Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191484 Ver 1_PCN Form Submission_20191030DWR IDIOM n of Water Resources Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form September 29, 2018 Ver 3 21nitial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?* r Yes r No Is this project a public transportation project?* G Yes r No Change only if needed. BIMS # Assigned 20191484 Is a payment required for this project?* r No payment required r Fee received r Fee needed - send electronic notification Select Project Reviewer* Garcy Ward:eads\gpward Information for Initial Review 1a. Name of project: Bridge 171 over Johnson Mill Run on SR 1418 (17BP.2.R.92 - Central) 1a. Who is the Primary Contact?* NCDOT 1b. Primary Contact Email:* jldilday@ncdot.gov Date Submitted 10/30/2019 Nearest Body of Water Johnson Mill Run Basin Tar -Pamlico Water Classification WS-IV; NSW Version# * 1 Reviewing Office* Washington Regional Office - (252) 946-6481 1c. Primary Contact Phone:* (919)707-6111 Site Coordinates Latitude: Longitude: 35.656803-77.403640 FA. Processing Information U County (or Counties) where the project is located: Pitt Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes r' No Is this a NCDOT Project?* r Yes r' No (NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number: 17BP.2.R.92 WBS # (?) 17BP.2.R.92 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) 1b. What types) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? W Nationwide Permit (NWP) r' Regional General Permit (RGP) r' Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? f Yes r No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 03 - Maintenance NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: fJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular F Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit F Individual Permit le. Is this notification solelyfor the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: F 401 Water Quality Certification - Express W Riparian Buffer Authorization 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?* C Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? C Yes r No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? C Yes t No Acceptance Letter Attachment 1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? C Yes r No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? C Yes r No F. Applicant Information 1d. Who is applying for the permit? rJ Owner r- Applicant (other than owner) le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?* C Yes r No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: NCDOT 2b. Deed book and page no.: 2c. Responsible party: 2d.Address Street Address 1000 Birch Ridge Drive Address Line 2 City Raleigh Postal / Zip Code 27610 2e. Telephone Number: (919)707-6111 2g. Email Address:* State / Ftovince / fagion NC Country USA 2f. Fax Number: * C Yes r No r Yes C No pharris@ncdot.gov C. Project Information and Prior Project History U 1. Project Information 1b. Subdivision name: (i appropriate) 1c. Nearest municipality/ town: Greenville 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: 2c. Project Address Street Address Address line 2 Oty Postal / Zip 03de 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:* Johnson Mill Run 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:* WS-IV; NSW 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located irl Tar -Pamlico 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030201030402 4. Project Description and History 2b. Property size: State / ftovince / Ibgion O�untry 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:* Land use in the project vicinity consists primarily of agriculture and residential development. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?* r Yes 6 No r Unknown 4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR) 4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR) 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 225 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:* The purpose of this project is to replace a structurally deficient bridge. 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:* This project involves replacing the 53-foot, 3-span bridge with a 85-foot, 2-span bridge on existing alignment using an off -site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project. 17BP.2.R.92_Buffer_Drawings _2019-10-22.pdf 1.45MB 17BP.2.R.92_Permit_Drawings _2019-10-22.pdf 3.47MB 17BP.2.R.92_Utility_ Buffer_ Drawings_2019-10-22.pdf 1.42MB 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?* ryes r No f Unknown Comments: No wetlands were identified 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A Corps AID Number: 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Tyler Stanton Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT Other: 5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?* r Yes r No Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? DProposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): F Wetlands 7 Streams -tributaries r- Open Waters r- Pond Construction 3. Stream Impacts W Buffers 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type * 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name * 3e. Stream Type * 3f. Type of 3g. S. width * 3h. Impact (?) Jurisdiction* length* ❑ 1(ginear S1 Ditch outfall/riprap Permanent Rip Rap Fill Johnson Mill Run Perennial Both 2Average (fee) fee) S2 Ditch outfall/riprap Temporary Rip Rap Fill Johnson Mill Run Perennial Both 25 43 Average (feet) (linear feet) 3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 0 3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts: 19 43 3i. Total stream and ditch impacts: 62 3j. Comments: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR) 6a. Project is in which protect basin(s)? Check all that apply. r Neuse P Tar -Pamlico r Catawba r Randleman r Goose Creek r Jordan Lake r Other 6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone f impact 6g. Zone 2 impact Bridge -Allowable P Johnson Mill Run No 1,642 1,589 Bridge (Utility) -Allowable P Johnson Mill Run No 782 477 6h. Total buffer impacts: Zone 1 Zone 2 Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00 Zone 1 Zone 2 Total Permanent impacts: 2,424.00 2,066.00 Zone 1 Zone 2 Total combined buffer impacts: 2,424.00 2,066.00 61. Comments: Bridge buffer impacts are due to the conversion of previous store eter ditches to riprap swales in all four quadrants. An additional impact is attributed to a utility easement on eastside of bridge. Supporting Documentation `. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: The bridge will be replaced on the eAsting alignment. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into Johnson Mill Run. See the stormwater management plan for additional measures. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: An off -site detour will be used during construction. NCDOT's Design Standards for Sensitive Watersheds will be adhered to. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? r^ Yes r No 2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why: Impacts are deemed minimal and compensatory mitigation is not proposed. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? r Yes r' No What type of SCM are you providing? r Level Spreader r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT) W Wetland Swale (higher SHWT) r Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen r Proposed project Will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer Diffuse Flow Documentation 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?* r Yes r No Comments G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?* r Yes r' No 1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? * r Yes r No 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House?* r Yes r No NEPAor SEPAFinal Approval Letter 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? * r Yes r No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?* f Yes r No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?* f Yes r Nor N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* r Yes r No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?* r Yes r No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. Is another Federal agency involved?* r Yes r No r Unknown 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? r Yes r No 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? N.C. Natural Heritage Program database; USFWS-Raleigh Field Office website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Pitt County, which include Tar River spinymussel, yellow lance, dwarf wedgemussel, and red -cockaded woodpecker. All current listed species received biological conclusions of "No Effect" with the exception of the Northern long-eared bat which received a biological conclusion of "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect". The Atlantic pigtoe has been proposed for federal listing. Updated aquatic surveys are currently underway to determine potential impacts to the proposed species. If it is determined that the project would negatively impact the Atlantic pigtoe, NCDOT proposes to use the programmatic biological opinion for freshwater mussels to satisfy Section 7. The NLEB has been addressed via the programmatic biological opinion for that species. Consultation Documentation Upload 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* r Yes r No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?* NMFS county index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?* r Yes r No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?* NEPA documentation 7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?* r Yes r No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?* FEMA maps Miscellaneous Comments Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested. Signature W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: . I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; • I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); . I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Mack Christopher Rivenbark III Signature Date 10/30/2019