310488_Inspection_20191018

�� Departure Time:== County: O "' Region:
—
Date of Visit: .'Arrival Time: P
Owner Email:
Farm Name:
Owner Name: 11—UOVN ''t Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
3rp�ine C
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
fi
rrowto Feederrrow to Finish
lts
Other
Other
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
jeefStocker
eefFeeder
eef Brood Cow
❑ Yes U ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes [ l o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21412015 Continued
Page I of 3

[FacilityNumber: - Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment ®.—❑ NA ❑ NE
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [DNA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: —
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3 _
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
[ No
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[�K0
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
t❑'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
NE
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
h re uired buffers setbacks or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes �lo [DNA ❑ NE
10. Are t ere any q
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? Yes o/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes LCT<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
❑ Yes NA NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[�No ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists []Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Yes
❑ Waste Transfers
o
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspecti;�/No
n❑ Sludge Survey
NA ❑ NE
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes
[]No
A ❑ NE
21412015 Continued
Page 2 of 3

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Z:O�CDI
NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Lolly' ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes J 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes []#6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:! No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �To
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes 5-<O
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:/ Date: to fig'
Page 3 of 3 21412015