The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About390002_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20191024Division of Water Resources Division of Soil and Water Conservation Other Agency Facility Number. 390002 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS390002 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Date of Visit: 10114/2019 Entry Time: Farm Name. C. F. Blackwell Company Owner. C Forest Blackwell Inactive Or Closed Date - County: Granville Region: Raleigh 09:00 am Exit Time: 1100 am Incident #: Owner Email: Phone: 919-593-4484 Mailing Address: 8114 Dick Blackwell Rd Oxford NC 27565 Physical Address: 2081 Mtn Creek Rd Oxford NC 27565 Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC Location of Farm: Mountain Creek Rd. between Sam Blackwell Rd. and Dick Blackwell Rd. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Records and Documents Certified Operator. C Forest Blackwell Secondary OIC(s): Latitude: 36' 26' 45" Longitude: 78' 41' 01" Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application Other Issues Operator Certification Number: 18339 On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Forest Blackwell Primary Inspector. Jane Bernard Phone: 919-791-4200 Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s)- Inspection Summary: 8-12-19 W001246 N=0,80 4-5-19 W006185 N=0.99 12-3-18 W003486 N=0.80 6-21-18 W0080D6 N=0.77 3-1-18 W005098 N=1.16 Sail Sample SL026643 2-18-17 Copper and Zinc within guideline. Next due on or before 12-31-20_ 2019 Survey must be submitted to RRO as soon as it is completed. Calibration due on or before 12-31-19. 2019 Annual Report due on or before March 31, 2020. Sams are empty at this time but wil be restocked. Primary lagoon level is below transfer point. The following items are a cause for concern. No sample for period starting 8-20-18, ending 10-4-18_ There were however 3 separate irrigatcons without a current waste Page 1 of 6 permit; AWS390002 Owner C Forest Blackwell Facility Number; 390002 Inspection Date: 10/14/19 Inspection Type Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Routine analysis. 2018 Sludge survey is believed to have been completed by Granville County Staff. The survey cannot be located because of several staff members leaving. Time reflects 30 min prep time and 30 min travel time. Page 2 of 6 Permit: AWS390002 Owner C Forest Blackwell Facility Number: 390002 Inspection Date: 10/14/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design capacity Current promotions Swine Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,256 0 Total Design Capacity: 1.256 Total 55LW: 169.560 Waste WasteStruc Effective Built Closed Designated Observed Type Identifier Date Date Dale Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon PRIMARY 07/1812005 Lagoon SECONDARY 07/1812005 1 1 41.00 5300 Page 3 of 6 Permit: AWS390002 Owner: C Forest Blackwell Facility Number: 390002 Inspection Date: 10/14/19 Inspection Type Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Im acts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes. notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ m ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ moo If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large ❑ M ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ m ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ moo S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ M ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ M ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ M ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. 1s there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Page 4 of 6 Permit AWS390002 Owner: C. Forest Blackwell Facility Number: 390002 Inspection Date: 10/14/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigat:on design or wettable acre ❑ ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ �] ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ Page 5 of 6 Permit: AWS390002 Owner: C Forest Blackwell Facility Number: 390002 Inspection Date, 10/14/19 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ E ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit cond lions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ Other issues Yes No NA NE 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ N ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes. ❑ E ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ E ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? [] [] ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑ CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑ Page 6 of 6