19980941 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19980916

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
I V"A
14D •
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
December 1, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Ken Bailey
Arland Community Development
448 Viking Drive
Suite 225
Virginia Beach, NC 23452
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Re: Delta Ridge subdivision
Wake County
DWQ # 980941
At your request, I conducted a site visit to this project to determine whether the
Neuse River Buffer rules apply to the site. Mr. Bob Zarzecki of Soil and Environmental
Consultants was also present. I confirmed that a stream and forest vegetation were
present at the location identified by Mr. Danny Smith of our Raleigh Regional Office and
that the Neuse River Buffer rules apply to this site.
Two other situations on this site need your immediate attention in order to avoid a
formal Notification of Violation from the NC Division of Water Quality for violations of
water quality standards including the Neuse River buffer rules. First, the sediment and
erosion control measures have failed on the site and (if not immediatly rectified) will
result in violations of our turbidity water quality standard. I understand from Mr.
Zarzecki that you plan to repair these measures. Please notify DWQ when this occurs so
I can visit the site. In any event DWQ staff will revisit this site within the next several
weeks to examine progress in this regard.
Second, the Neuse River buffer rules require the stormwater to be directed to
sheetflow across the buffer. The 18" stormwater pipe at the uppermost end of this stream
needs to be redesigned to force sheetflow rather than channeled flow as it is occuring
today. A redesigned, engineering solution will need to be developed and presented to
DWQ for written approval in order to avoid a Notice of Violation and possible penalty
for this violation of the Neuse River buffer rules.
Wetlands/401 Unit 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper
Please call me at 919-733-1786 if you have any questions about this project.
Sincerely,
John Dorney
Wetlands Certification Program
cc: Danny Smith, Raleigh Regional Office
Todd St. John
Bob Zarzecki; S & E C
Central Files

C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T
November 12, 1998
John R. Dorney
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality; Wetlands/401 Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE: Delta Ridge Subdivision; DWQ #980941
Dear Mr. Dorney:
?!7
NOV 161998
In response to your October 28, 1998, letter, Arland requests that
your office "revisit" the issue of vesting concerning Delta Ridge, now that
HB 1402 has become law. We understand that the new law has less
stringent requirements concerning establishing vested rights, which may
be applicable to our project. We also understand that the new law has
provisions that could allow us to proceed with our project through a
variance and/or mitigation. Having not yet had a chance to review the
new law, we are unable to determine which option(s) may be most
applicable to our project.
In light of these most recent actions by the legislature, we suggest
that a meeting with you to discuss these points further may resolve this
matter most efficiently. Perhaps we could discuss this issue after our
meeting for Eagle Ridge on November 18. Please contact me to confirm
this suggestion or to schedule another date.
448 Viking Drive, Suite 225 • Virginia Beach, VA 23452 • [phone] Fax [phone]
- 2 - November 12, 1998
Sincerely,
Kenneth W. Bailey, Jr.
Environmental Director
KWB
cc: John Cook; Womble Carlyle Sandridge 8s Rice
Alan Resh
OCT-16-98 FRI 12:40 PM WOMBLE &CARLYLE FAX NO. 19197552150
A
10-15-98 P12:32 IN
WOWLE
CARLYLE
SANDRIDGE
& RICE
A PROFESSIONAL LIMfTED
LIABILITY COMPANY
DATE: October 15, 1998
FROM: John C. Cooke
FAX: [phone]
PHONE: [phone]
CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED
The lgformatlon
contained In this
jaceimile Rvprtvlleged
and copodential
fi formation intended
for the sole use of the
adoWasee. t0ho
reader of this
facsimile is not the
intendedreeipient, or
the employee or agent
responsible for
delivering it to the
intended recipient,
you are hereby
noll led that any
dissemination,
distribution or
copying of this
communication is
strictly prohibited. If
you have received
this FAX in error,
plaose immediately
notify the person
listed above, and
return the original
message by mail to
the sender at the
address listed above,
150 Fayetteville Street Mall, Suite 21 D0
Raleigh, NC 27601
Mailing Address:
Post Office Box 931
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
P. 01/04
ATLANTA
CHARLOTTE
RALEIGH
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK
WASHINGTON, D.C.
W INSTON,SALEM
FACSIMILE
Please call ut at the following number if the message you receive is Incomplete or not
legible: [phone] ext. 6201.
ATTORNEY #: 088
CLIENTIMATTER #: 34134.0001.4
# OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER) 3
TO: FIRM/COMPANY:
John Dorney DWQ
Jill B. Hickey Office of Atty. General
MESSAGE:
FAX NO:
733-9959
716-6767
OCT-16-98 FRI 12:41 PM WOMBLE &CARLYLE FAX NO. 19197552150 P. 02/04
WOMBLE 150 Fayetteville Street Mall, Suite 2100
CARLYLE Raleigh, NC 21601
SANDRIDCiE Moiling Address John C. Cooke
Post Office Box 831 Direct Dinl: [phone]
RICE Raleigh, NC 27602 Direct Fax: [phone]
Telephone: [phone] E-mail: JCooke©WCsr,com
A PROPESSIONAL LIMITED
LIAZIUTT COMPANY Fax: [phone]
October 15, 1998
VIA FACSIMILE
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Re: Request for Vested Rights Confirmation - Neuse Buffer Rules
Delta Ridge Subdivision Project (Formerly Westmont Village)
DWQ -4 980941
Wake County
Dear John:
Ken Bailey received a copy of your memorandum to Jill Hickey, dated September 25, 1998.
Ken was concerned that the memorandum did not indicate that all of the material, particularly the
attachments to his letter dated September 4,1998, had been forwarded to Ms. Hickey for her review.
If these attachments were not forwarded or if we need to submit additional copies, please let Ken or
me know. We want to help DWQ to process the determination as smoothly and efficiently as
possible.
Also, Ken was concerned about the statement regarding your verification that a 401
certification had not been issued. Ken did not indicate in his submittal that a 401 certification had
been issued, and wants to be sure that you did not believe that he had made such a representation.
While we have not undertaken an extensive review of the Delta Ridge project, we believe
that Arland has a vested right to complete the project based upon various governmental approvals
granted or issued prior to July 22, 1997. Arland acquired this project for the purpose of completing
it in accordance with the basic governmental approvals in place and with the project's infrastructure
(roads and utilities) present. Arland is an out-of-state developer and did not want to speculate on
obtaining the approvals necessary to start a project "from scratch." Arland believes that a site
specific plan for the property was adopted by the City of Raleigh through the conditional zoning
process during the 1984-1986 time frame (Z-59-84, Z-36-85 and Z-37-85). Thereafter, in reliance
upon the governmental approvals and permits, the project's infrastructure was installed.(e,g., Delta
Lake Drive and Poyner Road). At that time, the infrastructure was sized and designed based upon
the overall approved project and complete buildout of the property within the Delta Lake Drive loop.
Infrastructure was completed well before July 22, 1997, because a plat showing these roads was
ATLANTA / CHARLOTTE / RALEIGH / RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK / WINSTON-5ALEM
OCT-16-98 FRI 12:41 PM WOMBLE &CARLYLE FAX NO. 19197552150 P. 03/04
V"ABLE PF
CARLYLE
SMDRIDGE
& RICE
P lA c
Mr. John Dorney
October 15, 1998
Page 2
recorded in April, 1985. If the Neuse Buffer Rule applies to the project, then the Rule will be
detrimental to the project and Arland because the project and Arland will lose three independent
building sites in the project.
Under the current rules and lower thresholds relating to 444 nationwide permits and 401
certifications, Arland believes that it will need to submit an application for a 401 certification.
Arland is willing to honor these new regulations because they will address directly any water quality
issues which might arise on the project.
Thank you for your kind consideration of this matter, and I trust that if you have any
questions or need any further documentation, you will contact Ken or me.
Very truly yours,
cc: Jill Hickey
Ken Bailey
WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE
A Professional Limited Liability Company
John C. Cooke
Rh271666.1
P. 04/04
DATE;
T0:
AUTOMATIC COVER SHEET
OCT-16-98 FRI 12;42 PM
FAX #; 97889959
FROM: WOMBLE &CARLYLE
FAX d; 19197552150
04 PAGES WERE SENT
(INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
1 ? •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 30, 1998
Mr. Alan Resh
Arland Community Development
448 Viking Drive Suite 225
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
Dear Mr. Resh:
RE: Delta Ridge Subdivision
Vested rights decision
Wake County
DWQ # 980941
Thank you for the September 29, 1998 fax from John Cook regarding vested
rights decision for this project. Your request for vested rights was dated September 4,
1998 but not received in our office until September 16, 1998. The project was reviewed
by staff on September 23, 1998 and sent to the Attorney General's office on September
25, 1998 for a decision on vested rights. Until that decision is made, I would advise you
not proceed to develop the site since you may be in violation of the Neuse River buffer
rules (15A NCAC 213.0233).
Also it is not clear whether a 404 Permit and corresponding 401 Certification will
be required for this project since the site plans you sent do not clearly depict the stream
that the Corps of Engineers confirmed on the site. Any fill or relocation of streams on
this site may also require approval from the Corps of Engineers and Division of Water
Quality under Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act, respectively. Again I would
suggest that this matter be clarified before development proceeds on the site to avoid
potential violations of this law as well.
If you have any questions with regard to this matter, please call me at 919-733-
1786.
980941.vst
c rel ours,
J n R. Dorney
cc: John Cook: Womble, Carlyle, Sandddge and Rice
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Jill Hickey, NC Attorney General's Office
Wetlands/401 Unit 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
,,
''I? I,. R r1 R04 -4 (19 1161 P. II I
Ohl ?". I(I. oR . ('I'III;) 15. ?). H AN RFSII ('11i0111)
JL_d -A- -D
C b M _M -U N I 'I' 'i I C V I: 1. r1 1' M r N T
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION

Company to., nu ?1 N ?t
Ai.tantion:
c ( )
I-a-, Number: (.Ili 110i11_
Pa-m-, InClUding Covro.r'
If yc.)u have any problom-1 rccPivil)>!, 1lti,; 1'.-Ix, telopl-jon+2 49$-1112.
Message:
Thn iniorcnation Ir,11ismiIlet I wiIIi 111k f„ ;i1i1iI , ,1vo•r -:11ocI i,: CONI I ) F N I IA1. ANI)
LEGALLY P'RIVILFCrf) artrl inh,tlrl<,rl truly fm- 11+, w if thr: im ividiml or rolify namml
above. If the rcadvr of this p.1+?? akr i" nut 014' 1n1r11drvi rar:il?ic!nt, you are wilified that:
tiny (dissemination, (listHimition or ropy I iw rrf ill ,or .1 ivy poi Ii+.n of this trmisntissinn iS
Atrictly prohibited. If ycm have receivert tali ; f.> r:.imil+ in errrrr, plea4e notify us by
telephone and return flip. original m+ossar v to p.1; l the alinva mldrr. % via the US Postage
Service.
I HANK )'()I)!
•118 Viking; Drive, Suitc 2,25 • Vilginia lk,wJi, VA %:I.1 .7. - ( IV17) ,198-11 t2 Fax [phone]
)W IR (11'111j I S: 2
111 !IN RFS11 (;ROM'
T1:1 : Rill R0.I r111R- 1161
C 0 ?1 M iJ N I 1 Y I? I: V I 1. i? V N1 1. N T
Me rric:yrL-n-ld (J ri I
To.
CC:
Froth.:
Date:
Re:
)lln l uI I I r y
Johri Cook, WnriO lir r m Itilli't nclrit]ge. Ni hicr
kel-? I t:ti.ll'j,
DET;I'7t Ltll ti ;lr;; Nli.i 1'11-' I',I II+'f'lta? Vlr: '.17r1f.;
P. 0?
l1 ?r f+`111oru ttl) hr lrltr ; r lltr.'rttLr;r '! Ir1:1r:t tit ,your of?rc, Luc wc'tulrl like to
I{P.P_17'y/r_tU 1r11t1r'n'li:(l v? iallr i?t _?!_ r+',::: rrtr Ilu'a ploiccl. Tbtvi g not rcccivecl
it >rc?spc)rt sc forn t yi.Y11 C:ut ir:i t n i l 1I ; c t u r li tl_cr, wr- hrestuxic t.ltat: you. concur
with nttr ccn?tc•1r1?.iottls. 1+tlr :lr?, prr>c•??r,rain?; u?ilh cur irrt?'ncl?rl.
[l.rvelu{arricall uL Ilirc t_l?til,o;r lilltilr; rri :I jtll is;clii?l.ictill'_li :'aCl'('?ltt'1. located
witEtin afar hri?ji r-t. Tf wc: l lri0t rr 1fic Il tv,l w a irTljYS'teN will require pnor
rtOti.{ic?kir.7t1 r?fciialc::r Ilt<? t.arll: , r.. lJ('.I II..NR, w1: will.lareparc and..ubmit.
;t TIC IN.

4119 Viking? Drivc, 5uito 25, - rtcm-h, t' - (75'd) 498-11 P f,ax (757) X198-1161
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
0 )VA
NC ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 25, 1998
MEMO
TO: Jill Hickey
Attorney General's Office
FROM: John Dorn
RE: Request for vested decisio - Neuse River buffer rules
Delta Ridge subdivision Project
DWQ # 980941
Wake County
Attached for your review is a request for a decision regarding rights for Delta
Ridge subdivision at Raleigh in Wake County. We have examined our records and find
no record of a 401 Certification issued for this project. Based on a review of the attached
materials, please advise us whether this project has vested rights. Please review the
material by October 12, 1998.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please call me at 733-1786 if you
have any questions.
cc: Dennis Ramsey
Greg Thorpe
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
John Dorney
Kenneth Bailey; Arland Community Development
980941.nbrvest.mem
Environmental Sciences Branch 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post consumer paper
l mil` ??1. L i ? r ?
C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T
September 4, 1998
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Environmental Management
Environmental Science Branch
North Carolina Department of Environmental
Health & Natural Resources
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE. PROPOSED DELTA RIDGE RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION RALEIGH, NC (THE "PROJECT-)
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Please find attached (attachment 1) a copy of a Preliminary Site Plan for
the above referenced Project, formerly known as Westmont Village, dated May
1, 1996. Two intermittent streams occur within this Project, so indicated by thick
dashed lines on the Plan. Both features have been confirmed as "waters of the
U.S." by the Army Corps of Engineers and drain southwest to Turky Creek. The
intermittent stream located in the northwest corner of the project is shown as an
intermittent stream on the most recent Raleigh West U.S.G.S. Quadrangle. The
intermittent stream located in the southern portion of the project is not identified
on the Quadrangle. As illustrated on the Plan, portions of both intermittent
streams have been planned for development for some time now. Since Arland
Community Development acquired the Project in June of 1997, the portion of the
Project that would have impacted the stream on the northwest corner has been
eliminated; however, the need to impact the southerly intermittent stream
remains.
Since the adoption of the New River Management temporary rule
(effective June 22, 1997) the question of the applicability of this rule to the
Project has arisen. It is Arland's position that the temporary rule does not apply
to this Project for two reasons.
Reason 1, Common Law Vesting
Soil and Environmental Consultants, Inc., submitted a brief synopsis of
the history of this project, beginning when Arland acquired the property, to your
448 Viking Drive, Suite 225 • Virginia Beach, VA 23452 • [phone] Fax [phone]
office on December 31, 1997. This synopsis, however, discusses only the recent
history of the Project. Additional history has been provided in the following
paragraph's in order for you to better understand why we feel, like Eagle Ridge,
this Project should be vested from the temporary rule.
In the years between 1984 and 1986, the property was rezoned and the
previous owner from the City of Raleigh obtained approvals (zoning approval
numbers: z-59-84, 2-36-85 and z-37-86). These approvals were based on a plan
(attachment 2) entitled "Westmont Village Apartments" dated May 2,1998.
Arland discovered these rezoning approvals and accompanying plan within the
past two weeks.
The previous owner of the property then authorized the preparation of a
Preliminary site Plan that was submitted to the City for review and approval
beginning in April of 1996. Copies of the correspondence between Rice &
Associates (the engineer) and the City prepared during the review process are
enclosed for your review (attachment 3).
Before final approval of the plan could be obtained, work was stopped on
the Project. When Arland acquired the property in June of 1997, however, the
city's review process was resumed. Final approval was obtained August 12,
1997. Copies of this support documentation (attachment 4) are enclosed for
your review.
Although final plan approval was obtained 22 days after the effective date
of the temporary rule, the prior approvals and continued efforts to develop this
Project clearly demonstrate a significant expenditure of resources based on
statutes and regulations that preceded the new rule.
Reason 2, Lack of "Forest Vegetation"
As you are aware, the Neuse Buffer temporary rule "only applies to
riparian areas where forest vegetation is established in Zone 1." More
specifically, subparagraph (3a) of the rule states that "Zone 1 is intended to be
an undisturbed forest'. As demonstrated in a letter (attachment 5) from
Forestland Management, Inc., the site was timbered beginning in July of 1997.
Currently, forest vegetation has been removed from the southerly intermittent
stream. Therefore, based on this information, Zone 1 cannot, by definition, be
established for this stream, and the placement of buffers along this feature is not
applicable.
Conclusion
From the information provided, it is evident that Neuse River temporary
rule is not applicable to the Project, due in part to the considerable expenditure
of resources on this project dating back to at least 1984. The lack of "forest
vegetation", as defined in a limited fashion in the rule, eliminates possible
application of riparian buffers to the southerly stream.
As such, Arland believes that based upon these facts, the Neuse Buffer
Rule does not apply to the Project. To the extent that other regulations are
applicable to the Project, Arland will abide by these regulations unless Arland
hears otherwise from DEHNR within 2 weeks of the date of this letter. Arland
will assume that DEHNR concurs with Arland's determination that the Neuse
Buffer Rule does not apply to the Project. If it is determined that specific federal
and state authorizations are required for this activity, you will be notified at the
appropriate time. If you have any questions or comments regarding this Project
or any of the above information, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
ARLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Kenneth W. Bailey Jr.
Environmental Director
Attachments
CC: Preston Howard, NC DEHNR
John Cook, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice
? C
m
1A
I
f

.17
g ?1
0 n
E ??t E
_ gl ¦.
t
E
I BINHE?
Mll
slti
¦¦so 1? ?
t€E
•t
s???lf
E, I..
?!•t11NE1 A fill,
t•if ram' ?????. Es
l??E.i' R
ttls.....3tJl.bit
t
F?
ORDDMNCE NO. (1986) 767 ZC 185
AN ORDnW1CE TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RALEIGH 9J-IICH
INCLUDES THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
BE IT ORDA= BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RALEIGH:
Section 1. That Section of the City of Raleigh Ccde, which includes the zoning
District Map, be and the same is hereby amended as follows:
(a) Hillsborough Street, north side, between Logan Court and
Chamberlain Street, being Parcel 4, Tax Map 522, rezoned to
Shopping Center Conditional Use District. (Z-23-86)
Conditions are as follows:
1. No Off-street parking space will be located in the area between
the building and the public right-of-way along Hillsborough Street.
2. The minimum building setback from the Hillsborough curb sha11 be
18 feet, or behind the right-of-way line, whichever is greater.
3. Street trees shall be planted along Hillsborough Street at the
rate of at least one tree every 25 feet per linear street frontage
along Hillsborough Street.
4. Sidewalk materials shall be brick, and sidewalks shall be
designed in accordance with the Com =dty Plan dated September 1,
1985.
5. The height of the building shall not exceed 25 feet.
6. All signage will be in conformity with sign ordinances and
regulations as may prevail at the time of installation.
7. Only those uses allowed in Buffer Commercial District with the
exception that outdoor seating will be allowed, and the maximan
gross floor area allowed shall be 5,500 square feet per floor.
(b) Delta Lake Road, north, west,
and 268, Tax 376, rezoned
District. (Z-37-
Conditions are as ollows:
and south sides, being Parcels 267
to Residential-15 Conditional Use
1. Tract E - 14.25 acres - 172 units maxim=
2. Tract F - 31.37 acres - 228 units maximum
3. No buildings or parking within 100 feet of west property line of Parcel F
according to map on file in the City of Raleigh Planning
Department (referred to as Exhibit A)
4. No building or parking in West 375 feet of Tract E according to map
on file in the City Planning Department (referred to as Exhibit A)
5. No buildings in excess of 3 stories in height on the Tracts E or F
6. The map on file in the City of Raleigh Planning Department describing
items 3 and 4 above would be a part of this conditional use request.
This map is described as Exhibit A Rezoning Exhibit and prepared
by Murphy/Yelle Associates.

f
} 1 t Iii
Oil
Jill
?I r (1
I p ? 11r?,?
I / / jar
I?h.
? ? `I ?• l iil ? _?
L
ALT
MN
?'??+'?. wow.

Section B
SUMMARY INFORMATION (SHOW ON PLAN ALSO)
DEVELOPMENT NAME: WtST M°?r tL?'O'UC TRaC? 17
LOCATION: ?-A144?5 PV`?/`'? r Ro
P42.6 A InuSIQr r-00 t7
WAKE COUNTY PROPERTY 1NDENTIFICATION NUMBER(S):
P.l.N.
Pill.
P.I.N.
P.I.N.
07 8(v-to -toy- -z3g3
CITY USE ONLY:
RECEPT WABER
FL.E NUMBER
PLANNNO DISTRICT
CAC DISTRICT
TYPE
Pill.
pill.
P.I.N.
ZONING DISTRICT (Include Overlay Districts): CZ-? b
TOTAL ACRES 25 - IoZZZ
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED: l O
AVERAGE LOT SIZE: _?Pt3S2 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: Soac7
N part of an approved subdivision, NAME, PHASE AND LOT NUMBER OF SUBDIVISION:
OWNER/ DEVELOPER: RI-v E
ADDRESS: 3-2 ATc?
TELEPHONE: Sao - Aq 3 3
PREPARER OF PLAN:
ADDRESS: Co G 61R
TELEPHONE- 133 f32gq
CONTACT PERSON StiG v G
INSIDE CITY LIMITS Yes lejilo _
9-1067LO peveL:ge t-r_.vT- co
?Nrkl. OA.Iy4 , 5V ITS IZZ
FAX: St o - 4 q ti'i
flSSoG? y1L`?
F?NSV I i?? R- - - GQIQ Y
_ FAX. Z 3 3- 9 of q
F-LC E PHONE 231- SFCt
FAX 233-'\ 0 t9
INSIDE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY Yes _No --1,Z (Call Conservation Inspections at 690-3767)
CALCULATIONS FOR DENSITY TRANSFERS (10-2074) N density transfer Is desired from extra thoroughfare tight-of-way,
instead of reimbursement:
AREA IN RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION (SO. FT.)
EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS TO BE TRANSFERRED
INSIDE FALLS LAKE, SWIFT CREEK DRAINAGE AREA Yes No
LINEAL FEET IN STREETS AND ACREAGE in dedicated street RM/; Thoroughfare 4 32-5 LEO III H too 5- V7-
Other
OWNER'S SIGNATURE
In tiling this plan efther by myself as the property wrd ugh my y a orized agents, We do hereby ogres and firm y
bind ourselves, my/ourheirs, executors, admix u assigns intyand severally to construct allimprovemants
and make aA dedications as shown on Ptgsfte ove y )Cou
Date Signed
6 zC2z/ Alt P16 R r `?L c?vr
Form Revised February 15. 1995 2
Subdivision Application

C I T Y OF RALEIGH, N. C.
Development Plans Review Center
\ P. 0. Box 590, Raleigh NC 27602
Tel: [phone] FAX: [phone]
** DEVELOPMENT PLANS REVIEW GROUP COMMENTS **
TO: Steve Rice @ Rice Assoc., 233-8999 (FAX [phone])
PROJECT: Westmont Village South
NUMBER: S-49-96
DATE: 4/10/96
PLANNER COORDINATING REVIEW: Greg Hallam
PLEASE RESPOND BY: Thursday, 4/17/96
PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS: Submit four (4) sets revised
plans.
PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THESE COMMENTS BY FAX, MARKED-UP PLANS
ARE AVAILABLE FOR PICK-UP IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS REVIEW CENTER, ROOM
307 OF THE RALEIGH MUNICIPAL BUILDING.
When you return revised plans, please bring them to Beth McFarling,
Development Plans Review Center, Room 307. She will forward them to
your coordinating planner. Don't forget to include mark-up sets.
Thanks.
The attached comments printout lists items that have been noted by the
Development Plans Review Group as needing revision, and / or
additional information before a recommendation of approval for this
project can be made, or administrative approval can be granted. The
following staff members are contacts •to call if you have specific
questions about comments that are listed for the workgroups noted on
the print-out:
PLNRV (Plans Review):
P_UTIL (Public Utilities):
CONSER (Conservation Inspections):
TRANS (Transportation):
ZONING (Zoning Inspections):
C_ENGN (Central Engineering):
Coordinating planner noted above
Jay Gibson, 890-3400
Mike Johnson (890-3767) or
Bill Brower (890-3766)
David Thompson, 890-3430
Ed Frederick, 890-3743
Marty Bizzell, 890-3030
Rice & Associates
Civil Engineering & Planning
April 18, 1996
Mr. Greg Hallam
City of Raleigh
Planning Department
P.O. Box 590
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Re: Westmont Village South
(S-49-96)
Raleigh, North Carolina
1' Review Comments
Dear Mr. Hallam:
We are submitting for your approval four sets of revised site plans for the Westmont Village
South project. We have revised our submittal package to include sheets SP-0, project boundaries
and details, SP-1, the preliminary plan and SP-2, the proposed grading plan. We have addressed
the review comments with the following notes or revisions:
PLANNING COMMENTS:
1. We have provided bold lines indicating the three sections of the proposed project.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMENTS:
2. Blow-off assemblies are the same size of the mains.
3. An additional water tap in Poyner Road is shown on the plans.
CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
4. Storm drain easements have been added as requested.
CENTRAL ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
5. Existing sidewalks have been shown on plan.
6. Sidewalks have been shown on plan for 31' B-B streets and the sidewalk is shown in 4he
typical street sections on SP-0.
108 Greensview Drive 9 Cary. North Carolina 275 11 • Telephone [phone] Fax[phone]
FROM RALEIGH PLANNING DEPARTMENT e4.24.1996 12=33 P. 1
CITY OT RALZXGB, N. C.
Develo went it ?P1 __RM33ex center
P. . eoz 90, Raleigh; 2
Tels [phone] Mks 890-3690
* * DSVEI,OPXM PLANS RBVIEw GROVp COMMMS * •
TO: Steve Rtce @ Rice i Assoc., 233-8999 (FAX [phone])
PROJ8CT: We tmont Village (Townhomes, South, and North)
NZJ?tBBR8 S-4 -96, S-49-96, S-50-96
DAM 4/24/ 6
PL SR C00 INATING REVIEWS Greg Hallam
PLEASE RNSPO BYs Wednesday, 5/1/96
PLZ18E INCLUOR THE FOLLO'ixr. MATERIALS= Submit three(3) copies of the
revised plan, four(4) copies of an 8?" z II" reduction of the plan
plan( (sheet SP-sheet 1 , and eighteen(18) Copies of an 11" z 17" reduction of the
?P-1).
PLEASE NOTE TAT IF YOU RECEIVE THESE COMMENTS BY FAX, NARKED-Up PLANS
ARE AVAILABLE FOR PICK-UP IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS REVIEW CENTER, ROOM
307 OF THE RA?ZIGH MUNICIPAL BUILDING.
When you rat1rn revised plans, please bring theca to Beth NCFarling,
Development P ans Review Center, Roost 3076 She will forward them to
your coordin ting planner. Don't forget to include mark-up sets.
Thanks.
The attached omments printout lists items that have bean noted by the
Development lane Review Group as needing revision, and / or
additional in oramation before a recommendation of approved for this
project can made, or administrative approval can be granted. The
following sta f members are contacts to call if you have specific
questions abo4t comments that are listed for the workgroups noted on
the print-outs
FV (Platte Review I C
P UT14 (Public•Utilities)s J
CSSER (Conser?&tion Inspections): N
TRANS (Transpo tation)s D
LONIN (Lopiog Inspections)r g,
C ENGH (Contra Enginesring)s a,
orCina'tiug planner noted above
yy Gibe n, 890-3400
ke JohAson (890-3767) or
11 Brer (890-3766) "h P
vid T ion, 890.3430
Freds ick, 890-3743
My 8112911, 890-3030

51101SIA3N
u«-rro-6a +•t rrw-wr•w +.•vt•rt ?'pr 4a L JOLT oupaO? 4410111 '45
161oY =
1-dS aYON MAN tO 3AINa 3NYl Y1130 /rru •nw•a a•w'a•n ••Nt..N..••y 001 do TTt •4nS'*AVa Iou-NON ?TLS -
olommoNwvua Nt''ld 311S ,k8VNlHll38d 30V_I?IA 1NOMS3M lulltuom it Ou,Awullul Ima C? '00 aNY1 30ala 3me
1N3Y4dOl3A3a IYILN3aIS3tl 88lH1DU66V V 30121
AI • .1 Tr •nl UW w UM r,11Y, w
ww. wwr• r a •,ny r•rw. wi •.w w.n v.U rw..,w • au wr. Ui.?"?'iin?i'wn+•w1O1r•??w•m•,ir ww
0061 '1 Ar11 . M 1 uwl Mj+?u"-?wN?i'?'? r?W.?•' r..r•' ?iwr
IW,1w•N•=i ?,?,, n• Nr •. w•?a.n.•w?vrw? ,., IW wrm n•.w 'm ,w wm•rlvwn ??ry,(,., ,.
I
d .000[ A 1..1/ ViYJr N 1r0 1 A v7•'i?iL'7iL"?lA i.?. G• • ww. •?- •, rN•.Nw un..r ? .r, w,•,'.. w+ .+,Rr ?iJlMiUt?t?i .1?t?R
Y M - - ? • F ..nl•• « W A v IIM rw• ,N ,N wr .•... • ., ?. ? L"a `ws
... n..1 C. L5.1CSL C S w, wr.. w+v+r ??w•N• N.w-r....r. ..wwlr ..mr «.v rr
XIVJS JJNdrllp ...ww.NNr.r.1J'IIJISY.. ..r.^.n.'?"? w. ?+ "•w"?'?"?r'"w, .. ,.oN•.w °LYiSwvRPrt".11"C'#L':"YEi".'9rYn
?'1?.'7i'6C is CL"?? {IrN.?+. ?..l71CIR'a LS' ? w rv ,. F.,.•w • rw. o., Nr.w w, .'H'1'il'd'Z.'E L"'C ?vS'J.1
H.LNOIV °84Td?6lt?@7 'L?' 111 Ru .?.N•R?, ', aft .. .w %Colo mR? x ?:sa
VIUIII?IIII1111{{y" ? •w'Y -•.":?-11f".u; ?•w•M?w YNIW N ,..w ?.;:.w.wwl MNrw vw ?? W'?? w?ww.•Y.i.. Y?rW 1 MI:w Iw. Y•I .ol
rl IILII III IWItY _ ' ^ N??-Uy?rYr .l• OW.M ?wW-sIM.•rq? WWn
-==r7w1rII7 r4 ....w.•..=_r_9 of-lu vN.?.n?'W ..W....,>. «I..,...I.N....
wrM4+U r••WI i1•n rr,wr M•,?•IM4rN WM•.wYM Y•I rrU rl,w, MiMUMM„?W,1 •wl u?'?
? , U•R-rl„ I rw.r, - s IwU - ,r••,•N • a rw r••. r rwww• • +N.rl In ,rnrr•
'w••?„?,,,,a , t INOUau-uvatNtnaorM Jut ttNlnltrl6NUtIt1
t ton - rtra wtn w «ut Naun - rtva tN n/071Ata
ngRN11p1118111M?wnnnRltlpMIBR1Big61Nmuntl? NtRq ,M®R H 11 '' '1. •.,? -p/? .. , ......... -.... • .?
'. I??w ?IHWRIRnwIIY? pRgAwRHa9RRI?tltlgCRnanlgRHqINeBHq HHUegRiR RRRRUgRYRRnRRgppu gA?RHgBBRngnY'
'oea ;
\ w ,
„
-mom
eat
•....... ? ?/ ?/ / l _ sadav tes11[ ?.. -.? '? '? .v'•v"?..ewv ?
a31S1M1 ,,,,• ?"" _ ? l
f I `y l '4' , - I a.••__,? 1,,f ? t ",' 1 y ?_-_ .1 ? ? ;? ,' I 1 11 t
\ t `` ( r r -` ')?' ,,,y1, ©,IA Ic ©-'' w• .? L`, rr `''t1, `\ . q tl . 1 rah
4A
ell
{ I y I ' 1` ? ?., .`:i. t O ? ?.O a ii.L ..'i' /--t"--A i? .?_'- 11, ?' 1•. ?1 I
LQ`1 p 1 - x?. I i
_'X-. 1 r6?b 1 _?. _ 1 1 - _ i 1 r.r.
A , -
' YQ v?' • Q '' ?" ; 1 l?li 9Lte(td,, °? ^ -. • + { f ' R
CO h s` r t_.. A i ! CJ7J ??d Il q
A6 _ -
dy`u'i
(J1' Y' on- ` ! t• ??\ \ ` y ? '?'Arf;?' - ;'?r / at ? I? r? ,p„ .. ,W .:I. 1 ?1{ 1
.?t?r' 1 -, ? 1t •.,?_1hRRq ?\_ ??;! / . o f / ? ® •' r •O. ;\"? N1? , ,? `,i ? `1, ;.
...rJNlrOre 1'. I Ot % _ ?/ 1 `"!C.,'C^glitt?. h.,+, / _. rte'`, M , ,.-' I ? ,r / Rq "60 ?' _ J
1 ? '- --?°------'1 I I` ? I •-J.-'-•11•yR??`'??"?;,Zi? M i « "f ,...___.y 1-' Ji I' /?tlYppgbR 1
1 1 1? {I -'. I® I ` ,T.- k / / Y A v J tlgBtlq ?i ?' RHRIHR1IR 1gugR14m
'? 1 ?y r= ll l 1 i - 'j '•1 ;,c..,.r l W 1{?' \' ?• i?-°9 I 12
i 1'1 ''' -?'-f" =5-- ;, ..-,? 6srot6; r••q. '`1- ., ,,?i??- f ` 1l ' ? / .? J % p:..d?-??F1+'+??!i'° '101 QNV
it .t_._ _ ..1 ;
-
-rte
066.. ?`' i ..."aro'•w. ww' ?f•,. ,1`,
0' 1; 61, 0 ISO t, p o ;, ;' i 1
V/d
1 \ o \ -' /'
a,
Rice & Associates
Civil Engineering & Planning
April 30, 1996
Mr. Greg Hallam
City of Raleigh Planning Department
P.O. Box 590
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Re: Westmont Village, 2' Review Comments
(S-48-96), (S-49-96), (S-50-96)
Raleigh, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Hallam:
We are submitting for your approval three sets of revised site plans for Westmont Village. In
addition, we are transmitting with this letter, four copies of an 8 '/2" x 11" reduction and eighteen
copies of an 11" x 17" reduction. We have addressed the review comments with the following
notes or revisions:
PLANNING COMMENTS:
1. A 50' wide public right-of-way extending from the proposed cul-de-sac to the western
property line has been added to the Westmont Village North section.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMENTS:
2. A fire hydrant has been added and the water line size changed to 6" at the cul-de-sac in the
Westmont Village South section.
ZONING COMMENTS:
3. Street yard trees at 50' intervals have been shown along Poyner Drive. A note has been
added to the plan that the final landscape plan with VSA shrub locations must be submitted
prior to obtaining a building permit.
No markups are returned as we did not pick them up. Should you have any additional comments,
please advise.
cc: Mr. Tomlahill, Blue Ridge Land Co.
108 Greensview Drive • Cary, North Carolina 27511 9 Telephone [phone] Fax[phone]
Very truly yours,

t
I
f

-AI
All
fit
/ I/.?• I _ J -III ,'? /r /. ' ? ? (? f L 1
flMN/n
?!1'tiri?
1

mrpu
• '1.

11/rrpY IN
J
111l1
il?IIN.?•

n..NY, 111 • ¦

NlyMM :Z.tY ,
r4
•
s
1N111. !¦
ly{,{
Ih/NNp
uuK1r A u
? S
((
.11141M/1 to
II
r
J
r
t
f! t f l j)
Y
srii

w p

Q
-cx

S! W +•?'

Z
3
a $1
tn
w ¦
h
Q?
¦
Vw R
uli
N"
Qs
?J
•
Zv
W
aI
r
ra
I21

d
J
V
n
r
4
U
'tt
A
C I T Y OF R A L E I G H, N. C.
Development Plans Review Center
P. O. Box 590, Raleigh, NC 27602
Tel: [phone] FAX: [phone]
** DEVELOPMENT PLANS REVIEW GROUP COMMENTS **
TO: Rice and Associates, 233-8999 (FAX [phone])
PROJECT: Westmont Village
NUMBER: S-72-97
DATE: 7/17/97
PLANNER COORDINATING REVIEW: Greg Hallam
PLEASE RESPOND BY: 7/25/97
PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS: Submit four (4) sets revised
plans.
PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU RECEIVE THESE COMMENTS BY FAX, MARKED-UP PLANS
ARE AVAILABLE FOR PICK-UP IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS REVIEW CENTER, ROOM
307 OF THE RALEIGH MUNICIPAL BUILDING.
When you return revised plans, please bring them to Beth McFarling,
Development Plans Review Center, Room 307. She will forward them to
your coordinating planner. Don't forget to include mark-up sets.
Thanks.
The attached comments printout lists items that have been noted by the
Development Plans Review Group as needing revision, and / or
additional information before a recommendation of approval for this
project can be made, or administrative approval can be granted. The
following staff members are contacts to call if you have specific
questions about comments that are listed for the workgroups noted on
the print-out:
PLNRV (Plans Review):
P_UTIL (Public Utilities):
CONSER (Conservation Inspections):
TRANS (Transportation):
ZONING (Zoning Inspections):
C_ENGN (Central Engineering):
Coordinating planner noted above
Cesar Sanchez 890-3400
Mike Johnson (890-3767) or
Bill Brower (890-3766)
David Thompson, 890-3430
Ed Frederick, 890-3743
Marty Bizzell, 890-3030
Rice & Associates
Civil Engineering & Planning
July 23, 1997
Mr. Greg Hallam
City of Raleigh
Planning Department
P.O. Box 590
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Re: Westmont Village
(S-72-97)
Raleigh, North Carolina
1'd Review Comments
Dear Mr. Hallam:
We are submitting for your approval four revised site plans for Westmont Village. We are also
enclosing a copy of a composite print of FEMA Flood Plain Panel 307 with a plot of our site plan
at the same scale as the FEMA map. We have addressed the review comments with the following
notes or revisions:
UNTITLED COMMENTS:
1. The owner is aware of the requirement for construction plans to be prepared and approved for
streets and utilities prior to recording any plat for this subdivision.
2. The lot numbers were changed as requested.
3. A note was added (#4 under General Notes) stating that a 5' maintenance easement is to be
recorded on the adjacent lot.
4. The Site Data Table was amended to provide Open Space Calculations. The developer
proposes to dedicate the open space as greenway since all of the proposed area grades are
greater than 8%.
5. We have requested a list of street names from the developer. They will be provided with the
next submittal.
6. Sidewalks were added to the site plan as requested.
PUBLIC UTILITY COMMENTS:
7. The size of the existing sewer feeding Section 2 has been labeled and deed references have
been added to all existing easements.
IOg Greensview Drive 0 Cary, Nonh Carolina 27511 0 Telephone [phone] Fax[phone]
h`
C I T Y OF R A L E I G H, N. C.
Planning Department, P. O. Box 590, Raleigh, NC 27602
www.raleigh-nc.org\planning\plandprc.htm
[phone]
** NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY PLAN DECISION**
TO: Arvista Comunity Development\Rice & Asscociates
PROJECT: Westmont Village
FILE NUMBER: S-72-97
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Approved
DATE OF ACTION: 8/12/97
COORDINATING PLANNER: Greg Hallam
Actions of the Planning Commission:
The Planning Commission approved this plan according to a map drawn by Rice
& Associates, dated 7/23/97.
Administrative Conditions:
Conditions that are to be met prior to approval of construction drawings:
1. That by separate City Council action, the proposed sanitary sewer
easement exchange for Section 1 be approved;
2. That a flood study for the proposed cul-de-sac street located within the
floodplain, Section 1, be reviewed and approved by the Conservation
Engineer in the Inspections Department;
Conditions to be met prior to Planning Department authorization to record
lots:
3. That 5-foot maintenance easements and party wall agreements be approved
by the City Attorney and recorded for the side yards of these zero-lot
line developments.
4. That street names for this development be approved by the Planning
Department and by Wake County;
5. That the greenway easement shown on the preliminary plat be dedicated
prior to, or in conjunction with the recording of a preliminary plat in
any phase affected by the greenway;
6. That the City Attorney approve the homeowner association documents for
the cluster unit development; and
7. That an instrument be approved by the City Attorney and recorded for
Section 1 to comply with Raleigh City Code Section 10-3071(b) (9)b.

Please do not hesitate to call me or the planner coordinating the review of
your project at 890-3125 if you are unsure of how to satisfy conditions, or
you have any other questions about this preliminary plan.
Sincerely,

Daniel A. Howe, ASLA, AICP
Subdivision Administrator

Dccember 1, 1997
Alan Resh Group
448 Viking Dr.. Ste. 200
Virginia Beach. VA 23452
Dear Mr. Resh:
In refcratce to our November 25, 1997 c,,)r%,rrsat!on. the pto; _ct oa i)clt:. Lakc Road began on
July 7, 1997 anal was completed on Sep:ea!bc; 9, 1997
If I can be of any other assistance, picase'-ct me 1--ow
ccr urs,
C narles R. Jackson
President
Domestic and International Consulting Forestry
4901 Waters Edge Drive. Suite 204 • Raleigh, NC 27606 • [phone] • [phone] • Fax [phone]
2:- NT
A
A
J W C O M
M U N
I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T
I
EWETIA
DS GROUP I
? .. WATER QUALITY Spl,
Memorandum
To: John Dorney
CC: John Cook, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice
From: Ken Bailey
Date: 09/29/98
Re: DELTA RIDGE; NEUSE BUFFER VESTING
0alc,(
As a follow up to our September 4 letter to your office, we would like to
keep you informed of our progress on this project. Having not received
a response form you concerning our letter, we presume that you concur
with our conclusions. We are proceeding with our intended
development of the upper limits of a jurisdictional stream located
within our project. If we determine that our impacts will require prior
notification of either the Corps or NCDENR, we will prepare and submit
a PCN.
448 Viking Drive, Suite 225 • Virginia Beach, VA 23452 • (757) 498-11 12 Fax [phone]