20191512 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191031

DR
02*10n of Water R"Ourc"
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
September 29, 2018 Ver 3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance into the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned *
Version#*
20191512
1
Is a payment required for this project?*
* No payment required
What amout is owed?*
* Fee received
r $240.00
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
r $570.00
Reviewing Office* Select Project Reviewer*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone] Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnsonl
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Village at Rocky River
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Nicholas Parker
1 b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
10/31/2019
Nearest Body of Water
Bearskin Creek
Basin
Yadkin-PeeDee
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
34.990132
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Union
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Longitude:
-80.610546
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
P Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r- Regional General Permit (RGP)
r- Standard (IP)
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]

1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
fJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - E)iress
r" Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r- Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r- Yes r- No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r- Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner FT Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Harrist Teeter Properties, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
3830/784
2c. Responsible party:
Keith Costenoble
2d.Address
Street Address
701 Crestdale Road
Address Line 2
CRY
Matthews
Fbstal / Zip Cade
28105
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Nicholas Parker
State / Rwince / Fegbn
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
r Yes r No
ryes r No

3b. Business Name:
Green Street Land Co., LLC
3c.Address
Street Address
5615 Potter Road
Address Line 2
City
Mathews
Fbstal / Zip Cade
28104
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
n r pa r ke r@a mi cu se n g. co m
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Nick Creidler
4b. Business Name:
Headwater Environmental, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
1844 Sir Tyler Drive
Address Line 2
aty
Wilmington
Postal / Zip Cbde
28405
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
B4f.Agent Authorization Letter.pdf
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if approprbte)
Village at Rocky River
1 c. Nearest municipality / town
Monroe
2. Project Identification
State / Rwince / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:
State / Rwince / Pegbn
NC
Country
New Hanover
4e. Fax Number:
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
09348013A;09348013B
55.07
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Rocky River Road
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Pegion
Monroe
NC
Fbstal / Zip Code
Country
28110
Union
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Bearskin Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
73.4KB

3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Yadkin -Pee Dee
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030401050501
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is currently wooded. Three wetland areas and one stream are located on site. Wetland A is located on the northern portion of the site. Wetland B is located on the southern
portion of the site, abutting Stream A. Stream A, located on the southwestern portion of the site, has intermittent flow and drains off -site to the northwest. According to Monroe Code of
Ordinances, Code §158.06, a 50-foot vegetative buffer is required along Stream A. Wetland C is located on the central portion of the site. Several mounds of dirt and vegetative debris
are located throughout Wetland C. The wetland and stream locations were verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on November 27, 2018 (SAW-2006-40743).
The site is situated in a developing area of Union County. An elementary school is located north of the site. Wooded land, agricultural land, and dwellings are located east of the site.
Weddington Road bounds the site to the south followed by a church. North Rocky River Road bounds the site to the west. Wooded and agricultural land are located further west.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
SAW-2006-40743
Project History Upload
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
C4d.Topo Map.pdf
878.56KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
C4e.Printed Soil Map.pdf 1.29MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.67 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
950feet
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision consisting of single-family homes. As the population of Union County continues to grow, new housing
accommodations are needed to keep up with an increasing population. Access to the proposed subdivision shall be located on the north site of Weddington Road and on the east side
of North Rocky River Road.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project includes development of a 184-lot residential subdivision consisting of single-family homes. The proposed residential development will generally avoid the
Wetland Area B and Stream A. There will be two access roads to the proposed subdivision. The access roads will extend north from Weddington Road and east from North Rocky River
Road.
Impacts to Wetland A on the northern portion of the site are necessary to build a required stormwater pond (BMP) for the proposed subdivision. The proposed 0.44-acre wetland impact
utilizes the lowest suitable location at the site. Surface runoff naturally flows into the BMP. Placement of the BMP on other areas of the site are not feasible because of higher elevations
which would not allow for surface runoff to be captured by the BMP. In order to avoid impacts to the stream and associated buffer, placement of the BMP on the southern portion of the
site was not considered.
Timbering of the site will utilize heavy machinery and chainsaws to clear the project areas for development. Bulldozers, backhoes, and excavators will be used in the grading of the site,
building of the BMPs, and other aspects associated with the development of a residential subdivision. Additionally, pick-up trucks will be utilized on site by contractors and construction
workers.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
C4j. Project Drawing Wetlands Impacts and Cross Sections.pdf 778.57KB
Village at Rocky River Old Site Plans (5-29-18).pdf 629.49KB
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
r No
Comments:
Wetland delineation completed by Headwater Environmental in September 2018.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
f• Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2006-40743
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
r Unknown

Name (if known): Paul Pascarosa; Nick Creidler
Agency/Consultant Company: Headwater Environmental, Inc.
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
PJD (SAW-2006-40743) issued by Bryan Roden Reynolds of the USACE on November 27, 2018.
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
SAW-2006-40743 (signed PJD)-signed.pdf 614.67KB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
B Yes f No
7b. If yes, explain.
Development of the residential subdivision will consist of five (5) phases. By building in phases, the developer is managing their budget by ensuring completed houses sell before they
invest in building new houses within the proposed subdivision.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
R Wetlands r Streams -tributaries r Buffers
j— Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason(?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W.*71
2d. W. name * 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
tff:]
stormwater pond P Pine Flat Wetland A Yes Corps 0.440
7� ] (acres)
29. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.440
2h. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.440
Permanent wetland impacts Will occur to build a required stormwater pond (BMP). The location of the BMP was chosen because it is located at one of
the two possible lowest locations on site which will allow runoff to naturally flow into the BMP. The other location for the BMP would have impacted
Stream A and the associated stream buffer. Site plans were altered as to not impact the stream and buffer associated on the southern portion of the
site.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The current project plans minimize impacts to aquatic resources onsite. Original site plans designed streets and residential lots through Wetland
Areas A and C and a road crossing through Stream A and associated 50-foot buffer. A third access point to the subdivision was located on the east
side of Rocky River Road. Stormwater BMPs were depicted on the southern portion of the site, abutting Stream A.
The second set of site plans did away with the third site access road along Rocky River Road and also eliminated the stream crossing. However, these
site plans still depicted residential lots throughout Wetland Areas A and C. Stormwater BMPs were located on the northeastern portion of the site and
on the southern portion of the site, abutting Stream A.
The third set of site plans relocated the southern BMP along Weddington Road. Impacts to Wetlands A were minimized.
The current plans have relocated tree preservation areas to coincide with the wetlands. A BMP was added to the northern portion of the site, within
the footprint of Wetland A. Permanent impacts to Wetland A consists of 0.44-acre which include a BMP, street, and portions of a residential lot. The
street is necessary to access adjacent lots. Residential lots have been removed from Wetland B.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Silt fencing will be installed prior to construction along the perimeter of the wetlands and stream to minimize sedimentation into these resources.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?

r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
In lieu of financial payment to the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services, Headwater recommend restoring the wetland area impacted from the placement of relic fill material.
Wetland Impacts 0.44 acre
Proposed Restoration 0.38 acre
Net wetland impacts 0.06 acre
After restoration activity is complete, wetland impacts will be less than 1/10 acre. Therefore, financial contribution to the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services is not proposed
The fill mounds and vegetative debris are to be removed from the wetland area. The wetland is then to be graded to create a concave feature that will naturally receive runoff and hold
water. Since Wetland C is a PFO wetland with mature trees and a sparse understory, native saplings and herbaceous shall be planted within the wetland once the area has been
graded.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHVVT)
r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
fJ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
r Local Government IJ State
State Stormwater Programs
r Phase II
r HWQ or ORW
Comments:
Stormwater management plan will be submitted to DWR for review.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
r Coastal Counties
fJ Other Stormwater permit to be submitted and will follow applicable local
and state guidelines.
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15ANCAC 2B.0200)?*
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Additional development not anticipated. Applicable local and state buffer requirements to be followed. Negative impacts to downstream water quality
not anticipated.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r Unknown
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS IPaC
Consultation Documentation Upload
G5j.IPaC Species List_091019.pdf 615.18KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
G7c.SHPO Map.pdf 599.8KB
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Online Flood Service Center: Map Panel # 3710541500J dated October 16, 2008.
Miscellaneous
Comments
Detailed restoration and mitigation plan is attached with this submission.
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
20181062A.Restoration Plan. pdf 3.94MB

Signature
m By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Nicholas Creidler
Signature
cy�us�dllld r��'/�
Date
10/31 /2019

Jurisdictional Determination Request
UNNOMMMMEN
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION','
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 13 the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name Additionally, by signing this document, I
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑Authorized Agents authorize Headwater Environmental, Inc. to
c7 �1e %Z serve as my agent regarding the wetland
Date
Si
assessment.
E. REASON FOR Jll REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
Q
'gned to avoid all aquatic resources.
1 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels oNNned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

1:
1V
w �=
• �� BM
64
1. f O
a Tr 1 655
J 640
GF
Legend
Site boundary?.
Feet
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 `"� l �• Ji; .�1 ,` ����
FIGURE 1
Headwater
SOURCE: LOCATION MAP
ENVIRONMENTAL INC. USGS
7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Harris Teeter Site
Monroe, North Carolina (1989) North Rocky River Road
Date: 9/14/2018 Controur Interval = 10 feet Monroe, North Carolina
/\ HEnv Project # 2018106A
Prepared by: NJC 'F 1 inch = 2,000 feet

Grace
2ng
CmB Ch
102
CmB TuB
•f-
/ �+
r,
Cm8 I
f r
l
Ri
n
6dB2
TbR? z<
aG m g
Cm8 Lid
W2 r
&JR7
i
102 • _ ��
CmB
f l �• 1
Legend h92
Site boundary 1pI
+ 1
F i
SOURCE: FIGURE 2
Headwater ARCHIVED SOIL SURVEY MAP
ENVIRONMENTAL i N C. Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) Harris Teeter Site
Archived Soil Survey North Rocky River Road
Date: 9/27/2018 Union County, North Carolina (1996) Monroe, North Carolina
/\ HEnv Project # 2018106A
Prepared by: NJC

-
E m
E N
b014Z ON 'SM3NIVW
OVO`d `dalo0 l S 19S
7n ' M ONbI IT=NIS NT=N5
VWO21V7{- AON'IOMNOW
2 UNN Jl�l�ON IV ADVATA
w
o
�
-_
-
� $
N
�
N a
N N
_ c y
� — o
U
o
O
-
m
BvB.
i amp
e �g3S fi88
3tMYYY
'22
_ r `
ly �,
1 _
I
0
\ 3
"
i ( �`♦ ♦ -- ---
_ __
16 4Ft��a.
I
I i
rm
1
I r
I
\ _ I
1 C
Il .II 11�I�
m
_i
VIAit
1
ON
i_
a I
so
m
oil
_
ga$gya
_ I
�
eggrys

M,
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
10'-0"
00
I
LO
41'-4"
20'-0"
r
5'-0"
TYPICAL LOT DIAGRAM
BLOCK LENGTH TABLE
BLOCK
DESCRIPTION
LENGTH
STREET A
END OF PHASE TO STREET G
315 FT
STREET A
STREET G TO STREET F
380 FT
STREET A
STREET F TO STREET E
849 FT
STREET A
STREET E TO STREET E
714 FT
STREET A
STREET E TO STREET D
290 FT
STREET A
STREET D TO STREET C
170 FT
STREET A
STREET C TO STREET B
686 FT
STREET A
STREET B TO STREET F
813 FT
STREET A
STREET F TO END OF ROAD
67 FT
STREET B
ROCKY RIVER ROAD TO STREET A
225 FT
STREET B
STREET A TO STREET C
295 FT
STREET B
STREET C TO STREET D
170 FT
STREET B
STREET D TO STREET E
290 FT
STREET C
STREET A TO STREET B
414 FT
STREET C
STREET B TO STREET D
795 FT
STREET D
STREET A TO STREET B
414 FT
STREET D
STREET B TO STREET C
766 FT
STREET D
STREET C TO STREET F
160 FT
STREET D
STREET F TO STREET A
428 FT
STREET E
STREET A TO STREET B
414 FT
STREET E
STREET B TO STREET A
159 FT
STREET F
STREET A TO STREET D
354 FT
STREET F
STREET D TO STREET A
290 FT
STREET G
ROCKY RIVER ROAD TO STREET D
490 FT
STREET G
STREET D TO STREET A
Jul FT
STREET G
STREET A TO END OF PHASE
— FT
TOTAL
9,989 FT
SITE PLAN DATA TABLE
Original Parcel ID Number(s).
09348013 A & 09348013 B
Total Acreage
50.19
Total Square Feet
2,398,884
Principal Uses(s)
Single -Family Residential
Building Type
Detached Homes
Existing Zoning District
R40, CD
Overlay District, if Applicable
N/A
Proposed Re -Zoning
Conditional District
Percentage of Impervious Shown
+/- 63.639.
Total open space required
8.27 acres (12.5X site area)
Total open space provided
10.71 acres (21.3Z site area)
Density
3.47 units/acre
Lot Count
174
Total Number of Dwellings (Detached/Attached)
174
Mixed-use/l of live/work units)
N/A
Total Square Foot of non residential
0
Dimensional Requirements
Single -Family Detached
Lot Size Range
<6,240 SF
Lot Width
52 FT +/-
Lot Depth
120 FT t/-
Front Built -to -line
20 FT
Corner Setbacks
5 FT
Rear Setbacks
10 FT
Side Setbacks
5 FT
COPYRIGHT © 2018, AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THE CONTENTS
OF THIS DOCUMENT, OR ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS
DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT
OF AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC, IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ONLY
COPIES FROM THE ORIGINAL OF THIS DOCUMENT, AS APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE VAUD, TRUE COPIES.
SURFACE COURSE
1.5" S9.56
FINAL LIFT TO BE APPLIED AFTER 75% DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANCY OR
1 YEAR FROM INTERMEDIATE COURSE PLACEMENT (WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST).
BASE COURSE
8" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, OR 4" ACBC TYPE 1325.013
SHOULD ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT HAVE A CBR OF 6 OR
GREATER, THEN AN ALTERNATIVE BASE COURSE PAVEMENT
DESIGN MAY BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
SUBGRADE
COMPACTED SUBGRADE (SEE SECTION 1.A.18)
IILTAB3rS7.�TIINIILINILYA OX.tT19T1y,01rOOlor" 9ralfl
LOT CHART
APPROXIMATE
PHASE
52'+
TOTAL
TIME FRAME
1
58
58
2018-2019
11
50
50
2019-2020
111
66
66
2020-2021
TOTAL
174
174
-5'-0" 7'-0"
1 /4" FT
25' (MIN
TYPICAL STREET SECTION (NOT TO SCALE)
50' R/W
CURB AND GUTTER
4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK
25' (MIN
- - - - - - - -
- - — - - — - - — - -
-�'� FF�l'��l'��l'��1����1'� i 1 31 �I 1I'I 0
I� II II'I 6 I'1 5I'I o� I'I o3 I'I 0� I'I 101 I'I o I'I g9 I'I ga I'I g�i I'I g6I'I g5 I'I gA� I'I g I'I g l l g g
I'I �,� I'1121 I'1120 I'I ,,g I'I titia I'111� I'I ,16 I'I titi5 I'111� I'I ti13 ' 11� I'11ti1
10I 11,0 I I log I 11oa I ti0 10 110 1 1 1 1 I� I I I I � I I I I I I
_ _ _ _ ---� -r - --_---"— -_—1 "—_—_—_—_—__—__—_-----1
- — - — - -
- -
------STR�' -A-- -
C !�_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_--- ---_—_—_—_—_-- — — --- r � --
7 — —
-\
III III III III 1185 11 6 1 I I l a I 7_J
5� I' 5a a a I > PAS_I L_���L.
- \�
-\�'
� � � I I I III o
roa III 6� III 66 1165 116� 1163 116 61 6 5 I I I III I I III
AN
1�0 VA \, -�"� \ AMENITY TREE PRESERVATION - -
\� -
AREA
BMP
TREE PRESERVATION \ — _- - _ \ I \I 30 - t I
AREA
PHASE
2� I
NATURAL c / " i '40 \'
OPEN SPACE ``�" A'w�-
I� L
�,
3 a
1
X�
/
G
10
c4
6
i i
1
III y '
- I II g .I a I I III II J'I� JJ'—
�-� ro� \\15�
�A: \ �'� J� — --- PHASE I "--- �_..._..�- STRIF
All
pgTED 45
6
1007)
STRIPED MEDIAN
(TYP.)
/
IMPERVIOUS AREA CHART
ROARS
(S4 ff T)
SIDEWALKS
(S4 ff T)
LOTS
(S4 ff T)
A"ENITY
(S4 ff T)
PERCENT IVFERVIOUS
229,747
10.3590
1,178,269
14 7W
83 &W
• BUA RESERVE SHALL BE A 1IINIIIUM OF 150 SQ FT OR
I% OF THE LOT AREA, WHICHEVER IS OF
GRAPHIC SCALE
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
— PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED LOT LINE
PROPOSED SETBACK
1 1 1
I � 1
1 I
� 1
1 I
IT MAX. 1
_L MAX. '1
1
1 .1
1 1
1 I
1
1
1 I
� 1
1 �
STRIPED MEDIAN 1
(TYP.) 11
1
;1 ,I
I 1
BEFORE YOU DIG STO P . CALL THE NC ONE -CALL
CENTER AT 811.
IT'S THE LAW.
1
W
a '�::
all
Firm License # P-1191
7140 Weddington Road
Suite 140
Concord, NC 28027
Civil Site Design
Low Impact Development
Small -Scale Building Design
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 704.248.7951
Seals:
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Project Number:
Date:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
nO
�0
m
LLJ
~
(\
CV
�O
0
>L
O
2�
LL
U
z
m
U
z
CV
W
lL
m
U
O
�
Q�
W
W
Ln
L
U
nzCO
ct�
O
17-17-230
05-29-2018
EML
NRP
i
Revisions:
05/20/1,5ORIGINAL5UBMITTAL
or
Sheet Title:
i
Overall
'1 Site
Plan
i
Sheet No:
C-200
REFERENCE: ALL PARCEL AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION, ADJACENT PROPERTIES, PROPERTY
DIMENSIONS, TOPO, AND COORIDINATES REFERENCED FROM A SURVEY PROVIDED BY McKIM
AND CREED.

� G - .fit '•..,. � —. •- • � r
b �
:VA 0
Ida.,• TM ,,, I Y -\♦ �.
qP
41
OVA
_ � r
n
4 Y
:.:
,,. _ .>x' s ; , i ,yam' t•' � �� i
' ;;. ;, . � ram; •j � 1r � `.BPS w�.�^, � �
7 .4'��iA `�" •Art, ,�/ � °~
� �� { �.+fir � � • f � �
s+
� ' +�'. P � � L t.. � 1 "" H �'e �r 1k'f� !" S '� ..,}, Y" �, • s a r..
IL
September 10, 2019
NR Points
SLHD Center Point
• NR Individual Listing
SLDQEHD Center Point
NR Listing, Gone
SL boundaries
NRHD Cen1erPoint
Fi
Study ListBoundary
NR Boundaries
Bath 5L and Determined Eligible Boundary
❑National
Register Boundary
DOE
Points
Boundary of DestroyedARernoved NR Listing
A
Determined Eligible
SL Points
A
DOE, Gone
M SL Individual Entry
5L and DOE
A' SL and DOE entry
A
5L and DOE, Gone
! S iudy List E ntry, Gone
❑OEHD Center Point
SL and DOE, Gone
SLID 0EHD Center Point
1: 28, 890
0 0.28 0,55 1.'1 mi
0 0.42 0.85 1.7 km
NC CenterforGeographic Information & Analysis

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.2ov/nc-es/es/cog fr
In Reply Refer To: September 10, 2019
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2019-SLI-0733
Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Project Name: Village at Rocky River
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: htips://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nc_counties.html. The AFO website list includes "species of concern" species that could
potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future. Also
available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
htlps://www.fws.Gov/asheville/htmls/Troject review/Recommendations.html
Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
htlps://www.fws.gov/nc-es/Tlant�/plant survey
Northern long-eared bat Guidance
hLtps://www.fws.lzov/asheville/htmls/Troject reviewNLEB in WNC.htmI
Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
htlps://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be
requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/assessment_guidance.html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://
www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should follow
the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879 3
www.fws. o� rg atorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws. o� rg atolybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1 000-2019-E-01 879
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2019-SLI-0733
Event Code: 04EN1000-2019-E-01879
Project Name: Village at Rocky River
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: The site is located northeast and adjacent to the intersection of
Weddington Road and North Rocky River Road in Monroe, Union
County. The site consists of two parcels. According to the Union County
GIS service, the parcels are identified as Parcel Identification Numbers
(PIN) 09348013A (21.346 acres) and 09348013B (35.89 acres), and are
owned by Harris Teeter Properties, LLC.
Headwater completed a Wetland Delineation report on January 18, 2019.
The Army Corps of Engineers agreed with out wetland delineation and
issued a Jurisdictional Determination (JD). The signed JD
(SAW-2006-40743) was received on January 18, 2019. The proposed use
of the site is for a residential subdivision.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/mgps/Tlace/34.989836637764036N80.61077489429942W
.IF
Counties: Union, NC
{
d "r.
KA

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 3 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Clams
NAME STATUS
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws. o.ecp/species/3534
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws. o.ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws. o.ecp/species/3849
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Acts.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws. og v/ecp/species/1626
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 20
and Alaska.

09/10/2019
Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 1 Okm grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN1 000-2019-E-01 879 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the IOkm grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald
Non BCCgVulnerable -4-�1� i 4-- --4--- +--+ +�+— — log look
— — — ' —�11 1111 Fill I'll
Kentucky Warbler +—+— —4 1 1 -- +--+ +—+— --� 111116-
— ' -� 4- -- -- — — — —
BCC Rangewide (CON) == ==== m��
Prairie Warbler +—+— —4 1 _+�� +��� ---� —� +--- — — — — ----
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker +����— — — — — — — --�—
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Rusty Blackbird '—+— —++— —'�� +--+ +—+— — — — — —
BCC Rangewide (CON) ��
Wood Thrush +—+— —++— —+-- +--+ J= IIII IIII IIIP +--- — — — — — — — —
BCC Rangewide (CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concem.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.�zov/birds/
mana e�project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws. omi r olybirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures and/or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the IOkm grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879 5
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879 6
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

09/10/2019 Event Code: 04EN 1 000-2019-E-01 879
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. AM CoK12s of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
RIVERINE
• R4SBC