20191471 Ver 1_Shoreline Stabilization_20191024

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
M Division of Water Resources
15A NCAC 02H OSOO — Water Quality Certification, Shoreline Stabilization
FORM: SSGP 02-2017
Shoreline Stabilization Application Form
Three copies of the application (including attachments) and the a j:g�Ltlon fee should be sent to:
if sending via US Postal Service If sending via delivery service (UPS, Fed Ex, eIC40
Karen Higgins Karen Higgins
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
A. Applicant Information NCAC 02h .05
1. Owner Information
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
N
QW
16m J
Fax Number:
2. Agent/ Contact Person Information
I'm
A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be attached if the Agent has
signed this application form. (A form can be downloaded here:
�,jtt 'c#( -_1F i Irgggl ryl L L rq�i SAIA� E AGENT AUTHOR!Z ggE _ _L qp_:�/EeL _L
Name:
N
Company Affiliation: 15rtemcth 5ipry_ AAA -Sun YV
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address: rc* f on e m ctn _,Y 197 G-1 MO I -
B. Project Information [15�A Nl�gL��CQ2H q5Q2fa
1. Attach a Vicinity map (i.e. street map) clearly showing the location of the property with
respect to local landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads.
2. Provide a detailed site plan showing property boundaries and proposed locations of
vegetation clearing, buildings, retaining walls, docks, impervious surfaces, rip rap, excavation
or dredging below Full Pond/ Normal Water Level elevations, and construction access
corridors. You may use the RfigffiW5UJ*N4yVq"nd of this application form.
OCT 24 2019
Water Rssoumc-s
FORM: SSGP 02-2017 loormitting Page 1 of 3

3. Attach a photograph of the shoreline/ buffer proposed to be stabilized. (Include a scale of
some sort- a yard stick, shovel handle, etc.)
4. Location oftheproperty (where work is to be conducted) U County: f1 r" Nearest Town: LAeLu t �.
Lake/ river/ ocean adjacent to property: Lake Lc- v--P—
Property size (acres): o _j ;
Subdivision name or site address (include phase/lot number):
b21 Rbl mev' Q& La1CP t.l •rf- MC, a 9-714(,2
Directions to site - please include road names and numbers, landmarks, etc.:
Latitude (in decimal degrees) 35.q X,8: Ili Longitude (decimal degrees) i 9 75ap1
S. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application
(residential, undeveloped, etc.):
6. Describe proposed work (include discussion as to how hardening of shoreline has been
avoided, or why it is necessary):
-IOU ©� +hc c�4ob y t e- D 2fe- . c ey-mnwv of S/PL6rYr (I .
7. Will work be conducted from land? From water? ❑
8. Total amount of impacts below the normal pool lake level / Normal Water Level
Permanent impacts (including all excavation, backfill, rip rap, retaining walls, etc.) in square feet:
Temporary impacts in square feet:
9. Total amount of impacts above the normal pool lake level / Normal Water Level and 50 feet
land -ward
Permanent impacts (including back fill, excavation, rip rap, retaining walls, etc.) in square feet:
200sic
Temporary impacts (temporary clearing, construction corridor) in square feet:
10. Please describe the vegetation above the normal pool lake level/ Normal Water Level and 50
feet landward to be impacted (number of trees, for instance): ^e r ount&
allaI 111 -V'ty
11. Sig ature
to
gner/Agent's Signature* [15A NCAC 02 .05O2(fi1 Date
'Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the owner is provided.
FORM: SSGP 02-2017 Page 2 of 4

August 30, 2019
Authorization is hereby given for Freeman Stone Masonry to be our agent of record
as related to permitting issues for replacing our seawall at 321 Holmes Road, Lake
Lure, NC 28746
Kenneth E. and Jean R. Frick
313 Glendalyn Place
Spartanburg, SC 29302
H: 864-585-1596
C: 864-542-4261

I -
'Je
Your location to 321 Holmes Rd, Lake Lure, NC 28746 Drive 8.7 miles, 20 min
Map data t-1201 9 ION ft
https,/Avww.google.com/maps/dir/35.4615296,-82.2910976/321 +Holmes+Rd,+Lake+Lure.+NC+287461@35.4300539,-82.1993403,15ztdata=!4mg!4m., , 1/1

- - MT31 ivNcozmm
m
a2 a+r�
��� 2�LiZ#Pt%af�1 � ��CiY �SCe25S'Cj.
C
CAR® J
nq��l
SSl'o 4i9 i
4 999
19856
IN
es ai
I
r D
�n 4P"t:9dt�s° 9�
-jnt i� vne
i a4L'^+Yy is oLsnej pesErr!t�S+si!icvJ:'.hti trr,>%. o'?5ae �::�.
5�.'t�y'i'L�rer;Ms uit a Lake Lre a the 9321,0,aW m,W.
A coz:cn ci tT•"s cfa7ert} (� :�Ihn a 3xy. r!�r..
��c
ar c4 t.3z wc3 a Fa�+^ae3
r rise i
LWIlm 0
dry*' -ides,LELID um
r
Nffift 46 � e9 Aexa G3
AW Y11F. FC°
q i pi -A
mllmmm 1pwmmFffmp2ll.
loyar in, ZIN11 UVI
20 0 10 20 40 6'
9CtaR1 � GID�Itl1
h� Sf34�
R9a
ii1RB8
SEAWALL DESIGN FOR
JEAN AND KENNETH FRICK
321 HUM RD. LAKE LURE, NC 28746
PROPERTY PLAT
ENGINEERED BY
DATE
SHEET
!QM B. WARNER, PE, PLLC
(EXISTING)
199coUNTRYWoMDRN
REVE REV
FOREST CfIY, NC 2W
REV
SCALE•l'=40'
PE NO I OM COMPANY NO PAW

Waters o
.�a Lake Lure
NEW MASONRY WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH /
ON LAKE FACE, TOP AND 6" ON SHORE SIDE, /
BACKFILLED TO WITHIN 3" OF TOP. /
APPROXIMATE LENGTH 37'-g'
4 ound iron _e J
® _ F S S /Lj?' 9
DISTURBED AREA = 300 SQ. FT. y
a _ L 9 99
19856
R®C/// �i/ � B 1 1 Re
%
°Q®%
° )
R®Ck
��✓ o
all
�� �,
C7 N,
orch
Ti 71-�
£ Ya
a®®roe.r
U P'l WA s e t
J a�R
SEAWALL DESIGN FOR PROPERTY PLAT I ENGtNEEREDBY DATE 82&19 eau cx'Eu`eu°�r�inn� ra+UsT anecc zrs
REV SHEET s�urtvasvuTv�wEu�tamxe�ss voq, rcanr�s�mmmvc�ecauu.c
JEAN AND KENNETH FRICK KIMB•WAPoVEfi,PE.PLLC 2
(PROPOSED) 139COUNTRYWOOOmm REV eav*¢nruv�eaEssvaTxsevmaTaoa*ucas nwTTMa�e a pa ra"ev masr�uaam
REV u�corumcaucc� n�esaEwxca can v�nnnEoeacaweennve
321HOLMESRD. LAt�LURE, NC28746 FORESTCR,NC2n Atv rom• aaauvuasensummvr�a vcauna�avu� s+ +u�aaassruar.mrnafea
SCALE-1'=40 PE NO19959fAMPANYNOP•1583 liU5T0TWAT "=0Fl--DE=e tM`°�naa

SLOPE GRADE AWAY FROM
WALL AT WALL
T.O.W. IS PROPOSED TO BE TWO
FEET ABOVE THE EXISTING WALL.
THE ESTIMATED WALL HEIGHT IS
&-8" OR LESS.
OPEN BOTTOM BOND BEAM IN
TOP COURSE WITH (2) #5 REBARS
AT EDGES AS SHOWN
COMPACTED SOIL FILL
STUCCO FINISH -LAKE FACE,
TOP AND 6" ON BACK
12" STEEL REINFORCED SOLID
FILLED CMU WALL
12" OF WASHED STONE
HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT -
LADDER TYPE REINFORCING IN
EVERY OTHER COURSE
VERTICAL. REINFORCEMENT-#4
BARS IN EVERY OTHER BLOCK
VOID (16" OC) CENTERED IN VOID
2" PVC DRAIN PIPE IN FIRST JOINT
ABOVE 990.0 AT 8 FT. INTERVALS
45 REBAR DOWEL 30" X 6", 8" OC
TOWARD BACK OF VOID
LAKE EL 990.0'
COMPACTED SOIL FILL F
MIN AT FACE OF WALL
#4 BARS 2'-6" LONG SPACED 16" OC
3'4" X 12" 350OPSI CONCRETE
FOOTING W! 12" DEEP X 17 WIDE
KEYWAY. REINFORCED WI444
BARS CONTINUOUS,10' APART,
AND 3" FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING,
INSTALL VERTICAL #4 BARS 16"
LONG APPROXIMATELY CENTERED
IN KEY SPACED 16" OC..
WALL SECTION (8'-8" TALL)
SCALE - 3I8" =1 °-0°
M
m
a
Y
C.)
d,L
s
w
z
w

MCA Ro
�14,
���i
4 AL �f69
19856 9
IN
i�1161 W i \`���
FOR MASONRY WALLS
DESIGN INFORMATION (APPLIES TO ALL PAGES)
THE DESIGNS PRESENTED ON THIS DRAWING INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM VALUES.
VERIFICATION OF THE DESIGN ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS DURING CONSTRUCTION IS
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY NOT THE DESIGN ENGINEER.
CONCRETE (WHEN APPLICABLE)
MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
FOOTINGS & WALLMLABS
3500/3500 PSF
DENSITY
150 PCF
PERFORMING SLUMP
41NCHES
SOIL (WHEN APPLICABLE)
MINIMUM SOIL BEARING PRESSURE
2500 PSF
MINIMUM SOIL INTERNAL FRICTION ANGLE
30 DEG
COMPACTED BACKFILL DENSITY
SLIDING COEFFICIENT
.35u
IMPORTANCE FACTORS (WHEN APPLICABLE)
WIND
1.0
SNOW
1.0
SEISMIC
1.0
DESIGN LOADS (WHEN APPLICABLE)
ROOF OL 1 SNOW
15120 PSF
FLOOR & DECKS DL / LL
10140 PSF
WIND
100 MPH
EXPOSURE CATEGORY
C
SEISMIC DESIGN (WHEN APPLICABLE)
REINFORCING (WHEN APPLICABLE) SEISMIC USE GROUP 1
ALL REINFORCING STEEL IS TO BE ASTM A615 GRADE 60, SITE CLASSIFICATION D
FABRICATED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318. SPECTRAL RESPONSE
ALL LAPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 36 BAR DIAMETERS. ACCELERATION SDS 39% g, SD121 % g
STRUCTURALSYSTEM MOMENTFRAME
SEISMIC BASE SHEAR Vx=1.ik, Vy=1.lk
GENERAL NOTES: ANALYSIS PROCEDURE EQVLNT LTRL FRCE
1. GLOBAL STABILITY AND SEISMIC LOADING HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED BV THIS DESIGN.
2. HYDROSTATIC LOADING IS NOT CONSIDERED IN THIS ANALYSIS. SUFFICIENT DRAINAGE MUST BE
PROVIDED (PER PLAN DETAILS WHERE APPLICABLE) SUCH THAT HYDROSTATIC LOADING IS DISSIPATED.
THE TYPICAL WALL SECTIONS PRESENTED IN THESE DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED TO BE
USED TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL TO TAKE THE PLACE OF AN EXISTING
DETERIORATING STONE WALL. THE NEW WALL IS TALLER THAN THE EXISTING WALL
AND SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE OLD WALL.
z
0
u-
E5
w
a
rn
0
L N
LLtuz
�
= z
LL
a
y Z JW
0 Q
Q
w�
7

��'
Y 4 ��
°
� � .i
�
/ � #
M1
s� �1�� t �
t ,t;
w� �}
i —r. � � � ���` airy
..-
i
�
..Ky_ ..
,Ft� � ,.
_� �
',,,., "'' 'A,,
Y _i�a _ _ '�'�.
_ �'�'.:
�-

�� ,• •`�'r .i w '-may �. LJ ♦ �� � '� � A f •' •�i � !' �^ ..�V
JA •. ,, +. �. ;' � y , -,�. tom..
Y.
.� IPA, ` . t .` . �.^ y.� '► /6%r`� ��
r;
dillU
l
r