEQ IWGP 100000 notification threshold of 0.5 acre.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream B
PER
Corps
4
11
S2 P
Fill
Stream B
PER
Corps
4
80
S3 P
Rip Rap Armoring
Stream B
PER
Corps
4
27
S4 T
Dewatering
Stream B
PER
Corps
4
80
S5 P
Culvert
Stream B
PER
Corps
4
68
S6 P
Rip Rap Armoring
Stream B
PER
Corps
4
34
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
300
3i. Comments:
Permanent stream impacts will total 220 If. Loss of waters will total 159 If.
Rip rap armoring of the inlets/outlets of the proposed culverts will result in 61 If of permanent impacts, however this is not considered a loss of waters
requiring mitigation, as the rip rap will be placed at grade within the stream.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indiv dually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5of10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See additional sheets (Attachment D).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See additional sheets (Attachment D).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
0 Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ 0 Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
0 Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
0 Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
159 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Stream B scored a 'low' on NCSAM due to the primary use of the riparian area and watershed as agricultural (Attachment I and J).
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6of10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes OX No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑R No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
24 %
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The overall imperviousness of this project is <24%. Therefore, a stormwater management plan is not required.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes 0 No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8of10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 28 .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater be to the Charlotte sewage treatment facility.
will piped nearest -Mecklenburg
Page 9of10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
0 Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A field assessment of the on -site habitat was conducted, and a review by the USFWS-Asheville Field Office was requested. The Asheville Field Office
determined that endangered species habitat exists on -site and recommended a targeted species survey (Attachment L).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See NC SHPO concurrence (Attachment M)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
A floodplain development permit will be obtained from the local FEMA administrator (CLOMR), however no fill in streams or wetlands within the FEMA
100-year floodplain is proposed.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FRIM No. 3710455100K
Dan Zurlo
7.29.19
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/AgIM Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10of10

Preston Park
Attachment Sheet
October 25, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0441
Attachment C
Additional Sheets to PCN

Additional Supplemental Information
Preston Park
Pre -Construction Notification For Activities Affecting Waters of the United States of the
State of North Carolina
133e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used.
The Preston Park project involves grading and construction of a proposed single family
residential development, along with associated access roads. Proposed activities in waters of
the U.S. include two culverted stream crossings (S1-S6) (Attachment H, updated 10.1.19).
Crossing 1
Impacts include the installation of three 45"x 29", elliptical, 39-If reinforced concrete pipes (RCP)
that will result in 91-If of impact to Stream B (S1-S2) and an additional 27-If of rip rap (S3) to
stabilize the inlet and outlet of the pipes. 11-If of Stream B will be piped, between the culvert
outlet and currently existing crossing (S1). The 80-If of Stream B upstream of the existing
crossing angles away from the proposed culvert, and as a result will be filled (S2). Drainage in
the area will be diverted to the inlet of the proposed culvert. The proposed culvert cannot be
angled to match the stream as this would require a full re -design and grading on the adjacent
parcel, not owned by the applicant. Due to project time constraints, these options would be
unfeasible (Attachment H, Detail Sheet 1, updated 10.1.19).
The proposed culverted crossing will involve two additional pipes to handle bankfull flows. They
will have a steel plate baffle system installed at the bankfull height (Attachment H, Detail Sheet
2). An additional 40-If (of 80 If of total dewatering impacts) of temporary impact will result from a
pump around operation to dewater the stream (S4). Permanent impacts from Crossing 1 to
Stream B will total 118-If, however only the impacts associated with the pipe installation and fill
will result in a loss of waters (91-If), requiring mitigation, as the riprap stabilization will be keyed
into the bed and bank of the stream and not alter the original bed grade.
Crossing 2
Impacts include the installation of three 48", 68-If RCPs that will result in 68-If of impact to
Stream B (S5) and an additional 34-If of rip rap (S6) to stabilize the inlet and outlet of the pipes.
The proposed culverted crossing will involve two additional pipes to handle bankfull flows. They
will have a steel plate baffle system installed at the bankfull height (Attachment H, Detail Sheet
2). An additional 40-If (of 80 If of total dewatering impacts) of temporary impact will result from a
pump around operation to dewater the stream (S4). Permanent impacts from Crossing 2 to
Stream B will total 102-If, however only the impacts associated with the pipe installation will
result in a loss of waters (68-I0, requiring mitigation, as the riprap stabilization will be keyed into
the bed and bank of the stream and not alter the original bed grade (Attachment H, Detail Sheet
2, updated 10.1.19).

All on -site Jurisdictional wetlands will be avoided. The only permanent wetland impacts will be
to 0.29 acre of isolated, non-404 jurisdictional wetlands. These impacts fall below the NC IWGP
100000 notification threshold.
Equipment to be used includes a track hoe, dump truck, pumps, various hand tools, possibly a
crane to move construction material such as reinforced bars of steel, and concrete buckets to
place concrete. Typical heavy equipment will be used in the grading operations (bulldozers,
excavators, dump trucks, graders, etc.).
135a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including
all prior phases) in the past?
Yes.
65b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Section 404 and AJD verification pursuant to NWP 12 was issued for site tax parcel 2050810 on
March 6, 2014 (SAW-2014-0393). The NWP 12 verification expired March 18, 2017, and the
AJD verification expired March 6, 2019 (Attachment E). A new AJD request will be submitted
with this permit application to verify the current wetland boundaries on the site.
131a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in
designing project.
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S., the project limits were delineated for
streams and wetlands prior to site design. All on -site Jurisdictional wetlands will be avoided,
while the only wetlands to be impacted are classified as isolated, non-404 Waters of the State.
Permanent impacts to Stream B total 118-If. 91-If of impacts to Stream B are considered a loss
of waters and will require compensatory mitigation.
A "No Build" alternative was considered. Since the purpose of the project is to construct a
residential development, a "No Build" option would not meet any of the project goals.
Preferred Site Design:
The site was designed to minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. and to accommodate the
overhead clearance requirements for the existing Duke Energy powerline right-of-way. The two
crossings have designed to minimize impacts to Stream B as pipes laid in the stream bed will be
buried by 20% of their diameter to allow for the passage of both water and aquatic life during

low flow events. Additionally, pipes installed to handle bankfull flows will have a steel plate
baffle system installed at the bankfull height (Attachment H, Detail Sheet 2). These will only
allow flow to during bankfull events and will not alter the natural stream channel width.
The location of Crossing 1 is dictated by the available access to Industrial Drive, as only one
unoccupied, narrow parcel exists connecting the site to this street. Impacts to the headwaters
of Stream B, located at the southern end of this narrow parcel, are unavoidable as an on -site
access must cross to provide ingress/egress to residents and emergency vehicles.
Crossing 2 is necessary to connect the eastern and western portions of the development.
Stream B essentially bisects the site so any road connecting the two sides would inevitably have
to cross it. Therefore, impacts associated with Crossing 2 are unavoidable. Furthermore, in the
originally submitted version of this permit, Crossing 2 was proposed to be a bottomless, arched
crossing, with no impact to Stream B. However, as this option was further investigated, it
became clear that this option would not be feasible. Constructing the bottomless culvert would
put an extreme financial burden on the project, and it is likely the project would not be viable
with the construction of the bottomless crossing. Therefore, a more conventional, culverted
crossing was chosen for Crossing 2.
One temporary crossing of Stream B will be constructed to support transportation of
construction equipment. This crossing will be a temporary bridge and not result in any
additional impact.
All on -site Jurisdictional wetlands will be avoided. The only permanent wetland impacts will be
to 0.29 acre of isolated, non-404 jurisdictional wetlands. These impacts fall below the NC IWGP
100000 notification threshold.
D1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts
through construction techniques.
Erosion and sedimentation control measures will be properly installed and inspected in
accordance with the latest NPDES permit. Erosion and sedimentation BMPs will be installed
prior to construction. Water will be diverted around the work area to prevent sedimentation of
downstream aquatic resources and all work will be conducted in the dry. Impacts will be
minimized by strict enforcement of Best Management Practices for the protection of surface
waters, restrictions against the staging of equipment in or adjacent to waters of the US. This
project will follow all conditions of NWP 29 and WGC 4139. All temporary impacts will be
removed, and channel bed and banks will be restored to pre-existing elevations. Equipment to
be used includes a track hoe, dump truck, pumps, various hand tools, possibly a crane to move
construction material such as reinforced bars of steel, and concrete buckets to place concrete.
Typical heavy equipment will be used in the grading operations (bulldozers, excavators, dump
trucks, graders, etc.).

Preston Park
Attachment Sheet
Attachment D
NCSAM Forms
October 25, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0441

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
user manual version z.-i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Preston Park
3. Applicantlowner name: Cranford Familv Lots
5. County: Mecklenburg
Date of evaluation: 1/21/19
Assessor name/organization: Carolina Wetland Services
Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Sugar Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.093146,-80.892910
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream B 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 380
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑AL ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑ll ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water— assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
❑A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
®A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes []No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check
all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
W N
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
F 2
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
o
U)C
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
Y
71
Sand bottom
®C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
t
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
2
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate— assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11 a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
®B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11 d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach —whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ®Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Basef low Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (z 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider `leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ®D ®D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If jjqrie ;of the following stressors occurs on either bank check here and skip to Metric 22. El
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ®A ®A Row crops ,
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:

Stream Site Name Preston Park
Stream Category Pbl
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 1/21/19
Assessor Name/Organization Carolina Wetland Services
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Stream -side Habitat
LOW
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

Preston Park
Attachment Sheet
Attachment E
NCDMS Acceptance
October 25, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0441

ROY COOPER
Gdldffnar
MtCHAEL S. REGAN
sear"y
TiM BAUMGARTNER
nvernr
Susan Rosenblatt
Cranford Single Family Lots LLC
136 Main Street
Pineville, NC 28134
.44
�✓y�..`g.�yv yt.
NORTH CAROUNA
Envfronmenfd Quality
October 1, 2019
Expiration of Acceptance: 4/1/2020
Project: Preston Park County: Mecklenburg
This acceptance letter replaces and revises one issue July 1, 2019.
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin Impact Location Impact Type I Impact Quantity
(8-digit HUC) i
Catawba 03050103 Warm Stream I 159
'DMS proposes to utilize the Catawba 03 Expanded Service Area to meet the mitigation requirement.
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
tAet
B Stanfill
anagement Supervisor
cc: Dan Zurlo, agent
North Carorma Depwiment of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
2r7 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919,707.8976

Preston Park
Attachment Sheet
Attachment F
Updated JD Map
October 25, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0441

Jurisdictional Wetland
" M
Wetland EE I ;
CM
0.35 acreie�
°
oCJ
= O
z
Legend
Rt v
_
z
d 6.11
Project Limits (134.8 ac.)
;0 •L
=�
= a.
Perennial Stream
v
d n. 3:
Wetlands
;
Isolated Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetland
•''
---� Culvert
a.
Culvert Openings
FEMA Existing 100yr Floodplain
a
ODP Data Point
♦SCP Stream Classification Point
�--► Photo Location and Direction
Indicates Flow
FIGURE NO.
475 0 950 Feet
/

Preston Park
Attachment Sheet
Attachment G
Photopage
October 25, 2019
CWS Project No. 2018-0441

h
r

Preston Park October 25, 2019
Attachment C: Photopage CWS Project No. 2018-0441
Photograph 3. View of Stream B, in the vicinity of the second crossing (S4-S6)
Photopage 2 of 2