Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000240_Charlotte 2019 Annual Report_20191031City of Charlotte NPDES MS4 Permit Program Stormwater Management Program Plan FY2019 Annual Report Permit Number NCS000240 October 2019 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report i Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction ................................................................................................1 Section 2 Background Information ..........................................................................3 Section 3 Public Education and Outreach Program .............................................10 Section 4 Public Involvement and Participation Program ...................................25 Section 5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program ..........................36 Section 6 Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Program.....................70 Section 7 Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program .......................76 Section 8 Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Program.............................82 Section 9 Industrial Facilities Evaluation and Monitoring Program ..................99 Section 10 Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Program ........................110 Section 11 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program ..................................126 Acronyms Used in This Document: BMP: Best Management Practice CAR: Corrective Action Request CATS: Charlotte Area Transit System CDOT: Charlotte Department of Transportation CFD: Charlotte Fire Department CITY: City of Charlotte CMANN: Continuous Monitoring Alert Notification Network CMCSI: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Certified Site Inspector CMPD: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department CMSWS: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services CW: Charlotte Water Department (formerly Charlotte-Mecklenburg Utilities) DEMLR: Division of Energy, Mining, and Land Resources DO: Dissolved Oxygen DWF: Dry Weather Flow DWQ: Division of Water Quality EPM-SWS: Engineering and Property Management Dept.-Storm Water Services Division EPM-LD: Engineering and Property Management Dept.-Land Development Division ETJ: Extra Territorial Jurisdiction City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report ii FY: Fiscal Year GIS: Geographic Information System GSD-SWS: General Services Department-Storm Water Services Division HDD: Horizontal Directional Drilling IDDE: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination IDEP: Illicit Discharge Elimination Program MEP: Maximum Extent Practicable MS4: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MST: Microbial Source Tracking NCDEQ: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality NCGA: North Carolina General Assembly NOV: Notice of Violation NPDES: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System O&M: Operation & Maintenance PCSO: Post-Construction Stormwater Ordinance QA/QC: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program RSWP : Regional Stormwater Partnership SAP: Standard Administrative Procedure SARA: Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SCM: Stormwater Control Measure SOP: Standard Operating Procedure SSO: Sanitary Sewer Overflow SWAC: Stormwater Advisory Committee SWMP: Stormwater Management Program Plan SPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan TMDL: Total Maximum Daily Load TP: Total Phosphorus TSS: Total Suspended Solids UNCC: University of North Carolina at Charlotte USEPA: United States Environmental Protection Agency WLA: Waste Load Allocation WQ: Water Quality WQS: Water Quality Standards WTP: Water Treatment Plant WWTP: Wastewater Treatment Plant City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 1 Section 1: Introduction On November 1, 1993, the City of Charlotte began operating under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit Number NCS000240. This permit has subsequently been renewed for a 5-year permit term on four occasions and is currently in its 5th permit cycle effective October 10, 2018 through October 9, 2023. This document provides the Annual Report for the Stormwater Management Program Plan (SWMP) for FY2019 under the current permit term as required by Part III, paragraph 2 and Part IV, paragraph B of the NPDES MS4 permit. The overall objective of this Annual Report is to document activities conducted in support of the SWMP during FY2019 (July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019) and discuss future proposed program activities and/or SWMP changes as necessary. The City General Services Department-Storm Water Services Division (GSD-SWS) (formerly Engineering and Property Management Department-Storm Water Services Division (EPM- SWS)) is the primary agency responsible for managing the City’s NPDES MS4 permit, the MS4 system and the SWMP. The implementation of the requirements within the permit program and SWMP are coordinated with other applicable City departments as necessary. In addition, coordination is conducted with the NPDES MS4 permit programs for the jurisdictions in Mecklenburg County adjacent to the City where appropriate and feasible. This coordination is conducted to help ensure uniformity between the local NPDES MS4 stormwater permit programs and jurisdictions. Mecklenburg County stormwater staff along with GSD-SWS staff collectively form Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS). City and County water quality staff within CMSWS work together to accomplish many of the activities discussed in this report. Included in this SWMP Annual Report are: • Best management practices (BMPs) that are being used to fulfill the program requirements; • Frequency and status of each BMP; • Measurable program goals and planned future activities; • Implementation schedule; • Responsible positions; and • An assessment of program activities conducted during the reporting year. Staff of GSD-SWS, under the direction of the City’s Surface Water Quality and Environmental Permitting Program Manager, is responsible for the fulfillment of most of the activities discussed in this SWMP. Exceptions to this include the City’s General Services Department-Land Development Division (EPM-LD), which is the primary agency responsible for the Development and Redevelopment Plan Review and Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control programs within the SWMP. In addition, the City’s Department of Transportation-Street Maintenance Division and Solid Waste Services Department have responsibility for routine maintenance of certain portions of the MS4, in coordination with GSD-SWS. Funding for the BMPs specified in City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 2 the SWMP is provided by local stormwater utility fees, except where noted. The City’s SWMP includes the following core permit programs: 1. Public Education and Outreach Program – This program provides the public and businesses with information on general water quality, pollution prevention, and reporting problems, as well as specialized information on various activities that have the potential to cause pollution and harm water quality. This information is delivered through a wide range of methods including print, web, radio, social media, television, presentations, and public events. 2. Public Involvement and Participation Program – This program provides the public and businesses the opportunity to participate in various programs within the City’s SWMP. Charlotte-Mecklenburg government maintains a Storm Water Advisory Committee (SWAC), which is an appointed citizen panel to review and comment on the City’s and County’s stormwater programs. In addition, public volunteer opportunities are available with City/County programs such as Storm Drain Marking, Adopt-a-Stream, and the annual Big Spring Clean event. 3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program – This program is designed to protect water quality by detecting and eliminating pollution sources such as improper sewage or wastewater connections; illegal discharges of chemicals, paint, or oil; and accidental discharges from sanitary sewer lines and vehicle accidents. As part of this program, the City enforces the “City of Charlotte - Stormwater Pollution Control Ordinance,” which prohibits the discharge of pollutants to the storm drainage system and receiving streams. The City relies on reports from the public, various monitoring programs, and a wide range of other activities to assist in identifying and eliminating these sources of pollution. 4. Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Program – This program maintains the City’s delegated erosion and sediment control program to control sediments and other pollutants from construction sites. As part of this program, the City enforces the “City of Charlotte - Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance,” which requires suitable erosion control on project sites. The City conducts routine inspections of construction sites and issues violation notices and fines when necessary to ensure compliance with the ordinance. 5. Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program – This program is designed to control the discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment projects. As part of this program, the City enforces the “City of Charlotte – Post- Construction Stormwater Ordinance,” which requires structural stormwater controls for applicable new development and redevelopment projects as defined in the ordinance. The program involves review and approval of project plans as well as site inspections and maintenance activities to ensure that treatment practices are properly operated and maintained. 6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Program – This program focuses on ensuring that City facilities and field operations are managed in a way that minimizes stormwater pollutant discharges. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and Spill Response Plans are maintained City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 3 for applicable facilities that conduct activities with the potential for stormwater pollutant discharges. The City conducts inspections and training sessions at these facilities to ensure that requirements are being met. Field operations are evaluated for impacts on stormwater quality and best management practices are developed and implemented in order to minimize those impacts. 7. Industrial Facilities Evaluation and Monitoring Program – This program focuses on industrial facilities that discharge stormwater to the City’s MS4 and receiving streams. Inspections are conducted at these facilities on a rotational basis to review site operations and materials handling practices. In addition, if the facility has a stormwater permit, it is reviewed to ensure that permit conditions are adhered to. 8. Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Program – This program maintains a water quality monitoring plan designed to monitor major streams to determine water quality conditions and assist in evaluating the effectiveness of various stormwater management programs. The program is also used to assist in locating illicit discharges and connections where possible. 9. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program – This program maintains a TMDL watershed plan designed to address applicable TMDL pollutants of concern by implementing best management practices (BMPs) within the six minimum NPDES stormwater permit measures. These BMPs are designed to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern within the Permittee’s assigned MS4 NPDES regulated waste load allocation to the maximum extent practicable (MEP), and to the extent authorized by law. Section 2: Background Information 2.1 Population Served The SWMP covers the jurisdictional area, including the incorporated area and extra territorial jurisdiction (ETJ), for the City, as applicable and defined by the NPDES MS4 permit. Table 2-1 provides the population for the City based on the 2000 and 2010 US census. This census data was obtained from the following website of the US Census Bureau: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/3712000,00 Table 2-1: Population and Growth Rate for the City of Charlotte. 2018 Population (est.) 2010 Population 2000 Population Average Annual Percent Change (2010-2018) 872,498 731,424 540,828 2.4% City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 4 2.2 Growth Rate Table 2-1 shows the population growth rate represented as an “Average Annual Percent Change” for the City. This growth rate was calculated by dividing the overall percent change between the 2010 and 2018 population by the 8-year interval. 2.3 Jurisdictional and MS4 Service Areas The jurisdictional and MS4 service area for the City is provided in Table 2-2. The location of this area within Mecklenburg County and corresponding watershed areas are provided in Figure 2-1. The source of this information is the City Planning Department, which updates jurisdictional and geographical boundaries as annexations occur. Table 2-2: Jurisdictional and MS4 Service Area for the City of Charlotte. Incorporated Area (Sq. Miles) ETJ (Sq. Miles) Total Jurisdiction (Sq. Miles) 309 67 376 2.4 MS4 Conveyance System The existing MS4 serving the City is composed of curbs, gutters, catch basins, culverts, pipes, ditches, and outfalls that collect and convey stormwater for discharge to receiving streams. Currently, there are an estimated 6,997 outfalls, 3,702 miles of storm drain pipe and 163,751 catch basins and drop inlets within the City’s MS4. Pipe systems are typically 15 inches or larger in diameter and are designed for the ten-year storm event. Outlet energy is commonly dissipated through the use of end-walls or flared end sections with riprap aprons. Although the natural alignment of many receiving streams has been altered over the past century, many of the stream banks remain mostly vegetated as a result of the City’s stormwater management philosophies. Stream banks that were previously armored with riprap are currently allowed to re-vegetate naturally, and new projects incorporate “soft” methods involving tree plantings and other vegetation. Maintenance and improvements to the MS4 system are funded by stormwater utility fees collected within the City. Maintenance activities include cleaning inlets of debris and sediment, maintaining channels to reduce erosion and maximize pollution reduction capabilities, and the removal of blockages. Improvements to the MS4 system include solving infrastructure problems, channel stabilization, safety improvements, stream habitat enhancement, water quality enhancement, and resolving flooding problems associated with stormwater generated from public streets. 2.5 Land Use Composition Estimates The number of square miles and percentage of the MS4 service area under residential, commercial, industrial and open space land use categories are provided in Table 2-3. These percentages include the incorporated area and ETJ for the City. Figure 2-2 provides a map of City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 5 these land use areas. Land use estimates are derived from Mecklenburg County land parcel geographic information system (GIS) data (2019). Table 2-3: Percentage of Land Uses in the City of Charlotte (including ETJ). Land use Category Number of Square Miles % of Land Use within City of Charlotte and ETJ Residential 132 35 Commercial 56 15 Industrial 13 4 Open Space 98 26 Institutional 20 5 Transportation/Other 54 14 Lake Water/Open Space 3 1 [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 6 FIGURE 2-1 Charlotte Jurisdictional Area and Watersheds City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 7 FIGURE 2-2 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 8 2.6 Receiving Waters Approximately two-thirds of the City of Charlotte land area drains west in the Catawba River Basin while the remaining one-third drains east in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin. MS4 receiving stream information by river basin is provided in Table 2-4 (Catawba) and Table 2-5 (Yadkin-Pee Dee). The information for the development of these tables was obtained from the 2018 Category 5 303(d) list. The location of the watershed areas in the City of Charlotte is illustrated in Figure 2-1. Table 2-4: Catawba River Basin Streams Receiving Stream Name Stream Segment Index # WQ Classification Use Support Rating WQ Issues (303(d) Listing) Catawba River (Mountain Island Lake below elevation 648) 11-(114) WS-IV, B, CA Impaired PCB Fish Tissue Advisory(5) Catawba River (Lake Wylie below elevation 570) 11-(117) WS-IV-CA Impaired PCB Fish Tissue Advisory(5) Catawba River (Lake Wylie below elevation 570) 11-(122) WS-IV, B, CA Impaired PCB Fish Tissue Advisory(5) Catawba River (Lake Wylie below elevation 570) 11-(123.5) WS-IV, B Impaired PCB Fish Tissue Advisory(5) Long Creek 11-120-(0.5) C Not Rated None Long Creek 11-120-(2.5) WS-IV Not Rated None Dixon Branch 11-120-1 C Not Rated None McIntyre Creek 11-120-3-(1) C Not Rated None McIntyre Creek 11-120-3-(2) WS-IV Not Rated None Gutter Branch 11-120-4-(1) C Not Rated None Gutter Branch 11-120-4-(2) WS-IV Not Rated None Gum Branch 11-120-5 WS-IV Not Rated None Paw Creek 11-124 C Not Rated None Ticer Branch 11-124-1 C Not Rated None Little Paw Creek 11-125 C Not Rated None Beaverdam Creek 11-126 C Not Rated None Stowe Branch 11-127 C Not Rated None Porter Branch 11-133 C Not Rated None Studman Branch 11-134 C Not Rated None Sugar Creek Portions of 11- 137a,b,c C Impaired Fecal Coliform (4t); Turbidity (1t); Benthos Impairment(5) Irwin Creek 11-137-1 C Impaired Dissolved Oxygen (1t); Fecal Coliform (4t); Turbidity (4t); Fish impairment Stewart Creek 11-137-1-2 C Not Rated None Taggart Creek 11-137-2 C Not Rated None Coffey Creek 11-137-4 C Not Rated None Kings Branch 11-137-6 C Not Rated None McCullough Branch 11-137-7 C Impaired Benthos impairment City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 9 Receiving Stream Name Stream Segment Index # WQ Classification Use Support Rating WQ Issues (303(d) Listing) Little Sugar Creek 11-137-8 C Impaired Copper(5) Mercury(5) Turbidity(1t) Dissolved Oxygen(1t); Fecal Coliform (4t); Benthos impairment(4s) Dairy Branch 11-137-8-1 C Not Rated None Briar Creek 11-137-8-2 C Not Rated None Edwards Branch 11-137-8-2-1 C Not Rated None Little Hope Creek 11-137-8-3 C Not Rated None McAlpine Creek 11-137-9 C Impaired Dissolved Oxygen(1t); Fecal Coliform (4t);Turbidity (1t); Benthos and fish impairment(5) Campbell Creek 11-137-9-1 C Not Rated None Irvins Creek 11-137-9-2 C Not Rated None Fourmile Creek 11-137-9-4 C Not Rated None Rocky Branch 11-137-9-4-1 C Not Rated None McMullen Creek 11-137-9-5 C Impaired Benthos impairment(5) Steele Creek 11-137-10 C Not Rated None** Walker Branch 11-137-10-1 C Not Rated None Polk Ditch 11-137-10-1-1 C Not Rated None Clems Branch 11-137-11 C Not Rated None Sixmile Creek 11-138-3 C Impaired Fish impairment(5) Twelvemile Creek 11-138 C Impaired Dissolved Oxygen(5); Copper(5); Turbidity(5); Fish impairment(4s) Flat Branch 11-138-3-2 C Not Rated None Table 2-5: Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin Streams Receiving Stream Name Stream Segment Index # WQ Classification Use Support Rating WQ Issues (303(d) Listing) Mallard Creek 13-17-5b C Impaired Turbidity(5) Clarks Creek 13-17-5-2 C Impaired Benthos impairment(5) Doby Creek 13-17-5-3 C Impaired Benthos impairment(5) Toby Creek 13-17-5-4 C Impaired Benthos impairment(5) Stony Creek 13-17-5-5 C Impaired Benthos impairment(5) Back Creek 13-17-7 C Impaired Benthos impairment(5) Fuda Creek 13-17-7-1 C Not Rated None Reedy Creek 13-17-8 C Impaired Benthos impairment(5)* McKee Creek 13-17-8-4 C Impaired Fecal Coliform(4t); Benthos impairment(5) Use Support Ratings (1t) No criteria exceeded but approved TMDL for parameter of interest (4s) Impaired biological integrity with an identified Aquatic Life Standards Violation listed in Category 5 (4t) Designated use impaired with an approved TMDL (5) Designated use impaired because of biological or ambient water quality standards violations and needing a TMDL ** Listed as impaired on South Carolina 303(d) list for Fecal Coliform; TMDL developed May 2007. Source: North Carolina’s 2018 303(d) Report City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 10 Section 3: Public Education and Outreach Program During the annual report period, the Public Education and Outreach Program distributed educational materials to the community and conducted outreach activities focused on the impacts of stormwater discharges on water bodies per the SWMP. The following sub-sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Target audience and pollution sources; • Outreach strategy; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and • Program assessment. 3.1 BMP Summary Table Table 3-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the Public Education and Outreach Program requirements. Table 3-1: BMP Summary Table for the Public Education and Outreach Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Describe target pollutants and target pollutant sources Describe the target pollutants and target pollutant sources the permittee’s public education program is designed to address and why they are an issue. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Describe target audiences Describe the target audiences likely to have significant stormwater impacts and why they were selected. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Informational Web Site The permittee shall promote and maintain an internet web site designed to convey the program’s message. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Distribute public education materials to identified user groups. Distribute general stormwater educational material to appropriate target groups as likely to have a significant stormwater impact. Instead of developing its own materials, the permittee may rely on state- supplied Public Education and Outreach materials, as available, when implementing its own program. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Promote and maintain Hotline/Help line Promote and maintain a stormwater hotline/helpline. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Implement a Public Education and Outreach Program. The permittee’s outreach program, including those elements implemented locally or through a cooperative agreement, shall include a combination of approaches designed to reach the target audiences. For each media, event or activity, including those elements implemented locally or through a cooperative agreement the permittee shall estimate and record the extent of exposure. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 11 3.2 Target Pollutants and Sources Table 3-2 provides the specific pollution sources targeted for the public education program as well as a description as to why the sources were important for protecting water quality in the City. Table 3-2: Targeted Pollution Sources for the Public Education and Outreach Program. Target Pollutant Pollution Source Issue Bacteria Improper Waste Disposal Sanitary Sewer Overflows Pet Waste Improper handling and disposal of wastes can result in the discharge of a variety of pollutants to the storm drainage system, causing increases in harmful bacteria. Discharges of food wastes such as fats, oils, and greases to the sanitary sewer system can result in line blockages that cause sanitary sewer overflows. Improper disposal of pet waste can also cause discharges of bacteria to the storm drainage system. Sediment Construction Erosion Stream Bank Erosion Improper erosion control practices at construction sites can result in sediment discharges to the storm drainage system. In addition, uncontrolled volumes of stormwater runoff can cause scouring of stream banks resulting in increased sediment volumes in streams. 3.3 Target Audience The City’s public education and outreach program reaches a fairly broad representation of the city’s population through various methods as explained in Section 3.4 with the goal of reaching certain target audiences for particular reasons as explained below. The target audiences are evaluated with each annual SWMP update and as part of the development of the SWMP following permit renewal. Multi-Family Residential Apartment Complexes: This target audience has been selected because private sanitary sewer systems at apartment complexes are often not well-maintained and have been found to be significant contributors to SSOs in the municipal sewer system due to improper disposal of grease and other items by apartment residents. Construction Industry: This target audience has been selected because it has the greatest potential for affecting erosion and sedimentation control at construction sites, which can be a significant contributor of sediment to the City’s waterways. Commercial Sectors: Various commercial sectors are targeted for education each year due to the significant negative impacts they can have on water quality by improperly handling and disposing of wastes and practicing poor housekeeping at their facilities. Each year an evaluation of previous pollution service requests, illicit discharges, and notices of violation is conducted to determine which commercial sectors are commonly demonstrating non-compliance. Based on that evaluation, education and outreach efforts are focused on particular sectors for a certain time period, typically a fiscal year. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 12 School-aged Children: Children are very important when it comes to protecting surface waters. They play in creeks and lakes and, therefore, want to protect them. They bring home what they learn and encourage their parents to adopt positive behaviors for protecting water quality. Lessons about surface water quality and stormwater pollution often fit into and enhance science learning principles required by school curricula. Also, teaching children instills a sense of responsibility for the environment that can carry forward and grow into their adult lives. For these reasons, the City’s public education program focuses significant resources on teaching students at various grade levels. Pet Owners: Pet waste has been identified as a significant source of bacteria in surface waters, so starting two years ago, CMSWS added pet owners as a target audience as one way to help combat elevated fecal coliform counts in local creeks. CMSWS has also been exploring ways to educate an even more diverse representation of our population. A research and strategizing phase is underway to establish priorities and determine effective methods for sharing water quality messages with various audiences and getting more of them involved in volunteering and advocating for protection of water resources. A focus group and stormwater learning session are planned for FY2020. These events will be marketed to a diverse audience in order to gain awareness of our public education and involvement programs. 3.4 Stormwater Public Education and Outreach Program The City’s Stormwater Public Education and Outreach Program provides water quality and pollution prevention messages to educate residents and businesses about the ways they can help protect water quality and get involved to help reduce stormwater pollution. The program provides these messages through the following activities: • Mass Media; • Social Media; • Public Hotline Promotion; • School Presentations; • Public Presentations and Events; • Website; and • Public Education Materials. 3.4.1 Mass Media Significant resources were spent on providing water quality messages through mass media channels because they are one of the most effective ways to reach adult audiences. The media campaign focused on four main themes: • Report Pollution; • Volunteer; • Flood Safety; and City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 13 • Aging Infrastructure. Media channels utilized to promote events and messages consisted of television, radio, website, and print advertisements. A total of 876 television ads ran on local stations WBTV, WCNC and WCCB. In addition, 48 total radio ads ran on WFAE 90.7 FM and 102.1 Latina Radio. CMSWS also worked with WCCB to produce “Wilson’s World” segments that focused on the importance of recognizing and reporting stormwater pollution. WCNC produced “Walk and Talk” segments that were filmed at various sites and focused on sources of pollution and volunteering. These segments are considered “added value” segments as they provided additional media impressions at no additional cost. Print media for the City’s program included the use of: • Vehicle wraps; • A parking garage banner; and • Utility bill inserts. 3.4.2 Social Media CMSWS continued efforts to build a social media presence this past year as more and more people are receiving information through this media source. Four social media channels used by CMSWS are shown in Table 3-3. Table 3-3: Social Media Channels Social Media Account Name Handle URL Facebook CMSWS* @StormWaterCM https://www.facebook.com/StormWaterCM Twitter CMSWS* @StormWaterCM https://twitter.com/StormWaterCM Instagram CMSWS* @StormWaterCM https://www.instagram.com/stormwatercm/ YouTube CMSWS* N/A https://www.youtube.com/user/StormWaterServices *Abbreviation for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services CMSWS posted various videos and news stories on its YouTube channel. CMSWS also provided more content, pictures and videos related to stormwater pollution, surface water quality, pollution prevention and flood messages on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram and boosted some posts to reach tens of thousands of users. There are 6,947 Facebook fans, a 2% increase from last fiscal year. There are 766 Instagram followers, a 55% increase from last fiscal year. There are 1,171 Twitter followers, a 23% increase from last year. There are 43 subscribers to our YouTube page, a 16% increase from last fiscal year. Figure 3-1 shows a typical Facebook post. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 14 During 2013, CMSWS launched a mobile application called “Water Watchers” for citizens to report pollution. There were 98 downloads of the application during FY2019, making for a total of 1,817 downloads since the application was first launched. This past year, there were 38 reports of pollution using the application. The application allows users to provide pictures of their concern and this feature has proven very helpful to staff for providing follow-up services. A variety of tools and events were used to promote the 311 reporting hotline and the Water Waters mobile application including: • Giving away promotional products such as magnets and water bottles with 311 and Water Watcher information; • Providing information about reporting pollution on a website; • Working with local TV stations to produce news segments focused on reporting pollution; • Buying media time and airing a TV ad focused on reporting pollution; • Designing and mailing the October utility bill insert, focused on volunteering and reporting pollution, to approximately 255,300 residents; and • Hanging a six-story banner on a parking garage across from a popular exit ramp off I-277 (Figure 3-2). 3.4.3 Public Hotline The City, in cooperation with Mecklenburg County, operates a joint customer service hotline to receive information about a variety of concerns. Citizens can call 311 to report pollution, flooding, and blockages to the drainage system as well as request other City/County services. The 311 call center is staffed to receive calls Monday through Friday from 7 am to 7 pm. Citizens can also submit requests for service to 311 online anytime (24/7/365). All personnel from the customer service group receive training on stormwater issues and pollution to ensure calls are directed to appropriate personnel and handled in a timely manner. During this past fiscal year, a total of 8,934 calls were received by 311 and referred to EPM-SWS and/or CMSWS. Out of this total number, 553 resulted in service requests related to surface water quality issues within the City. Of the calls received, the highest number came from citizens. Figure 3-1: Typical Facebook post Figure 3-2: Typical Parking Garage Banner City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 15 Calls from citizens as a group made up 62% of all calls, which was 47% higher than from the next most frequent caller type, Mecklenburg County Storm Water Services staff, which accounted for 15% of calls. This is important information for targeting education campaigns related to pollution reporting. Table 3-4 provides information about the number and type of callers that reported these issues. Table 3-4: FY2019 Service Request Source Summary Caller Type Number of Service Requests* Public Citizen 342 Business 4 Charlotte Fire Department staff 24 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department staff 0 Charlotte Storm Water Services staff 45 Charlotte Water staff 33 Mecklenburg County Storm Water Services staff 83 State – NCDEQ staff 5 Environmental Protection Agency/NRC 2 Other 15 TOTAL 553 * Source summary data includes all types of service requests within the City jurisdiction An additional unique outreach tool for publicizing pollution reporting was the design and implementation of three vehicle wraps (Figure 3-3). These vehicle wraps have been placed on three CMSWS vehicles and each addressed a different subject – storm drains lead to streams, smelly and discolored streams, and mud pollution. In addition to informing and educating, these wraps encourage residents to recognize and report pollution by calling 311. The vehicle wraps were completed toward the end of FY2016 and have been driven since then by CMSWS staff while conducting illicit discharge investigations and service request responses. It is estimated that the vehicle wraps will last about five years. Discussions about a fourth vehicle wrap took place during FY2019 with plans to complete the wrap during FY2020. 3.4.4 School Presentations During FY2019, CMSWS staff provided 117 school presentations to 2,872 students, grades K- 12, at 16 different schools. There were seven different programs available to the schools which included: Figure 3-3: Vehicle Wrap on a CMSWS vehicle City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 16 • Blue Planet; • Common Water; • Freddie the Fish; • Enviroscape Model and Video; • CMANN Demo and Power Point; • Festival Table Demonstrations; and • Career Day. Two stormwater pollution videos (made by a former local meteorologist) and the Enviroscape model were also available on loan to schools upon their request. Figure 3-4 shows a presentation using the Enviroscape model. 3.4.5 Public Presentations and Workshops A variety of water quality presentations and workshops were available from CMSWS to the public, interest groups, businesses and industrial facilities upon request. Each presentation, while similar in nature, was also changed depending on the topic of interest and the audience receiving the presentation. For example, this past year presentations were given about yard waste, grease, pollution prevention, general water quality information, and landscaping tips. Table 3-5 shows the public presentations that were provided by CMSWS during FY2019. Table 3-5: FY2019 Public Presentations and Workshops Date Event Name Number of Attendees 07/19/2018 County Floodplain Future Conditions Stakeholder Workshop 13 09/22/2018 Volunteer Monitoring Training 13 10/27/2018 City of Charlotte Civic Leadership Academy 36 12/06/2018 Stormwater Ordinance Training 151 01/12/2019 Citizen’s Water Academy 35 02/28/2019 Plaza Eastway Partners 43 03/23/2019 City of Charlotte Civic Leadership Academy 40 03/28/2019 Master Naturalist Training 22 04/04/2019 NC DEQ 55 04/10/2019 League of Women Voters 55 04/10/2019 League of Women Voters 30 04/10/2019 Providence Country Club HOA Meeting 25 04/11/2019 Kings Creek HOA Meeting 20 04/12/2019 Land Development Design Initiative 35 04/26/2019 Surveyors' Conference 55 05/23/2019 Master Naturalist Training 22 05/09/2019 Master Naturalist Training 22 05/25/2019 Catawba Riverkeeper Young Allies of the River Event 10 TOTAL 620 Figure 3-4: Enviroscape Model Presentation City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 17 3.4.6 Public Events CMSWS staff participated in a variety of community events that were used to promote education campaigns, give away promotional products, provide face-to-face education opportunities, and provide formal presentations on water quality topics when appropriate. Table 3-6 shows the public event participation during FY2019. Table 3-6: FY2019 Public Event Participation Date Conducted Event Name Number of Attendees Interacted With 08/17/2018 Mountain Island Lake Takeover 13 08/17/2018 Mountain Island Lake Takeover 3 09/22/2018 Charlotte Monarch Celebration 62 09/30/2018 Open Streets 124 10/04/2018 Meet & Eat CLTMeckGov 15 10/09/2018 Meet & Eat CLTMeckGov 15 10/18/2018 Meet & Eat CLTMeckGov 15 10/20/2018 Nature at Night 172 10/23/2018 Meet & Eat CLTMeckGov 15 10/25/2018 Meet & Eat CLTMeckGov 15 10/29/2018 Meet & Eat CLTMeckGov 15 11/08/2018 Air Quality Forum 25 11/30/2018 Charlotte Career Discovery Day 150 01/19/2019 MLK Day Parade 600 03/14/2019 Realtor Expo 400 03/15/2019 Weatherfest 350 03/14-15/2019 Passport to Stem 400 03/23/2019 National Puppy Day Fair 100 04/07/2019 Charlotte Checkers Pooch Party 500 04/10/2019 Air Quality Forum 40 04/18/2019 Ballantyne Earth Day 125 04/03/2019 UNCC Earth Day 100 04/06/2019 Paws in the Park 150 04/06/2019 Animal Control Pet Adoption 30 04/10/2019 Flood/Infrastructure Talk 40 04/13/2019 Char-Meck Rabies Clinic 30 04/26/2019 Earth Day Celebration at CMGC 130 04/27/2019 Pet Palooza 150 04/27/2019 Earth Jam 70 04/27/2019 Highland Mill Montessori Sustainability Fair 45 04/28/2019 Open Streets 150 05/09/2019 Hurricane Awareness 300 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 18 Date Conducted Event Name Number of Attendees Interacted With 05/18/2019 Pints for Paws 40 TOTAL 3,970 3.4.7 Informational Website A significant amount of resources were utilized to continue promoting and maintaining the CMSWS website http://charlottenc.gov/StormWater (Figure 3-5). During September 2016, the City launched a new, redesigned website. The new website provides an updated and enhanced site that continues to be one of the best ways to provide the public with water quality information. A vast amount of water quality information is provided on this website including, but not limited to, pollution prevention fact sheets, activities and lessons for kids, volunteer activities, sediment and erosion, regulations, data, maps, watershed information, and stormwater projects. The number of website page views during FY2019 was 376,617; of these, the number of unique page views (i.e. the number of times a page was accessed at least once during a browsing session) was 158,480. Figure 3-5: CMSWS Main Webpage City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 19 3.4.8 Public Education Materials This outreach mechanism was used to target specific pollution sources associated with the public and industrial/commercial facilities including lawn care practices, handling of used oil and other automotive wastes, housekeeping techniques, etc. Public outreach materials were also used to increase public reporting of pollution problems. Figure 3-6 shows an example of a brochure that was distributed during responses to citizen service requests. The following provides a list of topics for the written outreach materials/handouts available to staff for distribution during citizen requests for service: • A Guide to Used Oil Recycling • Scoop the Poop (proper handling of animal waste) • Only Rain Goes Down The Storm Drain – The Citizen’s Guide to Pollution Prevention • Volunteer Opportunities (updated for FY2019) • A Brief Look at Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services – Your Storm Water Fees at Work • Flow Free (proper disposal of grease from Charlotte Water Department) • Household Hazardous Waste – What do you do with left over chemicals • Mobile Detailer Best Management Practices • Landscapers Best Management Practices • Painters Best Management Practices • Contractors Best Management Practices • Carpet Cleaners Best Management Practices • Vehicle Service Best Management Practices • Food Service Best Management Practices • Multi-family Best Management Practices • Stone Cutting & Fabrication Industry Best Management Practices • Concrete Industry Best Management Practices • Commercial Property Management Best Management Practices • Asphalt Sealing Best Management Practices • Swimming Pool & Spa Industry Best Management Practices • Dry Detention BMP Maintenance • Rain Garden BMP Maintenance • Sand Filter BMP Maintenance • SW Wetland BMP Maintenance • Wet Pond BMP Maintenance Figure 3-6: Example of a Food Services Best Management Practices flyer distributed as part of service requests City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 20 • Environmental Notices – Disposal into the storm drain is against the law (available in English, Spanish, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Korean) 3.4.8.1 Promotional Items Promotional items were designed and distributed to complement outreach activities such as group presentations, workshops and public events. All promotional items have the CMSWS website and include other messages as space allows. Table 3-7 shows the promotional items distributed during FY2019. Table 3-7: FY2019 Promotional Items Promotional Item Message Ink Pens 6 rotating messages – report pollution, street to stream, volunteer, turn around don’t drown, flooding can happen anywhere, buy flood insurance Umbrella Rain Gauge General stormwater information; Stormwater.CharMeck.org Flashlight General stormwater information; Stormwater.CharMeck.org Sunscreen General stormwater information; Stormwater.CharMeck.org Stormy’s Guide to Stormwater Coloring Book General stormwater information 3.4.8.2 Utility Bill Inserts During FY2019, CMSWS included utility bill inserts in five of the monthly water/sewer utility bills issued by Charlotte Water. The inserts focus on various topics which included volunteering, water quality, flooding, CMSWS services and fee changes. The total number of stormwater related utility bill inserts that were mailed during FY2019 was 1,330,520. Figure 3-7 shows a typical utility bill insert that was mailed. Figure 3-7: October 2018 Utility Bill Insert City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 21 3.4.9 Regional Stormwater Partnership The City serves on the Executive Committee of the Regional Stormwater Partnership of the Carolinas (RSPC); a partnership which includes 18 municipalities throughout the region that collaborating on meeting NPDES MS4 permit requirements, particularly education and outreach initiatives. Formed in 2006 and originally comprised of professionals from six municipalities in the Charlotte metropolitan area, the RSPC was developed as a forum for stormwater professionals to work collaboratively on local stormwater issues. The RSPC has grown significantly and obtained a registered 501(c)(3) organization designation during FY2019. The RSPC provides an opportunity to leverage limited resources to fulfill common needs of the partners. During FY2019, the RSPC’s media campaign ran television, radio and web-based television advertisements on WCCB CW, GCCB MeTV, HCCB Antenna TV and WCCB charlotte.com. Television advertisements had a total of 8,966,574 media impressions (7,588,067 on regular television and 1,378,459 on web-based television). WCCB ran a Carolina Insight story highlighting stormwater infrastructure and two Rising Spotlight segments that discussed the benefits of stormwater fees to homeowners and ways citizens can help keep waterways clean. Furthermore, radio advertisements resulted in 444,000 radio media impressions. In addition to these media endeavors, the RSPC held two Tech Talk Training workshops during FY2019. The first was titled “GIS Mapping for Stormwater Applications” with 27 attendees and the second was titled “Managing Stormwater Service Requests From Citizens” with 29 attendees. There were also 48 attendees from across the area to the Elected Officials Stormwater Workshop. This workshop discussed stormwater basics, permit requirements, fees, infrastructure and control measures. Also, during FY2019 there were 2,284 total visits to the RSPC website. Of the website visits, 2,271 were new users and 344 were returning users. 3.4.10 Special Campaigns and Programs Pet Waste Campaign: During FY2019, CMSWS delivered a “Scoop the Poop” campaign during April 2019 that targeted pet owners as a way to educate them about water quality impacts from pet waste and the importance of cleaning it up. This program included many components such as the temporary flagging of deposits of dog waste (Figure 3-8) in five parks and greenway locations along with signs that provided information about harmful impacts to water quality and human health. The campaign also included social media consisting of five posts on Facebook, six posts on Instagram, and six posts on Twitter. The social media campaign resulted in 276 shares on Facebook, 123 reactions on Instagram, and 20 retweets on Twitter. The campaign also received local media coverage which helped to raise awareness. One other component of this program included having educational tables Figure 3-8: Pet waste flag City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 22 at nine events including a Charlotte Checkers hockey game, Animal Control’s Pet Adoption event, the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Rabies Clinic, and the Pet Palooza festival. Stormy Mascot: Two years ago, CMSWS worked with a vendor to create a “Stormy the Turtle” mascot which was based on previous use of the Stormy character in various education and outreach materials. Stormy has quickly become popular and appeared 14 times during FY2019 at various events including parades, photo shoots, and festivals. CMSWS will continue to utilize Stormy in this way to enhance the education and outreach program and has plans to expand use of the character as part of the Storm Water Services brand. Figure 3-9 shows Stormy riding in a city parade. Creek Week: During FY2019, CMSWS participated for the first time in a nationwide program called Creek Week in order to bring more attention to the importance of creeks in the community. CMSWS partnered with several other governmental and non-profit organizations to develop and market events that tied into the overall water quality theme. A logo was created and 20 events were held from March 23 to March 30, 2019, examples including several story times at libraries, a volunteer monitoring workshop, a stream restoration educational walk, and various stream cleanups and educational workshops. 3.5 Measurable Goals/Planned Activities for Future Program Years Table 3-8 describes the various Public Education and Outreach BMPs and the Measurable Goals and Planned Activities for Future Program Years for each BMP by permit term year. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] Figure 3-9: Stormy mascot City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 23 Table 3-8: BMP Measurable Goals for the Public Education and Outreach Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5+ Describe target pollutants and target pollutant sources Describe the target pollutants and target pollutant sources the permittee’s public education program is designed to address and why they are an issue. Identify target pollution sources utilizing monitoring and service request data Review and update target pollution sources as necessary. (On-going, years 2 – 5+) Describe target audiences Describe the target audiences likely to have significant stormwater impacts and why they were selected. Identify target audiences to adopt desired water quality improvement behaviors Review and update target audiences as necessary. (On-going, years 2 – 5+) Informational Web Site The permittee shall promote and maintain an internet web site designed to convey the program’s message. Continue to maintain an informational website to provide program information to the public . (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Distribute public education materials to identified user groups. Distribute general stormwater educational material to appropriate target groups as likely to have a significant stormwater impact. Instead of developing its own materials, the permittee may rely on state- supplied Public Education and Outreach materials, as available, when implementing its own program. Distribute educational materials at public events, workshops and presentations. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Promote and maintain Hotline/Help line Promote and maintain a stormwater hotline/helpline. Maintain a hotline that receives information from the public 24 hours a day. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Implement a Public Education and Outreach Program. The permittee’s outreach program, including those elements implemented locally or through a cooperative agreement, shall include a combination of approaches designed to reach the target audiences. For each media, event or activity, including those elements implemented locally or through a cooperative agreement the permittee shall estimate and record the extent of exposure. Continue to implement a plan to conduct education & outreach activities, including a media campaign, that address target pollutants and audiences. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 24 3.6 Program Assessment The overall Public Education and Outreach Program was successfully implemented during the annual report period. Table 3-9 shows a summary of the various items and corresponding data results for activities conducted under the program. Table 3-9: Program Summary PUBLIC EDUCATION PROGRAM FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Television advertising spots 876 Radio advertising spots 48 Social Media Followers/Subscribers1. 8,927 Social media posts 620 Social media responses 1,045 Water Watchers Mobile App Downloads 98 Public requests to stormwater hotline 8,934 Public requests to stw. hotline - WQ related 553 School presentations 117 Students educated at school presentations 2,872 Public presentations 18 Citizens educated at public presentations 620 Public events 33 Attendees at public events 3,970 Website page views 376,617 Website unique page views 158,480 Utility bill inserts 1,330,520 Flow Free (FOG) brochures distributed 2,231 Flow Free (FOG) presentations 12 Citizens educated on Flow Free program 1,640 1. Includes Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. Overall: A combination of evaluation tools indicates that the City’s residents were successfully being exposed to water quality education messages. It is always difficult to measure the true impact of an education program, but continued program offerings and continued participation in them indicate that messages were successfully provided through a diverse set of communication channels. To be successful, CMSWS must build on its strengths and invest in new learning opportunities that attract and motivate current, new and expanding audiences to actively engage in activities that reduce the impacts of stormwater discharges to our surface waters. Staff has developed plans and done research on potential methods that can be used to reach more diverse audiences and expand the outreach program. The following provides more detail regarding some of the numbers reported above. Utility Bill Inserts: During FY2019 there was an increase in the number of utility bill inserts from FY2018. This is due to the increase in distribution frequency. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 25 Public Events & Public Presentations: The number of events and presentations during FY2019 remained consistent. School Presentations: The number of school presentations and the number of students educated at school presentations increased for FY2019. Website Page views: The number of website page views increased by 37% from the previous fiscal year. Social Media: CMSWS gained over 600 additional followers/subscribers to its social media channels in FY2019 Section 4: Public Involvement and Participation Program During the annual report period, the Public Involvement and Participation Program provided opportunities for the public to participate in program development and implementation per the SWMP. The following sub-sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Target audience; • Volunteer opportunities; • Public involvement mechanisms; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and • Program assessment. 4.1 BMP Summary Table Table 4-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the Public Involvement and Participation Program requirements. Table 4-1: BMP Summary Table for the Public Involvement and Participation Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Volunteer community involvement program The permittee shall include and promote volunteer opportunities designed to promote ongoing citizen participation. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Establish a Mechanism for Public involvement The permittee shall provide and promote a mechanism for public involvement that provides for input on stormwater issues and the stormwater program. X X X X X Stormwater Division Manager Establish Hotline/Help line The permittee shall promote and maintain a hotline/helpline for the purpose of public involvement X X X X X Water Quality Program City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 26 and participation. Manager Public Review and Comment The permittee shall make copies of their most recent Stormwater Plans available for public review and comment. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Public Notice Pursuant to 122.34 the permittee must, at a minimum, comply with State, Tribal and local public notice requirements when implementing a public involvement/ participation program. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager 4.2 Volunteer Involvement Program 4.2.1 Target Audience Public involvement is essential for ensuring the success of volunteer programs. The City recognizes that without public involvement and support, little progress can be made toward protecting and improving water quality in its streams. The primary target audience for volunteer participation includes citizens between the ages of 25 and 55 due to their likelihood to become involved in volunteer activities. There is a special emphasis to improve outreach to the African- American and Hispanic populations and to increase the diversity of engaged citizens in general. The following sub-sections discuss the volunteer programs used in the City’s overall Public Involvement and Participation Program. 4.2.2 Storm Drain Marking Program CMSWS continued to provide volunteers the opportunity to help educate their community about stormwater pollution through the Storm Drain Marking program. This program enabled volunteers to adhere vinyl printed markers (Figure 4-1) to storm drains along streets they had selected in their neighborhoods. CMSWS provided the decals, adhesive, safety vests and information forms for completion by the groups. Following the completion of storm drain marking activities, the groups submitted a report that included the street names and number of drains that were marked, information concerning the condition of storm drains, and whether any pollution problems were observed. CMSWS staff recorded the storm drains that had been marked and ensured any issues reported received follow-up investigation. During FY2019, a total of 1,699 storm drains were marked by 352 volunteers for a combined total of 1,019 volunteer hours for this program. Storm Drain Marking activities are tracked in order to help determine programmatic gaps and where resources should be focused. Figure 4-2 shows Storm Drain Marking activities conducted during FY2019. The Storm Drain Marking program is a well-organized and a relatively easy-to-manage activity for successfully including citizens of all ages in stormwater education. By using a more focused approach and targeting families and volunteer groups, the program saw an increase in participation. Figure 4-1: Storm Drain Marker City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 27 4.2.3 Adopt-A-Stream Program The objective of this program is for volunteers to “adopt” segments of streams and agree to walk them, picking up trash and reporting any pollution problems found along the way. The program not only serves as a public involvement initiative, but it also allows for interaction and observations of the City’s streams by its citizens, which can lead to the identification and elimination of pollution sources. The Adopt-A-Stream Program is designed in a way that empowers volunteers and provides them with the necessary resources and educational information to assist in improving water quality conditions in Charlotte-Mecklenburg streams. Individuals, families, organized groups, schools, businesses, and industry “adopt” their favorite stream sections and were responsible for walking these sections a minimum of two times per year. The current Adopt-A-Stream Program format promotes a sense of community ownership and responsibility for local water resources. During FY2019, a total of 101 groups of volunteers completed 190 stream cleanups under the Adopt-A-Stream Program in the City. A total of 2,470 volunteers dedicated 6,345 hours to picking up trash and reporting pollution in Charlotte-Mecklenburg streams. In addition, volunteers removed approximately 23 tons of trash and debris. Adopt-A-Stream activities are tracked in order to help determine programmatic gaps and where resources should be focused. Figure 4-3 shows Adopt-A-Stream activities conducted during FY2019. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 28 FIGURE 4-2 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 29 FIGURE 4-3 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 30 4.2.4 The Big Spring Clean The Big Spring Clean is a one-day annual event promoted by CMSWS and the local organization Keep Mecklenburg Beautiful. The event is held on a selected Saturday morning during the spring season and typically provides seven to nine locations where citizens can go to remove trash from local streams. These locations are conveniently situated at greenway trailheads with ample parking and staffed by CMSWS to provide the volunteers with supplies, drinks and snacks. CMSWS coordinates the logistics during this event and collects statistics such as number of volunteers participating, volunteer hours, and the amount of trash removed at each location. CMSWS also coordinates with the Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation Department to have the collected trash removed and properly disposed. During FY2019, a total of 470 volunteers dedicated 1,880 hours to participating in the event and removed 11 tons of trash from local waterways at six locations throughout the City. Figure 4-4 shows one of the promotional information items used for the event. Figure 4-4: Big Spring Clean Utility Bill Insert 4.2.5 Volunteer Monitoring Program During FY2019, the Volunteer Monitoring Program was expanded after discussion and analysis led staff to determine that, based on the amount of time and staff resources expended, not enough volunteers were being recruited for the existing program. Additionally, volunteers for the most part were not being consistent with conducting monitoring and submitting data. Two new activities called Visual Assessment and Snapshot Assessment were added for FY2019 as a result of the discussion and analysis. For the visual assessment program, volunteers are trained in workshops about surface water quality, common stream pollutants, and how to identify them. Trained individuals then select a stream site from among a list and agree to send in qualitative, visual assessment forms every month for their assigned sites. One workshop was City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 31 help during FY2019 with 13 attendees and the plan is to hold two workshops per year going forward. The snapshot assessment program is available to all citizens without having to attend a workshop. Three signs were posted along stream greenways that have a number for people to text a picture and report the condition of the stream. Staff then follow up on any reports of pollution. Most of the pictures were of trash, but there were several that were verified as pollution sources. The snapshot program was a pilot program conducted during FY2019 and staff are currently evaluating it to determine the path forward. Existing volunteer monitoring programs including stream chemical monitoring and macroinvertebrate monitoring will continue; however, rather than holding weekend workshops to recruit volunteers as was done previously, staff will train volunteer groups upon request. These programs tend to be most popular among school groups. During FY2019, there were 33 attendees at two Volunteer Monitoring workshops. A total of 144 trained volunteers dedicated 288 hours to participating in the Volunteer Monitoring program. Figure 4-5 shows workshop attendees receiving training. 4.2.6 Second Saturday Volunteer Events As a way to involve more citizens in volunteering to improve surface water quality, CMSWS started “Second Saturday” events during FY2018. These events have taken place on the second Saturday of every month and ran typically from 9 am to 12 noon at different locations that are selected based on clean-up or maintenance needs. The events rotate between stream cleanups, tree maintenance, and storm drain marking. To make it easy for citizens to participate, registration is not required and the location of each event is made known to the public the month prior to each event. During FY2019, there were 423 volunteers who participated in nine Second Saturday events held within the City including five stream clean-ups, two tree maintenance events, and two storm drain marking events. This program has proven to be quite popular and successful mostly because it allows citizens to participate in a one-time event as opposed to our other programs that require a longer-term commitment. Plans are to continue the events through the next fiscal year at a minimum. 4.3 Public Involvement Mechanism The City of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County established a citizen Storm Water Advisory Figure 4-5: Volunteer Monitoring workshop attendees learning sampling techniques City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 32 Committee (SWAC) during 1994 in conjunction with the development of their stormwater utility (CMSWS). SWAC members are nominated and subsequently appointed by the Mecklenburg Board of County Commissioners, Charlotte City Council, Charlotte Mayor and Town Boards. SWAC includes residents from the City of Charlotte. SWAC serves as the City’s stormwater management citizen advisory panel for involving the public in the development and implementation of the permit program. The SWAC reviews: • Capital and operational programs; • Appeals; • Stormwater program policies; • Long-range plans; and • Budgets. These reviews assist CMSWS in making recommendations and offering comments to the City Council and the Board of County Commissioners on program matters and annual budgets. The committee also adjudicates appeals for erosion control violations, pollution control violations, service charges, and fee credits and adjustments. During FY2019, nine monthly SWAC meetings were conducted with a combined total of 167 meeting attendees for the year. 4.4 Public Hotline The City, in cooperation with Mecklenburg County, operates a joint customer service hotline to receive information about a variety of concerns. Citizens can call 311 to report pollution, flooding, and blockages to the drainage system as well as request other City/County services. The 311-call center is staffed to receive calls Monday through Friday from 7 am to 7 pm. Citizens can also submit requests for service to 311 online anytime (24/7/365). All personnel from the customer service group receive training on stormwater issues and pollution to ensure calls are directed to appropriate personnel and handled in a timely manner. 4.5 Public Review and Comment Opportunities The City provided opportunities for public review and comment in the implementation of its permit and SWMP Plan through website information. During FY2019, the draft FY2020 SWMP was prepared and placed on the CMSWS website and a public notice was published in the local newspaper to notify the public of the opportunity to provide comments on the SWMP. 4.6 Public Notice A public notice was published in the main local newspaper concerning the City’s FY2020 SWMP. The draft plan was placed on the CMSWS website and made available for review. No comments were received by the City. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 33 4.7 Measurable Goals/Planned Activities for Future Program Years Table 4-2 describes the various Public Involvement and Participation Program BMPs and the Measurable Goals and Planned Activities for Future Program Years for each BMP by permit term year. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 34 Table 4-2: BMP Measurable Goals for the Public Involvement and Participation Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5+ Volunteer community involvement program The permittee shall include and promote volunteer opportunities designed to promote ongoing citizen participation. Continue to maintain a public involvement and participation program that outlines campaigns and tools to encourage public involvement. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Establish a Mechanism for Public involvement The permittee shall provide and promote a mechanism for public involvement that provides for input on stormwater issues and the stormwater program. Maintain the Stormwater Advisory Committee. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Establish Hotline/Help line The permittee shall promote and maintain a hotline/helpline for the purpose of public involvement and participation. Maintain a hotline that receives information from the public 24 hours a day. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Public Review and Comment The permittee shall make copies of their most recent Stormwater Plans available for public review and comment. Maintain an informational website which includes the SWMP available for review and comment. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Public Notice Pursuant to 122.34 the permittee must, at a minimum, comply with State, Tribal and local public notice requirements when implementing a public involvement/ participation program. Comply with State and local public notice requirements when making major changes to the stormwater program and/or applying for permit renewals. (On-going, as needed) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 35 4.8 Program Assessment The Public Involvement and Participation Program was successfully implemented during the annual report period. In addition, although not currently listed as a required BMP in the City’s NPDES MS4 permit or SWMP, the City coordinates with Mecklenburg County to sponsor an annual Big Spring Clean event. Data on this additional program is included in the table below for reference. Table 4-3 shows a summary of the various items and corresponding results for activities conducted under the program. Table 4-3: Program Summary PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Storm drains marked 1,699 Storm Drain Marking volunteers 352 Storm Drain Marking volunteer hours 1,019 Adopt-A-Stream groups 101 Adopt-A-Stream clean-ups conducted 190 Adopt-A-Stream volunteers 2,470 Adopt-A-Stream volunteer hours 6,345 Adopt-A-Stream trash removed (tons) 23 Adopt-A-Stream miles cleaned 136 Big Spring Clean volunteers 470 Big Spring Clean volunteer hours 1,880 Big Spring Clean trash removed (tons) 11 Big Spring Clean stream miles cleaned 16 Trees planted by volunteers 486 Adopt-A-Street volunteer hours 6,487 Adopt-A-Street bags of trash collected 2,563 Adopt-A-Street bags of recyclables collected 483 Adopt-A-Street miles cleaned 460 Volunteer Monitoring training sessions 2 Volunteer Monitoring participants trained 33 Volunteer Monitoring total participants 144 Volunteer Monitoring participant hours 288 Volunteer Monitoring samples collected 32 Volunteer Monitoring visual observations 102 SWAC meetings conducted 9 Persons attending SWAC meetings 167 The City’s Public Involvement and Participation Program provides a combination of activities that allows residents to be involved in the City’s stormwater management program and the City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 36 opportunity to comment on components of the City’s plan to meet NPDES MS4 permit requirements. The following provides an overview of the program’s effectiveness: Storm Drain Marking Program: The number of volunteers and storm drains marked increased during FY2019. Adopt-A-Stream Program: The number of volunteers and volunteer hours increased during FY2019. One-time stream clean-ups are becoming more popular with groups versus signing up to conduct two clean-ups per year, which has traditionally been required. Big Spring Clean: The number of volunteers for the Big Spring Clean more than doubled for FY2019. Volunteer Monitoring Program: The number of volunteer monitoring participants and hours dedicated to volunteer monitoring increased slightly during FY2019. SWAC meetings: Meeting frequency and participation continues to be maintained. These meetings continue to be a highly effective method for involving the public in policy decisions related to the overall stormwater program. Public Hotline/ Helpline: The 311 hotline continued to be a successful tool for allowing the public to report water pollution problems. Use of the Water Watchers app by the public as a reporting tool has declined over the past couple years. The reason for this decline is theorized to be that so many smartphone apps are now available that people are deleting the ones they do not use very often. CMSWS is currently evaluating whether to continue with the Water Watchers app and working with City Corporate Communications to transition to an app that allows citizens to report all municipal issues including stormwater pollution. Section 5: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Program During the annual report period, staff implemented the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) program to identify and eliminate sources of pollution to the MS4 per the SWMP. The following sub-sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and • Program assessment. 5.1 BMP Summary Table Table 5-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the IDDE Program requirements. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 37 Table 5-1: BMP Summary Table for the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Maintain appropriate legal authorities Maintain adequate ordinances or other legal authorities to prohibit illicit connections and discharges and enforce the approved IDDE Program. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Maintain a Storm Sewer System Base Map The permittee shall maintain a current map showing major outfalls and receiving streams. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Inspection / detection program to detect dry weather flows at MS4 outfalls Maintain written procedures and/or Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for detecting and tracing the sources of illicit discharges and for removing the sources or reporting the sources to the State to be properly permitted. Written procedures and/or SOPs shall specify a timeframe for monitoring and how many outfalls and the areas that are to be targeted for inspections. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Employee Training Conduct training for appropriate municipal staff on detecting and reporting illicit connections and discharges. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Maintain a public reporting mechanism Maintain and publicize reporting mechanism for the public to report illicit connections and discharges. Establish citizen request response procedures. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Documentation The permittee shall document the date of investigations, any enforcement action(s) or remediation that occurred. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager 5.2 Ordinance Administration and Enforcement The City adopted its Stormwater Pollution Control Ordinance on January 30, 1995 for the initial NPDES MS4 permit term. The ordinance was subsequently updated and amended on March 22, 2004 and most recently on June 9, 2008. This ordinance continued to be implemented as part of the NPDES MS4 permit program and SWMP. All procedures and guidelines for proper administration and enforcement of the ordinance were reviewed and updated, as necessary. These procedures and guidelines along with all other information relevant to the IDDE program were included in the IDDE Manual. Currently, the ordinance has four sections that are considered prohibitions (violations) for which the issuance of a Notice of Violation (NOV) and/or other enforcement remedies is authorized. Those sections are: • Section 18-80(a) Illicit Discharges and Disposals; • Section 18-80(b) Illicit Connections; • Section 18-80(c) Accidental Discharges; and • Section 18-80(d) Obstruction. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 38 Cumulatively from FY1995 through FY2019, a total of 1,331 violations of the ordinance have been discovered resulting in the issuance of an NOV. Historically, the majority of these violations have occurred under Section 18-80(a) with many of these being either for the improper disposal of washwater or wastewater, or the illicit discharge of sewage. During FY2019, a total of 125 violations of the ordinance were discovered resulting in the issuance of an NOV. Of these, 11 also resulted in the issuance of a civil penalty assessment to the violator. The number of violations observed for each ordinance section was: • Section 18-80(a) Illicit Discharges and Disposals (120); • Section 18-80(b) Illicit Connections (1); • Section 18-80(c) Accidental Discharges (4); and • Section 18-80(d) Obstruction (0). The violations are further categorized based on the type of material discharged. Table 5-2 shows the number of NOVs issued per material category per each month during FY2019. Table 5-2: NOVs Issued per Material Category per Month City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 39 Figure 5-1 shows the graphical representation of these material categories for which NOVs were issued, and Figure 5-2 shows the number of NOVs issued per month during FY2019. Figure 5-1: NOVs issued by material category. Figure 5-2: NOVs issued per month. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 40 5.3 Stormwater System Inventory and Storm System Base Map The City collects stormwater system inventory using a Stream Walk Program and a Stormwater Inventory Program. Stream Walk Program: This program focuses on CMSWS staff walking stream channels to inspect outfalls, identify and collect data on new outfalls, and to identify dry weather flows. Stream walks are scheduled in every sub-basin within the City at least one time every five years. All Stream Walk Program data is transferred to the City’s Inventory Program annually. During FY2018, a new five-year stream-walk plan was developed based on an analysis of the previous five-year stream-walk program and the following conclusions: • The high priority basins (history of poor water quality and illicit discharges) that were walked every other year did not result in a significant number of new outfalls or illicit discharges as compared to the other basins. • The large number of miles walked in the high priority basins each year made it difficult for staff to walk different basins if the need was identified. The analysis led to changes in protocol to develop the new five-year stream walk plan that groups the sub-basins by watershed in both the City and Mecklenburg County. The same number of miles will be walked each year as previously, but the plan will also allow for a 20- mile per year reserve that can be used for walking in any basin(s) when the need is identified. Figure 5-3 shows the new five-year (FY2018 – FY2022) stream walk plan and Figure 5-4 shows the sub-basins that were walked during FY2019 within the McAlpine watershed. Stormwater Inventory Program: This program verifies the outfall data collected by the Stream Walk Program and collects additional data on other components of the stormwater system such as catch basins, inlets, pipes, etc. The Inventory Program also collects stormwater infrastructure data from the analysis of new development and municipal project areas received from the EPM- SWS Design and Engineering Teams, and EPM’s Engineering Services and Land Development divisions. All inventory data receives QA/QC and is converted digitally into GIS. During FY2019, the following activities were conducted as part of Stream Walk Program: • One watershed and 21 sub-basins covering 218 stream miles were walked and assessed; • Added to the system inventory were 340 new outfalls; and • Of the previously inventoried outfalls, 684 received inventory QA/QC. During FY2019, the following activities were conducted as part of the Inventory Program: • Of the MS4 area, 31 sub-basins and 24.6 square miles were inventoried for drainage infrastructure. The inventory collection included: 285 miles of pipe; 138 miles of open drainage; 41,167 stormwater features; and 349 municipal and new private development projects. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 41 FIGURE 5-3 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 42 FIGURE 5-4 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 43 5.4 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program 5.4.1 Outfall Inspection and Dry Weather Flow Detection Each year, outfalls are inspected for physical condition, the presence of dry weather flows (DWFs), and illicit discharges. These inspections are primarily conducted during Stream Walks and Hot Spot Investigations. Standard Operating Procedures for these activities are documented in the NPDES MS4 IDDE Manual and reviewed and updated annually. Outfall inspections also occur during service request and field investigations, municipal facility inspections, and industrial facility inspections. Stream Walk Program: As discussed in Section 5.3, this program involves CMSWS staff walking the stream channel to inspect outfalls, sample DWFs, and document a variety of other water quality related problems. Various reasons make it impossible to sample all DWFs including very low flows (seepage), frozen water, etc. DWFs are sampled for physical parameters (temperature, conductivity, pH, etc.), fecal coliform and total phosphorus. Fecal coliform samples are also collected from areas where tributaries enter the channel being walked and staff document stream blockages, areas of severe stream bank erosion, wetlands and new stream reference reaches as they observe them. During FY2019, the Stream Walk program produced the following results: • Inspection of 1,024 outfalls; • Detection of 267 DWFs at outfalls; • Sampling of 93 of the 267 DWFs, which included 61 fecal coliform and 32 total phosphorous samples; • Analysis of 428 data points for fecal coliform and total phosphorous including sampling of DWFs, flows during follow up investigations, and points where tributaries meet the main stream; • Investigation of 14 fecal coliform sample locations where the analysis result exceeded the program action limit threshold; and • Discovery of ten illicit discharges, 42 stream blockages, 30 areas of severe stream bank erosion, and 48 other potential issues. In addition, CMSWS staff inspected 213 outfalls as part of service request response, field investigations, municipal facilities inspections, and industrial facility inspections. 5.4.2 Water Quality Monitoring Water quality in-stream monitoring is used to identify problems and to track long and short-term water quality trends. The two main monitoring programs used to support IDDE efforts are the Fixed Interval and CMANN (Continuous Monitoring and Alert Notification Network) stream monitoring programs. The Fixed Interval program conducts in-stream monitoring for various chemical and physical parameters on a monthly basis and is discussed further in Section 10. The CMANN program is an automated monitoring network that takes in-stream readings every 60 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 44 minutes at monitoring sites for dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, conductivity, and turbidity. This parameter data is transferred to a database in real-time using cellular telemetry. Figure 5-5 shows the monitoring locations for this program. “Watch” and “Action” levels for the monitoring parameters are used as part of the program to determine when follow-up investigations are needed to address potential problems. The Watch and Action levels are based on state water quality standards and historical local data for the chemical and physical parameters. Exceedance of these levels will trigger a field investigation. During FY2019, eight follow-up investigations were conducted as a result of watch and action level exceedances detected by the Fixed Interval and CMANN stream monitoring programs. These investigations resulted in the discovery of several water quality issues (water main breaks, elevated turbidity levels, etc.) and three illicit discharges. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 45 FIGURE 5-5 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 46 5.4.3 Illicit Discharge Elimination Program (IDEP) The IDEP program is a sub-set of the overall IDDE program. This program conducts illicit discharge detection, investigation and outreach activities in areas where data and staff experience indicate the greatest likelihood for the occurrence of illicit discharges and/or poor housekeeping practices. This past fiscal year, the IDEP program conducted the following activities: • Hot Spot Investigations • Multi-Family Residential Community Inspections • Business Corridor Runs • Industry-wide Investigations • Pet Waste Flagging Campaign Standard operating procedures have been developed to describe all IDEP program activities and protocols which are reviewed annually. Hot Spot Investigations: This activity conducts investigations in areas where analysis of monitoring and/or service request data indicates a priority problem area. These investigations require more experienced staff with extensive field investigation expertise to locate sources of pollution in these priority areas. The field investigations typically include use of one or more of the following techniques: • Establishing a temporary CMANN monitoring station; • Collecting grab samples in tributaries, pipes, and manholes; • Dye testing businesses and homes; • Monitoring suspect facilities; • Smoke testing sanitary sewers; and/or • Conducting pipe video inspections. During previous years, Hot Spot investigations included the identification of a priority sub-basin in which IDEP staff would walk the sub-basin and sample minor outfalls to locate pollution sources and/or problems. From analysis of past program data, this method was determined to be largely unsuccessful. As a result, during FY2019 four priority areas were instead determined based on the methodology described above. These areas received Hot Spot investigations as summarized below: • Worthington Drainage Basin, Irwin Creek Watershed: During FY2018, bacteria levels in Irwin Creek led staff to the Worthington drainage basin stormwater outfall where intermittent discharges of sewage were evident and extensive sampling of manholes was unsuccessful in identifying the location of a source(s). During FY2019, IDEP staff worked with Charlotte Water staff, CMSWS pipe video staff and a private contractor to conduct smoke testing, dye testing, and pipe video in various areas of the Worthington drainage basin. This work led to the identification and correction of a leaking sewer pipe and the dramatic reduction of sewage indicators at the Worthington drainage basin City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 47 stormwater outfall. Follow-up investigations are planned for FY2020 to ensure that there are no other sewage sources in this drainage area. • Little Sugar Creek at 4th Street, Little Sugar Creek Watershed: During FY2018, high bacteria results in the Little Sugar Creek watershed led staff to establish a new CMANN monitoring station at a major stormwater outfall located on Little Sugar Creek at 4th Street. This outfall discharges stormwater from a portion of the Charlotte central business district. During FY2019, CMSWS staff sampled multiple manholes within this drainage area and conducted pipe video inspections, which identified a cross-connection between the sanitary sewer and stormwater systems. This connection was subsequently eliminated and resulted in the dramatic reduction of DWFs and bacteria counts at the stormwater outfall. • Sink Holes at 12th Street Fleet Management, Irwin Creek Watershed: During FY2018, sink holes in the parking area of the City’s Fleet Management Shop revealed sewage sources in a tributary to Irwin Creek. During FY2019, CMSWS staff worked with Charlotte Water to smoke test public sewer lines and conducted multiple dye tests at various facilities in the area. A private sewer lateral was identified to be a source of the sewage and staff worked with the facility to ensure elimination of the discharge. • Amtrak Creekside, Little Sugar Creek Watershed: During a construction project to replace aging stormwater infrastructure, strong sewage odors were noticed. CMSWS staff conducted multiple efforts to evaluate this problem. The efforts included sampling at stormwater manholes and stream tributaries and dye testing and smoke testing of three municipal sanitary sewer lines in the area. Results of these efforts pointed to an existing building within a commercial redevelopment project called Amtrak Creekside. Pipe video inspection of a private sewer lateral serving the building revealed a blockage that was causing a sewage discharge to the storm drain system. CMSWS staff worked with the property owner to ensure the private lateral was monitored and cleared of blockage until the building was permanently vacated. The private sewer lateral will be replaced as part of the redevelopment project. Multi-Family Residential Community Inspections: This activity conducts inspections of privately maintained multi-family residential sewer systems to look for signs of problems with the operation and maintenance of these systems. CMSWS inspectors check system manholes and clean outs looking for signs of current or potential overflows and pipe blockages and/or evidence of previous problems such as limed areas, sewage solids on ground, etc. The multi-family systems selected are based on their sewer overflow history. During FY2019, 11 multi-family inspections were conducted with no illicit discharges noted. Figure 5-6 shows a sewage discharge from a multi-family system. Figure 5-6: Overflowing manhole at a multi-family residential system City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 48 Business Corridor Runs: This activity conducts windshield surveys along streets throughout the City that have a high concentration of commercial businesses where illicit discharges and poor housekeeping practices may potentially be found. The surveys allow staff to quickly survey these business areas for the presence of practices such as dumping of washwater, mobile pressure washing, motor oil discharges from automotive maintenance practices, and cooking oil/grease discharges at restaurants. Staff will also inspect storm drain inlets and outfalls in these areas when illicit discharges are suspected. During FY2019, business corridor efforts included the inspection of 2,457 businesses and 358 catch basins. This led to the discovery of 12 illicit discharges resulting in the issuance of NOVs and the distribution of four environmental notices for poor housekeeping practices. Industry-wide Investigations: This activity involves staff focusing on a specific industry or commercial business sector for inspections. During FY2019, the beer brewing industry was targeted due to the potential for illicit discharge from the improper storage of process waste. Staff prepared a list of breweries within the City and conducted inspections at two facilities resulting in the discovery of poor housekeeping practices. Staff worked with the breweries to assist in developing BMPs to reduce pollution potential from their facilities. Staff will conduct additional inspections at breweries during FY2020. Pet Waste Flagging Campaign: This effort began during FY2018 and has continued with the goal of reducing the amount of improperly disposed pet waste. Greenways and park areas known for pet waste problems were targeted and IDEP staff used small flags (i.e. utility marking flags) with messages of the environmental and health risks resulting from improper disposal of pet waste, specifically marking and drawing attention to visible obvious deposits of canine waste. Staff also used chalk to mark deposits in areas where the soil was too compact for the use of flags. Each week throughout April, staff visited these areas to mark pet waste deposits and educate residents. These activities were also combined with social media/on-line outreach, attendance at community events for pet owners, and interviews with local TV personalities and on-line media staff. During FY2019, staff marked 306 deposits of pet waste and engaged with 25 residents during the flagging campaign. Figure 5-7 shows the locations where IDEP activities occurred during FY2019 and Figure 5-8 shows the business corridors evaluated during FY2019. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 49 FIGURE 5-7 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 50 FIGURE 5-8 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 51 5.5 Employee IDDE Training and Education Employee IDDE Training and Education involves training municipal employees about the detection of illicit connections and discharges, and the various methods for reporting suspected pollution problems. Training is provided through a combination of the following methods: • Staff meeting presentations; • On-site, in-person training sessions; • On-line training module; and • Other methods such as posters, fliers, light box displays, emails, websites, and displays and information at employee gatherings Staff meeting presentations: This method involves providing a ten-minute presentation at a regularly scheduled staff meeting to provide information about identifying common illicit discharges in the community, the importance of reporting them, and the various methods that can be used to report them. Staff meeting presentations can also include workshops when internal staff attends and at least ten minutes are dedicated to providing information about identifying and reporting illicit discharges. The following staff presentations were provided during FY2019 reaching 264 employees: • Housing and Neighborhood Services Department - Code Enforcement Staff Retreat • EPM - Stormwater Division Pipe Video Crew staff meeting • Charlotte Department of Transportation - Utility Stakeholders Meeting • Charlotte Planning, Design and Development Staff Meeting On-site, in-person training sessions: This method uses specially scheduled classroom style sessions that occur annually and include a power point presentation and video covering: • Common illicit discharges in the community; • How to detect them when they enter surface water; • The importance of reporting them and the various ways they can report them as well as more in-depth pollution prevention information related to their facility and field work; • Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans; • Spill prevention and response (Figure 5-9); • Pollution prevention and the role of the employees to protect the environment and set an example for the community; and • Results from recent facility inspections. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 52 Presentations are given by CMSWS staff at all facilities except those owned by the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) and the Airport. The presentations provided by CMSWS and CATS were customized to reflect field work pollution prevention practices related to the audiences’ daily work, the most recent facility inspection and a three- minute Spill Response Video which covered the importance of spill response. Presentations provided by the Airport were targeted at employees as well as contractors who are then responsible for training their own staff. On-line training module: This method provides a power point presentation and video that is very similar to the on-site, in-person training session version, but allows field or shift-work staff to take the training at times more convenient for them. Other methods: Additional methods used during FY2019 to reach internal staff with messages of report pollution included: • Participation in the City’s Earth Day event; • Piloting a Rewards Program; and • The use of Report Pollution Posters. Participation in the City’s Earth Day event included EPM-SWS staff attendance at the City employee Earth Day event held in the courtyard of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center. This event provided the opportunity to engage approximately 130 employees with a table-top display about stormwater pollution and reporting, promotional products, and a hands- on demonstration. The Rewards Program was a pilot program conducted during FY2019 over a four-month period that targeted EPM-SWS staff only. The program began by e-mailing all EPM-SWS staff to announce that rewards would be provided to anyone who reported stormwater pollution and the report resulted in a valid investigation. The rewards that staff could choose from included coffee cups, water bottles and stuffed animals (Stormy the Turtle with Report Pollution messaging). Each month, an e- mail was sent to EPM-SWS staff highlighting the reports received and rewards provided. Over the course of the four-month period, 19 staff members Figure 5-9: Spill Response Video used for Training Figure 5-10: Rewards Program advertisement City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 53 reported potential pollution problems and received rewards. Figure 5-10 shows an advertisement for the rewards program. The Report Pollution Poster involved the development of a poster (Figure 5-11) and posting it at 47 locations across City departments. Locations included break rooms, copy rooms, and bulletin boards for all floors of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Government Center and old City Hall and at four field operation facilities. 5.5.1 Commercial Sector Education and Outreach Certain businesses can be frequent sources of illicit discharges and connections. To improve compliance and reduce the number and severity of illicit discharges coming from the commercial sector, the City proactively provides education to certain commercial business sectors each year. During FY2019, CMSWS provided 16 two-page best practices publications and guidance documents for commercial sectors available on-line. CMSWS also distributed these publications as part of service requests, mailings, training sessions and public events. The following provides a complete list of the commercial sector publications that have been developed: • Landscape Maintenance • Concrete • Pressure Washers • Horizontal Directional Drilling • Mobile Vehicle Detailers • Painting • Food Service Industry • Swimming Pools and Spas • Managers of Apartments and Condos • Rooftop Work • Asphalt Sealing • Stone Cutting • Carpet Cleaning • Vehicle and Equipment Repair • Commercial Property Management • Municipal Contractors [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] Figure 5-11: Report Pollution Poster City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 54 Food Service Industry: During FY2019, CMSWS updated the format for the Food Services best practices publication to reduce wording and focus on highlighting the most important information for prevention and response to illicit discharges relevant to the industry. The intent of this effort was to increase the likelihood that this publication would be used as a poster for employee education (Figure 5-12) and that the publication will be read when distributed during service requests. This new format will also be used as a template to update the other 15 best practices publications over time. Multiple social media posts and a Utility Bill Insert also highlighted reporting leaking grease bins (the most common illicit discharge from this industry) and provided a link to this updated publication. Swimming Pools and Spas: During FY2019, CMSWS staff implemented an outreach plan specific to the Swimming Pool and Spa Industry. Staff first met with 15 commercial pool operators at an annual meeting held by the Mecklenburg County Environmental Health division to discuss the best way to reach this sector of contractors most effectively. As a result of the discussion with operators, it was decided that outreach efforts should focus on helping residents who have pools to understand the best practices that contractors should employ when servicing the resident’s pool and/or spa. This effort was conducted by developing a GIS coverage and associated mailing list of all 8,300 residents with pools located within the City of Charlotte. A post card (Figure 5-13) and webpage were developed Figure 5-13: Pool and Spa Post Card Figure 5-12: Food Service poster City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 55 to highlight the best practices for pool and spa owners and contractors. The postcard was mailed to all 8,300 residents with pools on the mailing list. 5.5.2 Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Septic Systems CMSWS works with two separate City/County departments to reduce sources of bacteria from sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) and septic systems: Charlotte Water (CW) and Mecklenburg County Groundwater and Wastewater Services. Sanitary Sewer Overflows(SSOs): CW is the department responsible for operating the municipal water supply and sanitary sewer systems in the City. During FY2019, there were 162 SSOs (total volume of 4,434,266 gallons) from the municipal sanitary sewer system. This is a decrease in volume of ~78.5% from FY2018. It is important to note that the largest overflow during FY2019 was caused by a large tree falling on a wastewater pipe which accounted for 59.5% of the total volume spilled. Heavy rain events and two tropical storms also caused large overflows. Together these large events accounted for 97% of the total gallons spilled for the year. Figure 5-14 summarizes the causes for these SSOs. In addition, the number of spills per 100 miles of pipe system continued to show a steady decline. For example, during FY2007 there were 10.8 SSOs per 100 miles of pipe system compared to 3.7 SSOs per 100 miles during FY2019. This represents a 65.7% decrease over the 11-year period. The City works to decrease SSOs in four main ways: • Infrastructure maintenance and inspections; • Commercial/restaurant/ industrial inspections; • Multi-family residential outreach; and • The Flow Free (Fats, Oils, and Grease) education campaign. Infrastructure maintenance and inspection: CW implements a number of infrastructure maintenance and inspection programs designed to reduce inflow and infiltration and sanitary sewer losses. During FY2019, the following was accomplished: • 20.1 miles of sanitary sewer pipe were relined; Figure 5-14: FY2019 SSOs by cause City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 56 • 8,906 sanitary sewer system manholes were inspected; • 21.5 miles of wastewater pipe and 301 manholes were rehabilitated, repaired or replaced; • 259 miles of sanitary sewer pipe were treated with root control chemicals; • 971 miles of sanitary sewer pipe were cleaned; • 248 sewer service connections were replaced; • 83 miles of sanitary sewer line rights of way were cleared to maintain access for inspection and maintenance; • 172 miles of sewer line were inspected using closed circuit television recording; and • 161 preventative maintenance tasks were conducted at the system’s 82 lift stations. Commercial/restaurant/industrial inspections: During FY2019, CW performed the following activities: • Inspections of grease handling facilities at 5,449 food service establishments and restaurants; • 200 inspections of industrial pretreatment facilities; • 39 NOVs were issued for violation of the City’s Sewer Use Ordinance (includes NOVs issued to commercial and industrial facilities); • 231 Notices of Deficiency (NOD) were sent to businesses; • 44 grease traps were installed by businesses to fulfill NOD requirements; • CW continued to provide educational information about proper disposal of pipe-blocking items (Flow Free education); • Inspectors mailed information to 1,236 customers near SSO sites and handed out information to 2,231 customers at multi-family communities. • 1,640 adults and children received presentations from staff; • Staff continued to distribute door-hangers to maintenance personnel and property managers of multi-family communities. • CW created the Pipes Hate Wipes campaign to educate residents about the impact flushable wipes have on the collection system and wastewater treatment plants. The campaign primarily used videos and paid Facebook/Instagram advertisements and YouTube Pre-roll. A copy of Charlotte Water’s full FY2019 Wastewater Performance Report can be found here: https://charlottenc.gov/Water/Documents/FY19%20Wastewater%20Report.pdf. Multi-Family Residential Program: Since 2009, CMSWS has been working with CW to prevent SSOs through education and inspection. From FY2010 through FY2018, the following was accomplished: • Over 350 informational letters were mailed to multi-family residential communities to advise them of private sewer system requirements; • Six workshops were provided, educating over 190 personnel about the operation & maintenance (O&M) requirements for private sanitary sewer systems; • Over 200 multi-family residential communities were inspected; and City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 57 • Assistance was provided to 187 multi-family residential communities to complete an O&M plan. During the fall of 2018 (FY2019), CMSWS and CW met four times to comprehensively evaluate the previous years of effort and the accomplishments related to the program. The results of the evaluation led the two groups to determine that, for FY2019, the number of inspections of private and public sewer systems should be increased and concentrated in prioritized areas where the greatest number of SSOs had occurred within the past five years. The groups would also work together to implement new ways of educating multi-family facility managers and their residents about proper O&M practices. In addition, the groups would meet with NCDEQ officials to understand how they can all work together to promote and enforce the program. During FY2019, the CMSWS part of the program accomplished the following: • 48 multi-family residential communities received informational letters; • 26 O&M plans were submitted by multi-family facilities; • 48 inspections were conducted at multi-family facilities and eight of the inspections revealed problems in the private sanitary sewer system such as built up debris, missing sewer clean-out caps, and evidence of recent overflows. • Ten NOVs for violation of the Stormwater Pollution Control Ordinance were issued to multi-family facilities for SSOs from their private sanitary sewer system that resulted in an illicit discharge to the storm drainage system and/or surface waters. Figure 5-15 shows the locations of the 48 multi-family facilities inspected by CMSWS during FY2019. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 58 FIGURE 5-15 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 59 Septic Systems: CMSWS works with Mecklenburg County Groundwater and Wastewater Services each year to monitor discharges from septic systems. The County conducts the permitting, inspections, education and enforcement activities related to septic systems and CMSWS reviews this information to look for potential impacts on surface waters. During FY2019, a total of 67 failing septic systems were discovered in the City, 13 were repaired and 54 were connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system. These failures were not localized to any particular watershed area. No follow-up field investigations or monitoring were deemed necessary by CMSWS during the fiscal year. Figure 5-16 shows locations of septic system failure activities during FY2019. 5.6 Public Reporting Hotline The City, in cooperation with Mecklenburg County, operates a joint customer service hotline to receive information about a variety of concerns. Citizens can dial 311 to report pollution, flooding, and blockages to the drainage system as well as request other City/County services. The 311 call center is staffed and open Monday through Friday from 7 am to 7 pm to receive calls. Citizens can also submit requests for service to 311 on-line anytime (24/7/365). The City promotes this hotline throughout all of the activities provided as part of the Stormwater Public Education and Outreach Program. EPM-Storm Water Services works with the 311 customer service group to make sure calls are directed to appropriate personnel and/or are handled in a timely manner. The hotline/help line is discussed further in sub-section 3.4.3. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 60 FIGURE 5-16 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 61 5.6.1 Public Education and Outreach The City continued to maintain a public education and outreach program to inform businesses, industries and the public about illicit discharges and improper waste disposal and how they impact the environment. This education and outreach program included instructions regarding the proper method for reporting illicit discharges. The primary education and outreach mechanisms used were: • Media campaign (included mass media and social media); • Website; • Utility bill inserts; • Handouts/brochures; • Public events; and • In-person education and training sessions. Handouts and brochures were reviewed and revised as necessary and were distributed during the performance of facility inspections, when responding to citizen requests for service, and at event displays. These public education and outreach items for the IDDE Program were included as a component of the Public Education and Outreach Program described in more detail in Section 3. 5.7 Service Requests and Documentation Responding to service requests continued to be one of the most important methods for detecting and eliminating illicit discharges and connections in the City. During FY2019, a total of 553 service requests related to surface water pollution were investigated. These included 31 emergency response situations that typically involve oil, fuel, or other hazardous material releases, as discussed further in sub-section 8.5. All service requests were investigated and follow-up was provided to ensure efforts were taken to remediate the discharge and restore impacted areas. Enforcement activities were implemented as appropriate and are described in more detail in sub-section 5.2. Table 5-3 shows the caller type and corresponding number of service requests received. Table 5-3: FY2019 Service Request Source Summary Caller Type Number of Service Requests* Public Citizen 342 Business 4 Charlotte Fire Department staff 24 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department staff 0 Charlotte Storm Water Services staff 45 Charlotte Water staff 33 Mecklenburg County Storm Water Services staff 83 State – NCDEQ staff 5 Environmental Protection Agency/NRC 2 Other 15 TOTAL 553 * Source summary data includes all types of service requests within the City jurisdiction City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 62 The City utilizes the Cityworks® database platform to maintain electronic and hard copy files documenting all IDDE activities including citizen requests. These were tracked from the original call for service, through investigations and applicable enforcement actions, and until final remedial work was completed. The database stores information such as reporting party contact information, date, time, investigator information, pollutant category, investigation reports, monitoring data, photos and attachments, applicable enforcement information, and geo-location. During FY2019, the following watershed areas recorded the highest number of activities including service requests, emergency responses, and NOVs: • Little Sugar Creek; • Briar Creek; • Irwin Creek; and • Stewart Creek. Figure 5-17 shows a summary report of a service request activity, and Figure 5-18 shows the FY2019 spatial distribution of service requests within the City. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 63 FIGURE 5-17 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 64 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 65 FIGURE 5-18 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 66 5.8 Measurable Goals/Planned Activities for Future Program Years Table 5-4 describes the various Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination program BMPs and the Measurable Goals and Planned Activities for Future Program Years for each BMP by permit term year. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 67 Table 5-4: BMP Measurable Goals for the Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5+ Maintain appropriate legal authorities Maintain adequate ordinances or other legal authorities to prohibit illicit connections and discharges and enforce the approved IDDE Program. Continue administration and enforcement of the Pollution Control Ordinance and IDDE Program. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Maintain a Storm Sewer System Base Map The permittee shall maintain a current map showing major outfalls and receiving streams. Continue to maintain storm sewer map in GIS and update as necessary to show additional outfalls. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Inspection / detection program to detect dry weather flows at MS4 outfalls Maintain written procedures and/or Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for detecting and tracing the sources of illicit discharges and for removing the sources or reporting the sources to the State to be properly permitted. Written procedures and/or SOPs shall specify a timeframe for monitoring and how many outfalls and the areas that are to be targeted for inspections. Maintain and update SOPs for detecting and eliminating illicit discharges and performing outfall inspections. Roughly 20% of identified outfalls will be inspected each year, with extra emphasis on hotspot areas. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Employee Training Conduct training for appropriate municipal staff on detecting and reporting illicit connections and discharges. Maintain an employee training program and conduct employee training. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Maintain a public reporting mechanism Maintain and publicize reporting mechanism for the public to report illicit connections and discharges. Establish citizen request response procedures. Maintain the public reporting hotline and publicize through the media outreach campaign. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Documentation The permittee shall document the date of investigations, any enforcement action(s) or remediation that occurred. Continue to maintain IDDE program records and databases to accurately document the activities in the program. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 68 5.9 Program Assessment The overall Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Program was successfully implemented during the annual report period. Table 5-5 shows a summary of the various items and corresponding data results for activities conducted under the program. Table 5-5: Program Summary IDDE PROGRAM FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Stream miles assessed 218 Watershed sub-basins assessed 21 Outfalls inspected/inventoried/updated 1,236 Dry weather flows detected 267 Dry weather flows sampled 61 Citizen service requests responded to 553 Emergency spills responded to 31 Illicit discharges detected/corrected 371 Ordinance violations/NOVs issued 125 Penalty enforcements issued 11 Municipal employee IDDE training sessions 86 Municipal employees trained on IDDE 1,993 SSOs detected/referred 76 Sanitary sewer use ordinance NOVs issued 39 Sanitary sewer system pretreatment inspections 200 Sanitary sewer system FOG inspections 5,449 Sanitary sewer system pipe miles cleaned 971 Sanitary sewer system ROW miles cleared 83 Sanitary sewer system miles re-lined 20.1 Sanitary sewer system manholes inspected 8,906 Sanitary sewer system lift stations maintained 82 Sanitary sewer system overflows corrected 162 Pet waste deposits flagged 306 Pet waste receptacles provided 100 Septic system failures detected/corrected 67 The following is clarification of certain numbers provided in Table 5-5: • Outfalls inspected/inventoried/updated includes outfalls from stream-walks, IDEP program, and municipal and industrial inspections; City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 69 • Dry weather flows detected and sampled includes those from outfalls inventoried during Streamwalks; • Illicit discharges detected includes those found during service requests (102) (including emergency response and private sewage system discharges), IDEP (12), septic system failures (67), stream-walks (10), water quality monitoring (3), and municipal (3) and industrial inspections (12); • Employee IDDE training sessions includes the number of classroom sessions, number of facilities assigned the on-line training module, and employee training/outreach events • Number of employees trained on IDDE includes all those trained during the sessions described in the bulleted item above; and • Number of SSOs includes those from both municipal and private systems. As part of a continual evaluation process, CMSWS started a new initiative during FY2018 called “IDDE Think Tank Meetings.” These meetings are used to evaluate the effectiveness of current activities, identify new methods for identifying illicit discharges, and coordination of program implementation. The following highlights some of the results from FY2019: • Discussion of various initiatives to evaluate new technology for potential use in identifying illicit discharges; • Installation of ammonia probes at two locations to assist in identifying illicit discharges; • Targeting beer brewery facilities; • Targeting stormwater outfall inspections and sampling in neighborhoods with old infrastructure; • Continuation of the Pet Waste Flagging Campaign; and • Increased focus on ambient flow and oxygen dynamics to potentially identify illicit discharges. The annual evaluation of the IDDE program also resulted in the following conclusions: • GIS analysis of illicit discharges continues to show that most of these occur in highly urbanized areas of the City. As such, the IDEP program will continue to be implemented as support for the Stream-Walk program in priority basins; • Education targeting pool and spa contractors will continue to build upon efforts this past year; • Targeting multi-family residential communities with education and inspections will continue as these communities are a significant source of SSOs. CMSWS and CW will continue to coordinate their efforts with each other and the State to improve effectiveness of the program in FY2020; • The public and internal staff continue to be the number one source of illicit discharge reporting. The public reporting hotline, public education campaigns, internal education and service request response will continue to be a staple for IDDE efforts; • The Cityworks® database and use of smart phones for field data entry continues to facilitate data entry, storage and query capabilities; and City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 70 • The City’s vast and varied surface and stormwater monitoring program continues to be an important resource for detecting illicit discharges and understanding long term trends in water quality. Section 6: Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Program During the annual report period, the Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control program conducted site evaluations and enforced the local ordinance per the SWMP. The following sub- sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and • Program assessment. 6.1 BMP Summary Table Table 6-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the requirements of the Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Program. Funding for the BMPs in this section is covered by local land development fees. Table 6-1: BMP Summary Table for the Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Erosion and Sediment Control Program The permittee has a delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program. As such, to the extent authorized by law, the permittee is responsible for compliance with the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1973 and Chapter 4 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code. The delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program effectively meets the maximum extent practicable (MEP) standard for Construction Site Runoff Controls by permitting and controlling development activities disturbing one or more acres of land surface and those activities less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development as authorized under the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1973 and Chapter 4 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code. X X X X X Land Development Division Manager Develop requirements for construction site operators The NCG010000 permit establishes requirements for construction site operators to control waste such as discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste at the construction site that may cause adverse impacts to water quality, as part of the Permittee’s X X X X X Land Development Division Manager City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 71 delegated program. Public information and reporting The permittee shall provide and promote a means for the public to notify the appropriate authorities of observed erosion and sedimentation problems. The permittee may implement a plan promoting the existence of the NCDEQ, Division of Land Resources “Stop Mud” hotline to meet the requirements of this paragraph. X X X X X Land Development Division Manager Plan reviews Implement construction site plan reviews as part of the Permittee’s delegated program. For new development and redevelopment projects to be built within the permittee’s planning jurisdiction by entities with eminent domain authority, the permittee shall, to the maximum extent practicable, coordinate the approval of the construction site runoff control with the Division of Land Resources of NCDEQ. X X X X X Land Development Division Manager 6.2 Erosion and Sediment Control Program The City has operated a soil erosion and sediment control program locally since 1983, which is currently a delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program under authority granted by the North Carolina Sedimentation Commission. As such, to the extent authorized by law, the City is responsible for compliance with the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1973 and Chapter 4 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code. During FY2019 the program served to provide added protection to surface water resources in the City by ensuring that builders and developers followed minimum standards for erosion and sediment control per State and Local guidelines. The “City of Charlotte-Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance,” amended and adopted by council in 2008, serves as the backbone of the program. Ordinance highlights include the following requirements: • An approved soil erosion and sediment control plan for all qualifying land disturbances of one acre or greater; • An on-site preconstruction conference prior to the installation of any measures or commencement of land disturbing activities; • Issuance of a grading permit prior to the commencement of land disturbing activities; • Weekly inspections at a minimum by the permit holder of erosion control measures depending on sensitivity of receiving waters; • Inspections by the permit holder of measures after any rainfall event totaling one-half inch or greater; • Documentation and maintenance of inspection records performed by the permit holder; • Maintenance and optimal performance of all measures for the life of the project performed by the permit holder; • Requirements for controls to minimize erosion and prevent offsite sedimentation; and City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 72 • Enhanced local erosion control requirements which were deemed essential for protecting sensitive environmental features and were developed based on years of field experience and observations. The ordinance also provides EPM-LD staff with the following: • Authority to issue NOVs for practices and/or impacts contravening ordinance requirements; and • Authority to issue civil penalties for violations of the Soil Erosion & Sedimentation Control Ordinance. 6.2.1 Inspection Procedures All construction sites that required a preconstruction meeting and approved plan were logged, filed and placed in the queue for regular inspections. Staff goals were to visit and inspect every logged site utilizing a scheduled inspection process. Sites that generated citizen complaints, had a history of non-compliance, or were in close proximity to a critical area (e.g., sites adjacent to water features or within a water-supply watershed) were considered a priority for additional inspections and follow-up. 6.3 Construction Site Requirements The program requires that all land disturbing activities comply with ordinance requirements for controlling erosion and sediment on site. As an additional requirement, and in compliance with NPDES regulations, all construction sites one acre or greater must have an approved soil erosion and sediment control plan designed specifically for the site as required by NPDES General Permit NCG010000 for Construction Related Activities. After plan approval, responsible parties were required to follow the approved plan for all phases of construction, as well as maintain measures in a state that ensured optimal performance throughout the duration of construction activities and until final site stabilization was achieved. Regular self-inspections were a requirement for optimal performance and all sites were required to employ a competent person to conduct inspections and maintain logbooks and documentation for ready-review by local or state representatives. 6.4 Public Information and Reporting The City’s Erosion Control Program maintains a website to assist with the dissemination of information to the development community and the public. In addition, the City maintains an information/help line and citizens can dial 311 to report erosion, pollution, flooding, and blockages to the drainage system as well as request other City/County services. The 311 call center is staffed and open Monday through Friday from 7 am to 7 pm to receive calls. Citizens can also submit requests for service to 311 on-line anytime (24/7/365). The help line serves as a clearinghouse for general information and ensures that erosion control related issues are directed to appropriate EPM-LD staff for resolution. Information sharing and inter-department training between City and County agencies also ensures that problems, questions, or requests for City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 73 information from the public can be processed and resolved quickly. The City’s erosion control webpage can be viewed at: http://charlottenc.gov/ld/Pages/default.aspx 6.4.1 Education and Training Materials The City maintained an education and training program for developers, contractors and other interested parties within the region. Although program policies and procedures dictated that self- inspectors maintain a level of competence necessary to ensure compliance, the City took a proactive role in providing local training and handout materials for affected parties. In a cooperative effort with Mecklenburg County, the City maintained the Charlotte- Mecklenburg Certified Site Inspector (CMCSI) training program, which to date has provided training to over 6,180 individuals since its inception in 2003. CMCSI is a full day training course that provides attendees with an understanding of the importance of water resources to our community, the local and state requirements for controlling construction site runoff, principles of erosion control, common site problems, recommendations for conducting effective inspections, and a certification exam. The CMCSI program was offered three times in classroom sessions during FY2019 as well as being offered as an online option throughout the year for renewal/recertification purposes. This effort provided training to 349 people (Table 6-2). In addition to the CMCSI education program, all developers, builders and responsible parties received handouts and materials at preconstruction meetings and at other times as necessary to explain ordinance requirements, minimum standards and other relevant information for the financially responsible party and/or site operators. Table 6-2: CMCSI Training Program Dates and Attendance – FY2019 Date Registered Attended 10/22/2018 136 98 01/23/2019 132 117 05/09/2019 98 74 Online training option N/A 60 Totals 366 349 6.5 Plan Reviews All land disturbing activity one acre or greater was required to obtain plan approval of the soil erosion and sediment control plan prior to scheduling a preconstruction conference. Erosion control plans submitted by the applicants were reviewed and approved by EPM-LD erosion control staff. All EPM-LD erosion control staff obtained and/or maintained their status as a Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC) which provided accreditation for plan review. Plans were reviewed for suitability of selected measures and to ensure that design City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 74 parameters and calculations were appropriately employed and minimum standards were achieved. 6.6 Measurable Goals/Planned Activities for Future Program Years Table 6-3 describes the various Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control BMPs and the Measurable Goals and Planned Activities for Future Program Years for each BMP by permit term year. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 75 Table 6-3: BMP Measurable Goals for the Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5+ Erosion and Sediment Control Program The permittee has a delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program. As such, to the extent authorized by law, the permittee is responsible for compliance with the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1973 and Chapter 4 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code. The delegated Sediment and Erosion Control Program effectively meets the maximum extent practicable (MEP) standard for Construction Site Runoff Controls by permitting and controlling development activities disturbing one or more acres of land surface and those activities less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development as authorized under the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1973 and Chapter 4 of Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code. Continue to implement the delegated Sediment and Erosion Control program and enforce the City ordinance. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Develop requirements for construction site operators The NCG010000 permit establishes requirements for construction site operators to control waste such as discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste at the construction site that may cause adverse impacts to water quality, as part of the Permittee’s delegated program. Continue requirements for BMPs and waste control through issuance of General Construction Permit NCG010000. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Public information and reporting The permittee shall provide and promote a means for the public to notify the appropriate authorities of observed erosion and sedimentation problems. The permittee may implement a plan promoting the existence of the NCDENR, now NCDEQ, Division of Land Resources “Stop Mud” hotline to meet the requirements of this paragraph. Continue to maintain reporting hotline and website. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Plan reviews Implement construction site plan reviews as part of the Permittee’s delegated program. For new development and redevelopment projects to be built within the permittee’s planning jurisdiction by entities with eminent domain authority, the permittee shall, to the maximum extent practicable, coordinate the approval of the construction site runoff control with the Division of Land Resources of DENR. Continue plan reviews to ensure program requirements are met. Coordinate with NCDEQ – DEMLR as necessary. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 76 6.7 Program Assessment The overall Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Program was successfully implemented during the annual report period. Table 6-4 shows a summary of the various items and corresponding data results for activities conducted under the program. Table 6-4: Program Summary CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF PROGRAM FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 CMCSI education workshops conducted 3 Citizens trained via CMCSI program 349 Project/site plans reviewed 1,254 Erosion control citizen requests responded to 500 Site inspections conducted 3,513 NOVs issued 51 Penalty enforcements issued 60 Section 7: Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program During the annual report period, the City conducted implementation of its Post-Construction Stormwater Management program in accordance with the Post-Construction Stormwater Ordinance (PCSO) and program administrative manual. The following sub-sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and • Program assessment. 7.1 BMP Summary Table Table 7-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the requirements of the Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program. Funding for the BMPs in this section is covered by local stormwater utility fees and land development fees. Table 7-1: BMP Summary Table for the Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program Maintain an ordinance (or similar regulatory mechanism) and program to address stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Strategies which include BMPs appropriate for the MS4 Maintain strategies that include a combination of structural and/or non-structural BMPs implemented in concurrence with ordinance above. Provide a mechanism to require long-term operation and X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 77 maintenance of structural BMPs. Require annual inspection reports of permitted structural BMPs performed by a qualified professional. A qualified professional means an individual trained and/or certified in the design, operation, inspection and maintenance aspects of the BMPs being inspected, for example, someone trained and certified by NC State for BMP Inspection & Maintenance. Deed Restrictions and Protective Covenants The permittee shall provide mechanisms such as recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants so that development activities maintain the project consistent with approved plans. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Operation and Maintenance Plan The developer shall provide the permittee with an operation and maintenance plan for the stormwater system, indicating the operation and maintenance actions that shall be taken, specific quantitative criteria used for determining when those actions shall be taken, and who is responsible for those actions. The plan must clearly indicate the steps that shall be taken and who shall be responsible for restoring a stormwater system to design specifications if a failure occurs and must include an acknowledgment by the responsible party. Development must be maintained consistent with the requirements in the approved plans and any modifications to those plans must be approved by the Permittee. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Educational materials and training for developers Provide educational materials and training for developers. New materials may be developed by the permittee, or the permittee may use materials adopted from other programs and adapted to the permittee’s new development and redevelopment program. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager 7.2 Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program The City’s post-construction program is designed to meet the stormwater management and water quality protection requirements of North Carolina Administrative Code at 15A 02H Sections .0126, .0150 - .0154 (NPDES) and at 15A 02H Section .1000 (Stormwater Management) to address post-construction stormwater runoff from new development and applicable redevelopment projects as required b y the NPDES MS4 permit program and as allowable under current State law. The City has developed a Post-Construction Stormwater Ordinance (PCSO) which covers the entire jurisdictional area (incorporated and ETJ areas) of the City. An City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 78 administrative manual has been developed to ensure successful implementation of the program and ordinance. 7.3 Post-Construction BMP Strategies BMP strategies for the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Management program consist mainly of structural stormwater control measures (SCMs) such as sand filters, wet ponds, wetlands, and bioretention areas. SCMs and design procedures are detailed in a local manual developed by the City and County. SCMs are required on projects that have 24% or greater built upon area as defined by the program. This threshold is reduced to 10-12% built upon area for developments disturbing more than an acre and/or adding more than 20,000 sf of built upon area in sensitive watersheds as defined by the ordinance. In addition, SCMs must be designed to: • Remove 85% of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) for the runoff volume generated from the first 1-inch of rainfall; • Control the runoff volume from the 1-year – 24-hour storm event; and • Control the peak flow from the 10 and 25-year storm events for residential and commercial development. The program also requires proper operation, maintenance, and inspection of SCMs as discussed in later sub-sections. Green infrastructure practices such as rain gardens, pervious pavements, vegetated conveyances, and rain water harvesting are allowed, depending on development needs. Undisturbed natural areas and natural resource protection as well as tree preservation requirements are part of the program. Additional requirements include: • 70% Total Phosphorus removal in certain watersheds; • Various buffer requirements and widths from 30 – 200 feet based on stream jurisdictional determination; and • Design standards depending on watershed location and sensitivity. All of these requirements combine to make a much more sound and protective ordinance and program. 7.4 Deed Restrictions and Protective Covenants As part of the PCSO program, the City required deed restrictions and protective covenants to ensure that development projects remain consistent with approved plans. Streams and buffer boundaries were required to be specified on all surveys and record plats. An operation and maintenance agreement for SCMs was required to be referenced on record plats and recorded in deeds. In addition, a maintenance easement was required to be recorded to provide access to structural SCMs. 7.4.1 Setbacks for Built-Upon Areas City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 79 The PCSO program required a minimum of 30-foot buffers on all perennial and intermittent streams draining less than 50 acres, and incrementally increased required buffer widths up to 100-feet for streams draining 640 acres or more. A special provision in the program required 200-foot buffers on all perennial streams and 100-foot buffers on all intermittent streams in the Six Mile Creek watershed due to the potential presence of the federally endangered species, Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata). These buffers were recorded on record plats as noted in sub-section 7.4. 7.5 Operation and Maintenance Plan The PCSO program required an operation and maintenance agreement executed by the responsible party (owner) of each stormwater control measure (SCM). As part of the program, the owner was required to: • Conduct annual inspections of SCMs; • Maintain proper records documenting operation and maintenance activities; and • Submit inspection reports to the City. In the case of single family residential projects, at the request of the homeowner’s association the City may assume the responsibility for operating, maintaining, and inspecting required SCMs after an initial two-year period for SCMs that are constructed and functioning properly. 7.6 Education and Training Program The City implemented an education and training program designed to provide developers and designers with the information necessary to comply with the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Ordinance. Training included information on: • Overall ordinance requirements; • Review processes; • Land development and SCM design requirements; • Deed restrictions and protective covenants; • Buffer requirements; and • Operation, maintenance, and inspection requirements for SCMs. Education and training was accomplished by providing the following: • Website information; • Individual meetings with developers and designers; • Presentations at public meetings; • Periodic seminars and training sessions; and • Training City design staff. A half-day Post-Construction Stormwater Ordinance education workshop was held on December 6, 2018 with 128 people in attendance. Attendees included representatives from local City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 80 government; engineering, land development and design firms; and survey companies. The presentation topics included: • Background about City and County PCSOs; • City Redevelopment Mitigation Option; • Built Upon Area, As-Built Survey & Polaris Case Study; • Stormwater SCM Inspections; • Huntersville’s LID Ordinance; and • Question & Answer Session. 7.7 Measurable Goals/Planned Activities for Future Program Years Table 7-2 describes the various Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program BMPs and the Measurable Goals and Planned Activities for Future Program Years for each BMP by permit term year. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 81 Table 7-2: BMP Measurable Goals for the Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5+ Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program Maintain an ordinance (or similar regulatory mechanism) and program to address stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment. Maintain the City’s Post- Construction Ordinance (PCSO) and implement and enforce the ordinance. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Strategies which include BMPs appropriate for the MS4 Maintain strategies that include a combination of structural and/or non-structural BMPs implemented in concurrence with (a) above. Provide a mechanism to require long -term operation and maintenance of structural BMPs. Require annual inspection reports of permitted structural BMPs performed by a qualified professional. A qualified professional means an individual trained and/or certified in the design, operation, inspection and maintenance aspects of the BMPs being inspected, for example, someone trained and certified by NC State for BMP Inspection & Maintenance. Continue PCSO program and ensuring proper BMP operation, maintenance, and annual inspections. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Deed Restrictions and Protective Covenants The permittee shall provide mechanisms such as recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants so that development activities maintain the project consistent with approved plans. Continue to implement Deed Restrictions and Protective Covenants through administration of the PCSO Program. (On- going, years 1 – 5+) Operation and Maintenance Plan The developer shall provide the permittee with an operation and maintenance plan for the stormwater system, indicating the operation and maintenance actions that shall be taken, specific quantitative criteria used for determining when those actions shall be taken, and who is responsible for those actions. The plan must clearly indicate the steps that shall be taken and who shall be responsible for restoring a stormwater system to d esign specifications if a failure occurs and must include an acknowledgment by the responsible party. Development must be maintained consistent with the requirements in the approved plans and any modifications to those plans must be approved by the Permitt ee. Continue to implement BMP operation, maintenance, and inspection plan and procedures. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Educational materials and training for developers Provide educational materials and training for developers. New materials may be developed by the permittee, or the permittee may use materials adopted from other programs and adapted to the permittee’s new development and redevelopment program. Continue to provide and update education/ training tools for developers. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 82 7.8 Program Assessment The overall Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program was successfully implemented during the annual report period. Table 7-3 shows a summary of the various items and corresponding data results for activities conducted under the program. Table 7-3: Program Summary POST-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Site plans reviewed 126 SCMs added 112 SCM inspections conducted1. 1,600 NOVs and CARs issued2. 948 Education workshops conducted 1 Citizens educated at workshops 128 1. Includes Post-Construction and Peak Detention SCMs inspected. 2. Includes NOVs and Corrective Action Requests (CARs); and notice of maintenance and report due letters to remind the property owner that a yearly inspection report is due. 3. Number includes only attendees at workshops. Others were educated about aspects of the Post-Construction program through phone calls, website, and other ways. There has been a significant increase in SCM inspections during FY2019 over previous years. This has been an ongoing goal of the Post-Construction Stormwater Management Program. As SCMs increase in the City it is the goal of the program to continue with these efforts such that additional staff would be added to conduct inspections (i.e. the program started with one SCM inspector and now has three). In addition, the number of NOVs and CARs issued during FY2019 was higher than FY2018; however, relative to the number of inspections that were conducted during FY2019, this was consistent. The reduction in SCMs added compared to previous years is due to a shift in reporting from the number of SCMs approved for construction to the number of SCMs constructed and verified as- built. Section 8: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Program During the annual report period, inspection, training, and program development activities were conducted for municipal facilities and operations as part of the Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping Program per the SWMP. The following sub-sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 83 • Program assessment. 8.1 BMP Summary Table Table 8-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the requirements of the Pollution Prevention & Good Housekeeping Program. Table 8-1: BMP Summary Table for the Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Operation and maintenance program for municipal facilities and operations. Maintain and implement an operation and maintenance program for municipal facilities owned and operated by the permittee that have been determined by the permittee to have significant potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff that has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Site Pollution Prevention Plans for municipal facilities and operations. Maintain and implement Site Pollution Prevention Plans for municipal facilities owned and operated by the permittee that have been determined by the permittee to have significant potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff that has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Inspection and evaluation of municipal facilities and operations. Maintain an inventory of municipal facilities and operations owned and operated by the permittee that have been determined by the permittee to have significant potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff, including the MS4 system and associated structural SCMs, conduct inspections at facilities and operations owned and operated by the permittee for potential sources of polluted runoff, the stormwater controls, and conveyance systems, and evaluate the sources, document deficiencies, plan corrective actions, implement appropriate controls, and document the accomplishment of corrective actions. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Spill Response Procedures municipal facilities and operations. Maintain spill response procedures for municipal facilities and operations owned and operated by the permittee that have been determined by the permittee to have significant potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Prevent or Minimize Contamination of Stormwater Runoff from all areas used for Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Describe measures that prevent or minimize contamination of the stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle and equipment cleaning, including fire stations that serve more than three fire trucks and ambulances. Perform all cleaning operations indoors, cover the cleaning operations, ensure wash water drains to the sanitary sewer system, collect stormwater runoff from the cleaning area and providing treatment or recycling, or other equivalent measures. If sanitary sewer is X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 84 not available to the facility and cleaning operations take place outdoors, the cleaning operations shall take place on grassed or graveled areas to prevent point source discharges of the wash water into the storm drains or surface waters. Where cleaning operations cannot be performed as described above and when operations are performed in the vicinity of a storm drainage collection system, the drain is to be covered with a portable drain cover during cleaning activities. Any excess standing water shall be removed and properly handled prior to removing the drain cover. Facilities that serve three or fewer fire trucks and ambulances and that cannot comply with these requirements shall incorporate structural measures during facility renovation. Streets, roads, and public parking lots maintenance The permittee shall evaluate BMPs to reduce polluted stormwater runoff from municipally- owned streets, roads, and public parking lots within the corporate limits. Within 12 months of permit issuance, the permittee must update its Stormwater Plan to include the BMPs selected. X Water Quality Program Manager Streets, roads, and public parking lots maintenance Within 24 months of permit issuance, the permittee must implement BMPs selected to reduce polluted stormwater runoff from municipally-owned streets, roads, and public parking lots identified by the permittee in the Stormwater Plan. X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Operation and Maintenance (O&M) for municipally- owned or maintained structural SCMs and the storm sewer system (including catch basins, the conveyance system, and structural stormwater controls). Within 12 months of permit issuance, the permittee shall develop and implement an operation and maintenance program for structural SCMs and the storm sewer system (including catch basins, the conveyance system, and structural stormwater controls). X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Staff training Maintain and implement a training plan that indicates when, how often, who is required to be trained and what they are to be trained on. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager 8.2 Operation and Maintenance Program The City continued to provide an extensive network of municipal operations designed to serve its citizens and keep vital infrastructure functioning properly. A number of these operations impact the storm drainage system directly, such as storm drainage system maintenance and street sweeping, and indirectly, such as landscape management and municipal building maintenance. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 85 The cumulative impact of all these operations can potentially be significant, so it is important to maintain operation and maintenance programs to minimize impacts to the storm drainage system. Operation and maintenance of municipal facilities was managed through implementation of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SPPPs) and the municipal facility inspection program. Those programs are discussed below in sub-sections 8.3, 8.4, 8.5 and 8.9. Operation and maintenance of the municipal stormwater system is discussed separately in sub-section 8.8. EPM-SWS staff continued to work with various departments to improve and refine best management practices to minimize negative impacts to the storm drainage system. This is primarily accomplished through observations in the field and response to reports from concerned residents and internal staff about field operation practices where improvements are needed. CMSWS staff then work with staff from various departments to refine established BMPs for field operations and/or establish new BMPs. Implementation of BMPs then occurs through a combination of communications with management, training of field operations staff, and revision of contract requirements. During FY2019, EPM-SWS staff also accomplished activities related to improving pollution prevention from City contractors and City field crews, as follows: • Worked with EPM-SWS construction staff, land development erosion control staff, and CW Engineering to share resources, coordinate efforts, and develop the best procedures and methods for improving contractor and subcontractor performance related to soil erosion and sediment control; • Continued to support the use of a “Surface Water Quality Protection” clause for EPM- SWS construction contracts that included requirements related to: - Concrete washouts; - Spill response and mobile fueling; and - Erosion control and pollution prevention before street washing. • Continued discussions with CDOT and research of stormwater BMPs for street milling; • Worked with EPM-SWS contractors and EPM-SWS construction inspectors to determine standards for power washing water from spin casting; • Continued communications and meetings with CW regarding stormwater BMPs for slurry created during emergency water main breaks; • Continued communications with City Solid Waste Services regarding street sweeping discharges; • Communicated snow disposal BMP to CDOT before an ice and snow event; and • Continued discussion with the City’s Risk Management Department regarding spill response preparedness. 8.3 Municipal Facility Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans SPPPs are developed for all 32 municipal facilities listed in Table 8-2 regardless of whether or not they are required; however, SPPPs are not required or developed for fire stations. The SPPPs City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 86 are reviewed and updated annually with all documentation kept in the SPPPs, including site maps. The SPPPs are used as an implementation guide for maintaining good housekeeping and reducing stormwater pollution. All appropriate topics are covered in the SPPPs including: • Best management practices; • Facility inspections; • Facility monitoring; • Employee training; • Spill prevention and response; • Vehicle/equipment cleaning and fueling; and • Preventative maintenance. Table 8-2: City Facilities within the Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Program. Municipal Facility Physical Address Charlotte-Douglas International Airport 5501 Josh Birmingham Pkwy., Charlotte, NC 28208 CATS Bus Maintenance Operations Facility 3145 S. Tryon St., Charlotte, NC 28217 CATS Transit Maintenance Operations Center 901 N. Davidson St., Charlotte, NC 28202 CATS Transit Center 310 E. Trade St., Charlotte, NC 28202 CATS Light Rail Maintenance Facility – North Yard 1911 North Brevard Street, Charlotte NC 28202 CATS Light Rail Maintenance Facility – South Yard 3305 Pelton St., Charlotte, NC CDOT - Traffic Engineering Operations Center 3701 Craig Ave., Charlotte, NC 28211 CDOT – Street Maintenance Division - Northwest District 4411 Northpointe Industrial Blvd., Charlotte, NC 28216 CDOT – Street Maintenance Division - Northeast District 6001 General Commerce Dr., Charlotte, NC 28213 CDOT – Street Maintenance Division - Southwest District 4600 Sweden Rd., Charlotte, NC 28273 Charlotte Water Department - Irwin Creek WWTP 4000 Westmont Dr., Charlotte, NC 28217 Charlotte Water Department - Mallard Creek WWTP 12400 Hwy 29 N, Charlotte, NC 28262 Charlotte Water Department - McAlpine Creek WWTP & Zone 3 Water/Wastewater Operations 12701 Lancaster Hwy, Pineville, NC 28134 Charlotte Water Department - McDowell Creek WWTP 4901 Neck Rd., Huntersville, NC 28078 Charlotte Water Department - Sugar Creek WWTP 5301 Closeburn Rd., Charlotte, NC 28210 Charlotte Water Department - Franklin WTP 5200 Brookshire Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28216 Charlotte Water Department - Lee S Dukes WTP 7980 Babe Stillwell Rd., Huntersville, NC 28078 Charlotte Water Department - Vest WTP 820 Beatties Ford Rd., Charlotte, NC 28216 Charlotte Water Department – Zone 1 Water/Wastewater Field Operations 11609 Hord Dr., Huntersville, NC 28078 Charlotte Water Department – Zone 2 Water/Wastewater Field Operations 5730 General Commerce Dr., Charlotte, NC 28213 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 87 Municipal Facility Physical Address Charlotte Water Department – Zone 4 Water/Wastewater Field Operations 4100 W. Tyvola Rd., Charlotte, NC 28208 Charlotte Water Department – Catawba Pump Station 12548 Pump Station Rd., Charlotte, NC 28216 Engineering & Property Management - Heavy Equipment Shop 4600 Sweden Rd., Charlotte, NC 28273 Engineering & Property Management - Heavy Truck Shop / Central Yard Truck Wash 829 Louise Ave., Charlotte, NC 28204 Engineering & Property Management - Light Vehicle Shop 1031 Atando Ave., Charlotte, NC 28216 Engineering & Property Management - Small Engine Repair Shop 701 Tuckaseegee Rd., Charlotte, NC 28208 Engineering & Property Management - 12th Street Vehicle Garage 900 W 12th St, Charlotte, NC 28206 CFD - Fire Logistics 1501 N. Graham St., Charlotte, NC 28206 CMPD - Animal Control Shelter 8315 Byrum Dr., Charlotte, NC 28217 CMPD - Police and Fire Training Academy 1770 Shopton Rd., Charlotte, NC 28217 Solid Waste Services - Street Sweeper Facility & Sanitation Packer Lot 829 Louise Ave., Charlotte, NC 28204 Landscape Management Operations 701 Tuckaseegee Rd., Charlotte, NC 28208 8.4 Municipal Facility Inventory and Site Inspections All parcels of land owned or operated by the City continued to be examined to determine whether they should be included in the Municipal Facilities Inventory within the Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Program. A Standard Administrative Procedure (SAP) is followed when evaluating parcels for this inventory. Once included in the inventory, applicable facilities receive: • Preparation and implementation of a SPPP; • Regular inspections; and • Annual employee training. All facilities included in the inventory are inspected annually with the exception of fire stations which are inspected once every five years. The following are elements of all facility inspections: • Thorough assessment of facility operations and maintenance activities; • Evaluation of waste disposal and storage methods; • Evaluation of the stormwater drainage system, including catch basin inlets, structural best management practices and outfalls; • Review of spill response and clean up procedures with recommended revisions as appropriate; • Evaluation of housekeeping practices with recommended revisions as necessary to eliminate potential pollution sources; City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 88 • Evaluation of outdoor storage facilities and recommendations for elimination of potential pollution sources; • Identification and elimination of dry weather discharges; • Review of SPPPs where applicable including outfall monitoring (if required by an NPDES permit); and • Completion of a written report documenting findings and recommendations. Follow-up inspections, communication and meetings with appropriate personnel are conducted as necessary to eliminate potential pollution sources. The supervisor and other management personnel of each facility are contacted and provided with a copy of the written report. Reports include information about areas and equipment that have a potential for pollution, recommendations for continuing good practices or making minor improvements, any deficiencies requiring more significant improvements, and/or any illicit discharges observed. All inspections are conducted following the procedures outlined in the Municipal Inspections and Monitoring SAP which is reviewed and updated annually. During FY2019 the following activities were conducted as part of the municipal facility site inspections: • 32 inspections were conducted; • 12 pollution control ordinance deficiencies were detected (including three illicit discharges); and • 13 SPPP issues were noted. Ordinance deficiencies and SPPP issues required corrective action by facility staff. Figure 8-1 shows the locations of the facilities inspected during FY2019. (Note: Some CW facilities are located outside the City limits.) [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 89 FIGURE 8-1 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 90 8.4.1 NPDES Stormwater Permitted Municipal Facilities Review Twelve of the 32 municipal facilities discussed in sub-section 8.3 above have been issued NPDES Stormwater permits (*Note: The airport’s permit is a combined stormwater/wastewater individual permit). Table 8-3 shows these facilities. Table 8-3: Municipal Facilities with NPDES Stormwater Permits Municipal Operation Permit Number Certificate of Permit Coverage Number Address CATS Transit Maintenance Operations Center NCG080000 NCG080029 901 N. Davidson Street CATS Bus Maintenance Operations Facility NCG080000 NCG080710 3145 S. Tryon Street Heavy Truck Shop, Truck Wash & Street Sweeper Yard NCG080000 NCG080822 829 Louise Avenue Heavy Equipment Shop NCG080000 NCG080840 4600 Sweden Road Light Vehicle Maintenance Shop NCG080000 NCG080879 1031 Atando Avenue 12th Street Fleet Maintenance NCG080000 NCG080063 900 West 12th Street Charlotte-Douglas International Airport* NC0083887 Not applicable 5501 Josh Birmingham Parkway Irwin Creek WWTP NCG110000 NCG110008 4000 Westmont Drive Mallard Creek WWTP NCG110000 NCG110114 12400 Highway 29 North McAlpine Creek WWTP NCG110000 NCG110010 12701 Lancaster Hwy McDowell Creek WWTP NCG110000 NCG110011 4901 Neck Road Sugar Creek WWTP NCG110000 NCG110012 5301 Closeburn Road Annual inspections were conducted at each facility listed in Table 8-3. The same inspection items listed in sub-section 8.4 were reviewed at these permitted facilities. Emphasis was placed on elimination of illicit discharges, good housekeeping improvements, and compliance with permit and SPPP requirements, including inspections, monitoring and training. The SPPPs were reviewed and updated annually as required. Environmental management personnel at the airport and five wastewater treatment plants are responsible for updating the SPPPs at their facilities, while staff of EPM-SWS reviewed and updated SPPPs for the other facilities listed in Table 8.3. 8.5 Municipal Spill Response Procedures Numerous activities conducted by City employees, both in the field and at facilities, have the potential to generate spills that may enter the MS4 and contaminate surface waters. Because of that potential, Spill Prevention and Response Procedures have been developed for all facilities (and associated field operations) listed in Table 8-2. These procedures are incorporated into the facility SPPPs. The procedures and proper implementation of them was evaluated as part of the annual inspections. Items that have been evaluated and incorporated into the procedures included the following: • Product storage tanks/containers, exposure, and secondary containment; City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 91 • Flow path and potential for entry into the MS4; • Spill history, response to those spills, and documentation; • Activities that may generate spills; • Operating procedures to prevent spills; • Spill response procedures and reporting; • Spill response equipment and other countermeasures; and • Employee training. In addition, to address spills that may occur on municipal streets, roads, and in other areas as related to the overall IDDE program, CMSWS staff maintained a 24-hour emergency response team that responds to environmental emergencies. Members of the team act in an advisory role to the CFD Hazmat Unit. Once Hazmat secures a scene and contains the spill, the team worked with the responsible party to ensure that spills were cleaned up properly and had minimal impacts to the environment. The team’s actions are guided by a set of written emergency response protocols. During FY2019, the team responded to 31 emergency response calls, but none were related to the municipal facilities listed in Table 8-2. Figure 8-2 shows a downward trend in the number of emergency response calls from FY1995 through FY2019, while Figure 8-3 shows the locations of the emergency response calls. FIGURE 8-2 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 92 FIGURE 8-3 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 93 8.6 Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Operations The City recognizes the negative impacts that municipal vehicle and equipment wash water runoff can have on stormwater and, ultimately, surface waters. Municipal employees washed the majority of vehicles and equipment at commercial or municipal vehicle wash facilities that drain to the sanitary sewer system. Vehicle and equipment washing at municipal facilities continued to be assessed during annual inspections at facilities listed in Table 8-2, where applicable. 8.7 Streets, Roads, and Public Parking Lots Maintenance Streets and parking lots can be a significant source of stormwater pollution. During previous years, the City has implemented various BMPs to address these pollutants within the MS4 such as cleaning catch basins. The City has evaluated additional types of BMPs that are considered to best address polluted stormwater runoff from these sources. As a result of the evaluation, the City implemented the following non-structural BMPs: • Street sweeping program; • Adopt-A-Street program; • Leaf and yard waste collection program; • Trash receptacles along downtown streets; • Trash receptacles and litter control activities at Park and Ride parking lots; and • Public education to address polluted stormwater runoff from municipally-owned streets and public parking lots. During FY2019 the following activities were conducted by the City Solid Waste department as part of efforts to clean and maintain public roads and parking lots: • 58,818 miles of streets swept; • 1,260 tons of street sweeping debris/ROW trash removed; • 61,692 tons of yard waste collected; • 460 street miles received litter collection from volunteers contributing 6,487 hours to participation in the Adopt-a-Street program; and • 2,563 bags of trash and 483 bags of recycling were removed from street rights-of-way through the Adopt-a-Street program 8.8 Municipal SCMs and MS4 System Operation and Maintenance During previous years, the City inventoried municipal structural SCMs and developed a list of over 120 SCMs to be inspected at various frequencies based on the type of SCM. The list continues to be updated as new SCMs are constructed. Routine maintenance activities for these SCMs included: • Mowing; • Woody growth removal; City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 94 • Cattail removal; and • Inlet and outlet clearing. These inspection and maintenance activities have been conducted to ensure proper function of structural SCMs. The EPM-Landscape Management Division and Building Services Division have primary responsibility for conducting inspections and ensuring proper maintenance. Employees at certain facilities where SCMs are located also assist with routine maintenance, such as grass mowing. Standard inspection forms have been developed and were utilized to conduct and document inspections. Completed inspection forms were provided to EPM-SWS SCM inspection and maintenance coordinators, who then entered the information into the Cityworks® database. The coordinators also worked with City staff responsible for inspections to ensure they were completed as required. The City conducted extensive cleaning and maintenance of the MS4 system during FY2019. Work included, but was not limited to: • Catch basin cleaning (manually and with vacuum trucks); • Storm drain top cleaning; • Curb and gutter cleaning; • Culvert/channel cleaning; • Drainage structure installation and repair; • Ditch reshaping; and • Erosion control. During FY2019, a total of: • 47,377 catch basin tops were cleaned; • 1,366 catch basins were vacuumed out; and • 12,781 linear feet of stormwater pipes were vacuumed out. 8.9 Employee/Staff Training at Municipal Facilities Training was conducted for employees at all of the facilities listed in Table 8-2. The goal of training was to inform employees of the actions necessary to reduce the discharge of pollutants from their facilities/operations and protect water quality. Topics for this training included: • Description of common pollutants, their sources and water quality impacts; • Description of the actions that each facility should take to reduce discharges of pollutants, with an emphasis on good housekeeping; • Description of effective spill prevention measures that should be employed at each facility; City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 95 • Discussion of typical pollution sources at municipal operations and specific actions that should be taken to eliminate these sources and protect water quality; • Review of the facility SPPP, where applicable; • Explanation of the potential negative consequences of failing to control pollutants at facilities; and • Overview of IDDE Program and how to report observed water quality problems. High priority facilities were provided in-person classroom presentations while lower priority facilities were assigned on-line training. More details about the classroom and on-line training for municipal facilities is described in sub-section 5.5 as it is combined with education for employees related to the identification and reporting of illicit discharges. During FY2019, training was conducted as follows: • 19 on-site, in-person training sessions were provided by CMSWS staff to 612 employees at 17 of the municipal facilities listed on Table 8-2; • Three in-person training sessions were provided by CATS staff to 93 employees at two facilities (CATS S. Tryon, CATS Davidson); • Five on-site in-person training sessions were provided by CW staff to 97 employees at five wastewater facilities; • Two on-site in-person training sessions were provided by Charlotte airport staff to 75 vendors of the airport who then provided 39 training sessions to an additional 518 of their employees. This totals to 593 people who received training; and • 344 employees from nine facilities were assigned an on-line training module. 8.10 Measurable Goals/Planned Activities for Future Program Years Table 8-4 describes the various Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Program BMPs and the Measurable Goals and Planned Activities for Future Program Years for each BMP by permit term year. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 96 Table 8-4: BMP Measurable Goals for the Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5+ Operation and maintenance program for municipal facilities and operations. Maintain and implement an operation and maintenance program for municipal facilities owned and operated by the permittee that have been determined by the permittee to have significant potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff that has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff. Review and update Operation and Maintenance programs as necessary. Continue operation and maintenance activities per established procedures. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Site Pollution Prevention Plans for municipal facilities and operations. Maintain and implement Site Pollution Prevention Plans for municipal facilities owned and operated by the permittee that have been determined by the permittee to have significant potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff that has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff. Review and update facility SPPPs as necessary. Continue implementation of SPPPs. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Inspection and evaluation of municipal facilities and operations. Maintain an inventory of municipal facilities and operations owned and operated by the permittee that have been determined by the permittee to have significant potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff, including the MS4 system and associated structural SCMs, conduct inspections at facilities and operations owned and operated by the permittee for potential sources of polluted runoff, the stormwater controls, and conveyance systems, and evaluate the sources, document deficiencies, plan corrective actions, implement appropriate controls, and document the accomplishment of corrective actions. Review and update inventory of facilities for inspection. Conduct inspections of applicable facilities and make corrective actions where necessary. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Spill Response Procedures municipal facilities and operations. Maintain spill response procedures for municipal facilities a nd operations owned and operated by the permittee that have been determined by the permittee to have significant potential for generating polluted stormwater runoff. Review facility spill response procedures and update as necessary. Continue implementation of procedures. (On- going, years 1 – 5+) Prevent or Minimize Contamination of Stormwater Runoff from all areas used for Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Describe measures that prevent or minimize contamination of the stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle and equipment cleaning, including fire stations that serve more than three fire trucks and ambulances. Perform all cleaning operations indoors, cover the cleaning operations, ensure wash water drains to the sanitary sewer system, collect stormwater runoff from the cleaning area and providing treatment or recycling, or other equivalent measures. If sanitary sewer is not available to the facility and cleaning operations take place outdoors, the cleaning operations shall take place on grassed or graveled areas to prevent point source discharges of the wash water into the storm drains or surface waters. Review procedures for vehicle and equipment cleaning operations and update as necessary. Ensure that corrective actions are implemented where operations are found to not be in compliance with the permit. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 97 Where cleaning operations cannot be performed as described above and when operations are performed in the vicinity of a storm drainage collection system, the drain is to be covered with a portable drain cover during cleaning activities. Any excess standing water shall be removed and properly handled prior to removing the drain cover. Facilities that serve three or fewer fire trucks and ambulances and that cannot comply with these requirements shall incorporate structural measures during facility renovation. Streets, roads, and public parking lots maintenance The permittee shall evaluate BMPs to reduce polluted stormwater runoff from municipally-owned streets, roads, and public parking lots within the corporate limits. Within 12 months of permit issuance, the permittee must update its Stormwater Plan to include the BMPs selected. Evaluate various types of BMPs that would best address polluted stormwater runoff from municipally- owned streets and parking lots and select BMPs based on the evaluation by Feb 28, 2014. None (years 2 – 5+) Streets, roads, and public parking lots maintenance Within 24 months of permit issuance, the permi ttee must implement BMPs selected to reduce polluted stormwater runoff from municipally- owned streets, roads, and public parking lots identified by the permittee in the Stormwater Plan. None Implement BMPs selected from year one evaluation by Feb 28, 2015. Continue to implement selected BMPs. (On-going, years 3 – 5+) Operation and Maintenance (O&M) for municipally-owned or maintained structural SCMs and the storm sewer system (including catch basins, the conveyance system, and structural stormwater controls). Within 12 months of permit issuance, the permittee shall develop and implement an operation and maintenance program for structural SCMs and the storm sewer system (including catch basins, the conveyance system, and structural stormwater controls). Continue to implement structural SCM operation, maintenance, and inspection program. Continue operation and maintenance program for the MS4 system. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Staff training Maintain and implement a training plan that indicates when, how often, who is required to be trained and what they are to be trained on. For facilities included in the municipal facility inspection program, conduct staff training on SPPPs and Spill Response Procedures according to the Training Plan. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 98 8.11 Program Assessment The overall Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping Program was successfully implemented during the annual report period. Table 8-5 shows a summary of the various items and corresponding data results for activities conducted under the program. Table 8-5: Program Summary MUNICIPAL GOOD HOUSEKEEPING PROGRAM FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 City owned parcels inventoried 35 Municipal facilities inspected1. 32 Municipal program evaluations 17 Problems detected/corrected at City facilities 72 Municipal facility employee training sessions 86 Municipal facility employees trained 1,993 1. Not all parcels are included in the municipal inspection program. See Sec 8.4 The following is clarification of numbers provided in Table 8-5: • Number of City owned parcels inventoried includes properties purchased in the previous calendar year; • Number of municipal facilities inspected includes those at which CMSWS staff conducted inspections; • Municipal program evaluations include reviews (field observations, meetings, etc.) of municipal field operations for development and/or implementation of stormwater pollution prevention best practices; • Problems detected/corrected includes the number of facility and SWPPP recommendations made as a result of municipal facility inspections that needed correction; • Employee training sessions includes classroom sessions (conducted by CMSWS, CW, CATS, and the Airport) and number of facilities assigned the on-line training module; and • Employees trained includes all employees who completed training as described in the previous bullet. The City maintains a very comprehensive Good Housekeeping and Pollution Prevention program which has expanded in program depth and scope each year. With the frequency of inspections and training received, municipal facility staff has grown in awareness and knowledge of stormwater pollution prevention issues. However, with the large growth in the City, there is still plenty of need for process improvement. Specific focus areas for this will include: • Develop and improve upon stormwater pollution prevention best management practices among municipal field operations; • Investigate and support the allocation of more resources for street sweeping to support water quality improvements; City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 99 • Implement procedures that help departments utilize city-wide spill response contracts; • Improve contract language and guidance for contractors regarding the expectation for preventing illicit discharges and the BMPs that may be used in various operations; • Integrate structural stormwater BMPs and green infrastructure into municipal projects and infrastructure; and • Continue to implement various means of training municipal staff about BMPs for facilities and field practices. Section 9: Industrial Facilities Evaluation and Monitoring Program During the annual report period, inspection and monitoring activities were conducted under the Industrial Facilities Inspection and Monitoring Program per the SWMP. The following sub- sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and • Program assessment. 9.1 BMP Summary Table Table 9-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the requirements of the Industrial Facilities Program. Table 9-1: BMP Summary Table for the Industrial Facilities Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Maintain an Inventory of Industrial Facilities Maintain an inventory of permitted hazardous waste treatment, disposal, and recovery facilities, industrial facilities that are subject to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), industrial facilities identified with an industrial activity permitted to discharge stormwater to the permittee’s MS4, or as identified as an illicit discharge under the IDDE Program. For the purposes of this permit, industrial activities shall mean all permitted industrial activities as defined in 40 CFR 122.26. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Inspection Program Identify priorities and inspection procedures. At a minimum, priority facilities include those identified above in subsection II.H.2.a. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 100 BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Evaluate Industrial Facilities discharging stormwater to the City’s MS4 The Permittee is required to evaluate control measures implemented at permitted hazardous waste treatment, disposal, and recovery facilities, industrial facilities that are subject to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), industrial facilities identified with an industrial activity permitted to discharge stormwater to the permittee’s MS4, or as identified as an illicit discharge under the IDDE Program. For permitted facilities, the municipality shall establish procedures for reporting deficiencies and non-compliance to the permitting agency. Where compliance with an existing industrial stormwater permit does not result in adequate control of pollutants to the MS4, municipality will recommend and document the need for permit modifications or additions to the permit issuing authority. For the purposes of this permit, industrial activities shall mean all permitted industrial activities as defined in 40 CFR 122.26. For the purpose of this permit, the Permittee is authorized to inspect the permitted hazardous waste treatment, disposal, and recovery facilities as an authorized representative of the Director. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager 9.2 Industrial Facility Inventory An inventory of facilities is maintained showing those facilities that discharge to the City’s MS4 and have the potential to discharge significant pollutant loads. The inventory is used to select each year’s facilities for inspection and monitoring. Facilities included in the inventory fit into one or more of the following categories: • Hazardous waste TSD facility; • SARA Title III facility (TRI reporter); • NPDES Stormwater permitted facility; • Stormwater No Exposure Certificate facility; • Industrial Wastewater Pre-Treatment permitted facility; and • Facilities identified as having an illicit discharge under the IDDE Program. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 101 9.3 Industrial Facilities Inspection Program The purpose of the Industrial Facilities Inspection program is to evaluate activities at industrial facilities that may impact stormwater discharges, and then work with identified problem facilities to reduce stormwater pollution from the facility. The overall goal of the program is to inspect all permitted facilities listed in the facility inventory approximately once every five (5) years, but a facility may be inspected more frequently if it has had previous compliance issues or it has been deemed to have a higher potential for stormwater pollution. Likewise, a permitted facility may be inspected less frequently if it has been deemed to have less potential for stormwater pollution. During FY2018, a strategy was finalized for prioritizing industrial facilities for inspection which designates different priority tiers for permitted facilities based on several criteria that indicate a facility’s potential to impact surface waters. To support this prioritization strategy, CMSWS staff developed a document that details the criteria for each priority tier and a flow chart that guides the ongoing prioritization of facilities. Each year staff update the facility database by assigning a priority tier for each facility. Non-permitted industrial facilities are also selected for inspection based on the recommendation of CMSWS staff, citizen complaints, or from viewing aerial photography that indicate potential pollution issues at a site. In addition, vehicle maintenance facilities and machine shops are included as part of the program due to the potential of finding poor housekeeping practices and illicit discharges at these facilities. Aerial photography and drive-by visits are used to select vehicle maintenance and machine shop facilities for inspection based on their appearance of having a higher potential to pollute. To effectively accomplish the goals of the program, an Industrial Facilities Inspection and Monitoring Procedures Manual is utilized. The manual objectives are as follows: • Provide instructions and guidance about the selection of facilities for inspections, prepare for and conduct industrial inspections and monitoring, collect vital information, write reports and conduct follow-up activities; • Provide consistency for program implementation as a means of quality assurance and control; and • Provide forms, templates and examples to aid in implementation of the program. The manual also details the inspection process. Listed below are general tasks conducted as part of an industrial inspection: • Thorough assessment of facility operations and maintenance activities; • Evaluation of waste disposal and storage methods; • Evaluation of the stormwater drainage system, including catch basin inlets, structural best management practices and outfalls; • Review of spill response and clean up procedures; City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 102 • Evaluation of housekeeping practices with recommended revisions as necessary to eliminate potential pollution sources; • Evaluation of outdoor storage facilities and recommendations for elimination of potential pollution sources; • Identification and elimination of dry weather discharges; • Review of SPPP implementation where applicable, including outfall monitoring (if required by permit); • Sampling/monitoring of site stormwater runoff and/or dry weather flows; • Evaluation of monitoring data results; and • Completion of a written report documenting findings and recommendations. A standard inspection form is used for conducting all industrial facility inspections with the exception of vehicle maintenance facility inspections which utilizes a separate inspection form. For inspections at NPDES stormwater permitted facilities, any deficiencies related to NPDES stormwater permit requirements are identified and included in the report, with a copy sent to the NCDEQ. The understanding between CMSWS and NCDEQ is that the State is responsible for following up on permit-related deficiencies and violations since they are the regulatory authority for the issued permits. Facilities that are found without coverage under an appropriate general stormwater permit category are also brought to the attention of NCDEQ. All facilities where deficiencies were noted received follow-up correspondence and inspections from CMSWS staff to assist with compliance. During FY2019 the Industrial Facilities Inspection and Monitoring Program completed the following activities: • 40 industrial facilities inspected (32 permitted and 8 non-permitted); • 20 vehicle maintenance shops and three machine shops inspected; • 12 illicit discharges were identified and corrected; • Five of the NPDES permitted sites’ inspection results were unsatisfactory as well as 23 of the non-permitted sites (includes vehicle maintenance and machine shops); • Two non-permitted facilities obtained a new NPDES permit as a result of program inspections; and • For the 23 vehicle maintenance and machine shop facilities inspected, 32 deficiencies were identified and four NOVs were issued. Tables 9-2 and 9-3 provide a list of the facilities inspected while Figures 9-1 and 9-2 show the location of those facilities. Table 9-2: FY2019 List of Industrial Facility Inspections Facility NPDES Permit # Address Auto Parts U Pull, Inc NCG100240 9820 Statesville Rd Salvage Auto Supply LLC NCG100207 3301 Robinson Cir Queen City Transfer Station NCG130079 3130 Jeff Adams Drive CMC Commercial Metals NCG200351 419 Atando Avenue Thomas Concrete of Carolina Inc. NCG140308 3701 N Graham St City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 103 Facility NPDES Permit # Address Custom Pallet & Crating NCG210417 5104 N Graham St Queen City Metal Recycling NCG200458 2800 North Tryon Street Migway, Inc NCG080959 9349 China Grove Church Rd. Elan Trading (doing business as South Resources) NCG200461 3826 Raleigh Street West Plant - Concrete Supply NCG140054 3030 West Trade Street Charlotte Rebar Division - Gerdau AmeriSteel NCG030284 301 Black Satchel Dr Masonite Entry Doors NCG030422 7300 Reames Rd Macleod Construction - Ready Mix Plant NCG140448 4304 Northpointe Industrial Thomas Concrete of Carolina Inc. NCG140373 4217 Keeter Dr Wire Bond NCG140373 400 Rountree Rd Stevenson Weir, Inc. NCG140455 3725 Westinghouse Road Huntsman International NCG060037 3400 Westinghouse Blvd Frito Lay Incorporated NCG060175 2911 Nevada Blvd Old Dominion Freight Line-Mecklenburg NCG080019 2911 Nevada Blvd Logistic Leasing LLC (Charlotte) NCG080870 5600 Wilkinson Blvd Norfolk Southern Railway Co - Liddell St NCG080620 11906 General Dr CHEP Recycled Pallet Solutions, LLC NCG210454 901 Carrier Dr DBA/S&R Auto & Truck Salvage NCG100076 1420 W Craighead Rd Full Stream Recycling NCG130078 2214 North Graham Street Blue Dot Readi-Mix - Exchange Street NCG140430 1022 Exchange St TRANSFLO Charlotte West Terminal NCG080802 6816 Csx Way CSX Intermodal NCG080774 5430 Hovis Rd Carolina Service Center - Frito Lay NCG080950 10230 Ridge Creek Dr. Charlotte GP Transflo Terminal NCG080664 601 N Hoskins Rd Greenteknology Electronics Recycling Solutions LLC NCG200514 5019 Hovis Road Suite G ReCommunity Recycle NCG130046 1007 Amble Drive Genpak, LLC NCG050366 11401 Wilmar Blvd Non permitted: Streeter Trucking N/A 6824 Old Statesville Piedmont Grading and Wrecking 3652 Beatties Ford Road Brenntag Chemicals 11750 Fruehauf Dr. Carolina Foods 1807 South Tryon Street Linda Construction Company 1805 North Tryon AB Investments, LLC 6145 Brookshire Blvd Andino's Metal Recycling 4715 Nations Crossing Rd. Car Parts NC 11900 N Tryon Street Table 9-3: FY2019 List of Vehicle Maintenance and Machine Shop Facility Inspections Facility Address Mario Auto Repair / Taller Mexicano 7720 Pence Road Lloyds Auto 7852 Pence Road Ell Chapulin Colorado Repair and Towing 7611 Pence Road Almanza Complete Auto Care 10725-E Albemarle Road R&S Auto Sales and Service 10619 Albemarle Road Greg's Automotive Repair 10417 Albemarle Road Chelito Auto Repair 5734 North Tryon Street World Wide Used Tires 5542 North Tryon Blessy Auto Repair (NAPA, AJ Auto) 6833 Orr Road City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 104 Facility Address Hildreth Volkswagen Service 6735 Orr Road Polanco Auto Care 6431 Orr Road RBM Automotive 6637 Orr Road Tryon Auto Repair 5701 Orr Road Ali and Sons Auto Care 3036 Milton Road F&Z Tabares Auto Repair 3744 Rozzelles Ferry Joes Auto Service 3308 Rozzelles Ferry Road A&R Auto and Engineworks 3600 Brookshire Boulevard El Monchis 5341 Salem Church Road Charlotte Truck Repair 855 North Hoskins Road Charlotte Auto Mall 3512 Odum Avenue Kloeckner Metals Corporation (Machine Shop) 624 Black Satchel Rd. Banner Service Corporation (Machine Shop) 6424 South Blvd. Bevans Steel Fabrication, Inc. (Machine Shop) 4017 Hargrove Ave. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 105 FIGURE 9-1 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 106 FIGURE 9-2 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 107 9.3.1 Industrial Facilities Monitoring Program The purpose of the Industrial Facilities Monitoring Program is to monitor stormwater runoff from select industrial facilities and identify and correct pollution sources related to industrial activities. Facilities monitored consist of both those with and without an NPDES stormwater permit. Facilities are selected based on input from the CMSWS inspectors who inspected these facilities under the Industrial Inspections Program during the previous fiscal year. Table 9-4 shows the facilities where one outfall was monitored during wet weather at least one time during FY2019. Table 9-4: FY2019 List of Industrial Facility Monitoring Sites Facility Address Hunter Salvage 5310 David Cox Road Atlantic Ingredients 512 Domino Court Orbit Energy Charlotte 600 Johnson Road Lucas Concrete 401 Rountree Road JML Resources 327 Old Hebron Blythe Construction 10500 Old Nations Ford Road Concrete Supply – South Plant 400 Minuet Lane Concrete Supply – North Plant 3823 Raleigh Street Concrete Supply – Reames Road 9950 Metromont Boulevard Argos, LLC – Hebron Plant 325 East Hebron Street Southern Concrete Materials 715 State Street Thomas Concrete – North Graham 3701 North Graham Street All monitoring data from these facilities was reviewed and compared with permit benchmarks (if applicable), past monitoring results from the CMSWS industrial monitoring program, and in- stream state water quality standards. During FY2011, an SAP was developed for comparing industrial stormwater monitoring results to these numbers. The SAP is reviewed and updated annually. Once data is reviewed, a letter summarizing the analytical sampling results is sent to each monitored facility. Copies of this letter are also provided to NCDEQ for NPDES permitted facilities for potential follow-up for permit deficiencies or recommendations for acquiring or modifying a permit. For facilities with elevated pollutant levels, recommendations are made to improve outdoor operations, housekeeping, material storage practices, and other measures that should result in reduced pollutant runoff. Follow-up inspections are then conducted to ensure that recommendations/requirements for eliminating pollution sources were implemented. During FY2019, the Industrial Facilities Monitoring Program monitored 12 facilities (ten permitted and two non-permitted). Of the permitted facilities monitored, seven were Ready Mix concrete facilities covered under the Industrial Stormwater General Permit NCG140000. The two non-permitted facilities appeared to need a permit and were notified that they should apply for one. Analysis of the monitoring data revealed the following conclusions: City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 108 • All 12 facilities showed elevated pollutant levels in the stormwater and/or process water samples when compared to CMSWS historical industrial monitoring data, permit benchmarks, and NCDEQ in-stream water quality standards. The parameters that were above the state in-stream water quality standards by the greatest value were zinc, copper, chromium, COD, and turbidity; • The two non-permitted facilities showed monitoring results that would exceed several benchmarks had the facilities been permitted under general permits applicable to the type of respective facility operations; • One facility (Atlantic Ingredients) covered under general permit NCG060000 (Food and Kindred) exceeded the benchmarks for TSS and COD. The results also exceeded the CMSWS historical industrial monitoring average for BOD; and • The seven facilities covered under the NCG140000 Ready Mix Concrete general permit showed monitoring results as shown below. Follow-up was conducted, as appropriate, including directing facilities to implement corrective actions, follow-up inspections, issuance of notices of violation, and referral to NCDEQ: - Only one facility was below/compliant with the benchmark/effluent limit for TSS and pH, respectively (Southern Concrete Materials); - Six of the seven facilities were in exceedance of the effluent limit for pH. (Concrete Supply - South Plant, Concrete Supply - North Plant, Concrete Supply - South Plant, Concrete Supply – Reames Road Plant, Argos, LLC – Hebron Plant, Thomas Concrete – North Graham Plant); and - One facility was in exceedance of its effluent limit for pH and TSS (Lucas Concrete). All procedures for the Industrial Facilities Monitoring Program are outlined in the Industrial Inspection Procedure Manual and reviewed annually. 9.4 Evaluation Measures As discussed in sub-section 9.3, the appropriate evaluation measures that were implemented to reduce polluted discharges to the City’s MS4 were industrial inspections and monitoring. Inspection letters noted that the inspection was being conducted to satisfy both State and City NPDES MS4 permit requirements. As pollution sources were identified through the inspection and monitoring program, CMSWS worked with the NCDEQ and facility personnel to eliminate the pollution sources. When violations of illicit discharge prohibitions and other applicable regulations were identified, enforcement measures were implemented by the City or NCDEQ, as applicable. 9.5 Measurable Goals/Planned Activities for Future Program Years Table 9-5 describes the various Industrial Facilities Program BMPs and the Measurable Goals and Planned Activities for Future Program Years for each BMP by permit term year. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 109 Table 9-5: BMP Measurable Goals for the Industrial Facilities Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5+ Maintain an Inventory of Industrial Facilities Maintain an inventory of permitted hazardous waste treatment, disposal, and recovery facilities, industrial facilities that are subject to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), industrial facilities identified with an industrial activity permitted to discharge stormwater to the permittee’s MS4, or as identified as an illicit discharge under the IDDE Program. For the purposes of this permit, industrial activities shall mean all permitted industrial activities as defined in 40 CFR 122.26. Maintain and update the industrial facility inventory as needed. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Inspection Program Identify priorities and inspection procedures. At a minimum, priority facilities include those identified above in subsection II.H.2.a. Update current Industrial Inspection and Monitoring Procedures and develop an inspection prioritization strategy. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Evaluate Industrial Facilities discharging stormwater to the City’s MS4 The Permittee is required to evaluate control measures implemented at permitted hazardous waste treatment, disposal, and recovery facilities, industrial facilities that are subject to Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), industrial facilities identified with an industrial activity permitted to discharge stormwater to the permittee’s MS4, or as identified as an illicit discharge under the IDDE Program. For permitted facilities, the municipality shall establish procedures for reporting deficiencies and non-compliance to the permitting agency. Where compliance with an existing industrial stormwater permit does not result in adequate control of pollutants to the MS4, municipality will recommend and document the need for permit modifications or additions to the permit issuing authority. For the purposes of this permit, industrial activities shall mean all permitted industrial activities as defined in 40 CFR 122.26. For the purpose of this permit, the Permittee is authorized to inspect the permitted hazardous waste treatment, disposal, and recovery facilities as an authorized representative of the Director. Conduct inspection activities based on established procedures and prioritization strategy at 50 facilities for years 1 and 2; and 40 facilities in years 3 -5+. Conduct stormwater runoff monitoring at 10 facilities for years 1 and 2; and 8 facilities in years 3 -5+. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 110 9.6 Program Assessment The overall Industrial Facilities and Monitoring Program was successfully implemented during the annual report period. Table 9-6 shows a summary of the various items and corresponding data results for activities conducted under the program. Table 9-6: Program Summary INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES PROGRAM FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Master industrial inspection inventory sites 514 Industrial facilities inspected 40 Vehicle maintenance facilities inspected 20 Machine shop facilities inspected 3 Industrial facilities monitored 12 Industrial facility Notice of Deficiencies issued 15 Illicit discharges or connections detected/corrected 12 The following is clarification of certain numbers provided in Table 9-6: • Site inventory includes: 187 industrial facilities with an NPDES stormwater permit; 77 facilities with a stormwater No Exposure Certificate; 60 facilities with a CW pre- treatment permit; 181 facilities classified as a TRI submitter; and 9 facilities classified as a TSD facility; and • Number of industrial facility (not including vehicle maintenance facilities) deficiencies with notices issued includes industrial facilities whose reports were issued as an NOV or Unsatisfactory with regard to their compliance with the City’s Stormwater Pollution Control Ordinance. Facilities with strictly NPDES permit compliance issues (e.g., lack of required monitoring or training) were not counted in this number. Section 10: Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Program During the annual report period, monitoring activities were conducted per the Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring program plan and the SWMP. The following sub-sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and • Program assessment. 10.1 BMP Summary Table Table 10-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the requirements of the Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Program. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 111 Table 10-1: BMP Summary Table for the Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan Maintain a Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan. The Plan shall include a schedule for implementing the proposed assessment and monitoring activities. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Water Quality Monitoring Maintain and implement the Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan submitted to DWQ. X X X X X Water Quality Program Manager 10.2 Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan The City has been conducting water quality monitoring of streams and stormwater discharges since the inception of its NPDES MS4 Permit Program in 1992. Initially, the monitoring program focused mainly on identifying illicit discharges and especially SSOs, and therefore included sampling for fecal coliform bacteria. Data was used to identify and eliminate these illicit discharges to the MS4 and surface waters and proved to be highly successful. While current water quality monitoring efforts continue to be used for this purpose, the program has been expanded over the years to include a wider array of water quality parameters (Table 10-2) with the additional goal of identifying short-term and long-term water quality trends and gauging overall program effectiveness. Table 10-2: Water Quality Monitoring Parameters. Parameter Sample Type Frequency (Minimum) Fecal Coliform Grab Quarterly E-Coli Grab Quarterly Total Phosphorus Grab Quarterly Nitrite + Nitrate Grab Quarterly Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Grab Quarterly Ammonia Nitrogen Grab Quarterly Total Suspended Solids Grab Quarterly Turbidity Grab Quarterly Copper Grab Quarterly Zinc Grab Quarterly Chromium Grab Quarterly Lead Grab Quarterly Dissolved Oxygen In Situ Quarterly Temperature In Situ Quarterly Conductivity In Situ Quarterly pH In Situ Quarterly City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 112 The City implements the Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan developed during the previous permit term. The plan specifies the basic water quality monitoring program and activities to be performed on a quarterly basis at 15 stream sites within the major watersheds in the City (Figure 10-1; Table 10-3). Monitoring is conducted for chemical and physical parameters listed in Table 10-2 on a fixed interval monitoring basis. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 113 FIGURE 10-1 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 114 Table 10-3: Description of City of Charlotte Water Quality Monitoring Sites. Site # Stream Location MY11B Mallard Creek Pavilion Blvd Bridge, S. of US Hwy 29 MY12B Back Creek Stream location, off of Wentwater Street, near Caldwell Rd. MY13 Reedy Creek Reedy Creek Rd. Bridge, S. of Plaza Rd. Ext. MY7B McKee Creek Reedy Creek Rd. Bridge, S. of Harrisburg Rd. MC14A Long Creek Pine Island Dr. at End of Street at Golf Course MC17 Paw Creek Hwy 74 Culvert, Between Sam Wilson & Little Rock Rd. MC22A Irwin Creek Westmont Dr. Bridge, at Irwin Creek WWTP MC27 Sugar Creek Hwy. 51 Bridge, E. of Downs Rd. MC38 McAlpine Creek Sardis Rd. Bridge, Between Sardis Ln. & Sardis Rd. N. MC40A Four Mile Creek Elm Ln. Bridge, S. of Hwy. 51 MC42 McMullen Creek Sharon View Rd. Bridge, Between Sharon Rd. & Colony Rd. MC45 McAlpine Creek McAlpine Creek WWTP MC47A Steele Creek Carowinds Blvd. Culvert, W. of Carowinds Amusement Park MC49A Little Sugar Creek Hwy. 51 Bridge, W. of Carolina Place Mall MC51 Six Mile Creek Marvin Rd. Bridge, S. of Ardrey Kell Rd. 10.3 Water Quality Monitoring Implementation The City conducts a basic quarterly fixed interval monitoring program at the 15 monitoring sites listed in Table 10-3. Following completion of monitoring activities at the end of each permit reporting year (June 30th), monitoring data is visually assessed to determine whether water quality trends are apparent. This can help to gauge the combined effectiveness of NPDES program efforts. In addition to the basic monitoring required in the plan, the City also conducts an enhanced monitoring program which includes additional parameters, sites and frequencies to support other initiatives and management activities. 10.4 Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan Revisions The City has reviewed the basic monitoring program plan and data generated during FY2019 and proposes no major changes to that plan at this time. 10.5 Measurable Goals/Planned Activities for Future Program Years Table 10-4 describes the Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Program BMPs and the Measurable Goals and Planned Activities for Future Program Years for each BMP by permit term year. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 115 Table 10-4: BMP Measurable Goals for the Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5 Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan Maintain a Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan. The Plan shall include a schedule for implementing the proposed assessment and monitoring activities. Maintain the WQ Assessment & Monitoring Plan and update as necessary. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) Water Quality Monitoring Maintain and implement the Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Plan submitted to DWQ. Maintain and implement the monitoring plan and conduct WQ assessment and monitoring activities per the plan. (On-going, years 1 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 116 10.6 Program Assessment The overall Water Quality Assessment and Monitoring Program was successfully implemented during the annual report period. Table 10-5 shows a summary of the various items and corresponding data results for activities conducted under the program. Table 10-5: Program Summary WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Stream sites monitored1. 15 Stream samples collected1. 60 Laboratory sample analyses conducted1. 720 Stream physical measurements (DO, Temp, pH, Cond) 1. 240 IDDE problems detected/corrected through monitoring 1 1. Data reported is the minimum quarterly amount per the basic monitoring plan. 10.6.1 Water Quality Monitoring Program Evaluation During FY2017, an evaluation of the enhanced water quality monitoring program was conducted to determine whether any changes were needed to improve the cost-effectiveness of the program. This evaluation resulted in the removal of enhanced program parameters Enterococcus and several total metals (beryllium, selenium, cadmium, and silver) from the monitoring program. Enterococcus was removed because it was determined to be unnecessary to collect in addition to E. coli and fecal coliform. The total metals mentioned above were removed because they were consistently below detection limits and water quality standards. Data analysis continued through FY2019, but no additional changes to the monitoring program have been made. 10.6.2 Water Quality Trend Analysis The City utilizes water quality data generated from various monitoring programs, including NPDES MS4, to generate a Stream Use Support Index. This spatial index visually represents water quality conditions by sub-basin and can be compared year by year to determine general trends. The index map for calendar year 2018 is shown below in Figure 10-2. The map shows general WQ conditions to be in the partially supporting to impaired category for the sub-basins within the City. Figure 10-3 shows time series graphs for each non-metal parameter in the monitoring plan for the ten-year period from Jan 2009 to Jun 2019 (metals are shown separately in Figure 10-4). Each graph displays median analyte values across all sites for each particular fixed interval sampling event (i.e., quarterly at minimum, though typically monthly). Additional analyses, considering each analyte and watershed individually combined with normalization for flow conditions at the time of sampling, will likely be needed to further discern water quality trends. These analyses are ongoing and may be reported in future annual reports. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 117 FIGURE 10-2 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 118 FIGURE 10-3 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 119 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 120 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 121 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 122 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 123 Figure 10-4 shows data for the metals included in the monitoring plan for the period of July 2010 through June 2019. These data have been plotted as the difference between individual sample results and the acute dissolved standard at the sample’s hardness value to better illustrate exceedances and non-exceedances on a temporal basis. As a result, the vertical axes represent how far above or below the standard a given sample was, as opposed to showing absolute sample concentrations. Samples collected prior to implementation of the dissolved metals standards are City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 124 also shown relative to the current dissolved metals standards, as this gives a better picture of historical toxicity. The City has analyzed fixed interval samples for dissolved copper, dissolved lead, and dissolved zinc since July 2015, given that historically total metals samples of those elements have exceeded the new dissolved metals standards at least once. For chromium, which has never exceeded the total metal standard or the more protective dissolved standard, the City continues to analyze on a total basis. It can be seen from Figure 10-4 that copper is the only metal for which the dissolved standard has been exceeded at any sites since coming into effect in 2015. FIGURE 10-4 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 125 City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 126 Section 11: Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program The City continued to fulfill the NPDES MS4 permit requirements regarding the TMDL Program by implementing the following BMPs within the six minimum NPDES MS4 permit measures. The BMPs are designed to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern within the TMDL assigned MS4 NPDES regulated waste load allocation to the maximum extent practicable (MEP) within the impaired water bodies in the City’s jurisdiction that are subject to approved TMDLs. The following sub-sections explain: • The BMPs implemented to meet program requirements; • Measures of success; • Future goals and planned activities; and • Program assessment. 11.1 BMP Summary Table Table 11-1 provides information concerning the BMPs implemented to fulfill the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program requirements. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 127 Table 11-1: BMP Summary Table for Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program. BMP BMP Description Schedule (years) Responsible Position 1 2 3 4 5 Identify, describe and map watershed, outfalls, and streams Within 24 months the permittee shall prepare a plan that: • Identifies the watershed(s) subject to an approved TMDL with an approved Waste Load Allocation (WLAs) assigned to the permittee, • Includes a description of the watershed(s), • Includes a map of watershed(s) showing streams & outfalls • Identifies the locations of currently known major outfalls within its corporate limits with the potential of contributing to the cause(s) of the impairment to the impaired segments, to their tributaries, and to segments and tributaries within the watershed contributing to the impaired segments and • Includes a schedule to discover and locate other major outfalls within its corporate limits that may be contributing to the cause of the impairment to the impaired stream segments, to their tributaries, and to segments and tributaries within the watershed contributing to the impaired segments. X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Existing measures Within 24 months the Permittee’s plan: • Shall describe existing measures being implemented by the Permittee designed to achieve the MS4’s NPDES WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies; and • Provide an explanation as to how those measures are designed to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern. • The Permittee shall continue to implement the existing measures until notified by DWQ. X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Assessment of available monitoring data Within 24 months the permittee’s plan shall include an assessment of available monitoring data. Where long-term data is available, this assessment should include an analysis of the data to show trends. X X X X Water Quality Program Manager Monitoring Plan Within 36 months the permittee shall develop and submit to the Division a Monitoring Plan for the permittee’s assigned NPDES regulated WLA as specified in the TMDL. The permittee shall maintain and implement the Monitoring Plan as additional outfalls are identified and as accumulating data may suggest. Following any review and comment by the Division the permittee shall incorporate any necessary changes to monitoring pla n and initiate the plan within six months. Modifications to the monitoring plan shall be approved by the Division. Upon request, the requirement to develop a X X X Water Quality Program Manager City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 128 Monitoring Plan may be waived by the Division if the existing and proposed measures are determined to be adequate to achieve the MS4’s NPDES WLA to MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. Additional Measures Within 36 months the permittee’s plan shall: • Describe additional measures to be implemented by the permittee designed to achieve the permittee’s MS4’s NPDES WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies; and • Provide an explanation as to how those measures are designed to achieve the permittee’s MS4’s NPDES regulated WLA to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. X X X Water Quality Program Manager Implementation Plan Within 48 months the permittee’s plan shall: • Describe the measures to be implemented within the remainder of the permit term designed to achieve the MS4’s NPDES WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP and • Identify a schedule, subject to DWQ approval, for completing the activities. X X Water Quality Program Manager Incremental Success The permittee’s plan must outline ways to track and report successes designed to achieve the MS4’s NPDES regulated WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. X X Water Quality Program Manager Reporting The permittee shall conduct and submit to the Division an annual assessment of the program designed to achieve the MS4’s NPDES WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. Any monitoring data and information generated from the previous year are to be submitted with each annual report. X X X X Water Quality Program Manager 11.2 TMDL Watershed Plan The City developed a TMDL watershed plan during February 2015 for the applicable identified watersheds that are subject to an approved TMDL within the City’s jurisdiction as defined in Part II, Sec J.1 and J.2 within the City’s current NPDES MS4 permit. The plan utilizes BMPs as outlined in the permit within the six minimum NPDES MS4 permit measures that are designed to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern within the TMDL assigned MS4 NPDES regulated waste load allocation to the MEP. In addition, per Part II, Sec J.3 within the City’s current NPDES MS4 permit, the plan addresses the pollutant of concern for approved TMDLs that do not assign a waste load allocation for the pollutant of concern to the municipal stormwater system by evaluating strategies and tailoring BMPs within the scope of the six minimum permit measures City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 129 to address the pollutant of concern to the MEP in the watershed(s) to which the TMDL applies. The plan is available for review on the City’s website: http://charlottenc.gov/StormWater/SurfaceWaterQuality/Documents/CLT%20NPDES%20MS4 %20TMDL%20Watershed%20Plan%20Updates%20-%20Feb%202017%20-%20FINAL.pdf 11.2.1 TMDL Watershed Identification Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act requires States to identify and establish a priority ranking for water bodies that do not meet applicable water quality standards (303(d) list), establish TMDLs for the pollutants causing impairment of these water bodies, and submit the list of impaired waters and TMDLs to the USEPA. The TMDL process establishes the allowable loadings of pollutants or other quantifiable parameters for a water body based on the relationship between pollution sources and in-stream water quality conditions. The TMDL process is used by States to establish water quality-based controls to reduce pollutants from point and non-point sources and restore and maintain the quality of the water resources in compliance with applicable standards. In addition to the 303(d) list, the federal Clean Water Act requires States to submit a report describing how well water bodies support designated uses (e.g., swimming, aquatic life support, water supply), as well as likely causes and potential sources of impairment (305(b) list). As part of the TMDL watershed plan development during FY2015, the City reviewed the NCDEQ website to determine which TMDLs were in place within the City’s jurisdiction. Currently, there are seven approved TMDLs applicable to multiple streams in the City, some of which also include portions of Mecklenburg County. Table 11-2 and Figure 11-1 provide information on, and a map of, these TMDLs and affected watersheds, respectively. Additional information concerning these TMDLs is provided in the City’s TMDL Watershed Plan referenced in section 11.2. Table 11-2: City of Charlotte Streams with Approved TMDLs Receiving Stream Name WQ Classification TMDL Approved TMDL Pollutant of Concern Irwin Creek C February 1996 Dissolved Oxygen Little Sugar Creek C February 1996 Dissolved Oxygen McAlpine Creek C February 1996 Dissolved Oxygen Lake Wylie WS-IV, B, CA February 1996 Chlorophyll-a Irwin Creek C March 2002 Fecal Coliform Little Sugar Creek C March 2002 Fecal Coliform McAlpine Creek C March 2002 Fecal Coliform Sugar Creek C March 2002 Fecal Coliform McKee Creek C August 2003 Fecal Coliform Irwin Creek C February 2005 Turbidity Little Sugar Creek C February 2005 Turbidity Long Creek C February 2005 Turbidity McAlpine Creek C February 2005 Turbidity Sugar Creek C February 2005 Turbidity Steele Creek C May 2007 Fecal Coliform Statewide All October 2012 Mercury Source: 2017 NCDEQ – Division of Water Resources website: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 130 FIGURE 11-1 Charlotte Approved TMDL Streams City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 131 11.2.2 Outfall Identification for TMDL Watersheds As part of the development of the TMDL watershed plan, during FY2015 the City developed an existing outfall inventory for the applicable TMDL watersheds. This inventory is maintained using a GIS coverage to show existing outfalls within the TMDL watersheds that have the potential of contributing to the cause(s) of the impairment to the impaired segments, to their tributaries, and to segments and tributaries within the watershed contributing to the impaired segments. Additional information on the outfall inventory is provided in the City’s TMDL Watershed Plan referenced in section 11.2. 11.3 Identification of Existing Measures As part of the development of the TMDL watershed plan, during FY2015 the City identified existing programs and measures which are currently in use within the City’s NPDES MS4 permit and water quality monitoring programs that are designed to address the assigned MS4 NPDES regulated waste load allocation (WLA) and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. Additional information on the existing measures is provided in the City’s TMDL Watershed Plan referenced in section 11.2. 11.4 Assessment of Available Monitoring Data Fixed interval surface water quality data collected from 2006 through 2019 have been analyzed for all applicable TMDL watersheds and pollutants of concern in the City and County. These data help to illustrate surface water quality trends in relation to the NC surface water quality standards. The City’s current NPDES MS4 permit, effective October 10, 2018, states that the “The permittee is not responsible for attaining water quality standards (WQS). The Division expects attaining WQS will only be achieved through reduction from all point and nonpoint source contributors identified in the approved TMDL.” It is infeasible to monitor every MS4 stormwater outfall to determine how progress is being made toward achieving MS4 NPDES WLAs; therefore, the City will utilize fixed interval surface water data to investigate water quality trends. The data presented below, while illustrating how in-stream water quality has changed over time, unfortunately are not able to distinguish MS4 contributions from other point and nonpoint sources that are not under the control of the MS4. Consequently, increases in surface water contaminants observed in the data do not necessarily indicate that MS4 contributions are also increasing. 11.4.1 Fecal Coliform Data from the six watersheds listed as being subject to fecal coliform TMDLs in Table 11-2 are discussed in this sub-section. Of the six watersheds listed in Table 11-2, a MS4 NPDES WLA was only developed for McKee and Steele Creeks. According to Part II, Section J.3 of the City’s NPDES MS4 permit, for approved TMDLs where a MS4 NPDES WLA for the pollutant of concern is not assigned to the municipal stormwater system, the Permittee is still required to “evaluate strategies and tailor BMPs within the scope of the six minimum permit measures to City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 132 address the pollutant of concern in the watershed(s) to which the TMDL applies.” Watersheds with and without MS4 WLAs are discussed in the subsections below. 11.4.1.1 McKee Creek Fixed interval stream data for fecal coliform was collected at the CMSWS monitoring site MY7B on McKee Creek. A summary of the data collected from July 2006 through July 2019 is provided in Figure 11-2. A total of 157 samples have been collected over this period under the fixed interval monitoring program. Of these, 53% exceeded the 400 cfu/100mL State standard with 90% confidence. Exceedances tended to be more frequent and more extreme under wet weather influenced sampling conditions (meaning some precipitation within the County in the 72-hour preceding the sampling event), however exceedances did occur under both ambient and wet weather influenced conditions. Figure 11-2: McKee Creek –MY7B - Overall Monitoring Data 11.4.1.2 Steele Creek Watershed Fixed interval stream data for fecal coliform were collected at the CMSWS monitoring site MC47A on Steele Creek. A summary of the data collected from July 2006 through July 2019 is provided in Figure 11-3. A total of 171 samples have been collected over this period under the City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 133 fixed interval monitoring program. Of these, 51% exceeded the 400 cfu/100mL State standard with 90% confidence. Exceedances tended to be more frequent and more extreme under wet weather influenced sampling conditions (meaning some precipitation within the County in the 72-hour preceding the sampling event), however exceedances did occur under both ambient and wet weather influenced conditions. Figure 11-3: Steele Creek –MC47A - Overall Monitoring Data 11.4.1.3 Sugar/Irwin Creek Watershed There are two fixed interval monitoring locations in the Sugar Creek watershed, MC27 in southern Mecklenburg County, and MC22A on Irwin Creek just before its confluence with Sugar Creek. An assessment of available watershed and water quality data was conducted utilizing fixed interval stream data for fecal coliform collected at these two monitoring locations. A summary of the data collected from July 2006 through July 2019 is provided in Figures 11-4 and 11-5. A total of 165 samples have been collected at MC27 over this period under the fixed interval monitoring program. Of these, 43% exceeded the 400 cfu/100mL State standard with 90% confidence. Exceedances tended to be more frequent and more extreme under wet weather influenced sampling conditions (meaning some precipitation within the County in the 72-hour City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 134 preceding the sampling event), however exceedances did occur under both ambient and wet weather influenced conditions. Figure 11-4: Sugar Creek –MC27 - Overall Monitoring Data During the same period, a total of 162 samples were collected at MC22A under the fixed interval monitoring program. Of these, 47% exceeded the 400 cfu/100mL State standard with 90% confidence. Exceedances tended to be more frequent and more extreme under wet weather influenced sampling conditions (meaning some precipitation within the County in the 72-hour preceding the sampling event), however exceedances did occur under both ambient and wet weather influenced conditions. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 135 Figure 11-5: Irwin Creek –MC22A - Overall Monitoring Data 11.4.1.4 Little Sugar Creek Watershed There are two monitoring locations on Little Sugar Creek, MC49A in southern Mecklenburg County just outside the City, and MC29A-1 just downstream of downtown area of the City. An initial assessment of available watershed and water quality data was conducted utilizing fixed interval stream data for fecal coliform collected at these two monitoring locations. A summary of the data collected from July 2006 through July 2019 is provided in Figures 11-6 and 11-7. A total of 166 samples have been collected at MC49A over this period under the fixed interval monitoring program. Of these, 53% exceeded the 400 cfu/100mL State standard with 90% confidence. Exceedances tended to be more frequent and more extreme under wet weather influenced sampling conditions (meaning some precipitation within the County in the 72-hour preceding the sampling event), however exceedances did occur under both ambient and wet weather influenced conditions. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 136 Figure 11-6: Little Sugar Creek –MC49A - Overall Monitoring Data A total of 173 samples have been collected at MC29A-1 over this period under the fixed interval monitoring program. Of these, 79% exceeded the 400 cfu/100mL State standard with 90% confidence. Exceedances tended to be more frequent and more extreme under wet weather influenced sampling conditions (meaning some precipitation within the County in the 72-hour preceding the sampling event), however exceedances did occur under both ambient and wet weather influenced conditions. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 137 Figure 11-7: Little Sugar Creek –MC29A-1 - Overall Monitoring Data 11.4.1.5 McAlpine Creek Watershed There are two monitoring locations on McAlpine Creek, MC45B just downstream of the North Carolina/South Carolina border, and MC38 downstream of the confluence with Campbell Creek and Irvins Creek. An initial assessment of available watershed and water quality data was conducted utilizing fixed interval stream data for fecal coliform collected at these two monitoring locations. A summary of the data collected from July 2006 through July 2019 is provided in Figures 11-8 and 11-9. A total of 161 samples have been collected at MC45B over this period under the fixed interval monitoring program. Of these, 34% exceeded the 400 cfu/100mL State standard with 90% confidence. Exceedances tended to be much more frequent under wet weather influenced sampling conditions (meaning some precipitation within the County in the 72-hour preceding the sampling event), however exceedances did occur under both ambient and wet weather influenced conditions. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 138 Figure 11-8: McAlpine Creek –MC45B - Overall Monitoring Data A total of 166 samples have been collected at MC38 over this period under the fixed interval monitoring program (Figure 11-9). Of these, 48% exceeded the 400 cfu/100mL State standard with 90% confidence. Exceedances tended to be much more frequent and more extreme under wet weather influenced sampling conditions (meaning some precipitation within the County in the 72-hour preceding the sampling event), however exceedances did occur under both ambient and wet weather influenced conditions. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 139 Figure 11-9: McAlpine Creek –MC38 - Overall Monitoring Data 11.4.1.6 Fecal Coliform Summary The State standard for fecal coliform is exceeded by more than 10% with 90% confidence for all watersheds with a fecal coliform TMDL identified above, based on fixed interval data collected between 2006 and 2019. These exceedances are more common in wet weather influenced conditions, but exceedances also occurred during ambient conditions in each of these watersheds. Since exceedance rates are highly influenced by wet weather, long term variations in the exceedance rates should account for how many samples in a given year are influenced by wet weather conditions. For instance, between August 2008 and July 2009, approximately 27% of samples were collected during wet weather conditions, whereas in the past two years (Aug 2017- July 2018 and Aug 2018 – July 2019), 69% and 87% of fixed interval samples were collected during wet weather conditions, respectively. A higher percentage of wet weather events on fixed interval sampling days is expected to result in a higher percentage of samples that exceed water quality standards. Since “wet weather” is defined as at least 0.1 inches of rainfall recorded anywhere in the City of Charlotte/Mecklenburg County in the 72 hours prior to sampling, future analysis may also attempt to utilize rain gages in closer proximity to each monitoring station to more accurately verify whether a sample was influenced by wet weather conditions, as rainfall in one part of the City/County does not necessarily mean it is raining everywhere in the City/County. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 140 11.4.2 Turbidity As discussed in sub-section 2.2, the turbidity TMDL developed in 2005 included five Charlotte- Mecklenburg watersheds but only developed a WLA for turbidity for Long Creek since the water quality data assessment performed for the TMDL demonstrated that the remaining four watersheds had less than a 10% exceedance rate of the 50 NTU State standard. Therefore, this sub-section includes an assessment of turbidity data only for Long Creek. 11.4.2.1 Long Creek Watershed An initial assessment of available watershed and water quality data was conducted utilizing stream data for turbidity collected at the CMSWS monitoring site MC14A on Long Creek. A summary of the data collected from January 2010 through July 2019 is provided in Figure 11- 10. A total of 156 samples were collected during this period, with 16% exceeding the 50 NTU State standard with 90% confidence. These exceedances all occurred under wet weather conditions. Figure 11-10: Long Creek –MC14A - Overall Monitoring Data 11.4.3 Dissolved Oxygen City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 141 As stated in sub-section 2.3, the 1996 dissolved oxygen (DO) TMDL for Irwin Creek, McAlpine Creek, and Little Sugar Creek did not include a MS4 NPDES WLA. Nevertheless, since the City’s NPDES MS4 permit states in Part II, Section J.3, for approved TMDLs where a MS4 NPDES WLA for the pollutant of concern is not assigned to the MS4, the Permittee is still required to “evaluate strategies and tailor BMPs within the scope of the six minimum permit measures to address the pollutant of concern in the watershed(s) to which the TMDL applies.” For this reason, the dissolved oxygen data is provided below in Figures 11-11 through 11-15. Unlike the other parameters, for dissolved oxygen the State standard is violated when concentrations go below the standard rather than exceeding the standard. Based on the fixed interval sampling conducted between July 2006 and July 2019, only one sample collected from a TMDL watershed was lower than the instantaneous State standard of 4 mg/L. On October 10, 2017, a value of 3.81 mg/L was recorded at McAlpine Creek (MC38). No other sample violated the standard during this period of record. The 2018 NC Integrated Report categorizes each of these watersheds as 1i for DO, meaning that they have a TMDL but are not impaired and are supporting their designated uses. Figure 11-11: Irwin Creek–MC22A - Overall Monitoring Data City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 142 Figure 11-12: McAlpine Creek –MC45B - Overall Monitoring Data Figure 11-13: McAlpine Creek –MC38 - Overall Monitoring Data City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 143 Figure 11-14: Little Sugar Creek –MC49A - Overall Monitoring Data Figure 11-15: Little Sugar Creek –MC29A-1 – Overall Monitoring Data City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 144 11.4.4 Chlorophyll a As stated in sub-section 2.4, Mecklenburg County is responsible for providing annual assessment reports for the Lake Wylie chlorophyll-a TMDL under their NPDES MS4 permit program. 11.4.5 Mercury NCDEQ did not consider it necessary to include an MS4 NPDES WLA for mercury in their statewide TMDL. For this reason, mercury data is not analyzed under the City’s TMDL Watershed Plan. 11.5 Monitoring Plan for Assigned MS4 NPDES Regulated Waste Load Allocation As part of the TMDL watershed plan, during FY2016 the City developed a monitoring plan for each pollutant of concern with an assigned MS4 NPDES regulated WLA within each watershed with an approved TMDL within the City’s jurisdiction. The purpose of the monitoring plan is to guide activities for data collection and assessment of pollutants of concern as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of achieving the regulated waste load allocation (WLA) identified within the TMDL. In developing the monitoring plan, sample locations were selected to assess water quality conditions within each TMDL watershed. Additional information concerning the monitoring plan is provided in the City’s TMDL Watershed Plan referenced in section 11.2. 11.6 Identification of Additional Measures As part of the TMDL watershed plan, during FY2016 the City identified additional measures for implementation within the City’s MS4 permit program that are designed to achieve the assigned MS4 NPDES regulated WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. The plan also discusses how the additional measures are designed to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern. Additional information concerning these measures is provided in the City’s TMDL Watershed Plan referenced in section 11.2. 11.7 Implementation of Additional Measures During FY2017 the TMDL watershed plan was updated to discuss the implementation of the additional programs and measures identified in sub-section 11.6. Additional information concerning these measures is provided in the City’s TMDL Watershed Plan referenced in section 11.2 above. 11.8 Tracking Incremental Success During FY2017, various BMP data parameters were identified to track incremental success within the TMDL watershed plan. These parameters and corresponding data for FY2019 are shown in sub-section 11.10 below. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 145 11.9 Measurable Goals Table 11-3 describes the various Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program BMPs and the Measurable Goals for each BMP by permit term year. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 146 Table 11-3: BMP Measurable Goals for Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program. BMP BMP Description Measurable Goals (by permit term year) 1 2 3 4 5+ Identify, describe and map watershed, outfalls, and streams Within 24 months the permittee shall prepare a plan that: • Identifies the watershed(s) subject to an approved TMDL with an approved Waste Load Allocation (WLAs) assigned to the permittee, • Includes a description of the watershed(s), • Includes a map of watershed(s) showing streams & outfalls • Identifies the locations of currently known major outfalls within its corporate limits with the potential of contributing to the cause(s) of the impairment to the impaired segments, to their tributaries, and to segments and tributaries within the watershed contributing to the impaired segments and • Includes a schedule to discover and locate other major outfalls within its corporate limits that may be contributing to the cause of the impairment to the impaired stream segments, to their tributaries, and to segments and tributaries within the watershed contributing to the impaired segments. None Develop TMDL Watershed Plan per requirements of the MS4 permit by Feb 28, 2015. Update TMDL Watershed Plan as necessary. (On-going, years 3 – 5+) Existing measures Within 24 months the Permittee’s plan: • Shall describe existing measures being implemented by the Permittee designed to achieve the MS4’s NPDES WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies; and • Provide an explanation as to how those measures are designed to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern. • The Permittee shall continue to implement the existing measures until notified by DWQ. None Identify existing measures within TMDL plan by Feb 28, 2015. Continue to implement existing measures per TMDL plan. (On-going, years 3 – 5+) Assessment of available monitoring data Within 24 months the permittee’s plan shall include an assessment of available monitoring data. Where long-term data is available, this assessment should include an analysis of the data to show trends. None Conduct a review and assessment of available monitoring data by Feb 28, 2015. Continue to review and assess monitoring data as it becomes available. (On-going, years 3 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 147 Monitoring Plan Within 36 months the permittee shall develop and submit to the Division a Monitoring Plan for the permittee’s assigned NPDES regulated WLA as specified in the TMDL. The permittee shall maintain and implement the Monitoring Plan as additional outfalls are identified and as accumulating data may suggest. Following any review and comment by the Division the permittee shall incorporate any necessary changes to monitoring plan and initiate the plan within six months. Modifications to the monitoring plan shall be approved by the Division. Upon request, the requirement to develop a Monitoring Plan may be waived by the Division if the existing and proposed measures are determined to be adequate to achieve the MS4’s NPDES WLA to MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. None None Develop monitoring plan for each TMDL watershed for the TMDL pollutants of concern by Feb 28, 2016. Complete monitoring activities specified in the plan by June 30, 2017. Assess monitoring data collected under the monitoring plan to determine effectiveness of Water Quality Programs by December 31, 2017. Update monitoring plan as necessary based on data review and assessment activities. Complete monitoring activities specified in the plan by June 30, 2018. Assess monitoring data collected under the monitoring plan to determine effectiveness of Water Quality Programs by December 31, 2018. Update monitoring plan as necessary based on data review and assessment activities. Additional Measures Within 36 months the permittee’s plan shall: • Describe additional measures to be implemented by the permittee designed to achieve the permittee’s MS4’s NPDES WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies; and • Provide an explanation as to how those measures are designed to achieve the permittee’s MS4’s NPDES regulated WLA to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. None None Determine additional measures that may be needed to achieve assigned MS4 NPDES regulated WLA and address TMDL pollutant of concern by Feb 28, 2016. Continue to evaluate and update additional measures per TMDL plan, as needed. (On- going, years 4 – 5+) Implementation Plan Within 48 months the permittee’s plan shall: • Describe the measures to be implemented within the remainder of the permit term designed to achieve the MS4’s NPDES WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP and • Identify a schedule, subject to DWQ approval, for completing the activities. None None None Develop an implementation plan for identified additional measures that may be needed to achieve assigned MS4 NPDES regulated WLA and address TMDL Continue to implement additional measures per the plan. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 148 pollutant of concern by Feb 28, 2017. Incremental Success The permittee’s plan must outline ways to track and report successes designed to achieve the MS4’s NPDES regulated WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. None None None Develop a methodology to track and report data and successes for identified additional measures that may be needed to achieve assigned MS4 NPDES regulated WLA and address TMDL pollutant of concern by June 30, 2017. Continue to track and report successes per the plan. Reporting The permittee shall conduct and submit to the Division an annual assessment of the program designed to achieve the MS4’s NPDES WLA and to reduce the TMDL pollutant of concern to the MEP within the watershed to which the TMDL applies. Any monitoring data and information generated from the previous year are to be submitted with each annual report. None Prepare an annual assessment of activities and data analysis for the TMDL watershed plan. Provide this information in the NPDES MS4 permit annual report. (On-going, years 2 – 5+) City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 149 11.10 Program Assessment and Reporting The overall TMDL Program and Watershed Plan were successfully implemented during the annual report period. Table 11-4 shows a summary of the various BMPs implemented and corresponding data results per TMDL watershed for the report period. BMPs that apply to the City or a program as a whole, such as television advertisements, cannot be differentiated by watershed and are therefore reported as “Citywide.” Additional information concerning these BMPs is provided in the City’s TMDL Watershed Plan referenced in sub-section 11.2. [THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 150 Table 11-4: TMDL Program Summary for FY2019 TMDL WATERSHED BMP Citywide Irwin Lake Wylie Little Sugar Long McAlpine McKee Steele Sugar Public Education and Outreach Television advertising spots 876 Radio advertising spots 48 Social media posts 620 Social media responses 1,045 Public requests to stormwater hotline – WQ related 553 School presentations 2 01. 11 15 27 01. 4 1 Students educated at school presentations 56 01. 342 360 696 01. 96 20 Public presentations 18 Citizens educated at public presentations 620 Public events 33 Attendees at public events 3,970 Website page views 376,617 Website unique page views 158,480 Utility bill inserts 112,995 71,651 231,569 73,270 301,779 9,846 38,574 53,728 CMCSI education workshops conducted 3 Citizens educated at CMCSI workshops 289 Pet waste messages 17 Environmental notices and brochures distributed 4 Flow Free (Fats Oils & Grease-FOG) brochures distributed 2,231 Flow Free (FOG) presentations 12 Citizens educated on Flow Free (FOG) program 1,640 1. Activity not conducted in this watershed during fiscal year 2019. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 151 TMDL WATERSHED BMP Citywide Irwin Lake Wylie Little Sugar Long McAlpine McKee Steele Sugar Public Involvement Storm drains marked 119 01. 70 66 538 01. 01. 402 Adopt-A-Stream trash removed (lbs.) 8,050 01. 27,678 405 4,838 01. 785 1,070 Adopt-A-Stream miles cleaned 23 01. 56 3 28 01. 4.5 4.3 Big Spring Clean trash removed (lbs.) 2,410 10,850 3,525 01. 5,690 01. 01. 01. Big Spring Clean stream miles cleaned 2 6 3 01. 5 01. 01. 01. Volunteer Monitoring samples collected 4 01. 01. 01. 28 01. 01. 01. Volunteer Monitoring visual observations 15 01. 87 01. 01. 01. 01. 01. Trees planted during tree planting volunteer events 486 Adopt-A-Street bags of trash collected 2,563 Adopt-A-Street bags of recyclables collected 483 Adopt-A-Street miles cleaned 460 1. Activity not conducted in this watershed during fiscal year 2019. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 152 TMDL WATERSHED BMP Citywide Irwin Lake Wylie Little Sugar Long McAlpine McKee Steele Sugar Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Stream walk miles inspected 01. 01. 15.47 01. 201.49 01. 01. 01. Stream walk outfalls inspected 01. 01. 102 01. 910 01. 01. 01. Dry weather flows detected 01. 01. 25 01. 239 01. 01. 01. Dry weather flows sampled 01. 01. 8 01. 84 01. 01. 01. Stream walk IDDE problems detected/corrected 01. 01. 01. 01. 10 01. 01. 01. Multi-family sewer system inspections 6 01. 19 01. 15 01. 01. 7 Multi-family sewer system personnel trained 01. Stormwater pollution ordinance violations/NOVs issued 32 5 40 5 19 01. 3 7 Stormwater pollution ordinance penalty enforcements issued 3 01. 3 01. 2 01. 01. 3 Septic system failures detected/corrected 8 01. 4 12 11 4 01. 9 Municipal employees trained on IDDE 1,993 Sanitary sewer use ordinance NOVs issued 39 Sanitary sewer system pretreatment inspections 200 Sanitary sewer system FOG inspections 5,449 Sanitary sewer system pipe miles cleaned 971 Sanitary sewer system ROW miles cleared 83 Sanitary sewer system miles re-lined 20.1 Sanitary sewer system manholes inspected 8,906 Sanitary sewer system lift stations maintained 82 Sanitary sewer system overflows corrected 162 Pet waste deposits flagged 306 Pet waste receptacles provided 100 IDEP business corridor inspections 2,457 IDEP outfall inspections 01. 01. 01. 01. 01. 01. 01. 01. IDEP problems detected/corrected 3 01. 5 01. 01. 01. 01. 01. IDEP fecal sampled collected 12 01. 15 01. 01. 01. 01. 01. Citizen service requests responded to 85 5 164 31 128 1 14 33 1. Activity not conducted in this watershed during fiscal year 2019. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 153 TMDL WATERSHED BMP Citywide Irwin Lake Wylie Little Sugar Long McAlpine McKee Steele Sugar Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control Erosion control ordinance NOVs issued 51 Erosion control ordinance penalty enforcements issued 60 Project/site plans reviewed 1,254 Sites inspected 3,513 Post-Construction Stormwater Management Post-Construction ordinance NOVs and CARs issued 948 Post-Construction education workshops conducted 1 Citizens educated at Post-Construction workshops 128 Project/site plans reviewed 126 Buffer protected/added (acres) 71 Buffer mitigation plans approved 1 01. 4 01. 01. 2 1 2 SCMs added 7 5 17 5 4 01. 5 8 SCMs inspected 137 65 129 102 210 5 113 238 Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping City facilities inspected 11 01. 9 01. 2 01. 01. 5 Stormwater pollution prevention plans implemented 11 01. 9 01. 2 01. 01. 5 Spill prevention response plans implemented 11 01. 9 01. 2 01. 01. 5 Catch basin tops cleaned 47,377 Catch basins cleaned 1,366 Stormwater pipe cleaned (feet) 12,781 Street sweeping (miles swept) 58,818 Street sweeping debris/ROW trash removed (tons)2. 1,260 Yard waste collected (tons) 61,692 1. Activity not conducted in this watershed during fiscal year 2019. 2. Tonnage includes debris/trash picked up from street sweepers and street ROW debris/trash collected by hand. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 154 TMDL WATERSHED BMP Citywide Irwin Lake Wylie Little Sugar Long McAlpine McKee Steele Sugar Industrial Facilities Industrial facilities inspected 15 01. 9 3 01. 01. 5 4 Vehicle maintenance facilities inspected 7 01. 4 01. 3 1 01. 4 Industrial facilities monitored 2 01. 2 1 01. 01. 01. 5 Illicit discharges or connections detected/corrected 25 01. 19 1 3 1 1 1 Water Quality Monitoring Fixed interval TSS samples collected 13 13 52 13 65 13 13 26 Fixed interval Turbidity samples collected 13 13 52 13 65 13 13 26 Fixed interval Dissolved Oxygen samples collected 12 12 48 12 60 12 12 24 Fixed interval Fecal Coliform samples collected 22 13 80 19 92 23 19 36 CMANN Turbidity observations/readings2. 5,738 1,472 62,354 9,689 17,901 3,293 4,677 10,948 CMANN Dissolved Oxygen observations/readings 2. 6,544 2,227 86,226 13,174 23,557 7,055 9,444 14,303 Action/watch level follow-up investigations conducted3. 3 01. 16 2 10 5 4 2 1. Activity not conducted in this watershed during fiscal year 2019. 2. CMANN is an automated monitoring network that collects data readings typically once per hour (select sites collect readings every 15 min.). Data reported is QA/QC accepted data only. 3. Includes Fixed Interval and CMANN program investigations. City of Charlotte – MS4 Stormwater Management Program – FY2019 Annual Report 155 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK]